Misplaced Pages

Talk:Veganism: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 16:41, 14 February 2024 editLowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,292,589 editsm Archiving 1 discussion(s) to Talk:Veganism/Archive 20) (bot← Previous edit Revision as of 03:02, 16 December 2024 edit undoIWannaBeSedated24 (talk | contribs)21 edits "particularly in diet"Next edit →
(36 intermediate revisions by 13 users not shown)
Line 26: Line 26:
{{WikiProject Alternative Views|importance=Mid}} {{WikiProject Alternative Views|importance=Mid}}
{{WikiProject Animal rights|importance=Top}} {{WikiProject Animal rights|importance=Top}}
{{WikiProject Food and drink|importance=high| b1 <!--Referencing & citations--> = yes {{WikiProject Food and drink|importance=high}}
| b2 <!--Coverage & accuracy --> = yes
| b3 <!--Structure --> = yes
| b4 <!--Grammar & style --> = yes
| b5 <!--Supporting materials --> = yes
| b6 <!--Accessibility --> = yes}}
{{WikiProject Effective Altruism|importance=Mid}} {{WikiProject Effective Altruism|importance=Mid}}
{{WikiProject Medicine|importance=Mid}} {{WikiProject Medicine|importance=Mid}}
{{WikiProject Veganism and Vegetarianism|importance=Top}} {{WikiProject Veganism and Vegetarianism|importance=Top}}
{{WikiProject Nonviolence|importance=top}} {{WikiProject Nonviolence}}
{{WikiProject Philosophy|importance=Low|ethics=yes|auto=yes|contemporary=yes}} {{WikiProject Philosophy|importance=Low|ethics=yes|contemporary=yes}}
}} }}
{{Press {{Press
Line 61: Line 56:
<center>'''Archives by topic:'''<br /> <center>'''Archives by topic:'''<br />
]</center>​}} ]</center>​}}
This article is incorrect the definition of vegan, philosophy that defines a person's actions towards causing the least amount of hato sentien beings. <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 02:28, 4 February 2024 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->


== Critiques of Veganism == == "particularly in diet" ==


I know this has been discussed a hundred times but... this isn't a dictionary, this is an encyclopedia. It's ok for a dictionary to reflect how people misuse words, but an encyclopedia should reflect what the word ''actually'' means. As I dig deeper all I can see is that The Vegan Society never defined veganism as a diet. They always defined it as a philosophy. ] (]) 17:03, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
In the interests of fairness, shouldn't there be a section listing critiques and criticisms of the vegan diet from a health point of view at the very least? The only dissenting voice given in the article is from "Discrimination against vegans" and "Vegaphobia" which very strongly implies that only irrational and spiteful people would have any problem with this lifestyle. It just seems strange that nearly every other movement listed on this site follows a very standard formula of its history, its beliefs, and nearly always ends with a list of its criticisms written from a neutral point of view. Why should veganism be any different? ] (]) 03:19, 24 November 2023 (UTC)Phoenix
:It wasn't originally defined as a philosophy, vegan back then just meant "non-dairy vegetarian". Watson's first definition of veganism in 1945 was very simple, "''the practice of living on fruits, nuts, vegetables, grains, and other wholesome non-animal products''". Veganism as a philosophy was first defined by Leslie Cross in 1951. It's both a diet and a philosophy. Over time it was turned into a philosophy. Most vegans today consider it a philosophy. Nothing wrong with that they can call it what they want, but we can't deny diet has been an important factor. ] (]) 19:18, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
:You are correct, wikipedia is misrepresenting veganism, by suggesting that it is mainly dietary. The usage of "particularly in diet" is completely incorrect.
:The correct definition is: "Veganism is a philosophy and way of living which seeks to exclude—as far as is possible and practicable—all forms of exploitation of, and cruelty to, animals for food, clothing or any other purpose; and by extension, promotes the development and use of animal-free alternatives for the benefit of animals, humans and the environment. In dietary terms it denotes the practice of dispensing with all products derived wholly or partly from animals" ~ The Vegan Society
:The wikipedia definition has been incorrect for many years, and they do not appear to allow the page to be corrected. This would have been pointed out to wikipedia many times. After many years of donations, they will not be receiving any more of my money. ] (]) 02:04, 2 October 2024 (UTC)


::Your definition of veganism is incorrect, and misleading, it has been this way for years, and there is no doubt this has been pointed out to you many times, yet it remains incorrect. Why is this? Veganism is not a diet.
: Agree with this - personally I have no issue with vegans or veganism in general but it is odd that this article is basically uncritical. ] (]) 08:50, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
::From the lede: "Vitamin B12 supplementation is important because its deficiency can cause blood disorders and potentially irreversible neurological damage". In general, ] are to be avoided. ] (]) 09:06, 20 December 2023 (UTC)


The term veganism was coined by The Vegan Society, their definition is not up for dispute
== Eating vs Using ==


"Veganism is a philosophy and way of living which seeks to exclude—as far as is possible and practicable—all forms of exploitation of, and cruelty to, animals for food, clothing or any other purpose; and by extension, promotes the development and use of animal-free alternatives for the benefit of animals, humans and the environment. In dietary terms it denotes the practice of dispensing with all products derived wholly or partly from animals." ] (]) 02:08, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
The lead sentence is grammatically incorrect. Eating something doesn't count as using it. How about this:
::The Vegan Society definition of veganism changed many times in the past. Their original definition of veganism in 1945 was "''the practice of living on fruits, nuts, vegetables, grains, and other wholesome non-animal products''" . The claims about veganism being a philosophy came years later.
::The line on the article "''Veganism is the practice of abstaining from the use of animal products—particularly in diet—and an associated philosophy that rejects the commodity status of animals''", is accurate per the sourcing. ] (]) 11:48, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
:::Ok, here is my suggestion for a lead sentence that reflects this without downplaying the other aspects of the lifestyle: "Veganism is the practice of abstaining from the use of ] and the consumption of ] — and an associated philosophy that rejects the commodity status of animals." If a reliable source is needed, I would suggest this one: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11016330/
::::What do you think? --] (]) 22:04, 12 October 2024 (UTC)
:::::] has a poor academic reception and has been accused of predatory publishing. I doubt many would agree the source qualifies as a good ]. ] (]) 22:30, 12 October 2024 (UTC)
::::::Ok, here's another source: https://www.academia.edu/3641785/Resisting_the_Globalization_of_Speciesism_Vegan_Abolitionism_as_a_Site_of_Consumer_Based_Social_Change
::::::Is this a reliable source?
::::::] (]) 18:47, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
:::::::Looks good to me.] (]) 03:02, 16 December 2024 (UTC)


:::FYI the modern vegan society definition is already cited on the article in the "definition" section ] (]) 12:01, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
"'''Veganism''' is the practice of abstaining from ] and the use of ], and an associated philosophy that rejects the ]." ] (]) 15:50, 7 December 2023 (UTC)
::::FYI the contemporary definition of veganism, which has not changed in many years, is the definition that this article should commence with. Anything else is a deliberate misrepresentation of the truth. Veganism is not a diet, vegetarianism is, they are two completely different things. ] (]) 12:07, 2 October 2024 (UTC)

::::Your profile on wikipedia clearly states your bias, as a vegetarian you should remove yourself from any, and all interactions with vegan pages. Misplaced Pages should be treating them as completely different subjects, since they are.
== A person who follows the diet is known as a vegan? ==
::::Your claim of "objectivity" is a mockery to the premise of Misplaced Pages. Your sole interest is to pretend that vegetarianism is ethical, deliberately contriving similarities with veganism, and grouping the two together at every opportunity. It is a wonder you do not boast about blocking the correction of this page on your profile, there is still some room for more boasting... ] (]) 12:15, 2 October 2024 (UTC)

:::::Your account is likely to be blocked if you continue with that because you are far too aggressive and are making personal attacks. It's not worth responding to your false allegations and misinformation. I founded ]. We already have a definition section of veganism on the article and a lead that is well sourced. ] if you want your suggestions to be added to the article, but doubtful because we have already had this discussion many times before. Check the archives. ] (]) 12:50, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
There's actually another term for someone who follows the diet without following the philosophy: plant-based dieter.
::::::Begenuine8 has been indef blocked for making personal attacks. If any other users want to continue this discussion make sure to suggest good ]. As noted already in the "Definition" section of the article, we do cite the Vegan Society's modern definition of veganism. ] (]) 15:46, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
https://www.google.com/books/edition/The_Plant_Based_Diet_CookBook/eojPDwAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=%22plant+based+dieter%22&pg=PP10&printsec=frontcover ] (]) 15:45, 8 December 2023 (UTC)

:]s can be meaty. Veganism is more plant-only. ] (]) ] (]) 15:49, 8 December 2023 (UTC)

::Someone who follows a plant-only diet but wears leather is a strict plant-based dieter, not a vegan. Is that book I linked to not a reliable source?--] (]) 15:54, 8 December 2023 (UTC)
:::Not really. See also ] (where you are mentioned). ] (]) 16:02, 8 December 2023 (UTC)
:::@] No, that book is self-published. Possibly AI-generated. ] (]) 16:02, 8 December 2023 (UTC)

== Merge ==

Should we merge this with ]? ] (]) 00:06, 23 December 2023 (UTC)

:Maybe link it but not completely merge ] (]) 05:06, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
:No.--] (]) 05:15, 21 January 2024 (UTC)

:No. Abolitionism and veganism are interrelated yet distinct philosophies. They complement each other. ] (]) 13:37, 21 January 2024 (UTC)

::This merge proposal is also discussed at ]. I ''oppose'' this merge. There are a number of RS sources that have significant coverage of Abolitionism as a concept, which alone is justification for a separate article.] (]) 13:24, 21 January 2024 (UTC)

== Prevalence by country: Germany, incorrect statement ==

...better educated (people who ended their formal education with Hauptschule graduation)...

In Germany, Hauptschule is not considered better educated. It's the lowest of the 3 schools kids attend starting 5th grade. ] (]) 23:57, 10 February 2024 (UTC)

:I deleted the part that goes into detail about education and East/West Germany. The study is too small to draw any of these conclusions. ] (]) 09:48, 12 February 2024 (UTC)

Revision as of 03:02, 16 December 2024

? view · edit Frequently asked questions

To view an answer, click the link to the right of the question.

Q1: Why does the article distinguish between dietary and ethical vegans? Aren't ethical vegans the only true vegans? The article makes the distinction because reliable sources make it. See Talk:Veganism/Sources for the dietary veganism distinction for a selection of sources. For example:
  • Brenda Davis, Vesanto Melina (2013):
    "There are degrees of veganism. A pure vegetarian or dietary vegan is someone who consumes a vegan diet but doesn't lead a vegan lifestyle. Pure vegetarians may use animal products, support the use of animals in research, wear leather clothing, or have no objection to the exploitation of animals for entertainment. They are mostly motivated by personal health concerns rather than by ethical objections. Some may adopt a more vegan lifestyle as they are exposed to vegan philosophy."
  • A. Breeze Harper (2011):
    "Practitioners of veganism abstain from animal consumption (dietary and non-dietary). However, the culture of veganism iself is not a monolith and is composed of many different subcultures and philosophies throughout the world, ranging from punk strict vegans for animals rights, to people who are dietary vegans for personal health reasons, to people who practice veganism for religious and spiritual reasons."
  • Associated Press (2011):
    "Ethical vegans have a moral aversion to harming animals for human consumption ... though the term often is used to describe people who follow the diet, not the larger philosophy"
  • Gary Francione (2010):
    "Although veganism may represent a matter of diet or lifestyle for some, ethical veganism is a profound moral and political commitment ..."
  • Robert Garner (2010):
    "I have been a vegetarian all my adult life, and I am currently a dietary vegan, and I do not wear leather."
  • Layli Phillips (2010):
    "While some vegans, for instance members of the Straight Edge community, demand unswerving commitment to vegan ideals and practices, many people practice some form of partial veganism. For instance, many vegans refrain from eating meat, dairy, and eggs, yet eat honey or wear leather. Other vegans shop vegan and eat vegan at home, but look the other way at a vegetarian restaurant for dishes that use a small amount of butter, cream, or cheese. ... You get the idea: for many people, veganism is a principle, not a law."
  • International Vegetarian Union (2000):
    "Dietary Vegan: follows a vegan diet, but doesn't necessarily try and exclude non-food uses of animals."
References
  1. Brenda Davis, Vesanto Melina, Becoming Vegan: Express Edition, Summertown: Book Publishing Company, 2013, 3.
  2. A. Harper Breeze, "Going Beyond the Normative White 'Post-racial' Vegan Epistemology", in Psyche Williams Forson and Carole Counihan (eds.), Taking Food Public: Redefining Foodways in a Changing World, New York: Routledge, 2011, 158.
  3. "Vegan Diets Become More Popular, More Mainstream". CBS News. Associated Press. 5 January 2011. Archived from the original on 1 March 2018. Retrieved 1 March 2018. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |dead-url= ignored (|url-status= suggested) (help)
  4. Gary L. Francione, "The Abolition of Animal Exploitation" in Gary L. Francione and Robert Garner, The Animal Rights Debate: Abolition Or Regulation?, Columbia University Press, 2010, 62.
  5. "A Discussion between Francione and Gardner", in Francione and Garner 2010, 257.
  6. Layli Phillips, "Veganism and Ecowomanism", in A. Breeze Harper (ed.), Sistah Vegan: Black Female Vegans Speak on Food, Identity, Health, and Society, Brooklyn: Lantern Books, 2010, 11.
  7. "Definitions", International Vegetarian Union, archived 29 September 2000.
This page is not a forum for general discussion about Veganism. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about Veganism at the Reference desk.
This article is written in British English with Oxford spelling (colour, realize, organization, analyse; note that -ize is used instead of -ise) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
Former good articleVeganism was one of the good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
July 18, 2007Good article nomineeListed
October 14, 2007Good article reassessmentDelisted
January 20, 2013Good article nomineeNot listed
Current status: Delisted good article
This  level-4 vital article is rated B-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects.
WikiProject iconAlternative views Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Alternative views, a collaborative effort to improve Misplaced Pages's coverage of significant alternative views in every field, from the sciences to the humanities. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion.Alternative viewsWikipedia:WikiProject Alternative viewsTemplate:WikiProject Alternative viewsAlternative views
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconAnimal rights Top‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Animal rights, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of animal rights on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Animal rightsWikipedia:WikiProject Animal rightsTemplate:WikiProject Animal rightsAnimal rights
TopThis article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconFood and drink High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
Food and Drink task list:
To edit this page, select here

Here are some tasks you can do for WikiProject Food and drink:
Note: These lists are transcluded from the project's tasks pages.
WikiProject iconEffective Altruism Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Effective Altruism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relevant to effective altruism on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Effective AltruismWikipedia:WikiProject Effective AltruismTemplate:WikiProject Effective AltruismEffective Altruism
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.
WikiProject iconMedicine Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconVeganism and Vegetarianism Top‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Veganism and Vegetarianism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of veganism and vegetarianism on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Veganism and VegetarianismWikipedia:WikiProject Veganism and VegetarianismTemplate:WikiProject Veganism and VegetarianismVeganism and Vegetarianism
TopThis article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconNonviolence (inactive)
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Nonviolence, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.NonviolenceWikipedia:WikiProject NonviolenceTemplate:WikiProject NonviolenceNonviolence
WikiProject iconPhilosophy: Ethics / Contemporary Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Misplaced Pages.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Associated task forces:
Taskforce icon
Ethics
Taskforce icon
Contemporary philosophy
Media mentionThis article has been mentioned by a media organization:



Archives
Index 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20
Archives by topic:
Sources for ethical/dietary distinction


This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III.

"particularly in diet"

I know this has been discussed a hundred times but... this isn't a dictionary, this is an encyclopedia. It's ok for a dictionary to reflect how people misuse words, but an encyclopedia should reflect what the word actually means. As I dig deeper all I can see is that The Vegan Society never defined veganism as a diet. They always defined it as a philosophy. Countryboy603 (talk) 17:03, 27 May 2024 (UTC)

It wasn't originally defined as a philosophy, vegan back then just meant "non-dairy vegetarian". Watson's first definition of veganism in 1945 was very simple, "the practice of living on fruits, nuts, vegetables, grains, and other wholesome non-animal products". Veganism as a philosophy was first defined by Leslie Cross in 1951. It's both a diet and a philosophy. Over time it was turned into a philosophy. Most vegans today consider it a philosophy. Nothing wrong with that they can call it what they want, but we can't deny diet has been an important factor. Psychologist Guy (talk) 19:18, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
You are correct, wikipedia is misrepresenting veganism, by suggesting that it is mainly dietary. The usage of "particularly in diet" is completely incorrect.
The correct definition is: "Veganism is a philosophy and way of living which seeks to exclude—as far as is possible and practicable—all forms of exploitation of, and cruelty to, animals for food, clothing or any other purpose; and by extension, promotes the development and use of animal-free alternatives for the benefit of animals, humans and the environment. In dietary terms it denotes the practice of dispensing with all products derived wholly or partly from animals" ~ The Vegan Society
The wikipedia definition has been incorrect for many years, and they do not appear to allow the page to be corrected. This would have been pointed out to wikipedia many times. After many years of donations, they will not be receiving any more of my money. Begenuine8 (talk) 02:04, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
Your definition of veganism is incorrect, and misleading, it has been this way for years, and there is no doubt this has been pointed out to you many times, yet it remains incorrect. Why is this? Veganism is not a diet.

The term veganism was coined by The Vegan Society, their definition is not up for dispute

"Veganism is a philosophy and way of living which seeks to exclude—as far as is possible and practicable—all forms of exploitation of, and cruelty to, animals for food, clothing or any other purpose; and by extension, promotes the development and use of animal-free alternatives for the benefit of animals, humans and the environment. In dietary terms it denotes the practice of dispensing with all products derived wholly or partly from animals." Begenuine8 (talk) 02:08, 2 October 2024 (UTC)

The Vegan Society definition of veganism changed many times in the past. Their original definition of veganism in 1945 was "the practice of living on fruits, nuts, vegetables, grains, and other wholesome non-animal products" . The claims about veganism being a philosophy came years later.
The line on the article "Veganism is the practice of abstaining from the use of animal products—particularly in diet—and an associated philosophy that rejects the commodity status of animals", is accurate per the sourcing. Psychologist Guy (talk) 11:48, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
Ok, here is my suggestion for a lead sentence that reflects this without downplaying the other aspects of the lifestyle: "Veganism is the practice of abstaining from the use of animal products and the consumption of animal source foods — and an associated philosophy that rejects the commodity status of animals." If a reliable source is needed, I would suggest this one: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11016330/
What do you think? --Countryboy603 (talk) 22:04, 12 October 2024 (UTC)
Cureus has a poor academic reception and has been accused of predatory publishing. I doubt many would agree the source qualifies as a good WP:RS. Psychologist Guy (talk) 22:30, 12 October 2024 (UTC)
Ok, here's another source: https://www.academia.edu/3641785/Resisting_the_Globalization_of_Speciesism_Vegan_Abolitionism_as_a_Site_of_Consumer_Based_Social_Change
Is this a reliable source?
Countryboy603 (talk) 18:47, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
Looks good to me.IWannaBeSedated24 (talk) 03:02, 16 December 2024 (UTC)
FYI the modern vegan society definition is already cited on the article in the "definition" section Psychologist Guy (talk) 12:01, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
FYI the contemporary definition of veganism, which has not changed in many years, is the definition that this article should commence with. Anything else is a deliberate misrepresentation of the truth. Veganism is not a diet, vegetarianism is, they are two completely different things. Begenuine8 (talk) 12:07, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
Your profile on wikipedia clearly states your bias, as a vegetarian you should remove yourself from any, and all interactions with vegan pages. Misplaced Pages should be treating them as completely different subjects, since they are.
Your claim of "objectivity" is a mockery to the premise of Misplaced Pages. Your sole interest is to pretend that vegetarianism is ethical, deliberately contriving similarities with veganism, and grouping the two together at every opportunity. It is a wonder you do not boast about blocking the correction of this page on your profile, there is still some room for more boasting... Begenuine8 (talk) 12:15, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
Your account is likely to be blocked if you continue with that because you are far too aggressive and are making personal attacks. It's not worth responding to your false allegations and misinformation. I founded WP:VV. We already have a definition section of veganism on the article and a lead that is well sourced. WP:CON if you want your suggestions to be added to the article, but doubtful because we have already had this discussion many times before. Check the archives. Psychologist Guy (talk) 12:50, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
Begenuine8 has been indef blocked for making personal attacks. If any other users want to continue this discussion make sure to suggest good WP:RS. As noted already in the "Definition" section of the article, we do cite the Vegan Society's modern definition of veganism. Psychologist Guy (talk) 15:46, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
Categories: