Revision as of 06:24, 5 January 2004 editOliphaunt (usurped) (talk | contribs)4 edits Not NPOV← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 18:26, 7 December 2024 edit undoSpookyaki (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users4,841 edits Assessment: banner shell, Human rights (High) (Rater) | ||
(324 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{ARBPIA}} | |||
Israel should never have been created. | |||
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=B|vital=yes|1= | |||
{{WikiProject Israel|importance=High}} | |||
{{WikiProject Palestine|importance=Top}} | |||
{{WikiProject Israel Palestine Collaboration}} | |||
{{WikiProject Human rights|importance=High }} | |||
{{WikiProject Discrimination |importance=Low}} | |||
{{WikiProject Military history|class=B|b1=no|b2=yes|b3=yes|b4=yes|b5=yes|Middle-Eastern=yes|Cold-War=yes|Ottoman=yes|SciTech=yes}} | |||
}} | |||
{{OnThisDay|date1=2013-12-08|oldid1=584955033}} | |||
{{Archivebox|auto=yes|search=yes|bot=MiszaBot I|age=30}} | |||
{{User:MiszaBot/config | |||
|archiveheader = {{talkarchivenav}} | |||
|maxarchivesize = 100K | |||
|counter = 2 | |||
|algo = old(30d) | |||
|archive = Talk:First Intifada/Archive %(counter)d | |||
}} | |||
== Requested move 13 May 2021 == | |||
<div class="boilerplate" style="background-color: #efe; margin: 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px dotted #aaa;"><!-- Template:RM top --> | |||
:''The following is a closed discussion of a ]. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a ] after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. '' | |||
The result of the move request was: Not moved {{nac}} (] · ]) ''']''' 06:55, 27 May 2021 (UTC) | |||
---- | ---- | ||
:It is hard to discern a rational purpose behind the first Intifada, as the Palestinians had no realistic hope of defeating the Israelis, and peace was available if the Palestinians had been willing to accept a limited Palestinian State. Prior conflicts in the ] had the purpose destroying Israel entirely, but the first Intifada lacked this clear focus. It is also hard to discern any benefit that has accrued to the Palestinian people from the first Intifada, as the Oslo accords were enabled only when the PLO expressed more willingness to recognize Israels' right to exist. And, of course, the Oslo accords have accomplished virtually nothing. However, the general level of Palestinian militancy was probably increased and inspired by the first Intifada, which some Palestinians regard as a positive result. | |||
What is this? ] 03:35, 12 Dec 2003 (UTC) | |||
⚫ | == |
||
] → {{no redirect|First Palestinian Intifada}} – Rename per ] there have been multiple events named ] in the Arab World over the past century. Specifically, the first events named Intifada were the ] and parallel ]. Later those were followed by Bahraini ] in 1960s, the Sahrawi ] in 1970s, LEbanese ] in early 1980s (all being essentially "First Intifada"s) and only later in 1987 was the first Palestinian Intifada. Some sources which utilize the term "First Intifada" deal specifically with the Israeli-Palestinian event in retrospective and hence drop "Palestinian" from the term, while during the event itself it was rather branded "the Palestinian Intifada", the the "87 Intifada" - same as sources dealing with World War I referred to it as "the World War". It is certainly not the "First Intifada", but rather only in the Palestinian context. ] (]) 09:23, 13 May 2021 (UTC) <small>—'''''Relisting.''''' ~ ] (], ] | ], ]) 02:47, 21 May 2021 (UTC)</small> | |||
The article is not neutral, and supports the intifada throughout. For example, in the conclusion "Some say it was the Intifada that caused the repeated rise of the Israeli peace movement (see Peace Now), and Yitzhak Rabin's eventual re-election in 1992. " It does not mention that others believe it is responsible for an increase in the militant movement. | |||
*'''Comment''' - note that the Second Palestinian Intifada article is now at ] renamed to this title in 2019, now proposed for another title discussion.] (]) 09:29, 13 May 2021 (UTC) | |||
*:]. – ] (]) 14:57, 25 May 2021 (UTC) | |||
*'''Support''' It is true there have been others, so First is not very precise. It's an aka anyway.] (]) 09:59, 13 May 2021 (UTC) | |||
*'''Oppose''' - The full term "First Palestinian Intifada" is . I don't believe the extra disambiguation is necessary: the first couple of pages of a all refer to the Palestinian intifada and not any other. ] (]) 12:18, 13 May 2021 (UTC) | |||
*'''Oppose'''. I concur with Rublov. This seems like a case for disambiguation, but only as a hatnote on this article. — ] (]) 17:45, 17 May 2021 (UTC) | |||
*'''Oppose''' per ] and ]. ] (]) 03:24, 21 May 2021 (UTC) | |||
*'''Oppose'''. {{no redirect|Second Palestinian Intifada}} redirects to ]. – ] (]) 14:57, 25 May 2021 (UTC) | |||
*'''Oppose''' by far the primary topic for this, I'm unaware of a single other thing called the first intifada except for the first time by a user on this talk page. That somebody thinks some other event is ''essentially'' a "First Intifada", what matters is that sources nearly uniformly refer to the First Intifada as '''the''' First Intifada. <small style="border: 1px solid;padding:1px 3px;white-space:nowrap">''']''' - 15:12, 25 May 2021 (UTC)</small> | |||
{{abot}} | |||
== Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 20 December 2022 == | |||
Furthermore, while the causes of intifada and the harms against Palestinians by Israelis is discussed: | |||
{{Edit extended-protected|First Intifada|answered=yes}} | |||
"On October 1, 1987 Israeli military ambushed and killed seven men from Gaza believed to be members of the Jihad. Several days later an Israeli settler shot a Palestinian schoolgirl in the back." | |||
Please change "The impact on the Israeli services sector, including the important Israeli tourist industry, was notably negative." to "While filled with suffering and terror, the First Intifada became beneficial to the Palestinians. It solidified a clear and focused national consciousness for Palestine and the peoples need for statehood. The First Intifada brought a negative light to Israel on the world stage as many witnessed the horrors the Israeli Forces were capable of in trying to maintain their political legitimacy. The conflict also cost Israel hundreds of millions of dollars in lost tourism and imports." | |||
<ref>Pierpaoli, Paul G., Jr. "Intifada, First." The Encyclopedia of the Arab-Israeli Conflict: A | |||
Political, Social, and Military History, edited by Spencer C. Tucker and Priscilla Roberts, vol. 2, ABC-CLIO, 2008, pp. 472-474. Gale eBooks. Accessed 2022. | |||
</ref> ] (]) 04:15, 20 December 2022 (UTC) | |||
:] '''Not done:'''<!-- Template:EEp --> This language seems to violate ]. ] (]) 17:25, 20 December 2022 (UTC) | |||
{{reflist-talk}} | |||
"However, the general underlying cause of the intifada can be seen in the many years of military control that the Palestinians suffered under the Israelis. | |||
== Casus belli == | |||
Arabs maintain that the Intifada was a protest of Israel's brutal repression which included extra-judicial killings, mass detentions, house demolitions, indiscriminate torture, deportations, and so on. | |||
" | |||
In the introduction it is written "an Israeli Defense Forces' (IDF) truck collided with a civilian car, killing four Palestinian workers", but I don't see any reference that says that the truck was indeed one of the IDF. If it was an IDF's truck indeed, a reference saying so is, in my opinion, much needed. Otherwise, it would be good to edit this part out. Thank you ] (]) 14:03, 24 October 2023 (UTC) | |||
I cannot find any assessment whatsoever of the violence against Israelis that occured during the Intifada. | |||
:Changed to Israeli truck driver per sources. ] (]) 11:27, 9 December 2023 (UTC) | |||
"The mere presence of stories, reinforced by the real incidents above, caused wild panic and street fights against Israeli policemen and soldiers" | |||
⚫ | == Result == | ||
is the only statement on the other side, but it doesn't talk about how soldiers were killed, and the Israeli civilians are never mentioned. | |||
Wouldn’t the proper result be a “Palestinian political victory?” | |||
Basically, the article discusses the negative effects on one side (the Palestinians) without discussing how the other (the Israelis) was hurt. | |||
it says uprising suppressed, and I cannot access the source to confirm it, but given that this was not a military confrontation like the second intifada which was suppressed by two major operations but instead a series of protests, shouldn’t this be the more fitting result? ] (]) 04:49, 20 September 2024 (UTC) | |||
Another disturbing factor is that the only criticism of the Intifada is that it didn't go far enough: | |||
"Others point out that Palestinians felt abandoned by their Arab allies, the PLO had failed to destroy Israel and establish a Palestinian state in its stead as promised. " | |||
:my suggestion would be to remove the "result" from the infobox entirely since it isnt adding anything. I dont think any RS would describe the "result" of the first intifada simply as "uprising suppressed". ] (]) 06:18, 20 September 2024 (UTC) | |||
The article failed to point out another very common point of view - that it hurt Israel and was too violent a reaction. Additionally, the goal of "destroy Israel and establishing a Palestinian state in its stead" is not thought of as a positive goal by most groups. | |||
::That would work too, the first intifada wasn’t the full scale war like the second one and from what I’m reading it ended with a peace settlement (Madrid conference) rather than being quashed by military force ] (]) 13:31, 20 September 2024 (UTC) | |||
:::Who calls the second intifada a war? ] (]) 16:10, 20 September 2024 (UTC) | |||
::::The second intifada was more “militaristic” and was suppressed by 2 operations (homat magen and operation rainbow), the like of which didn’t happen in the first one. I was only bringing it up as a reference ] (]) 16:12, 20 September 2024 (UTC) | |||
:::Also I dont think we can argue that madrid was the result of the first intifada. RS do tend to describe it as an outcome, but not *the* result. | |||
:::khalidi: {{tq|. It is worth recalling that the Madrid Peace Conference and the Palestinian-Israel negotiations that followed were in a sense the fruit of the first intifada, which had galvanized Palestinian society and revealed to many Israelis after two decades that the occupation was untenable.}} | |||
:::Pappe: {{tq|The first Palestinian uprising in 1987 squashed all ideas of the autonomy option as it led Jordan to remove itself as a partner from future negotiations. The upshot of these developments was that the Israeli peace camp came around to accepting the Palestinians as partners for a future settlement. At first Israel tried, always with the help of the Americans, to negotiate peace with the Palestinian leadership in the Occupied Territories, which was allowed to take part, as an official peace delegation, in the 1991 Madrid peace conference. This conference was the award the American administration had decided to hand out to the Arab states for backing Washington’s military invasion of Iraq in the first Gulf War. Openly stalled by Israel, Madrid led nowhere.}} | |||
:::morris: {{tq|Only the Intifada, which started in December 1987, at last propelled the Israeli leadership toward moderation and concessions. At the same time, the realities of the uprising, and pressure from the grass roots in the occupied territories, compelled the PLO-Tunis leadership to move toward further moderation of its positions. It was the conjunction of these two processes and the break-up of the Soviet Union (which denied the Arabs a war option) that in 1991 made possible the Madrid Peace Conference and, ultimately, after a new, moderate government came to power in Jerusalem, the Israeli-PLO Oslo accords, including mutual recognition and the start of Israel’s gradual withdrawal from the Gaza Strip and the West Bank.}} ] (]) 16:20, 20 September 2024 (UTC) | |||
::::Do you see removing the result as the best decision here? What about Oslo I and Madrid, better to move it to the territorial changes? ] (]) 03:39, 21 September 2024 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 18:26, 7 December 2024
Warning: active arbitration remedies The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article is related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing this article:
Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.
|
This level-5 vital article is rated B-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
A fact from this article was featured on Misplaced Pages's Main Page in the On this day section on December 8, 2013. |
Archives |
This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
Requested move 13 May 2021
- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: Not moved (non-admin closure) (t · c) buidhe 06:55, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
First Intifada → First Palestinian Intifada – Rename per WP:CONCISE there have been multiple events named Intifada in the Arab World over the past century. Specifically, the first events named Intifada were the 1952 Egyptian revolution and parallel Iraqi Intifada (1952). Later those were followed by Bahraini March Intifada in 1960s, the Sahrawi Zemla Intifada in 1970s, LEbanese February 6 Intifada in early 1980s (all being essentially "First Intifada"s) and only later in 1987 was the first Palestinian Intifada. Some sources which utilize the term "First Intifada" deal specifically with the Israeli-Palestinian event in retrospective and hence drop "Palestinian" from the term, while during the event itself it was rather branded "the Palestinian Intifada", the the "87 Intifada" - same as sources dealing with World War I referred to it as "the World War". It is certainly not the "First Intifada", but rather only in the Palestinian context. GreyShark (dibra) 09:23, 13 May 2021 (UTC) —Relisting. ~ Aseleste (t, e | c, l) 02:47, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
- Comment - note that the Second Palestinian Intifada article is now at Al-Aqsa Intifada renamed to this title in 2019, now proposed for another title discussion.GreyShark (dibra) 09:29, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
- Support It is true there have been others, so First is not very precise. It's an aka anyway.Selfstudier (talk) 09:59, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose - The full term "First Palestinian Intifada" is not very common. I don't believe the extra disambiguation is necessary: the first couple of pages of a Google Scholar search for "first intifada" all refer to the Palestinian intifada and not any other. Rublov (talk) 12:18, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose. I concur with Rublov. This seems like a case for disambiguation, but only as a hatnote on this article. — Goszei (talk) 17:45, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose per WP:COMMONNAME and WP:CONCISE. Rreagan007 (talk) 03:24, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose. Second Palestinian Intifada redirects to Second Intifada. – wbm1058 (talk) 14:57, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose by far the primary topic for this, I'm unaware of a single other thing called the first intifada except for the first time by a user on this talk page. That somebody thinks some other event is essentially a "First Intifada", what matters is that sources nearly uniformly refer to the First Intifada as the First Intifada. nableezy - 15:12, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 20 December 2022
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please change "The impact on the Israeli services sector, including the important Israeli tourist industry, was notably negative." to "While filled with suffering and terror, the First Intifada became beneficial to the Palestinians. It solidified a clear and focused national consciousness for Palestine and the peoples need for statehood. The First Intifada brought a negative light to Israel on the world stage as many witnessed the horrors the Israeli Forces were capable of in trying to maintain their political legitimacy. The conflict also cost Israel hundreds of millions of dollars in lost tourism and imports."
Stitch2016 (talk) 04:15, 20 December 2022 (UTC)
- Not done: This language seems to violate WP:NPOV. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 17:25, 20 December 2022 (UTC)
References
- Pierpaoli, Paul G., Jr. "Intifada, First." The Encyclopedia of the Arab-Israeli Conflict: A Political, Social, and Military History, edited by Spencer C. Tucker and Priscilla Roberts, vol. 2, ABC-CLIO, 2008, pp. 472-474. Gale eBooks. Accessed 2022.
Casus belli
In the introduction it is written "an Israeli Defense Forces' (IDF) truck collided with a civilian car, killing four Palestinian workers", but I don't see any reference that says that the truck was indeed one of the IDF. If it was an IDF's truck indeed, a reference saying so is, in my opinion, much needed. Otherwise, it would be good to edit this part out. Thank you Nausicaasbel (talk) 14:03, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
- Changed to Israeli truck driver per sources. Selfstudier (talk) 11:27, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Result
Wouldn’t the proper result be a “Palestinian political victory?”
it says uprising suppressed, and I cannot access the source to confirm it, but given that this was not a military confrontation like the second intifada which was suppressed by two major operations but instead a series of protests, shouldn’t this be the more fitting result? The Great Mule of Eupatoria (talk) 04:49, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- my suggestion would be to remove the "result" from the infobox entirely since it isnt adding anything. I dont think any RS would describe the "result" of the first intifada simply as "uprising suppressed". DMH223344 (talk) 06:18, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- That would work too, the first intifada wasn’t the full scale war like the second one and from what I’m reading it ended with a peace settlement (Madrid conference) rather than being quashed by military force The Great Mule of Eupatoria (talk) 13:31, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Who calls the second intifada a war? DMH223344 (talk) 16:10, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- The second intifada was more “militaristic” and was suppressed by 2 operations (homat magen and operation rainbow), the like of which didn’t happen in the first one. I was only bringing it up as a reference The Great Mule of Eupatoria (talk) 16:12, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Also I dont think we can argue that madrid was the result of the first intifada. RS do tend to describe it as an outcome, but not *the* result.
- khalidi:
. It is worth recalling that the Madrid Peace Conference and the Palestinian-Israel negotiations that followed were in a sense the fruit of the first intifada, which had galvanized Palestinian society and revealed to many Israelis after two decades that the occupation was untenable.
- Pappe:
The first Palestinian uprising in 1987 squashed all ideas of the autonomy option as it led Jordan to remove itself as a partner from future negotiations. The upshot of these developments was that the Israeli peace camp came around to accepting the Palestinians as partners for a future settlement. At first Israel tried, always with the help of the Americans, to negotiate peace with the Palestinian leadership in the Occupied Territories, which was allowed to take part, as an official peace delegation, in the 1991 Madrid peace conference. This conference was the award the American administration had decided to hand out to the Arab states for backing Washington’s military invasion of Iraq in the first Gulf War. Openly stalled by Israel, Madrid led nowhere.
- morris:
Only the Intifada, which started in December 1987, at last propelled the Israeli leadership toward moderation and concessions. At the same time, the realities of the uprising, and pressure from the grass roots in the occupied territories, compelled the PLO-Tunis leadership to move toward further moderation of its positions. It was the conjunction of these two processes and the break-up of the Soviet Union (which denied the Arabs a war option) that in 1991 made possible the Madrid Peace Conference and, ultimately, after a new, moderate government came to power in Jerusalem, the Israeli-PLO Oslo accords, including mutual recognition and the start of Israel’s gradual withdrawal from the Gaza Strip and the West Bank.
DMH223344 (talk) 16:20, 20 September 2024 (UTC)- Do you see removing the result as the best decision here? What about Oslo I and Madrid, better to move it to the territorial changes? The Great Mule of Eupatoria (talk) 03:39, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Who calls the second intifada a war? DMH223344 (talk) 16:10, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- That would work too, the first intifada wasn’t the full scale war like the second one and from what I’m reading it ended with a peace settlement (Madrid conference) rather than being quashed by military force The Great Mule of Eupatoria (talk) 13:31, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- B-Class level-5 vital articles
- Misplaced Pages level-5 vital articles in History
- B-Class vital articles in History
- B-Class Israel-related articles
- High-importance Israel-related articles
- WikiProject Israel articles
- B-Class Palestine-related articles
- Top-importance Palestine-related articles
- WikiProject Palestine articles
- WikiProject Israel Palestine Collaboration articles
- B-Class Human rights articles
- High-importance Human rights articles
- WikiProject Human rights articles
- B-Class Discrimination articles
- Low-importance Discrimination articles
- WikiProject Discrimination articles
- C-Class military history articles
- C-Class military science, technology, and theory articles
- Military science, technology, and theory task force articles
- C-Class Middle Eastern military history articles
- Middle Eastern military history task force articles
- C-Class Ottoman military history articles
- Ottoman military history task force articles
- C-Class Cold War articles
- Cold War task force articles
- Selected anniversaries (December 2013)