Misplaced Pages

User talk:John Erickson 1962: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactivelyContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 17:21, 19 December 2024 editScienceFlyer (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users2,110 edits Warning: Edit warring on PANDAS.Tag: Twinkle  Latest revision as of 23:25, 19 December 2024 edit undoSandyGeorgia (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, File movers, Mass message senders, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers, Template editors278,949 edits December 2024: personal attacks 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 7: Line 7:
# '''Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.''' # '''Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.'''
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's ] to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an ] or seek ]. In some cases, it may be appropriate to ]. If you engage in an edit war, you '''may be ] from editing.''' <!-- Template:uw-ew --> ] (]) 17:21, 19 December 2024 (UTC) If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's ] to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an ] or seek ]. In some cases, it may be appropriate to ]. If you engage in an edit war, you '''may be ] from editing.''' <!-- Template:uw-ew --> ] (]) 17:21, 19 December 2024 (UTC)

:Please take this first warning seriously; there is extensive discussion on the talk page, you do not have consensus for your edits, and ] is not a license to revert -- you can be blocked for edit warring based on simply ignoring the talk page discussions demonstrating that your edits don't have consensus, and you have removed content sourced to high-quality secondary reviews. {{pb}} Also, you will find things will progress more quickly on article improvements if you ], learn to ], and ]. If you continue edit warring, you will only achieve getting the article locked (again). The article has a history of slow progress precisely because of the disruptive advocacy editing that has occurred all too often. ] (]) 19:11, 19 December 2024 (UTC)

== Personal attacks ==
] Hello, I'm ]. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Misplaced Pages, it's important to be mindful of the feelings of your fellow editors, who may be frustrated by certain types of interaction. While you probably didn't intend any offense, please do remember that Misplaced Pages strives to be an inclusive atmosphere. In light of that, it would be greatly appreciated if you could moderate yourself so as not to offend. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-harass1 -->{{pb}} is a ] against another editor, and unnecessarily personalizes a content dispute. {{pb}} Those personalizing edits, combined with the edit warring and the blanking of well-cited content from ] mentioned in the ], along with POV edits like leave the impression you are ] of understanding Misplaced Pages's ] and working collaboratively with other editors towards improved content. {{pb}} Again, collaborative discussion is a faster route towards content improvements, as disruptive editing only slows down the few volunteers who are working already working hard. Please review the ] suggestions and strive for a collaborative approach with fellow editors. ] (]) 23:25, 19 December 2024 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 23:25, 19 December 2024

December 2024

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on PANDAS. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

  1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. ScienceFlyer (talk) 17:21, 19 December 2024 (UTC)

Please take this first warning seriously; there is extensive discussion on the talk page, you do not have consensus for your edits, and WP:3RR is not a license to revert -- you can be blocked for edit warring based on simply ignoring the talk page discussions demonstrating that your edits don't have consensus, and you have removed content sourced to high-quality secondary reviews. Also, you will find things will progress more quickly on article improvements if you assume good faith, learn to use sources appropriately, and focus on content in talk page discussions. If you continue edit warring, you will only achieve getting the article locked (again). The article has a history of slow progress precisely because of the disruptive advocacy editing that has occurred all too often. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 19:11, 19 December 2024 (UTC)

Personal attacks

Information icon Hello, I'm SandyGeorgia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Misplaced Pages, it's important to be mindful of the feelings of your fellow editors, who may be frustrated by certain types of interaction. While you probably didn't intend any offense, please do remember that Misplaced Pages strives to be an inclusive atmosphere. In light of that, it would be greatly appreciated if you could moderate yourself so as not to offend. Thank you.

This edit is a personal attack against another editor, and this edit unnecessarily personalizes a content dispute.

Those personalizing edits, combined with the edit warring and the blanking of well-cited content from PANDAS mentioned in the section above, along with POV edits like this one leave the impression you are may not be here with the intent of understanding Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines and working collaboratively with other editors towards improved content.

Again, collaborative discussion is a faster route towards content improvements, as disruptive editing only slows down the few volunteers who are working already working hard. Please review the focus on content suggestions and strive for a collaborative approach with fellow editors. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 23:25, 19 December 2024 (UTC)