| Revision as of 22:29, 15 December 2024 editLethargilistic (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users7,821 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 07:06, 16 December 2024 edit undoLethargilistic (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users7,821 edits →topTags: Mobile edit Mobile app edit Android app edit App full source | ||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
| '''''La Abra Silver Mining Company v. United States''''', {{ussc|volume=175|page=423|year=1899|el=no}}, was a ] case in which the court held that a law is not invalid when a president signs it during a ], so long as it is signed within 10 days.<ref name="case">{{ussc|name=La Abra Silver Mining Company v. United States|volume=175|page=423|year=1899}}.</ref><ref name="Lieberman1999">{{Cite book |last=Lieberman |first=Jethro K. |title=A Practical Companion to the Constitution |year=1999 |pages=353|chapter=Pocket Veto}}</ref> | '''''La Abra Silver Mining Company v. United States''''', {{ussc|volume=175|page=423|year=1899|el=no}}, was a ] case in which the court held that a law is not invalid when a president signs it during a ], so long as it is signed within 10 days.<ref name="case">{{ussc|name=La Abra Silver Mining Company v. United States|volume=175|page=423|year=1899}}.</ref><ref name="Lieberman1999">{{Cite book |last=Lieberman |first=Jethro K. |title=A Practical Companion to the Constitution |year=1999 |pages=353|chapter=Pocket Veto}}</ref> | ||
| ==See also== | |||
| * '']'' | |||
| == References == | == References == | ||
| Line 37: | Line 40: | ||
| ] | ] | ||
| ] | ] | ||
| ] | |||
Latest revision as of 07:06, 16 December 2024
1899 United States Supreme Court case| La Abra Silver Mining Company v. United States | |
|---|---|
 Supreme Court of the United States | |
| Decided December 11, 1899 | |
| Full case name | La Abra Silver Mining Company v. United States |
| Citations | 175 U.S. 423 (more) |
| Holding | |
| A law is not invalid when a president signs it during a Congressional recess, so long as it is signed within 10 days. | |
| Court membership | |
| |
| Case opinion | |
| Majority | Harlan, joined by unanimous |
| Gray, McKenna took no part in the consideration or decision of the case. | |
| Laws applied | |
| Presentment Clause | |
La Abra Silver Mining Company v. United States, 175 U.S. 423 (1899), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the court held that a law is not invalid when a president signs it during a Congressional recess, so long as it is signed within 10 days.
See also
References
- La Abra Silver Mining Company v. United States, 175 U.S. 423 (1899).
- Lieberman, Jethro K. (1999). "Pocket Veto". A Practical Companion to the Constitution. p. 353.
External links
- Text of La Abra Silver Mining Company v. United States, 175 U.S. 423 (1899) is available from: Cornell Findlaw Justia
 | This article related to the Supreme Court of the United States is a stub. You can help Misplaced Pages by expanding it. |