Misplaced Pages

Edict of Thessalonica: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 19:50, 19 July 2021 editDeusImperator (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users3,518 editsNo edit summaryTag: Reverted← Previous edit Latest revision as of 01:59, 12 December 2024 edit undo1980fast (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users73,314 editsm More specific linkTag: Visual edit 
(107 intermediate revisions by 40 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Short description|Edict establishing Christianity as the Roman Empire's state religion, issued in AD 380}} {{Short description|Edict establishing Christianity as the Roman Empire's state religion, issued in AD 380}}
{{Expand French|topic=hist|date=March 2022}}


The '''Edict of Thessalonica''' (also known as '''''Cunctos populos'''''), issued on 27 February AD 380 by three reigning ]s, made ] {{efn|The Edict is the first which definitely introduces Catholic orthodoxy as the established religion of the Roman world. It marks the end of the fourth-century religious controversy on the Trinity, occasioned by the Arian heresy and calling forth definitions of orthodox dogma by the Council of Nicaea (325) and Constantinople (381). Acknowledgment of the true doctrine of the Trinity is made the test of State recognition. The citation of the Roman See as the yardstick of correct belief is significant; bracketing of the name of the Patriarch of Alexandria with that of the Pope was due to ti the Egyptian See's stalwart defence of the Trinitarian position, particularly under St. Athanasius. The last sentence of the Edict indicates that the Emperors contemplate the use of physical force in the service of orthodoxy; this is the first recorded instance of such a departure. - Church and State Through the Centuries Ed. Ehler Morrall}} the ] of the ].<ref name=Ehler65> The '''Edict of Thessalonica''' (]: Έδικτο της Θεσσαλονίκης), issued on 27 February AD 380 by ], made ]{{notetag|The Edict is the first which definitely introduces catholic ] as the established religion of the Roman State. It marks the end of the fourth-century religious controversy on the ], occasioned by ] and calling forth definitions of orthodox dogma by the ] (325) and the ] (381). Acknowledgment of the true doctrine of the Trinity is made the test of State recognition. The citation of the Roman See as the yardstick of correct belief is significant; bracketing of the name of the ] with that of the Pope was due to the Egyptian See's stalwart defence of the Trinitarian position, particularly under ]. The last sentence of the Edict indicates that the Emperors contemplate the use of physical force in the service of orthodoxy; this is the first recorded instance of such a departure.<ref>''Church and State Through the Centuries'', ed. Ehler and Morrall</ref>}} the ].<ref>''World Encyclopaedia of Interfaith Studies: World religions''. Jnanada Prakashan. 2009. {{ISBN|978-81-7139-280-3}}. <q>In the most common sense, "mainstream" refers to Nicene Christianity, or rather the traditions which continue to claim adherence to the Nicene Creed.</q></ref><ref>Pahner p. 378</ref><ref name=Ehler65>
{{cite book {{cite book
|page = 6-7 |page = 6-7
|url = https://books.google.com/books?id=2WuMyEzani8C&pg=PA6 |url = https://books.google.com/books?id=2WuMyEzani8C&pg=PA6
|title = Church and State Through the Centuries: A Collection of Historic Documents with Commentaries |title = Church and State Through the Centuries: A Collection of Historic Documents with Commentaries
|isbn = 9780819601896 |isbn = 978-0-8196-0189-6
|last1 = Ehler |last1 = Ehler
|first1 = Sidney Zdeneck |first1 = Sidney Zdeneck
|last2 = Morrall |last2 = Morrall
Line 18: Line 19:
|archive-date = 2016-05-15 |archive-date = 2016-05-15
}} }}
</ref> It condemned other Christian creeds such as ] as ] of madmen, and authorized their persecution.<ref>{{Cite web|title=The Edict of Thessalonica {{!}} History Today|url=https://www.historytoday.com/archive/months-past/edict-thessalonica|access-date=2021-02-27|website=www.historytoday.com}}</ref> </ref> It condemned other Christian creeds such as ] as ] of "foolish madmen," and authorized their ].<ref>{{Cite web|title=The Edict of Thessalonica {{!}} History Today|url=https://www.historytoday.com/archive/months-past/edict-thessalonica|access-date=2021-02-27|website=www.historytoday.com}}</ref>

This edict, addressed to the inhabitants of ] whom ] wished to pacify in order to make the city his imperial residence, constitutes the first known secular law which includes in its preamble a clear definition of what a Christian Roman ruler considers as ], opening the way of repression against dissidents qualified as "heretics". The Edict of Thessalonica was subsequently incorporated into Book XVI of the ] and was the milestone of the official ].


==Background== ==Background==
In 313 the emperor ], together with his eastern counterpart ], issued the ], which granted ] and ] for persecuted Christians. By 325 ], a school of ] which contended that Christ did not possess the divine essence of the Father but was rather a primordial creation and an entity subordinate to God, had become sufficiently widespread and controversial in ] that Constantine called the ] in an attempt to end the controversy by establishing an empire-wide, i.e., "]" ]. The council produced the ] of the ], which rejected the Arian confession and upheld that Christ is "true God" and "of one essence with the Father."<ref name="EmpireBay">Williams & Friell, (1994) pp. 46–53</ref> In 313 the emperor ], together with his eastern counterpart ], issued the ], which granted ] and ] for persecuted Christians. By 325 ], a school of ] which contended that Christ did not possess the divine essence of the Father but was rather a primordial creation and an entity subordinate to God, had become sufficiently widespread and controversial in ] that Constantine called the ] in an attempt to end the controversy by establishing an empire-wide, i.e., "]" ]. The council produced the ] of the ], which rejected the Arian confession and upheld that Christ is "true God" and "of one essence with the Father."<ref name="EmpireBay">Williams & Friell, (1994) pp. 46–53</ref>


However, the strife within the Church did not end with Nicaea, and the Nicene credal formulation remained contentious even among anti-Arian churchmen. Constantine, while urging tolerance, began to think that he had come down on the wrong side, and that the Nicenes &mdash; with their fervid, reciprocal persecution of Arians &mdash; were actually perpetuating strife within the Church. Constantine was not baptized until he was near death (337), choosing a bishop moderately sympathetic to ], ], to perform the baptism.<ref name="EmpireBay" /> However, the strife within the Church did not end with Nicaea, and the Nicene credal formulation remained contentious even among anti-Arian churchmen. Constantine, while urging tolerance, began to think that he had come down on the wrong side, and that the Nicenes&mdash;with their fervid, reciprocal persecution of Arians&mdash;were actually perpetuating strife within the Church. Constantine was not baptized until he was near death (337), choosing a bishop moderately sympathetic to ], ], to perform the baptism.<ref name="EmpireBay" />


Constantine's son and successor in the eastern empire, ] was partial to the Arian party, and even exiled pro-Nicene bishops. Constantius' successor ] (later called "The Apostate") was the only emperor after the conversion of Constantine to reject Christianity, attempting to fragment the Church and erode its influence by encouraging a revival of religious diversity, calling himself a "]" and supporting forms of ]. He championed the ] as well as Judaism, and furthermore declared toleration for all the various unorthodox Christian sects and schismatic movements. Julian's successor ], a Christian, reigned for only eight months and never entered the city of Constantinople. He was succeeded in the east by ], an Arian.<ref name="EmpireBay" /> ], Constantine's son and successor in the eastern empire, was partial to the Arian party, and even exiled pro-Nicene bishops. Constantius' successor ] (later called "The Apostate" by Christian writers) was the only emperor after the conversion of Constantine to reject Christianity, attempting to fragment the Church and erode its influence by encouraging a revival of religious diversity, calling himself a "]" and supporting forms of ]. He championed the ] as well as Judaism, and furthermore declared toleration for all the various unorthodox Christian sects and schismatic movements. Julian's successor ], a Christian, reigned for only eight months and never entered the city of Constantinople. He was succeeded in the east by ], an Arian.<ref name="EmpireBay" />


By 379, when Valens was succeeded by ], Arianism was widespread in the eastern half of the Empire, while the west had remained steadfastly Nicene. Theodosius, who had been born in ], was himself a Nicene Christian and very devout. In August, his western counterpart ] promoted persecution of ]s in the west.<ref name="EmpireBay" /> By 379, when Valens was succeeded by ], Arianism was widespread in the eastern half of the Empire, while the west had remained steadfastly Nicene. Theodosius, who had been born in ], was himself a Nicene Christian and very devout. In August, his western counterpart ] promoted persecution of ]s in the west.<ref name="EmpireBay" />


==Edict== ==Content==
The Edict of ] was jointly issued by ], emperor of the East, ], emperor of the West, and Gratian's junior co-ruler ], on 27 February 380.<ref name=Ehler65/> The edict came after Theodosius had been baptized by the bishop ] of Thessalonica upon suffering a severe illness in that city.<ref name="Ιερά Μητρόπολη Θεσσαλονίκης">{{cite web |url= http://www.imth.gr/default.aspx?lang=el-GR&loc=1&&page=147&saintid=33 |title= Ἀχόλιος ἢ Ἀσχόλιος ἐπίσκοπος Θεσσαλονίκης |access-date= 2016-09-23 |publisher= Ιερά Μητρόπολη Θεσσαλονίκης |url-status= live |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20160924104545/http://www.imth.gr/default.aspx?lang=el-GR&loc=1&&page=147&saintid=33 |archive-date= 2016-09-24 }}</ref> The Edict of ] was jointly issued by ], emperor of the East, ], emperor of the West, and Gratian's junior co-ruler ], on 27 February 380.<ref name=Ehler65/> The edict came after Theodosius had been baptized by the bishop ] of Thessalonica upon suffering a severe illness in that city.<ref name="Ιερά Μητρόπολη Θεσσαλονίκης">{{cite web |url= http://www.imth.gr/default.aspx?lang=el-GR&loc=1&&page=147&saintid=33 |title= Ἀχόλιος ἢ Ἀσχόλιος ἐπίσκοπος Θεσσαλονίκης |access-date= 2016-09-23 |publisher= Ιερά Μητρόπολη Θεσσαλονίκης |url-status= live |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20160924104545/http://www.imth.gr/default.aspx?lang=el-GR&loc=1&&page=147&saintid=33 |archive-date= 2016-09-24 }}</ref>


Line 38: Line 41:
DAT. III Kal. Mar. THESSAL(ONICAE) GR(ATI)ANO A. V ET THEOD(OSIO) A. I CONSS.}} DAT. III Kal. Mar. THESSAL(ONICAE) GR(ATI)ANO A. V ET THEOD(OSIO) A. I CONSS.}}


{{quote|EMPERORS GRATIAN, VALENTINIAN AND THEODOSIUS '']''. EDICT TO THE PEOPLE OF ].<br> It is our desire that all the various nations which are subject to our Clemency and Moderation, should continue to profess that religion which was delivered to the Romans by the divine ], as it has been preserved by faithful tradition, and which is now professed by the ] ] and by ], ], a man of ] holiness. According to the ] and the doctrine of the ], let us believe in the one deity of the ] and of the ] and of the ], in equal majesty and in a holy ]. We order the followers of this law to embrace the name of ] ]; but as for the others, since, in our judgment they are foolish madmen, we decree that they shall be branded with the ignominious name of ], and shall not presume to give to their conventicles the name of churches. They will suffer in the first place the chastisement of the ] and in the second the punishment of our authority which in accordance with the will of ] we shall decide to inflict.<br> GIVEN IN THESSALONICA ON THE THIRD DAY FROM THE ] OF MARCH, DURING THE FIFTH ] OF GRATIAN AUGUSTUS AND FIRST OF THEODOSIUS AUGUSTUS<ref>Codex Theodosianus XVI.1.2</ref>|'']'', ]}} {{quote|EMPERORS GRATIAN, VALENTINIAN AND THEODOSIUS '']''. EDICT TO THE PEOPLE OF ].<br> It is our desire that all the various nations which are subject to our Clemency and Moderation, should continue to profess that religion which was delivered to the Romans by the divine ], as it has been preserved by faithful tradition, and which is now professed by the ] ] and by ], ], a man of ] holiness. According to the ] and the doctrine of the ], let us believe in the one deity of the ] and of the ] and of the ], in equal majesty and in a holy ]. We order the followers of this law to embrace the name of ] ]; but as for the others, since, in our judgment they are foolish madmen, we decree that they shall be branded with the ignominious name of ], and shall not presume to give to their conventicles the name of churches. They will suffer in the first place the chastisement of the ] and in the second the punishment of our authority which in accordance with the will of ] we shall decide to inflict.<br> GIVEN IN THESSALONICA ON THE THIRD DAY FROM THE ] OF MARCH, DURING THE FIFTH ] OF GRATIAN AUGUSTUS AND FIRST OF THEODOSIUS AUGUSTUS<ref>Codex Theodosianus XVI.1.2</ref>|'']'', ]}}


==Importance== ==Importance==


The edict was followed in 381 by the ], which affirmed the Nicene Symbolum and gave final form to the ].<ref name=":0">Boyd (1905), p. 45</ref>
The edict was issued under the influence of ], and thus of ], who had appointed him. It re-affirmed a single expression of the Apostolic Faith as legitimate in the Roman Empire, "]" (that is, universal)<ref>{{OED|Catholic}}</ref><ref>(cf. </ref> and "]" (that is, correct in teaching).<ref>orthodox. Dictionary.com. The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language, Fourth Edition. Houghton Mifflin Company, 2004. (accessed: March 03, 2008).</ref>

After the edict, Theodosius spent a great deal of energy trying to suppress all non-Nicene forms of Christianity, especially Arianism, and in establishing Nicene orthodoxy throughout his realm.<ref name="CathEncyTheo">{{CathEncy|wstitle=Theodosius I}}</ref>

The edict was followed in 381 by the ], which affirmed the Nicene Symbolum and gave final form to the ].<ref>Boyd (1905), p. 45</ref> In 383, the Emperor ordered the various non-Nicene sects (Arians, ], ], and ]) to submit written creeds to him, which he prayerfully reviewed and then burned, save for that of the Novatians. The other sects lost the right to meet, ordain priests, or spread their beliefs.<ref>Boyd (1905), p. 47</ref> Theodosius forbade heretics to reside within Constantinople, and in 392 and 394 confiscated their places of worship.<ref>Boyd (1905), p. 50</ref>


==See also== ==See also==
* ] * ]
* ] * ]
* ] * ]
* ] * ]
* ]



==Notes== ==Notes==
{{NoteFoot}}
{{reflist|group=notelist}}


== References == == References ==
{{Reflist|30em}} {{Reflist|30em}}


=== Bibliography === == Bibliography ==
* {{cite book|last=Boyd|first=William Kenneth|date=1905|url=https://archive.org/details/ecclesiasticale00kenngoog|title= The Ecclesiastical Edicts of the Theodosian Code|publisher=Columbia University Press}}

* {{cite book|last1=Ehler|first1=Sidney Zdeneck|last2=Morrall|first2=John B|date=1967|title=Church and State Through the Centuries: A Collection of Historic Documents with Commentaries|ref=6|isbn=978-0-8196-0189-6}}
*{{cite book|last=Boyd|first=William Kenneth|date=1905|url=https://archive.org/details/ecclesiasticale00kenngoog|title= The Ecclesiastical Edicts of the Theodosian Code|publisher=Columbia University Press}}
* {{cite book|last1=Ehler|first1=Sidney Zdeneck|last2=Morrall|first2=John B|date=1967|title=Church and State Through the Centuries: A Collection of Historic Documents with Commentaries|ref=6|isbn=9780819601896}} * {{cite book|last1=Ferguson|first1=Everett|last2=McHugh|first2=Michael P.|last3=Norris|first3=Frederick W.|date=1999|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=kgRV7QohACcC|title=Encyclopedia of Early Christianity|publisher=Taylor & Francis|isbn=0-8153-3319-6}}
*{{cite book|last1=Ferguson|first1=Everett|last2=McHugh|first2=Michael P.|last3=Norris|first3=Frederick W.|date=1999|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=kgRV7QohACcC|title=Encyclopedia of Early Christianity|publisher=Taylor & Francis|isbn=0-8153-3319-6}} * {{cite book|last1=Williams|first1=Stephen|last2=Friell|first2=Gerard|date=1994|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=8kiJj92F-YkC|title=Theodosius: The Empire at Bay|publisher=B.T. Batsford Ltd|isbn=0-300-06173-0}}
*{{cite book|last1=Williams|first1=Stephen|last2=Friell|first2=Gerard|date=1994|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=8kiJj92F-YkC|title=Theodosius: The Empire at Bay|publisher=B.T. Batsford Ltd|isbn=0-300-06173-0}}
{{clear}} {{clear}}


{{DEFAULTSORT:Thessalonica, Edict of}} {{DEFAULTSORT:Thessalonica, Edict of}}
]
]
] ]
]
] ]
]
] ]
]
] ]
] ]
]
]

Latest revision as of 01:59, 12 December 2024

Edict establishing Christianity as the Roman Empire's state religion, issued in AD 380
You can help expand this article with text translated from the corresponding article in French. (March 2022) Click for important translation instructions.
  • Machine translation, like DeepL or Google Translate, is a useful starting point for translations, but translators must revise errors as necessary and confirm that the translation is accurate, rather than simply copy-pasting machine-translated text into the English Misplaced Pages.
  • Do not translate text that appears unreliable or low-quality. If possible, verify the text with references provided in the foreign-language article.
  • You must provide copyright attribution in the edit summary accompanying your translation by providing an interlanguage link to the source of your translation. A model attribution edit summary is Content in this edit is translated from the existing French Misplaced Pages article at ]; see its history for attribution.
  • You may also add the template {{Translated|fr|Édit de Thessalonique}} to the talk page.
  • For more guidance, see Misplaced Pages:Translation.

The Edict of Thessalonica (Greek: Έδικτο της Θεσσαλονίκης), issued on 27 February AD 380 by Theodosius I, made Nicene Christianity the state church of the Roman Empire. It condemned other Christian creeds such as Arianism as heresies of "foolish madmen," and authorized their punishment.

This edict, addressed to the inhabitants of Constantinople whom Theodosius wished to pacify in order to make the city his imperial residence, constitutes the first known secular law which includes in its preamble a clear definition of what a Christian Roman ruler considers as religious orthodoxy, opening the way of repression against dissidents qualified as "heretics". The Edict of Thessalonica was subsequently incorporated into Book XVI of the Theodosian Code and was the milestone of the official Christianization of the Roman Empire.

Background

In 313 the emperor Constantine I, together with his eastern counterpart Licinius, issued the Edict of Milan, which granted religious toleration and freedom for persecuted Christians. By 325 Arianism, a school of christology which contended that Christ did not possess the divine essence of the Father but was rather a primordial creation and an entity subordinate to God, had become sufficiently widespread and controversial in Early Christianity that Constantine called the Council of Nicaea in an attempt to end the controversy by establishing an empire-wide, i.e., "ecumenical" orthodoxy. The council produced the original text of the Nicene Creed, which rejected the Arian confession and upheld that Christ is "true God" and "of one essence with the Father."

However, the strife within the Church did not end with Nicaea, and the Nicene credal formulation remained contentious even among anti-Arian churchmen. Constantine, while urging tolerance, began to think that he had come down on the wrong side, and that the Nicenes—with their fervid, reciprocal persecution of Arians—were actually perpetuating strife within the Church. Constantine was not baptized until he was near death (337), choosing a bishop moderately sympathetic to Arius, Eusebius of Nicomedia, to perform the baptism.

Constantius II, Constantine's son and successor in the eastern empire, was partial to the Arian party, and even exiled pro-Nicene bishops. Constantius' successor Julian (later called "The Apostate" by Christian writers) was the only emperor after the conversion of Constantine to reject Christianity, attempting to fragment the Church and erode its influence by encouraging a revival of religious diversity, calling himself a "Hellene" and supporting forms of Hellenistic religion. He championed the traditional religious cultus of Rome as well as Judaism, and furthermore declared toleration for all the various unorthodox Christian sects and schismatic movements. Julian's successor Jovian, a Christian, reigned for only eight months and never entered the city of Constantinople. He was succeeded in the east by Valens, an Arian.

By 379, when Valens was succeeded by Theodosius I, Arianism was widespread in the eastern half of the Empire, while the west had remained steadfastly Nicene. Theodosius, who had been born in Hispania, was himself a Nicene Christian and very devout. In August, his western counterpart Gratian promoted persecution of heretics in the west.

Content

The Edict of Thessalonica was jointly issued by Theodosius I, emperor of the East, Gratian, emperor of the West, and Gratian's junior co-ruler Valentinian II, on 27 February 380. The edict came after Theodosius had been baptized by the bishop Ascholius of Thessalonica upon suffering a severe illness in that city.

IMPPP. GR(ATI)ANUS, VAL(ENTINI)ANUS ET THE(O)D(OSIUS) AAA. EDICTUM AD POPULUM VRB(IS) CONSTANTINOP(OLITANAE).

Cunctos populos, quos clementiae nostrae regit temperamentum, in tali volumus religione versari, quam divinum Petrum apostolum tradidisse Romanis religio usque ad nunc ab ipso insinuata declarat quamque pontificem Damasum sequi claret et Petrum Aleksandriae episcopum virum apostolicae sanctitatis, hoc est, ut secundum apostolicam disciplinam evangelicamque doctrinam patris et filii et spiritus sancti unam deitatem sub pari maiestate et sub pia trinitate credamus. Hanc legem sequentes Christianorum catholicorum nomen iubemus amplecti, reliquos vero dementes vesanosque iudicantes haeretici dogmatis infamiam sustinere ‘nec conciliabula eorum ecclesiarum nomen accipere’, divina primum vindicta, post etiam motus nostri, quem ex caelesti arbitro sumpserimus, ultione plectendos.

DAT. III Kal. Mar. THESSAL(ONICAE) GR(ATI)ANO A. V ET THEOD(OSIO) A. I CONSS.

EMPERORS GRATIAN, VALENTINIAN AND THEODOSIUS AUGUSTI. EDICT TO THE PEOPLE OF CONSTANTINOPLE.
It is our desire that all the various nations which are subject to our Clemency and Moderation, should continue to profess that religion which was delivered to the Romans by the divine Apostle Peter, as it has been preserved by faithful tradition, and which is now professed by the Pontiff Damasus and by Peter, Bishop of Alexandria, a man of apostolic holiness. According to the apostolic teaching and the doctrine of the Gospel, let us believe in the one deity of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, in equal majesty and in a holy Trinity. We order the followers of this law to embrace the name of Catholic Christians; but as for the others, since, in our judgment they are foolish madmen, we decree that they shall be branded with the ignominious name of heretics, and shall not presume to give to their conventicles the name of churches. They will suffer in the first place the chastisement of the divine condemnation and in the second the punishment of our authority which in accordance with the will of Heaven we shall decide to inflict.
GIVEN IN THESSALONICA ON THE THIRD DAY FROM THE CALENDS OF MARCH, DURING THE FIFTH CONSULATE OF GRATIAN AUGUSTUS AND FIRST OF THEODOSIUS AUGUSTUS

— Codex Theodosianus, xvi.1.2

Importance

The edict was followed in 381 by the First Council of Constantinople, which affirmed the Nicene Symbolum and gave final form to the Nicene-Constantinopolitan Creed.

See also

Notes

  1. The Edict is the first which definitely introduces catholic orthodoxy as the established religion of the Roman State. It marks the end of the fourth-century religious controversy on the Trinity, occasioned by Arianism and calling forth definitions of orthodox dogma by the First Council of Nicaea (325) and the First Council of Constantinople (381). Acknowledgment of the true doctrine of the Trinity is made the test of State recognition. The citation of the Roman See as the yardstick of correct belief is significant; bracketing of the name of the Patriarch of Alexandria with that of the Pope was due to the Egyptian See's stalwart defence of the Trinitarian position, particularly under Athanasius of Alexandria. The last sentence of the Edict indicates that the Emperors contemplate the use of physical force in the service of orthodoxy; this is the first recorded instance of such a departure.

References

  1. Church and State Through the Centuries, ed. Ehler and Morrall
  2. World Encyclopaedia of Interfaith Studies: World religions. Jnanada Prakashan. 2009. ISBN 978-81-7139-280-3. In the most common sense, "mainstream" refers to Nicene Christianity, or rather the traditions which continue to claim adherence to the Nicene Creed.
  3. Pahner p. 378
  4. ^ Ehler, Sidney Zdeneck; Morrall, John B (1967). Church and State Through the Centuries: A Collection of Historic Documents with Commentaries. p. 6-7. ISBN 978-0-8196-0189-6. Archived from the original on 2016-05-15. Retrieved 2016-09-28. This Edict is the first which definitely introduces Catholic orthodoxy as the established religion of the Roman world. Acknowledgment of the true doctrine of the Trinity is made the test of State recognition.
  5. "The Edict of Thessalonica | History Today". www.historytoday.com. Retrieved 2021-02-27.
  6. ^ Williams & Friell, (1994) pp. 46–53
  7. "Ἀχόλιος ἢ Ἀσχόλιος ἐπίσκοπος Θεσσαλονίκης". Ιερά Μητρόπολη Θεσσαλονίκης. Archived from the original on 2016-09-24. Retrieved 2016-09-23.
  8. Codex Theodosianus XVI.1.2
  9. Boyd (1905), p. 45

Bibliography

Categories: