| Revision as of 12:09, 7 December 2024 editMiminity (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers9,476 edits →Does anyone speak Japanese?Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit← Previous edit | Revision as of 16:19, 7 December 2024 edit undoErynamrod (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users519 edits →Does anyone speak Japanese?: ReplyTag: ReplyNext edit → | ||
| Line 47: | Line 47: | ||
| :Note that I can only read and understand some of it. The "Japan" section on the Criticism is okay. (The english NHK source already confirms it). Though I hope a more proficient than me looks into it though. '''''Warm Regards''''', ] (]) (]) 12:07, 7 December 2024 (UTC) | :Note that I can only read and understand some of it. The "Japan" section on the Criticism is okay. (The english NHK source already confirms it). Though I hope a more proficient than me looks into it though. '''''Warm Regards''''', ] (]) (]) 12:07, 7 December 2024 (UTC) | ||
| :I found this Asahi article in English which is a pretty good represantation of the Japanese Asahi article already used: https://www.asahi.com/ajw/articles/15052469 | |||
| :The Japanese Asahi article is paywalled after a certain point though, but what I want to point out about the Japanese articles and that English Asahi article, is that the people who did the survey finding these cases of abuse were not doing so at the behest of the government (they only did it after the government put out new guidelines of what's considered abuse in a religious context). The survey results were passed on to the government, but this makes me wonder if it is best to put this under a heading called "Government interactons". | |||
| :The English NHK article just says the survey was done by a "team of lawyers", and doesn't really clarify that the survey was carried out by an independent organization. | |||
| :I also question the term "investigation" used in the Wiki article. Investigation sounds a bit more in depth than what they did. It was an internet survey. There's nothing I can find that implies they verified these claims or found evidence to support them (though it does say some respondents spoke directly to psychiatrists). | |||
| :Honestly, that English Asahi article is probably a better source than the NHK one. The NHK one has some pretty bad translations. ] (]) 16:19, 7 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 16:19, 7 December 2024
 | This project page does not require a rating on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
 | WikiProject Japan was featured in a WikiProject Report in the Signpost on 11 April 2011. |
 |
| Talk & archives for WP Japan |
|---|
Project talk
|
Task force talk/archives
↔ = joint task force |
| Old notice board |
| Related talk/archives |
| Search the archives: |
| V·T·E |
Discussion on the reliability of Japanese sources
There is a discussion about some Japanese musical theatre sources on RSN, any editor who can help please see WP:RSN#Japanese-language sources. -- LCU ActivelyDisinterested «@» °∆t° 22:14, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
Requested move at Talk:Statism in Shōwa Japan#Requested move 20 October 2024
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Statism in Shōwa Japan#Requested move 20 October 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. ASUKITE 16:00, 7 November 2024 (UTC)
Kaoli Isshiki
A discussion is going on for Kaoli Isshiki, a soprano from Japan based in France. -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 17:45, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
Requested move at Talk:Nippon Ishin no Kai#Requested move 13 November 2024
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Nippon Ishin no Kai#Requested move 13 November 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Raladic (talk) 22:36, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
Sawabe Station
Can someone please source this stub? Bearian (talk) 02:00, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
Requesting merger of Shimamaki District, Hokkaido
I would like to merge Shimamaki District, Hokkaido into the village article of Shimamaki, Hokkaido. Bearian (talk) 00:30, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
Does anyone speak Japanese?
I'm trying to eventually get Jehovah's Witnesses to FA and I'd appreciate a second set of eyes from an experienced editor who can understand the sources cited in the Japan section. Is anything missing? Are the sources being misinterpreted? If it is, don't blame me (I didn't add the content in question). I just want to make sure everything is on the up and up. Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 11:15, 7 December 2024 (UTC)
- Note that I can only read and understand some of it. The "Japan" section on the Criticism is okay. (The english NHK source already confirms it). Though I hope a more proficient than me looks into it though. Warm Regards, Miminity (Talk?) (me contribs) 12:07, 7 December 2024 (UTC)
- I found this Asahi article in English which is a pretty good represantation of the Japanese Asahi article already used: https://www.asahi.com/ajw/articles/15052469
- The Japanese Asahi article is paywalled after a certain point though, but what I want to point out about the Japanese articles and that English Asahi article, is that the people who did the survey finding these cases of abuse were not doing so at the behest of the government (they only did it after the government put out new guidelines of what's considered abuse in a religious context). The survey results were passed on to the government, but this makes me wonder if it is best to put this under a heading called "Government interactons".
- The English NHK article just says the survey was done by a "team of lawyers", and doesn't really clarify that the survey was carried out by an independent organization.
- I also question the term "investigation" used in the Wiki article. Investigation sounds a bit more in depth than what they did. It was an internet survey. There's nothing I can find that implies they verified these claims or found evidence to support them (though it does say some respondents spoke directly to psychiatrists).
- Honestly, that English Asahi article is probably a better source than the NHK one. The NHK one has some pretty bad translations. Erynamrod (talk) 16:19, 7 December 2024 (UTC)