Misplaced Pages

2001 Bangladesh–India border clashes: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 17:44, 9 February 2024 view sourceBangladeshiEditorInSylhet (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users13,872 editsm top: Added linksTags: canned edit summary Mobile edit Mobile app edit Android app edit← Previous edit Latest revision as of 12:32, 8 December 2024 view source Cagliost (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users17,296 editsNo edit summary 
(71 intermediate revisions by 17 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{short description|Series of armed skirmishes between Bangladesh and India}} {{Short description|Series of armed skirmishes between Bangladesh and India}}
{{pp-dispute|small=yes}} {{pp-dispute|small=yes}}
{{EngvarB|date=March 2017}} {{Use British English|date=March 2017}}
{{Use dmy dates|date=March 2017}} {{Use dmy dates|date=March 2017}}
{{Infobox military conflict {{Infobox military conflict
Line 7: Line 7:
| colour_scheme = background:#91ACDB | colour_scheme = background:#91ACDB
| cause = Claims of intrusion of troops on both sides. | cause = Claims of intrusion of troops on both sides.
| date = 16 – 20 April 2001 ({{Age in months, weeks and days|month1=4|month2=4|day1=16|day2=20}}) | date = 16–20 April 2001 ({{Age in months, weeks and days|month1=4|month2=4|day1=16|day2=20}})
| place = ] (]/], ]) | place = ] (]/], ])
| result = Stalemate, ] | result = Inconclusive (See ] section)
| territory = ]
* Indian Tactical Failure.
* Strategic Stalemate.
| combatant1 = {{flag|Bangladesh}} | combatant1 = {{flag|Bangladesh}}
| combatant2 = {{flag|India}} | combatant2 = {{flag|India}}
| units1 = {{flagicon image|বর্ডার গার্ড বাংলাদেশের পতাকা.svg}} ] | units1 = {{flagicon image|বর্ডার গার্ড বাংলাদেশের পতাকা.svg}} ]
| units2 = {{flagicon image|BSF Flag.svg}} ] | units2 = {{flagicon image|BSF Flag.svg}} ]
| commander1 = {{flag|Bangladesh}} ] | commander1 = {{flagicon image|বর্ডার গার্ড বাংলাদেশের পতাকা.svg}} ]
| commander2 = {{flag|India}} ] | commander2 = {{flagicon image|BSF Flag.svg}} ]
| strength1 = {{flagicon image|বর্ডার গার্ড বাংলাদেশের পতাকা.svg}} 700–1,000 troops <ref name="frl">{{cite magazine |last=Gokhale |first=Nitin |date=30 April 2001 |title=A Tale Of Two Blunders |magazine=Outlook |url=https://www.outlookindia.com/magazine/story/a-tale-of-two-blunders/211448 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140714201917/http://www.bangladesh-web.com/view.php?hidRecord=362173 |archive-date=14 July 2014 |access-date=16 October 2014}}</ref><ref name="withdrawls" /><ref name="fline" /><ref>{{cite news |last1= |first1= |last2= |date=2001-04-24 |title=Bangladesh accused of border buildup |url=https://edition.cnn.com/2001/WORLD/asiapcf/south/04/24/india.bangladesh.border/index.html |website=] |language=en |access-date=2024-06-15}}</ref>
| strength1 = '''Pyrdiwah Intrusion '''800 BDR personnel<ref name="itoday" /><br />'''
| strength2 = {{flagicon image|BSF Flag.svg}} 300+ troops
'''Boraibari Clash''' : 11 ] ]
| casualties1 = {{flagicon image|বর্ডার গার্ড বাংলাদেশের পতাকা.svg}} {{ubl|3 killed|5 wounded<ref name="frontline" />}}
<ref name="frl">{{cite magazine |last=Gokhale |first=Nitin |date=30 April 2001 |title=A Tale Of Two Blunders |magazine=Outlook |url=https://www.outlookindia.com/magazine/story/a-tale-of-two-blunders/211448 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140714201917/http://www.bangladesh-web.com/view.php?hidRecord=362173 |archive-date=14 July 2014 |access-date=16 October 2014}}</ref><ref name="itoday">{{cite magazine |url=http://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/barbaric-killing-of-bsf-jawans-puts-india-bangladesh-relations-under-severe-strain/1/233646.html |title=Barbaric killing of BSF jawans puts India-Bangladesh relations under severe strain |date=7 May 2001 |magazine=India Today |access-date=3 July 2014}}</ref><ref name="withdrawls" /><ref name="fline" />
| casualties2 = {{flagicon image|BSF Flag.svg}} {{ubl|16 killed<ref name="bbc1" /><ref name="guardian">{{cite news |url=http://www.theguardian.com/world/2001/apr/23/bangladesh |title=Army defiant as Bangladesh election looms |first=Luke |last=Harding |date=23 April 2001 |work=] |access-date=3 July 2014 |archive-date=14 July 2014 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140714145527/http://www.theguardian.com/world/2001/apr/23/bangladesh |url-status=live}}</ref><ref name="assamtribune">{{cite news |url=http://www.assamtribune.com/scripts/detailsnew.asp?id=dec1012/at05 |title=Area where 16 BSF men were killed to go to Bangladesh |first=Dutta |last=Choudhury |date=10 Dec 2012 |work=] |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200901153801/http://www.assamtribune.com/scripts/detailsnew.asp?id=dec1012%2Fat05 |archive-date=1 September 2020 |access-date=3 July 2014 |url-status=live}}</ref><ref name=wsws /><ref>{{cite news |last1= |first1= |last2= |date=2001-04-18 |title=India, Bangladesh clash along border |url=https://edition.cnn.com/2001/WORLD/asiapcf/south/04/18/india.bangladesh.clash/index.html |website=] |language=en |access-date=2024-06-15}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.bbc.com/bengali/news-56776141|title=|last=Hosen|first=Akbar|date=18 April 2021|publication-place=]|language=bn-BD|script-title=bn:বড়াইবাড়ী যুদ্ধ: কুড়িগ্রামে কুড়ি বছর আগের যে সংঘাতে ১৬ জন ভারতীয় রক্ষী নিহত হয়|access-date=12 September 2024|work=]}}</ref>|2 wounded<ref name="India-Bangladesh border battle">{{cite news|url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/1283068.stm|title=India-Bangladesh border battle|date=18 April 2001|work=]}}</ref>|2 captured<ref name="India-Bangladesh border battle" /><ref>{{cite news |last1= |first1= |last2= |date=2001-04-18 |title=India, Bangladesh clash along border |url=https://edition.cnn.com/2001/WORLD/asiapcf/south/04/18/india.bangladesh.clash/index.html |website=] |language=en |access-date=2024-06-15}}</ref>}}
Total strength: 811 ] ]
| casualties3 = 24 civilians injured<ref name="schendel">{{cite book |last=van Schendel |first=Willem |year=2007 |chapter=The Wagah Syndrome: Territorial Roots of Contemporary violence in South Asia |editor1-last=Basu |editor1-first=Amrita |editor2-last=Roy |editor2-first=Srirupa |title=Violence and Democracy in India |publisher=] |location=] |pages=55–57}}</ref><br /> 10,000 civilians temporarily displaced<ref name="schendel"/>
| strength2 ='''Initial Intrusion:''' 31 border guards in Pyrdiwah, 300 additional border guard reinforcements sent to fight in Boraibari. <ref name="itoday" /><br />'''Final Clash in Mankachar:'''
50-60<ref name="itoday" />
Total strength: 391.
| casualties1 = {{flagicon image|বর্ডার গার্ড বাংলাদেশের পতাকা.svg}} 3 killed, 5 wounded <ref name="frontline" />

| casualties2 = {{flagicon image|BSF Flag.svg}} 16 ]<ref name="bbc1" /><ref name="cnn1">{{cite news |url=http://edition.cnn.com/2001/WORLD/asiapcf/south/04/26/india.police/ |title=India accuses Bangladesh of war crimes |date=27 April 2001 |work=CNN |access-date=3 July 2014 |archive-date=29 September 2014 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140929114032/http://edition.cnn.com/2001/WORLD/asiapcf/south/04/26/india.police/ |url-status=live }}</ref><ref name="guardian">{{cite news |url=http://www.theguardian.com/world/2001/apr/23/bangladesh |title=Army defiant as Bangladesh election looms |first=Luke |last=Harding |date=23 April 2001 |work=The Guardian |access-date=3 July 2014 |archive-date=14 July 2014 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140714145527/http://www.theguardian.com/world/2001/apr/23/bangladesh |url-status=live }}</ref><ref name="assamtribune">{{cite news |url=http://www.assamtribune.com/scripts/detailsnew.asp?id=dec1012/at05 |title=Area where 16 BSF men were killed to go to Bangladesh |first=Dutta |last=Choudhury |date=10 Dec 2012 |work=Assam Tribune |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200901153801/http://www.assamtribune.com/scripts/detailsnew.asp?id=dec1012%2Fat05 |archive-date=1 September 2020 |access-date=3 July 2014 |url-status=live }}</ref><ref name=wsws />
2 wounded. <ref name="India-Bangladesh border battle">{{cite web|url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/1283068.stm|title=A report by the news.bbc.co.uk on 18 April 2001}}</ref>
2 captured (including those who were ]) <ref name="India-Bangladesh border battle">{{cite web|url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/1283068.stm|title=A report by the news.bbc.co.uk on 18 April 2001}}</ref>
Total Casualties: 18.
|casualties3= 24 civilians injured<ref name="schendel">{{cite book |last=van Schendel |first=Willem |year=2007 |chapter=The Wagah Syndrome: Territorial Roots of Contemporary violence in South Asia |editor1-last=Basu |editor1-first=Amrita |editor2-last=Roy |editor2-first=Srirupa |title=Violence and Democracy in India |publisher=Seagull Books |location=Calcutta |pages=55–57}}</ref><br /> 10,000 civilians temporarily displaced<ref name="schendel"/>
| image = India Bangladesh Locator.svg | image = India Bangladesh Locator.svg
| image_size = 300px | image_size = 300px
Line 37: Line 27:
}} }}


The '''2001 Bangladesh–India border clashes''' were a series of ] skirmishes between ] and ] in April 2001. The clashes took place between troops of the ] (BDR) and the Indian ] (BSF) on the poorly-marked ]. The '''2001 Bangladesh–India border clashes''' were a series of armed skirmishes between ] and ] in April 2001. The clashes took place between troops of the ] (BDR) and the Indian ] (BSF) on the poorly-marked ].

The clashes began on 16 April 2001,<ref name="Analysis" /> when a force of around 800 to a 1000 Bangladeshi Paramilitary soldiers attacked and captured ] village, breaking the status quo and forcing the civilians there to flee.<ref name="withdrawls" /><ref name="fline" /> Bangladesh claimed that the village had been ] ] by India since ] in 1971.<ref name="Tension">{{cite news |title=Tension along the border |work=BBC News |url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/1283703.stm |access-date=1 May 2012 |archive-date=12 January 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130112073332/http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/1283703.stm |url-status=live }}</ref><ref name="bbc1">{{cite news |date=18 April 2001 |title=India-Bangladesh border battle |work=BBC News |url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/1283068.stm |access-date=16 October 2014 |archive-date=20 October 2014 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20141020102522/http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/1283068.stm |url-status=live }}</ref> The Indian Border Security Force (BSF) post in Padua/Pyrdiwah village was encircled, trapping 31 BSF troops within. However, both sides held their ] and began ]. Over the course of the following days, about three BSF ] proceeded to ] the outpost.<ref name="itoday" /> This incident was ] later without any bloodshed.


The clashes began on 16 April 2001,<ref name="Analysis" /> when a force of around 800 to a 1000 Bangladeshi Paramilitary soldiers attacked and captured ] village, breaking the status quo and forcing the civilians there to flee.<ref name="Joyce">{{cite web |last1=Joyce |first1=Elijah |title=The Invasion of Pyrdiwah (2001) — Modern History Summarized |url=https://medium.com/stories/063b91dd1aef |publisher=Medium |accessdate=26 February 2024 |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20240226165938/https://medium.com/@elijahjoyceweather21/the-invasion-of-pyrdiwah-2001-modern-history-summarized-063b91dd1aef |archivedate=26 February 2024 |format=] analysis |date=2024 |url-status=live}}</ref><ref name="withdrawls" /><ref name="fline" /> Bangladesh claimed that the village had been illegally occupied by India since ] in 1971.<ref name="Tension">{{cite news |title=Tension along the border |work=] |url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/1283703.stm |access-date=1 May 2012 |archive-date=12 January 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130112073332/http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/1283703.stm |url-status=live}}</ref><ref name="bbc1">{{cite news |date=18 April 2001 |title=India-Bangladesh border battle |work=] |url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/1283068.stm |access-date=16 October 2014 |archive-date=20 October 2014 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20141020102522/http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/1283068.stm |url-status=live}}</ref> The Indian Border Security Force (BSF) post in Padua/Pyrdiwah village was encircled, trapping 31 BSF troops within. However, both sides held their ] and began ]. Over the course of the following days, about three BSF ] proceeded to reinforce the outpost.<ref name="itoday">{{cite magazine |url=http://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/barbaric-killing-of-bsf-jawans-puts-india-bangladesh-relations-under-severe-strain/1/233646.html |title=Barbaric killing of BSF jawans puts India-Bangladesh relations under severe strain |date=7 May 2001 |magazine=] |access-date=3 July 2014}}</ref> This incident was ] later without any bloodshed.
Following this standoff, Indian BSF ] troops along the Bangladesh–India border were put on high alert and ordered to begin intensive patrolling. A few days later, a small contingent of 300 BSF troops entered ] near the village of Boraibari, more than 200 km to the west of Padua/Pyrdiwah, The intrusion was used as a "]" by India to retaliate after the earlier incident in Padua.
Immediately upon entering ] territory, the ] were ] by 11 ], at ] and the attack on ] outposts were halted<ref>"A brush with Bangladesh"</ref>


Following this standoff, ] ] troops along the ] were put on high alert and ordered to begin intensive patrolling. A few days later, a small contingent of 300 BSF troops entered ] near the village of Boraibari, more than 200 km to the west of Padua/Pyrdiwah, The intrusion was used as a "]" by India to retaliate after the earlier incident in Padua.
who were assisted by hundreds of ].<ref name="bbc1" /> Following their capture, The bodies of the Indian soldiers were returned to India on 20 April.<ref name="wsws" />
Immediately upon entering ] territory, the ] were ] by ] and the attack on BDR outposts were repulsed.<ref>{{Cite book |last=Ranjan |first=Amit |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=9sJ1DwAAQBAJ |title=India–Bangladesh Border Disputes History and Post-LBA Dynamics |series=South Asia Economic and Policy Studies |date=2018-10-30 |publisher=] |isbn=9789811083846 |page=107 |language=en |doi=10.1007/978-981-10-8384-6 |eissn=2522-5510 |issn=2522-5502}}</ref><ref name="frontline" /> who were assisted by hundreds of ].<ref name="bbc1" /> Following their capture, the bodies of the Indian soldiers were returned to India on 20 April.<ref name="wsws" />


The clashes finally ended on 21 April 2001, after both sides agreed to a ]. The clashes left a total of 21 people dead, including 16 Indian soldiers and three Bangladeshi border guards. The clashes finally ended on 21 April 2001, after both sides agreed to a ]. The clashes left a total of 21 people dead, including 16 Indian soldiers and three Bangladeshi border guards.


The clashes were a major setback to the improving relations between India and Bangladesh. The two countries had signed a number of agreements in the years leading up to the clashes including the '''2015 Land Boundary Agreement''' which served an important role in advancing the exchange of 111 enclaves (17,160.63 acres) from India to Bangladesh and reciprocatively, the latter transferred 51 enclaves (7,110.02 acres) to India.<ref>{{Cite web |title=India and Bangladesh: Exchanging border enclaves & (re-)connecting with new citizens |url=https://www.brookings.edu/articles/sambandh-blog-india-and-bangladesh-exchanging-border-enclaves-re-connecting-with-new-citizens/ |access-date=2023-07-23 |website=Brookings |language=en-US |archive-date=23 July 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230723140307/https://www.brookings.edu/articles/sambandh-blog-india-and-bangladesh-exchanging-border-enclaves-re-connecting-with-new-citizens/ |url-status=live }}</ref> The clashes were a major setback to the improving relations between ] and ]. The two countries had signed a number of agreements in the years leading up to the clashes including the '''2015 Land Boundary Agreement''' which served an important role in advancing the exchange of 111 enclaves (17,160.63 acres) from India to Bangladesh and reciprocatively, the latter transferred 51 enclaves (7,110.02 acres) to India.<ref>{{Cite web |title=India and Bangladesh: Exchanging border enclaves & (re-)connecting with new citizens |url=https://www.brookings.edu/articles/sambandh-blog-india-and-bangladesh-exchanging-border-enclaves-re-connecting-with-new-citizens/ |access-date=2023-07-23 |website=Brookings |language=en-US |archive-date=23 July 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230723140307/https://www.brookings.edu/articles/sambandh-blog-india-and-bangladesh-exchanging-border-enclaves-re-connecting-with-new-citizens/ |url-status=live}}</ref>


== Background == == Background ==
{{Main|Partition of Bengal (1947)}}
The ] left a poorly demarcated international border between the states of ] and ] (erstwhile ]). Ownership of several villages on both sides of the '']'' border were disputed and claimed by both countries. The dispute over the demarcation of the India–Bangladesh border worsened due to the existence of over ]. The ] left a poorly demarcated international border between the states of ] and ] (erstwhile ]). Ownership of several villages on both sides of the '']'' border were disputed and claimed by both countries. The dispute over the demarcation of the India–Bangladesh border worsened due to the existence of over ].


== Cause == == Cause ==
One of the disputed areas was a small sliver of land near the village of Padua (also known as Pyrdiwah), on the border between ] and the ] of ],<ref name="Analysis" /> which was used by ] during the ] to train ethnic ] guerrillas known as the ], who were fighting the ] and pro-] loyalist militias. Following its independence, Bangladesh staked its claim to the area in which ]'s ] (BSF) had established a post in since 1971.<ref name="fline">{{cite magazine |url=http://www.frontline.in/static/html/fl1809/18090220.htm |title=Disturbed Border |last=Chaudhuri |first=Kalyan |date=28 April 2001 |magazine=Frontline |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170828014225/http://www.frontline.in/static/html/fl1809/18090220.htm |archive-date=28 August 2017 |access-date=3 July 2014}}</ref><ref name="Analysis" /> The village is one of the Indian ] on the border between Bangladesh and Meghalaya.<ref name="Hillary">{{cite book |last=Kobayashi-Hillary |first=Mark |year=2004 |title=Outsourcing to India: The Offshore Advantage |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=qcEwts3f26wC&pg=PA61 |publisher=Springer Science & Business Media |pages=61– |isbn=978-3-540-20855-6}}</ref><ref name="Taylor">{{cite book |title=The Europa World Year Book 2003 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=XLvU9lroRuUC&pg=PA662 |year=2003 |publisher=Taylor & Francis |pages=662– |isbn=978-1-85743-227-5}}</ref> There are 111 Indian enclaves in Bangladeshi-claimed territory and 50 Bangladeshi enclaves in Indian-claimed territory. Padua village is an ]—a village inhabited by ] that is legally owned by Bangladesh (until the border agreement is ratified and the ]).<ref name="itoday"/><ref name="nautilus">{{cite web |url=http://www.nautilus.org/archives/sand/Updates2001/V2N17.html |title=South Asia Nuclear Dialogue |publisher=nautilus.org |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20081203131236/http://www.nautilus.org/archives/sand/Updates2001/V2N17.html |archive-date=3 December 2008 |url-status=dead}}</ref><ref name="schendel"/> The people of this village are ethnic ].<ref name="fline" /> One of the disputed areas was a small sliver of land near the village of Padua (also known as Pyrdiwah), on the border between ] and the ] of ],<ref name="Analysis" /> which was used by ] during the ] to train ethnic ] ] known as the ], who were fighting the ] and pro-] loyalist militias. Following its independence, Bangladesh staked its claim to the area in which ]'s ] (BSF) had established a post in since 1971.<ref name="fline">{{cite magazine |url=http://www.frontline.in/static/html/fl1809/18090220.htm |title=Disturbed Border |last=Chaudhuri |first=Kalyan |date=28 April 2001 |magazine=Frontline |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170828014225/http://www.frontline.in/static/html/fl1809/18090220.htm |archive-date=28 August 2017 |access-date=3 July 2014}}</ref><ref name="Analysis" /> The village is one of the Indian ] on the border between Bangladesh and Meghalaya.<ref name="Hillary">{{cite book |last=Kobayashi-Hillary |first=Mark |year=2004 |title=Outsourcing to India: The Offshore Advantage |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=qcEwts3f26wC&pg=PA61 |publisher=] |pages=61– |isbn=978-3-540-20855-6}}</ref><ref name="Taylor">{{cite book |title=The Europa World Year Book 2003 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=XLvU9lroRuUC&pg=PA662 |year=2003 |publisher=] |pages=662– |isbn=978-1-85743-227-5}}</ref> There are 111 Indian enclaves in Bangladeshi-claimed territory and 50 Bangladeshi enclaves in Indian-claimed territory. Padua village is an ]—a village inhabited by ] that is legally owned by Bangladesh (until the border agreement is ratified and the ]).<ref name="itoday"/><ref name="nautilus">{{cite web |url=http://www.nautilus.org/archives/sand/Updates2001/V2N17.html |title=South Asia Nuclear Dialogue |publisher=nautilus.org |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20081203131236/http://www.nautilus.org/archives/sand/Updates2001/V2N17.html |archive-date=3 December 2008 |url-status=dead}}</ref><ref name="schendel"/> The people of this village are ethnic ].<ref name="fline" />


In an interview published much later, the then-director of the ] (BDR), ] ], who was later dismissed from service by the rival government following an election, claimed that the Indian BSF had begun to construct a linking road between their camp in Padua and another camp {{Convert|10|km|mi|abbr=on}} away through ] and Bangladeshi territory.<ref name="frontline" /><ref name="newagebd">{{cite news |url=http://newagebd.com/supliment.php?sid=313&id=2142 |title=A country should have strength to implement its political plans |date=20 Dec 2013 |work=New Age |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140222134313/http://newagebd.com/supliment.php?sid=313&id=2142 |archive-date=22 February 2014 |access-date=3 July 2014}}</ref> In an interview published much later, the then-director of the ] (BDR), ] ], who was later dismissed from service by the rival government following an election, claimed that the ] had begun to construct a linking road between their camp in Padua and another camp {{Convert|10|km|mi|abbr=on}} away through ] and Bangladeshi territory.<ref name="frontline" /><ref name="newagebd">{{cite news |url=http://newagebd.com/supliment.php?sid=313&id=2142 |title=A country should have strength to implement its political plans |date=20 Dec 2013 |work=] |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140222134313/http://newagebd.com/supliment.php?sid=313&id=2142 |archive-date=22 February 2014 |access-date=3 July 2014}}</ref>


== Conflict == == Conflict ==
The fighting that took place during these clashes was the worst since ]'s war with ] in 1971. It took place around the village of Padua in the Indian state of ]<ref name="Analysis" /> which adjoins the ] area of the Bangladeshi border in the ]. Although an effective '']'' had been maintained in this area, around {{Convert|6.5|km|mi|abbr=on}} of the border had been disputed for the past 30 years. The fighting that took place during these clashes was the worst since ]'s war with ] in 1971. It took place around the village of Padua in the Indian state of ]<ref name="Analysis" /> which adjoins the ] area of the Bangladeshi border in the ]. Although an effective '']'' had been maintained in this area, around {{Convert|6.5|km|mi|abbr=on}} of the border had been disputed for the past 30 years.


On 16 April 2001, a force of around 1000 Bangladeshi soldiers attacked and captured Padua village, breaking the status quo and forcing the civilians there to flee. Bangladesh claimed that the village had been illegally occupied by ] since Bangladesh's war of independence in 1971.<ref name="Analysis">{{cite news |title=Analysis: Surprising outbreak of hostilities |url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/1285576.stm |work=BBC News |access-date=1 May 2012 |archive-date=12 January 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130112073337/http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/1285576.stm |url-status=live }}</ref> The Indian ] (BSF) post in Padua village was surrounded, trapping several BSF troops within. However, both sides held their fire and began negotiations. Over the course of the following days, about three BSF ] proceeded to reinforce the outpost. This incident was resolved later without any bloodshed. On 16 April 2001, a force of around 1000 Bangladeshi soldiers attacked and captured Padua village, breaking the status quo and forcing the civilians there to flee. Bangladesh claimed that the village had been illegally occupied by ] since ].<ref name="Analysis">{{cite news |title=Analysis: Surprising outbreak of hostilities |url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/1285576.stm |work=] |access-date=1 May 2012 |archive-date=12 January 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130112073337/http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/1285576.stm |url-status=live}}</ref> The Indian ] (BSF) post in Padua village was surrounded, trapping several BSF troops within. However, both sides held their fire and began negotiations. Over the course of the following days, about three BSF ] proceeded to reinforce the outpost. This incident was resolved later without any bloodshed.


Following this standoff, BSF troops along the ] were put on high alert and ordered to begin intensive patrolling. A few days later, a small contingent of BSF troops entered Bangladeshi territory near the village of Boroibari, more than {{Convert|200|km|mi|abbr=on}} to the west of Padua. Unlike the latter village, which is an ], Boroibari is an area lying across a fence well inside Bangladesh. The intrusion was used as a "counter-attack" by India to retaliate after the earlier incident in Padua. According to Bangladeshi sources, Indian forces launched an early-morning attack on their posts in the frontier district of ], which lies on the border with the Indian state of ]. Following this standoff, BSF troops along the ] were put on high alert and ordered to begin intensive patrolling. A few days later, a small contingent of ] troops entered Bangladeshi territory near the village of Boroibari, more than {{Convert|200|km|mi|abbr=on}} to the west of Padua. Unlike the latter village, which is an ], Boroibari is an area lying across a fence well inside Bangladesh. The intrusion was used as a "''counter-attack''" by India to retaliate after the earlier incident in Padua. According to Bangladeshi sources, Indian forces launched an early-morning attack on their posts in the frontier district of ], which lies on the border with the Indian state of ].


Immediately upon entering Bangladeshi territory the 16 Indian ] personnel were ambushed and killed by Bangladeshi border guards, who were assisted by hundreds of villagers. Around midnight, the ], ], received a call from her ], ], saying that orders had been issued to restore the status quo as well as for an immediate Bangladeshi withdrawal from Padua. The ] (BDR) withdrew from Padua by the night of 19 April. Immediately upon entering Bangladeshi territory, 16 Indian ] personnel were ambushed and killed by Bangladeshi border guards, who were assisted by hundreds of villagers. Around midnight, the ], ], received a call from her ], ], saying that orders had been issued to restore the status quo as well as for an immediate Bangladeshi withdrawal from Padua. The ] (BDR) withdrew from Padua by the night of 19 April.


In the confrontation, 16 Indian border guards were killed while two suffered injuries. The attack also left three Bangladeshi border guards dead and another five wounded. About 10,000 civilians fled the area after some 24 were wounded in the cross-border clashes. In the confrontation, 16 Indian border guards were killed while two suffered injuries. The attack also left three Bangladeshi border guards dead and another five wounded. About 10,000 civilians fled the area after some 24 were wounded in the cross-border clashes.
Line 72: Line 61:


== Aftermath == == Aftermath ==
After ] intervened in the situation, the Bangladeshis and Indians returned to their original positions and restored the previous '']''.<ref name="withdrawls">{{cite news |url=http://www.tribuneindia.com/2001/20010420/main1.htm |title=A Guns fall silent on border; BSF men's bodies to be returned today |date=19 April 2001 |work=The Tribune |access-date=3 July 2014 |archive-date=13 May 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130513093930/http://www.tribuneindia.com/2001/20010420/main1.htm |url-status=live }}</ref> Fresh clashes erupted along the ] just hours after both sides voiced regret and concern over the recent killings, but by midnight on 20 April, cross-border firing had stopped. An article reported that 6,000 Indian civilians had fled the region, and ] officials were attempting to convince the displaced villagers to return to their homes.<ref name="nautilus" /> After ] intervened in the situation, the Bangladeshis and Indians returned to their original positions and restored the previous '']''.<ref name="withdrawls">{{cite news |url=http://www.tribuneindia.com/2001/20010420/main1.htm |title=A Guns fall silent on border; BSF men's bodies to be returned today |date=19 April 2001 |work=The Tribune |access-date=3 July 2014 |archive-date=13 May 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130513093930/http://www.tribuneindia.com/2001/20010420/main1.htm |url-status=live}}</ref> Fresh clashes erupted along the ] just hours after both sides voiced regret and concern over the recent killings, but by midnight on 20 April, cross-border firing had stopped. An article reported that 6,000 Indian civilians had fled the region, and ] officials were attempting to convince the displaced villagers to return to their homes.<ref name="nautilus" />
Bangladesh later agreed to return the bodies of 16 Indian soldiers the next day.<ref name="withdrawls" /> Upon examining the bodies of the dead personnel, ] accused ] of subjecting the ] to severe torture before they were shot dead.<ref>{{cite web |title='Criminal adventurism' must not go unpunished: Jaswant |url=http://in.rediff.com/news/2001/apr/23ls1.htm |work=Rediff.com |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110604015218/http://in.rediff.com/news/2001/apr/23ls1.htm |archive-date=4 June 2011 |url-status=live |access-date=12 July 2009}}</ref><ref name="bn">{{cite news |url=http://www.tribuneindia.com/2001/20010422/main1.htm |title=BSF men tortured, then shot dead |work=The Tribune |access-date=16 October 2014 |archive-date=26 March 2014 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140326070457/http://www.tribuneindia.com/2001/20010422/main1.htm |url-status=live }}</ref> On the other hand, three Bangladeshi soldiers were also killed; two during combat and another who died of wounds that were sustained during cross-border operations. Bangladesh later agreed to return the bodies of 16 Indian soldiers the next day.<ref name="withdrawls" /> Upon examining the bodies of the dead personnel, ] accused ] of subjecting the ] to severe torture before they were shot dead.<ref>{{cite web |title='Criminal adventurism' must not go unpunished: Jaswant |url=http://in.rediff.com/news/2001/apr/23ls1.htm |work=Rediff.com |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110604015218/http://in.rediff.com/news/2001/apr/23ls1.htm |archive-date=4 June 2011 |url-status=live |access-date=12 July 2009}}</ref><ref name="bn">{{cite news |url=http://www.tribuneindia.com/2001/20010422/main1.htm |title=BSF men tortured, then shot dead |work=The Tribune |access-date=16 October 2014 |archive-date=26 March 2014 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140326070457/http://www.tribuneindia.com/2001/20010422/main1.htm |url-status=live}}</ref> On the other hand, three Bangladeshi soldiers were also killed; two during combat and another who died of wounds that were sustained during cross-border operations.


Observers have termed the incident as a political ploy to rouse ] before the Bangladeshi elections (which were 2 months away at the time of the incident) and as malicious adventurism by the ] (BDR).<ref name="itoday" /><ref name="Analysis" /> The ] denied allegations that it had supported the BDR's initialization of hostilities with India and termed the incident as the "adventurism of its local commanders".<ref name="withdrawls" /> Observers have termed the incident as a political ploy to rouse ] before the Bangladeshi elections (which were 2 months away at the time of the incident) and as malicious adventurism by the ] (BDR).<ref name="itoday" /><ref name="Analysis" /> The ] denied allegations that it had supported the BDR's initialization of hostilities with India and termed the incident as the "adventurism of its local commanders".<ref name="withdrawls" />


The ] ] and ] ] engaged in telephonic discussions and subsequently agreed to order a high-level investigation into the incident.<ref name="frontline">{{Cite web|date=2014-02-22|title=A brush with Bangladesh|url=http://www.frontline.in/static/html/fl1810/18100280.htm|access-date=2021-11-11|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140222215106/http://www.frontline.in/static/html/fl1810/18100280.htm|archive-date=22 February 2014}}</ref><ref name="wsws">{{cite web |url=https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2001/05/bang-m21.html |title=India-Bangladesh border still tense after worst clash in 30 years |author=Nishanthi Priyangika |date=21 May 2012 |website=World Socialist Web site |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20081120133200/http://www.wsws.org/articles/2001/may2001/bang-m21.shtml |archive-date=20 November 2008 |url-status=live |access-date=12 July 2009}}</ref> ] spokesman ] reported that both ] and ] would improve bilateral diplomatic channels and promised to exercise restraint in the future.<ref name="nautilus" /> India and Bangladesh initiated talks to resolve their border disputes in March 2002. By July 2002, the two sides established joint-working groups to agree on and establish the non-demarcated sections of the border.<ref name=Taylor /> The ] ] and ] ] engaged in telephonic discussions and subsequently agreed to order a high-level investigation into the incident.<ref name="frontline">{{Cite web|date=22 February 2014|title=A brush with Bangladesh|url=http://www.frontline.in/static/html/fl1810/18100280.htm|access-date=11 November 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140222215106/http://www.frontline.in/static/html/fl1810/18100280.htm|archive-date=22 February 2014}}</ref><ref name="wsws">{{cite web |url=https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2001/05/bang-m21.html |title=India-Bangladesh border still tense after worst clash in 30 years |author=Nishanthi Priyangika |date=21 May 2012 |website=World Socialist Web site |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20081120133200/http://www.wsws.org/articles/2001/may2001/bang-m21.shtml |archive-date=20 November 2008 |url-status=live |access-date=12 July 2009}}</ref> ] spokesman ] reported that both ] and ] would improve bilateral diplomatic channels and promised to exercise restraint in the future.<ref name="nautilus" /> India and Bangladesh initiated talks to resolve their border disputes in March 2002. By July 2002, the two sides established joint-working groups to agree on and establish the non-demarcated sections of the border.<ref name=Taylor />


Bangladesh ordered no ], suspensions, or transfers of any local military commanders.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.mea.gov.in/articles-in-indian-media.htm?dtl/18607/Bangladesh+used+us+as+a+punching+bag |title='Bangladesh used us as a punching bag |publisher=Mea.gov.in |access-date=16 October 2014 |archive-date=30 March 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200330005510/http://www.mea.gov.in/articles-in-indian-media.htm?dtl/18607/Bangladesh+used+us+as+a+punching+bag |url-status=live }}</ref> This was the first armed engagement between India and Bangladesh, two neighbouring states that had otherwise maintained friendly relations since ] from ] in 1971.<ref name="cnn1" /> The end of the brief conflict saw an upsurge of ] in Bangladesh. In parliamentary elections, the four-party right-wing alliance led by the ] and ] won a majority of 196 seats out of 300. Bangladesh ordered no ], suspensions, or transfers of any local military commanders.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.mea.gov.in/articles-in-indian-media.htm?dtl/18607/Bangladesh+used+us+as+a+punching+bag |title='Bangladesh used us as a punching bag |publisher=Mea.gov.in |access-date=16 October 2014 |archive-date=30 March 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200330005510/http://www.mea.gov.in/articles-in-indian-media.htm?dtl/18607/Bangladesh+used+us+as+a+punching+bag |url-status=live}}</ref> This was the first armed engagement between India and Bangladesh, two neighbouring states that had otherwise maintained friendly relations since ] from ] in 1971.<ref name="cnn1">{{cite news |url=http://edition.cnn.com/2001/WORLD/asiapcf/south/04/26/india.police/ |title=India accuses Bangladesh of war crimes |date=27 April 2001 |work=CNN |access-date=3 July 2014 |archive-date=29 September 2014 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140929114032/http://edition.cnn.com/2001/WORLD/asiapcf/south/04/26/india.police/ |url-status=live}}</ref> The end of the brief conflict saw an upsurge of ] in Bangladesh. In parliamentary elections, the four-party right-wing alliance led by the ] and ] won a majority of 196 seats out of 300.


Both sides desisted from any further hostilities and began border talks to discuss disputes along their {{convert|4000|km|mi|abbr=on}} border.<ref name="border_talks">{{cite news |title=Bangladesh and India begin border talks |url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/south_asia/1889458.stm |work=BBC News |access-date=19 October 2006 |archive-date=23 February 2003 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20030223172557/http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/south_asia/1889458.stm |url-status=live }}</ref> The two states experienced a thaw in ] shortly afterwards. Both sides desisted from any further hostilities and began border talks to discuss disputes along their {{convert|4000|km|mi|abbr=on}} border.<ref name="border_talks">{{cite news |title=Bangladesh and India begin border talks |url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/south_asia/1889458.stm |work=] |access-date=19 October 2006 |archive-date=23 February 2003 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20030223172557/http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/south_asia/1889458.stm |url-status=live}}</ref> The two states experienced a thaw in ] shortly afterwards.
India has since then initiated the construction of a ] with Bangladesh,<ref name="border_fence">{{cite news |title=Livelihoods on line at Indian border |url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/south_asia/4622317.stm |work=BBC News |access-date=19 October 2006 |archive-date=28 August 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170828014225/http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/south_asia/4622317.stm |url-status=live }}</ref> and is still in the process of constructing it.<ref>{{cite news |url=http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/article589627.ece |title=India fences off Bangladesh to keep out Muslim terror |location=London |work=The Times |date=13 November 2005 |first1=Dean |last1=Nelson |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070220120456/http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/article589627.ece |archive-date=20 February 2007 |access-date=11 July 2007}}</ref> Bangladesh has protested the construction of the barrier, claiming that the construction of a fence within 150 yards of the international border was a gross violation of the ].<ref name="people">{{cite news |title=3 killed in Bangladesh-Indian border guards cross fire |url=http://english.people.com.cn/200504/17/eng20050417_181457.html |work=People's Daily |date=17 April 2005 |access-date=15 September 2019 |archive-date=12 May 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130512205046/http://english.people.com.cn/200504/17/eng20050417_181457.html |url-status=live }}</ref> The ] also protested the alleged frequent Indian ] (BSF) incursions into Bangladesh, and cross-border firing that has resulted in the deaths of ] inside Bangladeshi territory.<ref name="star">{{cite news |title=Border tension flares as BSF kills 2 more |url=http://www.thedailystar.net/2005/04/24/d5042401022.htm |work=The Daily Star |date=24 April 2005 |access-date=19 April 2007 |archive-date=17 June 2011 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110617114059/http://www.thedailystar.net/2005/04/24/d5042401022.htm |url-status=live }}</ref> In a news conference in August 2008, it was stated that 97 people had been killed (69 Bangladeshis, 28 Indians; rest unidentified) while trying to cross the border illegally in the prior six months.<ref name="bsf killing">{{cite news |title=India says 59 killed over last six months on Bangladesh border |url=http://in.reuters.com/article/topNews/idINIndia-35156020080824 |work=Reuters |date=24 August 2008 |access-date=15 September 2019 |archive-date=26 October 2008 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20081026110404/http://in.reuters.com/article/topNews/idINIndia-35156020080824 |url-status=live }}</ref><ref name="dstar11-16-08">{{cite news |url=http://www.thedailystar.net/story.php?nid=63748 |title=Three Bangladeshis killed in 'drunk shooting' by BSF man |work=The Daily Star |date=17 November 2008 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090212191647/http://www.thedailystar.net/story.php?nid=63748 |archive-date=12 February 2009}}</ref> India has since then initiated the construction of a ] with Bangladesh,<ref name="border_fence">{{cite news |title=Livelihoods on line at Indian border |url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/south_asia/4622317.stm |work=] |access-date=19 October 2006 |archive-date=28 August 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170828014225/http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/south_asia/4622317.stm |url-status=live}}</ref> and is still in the process of constructing it.<ref>{{cite news |url=http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/article589627.ece |title=India fences off Bangladesh to keep out Muslim terror |location=London |work=The Times |date=13 November 2005 |first1=Dean |last1=Nelson |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070220120456/http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/article589627.ece |archive-date=20 February 2007 |access-date=11 July 2007}}</ref> Bangladesh has protested the construction of the barrier, claiming that the construction of a fence within 150 yards of the international border was a gross violation of the ].<ref name="people">{{cite news |title=3 killed in Bangladesh-Indian border guards cross fire |url=http://english.people.com.cn/200504/17/eng20050417_181457.html |work=People's Daily |date=17 April 2005 |access-date=15 September 2019 |archive-date=12 May 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130512205046/http://english.people.com.cn/200504/17/eng20050417_181457.html |url-status=live}}</ref> The ] also protested the alleged frequent Indian ] (BSF) incursions into Bangladesh, and cross-border firing that has resulted in the deaths of ] inside Bangladeshi territory.<ref name="star">{{cite news |title=Border tension flares as BSF kills 2 more |url=http://www.thedailystar.net/2005/04/24/d5042401022.htm |work=The Daily Star |date=24 April 2005 |access-date=19 April 2007 |archive-date=17 June 2011 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110617114059/http://www.thedailystar.net/2005/04/24/d5042401022.htm |url-status=live}}</ref> In a news conference in August 2008, it was stated that 97 people had been killed (69 Bangladeshis, 28 Indians; rest unidentified) while trying to cross the border illegally in the prior six months.<ref name="bsf killing">{{cite news |title=India says 59 killed over last six months on Bangladesh border |url=http://in.reuters.com/article/topNews/idINIndia-35156020080824 |work=Reuters |date=24 August 2008 |access-date=15 September 2019 |archive-date=26 October 2008 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20081026110404/http://in.reuters.com/article/topNews/idINIndia-35156020080824 |url-status=dead}}</ref><ref name="dstar11-16-08">{{cite news |url=http://www.thedailystar.net/story.php?nid=63748 |title=Three Bangladeshis killed in 'drunk shooting' by BSF man |work=The Daily Star |date=17 November 2008 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090212191647/http://www.thedailystar.net/story.php?nid=63748 |archive-date=12 February 2009}}</ref>


==See also== ==See also==
Line 88: Line 77:
* ] * ]
* ] * ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]


== References == == References ==
Line 105: Line 98:
] ]
] ]
]
]
{{Pp-extended}}

Latest revision as of 12:32, 8 December 2024

Series of armed skirmishes between Bangladesh and India

2001 Bangladesh–India clashes

Map showing the locations of India and Bangladesh (highlighted in green and orange, respectively)
Date16–20 April 2001 (4 days)
LocationBangladesh–India border (Gowainghat, Sylhet/East Khasi Hills, Meghalaya, Boraibari, Kurigram)
Result Inconclusive (See Aftermath section)
Territorial
changes
Status quo ante bellum
Belligerents
 Bangladesh  India
Commanders and leaders
A. L. M. Fazlur Rahman Gurbachan Singh Jagat
Units involved
Bangladesh Rifles Border Security Force
Strength
700–1,000 troops 300+ troops
Casualties and losses
  • 3 killed
  • 5 wounded
  • 16 killed
  • 2 wounded
  • 2 captured
24 civilians injured
10,000 civilians temporarily displaced

The 2001 Bangladesh–India border clashes were a series of armed skirmishes between India and Bangladesh in April 2001. The clashes took place between troops of the Bangladesh Rifles (BDR) and the Indian Border Security Force (BSF) on the poorly-marked international border between the two countries.

The clashes began on 16 April 2001, when a force of around 800 to a 1000 Bangladeshi Paramilitary soldiers attacked and captured Padua/Pyrdiwah village, breaking the status quo and forcing the civilians there to flee. Bangladesh claimed that the village had been illegally occupied by India since Bangladesh's War of Independence in 1971. The Indian Border Security Force (BSF) post in Padua/Pyrdiwah village was encircled, trapping 31 BSF troops within. However, both sides held their fire and began negotiations. Over the course of the following days, about three BSF companies proceeded to reinforce the outpost. This incident was resolved later without any bloodshed.

Following this standoff, Indian BSF paramilitary troops along the Bangladesh–India border were put on high alert and ordered to begin intensive patrolling. A few days later, a small contingent of 300 BSF troops entered Bangladeshi territory near the village of Boraibari, more than 200 km to the west of Padua/Pyrdiwah, The intrusion was used as a "counter-attack" by India to retaliate after the earlier incident in Padua. Immediately upon entering Bangladeshi territory, the Indian BSF paramilitary company were ambushed by Bangladeshi border guards and the attack on BDR outposts were repulsed. who were assisted by hundreds of villagers. Following their capture, the bodies of the Indian soldiers were returned to India on 20 April.

The clashes finally ended on 21 April 2001, after both sides agreed to a ceasefire. The clashes left a total of 21 people dead, including 16 Indian soldiers and three Bangladeshi border guards.

The clashes were a major setback to the improving relations between India and Bangladesh. The two countries had signed a number of agreements in the years leading up to the clashes including the 2015 Land Boundary Agreement which served an important role in advancing the exchange of 111 enclaves (17,160.63 acres) from India to Bangladesh and reciprocatively, the latter transferred 51 enclaves (7,110.02 acres) to India.

Background

Main article: Partition of Bengal (1947)

The Partition of Bengal in 1947 left a poorly demarcated international border between the states of India and Bangladesh (erstwhile East Pakistan). Ownership of several villages on both sides of the de facto border were disputed and claimed by both countries. The dispute over the demarcation of the India–Bangladesh border worsened due to the existence of over 190 enclaves.

Cause

One of the disputed areas was a small sliver of land near the village of Padua (also known as Pyrdiwah), on the border between Bangladesh and the Indian state of Meghalaya, which was used by Indian security forces during the 1971 Bangladesh Liberation War to train ethnic Bengali guerrillas known as the Mukti Bahini, who were fighting the Pakistan Army and pro-Pakistan loyalist militias. Following its independence, Bangladesh staked its claim to the area in which India's Border Security Force (BSF) had established a post in since 1971. The village is one of the Indian exclaves on the border between Bangladesh and Meghalaya. There are 111 Indian enclaves in Bangladeshi-claimed territory and 50 Bangladeshi enclaves in Indian-claimed territory. Padua village is an adverse possession—a village inhabited by Indians that is legally owned by Bangladesh (until the border agreement is ratified and the populations exchanged). The people of this village are ethnic Khasis.

In an interview published much later, the then-director of the Bangladesh Rifles (BDR), Major-General Fazlur Rahman, who was later dismissed from service by the rival government following an election, claimed that the Indian BSF had begun to construct a linking road between their camp in Padua and another camp 10 km (6.2 mi) away through no man's land and Bangladeshi territory.

Conflict

The fighting that took place during these clashes was the worst since Bangladesh's war with Pakistan in 1971. It took place around the village of Padua in the Indian state of Meghalaya which adjoins the Tamabil area of the Bangladeshi border in the Sylhet district. Although an effective status quo had been maintained in this area, around 6.5 km (4.0 mi) of the border had been disputed for the past 30 years.

On 16 April 2001, a force of around 1000 Bangladeshi soldiers attacked and captured Padua village, breaking the status quo and forcing the civilians there to flee. Bangladesh claimed that the village had been illegally occupied by India since Bangladesh's War of independence in 1971. The Indian Border Security Force (BSF) post in Padua village was surrounded, trapping several BSF troops within. However, both sides held their fire and began negotiations. Over the course of the following days, about three BSF companies proceeded to reinforce the outpost. This incident was resolved later without any bloodshed.

Following this standoff, BSF troops along the Indian–Bangladeshi border were put on high alert and ordered to begin intensive patrolling. A few days later, a small contingent of BSF troops entered Bangladeshi territory near the village of Boroibari, more than 200 km (120 mi) to the west of Padua. Unlike the latter village, which is an adverse possession, Boroibari is an area lying across a fence well inside Bangladesh. The intrusion was used as a "counter-attack" by India to retaliate after the earlier incident in Padua. According to Bangladeshi sources, Indian forces launched an early-morning attack on their posts in the frontier district of Kurigram, which lies on the border with the Indian state of Assam.

Immediately upon entering Bangladeshi territory, 16 Indian paramilitary personnel were ambushed and killed by Bangladeshi border guards, who were assisted by hundreds of villagers. Around midnight, the Foreign Secretary of India, Chokila Iyer, received a call from her Bangladeshi counterpart, Syed Muazzem Ali, saying that orders had been issued to restore the status quo as well as for an immediate Bangladeshi withdrawal from Padua. The Bangladesh Rifles (BDR) withdrew from Padua by the night of 19 April.

In the confrontation, 16 Indian border guards were killed while two suffered injuries. The attack also left three Bangladeshi border guards dead and another five wounded. About 10,000 civilians fled the area after some 24 were wounded in the cross-border clashes.

After the Boroibari intrusion on 18 April, India alleged that the BDR started firing 3-inch and 8-inch mortar shells on Mankachar village, which is another disputed Indian enclave.

Aftermath

After both governments intervened in the situation, the Bangladeshis and Indians returned to their original positions and restored the previous status quo. Fresh clashes erupted along the India–Bangladesh border just hours after both sides voiced regret and concern over the recent killings, but by midnight on 20 April, cross-border firing had stopped. An article reported that 6,000 Indian civilians had fled the region, and Indian government officials were attempting to convince the displaced villagers to return to their homes. Bangladesh later agreed to return the bodies of 16 Indian soldiers the next day. Upon examining the bodies of the dead personnel, India accused Bangladeshi Armed Forces of subjecting the captives to severe torture before they were shot dead. On the other hand, three Bangladeshi soldiers were also killed; two during combat and another who died of wounds that were sustained during cross-border operations.

Observers have termed the incident as a political ploy to rouse nationalistic passions before the Bangladeshi elections (which were 2 months away at the time of the incident) and as malicious adventurism by the Bangladesh Rifles (BDR). The Government of Bangladesh denied allegations that it had supported the BDR's initialization of hostilities with India and termed the incident as the "adventurism of its local commanders".

The Prime Minister of Bangladesh Sheikh Hasina and Prime Minister of India Atal Bihari Vajpayee engaged in telephonic discussions and subsequently agreed to order a high-level investigation into the incident. Indian Foreign Ministry spokesman Raminder Singh Jassal reported that both India and Bangladesh would improve bilateral diplomatic channels and promised to exercise restraint in the future. India and Bangladesh initiated talks to resolve their border disputes in March 2002. By July 2002, the two sides established joint-working groups to agree on and establish the non-demarcated sections of the border.

Bangladesh ordered no courts-martial, suspensions, or transfers of any local military commanders. This was the first armed engagement between India and Bangladesh, two neighbouring states that had otherwise maintained friendly relations since Bangladesh's independence from Pakistan in 1971. The end of the brief conflict saw an upsurge of nationalism in Bangladesh. In parliamentary elections, the four-party right-wing alliance led by the Bangladesh Nationalist Party and Jamaat-e-Islami Bangladesh won a majority of 196 seats out of 300.

Both sides desisted from any further hostilities and began border talks to discuss disputes along their 4,000 km (2,500 mi) border. The two states experienced a thaw in their diplomatic relations shortly afterwards. India has since then initiated the construction of a barrier along the entire length of its international border with Bangladesh, and is still in the process of constructing it. Bangladesh has protested the construction of the barrier, claiming that the construction of a fence within 150 yards of the international border was a gross violation of the Indo-Bangladeshi Treaty of Friendship, Cooperation and Peace. The Bangladeshi government also protested the alleged frequent Indian Border Security Force (BSF) incursions into Bangladesh, and cross-border firing that has resulted in the deaths of Bangladeshis inside Bangladeshi territory. In a news conference in August 2008, it was stated that 97 people had been killed (69 Bangladeshis, 28 Indians; rest unidentified) while trying to cross the border illegally in the prior six months.

See also

References

  1. Gokhale, Nitin (30 April 2001). "A Tale Of Two Blunders". Outlook. Archived from the original on 14 July 2014. Retrieved 16 October 2014.
  2. ^ "A Guns fall silent on border; BSF men's bodies to be returned today". The Tribune. 19 April 2001. Archived from the original on 13 May 2013. Retrieved 3 July 2014.
  3. ^ Chaudhuri, Kalyan (28 April 2001). "Disturbed Border". Frontline. Archived from the original on 28 August 2017. Retrieved 3 July 2014.
  4. "Bangladesh accused of border buildup". CNN. 24 April 2001. Retrieved 15 June 2024.
  5. ^ "A brush with Bangladesh". 22 February 2014. Archived from the original on 22 February 2014. Retrieved 11 November 2021.
  6. ^ "India-Bangladesh border battle". BBC News. 18 April 2001. Archived from the original on 20 October 2014. Retrieved 16 October 2014.
  7. Harding, Luke (23 April 2001). "Army defiant as Bangladesh election looms". The Guardian. Archived from the original on 14 July 2014. Retrieved 3 July 2014.
  8. Choudhury, Dutta (10 December 2012). "Area where 16 BSF men were killed to go to Bangladesh". Assam Tribune. Archived from the original on 1 September 2020. Retrieved 3 July 2014.
  9. ^ Nishanthi Priyangika (21 May 2012). "India-Bangladesh border still tense after worst clash in 30 years". World Socialist Web site. Archived from the original on 20 November 2008. Retrieved 12 July 2009.
  10. "India, Bangladesh clash along border". CNN. 18 April 2001. Retrieved 15 June 2024.
  11. Hosen, Akbar (18 April 2021). বড়াইবাড়ী যুদ্ধ: কুড়িগ্রামে কুড়ি বছর আগের যে সংঘাতে ১৬ জন ভারতীয় রক্ষী নিহত হয়. BBC Bangla (in Bengali). Dhaka. Retrieved 12 September 2024.
  12. ^ "India-Bangladesh border battle". BBC News. 18 April 2001.
  13. "India, Bangladesh clash along border". CNN. 18 April 2001. Retrieved 15 June 2024.
  14. ^ van Schendel, Willem (2007). "The Wagah Syndrome: Territorial Roots of Contemporary violence in South Asia". In Basu, Amrita; Roy, Srirupa (eds.). Violence and Democracy in India. Calcutta: Seagull Books. pp. 55–57.
  15. ^ "Analysis: Surprising outbreak of hostilities". BBC News. Archived from the original on 12 January 2013. Retrieved 1 May 2012.
  16. Joyce, Elijah (2024). "The Invasion of Pyrdiwah (2001) — Modern History Summarized" (Historical analysis). Medium. Archived from the original on 26 February 2024. Retrieved 26 February 2024.
  17. "Tension along the border". BBC News. Archived from the original on 12 January 2013. Retrieved 1 May 2012.
  18. ^ "Barbaric killing of BSF jawans puts India-Bangladesh relations under severe strain". India Today. 7 May 2001. Retrieved 3 July 2014.
  19. Ranjan, Amit (30 October 2018). India–Bangladesh Border Disputes History and Post-LBA Dynamics. South Asia Economic and Policy Studies. Springer Nature Singapore. p. 107. doi:10.1007/978-981-10-8384-6. eISSN 2522-5510. ISBN 9789811083846. ISSN 2522-5502.
  20. "India and Bangladesh: Exchanging border enclaves & (re-)connecting with new citizens". Brookings. Archived from the original on 23 July 2023. Retrieved 23 July 2023.
  21. Kobayashi-Hillary, Mark (2004). Outsourcing to India: The Offshore Advantage. Springer Science & Business Media. pp. 61–. ISBN 978-3-540-20855-6.
  22. ^ The Europa World Year Book 2003. Taylor & Francis. 2003. pp. 662–. ISBN 978-1-85743-227-5.
  23. ^ "South Asia Nuclear Dialogue". nautilus.org. Archived from the original on 3 December 2008.
  24. "A country should have strength to implement its political plans". New Age (Bangladesh). 20 December 2013. Archived from the original on 22 February 2014. Retrieved 3 July 2014.
  25. "'Criminal adventurism' must not go unpunished: Jaswant". Rediff.com. Archived from the original on 4 June 2011. Retrieved 12 July 2009.
  26. "BSF men tortured, then shot dead". The Tribune. Archived from the original on 26 March 2014. Retrieved 16 October 2014.
  27. "'Bangladesh used us as a punching bag". Mea.gov.in. Archived from the original on 30 March 2020. Retrieved 16 October 2014.
  28. "India accuses Bangladesh of war crimes". CNN. 27 April 2001. Archived from the original on 29 September 2014. Retrieved 3 July 2014.
  29. "Bangladesh and India begin border talks". BBC News. Archived from the original on 23 February 2003. Retrieved 19 October 2006.
  30. "Livelihoods on line at Indian border". BBC News. Archived from the original on 28 August 2017. Retrieved 19 October 2006.
  31. Nelson, Dean (13 November 2005). "India fences off Bangladesh to keep out Muslim terror". The Times. London. Archived from the original on 20 February 2007. Retrieved 11 July 2007.
  32. "3 killed in Bangladesh-Indian border guards cross fire". People's Daily. 17 April 2005. Archived from the original on 12 May 2013. Retrieved 15 September 2019.
  33. "Border tension flares as BSF kills 2 more". The Daily Star. 24 April 2005. Archived from the original on 17 June 2011. Retrieved 19 April 2007.
  34. "India says 59 killed over last six months on Bangladesh border". Reuters. 24 August 2008. Archived from the original on 26 October 2008. Retrieved 15 September 2019.
  35. "Three Bangladeshis killed in 'drunk shooting' by BSF man". The Daily Star. 17 November 2008. Archived from the original on 12 February 2009.

Further reading

Bangladesh Armed Forces
 Bangladesh Army    Bangladesh Navy    Bangladesh Air Force
Organization Tri-service Logo of Bangladesh Armed Forces
Leadership
History and wars
War leaders
Decorations
Personnel and
equipment
Ranks
Training
Equipment
Special ops
Bangladesh Bangladesh–India relations India
Diplomatic posts
Diplomacy
Incidents
Military relations
Initiatives
Transport
Related
Category:Bangladesh–India relations
Extended-protected articleEditing of this article by new or unregistered users is currently disabled.
See the protection policy and protection log for more details. If you cannot edit this article and you wish to make a change, you can submit an edit request, discuss changes on the talk page, request unprotection, log in, or create an account.
Categories: