Misplaced Pages

Stephen Barrett: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 01:43, 16 September 2007 editValjean (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, IP block exemptions, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers95,275 edits copy edits: historical context so it makes sense, and more references, including court documents← Previous edit Latest revision as of 14:54, 6 December 2024 edit undoColonies Chris (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers445,550 editsm minor fixes, replaced: New York City → New York City (2), , MD → , Maryland (3), - → –Tag: AWB 
(791 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{short description|American psychiatrist (born 1933)}}
{{Infobox Person
| name = Stephen J. Barrett, MD {{other people|Stephen Barrett|Stephen Barrett (disambiguation)}}
{{Use mdy dates|date=October 2013}}
| image =
{{Infobox person
| image_size =
| caption = Stephen J. Barrett, MD | name = Stephen Barrett
| image = Stephen Barrett seated at desk crop.jpg
| birth_date = 1933
| image_size =
| birth_place = New York City
| death_date = | caption =
| birth_name = Stephen Joel Barrett
| death_place =
| birth_date = {{birth year and age|1933}}
| occupation = Psychiatrist, Author, Consumer Advocate, Webmaster
| website = | birth_place = New York City, U.S.
| death_date =
| death_place =
| education = ]
| occupation = Psychiatrist, author, consumer advocate, webmaster
| years_active = 1961–1993 (psychiatry)
| known_for = Being the webmaster of ]
| spouse = Judith Nevyas Barrett<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.quackwatch.org/10Bio/biovitae.html |title=Stephen Barrett, M.D. Curriculum Vitae |last=Barrett |first=Stephen |date=December 21, 2016 |website=Quackwatch |access-date=February 25, 2017 |quote=Wife, Judith Nevyas Barrett, M.D., is a retired family practitioner.}}</ref><ref name="biography">{{cite news |last=Rosen |first=Marjorie |date=October 1998 |title=Interviews – Stephen Barrett, M.D. |url=https://www.quackwatch.org/10Bio/biography.html |newspaper=Biography Magazine |access-date=February 25, 2017}}</ref>
| children = 3
| website = {{URL|quackwatch.org|QuackWatch.org}}
}} }}


'''Stephen J. Barrett''', M.D. (born ]), is a retired ] ], ], co-founder of the ] (NCAHF), and the webmaster of ]. He runs a number of websites dealing with what he calls ] and health ]. He says that he bases his writings on ], ], and ]. Barrett's critics have accused him of having a lack of objectivity. He has brought several defamation lawsuits against a number of them with mixed results. Numerous sources have cited Stephen Barrett's Quackwatch as a credible or reliable source for online consumer information. '''Stephen Joel Barrett''' ({{IPAc-en|ˈ|b|æ|r|ɪ|t}}; born 1933) is an American retired ], author, co-founder of the ] (NCAHF), and the webmaster of ]. He runs a number of websites dealing with ] and health fraud. He focuses on ], ], and ].<!-- A long list is already referenced in the body of the article. This is the LEAD where things are abbreviated. -->


==Early life and education==
== Biography ==
Barrett was born in New York City. He is a 1957 graduate of the ] and completed his psychiatry ] in 1961. In 1968, he completed part of a correspondence course in American Law and Procedure at ] in ].<ref name="QWBIO">{{cite news |first=Stephen |last=Barrett |title=Curriculum Vitae |url=http://www.quackwatch.org/10Bio/biovitae.html |publisher=] |date=June 24, 2007 |access-date=July 18, 2007}}</ref>


==Career==
Barrett is a ] graduate of the ] and completed his psychiatry ] in 1961. In 1967 and 1968 he followed part of a correspondence course in American Law and Procedure at ] (Chicago).<ref name="QWBIO">
Barrett was a practicing physician until retiring from active practice in 1993. {{As of|2019}}, his ] was listed as "Expired" in good standing: "No disciplinary actions were found for this license."<ref>{{Cite web |url = http://www.licensepa.state.pa.us/Details.aspx?agency_id=1&license_id=528406& |title = Pennsylvania Department of State; Stephen Barret Medical License Status and standing |access-date = November 19, 2015 |publisher = Pennsylvania Department of State; to be considered a primary resource }}{{Dead link|date=October 2023 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }}</ref><!--verifiable by searching here: https://www.pals.pa.gov/#/page/search--> A longtime resident of ], Barrett now resides in ].<ref name="mcall">{{cite news |first=Ann |last=Wlazelek |title=Allentown critic of quacks moves to 'milder winters' |url=https://www.mcall.com/2007/06/13/allentown-critic-of-quacks-moves-to-milder-winters-stephen-barrett-73-says-hell-keep-exposing-false-medical-claims/ |work=] |date=June 13, 2007 |access-date=September 25, 2014}}</ref>
{{cite news
|first=Stephen
|last=Barrett
|title=Curriculum Vitae
|url=http://www.quackwatch.org/10Bio/biovitae.html
|publisher=]
|date=June 24, 2007
|accessdate=2007-07-18}}</ref> He was a licensed physician until retiring from active practice in 1993, and his ] is currently listed as "Active-Retired" in good standing.<ref name="License_Verification">
{{cite news
|first=Stephen
|last=Barrett
|title=License Verification
|url=http://www.licensepa.state.pa.us/publicinfo.asp?sid=268928087&record=0&facility=False&l_person_id=528406&l_profession_id=1700&l_license_id=528406&Last_Name=Barrett&First_Name=Stephen&License_number=&Facility_Name=&DBA_Name=
|publisher=Pennsylvania Department of State, Bureau of Professional and Occupational Affairs
|date=
|accessdate=2007-07-18}}</ref> Longtime resident of ], Barrett now resides in ].<ref name="mcall">
{{cite news
|first=Ann
|last=Wlazelek
|title=Allentown critic of quacks moves to 'milder winters'
|url=http://pqasb.pqarchiver.com/mcall/access/1287793231.html?dids=1287793231:1287793231&FMT=ABS&FMTS=ABS:FT&date=Jun+13%2C+2007&author=Ann+Wlazelek+Of+The+Morning+Call&pub=Morning+Call&edition=&startpage=B.2&desc=Allentown+critic+of+quacks+moves+to+%22milder+winters%27+**+Stephen+Barrett%2C+73%2C+says+he%27ll+keep+exposing+false+medical+claims
|publisher=]
|date=June 13, 2007
|accessdate=2007-07-21}}</ref>


In addition to ]ing his websites, Barrett is a co-founder, vice-president and a board member of the ] (NCAHF). He is an advisor to the ], and a Fellow of the ] (CSI). From 1987 through 1989, he taught health education at ]. In addition to ]ing his websites, Barrett was a co-founder, vice-president and a board member of the ] (NCAHF). He is a scientific advisor to the ], and a fellow of the ] (CSI). From 1987 through 1989, he taught ] at ].


Barrett was the consulting editor for the Consumer Health Library at ],<ref name="prometheus books">{{cite web |url=http://www.prometheusbooks.com/PBcatalog.pdf|title=Prometheus Books Spring-Summer 2007 Trade Catalog|access-date=March 29, 2007|page=63 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20061114180455/http://www.prometheusbooks.com/PBcatalog.pdf |archive-date = November 14, 2006}}</ref> and has been a ] panelist for <ref name="SBcv">{{cite news |first=Stephen |last=Barrett |title=Stephen Barrett, M.D., Biographical Sketch |url=http://www.quackwatch.com/10Bio/bio.html |publisher=Quackwatch |date=June 4, 2007 |access-date=August 12, 2007}}</ref> two<ref name="jama_peer_reviewer1">{{cite journal |first=Elaine S |last=Williams |title=The JAMA 1998 Editorial Peer Review Audit |journal=] |date=April 21, 1999 | doi = 10.1001/jama.281.15.1443 |volume=281 |issue=15 |page=1443|doi-access=free }}</ref><ref name="jama_peer_reviewer2">{{Cite journal|title=JAMA Peer Reviewers for 2003|date=February 11, 2004|journal=JAMA|volume=291|issue=6|pages=751–764|doi=10.1001/jama.291.6.751|s2cid=162455343 |doi-access=free}}</ref><ref name="annals_peer_reviewer">{{cite journal |title=Thanks to Reviewers-2001 |journal=] |date=December 18, 2001 |volume=135 |issue=12 |pages=1098–1106 |doi=10.7326/0003-4819-135-12-200112180-00033|s2cid=53089455 |doi-access= }}</ref> ]s. He has also served on the editorial board of ]<ref name="medscape">{{cite journal |title=Introducing the Editorial Board of Medscape |journal= MedGenMed|pmid=11104430 | page=E28 | last1 = Lundberg | first1 = GD | year=1999}}{{cbignore|bot=medic}}</ref> and the '']''.<ref name="SRAM">{{cite web |title=The Scientific Review of Alternative Medicine |date=August 15, 2002 |url=http://www.quackwatch.com/04ConsumerEducation/sram.html |publisher=Quackwatch |access-date=15 February 2015}}</ref> According to his website, he "has written more than 2,000 articles and delivered more than 300 talks at colleges, universities, medical schools, and professional meetings. His media appearances include '']'', '']'', '']'', '']'', '']'', ], ], and more than 200 other radio and television talk show interviews."<ref name="SBcv" /><ref name=GMA_04_07_2009>Sintay and Hagan. . Barrett participated on '']'', April 7, 2009.</ref>
Barrett is the consulting editor for the Consumer Health Library at ],<ref name="prometheus books">{{cite web |url=http://www.prometheusbooks.com/PBcatalog.pdf|title=Prometheus Books Spring-Summer 2007 Trade Catalog|accessdate=2007-03-29|
format=]|work=|publisher=|pages=p. 63}}</ref> has been a ] panelist for at least<ref name="SBcv">
{{cite news
|first=Stephen
|last=Barrett
|title=Stephen Barrett, M.D., Biographical Sketch
|url=http://www.quackwatch.com/10Bio/bio.html
|publisher=]
|date=June 4, 2007
|accessdate=2007-08-12}}</ref> two<ref name="jama_peer_reviewer">
{{cite news
|first=Elaine S
|last=Williams
|title=The JAMA 1998 Editorial Peer Review Audit
|url=http://jama.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/full/281/15/1443?maxtoshow=&HITS=150&hits=150&RESULTFORMAT=1&andorexacttitle=and&titleabstract=peer+reviewers&andorexacttitleabs=phrase&andorexactfulltext=and&searchid=1&FIRSTINDEX=0&sortspec=relevance&resourcetype=HWCIT
|publisher=]
|date=April 21, 1999
|accessdate=2007-08-12}}</ref><ref name="annals_peer_reviewer">
{{cite news
|first=
|last=
|title=Thanks to Reviewers-2001
|url=http://www.annals.org/cgi/content/full/135/12/1098?maxtoshow=&HITS=10&hits=10&RESULTFORMAT=1&andorexacttitle=and&titleabstract=peer+reviewers&andorexacttitleabs=phrase&andorexactfulltext=and&searchid=1&FIRSTINDEX=0&sortspec=relevance&fdate=1/1/1997&tdate=3/31/2005&resourcetype=HWCIT,HWELTR
|publisher=]
|date=December 18, 2001|Volume 135 Issue 12|Pages 1098-1106
|accessdate=2007-08-12}}</ref> medical journals. He has also served on the editorial board of ]<ref name="medscape">
{{cite news
|first=
|last=
|title=Introducing the Editorial Board of Medscape
|url=http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/407984
|publisher=]
|date=
|accessdate=2007-09-03}}</ref> and The Scientific Review of Alternative Medicine.<ref name="SRAM">
{{cite news
|first=
|last=
|title=The Scientific Review of Alternative Medicine
|url=http://www.hutch.demon.co.uk/SRAM/index.htm
|publisher=The Scientific Review of Alternative Medicine
|date=
|accessdate=2007-09-12}}</ref> According to his website, he "has written more than 2,000 articles and delivered more than 300 talks at colleges, universities, medical schools, and professional meetings. His media appearances include '']'', the '']'', '']'', '']'', '']'', ], ], and more than 200 other radio and television talk show interviews."<ref name="SBcv"/>


Quackwatch received the award of Best Physician-Authored Site by MD NetGuide, May 2003.<ref name=nettie>{{cite web |url=http://www.mdnetguide.com/departments/may_june2003/cover.html |title=Pass the Envelope, Please...: ''Best Physician- Authored Site'' |work=MD Net Guide |date=May–June 2003 |access-date=April 3, 2009 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20030625042915/http://www.mdnetguide.com/departments/may_june2003/cover.html |archive-date = June 25, 2003}}</ref> In 1984, he received an ] Commissioner's Special Citation Award for Public Service in fighting nutrition quackery.<ref name="Medical_Reporter">{{cite web|author=Joel R. Cooper|url=http://medicalreporter.health.org/tmr0199/consumerfraud.html |title=Consumer Health Fraud...don't be a victim! Interview with Stephen Barrett, M.D. |work=The Medical Reporter|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20061212174116/http://medicalreporter.health.org/tmr0199/consumerfraud.html|archive-date=December 12, 2006 }}</ref> He was included in the list of outstanding skeptics of the 20th century by '']'' magazine.<ref name="csicop">{{cite web |title=Ten Outstanding Skeptics of the Century |url=http://www.csicop.org/articles/19991214-century/ |work=] |access-date=August 12, 2007 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20070715132139/http://www.csicop.org/articles/19991214-century/ |archive-date = July 15, 2007}}</ref> In 1986, he was awarded honorary membership in the ].<ref name="Medical_Reporter" /> Barrett has been profiled in ''Biography Magazine'' (1998)<ref name="rosen">{{cite news |first=Marjorie |last=Rosen |title=Interview with Stephen Barrett, M.D |url=http://www.quackwatch.org/10Bio/biography.html |work=Biography Magazine |date=October 1998 |access-date=August 16, 2007}}</ref> and in '']'' (2001).<ref name="jaroff">{{cite news |first=Leon |last=Jaroff |title=The Man Who Loves To Bust Quacks |url=http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1101010430-107254,00.html |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20050406044958/http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1101010430-107254,00.html |url-status=dead |archive-date=April 6, 2005 |work=] |date=April 30, 2001 |access-date=August 16, 2007}}</ref>
Barrett has received a number of awards and recognition for his ] work against quackery.<ref name="nettie"/> ] received the award of ''Best Physician- Authored Site'' by MD NetGuide, May ].<ref name="nettie"> ''MDNetGuide'', May/June 2003.</ref>
In ], he received an ] Commissioner's Special Citation Award for Public Service in fighting nutrition quackery.<ref name="Medical_Reporter">Joel R. Cooper. Interview with Stephen Barrett, M.D., ''The Medical Reporter''</ref> He received multiple votes or at least one first-place vote in "10 outstanding skeptics of the 20th century by '']'' magazine.<ref name="csicop">
{{cite news
|first=
|last=
|title=Ten Outstanding Skeptics of the Century
|url=http://www.csicop.org/articles/19991214-century/
|work=Scientifically Investigating Paranormal and Fringe Science Claims
|publisher=]
|date=
|accessdate=2007-08-12}}</ref> In ], he was awarded honorary membership in the ].<ref name="Medical_Reporter"/> Barrett has been profiled in ''Biography Magazine'' (])<ref name="rosen">
{{cite news
|first=Marjorie
|last=Rosen
|title=Interview with Stephen Barrett, M.D
|url=http://www.quackwatch.org/10Bio/biography.html
|publisher=Biography Magazine
|date=October 1998
|accessdate=2007-08-16}}</ref> and in ''] (])''.<ref name="jaroff">
{{cite news
|first=Leon
|last=Jaroff
|title=The Man Who Loves To Bust Quacks
|url=http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1101010430-107254,00.html
|publisher=]
|date=April 30, 2001
|accessdate=2007-08-16}}</ref>

The magazine '']'' included Barrett in a survey of 134 persons<ref name="Spiked_Interviewees">
{{cite news
|first=
|last=
|title=What Inspired You? — Index of Survey responses
|url=http://www.spiked-online.com/index.php?/inspired/atoz/
|publisher=]
|date=
|accessdate=2007-07-23
|quote=}}</ref> they termed "key thinkers in science, technology and medicine."<ref name="Spiked_Introduction">
{{cite news
|first=
|last=
|title=What Inspired You? — Introduction
|url=http://www.spiked-online.com/index.php?/inspired/
|publisher=]
|date=
|accessdate=2007-07-23
|quote=}}</ref><ref name="Spiked_Online">
{{cite news
|first=Stephen
|last=Barrett
|title=What Inspired You? — Survey responses — Dr Stephen Barrett
|url=http://www.spiked-online.com/index.php?/inspired/article/1336
|publisher=]
|date=
|accessdate=2007-07-23
|quote=}}</ref> When he was asked: "What inspired you to take up science?" he replied that his appreciation of medical science:


The magazine '']'' included Barrett in a survey of 134 persons<ref name="Spiked_Interviewees">{{cite news |title=What Inspired You? – Index of Survey responses |url=http://www.spiked-online.com/index.php?/inspired/atoz/ |work=] |access-date=July 23, 2007 }}</ref> they termed "key thinkers in science, technology and medicine."<ref name="Spiked_Introduction">{{cite news |title=What Inspired You? – Introduction |url=http://www.spiked-online.com/index.php?/inspired/ |work=Spiked-Online |access-date=July 23, 2007 }}</ref><ref name="Spiked_Online">{{cite news |first=Stephen |last=Barrett |title=What Inspired You? – Survey responses – Dr Stephen Barrett |url=http://www.spiked-online.com/index.php?/inspired/article/1336 |work=Spiked-Online |access-date=July 23, 2007|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120920174441/http://www.spiked-online.com/index.php/inspired/article/1336/|archive-date=September 20, 2012 }}</ref> When he was asked: "What inspired you to take up science?" he replied that his appreciation of medical science:
<blockquote>"probably began when I took a college course in medical statistics, and learned what makes the difference between scientific thought and poor reasoning. Medical school brought me in touch with the rapid and amazing strides being made in the understanding and treatment of disease. My anti-quackery activities have intensified my interest and concern in distinguishing science from pseudoscience, quackery and fraud."<ref name="Spiked_Online"/></blockquote>


<blockquote>probably began when I took a college course in medical statistics, and learned what makes the difference between scientific thought and poor reasoning. Medical school brought me in touch with the rapid and amazing strides being made in the understanding and treatment of disease. My anti-quackery activities have intensified my interest and concern in distinguishing science from pseudoscience, quackery and fraud.<ref name="Spiked_Online" /></blockquote>
== Online activism ==


===Quackwatch===
The ] website is Barrett's main platform for describing and exposing for what he considers to be quackery and health fraud.<ref name="quacks">
{{main|Quackwatch}}
The Quackwatch website is Barrett's main platform for describing and exposing what he and other contributors consider to be ] and health fraud.<ref name="quacks">
{{cite news {{cite news
|first=Fred D |first=Fred D
|last=Baldwin |last=Baldwin
|url=http://www.medhunters.com/articles/ifItQuacksLikeADuck.html |url=http://www.medhunters.com/articles/ifItQuacksLikeADuck.html
|title=If It Quacks Like a Duck ... |title=If It Quacks Like a Duck ...
|access-date=September 16, 2007
|accessdate=2007-09-16
|publisher=MedHunters}}</ref> The website is part of Quackwatch, Inc., a ] that aims to "combat health-related frauds, myths, fads, fallacies, and misconduct."<ref name="mission_statement"> |publisher=MedHunters |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20080206060833/http://www.medhunters.com/articles/ifItQuacksLikeADuck.html |archive-date = February 6, 2008}}</ref> The website was part of Quackwatch, Inc., a ] founded by Barrett that aims to "combat health-related frauds, myths, fads, fallacies, and misconduct." The non-profit was dissolved in 2008.<ref name="mission_statement">
{{cite news {{cite news
|first=Stephen, MD |first=Stephen, MD
Line 161: Line 54:
|url=http://www.quackwatch.org/00AboutQuackwatch/mission.html |url=http://www.quackwatch.org/00AboutQuackwatch/mission.html
|title=Quackwatch mission statement |title=Quackwatch mission statement
|access-date=August 16, 2007
|accessdate=2007-08-16
|publisher=]}}</ref> Barrett's writing is supplemented with contributions from 150+ scientific, technical, and lay volunteers.<ref name="advisors"> |publisher=Quackwatch}}</ref> Barrett's writing is supplemented with contributions from many scientific, technical, and lay volunteers and includes numerous references to published research articles.<ref name="advisors">
{{cite news {{cite news
|first=Stephen, MD |first=Stephen, MD
Line 168: Line 61:
|title=150+ Scientific and Technical Advisors |title=150+ Scientific and Technical Advisors
|url=http://www.quackwatch.org/09Advisors/advbd.html |url=http://www.quackwatch.org/09Advisors/advbd.html
|publisher=] |publisher=Quackwatch
|date=January 28, 2003 |date=January 28, 2003
|accessdate=2007-08-16}}</ref> Barrett defines ''quackery'' as "anything involving overpromotion in the field of health,"<ref name="quackdefinition"> |access-date=May 21, 2015}}</ref> Barrett defines ''quackery'' as "anything involving overpromotion in the field of health,"<ref name="quackdefinition">
{{cite news {{cite news
|first=Stephen, MD |first=Stephen, MD
Line 176: Line 69:
|title=Quackery: How Should It Be Defined? |title=Quackery: How Should It Be Defined?
|url=http://www.quackwatch.org/01QuackeryRelatedTopics/quackdef.html |url=http://www.quackwatch.org/01QuackeryRelatedTopics/quackdef.html
|publisher=] |publisher=Quackwatch
|access-date=August 16, 2007}}</ref> and reserves the word ''fraud'' "only for situations in which deliberate deception is involved."<ref name="frauddefinition">{{cite news
|date=
|accessdate=2007-08-16}}</ref> and reserves the word ''fraud'' "only for situations in which deliberate deception is involved."<ref name="frauddefinition">{{cite news
|author=Barrett SJ, Jarvis WT |author=Barrett SJ, Jarvis WT
|url=http://www.quackwatch.org/01QuackeryRelatedTopics/quackdef2.html |url=http://www.quackwatch.org/01QuackeryRelatedTopics/quackdef2.html
|title=Quackery, Fraud and "Alternative" Methods: Important Definitions |title=Quackery, Fraud and "Alternative" Methods: Important Definitions
|publisher=] |publisher=Quackwatch
|accessdate=2007-08-16}}</ref> |access-date=August 16, 2007}}</ref>
Barrett has become a "lightning rod" for controversy as a result of his criticisms of alternative medicine theories and practitioners. Barrett says he does not criticize conventional medicine because that would be "way outside scope."<ref name="jaroff" /><ref name="Ladd"> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140123015421/http://www.villagevoice.com/1999-06-22/news/doctor-who/ |date=January 23, 2014 }} by Donna Ladd, '']'', June 23–29, 1999. Retrieved September 2, 2006</ref> He states he does not give ] to some subjects, and has written on his web site that "Quackery and fraud don't involve legitimate controversy and are not balanced subjects. I don't believe it is helpful to publish 'balanced' articles about unbalanced subjects."<ref name="Barrett">{{cite news

Barrett has criticized numerous forms of alternative medicine and other practices he considers questionable, for example:
{{MultiCol}}
* ]<ref name="qw-homepage">
{{cite news
|first=Stephen
|last=Barrett
|title=Quackwatch — listing criticisms of several practices
|url=http://www.quackwatch.org/
|work=Your Guide to Quackery, Health Fraud, and Intelligent Decisions
|publisher=]
|date=
|accessdate=2007-07-17
|quote=}}</ref>
* ]-based therapies<ref name="algae">Barrett, S. "" Retrieved 17 July 2007</ref>
* ]<ref name="amalgam">Barrett, S. "" Retrieved 17 July 2007</ref> within ]
* ]<ref name="qw-homepage"/>
* ]<ref name="altmed">Barrett, S. "" Retrieved 17 July 2007</ref>
* ]<ref name="qw-homepage"/>
* ]<ref name="qw-homepage"/>
* ]<ref name="chinese herbal medicine">Barrett, S. "" Retrieved 17 July 2007</ref>
* ]<ref name="chiro_subluxation">Barrett, S. "" Retrieved 17 July 2007</ref>
* ]<ref name="qw-homepage"/>
* ]<ref name="colonic">Barrett, S. "" Retrieved 17 July 2007</ref>
* ]<ref name="qw-homepage"/>
{{ColBreak}}
* ]s<ref name="supplements">Barrett, S. "" Retrieved 17 July 2007</ref>
* ] clinics<ref name="embryonic">Barrett, S. "" Retrieved 17 July 2007</ref> and ] banking<ref name="embryonic"/>
* ]s<ref name="qw-homepage"/>
* ]<ref name="qw-homepage"/>
* Genetic diagnoses<ref name="qw-homepage"/>
* ]<ref name="qw-homepage"/>
* ]<ref name="qw-homepage"/>
* ]<ref name="qw-homepage"/>
* ]<ref name="herbal">Barrett, S. "" Retrieved 17 July 2007</ref>
* ]<ref name="homeopathy">Barrett, S. "" Retrieved 17 July 2007</ref>
* ]<ref name="qw-homepage"/>
{{ColBreak}}
* ]<ref name="qw-homepage"/>
* ]<ref name="qw-homepage"/>
* Metabolic therapy<ref name="qw-homepage"/>
* ]<ref name="qw-homepage"/>
* ]<ref name="naturopathy">Barrett, S. "" Retrieved 17 July 2007</ref>
* ]<ref name="qw-homepage"/>
* ]<ref name="qw-homepage"/>
* ]<ref name="qw-homepage"/>
* Pneumatic trabeculoplasty<ref name="qw-homepage"/>
* ]<ref name="qw-homepage"/>
* ]<ref name="qw-homepage"/>
{{EndMultiCol}}
On his main website he also maintains public lists of sources, individuals, and groups which he considers questionable and non-recommendable.<ref name="nonrecsource">{{cite web|url=http://www.quackwatch.org/#nonrecadvice|author=Barrett SJ|title=Nonrecommended Sources of Health Advice|accessdate=2007-02-12|publisher=Quackwatch}}</ref><ref name="nonrec">{{cite web|url=http://www.quackwatch.org/04ConsumerEducation/nonrecorg.html|author=Barrett SJ|title=Questionable Organizations: An Overview|accessdate=2007-02-12|publisher=Quackwatch}}</ref> The list includes two-time ] winner ] (for his claims about mega-doses of ]<ref name="pauling">{{cite web|url=http://www.quackwatch.org/01QuackeryRelatedTopics/pauling.html|author=Barrett SJ|title=The Dark Side of Linus Pauling's Legacy|accessdate=2007-02-12|publisher=Quackwatch}}</ref>), the ] (NIH) ], as well as ] proponent ].<ref name="weil">{{cite web|url=http://www.quackwatch.org/11Ind/weil.html|author=Relamn AS|title=A Trip to Stonesville: Some Notes on Andrew Weil|accessdate=2007-02-12|publisher=]}}</ref>

== Credibility as a source ==

Stephen Barrett's Quackwatch has been cited as a credible or reliable source for consumer information include:

* The inactive Science Panel on Interactive Communication and Health, appointed by the U.S. ], has named Barrett's Quackwatch as a credible source for exposing fraudulent online health information.<ref name="Ladd"/><ref name="SciPICH">{{cite news
|first=
|last=
|title=Science Panel on Interactive Communication and Health
|url=http://www.health.gov/scipich/
|work=
|publisher=]
|date=July 11, 2002
|accessdate=2007-09-12
|quote=}}</ref>

* In Ethical, Scientific, and Educational Concerns With Unproven Medications W Steven Pray. ''American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education''. Alexandria: 2006. Vol. 70, Iss. 6; pg. O1, 14 pgs. Quackwatch is named as a reliable source together with Skeptical Enquirer, specifically for Pharmacy Course on Unproven Medications and Therapies.

* In: Medical quackery squashers on the web, Marilynn Larkin. '']''. London: May 16, 1998. Vol. 351, Iss. 9114; pg. 1520 - 2. Names Quackwatch as the premier site for exposing purveyors of health frauds, myths, and fads.

* In: If It Walks like a Duck . . . : Concerns about Quackery in Marketing Education, Lawrence B Chonko. ''Journal of Marketing Education''. Boulder: Apr 2004. Vol. 26, Iss. 1; pg. 4, 13 pgs. Chonko states “Many of the thoughts on which this article is based are adapted from materials found on this site.” (referring to Quackwatch)

* In: Propagation of the Absurd: demarcation of the Absurd revisited Wallace Sampson, Kimball Atwood IV. ''Medical Journal of Australia''. Pyrmont: Dec 5-Dec 19, 2005. Vol. 183, Iss. 11/12; pg. 580 - 1. Sampson states that “CAM source information tends to exclude well known critical and objective web pages such as those found on Quackwatch (www.quackwatch.org).”

* In: Internet hoaxes: How to spot them and how to debunk them Eleese Cunningham, Wendy Marcason. American Dietetic Association. '']''. Chicago: Apr 2001. Vol. 101, Iss. 4; pg. 460 - 1. Cunningham and Marcason state that “Two Web sites that can be useful in determining hoaxes are www.quackwatch.com and www.urbanlegends.com.”

* In the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services' healthfinder.gov, Quackwatch is available from their database of reliable health information.<ref name="healthfinder">{{cite news
|first=
|last=
|title=U.S. Department of Health & Human Services
|url=http://www.healthfinder.gov/search/default.asp?sort=date%253AD%253AL%253Ad1&output=xml&ie=UTF-8&client=healthfinder2&lr=lang_en&numgm=5&site=Federal%7Cnonprofit&q=quackwatch&submit1=Search
|work=healthfinder.gov
|publisher=National Health Information Center
|date=
|accessdate=2007-09-12
|quote=}}</ref>

* The Stephen Barrett's Quackwatch is used as a reliable educational resource guide by libraries across the Unites States of America.<ref name="Southwest Public Libraries">{{cite news
|first=
|last=
|title=Southwest Public Libraries
|url=http://www.spl.lib.oh.us/wf/category2.cfm?cat_id1=17
|work=
|publisher=
|date=
|accessdate=2007-09-12
|quote=}}</ref><ref name="National Library of Medicine">{{cite news
|first=
|last=
|title=National Network of Libraries of Medicine
|url=http://nnlm.gov/outreach/consumer/evalsite.html
|work=Evaluating Health Web Sites, Consumer Health Manual
|publisher=National Library of Medicine
|date=
|accessdate=2007-09-12
|quote=}}</ref><ref name="VCU Libraries">{{cite news
|first=
|last=
|title=VCU Libraries
|url=http://www.library.vcu.edu/tml/bibs/cam.html
|work=Complementary and Alternative Medicine Resource Guide — Fraud and Quackery Resources
|publisher=]
|date=
|accessdate=2007-09-12
|quote=}}</ref><ref name="Rutgers University Libraries">{{cite news
|first=
|last=
|title=Rutgers University Libraries
|url=http://www.libraries.rutgers.edu/rul/rr_gateway/research_guides/pharm/findingit.shtml
|work=Finding What You Want on the Web: A Guide
|publisher=]
|date=
|accessdate=2007-09-12
|quote=}}</ref><ref name="USC Libraries">{{cite news
|first=
|last=
|title=USC Libraries — Electronic Resources — Quackwatch
|url=http://www.usc.edu/e_resources/isd/gateways/4982.php
|work=
|publisher=]
|date=
|accessdate=2007-09-12
|quote=}}</ref><ref name="Mecical Center Library">{{cite news
|first=
|last=
|title=Mecical Center Library
|url=http://www.uky.edu/Libraries/libpage.php?lweb_id=262&llib_id=12&ltab_id=590
|work=
|publisher=]
|date=
|accessdate=2007-09-12
|quote=}}</ref>

== Criticism ==

Barrett has become a "lightning rod" for controversy as a result of his criticisms of alternative medicine theories and practitioners. Barrett says he does not criticize conventional medicine because that would be "way outside scope."<ref name="jaroff"/><ref name="Ladd"> by Donna Ladd, ], June 23 - 29, 1999. Retrieved September 2, 2006</ref> He states he does not give ] to some subjects, and has written on his web site that "Quackery and fraud don't involve legitimate controversy and are not balanced subjects. I don't believe it is helpful to publish "balanced" articles about unbalanced subjects.<ref name="Barrett">{{cite news
|url=http://www.quackwatch.org/00AboutQuackwatch/faq2.html |url=http://www.quackwatch.org/00AboutQuackwatch/faq2.html
|author=Barrett SJ |author=Barrett SJ
|title=How do you respond to accusations that your writing is unbalanced? |title=How do you respond to accusations that your writing is unbalanced?
|access-date=August 16, 2007
|accessdate=2007-08-16
|publisher=Quackwatch}}</ref> Barrett is at the forefront of exposing questionable aspects of ].<ref>{{cite book |pages=171–72 |chapter= The truth about chiropractic therapy |title= Trick or Treatment: The Undeniable Facts about Alternative Medicine |author= Singh S, Ernst E |year=2008 |publisher= W.W. Norton |isbn=978-0-393-06661-6}}</ref>
|publisher=]}}</ref>


Barrett is a strong supporter of the ] and has made efforts to improve compliance with its rules and to expose those who abuse it.<ref name="Wanjek">Christopher Wanjek. '']'', April 20, 2004; Page HE01</ref>
A number of practitioners and supporters of ] criticize Barrett and Quackwatch for its criticism of alternative medicine.<ref name="Ladd"/><ref name="colgan">{{cite news
|first=Michael
|last=Colgan
|title=The Vitamin Pushers
|url=
|work=
|publisher=Townsend Letter for Doctors
|date=October 1992, p. 126
|accessdate=2007-08-12}}</ref><ref name="Evaluating_CAM">Hufford DJ. David J Hufford, "Symposium article: Evaluating Complementary and Alternative Medicine: The Limits of Science and Scientists." J Law, Medicine & Ethics, 31 (2003): 198-212. Hufford's symposium presentation was the counterpoint for another doctor's presentation, which argued that "alternative medicine" is not medicine at all. See Lawrence J. Schneiderman, "Symposium article: The (Alternative) Medicalization of Life." J Law, Medicine & Ethics, 31 (2003): 191-198.</ref> ], a journalist with '']'', says Barrett relies mostly on negative research to criticize alternative medicine, rejecting most positive case studies as unreliable. She further writes that Barrett insists that most alternative therapies simply should be disregarded without further research. "A lot of things don't need to be tested they simply don't make any sense," he says, pointing to homeopathy, chiropractic, and acupuncture, among a myriad of other things.<ref name="Ladd"/>


A number of practitioners and supporters of ] oppose Barrett and Quackwatch for its criticism of alternative medicine.<ref name="Ladd" /><ref name="Evaluating_CAM">{{cite journal | last1 = Hufford | first1 = David J. |authorlink1=David Hufford | year = 2003 | title = Symposium article: Evaluating Complementary and Alternative Medicine: The Limits of Science and Scientists | journal = The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics | volume = 31 | issue = 2| pages = 198–212 | doi = 10.1111/j.1748-720x.2003.tb00081.x | pmid = 12964264 | s2cid = 29859505 }}. Hufford's symposium presentation was the counterpoint for another doctor's presentation, which argued that "alternative medicine" is not medicine at all. See {{cite journal | last1 = Schneiderman | first1 = Lawrence J. | year = 2003 | title = Symposium article: The (Alternative) Medicalization of Life | journal = The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics | volume = 31 | issue = 2| pages = 191–198 | doi = 10.1111/j.1748-720x.2003.tb00080.x | pmid = 12964263 | s2cid = 43786245 }}</ref> ], a journalist with '']'', says Barrett relies mostly on negative research to criticize alternative medicine, rejecting most positive case studies as unreliable due to methodological flaws. According to Ladd, Barrett insists that most alternative therapies "simply should be disregarded without further research. 'A lot of things don't need to be tested they simply don't make any sense', he says, pointing to ], chiropractic, and ] as examples of alternative treatments with no plausible mechanism of action."<ref name="Ladd" />
Peter Barry Chowka, a former adviser to the National Institutes of Health's Office of Alternative Medicine, remarked that Barrett "seems to be putting down trying to be objective."<ref name="Ladd"/> David Hufford, who is a Professor at the Penn State College of Medicine, wrote an opinion piece in which he asserts — the Stephen Barrett's Quackwatch would be more effective if he relied more on research and less on personal beliefs.<ref name="Evaluating_CAM"/>


Both website reviews<ref name="The Good Web Guide">{{cite book
Barrett's involvement in the legal system has also spawned controversy about his objectivity to pass judgment on those he deems "quacks." He or NCAHF has initiated a number of lawsuits against those engaged in what he considers unscientific medical practices. He has also offered testimony on psychiatry, FDA regulatory issues, homeopathy, and other areas of alternative medicine. This has lended to him being criticized for his ] and ].
|author=Arabella Dymoke
|title=The Good Web Guide
|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=JCipdQBDUucC&pg=PA35
|year=2004
|publisher=The Good Web Guide Ltd
|isbn=978-1-903282-46-5
|page=35
|quote=Quackwatch is without doubt an important and useful information resource and injects a healthy dose of scepticism into reviewing popular health information. Its aim is to investigate questionable claims made in some sectors of what is now a multi-million pound healthcare industry.}}</ref><ref name="ascp">{{cite news
|first=Bao-Anh
|last=Nguyen-Khoa
|title=Selected Web Site Reviews — Quackwatch.com
|url=http://www.ascp.com/publications/tcp/1999/jul/access.shtml
|publisher=]
|date=July 1999
|access-date=June 24, 2013
|url-status=dead
|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090318041703/http://www.ascp.com/publications/tcp/1999/jul/access.shtml
|archive-date=March 18, 2009 }}</ref><ref name="forbes">{{cite web
|url=https://www.forbes.com/bow/b2c/review.jhtml?id=865
|work=]
|title=Best of the Web website reviews: Quackwatch.
|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080114071544/http://www.forbes.com/bow/b2c/review.jhtml?id=865
|archive-date=January 14, 2008 }}</ref><ref name="thedietchannel">{{cite news
|title=Diet Channel Award Review Of Quackwatch
|url=http://www.thedietchannel.com/Quackwatch-Review.htm
|access-date=September 18, 2007
|quote=Quackwatch is a very informative site which informs you about health fraud and gives you advice on many decisions.}}</ref><ref name="USNWR1999">{{cite news|title=The Best of The Web Gets Better
|url=https://www.usnews.com/usnews/culture/articles/991115/archive_002597_7.htm
|work=US News
|date=November 7, 1999
|url-status=dead
|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060524122033/http://www.usnews.com/usnews/culture/articles/991115/archive_002597_7.htm |archive-date=May 24, 2006 }}</ref> and various journal articles<ref name="AJPE">{{Cite journal
|pmc = 1803699
|year = 2006
|last1 = Pray
|first1 = W. S.
|title = Ethical, Scientific, and Educational Concerns with Unproven Medications
|journal = American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education
|volume = 70
|issue = 6
|pages = 141
|pmid = 17332867
|doi = 10.5688/aj7006141}}</ref><ref name="JME">{{cite journal
|doi=10.1177/0273475303257763
|title=If it Walks Like a Duck...: Concerns about Quackery in Marketing Education
|journal=Journal of Marketing Education
|volume=26
|pages=4–16
|year=2004
|last1=Chonko
|first1=Lawrence B.
|s2cid=167338734
|id={{ERIC|EJ807197}}}}</ref><ref name="MJA" >{{Cite journal
|pmid = 16336135
|year = 2005
|last1 = Sampson
|first1 = Wallace
|title = Propagation of the absurd: Demarcation of the absurd revisited
|journal = The Medical Journal of Australia
|volume = 183|issue = 11–12
|pages = 580–1
|last2 = Atwood IV
|first2 = Kimball|doi = 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2005.tb00040.x
|s2cid = 43272637
}}</ref><ref name="JADA">{{cite journal
|doi=10.1016/S0002-8223(01)00117-1
|title=Internet hoaxes: How to spot them and how to debunk them
|journal=Journal of the American Dietetic Association
|volume=101
|issue=4
|pages=460
|year=2001
|last1=Cunningham
|first1=Eleese
|last2=Marcason
|first2=Wendy}}</ref><ref name=JAMA>{{cite journal
|doi=10.1001/jama.280.15.1380
|title=Click here: How to find reliable online health information and resources
|journal=JAMA
|volume=280
|issue=15
|pages=1380
|year=1998
|pmid=9794323}}</ref><ref name="The Lancet">{{Cite journal
|doi = 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)78918-2
|title = Medical quackery squashers on the web
|journal = The Lancet
|volume = 351
|issue = 9114
|pages = 1520
|year = 1998
|last1 = Larkin
|first1 = Marilynn|s2cid = 54300255
}}</ref> mention or use as references Stephen Barrett's ''Quackwatch'' as a useful source for consumer information. However, other authors have criticised Quackwatch as being overly biased in its presentation.<ref>{{cite journal | last1 = Okasha | first1 = Mona | year = 2000 | title = Quackery on the web – questionable cancer therapies | url = https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanonc/article/PIIS1470-2045(00)00162-5/fulltext | journal = The Lancet Oncology | volume = 1 | issue = 4| page = 251 | doi = 10.1016/S1470-2045(00)00162-5 }}</ref><ref>Cuzzell, Jane. (2000). "", ''Dermatology Nursing'', Apr. 2000, p. 134. Accessed 6 November 2019.</ref><ref name=Vankevitch>{{cite book|author=Vankevitch, Ned|chapter=Limiting Pluralism|editor=Ernst, Waltraud |title=Plural medicine, tradition and modernity, 1800-2000 |publisher=Routledge |location=New York |year=2002 |pages=219–244|chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=DVp71Gp4eE4C|isbn=978-0-415-23122-0}}</ref>


In February 2020, Quackwatch became part of the ]. CFI maintains its various websites.<ref>{{cite web |last1=Fidalgo |first1=Paul |title=Quackwatch Joins the Center for Inquiry |url=https://centerforinquiry.org/press_releases/quackwatch-joins-the-center-for-inquiry/ |website=Center for Inquiry |date=February 26, 2020 |access-date=26 February 2020}}</ref>
== Defamation lawsuits ==


== Publications ==
Several libel suits have been filed by Barrett after he was criticized in a long series of email newsletters by ] employee, Patrick "Tim" Bolen, over his criticisms of Clark. Bolen claimed that Barrett had been "de-licensed," among other things. Barrett sued for libel<ref name="bolensuit"></ref> and Hulda Clark's publishing company ''New Century Press'' responded with a countersuit<ref name="countersuit"> Case no. 833 021-5, Nov. 3, 2000</ref> against Barrett (as well as numerous members of a mailing list at Yahoo! Groups, a non-existent website, and a strong supporter of Clark) for at least 12 types of crimes and about 20 other civil wrongs, with the most serious being racketeering. After Barrett filed a complaint for damages<ref name="complaint"> Barrett v. Carlos F. Negrete, Hulda Clark, New Century Press</ref> the countersuit was eventually withdrawn,<ref name="negreteappeal"> Stephen J. Barrett, M.D. v. Carlos F. Negrete et al. U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit No 04-55193, Filed March 14, 2005. "As to point number one, the district court correctly concluded that Negrete's voluntary dismissal of the underlying action constituted a termination favorable to Barrett."</ref> but was heavily reported by Bolen and others of Barrett's detractors long afterwards without mentioning the withdrawal.<ref name="New_Century_countersuit">{{cite web|url=http://www.quackwatch.org/11Ind/bolen.html|author=Barrett SJ|title=A Response to Tim Bolen|accessdate=2007-02-12|publisher=Quackwatch}}</ref>
Barrett's articles include:
<ref name="negrete_suit">Barrett, S. ""</ref>
* In 1985, Barrett was the author of the "Commercial hair analysis. Science or scam?" article in the '']'' that exposed commercial laboratories performing multimineral ]. He commented that in his opinion, "commercial use of hair analysis in this manner is unscientific, economically wasteful, and probably illegal."<ref name="hairanalysis">Barrett SJ (August 23, 1985). ''JAMA'' Vol. 254 No. 8.</ref> His report has been cited in later articles, including one which concluded that such testing was "unreliable."<ref name="Seidel">, Seidel S, et al., ''JAMA''. 2001;285:67–72.</ref>
* , Rosa L, ], Sarner L, Barrett SJ. (April 1, 1998). '']'', Vol. 279, No. 13, pp 1005–1010.


His (co)authored and (co)edited books include:<ref name="booklist">{{cite web|url=http://www.quackwatch.org/10Bio/biobooks.html|author=Barrett SJ|title=Books and book chapters|access-date=February 12, 2007|publisher=Quackwatch}}</ref>
Barrett has filed ] suits against several website operators and USENET posters who reposted Bolen's letters online. Barrett explained his lawsuits this way:
* ''Consumer Health: A Guide to Intelligent Decisions'', Barrett S, ], Kroger M, ], ] (2013). (textbook, 9th ed.) McGraw-Hill, {{ISBN|978-0078028489}}
* ''Dubious Cancer Treatment'', Barrett SJ & Cassileth BR, editors (2001). Florida Division of the ]
* ''Chemical Sensitivity: The Truth About Environmental Illness'' (Consumer Health Library), Barrett, SJ & Gots, Ronald E. (1998). Prometheus Books. {{ISBN|9781573921954}}
* ''The Health Robbers: A Close Look at Quackery in America'', Barrett SJ, Jarvis WT, eds. (1993). Prometheus Books, {{ISBN|0-87975-855-4}}
* ''Health Schemes, Scams, and Frauds'', Barrett SJ (1991). Consumer Reports Books, {{ISBN|0-89043-330-5}}
* ''Reader's Guide to Alternative Health Methods'', Zwicky JF, Hafner AW, Barrett S, Jarvis WT (1993). ], {{ISBN|0-89970-525-1}}
* ''The Vitamin Pushers: How the "Health Food" Industry Is Selling America a Bill of Goods'', Barrett SJ, Herbert V (1991). Prometheus Books, {{ISBN|0-87975-909-7}}
* ''Vitamins and Minerals: Help or Harm?'', Marshall CW (1983). Lippincott Williams & Wilkins {{ISBN|0-397-53060-9}} (edited by Barrett, won the ] award for best book of 1983 for the general public, republished by ]).


Collections of articles:
<blockquote>"None of us are thin-skinned or care when people attack our ideas. But unjustified attacks on our character or professional competence are another matter. As Bolen's campaign unfolded, my colleagues and I have notified him and many of the people spreading his messages that libel is a serious matter and that they had better stop. Some did, but it soon became clear that others would not. To defend ourselves, several of us have filed suit for libel."<ref name="bolen_response">{{cite web|url=http://www.quackwatch.org/11Ind/bolen.html|author=Barrett SJ|title=A Response to Tim Bolen|accessdate=2007-02-12|publisher=Quackwatch}} Barrett states that a "suit was settled with a retraction and payment of $50,000."</ref></blockquote>
* ''Paranormal Claims: A Critical Analysis'', 2007, edited by Bryan Farha, ], {{ISBN|978-0-7618-3772-5}}. Three of the eighteen chapters are written by Barrett.

Barrett filed lawsuits in several jurisdictions, including Illinois,<ref name="barrett v mercola">
''Barrett v. Mercola'', against ], </ref><ref name="b v f">See ''Barrett v. Fonorow'', filed July 2001 against Owen R. Fonorow, and Intelisoft Multimedia, Inc, 18th Cir., DuPage County, Illinois, No. 01 L 820. Barrett alleged that Fonorow reposted ten articles by Tim Bolen mischaracterizing him with several disparaging claims. {{cite news| title=Suits may redefine Internet libel law|author=Ted Gregory|publisher=''Chicago Tribune''|date=]|page=L1}}
</ref>
California,<ref name="b v c">
''Barrett v. Clark'', filed November 2000. Barrett and Polevoy sued ], Tim Bolen, Jan Bolen, David P. Amrein, Ilena Rosenthal, and unknown defendants for libel, libel per se, and conspiracy. {{cite web|url=http://www.quackwatch.org/11Ind/bolensuit.html|title=Barrett's case filing|accessdate=2007-02-12|publisher=Quackwatch}}
</ref>
and Pennsylvania.<ref name="b v k">
''Barrett v. Koren'', filed against Tedd Koren, D.C. alleging that Koren made libelous remarks about him in his newsletter. Stephen Barrett, "," last revised on October 13, 2005.
</ref>
Many of these were dismissed on ] under anti-] statutes,<ref name="B v C">
E.g. the trial court rulings in ''Barrett v. Clark'', where on July 25, 2001 the court granted Rosenthal's ] under California's anti-SLAPP provision, and ruled that the statements made by Rosenthal were opinion, and not statements of fact. Monica Dias, "", The News Media & The Law, Fall 2001 (Vol. 25, No. 4), Page 21. Plaintiffs additionally failed to provide any evidence of damage, as required in a ] lawsuit. "," California Anti-SLAPP Project. Perkins Coie, "," Internet Case Digest, July 25, 2001.
</ref> for failing to establish the evidentiary burden for libel,<ref name="B v K">
See ''Barrett v. Koren'', dismissed by a Pennsylvania judge who found that Barrett had provided insufficient evidence to prove his claim. Civil Action 2002-c-1837, Court of Common Pleas of Lehigh County. The dismissal was affirmed June 2007, SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA, . See also the trial court in ''Barrett v. Clark'', ''supra''. The Illinois court in ''Barrett v. Mercola'' reached the opposite conclusion, and the parties settled. .</ref> or because of an interpretation of ] ("CDA") that gives users immunity from lawsuits when reposting material online, such that courts need not determine whether Bolen's remarks constituted libel.<ref name="B v F">
''Barrett v. Fonorow'', dismissed in 2003. , No. 2--02--0886. {{cite news| title=Internet libel suit is tossed out; Decency Act protection cited by DuPage judge|author=Ted Gregory| publisher=''Chicago Tribune''|date=]|page=D13}} Dismissal affirmed in ''Barrett v. Fonorow'', 799 N.E.2d 916, 343 Ill. App. 3d 1184 (Ill. App. 2003). This was the predominant&mdash;though criticized&mdash;interpretation of the CDA; the 2004 appellate decision in ''Barrett v. Rosenthal'' was one of the few authorities suggesting that the CDA did ''not'' extend immunity to individuals reposting material online. {{cite news|title=Court gives go-ahead to defamation on the Web|author=Peter M. Katsaros; Fredrick S. Rhine|publisher=''Chicago Daily Law Bulletin''|date=]}} See also the California Supreme Court's eventual ruling in ''Barrett v. Rosenthal''.
</ref> However, Barrett won a preliminary victory in at least one suit and the parties ultimately settled in April 2003<ref name="barrett v mercola"/><ref name="mercolacasedismissal">
{{cite news
|first=
|last=
|title=Dismiss by Stipulation or Agreement
|url=https://w3.courtlink.lexisnexis.com/cookcounty/FindDock.asp?SearchType=0&Database=2&NCase=2001-L-009026&CDate=&PLtype=2&sname=mercola
|publisher=Circuit Court of Cook County, Illinois
|date=April 17, 2003
|accessdate=2007-09-06}}</ref> after the osteopath made restitution, including a retraction of the offensive material and a payment to Barrett.<ref name="bolen_response"/><ref name="Illinois_osteopath_sued">
{{cite news
|first=
|last=
|title=A Response to Tim Bolen
|url=http://web.archive.org/web/20040216103602/www.quackwatch.org/11Ind/bolen.html
|work=]
|publisher=]
|date=August 9, 2003
|accessdate=2007-09-07}}</ref>

'']'', a lawsuit that Barrett initiated with another doctor in California, was appealed to that state's supreme court.<ref name="cybertort">On January 21, 2004, a California court of appeals vacated the trial court's order in ''Barrett v. Clark'' as it applied to Dr. Polevoy. ''Barrett v. Rosenthal'', 9 Cal.Rptr.3d 142 (Cal. App. 2004). The court found that Rosenthal's claims of Dr. Polevoy stalking a talk show host constituted libel per se, so did not require proof of damages and was not covered by California's anti-SLAPP statute, and refused to extend Rosenthal immunity from Section 230 of the CDA. See Michael L. Rustad, Thomas H. Koenig '''', 80 Wash. L. Rev. 335 (2005).
</ref>
Though the California Supreme Court did not rule on whether or not the material in question was indeed libelous, they did adopt the predominant interpretation of Section 230 of the CDA, which grants immunity to defendants for reposting libelous material online.<ref name="Mintz">
Howard Mintz, '''', ], November 21, 2006. The issue of defamation against Barrett was not before the court, as lower courts had ruled that Rosenthal had not defamed Barrett. Eric J. Sinrod, '''', ] News.com, December 20, 2006.
</ref>
At least one of Barrett's lawsuits is still pending in federal court.<ref name="barrettVnegreteRemand">
''Barrett v. Negrete'', a suit against Negrete and Clark which the Ninth Circuit ]ed, reversing the district court's dismissal. {{cite web|url=http://www.quackwatch.org/11Ind/negreteappeal.html|author=Barrett SJ|title=''Appeals Court Upholds Malicious Prosecution Suit against Hulda Clark and Attorney Carlos Negrete'', (Mem,. No. 04-55193 D.C. No. CV -02-0221 O-JML; No. 03-56663 D.C. No. CY -02-0221 O-JML March 14, 2005|accessdate=2007-02-12|publisher=Quackwatch}}. ''Barret v. Negrete'', 126 Fed.Appx. 816 (9th Cir. 2005) (unpublished).</ref>

== Selected publications ==
{{expand-section}}
A partial list of articles Barrett was one of the authors or his authored work was cited include:

* In 1985, Barrett was the author of the ''Commercial hair analysis. Science or scam?'' article in the ] that exposed commercial laboratories performing multimineral ]. He concluded that ''"commercial use of hair analysis in this manner is unscientific, economically wasteful, and probably illegal."''<ref name="hairanalysis">Barrett SJ (August 23, 1985). '']'' Vol. 254 No. 8.</ref> His report has been cited in later articles, including one which concluded that such testing was "unreliable."<ref name="Seidel">, Seidel S, et al. , '']''. 2001;285:67-72.</ref>

* - Rosa L, Rosa E, Sarner L, Barrett SJ. (April 1, 1998). '']'', Vol. 279, No. 13, pp 1005-1010.

A partial list of his (co)authored and (co)edited books include:<ref name="booklist">{{cite web|url=http://www.quackwatch.org/10Bio/biobooks.html|author=Barrett SJ|title=Books and book chapters|accessdate=2007-02-12|publisher=]}}</ref>

*''Consumer Health: A Guide to Intelligent Decisions'' - Barrett SJ, Jarvis WT, Kroger M, London WM (2006). (textbook, 8th ed.) McGraw-Hill, ISBN 0-07-248521-3

*''Dubious Cancer Treatment'' - Barrett SJ & Cassileth BR, editors (2001). Florida Division of the ]

*''The Health Robbers: A Close Look at Quackery in America'' - Barrett SJ, Jarvis WT, eds. (1993). Prometheus Books, ISBN 0-87975-855-4

*''Health Schemes, Scams, and Frauds'' - Barrett SJ (1991). Consumer Reports Books, ISBN 0-89043-330-5

*''Reader's Guide to Alternative Health Methods'' - by Zwicky JF, Hafner AW, Barrett S, Jarvis WT (1993). ], ISBN 0-89970-525-1

*''The Vitamin Pushers: How the "Health Food" Industry Is Selling America a Bill of Goods'' - Barrett SJ, Herbert V (1991). Prometheus Books, ISBN 0-87975-909-7

*''Vitamins and Minerals: Help or Harm?'' - Marshall CW (1983). Lippincott Williams & Wilkins ISBN 0-397-53060-9 (edited by Barrett, won the ] award for best book of 1983 for the general public, republished by ]).


== See also == == See also ==
* '']''

* ]
* ]
* ] * ]
* ] * ]
* ]
* ] * ]
* ]
* ] * ]
* ]
* ]


== References == == References ==
{{reflist|2}} {{Reflist|2}}


== External links == == External links ==
{{commons category}}
*


{{Authority control}}
* - Stephen Barrett


{{DEFAULTSORT:Barrett, Stephen}} {{DEFAULTSORT:Barrett, Stephen}}
] ]
] ]
] ]
] ]
] ]
] ]
]

]
]
]
]
]
]

Latest revision as of 14:54, 6 December 2024

American psychiatrist (born 1933) For other people named Stephen Barrett, see Stephen Barrett (disambiguation).

Stephen Barrett
BornStephen Joel Barrett
1933 (age 90–91)
New York City, U.S.
EducationColumbia University
Occupation(s)Psychiatrist, author, consumer advocate, webmaster
Years active1961–1993 (psychiatry)
Known forBeing the webmaster of Quackwatch
SpouseJudith Nevyas Barrett
Children3
WebsiteQuackWatch.org

Stephen Joel Barrett (/ˈbærɪt/; born 1933) is an American retired psychiatrist, author, co-founder of the National Council Against Health Fraud (NCAHF), and the webmaster of Quackwatch. He runs a number of websites dealing with quackery and health fraud. He focuses on consumer protection, medical ethics, and scientific skepticism.

Early life and education

Barrett was born in New York City. He is a 1957 graduate of the Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons and completed his psychiatry residency in 1961. In 1968, he completed part of a correspondence course in American Law and Procedure at La Salle Extension University in Chicago.

Career

Barrett was a practicing physician until retiring from active practice in 1993. As of 2019, his medical license was listed as "Expired" in good standing: "No disciplinary actions were found for this license." A longtime resident of Allentown, Pennsylvania, Barrett now resides in Chapel Hill, North Carolina.

In addition to webmastering his websites, Barrett was a co-founder, vice-president and a board member of the National Council Against Health Fraud (NCAHF). He is a scientific advisor to the American Council on Science and Health, and a fellow of the Committee for Skeptical Inquiry (CSI). From 1987 through 1989, he taught health education at Pennsylvania State University.

Barrett was the consulting editor for the Consumer Health Library at Prometheus Books, and has been a peer-review panelist for two medical journals. He has also served on the editorial board of Medscape and the Scientific Review of Alternative Medicine. According to his website, he "has written more than 2,000 articles and delivered more than 300 talks at colleges, universities, medical schools, and professional meetings. His media appearances include Dateline, Today, Good Morning America, Primetime, Donahue, CNN, National Public Radio, and more than 200 other radio and television talk show interviews."

Quackwatch received the award of Best Physician-Authored Site by MD NetGuide, May 2003. In 1984, he received an FDA Commissioner's Special Citation Award for Public Service in fighting nutrition quackery. He was included in the list of outstanding skeptics of the 20th century by Skeptical Inquirer magazine. In 1986, he was awarded honorary membership in the American Dietetic Association. Barrett has been profiled in Biography Magazine (1998) and in Time (2001).

The magazine Spiked included Barrett in a survey of 134 persons they termed "key thinkers in science, technology and medicine." When he was asked: "What inspired you to take up science?" he replied that his appreciation of medical science:

probably began when I took a college course in medical statistics, and learned what makes the difference between scientific thought and poor reasoning. Medical school brought me in touch with the rapid and amazing strides being made in the understanding and treatment of disease. My anti-quackery activities have intensified my interest and concern in distinguishing science from pseudoscience, quackery and fraud.

Quackwatch

Main article: Quackwatch

The Quackwatch website is Barrett's main platform for describing and exposing what he and other contributors consider to be quackery and health fraud. The website was part of Quackwatch, Inc., a nonprofit corporation founded by Barrett that aims to "combat health-related frauds, myths, fads, fallacies, and misconduct." The non-profit was dissolved in 2008. Barrett's writing is supplemented with contributions from many scientific, technical, and lay volunteers and includes numerous references to published research articles. Barrett defines quackery as "anything involving overpromotion in the field of health," and reserves the word fraud "only for situations in which deliberate deception is involved." Barrett has become a "lightning rod" for controversy as a result of his criticisms of alternative medicine theories and practitioners. Barrett says he does not criticize conventional medicine because that would be "way outside scope." He states he does not give equal time to some subjects, and has written on his web site that "Quackery and fraud don't involve legitimate controversy and are not balanced subjects. I don't believe it is helpful to publish 'balanced' articles about unbalanced subjects." Barrett is at the forefront of exposing questionable aspects of chiropractic.

Barrett is a strong supporter of the HONcode and has made efforts to improve compliance with its rules and to expose those who abuse it.

A number of practitioners and supporters of alternative medicine oppose Barrett and Quackwatch for its criticism of alternative medicine. Donna Ladd, a journalist with The Village Voice, says Barrett relies mostly on negative research to criticize alternative medicine, rejecting most positive case studies as unreliable due to methodological flaws. According to Ladd, Barrett insists that most alternative therapies "simply should be disregarded without further research. 'A lot of things don't need to be tested they simply don't make any sense', he says, pointing to homeopathy, chiropractic, and acupuncture as examples of alternative treatments with no plausible mechanism of action."

Both website reviews and various journal articles mention or use as references Stephen Barrett's Quackwatch as a useful source for consumer information. However, other authors have criticised Quackwatch as being overly biased in its presentation.

In February 2020, Quackwatch became part of the Center for Inquiry. CFI maintains its various websites.

Publications

Barrett's articles include:

  • In 1985, Barrett was the author of the "Commercial hair analysis. Science or scam?" article in the Journal of the American Medical Association that exposed commercial laboratories performing multimineral hair analysis. He commented that in his opinion, "commercial use of hair analysis in this manner is unscientific, economically wasteful, and probably illegal." His report has been cited in later articles, including one which concluded that such testing was "unreliable."
  • "A Close Look at Therapeutic Touch", Rosa L, Rosa E, Sarner L, Barrett SJ. (April 1, 1998). JAMA, Vol. 279, No. 13, pp 1005–1010.

His (co)authored and (co)edited books include:

Collections of articles:

See also

References

  1. Barrett, Stephen (December 21, 2016). "Stephen Barrett, M.D. Curriculum Vitae". Quackwatch. Retrieved February 25, 2017. Wife, Judith Nevyas Barrett, M.D., is a retired family practitioner.
  2. Rosen, Marjorie (October 1998). "Interviews – Stephen Barrett, M.D." Biography Magazine. Retrieved February 25, 2017.
  3. Barrett, Stephen (June 24, 2007). "Curriculum Vitae". Quackwatch. Retrieved July 18, 2007.
  4. "Pennsylvania Department of State; Stephen Barret Medical License Status and standing". Pennsylvania Department of State; to be considered a primary resource. Retrieved November 19, 2015.
  5. Wlazelek, Ann (June 13, 2007). "Allentown critic of quacks moves to 'milder winters'". The Morning Call. Retrieved September 25, 2014.
  6. "Prometheus Books Spring-Summer 2007 Trade Catalog" (PDF). p. 63. Archived from the original (PDF) on November 14, 2006. Retrieved March 29, 2007.
  7. ^ Barrett, Stephen (June 4, 2007). "Stephen Barrett, M.D., Biographical Sketch". Quackwatch. Retrieved August 12, 2007.
  8. Williams, Elaine S (April 21, 1999). "The JAMA 1998 Editorial Peer Review Audit". Journal of the American Medical Association. 281 (15): 1443. doi:10.1001/jama.281.15.1443.
  9. "JAMA Peer Reviewers for 2003". JAMA. 291 (6): 751–764. February 11, 2004. doi:10.1001/jama.291.6.751. S2CID 162455343.
  10. "Thanks to Reviewers-2001". Annals of Internal Medicine. 135 (12): 1098–1106. December 18, 2001. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-135-12-200112180-00033. S2CID 53089455.
  11. Lundberg, GD (1999). "Introducing the Editorial Board of Medscape". MedGenMed: E28. PMID 11104430.
  12. "The Scientific Review of Alternative Medicine". Quackwatch. August 15, 2002. Retrieved February 15, 2015.
  13. Sintay and Hagan. From Farrah Fawcett to Suzanne Somers: Is Alternative Medicine Safe?. Barrett participated on Good Morning America, April 7, 2009.
  14. "Pass the Envelope, Please...: Best Physician- Authored Site". MD Net Guide. May–June 2003. Archived from the original on June 25, 2003. Retrieved April 3, 2009.
  15. ^ Joel R. Cooper. "Consumer Health Fraud...don't be a victim! Interview with Stephen Barrett, M.D." The Medical Reporter. Archived from the original on December 12, 2006.
  16. "Ten Outstanding Skeptics of the Century". Skeptical Inquirer. Archived from the original on July 15, 2007. Retrieved August 12, 2007.
  17. Rosen, Marjorie (October 1998). "Interview with Stephen Barrett, M.D". Biography Magazine. Retrieved August 16, 2007.
  18. ^ Jaroff, Leon (April 30, 2001). "The Man Who Loves To Bust Quacks". Time. Archived from the original on April 6, 2005. Retrieved August 16, 2007.
  19. "What Inspired You? – Index of Survey responses". Spiked-Online. Retrieved July 23, 2007.
  20. "What Inspired You? – Introduction". Spiked-Online. Retrieved July 23, 2007.
  21. ^ Barrett, Stephen. "What Inspired You? – Survey responses – Dr Stephen Barrett". Spiked-Online. Archived from the original on September 20, 2012. Retrieved July 23, 2007.
  22. Baldwin, Fred D. "If It Quacks Like a Duck ..." MedHunters. Archived from the original on February 6, 2008. Retrieved September 16, 2007.
  23. Barrett, Stephen, MD. "Quackwatch mission statement". Quackwatch. Retrieved August 16, 2007.{{cite news}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  24. Barrett, Stephen, MD (January 28, 2003). "150+ Scientific and Technical Advisors". Quackwatch. Retrieved May 21, 2015.{{cite news}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  25. Barrett, Stephen, MD. "Quackery: How Should It Be Defined?". Quackwatch. Retrieved August 16, 2007.{{cite news}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  26. Barrett SJ, Jarvis WT. "Quackery, Fraud and "Alternative" Methods: Important Definitions". Quackwatch. Retrieved August 16, 2007.
  27. ^ Dr. Who? Diagnosing Medical Fraud May Require a Second Opinion. Archived January 23, 2014, at the Wayback Machine by Donna Ladd, The Village Voice, June 23–29, 1999. Retrieved September 2, 2006
  28. Barrett SJ. "How do you respond to accusations that your writing is unbalanced?". Quackwatch. Retrieved August 16, 2007.
  29. Singh S, Ernst E (2008). "The truth about chiropractic therapy". Trick or Treatment: The Undeniable Facts about Alternative Medicine. W.W. Norton. pp. 171–72. ISBN 978-0-393-06661-6.
  30. Christopher Wanjek. Attacking Their HONor: Some Dispute Value of Logo Used to Verify Accuracy, Integrity Of Health Web Site Contents. The Washington Post, April 20, 2004; Page HE01
  31. Hufford, David J. (2003). "Symposium article: Evaluating Complementary and Alternative Medicine: The Limits of Science and Scientists". The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics. 31 (2): 198–212. doi:10.1111/j.1748-720x.2003.tb00081.x. PMID 12964264. S2CID 29859505.. Hufford's symposium presentation was the counterpoint for another doctor's presentation, which argued that "alternative medicine" is not medicine at all. See Schneiderman, Lawrence J. (2003). "Symposium article: The (Alternative) Medicalization of Life". The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics. 31 (2): 191–198. doi:10.1111/j.1748-720x.2003.tb00080.x. PMID 12964263. S2CID 43786245.
  32. Arabella Dymoke (2004). The Good Web Guide. The Good Web Guide Ltd. p. 35. ISBN 978-1-903282-46-5. Quackwatch is without doubt an important and useful information resource and injects a healthy dose of scepticism into reviewing popular health information. Its aim is to investigate questionable claims made in some sectors of what is now a multi-million pound healthcare industry.
  33. Nguyen-Khoa, Bao-Anh (July 1999). "Selected Web Site Reviews — Quackwatch.com". The Consultant Pharmacist. Archived from the original on March 18, 2009. Retrieved June 24, 2013.
  34. "Best of the Web website reviews: Quackwatch". Forbes. Archived from the original on January 14, 2008.
  35. "Diet Channel Award Review Of Quackwatch". Retrieved September 18, 2007. Quackwatch is a very informative site which informs you about health fraud and gives you advice on many decisions.
  36. "The Best of The Web Gets Better". US News. November 7, 1999. Archived from the original on May 24, 2006.
  37. Pray, W. S. (2006). "Ethical, Scientific, and Educational Concerns with Unproven Medications". American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education. 70 (6): 141. doi:10.5688/aj7006141. PMC 1803699. PMID 17332867.
  38. Chonko, Lawrence B. (2004). "If it Walks Like a Duck...: Concerns about Quackery in Marketing Education". Journal of Marketing Education. 26: 4–16. doi:10.1177/0273475303257763. S2CID 167338734. ERIC EJ807197.
  39. Sampson, Wallace; Atwood IV, Kimball (2005). "Propagation of the absurd: Demarcation of the absurd revisited". The Medical Journal of Australia. 183 (11–12): 580–1. doi:10.5694/j.1326-5377.2005.tb00040.x. PMID 16336135. S2CID 43272637.
  40. Cunningham, Eleese; Marcason, Wendy (2001). "Internet hoaxes: How to spot them and how to debunk them". Journal of the American Dietetic Association. 101 (4): 460. doi:10.1016/S0002-8223(01)00117-1.
  41. "Click here: How to find reliable online health information and resources". JAMA. 280 (15): 1380. 1998. doi:10.1001/jama.280.15.1380. PMID 9794323.
  42. Larkin, Marilynn (1998). "Medical quackery squashers on the web". The Lancet. 351 (9114): 1520. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(05)78918-2. S2CID 54300255.
  43. Okasha, Mona (2000). "Quackery on the web – questionable cancer therapies". The Lancet Oncology. 1 (4): 251. doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(00)00162-5.
  44. Cuzzell, Jane. (2000). "Quackwatch: Your Guide to Health Fraud, Quackery, and Intelligent Decisions", Dermatology Nursing, Apr. 2000, p. 134. Accessed 6 November 2019.
  45. Vankevitch, Ned (2002). "Limiting Pluralism". In Ernst, Waltraud (ed.). Plural medicine, tradition and modernity, 1800-2000. New York: Routledge. pp. 219–244. ISBN 978-0-415-23122-0.
  46. Fidalgo, Paul (February 26, 2020). "Quackwatch Joins the Center for Inquiry". Center for Inquiry. Retrieved February 26, 2020.
  47. Barrett SJ (August 23, 1985). Commercial hair analysis. Science or scam? JAMA Vol. 254 No. 8.
  48. Assessment of Commercial Laboratories Performing Hair Mineral Analysis, Seidel S, et al., JAMA. 2001;285:67–72.
  49. Barrett SJ. "Books and book chapters". Quackwatch. Retrieved February 12, 2007.

External links

Categories: