Revision as of 16:25, 1 March 2024 edit2a00:23c7:9985:1701:fdc4:ceb3:6182:2c52 (talk) →References needed: new sectionTag: New topic← Previous edit |
Latest revision as of 22:40, 12 December 2024 edit undoASchudak (talk | contribs)230 edits →Nationality |
(30 intermediate revisions by 18 users not shown) |
Line 1: |
Line 1: |
|
{{Talk header|archive_age=60|archive_bot=Lowercase sigmabot III}} |
|
{{Talk header}} |
|
{{WikiProject banner shell|collapsed=yes|class=B|vital=yes|living=no|listas=Copernicus, Nicolaus|1= |
|
{{WikiProject banner shell|collapsed=yes|class=B|vital=yes|living=no|listas=Copernicus, Nicolaus|1= |
|
{{WikiProject Astronomy|importance=top}} |
|
{{WikiProject Astronomy|importance=top}} |
Line 9: |
Line 9: |
|
{{WikiProject Philosophy|importance=Mid|philosopher=yes|medieval=yes|science=yes}} |
|
{{WikiProject Philosophy|importance=Mid|philosopher=yes|medieval=yes|science=yes}} |
|
{{WikiProject Physics|importance=High|bio=yes|hist=yes}} |
|
{{WikiProject Physics|importance=High|bio=yes|hist=yes}} |
|
{{WikiProject Poland |
|
{{WikiProject Poland|importance = Top}} |
|
| b1 <!--Referencing & citations--> = yes |
|
|
| b2 <!--Coverage & accuracy --> = yes |
|
|
| b3 <!--Structure --> = yes |
|
|
| b4 <!--Grammar & style --> = yes |
|
|
| b5 <!--Supporting materials --> = yes |
|
|
| b6 <!--Accessibility --> = yes |
|
|
|importance = Top}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject Religion|importance=Top}} |
|
{{WikiProject Religion|importance=Top}} |
|
}} |
|
}} |
Line 72: |
Line 65: |
|
|
|
|
|
The same information is also provided by {{cite journal|first1=David Eugene|last1=Smith|author-link1=David Eugene Smith|url=https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7927718/?page=5|title=Medicine and Mathematics in the Sixteenth Century|PMC=7927718|PMID= 33943138|journal=Ann Med Hist.|date=July 1, 1917|volume= 1|issue=2|pages=125–140|format=PDF|OCLC=12650954|access-date=July 15, 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210515201754/https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7927718/pdf/annmedhist148575-0021.pdf|archive-date=May 15, 2021|url-status=live}} (here cited p. 129). This book dates back to 1917 and is also an alternative source about the Copernicus' masters of mathematics and astronomy: Peuerbach, Regiomontanus, Domenico Maria, and Brudzewski. All of them are actually sourced by a unique monography (Dobrzycki and Hajdukiewicz (1969)). Regards, Theologian81sp |
|
The same information is also provided by {{cite journal|first1=David Eugene|last1=Smith|author-link1=David Eugene Smith|url=https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7927718/?page=5|title=Medicine and Mathematics in the Sixteenth Century|PMC=7927718|PMID= 33943138|journal=Ann Med Hist.|date=July 1, 1917|volume= 1|issue=2|pages=125–140|format=PDF|OCLC=12650954|access-date=July 15, 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210515201754/https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7927718/pdf/annmedhist148575-0021.pdf|archive-date=May 15, 2021|url-status=live}} (here cited p. 129). This book dates back to 1917 and is also an alternative source about the Copernicus' masters of mathematics and astronomy: Peuerbach, Regiomontanus, Domenico Maria, and Brudzewski. All of them are actually sourced by a unique monography (Dobrzycki and Hajdukiewicz (1969)). Regards, Theologian81sp |
|
|
|
|
== someone please correct small grammar issue == |
|
|
|
|
|
Near the beginning of the article it says that he was active as a mathematician, an astronomer, and Catholic canon. That's ungrammatical. Someone please correct it, e.g., to: active in mathematics, astronomy, and Cathologic canon. (I don't have an account, and don't want one, so I cannot correct it myself.) ] (]) 13:58, 18 July 2022 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
:I fail to see the grammatical error. On the other hand, the existing statement says that he acted in different professions, not just doing a bit of math, astronomy and especially canon. So as a non-native speaker I cannot judge whether the existing sentence is grammatically wrong, but I know that your version does not carry the meaning that is supposed to be there. Just to explain why I will not follow your request. ] (]) 14:28, 25 July 2022 (UTC) |
|
|
::how do you know ] (]) 00:51, 15 March 2023 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
⚫ |
== Semi-protected edit request on 18 May 2023 == |
|
|
|
|
⚫ |
{{Edit semi-protected|Nicolaus Copernicus|answered=yes}} |
|
|
Grammatical corrections? ] (]) 22:32, 18 May 2023 (UTC) |
|
|
:I'd be happy to make any corrections - feel free to list the changes you'd like to make here and they will be made on your behalf. ] (]) 23:04, 18 May 2023 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
== A monumental scandal == |
|
== A monumental scandal == |
Line 92: |
Line 72: |
|
:True, but both sides have valid arguments, it's best to leave nationality out of this ] (]) 19:55, 29 May 2023 (UTC) |
|
:True, but both sides have valid arguments, it's best to leave nationality out of this ] (]) 19:55, 29 May 2023 (UTC) |
|
::No they don't it's not even a discussion. He was quite obviously ethnically German but wikipedia is leftist political propaganda at it's finest. This site truly has become a disgrace. ] (]) 11:47, 9 July 2023 (UTC) |
|
::No they don't it's not even a discussion. He was quite obviously ethnically German but wikipedia is leftist political propaganda at it's finest. This site truly has become a disgrace. ] (]) 11:47, 9 July 2023 (UTC) |
|
|
:::I would say Misplaced Pages is Western-centered and racist towards Eastern and Central Europeans with figures such as Copernicus or Sklodowska-Curie being Westernized in articles (which itself on the main webpage with news and trivia mentions in 90% only West-related things and takes Western perspective. Ergo, it's not international but English/West-centered. |
|
|
:::Now not mentioning Copernicus nationality because it's not relevant is fairly silly concerning the fact that somehow other figures of that time like let's say Durer or Caravaggio magically have some nationality. ] (]) 20:58, 23 April 2024 (UTC) |
|
:The current article represents a hard-earned consensus, after monumental disruption by editors who aggressively espoused competing assertions of nationality. Please don't start that again. '''<span style="font-family: Arial;">] <small>]</small></span>''' 19:59, 29 May 2023 (UTC) |
|
:The current article represents a hard-earned consensus, after monumental disruption by editors who aggressively espoused competing assertions of nationality. Please don't start that again. '''<span style="font-family: Arial;">] <small>]</small></span>''' 19:59, 29 May 2023 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
Line 113: |
Line 95: |
|
:::If in doubt, use the regulations of the Gdańsk (Danzig) Vote. See the intro of this article. ] (]) 06:07, 6 December 2023 (UTC) |
|
:::If in doubt, use the regulations of the Gdańsk (Danzig) Vote. See the intro of this article. ] (]) 06:07, 6 December 2023 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
⚫ |
== Silesian roots == |
|
== Why does this article have a section named Controversy? == |
|
|
⚫ |
"His father was a merchant from Kraków (Krakau) and his mother was the daughter of a wealthy Toruń merchant.[13" |
|
⚫ |
But: the father´s side of Upper Silesian and the mother´s side od Lower Silesian origin. <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 20:11, 26 December 2023 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--><br> |
|
|
Why (Krakau)?] (]) 23:45, 12 March 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
== Semi-protected edit request on 28 April 2024 == |
|
I think the subsection labeled Controversy, is unclear. Take ], ], ], ]. All these scientists had controversies during their lives. They don't have a dedicated section for those. This has a peculiar feel to it. It should be labeled Controversies during lifetime, or smth similar. There's no controversy about geocentrism. ] (]) 10:46, 26 July 2023 (UTC) |
|
|
:Because he´s german. Just see the discussion above. Every German knows that "Nicolaus Copernicus" was born Niklas Koppernigk (a Name not even revealed in this shoddy english article), was definitely German, spoke only german and latin, but the poles just love to get their sticky little fingers on him, because his place of birth happens to be in todays poland (courtesy of Stalin). This is simply an exit "strategy" if the polonisation fails - then a negative narrative like "Controversy" helps to decry the "f###### german". After all, it is widely en vouge in en:wp and the rest of the world to shit on the germans. ;-) ] (]) 20:13, 19 February 2024 (UTC) |
|
⚫ |
::Simply mad! ] (]) 20:17, 19 February 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
:Actually Galileo has two different sections called "Controversy over...". He and Copernicus are probably the two most controversial big scientic names. Were Newton and Leibniz actually controversial? Darwin's "controversy" is largely a myth of science, when examined closely. In science his theories were accepted smoothly and rapidly. ] (]) 20:23, 19 February 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
⚫ |
{{Edit semi-protected|Nicolaus Copernicus|answered=yes}} |
⚫ |
== Semi-protected edit request on 28 November 2023 == |
|
|
|
In the "Commemoration" section of the article, in the subsection titled "Poland", in the second paragraph change the " in Poland's third largest city, Łódź." to " in Poland's fourth largest city, Łódź." |
|
|
|
|
|
|
In the article the city of Łódź is called Poland's third largest city. In the data provided in the (data from 20th July 2023), the population of Łódź city has dropped and currently city of Wrocław has surpassed Łódź in the number of population. ] (]) 10:59, 28 April 2024 (UTC) |
⚫ |
{{edit semi-protected|Nicolaus Copernicus|answered=yes}} |
|
|
|
:{{done}}<!-- Template:ESp --> This is also verified and cited on the ] page. ] (]) 18:58, 28 April 2024 (UTC) |
|
In "Predecessors", the blue link On the revolutions sends the user to De revolutionibus orbium coelestium (1543). It is the wrong book. On the revolutions is the translation of De revolutionibus coelestium which is signed and sent to the Pope in 1536 (7 years before De revolutionibus orbium coelestium) ] (]) 16:50, 28 November 2023 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
⚫ |
== Semi-protected edit request on 14 May 2024 == |
|
:Nevermind, I just realized my mistake. My bad, have a great day ] (]) 16:53, 28 November 2023 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
⚫ |
{{Edit semi-protected|Nicolaus Copernicus|answered=yes}} |
|
== Fathers name == |
|
|
|
in the Work section, "till" is used in "(or perhaps till his uncle's death on 29 March 1512)" and i believe this should be changed to until ] (]) 16:46, 14 May 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
:{{done}}<!-- Template:ESp --> ] (]) 17:30, 14 May 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
== Extended-protected status? == |
|
"The father, Mikołaj the Elder, likely the son of Jan, came from the Kraków line" was Mikołaj really the name of his father, it was more likely Nicolaus or Nikolaus or Niklas? ] (]) 20:44, 9 December 2023 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I propose that this article be given extended-protected status. It is experiencing an onslaught of neo-nazis. ] (]) 17:44, 22 August 2024 (UTC) |
⚫ |
== Silesian roots == |
|
|
|
|
⚫ |
"His father was a merchant from Kraków (Krakau) and his mother was the daughter of a wealthy Toruń merchant.[13" |
|
|
|
== Successors == |
⚫ |
But: the father´s side of Upper Silesian and the mother´s side od Lower Silesian origin. <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 20:11, 26 December 2023 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|
|
|
|
|
|
The article's "]" section states that "Scholars hold that sixty years after the publication of ''The Revolutions'' there were only around 15 astronomers espousing Copernicanism in all of Europe..." |
|
|
|
|
|
That implies that all the 15 listed would have survived to the year 1603. |
|
|
|
|
|
At least two of them died before then: ] (1550) and ] (1574). |
|
|
|
|
⚫ |
] (]) 04:24, 7 September 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Nationality == |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Should we assume Copernicus' nationality can be ]? ] (]) 23:11, 14 November 2024 (UTC) |
|
== References needed == |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
:Do you have NEW evidence that goes beyond those that have been debated here for a decade or two? |
|
See https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/full/10.1086/703410 . This says that Copernicus did not know Hebrew or Arabic. The article says he did know Hebrew. ] (]) 16:25, 1 March 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
|
:If not, leave it as it is. |
|
|
:See my above comment that starts with "We have been through this". ] (]) 22:40, 12 December 2024 (UTC) |
The current WP article refers of his son Andreas in the role of Augustianin canon of the Cathedral of Frauenburg. But the same charge took to Nicolaus, in 1497, when he was in Italy yet (source: Holmes Charles Nevers, Popular Astronomy, Vol. 24, p. 219, in SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System (ADS)).
An enormous bulk of evidence about Copernicus having been ethnically German and of Polonising German topography has been "archived". The present article carefully avoids the terms German or Polish for the ethnicity of the man because the evidence is clear that he was German - with a German father and a German mother, who will have taught him the German and not the Polish language. And the article Polonises all place names in Prussia that got Polish names only in the 20th century, but misses out on Danzig. - A monumental scandal and a disgusting disgrace. 2001:9E8:25F:FD00:E9AB:E4CF:D944:B901 (talk) 23:21, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
In the "Commemoration" section of the article, in the subsection titled "Poland", in the second paragraph change the " in Poland's third largest city, Łódź." to " in Poland's fourth largest city, Łódź."
In the article the city of Łódź is called Poland's third largest city. In the data provided in the Polish Misplaced Pages (data from 20th July 2023), the population of Łódź city has dropped and currently city of Wrocław has surpassed Łódź in the number of population. BlueBlack22 (talk) 10:59, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
in the Work section, "till" is used in "(or perhaps till his uncle's death on 29 March 1512)" and i believe this should be changed to until Maddybac (talk) 16:46, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
I propose that this article be given extended-protected status. It is experiencing an onslaught of neo-nazis. Meellk (talk) 17:44, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
That implies that all the 15 listed would have survived to the year 1603.