Revision as of 15:18, 26 April 2007 editPoeticbent (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers29,717 edits →[]: added link to Talk← Previous edit | Revision as of 17:56, 26 April 2007 edit undoInteriot (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users18,834 edits IRCNext edit → | ||
Line 229: | Line 229: | ||
We have a new anon on a destructive spree. Can you take care of this? Thanks. --] ] 15:13, 26 April 2007 (UTC) | We have a new anon on a destructive spree. Can you take care of this? Thanks. --] ] 15:13, 26 April 2007 (UTC) | ||
== IRC == | |||
Okay, you're added. You may have to type <tt style="background-color:#cfc">/msg chanserv invite #wikipedia-en-admins</tt> before joining. --] 17:56, 26 April 2007 (UTC) |
Revision as of 17:56, 26 April 2007
File:WikipediaSignpost icon.png You have the right to stay informed. Exercise it by reading the Misplaced Pages Signpost today. |
This talk page is automatically archived by Werdnabot. Any sections older than 7 days are automatically archived to User talk:Piotrus/Archive 15. Sections without timestamps are not archived. |
"You have new messages" was designed for a purpose: letting people know you have replied to them. I do not watch your talk page and I will likely IGNORE your reply if it is not copied to my page, as I will not be aware that you replied! Thank you. |
---|
Please add new comments in new sections if you are addressing a new issue. Please sign it by typing four tildes, like this: ~~~~. Thanks in advance. |
---|
Please add new comments in new sections if you are addressing a new issue. Please sign it by typing four tildes, like this: ~~~~. Thanks in advance. |
---|
"You have new messages" was designed for a purpose: letting people know you have replied to them. I do not watch your talk page and I will likely IGNORE your reply if it is not copied to my page, as I will not be aware that you replied! Thank you. |
---|
Talk archives: Archive 1 (moved Jan 17, 2005), Archive 2 (moved Feb 21, 2005), Archive 3 (moved May 19, 2005), Archive 4 (moved July 14, 2005), Archive 5 (moved September 27, 2005), Archive 6 (moved November 23, 2005), Archive 7 (moved January 7, 2006), Archive 8 (moved 19 March, 2006), Archive 9 (moved 6 May, 2006), Archive 10 (moved 17 June, 2006), Archive 11 (moved 28 July, 2006), Archive 12 (moved 25 September, 2006), Archive 13 (moved 28 October, 2006), Archive 14 (moved 27 December, 2006), Archive 15 (moved 4 February, 2007), Archive 16 (moved 20 March, 2007)
If you have come here to place a request for a re-confirmation of my adminship, please note that I will either:
at my discretion
ArbCom/PiotrusYour behavior will be scrutinized here: M.K. 10:16, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
Polish translation of edit summaryHi there... I am wondering, as someone who indcates they can translate polish, could you review the following edit summary for this diff and let me know it's general content. Based on the topic and the fact the edit reversed my editing, I believe it is likely in polish and directed at me. It is unlikely I will report it or anything, but it is always nice to know if someone is slamming you. Thanks.--User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 12:47, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment/PoliciesYour latest proposal seems to have broken ilink...-- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk 19:38, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
koloman göghyou are invited to improve article, thanks --Mt7 20:44, 20 April 2007 (UTC) what you say is humbug, no one is czechoslovak player Ján Čapkovič, Antonín Panenka, Ladislav Jurkemik,Ivo Knoflíček, František Plánička, Ján Švehlík, Josef Masopust, Alexander Vencel (born 1944), Ivo Viktor, we need a new wikipedia for you. --Mt7 21:07, 20 April 2007 (UTC) WikiProjectThanks for the link. I will take a look. How did you know about my interest in this sort of stuff? --HappyCamper 04:56, 21 April 2007 (UTC) Prodding List of... articleI do not think that you should be prodding List of... articles as you currently are doing. You tried to mass AfD them, and that did not work; nor was there consensus that it was a good idea. Nowhere have I seen evidence of consensus being reached that the deletion is a good thing. I think you should seek to get some consensus before engaging in this exercise. At the moment it appears to be your personal opinion that there's something wrong with these articles; you look like you're rampaging through Misplaced Pages without giving a second thought to other people's opinion.--Tagishsimon (talk)
The Polish Barnstar of National Merit, 2nd ClassThank you, Piotr. I appreciate it very much. I'm moving the awards to my userpage. Thanks a million. --Poeticbent talk 22:29, 21 April 2007 (UTC) You are welcomeBut - remember, every rose has thorns :) The more active you are, the more effort you put in - the more enemies you make... there are days I wonder if it is worth it, really... -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk 00:05, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
Arbitration statement lengthPlease note that an arbitrator has requested that you reduce the length of your statement on Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration. Thank you. Newyorkbrad 14:07, 22 April 2007 (UTC) DYK
Reification (fallacy)Thanks for the article, Piotrus. How does one generate the kind of notice that I received from you the next time a user accesses en.Misplaced Pages? Two comments on the article: Your subheading "Ethymology" is not as familiar as the equivalent "Etymology" – the former redirects to the latter in en.Misplaced Pages. Also, in the "Theory" section you write "A reification circle refers to the event when a norm, first seen as artificial and forces,...." It makes sense to me if "forces" should be "forced" but perhaps you had something else in mind that I'm not getting. I'll duplicate these comments on the Reification (fallacy) talk page if you want to discuss. —Blanchette 06:10, 23 April 2007 (UTC) a recent {{prod}}I left a message for you here. I can see your point about not keeping redundant information, as the two locations can get out of sync, causing confusion. But, if the out-of-date, and possibly redundant info hasn't been checked, before the article is removed, it is lost. And I think that should be checked first. Probably a lot of work to do a proper job of it. Cheers! -- Geo Swan 15:24, 23 April 2007 (UTC) LWD Szpak
Your arbcom commentThanks for your comment wrt the Romania case. You wrote:
Maybe I am suffering from certain delusions, but may be I am correct on who you mean by "certain users". In this case, please reread the Latvia case, note the list of users ArbCom found engaged in "poor behavior", reread the talk of the Romania article find those engaged in poor behavior there as well and compare the list. I am writing to you off the arbcom page because the page is already loaded, but I welcome your continued scrutiny. In fact, from the pattern of your edits that show up in certain articles I am aware of being under the radar and it does not bother me. So, I would be interested in your more detailed analysis rather than a totally unsupported statement. --Irpen 05:52, 24 April 2007 (UTC) Leaving my comments in the air with lost contextWhen you remove or significantly alter your comments to which I already replied, my comments start to look irrelevant at worst or strange and mysterious at best. Please post your new thoughts below (rather than in place) of old thoughts so that I know what I should be replying to and the reader may follow the discussion. TIA, --Irpen 05:59, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for April 23rd, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:56, 24 April 2007 (UTC) 3O ToTI am removing Misplaced Pages:Third opinion Time of Troublesrequest because you did not include the section on the talk page it related to and there seem to be more than two people involved now. If I am mistaken please resubmit. --Philip Baird Shearer 00:49, 25 April 2007 (UTC) Polish CommunesHi. You are an admin here, so I'd like to ask you for something. After my talk with User:Marcin Suwalczan, we agreed to keep standard of "Name Commune", not "Gmina Name". But I was move few articles before: Gmina Abramów; Gmina Adamów, Łuków County; Gmina Adamów, Zamość County; Gmina Adamówka, Gmina Aleksandrów, Biłgoraj County; Gmina Aleksandrów, Piotrków Trybunalski County; Gmina Aleksandrów Kujawski and Gmina Aleksandrów Łódzki, all of them should be moved back. And, as You know, it is not possible without deletion of redirect pages. Sorry for this perturbation. Regards Lajsikonik 20:42, 25 April 2007 (UTC) User:87.187.170.182(talk)We have a new anon on a destructive spree. Can you take care of this? Thanks. --Poeticbent talk 15:13, 26 April 2007 (UTC) IRCOkay, you're added. You may have to type /msg chanserv invite #wikipedia-en-admins before joining. --Interiot 17:56, 26 April 2007 (UTC) |