Misplaced Pages

:Featured article review/The Hardy Boys/archive1: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Featured article review Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 02:24, 13 December 2024 editZ1720 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Oversighters, Administrators29,422 edits FARC section: Delist← Previous edit Revision as of 18:50, 14 December 2024 edit undoNikkimaria (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users231,684 edits closeNext edit →
Line 14: Line 14:
*'''Delist'''. Tagged for needing prose work since June. Unsourced statements including "it is unknown", "for unknown reasons", "lifelong fan" and "successful". Miscellaneous other media and video games sections are lists of selected works instead of summarizing the cultural impact and are either unsourced or rely on primary sources. ] (]) 14:15, 30 November 2024 (UTC) *'''Delist'''. Tagged for needing prose work since June. Unsourced statements including "it is unknown", "for unknown reasons", "lifelong fan" and "successful". Miscellaneous other media and video games sections are lists of selected works instead of summarizing the cultural impact and are either unsourced or rely on primary sources. ] (]) 14:15, 30 November 2024 (UTC)
*'''Delist''': No edits since November, uncited statements and disorganization remain. ] (]) 02:24, 13 December 2024 (UTC) *'''Delist''': No edits since November, uncited statements and disorganization remain. ] (]) 02:24, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
{{FARClosed|delisted}} ] (]) 18:50, 14 December 2024 (UTC)

Revision as of 18:50, 14 December 2024

The Hardy Boys

The Hardy Boys (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Toolbox
Notified: WikiProject Children's literature, WikiProject Novels, WikiProject Fictional characters, Ricardiana

Review section

I am nominating this featured article for review because...This old article isn't written properly. Some of the citations are poorly formatted, for example. the lack of authors and etc. + There are several unsourced statements and too many quote tables + It needs some updates for books and video game appearances + the books, in-other media (should be converted into prose written style, not lists), comics, and especially the video game sections are a mess + Thematic analysis and reception could be expanded. Overall, it needs some love to meet its current FA standard. 🍕BP!🍕 (🔔) 06:06, 9 November 2024 (UTC)

From a cursory read, the quote tables do certainly seem a bit odd. They don't provide much context for the work for someone not familiar, and they don't (at first glance) support the content in the text in an obvious way... added captions to put the quotes in context might help. Some parts ("It has been a matter of disagreement regarding the treatment of minorities in the books.") seem like they would fit better in a criticism or reception section. Caleb Stanford (talk) 16:31, 18 November 2024 (UTC)

FARC section

Issues raised in the review section include sourcing and organization. Nikkimaria (talk) 18:49, 23 November 2024 (UTC)