Misplaced Pages

Battle of Longewala: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 10:36, 28 October 2004 edit202.63.173.245 (talk)No edit summary← Previous edit Latest revision as of 04:04, 13 December 2024 edit undoRainfallNightfall (talk | contribs)5 editsm Removed 'Sikh' credentials from the Army veteran's name. A solider is a soldier. His religious identity is needless to be mentioned.Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Short description|Major battle of the 1971 Indo-Pakistani War}}
The '''Battle of Longewala''' ] - ] ] was a military battle between ] and ] troops. It was a part of the ] fought in the ] of ] state in India.
{{Use dmy dates|date=October 2020}}
{{Infobox military conflict
| conflict = Battle of Longewala
| partof = the ]
| image = Longewala.jpg
| image_size = 300
| caption = Tank tracks at Longewala. Photographic reconnaissance image taken at the time showing the desperate last-minute manoeuvres by Pakistani tanks in the Longewala sector. Circles show destroyed Pakistani tanks.
| date = 4–7 December 1971<br />({{Age in years, months, weeks and days|month1=12|day1=4|year1=1971|month2=12|day2=7|year2=1971}})
| place = ], ], ]
| map_type = India Rajasthan
| map_relief =
| coordinates = {{coord|27.524942|70.156693|type:event|display=inline}}
| map_size =
| map_marksize =
| map_caption =
| map_label =
| territory =
| result = Indian victory<ref>p. 1187, IDSA</ref>
| status =
| combatants_header =
| combatant1 = {{flag|India}}
| combatant2 = {{flag|Pakistan}}
| commander1 = {{plainlist|
{{flagicon|India|army}} Major ]<ref>{{cite book |last=Lal |first=Pratap Chandra |isbn=978-81-7062-008-2 |url=http://www.abebooks.com/9788170620082/Years-Iaf-Lal-Marshal-8170620082/plp |title=My Years with the Iaf |year=1986 |publisher=Lancer International |access-date=6 July 2013}}</ref>
* {{flagicon|India|air force-1950}} Wing Cdr. D. M. Conquest <ref>https://www.bharat-rakshak.com/IAF/Database/4692 {{Bare URL inline|date=August 2024}}</ref>
* {{flagicon|India|army}} Major Atma Singh
}}
| commander2 = {{plainlist|
* {{flagicon|Pakistan|army}} Maj Gen. B. M. Mustafa
* {{flagicon|Pakistan|army}} Brig. Tariq Mir
* {{flagicon|Pakistan|army}} Brig. Jahanzeb Abab
* {{flagicon|Pakistan|army}} Lt. Col. Akram Hussain
* {{flagicon|Pakistan|army}} Lt. Col. Zahir Alam Khan
}}
| strength1 = 1 Company (120 personnel) accompanied by half a platoon (6-7 border guards)<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/other-states/1971-india-pakistan-war-bhairon-singh-rathore-longewala-dies-jodhpur-81/article66281600.ece/amp/|title=1971 India-Pakistan war {{!}} Bhairon Singh Rathore, hero of Longewala, passes away in Jodhpur at 81|work=]}}</ref><ref name="DeRouenHeo2007">{{cite book|author1=Karl R. DeRouen|author2=Uk Heo|title=Civil Wars of the World: Major Conflicts Since World War II|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=nrN077AEgzMC&pg=PA101|year=2007|publisher=ABC-CLIO|isbn=978-1-85109-919-1|pages=101–}}</ref><br />
2 Medium machine guns<br />
2 ]s<br />
4 ]<br />
2 ]-borne 106mm ]<br />
4 ]s<br />
3 ]s<br />
10 ]<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.tribuneindia.com/2000/20001216/windows/main2.htm|title=Taking on the enemy at Longenwala|author=James Hattar|website=]}}</ref>
| strength2 = 2 ] (2,000–3,000 personnel)<ref name=DeRouen>{{cite book|last=DeRouen|first=Karl R.|title=Civil Wars of the World|year=2007|publisher=ABC-CLIO|isbn=978-1851099191|editor=Karl R. DeRouen, Uk Heo|page=596}}</ref><ref name=Jaques>{{cite book|last=Jaques|first=Tony|title=Dictionary of Battles and Sieges: A Guide to 8,500 Battles from Antiquity Through the Twenty-First Century|year=2007|publisher=Greenwood|isbn=978-0313335389|page=597}}</ref><br />
40 tanks<ref name=Jaques/><br />
1 field regiment<br />
2 artillery batteries
| casualties1 = 2 personnel killed<ref name="Francis">{{cite book|author=Col J Francis (Retd)|title=Short Stories from the History of the Indian Army Since August 1947|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=rotnAgAAQBAJ&pg=PA93|date=30 August 2013|publisher=Vij Books India Pvt Ltd|isbn=978-93-82652-17-5|pages=93–96}}</ref><ref name="mention">{{cite web |title=1971 war hero gives hour-by-hour account of the battle of Longewala |url=https://www.mynation.com/news/1971-war-hero-gives-hour-by-hour-account-of-the-battle-of-laungewala-pjcyzd |publisher=Asianet News Network Pvt Ltd |access-date=17 August 2020}}</ref><br />
1 ] and ] destroyed<ref name="Francis"/><br />
5 camels killed
| casualties2 = 200 personnel killed<ref name="Francis">{{cite book|author=Col J Francis (Retd)|title=Short Stories from the History of the Indian Army Since August 1947|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=rotnAgAAQBAJ&pg=PA93|date=30 August 2013|publisher=Vij Books India Pvt Ltd|isbn=978-93-82652-17-5|pages=93–96}}</ref><br />36 tanks destroyed<br />
500+ vehicles destroyed or abandoned<ref name="Francis"/><ref name=Jaques>{{cite book|last=Jaques|first=Tony|title=Dictionary of Battles and Sieges: A Guide to 8,500 Battles from Antiquity Through the Twenty-First Century|year=2007|publisher=Greenwood|isbn=978-0313335389|page=597}}</ref>
| notes =
| campaignbox = {{Campaignbox Indo-Pakistani War of 1971}}{{Campaignbox Indo-Pakistani Wars}}
| units1 = {{flagicon|India|army}} ]
*{{flagicon|India|army}} Alpha Company, 23rd Battalion, ]
{{flagicon image|BSF Flag.svg}} 14th ] Battalion (attached to 23rd Punjab)<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.outlookindia.com/national/1971-war-hero-bhairon-singh-rathore-who-inspired-many-to-serve-the-country-cremated-with-full-state-honours-news-246688|title = 1971 War Hero Bhairon Singh Rathore, Who Inspired Many To Serve The Country, Cremated With Full State Honours| date=20 December 2022 }}</ref>
{{flagicon|India|air force-1950}} 122 Squadron
| units2 = {{flagicon|Pakistan|army}} 18th Infantry Division
*{{flagicon|Pakistan|army}} 206 Brigade
*{{flagicon|Pakistan|army}} 51 Brigade
*{{flagicon|Pakistan|army}} 22 Cavalry (])
*{{flagicon|Pakistan|army}} 38 Cavalry (])
*{{flagicon|Pakistan|army}} Field Rgt. (])
*{{flagicon|Pakistan|army}} 120 mm mortar battery
*{{flagicon|Pakistan|army}} 130 mm med. battery
| width = 360px
}}
The '''Battle of Longewala''' (4–7 December 1971) was one of the first major ] in the western sector during the ], fought between assaulting ]i forces and ]n defenders at the Indian border post of ], in the ] of ]. The battle was fought between 120 Indian soldiers accompanied by four ] and three ] fighter-bombers and 2,000–3,000 Pakistani soldiers accompanied by 30–40 tanks.


A ] of the ]'s 23rd Battalion, ], commanded by Major ] an Indian Army officer, was left with the choice of either attempting to hold out until reinforced, or fleeing on foot from a Pakistani ] force.<ref name="TI">{{cite web|url=http://www.tribuneindia.com/2000/20001216/windows/main2.htm|title=The Tribune – Windows – Featured story|work=tribuneindia.com|access-date=2 August 2016}}</ref> Choosing the former, Chandpuri ensured that all his assets were correctly deployed and made the best use of his strong defensive position, as well as weaknesses created by errors in enemy tactics. He was also fortunate that an ] ] was able to secure and direct aircraft in support of the post's defence until reinforcements arrived six hours later.<ref name="Dijg">{{Cite web |last=Singh |first=Harvijay |title=Battles that Made History – Defstrat |url=https://www.defstrat.com/magazine_articles/battles-that-made-history-15/ |access-date=2023-06-05 |website=www.defstrat.com}}</ref>
A section of ] decimated an entire Pakistani tank regiment.
Introduction.


The Pakistani commanders made several questionable decisions, including a failure of their ] to foresee the availability of Indian ] in the Longewala area, exercising ] with little or no ], and conducting a tactical ] with no ].<ref name="theprint.in">{{Cite web|url=https://theprint.in/opinion/the-1971-battle-of-longewala-a-night-of-confusion-sam-manekshaws-order-pakistans-folly/329321/|title = The 1971 Battle of Longewala: A night of confusion, Sam Manekshaw's order, Pakistan's folly| website=] |date = 3 December 2019}}</ref><ref name="Dijg">{{Cite web |last=Singh |first=Harvijay |title=Battles that Made History – Defstrat |url=https://www.defstrat.com/magazine_articles/battles-that-made-history-15/ |access-date=2023-06-05 |website=www.defstrat.com}}</ref> That led to the Pakistani ] group being left extremely vulnerable to air attack and vehicles becoming bogged in terrain unsuitable for the movement of armoured vehicles, as they tried to deploy off a single track and were more susceptible to enemy fire since they used external fuel storage in ] and attempted to execute a night attack over unfamiliar terrain, and infantry was surprised by ], which caused confusion and stalling the attack during the crucial hours of darkness, when the assaulting infantry still had a measure of concealment from Indian ] and ] fire.<ref name="theprint.in"/>
In the annals of Military History, BATTLE OF LONGEWALA would go down as one of the unique events, where the most significant part in totally thwarting designs of the enemy, was played by Air Power. The battle is a glorious chapter in the history of the Indian Air Force (IAF), where a small number of pilots and their Hunter aircraft not only blunted but also decimated a determined Pakistani Armour Thrust across the Thar Desert. One can be justifiably proud of the fact that IAF demonstrated, as to how effective use of Air Power could decisively change the course of the land war. That Longewala is a precursor to the Gulf War, is clear to any student of military history. Although a lot has been written about the fast paced events of 4th to 6th December 1971. As one of the privileged set of pilots who participated in the famous Battle of Longewala, I would like to narrate my personal experience of it.


== Background ==
SAGA OF LONGEWALA
The main thrust of the Indian Army during the ] was directed towards the eastern theatre, with the western sector envisioned as a holding operation to prevent the ] from achieving any success that would allow the ], ], any bargaining tool to trade against the captured territories in the east. By the last week of November 1971, the Indian Army had launched offensive manoeuvres at ] against Pakistani border posts and communications centres along the eastern border. The ] also launched an offensive against ] at this time.<ref name= LOC>{{Cite web|url=http://memory.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/r?frd/cstdy:@field(DOCID+pk0032)|title=Pakistan — Yahya Khan and Bangladesh|publisher= Library of Congress Country Studies|access-date = 6 April 2009|date=April 1994}}</ref> It was clear to ] by this time that open conflict was inevitable, and that ] was indefensible in the long run.<ref name= gs>{{Cite web|url=http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/library/report/1984/KRG.htm |title = The India-Pakistan War of 1971: A Modern War|author=Kyle, R.G. |date=14 March 1964|access-date=6 April 2009| archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20090418234716/http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/library/report/1984/KRG.htm| archive-date= 18 April 2009 | url-status= live}}</ref> Yahya Khan chose at this point to try to protect Pakistan's integrity and to hold India by ]'s strategy—''"The defence of East Pakistan lies in the West"''.<ref name=Faruqui>''Failure in Command: Lessons from Pakistan's Indian Wars, 1947–1999.'' Faruqui A. Defense Analysis Vol.17, No. 1, 1 April 2001</ref>


== Prelude ==
Air Marshal (retd.) M.S. Bawa, PVSM, AVSM, VM
=== The Western sector ===
From the Indian Air Force Journal, 1997


Khan's policy made the assumption that an open conflict with India would not last long due to ], and that since East Pakistan was undefendable, the war effort should be concentrated on occupying as much Indian territory as possible as a bargaining tool at the negotiating table.<ref>{{Cite book |last=Choudhary |first=Diptendu |title=INDIA–PAKISTAN WAR :50 Years Later |publisher=Pentagon Press |year=2022 |isbn=978-93-90095-69-8 |location=India |pages=115–116}}</ref> The initial plans for the offensive called for at least temporary ] by the ] (PAF) under which Khan's troops could conduct a lightning campaign deep into ] before digging in and consolidating their positions. The PAF launched ] on the evening of 3 December that led to the formal commencement of hostilities in the western theatre. The city of ], close to the international border, formed a critical communication centre for Khan's forces and, situated on the Sindh–Punjab railway, remained a vulnerable link in Khan's logistics. The fall of Rahim Yar Khan to Indian forces would cut off the railway as well as road link between ] and ], starving Khan's forces of fuel and ammunition delivered to ].<ref>{{Cite book |last=Kumar |first=Bharat |title=The Epic Battle of Longewala |publisher=Natraj Publishers |year=2020 |pages=India |language=en}}</ref>
Longewala will go down in the annals of warfare as a remarkable milestone where a handful of IAF pilots routed a formidable armoured thrust during the 1971 Indo-Pak War. It was indeed the IAF's finest hour, not withstanding what the Bollywood film, BORDER, depicts. When for the first time the IAF joined battle on the ground alone and won the offensive hands down. Here is the full account from the then-base commander of Jaisalmer. Another article on this Battle by Wg Cdr Suresh is at this link


Indian battle plans called for a strike by the 12th Indian Division across the border towards ] through Sarkari Tala, subsequently advancing through Baghla to secure Rahim Yar Khan. This would destabilise the Pakistani defences in the Punjab and ] Sector, allowing the planned Indian offensive ] to sweep the Pakistani forces trapped there.<ref name=Ludra>{{Cite web|url=http://www.tribuneindia.com/2001/20010113/windows/main4.htm|title=An assessment of the battle of Longewala|first=K. S.|last=Thakur Ludra|work=The Tribune|location=India|date=13 January 2001|access-date=6 April 2009|page=1}}</ref>
Bursting of the Bubble


Pakistan, which envisaged the Punjab as an operational centre, had a strong intelligence network in the area and planned to counter its own comparatively weak strength on the ground with a pre-emptive strike through ] towards the divisional headquarters south of Ramgarh.<ref name=Ludra/> Longewala, which was originally a ] (BSF) post but was later taken over by a company of the Punjab Regiment prior to the war, formed a strategic point en route to capturing vast tracts of land and also a pivotal theatre of war in engaging India on the western front.<ref name="theprint.in"/>
The bubble burst when Pakistan carried out a pre-emptive air strike at sunset on 3rd December 1971 on the airfields of Amritsar, Avantipur, Pathankot, Utterlai, Ambala, Agra, Nal and Jodhpur. Taking a leaf out of Moshe Dayan’s book, the PAF evidently attempted to neutralize the IAF on the ground with a lightning air strike. it was at Longewala that the enemy made his biggest armoured thrust with a view to capture a large chunk of the Indian territory. The Pakistani thrust was blunted entirely by air action alone.


=== Tactical plan ===
Hunter turns Hunted
Pakistan's tactical plan was based on the assumption that an attack in the area would help their 1st Armoured Division's task in the ] area. Pakistan High command also felt that it was important to protect the north–south road link which they felt was vulnerable, as it was close to the border. A ] plan was decided upon. This involved two infantry brigades and two armoured regiments. A separate division, the 18th Division, was formed for this purpose. The 18th Division's operation orders required one infantry brigade (206th) with an armoured regiment (38th Cavalry) to capture and establish a firm base at Longewala, a junction on the Indian road system, and the 51st Infantry Brigade and the 22nd Cavalry (]) to operate beyond Longewala to capture ].<ref> {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060622082310/http://www.defencejournal.com/feb-mar99/letter.htm |date=22 June 2006 }} URL accessed on 22 September 2006</ref>


The Pakistani plan was to reach Longewala, Ramgarh and Jaisalmer.<ref>{{Cite book |last=H. Gill |first=John |title=An Atlas of the 1971 India – Pakistan War: The Creation of Bangladesh |publisher=National Defense University |year=2003 |edition=Bangladesh |location=India |pages=56}}</ref> The plan was far-fetched from the start, if only because it called for a night attack to be conducted over terrain that was not preceded by route or engineer reconnaissance, and the armoured troops were therefore unaware the ground could not support rapid movement towards the objective. As the day unfolded, Longewala would stand out as one of the biggest losses for Pakistan, despite overwhelming superiority before commencement of the battle, largely due to the vehicles becoming bogged down in soft sand.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Battles that Made History – Defstrat |url=https://www.defstrat.com/magazine_articles/battles-that-made-history-15/ |access-date=2023-06-17 |website=www.defstrat.com}}</ref>
In the early hours of 5th December 1971, a radio called the base commander, "This is Tiger, here (Maj. Gen. Khambata, GOC 12 Div). I suspect that an enemy armoured column is making rapid headway for Ramgarh. Our post at Longewala has heard tank noises throughout the night and seen tanks go past it with full headlights towards Ramgarh. I want your boys to investigate as early as possible." The Division Commander's voice on the radio was grave with anxiety.


=== Indian defensive planning ===
While the aircrew were being put into the picture, the situation at Longewala was fast deteriorating. Enemy tanks carrying infantry elements had placed a ring around the post and had begun shelling it. Company Commander at the post was Major Kuldip Singh Chandpuri.
] that destroyed several tanks during battle]]


On the Indian side, the post was held by A Company, 23rd Battalion, Punjab Regiment, led by Major ], the defences occupying a high sand dune which dominated the area that was largely intractable to vehicles.<ref name="TI"/> The post was surrounded by a ] fence of three strands. The rest of the battalion was located at Sadhewala, {{convert|17|km}} to the north-east. Chandpuri commanded an infantry company reinforced by a section each of ]s (MMGs) and ]s, and one ]-mounted ] (RCL). His two other recoilless rifle teams of the anti-tank section were under training at battalion headquarters. Chandpuri also had under his command a four-man team of the camel ] division.<ref name=SS>Shorey A. ''Sainik Samachar''. Vol.52, No.4, 16– 28 February 2005</ref>
Faced with this situation and being severely outnumbered and up against an armoured assault, he could at best appraise the Division of the magnitude of threat & clamour for help. He was advised to await the friendly Air Force at first light. Chandpuri kept low in his trench; a thin veil of darkness lay separating life from the death for all the besieged at this lonely outpost in the dark desert.


The Longewala post had no armoured vehicles, but artillery support was available from a battery of the 170 Field Regiment, tasked with direct support of the battalion, and the ], which had been deployed to the area in secrecy just a day earlier. The direct support battery was attached to the 168 Field Regiment and served as its "Sierra" Battery. Immediately after PAF strikes on Indian airfields on 3 December, Chandpuri dispatched a 20-man-strong patrol under Second Lieutenant Dharam Veer to Boundary Pillar (BP) 638, on the border. This patrol was to play an important part in detecting the advances of Pakistani forces.<ref name="Dijg">{{Cite web |last=Singh |first=Harvijay |title=Battles that Made History – Defstrat |url=https://www.defstrat.com/magazine_articles/battles-that-made-history-15/ |access-date=2023-06-05 |website=www.defstrat.com}}</ref>
When the first two Hunters of the IAF arrived on the scene, the enemy was still shelling the post but was yet to hit any worthwhile target. The Hunters came low, scanning the road from Ramgarh; Flt. Lt. D.K. Dass and Fg. Off. R.C. Gosain with eyes peeled, guided by an Air Observation Post aircraft, found the enemy's T-59 tanks. The fight between the IAF and the Pakistani armour began.


== Battle ==
They called up and picked on a tank which was closest to the area, not even 50 metres from Chandpuri’s besieged post. "01 Alpha" entered the dive, put his aiming index on the tank and fired half his rockets. The tank lumbered a few meters in the sand, spit and ignited. "Bravo" yelled with joy. "You have got him Alpha! He is burning, the bastard!" He himself was getting into the firing range. He had picked on a tank near the helipad which was quite close to the post. He pressed the trigger for a short time and behold....that tank was shattering into splinters!
], mounted with 105 mm RCL gun, which destroyed several tanks]]


] used by the IAF against Pakistani armour at Longewala]]
But even as these two aircraft were picking up and making their kills, the enemy on the ground was advancing. A few tanks had already reached the helipad, situated at the base of Longewala post. Mission 01 was running short of fuel and ammunition. If the small, but tactically important post at Longewala was to be held, the killing would have to continue. The kill could only be made from the air. For, our armour was nowhere at the scene, and Chandpuri had only one RCL shell! The race has now begun against time.
During the night of the 4th, Dharam Veer's platoon, while on a patrol, detected noises across the border that suggested a large number of armoured vehicles approaching.<ref>p. 177, Nayar</ref> These were soon confirmed by reports—from the Army's air observation post aircraft flown by Major Atma Singh—in the area of a {{convert|20|km|mi|-long|adj=mid}} armoured column on the track leading to the post advancing in the general direction of the Longewala post.<ref>p. 239, Rao</ref> Directing Dharam Veer Bhakri's patrol to trail the advancing armoured column, Chandpuri contacted battalion headquarters, requesting urgent reinforcements and armour and artillery support. Battalion headquarters gave him the choice of staying put and containing the attack as much as possible, or carrying out a tactical retreat to Ramgarh, as reinforcements would not be available that night. Despite his command having all the transportation to retreat back on time, he chose to stay and fight back the advancing enemy.<ref>{{Cite web |title=BATTLE of Longewala-Retold Lest it is forgotten |url=https://www.esamskriti.com/essay-chapters.aspx?sectionname=History&subsectionname=Indian-History&topicname=BATTLE-of-Longewala~Retold-Lest-it-is-forgotten&chapter=1 |access-date=2023-06-05 |website=www.esamskriti.com |language=en-us}}</ref>


<!-- Deleted image removed: ] -->
Back at base, every available skilled man was released from all other duties to help and turn the aircraft around in the shortest time possible. This was the only course of action open to the IAF in the area. As many tanks as possible had to be destroyed during the daylight hours, because if the enemy thrust was not completely foiled during the day time, the threat could assume menacing proportions at night and perhaps even threaten the airfield, as there were no anti-tank defences provided to this airbase.


The Pakistani forces began their attack at 12:30 am.<ref name="p.83, Imprint">p. 83, Imprint</ref> As the offensive approached the lone outpost, Pakistani artillery opened up across the border with medium artillery, killing five of the ten camels from the ] detachment. As the column of 45 tanks neared the post, Indian defences, lacking the time to lay a prepared minefield, laid a hasty anti-tank minefield as the enemy advanced, one infantryman being killed in the process.<ref>{{Cite news|url=http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/jaipur/Years-later-Longewala-reminds-the-do-or-die-battle/articleshow/27554710.cms|title = Years later, Longewala reminds the do-or-die battle &#124; Jaipur News – Times of India| website=] | date=18 December 2013 }}</ref><ref name="p.42, Sharma">p. 42, Sharma</ref> The Indian infantry held their fire until the leading Pakistani tanks had approached to within {{convert|15|–|30|m}} before firing their ]s.<ref name="p.42, Sharma"/>{{Failed verification|date=December 2023|reason=Not in source given}} They accounted for the first two tanks on the track with their ]-mounted 106&nbsp;mm ], with one of its crew being killed during the engagement.<ref name="p.42, Sharma" />{{Failed verification|date=December 2023|reason=Not in source given}} This weapon proved quite effective because it was able to engage the thinner top armour of the Pakistani tanks from its elevated position, firing at often stationary, bogged-down vehicles.<ref name="p.42, Sharma" />{{Failed verification|date=December 2023|reason=Not in source given}}
Even as Mission 01 was turning towards home, yet another pair of aircraft flown by Bali and Yadav was on its way to the target area. The first pair claimed two tanks destroyed and five others damaged. The second mission engaged those menacing monsters on ground and continued till it had exhausted all its war loads. The pilots claimed two tanks destroyed and six damaged.


In all, the post defenders claimed 12 tanks destroyed or damaged. The initial Pakistani attack stalled almost immediately when the infantry discovered the barbed wire which had not been spotted in the night, and interpreted it as signifying a minefield. Firing for the Indian RCL crews was made easier by the flames of fires when the spare fuel tanks on the Pakistani tanks, intended to supplement their internal capacity for the advance to ], exploded, providing ample light for Indians located on higher ground, and creating a dense, acrid ] at ground level for the Pakistani infantry, adding to the confusion. Two hours were lost as Pakistani sappers were brought up, only to discover there was no minefield. However, at this time, Pakistani infantry were required to make another attack, from a different direction, but in the dawn light. The Pakistani advance then attempted to surround the post two hours later by vehicles getting off the road, but many vehicles, particularly armoured personnel carriers and tanks, in trying to soften up the Indian defenders before attacking, became bogged down in the soft sand of the area surrounding the post. Throughout the engagement, Chandpuri continued to direct the supporting artillery fire.<ref name="p.42, Sharma" />
Any tanks set ablaze were claimed as destroyed and those crippled as damaged. The tanks were moving around in circles on the ground trying mainly to offer a moving target to the enemy air and secondly to find protection in the cloud of dust that their movement raised. The effort was futile since the Indian fighter bombers had complete and unchallenged freedom of air.


Although massively outnumbering the Indian defenders and having surrounded them, the Pakistani troops were unable to advance over open terrain on a full-moon night, under small arms and mortar fire from the outpost.<ref name="p.83, Imprint"/> This encouraged the Indians not to give up their strong defensive position, frustrating the Pakistani commanders. As dawn arrived, the Pakistan forces had still not taken the post, and were now faced with doing so in full daylight.<ref name="Dijg">{{Cite web |last=Singh |first=Harvijay |title=Battles that Made History – Defstrat |url=https://www.defstrat.com/magazine_articles/battles-that-made-history-15/ |access-date=2023-06-05 |website=www.defstrat.com}}</ref>


In the morning, the ] was finally able to direct the newly assembled 122 Squadron under the command of WC Donald Melvyn Conquest comprising ]s and ] aircraft to assist the post; they were not outfitted with ], and so had to wait until dawn.<ref>p. 100, Nordeen</ref><ref>{{Cite web |title=Service Record for Group Captain Donald Melvyn Conquest 4692 GD(P) at Bharat Rakshak.com |url=http://www.bharat-rakshak.com/IAF/Database/4692 |access-date=2024-05-28 |website=Bharat Rakshak |language=en-gb}}</ref> With daylight, however, the IAF was able to operate effectively, with the strike aircraft being guided to targets by the airborne ] (FAC), Singh, in a ] observation aircraft.<ref> {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20051205024625/http://www.bharat-rakshak.com/IAF/History/1971War/Suresh.html |date=5 December 2005 }}, Suresh</ref> The Indian aircraft attacked the Pakistani ground troops with 16 ] T-10 rockets and ] on each aircraft. Without support from the Pakistan Air Force, which was busy elsewhere, the tanks and other armoured vehicles were easy targets for the IAF's Hunters. The range of the 12.7&nbsp;mm ] ]s mounted on the tanks was limited and therefore ineffective against the Indian jets. Indian air attacks were made easier by the barren terrain. Many IAF officers later described the attack as a "]", signifying the lopsidedness.<ref name="Dijg">{{Cite web |last=Singh |first=Harvijay |title=Battles that Made History – Defstrat |url=https://www.defstrat.com/magazine_articles/battles-that-made-history-15/ |access-date=2023-06-05 |website=www.defstrat.com}}</ref>
Gun Camera Pictures showing the tanks of the Pakistani 22nd Cavalry under attack by the Hunters of Jaisalmer.


By noon the next day, the assault had ended completely, having cost Pakistan 36 tanks 22 of which were destroyed by aircraft fire, 12 by ground anti-tank fire, and 2 captured after being abandoned, with a total of around 100 vehicles destroyed or damaged in the desert around the post. The Pakistani forces were forced to withdraw when Indian tanks from the division's cavalry regiment, the ], commanded by Colonel Bawa Guruvachan Singh, along with the 17th Battalion, ], launched their counter-offensive to end the six-hour engagement.<ref name="p.42, Sharma" /> Longewala had proved to be one of the defining moments in the war.{{Citation needed|date=April 2024}}
Every pilot had to wait for his turn. This was the only sore point among the aircrew at Jaisalmer. So by the time Tully and Suresh got their turn, they were angry. When they ultimately went to attack, it was like attacking injured snakes. The tanks went writhing in circles and yet trying to sting with their anti-aircraft guns whenever the Hunters got near them.


== Aftermath ==
In one, Suresh met the tank head on. Both the tank's and the aircraft's guns fired simultaneously. The aircraft, however won when its rockets hit and blew up the tank. The big flash that followed blinded Suresh for a moment. The pullout from the dive was momentarily delayed with the result that the aircraft scraped the ground with its tail but it continued to fly and was brought back safely to base. The mission claimed 3 tanks destroyed and 7 disabled.
Since the Indians were on the defensive, they managed to inflict heavy losses on the Pakistanis: 200 soldiers killed,<ref name="Francis"/> 36 tanks destroyed or abandoned, and 500 additional vehicles lost.<ref name=Jaques/> The Pakistani ] set up at the end of war recommended the commander of 18th Division, Major General Mustafa, be tried for negligence.<ref name="HRC Report">{{Cite report|author=Hamoodur Rehman |author-link=Hamoodur Rehman |author2=Sheikh Anwarul Haq |author3=Tufail Ali Abdul Rehman |title=Hamoodur Rahman Commission Report |url=http://www.pppusa.org/Acrobat/Hamoodur%20Rahman%20Commission%20Report.pdf |publisher=Government of Pakistan |pages=79–80 |access-date=19 July 2013 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120304011310/http://www.pppusa.org/Acrobat/Hamoodur%20Rahman%20Commission%20Report.pdf |archive-date= 4 March 2012 }}</ref>


Notwithstanding the Indian victory, there were intelligence and strategic failures on both sides. India's intelligence service failed to provide warning of such a large armoured force in the western sector. Moreover, the defending post was not heavily armed. Finally, they did not push home their advantage and destroy the fleeing Pakistani tanks while the IAF had them on the run. They did, however, destroy or capture some 36 tanks, one of the most disproportionate tank losses for one side in a single battle after ].<ref name=JH/>
When Tully and Gosain landed at 1400 hrs, they reported that after they had attacked three tanks that they spotted, they had to shift their attacks on to vehicles. This was the first indication that the panzer offensive had been successfully foiled. Only half a day had gone past.


The Pakistani troops, meanwhile, had underestimated the post's defensive capability due to the difficulty of approach over sand, conducting the attack at night and in full-moon light, against stiff resistance from a well-prepared defensive position located on a dominant height. Attacking with virtually no air cover, they took too long to close for an assault on the position, and failed to anticipate the availability of Indian ]. Given that Pakistan's ]s and ] Chinese tanks were slow on the sandy ], some military analysts have opined that the attack may have been poorly planned and executed, given the terrain.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/pakistan/army-orbat-corps-aor.htm|title=Pakistan Army Order of Battle — Corps Sectors|access-date=14 January 2014}}</ref> Some Pakistani tanks suffered engine failure due to overheating in trying to extricate themselves, and were abandoned. The open desert battleground provided little to no cover for the tanks and infantry from air attacks. The plan to capture Longewala may have been good in conception, but failed due to lack of air cover. As a result, two tank regiments failed to take Longewala.<ref>{{Cite news |date=2021-02-19 |title=Longewala not won by infantry alone, air power played key role: IAF book |work=The Times of India |url=https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/longewala-not-won-by-infantry-alone-air-power-played-key-role-iaf-book/articleshow/81100982.cms |access-date=2023-06-17 |issn=0971-8257}}</ref>
Just then the Indian side, at the Longewala sector on 05 December 1971, intercepted a Pakistani message. An English translation of the message read,


]]]
"The enemy air force has been creating havoc - One aircraft leaves and another comes and stays overhead for twenty minutes. 40% troops and tanks have been destroyed, injured or damaged. Further advance has become very difficult. Send air force for help as soon as possible otherwise even a safe withdrawal would be difficult."
After the battle, Burnt out, stranded hulks of T-59 tanks of the Pakistani Army lying in the desert sands of Longewala


For his part, the Indian company commander, Chandpuri, was decorated with India's second-highest gallantry award – the ]. Several other awards were earned by members of the defending company and the battalion's commander.<ref name="Dijg">{{Cite web |last=Singh |first=Harvijay |title=Battles that Made History – Defstrat |url=https://www.defstrat.com/magazine_articles/battles-that-made-history-15/ |access-date=2023-06-05 |website=www.defstrat.com}}</ref> On the other hand, the Pakistani divisional commander was dismissed from service.<ref name = JH/>
By the time the last mission over Longewala had completed its attack, the enemy force lay in shambles. The enemy's morale had evidently been completely shattered. With the plans of over running Longewala, Ramgarh and then capturing Jaisalmer airfield foiled, the enemy’s morale was at its lowest ebb. It is more than a mere conjecture that the enemy, never in his wildest dreams, could have imagined that the small air contingent of the IAF positioned at Jaisalmer would destroy their powerful armoured thrust.


British media reported on the defence of Longewala; James Hatter compared the Battle of Longewala to ] in his article ''Taking on the enemy at Longewala'', describing it as the deciding moment of the 1971 war.<ref name=JH/> Similarly, Field Marshal ], the ] at the time, visited Longewala a few weeks after the war to learn the details of the battle from Chandpuri.<ref name=JH>{{Cite web|url=http://www.tribuneindia.com/2000/20001216/windows/main2.htm|title=Taking on the enemy at Longewala|first= James|last= Hattar|work= The Tribune|date=16 December 2000|access-date=6 April 2009| archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20090422023208/http://www.tribuneindia.com/2000/20001216/windows/main2.htm| archive-date= 22 April 2009| url-status= live}}</ref>
There was no dispute that every single piece of armour and supporting vehicle which lay destroyed, crippled, burned or shattered were purely the result of air action. A prime factor beside absence of air opposition, was the absence of our own troops in the area. Their presence would have induced the problem of recognition and consequently delayed launching or missions in quick succession as was actual achieved in this situation. So the otherwise undesirable factor actually proved to be a blessing in disguise under these circumstances.


In 2008, the battle was the subject of disagreement, some officers of the time ascribing all the combat success to the IAF.<ref>{{cite news|title= The truth of courage|url= http://archive.tehelka.com/story_main38.asp?filename=Ne150308the_truth.asp|publisher= tehelka|url-status= dead|archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20141022072452/http://archive.tehelka.com/story_main38.asp?filename=Ne150308the_truth.asp|archive-date= 22 October 2014}}{{cite news|title= The truth of courage|url= http://archive.tehelka.com/story_main38.asp?filename=Ne150308the_truth.asp|publisher= tehelka|url-status= dead|archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20141022072452/http://archive.tehelka.com/story_main38.asp?filename=Ne150308the_truth.asp|archive-date= 22 October 2014}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|title=Army lied to the nation Longewala? |url=http://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/army-lied-to-the-nation-on-laungewala/article1-279335.aspx |work=Hindustan times|url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20141104065802/http://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/army-lied-to-the-nation-on-laungewala/article1-279335.aspx |archive-date= 4 November 2014}}</ref> This led to Chandpuri suing for the token amount of one ].<ref>{{cite news |last=Sura |first=Ajay |date=29 November 2013 |title=War veteran's book reiterates doubts over Army's role in Longewala battle |url=http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/chandigarh/War-veterans-book-reiterates-doubts-over-Armys-role-in-Longewala-battle/articleshow/26545285.cms |newspaper=The Times of India}}</ref>
The last mission found the enemy dragging his feet on the sandy track leading back to Ghabbar in Pakistan. To make the retreat difficult and deprive the enemy of much needed vehicles, APCs and armour, these were hit all along the track back to Ghabbar. The vehicles lay burning, bogged and abandoned. The enemy prayed for darkness to come, but the sun continued to set the bloody sands of desert ablaze for a much longer time than elsewhere - that's why deserts are deserts.


== In popular culture ==
The action during the daytime, in addition to blunting the enemy attack, provided valuable time to the Divisional Commander to reformulate his plans and effect the redeployment of troops. As the day ended, the air ops and the Company at Longewala confirmed that 20 tanks and a large number of vehicles had been destroyed or damaged by the Air Force. The performance of a handful of gallant pilots had saved the day. The gratitude was most aptly worded in the message received at base from the Divisional Commander, Major General R.F. Khambatta at 10:00 P.M. on 05 December 71.
The Battle of Longewala was depicted in the 1997 ] film '']'', which was directed by ] and starred ] as Major Kuldeep Singh, ] as Wing Commander M.S. Bawa, ] as Assistant Commandant Bhairon Singh (BSF), and ] as Dharam Veer.<ref>p. 17, Alter</ref> The main criticism of the movie was that it showed Indian forces being in a terrible position before any sort of help came from the IAF.<ref>{{Cite web |title=If the reel Border is full of drama and heroism, so was the real battle in 1971 |url=https://www.indiatoday.in/magazine/society-and-the-arts/films/story/19970728-if-the-reel-border-is-full-of-drama-and-heroism-so-was-the-real-battle-in-830426-1997-07-27 |access-date=2023-06-17 |website=India Today |date=28 July 1997 |language=en}}</ref>


== See also ==
The message read,
{{Div col}}
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
{{col div end}}


== Citations and notes ==
"Personal from GOC for Base Cdr(.) We had excellent cooperation and support today(.) Shooting by your boys had been most accurate resulting in destroying number of enemy tanks and blunting the attack(.) Please convey my appreciation and that of my troops to the pilots(.) Congratulations on excellent performance(.)"
{{Reflist|30em}}


== References ==
Even as the Jaisalmer element was preparing for the night, a telephone call was received from the Div. Cdr. who said that it was his personal appreciation of the situation whereby he highlighted the possibility of the enemy making a likely thrust against Jaisalmer airfield, bypassing Ramgarh with whatever was left of his armoured forces in the area - roughly a squadron strength of tanks. This was more likely to be resorted to if the enemy had a determined commander.
* Indivisible Air Power, ''Strategic Analysis'', Institute for Defence Studies and Analyses, 1984, v.8, 1185–1202
* ''Imprint'', Justified Press, 1972, v.12:7–12 (Oct 1972 – Mar 1973)
* Alter, Stephen, ''Amritsar to Lahore: A Journey Across the India-Pakistan Border'', University of Pennsylvania Press, 2000
* Nordeen, Lon O., ''Air Warfare in the Missile Age'', Smithsonian Institution Press, 1985
* Suresh, Kukke, Wg. Cdr. (Retd), Battle of Longewala: 5 and 6 December 1971, 1971 India Pakistan Operations, http://www.bharat-rakshak.com
* Sharma, Gautam, ''Valour and Sacrifice: Famous Regiments of the Indian Army'', Allied Publishers, 1990


== Further reading ==
Tension mounted as the night advanced. Then at 0437 hrs on December 6, Major Atma Singh reported from Ranau that a bomber raid was heading for Jaisalmer airfield at low level. The guns reacted very fast. Although only a silhouette could be seen by the bursting ack-ack, the aircraft was noted to have put on bank and turned sharply away before entering the airfield boundary.
* Anil Shorey ''Pakistan's Failed Gamble: The Battle of Laungewala'' Manas, 2005, {{ISBN|81-7049-224-6}}.
* Brigadier Zafar Alam Khan ''The Way It Was''. He was probably the commanding officer of the 22nd Armoured Regiment.
* Virendra Verma, Hunting hunters: Battle of Longewala, December 1971: a study in joint army-air operations (Stories of war in post-independence India), Youth Education Publications, 1992


== External links ==
Goofy was the first one to take to air on the morning of December 6th. His task was to check all routes leading to Jaisalmer for any enemy intrusion, specially the routes leading from Shagarh Bulge, as these approaches had remained unguarded. He flew low into the area and checked and rechecked every suspicious object which looked like the enemy and found no trace of him. With a mixed feeling of happiness and disappointment, he proceeded towards Longewala sector, on his second part of the mission - interdiction of the retreating enemy and bring back information regarding his whereabouts for subsequent missions.
*
* – Orbat


{{1971 Indo-Pak War}}
The next recce was carried out in the area Sadewal-Sandh-Ghabbar-Longewala, with a view to check if the enemy was attempting a hook from Sandh to Tanot trying to surprise our troops in this area. No trace of the enemy was found and it was rightly assumed that he was still licking his wounds near Longewala on the Longewala-Ghabbar axis.
{{Military of India}}
{{Military of Pakistan}}


{{DEFAULTSORT:Longewala 1971}}
The mission attacked and destroyed vehicle concentrations near Ghabbar. The pilots, during their debriefing, reported that Ghabbar appeared to be the administrative echelon of the enemy. Disabled tanks lay all along from Kharo Tar to Longewala. The tanks appeared to have been charred and abandoned.
]

]
The battle of Longewala in fact was over now. Longewala in this district of Jaisalmer of Rajasthan became the graveyard of Pakistani armour. As was expected, Pakistan met its waterloo here. This was because the IAF took timely and decisive action before the thrust could assume menacing proportions. Emboldened by their experience of 1965 War, Pakistan mounted one of its biggest offensives on our positions at Longewala with a fleet of about 45 tanks and an Infantry Brigade. When the curtain came down, 37 of these tanks were accounted for, not to mention the innumerable APC’s and vehicles that lay scattered all over the area.
]

]
Impact of Longewala Battle on other fronts
]

]
On the other hand the most significant fallout and the contribution of air operation was that it frustrated General Tikka Khan's planned offensive in the Ganga Nagar sector with his 'Strike Force South'. This destruction resulted in splitting up of 33 Inf. Div. of Pakistan, as the 18th Division at Longewala needed reinforcement on an emergency basis.
]

33 Inf. Div. was part of General Tikka Khan’s ‘Strike Force South’, its depletion put an end to his planned offensive into the Ganga Nagar Sector for good, which otherwise might have alter the course of war in the west and might have also caused extensive destruction and bloodshed.

Churchill's now famous eulogy is aptly applicable to our pilots at Longwala when he said "...Never before...have so many owed so much to so few." I am told that a BSF post now at Longewala has kept a war diary which gives a vivid account of the battle and sums up by saying that the BSF repulsed the armoured thrust with little support from the air force!

This reminds me of a famous saying from John F. Kennedy, "Victory has hundred fathers, but defeat is an orphan!" No wonder, BORDER also has a different tale to tell. In battle, truth seems to be the first casualty.
----
'''External Links'''


Latest revision as of 04:04, 13 December 2024

Major battle of the 1971 Indo-Pakistani War

Battle of Longewala
Part of the Indo-Pakistani War of 1971

Tank tracks at Longewala. Photographic reconnaissance image taken at the time showing the desperate last-minute manoeuvres by Pakistani tanks in the Longewala sector. Circles show destroyed Pakistani tanks.
Date4–7 December 1971
(3 days)
LocationLongewala, Rajasthan, India27°31′30″N 70°09′24″E / 27.524942°N 70.156693°E / 27.524942; 70.156693
Result Indian victory
Belligerents
 India  Pakistan
Commanders and leaders
India Major K. S. Chandpuri
  • India Wing Cdr. D. M. Conquest
  • India Major Atma Singh
  • Pakistan Maj Gen. B. M. Mustafa
  • Pakistan Brig. Tariq Mir
  • Pakistan Brig. Jahanzeb Abab
  • Pakistan Lt. Col. Akram Hussain
  • Pakistan Lt. Col. Zahir Alam Khan
Units involved

India 12th Infantry Division

14th BSF Battalion (attached to 23rd Punjab)

India 122 Squadron

Pakistan 18th Infantry Division

  • Pakistan 206 Brigade
  • Pakistan 51 Brigade
  • Pakistan 22 Cavalry (T-59)
  • Pakistan 38 Cavalry (Sherman)
  • Pakistan Field Rgt. (25 pdr)
  • Pakistan 120 mm mortar battery
  • Pakistan 130 mm med. battery
Strength

1 Company (120 personnel) accompanied by half a platoon (6-7 border guards)
2 Medium machine guns
2 L16 81mm mortars
4 PIAT anti-tank rocket launchers
2 Jonga-borne 106mm M40 RCL gun
4 Hawker Hunters
3 HAL Maruts

10 Camels

2 Mobile infantry brigade (2,000–3,000 personnel)
40 tanks
1 field regiment

2 artillery batteries
Casualties and losses

2 personnel killed
1 Jonga and M40 recoilless rifle destroyed

5 camels killed

200 personnel killed
36 tanks destroyed

500+ vehicles destroyed or abandoned
Battle of Longewala is located in RajasthanBattle of Longewalaclass=notpageimage| Location within Rajasthan
Indo-Pakistani war of 1971
Western Front
Eastern Front
Indo-Pakistani conflicts
Kashmir conflict

Other conflicts

Border skirmishes

Strikes

The Battle of Longewala (4–7 December 1971) was one of the first major engagements in the western sector during the Indo-Pakistani War of 1971, fought between assaulting Pakistani forces and Indian defenders at the Indian border post of Longewala, in the Thar Desert of Rajasthan. The battle was fought between 120 Indian soldiers accompanied by four Hawker Hunter and three HAL Marut fighter-bombers and 2,000–3,000 Pakistani soldiers accompanied by 30–40 tanks.

A company of the Indian Army's 23rd Battalion, Punjab Regiment, commanded by Major Kuldip Singh Chandpuri an Indian Army officer, was left with the choice of either attempting to hold out until reinforced, or fleeing on foot from a Pakistani mechanized infantry force. Choosing the former, Chandpuri ensured that all his assets were correctly deployed and made the best use of his strong defensive position, as well as weaknesses created by errors in enemy tactics. He was also fortunate that an Indian Air Force forward air controller was able to secure and direct aircraft in support of the post's defence until reinforcements arrived six hours later.

The Pakistani commanders made several questionable decisions, including a failure of their strategic intelligence to foresee the availability of Indian fighter-bombers in the Longewala area, exercising operational mobility with little or no route reconnaissance, and conducting a tactical frontal assault with no engineer reconnaissance. That led to the Pakistani brigade group being left extremely vulnerable to air attack and vehicles becoming bogged in terrain unsuitable for the movement of armoured vehicles, as they tried to deploy off a single track and were more susceptible to enemy fire since they used external fuel storage in tactical combat and attempted to execute a night attack over unfamiliar terrain, and infantry was surprised by obstacles to troop movement, which caused confusion and stalling the attack during the crucial hours of darkness, when the assaulting infantry still had a measure of concealment from Indian small arms and infantry support weapon fire.

Background

The main thrust of the Indian Army during the 1971 war was directed towards the eastern theatre, with the western sector envisioned as a holding operation to prevent the Pakistan Army from achieving any success that would allow the President of Pakistan, Yahya Khan, any bargaining tool to trade against the captured territories in the east. By the last week of November 1971, the Indian Army had launched offensive manoeuvres at Atgram against Pakistani border posts and communications centres along the eastern border. The Mukti Bahini also launched an offensive against Jessore at this time. It was clear to Islamabad by this time that open conflict was inevitable, and that East Pakistan was indefensible in the long run. Yahya Khan chose at this point to try to protect Pakistan's integrity and to hold India by Ayub Khan's strategy—"The defence of East Pakistan lies in the West".

Prelude

The Western sector

Khan's policy made the assumption that an open conflict with India would not last long due to international pressure, and that since East Pakistan was undefendable, the war effort should be concentrated on occupying as much Indian territory as possible as a bargaining tool at the negotiating table. The initial plans for the offensive called for at least temporary air dominance by the Pakistan Air Force (PAF) under which Khan's troops could conduct a lightning campaign deep into Western India before digging in and consolidating their positions. The PAF launched pre-emptive strikes on the evening of 3 December that led to the formal commencement of hostilities in the western theatre. The city of Rahim Yar Khan, close to the international border, formed a critical communication centre for Khan's forces and, situated on the Sindh–Punjab railway, remained a vulnerable link in Khan's logistics. The fall of Rahim Yar Khan to Indian forces would cut off the railway as well as road link between Sindh and West Punjab, starving Khan's forces of fuel and ammunition delivered to Karachi.

Indian battle plans called for a strike by the 12th Indian Division across the border towards Islamgarh through Sarkari Tala, subsequently advancing through Baghla to secure Rahim Yar Khan. This would destabilise the Pakistani defences in the Punjab and Jammu & Kashmir Sector, allowing the planned Indian offensive in the Shakargarh sector to sweep the Pakistani forces trapped there.

Pakistan, which envisaged the Punjab as an operational centre, had a strong intelligence network in the area and planned to counter its own comparatively weak strength on the ground with a pre-emptive strike through Kishangarh towards the divisional headquarters south of Ramgarh. Longewala, which was originally a Border Security Force (BSF) post but was later taken over by a company of the Punjab Regiment prior to the war, formed a strategic point en route to capturing vast tracts of land and also a pivotal theatre of war in engaging India on the western front.

Tactical plan

Pakistan's tactical plan was based on the assumption that an attack in the area would help their 1st Armoured Division's task in the Sri Ganganagar area. Pakistan High command also felt that it was important to protect the north–south road link which they felt was vulnerable, as it was close to the border. A combined arms plan was decided upon. This involved two infantry brigades and two armoured regiments. A separate division, the 18th Division, was formed for this purpose. The 18th Division's operation orders required one infantry brigade (206th) with an armoured regiment (38th Cavalry) to capture and establish a firm base at Longewala, a junction on the Indian road system, and the 51st Infantry Brigade and the 22nd Cavalry (Pakistan Army Armoured Corps) to operate beyond Longewala to capture Jaisalmer.

The Pakistani plan was to reach Longewala, Ramgarh and Jaisalmer. The plan was far-fetched from the start, if only because it called for a night attack to be conducted over terrain that was not preceded by route or engineer reconnaissance, and the armoured troops were therefore unaware the ground could not support rapid movement towards the objective. As the day unfolded, Longewala would stand out as one of the biggest losses for Pakistan, despite overwhelming superiority before commencement of the battle, largely due to the vehicles becoming bogged down in soft sand.

Indian defensive planning

Jonga that destroyed several tanks during battle

On the Indian side, the post was held by A Company, 23rd Battalion, Punjab Regiment, led by Major Kuldip Singh Chandpuri, the defences occupying a high sand dune which dominated the area that was largely intractable to vehicles. The post was surrounded by a barbed wire fence of three strands. The rest of the battalion was located at Sadhewala, 17 kilometres (11 mi) to the north-east. Chandpuri commanded an infantry company reinforced by a section each of medium machine guns (MMGs) and L16 81mm mortars, and one Jonga-mounted M40 recoilless rifle (RCL). His two other recoilless rifle teams of the anti-tank section were under training at battalion headquarters. Chandpuri also had under his command a four-man team of the camel Border Security Force division.

The Longewala post had no armoured vehicles, but artillery support was available from a battery of the 170 Field Regiment, tasked with direct support of the battalion, and the 168 Field Regiment, which had been deployed to the area in secrecy just a day earlier. The direct support battery was attached to the 168 Field Regiment and served as its "Sierra" Battery. Immediately after PAF strikes on Indian airfields on 3 December, Chandpuri dispatched a 20-man-strong patrol under Second Lieutenant Dharam Veer to Boundary Pillar (BP) 638, on the border. This patrol was to play an important part in detecting the advances of Pakistani forces.

Battle

Jonga, mounted with 105 mm RCL gun, which destroyed several tanks
One of the three HAL Marut used by the IAF against Pakistani armour at Longewala

During the night of the 4th, Dharam Veer's platoon, while on a patrol, detected noises across the border that suggested a large number of armoured vehicles approaching. These were soon confirmed by reports—from the Army's air observation post aircraft flown by Major Atma Singh—in the area of a 20-kilometre-long (12 mi) armoured column on the track leading to the post advancing in the general direction of the Longewala post. Directing Dharam Veer Bhakri's patrol to trail the advancing armoured column, Chandpuri contacted battalion headquarters, requesting urgent reinforcements and armour and artillery support. Battalion headquarters gave him the choice of staying put and containing the attack as much as possible, or carrying out a tactical retreat to Ramgarh, as reinforcements would not be available that night. Despite his command having all the transportation to retreat back on time, he chose to stay and fight back the advancing enemy.


The Pakistani forces began their attack at 12:30 am. As the offensive approached the lone outpost, Pakistani artillery opened up across the border with medium artillery, killing five of the ten camels from the BSF detachment. As the column of 45 tanks neared the post, Indian defences, lacking the time to lay a prepared minefield, laid a hasty anti-tank minefield as the enemy advanced, one infantryman being killed in the process. The Indian infantry held their fire until the leading Pakistani tanks had approached to within 15–30 metres (49–98 ft) before firing their PIATs. They accounted for the first two tanks on the track with their Jonga-mounted 106 mm M40 recoilless rifle, with one of its crew being killed during the engagement. This weapon proved quite effective because it was able to engage the thinner top armour of the Pakistani tanks from its elevated position, firing at often stationary, bogged-down vehicles.

In all, the post defenders claimed 12 tanks destroyed or damaged. The initial Pakistani attack stalled almost immediately when the infantry discovered the barbed wire which had not been spotted in the night, and interpreted it as signifying a minefield. Firing for the Indian RCL crews was made easier by the flames of fires when the spare fuel tanks on the Pakistani tanks, intended to supplement their internal capacity for the advance to Jaisalmer, exploded, providing ample light for Indians located on higher ground, and creating a dense, acrid smoke screen at ground level for the Pakistani infantry, adding to the confusion. Two hours were lost as Pakistani sappers were brought up, only to discover there was no minefield. However, at this time, Pakistani infantry were required to make another attack, from a different direction, but in the dawn light. The Pakistani advance then attempted to surround the post two hours later by vehicles getting off the road, but many vehicles, particularly armoured personnel carriers and tanks, in trying to soften up the Indian defenders before attacking, became bogged down in the soft sand of the area surrounding the post. Throughout the engagement, Chandpuri continued to direct the supporting artillery fire.

Although massively outnumbering the Indian defenders and having surrounded them, the Pakistani troops were unable to advance over open terrain on a full-moon night, under small arms and mortar fire from the outpost. This encouraged the Indians not to give up their strong defensive position, frustrating the Pakistani commanders. As dawn arrived, the Pakistan forces had still not taken the post, and were now faced with doing so in full daylight.

In the morning, the Indian Air Force was finally able to direct the newly assembled 122 Squadron under the command of WC Donald Melvyn Conquest comprising HAL HF-24 Maruts and Hawker Hunter aircraft to assist the post; they were not outfitted with night-vision equipment, and so had to wait until dawn. With daylight, however, the IAF was able to operate effectively, with the strike aircraft being guided to targets by the airborne Forward Air Controller (FAC), Singh, in a HAL Krishak observation aircraft. The Indian aircraft attacked the Pakistani ground troops with 16 Matra T-10 rockets and 30 mm ADEN cannons on each aircraft. Without support from the Pakistan Air Force, which was busy elsewhere, the tanks and other armoured vehicles were easy targets for the IAF's Hunters. The range of the 12.7 mm anti-aircraft heavy machine guns mounted on the tanks was limited and therefore ineffective against the Indian jets. Indian air attacks were made easier by the barren terrain. Many IAF officers later described the attack as a "turkey shoot", signifying the lopsidedness.

By noon the next day, the assault had ended completely, having cost Pakistan 36 tanks 22 of which were destroyed by aircraft fire, 12 by ground anti-tank fire, and 2 captured after being abandoned, with a total of around 100 vehicles destroyed or damaged in the desert around the post. The Pakistani forces were forced to withdraw when Indian tanks from the division's cavalry regiment, the 20th Lancers, commanded by Colonel Bawa Guruvachan Singh, along with the 17th Battalion, Rajputana Rifles, launched their counter-offensive to end the six-hour engagement. Longewala had proved to be one of the defining moments in the war.

Aftermath

Since the Indians were on the defensive, they managed to inflict heavy losses on the Pakistanis: 200 soldiers killed, 36 tanks destroyed or abandoned, and 500 additional vehicles lost. The Pakistani judicial commission set up at the end of war recommended the commander of 18th Division, Major General Mustafa, be tried for negligence.

Notwithstanding the Indian victory, there were intelligence and strategic failures on both sides. India's intelligence service failed to provide warning of such a large armoured force in the western sector. Moreover, the defending post was not heavily armed. Finally, they did not push home their advantage and destroy the fleeing Pakistani tanks while the IAF had them on the run. They did, however, destroy or capture some 36 tanks, one of the most disproportionate tank losses for one side in a single battle after World War II.

The Pakistani troops, meanwhile, had underestimated the post's defensive capability due to the difficulty of approach over sand, conducting the attack at night and in full-moon light, against stiff resistance from a well-prepared defensive position located on a dominant height. Attacking with virtually no air cover, they took too long to close for an assault on the position, and failed to anticipate the availability of Indian close air support. Given that Pakistan's Sherman tanks and T-59/Type 59 Chinese tanks were slow on the sandy Thar Desert, some military analysts have opined that the attack may have been poorly planned and executed, given the terrain. Some Pakistani tanks suffered engine failure due to overheating in trying to extricate themselves, and were abandoned. The open desert battleground provided little to no cover for the tanks and infantry from air attacks. The plan to capture Longewala may have been good in conception, but failed due to lack of air cover. As a result, two tank regiments failed to take Longewala.

Maj. Kuldip Singh Chandpuri, MVC

For his part, the Indian company commander, Chandpuri, was decorated with India's second-highest gallantry award – the Maha Vir Chakra. Several other awards were earned by members of the defending company and the battalion's commander. On the other hand, the Pakistani divisional commander was dismissed from service.

British media reported on the defence of Longewala; James Hatter compared the Battle of Longewala to Battle of Thermopylae in his article Taking on the enemy at Longewala, describing it as the deciding moment of the 1971 war. Similarly, Field Marshal R. M. Carver, the Chief of the General Staff (United Kingdom) at the time, visited Longewala a few weeks after the war to learn the details of the battle from Chandpuri.

In 2008, the battle was the subject of disagreement, some officers of the time ascribing all the combat success to the IAF. This led to Chandpuri suing for the token amount of one rupee.

In popular culture

The Battle of Longewala was depicted in the 1997 Hindi film Border, which was directed by J. P. Dutta and starred Sunny Deol as Major Kuldeep Singh, Jackie Shroff as Wing Commander M.S. Bawa, Sunil Shetty as Assistant Commandant Bhairon Singh (BSF), and Akshaye Khanna as Dharam Veer. The main criticism of the movie was that it showed Indian forces being in a terrible position before any sort of help came from the IAF.

See also

Citations and notes

  1. p. 1187, IDSA
  2. Lal, Pratap Chandra (1986). My Years with the Iaf. Lancer International. ISBN 978-81-7062-008-2. Retrieved 6 July 2013.
  3. https://www.bharat-rakshak.com/IAF/Database/4692
  4. "1971 War Hero Bhairon Singh Rathore, Who Inspired Many To Serve The Country, Cremated With Full State Honours". 20 December 2022.
  5. "1971 India-Pakistan war | Bhairon Singh Rathore, hero of Longewala, passes away in Jodhpur at 81". The Hindu.
  6. Karl R. DeRouen; Uk Heo (2007). Civil Wars of the World: Major Conflicts Since World War II. ABC-CLIO. pp. 101–. ISBN 978-1-85109-919-1.
  7. James Hattar. "Taking on the enemy at Longenwala". The Tribune.
  8. DeRouen, Karl R. (2007). Karl R. DeRouen, Uk Heo (ed.). Civil Wars of the World. ABC-CLIO. p. 596. ISBN 978-1851099191.
  9. ^ Jaques, Tony (2007). Dictionary of Battles and Sieges: A Guide to 8,500 Battles from Antiquity Through the Twenty-First Century. Greenwood. p. 597. ISBN 978-0313335389.
  10. ^ Col J Francis (Retd) (30 August 2013). Short Stories from the History of the Indian Army Since August 1947. Vij Books India Pvt Ltd. pp. 93–96. ISBN 978-93-82652-17-5.
  11. "1971 war hero gives hour-by-hour account of the battle of Longewala". Asianet News Network Pvt Ltd. Retrieved 17 August 2020.
  12. ^ "The Tribune – Windows – Featured story". tribuneindia.com. Retrieved 2 August 2016.
  13. ^ Singh, Harvijay. "Battles that Made History – Defstrat". www.defstrat.com. Retrieved 5 June 2023.
  14. ^ "The 1971 Battle of Longewala: A night of confusion, Sam Manekshaw's order, Pakistan's folly". ThePrint. 3 December 2019.
  15. "Pakistan — Yahya Khan and Bangladesh". Library of Congress Country Studies. April 1994. Retrieved 6 April 2009.
  16. Kyle, R.G. (14 March 1964). "The India-Pakistan War of 1971: A Modern War". Archived from the original on 18 April 2009. Retrieved 6 April 2009.
  17. Failure in Command: Lessons from Pakistan's Indian Wars, 1947–1999. Faruqui A. Defense Analysis Vol.17, No. 1, 1 April 2001
  18. Choudhary, Diptendu (2022). INDIA–PAKISTAN WAR :50 Years Later. India: Pentagon Press. pp. 115–116. ISBN 978-93-90095-69-8.
  19. Kumar, Bharat (2020). The Epic Battle of Longewala. Natraj Publishers. pp. India.
  20. ^ Thakur Ludra, K. S. (13 January 2001). "An assessment of the battle of Longewala". The Tribune. India. p. 1. Retrieved 6 April 2009.
  21. Correspondence from Lt. Col. (Retd) H.K. Afridi Defence Journal, Karachi. feb-mar99 Archived 22 June 2006 at the Wayback Machine URL accessed on 22 September 2006
  22. H. Gill, John (2003). An Atlas of the 1971 India – Pakistan War: The Creation of Bangladesh (Bangladesh ed.). India: National Defense University. p. 56.
  23. "Battles that Made History – Defstrat". www.defstrat.com. Retrieved 17 June 2023.
  24. Shorey A. Sainik Samachar. Vol.52, No.4, 16– 28 February 2005
  25. p. 177, Nayar
  26. p. 239, Rao
  27. "BATTLE of Longewala-Retold Lest it is forgotten". www.esamskriti.com. Retrieved 5 June 2023.
  28. ^ p. 83, Imprint
  29. "Years later, Longewala reminds the do-or-die battle | Jaipur News – Times of India". The Times of India. 18 December 2013.
  30. ^ p. 42, Sharma
  31. p. 100, Nordeen
  32. "Service Record for Group Captain Donald Melvyn Conquest 4692 GD(P) at Bharat Rakshak.com". Bharat Rakshak. Retrieved 28 May 2024.
  33. An IAF pilot's account of the battle Archived 5 December 2005 at the Wayback Machine, Suresh
  34. Hamoodur Rehman; Sheikh Anwarul Haq; Tufail Ali Abdul Rehman. Hamoodur Rahman Commission Report (PDF) (Report). Government of Pakistan. pp. 79–80. Archived from the original (PDF) on 4 March 2012. Retrieved 19 July 2013.
  35. ^ Hattar, James (16 December 2000). "Taking on the enemy at Longewala". The Tribune. Archived from the original on 22 April 2009. Retrieved 6 April 2009.
  36. "Pakistan Army Order of Battle — Corps Sectors". Retrieved 14 January 2014.
  37. "Longewala not won by infantry alone, air power played key role: IAF book". The Times of India. 19 February 2021. ISSN 0971-8257. Retrieved 17 June 2023.
  38. "The truth of courage". tehelka. Archived from the original on 22 October 2014."The truth of courage". tehelka. Archived from the original on 22 October 2014.
  39. "Army lied to the nation Longewala?". Hindustan times. Archived from the original on 4 November 2014.
  40. Sura, Ajay (29 November 2013). "War veteran's book reiterates doubts over Army's role in Longewala battle". The Times of India.
  41. p. 17, Alter
  42. "If the reel Border is full of drama and heroism, so was the real battle in 1971". India Today. 28 July 1997. Retrieved 17 June 2023.

References

  • Indivisible Air Power, Strategic Analysis, Institute for Defence Studies and Analyses, 1984, v.8, 1185–1202
  • Imprint, Justified Press, 1972, v.12:7–12 (Oct 1972 – Mar 1973)
  • Alter, Stephen, Amritsar to Lahore: A Journey Across the India-Pakistan Border, University of Pennsylvania Press, 2000
  • Nordeen, Lon O., Air Warfare in the Missile Age, Smithsonian Institution Press, 1985
  • Suresh, Kukke, Wg. Cdr. (Retd), Battle of Longewala: 5 and 6 December 1971, 1971 India Pakistan Operations, http://www.bharat-rakshak.com
  • Sharma, Gautam, Valour and Sacrifice: Famous Regiments of the Indian Army, Allied Publishers, 1990

Further reading

  • Anil Shorey Pakistan's Failed Gamble: The Battle of Laungewala Manas, 2005, ISBN 81-7049-224-6.
  • Brigadier Zafar Alam Khan The Way It Was. He was probably the commanding officer of the 22nd Armoured Regiment.
  • Virendra Verma, Hunting hunters: Battle of Longewala, December 1971: a study in joint army-air operations (Stories of war in post-independence India), Youth Education Publications, 1992

External links

Indo-Pakistani war of 1971
History
Conflict
Pakistani peace proposals
Leaders
India
Pakistan
Bangladesh
Highest
awards
Param Vir Chakra
Nishan-E-Haider
Bir Sreshtho
Indian Armed Forces
Leadership
Organisation
Ministry and
committees/councils
Commands
Joint
Army
Navy
Air Force
Other components
Personnel
Operations
Wars
External
conflicts
Annexations
Insurgencies
Equipment
Army
Navy
Air Force
Documents
Other topics
Pakistan Armed Forces
Military history of Pakistan
Leadership
Ministers
Joint Chiefs of Staff
Services
Inter-Services
Paramilitary
Personnel
Ranks and insignia
Business interests
Foundations
Criticism
Categories (ArmyAir ForceNavy)
Categories: