| Revision as of 23:53, 16 February 2019 edit100.40.78.245 (talk) →"Greatest" ?: no he is the best boi (the unknown user that commented like this right below) lololololololololol← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 00:04, 15 December 2024 edit undoKGRAMR (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, File movers107,774 editsNo edit summary | ||
| (61 intermediate revisions by 46 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{ |
{{Talk header}} | ||
| {{ArticleHistory | {{ArticleHistory | ||
| |action1=FAC | |action1=FAC | ||
| Line 33: | Line 33: | ||
| |currentstatus=DGA | |currentstatus=DGA | ||
| |topic=Everyday life | |topic=Everyday life | ||
| |otd1date=2023-11-16|otd1oldid=1185426311 | |||
| }} | }} | ||
| {{WikiProject banner shell|blp=yes|class=B|vital=yes|listas=Miyamoto, Shigeru|1= | |||
| {{Vital article|level=4|topic=People|class=B}} | |||
| {{WikiProject Biography|a&e-priority=Mid|a&e-work-group=yes|old-peer-review=yes}} | |||
| {{WikiProjectBannerShell|blp=yes|1= | |||
| {{WikiProject |
{{WikiProject Video games |class=B |importance=High |Nintendo=yes }} | ||
| {{WikiProject |
{{WikiProject Japan|importance=high|bio=y}} | ||
| {{WikiProject Japan|class=b| b1 <!--Referencing & citations--> = y | |||
| | b2 <!--Coverage & accuracy --> = y | |||
| | b3 <!--Structure --> = y | |||
| | b4 <!--Grammar & style --> = y | |||
| | b5 <!--Supporting materials --> = y | |||
| | b6 <!--Accessibility --> =yes|importance=high|bio=y}} | |||
| {{WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors|user=Scapler|date=February 2, 2010}} | {{WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors|user=Scapler|date=February 2, 2010}} | ||
| {{WikiProject Business |
{{WikiProject Business |importance=Mid}} | ||
| }} | |||
| {{Top 25 Report|Nov 27 2016 (24th)}} | |||
| {{refideas | |||
| |1= | |||
| |2= | |||
| |3=https://archive.org/details/GAME-Pia-5/GAME%E3%81%B4%E3%81%82%205/page/20/mode/2up (Interview) | |||
| |4=https://archive.org/details/book_game-maestro_vol1/page/97/mode/2up (interview) | |||
| }} | |||
| {{User:MiszaBot/config | |||
| | algo = old(60d) | |||
| | archive = Talk:Shigeru Miyamoto/Archive %(counter)d | |||
| | counter = 1 | |||
| | maxarchivesize = 100K | |||
| | archiveheader = {{Automatic archive navigator}} | |||
| | minthreadstoarchive = 1 | |||
| | minthreadsleft = 5 | |||
| }}{{Archives|bot=Lowercase sigmabot III|age=60}} | |||
| {{Broken anchors|links= | |||
| * <nowiki>]</nowiki> The anchor (#Top 20 console games of all time) has been ] before. <!-- {"title":"Top 20 console games of all time","appear":{"revid":121539983,"parentid":121495666,"timestamp":"2007-04-09T22:45:49Z","replaced_anchors":{"Top 21 console games of all time":"Top 20 console games of all time"},"removed_section_titles":,"added_section_titles":},"disappear":{"revid":384846242,"parentid":384774639,"timestamp":"2010-09-14T19:33:50Z","replaced_anchors":{"Top 20 console games of all time":"Top 20 best selling console games of all time"},"removed_section_titles":,"added_section_titles":},"very_different":false,"rename_to":"20 best-selling console games"} --> | |||
| }} | }} | ||
| {{dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment | course = Misplaced Pages:Wiki_Ed/Mt_San_Antonio_College/AHIS_5-_History_of_Western_Art,_Renaissance_through_Modern_(Fall_2017) | assignments = ] }} | |||
| ==old comments== | |||
| Re last edit: People don't cite him as just , he really is considered the by quite a margin. | |||
| :Hmmmmmmmmmmm, WHAT!!... according to the link you posted, people DO cite him as just 'great'. I guess until someone comes up with a greatometer or some other metric for measuring someone's greatness, we'll just have to accept the neutral, encyclopedic viewpoint.] (]) 08:42, 29 May 2009 (UTC) | |||
| == Wind Waker == | |||
| Whoever keeps adding Wind Waker to Miyamoto's Selected Gameography, ''PLEASE STOP'', or atleast engage in the discussion below so some agreement can be reached. <small>—Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 16:29, 10 March 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
| == Twilight Princess == | |||
| Whoever keeps adding The Twilight Princess to Miyamoto's Selected Gameography, ''PLEASE STOP'', or atleast engage in the discussion below so some agreement can be reached. <small>—Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 04:30, 28 February 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
| :There is no argument that Twilight Princess was his brainchild, although the development team... well, let me direct you to https://cherylitou.wordpress.com for now... -JinzouTamashii] (]) <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding ] comment added 04:37, 4 February 2010 (UTC).</span><!--Template:Undated--> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
| == "Father of Modern Video Gaming"/Selected Gameography == | |||
| 1) Though the quotations probably imply that it's a widespread label, isn't it somewhat misleading to call Miyamoto the "father of modern video gaming"? I say this because, technically speaking, the "Modern Era" connotes 1900-1945 - which makes the moniker as strange as calling him the "father of medieval gaming" or some other such thing. | |||
| Of course, the obvious retort is to suggest that the term 'modern' (particularly when uncapitalized) suggests only its dictionary definition, but the description is still unneccessarily confusing. Can we find a more profound quote to include in its place? It should be noted, too, that in the context of games, the 'modern game' is only loosely-defined - adding even further to the disorientation. | |||
| yeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeet brooooooooooooooooooooooooooo | |||
| 2) I created the 'Selected Gameography' section as a means of distinguishing the most critically successful titles Miyamoto has been involved in creating (this IS the criteria, as noted on the page). The objective measuring process for this includes three things: 1) review scores, 2) GOTY-related awards and nominations, and 3) inclusion on 'Top 100 Games'-type lists from reliable publications. As such, Super Mario Bros., The Legend of Zelda, Super Mario Bros. 3, Super Mario World, The Legend of Zelda: A Link to the Past, and Super Mario Kart all appear on the list because - even though they were created prior to the existence of most major critical publications - they are frequent entries on 'Top 100 Games'-type lists (moreso than, say, Super World 2 or Wave Race 64). Super Mario 64 appears on the list not because of it's critical reception (Metacritic gives it a 94, in contrast to The Twilight Princess' 95, for example) but because it is frequently cited in hindsight by critics (on 'Top 100 Games' lists, among other things) as being one of the greatest/most influential titles ever. Anyone familiar with game criticism should know Zelda: Ocarina of Time is an obvious inclusion, as it frequently tops critical 'Best Ever' lists, often right behind or following closely after Super Mario Bros. Zelda: Majora's Mask, by contrast, does not appear on this list as its similaries to OoT (and don't tell me 'it's teh darker' or whatever) led it to receive a lesser critical reaction: it's metascore is 95, it received relatively few GOTY awards, and it's rarely mentioned on 'Top 100 Games' type lists (EGM and one of IGN's annual lists being the exceptions). | |||
| As the post-N64 era goes, a broad investigation of critical rankings makes it obvious that Metroid Prime (96 on Meta, several GOTY awards) and Super Mario Galaxy (97 on Meta, several GOTY awards) are the most critically revered titles since the advent of the Gamecube. Notably, I didn't include either Wind Waker or The Twilight Princess, as they both received less critical praise than the aforementioned titles as a result of their flaws (for example, Wind Waker's lack of difficulty, or The Twilight Princess' shoddy graphics and tacked-on controls). Please don't continually edit this page to add either of them, as there is objective reasoning for them not being on the list. | |||
| As a postscript: several titles missed this list by a shade. If someone were to create an objective B-list (I say this as an example of what wasn't included, not a suggestion), it would have to include based on critical rankings titles like Super Mario World 2, Wave Race 64, The Legend of Zelda: Majora's Mask, Super Smash Bros. Melee, The Legend of Zelda: Wind Waker, The Legend of Zelda: The Twilight Princess, etc. etc. <small>—Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 07:23, 26 February 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
| Shouldn't Donkey Kong be in the selected Gameography list? This is the game that made miyamoto important.~~ <small>—Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 23:33, 9 March 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
| 1) This list is addressing the games that were most relevant to the industry, not Miyamoto's career. | |||
| 2) Not really - Donkey Kong simply hasn't been praised as much as the titles that made the list. Part of this has to with the fact that game criticism rarely gives much credence to pre-1985 titles, but Misplaced Pages's not the place for conjecture. <small>—Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 04:22, 10 March 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
| I highly disagree with you. Misplaced Pages is not a fansite. Do not create your own criteria.--] (]) 10:53, 7 January 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :These have been the inclusion criteria at this article for nearly 2 years and has gained consensus via ]. I also think they are a fine way to use objective methods to create a non-exhaustive summary list of the games Miyamoto has had a hand in that are the most notable. This has nothing to do with fansite behavior. In fact by seeking to limit the number of games listed, it is clearly the very opposite of fansite behavior. File an RfC if you wish, but for the moment, this is consensus. -] (]) 13:23, 7 January 2010 (UTC) | |||
| == Trivia == | |||
| We should just get rid of the trivia section. Some of it should be integrated into the main article, but comments like "people thought he died once, but he didn't" really aren't that important. ] 15:36, 19 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == His current role == | |||
| The article might give some people the impression that Miyamoto is still a game designer in the traditional sense, i.e. someone who leads a single project from conceptualization to gold master. Perhaps the article could more reflect his role as creative director, guiding dozens of team leaders at the same time and sort of being the first line of quality assurance for the company. He also appears to have a great deal of influence on hardware development. The Iwata interviews on the Wii site might be a good starting point: http://ms.nintendo-europe.com/wii/?site=v5_04.html&expand=5&l=enGB . I'd love to "be bold" but I might not be knowledgeable enough to do it. ] 14:32, 13 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Pronunciation == | |||
| How about a pronounciation guide for his name? -- BradDaBugaa | |||
| shy-jair-oo me-ah-moe-toe | |||
| :Actually, it should be "Shee-geh-roo Mee-ya-moe-toe" ] 03:31, September 8, 2005 (UTC) | |||
| :More like Shee-geh-roh Mee-ya-moh-toh if you want to pronouce it the way Japanese people pronounce it, which is the correct one. ] 20:59, Oct 23 2005 (UTC) | |||
| :I'm a student of Japanese... SHEE-GEH-ROO ME-YAH-MOH-TOH, as Fieari and Shaojian stated, is pretty much correct. ] 02:18, 21 April 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ::No personal research please. --] (]) 00:31, 28 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
| {{edit semi-protected|answered=yes}} | |||
| At the time I'm writing this, ] kindly provided us with the IPA pronunciation, at the very beginning of the article. However, I think there's a slight mistake: the subscript circle under the of Shigeru, which denotes devoicing, is incorrect. In my understanding, the vowel shouldn't be devoiced, because it's followed by a voiced consonant () (see ]). Could someone edit this and replace the subscript circled with a normal ? ] (]) 21:26, 22 March 2016 (UTC) | |||
| ::Done. I also left the two possibilities of the pronunciation of {{IPA|/ɡ/}} as explained ]. ] ]]] 16:09, 23 March 2016 (UTC) | |||
| :] '''Already done'''<!-- Template:ESp --> ] ] <small>Please {{]}}</small> 19:25, 24 March 2016 (UTC) | |||
| == "Greatest" ? == | |||
| Comparing Wright or Meier to Miyamoto is an insult, and Wright and Meier would be the first to agree. Videogames would be nothing without Miyamoto's influences. Videogames would be virtually identical without Sid Meier or Will Wright, except lacking Civ 4 and Simcity games. Big deal. Spore is an interesting, over hyped concept, nothing more. It certainly does not bring him to the same continent as Miyamoto in game design: only Masahiro Sakurai comes close. (unknown user that added better stuff in other people's comment to make it 100 times better) :-) :-] | |||
| :Comparing these two major game designers to Miyamoto is, as you say, an insult but the only one you say compares(Kondo) doesn't even make video games. Are you really arguing for the sake of game design or is this more of a Japan vs. America issue? ] (]) 08:52, 29 May 2009 (UTC) | |||
| Many hold that that title goes to ] or ]. Myself, I think it goes to ], though of course I'm nearly alone in that. :) Moreover it's easy to think Shigeru Miyamoto is the greatest game designer in the world if he's the only designer whose name you actually know. Certainly Miyamoto's games have been among the best selling, but that's usually only one factor in determining the "best"; it can even be argued it's no factor at all. | |||
| --] 16:24, 18 May 2004 (UTC) | |||
| Wright has, himself, admitted to being influenced by Miyamoto in | |||
| Greatest? Maybe. Most influential? Arguably. Weirdest. More than likely. Most charasmatic? That gets my vote. <small>—The preceding ] comment was added by ] (] • ]) {{{2|}}}.</small><!-- --> | |||
| Donkey Kong was one of (Or very well be) the first games ever created that had a story (If you pay attention that is) <small>—The preceding ] comment was added by ] (] • ]) {{{2|}}}.</small><!-- --> | |||
| How about Zork? | |||
| :Yeah, I like Miyamoto as much as the next guy, but this is incorrect. Donkey Kong was released in '81. ], ], ], and ] all preceded it and had much richer stories. ] (]) 09:05, 29 May 2009 (UTC) | |||
| Will Wright created one franchise, and an annoying one at that. Miyamoto is considered the greatest because he has lasted all these years, and has made more franchises that you can shake a Wiimote at. He was the person who doodled Zelda, he was the person who supported Satoshi Tajiri on Pokémon, he is the one that bent the industry over backwards with changing innovations. He created ''Pikmin'' with ideas from his garden, he created ''Nintendogs'' based on his dog. And he's still here. ]<font color="#009933">]</font>] <sup>]</sup> 19:42, 12 May 2006 (UTC) | |||
| Give examples of franchises he's created. | |||
| Mario, Zelda, Nintendogs, Donkey Kong, Pikmin, it goes on, and on, and on, and on, and on, etc. | |||
| I agree, he pretty much brought console games into everyday homes. ] 07:32, 7 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| : Apparently you weren't alive in 1977 when Atari brought console games into everyday homes and were synonymous with video games ] (]) <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding ] comment added 08:26, 29 May 2009 (UTC).</span><!--Template:Undated--> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
| :: And then Atari pissed it all down their leg, and if it hadn't been for Donkey Kong and Super Mario Bros., video games would have been nothing but a passing fad. Not that any of this has anything to do with improving the article, of course. ] (]) 03:01, 31 July 2009 (UTC) | |||
| :::That's fascinating... you're telling me a multi-billion dollar demand would have just disappeared if it weren't for two games? I think you missed the point... Atari brought console games into everyday homes, not Nintendo. As much as we love Miyamoto, we can't re-write history for him. ] (]) 20:49, 3 August 2009 (UTC) | |||
| == "Modern" ? == | |||
| One of the fathers of the modern video game? Can someone name a classical or ancient video game? --] 10:02, 5 Dec 2004 (UTC) | |||
| :], perhaps. ] (])] 16:50, Dec 5, 2004 (UTC) | |||
| : There were over a decade of black & white blob videogames before Donkey Kong (or Burgertime). "Modern video game" isn't well-defined yet, but the adjective communicates something. -- ] 21:22, 26 March 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :: Space Invaders? ] 04:21, 28 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == "A delayed game is eventually good; a bad game is bad forever" == | |||
| I have changed this section's title to "Delays." The original title, when taken out of context, undermines Miyamoto's willingness to delay a game because he believes it will truly help it. More importantly, the quote is flat out wrong. Miyamoto never said "a delayed game is eventually good..." He said, and I will try to find the exact article or strategy guide the quote comes from so I can sound more authoritative, something closer to "Years from now, no one will care if a game was delayed six months, or a year. But a bad game is forever bad." He's saying that people shouldn't worry so much about a game being delayed, because if it's being delayed it must be necessary. He's not saying that he can turn any piece of crap into gold so long as he keeps delaying it... | |||
| --] 20:52, 22 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == "Ancient" videogame == | |||
| When Miyamoto created "Donkey Kong," he started the move towards actual characters. "Donkey Kong" was a forerunner of video games in that it involved characters with faces and expression as opposed to mishapen colored blobs. Though it may seem inconsequential, "DK" was the begining of the era of video games that involve detail and realism. | |||
| : DK was certainly influential in many ways, but I think you're giving it way too much credit. Gunfight, Pac Man, and Space Invaders all preceded DK and featured detailed characters, often with faces. ] (]) <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding ] comment added 08:13, 29 May 2009 (UTC).</span><!--Template:Undated--> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
| ancient? no. 1980 when he first created jump man was only 30 years ago | |||
| and obviously his work then has be replaced with more recent work but this doesn't mean that it is ancient. could you consider his work from 1980 out dated? yes but it is extremly influental, without this we would still be in the dark ages of gaming.Much like the wheel in the history of man. Many thanks to you Shigeru Miamoto. | |||
| Metal__gamer@hotmail.com | |||
| == Biography == | == Biography == | ||
| Line 173: | Line 68: | ||
| References to "Sonobe" should be corrected to "Sonebe". | References to "Sonobe" should be corrected to "Sonebe". | ||
| == Chronological Tweaks == | |||
| I made two edits to help the timeline make sense. I cut "Miyamoto has dedicated his life to video game designing and planning" from the end of the paragraph about him getting hired at Nintendo, since it would be three more years at that point until he began devoting his life to gaming. In the pargraph about the creation of Donkey Kong, I changed "...and composing the music himself on a small electronic keyboard for Super Mario," deleting "...for Super Mario", since it's a discussion of a game in which Mario was known as Jumpman! If this is incorrect (i.e., if Miyamoto composed the music for the original Famicom/NES "Super Mario" on a small electronic keyboard but did not do so for "Donkey Kong", then someone can move the information to the appropriate spot in the discussion of "Super Mario Bros."] 18:04, 18 March 2006 (UTC) | |||
| '' | |||
| == Change the picture? == | |||
| Would it be better to use a newer, more flattering picture instead? | |||
| The article of J Allard is using pictures of him "made over". | |||
| What's the policy on things like that? <small>—Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 17:39, 14 April 2006 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> | |||
| Speaking of pictures, someone changed the picture to his Wii Music conducting picture.I think The picture where he is holding all the plushies of his games better conveys what he's about. <small>—Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 01:53, 30 June 2006 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> | |||
| :Unfortunately, that was used under fair use, and as a free alternative was available, it was deleted. ] 07:19, 18 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ::I don't really care about "fair use" vs. "free" (as in it doesn't really matter to me) but the new picture is just atrocious. It's not even a decent quality picture. | |||
| '''Definately change the picture''' | |||
| I completely agree with the Wikipedian. The picure of Miyamoto is unrepresentative of his status in the world of video games. The fact Miyamoto is "conducting" is confusing. Im not very good on computers or I would have put on an image of Miyamoto hugging Mario or something like that. <small>—Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 02:54, 18 July 2006 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> | |||
| == Drug use and religion. == | |||
| Anyone else agree these are important aspects to add to this article? | |||
| : What information is there as respects to drug use or religion? I've never heard anything about those. --] 23:43, 18 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
| I've wondered this too I suspect drug use too, he relates game elements to his experiences well where did he get the idea of mushroom power ups???? | |||
| ::Alice in Wonderland.] 00:50, 1 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == The "Miyahon check" == | |||
| Y'all need to translate the stuff in Japanese Misplaced Pages about "overturning the tea table." It's good stuff! | |||
| 一つのゲームに注力する立場から、任天堂関連ソフトを監修するという立場が強くなった現在、駄目出しの結果「面白くない」とほぼ白紙に戻す「ちゃぶ台返し（本人命名）」を行うことが多々ある。このことから開発部、関連会社からは「宮本（ミヤホン）チェック」として大いに恐れられている。以下、判明しているゲームを書き出す。 | |||
| Roughly: Nintendo games are known for being very fun, but when a game comes out that's "boring" it's time to go back to scratch and "overturn the tea table." This result is the bane of companies that work with Nintendo and is also called the "Miyahon check." Below are some games where this occured in development: | |||
| * ''Hoshi no Kirby'' | |||
| * Ocarina of Time | |||
| * Metroid Prime | |||
| * Twilight Princess | |||
| Aminita Muscaria is the mushroom in super mario that he uses to power up, this mushroom is a strong dilerium, it is guessed that he found one of these in forest while growing up and continued to use them to help him come up with his far out ideas for video games <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 16:21, 23 March 2011 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
| Anyone, someone who's better at Japaneseing than me should really move all that stuff into this article!! | |||
| :How valid is this information? I would never have considered the predecessors of those games "boring". I'd just consider it necessary progression. ] 14:27, 30 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ::The term is so well known that any late game development in Nintendo is attributed to it. Here is an example from a . Chabudai Gaeshi is highlighted with yellow. ] | |||
| specifically refers to the tea table overturning. —] 19:32, 31 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
| http://zelda.com/universe/game/twilightprincess/inside01.jsp also refers to the Miyamoto test. | |||
| :Did Metroid Prime almost got cancelled because Miyamoto didn't like the game when the early build up was 3rd person?] 20:39, 14 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==Can I use this photo under fair use?== | ==Can I use this photo under fair use?== | ||
| I found . It's snap shot photograph of a slide presentation of Game Developers Conference 2004. This is funny but still verified. Only problem is that this Japanese site explicitly ask people not to use any material (incl photo) elsewhere. However, it a mere snap photograph of the presenation by Eiji Aonuma, so I'm hoping that we can use the photo under fair use. ] | I found . It's snap shot photograph of a slide presentation of Game Developers Conference 2004. This is funny but still verified. Only problem is that this Japanese site explicitly ask people not to use any material (incl photo) elsewhere. However, it a mere snap photograph of the presenation by Eiji Aonuma, so I'm hoping that we can use the photo under fair use. ] | ||
| ==Left-Handedness== | |||
| 'Some Nintendo sports games, such as the Mario Tennis series, allow you to choose left-handed characters, which is an oddly rare choice in most video games.' - It's certainly not unusual for a tennis game to have left and right-handed players - actually I would expect it in a game of this type. ] 11:19, 6 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==Chain Chomp== | |||
| Interesting - In trying to find a source for the story about Miyamoto's supposed dog attack, so far every website referring to the story cite Misplaced Pages as their source. (one even keeps the citation needed tag!) Maybe it would be 'locking the stable door after the horse has bolted', but perhaps the line should be removed until a source is found. ] 11:28, 6 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :The book is actually already cited. Taken from pages 44 and 45 of David Sheff's ''Game Over'' (1993): | |||
| "At home, Miyamoto lived in books, and he drew and painted and made elaborate puppets, which he presented in fanciful shows. After school, he often lit out into the countryside for adventure. He had to pass a neighbor's house where a bulldog lay in wait for him. The dog charged every time, barking and snapping, and Miyamoto froze. At the last second, the dog's chain reached its limit and jerked it back. Miyamoto stood just out of the reach of its salivating jaws." --] 00:53, 1 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==Children?== | |||
| The article is grammatically unclear on if his children were born in 1977, he was married in 1977, his children said something in 1977, or his wife was general manager of nintendo in 1977" | |||
| "Shigeru Miyamoto has two children with his wife, Yasuko Miyamoto, who was general manager of Nintendo of Japan in 1977" | |||
| :I think it's quite clear -and correct- that his wife was general manager of Nintendo in 1977. ] 04:13, 1 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Loading screens == | |||
| I'm looking for a reference regarding ]s. Miyamoto says there's no good reason for them to be as prevalent as they are in games today, <small>IIRC…</small> I'd like to find where I heard this from. It was possibly a magazine interview, likely ] if that's the case. Does anyone know about this off-hand? | |||
| I've already looked through Google without much luck. If none of you know an online source, I suppose I'll have to find wherever I stowed my old 90s magazines and dust them off. –'']'' 06:26, 4 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :Try checking the "Iwata Asks" interviews on the official Wii website. I think I remember such a statement when they discussed the Wii's general user interface. ] 09:35, 4 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Smoking? == | |||
| Think a source on this is needed - looks like it may have been added for a joke. ] 17:54, 9 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
| *I think so as well, I'll delete it until someone adds one. --] 02:35, 12 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
| **I actually remember a journalist (probably from Edge, possibly not) talking about "staying up all night and smoking ciggies". I could have a look, if no-one else can beat me to it ] (]) 23:08, 12 December 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Miyamoto's death == | |||
| I'm deleting that. Please, read your sources before taking them for granted. It's a VERY OBVIOUS fake; somebody hacked that page. I bet there's someone that posted that fake Ogre Battle news too (Though at least that news are believable :D) | |||
| Jeez, a frigging EAGLE hitting him with a TURTLE. ] 11:15, 19 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
| Can we stop editing of this article until this blows over? People keep adding that he's dead over and over. - ] 12:23, 19 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
| RIP Shiggy.. you made some beautiful games.. you will be missed by 13 year old N-Tards | |||
| This guy appears to be a 13 year old fanboy of some console.] 09:45, 20 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :He's '''not''' dead. --] 17:23, 19 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
| : Since Shigeru Miyamoto's delivering a keynote to the GDC... ] 02:08, 24 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
| =="Chabudai Gaeshi"ed== | |||
| Hi, can someone please clarify this remark in the '''"A delayed game is eventually good, a bad game is bad forever"''' section: | |||
| :''He stated that the switch was the result of a year-long development being "Chabudai Gaeshi"ed.'' | |||
| What on earth does that mean? <font color="#0099FF">]</font> 21:41, 2 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::A few lines before is the answer: | |||
| :::''This is largely due to the perfectionist tendency of Miyamoto who would go as far as scrapping the entire development if he did not find a game up to his standard. Miyamoto and fellow developers refer to this scrapping as '''"Chabudai Gaeshi"''''' | |||
| ::] 23:01, 2 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Pokemon Trivia == | |||
| Shouldn't it read "(Gary Oak or BLUE in the English version)"? Green was the Japanese version. ] 23:44, 10 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Aspergers syndrome == | |||
| Is this true? Is this one of those refernce needed deals?--] 19:18, 11 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| Reference needed, otherwise it shouldn't even be taken into consideration. <small>—Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 09:52, 16 October 2007 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
| == Great Work! == | |||
| Great work people! Keep it up! ] 04:26, 28 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| =="A late game is only late until it ships. A bad game is bad until the end of time."== | |||
| Are you sure it's "A late game is only late until it ships. A bad game is bad until the end of time."? I heard that it was "A late game is eventually good. A bad game is bad forever." ] 21:29, 28 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==Can somebody explain the use of Chabudai Gaeshi-ed a little bit more?== | ==Can somebody explain the use of Chabudai Gaeshi-ed a little bit more?== | ||
| Line 308: | Line 76: | ||
| "Eiji Aonuma was initially the producer of The Legend of Zelda: Twilight Princess. However, between 2005 to 2006, Miyamoto switched to the producer's role. He stated that the switch was the result of a year-long development being Chabudai Gaeshi-ed. In the same interview, Miyamoto said that he had to clean up the mess of his Chabudai Gaeshi, so he joined in as a producer and also to assist in the development of the game." - i don't fully understand the point now. Can you help sound it more english? Thanks! | "Eiji Aonuma was initially the producer of The Legend of Zelda: Twilight Princess. However, between 2005 to 2006, Miyamoto switched to the producer's role. He stated that the switch was the result of a year-long development being Chabudai Gaeshi-ed. In the same interview, Miyamoto said that he had to clean up the mess of his Chabudai Gaeshi, so he joined in as a producer and also to assist in the development of the game." - i don't fully understand the point now. Can you help sound it more english? Thanks! | ||
| :: Solved: This practice is also known as Flipping Chabudai, and has been used figuratively by Shigeru Miyamoto to scrap projects he was not satisfied with. Eiji Aonuma, whose initial one year long development of was scrapped by Miyamoto, has jokingly described "Chabudai Gaeshi" as "Don't like what's for dinner." | :: Solved: This practice is also known as Flipping Chabudai, and has been used figuratively by Shigeru Miyamoto to scrap projects he was not satisfied with. Eiji Aonuma, whose initial one year long development of was scrapped by Miyamoto, has jokingly described "Chabudai Gaeshi" as "Don't like what's for dinner." | ||
| == Trivia == | |||
| Per ], I have moved the trivia section to the talk page. Generally, it is not best to include a trivia section. If its possible, maybe someone can go through, find proper sources for citation, place these quotes in appropriate places and then <s>strikethrough</s> the ones that have been re-included in the article. ] 17:54, 8 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :*Shigeru Miyamoto is ], though he prefers using his left hand. As a video game designer, he made some of his characters such as ] and ] left-handed or ambidextrous.{{Fact|date=June 2007}} | |||
| :: I'd like to know where this information comes from. Also (assuming it is accurate) whether he is truly ambidextrous (equally good with both hands), or mixed-handed (better at doing different tasks, with different hands) and if he is ambidextrous, whether he was born that way, or learned it (if so: What handedness was he born with?). <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 21:19, 27 August 2009 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
| :*Miyamoto likes quick, hand held games which he plays with his family.{{Fact|date=June 2007}} | |||
| :*Miyamoto has recently appeared in a '']''-themed video of ]. | |||
| :*In '']'', Mario briefly mentions Miyamoto by saying "Don't forget Mr. Miyamoto!" | |||
| :*He has been known to advise all children to play outside on days with fair weather. | |||
| ::Well, the trivia section was much larger before I moved most of them into the main article. ] (]) (]) 17:59, 8 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :::Still not a good precedent for keeping it. I would recommend finding ways to incorporating the information in. :) ] | |||
| :::: I know, I'm just saying, because I want to have this article at least a "Good Article" status. :) ] (]) (]) 18:09, 8 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::::: ^_^ Me too. So let's hash it out on the talk page. It might need a fair good bit of more footnotes in other places also. ] 18:10, 8 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
| Sorry for not replying for a while, been busy, anyways, I'll soon be looking for sources on the Internet sometime soon. ] (]) (]) 01:42, 27 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == External Links need a cleanup == | |||
| I've noticed that the external links are too large. ] (see ] for more info on external links) so therefore I added a tag to the section, until the unimportant links are out. So which ones are staying which ones are going? ] (]) (]) 15:56, 2 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == English? == | |||
| I'm confused. I know he understands English, but perfers to answer in Japanese. Has he ever stated why? I dont see a mention of this in the article. ] ] 04:52, 7 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :Porque su idioma nativo no es el inglés. ] (]) 23:53, 2 April 2012 (UTC) | |||
| == Pokemon and Link Cable == | |||
| I can recall from my old, dusty memories from the late 90s that he advised the guy who created pokemon, and became very much a mentor. Also, i've heard a few times that he helped develop the link-cable technology for gameboy which helped it really take off. | |||
| Anyone know about refs for any of that? | |||
| cheers --] 16:00, 12 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Radar Scope == | |||
| Is it true that Miyamato developed Radar Scope? According to the Radar Scope page on Misplaced Pages, the game has been developed by somebody else called Ikegami Tsushinki. <small>—Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 20:03, 21 November 2007 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
| '''No, Radar Scope was created by the guy you say and then Miyamoto modified it to be Donkey Kong.--] 21:28, 3 December 2007 (UTC) | |||
| When we say he "modified" Radar Scope to make Donkey Kong, it's a little misleading. They used the Radar Scope ''hardware'' to run Donkey Kong, but no element of the Radar Scope game or any of it's code is present in Donkey Kong. <small>—Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 04:16, 6 February 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
| == Humility and salary == | == Humility and salary == | ||
| Line 358: | Line 82: | ||
| I read an article that Nintendo's board insisted that Miyamoto should travel to work by car because of the safety risk of him travelling by bicycle (I don't have the link for this I'm afraid). | I read an article that Nintendo's board insisted that Miyamoto should travel to work by car because of the safety risk of him travelling by bicycle (I don't have the link for this I'm afraid). | ||
| == Death = False == | |||
| Someone has posted that Mr. Miyamoto "died" on January 10th, and posted it on a popular message board. It is completely false. If anyone sees it posted on here again, please assist in reverting it. I am currently trying to revert all vandalism, which is why there are so many edits on this page. Thank you ] (]) 02:24, 12 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == Over 9000 what? == | |||
| It mentions that there was a survey of over 9000 developers. I doubt I'm the only one that's heard of this meme, but is this vandalism or did the survey really have over 9000 devs? <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 19:36, 26 July 2009 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
| == Obvious vandalism by Thibbs == | |||
| You know information on wikipedia articles need sources. This is a wikipedia's prime policy. The user Thibbs repeatedly adds sentences or sections like "Selected gameography" which has NO sources. And he removes the "unsourced tag" which I added WITHOUT PROVIDING ANY SOURCE. He makes his own stupid criteria and adds contents with no sources and removed "unsourced tag". This is an obvious vandalism. Stop vandalizing this article or go away.--] (]) 11:01, 7 January 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :Please calm down. Your accusations are far off the mark and quite unbecoming of an editor at Misplaced Pages. I know you've only made a handful of edits here and are quite new, but we are expected to ] at Misplaced Pages. I have not vandalized the article in any way nore have I created "stupid criteria." The inclusion criteria for games under the "Select gameography" section was developed almost 2 years ago. Please see ]. I have restored the note concerning this to the article. Please do not remove it again without further discussion in talk (you may wish to examine ] for an explanation of why). As far as the removal of the "unsourced tag," that was my mistake. I hadn't noticed its inclusion. Your accusation that this was vandalism on my part, however, is extremely detrimental to the collaborative spirit of the project. Please re-evaluate your rhetoric. -] (]) 13:17, 7 January 2010 (UTC) | |||
| The criteria seem to be created by just one IP user. Then why do we need to follow it? The poblem is obvious. Just one person created that criteria based on his completely PERSONAL taste. And the process of how those games pass the criteria is not shown. The person who created the criteria says twilight princess should not be included, but twilight princess got FAR MORE GOTY awards than ocarina of time. His opinion is just inconsistent and we should remove that section. That section seems to worsen this article.--] (]) 13:36, 7 January 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :I disagree. In the past 22 months, there has only been one complaint about these criteria. The fact that they were developed by an IP editor does not detract from the general consensus that has developed through use. Many popular video game designers and developers have gameography sections, so the whole-scale removal of this section is unnecessary. Since Miyamoto gameography's is extensive, I think it's a good decision to limit it to objectively determinable criteria for inclusion as suggested earlier by the IP editor. If you wish to limit the criteria further, then by all means make a suggestion here in talk so that consensus can develop. I disagree that the "inclusion criteria" are the result of "completely PERSONAL taste," however. They are clearly objective factors. If your application of the current consensus-based criteria leads you to include more titles that those currently displayed (e.g. Twilight Princess), then feel free to add them. But without a note to the effect that we are by consensus limiting the list in some way, we run the risk of some fan adding every title he has had a hand in. This would make the article unnecessarily cluttered and would be duplicative of the main article ("List of games created by Miyamoto") linked under this section. -] (]) 13:58, 7 January 2010 (UTC) | |||
| I researched the history of this article and found this section was READDED on August 2009, and before this, OVER 1 YEAR THAT SECTION WAS NOT EXISTENT. It means editors agreed this section was not needed and just one IP user readded the section without discussing anything. I also researched how many articles have Selected Gameography section and found 6 articles have it. And all of them do NOT have the main articles as to Gameography. It means their Selected Gameographies are almost full Gameographies. Miyamoto has the main article of it then why do we need "Selected" Gameographies. It is unnecessary. Also the section is quite misleading. Miyamoto did NOT touch the development of Pokémon Red and Blue AT ALL. He was listed in the credit just because pokemon was an expected title. This section misleads readers into believing he is one of the members who created pokemon. Anyway "Selected" Gameographies is pretty subjective because we must SELECT which games should be included although there is already full article of it. This section should be removed immediately.--] (]) 01:04, 8 January 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :It is true that the "Selected Gameography" section has not always been a part of the article. Since it was first added to the article in Feb 2008, it has been removed repeatedly by one editor who has since been banned from Misplaced Pages for making vandalistic anti-Miyamoto edits among other reasons. is his first removal of the section, is his second removal, is his third removal of the section. Apart from these edits that have all been considered vandalism, there has been no removal of the section since it was first created. You're the first person to agree with this editor on this topic. The reason this vandal gave for deleting the article was the same as your argument that it was not sourced. The solution for lack of sourcing is not the removal of the section, but rather it is the adding of sources. These sources are readily available online, and I think you'd make better use of your time helping me to add them. | |||
| :Secondly, although it is true that section was added by an anonymous editor, this fact cannot be used against him. According to ], "Contributors who have not created an account or logged in may ... edit pages that are not protected or semi-protected." You'll notice that the editor who is responsible for repeatedly deleting the "Select Gameography" section also often used an anonymous IP address. | |||
| :Third, I find 7 articles that have a "Select Gameography" section and many more that have a "Gameography" section. The reason for having a ''select'' gameography rather than a ''full'' gameography is obvious. Articles with ''select'' gameographies would be made too cumbersome by having a full gameography because the game-maker's full gameography is extremely lengthy. That is the case here. "Gameography" and "Select Gameography" sections are clearly acceptable at pertinent to the topic of the article. I think it's a good idea in this case to include a "select gameography" section. Judging by the number of edits from other users adding to the section and removing from it without deleting it entirely, I think it is clear that editors of this article approve of the section. | |||
| :Finally, I understand your criticism of the potentially misleading nature of the section, although I think this is more of a danger that readers who are not close readers will face. The section makes absolutely no claims that the games listed are all ''developed by'' Miyamoto, merely that he had a hand in them. If you wish to add notes to the section describing exactly what Miyamoto's duties were for thee game, then I would support that idea. -] (]) 23:30, 8 January 2010 (UTC) | |||
| What I am saying is that Selected gameographies in other articles are almost equal to FULL gameographies. The editors of those articles did not select anything. They just listed all games they found, but they are not sure those are really "all" so they just put the word "selected". The point is Selected gameographies in those articles are objective, but Selected gameography in this article is pretty subjective. Just look at the history, random editors add games without providing sources or discussing anything. In other words the Selected gameography in this article is full of random games. The section is pretty subjective, inaccurate, non encyclopedic, random. The criterion is just in name only, created by just one user and no one agreed to it. And I highly disagree to it. Furthermore, the process of how games pass the criteria is not shown at all. If we try to make the section accurate, we must construct the process guideline from the very beginning for I disagree to that criterion and it must be discussed and furthermore we must make a process guideline, both of which will require much time and discussion. And those criteria and process guideline are in the end pretty subjective based on some editors' tastes. As I said above, this is the only article that has the SUBJECTIVE Selected gameography. It is obvious this section is deteriorating this article. If you wish the improvement of this article, please agree to the removal.--] (]) 06:31, 9 January 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :The reason the list of games is limited here is because there are too many. This is a reasonable rationale. Other articles have gameography sections so such a section is clearly acceptable. The section has existed at this article without any complaint except from one vandal. I think the removal of the section is unwarranted and would reduce the quality of the article. | |||
| :As for your concerns that the inclusion criterion for the section is subjective, it would help to examine the note included in the article: "the inclusion criterion for this selection is critical success. Objective factors demonstrating critical success includes three things: 1) review scores, 2) GOTY-related awards and nominations, and 3) inclusion on 'Top 100 Games'-type lists from reliable publications." There is nothing subjective about demonstrable "critical success" when reliable sources concerning "review scores," "GOTY-related awards and nominations," and/or "inclusion on 'Top 100 Games'-type lists" are used to bolster it. By using the tried and true methods of ] to establish ] (in this case limited to "review scores," "GOTY-related awards and nominations," and/or "inclusion on 'Top 100 Games'-type lists"), we're following in the best tradition of Wikipedian editorial practice. The process for using the inclusion criteria to put games into or remove games from the list is as follows: 1)Read a reliable source that establishes a game as a "critical success" in terms of review score, GOTY-related awards/nominations, and/or "Top 100" status. 2)] add the game and cite the reliable source. 3)If another editor disputes the addition then he may chose to revert the edit. 4)A discussion about the inclusion/exclusion of the game will continue in talk until consensus has been reached. I think the only reason this is not made explicit in the note to the gameography section is that this is standard Misplaced Pages policy. It's common sense and common practice for most editors. I'm sure it'll work just as well here as it does on the rest of Misplaced Pages. Does this address your concerns or were there any factors in specific that you believed to be too subjective? I'd be open to the idea of altering the factors of the inclusion criterion if there is any reasonable rationale to do so. -] (]) 14:52, 9 January 2010 (UTC) | |||
| == Hommage to him in Daikatana, really? == | |||
| In citation #18, it is unclear that Hiro Miyamoto being an hommage to Shigeru Miyamoto was said by the game designer or not. The sentence in parentesis looks like a comment added by the editor. The inspiration for Hiro Miyamoto would most likely be ] (1584–1645), a historical swordsman, Daikatana being about a magical sword... <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 04:59, 11 January 2010 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
| == "Impact" == | |||
| Is there a reason why the Impact section only mentions his N64 games? / ]-] 15:30, 12 March 2010 (UTC) | |||
| Because there the more aclamied. --] <sup>]</sup> 16:07, 12 March 2010 (UTC) | |||
| : More acclaimed than the Mario games, the best sold games of all times? Have you read the articles about those games? ] etc? Is that game not acclaimed? | |||
| : I thought perhaps the answer was that he was not that much involved in those games or something. | |||
| : ]-] 19:09, 12 March 2010 (UTC) | |||
| ::Better?., --] <sup>]</sup> 21:57, 12 March 2010 (UTC) | |||
| == Orphaned references in ] == | |||
| I check pages listed in ] to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for ] in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of ]'s orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for ''this'' article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article. | |||
| <b>Reference named "CVG":</b><ul> | |||
| <li>From ]: {{cite web|url=http://www.computerandvideogames.com/article.php?id=149795|title=Review: Wii Sports|work=]|publisher=]|date=2006-11-23|last=Jackson|first=Mike|accessdate=2008-02-01}}</li> | |||
| <li>From ]: {{cite web| url=http://www.computerandvideogames.com/article.php?id=80100| title=Super Mario Sunshine| publisher=]| accessdate=2008-10-28}}</li> | |||
| <li>From ]: {{Cite web|url= http://www.computerandvideogames.com/article.php?id=149383&skip=yes|title=Legend of Zelda: Twilight Princess |publisher=]|accessdate=2008-05-22|first=Andy|last=Robinson}}</li> | |||
| </ul> | |||
| <b>Reference named "egm":</b><ul> | |||
| <li>From ]: {{Cite web | author=S.B. |date=February 2006| title=The 200 Greatest Video Games of their Time | publisher=] | url=http://egm.1up.com/do/feature?pager.offset=6&cId=3147448 | accessdate=2006-10-01}}</li> | |||
| <li>From ]: {{cite journal |title=Metroid Prime |journal=Electronic Gaming Monthly |issue=162 |date=January 2003 |page=184 }}</li> | |||
| </ul> | |||
| <b>Reference named "GI review":</b><ul> | |||
| <li>From ]: {{cite journal|last=Reiner|first=Andrew|date=January 2003|title=Metroid Prime review|work=]|issue=117|page=98|url=http://www.gameinformer.com/Games/Review/200301/R03.0730.1556.03467.htm?CS_pid=220081}}</li> | |||
| <li>From ]: {{cite journal |last=Reiner |first=Andrew |title=The Legend of Zelda: Majora's Mask review |journal=] |date=November 2000 |issue=91 |page=136 }}</li> | |||
| </ul> | |||
| <b>Reference named "gamespot":</b><ul> | |||
| <li>From ]: {{cite web | url=http://www.gamespot.com/mac/action/halo/index.html | title=''Halo: Combat Evolved'' Mac version at GameSpot | accessdate=August 22, 2006}}</li> | |||
| <li>From ]: {{cite web|authorlink=Greg Kasavin|last=Kasavin|first=Greg|title=Metroid Prime review|publisher=]|date=15 November 2002|url=http://www.gamespot.com/gamecube/action/metroidprime/review.html|accessdate=2006-01-29}}</li> | |||
| <li>From ]: {{cite web | title = ''Star Fox 64'' for Nintendo 64 Review | publisher = GameSpot | url=http://www.gamespot.com/n64/action/starfox64/review.html | accessdate=2006-06-13}}</li> | |||
| </ul> | |||
| I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. ]] 06:33, 13 March 2010 (UTC) | |||
| {{/GA1}} | |||
| == Missing content == | |||
| I've just noticed that some of the text of this article, that's visible when you look at its source, isn't showing up in the article itself. This is the case of the section heading "personal life", as well as the first sentence after this heading which I've just added. (Describing Miyamoto's hobby of playing guitar and banjo.) Does anyone know what's causing this problem, or how to fix it? --] (]) 23:53, 2 June 2010 (UTC) | |||
| == Expanded Impact segment == | == Expanded Impact segment == | ||
| Line 470: | Line 116: | ||
| <br> | <br> | ||
| {{reflist-talk}} | {{reflist-talk}} | ||
| ==Is this really a good article?== | |||
| It reads like a bunch of loosely put together facts and doesn't really sound cohesive. For instance, the Impact section begins by talking about The Wizard. Really, The Wizard??? There is also this bit: "The second game was The Legend of Zelda: Ocarina of Time. Miyamoto was the principal director of Super Mario 64. He produced his next game: The Legend of Zelda: Ocarina of Time, and led a team of several directors." Does that series of sentences actually sound good to anyone? Also, the mention of his wife and kids is at the top of the article but under personal life there is no mention of them. | |||
| I only did a cursory scan but I'm sure there's much more wrong here. Does this really meet the criteria for a good article? ] (]) 11:50, 9 October 2011 (UTC) | |||
| :I completely agree with you. A lot of the article feels like that it was copied from other articles about Nintendo games, simply because Miyamoto was involved with them in some way or another. In fact, before I had some work done on 2006-Present, so much of that section was just copied verbatim from ], with no effort to interweave the information into the text. So I agree that it does not meet the criteria for a good article. It's just too messy. --] (]) 12:18, 9 October 2011 (UTC) | |||
| ::Well then, per ], which states "Make sure you are logged in; if you are not a registered user, please ask another editor to reassess the article, or request a community reassessment." would you go through that process? ] (]) 23:10, 15 October 2011 (UTC) | |||
| :::I agree, I've gone ahead a nominated it for reassessment.] (]) 05:41, 16 October 2011 (UTC) | |||
| {{Talk:Shigeru Miyamoto/GA2}} | |||
| ==Luigi's Mansion 2== | |||
| Should Luigi's Mansion 2 be listed under his current projects as he is overseeing the development of this game. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 22:56, 11 October 2011 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
| == Retirement from management == | |||
| http://www.wired.com/gamelife/2011/12/miyamoto-interview/ | |||
| Retiring as development overseer/manager, focusing more on smaller development projects. ] (]) 03:30, 8 December 2011 (UTC) | |||
| :Turns out that's untrue: http://wii.ign.com/articles/121/1214255p1.html --] (]) 14:08, 8 December 2011 (UTC) | |||
| == Edit request on 6 June 2012 == | |||
| {{edit semi-protected|answered=yes}} | |||
| <!-- Begin request --> | |||
| Under "Early Life", "Kanazawa Municipal College of Industrial Arts" should be linked to http://en.wikipedia.org/Kanazawa_College_of_Art | |||
| Thank you. | |||
| <!-- End request --> | |||
| ] (]) 23:53, 6 June 2012 (UTC) | |||
| :] '''Done'''<!-- Template:ESp --> ] (]) 07:35, 7 June 2012 (UTC) | |||
| == Inline citation formatting needs work == | |||
| I've just added a "format footnotes" tag to the article because several of the footnotes are undecipherable to readers. Specifically, Footnotes 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 22, and 23 all use the ] without ever presenting the full citation so these footnotes all fail ]. | |||
| *Is the "Kent" source that is cited twice (footnotes 7 and 8) the same as one of the "Kent Miller" sources from Nintendo Power? Or is it a reference to Steven Kent's "Ultimate History of Video Games" (2001)? It was added in but there was no indication about which Kent or which work was being cited. | |||
| *I presume that the "Sheff (1993)" source (footnotes 22 and 23) refers to "David Sheff's ''Game Over'' (1993)" from ] (and ]), but are the undated "Sheff" sources (footnotes 9, 12, 14, and 15) from the same work? | |||
| *And what of the "Kohler" source? Is it perhaps a reference to Chris Kohler's "Power-Up: How Japanese Video Games Gave the World an Extra Life" (2004)? It seems to have been added in , but there is no indication as to which Kohler we are speaking of nor which of his/her articles is being cited. | |||
| If anyone knows any details on these sources, please help to improve the refs. -] (]) 16:51, 12 July 2012 (UTC) | |||
| I have a copy of the Sheff work in front of me (specifically, the 1999 version with added content), titled "Game Over: Press Start to Continue; The Maturing of Mario," by David Sheff. I have confirmed the references to the book with 2 changes. First, there is no reference to "maze" games in citation 14 (page 49 of the book); the specific quote is "The salesmen were used to battle games with space invaders, and heroes shooting lasers at aliens." Second, citation 15 (page 109) misspells the name of the landlord, who in the book is referred to as "Mario Segali." | |||
| Hope this helps, | |||
| ] (]) 08:19, 8 September 2012 (UTC) | |||
| == Edit request on 24 January 2013 == | |||
| {{edit semi-protected|answered=yes}} | |||
| <!-- Begin request --> | |||
| Under career, in the section labeled '2000-2006,' the phrase "and ''Legend of Zelda'' series on the both the GameCube..." should be changed to "and ''Legend of Zelda'' series on both the GameCube..." because there is an extra 'the' in the sentence. | |||
| <!-- End request --> | |||
| ] (]) 00:45, 24 January 2013 (UTC) | |||
| :] '''Done'''<!-- Template:ESp --> Thanks. --] (]) 01:17, 24 January 2013 (UTC) | |||
| == salary == | |||
| In 2009, Miyamoto's salary was ¥126 million ($1.4 million), making him currently the second highest paid Nintendo employee <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 00:05, 21 June 2013 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
| :Source?] (]) 12:15, 23 June 2013 (UTC) | |||
| ::Does look legit per . Apparently it's a requirement of Japanese law now to release salaries for 100 million+ yen earners. This is probably worth including, especially since it makes him the second-highest paid Nintendo employee, but I'm not sure where. ] (]) 20:49, 10 August 2013 (UTC) | |||
| == Orphaned references in ] == | |||
| I check pages listed in ] to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for ] in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of ]'s orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for ''this'' article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article. | |||
| <b>Reference named "ign-history":</b><ul> | |||
| <li>From ]: {{cite web|url=http://retro.ign.com/articles/833/833615p2.html|title=IGN Presents The History of Super Mario Bros.|last=McLaughlin|first=Rus|accessdate=2009-04-13}}</li> | |||
| <li>From ]: {{cite web|url=http://retro.ign.com/articles/833/833615p2.html|title=IGN Presents The History of Super Mario Bros.|last=McLaughlin|first=Rus|date=2007-11-08|accessdate=2009-04-13}}</li> | |||
| <li>From ]: {{cite web |url= http://retro.ign.com/articles/833/833615p2.html|title=IGN Presents The History of Super Mario Bros. | work = ] | publisher = ] |last= McLaughlin|first= Rus|accessdate= 2009-04-13}}</li> | |||
| </ul> | |||
| I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. ]] 06:12, 9 August 2013 (UTC) | |||
| == Career vs. impact == | |||
| I'm having some trouble distinguishing what to put in the career section vs. What to put in the impact section. The simple fact is that there's considerable overlap between the two -- tightly linked with the fact that he created Mario 64, for instance, is the fact that it helped pioneer 3D camera control schemes. I'm not sure where to put findings about his impact. Should they go into the chronological career section or into the more series-based impact section? I've considered that perhaps the impact of specific titles should be included in the career section alongside development information, while broader impact that spans multiple games would go in the impact section. | |||
| I also noticed debate in the past regarding the selected gameography section . Information about what groundbreaking games he created (and a list of all of them on a separate page) seems very important -- it's all about highlighting the major, impactful games he's made. Although I would think any gameography on this article should include prose explanations rather than a simple list. | |||
| All this being said, what do people think about how the content should be organized? I'd appreciate any feedback, including original ideas I haven't yet considered. Thank you. ] (]) 21:32, 10 August 2013 (UTC) | |||
| == Citation for "the best selling game of all time" == | |||
| The statement "and Wii Sports, the best-selling game of all time." needs a citation. Would be acceptable? I can't do it myself because the page is semi-protected. ] (]) 20:32, 26 November 2013 (UTC) | |||
| :No, VG Chartz is not considered a reliable source. Simon Carless of ] wrote .--]<sup>]</sup> 20:43, 26 November 2013 (UTC) | |||
| == reliable source dispute. Guy interviews Miyamoto on Kotaku == | |||
| *Harizotoh9 removes this with the edit summary (kotaku not reliable source). | |||
| *I reverted with the edit summary (it is a reliable source. The article is from a guy who interviews Miyamoto regularly) | |||
| *Harizotoh9 removes i again with the edit summary (Kotaku is a low quality group blog, not a WP:RS. Sourcing is all that matters, not what's true/false.} | |||
| *Opinions please. Would guy who interviews Miyamoto regularly on Kotaku be a reliable source for information about him? Especially when he is quoting what he said in the article. ] 19:47, 30 March 2014 (UTC) | |||
| ::It's a source, but not a great one. ] does permit blogs from reputable news organizations to be used, but this isn't a news blog. Also, if he's being interviewed regularly, then it's pretty much a self-published source, and personal interviews are a no-no. Also, who owns the blog? Is it neutral, or owned by some gaming company and being used to promote product? I agree with ]. ] (]) 21:47, 30 March 2014 (UTC) | |||
| :::] says "News posts after 2010 are considered reliable. For posts before 2010, only those (significant) opinion posts that are written by established writers are allowed". And there is nothing wrong with using interviews with someone, that's how a lot of information is found out. ] 02:30, 31 March 2014 (UTC) | |||
| :Stephen Totilo is the editor in chief of Kotaku, and and established journalist in the VG industry. As such, this is clearly a reliable source. --] (]) 02:49, 31 March 2014 (UTC) | |||
| ::Kotaku has been established by ] as being a reliable source, and as such as long as it's applied properly it should be just fine to use. If it is an interview, that makes statements by Miyamoto primary source material, which is acceptable in certain circumstances. ] ] 03:11, 31 March 2014 (UTC) | |||
| :::I would disagree with ], and argue that they should just avoid Kotaku entirely, and Gawker media as a whole. It's either low grade clickbait tabloid stories, or news stories that you can get anywhere else. As a source it really adds nothing, and can potentially lower the quality of the article significantly. --] (]) 03:53, 31 March 2014 (UTC) | |||
| ::::That's a whole different issue. For the time being, we have a very clear precedent of allowing Kotaku articles, especially from its EIC. If you want to question that long-standing consensus, the ] talk page (and not this one) is the place to do it. The reputation of Gawker isn't lost on me, but I think you have a tough case to make unless you have widespread proof of the outlet's lack of reliability. As for this specific case, it's not like Totilo ''didn't'' interview Miyamoto. <span style='font:1.1em"Avenir";padding:1px 3px;border:1px solid #909;color:#909'>czar ]</span> 04:20, 31 March 2014 (UTC) | |||
| :::::Just another editor chiming in that at least the current consensus is that the source is useable/reliable. You'd need to change consensus before being able to reject the website whole like is being proposed. (I don't personally like the website or some of its headlines either, so I get that concern, but I also still recognize that that is a personal preference, and that it can be still be used to appropriately source articles here on Misplaced Pages.) ] ] 17:35, 31 March 2014 (UTC) | |||
| ::::::This is overwhelmingly reliable. Even interviews from non-reliable sources like fansites are usually considered okay, and Kotaku is plenty well-esteemed here (as much as ] or ], roughly). ] (]) 20:47, 31 March 2014 (UTC) | |||
| == Development Philosophy == | |||
| I went ahead and edited this section because of the flag for list format. It is now in more of a prose style, and hopefully the way that the flag was indicating it should be. I removed the flag, but if someone feels as though the edits are not adequate, let me know and we can work on fixing the section together. Thank you. ] (]) 20:21, 26 June 2014 (UTC) | |||
| :{{reply to|Triforces}}No it's just fine and I can't imagine why someone added a flag rather than simply deleting carriage returns. Very weird. — ] <small>] ]</small> 20:27, 26 June 2014 (UTC) | |||
| == Western genre television shows had a major influence on Miyamoto. == | |||
| Is a false source of information submitted? A remark of Miyamoto is not found. | |||
| This source of information is meaningless. If there is a substitute, change it. ] (]) 13:07, 29 October 2014 (UTC) | |||
| == Source for Miyamoto's hobby == | |||
| Sorry I'm useless at formatting citations. Anyway for Miyamoto's hobby of guessing lengths and then measuring things. https://www.nintendo.co.uk/Iwata-Asks/Iwata-Asks-Wii-Fit-Plus/Interview-with-Shigeru-Miyamoto/1-Not-a-Sequel-but-an-Enhanced-Version/1-Not-a-Sequel-but-an-Enhanced-Version-209472.html While the other establishes significance, I think it's a tertiary source. ]] 01:38, 10 January 2015 (UTC) | |||
| == Professional title == | |||
| I don't know if I've ever seen an official job title for Shigeru Miyamoto. Does he have one? Does he have only the colloquial acknowledgements and in-game credits of "producer" or "designer", in addition to providing substantial spokesperson duties? Does he have a business card, or is he just a royal demigod, transcending analysis, and beyond question or reproach? :-D A business card cited in a book is at least how we decided upon the spelling of ]. lol. Thanks. Edit: okay says "Senior Managing Director". I wonder if that's a standard corporate title with a clear definition. It's not even a vice presidency, huh? — ] <small>] ]</small> 09:24, 9 February 2015 (UTC) | |||
| == Semi-protected edit request on 18 July 2015 == | |||
| {{edit semi-protected|Shigeru Miyamoto|answered=y}} | |||
| <!-- Begin request --> | |||
| Can someone add Co-President of Nintendo to occupations? Thanks. | |||
| <!-- End request --> | |||
| ] (]) 15:51, 18 July 2015 (UTC) | |||
| :] '''Not done:'''<!-- Template:ESp --> as you have not cite ] to back up your request, without which no information should be added to, or changed in, any article.<br />AFAIK he is currently only "acting Representative Director" - ] (]) 10:45, 22 July 2015 (UTC) | |||
| == Something I believe is important == | |||
| We need to add "Temporary President and CEO of Nintendo" to his occupations list. <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 09:34, 2 August 2015 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
| == External links modified == | |||
| Hello fellow Wikipedians, | |||
| I have just added archive links to {{plural:5|one external link|5 external links}} on ]. Please take a moment to review . If necessary, add {{tlx|cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{tlx|nobots|deny{{=}}InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes: | |||
| *Added archive https://web.archive.org/20100111070103/http://us.wii.com:80/iwata_asks/punchout/vol1_page2.jsp to http://us.wii.com/iwata_asks/punchout/vol1_page2.jsp | |||
| *Added archive https://web.archive.org/20060130212907/http://www.gamespot.com:80/gamespot/features/video/15influential/p9_01.html to http://www.gamespot.com/gamespot/features/video/15influential/p9_01.html | |||
| *Added archive https://web.archive.org/20060130160346/http://www.gamespot.com:80/gamespot/features/video/15influential/p15_01.html to http://www.gamespot.com/gamespot/features/video/15influential/p15_01.html | |||
| *Added archive https://web.archive.org/20061202120515/http://wii.gamespy.com/wii/legend-of-zelda-wii/745573p1.html to http://wii.gamespy.com/wii/legend-of-zelda-wii/745573p1.html | |||
| *Added archive https://web.archive.org/20121106233011/http://www.gamespot.com/news/2463264.html to http://www.gamespot.com/news/2463264.html | |||
| When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the ''checked'' parameter below to '''true''' to let others know. | |||
| {{sourcecheck|checked=false}} | |||
| Cheers. —]<small><sub style="margin-left:-14.9ex;color:green;font-family:Comic Sans MS">]:Online</sub></small> 02:19, 29 August 2015 (UTC) | |||
| == Focus == | |||
| The lead focuses a lot on him having helped create some of the "best" games, but this grossly misrepresents what he did. It's odd how it underlines that he helped with Super Mario Bros, but not that he pretty much ''entirely developed Mario and Donkey Kong'' in the first place. His developing role would be much more important, no? ] (]) 16:39, 21 March 2016 (UTC) | |||
| == Scouting? == | |||
| The article ] links him to Boy Scouting, can anyone cite this?--] (]) 15:48, 21 November 2016 (UTC) | |||
| == Semi-protected edit request on 26 November 2016 == | |||
| {{edit semi-protected|Shigeru Miyamoto|answered=y}} | |||
| Could somebody add an apostrophe infront of "70s" so that it's, '70s, in the second sentence in the second paragraph, "His games have been seen on every Nintendo video game console, with his earliest work appearing on arcade machines in the late '''70s'''." | |||
| ] (]) 02:45, 26 November 2016 (UTC) | |||
| : ] - I've added 19 in front of it, as ] - ] (]) 10:27, 26 November 2016 (UTC) | |||
| == Personal Life Section == | |||
| The "Personal Life" section on this article is a mess. There is no flow or cohesiveness to the facts strewn throughout it, and the section as a whole is just poorly written. | |||
| "His children played video games, but he also made them go outside." | |||
| Really? | |||
| ] (]) 16:01, 12 May 2017 (UTC) | |||
| *Agreed. The majority of the article needs a re-write, not just this section. ~ ] <sup>(])</sup> 23:32, 12 May 2017 (UTC) | |||
| == Edit request, 1 Dec 2017 == | |||
| In footnote 66, "6-4bit" is clearly a typo for "64-bit". ] (]) 03:55, 1 December 2017 (UTC) | |||
| :Yeah but it's not our typo. It's a quotation. I resurrected the dead link and inserted "". — <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">]]</span> 06:02, 1 December 2017 (UTC) | |||
| == External links modified == | |||
| Hello fellow Wikipedians, | |||
| I have just modified 9 external links on ]. Please take a moment to review ]. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit ] for additional information. I made the following changes: | |||
| *Added archive https://www.webcitation.org/6bXQLoHCB?url=http://www.nintendo.co.jp/ir/pdf/2015/150914e.pdf to https://www.nintendo.co.jp/ir/pdf/2015/150914e.pdf | |||
| *Added archive https://www.webcitation.org/6bXQLoHCB?url=http://www.nintendo.co.jp/ir/pdf/2015/150914e.pdf to https://www.nintendo.co.jp/ir/pdf/2015/150914e.pdf | |||
| *Corrected formatting/usage for http://games.ign.com/articles/833/833615p1.html | |||
| *Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.gamespot.com/gamespot/features/video/hist_zelda/index.html | |||
| *Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.meanmachinesmag.co.uk/review/192/super-mario-bros-3.php | |||
| *Replaced archive link https://web.archive.org/web/20120209114608/http://n-europe.com/news.php?nid=2349 with https://web.archive.org/web/20080609020646/http://n-europe.com/news.php?nid=2349 on http://n-europe.com/news.php?nid=2349 | |||
| *Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.time.com/time/asia/2006/heroes/bl_miyamoto.html | |||
| *Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.fpa.es/en/press/news/shigeru-miyamoto-prince-of-asturias-award-for-communication-and-humanities/ | |||
| *Corrected formatting/usage for http://kotaku.com/5381876/miyamotos-secret-hobby-measuring-stuff | |||
| When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs. | |||
| {{sourcecheck|checked=false|needhelp=}} | |||
| Cheers.—] <span style="color:green;font-family:Rockwell">(])</span> 02:23, 6 December 2017 (UTC) | |||
| == New Mario Game == | |||
| Hi I have a idea for a new Mario game. My idea is that Bowser has a brother name Flowser. And he kidnap Princes Peach new sister. And his son FlowserJR. So Mario and his new companion cappy try to get Peaches sister back. BY Emanuel Gammon <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 17:06, 30 December 2017 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
| == External links modified == | |||
| Hello fellow Wikipedians, | |||
| I have just modified 3 external links on ]. Please take a moment to review ]. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit ] for additional information. I made the following changes: | |||
| *Added archive https://archive.is/20070927213408/http://www.1up.com/do/reviewPage?cId=3155329&sec=REVIEWS to http://www.1up.com/reviews/legend-zelda | |||
| *Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100402015830/http://games.ign.com/top-100-game-creators/1.html to http://games.ign.com/top-100-game-creators/1.html | |||
| *Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20170721153007/https://miiverse.nintendo.net/users/ShigeruMiyamoto to https://miiverse.nintendo.net/users/ShigeruMiyamoto | |||
| When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs. | |||
| {{sourcecheck|checked=false|needhelp=}} | |||
| Cheers.—] <span style="color:green;font-family:Rockwell">(])</span> 06:29, 9 January 2018 (UTC) | |||
| == External links modified == | |||
| Hello fellow Wikipedians, | |||
| I have just modified 2 external links on ]. Please take a moment to review ]. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit ] for additional information. I made the following changes: | |||
| *Added archive https://www.webcitation.org/6JJppTINq?url=http://multiplayerblog.mtv.com/2011/04/04/super-mario-bros-2-interview-reveals-a-strange-vertical-only-prototype/ to http://multiplayerblog.mtv.com/2011/04/04/super-mario-bros-2-interview-reveals-a-strange-vertical-only-prototype/ | |||
| *Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121208051104/http://www.danielpemberton.com/shigerumiyamoto.html to http://www.danielpemberton.com/shigerumiyamoto.html | |||
| When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs. | |||
| {{sourcecheck|checked=false|needhelp=}} | |||
| Cheers.—] <span style="color:green;font-family:Rockwell">(])</span> 04:36, 13 January 2018 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 00:04, 15 December 2024
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Shigeru Miyamoto article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
|
| Find video game sources: "Shigeru Miyamoto" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · TWL · NYT · WP reference · VG/RS · VG/RL · WPVG/Talk |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 2 months  |
 | Shigeru Miyamoto was one of the Sports and recreation good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This  level-4 vital article is rated B-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the Top 25 Report. The week in which this happened: |
 | The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future: |
 Archives | |
|
|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 60 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
 |
Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
|
Biography
This section has a few errors.
References to "Sonobe" should be corrected to "Sonebe".
Can I use this photo under fair use?
I found this photo. It's snap shot photograph of a slide presentation of Game Developers Conference 2004. This is funny but still verified. Only problem is that this Japanese site explicitly ask people not to use any material (incl photo) elsewhere. However, it a mere snap photograph of the presenation by Eiji Aonuma, so I'm hoping that we can use the photo under fair use. Vapour
Can somebody explain the use of Chabudai Gaeshi-ed a little bit more?
I don't understand what Chabudai Gaeshi means in the following sentence: "Eiji Aonuma was initially the producer of The Legend of Zelda: Twilight Princess. However, between 2005 to 2006, Miyamoto switched to the producer's role. He stated that the switch was the result of a year-long development being Chabudai Gaeshi-ed. In the same interview, Miyamoto said that he had to clean up the mess of his Chabudai Gaeshi, so he joined in as a producer and also to assist in the development of the game." - i don't fully understand the point now. Can you help sound it more english? Thanks!
- Solved: This practice is also known as Flipping Chabudai, and has been used figuratively by Shigeru Miyamoto to scrap projects he was not satisfied with. Eiji Aonuma, whose initial one year long development of was scrapped by Miyamoto, has jokingly described "Chabudai Gaeshi" as "Don't like what's for dinner."
Humility and salary
Is there an up-to-date reference on Miyamoto's salary and his preferred method of transport to work? He is a senior managing director at one of Japan's most-wealthy companies; I very much doubt that he receives an average salary.
I read an article that Nintendo's board insisted that Miyamoto should travel to work by car because of the safety risk of him travelling by bicycle (I don't have the link for this I'm afraid).
Expanded Impact segment
Anybody else wanting to look for stuff to add about the specific influences he has made to gaming? There's a lot out there.
I'm making a list below, so please feel free to add suggestions or references to those with asterisks by them.
There are some TV documentaries of Shigeru Miyamoto that haven't been used in this article which I will find which provided some of the info I used so far in this list. If anybody wants to help please feel free to add.
List
-Created and popularized the platforming genre*
-Launched and popularized the use of battery powered saved games with his implementation of it in the original Legend of Zelda game(first game to use it).*
-Introduced open world, free roaming/nonlinear gaming with the Legend of Zelda
-Introduced/popularized level system not based on highscore but "beating" the game with Super Mario bro.s
-Greatly integral in the success of the NES by producing Super Mario Bro.s, the game that came bundled with it.
^^^ All four of which shifted the designers focus from arcade gaming to home console gaming*
-"Integral" in Nintendo's production of the DS.
-Analog stick, DS Touchscreen, Wii remote all influenced by his ideas.
-Influential in the revival of the video game industry following the crash of 83' by greatly aiding the launch of the NES with the original Mario game that was bundled with it*
-Greatly influenced 3D gaming with the sense of freedom and range of movement he provided in Mario 64 and the camera lock on system in the Legend of Zelda: Ocarina of Time.
-2006-Present section may want to mention his getting the 2D/3D slider into the Nintendo 3DS.*
-Influenced the design of video game characters. Early on the video game industry didn't have game artists and the programmers made the art themselves. Most games featured people who were proportionate but looked little more than stick figures. He designed Mario with a head the size of his body, a large nose that could be seen easier, a mustache which was hard to distinguish if it was a mouth or a mustache. Mario was the first video game character to really look like a human.*
-Reinvigorated the Arcade with Donkey Kong.
-Promoted hidden secrets and alternate ways to progress in his games(particularly the first Mario and Zelda games).
References
- "Top 100 Game Creators of all Time". IGN. Retrieved 2010-12-10.
- "Top Ten Game Creators". Gametrailers.com. Retrieved 2010-12-10.
- "Top Ten Game Creators". Gametrailers.com. Retrieved 2010-12-10.
- "Top Ten Game Creators". Gametrailers.com. Retrieved 2010-12-10.
- "Top Ten Game Creators". Gametrailers.com. Retrieved 2010-12-10.
- Delisted good articles
- Old requests for peer review
- Biography articles of living people
- B-Class level-4 vital articles
- Misplaced Pages level-4 vital articles in People
- B-Class vital articles in People
- B-Class biography articles
- B-Class biography (arts and entertainment) articles
- Mid-importance biography (arts and entertainment) articles
- Arts and entertainment work group articles
- Old requests for Biography peer review
- WikiProject Biography articles
- B-Class video game articles
- High-importance video game articles
- B-Class Nintendo articles
- Nintendo task force articles
- WikiProject Video games articles
- B-Class Japan-related articles
- High-importance Japan-related articles
- WikiProject Japan articles
- Articles copy edited by the Guild of Copy Editors
- B-Class WikiProject Business articles
- Mid-importance WikiProject Business articles
- WikiProject Business articles
- Pages in the Misplaced Pages Top 25 Report