Revision as of 03:17, 8 August 2016 editSineBot (talk | contribs)Bots2,555,318 editsm Signing comment by 73.13.121.160 - "→Validity and Scientific Backing?: new section"← Previous edit |
Latest revision as of 17:10, 5 December 2024 edit undoSpookyaki (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users4,343 edits Assessment: banner shell, Human rights (Top), Politics (Rater) |
(95 intermediate revisions by 59 users not shown) |
Line 1: |
Line 1: |
|
{{Talk header}} |
|
{{Talk header}} |
|
{{Vital article|level=4|topic=Society|class=C}} |
|
|
{{controversial}} |
|
{{controversial}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=B|vital=yes|1= |
|
{{WikiProjectBannerShell|1= |
|
|
{{WikiProject Freedom of speech|class=C|importance=high}} |
|
{{WikiProject Freedom of speech |importance=high}} |
|
{{WikiProject Human rights|class=C|importance=mid}} |
|
{{WikiProject Human rights |importance=Top}} |
|
{{WikiProject Law|class=C|importance=Top}} |
|
{{WikiProject Journalism |importance=top}} |
|
{{WikiProject Media|class=C|importance=Low}} |
|
{{WikiProject Law |importance=Top}} |
|
{{WikiProject Journalism|class=C|importance=top}} |
|
{{WikiProject Media |importance=high}} |
|
{{WikiProject Philosophy|class=C|importance=low|ethics=yes|social=yes}} |
|
{{WikiProject Philosophy |importance=low |ethics=yes |social=yes}} |
|
{{WikiProject Politics|class=C|importance=low}} |
|
{{WikiProject Politics|importance=Low|libertarianism=yes|libertarianism-importance=mid}} |
|
{{WikiProject Pornography|class=C|importance=high}} |
|
{{WikiProject Pornography |importance=high}} |
|
|
}} |
|
{{dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment | course = Misplaced Pages:Wiki_Ed/Carroll_College/PO_241_Democracy_and_Autocracy_(Spring_2016) | assignments = ] | reviewers = ] }} |
|
|
|
{{Copied |
|
⚫ |
| from = Internet censorship |
|
|
| from_oldid = 298795207 |
|
⚫ |
| to = Censorship |
|
|
| to_diff = 299045696 |
|
|
| date = 28 June 2009 |
|
}} |
|
}} |
|
{{User:MiszaBot/config |
|
{{User:MiszaBot/config |
Line 21: |
Line 26: |
|
}} |
|
}} |
|
|
|
|
|
|
==Wiki Education assignment: Introduction to Communication Studies - 1== |
|
|
{{dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment | course = Misplaced Pages:Wiki_Ed/Rollins_College/Introduction_to_Communication_Studies_-_1_(Spring_2023) | assignments = ], ] | reviewers = ] | start_date = 2023-01-18 | end_date = 2023-05-09 }} |
|
|
|
|
|
|
<span class="wikied-assignment" style="font-size:85%;">— Assignment last updated by ] (]) 12:25, 13 April 2023 (UTC)</span> |
|
== New related category: ] == |
|
|
|
|
|
Following up on the old discussion at ], I have created ]. Please help populate. --<sub style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">]|]</sub> 04:17, 25 February 2016 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
== Inclusion of Censorship | Fandom as external reference == |
|
== Possible weasel words? == |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I want to discuss if the website {{cite web |title=Censorship {{!}} Fandom |url=https://censorship.fandom.com/Index}} can be used as external source to view which content is censored and how. That website is a primary source of information, and it's user-driven. It has to be that way, since no official movie producer discloses (or has to) what is censored and why, not even less compare with other countries. |
|
Part of the article says "There are many ways that censors exhibit creativity, but a specific variant is of concern in which censors rewrite texts, giving these texts secret co-authors." |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Isn't 'there are many' weasel words in the same way 'many say' or 'it is commonly believed', without citation?] (]) 07:53, 29 March 2016 (UTC) |
|
|
:Well, I think it's more precise, so it is probably fine. What I'd worry more is whether the claim is referenced. If it is we could check the original source. --<sub style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">]|]</sub> 20:43, 29 March 2016 (UTC) |
|
|
:: There's no reference mark on it, hmm. ] (]) 01:28, 30 March 2016 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
] (]) 09:54, 20 July 2023 (UTC) |
⚫ |
== Social Media Censorship == |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
:No. We don't use self published sites and/or open wikis as sources, see ]. We also don't use reddit, and we don't use conduct ] to make points not present in cited sources. ] (]) 11:45, 20 July 2023 (UTC) |
|
Hi KTJeno, the social media censorship part that you added looks good. I added a bit about why seeing disgruntled citizens' comments about certain elected officials can be good for the government who is doing the censoring, as well as provide a link to the video. You could maybe add more about why social media censorship can be viewed as good or bad to improve your section further. ] (]) 01:54, 15 April 2016 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
== Semi-protected edit request on 26 June 2024 == |
⚫ |
== Internet censorship map colours == |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{{edit semi-protected|Censorship|answered=yes}} |
|
Substantial, selective and not classified/no data are too close in colour, even if the map is blown up. <small class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 07:09, 28 May 2016 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|
|
|
Would like to add for further reading: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gosztonyi, Gergely (2023) . Springer, Cham. ISBN: 978-3-031-46528-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-46529-1 ] (]) 20:54, 26 June 2024 (UTC) |
|
== Validity and Scientific Backing? == |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
:{{done}}<!-- Template:ESp --> ] (]) 06:34, 29 June 2024 (UTC) |
|
I've been told that one of the main drivers of censorship and modification of language is in the idea of ]. Related would be the ideas of ], ], ], and Cognitive Universalism. Anyone else think this might be a good/bad idea? <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 03:17, 8 August 2016 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|