Revision as of 12:45, 18 April 2022 editFlorian Blaschke (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users40,844 edits Restoring remark about AAVE← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 15:32, 6 December 2024 edit undoWolfdog (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users21,765 edits Thurmond audio description | ||
(59 intermediate revisions by 19 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{ |
{{Short description|Former set of American dialects}} | ||
{{Short description|Former set of dialects}} | |||
{{Infobox language | {{Infobox language | ||
| name = Older Southern American English | | name = Older Southern American English | ||
| region = ] | | region = ] | ||
|familycolor=Indo-European | | familycolor = Indo-European | ||
|fam2=] | | fam2 = ] | ||
|fam3=] | | fam3 = ] | ||
|fam4=] | | fam4 = ] | ||
|fam5=] | | fam5 = ] | ||
|fam6=] | | fam6 = ] | ||
|fam7=] | | fam7 = ] | ||
|fam8=] | | fam8 = ] | ||
|fam9=] | | fam9 = ] | ||
|ancestor=] | | ancestor = ] | ||
|ancestor2=] | | ancestor2 = ] | ||
|ancestor3=] | | ancestor3 = ] | ||
| nation = | | nation = | ||
| script = ] | | script = * ] (]) | ||
| isoexception = dialect | | isoexception = dialect | ||
| glotto = none | | glotto = none | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{listen|filename=Strom Thurmond voice.ogg|type=speech|title=Speech example|description=An example of a ] man born in 1902, whose speech contains elements of a non-rhotic Plantation Southern accent (]).}} | |||
'''Older Southern American English''' |
'''Older Southern American English''' is a diverse set of ] of the ] spoken most widely up until the ] of the 1860s, gradually transforming among its ]—possibly first due to postwar economy-driven migrations—up until the mid-20th century.<ref name="Thomas 2006 4">{{Harvcoltxt|Thomas|2006|p=4}}</ref> By then, these local dialects had largely consolidated into, or been replaced by, a more regionally unified ]. Meanwhile, among Black Southerners, these dialects transformed into a fairly stable ], now spoken nationwide among Black people.<ref>{{Cite web|last=Thomas|first=Erik R.|title=Rural White Southern Accents|url=http://www.atlas.mouton-content.com/secure/generalmodules/varieties/unit0000/virtualsession/vslessons/thomas.pdf|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190324140951/http://www.atlas.mouton-content.com/secure/generalmodules/varieties/unit0000/virtualsession/vslessons/thomas.pdf|archive-date=2019-03-24|access-date=2020-12-21|website=]}}</ref> Certain features unique to older Southern U.S. English persist today, like ], though typically only among Black speakers or among very localized White speakers. | ||
Much of ] ] and ] comes from Older Southern American English;<ref>{{Cite web|last=Thomas|first=Erik R.|title=Rural White Southern Accents|url=http://www.atlas.mouton-content.com/secure/generalmodules/varieties/unit0000/virtualsession/vslessons/thomas.pdf|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190324140951/http://www.atlas.mouton-content.com/secure/generalmodules/varieties/unit0000/virtualsession/vslessons/thomas.pdf|archive-date=2019-03-24|access-date=2020-12-21|website=]}}</ref> specifically, Black Vernacular English shares features with the plantation dialect. | |||
==History== | ==History== | ||
This group of ] dialects evolved |
This group of ] dialects evolved over two hundred years from the older varieties of ] primarily spoken by those who initially settled the area. Given that language is an entity that is constantly changing,<ref>Lippi-Green, R. (1997). English with an Accent. New York, New York: Routledge.</ref> the English varieties of the colonists were quite different from any variety of English spoken today. In the early 1600s, the initial English-speaking settlers of the ] of Virginia, the ] in North America, spoke a variety of ], which itself was diverse.<ref>Wolfram, W, & Schilling-Estes, N. (2006). American English. Malden, Massachusetts: Blackwell Publishing.</ref> The older Southern dialects thus originated in varying degrees from a mix of the speech of these and later immigrants from many different regions of the ] who moved to the American South in the 17th and 18th centuries, as well as perhaps the English, creole, and post-creole speech of African and African-American slaves. | ||
One theory of historian ]'s book '']'' is that |
One theory of historian ]'s book '']'' is that indentured servants chiefly from England's ] and ] primarily settled the Tidewater (Virginia) region and poor ] and ] families primarily settled the Appalachian Southern ], so that the Tidewater and backcountry dialects were most directly influenced by those two immigrant populations, respectively.<ref>{{Cite book|title=Albion's Seed: Four British Folkways in America|chapter=From the South of England to Virginia|last=Fischer|first=David Hackett|publisher=OUP USA|year=1992|isbn=978-0195069051|location=On line stores/Public Libraries}}</ref> Indeed, the ] shows such likely immigrant influences as evidenced by, for example, their consistent preservation of ].<ref>{{cite web|last1=Devlin|first1=Thomas Moore|title=The United States of Accents: Southern American English|url=https://www.babbel.com/en/magazine/united-states-of-accents-southern-american-english|website=]|date=December 13, 2017}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|last1=Pool|first1=Jake|title=The Southern Drawl: Breakdown Of An American Accent|url=https://magoosh.com/english-speaking/the-southern-drawl-breakdown-of-an-american-accent/|website=]|date=16 January 2021}}</ref> However, linguists have disputed many of the specifics of Fischer's theory, instead arguing that dialect-mixing in both regions was in fact more varied and widespread.<ref>Kirkpatrick, Routledge (ed.) (2010). ''The Routledge Handbook of World Englishes''. Routledge: London and New York. pp. 97-99.</ref> For example, an '']'' linguistic article reveals the flawed premises and misrepresentation of sources in ''Albion's Seed'' and asserts that the early Southern dialects are actually difficult to trace to any singular influence.<ref name="Ellis1992">{{cite journal|author1=Michael Ellis |title=On the Use of Dialect as Evidence: "Albion's Seed" in Appalachia |journal=Appalachian Journal |date=1992 |volume=19 |issue=3 |pages=278–297 |issn=0090-3779|jstor=40933361}}</ref> | ||
In the decades following the ] of the 1760s to 1780s, major population centers of the coastal American South, such as ], and ], maintained strong commercial and cultural ties to southern England around London. Thus, as the upper-class standard dialect around London changed, some of its features were mirrored by: the dialects of upper-class Americans in eastern Virginia and the Charleston area, followed by the dialects of the surrounding regions in general, regardless of socioeconomic class. One such example accent feature is the "''r''-dropping" (or ]) of the late 18th and early 19th century, resulting in the similar ''r''-dropping found in these American areas during the cultural "]". Contrarily, in Southern areas away from the major coasts and plantations (like Appalachia), on certain isolated islands, and variously among lower-class White speakers, accents mostly remained rhotic. Another example feature is the British-style ], which also helped define the eastern Virginia accent. The split was also adopted in the Gulf, Appalachian, and plantation regions of the South, though with their own articulation distinct from the British one. (The feature is extinct in virtually all these areas today.)<ref name="Thomas 2006 8">{{Harvcoltxt|Thomas|2006|p=8}}</ref> | |||
By the time of the ] in the 1860s, many different Southern accents had developed, |
By the time of the ] in the 1860s, many different Southern accents had developed, namely: eastern Virginia accents (including Tidewater accents), ] (or Charleston) accents, ], Plantation accents (those primarily of the ] region), and ]. | ||
===Decline=== | ===Decline=== | ||
After the Civil War, the growth of timber, coal, railroad, steel, textile, and tobacco mill industries throughout the South, along with the whole country's resulting migration changes, likely contributed to the expansion of a more unified Southern accent (now associated with the 20th century), which gradually ousted 19th-century Southern accents.<ref name="Thomas 2006 4–5">{{Harvcoltxt|Thomas|2006|pp=4–5}}</ref> |
After the Civil War, the growth of timber, coal, railroad, steel, textile, and tobacco mill industries throughout the South, along with the whole country's resulting migration changes, likely contributed to the expansion of a more unified Southern accent (now associated with the 20th century), which gradually ousted 19th-century Southern accents.<ref name="Thomas 2006 4–5">{{Harvcoltxt|Thomas|2006|pp=4–5}}</ref> The South's 19th-century linguistic prestige was rooted in the plantation areas and higher-class White people, including features such as non-rhoticity. However, by the mid-20th century, linguistic features originating from Texas, Appalachian towns, and lower-class White people—such as rhoticity—were suddenly expanding throughout all the Southern States. | ||
Also, before World War II, the demographic tendency of the South was out-migration, but after the war a counter-tendency emerged in the Southern cities, which received masses of migrant workers from the North: another possible motivation for the abandonment of older Southern accent features. Finally, the Civil Rights Movement seems to have led White and Black Southerners alike to resist accent features associated with the other racial group and even develop newly distinguishing features, which may have further contributed to the sudden mid-20th-century adoption of rhoticity among White Southerners of all classes, despite continuing non-rhoticity among Black Americans.<ref name="Thomas 2006 4–5"/> Today, this linguistic divide on the basis of rhoticity, alongside other accent features, largely persists between Black versus White Southerners. | |||
==Phonology== | ==Phonology== | ||
Line 61: | Line 61: | ||
| c'''a'''t, tr'''a'''p, y'''a'''k | | c'''a'''t, tr'''a'''p, y'''a'''k | ||
|- | |- | ||
| }}]] | | |cat=no}}]] | ||
| h'''a'''nd, m'''a'''n, sl'''a'''m | | h'''a'''nd, m'''a'''n, sl'''a'''m | ||
|- | |- | ||
| }}]] | | |cat=no}}]] | ||
| b'''a'''th, c'''a'''n't, p'''a'''ss | | b'''a'''th, c'''a'''n't, p'''a'''ss | ||
|- | |- | ||
Line 92: | Line 92: | ||
|- | |- | ||
| {{IPA|/ɜr/}} | | {{IPA|/ɜr/}} | ||
| {{IPA|}} or <br />{{IPA|}} (non-rhotic |
| {{IPA|}} (non-rhotic before a consonant) or <br />{{IPA|}} (non-rhotic) or <br />{{IPA|}} (rhotic) | ||
| n'''ur'''se, s'''ear'''ch, w'''or'''m | | n'''ur'''se, s'''ear'''ch, w'''or'''m | ||
|- | |- | ||
Line 138: | Line 138: | ||
====Plantation South==== | ====Plantation South==== | ||
] | ] (the Atlantic coast of South Carolina and Georgia).]] | ||
Older speech of the ] included those features above, plus: | Older speech of the ] included those features above, plus: | ||
*Non-rhoticity: ''R''-dropping historically occurred in the greater central sections of Georgia, Alabama, and Mississippi, and in coastal Texas and some other coastal communities of the Gulf states. Rhoticity (or ''r''-fulness) was more likely in the southernmost sections of Georgia, Alabama, and Mississippi, as well as in northern Florida, western Louisiana, and eastern Texas.<ref name="Thomas 2006 16">{{Harvcoltxt|Thomas|2006|p=16}}</ref> | *Non-rhoticity: ''R''-dropping historically occurred in the greater central sections of Georgia, Alabama, and Mississippi, and in coastal Texas and some other coastal communities of the Gulf states. Rhoticity (or ''r''-fulness) was more likely in the southernmost sections of Georgia, Alabama, and Mississippi, as well as in northern Florida, western Louisiana, and eastern Texas.<ref name="Thomas 2006 16">{{Harvcoltxt|Thomas|2006|p=16}}</ref> | ||
Line 146: | Line 146: | ||
*{{IPAc-en|ʌ}}, as in ''strut'', was ].<ref>{{Harvcoltxt|Thomas|2006|p=7}}</ref> | *{{IPAc-en|ʌ}}, as in ''strut'', was ].<ref>{{Harvcoltxt|Thomas|2006|p=7}}</ref> | ||
*{{IPAc-en|ɔɪ}}, as in ''choice'', was {{IPA-all|oɛ~oə|}}.<ref>{{Harvcoltxt|Thomas|2006|p=11}}</ref> | *{{IPAc-en|ɔɪ}}, as in ''choice'', was {{IPA-all|oɛ~oə|}}.<ref>{{Harvcoltxt|Thomas|2006|p=11}}</ref> | ||
*{{IPAc-en|ɝ}}, as in ''nurse'', was predominantly ] {{IPA|}} in the "Deep South" (all the Plantation South except North Carolina).<ref name="Thomas 2006 8"/> | *{{IPAc-en|ɝ}}, as in ''nurse'', was predominantly ] {{IPA|}} in the "Deep South" (all the Plantation South except North Carolina).<ref name="Thomas 2006 8"/> | ||
===Appalachia=== | ===Appalachia=== | ||
{{Main|Appalachian English}} | {{Main|Appalachian English}} | ||
Due to the former isolation of some regions of the ]n South, |
Due to the former isolation of some regions of the ]n South, a unique ] developed. This dialect is rhotic, meaning speakers consistently preserve the historical phoneme {{IPA|/r/}}. Moreover, Appalachians may even ] into certain words (for example, "worsh" or "warsh" for "wash"). | ||
The Southern Appalachian dialect |
The Southern Appalachian dialect could be heard, as its name implies, in ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], and ]. Southern Appalachian speech patterns, however, are not entirely confined to the mountain regions previously listed. | ||
The dialect here is often thought to be a window into the past, with various claims |
The dialect here is often thought to be a window into the past, with various claims having been made that it is either a surviving pocket of Elizabethan English or the way that the ] that make up a large fraction of the population there would have spoken back when they first migrated and settled there. However, these are both incorrect. Though some of the distinctive words used in Appalachia have their origins in the Anglo-Scottish border region, a more realistic comparison is the way that some people in North America would have spoken in the colonial period. | ||
Researchers have noted that the dialect retains a lot of vocabulary with roots in "]" owing to the make-up of the early European settlers to the area.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.wvculture.org/history/journal_wvh/wvh30-2.html |title=The Dialect of the Appalachian People |publisher=Wvculture.org |access-date=2012-11-08}}</ref> | Researchers have noted that the dialect retains a lot of vocabulary with roots in "]" owing to the make-up of the early European settlers to the area.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.wvculture.org/history/journal_wvh/wvh30-2.html |title=The Dialect of the Appalachian People |publisher=Wvculture.org |access-date=2012-11-08 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121023060610/http://www.wvculture.org/history/journal_wvh/wvh30-2.html |archive-date=2012-10-23 |url-status=dead}}</ref> | ||
===Charleston=== | ===Charleston=== | ||
Line 186: | Line 186: | ||
===Piedmont and Tidewater Virginia=== | ===Piedmont and Tidewater Virginia=== | ||
] on the ].]] | ] on the ].]] | ||
The people of the major central (]) and eastern (]) regions of Virginia, excluding Virginia's ], once spoke in a way long associated with the upper or ] ] class in the ] |
The people of the major central (]) and eastern (]) regions of Virginia, excluding Virginia's ], once spoke in a way long associated with the upper or ] ] class in the ]. Additional phonological features of this Atlantic Southern variety included: | ||
*Non-rhoticity (or ''r''-dropping). | *Non-rhoticity (or ''r''-dropping). | ||
*A possibility of both variants of ]: | *A possibility of both variants of ]: | ||
Line 194: | Line 194: | ||
*{{IPAc-en|eɪ}} pronounced as {{IPA|}} in certain words, making ''bake'' sound like "beck", and ''afraid'' like "uh Fred." | *{{IPAc-en|eɪ}} pronounced as {{IPA|}} in certain words, making ''bake'' sound like "beck", and ''afraid'' like "uh Fred." | ||
*{{IPAc-en|uː}} pronounced as {{IPA|}} or {{IPA|}}.<ref name="PEAS"/> | *{{IPAc-en|uː}} pronounced as {{IPA|}} or {{IPA|}}.<ref name="PEAS"/> | ||
*In ] particularly: | *In ] particularly, these further features became associated with the label '''Tidewater accent''': | ||
**{{IPAc-en|ɔr}}, {{IPAc-en|ɔː}}, {{IPAc-en|ɑː}}, and {{IPAc-en|ɑːr}} all potentially merge (as well as a small number of words that have {{IPA|/æ/}} in other American dialects, namely ''aunt'', ''rather'', and, earlier, ''pasture'' |
**{{IPAc-en|ɔr}}, {{IPAc-en|ɔː}}, {{IPAc-en|ɑː}}, and {{IPAc-en|ɑːr}} all potentially merge (as well as a small number of words that have {{IPA|/æ/}} in other American dialects, namely ''aunt'', ''rather'', and, earlier, ''pasture'': an imitation of the British-style ]). The merged vowel is long, low-back, and rounded: {{IPA|}} or {{IPA|}}. Examples words for each traditional phoneme include ''more'', ''maw'', ''ma'', and ''mar'', respectively.<ref name="PEAS"/> | ||
**{{IPAc-en|ɜr}}, as in ''bird, earth, flirt, hurt, word, dirt'', etc. pronounced with |
**{{IPAc-en|ɜr}}, as in ''bird, earth, flirt, hurt, word, dirt'', etc. pronounced with a weak {{IPA|/r/}} consonant as {{IPA|}}, or a less common variant without {{IPA|/r/}}: {{IPA|}}.<ref name="Thomas 2006 8"/> | ||
===Southern Louisiana=== | ===Southern Louisiana=== | ||
Southern ], as well as some of southeast ] (] to ]), and coastal ], feature a number of dialects influenced by other languages beyond English. Most of southern Louisiana constitutes ], dominated for hundreds of years by monolingual speakers of ],<ref name="Dubois 2">Dubois, Sylvia and Barbara Horvath (2004). "Cajun Vernacular English: phonology." In Bernd Kortmann and Edgar W. Schneider (Ed). ''A Handbook of Varieties of English: A Multimedia Reference Tool.'' New York: Mouton de Gruyter. p. 412-4.</ref> which combines elements of ] with other French and Spanish words. This French dialect is spoken by many of the older members of the ] ethnic group and is said to be dying out, although it is experiencing a minor resurgence among younger Franco-Louisianaise. A related language called ] also exists. The older English of Southern Louisiana did not participate in certain general older Southern English phenomena, for example lacking the Plantation South's ] and the fronting of {{IPAc-en|aʊ}}.<ref>{{Harvcoltxt|Thomas|2006|pp=8, 11}}</ref> | Southern ], as well as some of southeast ] (] to ]), and coastal ], feature a number of dialects influenced by other languages beyond English. Most of southern Louisiana constitutes ], dominated for hundreds of years by monolingual speakers of ],<ref name="Dubois 2">Dubois, Sylvia and Barbara Horvath (2004). "Cajun Vernacular English: phonology." In Bernd Kortmann and Edgar W. Schneider (Ed). ''A Handbook of Varieties of English: A Multimedia Reference Tool.'' New York: Mouton de Gruyter. p. 412-4.</ref> which combines elements of ] with other French and Spanish words. This French dialect is spoken by many of the older members of the ] ethnic group and is said to be dying out, although it is experiencing a minor resurgence among younger Franco-Louisianaise. A related language called ] also exists. The older English of Southern Louisiana did not participate in certain general older Southern English phenomena, for example lacking the Plantation South's ] and the fronting of {{IPAc-en|aʊ}}.<ref>{{Harvcoltxt|Thomas|2006|pp=8, 11}}</ref> | ||
] was likely developing in the early |
] was likely developing in the early 20th century, in large part due to ] from New York City migrants in New Orleans. | ||
==Grammar and vocabulary== | ==Grammar and vocabulary== | ||
* Zero copula in third person plural and second person. |
* Zero copula in third person plural and second person. This is historically a consequence of ], with e.g. ''you're'' merging with ''you''. | ||
*:You taller than Louise. | *:You taller than Louise. | ||
*:They gonna leave today (Cukor-Avila, 2003). | *:They gonna leave today (Cukor-Avila, 2003). | ||
Line 219: | Line 219: | ||
==Current projects== | ==Current projects== | ||
A project devised by ] Assistant Professor Dr. Bridget Anderson entitled ''Tidewater Voices: Conversations in Southeastern Virginia'' was initiated in late 2008. |
A project devised by ] Assistant Professor Dr. Bridget Anderson entitled ''Tidewater Voices: Conversations in Southeastern Virginia'' was initiated in late 2008. In collecting oral histories from natives of the area, this study offers insight to not only specific history of the region, but also to linguistic phonetic variants native to the area as well. This linguistic survey is the first of its kind in nearly forty years.<ref>{{cite web|last=Watson |first=Denise |url=http://hamptonroads.com/2009/01/odu-team-records-areas-accent-english-deep-roots |title=ODU team records area's accent - English with 'deep roots' | HamptonRoads.com | PilotOnline.com |publisher=HamptonRoads.com |date=2009-01-22 |access-date=2012-08-06 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150731091934/http://hamptonroads.com/2009/01/odu-team-records-areas-accent-english-deep-roots |archive-date=2015-07-31 |url-status=dead |df=ymd-all}}</ref> The two variants being analyzed the most closely in this study are the {{IPA|/aʊ/}} diphthong as in ''house'' or ''brown'' and post-vocalic ''r''-lessness as in {{IPA|/ˈfɑðə/}} for {{IPA|/ˈfɑðər/}}. | ||
==Notes== | ==Notes== | ||
Line 226: | Line 226: | ||
==References== | ==References== | ||
* {{citation|title=Rural White Southern Accents|first=Erik R.|last=Thomas|publisher=]|work=Atlas of North American English (online)|year=2006|url=http://www.atlas.mouton-content.com/secure/generalmodules/varieties/unit0000/virtualsession/vslessons/thomas.pdf|access-date=2015-07-27|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20141222004531/http://www.atlas.mouton-content.com/secure/generalmodules/varieties/unit0000/virtualsession/vslessons/thomas.pdf|archive-date=2014-12-22|url-status=dead}} | * {{citation|title=Rural White Southern Accents|first=Erik R.|last=Thomas|publisher=]|work=Atlas of North American English (online)|year=2006|url=http://www.atlas.mouton-content.com/secure/generalmodules/varieties/unit0000/virtualsession/vslessons/thomas.pdf|access-date=2015-07-27|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20141222004531/http://www.atlas.mouton-content.com/secure/generalmodules/varieties/unit0000/virtualsession/vslessons/thomas.pdf|archive-date=2014-12-22|url-status=dead}} | ||
* Lippi-Green, Rosina. (1997). ''English with an accent: Language, ideology, and discrimination in the United States''. New York: |
* Lippi-Green, Rosina. (1997). ''English with an accent: Language, ideology, and discrimination in the United States''. New York: Routledge. {{ISBN|9780415114769}}. | ||
*Shores, David L. (2000). Tangier Island: place, people, and talk. Cranbury, New Jersey. |
* Shores, David L. (2000). Tangier Island: place, people, and talk. Cranbury, New Jersey. Associated University Presses. | ||
* Wolfram, W, & Schilling-Estes, N. (2006). American English. Malden, Massachusetts: Blackwell Publishing. | * Wolfram, W, & Schilling-Estes, N. (2006). American English. Malden, Massachusetts: Blackwell Publishing. | ||
==External links== | ==External links== | ||
* a ] native, featured in the ] Linguistics program . | * a ] native, featured in the ] Linguistics program . | ||
* ] Library] | * | ||
* | * | ||
* at ] | * at ] | ||
* | * | ||
{{English dialects by continent}} | {{English dialects by continent}} |
Latest revision as of 15:32, 6 December 2024
Former set of American dialectsOlder Southern American English | |
---|---|
Region | Southern United States |
Language family | Indo-European
|
Early forms | Old English |
Writing system | |
Language codes | |
ISO 639-3 | – |
Glottolog | None |
Problems playing this file? See media help.
Older Southern American English is a diverse set of English dialects of the Southern United States spoken most widely up until the American Civil War of the 1860s, gradually transforming among its White speakers—possibly first due to postwar economy-driven migrations—up until the mid-20th century. By then, these local dialects had largely consolidated into, or been replaced by, a more regionally unified Southern American English. Meanwhile, among Black Southerners, these dialects transformed into a fairly stable African-American Vernacular English, now spoken nationwide among Black people. Certain features unique to older Southern U.S. English persist today, like non-rhoticity, though typically only among Black speakers or among very localized White speakers.
History
This group of American English dialects evolved over two hundred years from the older varieties of British English primarily spoken by those who initially settled the area. Given that language is an entity that is constantly changing, the English varieties of the colonists were quite different from any variety of English spoken today. In the early 1600s, the initial English-speaking settlers of the Tidewater area of Virginia, the first permanent English colony in North America, spoke a variety of Early Modern English, which itself was diverse. The older Southern dialects thus originated in varying degrees from a mix of the speech of these and later immigrants from many different regions of the British Isles who moved to the American South in the 17th and 18th centuries, as well as perhaps the English, creole, and post-creole speech of African and African-American slaves.
One theory of historian David Hackett Fischer's book Albion's Seed is that indentured servants chiefly from England's South and Midlands primarily settled the Tidewater (Virginia) region and poor Northern English and Ulster Scots families primarily settled the Appalachian Southern backcountry, so that the Tidewater and backcountry dialects were most directly influenced by those two immigrant populations, respectively. Indeed, the Appalachian dialect shows such likely immigrant influences as evidenced by, for example, their consistent preservation of rhoticity. However, linguists have disputed many of the specifics of Fischer's theory, instead arguing that dialect-mixing in both regions was in fact more varied and widespread. For example, an Appalachian Journal linguistic article reveals the flawed premises and misrepresentation of sources in Albion's Seed and asserts that the early Southern dialects are actually difficult to trace to any singular influence.
In the decades following the American Revolution of the 1760s to 1780s, major population centers of the coastal American South, such as Norfolk, Virginia, and Charleston, South Carolina, maintained strong commercial and cultural ties to southern England around London. Thus, as the upper-class standard dialect around London changed, some of its features were mirrored by: the dialects of upper-class Americans in eastern Virginia and the Charleston area, followed by the dialects of the surrounding regions in general, regardless of socioeconomic class. One such example accent feature is the "r-dropping" (or non-rhoticity) of the late 18th and early 19th century, resulting in the similar r-dropping found in these American areas during the cultural "Old South". Contrarily, in Southern areas away from the major coasts and plantations (like Appalachia), on certain isolated islands, and variously among lower-class White speakers, accents mostly remained rhotic. Another example feature is the British-style trap–bath split, which also helped define the eastern Virginia accent. The split was also adopted in the Gulf, Appalachian, and plantation regions of the South, though with their own articulation distinct from the British one. (The feature is extinct in virtually all these areas today.)
By the time of the American Civil War in the 1860s, many different Southern accents had developed, namely: eastern Virginia accents (including Tidewater accents), Lowcountry (or Charleston) accents, Appalachian accents, Plantation accents (those primarily of the Black Belt region), and accents in the secluded Pamlico and Chesapeake islands.
Decline
After the Civil War, the growth of timber, coal, railroad, steel, textile, and tobacco mill industries throughout the South, along with the whole country's resulting migration changes, likely contributed to the expansion of a more unified Southern accent (now associated with the 20th century), which gradually ousted 19th-century Southern accents. The South's 19th-century linguistic prestige was rooted in the plantation areas and higher-class White people, including features such as non-rhoticity. However, by the mid-20th century, linguistic features originating from Texas, Appalachian towns, and lower-class White people—such as rhoticity—were suddenly expanding throughout all the Southern States.
Also, before World War II, the demographic tendency of the South was out-migration, but after the war a counter-tendency emerged in the Southern cities, which received masses of migrant workers from the North: another possible motivation for the abandonment of older Southern accent features. Finally, the Civil Rights Movement seems to have led White and Black Southerners alike to resist accent features associated with the other racial group and even develop newly distinguishing features, which may have further contributed to the sudden mid-20th-century adoption of rhoticity among White Southerners of all classes, despite continuing non-rhoticity among Black Americans. Today, this linguistic divide on the basis of rhoticity, alongside other accent features, largely persists between Black versus White Southerners.
Phonology
This section contains phonetic transcriptions in the International Phonetic Alphabet (IPA). For an introductory guide on IPA symbols, see Help:IPA. For the distinction between , / / and ⟨ ⟩, see IPA § Brackets and transcription delimiters.General Older South
The phonologies of early Southern English in the United States were diverse. The following pronunciation features were very generally characteristic of the older Southern region as a whole:
English diaphoneme | Old Southern phoneme | Example words |
---|---|---|
/aɪ/ | bride, prize, tie | |
bright, price, tyke | ||
/æ/ | (or , often before /d/) | cat, trap, yak |
hand, man, slam | ||
bath, can't, pass | ||
/aʊ/ | mouth, ow, sound | |
/ɑː/ | or | father, laager, palm |
/ɑr/ | (non-rhotic) or (rhotic) |
ark, heart, start |
/ɒ/ | bother, lot, wasp | |
/eɪ/ | or (plantation possibility) |
face, rein, play |
/ɛ/ | (or , often before /d/) | dress, egg, head |
/ɜr/ | (non-rhotic before a consonant) or (non-rhotic) or (rhotic) |
nurse, search, worm |
/iː/ | fleece, me, neat | |
/ɪ/ | kit, mid, pick | |
happy, money, sari | ||
/oʊ/ | (after late 1800s) or (plantation possibility) |
goat, no, throw |
/ɔ/ | thought, vault, yawn | |
cloth, lost, off | ||
/ɔɪ/ | or (plantation possibility) |
choice, joy, loin |
/ʌ/ | or (plantation possibility) |
strut, tough, won |
- Lack of Yod-dropping: Pairs like do and due, or toon and tune, were often distinct in these dialects because words like due, lute, new, etc. historically contained a diphthong similar to /ju/ (like the you sound in cute or puny). (as England's RP standard pronunciation still does), but Labov et al. report that the only Southern speakers who make a distinction today use a diphthong /ɪu/ in such words. They further report that speakers with the distinction are found primarily in North Carolina and northwest South Carolina, and in a corridor extending from Jackson to Tallahassee. For most of the South, this feature began disappearing after World War II.
- Yod-coalescence: Words like dew were pronounced as "Jew", and Tuesday as "choose day."
- Wine–whine distinction: distinction between "w" and "wh" in words like "wine" and "whine", "witch and "which", etc.
- Horse–hoarse distinction: distinction between pairs of words like "horse" and "hoarse", "for" and "four", etc.
- Rhoticity and non-rhoticity: The pronunciation of the r sound only before or between vowels, but not after vowels, is known as non-rhoticity and was historically associated with the major plantation regions of the South: specifically, the entire Piedmont and most of the South's Atlantic Coast in a band going west towards the Mississippi River, as well as all of the Mississippi Embayment and some of the western Gulf Coastal Plain. This was presumably influenced by the non-rhotic East Anglia and London England pronunciation. Additionally, some older Southern dialects were even "variably non-rhotic in intra-word intervocalic contexts, as in carry ." Rhotic accents of the older Southern dialects, which fully pronounce all historical r sounds, were somewhat rarer and primarily spoken in Appalachia, the eastern Gulf Coastal Plain, and the areas west of the Mississippi Embayment.
- Palatalization of /k/ and /g/ before /ɑr/: Especially in the older South along the Atlantic Coast, the consonants /k/ (as in key or coo) and /ɡ/ (as in guy or go), when before the sound /ɑːr/ (as in car or barn), were often pronounced with the tongue fronted towards the hard palate. Thus, for example, garden in older Southern was something like "gyah(r)den" and "cart" like "kyah(r)t" . This pronunciation feature was in decline by the late 1800s.
- Lack or near-lack of /aɪ/ glide weakening: The gliding vowel in words like prize (but less commonly in price or other situations of this vowel appearing before a voiceless consonant) commonly has a "weakened" glide today in the South; however, this only became a documented feature since the last quarter of the 1800s and was otherwise absent or inconsistent in earlier Southern dialects. Today, the lack of glide weakening persists in the High Tider and updated Lowcountry accents. Full weakening has become a defining feature only of the modern Southern dialects, particularly the most advanced sub-varieties.
- Mary–marry–merry distinction: Unlike most of the U.S. and modern Southern, older Southern did not merge the following three vowels before /r/: (as in Mary), (as in marry), and (as in merry). Although the three are now merging or merged in modern Southern English, the "marry" class of words remains the least likely among modern Southerners to merge with the other two.
- Clear /l/ between front vowels: Unlike modern Southern and General American English's universally "dark" /l/ sound (often represented as ), older Southern pronunciation had a "clear" (i.e. non-velarized) /l/ sound whenever /l/ appears between front vowels, as in the words silly, mealy, Nellie, etc.
- Was, what and of pronounced with : The stressed word what, for example, rhymed with cot (not with cut, as it does elsewhere in the U.S.).
- No happy-tensing: The final vowel of words like happy, silly, monkey, parties, etc. were not tensed as they are in newer Southern and other U.S. dialects, meaning that this vowel sounded more like the of fit than the of feet.
- /oʊ/, as in goat, toe, robe, etc., kept a back starting place (unlike most Southern since World War II, but like most Northern U.S. dialects today); this became an opener in the early 1900s. The modern fronted form of the Atlantic South started as far back as the 1800s in northeastern North Carolina, in the form , but only spread slowly, until accelerating after World War II.
- /ʃr/ pronounced as (e.g. causing shrimp, shrub, etc. to sound like srimp, srub, etc.); this feature was reported earliest in Virginia.
Plantation South
Older speech of the Plantation South included those features above, plus:
- Non-rhoticity: R-dropping historically occurred in the greater central sections of Georgia, Alabama, and Mississippi, and in coastal Texas and some other coastal communities of the Gulf states. Rhoticity (or r-fulness) was more likely in the southernmost sections of Georgia, Alabama, and Mississippi, as well as in northern Florida, western Louisiana, and eastern Texas.
- Trap–bath split: Words like bath, dance, and ask, used a different vowel () than words like trap, cat, and rag (). A similarly organized (though different-sounding) split occurs in Standard British English.
- /eɪ/, as in face, was inconsistently pronounced [e̝ː].
- /oʊ/, as in goat, was inconsistently pronounced [o̝ː].
- /ʌ/, as in strut, was conservative.
- /ɔɪ/, as in choice, was [oɛ~oə].
- /ɜːr/, as in nurse, was predominantly up-gliding, non-rhotic in the "Deep South" (all the Plantation South except North Carolina).
Appalachia
Main article: Appalachian EnglishDue to the former isolation of some regions of the Appalachian South, a unique Appalachian accent developed. This dialect is rhotic, meaning speakers consistently preserve the historical phoneme /r/. Moreover, Appalachians may even insert it innovatively into certain words (for example, "worsh" or "warsh" for "wash").
The Southern Appalachian dialect could be heard, as its name implies, in north Georgia, north Alabama, east Tennessee, northwestern South Carolina, western North Carolina, eastern Kentucky, southwestern Virginia, western Maryland, and West Virginia. Southern Appalachian speech patterns, however, are not entirely confined to the mountain regions previously listed.
The dialect here is often thought to be a window into the past, with various claims having been made that it is either a surviving pocket of Elizabethan English or the way that the people of Scotch-Irish origin that make up a large fraction of the population there would have spoken back when they first migrated and settled there. However, these are both incorrect. Though some of the distinctive words used in Appalachia have their origins in the Anglo-Scottish border region, a more realistic comparison is the way that some people in North America would have spoken in the colonial period.
Researchers have noted that the dialect retains a lot of vocabulary with roots in "Early Modern English" owing to the make-up of the early European settlers to the area.
Charleston
The Lowcountry, most famously centering on the cities of Charleston, South Carolina and Savannah, Georgia, once constituted its own entirely unique English dialect region. Traditionally often recognized as a Charleston accent, it included these additional features, most of which no longer exist today:
- Cheer–chair merger towards .
- Non-rhoticity (or r-dropping).
- A possibility of both variants of Canadian raising:
- /eɪ/ pronounced as in a closed syllable, in an open syllable.
- /oʊ/ pronounced as in a closed syllable, in an open syllable.
- /ɔː/ pronounced as .
- /ɑː/ pronounced as , with possible remnant pronunciations using even older .
- /ɜːr/ pronounced as , or possibly
- /uː/ pronounced as or .
Pamlico and Chesapeake
Main article: High TiderThe "Down East" Outer Banks coastal region of Carteret County, North Carolina, and adjacent Pamlico Sound, including Ocracoke and Harkers Island, are known for additional features, some of which are still spoken today by generations-long residents of its unincorporated coastal and island communities, which have largely been geographically and economically isolated from the rest of North Carolina and the South since their first settlement by English-speaking Europeans. The same is true for the very similar dialect area of the Delmarva (Delaware–Maryland–Virginia) Peninsula and neighboring islands in the Chesapeake Bay, such as Tangier and Smith Island. These two regions historically share many common pronunciation features, sometimes collectively called a High Tider (or "Hoi Toider") accent, including:
- Rhoticity (or r-fulness, like in most U.S. English, but unlike in most other older Atlantic Southern dialects)
- /aɪ/, such as the vowel in the words high tide, retaining its glide and being pronounced beginning further back in the mouth, as or even rounded , often stereotyped as sounding like "hoi toid," giving Pamlico Sound's residents the name "High Tiders."
- /æ/ is raised to (so cattle sounds like kettle); /ɛ/ is raised to (so that mess sounds like miss); and, most prominently, /ɪ/ is raised to (so fish sounds like feesh). This mirrors the second and third stages of the Southern Vowel Shift (see under "Newer phonology"), despite this particular accent never participating in the very first stage of the shift.
- /ɔː/ pronounced as , similar to modern Australian or London English.
- /aʊ/, as in loud, town, scrounge, etc., pronounced with a fronted glide as . Before a voiceless consonant, this same phoneme is .
- /ɛər/, as in chair, square, bear, etc., as .
- Card–cord merger since at least the 1800s in the Delmarva Peninsula.
Piedmont and Tidewater Virginia
The people of the major central (Piedmont) and eastern (Tidewater) regions of Virginia, excluding Virginia's Eastern Shore, once spoke in a way long associated with the upper or aristocratic plantation class in the Old South. Additional phonological features of this Atlantic Southern variety included:
- Non-rhoticity (or r-dropping).
- A possibility of both variants of Canadian raising:
- /ɛər/ pronounced as .
- /eɪ/ pronounced as in certain words, making bake sound like "beck", and afraid like "uh Fred."
- /uː/ pronounced as or .
- In Virginia's Tidewater region particularly, these further features became associated with the label Tidewater accent:
- /ɔːr/, /ɔː/, /ɑː/, and /ɑːr/ all potentially merge (as well as a small number of words that have /æ/ in other American dialects, namely aunt, rather, and, earlier, pasture: an imitation of the British-style trap-bath split). The merged vowel is long, low-back, and rounded: or . Examples words for each traditional phoneme include more, maw, ma, and mar, respectively.
- /ɜːr/, as in bird, earth, flirt, hurt, word, dirt, etc. pronounced with a weak /r/ consonant as , or a less common variant without /r/: .
Southern Louisiana
Southern Louisiana, as well as some of southeast Texas (Houston to Beaumont), and coastal Mississippi, feature a number of dialects influenced by other languages beyond English. Most of southern Louisiana constitutes Acadiana, dominated for hundreds of years by monolingual speakers of Cajun French, which combines elements of Acadian French with other French and Spanish words. This French dialect is spoken by many of the older members of the Cajun ethnic group and is said to be dying out, although it is experiencing a minor resurgence among younger Franco-Louisianaise. A related language called Louisiana Creole also exists. The older English of Southern Louisiana did not participate in certain general older Southern English phenomena, for example lacking the Plantation South's trap–bath split and the fronting of /aʊ/.
New Orleans English was likely developing in the early 20th century, in large part due to dialect influence from New York City migrants in New Orleans.
Grammar and vocabulary
- Zero copula in third person plural and second person. This is historically a consequence of R-dropping, with e.g. you're merging with you.
- You taller than Louise.
- They gonna leave today (Cukor-Avila, 2003).
- Use of the circumfix a- . . . -in' in progressive tenses.
- He was a-hootin' and a-hollerin'.
- The wind was a-howlin'.
- The use of like to to mean nearly.
- I like to had a heart attack. (I nearly had a heart attack)
- The use of the simple past infinitive vs present perfect infinitive.
- I like to had. vs I like to have had.
- We were supposed to went. vs We were supposed to have gone.
- Use of "yonder" as a locative in addition to its more widely attested use as an adjective.
- They done gathered a mess of raspberries in them woods down yonder.
Current projects
A project devised by Old Dominion University Assistant Professor Dr. Bridget Anderson entitled Tidewater Voices: Conversations in Southeastern Virginia was initiated in late 2008. In collecting oral histories from natives of the area, this study offers insight to not only specific history of the region, but also to linguistic phonetic variants native to the area as well. This linguistic survey is the first of its kind in nearly forty years. The two variants being analyzed the most closely in this study are the /aʊ/ diphthong as in house or brown and post-vocalic r-lessness as in /ˈfɑðə/ for /ˈfɑðər/.
Notes
- Thomas (2006:4)
- Thomas, Erik R. "Rural White Southern Accents" (PDF). De Gruyter. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2019-03-24. Retrieved 2020-12-21.
- Lippi-Green, R. (1997). English with an Accent. New York, New York: Routledge.
- Wolfram, W, & Schilling-Estes, N. (2006). American English. Malden, Massachusetts: Blackwell Publishing.
- Fischer, David Hackett (1992). "From the South of England to Virginia". Albion's Seed: Four British Folkways in America. On line stores/Public Libraries: OUP USA. ISBN 978-0195069051.
- Devlin, Thomas Moore (December 13, 2017). "The United States of Accents: Southern American English". Babbel.
- Pool, Jake (16 January 2021). "The Southern Drawl: Breakdown Of An American Accent". Magoosh.
- Kirkpatrick, Routledge (ed.) (2010). The Routledge Handbook of World Englishes. Routledge: London and New York. pp. 97-99.
- Michael Ellis (1992). "On the Use of Dialect as Evidence: "Albion's Seed" in Appalachia". Appalachian Journal. 19 (3): 278–297. ISSN 0090-3779. JSTOR 40933361.
- ^ Thomas (2006:8)
- ^ Thomas (2006:4–5)
- ^ Thomas (2006:7–14)
- Even in 2012 Random House Dictionary labels due, new and tune as having the /yu/ sound as a variant pronunciation.
- Labov, Ash & Boberg (2006:53–54) harvcoltxt error: no target: CITEREFLabovAshBoberg2006 (help)
- ^ Thomas (2006:17)
- Thomas (2006:3, 16)
- Thomas (2006:10–11)
- Thomas (2006:15)
- ^ Thomas (2006:6)
- ^ Thomas (2006:10)
- Thomas (2006:18)
- Thomas (2006:16)
- ^ Thomas (2006:9)
- Thomas (2006:7)
- Thomas (2006:11)
- "The Dialect of the Appalachian People". Wvculture.org. Archived from the original on 2012-10-23. Retrieved 2012-11-08.
- Labov, Ash & Boberg (2006:259–260) harvcoltxt error: no target: CITEREFLabovAshBoberg2006 (help)
- ^ Thomas (2006:12)
- ^ Thomas (2006:11–12)
- ^ Kurath, Hans; MacDavid, Raven Ioor. The pronunciation of English in the Atlantic States. Vol. 3. University of Michigan Press, 1961. HathiTrust. pp. 18-22.
- Thomas (2006:4, 11)
- Wolfram, Walt (1997). Hoi Toide on the Outer Banks: The Story of the Ocracoke Brogue. University of North Carolina Press. p. 61.
- Dubois, Sylvia and Barbara Horvath (2004). "Cajun Vernacular English: phonology." In Bernd Kortmann and Edgar W. Schneider (Ed). A Handbook of Varieties of English: A Multimedia Reference Tool. New York: Mouton de Gruyter. p. 412-4.
- Thomas (2006:8, 11)
- Watson, Denise (2009-01-22). "ODU team records area's accent - English with 'deep roots' | HamptonRoads.com | PilotOnline.com". HamptonRoads.com. Archived from the original on 2015-07-31. Retrieved 2012-08-06.
References
- Thomas, Erik R. (2006), "Rural White Southern Accents" (PDF), Atlas of North American English (online), Walter de Gruyter, archived from the original (PDF) on 2014-12-22, retrieved 2015-07-27
- Lippi-Green, Rosina. (1997). English with an accent: Language, ideology, and discrimination in the United States. New York: Routledge. ISBN 9780415114769.
- Shores, David L. (2000). Tangier Island: place, people, and talk. Cranbury, New Jersey. Associated University Presses.
- Wolfram, W, & Schilling-Estes, N. (2006). American English. Malden, Massachusetts: Blackwell Publishing.
External links
- Example of an old Virginia accent spoken by a Richmond, Virginia native, featured in the George Mason University Linguistics program Speech Accent Archive.
- "Virginia’s Many Voices", Fairfax County, Virginia Library
- International Dialects of English Archive, "Dialects Of Virginia"
- "A National Map of the Regional Dialects of American English," by William Labov, Sharon Ash and Charles Boberg, The Linguistics Laboratory in the Department of Linguistics at University of Pennsylvania
- Hamptonroads.com
Dialects and accents of Modern English by continent | |||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Europe |
| ||||||||||||||||||
Americas |
| ||||||||||||||||||
Oceania |
| ||||||||||||||||||
Africa | |||||||||||||||||||
Asia |
| ||||||||||||||||||
Related |
|