Revision as of 12:08, 18 April 2024 editLowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,294,382 editsm Archiving 1 discussion(s) to Talk:Diamond/Archive 8) (bot← Previous edit |
Latest revision as of 01:41, 17 December 2024 edit undoAntiDionysius (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers39,318 editsm Reverted edits by 2600:1700:14BE:E00:50ED:D441:7C50:A161 (talk) to last version by TollensTag: Rollback |
(13 intermediate revisions by 11 users not shown) |
Line 1: |
Line 1: |
|
{{Talk header|archive_age=180|archive_boaryan |
|
{{Talk header}} |
|
t=lowercase sigmabot III}} |
|
|
{{American English}} |
|
{{American English}} |
|
{{Article history |
|
{{Article history |
Line 34: |
Line 33: |
|
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=FA|collapsed=yes|vital=yes|1= |
|
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=FA|collapsed=yes|vital=yes|1= |
|
{{WikiProject Gemology and Jewelry|gemstones=yes|importance=top}} |
|
{{WikiProject Gemology and Jewelry|gemstones=yes|importance=top}} |
|
{{WikiProject Africa|importance=mid}} |
|
{{WikiProject Africa|importance=mid|South Africa=yes|Angola=yes|Botswana=yes|Botswana-importance=High|Sierra Leone=yes|Sierra Leone-importance=High}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject Russia|importance=low}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject Canada|importance=low}} |
|
{{WikiProject Metalworking|importance=Low}} |
|
{{WikiProject Metalworking|importance=Low}} |
|
{{WikiProject Rocks and minerals|importance=Mid}} |
|
{{WikiProject Rocks and minerals|importance=Mid}} |
Line 47: |
Line 48: |
|
|url2=http://icwales.icnetwork.co.uk/0100news/0600uk/tm_objectid=14291990&method=full&siteid=50082&headline=-name_page.html}} |
|
|url2=http://icwales.icnetwork.co.uk/0100news/0600uk/tm_objectid=14291990&method=full&siteid=50082&headline=-name_page.html}} |
|
{{Connected contributor (paid)|User1=RockMagnetist (DCO visiting scholar)|U1-employer=Deep Carbon Observatory|U1-client= Deep Carbon Observatory|U1-otherlinks=}} |
|
{{Connected contributor (paid)|User1=RockMagnetist (DCO visiting scholar)|U1-employer=Deep Carbon Observatory|U1-client= Deep Carbon Observatory|U1-otherlinks=}} |
|
|
{{section size}} |
|
{{banner holder|collapsed=yes| |
|
|
|
|
|
}} |
|
|
{{Spoken Misplaced Pages request|Catfurball|Important}} |
|
{{Spoken Misplaced Pages request|Catfurball|Important}} |
|
<!--- Auto archiving configured by ] ---> |
|
<!--- Auto archiving configured by ] ---> |
Line 61: |
Line 60: |
|
|minthreadsleft = 4 |
|
|minthreadsleft = 4 |
|
}} |
|
}} |
|
|
|
|
== Rarity of diamonds == |
|
|
|
|
|
This piece states that diamonds are very rare, but this is not true. Multiple sources exist to counter that notion, e.g., from the International Gem Society. Diamond production has been heavily controlled to suit specific merchants. ] (]) 15:11, 1 June 2023 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
== Move discussion in progress == |
|
== Move discussion in progress == |
Line 78: |
Line 73: |
|
Hello! This is to let editors know that ], a ] used in this article, has been selected as the English Misplaced Pages's ] (POTD) for December 30, 2023. A preview of the POTD is displayed below and can be edited at ]. For the greater benefit of readers, any potential improvements or maintenance that could benefit the quality of this article should be done before its scheduled appearance on the ]. If you have any concerns, please place a message at ]. Thank you! — ] (]) 13:32, 20 December 2023 (UTC) <!-- Template:UpcomingPOTD --> |
|
Hello! This is to let editors know that ], a ] used in this article, has been selected as the English Misplaced Pages's ] (POTD) for December 30, 2023. A preview of the POTD is displayed below and can be edited at ]. For the greater benefit of readers, any potential improvements or maintenance that could benefit the quality of this article should be done before its scheduled appearance on the ]. If you have any concerns, please place a message at ]. Thank you! — ] (]) 13:32, 20 December 2023 (UTC) <!-- Template:UpcomingPOTD --> |
|
<div style="margin-top:4px; border:1px solid #ddcef2; background:#faf5ff; overflow:auto;"><div style="margin:0.6em 0.4em 0.1em;">{{POTD/Day|2023-12-30|excludeheader=yes}}</div></div> |
|
<div style="margin-top:4px; border:1px solid #ddcef2; background:#faf5ff; overflow:auto;"><div style="margin:0.6em 0.4em 0.1em;">{{POTD/Day|2023-12-30|excludeheader=yes}}</div></div> |
|
|
|
|
|
== Diamonds landscaping == |
|
|
|
|
|
Please advise employees to confirm w office before removing landscaping. Thx ] (]) 18:36, 10 May 2024 (UTC) |
Wow, is this a bad article. The lead states:"Because the arrangement of atoms in diamond is extremely rigid, few types of impurity can contaminate it (two exceptions are boron and nitrogen)." This is absolute rubbish. It isn't its "rigidity" that gives bulk diamond its impermeability (if that's what is meant by contamination). It is easy to "contaminate" a diamond CVD film with you name it. How big is the difference between contaminating a 1 inch cube (say) of pure iron vs. pure diamond? Not much. Ion implantation into (the near surface of) a diamond is also trivial. If the editors meant that NATURAL diamonds (on Earth) are typically quite pure, then SAY THAT! I suspect, but just an ignorant suspicion, that diamond must transition between impure high-carbon 'stuff' to the pure allotrope. I expect that at some point there's LOTS of contaminants in the nascent diamond. Aren't most natural diamonds black? What's that?? (the preceding is a digression, I'm ignorant on their natural occurrence.) There are so many FALSE statements in this article that it needs a total rewrite. There are many other bloopers but I don't have the patience to list them all. (For instance, did you know that hydrogen will leave an ash when burnt? No? Well, just read this article. When a diamond burns (in O2), any contaminants are left as ash. Ridiculous. (as is the assumption of complete combustion of the carbon) Another false claim is that diamond contains the most atoms per unit volume. (aside: at first, I thought the editor meant per unit cell volume!, not sure why s/he used the word "unit" since it doesn't add clarity (but it is not wrong)). Estimates of hydrogen density in the sun's core is ~10,000 kg/m^3, and without qualifying pressure and temperature the claim is likely false. I could go on...)40.142.183.146 (talk) 20:59, 20 August 2023 (UTC)