| Revision as of 19:33, 16 December 2011 editSecond Quantization (talk | contribs)Pending changes reviewers24,876 edits →Plant perception: duplicate of existing article plant perception← Previous edit |
Latest revision as of 18:27, 10 December 2024 edit undoPsychologist Guy (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users53,282 edits ←Changed redirect target from Plant cognition to Plant intelligenceTag: Redirect target changed |
| (37 intermediate revisions by 20 users not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
|
|
#Redirect ] |
|
].]] |
|
|
In ], '''plant intelligence''' is the ability of ]s to sense the environment and adjust their ], ] and ] accordingly.<ref>{{cite doi|10.1016/j.tplants.2005.07.005}}</ref> Research draws on the fields of ], ] and ]. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{{Redirect category shell|1= |
|
] is an ] describing abilities such as the capacities for ], ], ], ]ing, ], learning from past experiences, ]ning, and ]. Studies indicate plants are capable of ] and ]. |
|
|
|
{{Redirect to section }} |
|
|
|
|
|
{{Redirect with history}} |
|
==Problem solving== |
|
|
|
}} |
|
Plants adapt their behaviour in a variety of ways: |
|
|
* Active foraging for light and nutrients. They do this by changing their architecture, physiology and phenotype.<ref name="dekroon95">De Kroon, H. and Hutchings, M.J. (1995) . J. Ecol. 83, 143–152</ref><ref>{{cite doi|10.1023/A:1019640813676}}</ref><ref>{{cite doi|10.1016/S0065-2504(08)60215-9}}</ref> |
|
|
* Leaves and branches are positioned and oriented in response to light source.<ref name="dekroon95"/><ref>{{cite doi|10.1126/science.199.4331.888}}</ref> |
|
|
* Ability to detect soil volume and adapt growth accordingly independently of ] availability.<ref>{{cite doi|10.2307/1938905}}</ref><ref>{{cite jstor|2389968}}</ref><ref>{{cite doi|10.1016/S0065-2504(08)60032-X}}</ref> |
|
|
* ]. |
|
|
|
|
|
==Communication== |
|
|
Plants respond to volatile signals produced by other plants.<ref>Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1990 October; 87(19): 7713–7716. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC54818/</ref><ref>{{cite doi|10.1023/A:1007893626166}}</ref> |
|
|
|
|
|
==Mechanisms== |
|
|
{{Main|Signal transduction|Plant neurobiology|Plant hormone|}} |
|
|
In plants, the mechanism responsible for adaptation is ].<ref>{{Cite book |last1=Scheel |first1=Dierk |last2=Wasternack |first2=C. |title=Plant signal transduction |year=2002 |publisher= Oxford University Press |location=Oxford |isbn=0-19-963879-9}}</ref><ref>{{cite doi|10.1034/j.1399-3054.2001.1120202.x}}</ref><ref>{{cite pmid|12194182}}</ref><ref>{{cite pmid|10200239}}</ref> Plants do not have a brain or ], but reactions within signalling pathways may provide a biochemical basis for learning and memory.<ref>{{cite pmid|9888852}}</ref> Controversially, the brain is used as a metaphor in plant intelligence to provide an integrated view of signalling,<ref>{{cite doi|10.1016/j.tplants.2006.06.009}}</ref> (see ]). |
|
|
|
|
|
Plant cells can be electrically excitable and can display rapid electrical responses (]s) to environmental stimuli. These action potentials can influence processes such as ]-based cytoplasmic streaming, ], wound responses, respiration, ] and flowering.<ref>Wagner E, Lehner L, Normann J, Veit J, Albrechtova J (2006). Hydroelectrochemical integration of the higher plant—basis for electrogenic flower induction. pp 369–389 In: Balusˇka F, Mancuso S, Volkmann D (eds) Communication in plants: neuronal aspects of plant life. Springer, Berlin.</ref><ref>Fromm J, Lautner S. (2007). Electrical signals and their physiological significance in plants. Plant Cell Environ. 30(3):249-57. {{DOI|10.1111/j.1365-3040.2006.01614.x}} PMID 17263772</ref><ref>{{cite pmid|19129416}}</ref><ref>{{cite jstor|4353850}}</ref> |
|
|
|
|
|
==Plant adaptation vs plant intelligence== |
|
|
It has been argued that although plants are capable of adaptation, it should not be called intelligence. ''"A bacterium can monitor its environment and instigate developmental processes appropriate to the prevailing circumstances, but is that intelligence? Such simple adaptation behaviour might be bacterial intelligence but is clearly not animal intelligence."''<ref name="firn2004">{{cite pmid|15023701}}</ref> |
|
|
However, plant intelligence fits with the definition of intelligence proposed by ] in a book he wrote about evolution where he described it as "adaptively variable behaviour during the lifetime of the individual".<ref>http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg17523535.700-not-just-a-pretty-face.html</ref> |
|
|
|
|
|
It is also argued that a plant cannot have goals because operational control of the plant's organs is devolved.<ref name="firn2004"/> |
|
|
|
|
|
==History== |
|
|
] studied the movement of plants and in 1880 published a book ]. In the book he concludes: |
|
|
<blockquote> |
|
|
It is hardly an exaggeration to say that the tip of the ] thus endowed acts like the brain of one of the lower animals; the brain being situated within the anterior end of the body, receiving impressions from the sense-organs, and directing the several movements. |
|
|
</blockquote> |
|
|
]n scientist Sir ] began to conduct experiments on plants in the year 1900. He found that every plant and every part of a plant appeared to have a sensitive ] and responded to shock by a spasm just as an animal muscle does.<ref>Bose, J.C., The Nervous Mechanisms of Plants, Longmans, Green and Co., London. 1926</ref><ref>{{cite doi|10.1038/118654a0}}</ref> |
|
|
|
|
|
Bose's experiments stopped at this conclusion, but American ] expert ] conducted research that led him to believe that plants can communicate with other lifeforms.<ref>C Backster. Evidence of a primary perception in plant life. International Journal of Parapsychology, 1968</ref><ref>{{cite doi|10.1126/science.189.4201.478}}</ref> Backster's interest in the subject began in February 1966, when Backster wondered if he could measure the rate at which water rises from a philodendron's root area into its leaves. Because a polygraph or "lie detector" can measure electrical resistance, and water would alter the resistance of the leaf, he decided that this was the correct instrument to use. After attaching a polygraph to one of the plant's leaves, Backster claimed that, to his immense surprise, "the tracing began to show a pattern typical of the response you get when you subject a human to emotional stimulation of short duration". |
|
|
|
|
|
==See also== |
|
|
* ] |
|
|
* '']'' |
|
|
|
|
|
==References== |
|
|
{{Reflist}} |
|
|
|
|
|
{{DEFAULTSORT:Plant Intelligence}} |
|
|
] |
|
|
] |
|