Misplaced Pages

Visa Waiver Program: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 08:42, 5 October 2019 editBadYodels (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users799 edits Eligible countries: Hey guys, I know its exciting that Poland has been nominated, but it is not part of the program yet. Putting it there could confuse people.← Previous edit Latest revision as of 09:15, 15 December 2024 edit undoHeitordp (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users3,426 edits Added notes about biometric passports; clarified category for waiver of ineligibility 
(388 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Short description|Program allowing 90-day visa-free travel to the United States for nationals of some countries}}
{{Use American English|date = March 2019}} {{Use American English|date = March 2019}}
{{Use mdy dates|date=August 2019}}
{{Politics of the United States |expanded= Foreign}}


The '''Visa Waiver Program''' ('''VWP''') is a program of the ] that allows nationals of specific countries to travel to the United States for tourism, business, or while in transit for up to 90 days without having to obtain a ]. It applies to all fifty ]s, the ], ], and the ], as well as to ] and the ], which also have an additional program with waivers for more nationalities; ] has a similar but separate program.
{{Short description|program allowing 90-day visa free travel to the United States for citizens of some countries}}


The countries selected for the VWP by the U.S. government are generally regarded as ], with ] and a very high ].
{{Use mdy dates|date=August 2019}}
The '''Visa Waiver Program''' ('''VWP''') is a program of the US government that allows citizens of specific countries to travel to the United States for tourism, business, or while in transit for up to 90 days without having to obtain a ]. The program applies to the United States as well as the ] of Puerto Rico and the ] in the Caribbean, with limited application to other US territories.


Other visa waivers exist for citizens of certain jurisdictions.
All of the countries selected by the US government to be in the program are ] with a very high ] that are generally regarded as ].


==Eligible countries== ==Eligible countries==
] [[File:Visa policy of the USA.svg|thumb|none|800px|
{{legend|#ED1C24|The United States and ]}}
{{legend|#1191E5|] (freedom of movement)}}
{{legend|#008000|Visa-free (6 months)}}
{{legend|#22B14C|Visa Waiver Program (90 days)}}
{{legend|#FFD000|Visa-free with police certificate (6 months)}}
{{legend|#C0C0C0|Visa required to enter the United States}}]]


To be eligible for a visa waiver under the VWP, the traveler seeking admission to the United States must be a citizen of a country that has been designated by the ], in consultation with the ], as a "program country". ] of designated countries who are not citizens of a designated country do not qualify for a visa waiver. The criteria for designation as program countries are specified in Section 217 (c) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (Title {{UnitedStatesCode|8|1187}}).<ref>" {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160607035548/https://travel.state.gov/content/visas/en/visit/visa-waiver-program.html#reference |date=June 7, 2016 }}" ''Bureau of Consular Affairs''. United States Department of State.</ref> The criteria stress passport security and a very low nonimmigrant visa refusal rate, not more than 3% as specified in Section 217(c)(2)(A) of the Immigration and Nationality Act and ongoing compliance with the immigration law of the United States. To be eligible for a visa waiver under the VWP, the traveler seeking admission to the United States must be a national of a country that has been designated by the ], in consultation with the ], as a "program country". ] of designated countries who are not their nationals do not qualify for a visa waiver. The criteria for designation as program countries are specified in Section 217(c) of the Immigration and Nationality Act ({{UnitedStatesCode|8|1187}}). The criteria stress passport security, a nonimmigrant visa refusal rate below 3%, and a reciprocal visa waiver for U.S. nationals, among other requirements.


Citizens of 39 countries and territories are eligible for visa-free entry into the United States under the VWP:<ref>{{cite web |url=https://travel.state.gov/content/visas/en/visit/visa-waiver-program.html |title=Visa Waiver Program |work=U.S. Department of State |date=July 1, 2009 |accessdate=June 7, 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160607035548/https://travel.state.gov/content/visas/en/visit/visa-waiver-program.html |archive-date=June 7, 2016 |url-status=dead }}</ref><ref>"". ''U.S. Customs and Border Protection''. Archived from on October 19, 2015.</ref> As of 2024, nationals of 42 countries are eligible for entry into the United States without a visa under the VWP:<ref name=vwp>{{cite web | url=https://travel.state.gov/content/travel/en/us-visas/tourism-visit/visa-waiver-program.html | title=Visa Waiver Program | publisher=U.S. Department of State | location=Washington}}</ref><ref>{{cite web | url=https://www.dhs.gov/visa-waiver-program-requirements | title=Visa Waiver Program Requirements | publisher=U.S. Department of Homeland Security | location=Washington | accessdate=November 21, 2024}}</ref>


{|style=" {{border-radius|1em}} {{box-shadow|0.1em|0.1em|0.5em|rgba(0,0,0,0.75)}}; background-color: white; border: 1px solid white; padding: 5px;" {|style=" border-radius:1em; box-shadow: 0.1em 0.1em 0.5em rgba(0,0,0,0.75); background-color: white; border: 1px solid white; padding: 5px;"
|- style="vertical-align:top;" |- style="vertical-align:top;"
|colspan=3|
*{{flag|European Union}} ] {{small|(except ], ] and ])}}{{efn|ESTA is not available for nationals of ] born outside Hungary.<ref name=hu>{{cite web | url=https://hu.usembassy.gov/visas/visa-waiver-program/ | title=Visa Waiver Program|publisher=U.S. Department of State | location=Budapest}}</ref>}}{{efn|Only holders of ]s. ], which could be requested for children under age 12 as an alternative to a standard German passport before 2024, are not biometric and thus are not eligible for ESTA.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://de.usembassy.gov/visa-waiver-program/ |title=Visa Waiver Program |publisher=U.S. Embassy and Consulates in Germany}}</ref> The last passports of this kind were set to expire at the end of 2026.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.consilium.europa.eu/prado/en/DEU-AO-02002/index.html |title=Document: DEU-AO-02002 |work=Public Register of Authentic identity and travel Documents Online |publisher=European Council and Council of the European Union}}</ref>}}
|-
| |
*{{flagu|Andorra}} *{{flag|Andorra}}
*{{flagu|Australia}} *{{flag|Australia}}
*{{flagu|Austria}} *{{flag|Brunei}}
*{{flagu|Belgium}} *{{flag|Chile}}
*{{flagu|Brunei}} *{{flag|Iceland}}
*{{flag|Israel}}{{efn|Only holders of ]s issued with full validity, which can only be requested in person in Israel.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://travel.state.gov/content/travel/en/News/visas-news/visa-waiver-travel-for-israeli-citizens.html |title=Visa Waiver Travel for Israeli Citizens |publisher=U.S. Department of State |date=October 19, 2023}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=https://il.usembassy.gov/visas/visa-waiver-program-vwp-2/esta-faqs/ |title=ESTA – FAQS |publisher=U.S. Embassy in Israel}}</ref> Passports requested at ] abroad, which are not biometric, and those requested online or for recent immigrants in Israel, which are issued with reduced validity, are not eligible for ESTA.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://new.embassies.gov.il/usa/en/services/israeli-citizens/issuance-travel-documents-passport-citizens-and-residents-israel |title=Issuance of travel documents (passport) for citizens and residents of Israel |publisher=Embassy of Israel in Washington |date=17 June 2024}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.gov.il/en/service/application-for-biometric-docs |title=Get a biometric passport or identity card online |publisher=Government of Israel |date=30 April 2024}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.gov.il/BlobFolder/reports/olim_passport_or_travel_doc/en/traveldoc_eng.pdf |title=Immigrants ("olim"): eligibility for a passport or a travel document |publisher=Population and Immigration Authority of Israel |date=July 2021}}</ref>}}
*{{flagu|Chile}}
|valign="top"|
*{{flagu|Czech Republic}}
*{{flagu|Denmark}} *{{flag|Japan}}
*{{flagu|Estonia}} *{{flag|Liechtenstein}}
*{{flagu|Finland}} *{{flag|Monaco}}
*{{flagu|France}} *{{flag|New Zealand}}
*{{flagu|Germany}} *{{flag|Norway}}
*{{flagu|Greece}} *{{flag|Qatar}}
|valign=top| |valign="top"|
*{{flagu|Hungary}} *{{flag|San Marino}}
*{{flagu|Iceland}} *{{flag|Singapore}}
*{{flagu|Ireland}} *{{flag|South Korea}}
*{{flagu|Italy}} *{{flag|Switzerland}}
*{{flag|Taiwan}}{{efn|Only holders of passports with a ].}}
*{{flagu|Japan}}
*{{flag|United Kingdom}}{{efn|Only ] are eligible for the visa waiver.<ref>{{cite web | url=https://uk.usembassy.gov/visas/visa-waiver-program/machine-readable-biometric-passports/ | title=Machine Readable Biometric Passports|publisher=U.S. Department of State | location=London}}</ref>}}
*{{flagu|Latvia}}
*{{flagu|Liechtenstein}}
*{{flagu|Lithuania}}
*{{flagu|Luxembourg}}
*{{flagu|Malta}}
*{{flagu|Monaco}}
*{{flagu|Netherlands}}
*{{flagu|New Zealand}}
|valign=top|
*{{flagu|Norway}}
*{{flagu|Portugal}}
*{{flagu|San Marino}}
*{{flagu|Singapore}}
*{{flagu|Slovakia}}
*{{flagu|Slovenia}}
*{{flagu|South Korea}}
*{{flagu|Spain}}
*{{flagu|Sweden}}
*{{flagu|Switzerland}}
*{{flagu|Taiwan}}{{ref|TW|1}}
*{{flagu|United Kingdom}}{{ref|GB|2}}
|} |}


==Requirements==
;Notes:
===Passport===
#{{Note|TW}} – Citizens with ] only.
All visitors from VWP countries must hold a ].<ref>{{cite web | url=https://www.congress.gov/bill/114th-congress/house-bill/158/text|title=Text – H.R.158 – 114th Congress (2015–2016): Visa Waiver Program Improvement and Terrorist Travel Prevention Act of 2015 | last=Miller | first=Candice | date=December 9, 2015 | access-date=February 6, 2017}}</ref>
#{{Note|GB}} – Only ] are eligible to participate in the VWP.<ref>, U.S. Embassy & Consulates in the United Kingdom.</ref>
#For all countries, citizens with certain countries in their travel history are ineligible (see below)


All travelers must have individual passports. It is not acceptable (for the VWP) for children to be included on a parent's passport.<ref name=":0">{{cite web | url=http://canberra.usembassy.gov/visa_waiver_prog.html | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120302015254/http://canberra.usembassy.gov/visa_waiver_prog.html|archive-date=March 2, 2012 | title=Visa Waiver Program {{!}} Embassy of the United States Canberra, Australia | date=2012-03-02 | access-date=2020-02-22}}</ref>
{| class="wikitable collapsible collapsed" style="text-align: left; font-size: smaller; table-layout: fixed;"

|+
In principle, the passport must be valid for six months beyond the expected date of departure from the United States. However, the United States has agreements with a large number of countries to waive this requirement, including all VWP countries except Brunei.<ref>{{cite web | url=https://fam.state.gov/FAM/09FAM/09FAM040309.html#M403_9_3_B_2|title=9 FAM 101.1 INTRODUCTION TO 9 FAM | website=fam.state.gov | access-date=February 6, 2017}}</ref><ref name=":0" />

===Electronic System for Travel Authorization (ESTA)===
]
{{main|Electronic System for Travel Authorization}}
All incoming passengers who intend to take advantage of the Visa Waiver Program are required to apply for a travel authorization through the ] (ESTA) online before departure to the United States, preferably at least 72 hours (3 days) in advance. This requirement was announced on June 3, 2008 and is intended to bolster U.S. security by pre-screening participating VWP passengers against terrorist or no-fly lists and databases.<ref>{{cite news | url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/northamerica/usa/2067319/US-to-demand-72hrs-notice-for-British-tourists.html | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080606000754/http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/northamerica/usa/2067319/US-to-demand-72hrs-notice-for-British-tourists.html | archive-date=June 6, 2008 | work=The Daily Telegraph | location=London | title=US to demand 72hrs notice for British tourists | first=Andy | last=Bloxham | date=June 3, 2008 | access-date=May 27, 2010}}</ref> It is similar to Australia's ] system. The authorization is mandatory for participating VWP nationals before traveling to the United States, but as with formal visas this does not guarantee admission into the United States since final admission eligibility is determined at U.S. ports of entry by ] officers.

ESTA has an application fee of 4 ], and if approved, an additional fee of 17 USD is charged, for a total of 21 USD. An approved ESTA is valid for up to two years or until the traveler's passport expires, whichever comes first, and is valid for multiple entries into the United States.{{efn|For nationals of Brunei applying from July 6, 2023, ESTA is valid for one year. For nationals of Hungary applying from August 1, 2023, ESTA is valid for one year and for a single entry to the United States.<ref name=estafaq/>}}<ref name=estafaq>, Electronic System for Travel Authorization, U.S. Customs and Border Protection.</ref>

When traveling to the United States by air or sea under the VWP with ESTA, the person must be traveling on a participating commercial carrier and hold a valid return or onward ticket, dated within 90 days.<ref name=":0" /> The VWP does not apply at all (i.e. a visa is required) if a passenger arrives via air or sea on an unapproved carrier. ESTA is also required for travel by land.<ref>, U.S. Customs and Border Protection, April 7, 2022.</ref>

===Prior travel or dual nationality in certain countries===
Since 2016, those who have previously been in ], ], ], ], ], ], ] or ] on or after March 1, 2011, or in ] on or after January 12, 2021, or who are ] of Cuba, Iran, Iraq, North Korea, Sudan or Syria, are not eligible to travel under the VWP.<ref name="vwp"/> However, those who traveled to such countries for diplomatic, military, humanitarian, reporting or legitimate business purposes may have this ineligibility waived by the Secretary of Homeland Security.<ref>, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, January 21, 2016.</ref>

===Other requirements===
Applicants for admission under the Visa Waiver Program:<ref name=":0"/>
* Must have complied with the conditions of all previous admissions to the United States and have not been found ineligible for a U.S. visa.
* Must never have been convicted of, or arrested for, an offense or crime involving ]{{efn|There is an exemption in some cases for a single offense committed before age 18 and the crime was committed (and the person released from any confinement to a prison or correctional institution imposed for the crime) more than five years before the date of application for a visa, and also for a single instance if the maximum possible sentence in the United States is one year or less in jail, and less than six months was served. However, these exceptions cannot be applied by the individual as the question on ESTA is specific.}} or a controlled substance, or two or more crimes with a maximum aggregate sentence of five years' imprisonment or more, no matter how long ago. National regulations which normally expunge criminal records after a certain length of time (e.g. the ] in the UK) do not apply.
* Must not be otherwise inadmissible to the United States, such as on health or national security grounds.
* Must be intending to visit the United States for a purpose of tourism, business or transit.

Applicants should display social and economic ties which bind them to their country of origin or may be refused entry.<ref> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131222133227/http://www.travel.state.gov/visa/frvi/denials/denials_1361.html |date=December 22, 2013 }} retrieved April 19, 2012</ref>

Having been arrested or convicted does not in itself make a person ineligible to use the Visa Waiver Program. However, some U.S. embassies advise such persons to apply for a tourist visa even though there is no legal obligation to do so.<ref name=":0"/>

Those who do not meet the requirements for the Visa Waiver Program must obtain a U.S. visitor visa from a U.S. embassy or consulate.<ref name=":0"/>

===Restrictions===
Visitors under the VWP may stay for up to 90 days in the United States and cannot request an extension of the original allowed period of stay<ref name=":0"/> (this practice is allowed to those holding regular visas).<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.uscis.gov/working-united-states/temporary-visitors-business/b-1-temporary-business-visitor|title=B-1 Temporary Business Visitor|date=2015-07-14|website=USCIS|language=en|access-date=2020-02-03}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://immigration.com/visa/b-visa/b-visa-overview|title=B Visa Overview|date=2009-02-06|website=US Immigration Lawyer, Law Offices of Rajiv S. Khanna, PC, Rajiv S. Khanna|access-date=2020-02-03}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.uscis.gov/visit-united-states/extend-your-stay|title=Do you want or need to extend your stay in the U.S.?|date=2019-05-22|website=USCIS|language=en|access-date=2020-02-03}}</ref> However, VWP visitors may seek to adjust status on the basis of either marriage to a U.S. citizen or an application for asylum.<ref>{{cite web |title=8 USC §§ 1187, 1255(c)(4); Freeman v Gonzales, 444 F.3d 1031 (9th Cir. 2006) |url=http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2006/04/20/0435797.pdf |publisher=Ca9.uscourts.gov }}</ref>

] (CBP) officers determine admissibility upon the traveler's arrival. If one seeks to enter the United States under the VWP and is denied entry by a CBP officer at a port of entry, there is no path to appeal or review of the denial of entry.<ref>{{Cite web|last=Smith|first=Lamar|date=2000-10-30|title=H.R.3767 - 106th Congress (1999-2000): Visa Waiver Permanent Program Act|url=https://www.congress.gov/bill/106th-congress/house-bill/3767|access-date=2020-07-01|website=www.congress.gov}}</ref>

Travelers can leave to neighboring jurisdictions (], ] and the ]), but will not be granted another 90 days after reentry in the United States; instead they are readmitted to the United States for the remaining days granted on their initial entry.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://amsterdam.usconsulate.gov/visa_waiver_program2.html |publisher=The American Embassy in The Hague |title=Visa Waiver Program |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110619194258/http://amsterdam.usconsulate.gov/visa_waiver_program2.html |archive-date=June 19, 2011 }}</ref> Transit through the United States is generally permitted, if the total time in the United States, Canada, Mexico and adjacent islands is less than 90 days. However, if for example the traveler is transiting the United States on the way to a 6-month stay in Canada, the VWP cannot be used, as the total time in the United States, Canada, Mexico and adjacent islands will be over 90 days. In this case the traveler should apply for a ], or a ].<ref name=":0"/>

There are restrictions on the type of employment-related activities allowed. Meetings and conferences in relation to the travelers' profession, line of business or employer in their home country are generally acceptable, but most forms of "gainful employment" are not. There are however poorly-classifiable exceptions such as persons performing professional services in the United States for a non-U.S. employer, and persons installing, servicing and repairing commercial or industrial equipment or machinery pursuant to a contract of sale.<ref>{{cite web |title=Working (Legally) on a Visitor's Visa or Visa Waiver Entry |url= http://www.usvisalawyers.co.uk/article15.htm |publisher=Usvisalawyers.co.uk }}</ref> Performers (such as actors and musicians) who plan on performing live or taping scenes for productions in their country of origin, as well as athletes participating in an athletic event, are likewise not allowed to use the VWP for their respective engagements and are instead required to have an ] or ] prior to arrival. Foreign media representatives and journalists on assignment are required to have a nonimmigrant media (I) visa.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://travel.state.gov/visa/temp/without/without_1990.html |title=U.S. Department of State: Visa Waiver Program (VWP) |publisher=State.gov |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131102061718/http://travel.state.gov/visa/temp/without/without_1990.html#travelertype |archive-date=November 2, 2013}}</ref>

==History==
] passed legislation in 1986 to create the Visa Waiver Program with the aim of facilitating tourism and short-term business visits to the United States, and allowing the ] to focus consular resources on addressing higher risks.<ref name=":3" /> The United Kingdom became the first country to participate in the Visa Waiver Program in July 1988, followed by Japan in December 1988.<ref>{{cite news| url=https://www.nytimes.com/1988/10/30/travel/travel-advisory-accord-allows-trips-to-japan-without-a-visa.html | work=The New York Times | title=TRAVEL ADVISORY; Accord Allows Trips to Japan Without a Visa | date=October 30, 1988}}</ref> In July 1989, France, Italy, Netherlands, Sweden, Switzerland and West Germany were added to the VWP.<ref name=fr1997/>

In 1991, more European countries joined the Program – Andorra, Austria, Belgium, Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Liechtenstein, Luxembourg, Monaco, Norway, San Marino and Spain – as well as New Zealand (the first country from Oceania).<ref name=fr1997/> In 1993, Brunei became the second Asian country to be admitted to the Program.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d0338.pdf |title=United States General Accounting Office: Implications of Eliminating the Visa Waiver Program |access-date=July 12, 2012}}</ref>

On April 1, 1995, Ireland was added to the VWP.<ref name=ie/> In 1996, Australia and Argentina (the first Latin American country) joined,<ref name=fr1997/> although Argentina was later removed in 2002.<ref name=ar/> On September 30, 1997, Slovenia was added.<ref name=fr1997/> On August 9, 1999, Portugal, Singapore and Uruguay joined the program,<ref name=fr1999/> although Uruguay was subsequently removed in 2003.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.americanlaw.com/vwpp.html |title=Visa Waiver Program |publisher=Americanlaw.com |access-date=July 12, 2012}}</ref>

Following the ], the ] decided to tighten entry requirements into the United States, as a result of which legislation was passed requiring foreign visitors entering under the Visa Waiver Program to present a ] upon arrival starting from October 1, 2003, and a ] from October 26, 2004. However, as a number of VWP countries still issued non-machine readable passports (for example, more than a third of ] and ] passport holders held a non-machine readable version), the implementation of this rule was postponed to October 26, 2004, with the exception of ], as there were concerns about the security and integrity of ]s.<ref>{{cite news| url=https://www.nytimes.com/2003/09/09/us/two-years-later-borders-new-passport-rules-fight-terrorism-are-put-off-for-year.html | work=The New York Times | first=Philip | last=Shenon | title=TWO YEARS LATER: THE BORDERS; New Passport Rules to Fight Terrorism Are Put Off for a Year | date=September 9, 2003}}</ref> Likewise, the biometric passport requirement was also postponed to October 26, 2005, only to be further postponed by another year to October 26, 2006 at the request of the ], which raised concerns about the number of participating countries which would have been able to make the deadline.<ref>{{cite news |url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/6080384.stm |title=US imposes biometric entry demand |date=October 26, 2006 |work=] |access-date=November 30, 2011}}</ref> When the new rule came into force on that day, three countries (Andorra, Brunei and Liechtenstein) had not yet started issuing biometric passports.<ref name=":3">{{cite web |url=http://www.govexec.com/dailyfed/1006/102706j1.htm |title=Most countries meet e-passport deadline – Defense |publisher=GovExec.com |access-date=July 12, 2012 |archive-date=January 19, 2012 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120119145212/http://www.govexec.com/dailyfed/1006/102706j1.htm |url-status=dead }}</ref>

In November 2006, the U.S. government announced that plans for an "Electronic Travel Authorization" program (officially named "]") would be developed so that VWP travelers can give advance information on their travels to the United States. In return, they will be given authorization electronically to travel to the United States, although it does not guarantee admission to the United States. This program is modeled on the ] scheme that has been used in Australia for many years.<ref> {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070613080816/https://www.dhs.gov/xnews/releases/pr_1164919987951.shtm |date=June 13, 2007 }}</ref>

Argentina's participation in the VWP was terminated in 2002 in light of the ] taking place in that country and its potential effect on mass emigration and unlawful overstay of its nationals in the United States by way of the VWP. Uruguay's participation in the program was revoked in 2003 for similar reasons. While a country's political and economic standing does not directly determine its eligibility, it is widely believed that nationals of politically stable and economically developed nations would not have much incentive to illegally seek employment and violate their visa while in the United States, risks that consular officers seriously consider in approving or denying a visa.

===Road map===
After the ], both the newly admitted countries and EU agencies began intensive lobbying efforts to include those new countries in the VWP. The U.S. government initially responded to those efforts by developing bilateral strategies with 19 candidate countries known as the Visa Waiver road map process.<ref name=roadmap>{{cite book|url=http://www.ilw.com/immigrationdaily/news/2007,0314-crs1.pdf |author=Alison Siskin|title=Visa Waiver Program|publisher=Congressional Research Service|date=January 24, 2007|page=14}}. "Currently there are 19 'road map' countries. They are Argentina, Brazil, Bulgaria, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Estonia, Greece, Hungary, Israel, South Korea, Latvia, Lithuania, Malta, Poland, Romania, Slovakia, Taiwan, Turkey, and Uruguay."</ref> The U.S. government began to accept the possibility of departing from the original country designation criteria – which had been contained within immigration law ''per se'' – and to expand them by adding political criteria, with the latter being able to override the former. This development began first with Bill S.2844<ref> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151019021140/http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c108:S.2844.PCS: |date=October 19, 2015 }},</ref> which explicitly named Poland as the only country to be added to the VWP, and continued as an amendment to the ], whose Sec. 413, Visa Waiver Program Expansion,<ref>{{cite web |url=http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c109:S.2611.ES: |title=Comprehensive Immigration Reform Act of 2006 S.2611 |publisher=Thomas.loc.gov |access-date=July 12, 2012 |archive-date=October 19, 2015 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151019021140/http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c109:S.2611.ES: }}</ref> defined broader criteria that would apply to any EU country that provided "material support" to the multinational forces in ] and ]. However, the definition of that "material support" would be met again only by Poland and Romania, a fact that was not favorably received by the other EU candidate countries. Ironically, Poland remained the only Central European country that was not a participating nation in the VWP until 2019, due to a visa refusal rate above the critical threshold of 3%.

During his visit to Estonia in November 2006, ] announced his intention "to work with our Congress and our international partners to modify our visa waiver program". In 2006, the Secure Travel and Counterterrorism Partnership Bill was introduced in the Senate but no action was taken and that bill, as well as a similar one introduced in the House the following year, died after two years of inactivity.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=s109-4100 |title=Secure Travel and Counterterrorism Partnership Act |publisher=Govtrack.us |access-date=July 12, 2012}}</ref> The bill would have directed the Secretary of Homeland Security to establish a pilot program to expand the visa waiver program for up to five new countries that were cooperating with the United States on security and counterterrorism matters.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.congress.gov/bill/109th-congress/senate-bill/4100 |title=S.4100 - Secure Travel and Counterterrorism Partnership Act |date=December 7, 2006 |publisher=Congress.gov |access-date=May 30, 2016}}</ref>

A June 2007 ] Panel stressed the urgency of the inclusion of Central Europe in the VWP: "An inexplicable policy that is causing inestimable damage to the United States with its new Central and Eastern European NATO allies is the region's exclusion from the visa waiver program. As Helle Dale wrote in the spring issue of European Affairs: "Meanwhile, the problem is fueling anti-U.S. antagonisms and a perception of capricious discrimination by U.S. bureaucrats ---and damping the visits to the United States of people from countries with whom Washington would like to improve commercial and intellectual ties. Meanwhile, horror stories abound from friends and diplomats from Central and Eastern Europe about the problems besetting foreigners seeking to visit the United States. In fact bringing up the subject of visas with any resident of those countries is like waving a red flag before a bull." Visa waiver must be satisfactorily addressed and resolved at long last."<ref>Hudson Institute Panel:
Enduring Strains of Communism in Central and Eastern Europe </ref>

The ] allowed the inclusion of new countries in the VWP with a visa refusal rate up to 10% (up from the standard requirement of 3%) if they satisfied certain other conditions, from October 2008.<ref name=crs>, Congressional Research Service, June 29, 2020.</ref> With the relaxed criteria, eight countries were added to the program: Czech Republic, Estonia, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Slovakia and South Korea in November 2008,<ref>{{cite web|url=http://iipdigital.usembassy.gov/st/english/article/2008/10/20081017140208dmslahrellek0.8056452.html |title=Seven Nations to Join U.S. Visa Waiver Program |publisher=America.gov |access-date=June 10, 2016}}</ref> and Malta in December 2008.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.aila.org/File/DownloadEmbeddedFile/51690 |title=DHS Designates Malta as a Visa Waiver Program Country |publisher=Department of Homeland Security |date=December 22, 2008 |access-date=June 10, 2016}}</ref> ] ] called it "a removal of the last relict of Communism and the Cold War".<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.usatoday.com/news/world/2008-10-17-visa-waiver_N.htm |title=Bush announces visa waiver for 7 countries|work=USA Today |date= October 19, 2008|access-date=June 22, 2011}}</ref> However, from July 2009, the authority to include countries with such higher visa refusal rate became conditioned on the implementation of a system capable of matching the entry and exit from the United States of travelers under the VWP using biometric identifiers.<ref name=crs/> As such system was not implemented, the visa refusal rate requirement returned to 3%.

Greece officially joined the program on April 5, 2010.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.dhs.gov/ynews/releases/pr_1268162593062.shtm |title=Secretary Napolitano Announces Greece's Designation as a Member of the Visa Waiver Program |date=March 9, 2010 |publisher=Dhs.gov |access-date=July 12, 2012}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://athens.usembassy.gov/pr-2010-12.html |title=Greeks Can Travel to U.S. under Visa Waiver Program Starting April 5 With an Easy Electronic Application |publisher=Athens.usembassy.gov |access-date=July 12, 2012 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110707044928/http://athens.usembassy.gov/pr-2010-12.html |archive-date=July 7, 2011 }}</ref>

On October 2, 2012, Secretary ] announced the inclusion of Taiwan into the program effectively as of November 1, 2012.<ref> from http://www.dhs.gov; October 2, 2012</ref> Only holders of passports with a ] can benefit from the visa waiver.<ref>{{Cite web|title=Visa Waiver Program|url=https://www.ait.org.tw/visas/visa-waiver-program/|access-date=2021-01-26|publisher=American Institute in Taiwan}}</ref>

In 2013 there was conflict over the ] whose Senate version specified that satisfaction of the requirements regarding reciprocal travel privileges for U.S. nationals would be subject to security concerns.<ref> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150830093514/http://thomas.loc.gov/ |date=August 30, 2015 }}.</ref> Many members of the House of Representatives opposed the security language because it seemed to validate Israel's tendency to turn away Arab Americans without giving any reason. None of the other 37 countries in the visa waiver program had such an exemption.<ref>Ron Kampeas, , ], April 15, 2013.</ref>

] ] raised the issue of allowing holders of ]s or ]s to participate in the VWP during his visit to the United States in 2011, but proposals to allow this have not been successful.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.scmp.com/news/hong-kong/politics/article/1848106/return-moderate-mainstream-path-achieve-democracy-us-consul|title=Return to 'moderate mainstream' path to achieve democracy, US consul urges Hong Kong |work=] |date=August 20, 2015}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.scmp.com/news/hong-kong/politics/article/2097340/what-united-states-visa-waiver-scheme-envoy-kurt-tong-wants|title= What is the United States visa waiver scheme that envoy Kurt Tong wants to be applied to Hong Kong?|work=] |date=June 7, 2017|author=Viola Zhou |author2=Joyce Ng }}</ref>

Hong Kong is the only jurisdiction with a higher ] than the United States whose citizens cannot enjoy the program. The visa refusal rate for Hong Kong dropped to 1.7% for ] and 2.6% for ] in 2012.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.travel.state.gov/pdf/FY12.pdf |title=Adjusted Refusal Rate B-Visa only, by nationality, fiscal year 2012 |access-date=May 16, 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130717174850/http://www.travel.state.gov/pdf/FY12.pdf |archive-date=July 17, 2013 }}</ref> Hong Kong met all VWP criteria but did not qualify at the time because it was not legally a separate country, despite having its own passports and independent judicial system, monetary system and immigration control. The former ], ], raised the issue with then-Secretary of State ] during his visit to the United States in 2011 and was met with positive response.<ref name="scmp" /> On May 16, 2013, a bipartisan amendment bill was passed by the ] but not ratified into law. On August 10, 2015, the ], ], said during an interview with ] that the visa waiver was "not happening anytime soon", as the Visa Waiver law required the participant to be a "sovereign state" and Hong Kong was not independent, thus ending the possibility of Hong Kong joining the program. He also denied that the failed lobbying effort of the ] on this issue was a result of the refusal of detaining ] in 2013.<ref name="scmp">{{cite web|url=http://www.scmp.com/news/hong-kong/politics/article/1848106/return-moderate-mainstream-path-achieve-democracy-us-consul|title=Return to 'moderate mainstream' path to achieve democracy, US consul urges Hong Kong |work=] |date=August 20, 2015 |access-date=May 23, 2016}}</ref>

Chile joined the VWP on March 31, 2014.<ref name=cl/>

As of December 2018, ESTA is no longer approved in real-time to qualifying passengers and passengers are required to apply no later than 72 hours before departure.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.lonelyplanet.com/news/2018/12/20/estas-usa-new-changes|title=Travelling to the USA? The ESTA service has one important change|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181221230659/https://www.lonelyplanet.com/news/2018/12/20/estas-usa-new-changes|date=December 20, 2018|archive-date=December 21, 2018|author=Andrea Smith}}</ref>

In July 2019, U.S. Ambassador to Poland ] stated that "Poland would fully qualify for the Visa Waiver Program within 3 to 6 months after September 2019" depending on bureaucratic procedures.<ref>{{cite web | url=https://fakty.interia.pl/polska/news-georgette-mosbacher-potwierdza-wizy-dla-polakow-zostana-znie,nId,3120471 | title=To już przesądzone. Koniec wiz dla Polaków do USA }}</ref> On October 4, 2019, U.S. President ] confirmed that the Department of State had formally nominated Poland for entry into the Visa Waiver Program.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://trumpwhitehouse.archives.gov/briefings-statements/statement-press-secretary-regarding-nomination-poland-entry-visa-waiver-program/|title = Statement from the Press Secretary Regarding the Nomination of Poland for Entry into the Visa Waiver Program – the White House}}</ref> On November 11, 2019 Poland officially joined the Program and became its 39th member.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.dhs.gov/news/2019/11/06/acting-secretary-mcaleenan-announces-designation-poland-visa-waiver-program |title=Acting Secretary McAleenan Announces Designation of Poland into the Visa Waiver Program |date=November 6, 2019 |access-date=November 6, 2019}}</ref>

On February 12, 2021, U.S. Embassy in Croatia's Chargé d'Affaires Victoria Taylor announced on Twitter that the refusal rate for business and tourist visas in Croatia in 2020 dropped to 2.69%, marking a step forward for Croatia to join the VWP "in the near future." On August 2, 2021, ] ] announced that Croatia had been formally nominated to join the VWP.<ref>{{Cite web|date=2021-02-18|title=Croatians Soon to Travel Visa-Free to US, After the Country Met Another Condition for Joining Visa Waiver Program|url=https://www.schengenvisainfo.com/news/croatians-soon-to-travel-visa-free-to-us-after-the-country-met-another-condition-for-joining-visa-waiver-program/|access-date=2021-02-19|website=SchengenVisaInfo.com|language=en}}</ref><ref>, U.S. Embassy in Croatia, 2 August 2021.</ref> On September 28, 2021, ] ] officially announced that Croatia would join the VWP before December 1, 2021.<ref>{{Cite web|date=2021-09-28|title=Secretary Mayorkas Announces Designation of Croatia as a New Participant in the Visa Waiver Program|url=https://www.dhs.gov/news/2021/09/28/secretary-mayorkas-announces-designation-croatia-new-participant-visa-waiver-program|access-date=2021-09-28|website=Department of Homeland Security|language=en}}</ref> Croatia joined the VWP on October 23, 2021.<ref name=hr/>

On July 6, 2023, the validity of new ESTA applications by nationals of Brunei was reduced to one year.<ref name=estafaq/>

On September 27, 2023, Israel was designated to join the VWP by November 30, 2023.<ref>, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, September 27, 2023.</ref> Israel joined the VWP on October 19, 2023.<ref name=il/>

On September 24, 2024, Qatar was designated to join the VWP by December 1, 2024.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Secretary Mayorkas and Secretary Blinken Announce Designation of the State of Qatar into the Visa Waiver Program |url=https://www.dhs.gov/news/2024/09/24/secretary-mayorkas-and-secretary-blinken-announce-designation-state-qatar-visa |date=2024-09-24 |publisher=United States Department of Homeland Security}}</ref> Qatar joined the VWP on November 21, 2024.<ref name=qa/>

{| class="wikitable collapsible" style="font-size:90%"
|- |-
!style="width:100%;"|Date of addition to Visa Waiver Program !Date of addition to the Visa Waiver Program
|- |-
| |
* July 1, 1988: United Kingdom<ref name="fr1997">, Federal Register, September 30, 1997.</ref>
* July 1, 1988: United Kingdom
* December 15, 1988: Japan * December 15, 1988: Japan<ref name="fr1997" />
* July 1, 1989: France, Switzerland * July 1, 1989: France, Switzerland<ref name="fr1997" />
* July 15, 1989: Germany, Sweden * July 15, 1989: (West) Germany, Sweden<ref name="fr1997" />
* July 29, 1989: Italy, Netherlands * July 29, 1989: Italy, Netherlands<ref name="fr1997" />
* October 1, 1991: Andorra, Austria, Belgium, Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Liechtenstein, Luxembourg, Monaco, New Zealand, Norway, San Marino, Spain<ref name="fr1997" />
* July 29, 1991: Monaco
* July 29, 1993: Brunei<ref name="fr1997" />
* October 1, 1991: Andorra, Austria, Belgium, Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Liechtenstein, Luxembourg, New Zealand, Norway, San Marino, Spain
* April 1, 1995: Ireland<ref name="ie">, Federal Register, March 28, 1995.</ref>
* July 29, 1993: Brunei
* July 8, 1996: Argentina<ref name="fr1997" />
* April 1, 1995: Ireland
* July 29, 1996: Australia * July 29, 1996: Australia<ref name="fr1997" />
* September 30, 1997: Slovenia * September 30, 1997: Slovenia<ref name="fr1997" />
* August 9, 1999: Portugal, Singapore, Uruguay<ref name="fr1999">, Federal Register, August 3, 1999.</ref>
* August 9, 1999: Portugal, Singapore
* November 17, 2008: Czech Republic, Estonia, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Malta, Slovakia, South Korea * November 17, 2008: Czech Republic, Estonia, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Slovakia, South Korea<ref name="fr2008">, Federal Register, November 17, 2008.</ref>
* December 30, 2008: Malta<ref name="mt">, Federal Register, December 30, 2008.</ref>
* April 5, 2010: Greece
* April 5, 2010: Greece<ref name="gr">, Federal Register, March 31, 2010.</ref>
* November 1, 2012: Taiwan
* November 1, 2012: Taiwan<ref name="tw">, Federal Register, October 22, 2012.</ref>
* February 28, 2014: Chile
* March 31, 2014: Chile<ref name="cl">, Federal Register, March 31, 2014.</ref>
* November 11, 2019: Poland<ref name="pl">, Federal Register, November 11, 2019.</ref>
* October 23, 2021: Croatia<ref name="hr">{{cite web|url=https://hr.usembassy.gov/faq-croatias-inclusion-in-the-visa-waiver-program/|title=FAQ: Croatia's Inclusion in the Visa Waiver Program|date=October 22, 2021 |publisher=U.S. Embassy in Croatia|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211025160650/https://hr.usembassy.gov/faq-croatias-inclusion-in-the-visa-waiver-program/|archive-date=October 25, 2021}}</ref>
* October 19, 2023: Israel<ref name="il">, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, October 19, 2023.</ref>
* November 21, 2024: Qatar<ref name=qa>{{cite web |url=https://www.cbp.gov/document/bulletins/designation-qatar-visa-waiver-program |title=Designation of Qatar into the Visa Waiver Program |publisher=U.S. Customs and Border Protection |date=November 22, 2024}}</ref>


Cancelled:
Argentina was added to the program on July 8, 1996 and removed from the list from February 21, 2002.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.uscis.gov/ilink/docView/FR/HTML/FR/0-0-0-1/0-0-0-79324/0-0-0-83564/0-0-0-85305.html |title=Termination of the Designation of Argentina as a Participant Under the Visa Waiver Program |work=uscis.gov |date=February 21, 2002 |accessdate=March 25, 2017}}</ref> Uruguay was added to the program on August 9, 1999 and removed from the list from April 15, 2003.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.uscis.gov/ilink/docView/FR/HTML/FR/0-0-0-1/0-0-0-88492/0-0-0-90619/0-0-0-90848.html |title=Attorney General's Evaluations of the Designations of Belgium, Italy, Portugal, and Uruguay as Participants Under the Visa Waiver Program |work=U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services |date=March 7, 2003 |accessdate=March 25, 2017}}</ref>
* February 21, 2002: Argentina<ref name="ar">, Federal Register, February 21, 2002.</ref>
|-
* April 15, 2003: Uruguay<ref name="uy">, March 7, 2003.</ref>
|} |}


===Hungary's participation===
Visitors may stay for 90 days in the United States which also includes the time spent in Canada, Mexico, Bermuda, or the islands in the ] if the arrival was through the United States. The ] is required if arriving by air or cruise ship. Visa Waiver applies without ESTA for land border crossings, but the VWP does not apply at all (i.e. a visa is required) if a passenger is arriving via air or sea on an unapproved carrier.
In October 2017, U.S. officials discovered a massive ] scheme in Hungary, in which hundreds of non-Hungarians obtained genuine ]s.<ref name=HudsonPethro>John Hudson & Andras Petho, , ''Washington Post'' (May 12, 2018).</ref><ref name=Morris>Loveday Morris, , ''Washington Post'' (August 1, 2023).</ref> A ] report (obtained by the ''Washington Post'' and reported in May 2018) showed that of approximately 700 non-Hungarians who had obtained the passports, 85 had attempted to travel to the United States under false identites, 65 had been admitted to the United States through the VWP, and (as of October 2017) approximately 30 remained in the United States despite the efforts of U.S. authorities to locate and deport them.<ref name=HudsonPethro/> The fraud was enabled by a policy implemented in 2011 by Hungarian Prime Minister ]; under the policy, the Hungarian government provided passports to ], who could prove that one of their ancestors was a Hungarian citizen, with the goal of expediting ].<ref name=HudsonPethro/><ref name=Szandelszky>Béla Szandelszky, , Associated Press (August 1, 2023).</ref> More than a million people obtained Hungarian citizenship through the program.<ref name=Morris/><ref name=HudsonPethro/> Because the program lacked stringent identity-verification procedures, it was abused by bad actors, including criminals and applicants who used forged documents to falsely claim Hungarian descent.<ref name=Szandelszky/><ref name=HudsonPethro/> Some who received Hungarian passports under the program were criminals without any connection to Hungary.<ref name=Szandelszky/>


U.S. officials were alarmed by the risks created by the program, including the risk that the passports might be used in drug smuggling, organized crime, illegal immigration, espionage, or terrorism.<ref name=HudsonPethro/> In October 2017, the U.S. government downgraded Hungary's status in the VWP to "provisional" and sought to develop a "cooperative action plan" within 45 days.<ref name=HudsonPethro/><ref name="thesundaily">{{cite web|url=https://www.thesundaily.my/archive/us-threatens-end-hungary-visa-waivers-after-passport-fraud-report-GUARCH546813|title=US threatens end to Hungary visa waivers after passport 'fraud': Report|work=The Sun Daily|date=May 11, 2018|access-date=May 11, 2018}}</ref> U.S. and Hungarian officials engaged in a dialogue for several years on resolving the security risks, but Hungarian authorities failed to resolve the issues to the U.S. government's satisfaction.<ref name=Szandelszky/> As a result, beginning in 2020 and 2021, the U.S. government barred Hungarian passport-holders who were not born in Hungary from obtaining ESTA pre-travel authorizations.<ref>Lili Bayer, , ''Politico'' (August 1, 2023).</ref><ref>, ''Investment Migration Insider'' (April 22, 2022).</ref> In August 2023, the U.S. government imposed additional restrictions on Hungary's participation in the VWP: the ESTA validity period for Hungarian passport-holders was reduced from two years to one year, and each ESTA on a Hungarian passport would be valid for only one entry to the United States.<ref name=Szandelszky/><ref name=Morris/>
Since 2016,<ref>https://www.congress.gov/bill/114th-congress/house-bill/158 H.R.158 – Visa Waiver Program Improvement and Terrorist Travel Prevention Act of 2015, enacted Jan. 2016</ref> the visa waiver does not apply in cases where a person had previously traveled to Iran, Iraq, Libya, North Korea, Somalia, Sudan, Syria, or Yemen on or after March 1, 2011<ref>"". ''U.S. Customs and Border Protection''. December 5, 2017. Retrieved December 13, 2017.</ref> or for those who are dual citizens of Iran, Iraq, Sudan or Syria.<ref>"". ''U.S. Department of Homeland Security''. February 18, 2016.</ref> Certain categories such as diplomats, military, journalists, humanitarian workers or legitimate businessmen may have their visa requirement waived by the Secretary of Homeland Security.<ref>"". ''U.S. Department of Homeland Security''.</ref>


==Nominated and roadmap countries== ===Aspiring countries===
Of the 19 road map countries listed in 2007,<ref name=roadmap/> 12 have been admitted to the VWP. As of 2024, the U.S. government cited six countries aspiring to join the VWP:<ref>{{cite web |url=https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/R/R46300 |title=Adding Countries to the Visa Waiver Program: National Security and Tourism Considerations |publisher=Congressional Research Service |date=October 8, 2024}} This report does not cite ], the remaining road map country listed in 2007. Chile, Croatia and Qatar were not listed as road map countries in 2007 but were later admitted to the VWP.</ref>
Countries nominated for status in the Visa Waiver Program are in between "road map" status and eligibility to participate. Nomination initiates a detailed evaluation by the ] of the nominated country's homeland security and immigration practices. There is no established timeline for how long a country may remain on the nominated list before either being approved or rejected from the program.


{|style=" border-radius:1em; box-shadow: 0.1em 0.1em 0.5em rgba(0,0,0,0.75); background-color: white; border: 1px solid white; padding: 5px;"
Since 2005, the U.S. Department of State has been conducting discussions with countries known as "road map countries," which are interested in joining (or rejoining) the VWP.<ref name=roadmap>{{cite book|url=http://www.ilw.com/immigrationdaily/news/2007,0314-crs1.pdf |author=Alison Siskin|title=Visa Waiver Program|publisher=Congressional Research Service|date=January 24, 2007|format=PDF|accessdate=July 12, 2012|page=14|postscript=}}. Quote: "Currently there are 19 'road map' countries. They are Argentina, Brazil, Bulgaria, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Estonia, Greece, Hungary, Israel, South Korea, Latvia, Lithuania, Malta, Poland, Romania, Slovakia, Taiwan, Turkey, and Uruguay."</ref> Of the original 19 countries, 10 have been admitted to the VWP. The remaining nine countries are:
|- style="vertical-align:top;"
|
*{{flag|Argentina}}{{efn|Included in the VWP from 1996 to 2002.<ref name=ar/>}}
*{{flag|Brazil}}
*{{flag|Bulgaria}}
|valign=top|
*{{flag|Cyprus}}
*{{flag|Romania}}
*{{flag|Uruguay}}{{efn|Included in the VWP from 1999 to 2003.<ref name=uy/>}}
|}

In 2014, the ] pressured the United States to extend the Visa Waiver Program to its five member states that were not yet included in it (Bulgaria, Croatia, Cyprus, Poland and Romania).<ref>Gotev, Georgi. "". ''Euractiv''. February 5, 2014.</ref> In November 2014, the Bulgarian government announced that it would not ratify the ] unless the United States lifted the visa requirement for its nationals.<ref>"". ''Novinte''. November 26, 2014.</ref> Due to incomplete U.S. reciprocity, in March 2017 the ] approved a non-binding resolution calling on the ] to suspend the visa exemption for U.S. nationals to travel the ].<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/europe-visa-free-travel-americans-european-parliament-vote-a7609406.html|title=European Parliament votes to end visa-free travel for Americans|last=Sharman|first=Jon|date=3 March 2016|work=]|access-date=4 March 2017}}</ref> On May 2, 2017, the ] decided not act on the resolution and hoped to restart full visa reciprocity negotiations for the remaining EU member states with the ].<ref>{{Cite web|title=Press corner|url=https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/home/en|access-date=2021-02-19|website=European Commission - European Commission|language=en}}</ref> In 2019, as mentioned above, Poland, which had been the last Schengen Area country not yet included in the VWP, was admitted to the program. In October 2020, the European Parliament repeated its request for the European Commission to suspend the visa exemption for U.S. nationals, and in March 2021, it filed a judicial action against the European Commission for its failure to act on the subject.<ref name=eucourt>{{cite web |url=https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/en/TXT/?uri=CELEX:62021CJ0137 |title=Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 5 September 2023, European Parliament v European Commission |publisher=EUR-Lex}}</ref> In 2021, Croatia was admitted to the VWP before joining the Schengen Area in 2023. On March 15, 2023, ] ] ] introduced a bill that would allow including Romania in the VWP regardless of the program requirements.<ref>{{cite web|title= S.814 - Romania Visa Waiver Act of 2023 |url=https://www.congress.gov/bill/118th-congress/senate-bill/814|access-date= July 8, 2023|website=]|language=en}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|title=Romanian citizens could travel to the United States without a visa for a maximum of 90 days|url=https://radiomoldova.md/p/8280/romanian-citizens-could-travel-to-the-united-states-without-a-visa-for-a-maximum-of-90-days|date=March 16, 2023|website=]|language=en}}</ref> In September 2023, the ] dismissed the judicial action brought by the European Parliament, ruling that the European Commission was not obligated to suspend the visa exemption for U.S. nationals.<ref name=eucourt/> In December 2023, during a visit to the United States, ] ] said that Romania's entry into the U.S. visa-free program would be announced in 2024, ahead of the 2025 deadline discussed with the U.S. representatives.<ref>{{cite web|title=Romanians Could Soon Travel to the US Visa-Free|url=https://www.schengenvisainfo.com/news/romanians-could-soon-travel-to-the-us-visa-free/|date=December 7, 2023|website=SchengenVisaInfo|language=en}}</ref>

As of 2024, three EU member states (], ] and ]) are still not included in the VWP, and nationals of ] born outside Hungary are automatically denied ESTA due to a passport fraud scheme described above.<ref name=hu/>

==U.S. territories==
The Visa Waiver Program applies to all permanently inhabited ] except American Samoa.

===Guam and the Northern Mariana Islands===
Although the U.S. Visa Waiver Program also applies to the U.S. territories of ] and the ], and therefore nationals of VWP countries may travel to these territories with an ESTA, both territories have an additional visa waiver program for certain nationalities. The Guam–CNMI Visa Waiver Program, first enacted in October 1988 and periodically amended, permits nationals of 12 countries to travel to Guam and the Northern Mariana Islands for up to 45 days, and nationals of China to travel to the Northern Mariana Islands for up to 14 days, for tourism or business, without the need to obtain a U.S. visa.<ref name="8 CFR 212.1"/> This program also requires an electronic travel authorization similar to ESTA but without a fee.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.federalregister.gov/d/2024-00645 |title=Guam-Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands (CNMI) Visa Waiver Program Automation and Electronic Travel Authorization; Creation of CNMI Economic Vitality & Security Travel Authorization Program (EVS-TAP) |publisher=Federal Register |date=January 18, 2024}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=https://g-cnmi-eta.cbp.dhs.gov |title=Guam-Commonwealth of Northern Mariana Islands Electronic Travel Authorization (G-CNMI ETA) |publisher=U.S. Customs and Border Protection}}</ref>


{|style=" {{border-radius|1em}} {{box-shadow|0.1em|0.1em|0.5em|rgba(0,0,0,0.75)}}; background-color: white; border: 1px solid white; padding: 5px;" {|style=" border-radius:1em; box-shadow: 0.1em 0.1em 0.5em rgba(0,0,0,0.75); background-color: white; border: 1px solid white; padding: 5px;"
|- style="vertical-align:top;" |- style="vertical-align:top;"
| |
*{{flag|Australia}}
*{{flagu|Argentina}} (previous member, 1996–2002)<ref name="roadmap" /><ref>"". ''U.S. Federal Register''. February 21, 2002.</ref>
*{{flag|Brunei}}
*{{flagu|Brazil}}<ref name="roadmap" />
*{{flag|China}}{{efn|Only for travel to the Northern Mariana Islands for up to 14 days. For holders of a ], not including ] or ]s.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.cbp.gov/document/guides/carrier-information-guide |title=Carrier Information Guide |publisher=U.S. Customs and Border Protection}}</ref>}}
*{{flagu|Bulgaria}}<ref name="roadmap" />
*{{flag|Hong Kong}}{{efn|Holders of a ] with a ].}}
*{{flagu|Cyprus}}<ref name="roadmap" />
*{{flag|Japan}}
*{{flagu|Israel}}<ref name="roadmap" />
|valign="top"|
*{{flagu|Poland}} (nominated on October 4, 2019 for entry into VWP<ref name="roadmap" />
*{{flag|Malaysia}}
*{{flagu|Romania}}<ref name="roadmap" />
*{{flag|Nauru}}
*{{flagu|Turkey}}<ref name="roadmap" />
*{{flag|New Zealand}}
*{{flagu|Uruguay}} (previous member, 1999–2003)<ref name="roadmap" /><ref>{{Federal Register|64|42006}}</ref><ref>{{Federal Register|68|10955}}</ref>
*{{flag|Papua New Guinea}}
*{{flag|Singapore}}
|valign="top"|
*{{flag|South Korea}}
*{{flag|Taiwan}}{{efn|Must travel on a ] from Taiwan and hold a valid ] and ].}}
*{{flag|United Kingdom}}{{efn|Holders of a ] passport, or a ] with a ].}}
|} |}


===American Samoa===
] for the visa waiver may be withdrawn at any time. This may happen if the United States believes that citizens of a certain country are more likely than before to violate their VWP restrictions, such as working without a permit or overstaying their allowed period of stay in the United States. Accordingly, Argentina's participation in the VWP was terminated in 2002 in light of the ] taking place in that country and its potential effect on mass emigration and unlawful overstay of its citizens in the United States by way of the VWP. Uruguay's participation in the program was revoked in 2003 for similar reasons. While a country's political and economic standing does not directly determine its eligibility, it is widely believed that citizens of politically stable and economically developed nations would not have much incentive to illegally seek employment and violate their visa while in the U.S., risks that the consul seriously considers in approving or denying a visa.
U.S. visa policy does not apply to ], as it has its own entry requirements and maintains control of its own borders. Hence, neither a U.S. visa nor an ESTA can be used to enter American Samoa. If required, an entry permit or electronic authorization must be obtained from the Department of Legal Affairs of American Samoa.<ref>{{cite web | url=https://www.legalaffairs.as.gov/copy-of-immigration-office-1 | title=Immigration Office, Department of Legal Affairs of American Samoa}}</ref>
Israel has not been included in the VWP reportedly in part because of its strict scrutiny of ] traveling to Israel, thus not fulfilling the mutuality requirement.<ref>Dagoni, Ran. "". ''Globes''. December 4, 2014.</ref>


Nationals of ], ], ], ], and countries in the U.S. Visa Waiver Program (except Qatar) may visit American Samoa for up to 30 days without an entry permit. However, if arriving by air, they must apply online for an electronic authorization called "OK Board", at least 3 business days before travel, for a fee of 40 ].<ref>{{cite web | url=https://www.legalaffairs.as.gov/copy-of-entry-permit-waiver-program | title=Entry Permit Waiver Program}}, Department of Legal Affairs of American Samoa.</ref> Nationals of ] may also apply for a similar electronic authorization to visit American Samoa for up to 10 days, for a fee of 10 USD.<ref>, Department of Legal Affairs of American Samoa.</ref>
The ] has pressured the United States to extend the Visa Waiver Program to its five remaining member countries that are not currently in it: Bulgaria, Croatia, Cyprus, Poland, and Romania.<ref>Gotev, Georgi. "". ''Euractiv''. February 5, 2014.</ref> All of these are "road map countries" except Croatia, which only recently joined the EU in 2013. In November 2014 the Bulgarian Government announced it will not ratify the ] unless the United States lifted visas for its citizens.<ref>"". ''Novinte''. November 26, 2014.</ref>


Nationals of other countries need an entry permit, which must be requested by a local sponsor at the Immigration Office of the Department of Legal Affairs of American Samoa.<ref>, Department of Legal Affairs of American Samoa.</ref>
== Admission rate ==
Number of admissions into the United States per VWP country under the program (including the Guam and Northern Mariana Islands Visa Waiver Program):<ref name=":1">{{cite web|url=https://www.dhs.gov/sites/default/files/publications/table28d_7.xls|title=2014 Yearbook of Immigration Statistics|website=dhs.gov}}</ref><ref name=":2">{{cite web|url=https://www.dhs.gov/immigration-statistics/yearbook/2015/table28|title=Table 28|date=November 17, 2016|website=dhs.gov}}</ref>


==Statistics==
{| class="wikitable sortable"
[[File:US visa refusal rate.png|600px|thumbnail|
{|
|colspan=3|U.S. ] refusal rate in fiscal year 2024 (October 2023 to September 2024):
|- |-
|valign=top|{{legend|#00b900|<3%}} {{legend|#56eb15|3–5%}} {{legend|#a7eb15|5–10%}} {{legend|#ebde15|10–20%}}
! Country !! FY 2014<ref name=":1" /> || FY 2015<ref name=":2" />
|valign=top|{{legend|#e9b21d|20–30%}} {{legend|#c45327|30–40%}} {{legend|#c42727|40–50%}} {{legend|#910505|>50%}}
|valign=top|{{legend|#7816a5|United States}} {{legend|#1d236f|Visa-exempt countries}}
|}]]

===Admissions===
{| class="wikitable sortable collapsible collapsed" style="font-size:90%; line-height:1.2; text-align:right"
|+style=line-height:1.5 class=nowrap|Admissions into the United States under the VWP by country and ]
! Country
! 2023<ref>{{cite web|url=https://ohss.dhs.gov/topics/immigration/yearbook-immigration-statistics/yearbook-2023|title=Yearbook of Immigration Statistics 2023|publisher=U.S. Department of Homeland Security}}</ref>
! 2022<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.dhs.gov/ohss/topics/immigration/yearbook/2022|title=Yearbook of Immigration Statistics 2022|publisher=U.S. Department of Homeland Security}}</ref>
! 2021<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.dhs.gov/ohss/topics/immigration/yearbook/2021|title=Yearbook of Immigration Statistics 2021|publisher=U.S. Department of Homeland Security}}</ref>
! 2020<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.dhs.gov/ohss/topics/immigration/yearbook/2020|title=Yearbook of Immigration Statistics 2020|publisher=U.S. Department of Homeland Security}}</ref>
! 2019<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.dhs.gov/ohss/topics/immigration/yearbook/2019/table28|title=Table 28. Nonimmigrant Admissions (I-94 Only) by Selected Category of Admission and Region and Country of Citizenship: Fiscal Year 2019|publisher=U.S. Department of Homeland Security}}</ref>
! 2018<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.dhs.gov/ohss/topics/immigration/yearbook/2018/table28|title=Table 28. Nonimmigrant Admissions (I-94 Only) by Selected Category of Admission and Region and Country of Citizenship: Fiscal Year 2018|publisher=U.S. Department of Homeland Security}}</ref>
! 2017<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.dhs.gov/ohss/topics/immigration/yearbook/2017/table28|title=Table 28. Nonimmigrant Admissions (I-94 Only) by Selected Category of Admission and Region and Country of Citizenship: Fiscal Year 2017|publisher=U.S. Department of Homeland Security}}</ref>
! 2016<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.dhs.gov/ohss/topics/immigration/yearbook/2016/table28|title=Table 28. Nonimmigrant Admissions (I-94 Only) by Selected Category of Admission and Region and Country of Citizenship: Fiscal Year 2016|publisher=U.S. Department of Homeland Security}}</ref>
|- |-
| Andorra || 1,383 || 1,117 |{{left}}Andorra || 1,290 || 1,100 || 80 || 532 || 1,544 || 1,692 || 1,371 || 1,357
|- |-
| Australia || 1,361,886 || 1,371,960 |{{left}}Australia || 945,480 || 463,792 || 23,096 || 532,815 || 1,369,855 || 1,412,605 || 1,431,077 || 1,393,642
|- |-
|{{left}}Austria || 168,580 || 122,008 || 8,779 || 79,871 || 208,366 || 206,643 || 210,727 || 216,122
| Austria || 226,493 || 214,185
|- |-
|{{left}}Belgium || 254,430 || 187,804 || 10,472 || 108,442 || 297,934 || 303,669 || 295,607 || 291,235
| Belgium || 309,125 || 301,206
|- |-
| Brunei || 1,251 || 1,130 |{{left}}Brunei || 720 || 302 || 25 || 421 || 1,014 || 1,086 || 1,034 || 1,081
|- |-
|{{left}}Chile || 440,910 || 443,702 || 138,940 || 157,498 || 350,811 || 315,703 || 268,704 || 226,127
| Chile || 50,241 || 163,928
|- |-
|{{left}}Croatia || 25,690 || 14,474 || {{n/a}} || {{n/a}} || {{n/a}} || {{n/a}} || {{n/a}} || {{n/a}}
| Czech Republic || 88,700 || 93,076
|- |-
|{{left}}Czech Republic || 109,930 || 74,961 || 4,352 || 50,279 || 128,856 || 122,434 || 116,097 || 102,061
| Denmark || 323,271 || 335,515
|- |-
|{{left}}Denmark || 230,350 || 173,843 || 6,471 || 124,274 || 317,683 || 338,063 || 345,070 || 335,158
| Estonia || 19,110 || 19,040
|- |-
|{{left}}Estonia || 21,250 || 13,900 || 965 || 12,594 || 25,730 || 23,878 || 24,208 || 22,682
| Finland || 159,338 || 156,160
|- |-
|{{left}}Finland || 107,600 || 64,116 || 2,533 || 70,664 || 150,040 || 150,440 || 157,079 || 161,474
| France || 1,940,779 || 1,890,609
|- |-
|{{left}}France || 1,805,880 || 1,343,142 || 73,159 || 864,581 || 2,121,625 || 2,022,153 || 1,891,564 || 1,871,506
| Germany || 2,242,202 || 2,165,844
|- |-
|{{left}}Germany || 1,797,830 || 1,251,241 || 84,444 || 829,996 || 2,084,664 || 2,130,453 || 2,160,492 || 2,138,056
| Greece || 55,446 || 56,848
|- |-
|{{left}}Greece || 79,440 || 56,255 || 3,311 || 41,027 || 87,520 || 82,453 || 73,240 || 66,999
| Hong Kong* || 3,065 || 2,824
|- |-
|{{left}}Hong Kong{{efn|name=gump|Visa waiver only for Guam and the Northern Mariana Islands.}} || 90 || 27 || 3 || 123 || 2,415 || 2,983 || 5,979 || 2,736
| Hungary || 70,386 || 73,132
|- |-
|{{left}}Hungary || 76,250 || 53,325 || 3,115 || 47,966 || 110,906 || 98,060 || 90,997 || 81,320
| Iceland || 51,044 || 50,305
|- |-
|{{left}}Iceland || 41,520 || 33,741 || 771 || 25,299 || 63,569 || 68,724 || 62,782 || 54,571
| Ireland || 466,584 || 472,906
|- |-
|{{left}}Ireland || 506,140 || 366,153 || 10,226 || 245,669 || 588,911 || 576,099 || 521,641 || 491,963
| Italy || 1,255,976 || 1,204,574
|- |-
|{{left}}Italy || 1,139,330 || 769,705 || 104,633 || 494,102 || 1,333,908 || 1,315,270 || 1,248,156 || 1,234,097
| Japan || 3,917,113 || 3,733,997
|- |-
|{{left}}Japan || 1,207,480 || 338,837 || 49,627 || 1,590,287 || 3,615,829 || 3,509,759 || 3,672,493 || 3,696,408
| Latvia || 17,195 || 17,799
|- |-
|{{left}}Latvia || 19,580 || 14,272 || 1,279 || 10,581 || 22,887 || 21,544 || 21,459 || 19,107
| Liechtenstein || 2,125 || 2,088
|- |-
|{{left}}Liechtenstein || 1,360 || 1,004 || 60 || 670 || 1,820 || 1,890 || 1,919 || 2,053
| Lithuania || 23,813 || 25,622
|- |-
|{{left}}Lithuania || 39,910 || 28,201 || 2,312 || 18,490 || 41,297 || 37,734 || 24,383 || 30,287
| Luxembourg || 15,039 || 14,408
|- |-
|{{left}}Luxembourg || 13,660 || 9,371 || 431 || 5,101 || 14,864 || 14,196 || 13,008 || 14,195
| Malaysia* || 264 || 211
|- |-
|{{left}}Malaysia{{efn|name=gump}} || 110 || 54 || 7 || 152 || 488 || 416 || 609 || 255
| Malta || 5,589 || 5,341
|- |-
|{{left}}Malta || 8,210 || 4,900 || 451 || 3,117 || 8,157 || 6,999 || 6,252 || 6,000
| Monaco || 1,019 || 1,076
|- |-
|{{left}}Monaco || 810 || 580 || 34 || 408 || 998 || 888 || 991 || 1,097
| Nauru* || 18 || 11
|- |-
|{{left}}Nauru{{efn|name=gump}} || 40 || ≤236 || 0 || ≤32 || 22 || 28 || 5 || 9
| Netherlands || 755,094 || 737,861
|- |-
|{{left}}Netherlands || 630,430 || 480,942 || 52,601 || 317,788 || 813,888 || 812,905 || 777,886 || 751,482
| New Zealand || 290,241 || 307,124
|- |-
|{{left}}New Zealand || 287,080 || 103,279 || 7,039 || 121,474 || 338,162 || 345,102 || 338,371 || 322,001
| Norway || 313,382 || 305,752
|- |-
|{{left}}Norway || 168,460 || 110,403 || 3,387 || 97,091 || 263,579 || 276,912 || 290,688 || 274,958
| Papua New Guinea* || 208 || 182
|- |-
|{{left}}Papua New Guinea{{efn|name=gump}} || 170 || 26 || 0 || ≤32 || 55 || 59 || 100 || 252
| Portugal || 177,873 || 172,895
|- |-
|{{left}}Poland || 235,170 || 138,275 || 5,137 || 27,544 || {{n/a}} || {{n/a}} || {{n/a}} || {{n/a}}
| San Marino || 723 || 834
|- |-
|{{left}}Portugal || 194,360 || 137,241 || 12,290 || 86,176 || 207,772 || 205,780 || 185,010 || 174,040
| Singapore || 144,351 || 137,229
|- |-
|{{left}}San Marino || 430 || ≤236 || 30 || 286 || 711 || 746 || 692 || 693
| Slovakia || 40,914 || 42,337
|- |-
|{{left}}Singapore || 124,240 || 66,714 || 4,286 || 63,290 || 149,381 || 138,013 || 133,627 || 132,204
| Slovenia || 22,940 || 24,119
|- |-
|{{left}}Slovakia || 44,960 || 32,200 || 2,060 || 22,414 || 59,527 || 53,181 || 49,399 || 46,692
| South Korea || 1,366,599 || 1,561,508
|- |-
|{{left}}Slovenia || 23,050 || 14,521 || 1,521 || 13,719 || 30,275 || 27,019 || 25,015 || 24,197
| Spain || 935,775 || 934,205
|- |-
|{{left}}South Korea || 1,480,140 || 643,164 || 87,520 || 999,347 || 2,111,855 || 2,290,705 || 2,223,813 || 1,862,434
| Sweden || 568,765 || 578,672
|- |-
|{{left}}Spain || 890,650 || 784,673 || 135,197 || 441,802 || 1,122,063 || 1,080,300 || 1,015,528 || 991,483
| Switzerland || 456,711 || 445,366
|- |-
|{{left}}Sweden || 283,960 || 198,093 || 8,566 || 204,290 || 466,465 || 529,534 || 554,600 || 572,385
| Taiwan || 300,310 || 335,729
|- |-
|{{left}}Switzerland || 302,680 || 215,053 || 19,137 || 145,192 || 387,285 || 403,095 || 416,944 || 438,061
| United Kingdom || 4,323,416 || 4,461,216
|- |-
|{{left}}Taiwan || 277,940 || 74,654 || 24,790 || 165,869 || 440,995 || 442,622 || 419,748 || 388,629
| Total || 22,305,757 || 22,419,941
|-
|{{left}}United Kingdom || 3,873,730 || 2,795,703 || 115,057 || 1,918,654 || 4,758,514 || 4,635,480 || 4,558,681 || 4,691,708
|-class=sortbottom
!{{left}}Total || 17,861,310 || 11,625,987 || 1,008,194 || 9,939,927 || 24,102,240 || 24,007,315 || 23,637,046 || 23,132,817
|} |}
<small>* Only for Guam and the Northern Mariana Islands.</small>

==Adjusted Visa Refusal Rate==
{{transcluded section|Visa policy of the United States}}
{{#section-h::Visa policy of the United States|Adjusted Visa refusal Rate}}


==Overstay rate== ===Visa refusal rate===
To qualify for the Visa Waiver Program, a country must have had a visa refusal rate of less than 3% for the previous year.<ref name=crs/> This refusal rate is based on applications for ]s, for tourism and business purposes. B visas are adjudicated based on applicant interviews, which generally last between 60 and 90 seconds.<ref>{{cite web|title=Shortcuts to Immigration|date=January 2003|url=http://www.cis.org/TemporaryVisaProgram-Broken|publisher=]|access-date=October 10, 2013 |last1=Vaughan |first1=Jessica M. }}</ref>
A number of visitors from the Visa Waiver Program countries overstayed the 90-day maximum. The Department of Homeland Security publishes a report that lists the number of violations made by passengers who arrived via air and sea, on Visa Waiver Program, excluding visa holders, for example nonimmigrant students and exchange visitors. The table below excludes statistics on persons who left the United States later than their allowed stay or legalized their status and shows only suspected overstays who remained in the country.<ref>{{cite web |title=Entry/Exit Overstay Report, Fiscal Year 2016 |url=https://www.dhs.gov/sites/default/files/publications/Entry%20and%20Exit%20Overstay%20Report%2C%20Fiscal%20Year%202016.pdf |website=Department of Homeland Security |accessdate=June 13, 2018}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=Entry/Exit Overstay Report, Fiscal Year 2017 |url=https://www.dhs.gov/sites/default/files/publications/18_0807_S1_Entry-Exit-Overstay_Report.pdf |website=Department of Homeland Security |accessdate=June 13, 2018}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=Fiscal Year 2018 Entry/Exit Overstay Report |url=https://www.dhs.gov/sites/default/files/publications/19_0417_fy18-entry-and-exit-overstay-report.pdf |website=Department of Homeland Security |accessdate=October 1, 2019}}</ref>


{| class="wikitable sortable" {| class="wikitable collapsible collapsed sortable nowrap" style="font-size:90%; line-height:1.2; text-align:right; width:1em"
|+style=line-height:1.5|Refusal rates for B visas by country and fiscal year{{efn|Refusal rates lower than the VWP requirement (10% for fiscal year 2008, or 3% for other years), for nationalities without visa waivers, are highlighted in green in the table. Refusal rates for nationalities with visa waivers are highlighted in yellow.}}
! Country
! 2024<ref>{{cite web|url=https://travel.state.gov/content/dam/visas/Statistics/Non-Immigrant-Statistics/RefusalRates/FY24.pdf|title=Adjusted refusal rate – B-visas only, by nationality, fiscal year 2024|publisher=U.S. Department of State}}</ref>
! 2023<ref>{{cite web|url=https://travel.state.gov/content/dam/visas/Statistics/Non-Immigrant-Statistics/RefusalRates/FY23.pdf|title=Adjusted refusal rate – B-visas only, by nationality, fiscal year 2023|publisher=U.S. Department of State}}</ref>
! 2022<ref>{{cite web|url=https://travel.state.gov/content/dam/visas/Statistics/Non-Immigrant-Statistics/RefusalRates/FY22.pdf|title=Adjusted refusal rate – B-visas only, by nationality, fiscal year 2022|publisher=U.S. Department of State}}</ref>
! 2021<ref>{{cite web|url=https://travel.state.gov/content/dam/visas/Statistics/Non-Immigrant-Statistics/RefusalRates/FY21.pdf|title=Adjusted refusal rate – B-visas only, by nationality, fiscal year 2021|publisher=U.S. Department of State}}</ref>
! 2020<ref>{{cite web|url=https://travel.state.gov/content/dam/visas/Statistics/Non-Immigrant-Statistics/RefusalRates/FY20.pdf|title=Adjusted refusal rate – B-visas only, by nationality, fiscal year 2020|publisher=U.S. Department of State}}</ref>
! 2019<ref>{{cite web|url=https://travel.state.gov/content/dam/visas/Statistics/Non-Immigrant-Statistics/RefusalRates/FY19.pdf|title=Adjusted refusal rate – B-visas only, by nationality, fiscal year 2019|publisher=U.S. Department of State}}</ref>
! 2018<ref>{{cite web|url=https://travel.state.gov/content/dam/visas/Statistics/Non-Immigrant-Statistics/RefusalRates/FY%2018.pdf|title=Adjusted refusal rate – B-visas only, by nationality, fiscal year 2018|publisher=U.S. Department of State}}</ref>
! 2017<ref>{{cite web|url=https://travel.state.gov/content/dam/visas/Statistics/Non-Immigrant-Statistics/RefusalRates/FY%2017.pdf|title=Adjusted refusal rate – B-visas only, by nationality, fiscal year 2017|publisher=U.S. Department of State}}</ref>
! 2016<ref>{{cite web|url=https://travel.state.gov/content/dam/visas/Statistics/Non-Immigrant-Statistics/RefusalRates/FY16.pdf|title=Adjusted refusal rate – B-visas only, by nationality, fiscal year 2016|publisher=U.S. Department of State}}</ref>
! 2015<ref>{{cite web|url=https://travel.state.gov/content/dam/visas/Statistics/Non-Immigrant-Statistics/RefusalRates/FY15.pdf|title=Adjusted refusal rate – B-visas only, by nationality, fiscal year 2015|publisher=U.S. Department of State}}</ref>
! 2014<ref>{{cite web|url=https://travel.state.gov/content/dam/visas/Statistics/Non-Immigrant-Statistics/RefusalRates/FY14.pdf|title=Adjusted refusal rate – B-visas only, by nationality, fiscal year 2014|publisher=U.S. Department of State}}</ref>
! 2013<ref>{{cite web|url=https://travel.state.gov/content/dam/visas/Statistics/Non-Immigrant-Statistics/RefusalRates/FY13.pdf|title=Adjusted refusal rate – B-visas only, by nationality, fiscal year 2013|publisher=U.S. Department of State}}</ref>
! 2012<ref>{{cite web|url=https://travel.state.gov/content/dam/visas/Statistics/Non-Immigrant-Statistics/RefusalRates/FY12.pdf|title=Adjusted refusal rate – B-visas only, by nationality, fiscal year 2012|publisher=U.S. Department of State}}</ref>
! 2011<ref>{{cite web|url=https://travel.state.gov/content/dam/visas/Statistics/Non-Immigrant-Statistics/RefusalRates/FY11.pdf|title=Adjusted refusal rate – B-visas only, by nationality, fiscal year 2011|publisher=U.S. Department of State}}</ref>
! 2010<ref>{{cite web|url=https://travel.state.gov/content/dam/visas/Statistics/Non-Immigrant-Statistics/RefusalRates/FY10.pdf|title=Adjusted refusal rate – B-visas only, by nationality, fiscal year 2010|publisher=U.S. Department of State}}</ref>
! 2009<ref>{{cite web|url=https://travel.state.gov/content/dam/visas/Statistics/Non-Immigrant-Statistics/RefusalRates/FY09.pdf|title=Adjusted refusal rate – B-visas only, by nationality, fiscal year 2009|publisher=U.S. Department of State}}</ref>
! 2008<ref>{{cite web|url=https://travel.state.gov/content/dam/visas/Statistics/Non-Immigrant-Statistics/RefusalRates/FY08.pdf|title=Adjusted refusal rate – B-visas only, by nationality, fiscal year 2008|publisher=U.S. Department of State}}</ref>
|- |-
|{{left}}Afghanistan || 48.89% || 48.73% || 52.65% || 72.09% || 56.05% || 68.42% || 71.39% || 72.14% || 73.80% || 61.03% || 46.7% || 62.7% || 59.3% || 45.7% || 56.0% || 59.6% || 51.0%
! Country
!Number of<br> suspected<br> in-country<br> overstays <br>(2018)
!In-country<br> overstay rate<br> (against<br> total number<br> of expected<br> departures) <br>(2018)!! Number of<br> suspected<br> in-country<br> overstays <br>(2017) !! In-country<br> overstay rate<br> (against<br> total number<br> of expected<br> departures) <br>(2017) !! Number of<br> suspected<br> in-country<br> overstays <br>(2016) !! In-country<br> overstay rate<br> (against<br> total number<br> of expected<br> departures) <br>(2016)
|- |-
|{{left}}Albania || 33.37% || 31.10% || 27.55% || 10.78% || 40.06% || 41.45% || 41.92% || 40.45% || 35.95% || 36.82% || 39.8% || 40.4% || 40.5% || 42.3% || 37.7% || 39.6% || 38.7%
| Andorra
|3
|0.13%|| 5 || 0.36% ||9|| 0.69%
|- |-
|{{left}}Algeria || 50.72% || 35.19% || 18.10% || 38.40% || 49.69% || 44.22% || 39.26% || 43.96% || 36.00% || 25.92% || 23.1% || 28.3% || 24.2% || 29.2% || 21.9% || 20.5% || 20.3%
| Australia
|3,155
|0.22%|| 4,581 || 0.33% ||6,583||0.48%
|- |-
|{{left}}Andorra || bgcolor=#FF8|28.57% || bgcolor=#FF8|22.22% || bgcolor=#FF8|0.00% || bgcolor=#FF8|0.00% || bgcolor=#FF8|50.00% || bgcolor=#FF8|12.50% || bgcolor=#FF8|0.00% || bgcolor=#FF8|0.00% || bgcolor=#FF8|28.57% || bgcolor=#FF8|0.00% || bgcolor=#FF8|0.0% || bgcolor=#FF8|25.0% || bgcolor=#FF8|100.0% || bgcolor=#FF8|0.0% || bgcolor=#FF8|100.0% || bgcolor=#FF8|60.0% || bgcolor=#FF8|50.0%
| Austria
|647
|0.31%|| 820 || 0.38% ||2,784||1.32%
|- |-
|{{left}}Angola || 49.36% || 48.94% || 47.25% || 58.52% || 62.15% || 58.26% || 51.76% || 36.01% || 48.52% || 26.77% || 21.4% || 24.8% || 19.9% || 17.2% || 21.4% || 17.7% || 17.1%
| Belgium
|785
|0.26%|| 1,434 || 0.50% ||1,369|| 0.48%
|- |-
|{{left}}Antigua and Barbuda || 26.74% || 18.60% || 14.09% || 16.66% || 23.44% || 15.25% || 19.07% || 20.50% || 22.11% || 20.17% || 20.8% || 18.1% || 24.1% || 20.2% || 19.7% || 13.1% || 21.7%
| Brunei
|9
|0.78%|| 12 || 1.11% ||10|| 0.89%
|- |-
|{{left}}Argentina || 8.90% || 8.21% || 3.66% || bgcolor=#AFA|2.31% || bgcolor=#AFA|2.79% || bgcolor=#AFA|2.07% || bgcolor=#AFA|1.73% || bgcolor=#AFA|1.79% || bgcolor=#AFA|2.14% || bgcolor=#AFA|2.14% || bgcolor=#AFA|1.4% || bgcolor=#AFA|1.7% || bgcolor=#AFA|1.5% || bgcolor=#AFA|2.5% || 3.1% || 3.3% || bgcolor=#AFA|3.1%
| Chile
|5,364
|1.33%|| 4,494 || 1.13% ||5,416|| 1.49%
|- |-
|{{left}}Armenia || 59.46% || 51.49% || 37.87% || 37.07% || 56.47% || 51.65% || 53.83% || 51.87% || 45.88% || 47.17% || 43.8% || 37.9% || 38.5% || 54.5% || 51.4% || 48.9% || 53.3%
| Czech Republic
|612
|0.49%|| 723 || 0.64% ||924|| 0.90%
|- |-
|{{left}}Australia || bgcolor=#FF8|20.67% || bgcolor=#FF8|16.75% || bgcolor=#FF8|12.55% || bgcolor=#FF8|14.27% || bgcolor=#FF8|18.74% || bgcolor=#FF8|19.18% || bgcolor=#FF8|17.99% || bgcolor=#FF8|17.18% || bgcolor=#FF8|15.38% || bgcolor=#FF8|21.24% || bgcolor=#FF8|20.1% || bgcolor=#FF8|16.6% || bgcolor=#FF8|16.6% || bgcolor=#FF8|22.7% || bgcolor=#FF8|23.7% || bgcolor=#FF8|19.8% || bgcolor=#FF8|16.5%
| Denmark
|656
|0.19%|| 1,233 || 0.36% ||1,505|| 0.48%
|- |-
|{{left}}Austria || bgcolor=#FF8|9.94% || bgcolor=#FF8|9.38% || bgcolor=#FF8|6.97% || bgcolor=#FF8|6.29% || bgcolor=#FF8|8.91% || bgcolor=#FF8|5.21% || bgcolor=#FF8|5.39% || bgcolor=#FF8|5.00% || bgcolor=#FF8|5.93% || bgcolor=#FF8|7.40% || bgcolor=#FF8|7.8% || bgcolor=#FF8|8.7% || bgcolor=#FF8|11.1% || bgcolor=#FF8|9.3% || bgcolor=#FF8|11.5% || bgcolor=#FF8|11.9% || bgcolor=#FF8|20.3%
| Estonia
|91
|0.37%|| 135 || 0.53% ||160|| 0.69%
|- |-
|{{left}}Azerbaijan || 21.46% || 35.99% || 23.54% || 12.27% || 26.41% || 25.43% || 28.45% || 27.63% || 14.83% || 12.93% || 13.5% || 9.4% || 11.4% || 12.9% || 13.5% || 11.5% || 14.0%
| Finland
|293
|0.19%|| 642 || 0.40% ||604|| 0.39%
|- |-
|{{left}}Bahamas || bgcolor=#FF8|12.81% || bgcolor=#FF8|8.38% || bgcolor=#FF8|8.30% || bgcolor=#FF8|7.91% || bgcolor=#FF8|12.59% || bgcolor=#FF8|9.33% || bgcolor=#FF8|12.51% || bgcolor=#FF8|9.32% || bgcolor=#FF8|9.35% || bgcolor=#FF8|7.40% || bgcolor=#FF8|9.20% || bgcolor=#FF8|11.60% || bgcolor=#FF8|12.90% || bgcolor=#FF8|13.70% || bgcolor=#FF8|8.20% || bgcolor=#FF8|8.30% || bgcolor=#FF8|5.90%
| France
|10,427
|0.55%|| 14,406 || 0.80% ||10,358|| 0.59%
|- |-
|{{left}}Bahrain || 17.83% || 11.11% || 28.41% || 22.48% || 9.04% || 13.55% || 6.96% || 9.53% || 6.26% || 3.81% || 4.7% || 4.1% || 7.7% || bgcolor=#AFA|2.4% || 4.1% || 6.7% || bgcolor=#AFA|6.6%
| Germany
|5,766
|0.27%|| 9,952 || 0.46% ||18,780|| 0.91%
|- |-
|{{left}}Bangladesh || 46.09% || 43.66% || 30.30% || 29.91% || 40.34% || 39.78% || 40.05% || 60.88% || 62.82% || 59.96% || 50.8% || 43.5% || 26.0% || 42.4% || 36.4% || 34.1% || 48.2%
| Greece
|825
|0.91%|| 1,032 || 1.25% ||1,280|| 1.65%
|- |-
|{{left}}Barbados || 10.81% || 9.63% || 6.55% || 12.93% || 10.79% || 6.76% || 7.07% || 8.72% || 11.24% || 9.54% || 9.8% || 9.9% || 12.4% || 10.7% || 10.2% || 7.8% || 10.1%
| Hungary
|978
|0.99%|| 1,391 || 1.55% ||1,841|| 2.23%
|- |-
|{{left}}Belarus || 28.79% || 32.80% || 26.05% || 16.81% || 27.01% || 21.93% || 23.26% || 21.69% || 14.87% || 12.53% || 14.0% || 20.7% || 19.5% || 19.4% || 19.7% || 15.5% || 21.1%
| Iceland
|123
|0.18%|| 172 || 0.27% ||154|| 0.28%
|- |-
|{{left}}Belgium || bgcolor=#FF8|11.65% || bgcolor=#FF8|8.76% || bgcolor=#FF8|8.73% || bgcolor=#FF8|16.57% || bgcolor=#FF8|16.47% || bgcolor=#FF8|8.96% || bgcolor=#FF8|9.77% || bgcolor=#FF8|6.96% || bgcolor=#FF8|7.33% || bgcolor=#FF8|12.85% || bgcolor=#FF8|11.7% || bgcolor=#FF8|9.4% || bgcolor=#FF8|7.1% || bgcolor=#FF8|13.7% || bgcolor=#FF8|13.2% || bgcolor=#FF8|9.4% || bgcolor=#FF8|13.4%
| Ireland
|1,487
|0.27%|| 2,275 || 0.44% ||2,177|| 0.45%
|- |-
|{{left}}Belize || 29.48% || 26.25% || 26.45% || 25.36% || 23.31% || 28.63% || 34.55% || 30.91% || 35.21% || 30.47% || 16.4% || 19.7% || 22.7% || 36.8% || 33.4% || 21.4% || 25.4%
| Italy
|6,009
|0.46%|| 9,043 || 0.72% ||14,896|| 1.23%
|- |-
|{{left}}Benin || 61.49% || 49.11% || 40.57% || 32.05% || 45.27% || 48.48% || 47.74% || 42.10% || 38.01% || 35.74% || 31.4% || 34.6% || 33.0% || 48.2% || 39.7% || 37.0% || 39.1%
| Japan
|4,505
|0.14%|| 6,376 || 0.20% ||4,401|| 0.15%
|- |-
|{{left}}Bhutan || 49.46% || 45.03% || 34.55% || 43.33% || 53.56% || 57.13% || 59.63% || 52.43% || 69.78% || 54.55% || 43.6% || 42.0% || 52.2% || 60.7% || 64.1% || 68.1% || 48.3%
| South Korea
|3,524
|0.22%|| 4,326 || 0.30% ||4,507|| 0.36%
|- |-
|{{left}}Bolivia || 28.93% || 22.15% || 17.15% || 11.30% || 20.36% || 24.17% || 22.19% || 18.08% || 14.36% || 13.56% || 13.6% || 15.4% || 16.3% || 24.0% || 23.8% || 17.4% || 23.6%
| Latvia
|162
|0.71%|| 212 || 0.94% ||249|| 1.22%
|- |-
|{{left}}Bosnia and Herzegovina || 11.64% || 18.49% || 19.91% || 21.84% || 16.01% || 25.27% || 23.50% || 16.37% || 19.70% || 20.38% || 16.1% || 26.5% || 14.4% || 10.1% || 9.7% || 13.9% || 21.3%
| Liechtenstein
|2
|0.11%|| 12 || 0.60% ||15|| 0.72%
|- |-
|{{left}}Botswana || 32.44% || 23.81% || 11.19% || bgcolor=#AFA|0.00% || 19.26% || 17.54% || 18.67% || 17.94% || 18.97% || 16.67% || 16.9% || 17.3% || 12.5% || 11.0% || 13.9% || 16.8% || 15.6%
| Lithuania
|384
|1.00%|| 396 || 1.11% ||484|| 1.57%
|- |-
|{{left}}Brazil || 15.48% || 11.94% || 14.48% || 14.25% || 23.16% || 18.48% || 12.73% || 12.34% || 16.70% || 5.36% || 3.2% || 3.5% || 3.2% || 3.8% || 5.2% || 7.0% || bgcolor=#AFA|5.5%
| Luxembourg
|39
|0.29%|| 62 || 0.45% ||100|| 0.70%
|- |-
|{{left}}Brunei || bgcolor=#FF8|4.00% || bgcolor=#FF8|10.71% || bgcolor=#FF8|5.41% || bgcolor=#FF8|0.00% || bgcolor=#FF8|0.00% || bgcolor=#FF8|4.76% || bgcolor=#FF8|4.35% || bgcolor=#FF8|3.70% || bgcolor=#FF8|13.51% || bgcolor=#FF8|6.82% || bgcolor=#FF8|11.1% || bgcolor=#FF8|20.7% || bgcolor=#FF8|25.5% || bgcolor=#FF8|8.0% || bgcolor=#FF8|3.5% || bgcolor=#FF8|5.6% || bgcolor=#FF8|3.3%
| Malta
|22
|0.31%|| 36 || 0.55% ||54||0.89%
|- |-
|{{left}}Bulgaria || 6.02% || 11.61% || 10.00% || 18.40% || 12.52% || 9.75% || 11.32% || 14.97% || 16.86% || 17.26% || 15.2% || 19.9% || 18.0% || 15.7% || 17.2% || 17.8% || 13.3%
| Monaco
|3
|0.30%|| 2 || 0.19% || 4 ||0.36%
|- |-
|{{left}}Burkina Faso || 58.03% || 45.20% || 39.25% || 24.55% || 62.86% || 62.32% || 71.16% || 75.74% || 65.35% || 50.37% || 37.4% || 31.7% || 35.3% || 37.9% || 45.8% || 48.9% || 44.4%
| Netherlands
|2,821
|0.35%|| 3,565 || 0.47% ||4,081||0.57%
|- |-
|{{left}}Burundi || 65.52% || 66.29% || 69.52% || 53.23% || 77.72% || 73.16% || 74.39% || 75.55% || 61.33% || 58.35% || 50.0% || 52.7% || 46.1% || 45.5% || 36.4% || 52.2% || 58.8%
| New Zealand
|843
|0.24%|| 1,353 || 0.39% ||1,526||0.49%
|- |-
|{{left}}Cambodia || 28.32% || 25.95% || 24.50% || 35.62% || 26.50% || 33.65% || 32.63% || 41.05% || 35.62% || 48.41% || 39.9% || 28.9% || 33.9% || 44.0% || 42.9% || 47.2% || 44.3%
| Norway
|520
|0.18%|| 773 || 0.27% ||992|| 0.35%
|- |-
|{{left}}Cameroon || 55.57% || 58.62% || 52.22% || 39.93% || 57.12% || 57.97% || 52.27% || 47.29% || 36.84% || 29.89% || 28.2% || 37.3% || 41.1% || 40.6% || 40.5% || 48.3% || 46.7%
| Portugal
|3,140
|1.58%|| 3,242 || 1.81% ||3,365|| 2.04%
|- |-
|{{left}}Canada || bgcolor=#FF8|56.35% || bgcolor=#FF8|52.04% || bgcolor=#FF8|58.33% || bgcolor=#FF8|51.81% || bgcolor=#FF8|52.67% || bgcolor=#FF8|43.76% || bgcolor=#FF8|38.98% || bgcolor=#FF8|41.14% || bgcolor=#FF8|47.93% || bgcolor=#FF8|49.13% || bgcolor=#FF8|48.70% || bgcolor=#FF8|43.10% || bgcolor=#FF8|44.30% || bgcolor=#FF8|52.20% || bgcolor=#FF8|57.10% || bgcolor=#FF8|52.80% || bgcolor=#FF8|39.00%
| San Marino
|3
|0.41%|| 2 || 0.28% ||12||1.72%
|- |-
|{{left}}Cape Verde || 52.02% || 41.55% || 33.68% || 25.32% || 42.74% || 52.66% || 54.22% || 50.70% || 45.89% || 36.05% || 28.7% || 36.4% || 36.6% || 38.3% || 46.3% || 45.3% || 42.7%
| Singapore
|205
|0.15%|| 301 || 0.23% ||471|| 0.37%
|- |-
|{{left}}Central African Republic || 48.46% || 56.67% || 36.70% || 36.36% || 48.67% || 37.45% || 36.03% || 44.24% || 35.12% || 32.43% || 46.6% || 46.4% || 32.2% || 47.4% || 48.3% || 45.0% || 39.6%
| Slovakia
|406
|0.75%|| 429 || 0.85% ||703|| 1.51%
|- |-
|{{left}}Chad || 58.60% || 42.50% || 69.39% || 72.77% || 70.60% || 70.16% || 60.80% || 51.65% || 42.53% || 33.87% || 32.4% || 36.3% || 43.8% || 42.7% || 58.5% || 37.6% || 41.4%
| Slovenia
|86
|0.31%|| 118 || 0.46% ||223|| 0.92%
|- |-
|{{left}}Chile || bgcolor=#FF8|20.15% || bgcolor=#FF8|16.12% || bgcolor=#FF8|13.75% || bgcolor=#FF8|13.42% || bgcolor=#FF8|11.54% || bgcolor=#FF8|15.32% || bgcolor=#FF8|11.34% || bgcolor=#FF8|13.87% || bgcolor=#FF8|11.43% || bgcolor=#FF8|13.66% || bgcolor=#FF8|2.4% || bgcolor=#AFA|1.6% || bgcolor=#AFA|2.8% || 3.4% || 5.0% || 5.9% || bgcolor=#AFA|8.9%
| Spain
|10,208
|0.97%|| 11,850 || 1.19% ||11,716|| 1.25%
|- |-
|{{left}}China || 25.37% || 26.63% || 30.39% || 79.09% || 22.12% || 18.22% || 17.00% || 14.57% || 12.35% || 10.03% || 9.0% || 8.5% || 8.5% || 12.0% || 13.3% || 15.6% || 18.2%
| Sweden
|1,168
|0.22%|| 2,234 || 0.39% ||2,601|| 0.46%
|- |-
|{{left}}Colombia || 24.70% || 20.59% || 32.86% || 27.75% || 46.82% || 41.93% || 35.11% || 21.93% || 17.79% || 15.52% || 12.3% || 10.4% || 11.2% || 21.7% || 30.7% || 27.3% || 25.6%
| Switzerland
|1,032
|0.25%|| 1,476 || 0.34% ||2,257|| 0.52%
|- |-
|{{left}}Comoros || 25.42% || 33.33% || 43.48% || 73.68% || 86.15% || 53.02% || 69.46% || 48.45% || 53.73% || 54.44% || 17.0% || 32.6% || 22.1% || 29.6% || 43.6% || 24.5% || 14.0%
| Taiwan
|1,214
|0.28%|| 1,775 || 0.44% ||1,522|| 0.39%
|- |-
|{{left}}Congo || 48.78% || 49.65% || 37.19% || 63.82% || 59.34% || 60.49% || 52.23% || 48.47% || 46.55% || 40.77% || 35.4% || 27.5% || 30.7% || 25.2% || 34.4% || 33.0% || 33.2%
| United Kingdom
|12,233
|0.26%|| 23,231 || 0.49% ||20,670|| 0.44%
|- |-
|{{left}}Costa Rica || 12.66% || 16.09% || 12.71% || 7.97% || 24.77% || 18.66% || 9.91% || 6.49% || 8.39% || 9.83% || 11.4% || 13.7% || 11.3% || 13.7% || 17.7% || 16.6% || 21.2%
| '''TOTAL'''
|-
|'''79,750'''
|{{left}}Croatia || bgcolor=#FF8|11.56% || bgcolor=#FF8|9.32% || bgcolor=#FF8|5.56% || bgcolor=#FF8|4.65% || bgcolor=#AFA|2.69% || 4.02% || 5.92% || 5.10% || 6.78% || 5.29% || 6.1% || 5.9% || 4.4% || 6.3% || 5.3% || 5.3% || bgcolor=#AFA|5.1%
|'''0.35%'''||'''114,121''' || '''0.51%''' || '''128,806''' ||'''0.60%'''
|-
|{{left}}Cuba || 53.35% || 49.96% || 56.51% || 52.69% || 60.15% || 53.40% || 50.97% || 77.17% || 81.85% || 76.03% || 66.2% || 61.1% || 38.7% || 33.0% || 20.5% || 31.3% || 45.2%
|-
|{{left}}Cyprus || bgcolor=#AFA|2.16% || 4.48% || 6.22% || 15.09% || 6.21% || bgcolor=#AFA|2.78% || bgcolor=#AFA|2.38% || bgcolor=#AFA|1.69% || bgcolor=#AFA|2.03% || 3.53% || 3.5% || 4.0% || bgcolor=#AFA|1.9% || bgcolor=#AFA|1.8% || bgcolor=#AFA|1.7% || bgcolor=#AFA|1.4% || bgcolor=#AFA|1.7%
|-
|{{left}}Czech Republic || bgcolor=#FF8|7.96% || bgcolor=#FF8|8.05% || bgcolor=#FF8|8.50% || bgcolor=#FF8|16.24% || bgcolor=#FF8|26.82% || bgcolor=#FF8|12.41% || bgcolor=#FF8|10.37% || bgcolor=#FF8|6.81% || bgcolor=#FF8|7.82% || bgcolor=#FF8|6.33% || bgcolor=#FF8|8.1% || bgcolor=#FF8|5.8% || bgcolor=#FF8|6.4% || bgcolor=#FF8|6.4% || bgcolor=#FF8|9.6% || bgcolor=#FF8|6.9% || bgcolor=#AFA|5.2%
|-
|{{left}}Democratic Republic of the Congo || 46.77% || 48.53% || 43.93% || 37.36% || 58.03% || 53.80% || 50.56% || 49.94% || 45.63% || 45.62% || 39.1% || 41.9% || 37.4% || 39.1% || 40.8% || 35.6% || 36.2%
|-
|{{left}}Denmark || bgcolor=#FF8|9.25% || bgcolor=#FF8|10.66% || bgcolor=#FF8|12.17% || bgcolor=#FF8|31.11% || bgcolor=#FF8|17.58% || bgcolor=#FF8|14.26% || bgcolor=#FF8|12.38% || bgcolor=#FF8|13.18% || bgcolor=#FF8|11.74% || bgcolor=#FF8|20.73% || bgcolor=#FF8|12.0% || bgcolor=#FF8|11.0% || bgcolor=#FF8|14.7% || bgcolor=#FF8|17.0% || bgcolor=#FF8|18.3% || bgcolor=#FF8|13.6% || bgcolor=#FF8|16.6%
|-
|{{left}}Djibouti || 64.71% || 68.37% || 74.44% || 88.34% || 69.79% || 85.35% || 82.96% || 74.80% || 47.09% || 52.00% || 50.1% || 62.6% || 64.5% || 58.0% || 60.2% || 42.1% || 42.5%
|-
|{{left}}Dominica || 35.41% || 29.10% || 25.00% || 22.85% || 30.38% || 26.83% || 37.13% || 28.74% || 31.63% || 33.33% || 29.0% || 30.2% || 31.7% || 29.2% || 27.5% || 20.3% || 29.5%
|-
|{{left}}Dominican Republic || 43.38% || 36.69% || 15.75% || 4.33% || 39.18% || 53.21% || 49.54% || 35.78% || 31.88% || 33.78% || 35.9% || 41.3% || 32.0% || 32.1% || 31.2% || 34.6% || 45.6%
|-
|{{left}}East Timor || 6.25% || 8.51% || bgcolor=#AFA|0.00% || bgcolor=#AFA|0.00% || 21.43% || 4.23% || 8.16% || 7.02% || 26.67% || 12.68% || 25.0% || 5.6% || 16.7% || 25.5% || 13.3% || 17.5% || 16.7%
|-
|{{left}}Ecuador || 36.99% || 26.67% || 17.51% || 15.68% || 33.44% || 34.05% || 31.38% || 27.95% || 29.18% || 31.34% || 20.8% || 16.9% || 18.5% || 23.0% || 27.1% || 36.0% || 40.0%
|-
|{{left}}Egypt || 39.77% || 26.11% || 23.11% || 23.81% || 35.16% || 31.83% || 32.15% || 34.24% || 28.61% || 33.57% || 34.0% || 39.5% || 32.4% || 24.0% || 31.3% || 29.7% || 35.3%
|-
|{{left}}El Salvador || 52.65% || 57.91% || 45.46% || 20.63% || 62.95% || 58.18% || 51.49% || 52.97% || 57.12% || 45.72% || 36.3% || 45.1% || 41.4% || 47.1% || 47.4% || 52.1% || 45.7%
|-
|{{left}}Equatorial Guinea || 55.07% || 40.35% || 48.32% || 74.13% || 59.18% || 27.79% || 21.29% || 18.21% || 17.75% || 19.30% || 17.8% || 16.2% || 10.0% || 6.6% || 12.2% || 8.2% || 11.1%
|-
|{{left}}Eritrea || 49.94% || 61.97% || 47.04% || 55.96% || 63.62% || 65.39% || 69.54% || 71.69% || 50.49% || 55.67% || 41.7% || 40.5% || 39.2% || 46.2% || 52.6% || 48.2% || 51.1%
|-
|{{left}}Estonia || bgcolor=#FF8|9.79% || bgcolor=#FF8|16.22% || bgcolor=#FF8|21.43% || bgcolor=#FF8|9.09% || bgcolor=#FF8|32.65% || bgcolor=#FF8|24.81% || bgcolor=#FF8|26.73% || bgcolor=#FF8|21.16% || bgcolor=#FF8|20.74% || bgcolor=#FF8|13.53% || bgcolor=#FF8|16.4% || bgcolor=#FF8|13.6% || bgcolor=#FF8|14.9% || bgcolor=#FF8|21.9% || bgcolor=#FF8|29.3% || bgcolor=#FF8|6.2% || bgcolor=#AFA|3.9%
|-
|{{left}}Eswatini || 38.44% || 7.84% || 9.30% || 8.89% || 5.52% || 5.73% || 8.49% || 12.59% || 8.03% || 12.95% || 10.0% || 4.5% || 4.9% || 10.4% || 9.0% || 10.4% || 13.0%
|-
|{{left}}Ethiopia || 51.17% || 41.20% || 25.32% || 7.52% || 39.73% || 45.46% || 41.74% || 50.30% || 38.13% || 48.32% || 44.9% || 35.6% || 39.7% || 41.7% || 49.1% || 50.6% || 46.7%
|-
|{{left}}Fiji || 35.25% || 41.88% || 45.36% || 56.64% || 44.44% || 38.96% || 41.74% || 26.59% || 20.23% || 14.92% || 14.0% || 27.2% || 26.9% || 31.4% || 33.8% || 40.0% || 38.0%
|-
|{{left}}Finland || bgcolor=#FF8|14.49% || bgcolor=#FF8|22.82% || bgcolor=#FF8|13.07% || bgcolor=#FF8|16.51% || bgcolor=#FF8|14.03% || bgcolor=#FF8|11.00% || bgcolor=#FF8|15.05% || bgcolor=#FF8|11.78% || bgcolor=#FF8|7.72% || bgcolor=#FF8|11.86% || bgcolor=#FF8|14.5% || bgcolor=#FF8|15.0% || bgcolor=#FF8|7.6% || bgcolor=#FF8|19.4% || bgcolor=#FF8|15.4% || bgcolor=#FF8|23.6% || bgcolor=#FF8|17.1%
|-
|{{left}}France || bgcolor=#FF8|8.50% || bgcolor=#FF8|10.11% || bgcolor=#FF8|12.55% || bgcolor=#FF8|22.21% || bgcolor=#FF8|21.58% || bgcolor=#FF8|13.67% || bgcolor=#FF8|10.11% || bgcolor=#FF8|7.43% || bgcolor=#FF8|7.30% || bgcolor=#FF8|16.28% || bgcolor=#FF8|18.8% || bgcolor=#FF8|13.0% || bgcolor=#FF8|13.4% || bgcolor=#FF8|23.9% || bgcolor=#FF8|14.5% || bgcolor=#FF8|12.0% || bgcolor=#FF8|8.7%
|-
|{{left}}Gabon || 27.76% || 29.62% || 21.65% || 31.25% || 37.61% || 45.41% || 40.00% || 26.10% || 21.29% || 15.74% || 13.5% || 20.3% || 24.1% || 30.3% || 27.3% || 23.8% || 23.0%
|-
|{{left}}Gambia || 66.03% || 60.40% || 50.64% || 40.30% || 66.84% || 72.30% || 64.22% || 70.27% || 69.87% || 75.64% || 69.3% || 74.5% || 73.5% || 67.2% || 56.2% || 51.9% || 55.7%
|-
|{{left}}Georgia || 41.44% || 49.23% || 42.01% || 63.04% || 66.91% || 63.85% || 62.35% || 61.09% || 62.82% || 50.58% || 48.2% || 38.3% || 31.8% || 40.2% || 43.6% || 49.7% || 46.6%
|-
|{{left}}Germany || bgcolor=#FF8|10.02% || bgcolor=#FF8|10.84% || bgcolor=#FF8|11.69% || bgcolor=#FF8|24.82% || bgcolor=#FF8|12.69% || bgcolor=#FF8|9.30% || bgcolor=#FF8|7.40% || bgcolor=#FF8|5.91% || bgcolor=#FF8|7.25% || bgcolor=#FF8|10.87% || bgcolor=#FF8|12.8% || bgcolor=#FF8|12.8% || bgcolor=#FF8|16.4% || bgcolor=#FF8|18.6% || bgcolor=#FF8|15.4% || bgcolor=#FF8|16.0% || bgcolor=#FF8|13.8%
|-
|{{left}}Ghana || 55.59% || 37.56% || 27.66% || 17.49% || 57.01% || 55.60% || 49.35% || 56.18% || 65.70% || 63.28% || 59.8% || 61.8% || 61.7% || 59.3% || 58.0% || 54.3% || 50.1%
|-
|{{left}}Greece || bgcolor=#FF8|10.16% || bgcolor=#FF8|15.57% || bgcolor=#FF8|14.95% || bgcolor=#FF8|10.86% || bgcolor=#FF8|18.58% || bgcolor=#FF8|14.99% || bgcolor=#FF8|16.93% || bgcolor=#FF8|13.14% || bgcolor=#FF8|16.37% || bgcolor=#FF8|21.89% || bgcolor=#FF8|27.1% || bgcolor=#FF8|26.0% || bgcolor=#FF8|26.1% || bgcolor=#FF8|14.8% || bgcolor=#FF8|2.6% || bgcolor=#AFA|2.0% || bgcolor=#AFA|1.5%
|-
|{{left}}Grenada || 33.13% || 20.37% || 16.58% || 19.63% || 24.76% || 19.49% || 26.44% || 26.94% || 35.71% || 32.00% || 29.5% || 25.8% || 32.5% || 26.6% || 29.6% || 19.5% || 29.9%
|-
|{{left}}Guatemala || 30.84% || 21.55% || 5.45% || 7.26% || 52.36% || 58.64% || 53.62% || 47.14% || 48.68% || 45.37% || 35.9% || 37.7% || 30.9% || 30.2% || 28.0% || 29.7% || 33.8%
|-
|{{left}}Guinea || 70.25% || 61.37% || 53.56% || 61.26% || 63.79% || 73.29% || 66.16% || 64.59% || 63.53% || 59.81% || 47.8% || 52.5% || 54.2% || 60.6% || 66.0% || 67.8% || 63.8%
|-
|{{left}}Guinea-Bissau || 76.59% || 48.15% || 60.91% || 62.50% || 66.36% || 65.33% || 76.09% || 71.61% || 71.88% || 65.18% || 56.5% || 43.6% || 50.0% || 55.0% || 46.6% || 61.9% || 63.4%
|-
|{{left}}Guyana || 34.25% || 39.22% || 28.42% || 36.76% || 62.20% || 62.96% || 70.62% || 37.92% || 25.76% || 37.28% || 40.2% || 52.7% || 46.5% || 51.5% || 63.5% || 55.9% || 56.6%
|-
|{{left}}Haiti || 47.35% || 47.94% || 47.12% || 45.87% || 50.16% || 60.81% || 67.59% || 71.44% || 64.52% || 60.45% || 58.2% || 47.1% || 54.0% || 58.2% || 49.0% || 61.4% || 54.4%
|-
|{{left}}Honduras || 42.61% || 33.79% || 30.47% || 12.38% || 52.10% || 61.71% || 60.32% || 40.35% || 42.76% || 39.73% || 36.8% || 37.0% || 29.8% || 27.6% || 29.2% || 29.2% || 33.6%
|-
|{{left}}Hong Kong (]) || {{n/a}} || {{n/a}} || {{n/a}} || {{n/a}} || {{n/a}} || {{n/a}} || {{n/a}} || {{n/a}} || {{n/a}} || {{n/a}} || {{n/a}} || bgcolor=#AFA|2.4% || bgcolor=#AFA|2.6% || 3.6% || 5.0% || 5.0% || bgcolor=#AFA|3.3%
|-
|{{left}}Hong Kong (]) || 6.16% || 5.49% || 4.88% || 5.28% || 4.50% || 3.23% || 4.25% || 3.45% || 4.61% || 4.36% || 3.1% || bgcolor=#AFA|1.8% || bgcolor=#AFA|1.7% || 3.9% || 5.4% || 6.9% || bgcolor=#AFA|4.4%
|-
|{{left}}Hungary || bgcolor=#FF8|5.93% || bgcolor=#FF8|7.29% || bgcolor=#FF8|8.44% || bgcolor=#FF8|16.67% || bgcolor=#FF8|16.36% || bgcolor=#FF8|8.85% || bgcolor=#FF8|10.53% || bgcolor=#FF8|13.04% || bgcolor=#FF8|15.48% || bgcolor=#FF8|31.31% || bgcolor=#FF8|35.5% || bgcolor=#FF8|31.6% || bgcolor=#FF8|17.0% || bgcolor=#FF8|31.1% || bgcolor=#FF8|34.5% || bgcolor=#FF8|21.1% || bgcolor=#AFA|7.8%
|-
|{{left}}Iceland || bgcolor=#FF8|5.80% || bgcolor=#FF8|4.54% || bgcolor=#FF8|3.24% || bgcolor=#FF8|25.00% || bgcolor=#FF8|18.98% || bgcolor=#FF8|9.44% || bgcolor=#FF8|7.14% || bgcolor=#FF8|7.46% || bgcolor=#FF8|7.69% || bgcolor=#FF8|8.11% || bgcolor=#FF8|10.2% || bgcolor=#FF8|7.1% || bgcolor=#FF8|5.6% || bgcolor=#FF8|8.6% || bgcolor=#FF8|9.8% || bgcolor=#FF8|6.3% || bgcolor=#FF8|5.1%
|-
|{{left}}India || 16.32% || 10.99% || 6.54% || 12.25% || 27.26% || 27.75% || 26.07% || 23.29% || 26.02% || 23.78% || 19.8% || 18.7% || 24.1% || 30.1% || 26.8% || 28.7% || 24.7%
|-
|{{left}}Indonesia || 20.09% || 10.95% || 12.23% || 5.83% || 12.19% || 12.46% || 12.81% || 10.99% || 11.19% || 8.71% || 8.3% || 8.0% || 12.1% || 14.2% || 16.4% || 25.0% || 37.0%
|-
|{{left}}Iran || 55.54% || 53.26% || 54.09% || 66.81% || 85.88% || 86.58% || 87.66% || 58.66% || 45.02% || 38.55% || 41.8% || 48.2% || 37.6% || 31.0% || 38.9% || 40.1% || 42.5%
|-
|{{left}}Iraq || 33.44% || 37.09% || 44.63% || 36.48% || 45.24% || 49.94% || 56.95% || 60.71% || 51.71% || 52.82% || 41.4% || 39.2% || 32.8% || 27.3% || 42.2% || 31.8% || 46.3%
|-
|{{left}}Ireland || bgcolor=#FF8|22.19% || bgcolor=#FF8|19.41% || bgcolor=#FF8|21.32% || bgcolor=#FF8|40.00% || bgcolor=#FF8|26.07% || bgcolor=#FF8|22.69% || bgcolor=#FF8|21.77% || bgcolor=#FF8|17.89% || bgcolor=#FF8|15.48% || bgcolor=#FF8|18.34% || bgcolor=#FF8|19.6% || bgcolor=#FF8|16.9% || bgcolor=#FF8|21.1% || bgcolor=#FF8|23.3% || bgcolor=#FF8|25.1% || bgcolor=#FF8|24.2% || bgcolor=#FF8|20.0%
|-
|{{left}}Israel || bgcolor=#FF8|8.64% || bgcolor=#FF8|3.30% || bgcolor=#AFA|2.27% || 4.92% || 6.52% || 5.33% || 5.10% || 4.88% || 4.09% || 3.85% || 8.2% || 8.6% || 5.4% || 6.9% || 6.4% || 5.1% || bgcolor=#AFA|3.0%
|-
|{{left}}Italy || bgcolor=#FF8|10.89% || bgcolor=#FF8|10.62% || bgcolor=#FF8|9.75% || bgcolor=#FF8|15.86% || bgcolor=#FF8|20.82% || bgcolor=#FF8|15.03% || bgcolor=#FF8|14.83% || bgcolor=#FF8|12.54% || bgcolor=#FF8|10.86% || bgcolor=#FF8|22.10% || bgcolor=#FF8|22.9% || bgcolor=#FF8|15.2% || bgcolor=#FF8|13.3% || bgcolor=#FF8|18.3% || bgcolor=#FF8|16.1% || bgcolor=#FF8|11.1% || bgcolor=#FF8|9.3%
|-
|{{left}}Ivory Coast || 30.08% || 24.85% || 23.08% || 25.33% || 40.66% || 35.73% || 33.81% || 33.72% || 37.38% || 28.59% || 29.8% || 30.3% || 27.7% || 39.6% || 47.0% || 36.5% || 40.9%
|-
|{{left}}Jamaica || 43.67% || 40.29% || 30.04% || 19.13% || 57.07% || 56.59% || 54.46% || 46.78% || 35.64% || 37.62% || 32.3% || 35.3% || 41.6% || 45.7% || 47.4% || 46.4% || 35.5%
|-
|{{left}}Japan || bgcolor=#FF8|5.76% || bgcolor=#FF8|6.05% || bgcolor=#FF8|5.79% || bgcolor=#FF8|4.69% || bgcolor=#FF8|10.43% || bgcolor=#FF8|10.48% || bgcolor=#FF8|9.76% || bgcolor=#FF8|8.47% || bgcolor=#FF8|8.12% || bgcolor=#FF8|12.22% || bgcolor=#FF8|9.3% || bgcolor=#FF8|10.9% || bgcolor=#FF8|10.2% || bgcolor=#FF8|18.7% || bgcolor=#FF8|15.0% || bgcolor=#FF8|16.0% || bgcolor=#FF8|14.8%
|-
|{{left}}Jordan || 45.86% || 28.51% || 27.90% || 38.09% || 44.44% || 45.26% || 42.62% || 40.06% || 40.34% || 37.59% || 26.9% || 32.6% || 30.8% || 34.5% || 40.1% || 31.4% || 43.2%
|-
|{{left}}Kazakhstan || 46.29% || 41.93% || 44.02% || 43.29% || 47.34% || 42.58% || 39.38% || 32.81% || 27.55% || 12.70% || 9.9% || 8.0% || 7.5% || 8.3% || 9.4% || 12.2% || 11.7%
|-
|{{left}}Kenya || 63.32% || 51.68% || 42.02% || 34.86% || 50.26% || 49.86% || 41.59% || 33.17% || 26.60% || 27.34% || 27.3% || 28.3% || 33.6% || 39.3% || 40.2% || 35.8% || 35.6%
|-
|{{left}}Kiribati || 10.81% || 20.55% || 30.43% || 50.00% || 55.56% || 11.69% || 25.33% || 5.13% || 5.81% || 16.05% || 15.4% || 27.3% || 22.9% || 20.7% || 20.9% || 10.2% || 26.2%
|-
|{{left}}Kosovo || 36.52% || 29.79% || 17.93% || 12.51% || 39.47% || 36.76% || 35.97% || 37.92% || 41.48% || 44.03% || 38.1% || 40.0% || 31.7% || 29.0% || 25.4% || 29.0% || 47.9%
|-
|{{left}}Kuwait || 5.50% || 3.96% || 16.04% || 18.18% || 5.01% || 3.27% || bgcolor=#AFA|2.71% || 8.32% || 4.56% || 5.73% || 5.7% || 10.3% || 4.8% || bgcolor=#AFA|2.8% || 3.6% || bgcolor=#AFA|-2.2% || bgcolor=#AFA|6.5%
|-
|{{left}}Kyrgyzstan || 39.14% || 41.54% || 37.85% || 44.00% || 65.60% || 67.75% || 58.90% || 55.58% || 51.68% || 55.75% || 43.2% || 24.9% || 26.4% || 18.0% || 17.5% || 32.8% || 32.1%
|-
|{{left}}Laos || 82.84% || 72.79% || 56.20% || 89.86% || 70.57% || 65.60% || 64.06% || 63.66% || 62.37% || 66.68% || 61.1% || 61.4% || 60.1% || 74.8% || 74.4% || 72.4% || 73.4%
|-
|{{left}}Latvia || bgcolor=#FF8|7.67% || bgcolor=#FF8|9.28% || bgcolor=#FF8|9.95% || bgcolor=#FF8|15.91% || bgcolor=#FF8|23.01% || bgcolor=#FF8|18.98% || bgcolor=#FF8|15.24% || bgcolor=#FF8|12.83% || bgcolor=#FF8|13.45% || bgcolor=#FF8|18.40% || bgcolor=#FF8|23.3% || bgcolor=#FF8|20.4% || bgcolor=#FF8|23.4% || bgcolor=#FF8|29.7% || bgcolor=#FF8|33.9% || bgcolor=#FF8|19.5% || bgcolor=#AFA|8.3%
|-
|{{left}}Lebanon || 35.03% || 38.78% || 39.40% || 52.21% || 28.44% || 23.85% || 25.22% || 31.75% || 25.41% || 27.10% || 16.1% || 15.1% || 18.1% || 20.9% || 22.4% || 18.6% || 27.9%
|-
|{{left}}Lesotho || 29.57% || 25.82% || 22.22% || 50.00% || 26.74% || 28.24% || 21.94% || 35.97% || 21.20% || 13.95% || 16.7% || 19.4% || 11.2% || 18.6% || 21.1% || 17.7% || 32.1%
|-
|{{left}}Liberia || 79.38% || 78.19% || 62.73% || 54.17% || 67.62% || 73.93% || 64.36% || 64.98% || 70.23% || 62.45% || 49.4% || 59.0% || 45.5% || 56.1% || 57.6% || 66.0% || 70.7%
|-
|{{left}}Libya || 24.64% || 19.41% || 22.78% || 24.26% || 80.90% || 89.05% || 73.73% || 45.50% || 40.58% || 43.02% || 33.9% || 33.8% || 38.9% || 30.8% || 14.3% || 19.2% || 27.1%
|-
|{{left}}Liechtenstein || bgcolor=#FF8|0.00% || bgcolor=#FF8|0.00% || bgcolor=#FF8|12.50% || bgcolor=#FF8|25.00% || bgcolor=#FF8|0.00% || bgcolor=#FF8|0.00% || bgcolor=#FF8|0.00% || bgcolor=#FF8|0.00% || bgcolor=#FF8|0.00% || bgcolor=#FF8|0.00% || bgcolor=#FF8|11.1% || bgcolor=#FF8|10.0% || bgcolor=#FF8|0.0% || bgcolor=#FF8|0.0% || bgcolor=#FF8|5.9% || bgcolor=#FF8|12.5% || bgcolor=#FF8|0.0%
|-
|{{left}}Lithuania || bgcolor=#FF8|21.04% || bgcolor=#FF8|13.40% || bgcolor=#FF8|14.81% || bgcolor=#FF8|15.91% || bgcolor=#FF8|21.96% || bgcolor=#FF8|18.67% || bgcolor=#FF8|17.29% || bgcolor=#FF8|22.54% || bgcolor=#FF8|22.36% || bgcolor=#FF8|33.49% || bgcolor=#FF8|37.7% || bgcolor=#FF8|33.1% || bgcolor=#FF8|34.0% || bgcolor=#FF8|34.7% || bgcolor=#FF8|31.9% || bgcolor=#FF8|17.6% || bgcolor=#AFA|9.0%
|-
|{{left}}Luxembourg || bgcolor=#FF8|10.86% || bgcolor=#FF8|4.22% || bgcolor=#FF8|7.84% || bgcolor=#FF8|0.00% || bgcolor=#FF8|7.41% || bgcolor=#FF8|10.22% || bgcolor=#FF8|5.19% || bgcolor=#FF8|5.74% || bgcolor=#FF8|7.69% || bgcolor=#FF8|5.88% || bgcolor=#FF8|12.2% || bgcolor=#FF8|8.3% || bgcolor=#FF8|4.7% || bgcolor=#FF8|5.5% || bgcolor=#FF8|7.0% || bgcolor=#FF8|10.0% || bgcolor=#FF8|7.8%
|-
|{{left}}Macau || 9.85% || 11.57% || 20.17% || 12.50% || 7.12% || 5.03% || 7.79% || 5.38% || 7.71% || 9.30% || {{n/a}} || 3.1% || bgcolor=#AFA|2.3% || 8.9% || 12.0% || 16.4% || 14.2%
|-
|{{left}}Madagascar || 13.12% || 12.07% || 13.24% || 21.82% || 14.36% || 7.69% || 11.77% || 11.00% || 12.12% || 11.01% || 11.6% || 9.3% || 17.5% || 15.0% || 15.7% || 18.2% || 11.9%
|-
|{{left}}Malawi || 47.78% || 39.25% || 38.54% || 12.12% || 42.67% || 37.05% || 28.20% || 26.49% || 14.52% || 10.23% || 12.3% || 13.8% || 16.5% || 26.9% || 26.9% || 27.1% || 28.9%
|-
|{{left}}Malaysia || 6.79% || 4.43% || 9.41% || 7.21% || 6.97% || 4.91% || 4.94% || 3.93% || 3.65% || 3.34% || 4.6% || 5.0% || 5.4% || 4.7% || 5.9% || 6.6% || bgcolor=#AFA|5.6%
|-
|{{left}}Maldives || 25.82% || 14.66% || 23.65% || 66.67% || 22.88% || 33.65% || 39.88% || 27.74% || 47.56% || 15.49% || 6.7% || 22.9% || 42.2% || bgcolor=#AFA|0.9% || 12.2% || 19.7% || bgcolor=#AFA|4.7%
|-
|{{left}}Mali || 60.90% || 60.16% || 64.08% || 62.96% || 55.99% || 55.89% || 50.60% || 59.43% || 57.58% || 52.77% || 54.0% || 47.7% || 54.7% || 51.0% || 55.7% || 52.8% || 48.1%
|-
|{{left}}Malta || bgcolor=#FF8|12.43% || bgcolor=#FF8|10.56% || bgcolor=#FF8|10.78% || bgcolor=#FF8|16.67% || bgcolor=#FF8|28.38% || bgcolor=#FF8|17.76% || bgcolor=#FF8|9.59% || bgcolor=#FF8|4.81% || bgcolor=#FF8|8.38% || bgcolor=#FF8|7.87% || bgcolor=#FF8|11.1% || bgcolor=#FF8|6.6% || bgcolor=#FF8|17.6% || bgcolor=#FF8|11.9% || bgcolor=#FF8|12.5% || bgcolor=#FF8|3.8% || bgcolor=#AFA|2.5%
|-
|{{left}}Marshall Islands || bgcolor=#FF8|63.16% || bgcolor=#FF8|31.58% || bgcolor=#FF8|0.00% || bgcolor=#FF8|0.00% || bgcolor=#FF8|45.45% || bgcolor=#FF8|30.77% || bgcolor=#FF8|17.39% || bgcolor=#FF8|5.88% || bgcolor=#FF8|29.41% || bgcolor=#FF8|26.67% || bgcolor=#FF8|4.80% || bgcolor=#FF8|22.70% || bgcolor=#FF8|15.60% || bgcolor=#FF8|8.30% || bgcolor=#FF8|10.40% || bgcolor=#FF8|7.30% || bgcolor=#FF8|14.00%
|-
|{{left}}Mauritania || 70.07% || 76.43% || 89.72% || 83.14% || 80.15% || 67.79% || 61.58% || 67.30% || 71.45% || 61.45% || 52.2% || 50.0% || 54.7% || 61.5% || 49.7% || 54.1% || 51.0%
|-
|{{left}}Mauritius || 6.27% || 6.90% || 7.77% || 9.92% || 6.22% || 6.59% || 6.49% || 8.29% || 5.53% || 5.71% || bgcolor=#AFA|2.2% || 4.7% || 5.0% || 7.5% || 6.0% || 7.2% || 11.6%
|-
|{{left}}Mexico || 13.87% || 10.57% || 5.91% || 4.23% || 23.16% || 26.66% || 24.93% || 22.50% || 23.49% || 20.17% || 15.6% || 12.1% || 10.6% || 12.8% || 11.1% || 10.9% || 11.4%
|-
|{{left}}Micronesia || bgcolor=#FF8|0.00% || bgcolor=#FF8|100.00% || bgcolor=#FF8|100.00% || bgcolor=#FF8|0.00% || bgcolor=#FF8|0.00% || bgcolor=#FF8|100.00% || bgcolor=#FF8|100.00% || bgcolor=#FF8|100.00% || bgcolor=#FF8|25.00% || bgcolor=#FF8|85.71% || bgcolor=#FF8|80.00% || bgcolor=#FF8|100.00% || bgcolor=#FF8|50.00% || bgcolor=#FF8|33.30% || bgcolor=#FF8|0.00% || bgcolor=#FF8|100.00% || bgcolor=#FF8|50.00%
|-
|{{left}}Moldova || 46.99% || 42.42% || 43.57% || 66.37% || 51.00% || 58.03% || 61.10% || 49.12% || 36.35% || 41.83% || 40.1% || 33.6% || 31.0% || 34.7% || 38.5% || 41.3% || 36.7%
|-
|{{left}}Monaco || bgcolor=#FF8|0.00% || bgcolor=#FF8|0.00% || bgcolor=#FF8|0.00% || bgcolor=#FF8|0.00% || bgcolor=#FF8|50.00% || bgcolor=#FF8|22.22% || bgcolor=#FF8|0.00% || bgcolor=#FF8|0.00% || bgcolor=#FF8|0.00% || bgcolor=#FF8|12.50% || bgcolor=#FF8|0.0% || bgcolor=#FF8|33.3% || bgcolor=#FF8|57.1% || bgcolor=#FF8|0.0% || bgcolor=#FF8|0.0% || bgcolor=#FF8|0.0% || bgcolor=#FF8|25.0%
|-
|{{left}}Mongolia || 39.36% || 37.34% || 38.32% || 39.57% || 45.47% || 54.60% || 56.51% || 53.62% || 43.63% || 34.76% || 27.9% || 30.6% || 37.0% || 44.5% || 37.1% || 34.9% || 53.6%
|-
|{{left}}Montenegro || 36.48% || 43.59% || 34.03% || 9.30% || 58.53% || 39.10% || 35.35% || 26.41% || 28.69% || 31.26% || 28.0% || 32.6% || 31.4% || 39.0% || 36.6% || 27.5% || 25.6%
|-
|{{left}}Morocco || 14.45% || 15.92% || 21.90% || 20.85% || 23.35% || 28.48% || 42.88% || 36.99% || 26.77% || 20.60% || 21.9% || 23.3% || 21.3% || 15.1% || 15.5% || 19.6% || 24.0%
|-
|{{left}}Mozambique || 34.75% || 22.23% || 20.48% || 32.75% || 18.64% || 14.24% || 10.22% || 26.18% || 10.29% || 4.03% || 4.0% || bgcolor=#AFA|2.2% || 3.2% || bgcolor=#AFA|2.6% || 6.7% || 11.4% || 13.8%
|-
|{{left}}Myanmar || 62.58% || 43.67% || 46.15% || 39.40% || 40.68% || 30.91% || 23.12% || 17.88% || 13.02% || 16.32% || 15.5% || 23.5% || 31.0% || 33.2% || 32.0% || 34.2% || 41.9%
|-
|{{left}}Namibia || 21.95% || 22.40% || 12.05% || 10.71% || 5.20% || 6.60% || 8.40% || 6.31% || 5.56% || 7.43% || 7.6% || 6.2% || 8.8% || 8.9% || 14.9% || 10.8% || bgcolor=#AFA|6.8%
|-
|{{left}}Nauru || bgcolor=#AFA|0.00% || 10.00% || 66.67% || bgcolor=#AFA|0.00% || 25.00% || 20.83% || 21.43% || 20.97% || 13.33% || 5.26% || 42.9% || bgcolor=#AFA|0.0% || 18.2% || 16.7% || 41.7% || 60.0% || 66.7%
|-
|{{left}}Nepal || 49.47% || 31.03% || 19.85% || 18.72% || 48.11% || 50.70% || 51.53% || 46.42% || 49.54% || 42.19% || 38.2% || 46.4% || 49.4% || 59.9% || 58.3% || 59.1% || 51.2%
|-
|{{left}}Netherlands || bgcolor=#FF8|14.79% || bgcolor=#FF8|16.81% || bgcolor=#FF8|16.97% || bgcolor=#FF8|25.28% || bgcolor=#FF8|12.89% || bgcolor=#FF8|11.82% || bgcolor=#FF8|9.56% || bgcolor=#FF8|9.65% || bgcolor=#FF8|16.62% || bgcolor=#FF8|13.01% || bgcolor=#FF8|14.4% || bgcolor=#FF8|11.2% || bgcolor=#FF8|23.1% || bgcolor=#FF8|21.1% || bgcolor=#FF8|19.2% || bgcolor=#FF8|18.0% || bgcolor=#FF8|13.7%
|-
|{{left}}New Zealand || bgcolor=#FF8|22.79% || bgcolor=#FF8|13.28% || bgcolor=#FF8|12.52% || bgcolor=#FF8|12.74% || bgcolor=#FF8|14.47% || bgcolor=#FF8|16.32% || bgcolor=#FF8|19.97% || bgcolor=#FF8|22.02% || bgcolor=#FF8|15.45% || bgcolor=#FF8|16.94% || bgcolor=#FF8|15.1% || bgcolor=#FF8|14.0% || bgcolor=#FF8|13.3% || bgcolor=#FF8|19.3% || bgcolor=#FF8|19.0% || bgcolor=#FF8|16.1% || bgcolor=#FF8|14.0%
|-
|{{left}}Nicaragua || 58.71% || 65.60% || 50.81% || 12.72% || 63.17% || 63.52% || 46.75% || 43.28% || 44.54% || 41.19% || 35.8% || 26.7% || 27.6% || 30.1% || 33.8% || 35.1% || 41.8%
|-
|{{left}}Niger || 38.18% || 30.76% || 43.67% || 61.39% || 53.50% || 42.76% || 43.33% || 30.65% || 31.14% || 31.10% || 36.4% || 27.5% || 35.9% || 41.3% || 41.3% || 44.1% || 55.7%
|-
|{{left}}Nigeria || 46.51% || 29.23% || 25.80% || 43.78% || 64.83% || 67.20% || 57.47% || 44.95% || 41.44% || 32.56% || 33.2% || 35.1% || 33.6% || 38.0% || 33.7% || 37.3% || 36.0%
|-
|{{left}}North Korea || bgcolor=#AFA|0.00% || 100.00% || bgcolor=#AFA|0.00% || 100.00% || bgcolor=#AFA|0.00% || 100.00% || 100.00% || 54.55% || 15.00% || 47.67% || 55.6% || 28.6% || 36.0% || 8.3% || 23.3% || 4.0% || 16.3%
|-
|{{left}}North Macedonia || 28.00% || 29.13% || 26.29% || 12.31% || 29.62% || 36.19% || 31.29% || 28.69% || 33.84% || 36.08% || 29.8% || 27.0% || 20.7% || 19.6% || 20.0% || 21.5% || 33.5%
|-
|{{left}}Norway || bgcolor=#FF8|19.44% || bgcolor=#FF8|17.96% || bgcolor=#FF8|16.53% || bgcolor=#FF8|8.65% || bgcolor=#FF8|17.07% || bgcolor=#FF8|17.35% || bgcolor=#FF8|12.40% || bgcolor=#FF8|17.36% || bgcolor=#FF8|21.96% || bgcolor=#FF8|25.12% || bgcolor=#FF8|21.4% || bgcolor=#FF8|19.1% || bgcolor=#FF8|17.8% || bgcolor=#FF8|18.1% || bgcolor=#FF8|17.2% || bgcolor=#FF8|15.2% || bgcolor=#FF8|11.9%
|-
|{{left}}Oman || 4.50% || 4.76% || 18.45% || 16.45% || 6.32% || 5.13% || 4.87% || 3.46% || bgcolor=#AFA|1.93% || bgcolor=#AFA|2.00% || bgcolor=#AFA|2.1% || bgcolor=#AFA|2.3% || 4.5% || 5.7% || 8.7% || bgcolor=#AFA|2.8% || bgcolor=#AFA|2.2%
|-
|{{left}}Pakistan || 45.65% || 40.82% || 31.43% || 32.53% || 45.62% || 48.26% || 47.89% || 49.40% || 46.43% || 40.40% || 38.0% || 38.5% || 37.3% || 40.0% || 41.6% || 40.7% || 46.3%
|-
|{{left}}Palau || bgcolor=#FF8|63.64% || bgcolor=#FF8|100.00% || bgcolor=#FF8|66.67% || bgcolor=#FF8|0.00% || bgcolor=#FF8|40.00% || bgcolor=#FF8|100.00% || bgcolor=#FF8|71.43% || bgcolor=#FF8|83.33% || bgcolor=#FF8|53.33% || bgcolor=#FF8|96.00% || bgcolor=#FF8|84.20% || bgcolor=#FF8|29.20% || bgcolor=#FF8|35.70% || bgcolor=#FF8|57.10% || bgcolor=#FF8|54.50% || bgcolor=#FF8|0.00% || bgcolor=#FF8|20.00%
|-
|{{left}}Palestine || 44.51% || 34.77% || 33.96% || 50.80% || 58.27% || 52.92% || 53.87% || 50.98% || 40.64% || 42.68% || 36.7% || 37.6% || 38.9% || 34.2% || 36.2% || 45.2% || 55.6%
|-
|{{left}}Panama || 19.93% || 23.95% || 13.54% || 8.29% || 15.33% || 18.93% || 11.71% || 11.61% || 12.05% || 11.36% || 10.0% || 8.0% || 8.4% || 11.3% || 11.2% || 13.1% || 19.2%
|-
|{{left}}Papua New Guinea || 3.85% || 6.15% || 4.93% || 3.45% || 6.64% || bgcolor=#AFA|1.74% || 6.84% || 9.34% || 10.56% || 5.14% || 7.4% || 3.1% || bgcolor=#AFA|2.95% || 5.0% || 3.7% || 5.7% || bgcolor=#AFA|3.4%
|-
|{{left}}Paraguay || 18.09% || 16.00% || 17.95% || 13.33% || 16.80% || 12.41% || 8.02% || 6.83% || 7.47% || 6.15% || 6.1% || 4.4% || 4.6% || 7.6% || 9.3% || 9.8% || 14.4%
|-
|{{left}}Peru || 21.30% || 24.23% || 27.61% || 4.11% || 24.13% || 25.39% || 28.53% || 25.97% || 28.61% || 14.46% || 13.8% || 16.1% || 20.1% || 22.7% || 26.0% || 29.1% || 37.7%
|-
|{{left}}Philippines || 28.33% || 23.93% || 11.59% || 10.20% || 32.49% || 24.40% || 27.07% || 25.54% || 27.29% || 27.96% || 24.6% || 24.1% || 23.8% || 33.8% || 37.9% || 35.9% || 31.0%
|-
|{{left}}Poland || bgcolor=#FF8|10.99% || bgcolor=#FF8|16.47% || bgcolor=#FF8|14.74% || bgcolor=#FF8|18.48% || bgcolor=#FF8|8.91% || bgcolor=#AFA|2.76% || 3.99% || 5.92% || 5.37% || 6.37% || 6.4% || 10.8% || 9.3% || 10.2% || 9.8% || 13.5% || 13.8%
|-
|{{left}}Portugal || bgcolor=#FF8|7.91% || bgcolor=#FF8|10.52% || bgcolor=#FF8|9.41% || bgcolor=#FF8|17.86% || bgcolor=#FF8|9.75% || bgcolor=#FF8|6.52% || bgcolor=#FF8|7.28% || bgcolor=#FF8|11.06% || bgcolor=#FF8|8.97% || bgcolor=#FF8|8.41% || bgcolor=#FF8|4.7% || bgcolor=#FF8|9.9% || bgcolor=#FF8|10.3% || bgcolor=#FF8|16.2% || bgcolor=#FF8|17.7% || bgcolor=#FF8|17.4% || bgcolor=#FF8|10.7%
|-
|{{left}}Qatar || bgcolor=#FF8|4.67% || bgcolor=#AFA|2.53% || 12.86% || 11.69% || 8.28% || 10.33% || 8.34% || 7.48% || 3.50% || bgcolor=#AFA|2.97% || bgcolor=#AFA|2.1% || bgcolor=#AFA|1.8% || bgcolor=#AFA|1.2% || bgcolor=#AFA|0.6% || 3.2% || 3.4% || bgcolor=#AFA|4.9%
|-
|{{left}}Romania || bgcolor=#AFA|2.61% || 8.79% || 12.61% || 17.03% || 10.14% || 9.11% || 10.44% || 11.76% || 11.43% || 11.16% || 9.8% || 11.5% || 17.0% || 22.4% || 24.8% || 26.3% || 25.0%
|-
|{{left}}Russia || 38.56% || 39.49% || 26.18% || 29.42% || 17.79% || 15.19% || 14.89% || 11.61% || 9.29% || 10.24% || 7.8% || 10.2% || 9.6% || 10.3% || 10.1% || 4.9% || bgcolor=#AFA|7.5%
|-
|{{left}}Rwanda || 55.76% || 71.09% || 62.92% || 34.96% || 63.93% || 53.76% || 44.51% || 52.17% || 43.79% || 49.17% || 51.1% || 44.9% || 30.9% || 40.6% || 48.1% || 53.2% || 50.3%
|-
|{{left}}Saint Kitts and Nevis || 26.64% || 20.95% || 17.14% || 19.35% || 23.28% || 21.87% || 24.98% || 26.66% || 28.31% || 26.60% || 27.5% || 30.7% || 27.2% || 23.3% || 22.7% || 16.1% || 25.0%
|-
|{{left}}Saint Lucia || 26.82% || 16.60% || 16.72% || 17.47% || 23.31% || 16.75% || 21.90% || 22.34% || 27.16% || 26.90% || 27.6% || 22.5% || 28.2% || 25.4% || 23.8% || 17.2% || 26.6%
|-
|{{left}}Saint Vincent and the Grenadines || 26.64% || 16.99% || 14.12% || 15.08% || 21.10% || 14.55% || 19.77% || 20.38% || 27.46% || 27.15% || 24.1% || 22.5% || 27.2% || 25.8% || 27.2% || 17.1% || 26.4%
|-
|{{left}}Samoa || 45.75% || 34.37% || 29.52% || 32.58% || 36.87% || 27.02% || 26.26% || 40.32% || 28.44% || 29.99% || 27.2% || 22.1% || 29.5% || 41.7% || 37.0% || 22.4% || 32.4%
|-
|{{left}}San Marino || bgcolor=#FF8|9.09% || bgcolor=#FF8|33.33% || bgcolor=#FF8|0.00% || bgcolor=#FF8|0.00% || bgcolor=#FF8|0.00% || bgcolor=#FF8|50.00% || bgcolor=#FF8|25.00% || bgcolor=#FF8|0.00% || bgcolor=#FF8|0.00% || bgcolor=#FF8|0.00% || bgcolor=#FF8|100.0% || bgcolor=#FF8|0.0% || bgcolor=#FF8|0.0% || bgcolor=#FF8|0.0% || bgcolor=#FF8|0.0% || bgcolor=#FF8|0.0% || bgcolor=#FF8|50.0%
|-
|{{left}}São Tomé and Príncipe || 50.00% || 46.67% || 21.43% || 20.00% || 36.36% || 34.78% || 26.09% || 14.81% || 24.14% || 5.71% || 10.7% || 22.2% || 18.0% || 31.7% || 16.7% || 33.3% || 28.6%
|-
|{{left}}Saudi Arabia || 7.89% || 5.01% || 14.29% || 13.43% || 10.01% || 6.82% || 7.47% || 5.26% || 4.04% || 3.24% || 3.3% || 7.8% || 7.6% || 6.3% || 6.0% || 3.8% || bgcolor=#AFA|6.6%
|-
|{{left}}Senegal || 74.65% || 70.47% || 66.48% || 34.95% || 65.28% || 55.88% || 59.18% || 56.85% || 52.46% || 54.37% || 57.5% || 53.2% || 67.0% || 62.8% || 59.6% || 60.2% || 55.2%
|-
|{{left}}Serbia || 17.77% || 16.53% || 19.45% || 13.27% || 25.01% || 30.33% || 25.93% || 22.33% || 18.77% || 16.54% || 16.0% || 14.7% || 13.7% || 15.7% || 14.5% || 11.0% || 11.7%
|-
|{{left}}Serbia and Montenegro || {{n/a}} || {{n/a}} || {{n/a}} || {{n/a}} || {{n/a}} || {{n/a}} || {{n/a}} || {{n/a}} || {{n/a}} || {{n/a}} || 100.0% || 100.0% || 39.7% || 16.2% || 14.7% || 12.0% || 17.1%
|-
|{{left}}Seychelles || 7.59% || 4.55% || 10.26% || bgcolor=#AFA|0.00% || 6.38% || 10.60% || 11.64% || 13.14% || 9.66% || 7.26% || 6.8% || 4.3% || 4.8% || 15.9% || 8.5% || 21.3% || 18.0%
|-
|{{left}}Sierra Leone || 69.36% || 49.02% || 45.16% || 35.70% || 59.35% || 57.99% || 60.56% || 47.30% || 61.25% || 53.02% || 51.9% || 46.5% || 50.3% || 48.0% || 45.7% || 52.6% || 50.1%
|-
|{{left}}Singapore || bgcolor=#FF8|10.40% || bgcolor=#FF8|15.22% || bgcolor=#FF8|10.10% || bgcolor=#FF8|9.72% || bgcolor=#FF8|10.17% || bgcolor=#FF8|18.07% || bgcolor=#FF8|14.29% || bgcolor=#FF8|13.74% || bgcolor=#FF8|15.10% || bgcolor=#FF8|17.82% || bgcolor=#FF8|16.6% || bgcolor=#FF8|25.0% || bgcolor=#FF8|24.6% || bgcolor=#FF8|22.7% || bgcolor=#FF8|16.6% || bgcolor=#FF8|16.0% || bgcolor=#FF8|11.7%
|-
|{{left}}Slovakia || bgcolor=#FF8|11.58% || bgcolor=#FF8|11.49% || bgcolor=#FF8|15.86% || bgcolor=#FF8|10.87% || bgcolor=#FF8|28.08% || bgcolor=#FF8|11.99% || bgcolor=#FF8|16.21% || bgcolor=#FF8|13.30% || bgcolor=#FF8|12.28% || bgcolor=#FF8|11.14% || bgcolor=#FF8|17.3% || bgcolor=#FF8|15.3% || bgcolor=#FF8|13.5% || bgcolor=#FF8|16.6% || bgcolor=#FF8|11.8% || bgcolor=#FF8|8.3% || bgcolor=#AFA|5.3%
|-
|{{left}}Slovenia || bgcolor=#FF8|12.42% || bgcolor=#FF8|13.86% || bgcolor=#FF8|13.47% || bgcolor=#FF8|15.19% || bgcolor=#FF8|17.11% || bgcolor=#FF8|12.33% || bgcolor=#FF8|12.33% || bgcolor=#FF8|19.22% || bgcolor=#FF8|10.43% || bgcolor=#FF8|10.56% || bgcolor=#FF8|7.0% || bgcolor=#FF8|12.1% || bgcolor=#FF8|23.4% || bgcolor=#FF8|14.4% || bgcolor=#FF8|28.5% || bgcolor=#FF8|7.8% || bgcolor=#FF8|6.7%
|-
|{{left}}Solomon Islands || 5.00% || 4.35% || 7.69% || bgcolor=#AFA|0.00% || 9.09% || bgcolor=#AFA|2.20% || 3.57% || 16.79% || 4.28% || 7.26% || 5.4% || 12.7% || 5.4% || 13.1% || 10.7% || 17.0% || bgcolor=#AFA|6.5%
|-
|{{left}}Somalia || 77.02% || 69.89% || 73.97% || 66.67% || 71.76% || 80.77% || 90.16% || 75.50% || 63.89% || 64.60% || 52.0% || 65.8% || 61.7% || 66.8% || 69.6% || 73.4% || 54.0%
|-
|{{left}}South Africa || 10.65% || 11.27% || 9.68% || 17.67% || 7.80% || 6.92% || 7.31% || 6.44% || 6.83% || 5.08% || bgcolor=#AFA|2.6% || bgcolor=#AFA|2.6% || bgcolor=#AFA|2.9% || 4.6% || 4.1% || 3.8% || bgcolor=#AFA|4.6%
|-
|{{left}}South Korea || bgcolor=#FF8|14.97% || bgcolor=#FF8|14.44% || bgcolor=#FF8|17.38% || bgcolor=#FF8|18.03% || bgcolor=#FF8|8.46% || bgcolor=#FF8|7.69% || bgcolor=#FF8|7.96% || bgcolor=#FF8|9.05% || bgcolor=#FF8|8.65% || bgcolor=#FF8|13.21% || bgcolor=#FF8|21.2% || bgcolor=#FF8|18.1% || bgcolor=#FF8|13.0% || bgcolor=#FF8|7.5% || bgcolor=#FF8|9.4% || bgcolor=#FF8|5.5% || bgcolor=#AFA|3.8%
|-
|{{left}}South Sudan || 60.35% || 48.94% || 49.04% || 45.71% || 53.36% || 52.32% || 41.29% || 47.52% || 43.89% || 41.77% || 43.8% || 41.9% || 37.7% || 23.8% || {{n/a}} || {{n/a}} || {{n/a}}
|-
|{{left}}Spain || bgcolor=#FF8|16.39% || bgcolor=#FF8|15.66% || bgcolor=#FF8|10.75% || bgcolor=#FF8|18.29% || bgcolor=#FF8|20.17% || bgcolor=#FF8|16.53% || bgcolor=#FF8|14.04% || bgcolor=#FF8|17.26% || bgcolor=#FF8|15.09% || bgcolor=#FF8|17.76% || bgcolor=#FF8|15.8% || bgcolor=#FF8|16.0% || bgcolor=#FF8|10.2% || bgcolor=#FF8|6.6% || bgcolor=#FF8|6.5% || bgcolor=#FF8|7.7% || bgcolor=#FF8|9.9%
|-
|{{left}}Sri Lanka || 29.76% || 26.61% || 22.13% || 25.34% || 36.00% || 35.12% || 33.61% || 26.19% || 21.69% || 22.07% || 19.5% || 20.6% || 34.7% || 25.2% || 28.6% || 40.8% || 31.4%
|-
|{{left}}Sudan || 54.59% || 49.34% || 38.83% || 40.90% || 50.25% || 57.44% || 59.83% || 51.37% || 36.59% || 40.45% || 42.4% || 47.9% || 45.4% || 40.6% || 32.5% || 62.2% || 38.6%
|-
|{{left}}Suriname || 13.63% || 14.44% || 11.91% || 6.42% || 10.83% || 7.44% || 8.57% || 11.44% || 10.86% || 7.78% || 13.6% || 9.6% || 11.6% || 18.0% || 18.6% || 15.5% || bgcolor=#AFA|9.6%
|-
|{{left}}Sweden || bgcolor=#FF8|21.46% || bgcolor=#FF8|20.68% || bgcolor=#FF8|17.07% || bgcolor=#FF8|39.46% || bgcolor=#FF8|18.35% || bgcolor=#FF8|13.32% || bgcolor=#FF8|15.20% || bgcolor=#FF8|13.92% || bgcolor=#FF8|12.78% || bgcolor=#FF8|23.19% || bgcolor=#FF8|15.4% || bgcolor=#FF8|21.0% || bgcolor=#FF8|16.3% || bgcolor=#FF8|22.3% || bgcolor=#FF8|20.5% || bgcolor=#FF8|19.3% || bgcolor=#FF8|15.2%
|-
|{{left}}Switzerland || bgcolor=#FF8|5.39% || bgcolor=#FF8|5.36% || bgcolor=#FF8|3.05% || bgcolor=#FF8|18.92% || bgcolor=#FF8|10.92% || bgcolor=#FF8|7.20% || bgcolor=#FF8|5.50% || bgcolor=#FF8|5.89% || bgcolor=#FF8|5.20% || bgcolor=#FF8|4.62% || bgcolor=#FF8|7.2% || bgcolor=#FF8|4.4% || bgcolor=#FF8|3.6% || bgcolor=#FF8|4.2% || bgcolor=#FF8|3.3% || bgcolor=#FF8|2.8% || bgcolor=#FF8|3.4%
|-
|{{left}}Syria || 45.84% || 47.42% || 42.87% || 44.04% || 66.68% || 74.83% || 77.31% || 59.11% || 59.77% || 63.43% || 60.0% || 46.1% || 42.0% || 32.8% || 28.4% || 23.6% || 33.1%
|-
|{{left}}Taiwan || bgcolor=#FF8|5.22% || bgcolor=#FF8|4.92% || bgcolor=#FF8|4.56% || bgcolor=#FF8|12.65% || bgcolor=#FF8|5.02% || bgcolor=#FF8|4.62% || bgcolor=#FF8|6.80% || bgcolor=#FF8|5.42% || bgcolor=#FF8|5.36% || bgcolor=#FF8|8.81% || bgcolor=#FF8|12.3% || bgcolor=#FF8|6.9% || bgcolor=#AFA|1.4% || bgcolor=#AFA|1.9% || bgcolor=#AFA|2.2% || 4.4% || bgcolor=#AFA|5.9%
|-
|{{left}}Tajikistan || 45.24% || 54.96% || 57.93% || 57.24% || 59.55% || 60.97% || 53.39% || 51.84% || 55.24% || 44.44% || 49.0% || 53.7% || 42.6% || 30.3% || 31.4% || 23.8% || 32.4%
|-
|{{left}}Tanzania || 36.69% || 34.13% || 29.37% || 7.27% || 31.04% || 23.90% || 19.87% || 18.36% || 23.05% || 12.02% || 21.3% || 25.7% || 15.8% || 27.5% || 24.2% || 28.3% || 26.2%
|-
|{{left}}Thailand || 22.50% || 24.34% || 24.36% || 31.82% || 24.44% || 23.41% || 22.17% || 20.15% || 17.82% || 12.35% || 10.2% || 11.1% || 10.2% || 11.4% || 13.5% || 16.4% || 19.8%
|-
|{{left}}Togo || 66.60% || 55.13% || 43.87% || 16.98% || 62.32% || 59.78% || 59.61% || 59.88% || 54.39% || 43.42% || 35.6% || 44.0% || 37.7% || 35.8% || 42.1% || 42.6% || 51.7%
|-
|{{left}}Tonga || 47.33% || 50.61% || 51.27% || 46.67% || 48.15% || 45.85% || 51.33% || 32.85% || 31.58% || 28.09% || 25.4% || 42.1% || 41.5% || 46.5% || 42.8% || 47.8% || 48.7%
|-
|{{left}}Trinidad and Tobago || 18.18% || 16.62% || 13.64% || 7.05% || 14.10% || 13.05% || 19.28% || 22.46% || 22.70% || 25.16% || 21.2% || 20.6% || 18.7% || 19.3% || 32.0% || 33.1% || 23.8%
|-
|{{left}}Tunisia || 23.21% || 26.14% || 21.06% || 24.92% || 19.11% || 24.17% || 27.67% || 19.53% || 15.92% || 19.69% || 17.5% || 17.0% || 16.8% || 17.2% || 15.6% || 18.5% || 23.9%
|-
|{{left}}Turkey || 19.78% || 20.59% || 19.96% || 13.70% || 17.46% || 19.19% || 17.49% || 17.86% || 13.62% || 13.88% || 7.1% || 10.3% || 8.1% || 7.0% || 9.1% || 9.0% || 11.2%
|-
|{{left}}Turkmenistan || 58.80% || 51.10% || 35.69% || 32.00% || 58.55% || 56.26% || 52.93% || 40.60% || 32.95% || 25.41% || 18.6% || 16.3% || 17.7% || 24.3% || 20.6% || 19.8% || 45.4%
|-
|{{left}}Tuvalu || 8.33% || 22.22% || 27.27% || bgcolor=#AFA|0.00% || 33.33% || 25.81% || 34.78% || 15.38% || 20.00% || 21.05% || 27.3% || 71.4% || 21.4% || 32.0% || 38.1% || 28.6% || 17.6%
|-
|{{left}}Uganda || 47.29% || 47.13% || 42.15% || 38.70% || 49.82% || 51.65% || 42.29% || 42.38% || 41.53% || 30.63% || 37.2% || 32.7% || 33.2% || 37.3% || 36.3% || 38.8% || 34.4%
|-
|{{left}}Ukraine || 33.45% || 34.29% || 41.27% || 15.15% || 43.14% || 45.06% || 40.97% || 34.54% || 40.83% || 34.03% || 27.7% || 26.7% || 26.9% || 29.0% || 31.8% || 36.8% || 30.9%
|-
|{{left}}United Arab Emirates || bgcolor=#AFA|1.46% || 4.18% || 10.06% || 8.93% || 8.44% || 5.56% || 3.75% || 5.80% || 4.02% || 7.10% || 4.8% || 8.0% || 9.0% || 5.7% || 9.7% || 9.6% || 10.4%
|-
|{{left}}United Kingdom || bgcolor=#FF8|18.03% || bgcolor=#FF8|14.69% || bgcolor=#FF8|15.55% || bgcolor=#FF8|11.97% || bgcolor=#FF8|23.58% || bgcolor=#FF8|21.05% || bgcolor=#FF8|20.29% || bgcolor=#FF8|20.15% || bgcolor=#FF8|20.42% || bgcolor=#FF8|20.41% || bgcolor=#FF8|19.4% || bgcolor=#FF8|16.9% || bgcolor=#FF8|20.6% || bgcolor=#FF8|27.3% || bgcolor=#FF8|25.5% || bgcolor=#FF8|27.8% || bgcolor=#FF8|25.5%
|-
|{{left}}Uruguay || bgcolor=#AFA|2.63% || 3.21% || 5.70% || 8.82% || 9.77% || 5.91% || 4.11% || 3.19% || 3.14% || bgcolor=#AFA|2.70% || bgcolor=#AFA|1.8% || bgcolor=#AFA|2.8% || bgcolor=#AFA|2.7% || 3.8% || 5.6% || 5.4% || bgcolor=#AFA|9.5%
|-
|{{left}}Uzbekistan || 64.41% || 59.56% || 47.04% || 45.98% || 74.14% || 68.06% || 61.76% || 50.29% || 57.09% || 49.59% || 52.1% || 44.3% || 40.4% || 50.2% || 46.8% || 41.1% || 61.1%
|-
|{{left}}Vanuatu || 46.23% || 38.84% || 36.09% || 33.33% || 46.34% || 41.05% || 38.30% || 13.51% || 16.67% || 10.53% || 20.0% || 14.9% || 12.5% || 15.0% || 13.3% || 20.0% || 16.7%
|-
|{{left}}Vatican City || bgcolor=#AFA|0.00% || 14.29% || 14.29% || bgcolor=#AFA|0.00% || bgcolor=#AFA|0.00% || 8.33% || bgcolor=#AFA|0.00% || 36.36% || bgcolor=#AFA|0.00% || 25.00% || 7.7% || 33.3% || bgcolor=#AFA|0.0% || 11.8% || 14.3% || 7.1% || 16.7%
|-
|{{left}}Venezuela || 37.40% || 34.88% || 34.01% || 27.22% || 52.30% || 59.53% || 74.28% || 42.87% || 40.25% || 15.57% || 15.2% || 13.8% || 12.0% || 16.1% || 17.6% || 18.3% || 25.4%
|-
|{{left}}Vietnam || 22.12% || 25.78% || 14.98% || 11.32% || 18.78% || 23.70% || 26.20% || 24.06% || 29.49% || 23.43% || 14.3% || 20.3% || 22.2% || 33.5% || 36.1% || 42.3% || 38.8%
|-
|{{left}}Western Sahara || {{n/a}} || {{n/a}} || {{n/a}} || {{n/a}} || bgcolor=#AFA|0.00% || bgcolor=#AFA|0.00% || bgcolor=#AFA|0.00% || 100.00% || {{n/a}} || {{n/a}} || {{n/a}} || {{n/a}} || {{n/a}} || {{n/a}} || {{n/a}} || {{n/a}} || {{n/a}}
|-
|{{left}}Yemen || 58.07% || 57.16% || 56.14% || 54.30% || 76.66% || 78.45% || 82.50% || 60.76% || 48.85% || 54.01% || 44.2% || 44.0% || 47.8% || 48.4% || 54.3% || 47.3% || 54.7%
|-
|{{left}}Zambia || 44.97% || 32.36% || 33.22% || 16.54% || 44.78% || 40.64% || 22.45% || 21.72% || 22.26% || 20.98% || 22.2% || 26.2% || 22.9% || 22.1% || 23.1% || 38.9% || 53.3%
|-
|{{left}}Zimbabwe || 39.47% || 34.55% || 26.76% || 9.31% || 29.41% || 26.92% || 26.60% || 26.32% || 22.88% || 21.03% || 13.2% || 19.7% || 19.2% || 21.8% || 28.1% || 31.3% || 30.3%
|-
|{{left}}Unknown or stateless || 41.41% || 43.95% || 45.44% || 49.74% || 46.06% || 43.16% || 40.27% || 35.61% || 28.92% || 32.62% || 32.3% || 27.0% || 31.6% || 39.2% || 42.4% || 50.2% || 51.6%
|} |}


===Overstay rate===
The table below shows the overstay rate, which is the portion of visitors arriving under the Visa Waiver Program who remained in the United States longer than the maximum allowed stay of 90 days. Some of these visitors later left the United States or legalized their immigration status.<ref name=overstay>{{cite web |title=Entry/Exit Overstay Report |url=https://www.dhs.gov/publication/entryexit-overstay-report |publisher=U.S. Department of Homeland Security}}</ref>


{| class="wikitable collapsible collapsed sortable" style="font-size:90%; line-height:1.2; text-align:right"
==Recent events of the program==
|+style=line-height:1.5 class=nowrap|Overstay rate by country and fiscal year<ref name=overstay/>
After the expansion of the ] in 2004, both the newly admitted countries and EU agencies began intensive lobbying efforts to include those new countries in the VWP. The U.S. Government initially responded to those efforts by developing bilateral strategies with 19 candidate countries known as the Visa Waiver Roadmap process.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.ilw.com/immigdaily/news/2007,0314-crs1.pdf |title=CRS Report for Congress |format=PDF |accessdate=July 12, 2012}}</ref><ref>South Korea, and the rest of the EU members (Bulgaria, Cyprus, Czech Republic {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100527133813/http://prague.usembassy.gov/070202_rosen.html |date=May 27, 2010 }}, Estonia, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Malta, Poland, Romania, and Slovakia).</ref> The U.S. Government began to accept the possibility of departing from the original country designation criteria – which had been contained within immigration law ''per se'' – and to expand them by adding political criteria, with the latter being able to override the former. This development began first with Bill S.2844<ref>,</ref> which explicitly named Poland as the only country to be added to the VWP, and continued as an amendment to the ], whose Sec. 413, Visa Waiver Program Expansion,<ref>{{cite web|url=http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c109:S.2611.ES: |title=Comprehensive Immigration Reform Act of 2006 S.2611 |publisher=Thomas.loc.gov |accessdate=July 12, 2012}}</ref> defined broader criteria that would apply to any EU country that provided "material support" to the multinational forces in ] and ]. However, the definition of that "material support" would be met again only by Poland and Romania, a fact that was not favorably received by the other EU candidate countries. Ironically, Poland remains the only Central European country that is not a participating nation in the VWP as of 2017, due to a visa refusal rate above the critical threshold of 3%.
|-
! Country !! 2023 !! 2022 !! 2021 !! 2020 !! 2019 !! 2018 !! 2017 !! 2016 !! 2015
|-
|{{left}}Andorra || 0.91% || 1.32% || 0.00% || 0.43% || 0.63% || 0.19% || 0.44% || 0.69% || 0.41%
|-
|{{left}}Australia || 0.38% || 0.92% || 2.38% || 0.48% || 0.37% || 0.28% || 0.39% || 0.56% || 0.37%
|-
|{{left}}Austria || 0.37% || 0.61% || 1.37% || 0.70% || 0.38% || 0.34% || 0.41% || 1.37% || 1.33%
|-
|{{left}}Belgium || 0.35% || 0.65% || 1.64% || 0.53% || 0.36% || 0.31% || 0.55% || 0.54% || 0.56%
|-
|{{left}}Brunei || 1.00% || 2.12% || 4.55% || 2.14% || 0.99% || 0.78% || 1.29% || 0.98% || 0.96%
|-
|{{left}}Chile || 2.62% || 2.97% || 3.94% || 1.76% || 1.34% || 1.49% || 1.33% || 1.71% || 2.33%
|-
|{{left}}Croatia || 0.51% || 1.34% || {{n/a}} || {{n/a}} || {{n/a}} || {{n/a}} || {{n/a}} || {{n/a}} || {{n/a}}
|-
|{{left}}Czech Republic || 0.52% || 0.88% || 2.90% || 0.77% || 0.51% || 0.63% || 0.80% || 1.11% || 1.65%
|-
|{{left}}Denmark || 0.26% || 0.40% || 0.98% || 0.43% || 0.29% || 0.23% || 0.40% || 0.50% || 0.60%
|-
|{{left}}Estonia || 0.38% || 0.95% || 3.75% || 0.67% || 0.61% || 0.47% || 0.72% || 0.84% || 1.16%
|-
|{{left}}Finland || 0.24% || 0.38% || 0.86% || 0.53% || 0.35% || 0.23% || 0.45% || 0.46% || 0.55%
|-
|{{left}}France || 0.55% || 0.81% || 2.17% || 0.79% || 0.55% || 0.60% || 0.91% || 0.68% || 0.76%
|-
|{{left}}Germany || 0.35% || 0.60% || 1.59% || 0.47% || 0.39% || 0.32% || 0.51% || 0.98% || 1.07%
|-
|{{left}}Greece || 1.24% || 2.62% || 4.82% || 1.71% || 1.27% || 1.26% || 1.71% || 2.19% || 2.31%
|-
|{{left}}Hungary || 1.19% || 2.02% || 6.50% || 1.24% || 1.03% || 1.26% || 2.04% || 2.75% || 2.92%
|-
|{{left}}Iceland || 0.16% || 0.27% || 1.57% || 0.33% || 0.28% || 0.21% || 0.33% || 0.33% || 0.46%
|-
|{{left}}Ireland || 0.37% || 0.52% || 2.27% || 0.42% || 0.29% || 0.31% || 0.50% || 0.53% || 0.47%
|-
|{{left}}Italy || 0.81% || 2.25% || 3.91% || 0.86% || 0.63% || 0.54% || 0.83% || 1.36% || 1.60%
|-
|{{left}}Japan || 0.15% || 0.64% || 0.78% || 0.27% || 0.15% || 0.16% || 0.22% || 0.16% || 0.20%
|-
|{{left}}Latvia || 1.18% || 2.01% || 3.01% || 1.28% || 0.96% || 1.03% || 1.34% || 1.75% || 1.92%
|-
|{{left}}Liechtenstein || 0.16% || 0.32% || 0.00% || 0.44% || 0.96% || 0.21% || 0.60% || 0.82% || 0.68%
|-
|{{left}}Lithuania || 0.90% || 2.20% || 5.83% || 1.44% || 1.18% || 1.32% || 1.44% || 1.99% || 2.20%
|-
|{{left}}Luxembourg || 0.32% || 0.66% || 0.72% || 0.50% || 0.38% || 0.35% || 0.51% || 0.78% || 0.57%
|-
|{{left}}Malta || 0.68% || 1.07% || 1.40% || 0.59% || 0.48% || 0.35% || 0.59% || 1.01% || 0.85%
|-
|{{left}}Monaco || 0.41% || 0.93% || 0.00% || 0.45% || 0.32% || 0.40% || 0.19% || 0.55% || 0.44%
|-
|{{left}}Netherlands || 0.41% || 0.62% || 1.42% || 0.51% || 0.34% || 0.40% || 0.53% || 0.64% || 1.15%
|-
|{{left}}New Zealand || 0.34% || 1.42% || 2.39% || 0.53% || 0.36% || 0.32% || 0.52% || 0.58% || 0.49%
|-
|{{left}}Norway || 0.26% || 0.51% || 2.22% || 0.39% || 0.25% || 0.23% || 0.31% || 0.41% || 0.46%
|-
|{{left}}Poland || 0.65% || 1.55% || 3.54% || 0.95% || {{n/a}} || {{n/a}} || {{n/a}} || {{n/a}} || {{n/a}}
|-
|{{left}}Portugal || 2.30% || 4.75% || 7.38% || 2.19% || 1.80% || 1.80% || 2.08% || 2.42% || 2.31%
|-
|{{left}}San Marino || 0.28% || 3.20% || 0.00% || 0.74% || 0.14% || 0.41% || 0.42% || 2.01% || 2.28%
|-
|{{left}}Singapore || 0.28% || 0.75% || 3.15% || 0.28% || 0.29% || 0.22% || 0.29% || 0.49% || 0.38%
|-
|{{left}}Slovakia || 0.73% || 1.29% || 3.34% || 1.17% || 0.70% || 0.93% || 1.07% || 1.85% || 2.36%
|-
|{{left}}Slovenia || 0.33% || 0.75% || 1.67% || 0.59% || 0.41% || 0.39% || 0.59% || 1.03% || 1.17%
|-
|{{left}}South Korea || 0.30% || 0.91% || 1.65% || 0.35% || 0.27% || 0.29% || 0.37% || 0.46% || 0.76%
|-
|{{left}}Spain || 2.38% || 5.58% || 6.65% || 1.68% || 1.31% || 1.12% || 1.38% || 1.46% || 1.40%
|-
|{{left}}Sweden || 0.32% || 0.56% || 2.10% || 0.43% || 0.29% || 0.26% || 0.44% || 0.53% || 0.48%
|-
|{{left}}Switzerland || 0.39% || 0.64% || 1.48% || 0.51% || 0.45% || 0.30% || 0.39% || 0.59% || 0.55%
|-
|{{left}}Taiwan || 0.75% || 3.56% || 2.76% || 0.60% || 0.52% || 0.41% || 0.59% || 0.57% || 0.53%
|-
|{{left}}United Kingdom || 0.41% || 0.56% || 1.70% || 0.64% || 0.33% || 0.30% || 0.54% || 0.50% || 0.43%
|-class=sortbottom
!{{left}}Total || 0.62% || 1.32% || 2.96% || 0.64% || 0.44% || 0.41% || 0.58% || 0.68% || 0.73%
|}


==Other visa waivers==
A June 2007 ] Panel stressed the urgency of the inclusion of Central Europe in the VWP: "An inexplicable policy that is causing inestimable damage to the United States with its new Central and Eastern European NATO allies is the region's exclusion from the visa waiver program. As Helle Dale wrote in the spring issue of European Affairs: "Meanwhile the problem is fueling anti-U.S. antagonisms and a perception of capricious discrimination by U.S. bureaucrats ---and damping the visits to the U.S. of people from countries with whom Washington would like to improve commercial and intellectual ties. Meanwhile horror stories abound from friends and diplomats from Central and Eastern Europe about the problems besetting foreigners seeking to visit the United States. In fact bringing up the subject of visas with any resident of those countries is like waving a red flag before a bull." Visa waiver must be satisfactorily addressed and resolved at long last."<ref>Hudson Institute Panel:
===Nationals of neighboring jurisdictions===
Enduring Strains of Communism in Central and Eastern Europe </ref>
Separate from the Visa Waiver Program, {{USCSub|8|1182|d|4|B}} permits the Attorney General and the Secretary of State (acting jointly) to waive visa requirements for admission to the United States in nonimmigrant status for nationals of foreign contiguous territories or adjacent islands or for residents of those territories or islands who have a common nationality with those nationals. The regulations relating to such admissions can be found at {{USCFR|8|212|1}}.<ref name="68FR5190">{{cite journal | url=https://www.federalregister.gov/articles/2003/01/31/03-2164/removal-of-visa-and-passport-waiver-for-certain-permanent-residents-of-canada-and-bermuda | title=Removal of Visa and Passport Waiver for Certain Permanent Residents of Canada and Bermuda | journal=Federal Register | volume=68 | page=5190 | date=January 31, 2003 | access-date=October 28, 2013}}</ref>


Under this provision, nationals of the following jurisdictions may travel to the United States without a visa:
During his visit to Estonia in November 2006, President Bush announced his intention "to work with our Congress and our international partners to modify our visa waiver program". In 2006, the Secure Travel and Counterterrorism Partnership Bill was introduced in the Senate but no action was taken and that bill, as well as a similar one introduced in the House the following year, died after two years of inactivity.<ref>{{cite web|author=Sen. George Voinovich |url=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=s109-4100 |title=Govtrack.us |publisher=Govtrack.us |accessdate=July 12, 2012}}</ref> The bill would have directed the Secretary of Homeland Security to establish a pilot program to expand the visa waiver program for up to five new countries that are cooperating with the United States on security and counterterrorism matters.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.congress.gov/bill/109th-congress/senate-bill/4100 |title=Congress.gov |publisher=Congress.gov |accessdate=May 30, 2016}}</ref> The bill would have changed the nonimmigrant visa refusal rate threshold – from 3% – to 10%, thus making (as of 2010) 28 countries<ref>{{cite web|url=https://travel.state.gov/content/dam/visas/Statistics/Non-Immigrant-Statistics/RefusalRates/FY10.pdf |title=Adjusted Refusal Rate B-Visa only, by nationality, fiscal year 2010 |format=PDF |accessdate=July 12, 2012}}</ref> qualify for inclusion in the visa-waiver program: Argentina, Bahamas, Bahrain, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Brazil, Croatia, Cyprus, Hong Kong (] and ] passport), Israel, Kazakhstan, Kuwait, Malaysia, Mauritius, Mozambique, Oman, Papua New Guinea, Paraguay, Poland, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Seychelles, South Africa, Swaziland, Taiwan, Turkey, United Arab Emirates, and Uruguay. Note that Cyprus, Malta, Timor Leste, and Vatican City, had already (in 2006) refusal rates less than the original 3%, but were not included in the VWP countries (whereas a year later, some additional countries had this original low level: Cyprus and Taiwan). However, for continued participation, DHS re-evaluates participating countries every two years, as required by Congress. Through this process, two countries, Argentina and Uruguay, now are no longer eligible to participate. Current members will have to fulfill any new requirements to continue their eligibility for membership in the program. The European Union is currently planning to negotiate for participation of all of its members in the Visa Waiver Program.<ref>{{cite web|author=english@peopledaily.com.cn |url=http://english.people.com.cn/90001/90777/90856/6373242.html |title=EU seeks U.S. visa waiver for all EU citizens – People's Daily Online |work=People's Daily |date=March 14, 2008 |accessdate=July 12, 2012}}</ref>
*{{flag|Bahamas}}{{snd}}Nationals of the Bahamas do not need a visa to travel to the United States if they apply for admission at a ] located in the Bahamas. Applicants 14 years of age or older must present a certificate issued by the ] indicating no criminal record.<ref name="8 CFR 212.1">, ], January 21, 2021.</ref><ref>, U.S. Customs and Border Protection, December 10, 2019.</ref>
*{{flag|Bermuda}}{{snd}}]s of Bermuda do not need a visa to visit the United States under most circumstances for up to 180 days.<ref name=cabm/>
*{{flag|British Virgin Islands}}{{snd}}British Overseas Territories citizens of the British Virgin Islands may travel without a visa to the ]. They may also continue travel to other parts of the United States if they present a certificate issued by the ] indicating no criminal record.<ref name="8 CFR 212.1"/>
*{{flag|Canada}}{{snd}}Nationals of Canada do not need a visa to visit the United States under most circumstances.<ref name=cabm>{{cite web | url=https://travel.state.gov/content/travel/en/us-visas/tourism-visit/citizens-of-canada-and-bermuda.html | title=Citizens of Canada and Bermuda | access-date=January 24, 2021 | publisher=U.S. Department of State}}</ref> In addition, under the ] (and earlier ]), they may obtain authorization to work under a ].
*{{flag|Cayman Islands}}{{snd}}British Overseas Territories citizens of the Cayman Islands do not need a visa if they travel directly from the territory to the United States and present a certificate issued by the ] indicating no criminal record.<ref name="8 CFR 212.1"/>
*{{flag|Mexico}}{{snd}}Some nationals of Mexico do not need a visa to travel to the United States: government officials not permanently assigned to the United States and their accompanying family members, holding diplomatic or official passports, for stays of up to six months; members of the ] tribes of Texas or Oklahoma, holding Form I-872, American Indian Card; and crew members of ] operating in the United States.<ref name="8 CFR 212.1"/> Other nationals of Mexico may travel to the United States with a ], which functions as a visa and has similar requirements.<ref>, U.S. Department of State.</ref> Under the ] (and earlier ]), they may also obtain authorization to work under a ].
*{{flag|Turks and Caicos Islands}}{{snd}}British Overseas Territories citizens of the Turks and Caicos Islands do not need a visa if they travel directly from the territory to the United States and present a certificate issued by the ] indicating no criminal record.<ref name="8 CFR 212.1"/>


Restrictions on the use of the Visa Waiver Program do not affect this class of travelers unless separately provided for by statute or regulation. For example, a Canadian citizen who has briefly overstayed a previous visit to the United States (by less than 180 days) will still not require a visa for future visits, while a VWP national who overstays will become ineligible for the VWP for life and will need a visa for future visits. ESTA is not required from British Overseas Territories citizens using one of the above waivers with the respective territory's passport, but it is required if they use the VWP with a British citizen passport.
In October 2008, ] announced that the Czech Republic, Estonia, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Slovakia and South Korea would be added to the program on November 17.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://iipdigital.usembassy.gov/st/english/article/2008/10/20081017140208dmslahrellek0.8056452.html |title=Seven Nations to Join U.S. Visa Waiver Program |publisher=America.gov |accessdate=June 10, 2016}}</ref> "It is a removal of the last relic of Communism and the Cold War", said ] ].<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.usatoday.com/news/world/2008-10-17-visa-waiver_N.htm |title=Bush announces visa waiver for 7 countries|work=USA Today |date= October 19, 2008|accessdate=June 22, 2011}}</ref>


Until 2003, this visa waiver was granted not only to nationals of those countries and territories, but also to permanent residents of Bermuda and Canada who were nationals of countries in the ] or ].<ref name="68FR5190"/>
On December 22, 2008, in a joint press conference at ], Maltese Prime Minister ] and U.S. Ambassador Molly Bordonaro announced that Malta would join the program with effect from December 30, 2008.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.aila.org/File/DownloadEmbeddedFile/51690 |title=DHS Designates Malta as a Visa Waiver Program Country |publisher=Department of Homeland Security |date=December 22, 2008 |accessdate=June 10, 2016}}</ref>


===Citizens of freely associated states===
In January 2009 the first Assistant Secretary (acting as Under Secretary-equivalent) for Policy at the ] ] announced that Croatia is expected to join the Visa Waiver program by 2011.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.hrt.hr/index.php?id=48&tx_ttnews%5Btt_news%5D=26887&tx_ttnews%5BbackPid%5D=23&cHash=c092163516 |title=HRT: single |publisher=] |accessdate=December 23, 2010 }}{{Dead link|date=July 2018 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }}</ref>
Under ], citizens of the following countries may enter, reside, study and work in the United States indefinitely without a visa. These benefits are granted to citizens from birth or ], and to ] who have resided in the respective country for at least five years, excluding those who acquired citizenship by investment.<ref>, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, October 29, 2019.</ref><ref>, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, October 29, 2019.</ref>

{|
On June 17, 2008, Bulgarian Foreign Minister ] and U.S. Homeland Security Secretary ] signed an interim agreement under the Visa Waiver Program, the press service of the Bulgarian Foreign Ministry said in a statement.<ref>{{cite web|author=Spasena Baramova |url=http://sofiaecho.com/2008/06/18/661335_bulgaria-signs-interim-agreement-under-visa-waiver-programme-with-the-us |title=Bulgaria signs interim agreement under visa waiver programme with the US |publisher=Sofiaecho.com |date=June 18, 2008 |accessdate=July 12, 2012}}</ref>
|

*{{flag|Marshall Islands}}
Greece officially joined the program on April 5, 2010.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.dhs.gov/ynews/releases/pr_1268162593062.shtm |title=Secretary Napolitano Announces Greece's Designation as a Member of the Visa Waiver Program |publisher=Dhs.gov |accessdate=July 12, 2012}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://athens.usembassy.gov/pr-2010-12.html |title=Greeks Can Travel to U.S. under Visa Waiver Program Starting April 5 With an Easy Electronic Application |publisher=Athens.usembassy.gov |accessdate=July 12, 2012 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110707044928/http://athens.usembassy.gov/pr-2010-12.html |archive-date=July 7, 2011 |url-status=dead }}</ref>
*{{flag|Micronesia}}

*{{flag|Palau}}
President Obama promised that Poland would be added to the program, in a meeting with Polish President ] in December 2010; however no date has been set for when Poland will be added.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://thecable.foreignpolicy.com/posts/2010/12/08/obama_poland_will_be_admitted_to_the_visa_waiver_program |title=ACTUAL ARTICLE TITLE BELONGS HERE! |work=Foreign Policy |date=December 8, 2010 |accessdate=July 12, 2012}}</ref> Organizations such as the ] and the ] still oppose Poland's admission both due to its continued high visa refusal rate, as well as its being a major source of illegal immigrants; the CIS also criticized South Korea's admission to the program on these grounds.<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.eturbonews.com/60535/fair-opposes-adding-poland-us-visa-waiver-program|title=FAIR opposes adding Poland to US Visa Waiver Program|website=''eturbonews.com''|access-date=February 6, 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160304060625/http://www.eturbonews.com/60535/fair-opposes-adding-poland-us-visa-waiver-program|archive-date=March 4, 2016|url-status=dead}}</ref>
|}

On October 2, 2012, Secretary Napolitano announced the inclusion of Taiwan into the program effectively as of November 1, 2012.<ref> from ''www.dhs.gov; October 2, 2012</ref> Only Taiwanese nationals with a valid passport and ] can apply for ESTA online to benefit from the country's newly acquired visa-free status.

In 2013 there was conflict over the ] whose Senate version specifies that satisfaction of the requirements regarding reciprocal travel privileges for U.S. citizens would be subject to security concerns.<ref>.</ref> Many members of the House of Representatives oppose the security language because it seems to validate Israel's tendency to turn away Arab Americans without giving any reason. None of the other 37 countries in the visa waiver program has such an exemption.<ref>Ron Kampeas, , ], April 15, 2013.</ref>

The only European ] that is not a member of the program is the Vatican City.

The visa refusal rate for the ] has dropped to 1.7% for ] and 2.6% for ] as of 2012.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.travel.state.gov/pdf/FY12.pdf |title=Adjusted Refusal Rate B-Visa only, by nationality, fiscal year 2012 |format=PDF |accessdate=May 16, 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130717174850/http://www.travel.state.gov/pdf/FY12.pdf |archive-date=July 17, 2013 |url-status=dead }}</ref> Hong Kong met all VWP criteria but did not qualify at the time because it is not legally a separate country, despite having its own passports and independent judicial system, monetary system and immigration control. The former ], ], raised the issue with then-Secretary of State ] during his visit to the U.S. in 2011 and was met with positive response.<ref name="scmp" /> On May 16, 2013, a bipartisan amendment bill was passed by the ] but not ratified into law. On August 10, 2015, the ], ], said during an interview with ] that the visa waiver is "not happening anytime soon", as the Visa Waiver law requires the participant to be a "sovereign state" and Hong Kong is not independent, thus ending the possibility of Hong Kong joining the program. He also denied that the failed lobbying effort of ] on this issue was a result of the refusal of detaining ] in 2013.<ref name="scmp">{{cite web|url=http://www.scmp.com/news/hong-kong/politics/article/1848106/return-moderate-mainstream-path-achieve-democracy-us-consul|title=Return to 'moderate mainstream' path to achieve democracy, US consul urges Hong Kong |work=] |date=August 20, 2015 |accessdate=May 23, 2016}}</ref>

On May 11, 2018, the US threatened to remove Hungary from the Visa Waiver Program after multiple cases of passport fraud. An official report discovered a fraud scheme which allowed non-Hungarians to enter the US under false identities.<ref name="thesundaily">{{cite web|url=http://m.thesundaily.my/node/546813|title=US threatens end to Hungary visa waivers after passport 'fraud': Report|work=The Sun Daily|date=May 11, 2018|accessdate=May 11, 2018}}{{Dead link|date=February 2019 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }}</ref>

As of December 2018, ESTA is no longer approved in real-time to qualifying passengers and passengers are required to apply no later than 72 hours before departure.<ref></ref>

In July 2019 ] promised Poles, that on September 2019 (end of fiscal year) Poland will fully qualify for the Visa Waiver Program. She also said that rest of process will be just bureaucracy, and Poland will join program in 3–6 months after September 2019.<ref>https://fakty.interia.pl/polska/news-georgette-mosbacher-potwierdza-wizy-dla-polakow-zostana-znie,nId,3120471</ref>

On October 4, 2019 ] announced that the Department of State has formally nominated Poland for entry into the Visa Waiver Program.<ref>hhttps://www.whitehouse.gov/briefings-statements/statement-press-secretary-regarding-nomination-poland-entry-visa-waiver-program/</ref>

==History==
Congress passed legislation in 1986 to create the Visa Waiver Program with the aim of facilitating tourism and short-term business visits to the United States, and allowing the ] to focus consular resources on addressing higher risks. The United Kingdom became the first country to participate in the Visa Waiver Program in July 1988, followed by Japan on December 16, 1988.<ref>{{cite news| url=https://www.nytimes.com/1988/10/30/travel/travel-advisory-accord-allows-trips-to-japan-without-a-visa.html | work=The New York Times | title=TRAVEL ADVISORY; Accord Allows Trips to Japan Without a Visa | date=October 30, 1988}}</ref> In October 1989, France, Italy, the Netherlands, Sweden, Switzerland, and West Germany were added to the VWP.

In 1991, more European countries joined the Program – Andorra, Austria, Belgium, Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Liechtenstein, Luxembourg, Monaco, Norway, San Marino and Spain – as well as New Zealand (the first country from Oceania). In 1993, Brunei became the second Asian country to be admitted to the Program.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d0338.pdf |title=United States General Accounting Office: Implications of Eliminating the Visa Waiver Program |format=PDF |accessdate=July 12, 2012}}</ref>

On April 1, 1995, Ireland was added to the VWP. In 1996, Australia and Argentina (the first Latin American country) joined, although Argentina was later removed in 2002. On September 30, 1997, Slovenia was added. On August 9, 1999, Portugal, Singapore and Uruguay joined the program, although Uruguay was subsequently removed in 2003.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.americanlaw.com/vwpp.html |title=Visa Waiver Program |publisher=Americanlaw.com |accessdate=July 12, 2012}}</ref>

Following the ], the ] decided to tighten entry requirements into the United States, as a result of which legislation was passed requiring foreign visitors entering under the Visa Waiver Program to present a ] upon arrival starting from October 1, 2003. However, as a number of VWP still issued non-machine readable passports (for example, more than a third of ] and ] passport holders held a non-machine readable version), the implementation of the new rule was postponed to October 26, 2004, with the exception of ], as there were concerns about the security and integrity of ]s.<ref>{{cite news| url=https://www.nytimes.com/2003/09/09/us/two-years-later-borders-new-passport-rules-fight-terrorism-are-put-off-for-year.html | work=The New York Times | first=Philip | last=Shenon | title=TWO YEARS LATER: THE BORDERS; New Passport Rules to Fight Terrorism Are Put Off for a Year | date=September 9, 2003}}</ref>

The US government originally planned to require all visitors to the US under the Visa Waiver Program to hold a ] starting from October 26, 2004 if their passport was issued on or after that date. However, after the requirement to have a machine-readable passport was postponed to October 26, 2004, the biometric passport requirement subsequently had its implementation date moved to October 26, 2005, only to be further postponed by another year to October 26, 2006 at the request of the ], which raised concerns about the number of participating countries which would have been able to make the deadline.<ref>{{cite news |url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/6080384.stm |title=US imposes biometric entry demand |date=October 26, 2006 |publisher=] |accessdate=November 30, 2011}}</ref>

Starting on October 26, 2006, travellers entering the US under the Visa Waiver Program are required to present a biometric passport if their passport was issued on or after that date. When the new rule came into force on that day, three countries (Andorra, Brunei and Liechtenstein) had not yet started issuing biometric passports.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.govexec.com/dailyfed/1006/102706j1.htm |title=Most countries meet e-passport deadline – Defense |publisher=GovExec.com |accessdate=July 12, 2012}}</ref>

In November 2006, the US government announced that plans for an "Electronic Travel Authorization" program (officially named "]") would be developed so that VWP travelers can give advance information on their travels to the United States. In return, they will be given authorization electronically to travel to the United States, although it does not guarantee admission to the United States. This program is modeled on the ] scheme that has been used in Australia for many years.<ref> {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070613080816/https://www.dhs.gov/xnews/releases/pr_1164919987951.shtm |date=June 13, 2007 }}</ref>

While all participating nations must provide reciprocal visa-free travel for U.S. citizens (usually ninety days for tourism or business purposes), Australia is the only nation that requires U.S. citizens<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.eta.immi.gov.au/ETAAus1En.html |title=Australia Electronic Travel Authority: Am I Eligible? |publisher=Eta.immi.gov.au |accessdate=July 12, 2012 |url-status=dead |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20120623123943/http://www.eta.immi.gov.au/ETAAus1En.html |archivedate=June 23, 2012 }}</ref> to apply for an ] (ETA), which in fact is a visa that is stored electronically in a computer system operated by the Australian ] (DIAC). The ETA has replaced visa-free travel to Australia, and the only nation accorded visa-free travel rights to Australia is New Zealand under the auspices of the ] (rather than not requiring a visa, NZ citizens are accorded one automatically upon arrival). A passport holder must apply for and purchase an ETA through an authorized travel agency, airline, or via the official DIAC website<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.eta.immi.gov.au |title=Australian Electronic Travel Authority website |publisher=Eta.immi.gov.au |accessdate=July 12, 2012}}</ref> before departing for Australia. However, as the ETA process is relatively free of formality, the United States recognizes it as the equivalent of visa-free travel. Citizens of the European Union and other European nations must apply for an eVisitor electronic travel authorization for travel to Australia, which is similar to the ETA program, but free.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.immi.gov.au/visitors/tourist/evisitor/eligibility.htm |title=eVisitor: Eligibility |publisher=Immi.gov.au |date=October 29, 2008 |accessdate=July 12, 2012 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120707100547/http://www.immi.gov.au/visitors/tourist/evisitor/eligibility.htm |archive-date=July 7, 2012 |url-status=dead }}</ref> Australian government policy in this respect is similar to U.S. policy, which similarly requires Visa Waiver Program participants to apply for an ESTA.{{Citation needed|date=February 2017}}

===Visa waiver programs of Guam and the Northern Mariana Islands===
{{transcluded section|Visa policy of the United States}}
{{#section-h::Visa policy of the United States|Visa waiver programs of Guam and Northern Mariana Islands}}
The Northern Mariana Islands had previously been a separate jurisdiction from the United States in terms of immigration control. Under a federalization law passed by the U.S. Congress in 2008, the Northern Marianas' immigration functions were taken over by ] agencies on November 28, 2009. The present Guam-Northern Mariana Islands Visa Waiver Program took effect at that time, replacing previous Northern Marianas' legislation governing entry to the islands and also replacing a previous Guam-specific Visa Waiver Program. That program had included the aforementioned countries as well as Indonesia, Samoa, Vanuatu, and the Solomon Islands, though these countries were removed from the list of eligible nations for the new program.<ref name=transition>{{cite web |title=Transition to U.S. Immigration Law in the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands |work=United States Department of Homeland Security |date=November 21, 2008 |url=https://www.dhs.gov/ximgtn/programs/gc_1225725411526.shtm |access-date=July 29, 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110509215236/http://www.dhs.gov/ximgtn/programs/gc_1225725411526.shtm |archive-date=May 9, 2011 |url-status=dead }}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=The Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands Transition to U.S. Immigration Law: Overview |work=United States Department of Homeland Security |date=November 18, 2008 |url=https://www.dhs.gov/ximgtn/programs/gc_1226064183502.shtm |access-date=July 29, 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110515185040/http://www.dhs.gov/ximgtn/programs/gc_1226064183502.shtm |archive-date=May 15, 2011 |url-status=dead }}</ref>

In the past, the government of the Northern Mariana Islands had issued Visitor Entry Permits instead of visas. Citizens of all countries in the federal visa waiver program were exempt from the Visitor Entry Permit requirement, as were citizens of Taiwan and holders of ]s and ].<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.mymarianas.com/html/display.cfm?sid=1021 |title=Marianas Visitors Authority |publisher=Mymarianas.com |accessdate=December 23, 2010 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110714143227/http://www.mymarianas.com/html/display.cfm?sid=1021 |archive-date=July 14, 2011 |url-status=dead }}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.timaticweb.com/cgi-bin/tim_website_client.cgi?SpecData=1&VISA=&page=visa&NA=TW&DE=MP&PASSTYPES=PASS&user=NWB2C&subuser=NWB2C |title=Timaticweb.com |publisher=Timaticweb.com |accessdate=July 12, 2012}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.saipantribune.com/newsstory.aspx?newsID=85652&cat=1 |title=Saipan Tribune |work=Saipan Tribune |date=November 26, 2008 |accessdate=December 23, 2010 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120214005207/http://www.saipantribune.com/newsstory.aspx?newsID=85652&cat=1 |archive-date=February 14, 2012 |url-status=dead }}</ref> Under the islands' previous immigration policy, citizens of the following countries or jurisdictions were prohibited from entering the Northern Mariana Islands: Afghanistan, Algeria, Bahrain, Bangladesh, Cuba, Egypt, Eritrea, Fujian Province of China, Indonesia, Iran, Iraq, Jordan, Kuwait, Lebanon, Libya, Morocco, Myanmar, North Korea, Oman, Pakistan, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Somalia, Sri Lanka, Sudan, Syria, Tunisia, United Arab Emirates and Yemen.<ref> from '']''</ref>

===American Samoa===
{{transcluded section|Visa policy of the United States}}
{{#section-h::Visa policy of the United States|American Samoa}}

==Requirements for the visa waiver program==
The requirements for the visa waiver program are as follows:

===Biometric passports===
{{main|Biometric passports}}
All travelers must have individual passports. It is not acceptable (for the visa waiver scheme) for children to be included on a parent's passport.

All visitors from VWP countries must hold a biometric passport.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.congress.gov/bill/114th-congress/house-bill/158/text|title=Text – H.R.158 – 114th Congress (2015–2016): Visa Waiver Program Improvement and Terrorist Travel Prevention Act of 2015|last=Miller|first=Candice|date=December 9, 2015|access-date=February 6, 2017}}</ref>

===Electronic System for Travel Authorization (ESTA)===
{{main|Electronic System for Travel Authorization}}
All incoming passengers who intend to take advantage of the Visa Waiver Program when traveling to the U.S. via air or sea are required to apply for a travel authorization through the ] (ESTA) online before departure to the United States, preferably at least 72 hours (3 days) in advance. This new requirement was announced on June 3, 2008 and is intended to bolster U.S. security by pre-screening participating VWP passengers against terrorist and/or no-fly lists and databases.<ref>{{cite news| url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/northamerica/usa/2067319/US-to-demand-72hrs-notice-for-British-tourists.html | work=The Daily Telegraph | location=London | title=US to demand 72hrs notice for British tourists | first=Andy | last=Bloxham | date=June 3, 2008 | accessdate=May 27, 2010}}</ref> The electronic authorization, which is valid for a two-year period,<ref name="NZ_Herald_10514115">{{cite news |url=http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=10514115 |title=NZers visiting US will have to register online |date=June 3, 2008 |agency=] |work=] |accessdate=November 30, 2011}}</ref> mirrors Australia's ] system. The authorization is mandatory for participating VWP citizens before boarding flights destined to the United States, but as with formal visas this does not guarantee admission into the United States since final admission eligibility is determined at U.S. ports of entry by ] officers.

According to the ]'s ESTA fact sheet:

{{quote|An approved ESTA travel authorization is:

• valid for up to two years or until the traveler's passport expires, whichever comes first; <br/>
• valid for multiple entries into the U.S.; and <br/>
• not a guarantee of admissibility to the United States at a port of entry. ESTA approval only authorizes a traveler to board a carrier for travel to the U.S. under the VWP. In all cases, CBP officers make admissibility determinations at our ports of entry. (For additional information, please visit "Know Before You Go" at www.cbp.gov/travel.)

Currently all travelers from VWP countries are required to obtain an ESTA approval prior to boarding a carrier to travel by air or sea to the United States under the VWP.<ref> {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080604015538/https://www.dhs.gov/xnews/releases/pr_1212498415724.shtm |date=June 4, 2008 }}</ref>}}

===Passport validity===
The standard requirement for passport validity is six months beyond the expected date of departure from the United States. However, the US has signed agreements with a number of countries to waive this requirement.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://fam.state.gov/FAM/09FAM/09FAM040309.html#M403_9_3_B_2|title=9 FAM 101.1 INTRODUCTION TO 9 FAM|website=fam.state.gov|access-date=February 6, 2017}}</ref>

===Return or onward ticket===
If entering the United States by air or sea, additional requirements apply. The traveler must:

*Be traveling on a participating commercial carrier and;
*Be holding a valid return or onward ticket, dated within the 90 days period.

===Other eligibility requirements===
Applicants for admission under the Visa Waiver Program:

* Must have complied with the conditions of all previous admissions to the United States.
* Must never have been convicted of, or arrested for, an offense or crime involving ] (there is an exemption in some cases for a single offence committed before age 18 and the crime was committed (and the alien released from any confinement to a prison or correctional institution imposed for the crime) more than five years before the date of application for a visa, and also for a single instance if the maximum possible sentence in the U.S. is one year or less in jail, and less than six months was served. However these exceptions cannot be applied by the individual as the question on ESTA is specific) or a "controlled substance," or (two or more) crimes with a maximum aggregate sentence of five years' imprisonment or more, no matter how long ago. National regulations which normally expunge criminal records after a certain length of time (e.g. the ] in the UK) do not apply.
* Must not be otherwise inadmissible to the United States, such as on health or national security grounds
* Must be intending to visit the United States for a purpose of transit, tourism, or a short term business visit. Journalists and their accompanying staff cannot use the Visa Waiver Program to file and work on news reports for their news organizations from the United States and must instead apply for an ''I visa''.
* Starting from September 8, 2010, ] is collected. This is payable by credit/debit cards online only, in advance of travel.

Those who do not meet the requirements for the Visa Waiver Program must obtain a U.S. visitor visa from a U.S. embassy or consulate.

Having been arrested or convicted does not in itself make a person ineligible to use the Visa Waiver Program. You are only ineligible if you do not meet the requirements of the program. However, some U.S. embassies advise such persons to apply for a tourist visa even though there is no legal obligation for the individual to do so. There is no right of appeal if a CBP officer decides to refuse entry, unless you hold a visa when an appeal can be made to an immigration judge.

Those previously refused entry to the United States are not automatically ineligible for the Visa Waiver Program, but unless the reason for refusal is addressed, it is likely to reoccur. Hence again, many embassies advise such persons to apply for a tourist visa.

==Visa Waiver Program restrictions==
A person entering the United States under the VWP cannot request an extension of the original allowed period of stay in the U.S. (this practice is allowed to those holding regular visas). However, VWP visitors may seek to adjust status on the basis of either (1) marriage to a US citizen or (2) an application for asylum.<ref>{{cite web |title=8 USC §§ 1187, 1255(c)(4); Freeman v Gonzales, 444 F.3d 1031 (9th Cir. 2006) |url=http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2006/04/20/0435797.pdf |format=PDF |publisher=Ca9.uscourts.gov }}</ref> ] (CBP) officers determine admissibility upon traveler's arrival. If one seeks to enter the U.S. under the VWP and is denied entry by a CBP officer at a port of entry, no path of appealing or review of the denial of entry is allowed. VWP including ESTA does not guarantee entry to the United States. CBP officers make the final determination of entry to the United States.

Travelers can leave to contiguous countries (Canada, Mexico and the Caribbean), but will not be granted another 90 days after reentry in the United States.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://amsterdam.usconsulate.gov/visa_waiver_program2.html |publisher=The American Embassy in The Hague |title=Visa Waiver Program |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110619194258/http://amsterdam.usconsulate.gov/visa_waiver_program2.html |archive-date=June 19, 2011 |url-status=dead }}</ref>

There are restrictions on the type of employment-related activities allowed. Meetings and conferences in relation to the alien's profession/line of business/employer in their home country, are generally acceptable, but most forms of "gainful employment" are not. There are however poorly-classifiable exceptions such as persons performing professional services in the US for a non US employer, and persons installing, servicing and repairing commercial or industrial equipment or machinery
pursuant to a contract of sale.<ref>{{cite web |title=Working (Legally) on a Visitor's Visa or Visa Waiver Entry |url= http://www.usvisalawyers.co.uk/article15.htm |publisher=Usvisalawyers.co.uk |addessdate= }}</ref> Performers (such as actors and musicians) who plan on performing live or taping scenes for productions back home, as well as athletes participating in an athletic event are likewise not allowed to use the VWP for their respective engagements and are instead required to have an ] or ] prior to arrival. Foreign media representatives and journalists on assignment are required to have a nonimmigrant media (I) visa.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://travel.state.gov/visa/temp/without/without_1990.html |title=U.S. Department of State: Visa Waiver Program (VWP) |publisher=State.gov |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131102061718/http://travel.state.gov/visa/temp/without/without_1990.html#travelertype |archive-date=November 2, 2013 |url-status=dead }}</ref>

Applicant should display social and economic ties which bind them to their country of origin or may be refused entry.<ref> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131222133227/http://www.travel.state.gov/visa/frvi/denials/denials_1361.html |date=December 22, 2013 }} retrieved April 19, 2012</ref>

==Citizens of foreign contiguous territories and adjacent islands==
Separate from the Visa Waiver Program, {{USCSub|8|1182|d|4|B}} permits the Attorney General and the Secretary of State (acting jointly) to waive visa requirements for admission to the United States in nonimmigrant status for nationals of foreign contiguous territories or adjacent islands or for residents of those territories or islands who have a common nationality with those nationals. The regulations relating to such admissions can be found at {{USCFR|8|212|1}}.<ref name="68FR5190">{{cite journal|url=https://www.federalregister.gov/articles/2003/01/31/03-2164/removal-of-visa-and-passport-waiver-for-certain-permanent-residents-of-canada-and-bermuda|title=Removal of Visa and Passport Waiver for Certain Permanent Residents of Canada and Bermuda|journal=Federal Register|volume=68|page=5190|date=January 31, 2003|accessdate=October 28, 2013}}</ref>

Restrictions on the use of the Visa Waiver Program do not affect this class of travellers unless separately provided for by statute or regulation. For example, a Canadian citizen who has briefly overstayed a previous visit to the U.S. (by less than 180 days) will still not require a visa for future visits, while a VWP national who overstays will become ineligible for the VWP for life and will need a visa for future visits.

Until 2003, this visa waiver was granted not only to citizens of those countries and territories, but to permanent residents of Bermuda and Canada who were citizens of ] countries or of Ireland. In 2003, the Immigration and Naturalization Service announced that it would be terminating the visa waiver for non-citizen permanent residents of Bermuda and Canada; thenceforth, those Canadian & Bermudian permanent residents who were citizens of a Visa Waiver Program country could enjoy visa-free entry to the United States under that program, while citizens of other countries would be required to possess a valid advance visa for entry to the United States.<ref name="68FR5190"/>

===Citizens of the Bahamas===
Bahamian citizens do not require a visa to enter the United States if they apply for entry at one of the ] located in ] or ]. Bahamian citizens must not have had a criminal conviction or ineligibility, violated U.S. immigration laws in the past and must be in possession of valid, unexpired passport or a Bahamian Travel Document indicating that they have Bahamian citizenship. In addition to a passport, all applicants 14 years of age or older must present a police certificate issued by the ] within the past six months. All Bahamians applying for admission at a port-of-entry other than the Preclearance Facilities located in Nassau or Freeport International Airports are required to be in possession of a valid visa to enter the United States.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://nassau.usembassy.gov/pdf/bahamians.pdf |title=U.S. Embassy in Nassau, Bahamas: Non-Immigrant Visas |format=PDF |accessdate=July 12, 2012 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120303002816/http://nassau.usembassy.gov/pdf/bahamians.pdf |archive-date=March 3, 2012 |url-status=dead }}</ref>

===Citizens of Canada===
Canadian citizens do not require a non-immigrant visa when entering the United States, except those Canadians that fall under nonimmigrant visa categories E, K, S, or V,<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.americanlaw.com/vexempt.html |title=Visa exemptions for Canadians and certain landed immigrants |publisher=americanlaw.com |accessdate=February 25, 2011}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://cfr.vlex.com/vid/1-documentary-requirements-nonimmigrants-19609010 |title=8 CFR 212.1 – Documentary requirements for nonimmigrants. – Code of Federal Regulations – Title 8: Aliens and Nationality – Part 212: Documentary requirements: nonimmigrants; waivers; admission of certain inadmissible aliens; parole – vLex |publisher=cfr.vlex.com |accessdate=February 25, 2010 |url-status=dead |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20110308182743/http://cfr.vlex.com/vid/1-documentary-requirements-nonimmigrants-19609010 |archivedate=March 8, 2011 }}</ref> but under different legislation from the Visa Waiver program.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.travel.state.gov/visa/temp/without/without_1260.html |title=Citizens of Canada, Bermuda and Mexico- When is a Visa Required? |publisher=Travel.state.gov |accessdate=December 23, 2010 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20101222113514/http://www.travel.state.gov/visa/temp/without/without_1260.html |archive-date=December 22, 2010 |url-status=dead }}</ref> However, they must still establish that they meet the requirements of the appropriate status they wish to enter in. For example, while a Canadian intending to study in the U.S. does not need to present ] at a U.S. embassy or consulate in order to receive an F-1 visa like other foreigners, they must still be issued a Form I-20 and present it at the Port of Entry to establish their eligibility for F-1 status.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.isso.cornell.edu/students/ctc/visa.php#1c |title=Cornell University ISSO: International Student Life |publisher=isso.cornell.edu |accessdate=February 25, 2011}}</ref>

Citizens of Canada who enter as visitors are exempted from being fingerprinted or photographed under US-VISIT and do not require a machine readable passport. US Customs and Border Protection decides whether to allow entry based on non-immigrant intent. The maximum permitted length of stay is one year but can be extended,<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.uscis.gov/ilink/docView/SLB/HTML/SLB/0-0-0-1/0-0-0-11184/0-0-0-17100/0-0-0-17337.html |title=8 CFR 214.2(b) Visitors |publisher=uscis.gov |accessdate=June 19, 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130630042108/http://www.uscis.gov/ilink/docView/SLB/HTML/SLB/0-0-0-1/0-0-0-11184/0-0-0-17100/0-0-0-17337.html |archive-date=June 30, 2013 |url-status=dead }}</ref> although CBP usually considers six months to be the maximum permitted per calendar year, except under unusual circumstances (such as medical treatment).

Before January 23, 2007, citizens of Canada, (provided they held valid photo identification) were able to enter the United States with only a birth certificate as proof of citizenship and were not required to show a passport. Citizens of other parts of North America, such as Mexico or Bermuda have always been subject to holding a valid Visa stamp or a border crossing card along with their passports. On January 23, 2007, Canadian and U.S. citizens were required to have passports when entering the U.S. by air only.

As of June 1, 2009, Canadian and U.S. citizens are required to present either a valid passport, a ], a ] (FAST) or an ] when entering the United States by land or water. Canadians entering the U.S. by air are still required to present a valid passport or NEXUS card. A NEXUS card can only be used at designated U.S. and Canadian airports with NEXUS card kiosks. Children under 16, or under 19 while traveling with a school group need to only present a birth certificate or other similar proof of citizenship when entering the U.S. from Canada by land or water.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.cbsa-asfc.gc.ca/whti-ivho/menu-eng.html |title=Canada Border Services Agency: Western Hemisphere Travel Initiative |publisher=Cbsa-asfc.gc.ca |date=December 17, 2010 |accessdate=July 12, 2012 |url-status=dead |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20120626154124/http://www.cbsa-asfc.gc.ca/whti-ivho/menu-eng.html |archivedate=June 26, 2012 }}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.getyouhome.gov/html/eng_map.html |title=Western Hemisphere Travel Initiative |publisher=Getyouhome.gov |date=June 1, 2009 |accessdate=July 12, 2012 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120625103727/http://www.getyouhome.gov/html/eng_map.html |archive-date=June 25, 2012 |url-status=dead }}</ref>

===Certain British Overseas Territories citizens===

====Bermuda====
]s by virtue of their connection to Bermuda can enter the United States visa-free provided they are bona-fide visitors – no I-94 is required.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://hamilton.usconsulate.gov/bermuda_visa_exemption.html |title=Consulate General of the United States in Hamilton, Bermuda:Bermuda Visa Exemptions |publisher=Hamilton.usconsulate.gov |date=June 28, 2011 |accessdate=July 12, 2012 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120628040948/http://hamilton.usconsulate.gov/bermuda_visa_exemption.html |archive-date=June 28, 2012 |url-status=dead }}</ref> To qualify, they must not have had a criminal conviction or ineligibility, violated U.S. immigration laws in the past and must not be arriving the United States from outside the Western Hemisphere. In addition, they must present a ] which fulfils the following criteria:

*The front cover has "Government of Bermuda" printed on it
*The holder's nationality must be stated as either "British Overseas Territory Citizen" or "British Dependant Territories Citizen"
*The passport must contain one of the following endorsement stamps: "Holder is registered as a Bermudian", "Holder Possesses Bermudian Status" or "Holder is deemed to possess Bermudian status"

====British Virgin Islands====
British Overseas Territories Citizens by virtue of their connection to the British Virgin Islands can enter the neighboring U.S. Virgin Islands visa-free for short business and pleasure. Travelers must possess a valid British Virgin Islands passport and travel directly to the U.S. Virgin Islands in order to qualify for this territory-specific visa waiver arrangement. A visa is required for anyone traveling directly to Puerto Rico or the United States mainland.<ref> from 'Government of the Virgin Islands' official website. April 13, 2016</ref>

====Cayman Islands====
Whilst residents of the Cayman Islands, if they are British Overseas Territories Citizens, are eligible to automatically register as full British citizens under Section 4(A) of the ], and then enter the United States under the Visa Waiver Program, they can alternatively enter visa-free using their Cayman Islands passports. To qualify under this latter method, their Cayman Islands passports must confirm their British Overseas Territories citizenship and be endorsed by the Cayman Islands Passport and Corporate Services Office with a Cayman-U.S. visa waiver, issued at a cost of $15–25 and valid for only one entry.<ref> {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100310204843/http://kingston.usembassy.gov/waiverprog_visas.html |date=March 10, 2010 }}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.gov.ky/portal/page?_pageid=1142,3533570&_dad=portal&_schema=PORTAL |title=Cayman Islands Government: New U.S. Travel Requirements |publisher=Gov.ky |accessdate=July 12, 2012}}</ref> They must travel directly between the Cayman Islands and the United States and their Cayman Islands passport must also have a validity of at least six months beyond their intended departure date from the United States.<ref>{{cite web |title=Update Your Travel Documents |url=http://www.gov.ky/portal/page/portal/cighome/pressroom/archive/200908/updateyourtraveldocuments |website=Cayman Islands Government |accessdate=June 13, 2018}}</ref> If Cayman Islanders elect to enter the U.S. using the Cayman-U.S. visa waiver, they are not required to apply for an ] online, since they are not entering under the VWP.

====Turks and Caicos Islands====
British Overseas Territories Citizens by virtue of their connection to the Turks and Caicos Islands can enter the United States visa-free for short business and pleasure.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://nassau.usembassy.gov/pdf/turks.pdf |title=Embassy of the United States in Nassau, Bahamas: Turks and Caicos Visa Exemptions |format=PDF |accessdate=July 12, 2012 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120303002820/http://nassau.usembassy.gov/pdf/turks.pdf |archive-date=March 3, 2012 |url-status=dead }}</ref> To qualify, they must not have had a criminal conviction or ineligibility, not violated U.S. immigration laws in the past and must arrive in the United States on a direct flight from the territory. In addition, they must present a ] which states that they are a British Overseas Territory Citizen and have the right to abode in the Turks and Caicos Islands. In addition to a valid, unexpired passport, all travellers 14 years of age or older must present a police certificate issued by the Royal Turks and Caicos Islands Police Force within the past six months. All British Overseas Territories Citizens of the Turks and Caicos Islands who apply for admission at a port-of-entry that does not have direct air service to/from the territory, are required to be in possession of a valid visa to enter the United States.

==Citizens of the Federated States of Micronesia, Marshall Islands and Palau==
Under the ], citizens of the Federated States of Micronesia,<ref>{{cite web |url=http://kolonia.usembassy.gov/visas/fsm-citizens.html |title=U.S. Embassy in Kolonia, Micronesia |publisher=Kolonia.usembassy.gov |date=May 6, 2012 |accessdate=July 12, 2012 |url-status=dead |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20120717071839/http://kolonia.usembassy.gov/visas/fsm-citizens.html |archivedate=July 17, 2012 }}</ref> the Republic of the Marshall Islands,<ref>{{cite web |url=http://majuro.usembassy.gov/rmi_citizens/visa-free-travel-under-the-compact-of-free-association-as-amended.html |title=U.S. Embassy in Majuro, Marshall Islands: Non-Immigrant Visas |publisher=Majuro.usembassy.gov |date=August 12, 2010 |accessdate=April 2, 2014 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131021195718/http://majuro.usembassy.gov/rmi_citizens/visa-free-travel-under-the-compact-of-free-association-as-amended.html |archive-date=October 21, 2013 |url-status=dead }}</ref> and the Republic of Palau<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.palauembassy.com/Bulletins/200510051.htm |title=Embassy of the Republic of Palau in Washington |publisher=Palauembassy.com |accessdate=July 12, 2012 |url-status=dead |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20120508060526/http://www.palauembassy.com/Bulletins/200510051.htm |archivedate=May 8, 2012 }}</ref> (except for adopted children, citizens wishing to adopt while in the U.S., and citizens from any of these nations who acquired citizenship via an ]) may enter, reside, study, and work indefinitely in the United States without visas. These three sovereign nations hold the distinction of being the only countries in the world whose citizens do not require visas or other required documents (with the exception of a valid passport) in order to visit, study, or work in the United States for an indefinite period of time. However, individuals admitted under the Compact of Free Association do not have U.S. ] status and must apply for an immigrant visa or Adjustment of Status on the same basis as other aliens, such as family ties or employer sponsorship, before they can become U.S. permanent residents. Time spent in the United States under the Compact of Free Association does not count toward the physical presence requirements for naturalization as a U.S. citizen.


==See also== ==See also==
{{Portal|United States}} {{Portal|United States}}
*] (ESTA) * ] (ESTA)
*] * ]
*] * ]
*] * ]

==Notes==
{{notelist|colwidth=30em}}


==References== ==References==
Line 568: Line 913:
{{Visa Requirements}} {{Visa Requirements}}
{{Immigration to the United States}} {{Immigration to the United States}}
{{authority control}}


] ]

Latest revision as of 09:15, 15 December 2024

Program allowing 90-day visa-free travel to the United States for nationals of some countries

This article is part of a series on the
Politics of the
United States
Federal government
Legislature



Executive
Judiciary

Elections
  • National elections


  • Elections by state and territory



Political parties

Political ideologies

Federalism
Foreign relations




The Visa Waiver Program (VWP) is a program of the United States federal government that allows nationals of specific countries to travel to the United States for tourism, business, or while in transit for up to 90 days without having to obtain a visa. It applies to all fifty U.S. states, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, and the U.S. Virgin Islands, as well as to Guam and the Northern Mariana Islands, which also have an additional program with waivers for more nationalities; American Samoa has a similar but separate program.

The countries selected for the VWP by the U.S. government are generally regarded as developed countries, with high-income economies and a very high Human Development Index.

Other visa waivers exist for citizens of certain jurisdictions.

Eligible countries

  The United States and its territories   Freely associated states (freedom of movement)   Visa-free (6 months)   Visa Waiver Program (90 days)   Visa-free with police certificate (6 months)   Visa required to enter the United States

To be eligible for a visa waiver under the VWP, the traveler seeking admission to the United States must be a national of a country that has been designated by the U.S. Secretary of Homeland Security, in consultation with the Secretary of State, as a "program country". Permanent residents of designated countries who are not their nationals do not qualify for a visa waiver. The criteria for designation as program countries are specified in Section 217(c) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. § 1187). The criteria stress passport security, a nonimmigrant visa refusal rate below 3%, and a reciprocal visa waiver for U.S. nationals, among other requirements.

As of 2024, nationals of 42 countries are eligible for entry into the United States without a visa under the VWP:

Requirements

Passport

All visitors from VWP countries must hold a biometric passport.

All travelers must have individual passports. It is not acceptable (for the VWP) for children to be included on a parent's passport.

In principle, the passport must be valid for six months beyond the expected date of departure from the United States. However, the United States has agreements with a large number of countries to waive this requirement, including all VWP countries except Brunei.

Electronic System for Travel Authorization (ESTA)

Record of ESTA approval
Main article: Electronic System for Travel Authorization

All incoming passengers who intend to take advantage of the Visa Waiver Program are required to apply for a travel authorization through the Electronic System for Travel Authorization (ESTA) online before departure to the United States, preferably at least 72 hours (3 days) in advance. This requirement was announced on June 3, 2008 and is intended to bolster U.S. security by pre-screening participating VWP passengers against terrorist or no-fly lists and databases. It is similar to Australia's Electronic Travel Authority system. The authorization is mandatory for participating VWP nationals before traveling to the United States, but as with formal visas this does not guarantee admission into the United States since final admission eligibility is determined at U.S. ports of entry by CBP officers.

ESTA has an application fee of 4 USD, and if approved, an additional fee of 17 USD is charged, for a total of 21 USD. An approved ESTA is valid for up to two years or until the traveler's passport expires, whichever comes first, and is valid for multiple entries into the United States.

When traveling to the United States by air or sea under the VWP with ESTA, the person must be traveling on a participating commercial carrier and hold a valid return or onward ticket, dated within 90 days. The VWP does not apply at all (i.e. a visa is required) if a passenger arrives via air or sea on an unapproved carrier. ESTA is also required for travel by land.

Prior travel or dual nationality in certain countries

Since 2016, those who have previously been in Iran, Iraq, Libya, North Korea, Somalia, Sudan, Syria or Yemen on or after March 1, 2011, or in Cuba on or after January 12, 2021, or who are dual nationals of Cuba, Iran, Iraq, North Korea, Sudan or Syria, are not eligible to travel under the VWP. However, those who traveled to such countries for diplomatic, military, humanitarian, reporting or legitimate business purposes may have this ineligibility waived by the Secretary of Homeland Security.

Other requirements

Applicants for admission under the Visa Waiver Program:

  • Must have complied with the conditions of all previous admissions to the United States and have not been found ineligible for a U.S. visa.
  • Must never have been convicted of, or arrested for, an offense or crime involving moral turpitude or a controlled substance, or two or more crimes with a maximum aggregate sentence of five years' imprisonment or more, no matter how long ago. National regulations which normally expunge criminal records after a certain length of time (e.g. the Rehabilitation of Offenders Act 1974 in the UK) do not apply.
  • Must not be otherwise inadmissible to the United States, such as on health or national security grounds.
  • Must be intending to visit the United States for a purpose of tourism, business or transit.

Applicants should display social and economic ties which bind them to their country of origin or may be refused entry.

Having been arrested or convicted does not in itself make a person ineligible to use the Visa Waiver Program. However, some U.S. embassies advise such persons to apply for a tourist visa even though there is no legal obligation to do so.

Those who do not meet the requirements for the Visa Waiver Program must obtain a U.S. visitor visa from a U.S. embassy or consulate.

Restrictions

Visitors under the VWP may stay for up to 90 days in the United States and cannot request an extension of the original allowed period of stay (this practice is allowed to those holding regular visas). However, VWP visitors may seek to adjust status on the basis of either marriage to a U.S. citizen or an application for asylum.

U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) officers determine admissibility upon the traveler's arrival. If one seeks to enter the United States under the VWP and is denied entry by a CBP officer at a port of entry, there is no path to appeal or review of the denial of entry.

Travelers can leave to neighboring jurisdictions (Canada, Mexico and the Caribbean), but will not be granted another 90 days after reentry in the United States; instead they are readmitted to the United States for the remaining days granted on their initial entry. Transit through the United States is generally permitted, if the total time in the United States, Canada, Mexico and adjacent islands is less than 90 days. However, if for example the traveler is transiting the United States on the way to a 6-month stay in Canada, the VWP cannot be used, as the total time in the United States, Canada, Mexico and adjacent islands will be over 90 days. In this case the traveler should apply for a B-1/B-2 visa, or a transit visa.

There are restrictions on the type of employment-related activities allowed. Meetings and conferences in relation to the travelers' profession, line of business or employer in their home country are generally acceptable, but most forms of "gainful employment" are not. There are however poorly-classifiable exceptions such as persons performing professional services in the United States for a non-U.S. employer, and persons installing, servicing and repairing commercial or industrial equipment or machinery pursuant to a contract of sale. Performers (such as actors and musicians) who plan on performing live or taping scenes for productions in their country of origin, as well as athletes participating in an athletic event, are likewise not allowed to use the VWP for their respective engagements and are instead required to have an O or P visa prior to arrival. Foreign media representatives and journalists on assignment are required to have a nonimmigrant media (I) visa.

History

Congress passed legislation in 1986 to create the Visa Waiver Program with the aim of facilitating tourism and short-term business visits to the United States, and allowing the United States Department of State to focus consular resources on addressing higher risks. The United Kingdom became the first country to participate in the Visa Waiver Program in July 1988, followed by Japan in December 1988. In July 1989, France, Italy, Netherlands, Sweden, Switzerland and West Germany were added to the VWP.

In 1991, more European countries joined the Program – Andorra, Austria, Belgium, Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Liechtenstein, Luxembourg, Monaco, Norway, San Marino and Spain – as well as New Zealand (the first country from Oceania). In 1993, Brunei became the second Asian country to be admitted to the Program.

On April 1, 1995, Ireland was added to the VWP. In 1996, Australia and Argentina (the first Latin American country) joined, although Argentina was later removed in 2002. On September 30, 1997, Slovenia was added. On August 9, 1999, Portugal, Singapore and Uruguay joined the program, although Uruguay was subsequently removed in 2003.

Following the September 11 terrorist attacks, the George W. Bush administration decided to tighten entry requirements into the United States, as a result of which legislation was passed requiring foreign visitors entering under the Visa Waiver Program to present a machine-readable passport upon arrival starting from October 1, 2003, and a biometric passport from October 26, 2004. However, as a number of VWP countries still issued non-machine readable passports (for example, more than a third of French and Spanish passport holders held a non-machine readable version), the implementation of this rule was postponed to October 26, 2004, with the exception of Belgian nationals, as there were concerns about the security and integrity of Belgian passports. Likewise, the biometric passport requirement was also postponed to October 26, 2005, only to be further postponed by another year to October 26, 2006 at the request of the European Union, which raised concerns about the number of participating countries which would have been able to make the deadline. When the new rule came into force on that day, three countries (Andorra, Brunei and Liechtenstein) had not yet started issuing biometric passports.

In November 2006, the U.S. government announced that plans for an "Electronic Travel Authorization" program (officially named "Electronic System for Travel Authorization") would be developed so that VWP travelers can give advance information on their travels to the United States. In return, they will be given authorization electronically to travel to the United States, although it does not guarantee admission to the United States. This program is modeled on the Electronic Travel Authority scheme that has been used in Australia for many years.

Argentina's participation in the VWP was terminated in 2002 in light of the financial crisis taking place in that country and its potential effect on mass emigration and unlawful overstay of its nationals in the United States by way of the VWP. Uruguay's participation in the program was revoked in 2003 for similar reasons. While a country's political and economic standing does not directly determine its eligibility, it is widely believed that nationals of politically stable and economically developed nations would not have much incentive to illegally seek employment and violate their visa while in the United States, risks that consular officers seriously consider in approving or denying a visa.

Road map

After the 2004 enlargement of the European Union, both the newly admitted countries and EU agencies began intensive lobbying efforts to include those new countries in the VWP. The U.S. government initially responded to those efforts by developing bilateral strategies with 19 candidate countries known as the Visa Waiver road map process. The U.S. government began to accept the possibility of departing from the original country designation criteria – which had been contained within immigration law per se – and to expand them by adding political criteria, with the latter being able to override the former. This development began first with Bill S.2844 which explicitly named Poland as the only country to be added to the VWP, and continued as an amendment to the Comprehensive Immigration Reform Act of 2006 (S.2611), whose Sec. 413, Visa Waiver Program Expansion, defined broader criteria that would apply to any EU country that provided "material support" to the multinational forces in Iraq and Afghanistan. However, the definition of that "material support" would be met again only by Poland and Romania, a fact that was not favorably received by the other EU candidate countries. Ironically, Poland remained the only Central European country that was not a participating nation in the VWP until 2019, due to a visa refusal rate above the critical threshold of 3%.

During his visit to Estonia in November 2006, President Bush announced his intention "to work with our Congress and our international partners to modify our visa waiver program". In 2006, the Secure Travel and Counterterrorism Partnership Bill was introduced in the Senate but no action was taken and that bill, as well as a similar one introduced in the House the following year, died after two years of inactivity. The bill would have directed the Secretary of Homeland Security to establish a pilot program to expand the visa waiver program for up to five new countries that were cooperating with the United States on security and counterterrorism matters.

A June 2007 Hudson Institute Panel stressed the urgency of the inclusion of Central Europe in the VWP: "An inexplicable policy that is causing inestimable damage to the United States with its new Central and Eastern European NATO allies is the region's exclusion from the visa waiver program. As Helle Dale wrote in the spring issue of European Affairs: "Meanwhile, the problem is fueling anti-U.S. antagonisms and a perception of capricious discrimination by U.S. bureaucrats ---and damping the visits to the United States of people from countries with whom Washington would like to improve commercial and intellectual ties. Meanwhile, horror stories abound from friends and diplomats from Central and Eastern Europe about the problems besetting foreigners seeking to visit the United States. In fact bringing up the subject of visas with any resident of those countries is like waving a red flag before a bull." Visa waiver must be satisfactorily addressed and resolved at long last."

The Implementing Recommendations of the 9/11 Commission Act of 2007 allowed the inclusion of new countries in the VWP with a visa refusal rate up to 10% (up from the standard requirement of 3%) if they satisfied certain other conditions, from October 2008. With the relaxed criteria, eight countries were added to the program: Czech Republic, Estonia, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Slovakia and South Korea in November 2008, and Malta in December 2008. Czech Prime Minister Mirek Topolánek called it "a removal of the last relict of Communism and the Cold War". However, from July 2009, the authority to include countries with such higher visa refusal rate became conditioned on the implementation of a system capable of matching the entry and exit from the United States of travelers under the VWP using biometric identifiers. As such system was not implemented, the visa refusal rate requirement returned to 3%.

Greece officially joined the program on April 5, 2010.

On October 2, 2012, Secretary Janet Napolitano announced the inclusion of Taiwan into the program effectively as of November 1, 2012. Only holders of passports with a national identification number can benefit from the visa waiver.

In 2013 there was conflict over the United States-Israel Strategic Partnership Act of 2013 whose Senate version specified that satisfaction of the requirements regarding reciprocal travel privileges for U.S. nationals would be subject to security concerns. Many members of the House of Representatives opposed the security language because it seemed to validate Israel's tendency to turn away Arab Americans without giving any reason. None of the other 37 countries in the visa waiver program had such an exemption.

Chief Executive of Hong Kong Donald Tsang raised the issue of allowing holders of Hong Kong Special Administrative Region passports or British National (Overseas) passports to participate in the VWP during his visit to the United States in 2011, but proposals to allow this have not been successful.

Hong Kong is the only jurisdiction with a higher Human Development Index than the United States whose citizens cannot enjoy the program. The visa refusal rate for Hong Kong dropped to 1.7% for HKSAR passport and 2.6% for British National (Overseas) passport in 2012. Hong Kong met all VWP criteria but did not qualify at the time because it was not legally a separate country, despite having its own passports and independent judicial system, monetary system and immigration control. The former Chief Executive of Hong Kong, Donald Tsang, raised the issue with then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton during his visit to the United States in 2011 and was met with positive response. On May 16, 2013, a bipartisan amendment bill was passed by the Senate Judiciary Committee but not ratified into law. On August 10, 2015, the U.S. Consul General to Hong Kong and Macau, Clifford Hart, said during an interview with South China Morning Post that the visa waiver was "not happening anytime soon", as the Visa Waiver law required the participant to be a "sovereign state" and Hong Kong was not independent, thus ending the possibility of Hong Kong joining the program. He also denied that the failed lobbying effort of the HKSAR government on this issue was a result of the refusal of detaining Edward Snowden in 2013.

Chile joined the VWP on March 31, 2014.

As of December 2018, ESTA is no longer approved in real-time to qualifying passengers and passengers are required to apply no later than 72 hours before departure.

In July 2019, U.S. Ambassador to Poland Georgette Mosbacher stated that "Poland would fully qualify for the Visa Waiver Program within 3 to 6 months after September 2019" depending on bureaucratic procedures. On October 4, 2019, U.S. President Donald Trump confirmed that the Department of State had formally nominated Poland for entry into the Visa Waiver Program. On November 11, 2019 Poland officially joined the Program and became its 39th member.

On February 12, 2021, U.S. Embassy in Croatia's Chargé d'Affaires Victoria Taylor announced on Twitter that the refusal rate for business and tourist visas in Croatia in 2020 dropped to 2.69%, marking a step forward for Croatia to join the VWP "in the near future." On August 2, 2021, Secretary of State Antony Blinken announced that Croatia had been formally nominated to join the VWP. On September 28, 2021, Secretary of Homeland Security Alejandro Mayorkas officially announced that Croatia would join the VWP before December 1, 2021. Croatia joined the VWP on October 23, 2021.

On July 6, 2023, the validity of new ESTA applications by nationals of Brunei was reduced to one year.

On September 27, 2023, Israel was designated to join the VWP by November 30, 2023. Israel joined the VWP on October 19, 2023.

On September 24, 2024, Qatar was designated to join the VWP by December 1, 2024. Qatar joined the VWP on November 21, 2024.

Date of addition to the Visa Waiver Program
  • July 1, 1988: United Kingdom
  • December 15, 1988: Japan
  • July 1, 1989: France, Switzerland
  • July 15, 1989: (West) Germany, Sweden
  • July 29, 1989: Italy, Netherlands
  • October 1, 1991: Andorra, Austria, Belgium, Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Liechtenstein, Luxembourg, Monaco, New Zealand, Norway, San Marino, Spain
  • July 29, 1993: Brunei
  • April 1, 1995: Ireland
  • July 8, 1996: Argentina
  • July 29, 1996: Australia
  • September 30, 1997: Slovenia
  • August 9, 1999: Portugal, Singapore, Uruguay
  • November 17, 2008: Czech Republic, Estonia, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Slovakia, South Korea
  • December 30, 2008: Malta
  • April 5, 2010: Greece
  • November 1, 2012: Taiwan
  • March 31, 2014: Chile
  • November 11, 2019: Poland
  • October 23, 2021: Croatia
  • October 19, 2023: Israel
  • November 21, 2024: Qatar

Cancelled:

  • February 21, 2002: Argentina
  • April 15, 2003: Uruguay

Hungary's participation

In October 2017, U.S. officials discovered a massive passport fraud scheme in Hungary, in which hundreds of non-Hungarians obtained genuine Hungarian passports. A U.S. Department of Homeland Security report (obtained by the Washington Post and reported in May 2018) showed that of approximately 700 non-Hungarians who had obtained the passports, 85 had attempted to travel to the United States under false identites, 65 had been admitted to the United States through the VWP, and (as of October 2017) approximately 30 remained in the United States despite the efforts of U.S. authorities to locate and deport them. The fraud was enabled by a policy implemented in 2011 by Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán; under the policy, the Hungarian government provided passports to ethnic Hungarians living outside Hungary, who could prove that one of their ancestors was a Hungarian citizen, with the goal of expediting naturalization. More than a million people obtained Hungarian citizenship through the program. Because the program lacked stringent identity-verification procedures, it was abused by bad actors, including criminals and applicants who used forged documents to falsely claim Hungarian descent. Some who received Hungarian passports under the program were criminals without any connection to Hungary.

U.S. officials were alarmed by the risks created by the program, including the risk that the passports might be used in drug smuggling, organized crime, illegal immigration, espionage, or terrorism. In October 2017, the U.S. government downgraded Hungary's status in the VWP to "provisional" and sought to develop a "cooperative action plan" within 45 days. U.S. and Hungarian officials engaged in a dialogue for several years on resolving the security risks, but Hungarian authorities failed to resolve the issues to the U.S. government's satisfaction. As a result, beginning in 2020 and 2021, the U.S. government barred Hungarian passport-holders who were not born in Hungary from obtaining ESTA pre-travel authorizations. In August 2023, the U.S. government imposed additional restrictions on Hungary's participation in the VWP: the ESTA validity period for Hungarian passport-holders was reduced from two years to one year, and each ESTA on a Hungarian passport would be valid for only one entry to the United States.

Aspiring countries

Of the 19 road map countries listed in 2007, 12 have been admitted to the VWP. As of 2024, the U.S. government cited six countries aspiring to join the VWP:

In 2014, the European Union pressured the United States to extend the Visa Waiver Program to its five member states that were not yet included in it (Bulgaria, Croatia, Cyprus, Poland and Romania). In November 2014, the Bulgarian government announced that it would not ratify the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership unless the United States lifted the visa requirement for its nationals. Due to incomplete U.S. reciprocity, in March 2017 the European Parliament approved a non-binding resolution calling on the European Commission to suspend the visa exemption for U.S. nationals to travel the Schengen Area. On May 2, 2017, the European Commission decided not act on the resolution and hoped to restart full visa reciprocity negotiations for the remaining EU member states with the new U.S. administration. In 2019, as mentioned above, Poland, which had been the last Schengen Area country not yet included in the VWP, was admitted to the program. In October 2020, the European Parliament repeated its request for the European Commission to suspend the visa exemption for U.S. nationals, and in March 2021, it filed a judicial action against the European Commission for its failure to act on the subject. In 2021, Croatia was admitted to the VWP before joining the Schengen Area in 2023. On March 15, 2023, Democratic senator Dick Durbin introduced a bill that would allow including Romania in the VWP regardless of the program requirements. In September 2023, the Court of Justice of the European Union dismissed the judicial action brought by the European Parliament, ruling that the European Commission was not obligated to suspend the visa exemption for U.S. nationals. In December 2023, during a visit to the United States, Romanian Prime Minister Marcel Ciolacu said that Romania's entry into the U.S. visa-free program would be announced in 2024, ahead of the 2025 deadline discussed with the U.S. representatives.

As of 2024, three EU member states (Bulgaria, Cyprus and Romania) are still not included in the VWP, and nationals of Hungary born outside Hungary are automatically denied ESTA due to a passport fraud scheme described above.

U.S. territories

The Visa Waiver Program applies to all permanently inhabited U.S. territories except American Samoa.

Guam and the Northern Mariana Islands

Although the U.S. Visa Waiver Program also applies to the U.S. territories of Guam and the Northern Mariana Islands, and therefore nationals of VWP countries may travel to these territories with an ESTA, both territories have an additional visa waiver program for certain nationalities. The Guam–CNMI Visa Waiver Program, first enacted in October 1988 and periodically amended, permits nationals of 12 countries to travel to Guam and the Northern Mariana Islands for up to 45 days, and nationals of China to travel to the Northern Mariana Islands for up to 14 days, for tourism or business, without the need to obtain a U.S. visa. This program also requires an electronic travel authorization similar to ESTA but without a fee.

American Samoa

U.S. visa policy does not apply to American Samoa, as it has its own entry requirements and maintains control of its own borders. Hence, neither a U.S. visa nor an ESTA can be used to enter American Samoa. If required, an entry permit or electronic authorization must be obtained from the Department of Legal Affairs of American Samoa.

Nationals of Canada, Marshall Islands, Micronesia, Palau, and countries in the U.S. Visa Waiver Program (except Qatar) may visit American Samoa for up to 30 days without an entry permit. However, if arriving by air, they must apply online for an electronic authorization called "OK Board", at least 3 business days before travel, for a fee of 40 USD. Nationals of Samoa may also apply for a similar electronic authorization to visit American Samoa for up to 10 days, for a fee of 10 USD.

Nationals of other countries need an entry permit, which must be requested by a local sponsor at the Immigration Office of the Department of Legal Affairs of American Samoa.

Statistics

U.S. B visa refusal rate in fiscal year 2024 (October 2023 to September 2024):
  <3%   3–5%   5–10%   10–20%   20–30%   30–40%   40–50%   >50%   United States   Visa-exempt countries

Admissions

Admissions into the United States under the VWP by country and fiscal year
Country 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016
Andorra 1,290 1,100 80 532 1,544 1,692 1,371 1,357
Australia 945,480 463,792 23,096 532,815 1,369,855 1,412,605 1,431,077 1,393,642
Austria 168,580 122,008 8,779 79,871 208,366 206,643 210,727 216,122
Belgium 254,430 187,804 10,472 108,442 297,934 303,669 295,607 291,235
Brunei 720 302 25 421 1,014 1,086 1,034 1,081
Chile 440,910 443,702 138,940 157,498 350,811 315,703 268,704 226,127
Croatia 25,690 14,474
Czech Republic 109,930 74,961 4,352 50,279 128,856 122,434 116,097 102,061
Denmark 230,350 173,843 6,471 124,274 317,683 338,063 345,070 335,158
Estonia 21,250 13,900 965 12,594 25,730 23,878 24,208 22,682
Finland 107,600 64,116 2,533 70,664 150,040 150,440 157,079 161,474
France 1,805,880 1,343,142 73,159 864,581 2,121,625 2,022,153 1,891,564 1,871,506
Germany 1,797,830 1,251,241 84,444 829,996 2,084,664 2,130,453 2,160,492 2,138,056
Greece 79,440 56,255 3,311 41,027 87,520 82,453 73,240 66,999
Hong Kong 90 27 3 123 2,415 2,983 5,979 2,736
Hungary 76,250 53,325 3,115 47,966 110,906 98,060 90,997 81,320
Iceland 41,520 33,741 771 25,299 63,569 68,724 62,782 54,571
Ireland 506,140 366,153 10,226 245,669 588,911 576,099 521,641 491,963
Italy 1,139,330 769,705 104,633 494,102 1,333,908 1,315,270 1,248,156 1,234,097
Japan 1,207,480 338,837 49,627 1,590,287 3,615,829 3,509,759 3,672,493 3,696,408
Latvia 19,580 14,272 1,279 10,581 22,887 21,544 21,459 19,107
Liechtenstein 1,360 1,004 60 670 1,820 1,890 1,919 2,053
Lithuania 39,910 28,201 2,312 18,490 41,297 37,734 24,383 30,287
Luxembourg 13,660 9,371 431 5,101 14,864 14,196 13,008 14,195
Malaysia 110 54 7 152 488 416 609 255
Malta 8,210 4,900 451 3,117 8,157 6,999 6,252 6,000
Monaco 810 580 34 408 998 888 991 1,097
Nauru 40 ≤236 0 ≤32 22 28 5 9
Netherlands 630,430 480,942 52,601 317,788 813,888 812,905 777,886 751,482
New Zealand 287,080 103,279 7,039 121,474 338,162 345,102 338,371 322,001
Norway 168,460 110,403 3,387 97,091 263,579 276,912 290,688 274,958
Papua New Guinea 170 26 0 ≤32 55 59 100 252
Poland 235,170 138,275 5,137 27,544
Portugal 194,360 137,241 12,290 86,176 207,772 205,780 185,010 174,040
San Marino 430 ≤236 30 286 711 746 692 693
Singapore 124,240 66,714 4,286 63,290 149,381 138,013 133,627 132,204
Slovakia 44,960 32,200 2,060 22,414 59,527 53,181 49,399 46,692
Slovenia 23,050 14,521 1,521 13,719 30,275 27,019 25,015 24,197
South Korea 1,480,140 643,164 87,520 999,347 2,111,855 2,290,705 2,223,813 1,862,434
Spain 890,650 784,673 135,197 441,802 1,122,063 1,080,300 1,015,528 991,483
Sweden 283,960 198,093 8,566 204,290 466,465 529,534 554,600 572,385
Switzerland 302,680 215,053 19,137 145,192 387,285 403,095 416,944 438,061
Taiwan 277,940 74,654 24,790 165,869 440,995 442,622 419,748 388,629
United Kingdom 3,873,730 2,795,703 115,057 1,918,654 4,758,514 4,635,480 4,558,681 4,691,708
Total 17,861,310 11,625,987 1,008,194 9,939,927 24,102,240 24,007,315 23,637,046 23,132,817

Visa refusal rate

To qualify for the Visa Waiver Program, a country must have had a visa refusal rate of less than 3% for the previous year. This refusal rate is based on applications for B visas, for tourism and business purposes. B visas are adjudicated based on applicant interviews, which generally last between 60 and 90 seconds.

Refusal rates for B visas by country and fiscal year
Country 2024 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008
Afghanistan 48.89% 48.73% 52.65% 72.09% 56.05% 68.42% 71.39% 72.14% 73.80% 61.03% 46.7% 62.7% 59.3% 45.7% 56.0% 59.6% 51.0%
Albania 33.37% 31.10% 27.55% 10.78% 40.06% 41.45% 41.92% 40.45% 35.95% 36.82% 39.8% 40.4% 40.5% 42.3% 37.7% 39.6% 38.7%
Algeria 50.72% 35.19% 18.10% 38.40% 49.69% 44.22% 39.26% 43.96% 36.00% 25.92% 23.1% 28.3% 24.2% 29.2% 21.9% 20.5% 20.3%
Andorra 28.57% 22.22% 0.00% 0.00% 50.00% 12.50% 0.00% 0.00% 28.57% 0.00% 0.0% 25.0% 100.0% 0.0% 100.0% 60.0% 50.0%
Angola 49.36% 48.94% 47.25% 58.52% 62.15% 58.26% 51.76% 36.01% 48.52% 26.77% 21.4% 24.8% 19.9% 17.2% 21.4% 17.7% 17.1%
Antigua and Barbuda 26.74% 18.60% 14.09% 16.66% 23.44% 15.25% 19.07% 20.50% 22.11% 20.17% 20.8% 18.1% 24.1% 20.2% 19.7% 13.1% 21.7%
Argentina 8.90% 8.21% 3.66% 2.31% 2.79% 2.07% 1.73% 1.79% 2.14% 2.14% 1.4% 1.7% 1.5% 2.5% 3.1% 3.3% 3.1%
Armenia 59.46% 51.49% 37.87% 37.07% 56.47% 51.65% 53.83% 51.87% 45.88% 47.17% 43.8% 37.9% 38.5% 54.5% 51.4% 48.9% 53.3%
Australia 20.67% 16.75% 12.55% 14.27% 18.74% 19.18% 17.99% 17.18% 15.38% 21.24% 20.1% 16.6% 16.6% 22.7% 23.7% 19.8% 16.5%
Austria 9.94% 9.38% 6.97% 6.29% 8.91% 5.21% 5.39% 5.00% 5.93% 7.40% 7.8% 8.7% 11.1% 9.3% 11.5% 11.9% 20.3%
Azerbaijan 21.46% 35.99% 23.54% 12.27% 26.41% 25.43% 28.45% 27.63% 14.83% 12.93% 13.5% 9.4% 11.4% 12.9% 13.5% 11.5% 14.0%
Bahamas 12.81% 8.38% 8.30% 7.91% 12.59% 9.33% 12.51% 9.32% 9.35% 7.40% 9.20% 11.60% 12.90% 13.70% 8.20% 8.30% 5.90%
Bahrain 17.83% 11.11% 28.41% 22.48% 9.04% 13.55% 6.96% 9.53% 6.26% 3.81% 4.7% 4.1% 7.7% 2.4% 4.1% 6.7% 6.6%
Bangladesh 46.09% 43.66% 30.30% 29.91% 40.34% 39.78% 40.05% 60.88% 62.82% 59.96% 50.8% 43.5% 26.0% 42.4% 36.4% 34.1% 48.2%
Barbados 10.81% 9.63% 6.55% 12.93% 10.79% 6.76% 7.07% 8.72% 11.24% 9.54% 9.8% 9.9% 12.4% 10.7% 10.2% 7.8% 10.1%
Belarus 28.79% 32.80% 26.05% 16.81% 27.01% 21.93% 23.26% 21.69% 14.87% 12.53% 14.0% 20.7% 19.5% 19.4% 19.7% 15.5% 21.1%
Belgium 11.65% 8.76% 8.73% 16.57% 16.47% 8.96% 9.77% 6.96% 7.33% 12.85% 11.7% 9.4% 7.1% 13.7% 13.2% 9.4% 13.4%
Belize 29.48% 26.25% 26.45% 25.36% 23.31% 28.63% 34.55% 30.91% 35.21% 30.47% 16.4% 19.7% 22.7% 36.8% 33.4% 21.4% 25.4%
Benin 61.49% 49.11% 40.57% 32.05% 45.27% 48.48% 47.74% 42.10% 38.01% 35.74% 31.4% 34.6% 33.0% 48.2% 39.7% 37.0% 39.1%
Bhutan 49.46% 45.03% 34.55% 43.33% 53.56% 57.13% 59.63% 52.43% 69.78% 54.55% 43.6% 42.0% 52.2% 60.7% 64.1% 68.1% 48.3%
Bolivia 28.93% 22.15% 17.15% 11.30% 20.36% 24.17% 22.19% 18.08% 14.36% 13.56% 13.6% 15.4% 16.3% 24.0% 23.8% 17.4% 23.6%
Bosnia and Herzegovina 11.64% 18.49% 19.91% 21.84% 16.01% 25.27% 23.50% 16.37% 19.70% 20.38% 16.1% 26.5% 14.4% 10.1% 9.7% 13.9% 21.3%
Botswana 32.44% 23.81% 11.19% 0.00% 19.26% 17.54% 18.67% 17.94% 18.97% 16.67% 16.9% 17.3% 12.5% 11.0% 13.9% 16.8% 15.6%
Brazil 15.48% 11.94% 14.48% 14.25% 23.16% 18.48% 12.73% 12.34% 16.70% 5.36% 3.2% 3.5% 3.2% 3.8% 5.2% 7.0% 5.5%
Brunei 4.00% 10.71% 5.41% 0.00% 0.00% 4.76% 4.35% 3.70% 13.51% 6.82% 11.1% 20.7% 25.5% 8.0% 3.5% 5.6% 3.3%
Bulgaria 6.02% 11.61% 10.00% 18.40% 12.52% 9.75% 11.32% 14.97% 16.86% 17.26% 15.2% 19.9% 18.0% 15.7% 17.2% 17.8% 13.3%
Burkina Faso 58.03% 45.20% 39.25% 24.55% 62.86% 62.32% 71.16% 75.74% 65.35% 50.37% 37.4% 31.7% 35.3% 37.9% 45.8% 48.9% 44.4%
Burundi 65.52% 66.29% 69.52% 53.23% 77.72% 73.16% 74.39% 75.55% 61.33% 58.35% 50.0% 52.7% 46.1% 45.5% 36.4% 52.2% 58.8%
Cambodia 28.32% 25.95% 24.50% 35.62% 26.50% 33.65% 32.63% 41.05% 35.62% 48.41% 39.9% 28.9% 33.9% 44.0% 42.9% 47.2% 44.3%
Cameroon 55.57% 58.62% 52.22% 39.93% 57.12% 57.97% 52.27% 47.29% 36.84% 29.89% 28.2% 37.3% 41.1% 40.6% 40.5% 48.3% 46.7%
Canada 56.35% 52.04% 58.33% 51.81% 52.67% 43.76% 38.98% 41.14% 47.93% 49.13% 48.70% 43.10% 44.30% 52.20% 57.10% 52.80% 39.00%
Cape Verde 52.02% 41.55% 33.68% 25.32% 42.74% 52.66% 54.22% 50.70% 45.89% 36.05% 28.7% 36.4% 36.6% 38.3% 46.3% 45.3% 42.7%
Central African Republic 48.46% 56.67% 36.70% 36.36% 48.67% 37.45% 36.03% 44.24% 35.12% 32.43% 46.6% 46.4% 32.2% 47.4% 48.3% 45.0% 39.6%
Chad 58.60% 42.50% 69.39% 72.77% 70.60% 70.16% 60.80% 51.65% 42.53% 33.87% 32.4% 36.3% 43.8% 42.7% 58.5% 37.6% 41.4%
Chile 20.15% 16.12% 13.75% 13.42% 11.54% 15.32% 11.34% 13.87% 11.43% 13.66% 2.4% 1.6% 2.8% 3.4% 5.0% 5.9% 8.9%
China 25.37% 26.63% 30.39% 79.09% 22.12% 18.22% 17.00% 14.57% 12.35% 10.03% 9.0% 8.5% 8.5% 12.0% 13.3% 15.6% 18.2%
Colombia 24.70% 20.59% 32.86% 27.75% 46.82% 41.93% 35.11% 21.93% 17.79% 15.52% 12.3% 10.4% 11.2% 21.7% 30.7% 27.3% 25.6%
Comoros 25.42% 33.33% 43.48% 73.68% 86.15% 53.02% 69.46% 48.45% 53.73% 54.44% 17.0% 32.6% 22.1% 29.6% 43.6% 24.5% 14.0%
Congo 48.78% 49.65% 37.19% 63.82% 59.34% 60.49% 52.23% 48.47% 46.55% 40.77% 35.4% 27.5% 30.7% 25.2% 34.4% 33.0% 33.2%
Costa Rica 12.66% 16.09% 12.71% 7.97% 24.77% 18.66% 9.91% 6.49% 8.39% 9.83% 11.4% 13.7% 11.3% 13.7% 17.7% 16.6% 21.2%
Croatia 11.56% 9.32% 5.56% 4.65% 2.69% 4.02% 5.92% 5.10% 6.78% 5.29% 6.1% 5.9% 4.4% 6.3% 5.3% 5.3% 5.1%
Cuba 53.35% 49.96% 56.51% 52.69% 60.15% 53.40% 50.97% 77.17% 81.85% 76.03% 66.2% 61.1% 38.7% 33.0% 20.5% 31.3% 45.2%
Cyprus 2.16% 4.48% 6.22% 15.09% 6.21% 2.78% 2.38% 1.69% 2.03% 3.53% 3.5% 4.0% 1.9% 1.8% 1.7% 1.4% 1.7%
Czech Republic 7.96% 8.05% 8.50% 16.24% 26.82% 12.41% 10.37% 6.81% 7.82% 6.33% 8.1% 5.8% 6.4% 6.4% 9.6% 6.9% 5.2%
Democratic Republic of the Congo 46.77% 48.53% 43.93% 37.36% 58.03% 53.80% 50.56% 49.94% 45.63% 45.62% 39.1% 41.9% 37.4% 39.1% 40.8% 35.6% 36.2%
Denmark 9.25% 10.66% 12.17% 31.11% 17.58% 14.26% 12.38% 13.18% 11.74% 20.73% 12.0% 11.0% 14.7% 17.0% 18.3% 13.6% 16.6%
Djibouti 64.71% 68.37% 74.44% 88.34% 69.79% 85.35% 82.96% 74.80% 47.09% 52.00% 50.1% 62.6% 64.5% 58.0% 60.2% 42.1% 42.5%
Dominica 35.41% 29.10% 25.00% 22.85% 30.38% 26.83% 37.13% 28.74% 31.63% 33.33% 29.0% 30.2% 31.7% 29.2% 27.5% 20.3% 29.5%
Dominican Republic 43.38% 36.69% 15.75% 4.33% 39.18% 53.21% 49.54% 35.78% 31.88% 33.78% 35.9% 41.3% 32.0% 32.1% 31.2% 34.6% 45.6%
East Timor 6.25% 8.51% 0.00% 0.00% 21.43% 4.23% 8.16% 7.02% 26.67% 12.68% 25.0% 5.6% 16.7% 25.5% 13.3% 17.5% 16.7%
Ecuador 36.99% 26.67% 17.51% 15.68% 33.44% 34.05% 31.38% 27.95% 29.18% 31.34% 20.8% 16.9% 18.5% 23.0% 27.1% 36.0% 40.0%
Egypt 39.77% 26.11% 23.11% 23.81% 35.16% 31.83% 32.15% 34.24% 28.61% 33.57% 34.0% 39.5% 32.4% 24.0% 31.3% 29.7% 35.3%
El Salvador 52.65% 57.91% 45.46% 20.63% 62.95% 58.18% 51.49% 52.97% 57.12% 45.72% 36.3% 45.1% 41.4% 47.1% 47.4% 52.1% 45.7%
Equatorial Guinea 55.07% 40.35% 48.32% 74.13% 59.18% 27.79% 21.29% 18.21% 17.75% 19.30% 17.8% 16.2% 10.0% 6.6% 12.2% 8.2% 11.1%
Eritrea 49.94% 61.97% 47.04% 55.96% 63.62% 65.39% 69.54% 71.69% 50.49% 55.67% 41.7% 40.5% 39.2% 46.2% 52.6% 48.2% 51.1%
Estonia 9.79% 16.22% 21.43% 9.09% 32.65% 24.81% 26.73% 21.16% 20.74% 13.53% 16.4% 13.6% 14.9% 21.9% 29.3% 6.2% 3.9%
Eswatini 38.44% 7.84% 9.30% 8.89% 5.52% 5.73% 8.49% 12.59% 8.03% 12.95% 10.0% 4.5% 4.9% 10.4% 9.0% 10.4% 13.0%
Ethiopia 51.17% 41.20% 25.32% 7.52% 39.73% 45.46% 41.74% 50.30% 38.13% 48.32% 44.9% 35.6% 39.7% 41.7% 49.1% 50.6% 46.7%
Fiji 35.25% 41.88% 45.36% 56.64% 44.44% 38.96% 41.74% 26.59% 20.23% 14.92% 14.0% 27.2% 26.9% 31.4% 33.8% 40.0% 38.0%
Finland 14.49% 22.82% 13.07% 16.51% 14.03% 11.00% 15.05% 11.78% 7.72% 11.86% 14.5% 15.0% 7.6% 19.4% 15.4% 23.6% 17.1%
France 8.50% 10.11% 12.55% 22.21% 21.58% 13.67% 10.11% 7.43% 7.30% 16.28% 18.8% 13.0% 13.4% 23.9% 14.5% 12.0% 8.7%
Gabon 27.76% 29.62% 21.65% 31.25% 37.61% 45.41% 40.00% 26.10% 21.29% 15.74% 13.5% 20.3% 24.1% 30.3% 27.3% 23.8% 23.0%
Gambia 66.03% 60.40% 50.64% 40.30% 66.84% 72.30% 64.22% 70.27% 69.87% 75.64% 69.3% 74.5% 73.5% 67.2% 56.2% 51.9% 55.7%
Georgia 41.44% 49.23% 42.01% 63.04% 66.91% 63.85% 62.35% 61.09% 62.82% 50.58% 48.2% 38.3% 31.8% 40.2% 43.6% 49.7% 46.6%
Germany 10.02% 10.84% 11.69% 24.82% 12.69% 9.30% 7.40% 5.91% 7.25% 10.87% 12.8% 12.8% 16.4% 18.6% 15.4% 16.0% 13.8%
Ghana 55.59% 37.56% 27.66% 17.49% 57.01% 55.60% 49.35% 56.18% 65.70% 63.28% 59.8% 61.8% 61.7% 59.3% 58.0% 54.3% 50.1%
Greece 10.16% 15.57% 14.95% 10.86% 18.58% 14.99% 16.93% 13.14% 16.37% 21.89% 27.1% 26.0% 26.1% 14.8% 2.6% 2.0% 1.5%
Grenada 33.13% 20.37% 16.58% 19.63% 24.76% 19.49% 26.44% 26.94% 35.71% 32.00% 29.5% 25.8% 32.5% 26.6% 29.6% 19.5% 29.9%
Guatemala 30.84% 21.55% 5.45% 7.26% 52.36% 58.64% 53.62% 47.14% 48.68% 45.37% 35.9% 37.7% 30.9% 30.2% 28.0% 29.7% 33.8%
Guinea 70.25% 61.37% 53.56% 61.26% 63.79% 73.29% 66.16% 64.59% 63.53% 59.81% 47.8% 52.5% 54.2% 60.6% 66.0% 67.8% 63.8%
Guinea-Bissau 76.59% 48.15% 60.91% 62.50% 66.36% 65.33% 76.09% 71.61% 71.88% 65.18% 56.5% 43.6% 50.0% 55.0% 46.6% 61.9% 63.4%
Guyana 34.25% 39.22% 28.42% 36.76% 62.20% 62.96% 70.62% 37.92% 25.76% 37.28% 40.2% 52.7% 46.5% 51.5% 63.5% 55.9% 56.6%
Haiti 47.35% 47.94% 47.12% 45.87% 50.16% 60.81% 67.59% 71.44% 64.52% 60.45% 58.2% 47.1% 54.0% 58.2% 49.0% 61.4% 54.4%
Honduras 42.61% 33.79% 30.47% 12.38% 52.10% 61.71% 60.32% 40.35% 42.76% 39.73% 36.8% 37.0% 29.8% 27.6% 29.2% 29.2% 33.6%
Hong Kong (BNO) 2.4% 2.6% 3.6% 5.0% 5.0% 3.3%
Hong Kong (SAR) 6.16% 5.49% 4.88% 5.28% 4.50% 3.23% 4.25% 3.45% 4.61% 4.36% 3.1% 1.8% 1.7% 3.9% 5.4% 6.9% 4.4%
Hungary 5.93% 7.29% 8.44% 16.67% 16.36% 8.85% 10.53% 13.04% 15.48% 31.31% 35.5% 31.6% 17.0% 31.1% 34.5% 21.1% 7.8%
Iceland 5.80% 4.54% 3.24% 25.00% 18.98% 9.44% 7.14% 7.46% 7.69% 8.11% 10.2% 7.1% 5.6% 8.6% 9.8% 6.3% 5.1%
India 16.32% 10.99% 6.54% 12.25% 27.26% 27.75% 26.07% 23.29% 26.02% 23.78% 19.8% 18.7% 24.1% 30.1% 26.8% 28.7% 24.7%
Indonesia 20.09% 10.95% 12.23% 5.83% 12.19% 12.46% 12.81% 10.99% 11.19% 8.71% 8.3% 8.0% 12.1% 14.2% 16.4% 25.0% 37.0%
Iran 55.54% 53.26% 54.09% 66.81% 85.88% 86.58% 87.66% 58.66% 45.02% 38.55% 41.8% 48.2% 37.6% 31.0% 38.9% 40.1% 42.5%
Iraq 33.44% 37.09% 44.63% 36.48% 45.24% 49.94% 56.95% 60.71% 51.71% 52.82% 41.4% 39.2% 32.8% 27.3% 42.2% 31.8% 46.3%
Ireland 22.19% 19.41% 21.32% 40.00% 26.07% 22.69% 21.77% 17.89% 15.48% 18.34% 19.6% 16.9% 21.1% 23.3% 25.1% 24.2% 20.0%
Israel 8.64% 3.30% 2.27% 4.92% 6.52% 5.33% 5.10% 4.88% 4.09% 3.85% 8.2% 8.6% 5.4% 6.9% 6.4% 5.1% 3.0%
Italy 10.89% 10.62% 9.75% 15.86% 20.82% 15.03% 14.83% 12.54% 10.86% 22.10% 22.9% 15.2% 13.3% 18.3% 16.1% 11.1% 9.3%
Ivory Coast 30.08% 24.85% 23.08% 25.33% 40.66% 35.73% 33.81% 33.72% 37.38% 28.59% 29.8% 30.3% 27.7% 39.6% 47.0% 36.5% 40.9%
Jamaica 43.67% 40.29% 30.04% 19.13% 57.07% 56.59% 54.46% 46.78% 35.64% 37.62% 32.3% 35.3% 41.6% 45.7% 47.4% 46.4% 35.5%
Japan 5.76% 6.05% 5.79% 4.69% 10.43% 10.48% 9.76% 8.47% 8.12% 12.22% 9.3% 10.9% 10.2% 18.7% 15.0% 16.0% 14.8%
Jordan 45.86% 28.51% 27.90% 38.09% 44.44% 45.26% 42.62% 40.06% 40.34% 37.59% 26.9% 32.6% 30.8% 34.5% 40.1% 31.4% 43.2%
Kazakhstan 46.29% 41.93% 44.02% 43.29% 47.34% 42.58% 39.38% 32.81% 27.55% 12.70% 9.9% 8.0% 7.5% 8.3% 9.4% 12.2% 11.7%
Kenya 63.32% 51.68% 42.02% 34.86% 50.26% 49.86% 41.59% 33.17% 26.60% 27.34% 27.3% 28.3% 33.6% 39.3% 40.2% 35.8% 35.6%
Kiribati 10.81% 20.55% 30.43% 50.00% 55.56% 11.69% 25.33% 5.13% 5.81% 16.05% 15.4% 27.3% 22.9% 20.7% 20.9% 10.2% 26.2%
Kosovo 36.52% 29.79% 17.93% 12.51% 39.47% 36.76% 35.97% 37.92% 41.48% 44.03% 38.1% 40.0% 31.7% 29.0% 25.4% 29.0% 47.9%
Kuwait 5.50% 3.96% 16.04% 18.18% 5.01% 3.27% 2.71% 8.32% 4.56% 5.73% 5.7% 10.3% 4.8% 2.8% 3.6% -2.2% 6.5%
Kyrgyzstan 39.14% 41.54% 37.85% 44.00% 65.60% 67.75% 58.90% 55.58% 51.68% 55.75% 43.2% 24.9% 26.4% 18.0% 17.5% 32.8% 32.1%
Laos 82.84% 72.79% 56.20% 89.86% 70.57% 65.60% 64.06% 63.66% 62.37% 66.68% 61.1% 61.4% 60.1% 74.8% 74.4% 72.4% 73.4%
Latvia 7.67% 9.28% 9.95% 15.91% 23.01% 18.98% 15.24% 12.83% 13.45% 18.40% 23.3% 20.4% 23.4% 29.7% 33.9% 19.5% 8.3%
Lebanon 35.03% 38.78% 39.40% 52.21% 28.44% 23.85% 25.22% 31.75% 25.41% 27.10% 16.1% 15.1% 18.1% 20.9% 22.4% 18.6% 27.9%
Lesotho 29.57% 25.82% 22.22% 50.00% 26.74% 28.24% 21.94% 35.97% 21.20% 13.95% 16.7% 19.4% 11.2% 18.6% 21.1% 17.7% 32.1%
Liberia 79.38% 78.19% 62.73% 54.17% 67.62% 73.93% 64.36% 64.98% 70.23% 62.45% 49.4% 59.0% 45.5% 56.1% 57.6% 66.0% 70.7%
Libya 24.64% 19.41% 22.78% 24.26% 80.90% 89.05% 73.73% 45.50% 40.58% 43.02% 33.9% 33.8% 38.9% 30.8% 14.3% 19.2% 27.1%
Liechtenstein 0.00% 0.00% 12.50% 25.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 11.1% 10.0% 0.0% 0.0% 5.9% 12.5% 0.0%
Lithuania 21.04% 13.40% 14.81% 15.91% 21.96% 18.67% 17.29% 22.54% 22.36% 33.49% 37.7% 33.1% 34.0% 34.7% 31.9% 17.6% 9.0%
Luxembourg 10.86% 4.22% 7.84% 0.00% 7.41% 10.22% 5.19% 5.74% 7.69% 5.88% 12.2% 8.3% 4.7% 5.5% 7.0% 10.0% 7.8%
Macau 9.85% 11.57% 20.17% 12.50% 7.12% 5.03% 7.79% 5.38% 7.71% 9.30% 3.1% 2.3% 8.9% 12.0% 16.4% 14.2%
Madagascar 13.12% 12.07% 13.24% 21.82% 14.36% 7.69% 11.77% 11.00% 12.12% 11.01% 11.6% 9.3% 17.5% 15.0% 15.7% 18.2% 11.9%
Malawi 47.78% 39.25% 38.54% 12.12% 42.67% 37.05% 28.20% 26.49% 14.52% 10.23% 12.3% 13.8% 16.5% 26.9% 26.9% 27.1% 28.9%
Malaysia 6.79% 4.43% 9.41% 7.21% 6.97% 4.91% 4.94% 3.93% 3.65% 3.34% 4.6% 5.0% 5.4% 4.7% 5.9% 6.6% 5.6%
Maldives 25.82% 14.66% 23.65% 66.67% 22.88% 33.65% 39.88% 27.74% 47.56% 15.49% 6.7% 22.9% 42.2% 0.9% 12.2% 19.7% 4.7%
Mali 60.90% 60.16% 64.08% 62.96% 55.99% 55.89% 50.60% 59.43% 57.58% 52.77% 54.0% 47.7% 54.7% 51.0% 55.7% 52.8% 48.1%
Malta 12.43% 10.56% 10.78% 16.67% 28.38% 17.76% 9.59% 4.81% 8.38% 7.87% 11.1% 6.6% 17.6% 11.9% 12.5% 3.8% 2.5%
Marshall Islands 63.16% 31.58% 0.00% 0.00% 45.45% 30.77% 17.39% 5.88% 29.41% 26.67% 4.80% 22.70% 15.60% 8.30% 10.40% 7.30% 14.00%
Mauritania 70.07% 76.43% 89.72% 83.14% 80.15% 67.79% 61.58% 67.30% 71.45% 61.45% 52.2% 50.0% 54.7% 61.5% 49.7% 54.1% 51.0%
Mauritius 6.27% 6.90% 7.77% 9.92% 6.22% 6.59% 6.49% 8.29% 5.53% 5.71% 2.2% 4.7% 5.0% 7.5% 6.0% 7.2% 11.6%
Mexico 13.87% 10.57% 5.91% 4.23% 23.16% 26.66% 24.93% 22.50% 23.49% 20.17% 15.6% 12.1% 10.6% 12.8% 11.1% 10.9% 11.4%
Micronesia 0.00% 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 25.00% 85.71% 80.00% 100.00% 50.00% 33.30% 0.00% 100.00% 50.00%
Moldova 46.99% 42.42% 43.57% 66.37% 51.00% 58.03% 61.10% 49.12% 36.35% 41.83% 40.1% 33.6% 31.0% 34.7% 38.5% 41.3% 36.7%
Monaco 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 50.00% 22.22% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 12.50% 0.0% 33.3% 57.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 25.0%
Mongolia 39.36% 37.34% 38.32% 39.57% 45.47% 54.60% 56.51% 53.62% 43.63% 34.76% 27.9% 30.6% 37.0% 44.5% 37.1% 34.9% 53.6%
Montenegro 36.48% 43.59% 34.03% 9.30% 58.53% 39.10% 35.35% 26.41% 28.69% 31.26% 28.0% 32.6% 31.4% 39.0% 36.6% 27.5% 25.6%
Morocco 14.45% 15.92% 21.90% 20.85% 23.35% 28.48% 42.88% 36.99% 26.77% 20.60% 21.9% 23.3% 21.3% 15.1% 15.5% 19.6% 24.0%
Mozambique 34.75% 22.23% 20.48% 32.75% 18.64% 14.24% 10.22% 26.18% 10.29% 4.03% 4.0% 2.2% 3.2% 2.6% 6.7% 11.4% 13.8%
Myanmar 62.58% 43.67% 46.15% 39.40% 40.68% 30.91% 23.12% 17.88% 13.02% 16.32% 15.5% 23.5% 31.0% 33.2% 32.0% 34.2% 41.9%
Namibia 21.95% 22.40% 12.05% 10.71% 5.20% 6.60% 8.40% 6.31% 5.56% 7.43% 7.6% 6.2% 8.8% 8.9% 14.9% 10.8% 6.8%
Nauru 0.00% 10.00% 66.67% 0.00% 25.00% 20.83% 21.43% 20.97% 13.33% 5.26% 42.9% 0.0% 18.2% 16.7% 41.7% 60.0% 66.7%
Nepal 49.47% 31.03% 19.85% 18.72% 48.11% 50.70% 51.53% 46.42% 49.54% 42.19% 38.2% 46.4% 49.4% 59.9% 58.3% 59.1% 51.2%
Netherlands 14.79% 16.81% 16.97% 25.28% 12.89% 11.82% 9.56% 9.65% 16.62% 13.01% 14.4% 11.2% 23.1% 21.1% 19.2% 18.0% 13.7%
New Zealand 22.79% 13.28% 12.52% 12.74% 14.47% 16.32% 19.97% 22.02% 15.45% 16.94% 15.1% 14.0% 13.3% 19.3% 19.0% 16.1% 14.0%
Nicaragua 58.71% 65.60% 50.81% 12.72% 63.17% 63.52% 46.75% 43.28% 44.54% 41.19% 35.8% 26.7% 27.6% 30.1% 33.8% 35.1% 41.8%
Niger 38.18% 30.76% 43.67% 61.39% 53.50% 42.76% 43.33% 30.65% 31.14% 31.10% 36.4% 27.5% 35.9% 41.3% 41.3% 44.1% 55.7%
Nigeria 46.51% 29.23% 25.80% 43.78% 64.83% 67.20% 57.47% 44.95% 41.44% 32.56% 33.2% 35.1% 33.6% 38.0% 33.7% 37.3% 36.0%
North Korea 0.00% 100.00% 0.00% 100.00% 0.00% 100.00% 100.00% 54.55% 15.00% 47.67% 55.6% 28.6% 36.0% 8.3% 23.3% 4.0% 16.3%
North Macedonia 28.00% 29.13% 26.29% 12.31% 29.62% 36.19% 31.29% 28.69% 33.84% 36.08% 29.8% 27.0% 20.7% 19.6% 20.0% 21.5% 33.5%
Norway 19.44% 17.96% 16.53% 8.65% 17.07% 17.35% 12.40% 17.36% 21.96% 25.12% 21.4% 19.1% 17.8% 18.1% 17.2% 15.2% 11.9%
Oman 4.50% 4.76% 18.45% 16.45% 6.32% 5.13% 4.87% 3.46% 1.93% 2.00% 2.1% 2.3% 4.5% 5.7% 8.7% 2.8% 2.2%
Pakistan 45.65% 40.82% 31.43% 32.53% 45.62% 48.26% 47.89% 49.40% 46.43% 40.40% 38.0% 38.5% 37.3% 40.0% 41.6% 40.7% 46.3%
Palau 63.64% 100.00% 66.67% 0.00% 40.00% 100.00% 71.43% 83.33% 53.33% 96.00% 84.20% 29.20% 35.70% 57.10% 54.50% 0.00% 20.00%
Palestine 44.51% 34.77% 33.96% 50.80% 58.27% 52.92% 53.87% 50.98% 40.64% 42.68% 36.7% 37.6% 38.9% 34.2% 36.2% 45.2% 55.6%
Panama 19.93% 23.95% 13.54% 8.29% 15.33% 18.93% 11.71% 11.61% 12.05% 11.36% 10.0% 8.0% 8.4% 11.3% 11.2% 13.1% 19.2%
Papua New Guinea 3.85% 6.15% 4.93% 3.45% 6.64% 1.74% 6.84% 9.34% 10.56% 5.14% 7.4% 3.1% 2.95% 5.0% 3.7% 5.7% 3.4%
Paraguay 18.09% 16.00% 17.95% 13.33% 16.80% 12.41% 8.02% 6.83% 7.47% 6.15% 6.1% 4.4% 4.6% 7.6% 9.3% 9.8% 14.4%
Peru 21.30% 24.23% 27.61% 4.11% 24.13% 25.39% 28.53% 25.97% 28.61% 14.46% 13.8% 16.1% 20.1% 22.7% 26.0% 29.1% 37.7%
Philippines 28.33% 23.93% 11.59% 10.20% 32.49% 24.40% 27.07% 25.54% 27.29% 27.96% 24.6% 24.1% 23.8% 33.8% 37.9% 35.9% 31.0%
Poland 10.99% 16.47% 14.74% 18.48% 8.91% 2.76% 3.99% 5.92% 5.37% 6.37% 6.4% 10.8% 9.3% 10.2% 9.8% 13.5% 13.8%
Portugal 7.91% 10.52% 9.41% 17.86% 9.75% 6.52% 7.28% 11.06% 8.97% 8.41% 4.7% 9.9% 10.3% 16.2% 17.7% 17.4% 10.7%
Qatar 4.67% 2.53% 12.86% 11.69% 8.28% 10.33% 8.34% 7.48% 3.50% 2.97% 2.1% 1.8% 1.2% 0.6% 3.2% 3.4% 4.9%
Romania 2.61% 8.79% 12.61% 17.03% 10.14% 9.11% 10.44% 11.76% 11.43% 11.16% 9.8% 11.5% 17.0% 22.4% 24.8% 26.3% 25.0%
Russia 38.56% 39.49% 26.18% 29.42% 17.79% 15.19% 14.89% 11.61% 9.29% 10.24% 7.8% 10.2% 9.6% 10.3% 10.1% 4.9% 7.5%
Rwanda 55.76% 71.09% 62.92% 34.96% 63.93% 53.76% 44.51% 52.17% 43.79% 49.17% 51.1% 44.9% 30.9% 40.6% 48.1% 53.2% 50.3%
Saint Kitts and Nevis 26.64% 20.95% 17.14% 19.35% 23.28% 21.87% 24.98% 26.66% 28.31% 26.60% 27.5% 30.7% 27.2% 23.3% 22.7% 16.1% 25.0%
Saint Lucia 26.82% 16.60% 16.72% 17.47% 23.31% 16.75% 21.90% 22.34% 27.16% 26.90% 27.6% 22.5% 28.2% 25.4% 23.8% 17.2% 26.6%
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 26.64% 16.99% 14.12% 15.08% 21.10% 14.55% 19.77% 20.38% 27.46% 27.15% 24.1% 22.5% 27.2% 25.8% 27.2% 17.1% 26.4%
Samoa 45.75% 34.37% 29.52% 32.58% 36.87% 27.02% 26.26% 40.32% 28.44% 29.99% 27.2% 22.1% 29.5% 41.7% 37.0% 22.4% 32.4%
San Marino 9.09% 33.33% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 50.00% 25.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 50.0%
São Tomé and Príncipe 50.00% 46.67% 21.43% 20.00% 36.36% 34.78% 26.09% 14.81% 24.14% 5.71% 10.7% 22.2% 18.0% 31.7% 16.7% 33.3% 28.6%
Saudi Arabia 7.89% 5.01% 14.29% 13.43% 10.01% 6.82% 7.47% 5.26% 4.04% 3.24% 3.3% 7.8% 7.6% 6.3% 6.0% 3.8% 6.6%
Senegal 74.65% 70.47% 66.48% 34.95% 65.28% 55.88% 59.18% 56.85% 52.46% 54.37% 57.5% 53.2% 67.0% 62.8% 59.6% 60.2% 55.2%
Serbia 17.77% 16.53% 19.45% 13.27% 25.01% 30.33% 25.93% 22.33% 18.77% 16.54% 16.0% 14.7% 13.7% 15.7% 14.5% 11.0% 11.7%
Serbia and Montenegro 100.0% 100.0% 39.7% 16.2% 14.7% 12.0% 17.1%
Seychelles 7.59% 4.55% 10.26% 0.00% 6.38% 10.60% 11.64% 13.14% 9.66% 7.26% 6.8% 4.3% 4.8% 15.9% 8.5% 21.3% 18.0%
Sierra Leone 69.36% 49.02% 45.16% 35.70% 59.35% 57.99% 60.56% 47.30% 61.25% 53.02% 51.9% 46.5% 50.3% 48.0% 45.7% 52.6% 50.1%
Singapore 10.40% 15.22% 10.10% 9.72% 10.17% 18.07% 14.29% 13.74% 15.10% 17.82% 16.6% 25.0% 24.6% 22.7% 16.6% 16.0% 11.7%
Slovakia 11.58% 11.49% 15.86% 10.87% 28.08% 11.99% 16.21% 13.30% 12.28% 11.14% 17.3% 15.3% 13.5% 16.6% 11.8% 8.3% 5.3%
Slovenia 12.42% 13.86% 13.47% 15.19% 17.11% 12.33% 12.33% 19.22% 10.43% 10.56% 7.0% 12.1% 23.4% 14.4% 28.5% 7.8% 6.7%
Solomon Islands 5.00% 4.35% 7.69% 0.00% 9.09% 2.20% 3.57% 16.79% 4.28% 7.26% 5.4% 12.7% 5.4% 13.1% 10.7% 17.0% 6.5%
Somalia 77.02% 69.89% 73.97% 66.67% 71.76% 80.77% 90.16% 75.50% 63.89% 64.60% 52.0% 65.8% 61.7% 66.8% 69.6% 73.4% 54.0%
South Africa 10.65% 11.27% 9.68% 17.67% 7.80% 6.92% 7.31% 6.44% 6.83% 5.08% 2.6% 2.6% 2.9% 4.6% 4.1% 3.8% 4.6%
South Korea 14.97% 14.44% 17.38% 18.03% 8.46% 7.69% 7.96% 9.05% 8.65% 13.21% 21.2% 18.1% 13.0% 7.5% 9.4% 5.5% 3.8%
South Sudan 60.35% 48.94% 49.04% 45.71% 53.36% 52.32% 41.29% 47.52% 43.89% 41.77% 43.8% 41.9% 37.7% 23.8%
Spain 16.39% 15.66% 10.75% 18.29% 20.17% 16.53% 14.04% 17.26% 15.09% 17.76% 15.8% 16.0% 10.2% 6.6% 6.5% 7.7% 9.9%
Sri Lanka 29.76% 26.61% 22.13% 25.34% 36.00% 35.12% 33.61% 26.19% 21.69% 22.07% 19.5% 20.6% 34.7% 25.2% 28.6% 40.8% 31.4%
Sudan 54.59% 49.34% 38.83% 40.90% 50.25% 57.44% 59.83% 51.37% 36.59% 40.45% 42.4% 47.9% 45.4% 40.6% 32.5% 62.2% 38.6%
Suriname 13.63% 14.44% 11.91% 6.42% 10.83% 7.44% 8.57% 11.44% 10.86% 7.78% 13.6% 9.6% 11.6% 18.0% 18.6% 15.5% 9.6%
Sweden 21.46% 20.68% 17.07% 39.46% 18.35% 13.32% 15.20% 13.92% 12.78% 23.19% 15.4% 21.0% 16.3% 22.3% 20.5% 19.3% 15.2%
Switzerland 5.39% 5.36% 3.05% 18.92% 10.92% 7.20% 5.50% 5.89% 5.20% 4.62% 7.2% 4.4% 3.6% 4.2% 3.3% 2.8% 3.4%
Syria 45.84% 47.42% 42.87% 44.04% 66.68% 74.83% 77.31% 59.11% 59.77% 63.43% 60.0% 46.1% 42.0% 32.8% 28.4% 23.6% 33.1%
Taiwan 5.22% 4.92% 4.56% 12.65% 5.02% 4.62% 6.80% 5.42% 5.36% 8.81% 12.3% 6.9% 1.4% 1.9% 2.2% 4.4% 5.9%
Tajikistan 45.24% 54.96% 57.93% 57.24% 59.55% 60.97% 53.39% 51.84% 55.24% 44.44% 49.0% 53.7% 42.6% 30.3% 31.4% 23.8% 32.4%
Tanzania 36.69% 34.13% 29.37% 7.27% 31.04% 23.90% 19.87% 18.36% 23.05% 12.02% 21.3% 25.7% 15.8% 27.5% 24.2% 28.3% 26.2%
Thailand 22.50% 24.34% 24.36% 31.82% 24.44% 23.41% 22.17% 20.15% 17.82% 12.35% 10.2% 11.1% 10.2% 11.4% 13.5% 16.4% 19.8%
Togo 66.60% 55.13% 43.87% 16.98% 62.32% 59.78% 59.61% 59.88% 54.39% 43.42% 35.6% 44.0% 37.7% 35.8% 42.1% 42.6% 51.7%
Tonga 47.33% 50.61% 51.27% 46.67% 48.15% 45.85% 51.33% 32.85% 31.58% 28.09% 25.4% 42.1% 41.5% 46.5% 42.8% 47.8% 48.7%
Trinidad and Tobago 18.18% 16.62% 13.64% 7.05% 14.10% 13.05% 19.28% 22.46% 22.70% 25.16% 21.2% 20.6% 18.7% 19.3% 32.0% 33.1% 23.8%
Tunisia 23.21% 26.14% 21.06% 24.92% 19.11% 24.17% 27.67% 19.53% 15.92% 19.69% 17.5% 17.0% 16.8% 17.2% 15.6% 18.5% 23.9%
Turkey 19.78% 20.59% 19.96% 13.70% 17.46% 19.19% 17.49% 17.86% 13.62% 13.88% 7.1% 10.3% 8.1% 7.0% 9.1% 9.0% 11.2%
Turkmenistan 58.80% 51.10% 35.69% 32.00% 58.55% 56.26% 52.93% 40.60% 32.95% 25.41% 18.6% 16.3% 17.7% 24.3% 20.6% 19.8% 45.4%
Tuvalu 8.33% 22.22% 27.27% 0.00% 33.33% 25.81% 34.78% 15.38% 20.00% 21.05% 27.3% 71.4% 21.4% 32.0% 38.1% 28.6% 17.6%
Uganda 47.29% 47.13% 42.15% 38.70% 49.82% 51.65% 42.29% 42.38% 41.53% 30.63% 37.2% 32.7% 33.2% 37.3% 36.3% 38.8% 34.4%
Ukraine 33.45% 34.29% 41.27% 15.15% 43.14% 45.06% 40.97% 34.54% 40.83% 34.03% 27.7% 26.7% 26.9% 29.0% 31.8% 36.8% 30.9%
United Arab Emirates 1.46% 4.18% 10.06% 8.93% 8.44% 5.56% 3.75% 5.80% 4.02% 7.10% 4.8% 8.0% 9.0% 5.7% 9.7% 9.6% 10.4%
United Kingdom 18.03% 14.69% 15.55% 11.97% 23.58% 21.05% 20.29% 20.15% 20.42% 20.41% 19.4% 16.9% 20.6% 27.3% 25.5% 27.8% 25.5%
Uruguay 2.63% 3.21% 5.70% 8.82% 9.77% 5.91% 4.11% 3.19% 3.14% 2.70% 1.8% 2.8% 2.7% 3.8% 5.6% 5.4% 9.5%
Uzbekistan 64.41% 59.56% 47.04% 45.98% 74.14% 68.06% 61.76% 50.29% 57.09% 49.59% 52.1% 44.3% 40.4% 50.2% 46.8% 41.1% 61.1%
Vanuatu 46.23% 38.84% 36.09% 33.33% 46.34% 41.05% 38.30% 13.51% 16.67% 10.53% 20.0% 14.9% 12.5% 15.0% 13.3% 20.0% 16.7%
Vatican City 0.00% 14.29% 14.29% 0.00% 0.00% 8.33% 0.00% 36.36% 0.00% 25.00% 7.7% 33.3% 0.0% 11.8% 14.3% 7.1% 16.7%
Venezuela 37.40% 34.88% 34.01% 27.22% 52.30% 59.53% 74.28% 42.87% 40.25% 15.57% 15.2% 13.8% 12.0% 16.1% 17.6% 18.3% 25.4%
Vietnam 22.12% 25.78% 14.98% 11.32% 18.78% 23.70% 26.20% 24.06% 29.49% 23.43% 14.3% 20.3% 22.2% 33.5% 36.1% 42.3% 38.8%
Western Sahara 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 100.00%
Yemen 58.07% 57.16% 56.14% 54.30% 76.66% 78.45% 82.50% 60.76% 48.85% 54.01% 44.2% 44.0% 47.8% 48.4% 54.3% 47.3% 54.7%
Zambia 44.97% 32.36% 33.22% 16.54% 44.78% 40.64% 22.45% 21.72% 22.26% 20.98% 22.2% 26.2% 22.9% 22.1% 23.1% 38.9% 53.3%
Zimbabwe 39.47% 34.55% 26.76% 9.31% 29.41% 26.92% 26.60% 26.32% 22.88% 21.03% 13.2% 19.7% 19.2% 21.8% 28.1% 31.3% 30.3%
Unknown or stateless 41.41% 43.95% 45.44% 49.74% 46.06% 43.16% 40.27% 35.61% 28.92% 32.62% 32.3% 27.0% 31.6% 39.2% 42.4% 50.2% 51.6%

Overstay rate

The table below shows the overstay rate, which is the portion of visitors arriving under the Visa Waiver Program who remained in the United States longer than the maximum allowed stay of 90 days. Some of these visitors later left the United States or legalized their immigration status.

Overstay rate by country and fiscal year
Country 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015
Andorra 0.91% 1.32% 0.00% 0.43% 0.63% 0.19% 0.44% 0.69% 0.41%
Australia 0.38% 0.92% 2.38% 0.48% 0.37% 0.28% 0.39% 0.56% 0.37%
Austria 0.37% 0.61% 1.37% 0.70% 0.38% 0.34% 0.41% 1.37% 1.33%
Belgium 0.35% 0.65% 1.64% 0.53% 0.36% 0.31% 0.55% 0.54% 0.56%
Brunei 1.00% 2.12% 4.55% 2.14% 0.99% 0.78% 1.29% 0.98% 0.96%
Chile 2.62% 2.97% 3.94% 1.76% 1.34% 1.49% 1.33% 1.71% 2.33%
Croatia 0.51% 1.34%
Czech Republic 0.52% 0.88% 2.90% 0.77% 0.51% 0.63% 0.80% 1.11% 1.65%
Denmark 0.26% 0.40% 0.98% 0.43% 0.29% 0.23% 0.40% 0.50% 0.60%
Estonia 0.38% 0.95% 3.75% 0.67% 0.61% 0.47% 0.72% 0.84% 1.16%
Finland 0.24% 0.38% 0.86% 0.53% 0.35% 0.23% 0.45% 0.46% 0.55%
France 0.55% 0.81% 2.17% 0.79% 0.55% 0.60% 0.91% 0.68% 0.76%
Germany 0.35% 0.60% 1.59% 0.47% 0.39% 0.32% 0.51% 0.98% 1.07%
Greece 1.24% 2.62% 4.82% 1.71% 1.27% 1.26% 1.71% 2.19% 2.31%
Hungary 1.19% 2.02% 6.50% 1.24% 1.03% 1.26% 2.04% 2.75% 2.92%
Iceland 0.16% 0.27% 1.57% 0.33% 0.28% 0.21% 0.33% 0.33% 0.46%
Ireland 0.37% 0.52% 2.27% 0.42% 0.29% 0.31% 0.50% 0.53% 0.47%
Italy 0.81% 2.25% 3.91% 0.86% 0.63% 0.54% 0.83% 1.36% 1.60%
Japan 0.15% 0.64% 0.78% 0.27% 0.15% 0.16% 0.22% 0.16% 0.20%
Latvia 1.18% 2.01% 3.01% 1.28% 0.96% 1.03% 1.34% 1.75% 1.92%
Liechtenstein 0.16% 0.32% 0.00% 0.44% 0.96% 0.21% 0.60% 0.82% 0.68%
Lithuania 0.90% 2.20% 5.83% 1.44% 1.18% 1.32% 1.44% 1.99% 2.20%
Luxembourg 0.32% 0.66% 0.72% 0.50% 0.38% 0.35% 0.51% 0.78% 0.57%
Malta 0.68% 1.07% 1.40% 0.59% 0.48% 0.35% 0.59% 1.01% 0.85%
Monaco 0.41% 0.93% 0.00% 0.45% 0.32% 0.40% 0.19% 0.55% 0.44%
Netherlands 0.41% 0.62% 1.42% 0.51% 0.34% 0.40% 0.53% 0.64% 1.15%
New Zealand 0.34% 1.42% 2.39% 0.53% 0.36% 0.32% 0.52% 0.58% 0.49%
Norway 0.26% 0.51% 2.22% 0.39% 0.25% 0.23% 0.31% 0.41% 0.46%
Poland 0.65% 1.55% 3.54% 0.95%
Portugal 2.30% 4.75% 7.38% 2.19% 1.80% 1.80% 2.08% 2.42% 2.31%
San Marino 0.28% 3.20% 0.00% 0.74% 0.14% 0.41% 0.42% 2.01% 2.28%
Singapore 0.28% 0.75% 3.15% 0.28% 0.29% 0.22% 0.29% 0.49% 0.38%
Slovakia 0.73% 1.29% 3.34% 1.17% 0.70% 0.93% 1.07% 1.85% 2.36%
Slovenia 0.33% 0.75% 1.67% 0.59% 0.41% 0.39% 0.59% 1.03% 1.17%
South Korea 0.30% 0.91% 1.65% 0.35% 0.27% 0.29% 0.37% 0.46% 0.76%
Spain 2.38% 5.58% 6.65% 1.68% 1.31% 1.12% 1.38% 1.46% 1.40%
Sweden 0.32% 0.56% 2.10% 0.43% 0.29% 0.26% 0.44% 0.53% 0.48%
Switzerland 0.39% 0.64% 1.48% 0.51% 0.45% 0.30% 0.39% 0.59% 0.55%
Taiwan 0.75% 3.56% 2.76% 0.60% 0.52% 0.41% 0.59% 0.57% 0.53%
United Kingdom 0.41% 0.56% 1.70% 0.64% 0.33% 0.30% 0.54% 0.50% 0.43%
Total 0.62% 1.32% 2.96% 0.64% 0.44% 0.41% 0.58% 0.68% 0.73%

Other visa waivers

Nationals of neighboring jurisdictions

Separate from the Visa Waiver Program, 8 U.S.C. § 1182(d)(4)(B) permits the Attorney General and the Secretary of State (acting jointly) to waive visa requirements for admission to the United States in nonimmigrant status for nationals of foreign contiguous territories or adjacent islands or for residents of those territories or islands who have a common nationality with those nationals. The regulations relating to such admissions can be found at 8 CFR 212.1.

Under this provision, nationals of the following jurisdictions may travel to the United States without a visa:

  •  Bahamas – Nationals of the Bahamas do not need a visa to travel to the United States if they apply for admission at a U.S. preclearance facility located in the Bahamas. Applicants 14 years of age or older must present a certificate issued by the Royal Bahamas Police Force indicating no criminal record.
  •  Bermuda – British Overseas Territories citizens of Bermuda do not need a visa to visit the United States under most circumstances for up to 180 days.
  •  British Virgin Islands – British Overseas Territories citizens of the British Virgin Islands may travel without a visa to the U.S. Virgin Islands. They may also continue travel to other parts of the United States if they present a certificate issued by the Royal Virgin Islands Police Force indicating no criminal record.
  •  Canada – Nationals of Canada do not need a visa to visit the United States under most circumstances. In addition, under the USMCA (and earlier NAFTA), they may obtain authorization to work under a simplified procedure.
  •  Cayman Islands – British Overseas Territories citizens of the Cayman Islands do not need a visa if they travel directly from the territory to the United States and present a certificate issued by the Royal Cayman Islands Police Service indicating no criminal record.
  •  Mexico – Some nationals of Mexico do not need a visa to travel to the United States: government officials not permanently assigned to the United States and their accompanying family members, holding diplomatic or official passports, for stays of up to six months; members of the Kickapoo tribes of Texas or Oklahoma, holding Form I-872, American Indian Card; and crew members of Mexican airlines operating in the United States. Other nationals of Mexico may travel to the United States with a Border Crossing Card, which functions as a visa and has similar requirements. Under the USMCA (and earlier NAFTA), they may also obtain authorization to work under a simplified procedure.
  •  Turks and Caicos Islands – British Overseas Territories citizens of the Turks and Caicos Islands do not need a visa if they travel directly from the territory to the United States and present a certificate issued by the Royal Turks and Caicos Islands Police Force indicating no criminal record.

Restrictions on the use of the Visa Waiver Program do not affect this class of travelers unless separately provided for by statute or regulation. For example, a Canadian citizen who has briefly overstayed a previous visit to the United States (by less than 180 days) will still not require a visa for future visits, while a VWP national who overstays will become ineligible for the VWP for life and will need a visa for future visits. ESTA is not required from British Overseas Territories citizens using one of the above waivers with the respective territory's passport, but it is required if they use the VWP with a British citizen passport.

Until 2003, this visa waiver was granted not only to nationals of those countries and territories, but also to permanent residents of Bermuda and Canada who were nationals of countries in the Commonwealth of Nations or Ireland.

Citizens of freely associated states

Under Compacts of Free Association, citizens of the following countries may enter, reside, study and work in the United States indefinitely without a visa. These benefits are granted to citizens from birth or independence, and to naturalized citizens who have resided in the respective country for at least five years, excluding those who acquired citizenship by investment.

See also

Notes

  1. ESTA is not available for nationals of Hungary born outside Hungary.
  2. Only holders of biometric passports. German child passports, which could be requested for children under age 12 as an alternative to a standard German passport before 2024, are not biometric and thus are not eligible for ESTA. The last passports of this kind were set to expire at the end of 2026.
  3. Only holders of biometric passports issued with full validity, which can only be requested in person in Israel. Passports requested at Israeli diplomatic missions abroad, which are not biometric, and those requested online or for recent immigrants in Israel, which are issued with reduced validity, are not eligible for ESTA.
  4. Only holders of passports with a national identification number.
  5. Only British citizens are eligible for the visa waiver.
  6. For nationals of Brunei applying from July 6, 2023, ESTA is valid for one year. For nationals of Hungary applying from August 1, 2023, ESTA is valid for one year and for a single entry to the United States.
  7. There is an exemption in some cases for a single offense committed before age 18 and the crime was committed (and the person released from any confinement to a prison or correctional institution imposed for the crime) more than five years before the date of application for a visa, and also for a single instance if the maximum possible sentence in the United States is one year or less in jail, and less than six months was served. However, these exceptions cannot be applied by the individual as the question on ESTA is specific.
  8. Included in the VWP from 1996 to 2002.
  9. Included in the VWP from 1999 to 2003.
  10. Only for travel to the Northern Mariana Islands for up to 14 days. For holders of a Chinese passport, not including Hong Kong or Macau Special Administrative Region passports.
  11. Holders of a Hong Kong Special Administrative Region passport with a Hong Kong identity card.
  12. Must travel on a nonstop flight from Taiwan and hold a valid Taiwan passport and national identification card.
  13. Holders of a British citizen passport, or a British National (Overseas) passport with a Hong Kong identity card.
  14. ^ Visa waiver only for Guam and the Northern Mariana Islands.
  15. Refusal rates lower than the VWP requirement (10% for fiscal year 2008, or 3% for other years), for nationalities without visa waivers, are highlighted in green in the table. Refusal rates for nationalities with visa waivers are highlighted in yellow.

References

  1. ^ "Visa Waiver Program". Washington: U.S. Department of State.
  2. "Visa Waiver Program Requirements". Washington: U.S. Department of Homeland Security. Retrieved November 21, 2024.
  3. ^ "Visa Waiver Program". Budapest: U.S. Department of State.
  4. "Visa Waiver Program". U.S. Embassy and Consulates in Germany.
  5. "Document: DEU-AO-02002". Public Register of Authentic identity and travel Documents Online. European Council and Council of the European Union.
  6. "Visa Waiver Travel for Israeli Citizens". U.S. Department of State. October 19, 2023.
  7. "ESTA – FAQS". U.S. Embassy in Israel.
  8. "Issuance of travel documents (passport) for citizens and residents of Israel". Embassy of Israel in Washington. June 17, 2024.
  9. "Get a biometric passport or identity card online". Government of Israel. April 30, 2024.
  10. "Immigrants ("olim"): eligibility for a passport or a travel document" (PDF). Population and Immigration Authority of Israel. July 2021.
  11. "Machine Readable Biometric Passports". London: U.S. Department of State.
  12. Miller, Candice (December 9, 2015). "Text – H.R.158 – 114th Congress (2015–2016): Visa Waiver Program Improvement and Terrorist Travel Prevention Act of 2015". Retrieved February 6, 2017.
  13. ^ "Visa Waiver Program | Embassy of the United States Canberra, Australia". March 2, 2012. Archived from the original on March 2, 2012. Retrieved February 22, 2020.
  14. "9 FAM 101.1 INTRODUCTION TO 9 FAM". fam.state.gov. Retrieved February 6, 2017.
  15. Bloxham, Andy (June 3, 2008). "US to demand 72hrs notice for British tourists". The Daily Telegraph. London. Archived from the original on June 6, 2008. Retrieved May 27, 2010.
  16. ^ Frequently asked questions, Electronic System for Travel Authorization, U.S. Customs and Border Protection.
  17. CBP Expands ESTA Requirements for Visa Waiver Program Travelers, U.S. Customs and Border Protection, April 7, 2022.
  18. United States Begins Implementation of Changes to the Visa Waiver Program, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, January 21, 2016.
  19. Visa denials Archived December 22, 2013, at the Wayback Machine retrieved April 19, 2012
  20. "B-1 Temporary Business Visitor". USCIS. July 14, 2015. Retrieved February 3, 2020.
  21. "B Visa Overview". US Immigration Lawyer, Law Offices of Rajiv S. Khanna, PC, Rajiv S. Khanna. February 6, 2009. Retrieved February 3, 2020.
  22. "Do you want or need to extend your stay in the U.S.?". USCIS. May 22, 2019. Retrieved February 3, 2020.
  23. "8 USC §§ 1187, 1255(c)(4); Freeman v Gonzales, 444 F.3d 1031 (9th Cir. 2006)" (PDF). Ca9.uscourts.gov.
  24. Smith, Lamar (October 30, 2000). "H.R.3767 - 106th Congress (1999-2000): Visa Waiver Permanent Program Act". www.congress.gov. Retrieved July 1, 2020.
  25. "Visa Waiver Program". The American Embassy in The Hague. Archived from the original on June 19, 2011.
  26. "Working (Legally) on a Visitor's Visa or Visa Waiver Entry". Usvisalawyers.co.uk.
  27. "U.S. Department of State: Visa Waiver Program (VWP)". State.gov. Archived from the original on November 2, 2013.
  28. ^ "Most countries meet e-passport deadline – Defense". GovExec.com. Archived from the original on January 19, 2012. Retrieved July 12, 2012.
  29. "TRAVEL ADVISORY; Accord Allows Trips to Japan Without a Visa". The New York Times. October 30, 1988.
  30. ^ Adding Slovenia to the List of Countries Authorized To Participate in the Visa Waiver Pilot Program and Designating Ireland as a Permanent Participating Country (Formerly With Probationary Status), Federal Register, September 30, 1997.
  31. "United States General Accounting Office: Implications of Eliminating the Visa Waiver Program" (PDF). Retrieved July 12, 2012.
  32. ^ Visa Waiver Pilot Program; Ireland, Federal Register, March 28, 1995.
  33. ^ Termination of the Designation of Argentina as a Participant Under the Visa Waiver Program, Federal Register, February 21, 2002.
  34. ^ Adding Portugal, Singapore and Uruguay to the List of Countries Authorized To Participate in the Visa Waiver Pilot Program, Federal Register, August 3, 1999.
  35. "Visa Waiver Program". Americanlaw.com. Retrieved July 12, 2012.
  36. Shenon, Philip (September 9, 2003). "TWO YEARS LATER: THE BORDERS; New Passport Rules to Fight Terrorism Are Put Off for a Year". The New York Times.
  37. "US imposes biometric entry demand". BBC News. October 26, 2006. Retrieved November 30, 2011.
  38. Security Improvements to Visa Waiver Program Archived June 13, 2007, at the Wayback Machine
  39. ^ Alison Siskin (January 24, 2007). Visa Waiver Program (PDF). Congressional Research Service. p. 14.. "Currently there are 19 'road map' countries. They are Argentina, Brazil, Bulgaria, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Estonia, Greece, Hungary, Israel, South Korea, Latvia, Lithuania, Malta, Poland, Romania, Slovakia, Taiwan, Turkey, and Uruguay."
  40. Calendar No. 715 108th CONGRESS 2d Session S. 2844 Archived October 19, 2015, at the Wayback Machine,
  41. "Comprehensive Immigration Reform Act of 2006 S.2611". Thomas.loc.gov. Archived from the original on October 19, 2015. Retrieved July 12, 2012.
  42. "Secure Travel and Counterterrorism Partnership Act". Govtrack.us. Retrieved July 12, 2012.
  43. "S.4100 - Secure Travel and Counterterrorism Partnership Act". Congress.gov. December 7, 2006. Retrieved May 30, 2016.
  44. Hudson Institute Panel: Enduring Strains of Communism in Central and Eastern Europe
  45. ^ Visa Waiver Program, Congressional Research Service, June 29, 2020.
  46. "Seven Nations to Join U.S. Visa Waiver Program". America.gov. Retrieved June 10, 2016.
  47. "DHS Designates Malta as a Visa Waiver Program Country". Department of Homeland Security. December 22, 2008. Retrieved June 10, 2016.
  48. "Bush announces visa waiver for 7 countries". USA Today. October 19, 2008. Retrieved June 22, 2011.
  49. "Secretary Napolitano Announces Greece's Designation as a Member of the Visa Waiver Program". Dhs.gov. March 9, 2010. Retrieved July 12, 2012.
  50. "Greeks Can Travel to U.S. under Visa Waiver Program Starting April 5 With an Easy Electronic Application". Athens.usembassy.gov. Archived from the original on July 7, 2011. Retrieved July 12, 2012.
  51. DHS Announces Taiwan's Designation into the Visa Waiver Program from http://www.dhs.gov; October 2, 2012
  52. "Visa Waiver Program". American Institute in Taiwan. Retrieved January 26, 2021.
  53. THOMAS search of "United States-Israel Strategic Partnership Act of 2013", S. 462 Archived August 30, 2015, at the Wayback Machine.
  54. Ron Kampeas, In U.S. fight over visa waiver exemption for Israel, both sides cite discrimination, Jewish Telegraphic Agency, April 15, 2013.
  55. "Return to 'moderate mainstream' path to achieve democracy, US consul urges Hong Kong". South China Morning Post. August 20, 2015.
  56. Viola Zhou; Joyce Ng (June 7, 2017). "What is the United States visa waiver scheme that envoy Kurt Tong wants to be applied to Hong Kong?". South China Morning Post.
  57. "Adjusted Refusal Rate B-Visa only, by nationality, fiscal year 2012" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on July 17, 2013. Retrieved May 16, 2013.
  58. ^ "Return to 'moderate mainstream' path to achieve democracy, US consul urges Hong Kong". South China Morning Post. August 20, 2015. Retrieved May 23, 2016.
  59. ^ Designation of Chile for the Visa Waiver Program, Federal Register, March 31, 2014.
  60. Andrea Smith (December 20, 2018). "Travelling to the USA? The ESTA service has one important change". Archived from the original on December 21, 2018.
  61. "To już przesądzone. Koniec wiz dla Polaków do USA".
  62. "Statement from the Press Secretary Regarding the Nomination of Poland for Entry into the Visa Waiver Program – the White House".
  63. "Acting Secretary McAleenan Announces Designation of Poland into the Visa Waiver Program". November 6, 2019. Retrieved November 6, 2019.
  64. "Croatians Soon to Travel Visa-Free to US, After the Country Met Another Condition for Joining Visa Waiver Program". SchengenVisaInfo.com. February 18, 2021. Retrieved February 19, 2021.
  65. Croatia formally nominated to join the U.S. Visa Waiver Program, U.S. Embassy in Croatia, 2 August 2021.
  66. "Secretary Mayorkas Announces Designation of Croatia as a New Participant in the Visa Waiver Program". Department of Homeland Security. September 28, 2021. Retrieved September 28, 2021.
  67. ^ "FAQ: Croatia's Inclusion in the Visa Waiver Program". U.S. Embassy in Croatia. October 22, 2021. Archived from the original on October 25, 2021.
  68. Secretary Mayorkas and Secretary Blinken Announce Designation of Israel into the Visa Waiver Program, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, September 27, 2023.
  69. ^ DHS Announces Start of Applications for Visa-Free Travel to U.S. for Eligible Israeli Citizens and Nationals, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, October 19, 2023.
  70. "Secretary Mayorkas and Secretary Blinken Announce Designation of the State of Qatar into the Visa Waiver Program". United States Department of Homeland Security. September 24, 2024.
  71. ^ "Designation of Qatar into the Visa Waiver Program". U.S. Customs and Border Protection. November 22, 2024.
  72. Additional Countries Designated for the Visa Waiver Program, Federal Register, November 17, 2008.
  73. Designation of Malta for the Visa Waiver Program, Federal Register, December 30, 2008.
  74. Designation of Greece for the Visa Waiver Program, Federal Register, March 31, 2010.
  75. Designation of Taiwan for the Visa Waiver Program, Federal Register, October 22, 2012.
  76. Designation of Poland for the Visa Waiver Program, Federal Register, November 11, 2019.
  77. ^ Attorney General's Evaluations of the Designations of Belgium, Italy, Portugal, and Uruguay as Participants Under the Visa Waiver Program, March 7, 2003.
  78. ^ John Hudson & Andras Petho, Massive passport fraud in Hungary allowed dozens of people to enter U.S. under false identities, officials say, Washington Post (May 12, 2018).
  79. ^ Loveday Morris, After massive Hungarian passport fraud, U.S. tightens travel restrictions, Washington Post (August 1, 2023).
  80. ^ Béla Szandelszky, US restricts visa-free travel for Hungarian passport holders because of security concerns, Associated Press (August 1, 2023).
  81. "US threatens end to Hungary visa waivers after passport 'fraud': Report". The Sun Daily. May 11, 2018. Retrieved May 11, 2018.
  82. Lili Bayer, US limits visa waiver for Hungarians, Politico (August 1, 2023).
  83. US Drops Visa-Waivers for Hungarian Citizens Born Outside the Country, Cites Fraud Concerns, Investment Migration Insider (April 22, 2022).
  84. "Adding Countries to the Visa Waiver Program: National Security and Tourism Considerations". Congressional Research Service. October 8, 2024. This report does not cite Turkey, the remaining road map country listed in 2007. Chile, Croatia and Qatar were not listed as road map countries in 2007 but were later admitted to the VWP.
  85. Gotev, Georgi. "EU gives US six months to come clean on visa policy". Euractiv. February 5, 2014.
  86. "Bulgaria Will Not Sign TTIP Unless US Lifts Visa Requirements – Minister". Novinte. November 26, 2014.
  87. Sharman, Jon (March 3, 2016). "European Parliament votes to end visa-free travel for Americans". The Independent. Retrieved March 4, 2017.
  88. "Press corner". European Commission - European Commission. Retrieved February 19, 2021.
  89. ^ "Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 5 September 2023, European Parliament v European Commission". EUR-Lex.
  90. "S.814 - Romania Visa Waiver Act of 2023 [118th Congress (2023-2024)]". Congress.gov. Retrieved July 8, 2023.
  91. "Romanian citizens could travel to the United States without a visa for a maximum of 90 days". Radio Moldova. March 16, 2023.
  92. "Romanians Could Soon Travel to the US Visa-Free". SchengenVisaInfo. December 7, 2023.
  93. ^ 8 CFR 212.1 Documentary requirements for nonimmigrants, United States Government Publishing Office, January 21, 2021.
  94. "Guam-Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands (CNMI) Visa Waiver Program Automation and Electronic Travel Authorization; Creation of CNMI Economic Vitality & Security Travel Authorization Program (EVS-TAP)". Federal Register. January 18, 2024.
  95. "Guam-Commonwealth of Northern Mariana Islands Electronic Travel Authorization (G-CNMI ETA)". U.S. Customs and Border Protection.
  96. "Carrier Information Guide". U.S. Customs and Border Protection.
  97. "Immigration Office, Department of Legal Affairs of American Samoa".
  98. "Entry Permit Waiver Program"., Department of Legal Affairs of American Samoa.
  99. Entry Permit Waiver Program (PW10), Department of Legal Affairs of American Samoa.
  100. 30-day permit, Department of Legal Affairs of American Samoa.
  101. "Yearbook of Immigration Statistics 2023". U.S. Department of Homeland Security.
  102. "Yearbook of Immigration Statistics 2022". U.S. Department of Homeland Security.
  103. "Yearbook of Immigration Statistics 2021". U.S. Department of Homeland Security.
  104. "Yearbook of Immigration Statistics 2020". U.S. Department of Homeland Security.
  105. "Table 28. Nonimmigrant Admissions (I-94 Only) by Selected Category of Admission and Region and Country of Citizenship: Fiscal Year 2019". U.S. Department of Homeland Security.
  106. "Table 28. Nonimmigrant Admissions (I-94 Only) by Selected Category of Admission and Region and Country of Citizenship: Fiscal Year 2018". U.S. Department of Homeland Security.
  107. "Table 28. Nonimmigrant Admissions (I-94 Only) by Selected Category of Admission and Region and Country of Citizenship: Fiscal Year 2017". U.S. Department of Homeland Security.
  108. "Table 28. Nonimmigrant Admissions (I-94 Only) by Selected Category of Admission and Region and Country of Citizenship: Fiscal Year 2016". U.S. Department of Homeland Security.
  109. Vaughan, Jessica M. (January 2003). "Shortcuts to Immigration". Center for Immigration Studies. Retrieved October 10, 2013.
  110. "Adjusted refusal rate – B-visas only, by nationality, fiscal year 2024" (PDF). U.S. Department of State.
  111. "Adjusted refusal rate – B-visas only, by nationality, fiscal year 2023" (PDF). U.S. Department of State.
  112. "Adjusted refusal rate – B-visas only, by nationality, fiscal year 2022" (PDF). U.S. Department of State.
  113. "Adjusted refusal rate – B-visas only, by nationality, fiscal year 2021" (PDF). U.S. Department of State.
  114. "Adjusted refusal rate – B-visas only, by nationality, fiscal year 2020" (PDF). U.S. Department of State.
  115. "Adjusted refusal rate – B-visas only, by nationality, fiscal year 2019" (PDF). U.S. Department of State.
  116. "Adjusted refusal rate – B-visas only, by nationality, fiscal year 2018" (PDF). U.S. Department of State.
  117. "Adjusted refusal rate – B-visas only, by nationality, fiscal year 2017" (PDF). U.S. Department of State.
  118. "Adjusted refusal rate – B-visas only, by nationality, fiscal year 2016" (PDF). U.S. Department of State.
  119. "Adjusted refusal rate – B-visas only, by nationality, fiscal year 2015" (PDF). U.S. Department of State.
  120. "Adjusted refusal rate – B-visas only, by nationality, fiscal year 2014" (PDF). U.S. Department of State.
  121. "Adjusted refusal rate – B-visas only, by nationality, fiscal year 2013" (PDF). U.S. Department of State.
  122. "Adjusted refusal rate – B-visas only, by nationality, fiscal year 2012" (PDF). U.S. Department of State.
  123. "Adjusted refusal rate – B-visas only, by nationality, fiscal year 2011" (PDF). U.S. Department of State.
  124. "Adjusted refusal rate – B-visas only, by nationality, fiscal year 2010" (PDF). U.S. Department of State.
  125. "Adjusted refusal rate – B-visas only, by nationality, fiscal year 2009" (PDF). U.S. Department of State.
  126. "Adjusted refusal rate – B-visas only, by nationality, fiscal year 2008" (PDF). U.S. Department of State.
  127. ^ "Entry/Exit Overstay Report". U.S. Department of Homeland Security.
  128. ^ "Removal of Visa and Passport Waiver for Certain Permanent Residents of Canada and Bermuda". Federal Register. 68: 5190. January 31, 2003. Retrieved October 28, 2013.
  129. Bahamian citizen document requirements, U.S. Customs and Border Protection, December 10, 2019.
  130. ^ "Citizens of Canada and Bermuda". U.S. Department of State. Retrieved January 24, 2021.
  131. Border Crossing Card, U.S. Department of State.
  132. Status of Citizens of the Freely Associated States of the Federated States of Micronesia and the Republic of the Marshall Islands, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, October 29, 2019.
  133. Status of Citizens of the Republic of Palau, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, October 29, 2019.

External links

Visa policy by country
Africa
Americas
Asia
Europe
Oceania
Historical

British Overseas Territories. These countries span the conventional boundary between Europe and Asia. Partially recognized. Unincorporated territory of the United States. Part of the Kingdom of Denmark. Egypt spans the boundary between Africa and Asia.

Visa requirements by citizenship
Africa
Americas
Asia
Europe
Oceania
Other

British Overseas Territories. Azerbaijan, Georgia, Turkey, Kazakhstan, Russia and the partially recognised republics of Abkhazia and South Ossetia each span the conventional boundary between Europe and Asia. Cyprus, Armenia, and the partially recognised republic of Northern Cyprus are entirely in Western Asia but have socio-political connections with Europe. Egypt spans the boundary between Africa and Asia. Partially recognized.

Immigration law
Immigration to the United States and related topics
Relevant colonial era,
United States and
international laws
Colonial era
18th century
19th century
1900–1949
1950–1999
21st century
Visas and policies
Government
organizations
Supreme Court cases
Related issues
and events
Geography
Proposed legislation
Immigration stations
and points of entry
Operations
State legislation
Non-governmental
organizations
Documentaries
Categories: