Revision as of 13:28, 4 December 2004 edit213.112.113.118 (talk)No edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 16:09, 4 December 2004 edit undoJohan Magnus (talk | contribs)1,752 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
What is the diference between a "pitch accent" and a "melodic accent"? | What is the diference between a "pitch accent" and a "melodic accent"? | ||
: ] 13:28, 4 Dec 2004 | |||
Different function. They have the pitch variation in common, though. Melodic accent ''depends on'' grammatical rules, and may for instance ''accentuate'' in a similar way as ] is used in other languages — or ''together'' with vocal stress. | |||
What might be called the utilization of melodic accent to express differences depending on the roots of words is explained at http://www.webgraph.se/bosse.thoren/prosodi_eng.html — however, I do not agree with the author of that page when he states that there be no difference in vocal stress. That page also lacks comparisons between the different melodic accents typical for the language's high status varieties. | |||
--] 16:09, 4 Dec 2004 (UTC) |
Revision as of 16:09, 4 December 2004
What is the diference between a "pitch accent" and a "melodic accent"?
- User:213.112.113.118 13:28, 4 Dec 2004
Different function. They have the pitch variation in common, though. Melodic accent depends on grammatical rules, and may for instance accentuate in a similar way as vocal stress is used in other languages — or together with vocal stress.
What might be called the utilization of melodic accent to express differences depending on the roots of words is explained at http://www.webgraph.se/bosse.thoren/prosodi_eng.html — however, I do not agree with the author of that page when he states that there be no difference in vocal stress. That page also lacks comparisons between the different melodic accents typical for the language's high status varieties.
--Johan Magnus 16:09, 4 Dec 2004 (UTC)