Revision as of 16:40, 19 January 2023 editSineBot (talk | contribs)Bots2,555,350 editsm Signing comment by Patrug Dritte - "→Synthetic diamonds.: "← Previous edit |
Latest revision as of 01:41, 17 December 2024 edit undoAntiDionysius (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers39,318 editsm Reverted edits by 2600:1700:14BE:E00:50ED:D441:7C50:A161 (talk) to last version by TollensTag: Rollback |
(45 intermediate revisions by 33 users not shown) |
Line 1: |
Line 1: |
|
|
{{Talk header}} |
|
{{talkheader|archive_age=180|archive_bot=lowercase sigmabot III}} |
|
|
⚫ |
{{American English}} |
|
{{Article history |
|
{{Article history |
|
|action1=FAC |
|
|action1=FAC |
|
|action1date=22:06, 10 Mar 2005 |
|
|action1date=22:06, 10 Mar 2005 |
|
|action1link=Misplaced Pages:Featured article candidates/Diamond/archive1 |
|
|action1link=Misplaced Pages:Featured article candidates/Diamond/archive1 |
|
|action1result= promoted |
|
|action1result=fail |
|
|action1oldid=11005667 |
|
|action1oldid=11005667 |
|
|
|
|
|
|action2=FAC |
|
|action2=FAC |
|
|action2date=00:11, 16 Apr 2005 |
|
|action2date=00:11, 16 Apr 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|action2link=Misplaced Pages:Featured article candidates/Diamond |
|
|action2link=Misplaced Pages:Featured article candidates/Diamond |
|
|action2result=promoted |
|
|action2result=promoted |
Line 29: |
Line 31: |
|
|itndate=17 January 2010 |
|
|itndate=17 January 2010 |
|
}} |
|
}} |
|
{{WikiProjectBannerShell|collapsed=yes|1= |
|
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=FA|collapsed=yes|vital=yes|1= |
|
{{WikiProject Gemology and Jewelry|gemstones=yes|class=FA|importance=top}} |
|
{{WikiProject Gemology and Jewelry|gemstones=yes|importance=top}} |
|
{{WikiProject Africa|class=FA|importance=mid}} |
|
{{WikiProject Africa|importance=mid|South Africa=yes|Angola=yes|Botswana=yes|Botswana-importance=High|Sierra Leone=yes|Sierra Leone-importance=High}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject Russia|importance=low}} |
|
{{WP1.0|v0.5=pass|class=FA|category=Natsci||coresup=yes}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject Metalworking|class=FA|importance=Low}} |
|
{{WikiProject Canada|importance=low}} |
|
{{WikiProject Rocks and minerals|class=FA|importance=Mid}} |
|
{{WikiProject Metalworking|importance=Low}} |
|
{{WikiProject Spoken Misplaced Pages|Diamond.ogg|268382009}} |
|
{{WikiProject Rocks and minerals|importance=Mid}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject Spoken Misplaced Pages}} |
|
{{WP Geology|class=FA|importance=mid}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject Materials|class=FA|importance=mid}} |
|
{{WikiProject Geology|importance=Mid}} |
|
{{Vital article|level=4|topic=Science|class=FA|subpage=Physics}} |
|
|
}} |
|
}} |
|
⚫ |
{{Press|org=]|articlename=David Williamson's column|url=http://icwales.icnetwork.co.uk/0100news/0600uk/tm_objectid=14291990&method=full&siteid=50082&headline=-name_page.html|June 2004|wikilink=] |
⚫ |
{{Connected contributor (paid)|User1=RockMagnetist (DCO visiting scholar)|U1-employer=Deep Carbon Observatory|U1-client= Deep Carbon Observatory|U1-otherlinks=}} |
|
|
{{banner holder|collapsed=yes| |
|
⚫ |
{{Online source|org=]|articlename=David Williamson's column|url=http://icwales.icnetwork.co.uk/0100news/0600uk/tm_objectid=14291990&method=full&siteid=50082&headline=-name_page.html|June 2004|wikilink=] |
|
|
|year2=2004|section2=June 2004 (17 articles) |
|
|year2=2004|section2=June 2004 (17 articles) |
|
|title2=Untitled David Williamson column. |
|
|title2=Untitled David Williamson column. |
Line 48: |
Line 47: |
|
|date2=June 1, 2004 |
|
|date2=June 1, 2004 |
|
|url2=http://icwales.icnetwork.co.uk/0100news/0600uk/tm_objectid=14291990&method=full&siteid=50082&headline=-name_page.html}} |
|
|url2=http://icwales.icnetwork.co.uk/0100news/0600uk/tm_objectid=14291990&method=full&siteid=50082&headline=-name_page.html}} |
|
⚫ |
{{Connected contributor (paid)|User1=RockMagnetist (DCO visiting scholar)|U1-employer=Deep Carbon Observatory|U1-client= Deep Carbon Observatory|U1-otherlinks=}} |
⚫ |
{{American English}} |
|
|
|
{{section size}} |
|
}} |
|
|
{{Spoken Misplaced Pages request|Catfurball|Important}} |
|
{{Spoken Misplaced Pages request|Catfurball|Important}} |
|
<!--- Auto archiving configured by ] ---> |
|
<!--- Auto archiving configured by ] ---> |
Line 62: |
Line 61: |
|
}} |
|
}} |
|
|
|
|
|
|
== Move discussion in progress == |
|
== Semi-protected edit request on 12 November 2021 == |
|
|
|
|
|
Near the bottom of the article, under "Etymology," we have: |
|
|
|
|
|
"The name diamond is derived from the ancient Greek Ancient Greek: ἀδάμας (adámas), 'proper, unalterable, unbreakable, untamed'" |
|
|
|
|
|
The first instance of "ancient Greek" (the one that is not a hyperlink) should be removed to avoid repetition. |
|
|
] (]) 07:39, 12 November 2021 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
:Done. --] (]) 15:23, 12 November 2021 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Image not in english == |
|
|
|
|
|
The image showcasing major diamond mining countries is in French and not in English, despite of being on the English version of the page. ] (]) 11:54, 25 January 2022 (UTC) |
|
|
:Thanks for your concern. I'm not aware of any policy that says that images in this Misplaced Pages have to be in English. Of course, it is preferable, so I did a quick search for an alternative and didn't find one. If you're able to find or make one yourself, you're welcome to substitute it. But for now, I think the text is easy for an English speaker to understand, and of course it's reinforced by the map itself. <span style="font-family:Comic Sans MS; color:grey;">](])</span> 16:48, 25 January 2022 (UTC) |
|
|
:: Agreed. One of the biggest challenges for Misplaced Pages is finding suitable images on acceptable licensing terms to illustrate concepts in articles. For this reason, the rules governing images are more relaxed than those for contributed text (except for copyright, which is strictly enforced.) It's a necessity one hopes is temporary. --] (]) 17:25, 25 January 2022 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Synthetic diamonds. == |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There is a move discussion in progress on ] which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. <!-- Talk:Diamond the Body#Requested move 29 July 2023 crosspost --> —] 10:17, 29 July 2023 (UTC) |
|
Who is the world leader? |
|
|
How advanced is the technology of production?] (]) 17:02, 5 December 2022 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
== Chemistry == |
|
:Day . |
|
|
:: Do you mean technology for diamonds Sintes ? Where is the largest '''diamond sintezator'''? In my opinion - somewhere in Russia. Somewhere near Moskva. Plus . In Space . On space station "Soyuz".] (]) 16:12, 19 January 2023 (UTC) |
|
|
apropo: |
|
|
:"Those potentially synthetic diamonds require more investigation in a specialized lab. Examples of commercial screening devices are , , and . " <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 16:39, 19 January 2023 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wow, is this a bad article. The lead states:"Because the arrangement of atoms in diamond is extremely rigid, few types of impurity can contaminate it (two exceptions are boron and nitrogen)." This is absolute rubbish. It isn't its "rigidity" that gives bulk diamond its impermeability (if that's what is meant by contamination). It is easy to "contaminate" a diamond CVD film with you name it. How big is the difference between contaminating a 1 inch cube (say) of pure iron vs. pure diamond? Not much. Ion implantation into (the near surface of) a diamond is also trivial. If the editors meant that NATURAL diamonds (on Earth) are typically quite pure, then SAY THAT! I suspect, but just an ignorant suspicion, that diamond must transition between impure high-carbon 'stuff' to the pure allotrope. I expect that at some point there's LOTS of contaminants in the nascent diamond. Aren't most natural diamonds black? What's that?? (the preceding is a digression, I'm ignorant on their natural occurrence.) There are so many FALSE statements in this article that it needs a total rewrite. There are many other bloopers but I don't have the patience to list them all. (For instance, did you know that hydrogen will leave an ash when burnt? No? Well, just read this article. When a diamond burns (in O2), any contaminants are left as ash. Ridiculous. (as is the assumption of complete combustion of the carbon) Another false claim is that diamond contains the most atoms per unit volume. (aside: at first, I thought the editor meant per unit cell volume!, not sure why s/he used the word "unit" since it doesn't add clarity (but it is not wrong)). Estimates of hydrogen density in the sun's core is ~10,000 kg/m^3, and without qualifying pressure and temperature the claim is likely false. I could go on...)] (]) 20:59, 20 August 2023 (UTC) |
|
== Exports treemap == |
|
|
|
:Don't forget that vinyl will wear down a diamond!! ] (]) <!--Template:Undated--><small class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added 21:17, 13 September 2023 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|
] |
|
|
|
== Featured picture scheduled for POTD == |
|
The caption below the graph of exporting countries says: "Diamond exports by country (2014) from " |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hello! This is to let editors know that ], a ] used in this article, has been selected as the English Misplaced Pages's ] (POTD) for December 30, 2023. A preview of the POTD is displayed below and can be edited at ]. For the greater benefit of readers, any potential improvements or maintenance that could benefit the quality of this article should be done before its scheduled appearance on the ]. If you have any concerns, please place a message at ]. Thank you! — ] (]) 13:32, 20 December 2023 (UTC) <!-- Template:UpcomingPOTD --> |
|
However when I click on this link I see totally different data, for instance 14.71% for the US instead of 5% on our image. I played with the settings (e.g., "Diamonds, industrial, unworked", "SITC rev.2 (1962-2020)", "Net" instead of "Gross", other years, etc.) but I couldn't generate an identical tree map. |
|
|
|
<div style="margin-top:4px; border:1px solid #ddcef2; background:#faf5ff; overflow:auto;"><div style="margin:0.6em 0.4em 0.1em;">{{POTD/Day|2023-12-30|excludeheader=yes}}</div></div> |
|
|
|
|
|
|
== Diamonds landscaping == |
|
Should we remove this image? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Please advise employees to confirm w office before removing landscaping. Thx ] (]) 18:36, 10 May 2024 (UTC) |
|
We could also replace it by the but I'm not even sure the data makes sense for readers as the tree map seems to merge worked diamonds and unworked diamonds. ] (]) 13:11, 16 December 2022 (UTC) |
|
Wow, is this a bad article. The lead states:"Because the arrangement of atoms in diamond is extremely rigid, few types of impurity can contaminate it (two exceptions are boron and nitrogen)." This is absolute rubbish. It isn't its "rigidity" that gives bulk diamond its impermeability (if that's what is meant by contamination). It is easy to "contaminate" a diamond CVD film with you name it. How big is the difference between contaminating a 1 inch cube (say) of pure iron vs. pure diamond? Not much. Ion implantation into (the near surface of) a diamond is also trivial. If the editors meant that NATURAL diamonds (on Earth) are typically quite pure, then SAY THAT! I suspect, but just an ignorant suspicion, that diamond must transition between impure high-carbon 'stuff' to the pure allotrope. I expect that at some point there's LOTS of contaminants in the nascent diamond. Aren't most natural diamonds black? What's that?? (the preceding is a digression, I'm ignorant on their natural occurrence.) There are so many FALSE statements in this article that it needs a total rewrite. There are many other bloopers but I don't have the patience to list them all. (For instance, did you know that hydrogen will leave an ash when burnt? No? Well, just read this article. When a diamond burns (in O2), any contaminants are left as ash. Ridiculous. (as is the assumption of complete combustion of the carbon) Another false claim is that diamond contains the most atoms per unit volume. (aside: at first, I thought the editor meant per unit cell volume!, not sure why s/he used the word "unit" since it doesn't add clarity (but it is not wrong)). Estimates of hydrogen density in the sun's core is ~10,000 kg/m^3, and without qualifying pressure and temperature the claim is likely false. I could go on...)40.142.183.146 (talk) 20:59, 20 August 2023 (UTC)