Misplaced Pages

Talk:Censorship: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 09:46, 21 November 2016 edit2a02:587:410f:a900:bc5a:5b78:bb19:e344 (talk) political joke against the right and communism?← Previous edit Latest revision as of 17:10, 5 December 2024 edit undoSpookyaki (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users4,343 edits Assessment: banner shell, Human rights (Top), Politics (Rater
(93 intermediate revisions by 57 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Talk header}} {{Talk header}}
{{Vital article|level=4|topic=Society|class=C}}
{{controversial}} {{controversial}}
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=B|vital=yes|1=
{{WikiProjectBannerShell|1=
{{WikiProject Freedom of speech|class=C|importance=high}} {{WikiProject Freedom of speech |importance=high}}
{{WikiProject Human rights|class=C|importance=mid}} {{WikiProject Human rights |importance=Top}}
{{WikiProject Law|class=C|importance=Top}} {{WikiProject Journalism |importance=top}}
{{WikiProject Media|class=C|importance=Low}} {{WikiProject Law |importance=Top}}
{{WikiProject Journalism|class=C|importance=top}} {{WikiProject Media |importance=high}}
{{WikiProject Philosophy|class=C|importance=low|ethics=yes|social=yes}} {{WikiProject Philosophy |importance=low |ethics=yes |social=yes}}
{{WikiProject Politics|class=C|importance=low}} {{WikiProject Politics|importance=Low|libertarianism=yes|libertarianism-importance=mid}}
{{WikiProject Pornography|class=C|importance=high}} {{WikiProject Pornography |importance=high}}
}}
{{dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment | course = Misplaced Pages:Wiki_Ed/Carroll_College/PO_241_Democracy_and_Autocracy_(Spring_2016) | assignments = ] | reviewers = ] }}
{{Copied
| from = Internet censorship
| from_oldid = 298795207
| to = Censorship
| to_diff = 299045696
| date = 28 June 2009
}} }}
{{User:MiszaBot/config {{User:MiszaBot/config
Line 21: Line 26:
}} }}


==Wiki Education assignment: Introduction to Communication Studies - 1==
{{dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment | course = Misplaced Pages:Wiki_Ed/Rollins_College/Introduction_to_Communication_Studies_-_1_(Spring_2023) | assignments = ], ] | reviewers = ] | start_date = 2023-01-18 | end_date = 2023-05-09 }}


<span class="wikied-assignment" style="font-size:85%;">— Assignment last updated by ] (]) 12:25, 13 April 2023 (UTC)</span>
== New related category: ] ==

Following up on the old discussion at ], I have created ]. Please help populate. --<sub style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">]&#124;]</sub> 04:17, 25 February 2016 (UTC)


== Possible weasel words? ==

Part of the article says "There are many ways that censors exhibit creativity, but a specific variant is of concern in which censors rewrite texts, giving these texts secret co-authors."


== Inclusion of Censorship | Fandom as external reference ==
Isn't 'there are many' weasel words in the same way 'many say' or 'it is commonly believed', without citation?] (]) 07:53, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
:Well, I think it's more precise, so it is probably fine. What I'd worry more is whether the claim is referenced. If it is we could check the original source. --<sub style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">]&#124;]</sub> 20:43, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
:: There's no reference mark on it, hmm. ] (]) 01:28, 30 March 2016 (UTC)


I want to discuss if the website {{cite web |title=Censorship {{!}} Fandom |url=https://censorship.fandom.com/Index}} can be used as external source to view which content is censored and how. That website is a primary source of information, and it's user-driven. It has to be that way, since no official movie producer discloses (or has to) what is censored and why, not even less compare with other countries.
== Social Media Censorship ==


Hi KTJeno, the social media censorship part that you added looks good. I added a bit about why seeing disgruntled citizens' comments about certain elected officials can be good for the government who is doing the censoring, as well as provide a link to the video. You could maybe add more about why social media censorship can be viewed as good or bad to improve your section further. ] (]) 01:54, 15 April 2016 (UTC)


] (]) 09:54, 20 July 2023 (UTC)
Dogma remains our greatest enemy, and leads to censorship. War is social cannibalism. In the universe of ideas let language be explosive and guns be silent!] (]) 11:32, 10 August 2016 (UTC)


:No. We don't use self published sites and/or open wikis as sources, see ]. We also don't use reddit, and we don't use conduct ] to make points not present in cited sources. ] (]) 11:45, 20 July 2023 (UTC)
== Internet censorship map colours ==


== Semi-protected edit request on 26 June 2024 ==
Substantial, selective and not classified/no data are too close in colour, even if the map is blown up. <small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 07:09, 28 May 2016 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->


{{edit semi-protected|Censorship|answered=yes}}
== Validity and Scientific Backing? ==
Would like to add for further reading:


Gosztonyi, Gergely (2023) . Springer, Cham. ISBN: 978-3-031-46528-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-46529-1 ] (]) 20:54, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
I've been told that one of the main drivers of censorship and modification of language is in the idea of ]. Related would be the ideas of ], ], ], and Cognitive Universalism. Anyone else think this might be a good/bad idea? <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 03:17, 8 August 2016 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->


:{{done}}<!-- Template:ESp --> ] (]) 06:34, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
== photo correction ==
please reproduce again the photo because the black tables are bigger than they should be. Only third world censorship is that random. Some censorship officers were artists so the tables were exact, not bigger neither smaller than what it was needed. Misplaced Pages isn't a political newspaper. The fact you don't like censorship officers doesn't mean that they automatically become retarded.

Latest revision as of 17:10, 5 December 2024

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Censorship article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
Article policies
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Archives: 1, 2, 3Auto-archiving period: 3 months 
The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information.
This  level-4 vital article is rated B-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject iconFreedom of speech High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Freedom of speech, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Freedom of speech on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Freedom of speechWikipedia:WikiProject Freedom of speechTemplate:WikiProject Freedom of speechFreedom of speech
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconHuman rights Top‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Human rights, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Human rights on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Human rightsWikipedia:WikiProject Human rightsTemplate:WikiProject Human rightsHuman rights
TopThis article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconJournalism Top‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism
TopThis article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconLaw Top‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw
TopThis article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconMedia High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Media, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Media on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MediaWikipedia:WikiProject MediaTemplate:WikiProject MediaMedia
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject Media To-do List:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:
WikiProject iconPhilosophy: Ethics / Social and political Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Misplaced Pages.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Associated task forces:
Taskforce icon
Ethics
Taskforce icon
Social and political philosophy
WikiProject iconPolitics: Libertarianism Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Libertarianism (assessed as Mid-importance).
WikiProject iconPornography High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Pornography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of pornography-related topics on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PornographyWikipedia:WikiProject PornographyTemplate:WikiProject PornographyPornography
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
Text and/or other creative content from this version of Internet censorship was copied or moved into Censorship with this edit on 28 June 2009. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.

Wiki Education assignment: Introduction to Communication Studies - 1

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 18 January 2023 and 9 May 2023. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Rrodrigueznorat, Nick73102 (article contribs). Peer reviewers: MDWebb5.

— Assignment last updated by CommDocBDS (talk) 12:25, 13 April 2023 (UTC)

Inclusion of Censorship | Fandom as external reference

I want to discuss if the website "Censorship | Fandom". can be used as external source to view which content is censored and how. That website is a primary source of information, and it's user-driven. It has to be that way, since no official movie producer discloses (or has to) what is censored and why, not even less compare with other countries.

https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Censorship&diff=1166219543&oldid=1166187203

Bubbletruble (talk) 09:54, 20 July 2023 (UTC)

No. We don't use self published sites and/or open wikis as sources, see WP:RS. We also don't use reddit, and we don't use conduct original research to make points not present in cited sources. MrOllie (talk) 11:45, 20 July 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 26 June 2024

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Would like to add for further reading:

Gosztonyi, Gergely (2023) Censorship from Plato to Social Media. Springer, Cham. ISBN: 978-3-031-46528-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-46529-1 Zsosz (talk) 20:54, 26 June 2024 (UTC)

 Done TheNuggeteer (talk) 06:34, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
Categories: