Revision as of 21:56, 25 April 2007 editElsanaturk (talk | contribs)1,027 edits →history of baku: draft← Previous edit | Revision as of 23:59, 26 April 2007 edit undoThatcher (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users28,287 edits BlockedNext edit → | ||
Line 193: | Line 193: | ||
==Mao and China== | ==Mao and China== | ||
Hi, and thanks for your message. If you are not placing Mao as the founder of China proper, then I suppose that is alright, but at the same time, I think it's a mistake as the "People's Republic of China" is a political entity like the Soviet Union or the Islamic Republic of Iran. I'm not sure it would be appropriate to list such entities in that article, which deals with the founders of nations in the classical sense - for example, George Washington as the father of the United States or Ataturk as the father of Turkey. These are actual nations of people, rather than political entities. I think it is a mistake to conflate such a civilizational notion with the founders of political entities. ] 01:45, 24 April 2007 (UTC) | Hi, and thanks for your message. If you are not placing Mao as the founder of China proper, then I suppose that is alright, but at the same time, I think it's a mistake as the "People's Republic of China" is a political entity like the Soviet Union or the Islamic Republic of Iran. I'm not sure it would be appropriate to list such entities in that article, which deals with the founders of nations in the classical sense - for example, George Washington as the father of the United States or Ataturk as the father of Turkey. These are actual nations of people, rather than political entities. I think it is a mistake to conflate such a civilizational notion with the founders of political entities. ] 01:45, 24 April 2007 (UTC) | ||
== Blocked == | |||
] '''Blocked:''' Violation of revert parole on ] (failing to discuss revert on talk page ); also personal attacks, of which this most obviously crosses the line. ] 23:59, 26 April 2007 (UTC) |
Revision as of 23:59, 26 April 2007
|
Please
Hi. I'm not sure exactly why you made this edit, which sounds a bit like a personal attack; but I'd advise you not to do so again, because uncivil comments, no matter how justified, tend to aggravate a situation. Cheers. Yuser31415 (Editor review two!) 22:13, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
Blocked
You have been blocked for 24 hours for the edit warring on Azerbaijan Democratic Republic. Please do not edit war again; when you see a conflict brewing, take it to the talk page. It's really the best option; edit warring will just get you into plenty of pointless trouble. —Signed, your friendly neighborhood MessedRocker. 05:10, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
Revert parole
I'm hereby informing you that both you and Azerbaijani have been placed on a strict "1RR parole" on the following two articles you have been edit warring on recently:
Until further notice, neither of you may make more than one revert on those two articles in 24 hours (and that includes reverting not only each other but other editors as well) or you may be blocked by administrators for edit warring. The above list maybe expanded if either of you decide to carry your disputes to other related articles. Khoikhoi 11:40, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
- I'll get back to you soon; there's currently an arbitration going on, so we'll see there that goes. Khoikhoi 09:13, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
Arbitration
Hi. I added you to list of parties to an arbitration case initiated by Dmcdevit. Please make a statement at Misplaced Pages:Requests_for_arbitration#Armenia-Azerbaijan concerning the conflict with the other parties listed. Thanks. Artaxiad 03:38, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/Armenia-Azerbaijan
Hello,
An Arbitration case involving you has been opened: Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/Armenia-Azerbaijan. Please add any evidence you may wish the arbitrators to consider to the evidence sub-page, Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/Armenia-Azerbaijan/Evidence. You may also contribute to the case on the workshop sub-page, Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/Armenia-Azerbaijan/Workshop.
On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, Thatcher131 18:21, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
pls
Elsanaturk (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki) all roads lead to rome Ateshi - Baghavan 19:46, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
Notice of Arbitration Committee injunction
The Arbitration Committee has adopted a temporary injunction in the case of Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/Armenia-Azerbaijan, in which you have been named as a party. The injunction provides: Until the conclusion of this case, all parties are restricted to one content revert per article per day, and each content revert must be accompanied by a justification on the relevant talk page. Violators may be blocked for up to 24 hours. The case remains open for the submission of evidence or proposals. This notice is given by a Clerk on behalf of the Arbitration Committee. Newyorkbrad 00:25, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
Rasulzade
www.resulzade.org cannot be used as a source! How many times do I have to tell you this? Secondly, that information has nothing to do with the section. I'll give you a chance to revert yourself or I'll report you to an admin. You also removed "a broken man", which comes directly from Goltz.Azerbaijani 20:57, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
- just explain me why rasulzade.org cannot be a source and that mp3 file which was recorded by VOA what to do with by rasulzade org stuff? it is recorded by VOA . is VOA is less reliable than your million dollar babies? I state again, it is a recording of rasulzade's speech and has nothing to do with rasulzade org stuff. Elsanaturk 21:29, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
- Reason 1: It is not a third party source. Reason 2: It is not academic. I'm sick of these double standards. If you insist on keeping that, then I can dig up several Iranian sources too. I have already reported you for breaking 1rr, since I gave you a chance and you decided not to take it.Azerbaijani 00:13, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
- It could also be considered original research. Out of possibly many speeches you have chosen to highlight one comment made in one. If the editors can't agree on this, you could try to find a newspaper article of the time or a more recent biography or something that points to this speech as significant and reference it that way. If there are no serious disputes about authenticity or copyright, the speech might be appropriate as an external link. Thatcher131 03:45, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
- Reason 1: It is not a third party source. Reason 2: It is not academic. I'm sick of these double standards. If you insist on keeping that, then I can dig up several Iranian sources too. I have already reported you for breaking 1rr, since I gave you a chance and you decided not to take it.Azerbaijani 00:13, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
Warning: Looks like a technical violation , plus "do not remove mp3!" hardly counts as discussion. You get one freebie with me, and that's all. Thatcher131 03:45, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
cebeci
done. Enjoy!!!Istanbuljohnm 05:36, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
That IP warning
IP addresses are provided by your internet connection. Depending on how you connect to the internet, your IP address can change with every new connection (every time you dial in, for example, or whenever you reset your dsl modem). That warning message was meant for whoever made some anonymous vandal edits in September. You apparently live in the same general area so when you connected to the internet that day, you were randomly assigned that IP address and saw the old warning. On other days you are assigned other address from the same pool. It doesn't have anything to do with you and you can ignore it. Thatcher131 14:46, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/Armenia-Azerbaijan
The arbitration case involving you has closed. The Arbitration Committee has placed you on standard revert parole for a year. This means that you may revert only once per article per week except to revert obvious vandalism. Furthermore, you must explain your reasonings for content reverts on the associated talk page.
You may review the full decision at Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/Armenia-Azerbaijan.
For the Arbitration Committee, - Penwhale | 01:17, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
Pictures on Ancient Rome
Hi! Thank you for the picture of the inscriptions you added to the Ancient Rome article. I moved it to the section on language, and I lowered the size of the changing map to 300. The image was a little intrusive at 500, though I agree with where you moved it to. Again, thank you for your contributions to the article. Galanskov 01:17, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
Azerbaijani question
I have a question about the Azerbaijani manat, and I hope you could help me with it, since I see you speak Azerbaijani. I'd like to know what the native name of the currency is. The Azerbaijani article is at az:Azərbaycan Manatı, but the banknotes (see ) use "manat". Is it a declension issue? Thanks, Ingrid 15:17, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
- Thank you for your detailed reply. It's not boring at all. I love language, and find it fascinating. Unfortunately, I've never managed to learn another language fluently, since it's hard to practice regularly. Anyway, thanks for your help. Ingrid 17:49, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
history of baku
this is table prepared for History of baku article and it's draft, please do not modify and comment. Elsanaturk 18:06, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
Centuries/Years | Sources | Name of Baku |
---|---|---|
V-VIII cen AD | Movses Khorenatsi, Anania Shirakatsi, and Gevond | Atli-Bagavan or Ateshi-Bagavan |
930, 943-944 AD | Istaxri, Masudi | Bakuh |
942-952 AD | Abu Dulaf | Bakuya |
982 AD | Hudud-al-Alem | Baku |
985 AD | Muqaddasi | Bakuh |
XII cen | Khaqani | Baku |
XIII cen | Yaqut Hamavi, Nasiraddin Tusi | Bakuya |
XIV cen | Rashidaddin | Baku |
XV cen | Abdurrashid Bakuvi | Bakuya |
XVI cen | Hasan bey Rumlu | Baku |
XVII cen | Evliya Chalabi | Baku |
Baku was the home of the world's first oil well, the world's first paraffin factory, and the world's first oil platform. The city was once captured by Turkish troops in World War I, and afterwards by Bolsheviks. Along with the surrounding area, the city was incorporated into the Soviet Union. During World War II the growing demand for oil pushed Baku oil workers to reach record levels of extraction—23,482 million tons. Baku entered a period of decline after the break-up of the Soviet Union, but has since recovered.
Mao and China
Hi, and thanks for your message. If you are not placing Mao as the founder of China proper, then I suppose that is alright, but at the same time, I think it's a mistake as the "People's Republic of China" is a political entity like the Soviet Union or the Islamic Republic of Iran. I'm not sure it would be appropriate to list such entities in that article, which deals with the founders of nations in the classical sense - for example, George Washington as the father of the United States or Ataturk as the father of Turkey. These are actual nations of people, rather than political entities. I think it is a mistake to conflate such a civilizational notion with the founders of political entities. Atashparast 01:45, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
Blocked
Blocked: Violation of revert parole on History of Baku (failing to discuss revert on talk page ); also personal attacks, of which this most obviously crosses the line. Thatcher131 23:59, 26 April 2007 (UTC)