Misplaced Pages

Talk:Vajrayana: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 00:30, 20 December 2015 editLowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,296,283 editsm Archiving 1 discussion(s) to Talk:Vajrayana/Archive 1) (bot← Previous edit Latest revision as of 12:51, 6 December 2024 edit undoLowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,296,283 editsm Archiving 1 discussion(s) to Talk:Vajrayana/Archive 1) (bot 
(66 intermediate revisions by 31 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Talk header|search=yes}} {{Talk header|search=yes}}
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=B|vital=yes|1=
{{WikiProjectBannerShell|1=
{{WikiProject Buddhism|class=B|importance=Top}} {{WikiProject Buddhism|importance=Top}}
{{WikiProject Tibetan Buddhism|class=B|importance=top}} {{WikiProject Tibet|importance=Top}}
{{WPCHINA|tibet=yes|class=B|importance=High}} {{WikiProject Bhutan|importance=high}}
{{WikiProject Bhutan|class=b|importance=high}} {{WikiProject East Asia|importance=low}}
{{WikiProject East Asia|class=|importance=}} {{WikiProject South Asia|importance=Low}}
{{WikiProject South Asia|class=|importance=}} {{WikiProject India|importance=low}}
{{WikiProject India|class=C|importance=low}} {{WikiProject Nepal |importance=Low}}
{{Vital article|level=3|topic=Philosophy|class=B}}
{{WP1.0|class=B|category=category|VA=yes}}
}} }}

] ]
{{User:MiszaBot/config {{User:MiszaBot/config
Line 51: Line 48:
{{reflist|2}} {{reflist|2}}


== Grammatical Active Voice == == Origins of Vajrayana ==

This wikipedia page is basically affirming Vajrayana was born out of Hinduism. I think the page should gives rise to the possibility that it was taught by the historical Buddha. Both perspectives are taught widely and both can be stated on this page without it being a huge scandal. At the same time, I don't want to do this alone and I don't want to put work into this and then discover wikipedia editors simply want to keep the page as it is.


There are many good resources including books from Reggie Ray that would be good secondary sources.
Where specifically are there "too many gramatical errors" in this version , when it has the ]? Really was unnecessary to revert, maybe even lazy, could just point out your specific issues or, make changes. The active voice will bring better clarity to the reader here. The reverted version makes is sound like:


Anyone else interested in this project, or just leave it alone?
*the Bodhisattva is the only Vajrayāna goal, which is untrue. There are others, as Vajrayana transcends and includes with faithful acceptance.
*it sets up a comparatively opposite goal with Theravada, which is untrue; because, Vajrayana transcends and includes with faithful acceptance.
*there is a single purpose, which is untrue, because, Vajrayana transcends and includes with faithful acceptance of the two purposes, benefiting other and self.
*it confounds empty enlightened mind nature, which is unnecessary.
*makes "skillful means" as the Vajrayana basis, which is untrue.
*it puts deities and accoutrements tools to useful employment work, which is ungenerous to karmic acts and actions.
⚫ ] (]) 23:25, 31 October 2015 (UTC)


All best wishes,
:Just looking at the last edit you might notice that it takes more than removing -ing to make a sentence active voice. "The special tantric vows vary '''depend''' on the specific mandala practice for which the initiation is received" is a blatant copy edit error and incorrect grammar. A sentence with proper grammar and passive voice is better than incorrect grammar and active voice (especially since passive voice is permissable). If you take the time to read your changes you will see similar problems "Vajrayana Buddhism is esoteric in the sense that certain '''teaching's''' transmission only '''occur'''..." here you use the wrong contraction and make the subject singular but change the verb to not be singular (by removing the 's'). Perhaps you meant teachings' (plural and possessive) but it was still clearer before your edit as "Vajrayana Buddhism is esoteric in the sense that the transmission of certain teachings only occurs...". In the same edit "a reality side-effect" is less clear than the previous "a side-effect of the reality" especially in the context of the sentence. And of course in the edit you highlighted: "whereas the goal for ] practice is '''specific''' to become an ]" specific would need to become an adverb. I have no objections directly to the conceptual content (which is to say I didn't consider it), but your edits made ''multiple'' new problems with grammar and readability that other editors shouldn't have to scramble to clean up. It appears that you either don't double check your edits, or that English is not your primary language. Please reintroduce your edits with proper grammar by copy-editing yourself as you go and no one will be compelled to revert your edits.] (]) 03:35, 1 November 2015 (UTC)


⚫ ] (]) 16:23, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
:: Voice has to do with subject's or agent's verbs. Where the action is from, originated, or directed. A ] verb is a verb that takes one or more objects. Contrast with ] verbs, without objects. It's a subtle distinction that English articles "of", "the","by" can be reconstructed and redirect the action as Tibetans intend subject object to become same. With an action agent having articles "a","an". Tibetans have higher frequency intransitive construction occurrence than English, which evolved as a practical trade waring ownership language where object actions become imperative. Even linguists disagree on nature's proper structure. Many folks get confused with intransitive because, may see self as separate from agent. Friends tell me I sound like Yoda. It's a writer's choice to construct with "of", "the","by", "a" "an". I should move slower. Was off on the pluralities. ] (]) 04:36, 29 November 2015 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 12:51, 6 December 2024

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Vajrayana article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
Article policies
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 3 months 
This  level-4 vital article is rated B-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject iconBuddhism Top‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article falls within the scope of WikiProject Buddhism, an attempt to promote better coordination, content distribution, and cross-referencing between pages dealing with Buddhism. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page for more details on the projects.BuddhismWikipedia:WikiProject BuddhismTemplate:WikiProject BuddhismBuddhism
TopThis article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconTibet Top‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Tibet, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Tibet on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TibetWikipedia:WikiProject TibetTemplate:WikiProject TibetTibet
TopThis article has been rated as Top-importance on the importance scale.
WikiProject iconBhutan High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Bhutan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Bhutan on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BhutanWikipedia:WikiProject BhutanTemplate:WikiProject BhutanBhutanWikiProject icon
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconEast Asia (defunct)
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject East Asia, a project which is currently considered to be defunct.East AsiaWikipedia:WikiProject East AsiaTemplate:WikiProject East AsiaEast Asia
WikiProject iconSouth Asia Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject South Asia, which aims to improve the quality and status of all South Asia-related articles. For more information, please visit the Project page.South AsiaWikipedia:WikiProject South AsiaTemplate:WikiProject South AsiaSouth Asia
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.
WikiProject iconIndia Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Misplaced Pages's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconNepal Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Nepal, which aims to improve Misplaced Pages's coverage of Nepal-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page and add your name to the member's list.NepalWikipedia:WikiProject NepalTemplate:WikiProject NepalNepal
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Archive

The difference between Nirvana and Buddha hood.

Nirvana is a Sanskrit word as you well know, but did you know it consists of tree words, Nir Vad Djna, literally this mean “Without wrong thought”, at least this is what my teacher Chhimed Rigdzin Rinpoche taught me. To reach Nirvana is to come to the end of ones preconceived ideas, to the place where the world is new at every moment.

Buddha hood is to gain the state of a Buddha, to be a Buddha is to gain throughout ages an accumulation of merits or positive accumulated fearlessness to deal with the parts of life that beings do not like to deal with and witch make up what is commonly known as the subconscious. Having gained a storage of “good merit” one will have the connection to a whole world of sentient beings, through ones work, and so will start at a proper time a new world cycle of Buddhist teachings.

To become a Buddha and to attain Nirvana is one and the same, there is no difference between the two, in actual experience. To reach Nirvana is like becoming truly sane. And to become a Buddha is to become the King of Fearlessness.

Nirvana you may gain for you self anytime but becoming a Buddha is another matter. --Mitrapa 16:32, 25 Nov 2004 (UTC)Mitrapa.

Different teachers give different etymologies for the word "nirvana". The most common is as follows: "nir" is the prefix meaning "to cease" or "to stop"; "vaana" means "blowing": thus "extinguished" or "blown out" would be the literal translation. - --Bodhirakshita 03:53, 7 Feb 2005 (UTC)

where to put this?

don't know yet.

Deity practice

I removed the following, misleading fragment from the article:

"Deity Tantra is often practiced at the moment directly prior to sexual climax. The practitioner takes a consort and this is practiced in pairs. Often times the couple pictures themselves as the deities in the mandala making love."

It gives the impression that tantric buddhist deity practices are predominantly done in a "sexual" setting. In reality however, these deity practices are just meditation practices - with no consort involved. In anuttarayogatantra, the deities often do have consorts, but anuttarayogatantra is not relevant to most tantric practitioners.

Notes

Origins of Vajrayana

This wikipedia page is basically affirming Vajrayana was born out of Hinduism. I think the page should gives rise to the possibility that it was taught by the historical Buddha. Both perspectives are taught widely and both can be stated on this page without it being a huge scandal. At the same time, I don't want to do this alone and I don't want to put work into this and then discover wikipedia editors simply want to keep the page as it is.

There are many good resources including books from Reggie Ray that would be good secondary sources.

Anyone else interested in this project, or just leave it alone?

All best wishes,

Badabara (talk) 16:23, 5 December 2024 (UTC)

Categories: