Revision as of 02:55, 24 February 2024 editJenna.Hill1 (talk | contribs)15 edits →Update this page to keep up with current Research: new sectionTag: New topic← Previous edit |
Latest revision as of 04:30, 7 December 2024 edit undoDriesmand1 (talk | contribs)43 edits Update Human Anatomy Lecture assignment detailsTag: dashboard.wikiedu.org [2.3] |
(44 intermediate revisions by 20 users not shown) |
Line 1: |
Line 1: |
|
{{Talk header}} |
|
{{Talk header}} |
|
{{British-English}} |
|
{{British English}} |
|
{{Article history |
|
{{Article history |
|
|action1=GAN |
|
|action1=GAN |
Line 43: |
Line 43: |
|
}} |
|
}} |
|
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=B|collapsed=yes|vital=yes|listas=Alzheimer's disease|1= |
|
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=B|collapsed=yes|vital=yes|listas=Alzheimer's disease|1= |
|
{{WikiProject Medicine|importance=Top|neurology=yes|neurology-imp=Top|translation=yes|translation-imp=high|psychiatry=yes|psychiatry-imp=mid|dyk=yes|needs-infobox=no|needs-photo=no}} |
|
{{WikiProject Medicine|importance=Top|neurology=yes|neurology-imp=Top|translation=yes|translation-imp=high|psychiatry=yes|psychiatry-imp=mid|dyk=yes|needs-infobox=no|needs-image=no}} |
|
{{WikiProject Neuroscience|importance=High}} |
|
{{WikiProject Neuroscience|importance=High}} |
|
{{WikiProject Cognitive science}} |
|
{{WikiProject Cognitive science}} |
|
{{WikiProject Disability}} |
|
{{WikiProject Disability}} |
|
{{WikiProject Spoken Misplaced Pages|1=Alzheimer's Disease.ogg}} |
|
{{WikiProject Spoken Misplaced Pages}} |
|
}} |
|
}} |
|
{{Reliable sources for medical articles|synonym1=Alzheimer's+disease|synonym2=Alzheimer+disease}} |
|
{{Reliable sources for medical articles|synonym1=Alzheimer's+disease|synonym2=Alzheimer+disease}} |
|
{{banner holder|collapsed=yes| |
|
{{banner holder|collapsed=yes| |
|
{{mergedfrom|Retrogenesis}} |
|
{{Merged-from|Retrogenesis}} |
|
{{Backwards copy |
|
{{Backwards copy |
|
| title = Alzheimer’s Disease: A Review |
|
| title = Alzheimer’s Disease: A Review |
Line 78: |
Line 78: |
|
}} |
|
}} |
|
|
|
|
|
|
==Wiki Education assignment: Perception== |
|
== Alzheimer's disease and oral health == |
|
|
|
{{dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment | course = Misplaced Pages:Wiki_Ed/New_York_University/Perception_(Spring_2024) | assignments = ] | reviewers = ] | start_date = 2024-01-22 | end_date = 2024-05-11 }} |
|
This Misplaced Pages article doesn't mention the in the development of Alzheimer's disease. ] (]) 19:24, 20 September 2023 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<span class="wikied-assignment" style="font-size:85%;">— Assignment last updated by ] (]) 03:49, 10 May 2024 (UTC)</span> |
|
:Misplaced Pages typically uses ] to source content. If you can access the full content of {{PMID|32097126}}, which is a 2020 secondary review, it might be useful. ] (]) 19:43, 20 September 2023 (UTC) |
|
|
::{{reply to|SandyGeorgia}} The article also doesn't mention the in the development of this disease. Should any of these hypotheses be mentioned in ]? ] (]) 05:23, 7 December 2023 (UTC) |
|
|
:::It's probably ] unless there is a lot more than scattered primary sources. ] (]) 23:07, 7 December 2023 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hello! I previously edited this article for a course (also affiliated with Wiki Education) and have been keeping tabs on it as much as I could. At the time, I learned that we should avoid using documents such as the DSM to avoid copyright strikes. I noticed that after some edits to this article, the DSM itself is directly cited over a scientific review article discussing it (specifically in the Diagnosis (criteria) section). I wanted to ask about whether we could remove it, or if my understanding was incorrect. I am still learning so I hope this question isn't too bothersome! Thank you in advance! ] (]) 19:15, 15 August 2024 (UTC) |
|
==Media == |
|
|
Hello everyone! I'm a student at BYU-I. I am in Adult Development this semester and we are helping with wikipedia articles! I am so excited to learn. This is all in my own opinion and do not plan on changing anything, I just want to put this out there. The media section of this article seems a little random and unneeded. Is there a reason why that sections is in there? I think it would make more since to just take it out because it does not add to the facts of AD it's just a very random section of information people do not need to understand this disease. Again I do not plan on changing anything, Thank you for your time and keep up the great work! ] (]) 16:20, 23 September 2023 (UTC) |
|
|
: See ]. I would agree that reducing it to non-primary source mentions would be appropriate. ] (]) 16:24, 23 September 2023 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
== Computer-aided diagnosis == |
|
== Source - Life span == |
|
{{reply to|SandyGeorgia}} I added ] describing computer-aided diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease. Do we need consensus in order to include this topic in the article? ] (]) 05:41, 7 December 2023 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Broken link. ] (]) 23:31, 8 May 2024 (UTC) |
|
:Do you have any secondary sources? I've never seen it mentioned in a broad overview, making it UNDUE here. ] (]) 05:57, 7 December 2023 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
:Thanks for reporting, I've fixed it by replacing the original reference with some newer and more precise ones. ] (]) 22:06, 9 May 2024 (UTC) |
|
== Cause of Alzheimer’s == |
|
|
|
== "]" listed at ] == |
|
|
] |
|
|
The redirect <span class="plainlinks"></span> has been listed at ] to determine whether its use and function meets the ]. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at '''{{slink|Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 May 21#Brain rot}}''' until a consensus is reached. <!-- Template:RFDNote --> ] (]) 23:27, 21 May 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
== Amyloid beta theory under scrutiny == |
|
Not able to be sure, as I have not talk with anyone about this, but I am guessing that Alzheimer’s is caused by another person dying, like their lover or the flu shot for most occasions. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Should the article be updated to reflect the doubts about the amyloid beta plaque theory? The paper on which that theory is based is under investigation for fraud now. Source: |
|
Why do I say this? It is because, if I was told correctly, white blood cells end up expanding to ten times the area of what it was when it was alive. That could be a big problem if they are stored in the mind. It would cause the person to have problems using their brain in the area that the fat was at if the white blood cells died, which would happen if the person it came from passed away. |
|
|
|
https://www.science.org/content/article/potential-fabrication-research-images-threatens-key-theory-alzheimers-disease ] (]) 19:32, 25 May 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
:As described in ], the consensus seems to be that the alleged manipulation would not invalidate most of the research into the amyloid hypothesis. But since the report and the consequences have garnered significant attention from researchers as well as the general public, it would perhaps be a good improvement to mention it briefly in the ]. What do you think @]? (pinging you since you wrote most of the content covering this investigation). ] (]) 21:30, 2 June 2024 (UTC) |
|
Another thing is do we store them in our brains or somewhere else? I know we keep them in our bodies because we get healthier and do not loose it. If we did we would feel noticeable feelings of weaker, tired, and sickness but only if the person that it came from dies. |
|
|
|
::Thanks for the ping ... I agree with Bendeguz Acs that the sources indicate the alleged manipulation has little impact on most research, hence is not worthy of mention in the main article. As to whether it warrants a mention in the History section, my approach (particularly for a former ]) is to include only that which has been covered by secondary overall literature reviews -- the Lesne/Ashe issue has not risen to that level yet. Since this article has fallen from FA status, I won't strenuously object if it is added to History, but the standard I prefer is to base History on mention in overall literature reviews of the condition. ] (]) 15:37, 3 June 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
'''Update''': {{u|Bendegúz Ács}} considering this (and the at ]), it seems there is some disagreement as to whether the findings cast doubt upon the prevailing amyloid hypothesis. Considering this is the most highly cited paper ever retracted, perhaps a one- or two- sentence summary at ] is warranted? I'm out of time for today, and although I did (partially) update Lesné, I haven't yet updated ], in case you have time to work there -- I am going to be fairly busy through Friday. Thanks for keeping up with this! I still don't find it necessary to make changes to this article, as we don't overplay the amyloid hypothesis here, and it is covered in detail at the Biochemistry of article. ] (]) 02:50, 5 June 2024 (UTC) |
|
We do not make another persons white blood cells either, so we have to store them somewhere in our bodies. If we made them we would be clearer in the output of our cum the stronger we got. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
:I've also been busy, but I saw you made edits in both of those pages, I've reviewed them and they're great! I agree that ] is a good place to mention the retraction now. ] (]) 09:09, 8 June 2024 (UTC) |
|
Also it would not be noticeable right away, because it would take time for the white blood cells to expand. They might want to ask look into asking people that either have had it or know people that had it to see how long it would take for the Alzheimer’s to set in after the maker of the white blood cells had passed. ] (]) 08:51, 31 December 2023 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
==Wiki Education assignment: English 102 Section 6== |
|
==Wiki Education assignment: Human Anatomy Lecture== |
|
{{dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment | course = Misplaced Pages:Wiki_Ed/Allen_University/English_102_Section_6_(Spring_2024) | assignments = ] | start_date = 2024-01-09 | end_date = 2024-05-03 }} |
|
{{dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment | course = Misplaced Pages:Wiki_Ed/University_of_Dayton/Human_Anatomy_Lecture_(Fall_2024) | assignments = ] | reviewers = ] | start_date = 2024-08-19 | end_date = 2024-12-06 }} |
|
|
|
|
|
<span class="wikied-assignment" style="font-size:85%;">— Assignment last updated by ] (]) 17:33, 19 February 2024 (UTC)</span> |
|
<span class="wikied-assignment" style="font-size:85%;">— Assignment last updated by ] (]) 04:30, 7 December 2024 (UTC)</span> |
|
|
|
|
== Update this page to keep up with current Research == |
|
|
|
|
|
I have been looking at "Management" section of this article and it seems to need some help keeping up with current research of what treatment options are available whether they are options such as medications, caregiving options, etc. ] (]) 02:55, 24 February 2024 (UTC) |
|
Hello! I previously edited this article for a course (also affiliated with Wiki Education) and have been keeping tabs on it as much as I could. At the time, I learned that we should avoid using documents such as the DSM to avoid copyright strikes. I noticed that after some edits to this article, the DSM itself is directly cited over a scientific review article discussing it (specifically in the Diagnosis (criteria) section). I wanted to ask about whether we could remove it, or if my understanding was incorrect. I am still learning so I hope this question isn't too bothersome! Thank you in advance! Bharatss-SB (talk) 19:15, 15 August 2024 (UTC)