Revision as of 17:54, 28 November 2006 view source168.9.25.22 (talk) →John Brown← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 02:38, 21 December 2024 view source Citation bot (talk | contribs)Bots5,406,736 edits Removed URL that duplicated identifier. | Use this bot. Report bugs. | Suggested by Jay8g | #UCB_toolbar | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Short description|1861–1865 conflict in the United States}} | |||
:''"The Civil War" is the most common term in the United States of America for this conflict. See ].'' | |||
{{Pp-semi-indef}} | |||
{{Infobox Military Conflict| | |||
{{Pp-move}} | |||
image=]| | |||
{{Use mdy dates|date=April 2022}} | |||
caption=(clockwise from upper right) Confederate prisoners at ]; ], Arkansas; ] at ], Tennessee| | |||
{{Use American English|date=October 2013}} | |||
{{Infobox military conflict | |||
partof=| | |||
| image = CivilWarUSAColl.png | |||
date= ], ] – ], ]| | |||
| image_size = 300 | |||
place=Principally in the ]| | |||
| caption = Clockwise from top: {{flatlist| | |||
Southwestern regions| | |||
* ] | |||
casus = ]| result=] victory; ]; ] abolished| | |||
* ] officers under Captain ] | |||
combatant1=] ] (]) | | |||
* ] prisoners | |||
combatant2=] ] ]| | |||
* Ironclad {{USS|Atlanta|1861|6}} | |||
commander1=], President<br>], General| | |||
* Ruins of ] | |||
commander2=], President<br>], General| | |||
* ] | |||
strength1=2,200,000 | | |||
}} | |||
strength2=1,064,000| | |||
| date = April 12, 1861{{snd}}May 26, 1865{{efn|name=End1|{{multiref2|{{Cite web |date=May 29, 1865 |title=End of the Rebellion; The Last Rebel Army Disbands|url=https://www.nytimes.com/1865/05/29/archives/end-of-the-rebellion-the-last-rebel-army-disbands-kirby-smith.html |url-access=subscription |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180915002358/https://www.nytimes.com/1865/05/29/archives/end-of-the-rebellion-the-last-rebel-army-disbands-kirby-smith.html |archive-date=2018-09-15 |access-date=July 29, 2022 |website=] |agency=]}} | {{harvnb|Robertson|1963|p=31}}. "Lee's surrender left Johnston with no place to go. On April 26, near Durham, N.C., the Army of Tennessee laid down its arms before Sherman's forces. With the surrender of isolated forces in the Trans-Mississippi West on May 4, 11, and 26, the most costly war in American history came to an end." | {{harvnb|Catton|1965|p=445}}. "and on May 26 he surrendered and the war was over" | {{harvnb|Gallagher |Engle |Krick |Glatthaar|2003|p=308}}. "By 26 May, General Edward Kirby Smith had surrendered the Rebel forces in the trans-Mississippi west. The war was over." | {{harvnb|Blair|2015|p=9}}. "The sheer weight of scholarship has leaned toward portraying the surrenders of the Confederate armies as the end of the war."}}}}{{efn|name=End2|Among the many other contemporary sources and later historians citing May 26, 1865 as the end date for the American Civil War hostilities are ], who was a prominent New York lawyer; a founder, treasurer, and member of the Executive Committee of United States Sanitary Commission throughout the war; and a diarist. A diary excerpt is published in Gienapp, William E. (ed.). ''The Civil War and Reconstruction: A Documentary Collection.'' New York: W.W. Norton & Co., 2001, pp. 313–314 {{ISBN|978-0-393-97555-0}}. A footnote in Gienapp shows the excerpt was taken from an edited version of the diaries by Allan Nevins and Milton Halsey Thomas, eds., ''The Diary of George Templeton Strong'', vol. 2 (New York: The Macmillan Company), pp. 600–601, which differs from the volume and page numbers of the original diaries; the page in Strong's original handwriting is shown at {{Cite web |title=Volume 4, pages 124–125: diary entries for May 23 (continued)–June 7, 1865. |url=https://digitalcollections.nyhistory.org/islandora/object/nyhs%3A55249 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20221116151714/https://digitalcollections.nyhistory.org/islandora/object/nyhs%3A55249 |archive-date=November 16, 2022 |via=New-York Historical Society Museum & Library}}}} {{nwr|({{Age in years, months, weeks and days|month1=04|day1=12|year1=1861|month2=05|day2=26|year2=1865}})}} | |||
casualties1=110,000 ],<br>360,000 total dead,<br>275,200 wounded| | |||
| place = ], ] | |||
casualties2=93,000 killed in action,<br>258,000 total dead<br>137,000+ wounded| | |||
| result = ] victory | |||
| territory = Dissolution of the ] | |||
| combatant1 = {{flagicon|United States|1861}} ] | |||
| combatant2 = {{flagcountry|Confederate States of America|1861}} | |||
| commander1 = {{plainlist| | |||
* {{flagicon|United States|1861}} ]{{Assassinated|Assassination of Abraham Lincoln}} | |||
* {{flagicon|United States|1861}} ] | |||
* '']'' | |||
}} | |||
| commander2 = {{plainlist| | |||
* {{flagicon|Confederate States of America|1861}} ]{{Surrender}} | |||
* {{flagicon|Confederate States of America|1861}} ]{{Surrender}} | |||
* '']'' | |||
}} | |||
| strength1 = {{indented plainlist| | |||
* 698,000 at peak<ref>{{Cite web |title=Size of the Union Army in the American Civil War |url=http://www.oocities.org/littlegreenmen.geo/UASize.htm |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160130034407/http://www.oocities.org/littlegreenmen.geo/UASize.htm |archive-date=2016-01-30 |quote=Of which 131,000 were in the Navy and Marines, 140,000 were garrison troops and home defense militia, and 427,000 were in the field army}}</ref> | |||
* 2,200,000 total<ref name="NationalParkService">{{Cite web |title=Facts |url=http://www.nps.gov/civilwar/facts.htm |publisher=National Park Service}}</ref> | |||
}} | |||
| strength2 = {{indented plainlist| | |||
* 360,000 at peak<ref name="NationalParkService" /><ref>{{Cite web |year=1900 |title=The war of the rebellion: a compilation of the official records of the Union and Confederate armies; Series 4 – Volume 2 |url=http://ebooks.library.cornell.edu/cgi/t/text/pageviewer-idx?c=moawar;cc=moawar;q1=abstract;rgn=full%20text;idno=waro0128;didno=waro0128;view=image;seq=0542 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170725221244/http://ebooks.library.cornell.edu/cgi/t/text/pageviewer-idx?c=moawar;cc=moawar;q1=abstract;rgn=full%20text;idno=waro0128;didno=waro0128;view=image;seq=0542 |archive-date=July 25, 2017 |publisher=United States War Dept.}}</ref> | |||
* 750,000–1,000,000 total{{sfn|Long|1971|p=705}} | |||
}} | |||
| casualties1 = {{indented plainlist| | |||
* 110,000+ ] | |||
* 230,000+ died from accidents or disease<ref name="Fox1889">{{Cite book |last=Fox |first=William F. |url=http://www.civilwarhome.com/foxspref.html |title=Regimental losses in the American Civil War |year=1889 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170525214736/http://www.civilwarhome.com/foxspref.html |archive-date=May 25, 2017 |url-status=usurped}}</ref><ref name="DCAS">{{Cite web |title=U.S. Military Casualties: Principal Wars 1775–1991 |url=https://dcas.dmdc.osd.mil/dcas/app/summaryData/casualties/principalWars |website=Defence Casuality Analysis System (DCAS)}}</ref> | |||
* 25,000–30,000 died in Confederate prisons<ref name="NationalParkService" /><ref name="Fox1889" /> | |||
* '''365,000+ total dead'''{{sfn|Chambers|Anderson|1999|p=849}} | |||
}} | |||
---- | |||
{{indented plainlist| | |||
* 282,000+ wounded<ref name="DCAS" /> | |||
* 181,193 captured<ref name="Rhodes1893">{{Cite book |last=Rhodes |first=James Ford |url=http://archive.org/details/historyunitedst20unkngoog |title=History of the United States from the Compromise of 1850 |year=1893 |publisher=Harper & Bros. |location=New York |pages=507–508}}</ref>{{Efn|211,411 Union soldiers were captured, and 30,218 died in prison. The ones who died have been excluded to prevent double-counting of casualties.}} | |||
* '''828,000+ total casualties''' | |||
}} | |||
| casualties2 = {{indented plainlist| | |||
* 94,000+ ]<ref name="Fox1889" /> | |||
* 26,000–31,000 died in Union prisons<ref name="DCAS" /> | |||
* '''290,000+ total dead''' | |||
}} | |||
---- | |||
{{indented plainlist| | |||
* 137,000+ wounded | |||
* 436,658 captured<ref name="Rhodes1893" />{{Efn|462,634 Confederate soldiers were captured and 25,976 died in prison. The ones who died have been excluded to prevent double-counting of casualties.}} | |||
* '''864,000+ total casualties''' | |||
}} | |||
| casualties3 = {{plainlist| | |||
* 50,000 free civilians died<ref name="Nofi2001" /> | |||
* 60,000 documented slaves, "tens of thousands" of undocumented slaves died from disease<ref>{{harvnb|Downs|2012}}. "The rough 19th century estimate was that 60,000 former slaves died from the epidemic, but doctors treating black patients often claimed that they were unable to keep accurate records due to demands on their time and the lack of manpower and resources. The surviving records only include the number of black patients whom doctors encountered; tens of thousands of other slaves had no contact with army doctors, leaving no records of their deaths."</ref> | |||
* '''616,222<ref>Toward a Social History of the American Civil War Exploratory Essays, Cambridge University Press, 1990, p. 4.</ref>–1,000,000+ total dead'''<ref name="Hacker2011" /><ref>{{harvnb|Downs|2012}}. "An 2 April 2012 New York Times article, 'New Estimate Raises Civil War Death Toll', reports that a new study ratchets up the death toll from an estimated 650,000 to a staggering 850,000 people. As horrific as this new number is, it fails to reflect the mortality of former slaves during the war. If former slaves were included in this figure, the Civil War death toll would likely be over a million casualties ...".</ref>}} | |||
| conflict = | |||
}} | }} | ||
{{Campaignbox American Civil War}} | {{Campaignbox American Civil War}} | ||
{{Periods in US history}} | |||
The '''American Civil War''' (1861–1865) was a war between the United States Federal government (the "]") and eleven ] ] that declared their ] and formed the ], led by ] ]. The ], led by ] ] and the ], opposed the expansion of slavery and rejected any right of secession. Fighting commenced on ], ], when Confederate forces attacked a Federal military installation at ] in ]. | |||
During the first year, the Union asserted control of the border states and established a ] as both sides raised large armies. In 1862 the large, bloody battles began. In September 1862, Lincoln's ] made the freeing of the slaves a war goal, despite opposition from northern ] who tolerated secession and slavery. Emancipation ensured that ] and ] would not intervene to help the Confederacy. In addition, the goal also allowed the Union to recruit African-Americans for reinforcements, a resource that the Confederacy did not dare exploit until it was too late. ] reluctantly accepted emancipation as part of total war needed to save the Union. In the East, ] rolled up a series of Confederate victories over the ], but his best general, ], was killed at the ] in May 1863. Lee's invasion of the North was repulsed at the ] in Pennsylvania in July 1863; he barely managed to escape back to Virginia. In the West, the ] captured the port of ] in 1862, and ] seized control of the ] by capturing ] in July 1863, thus splitting the Confederacy. | |||
The '''American Civil War''' (April 12, 1861{{snd}}May 26, 1865; also known by ]) was a ] in the ] between the ]{{Efn|The Union was the U.S. government and included the states that remained loyal to it, both the non-slave states and the ] (Missouri, Kentucky, Maryland, and Delaware) where slavery was legal. Missouri and Kentucky were also claimed by the Confederacy and given full state delegations in the Confederate Congress for the duration of the war.}} ("the North") and the ] ("the South"), which was formed in 1861 by ]s that had ] from the Union. The ] was a dispute over whether ] should be permitted to expand into the western territories, leading to more ], or be prohibited from doing so, which many believed would place slavery on a course of ultimate extinction.<ref>{{Cite web |title=The Declaration of Causes of Seceding States. Primary Sources |url=https://www.battlefields.org/learn/primary-sources/declaration-causes-seceding-states |access-date=December 30, 2023 |publisher=]}}</ref><ref name="Woods2012">{{Cite journal |last=Woods |first=Michael E. |date=2012-08-20 |title=What Twenty-First-Century Historians Have Said about the Causes of Disunion: A Civil War Sesquicentennial Review of the Recent Literature |journal=] |volume=99 |issue=2 |pages=415–439 |doi=10.1093/jahist/jas272 |issn=0021-8723}}</ref> | |||
By 1864, long-term Union advantages in geography, manpower, industry, finance, political organization and transportation were overwhelming the Confederacy. Grant fought a number of bloody battles with Lee in Virginia in the summer of 1864. Lee won most of the battles in a tactical sense but on the whole lost strategically, as he could not replace his casualties and was forced to retreat into trenches around his capital, ]. Meanwhile, ] captured ]. ] destroyed a hundred-mile-wide swath of Georgia. In 1865, the Confederacy collapsed after Lee surrendered to Grant at ] and the slaves were freed. | |||
] over slavery were brought to a head when ], who opposed slavery's expansion, won the ]. Seven Southern slave states responded to Lincoln's victory by seceding from the United States and forming the Confederacy. The Confederacy seized U.S. forts and other federal assets within their borders. The war began on April 12, 1861, when the Confederacy bombarded ] in ]. A wave of enthusiasm for war swept over the North and South, as military recruitment soared. Four more Southern states ] after the war began and, led by its president, ], the Confederacy asserted control over a third of the U.S. population in eleven states. Four years of intense combat, mostly in the South, ensued. | |||
The full restoration of the Union was the work of a highly contentious postwar era known as ]. The war produced about 970,000 casualties (3% of the population), including approximately 620,000 soldier deaths—two-thirds by disease. <ref>http://www.cwc.lsu.edu/other/stats/warcost.htm</ref> The ], the reasons for its outcome, and even ] are subjects of lingering controversy even today. The main results of the war were the restoration and strengthening of the Union, and the end of ] in the United States. | |||
{{TOCright}} | |||
During 1861–1862 in the ], the Union made permanent gains—though in the ] the conflict was inconclusive. The abolition of slavery became a Union war goal on January 1, 1863, when Lincoln issued the ], which declared all slaves in rebel states to be free, applying to more than 3.5 million of the 4 million enslaved people in the country. To the west, the Union first destroyed the Confederacy's river navy by the summer of 1862, then much of its western armies, and ]. The successful 1863 Union ] split the Confederacy in two at the ], while Confederate General ]'s incursion north failed at the ]. Western successes led to General ]'s command of all Union armies in 1864. Inflicting an ever-tightening ] of Confederate ports, the Union marshaled resources and manpower to attack the Confederacy from all directions. This led to the ] in 1864 to Union General ], followed by his ]. The last significant battles raged around the ten-month ], gateway to the Confederate capital of ]. The Confederates abandoned Richmond, and on April 9, 1865, Lee surrendered to Grant following the ], setting in motion the ].{{Efn|Appomattox is referred to symbolically as the ], although arguably there are different dates for the war's conclusion. Lee's surrender to Grant set off a wave of Confederate surrenders. The last military department of the Confederacy, the ] disbanded on May 26.}} Lincoln lived to see this victory but ] on April 14, dying the next day. | |||
==Causes of the War== | |||
:''Main articles: ], ]'' | |||
By the end of the war, much of the South's infrastructure was destroyed. The Confederacy collapsed, slavery was abolished, and four million enslaved black people were freed. The war-torn nation then entered the ] in an attempt to rebuild the country, bring the former Confederate states back into the United States, and grant ] to freed slaves. The war is one of the most extensively studied and ] episodes in the ]. It remains the subject of cultural and ]. Of continuing interest is the myth of the ]. The war was among the first to use ]. Railroads, the ], steamships, the ], and mass-produced weapons were widely used. The war left an estimated 698,000 soldiers dead, along with an undetermined number of civilian casualties, making the Civil War the deadliest military conflict in American history.{{Efn|This assumes that Union and Confederate casualties are counted together; more Americans were killed in ] than in either the Union or Confederate Armies if their casualty totals are counted separately.}} The technology and brutality of the Civil War foreshadowed the coming ]. | |||
Secession was caused by the coexistence of a slave-owning South and an increasingly anti-slavery North. Lincoln did not propose federal laws making slavery unlawful where it already existed, but he had, in his 1858 ], envisioned it as being set on "the course of ultimate extinction". Much of the political battle in the 1850s focused on the expansion of slavery into the newly created territories. Both North and South assumed that if slavery could not expand it would wither and die. | |||
== Origins == | |||
Well-founded Southern fears of losing control of the Federal government to antislavery forces, and northern fears that the ] already controlled the government, brought the crisis to a head in the late 1850s. Sectional disagreements over the morality of slavery, the scope of democracy and the economic merits of free labor vs. slave plantations caused the ] and "]" parties to collapse, and new ones to arise (the ] in 1848, the ] in 1854, ] in 1860). In 1860, the last remaining national political party, the ], split along sectional lines. | |||
{{Main|Origins of the American Civil War}} | |||
{{Further|Timeline of events leading to the American Civil War|Slave states and free states|Slavery in the United States|Abolitionism in the United States}} | |||
The origins of the war were rooted in the desire of the ] to preserve the ].<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Woods |first=M. E. |date=2012-08-20 |title=What Twenty-First-Century Historians Have Said about the Causes of Disunion: A Civil War Sesquicentennial Review of the Recent Literature |url=https://doi.org/10.1093/jahist/jas272 |journal=] |volume=99 |issue=2 |pages=415–439 |doi=10.1093/jahist/jas272 |issn=0021-8723}}</ref> Historians in the 21st century overwhelmingly agree on the centrality of slavery in the conflict. They disagree on which aspects (ideological, economic, political, or social) were most important, and on the ]'s reasons for refusing to allow the Southern states to secede.<ref>Aaron Sheehan-Dean, "A Book for Every Perspective: Current Civil War and Reconstruction Textbooks", ''Civil War History'' (2005) 51#3 pp. 317–324</ref> The ] ] ideology denies that slavery was the principal cause of the secession, a view disproven by historical evidence, notably some of the seceding states' own ].<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Loewen |first=James W. |date=2011 |title=Using Confederate Documents to Teach About Secession, Slavery, and the Origins of the Civil War |url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/23210244 |journal=OAH Magazine of History |volume=25 |issue=2 |pages=35–44 |doi=10.1093/oahmag/oar002 |jstor=23210244 |issn=0882-228X |quote=Confederate leaders themselves made it plain that slavery was the key issue sparking secession. |access-date=April 7, 2023 |archive-date=April 7, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230407021438/https://www.jstor.org/stable/23210244 |url-status=live }}</ref> After leaving the Union, Mississippi issued a declaration stating, "Our position is thoroughly identified with the institution of slavery—the greatest material interest of the world."<ref name="Coates-2015">{{cite news |last1=Coates |first1=Ta-Nehisi |title=What This Cruel War Was Over |url=https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2015/06/what-this-cruel-war-was-over/396482/ |work=The Atlantic |date=23 June 2015 |archive-url=https://archive.today/20171031234944/https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2015/06/what-this-cruel-war-was-over/396482/ |archive-date=2017-10-31 |language=en}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=A Declaration of the Immediate Causes which Induce and Justify the Secession of the State of Mississippi from the Federal Union.|work=The Declaration of Causes of Seceding States |url=https://www.battlefields.org/learn/primary-sources/declaration-causes-seceding-states#South_Carolina |via=American Battlefield Trust |access-date=12 September 2024 |year=1861}}</ref> | |||
Other factors include ], modernization, sectionalism, the nullification crisis and economic differences between the North and South. | |||
The principal political battle leading to Southern secession was over whether slavery would expand into the Western territories destined to become states. Initially ] had admitted new states into the Union in pairs, ]. This had kept a sectional balance in the ] but not in the ], as free states outstripped slave states in numbers of eligible voters.<ref name="O'Brien2002qs">{{cite book |author=Patrick Karl O'Brien |title=Atlas of World History |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=ffZy5tDjaUkC&pg=PA184 |year=2002 |publisher=Oxford University Press |isbn=978-0-19-521921-0 |page=184 |access-date=October 25, 2015 |archive-date=September 5, 2015 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150905202421/https://books.google.com/books?id=ffZy5tDjaUkC&pg=PA184 |url-status=live }}</ref> Thus, at mid-19th century, the free-versus-slave status of the new territories was a critical issue, both for the North, where anti-slavery sentiment had grown, and for the South, where the fear of slavery's ] had grown. Another factor leading to secession and the formation of the ] was the development of ] nationalism in the preceding decades.<ref>John McCardell, ''The Idea of a Southern Nation: Southern Nationalists and Southern Nationalism, 1830–1860'' (1981)</ref> The primary reason for the North to reject secession was to preserve the Union, a cause based on ].<ref>Susan-Mary Grant, ''North Over South: Northern Nationalism and American Identity in the Antebellum Era'' (2000)</ref> | |||
===Note on causes=== | |||
Civil rights and voting rights for blacks were not major issues before the Civil War; they became important afterward during Reconstruction. The issue of maltreatment of slaves was promoted by abolitionists (especially in the novel and play "''Uncle Tom's Cabin''"), but was not one of the main causes of secession or the war itself. Slavery was at the root of economic, moral and political differences that led to control issues, states' rights and secession of seven states. The creation of an independent Confederate nation in defiance of the United States was the main reason for the war. That is, secession itself triggered the war. The secession of four more states was (from the Southern point of view) a protest against Lincoln's call to invade the South. From the North's point of view it was an attempt to defend the nation after it was attacked at Fort Sumter. Lincoln's war goals evolved, and were separate from causes of the war. He did not emphasize national unity during the 1860 campaign but brought it to the front in his March, 1861, inaugural address. At first Lincoln stressed the Union as a war goal to unite the War Democrats, border states and Republicans. In 1862 he added emancipation because it would weaken the Confederacy and permanently remove a divisive issue. In his 1863 Gettysburg Address he tied preserving democracy to emancipation and the Union as a war goal. | |||
Background factors in the run up to the Civil War were ], ], ] versus ], Southern and Northern nationalism, ], ], and modernization in the ]. As a panel of historians emphasized in 2011, "while slavery and its various and multifaceted discontents were the primary cause of disunion, it was disunion itself that sparked the war."<ref>], Bruce Levine, Marc Egnal, and Michael Holt at a plenary session of the organization of American Historians, March 17, 2011, reported by David A. Walsh "Highlights from the 2011 Annual Meeting of the Organization of American Historians in Houston, Texas" {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20111204081355/http://hnn.us/articles/137673.html |date=December 4, 2011 }}</ref> | |||
===State Rights=== | |||
The "]" debate cut across the issues. Southerners argued that the federal government was strictly limited and could not abridge the rights of states as reserved in ], and so had no power to prevent slaves from being carried into new territories. States' rights advocates also cited the | |||
fugitive slave clause in the Constitution to demand federal jurisdiction over slaves who escaped into the North. Anti-slavery forces took reversed stances on these issues. | |||
===Lincoln's election=== | |||
As Jefferson Davis said, <blockquote>Resolved, That the union of these States rests on the equality of rights and privileges among its members, and that it is especially the duty of the Senate, which represents the States in their sovereign capacity, to resist all attempts to discriminate either in relation to person or property, so as, in the Territories -- which are the common possession of the United States -- to give advantages to the citizens of one State which are not equally secured to those of every other State.<ref>Jefferson Davis' Resolutions on the Relations of States, Senate Chamber, U.S. Capitol, February 2, 1860, From ''The Papers of Jefferson Davis,'' Volume 6, pp. 273-76. Transcribed from the ''Congressional Globe, 36th Congress, 1st Session,'' pp. 658-59.</ref></blockquote> | |||
{{Main|1860 United States presidential election}} | |||
]'s ''Portrait of Abraham Lincoln'', 1860|alt=Portrait of the middle-aged Abraham Lincoln the year of 1860 by Mathew Brady]] | |||
] won the ].{{sfn|Potter|Fehrenbacher|1976|p=485}} Southern leaders feared Lincoln would stop slavery's expansion and put it on a course toward extinction.{{sfn|McPherson|1988|pp=254–255}} His victory triggered declarations of ] by seven slave states of the ], all of whose riverfront or coastal economies were based on cotton that was cultivated by slave labor. Lincoln was not inaugurated until March 4, 1861, giving the South time to prepare for war during the winter of 1860–1861.<ref name="NegativesPrints">{{Cite web |title=1861 Time Line |url=https://www.loc.gov/collections/civil-war-glass-negatives/articles-and-essays/time-line-of-the-civil-war/1861 |access-date=January 22, 2022 |website=Civil War Glass Negatives and Related Prints |publisher=Library of Congress}}</ref> Nationalists in the North and "Unionists" in the South refused to accept the declarations of secession. No foreign government ever recognized the Confederacy. The U.S. government, under President ], refused to relinquish its forts that were in territory claimed by the Confederacy. According to Lincoln, the American people had shown they had been successful in ''establishing'' and ''administering'' a republic, but a third challenge faced the nation: ''maintaining'' a republic based on the people's vote, in the face of an attempt to destroy it.<ref>{{Cite book |last=Jaffa |first=Harry V. |title=A New Birth of Freedom: Abraham Lincoln and the Coming of the Civil War |year=2004 |publisher=Rowman & Littlefield |isbn=978-0-8476-9953-7 |page=1}}</ref> | |||
]'s version of the states' rights theory was based on the idea of states defending free speech against the ]. ] added the idea that Southern states could defend their sectional interests through nullification and secession. According to McPherson, Calhoun regarded the territories as the "common property" of | |||
sovereign states, and said that Congress was acting merely as the "joint agents" of the states.<ref>McPherson, Battle Cry, page 57</ref> As Allan Nevins described it, "Governments, observed Calhoun, were formed to protect minorities, for majorities could take care of themselves."<ref> Nevins, Ordeal of the Union: Fruits of Manifest Destiny 1847-1852, page 155</ref> | |||
==Outbreak of the war== | |||
Like Calhoun, Davis believed that the states' rights theory protected the rights of the minority against a tyranical majority of Northerners. Jefferson Davis said that a "disparaging discrimination" and a fight for "liberty" against "the tyranny of an unbridled majority" gave the Confederate states a right to secede.<ref> Jefferson Davis' Second Inaugural Address, Virginia Capitol, Richmond, February 22, 1862 Transcribed from Dunbar Rowland, ed., ''Jefferson Davis, Constitutionalist,'' Volume 5, pp. 198-203. Summarized in ''The Papers of Jefferson Davis,'' Volume 8, p. 55.</ref> | |||
===Secession crisis=== | |||
{{Main|Ordinance of Secession}} | |||
] | |||
Lincoln's election provoked ]'s legislature to call a state convention to consider secession. South Carolina had done more than any other state to advance the notion that a state had the right to ] federal laws and even secede. On December 20, 1860, the convention unanimously voted to secede and adopted ]. It argued for states' rights for slave owners but complained about states' rights in the North in the form of resistance to the federal Fugitive Slave Act, claiming that Northern states were not fulfilling their obligations to assist in the return of fugitive slaves. The "cotton states" of ], ], ], ], ], and ] followed suit, seceding in January and February 1861.<ref name="NegativesPrints"/> | |||
In 1860, Congressman ] of South Carolina said, "The anti-slavery party contend that slavery is wrong in itself, and the Government is a consolidated national democracy. We of the South contend that slavery is right, and that this is a confederate Republic of sovereign States."<ref> Lawrence Keitt, Congressman from South Carolina, in a speech to the House on January 25, 1860: ''Congressional Globe.'' </ref> | |||
Among the ordinances of secession, those of Texas, Alabama, and Virginia mentioned the plight of the "slaveholding states" at the hands of Northern abolitionists. The rest made no mention of slavery but were brief announcements by the legislatures of the dissolution of ties to the Union.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Ordinances of Secession of the 13 Confederate States of America |url=http://www.civil-war.net/pages/ordinances_secession.asp |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20040611023102/http://civil-war.net/pages/ordinances_secession.asp |archive-date=June 11, 2004 |access-date=November 28, 2012}}</ref> However, at least four—South Carolina,<ref>{{Cite web |title=Confederate States of America – Declaration of the Immediate Causes which Induce and Justify the Secession of South Carolina from the Federal Union |url=http://avalon.law.yale.edu/19th_century/csa_scarsec.asp |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190220121942/http://avalon.law.yale.edu/19th_century/csa_scarsec.asp |archive-date=February 20, 2019 |access-date=November 28, 2012 |website=The Avalon Project}}</ref> Mississippi,<ref>{{Cite web |title=A Declaration of the Immediate Causes which Induce and Justify the Secession of the State of Mississippi from the Federal Union |url=http://avalon.law.yale.edu/19th_century/csa_missec.asp |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20141010225636/http://avalon.law.yale.edu/19th_century/csa_missec.asp |archive-date=October 10, 2014 |access-date=November 28, 2012 |website=The Avalon Project}}</ref> Georgia,<ref>{{Cite web |title=Confederate States of America – Georgia Secession |url=http://avalon.law.yale.edu/19th_century/csa_geosec.asp |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110714154731/http://avalon.law.yale.edu/19th_century/csa_geosec.asp |archive-date=July 14, 2011 |access-date=November 28, 2012 |website=The Avalon Project}}</ref> and Texas<ref>{{Cite web |title=Confederate States of America – A Declaration of the Causes which Impel the State of Texas to Secede from the Federal Union |url=http://avalon.law.yale.edu/19th_century/csa_texsec.asp |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110811013053/http://avalon.law.yale.edu/19th_century/csa_texsec.asp |archive-date=August 11, 2011 |access-date=November 28, 2012 |website=The Avalon Project}}</ref>—provided detailed reasons for their secession, all blaming the movement to abolish slavery and its influence over the North. Southern states believed that the ] made slaveholding a constitutional right. These states agreed to form a new federal government, the ], on February 4, 1861.{{sfn|McPherson|1988|p=24}} They took control of federal forts and other properties within their boundaries, with little resistance from outgoing President ], whose term ended on March 4. Buchanan said the ] was proof the Southern states had no reason to secede and that the Union "was intended to be perpetual". He added, however, that "The power by force of arms to compel a State to remain in the Union" was not among the "enumerated powers granted to Congress".<ref name="Buchanan1860" /> A quarter of the US army—the Texas garrison—was surrendered in February to state forces by its general, ], who joined the Confederacy.{{sfn|Winters|1963|p=28}} | |||
The South defined equality in terms of the equal rights of states, and | |||
opposed the declaration that all men are created equal. When arguing for the equality of states, Jefferson Davis said, "Who has been in advance of him in the fiery charge on the rights of the States, and in assuming to the Federal Government the power to crush and to coerce them? Even to-day he has repeated his doctrines. He tells us this is a Government which we will learn is not merely a Government of the States, but a Government of each individual of the people of the United States."<ref>Jefferson Davis' reply in the Senate to William H. Seward, Senate Chamber, U.S. | |||
Capitol, February 29, 1860, From ''The Papers of Jefferson Davis,'' Volume 6, pp. 277-84. Transcribed from the ''Congressional Globe, 36th Congress, 1st Session,'' pp. 916-18.</ref> When arguing against equality of individuals, Davis said, "We recognize the fact of the inferiority stamped upon that race of men by the Creator, and from the cradle to the | |||
grave, our Government, as a civil institution, marks that inferiority."<ref>Jefferson Davis' reply in the Senate to William H. Seward, Senate Chamber, U.S. Capitol, February 29, 1860, - From ''The Papers of Jefferson Davis,'' Volume 6, pp. 277-84. Transcribed from the ''Congressional Globe, 36th Congress, 1st Session,'' pp. 916-18.</ref> | |||
As Southerners resigned their Senate and House seats, Republicans could pass projects that had been blocked. These included the ], land grant colleges, a ], a transcontinental railroad,<ref>{{Cite web |year=1865 |title=Profile Showing the Grades upon the Different Routes Surveyed for the Union Pacific Rail Road Between the Missouri River and the Valley of the Platte River |url=http://www.wdl.org/en/item/4608/ |access-date=July 16, 2013 |publisher=]}}</ref> the ], authorization of ]s by the ], and the end of ]. The ] introduced ] to help finance the war.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Abraham Lincoln imposes first federal income tax |url=https://www.history.com/this-day-in-history/lincoln-imposes-first-federal-income-tax |access-date=June 12, 2021 |website=History.com}}</ref> | |||
South Carolina's "Declaration of the Immediate Causes for Secession" started with an argument for states' rights for slaveowners in the South, followed by a complaint about states' rights in the North, claiming that Northern states were not fulfilling their federal obligations. South Carolina's argument for secession was as follows:<blockquote>We maintain that in | |||
every compact between two or more parties, the obligation is mutual; that the failure of one of the contracting parties to perform a material part of the agreement, entirely releases the obligation of the other; and that where no arbiter is provided, each party is remitted to his own judgment to determine the fact of failure, with all its consequences. In the present case, that fact is established with certainty. We assert that fourteen of the States have deliberately refused, for years past, to fulfill their constitutional obligations, and we refer to their own Statutes for the proof. </blockquote> | |||
], ] (1861–1865)|alt=Middle-aged man in a goatee posed standing in a suit, vest and bowtie]] | |||
The Constitutional obligations in question were as follows: | |||
*Refusal of Northern states to enforce the fugitive slave code by passing personal liberty laws. | |||
*Agitation against slavery, which "denied the rights of property" established in the Constitution. | |||
*Assisting "thousands of slaves to leave their homes" through the Underground Railroad. | |||
*The election of Lincoln "because he has declared that that 'Government cannot endure permanently half slave, half free,' and that the public mind must rest in the belief that slavery is in the course of ultimate extinction." | |||
*"...elevating to citizenship, persons who, by the supreme law of the land, are incapable of becoming citizens."<ref>Declaration of the Immediate Causes Which Induce and Justify the Secession of South Carolina from the Federal Union - Adopted December 24, 1860</ref> | |||
In December 1860, the ] was proposed to re-establish the ] line, by constitutionally banning slavery in territories to the north of it, while permitting it to the south. The Compromise would likely have prevented secession, but Lincoln and the Republicans rejected it.{{sfn|McPherson|1988|pp=252–254}} Lincoln stated that any compromise that would extend slavery would bring down the Union.{{sfn|McPherson|1988|p=253}} A ] met in Washington, proposing a solution similar the Compromise; it was rejected by Congress. The Republicans proposed the ], an alternative, not to interfere with slavery where it existed, but the South regarded it as insufficient. The remaining eight slave states rejected pleas to join the Confederacy, following a no-vote in Virginia's First Secessionist Convention on April 4.{{sfn|McPherson|1988|pp=234–266}} | |||
It was an exageration to claim that the North granted blacks the rights of citizens, but most Northerners disagreed with the Dred Scott decision. | |||
On March 4, Lincoln was sworn in as president. In his ], he argued that the Constitution was a '']'' than the earlier ], was a binding contract, and called secession "legally void".<ref name="Lincoln1861" /> He did not intend to invade Southern states, nor to end slavery where it existed, but he said he would use force to maintain possession of federal property,<ref name="Lincoln1861" /> including forts, arsenals, mints, and customhouses that had been seized.{{sfn|McPherson|1988|p=262}} The government would not try to recover post offices, and if resisted, mail delivery would end at state lines. Where conditions did not allow peaceful enforcement of federal law, US marshals and judges would be withdrawn. No mention was made of bullion lost from mints. He stated that it would be US policy "to collect the duties and imposts"; "there will be no invasion, no using of force against or among the people anywhere" that would justify an armed revolution. His speech closed with a plea for restoration of the bonds of union, famously calling on "the mystic chords of memory" binding the two regions.<ref name="Lincoln1861" /> | |||
===Slavery in the territories=== | |||
The specific political crisis that led to secession stemmed from a dispute over the expansion of slavery into new territories. The Republicans, while maintaining that Congress had no power over slavery in the states, asserted that it did have power to ban slavery in the territories. The ] of 1820 maintained the balance of power in Congress by adding Maine as a free state and Missouri as a slave state. It prohibited slavery in the remainder of the Louisiana Purchase Territory north of 36°30'N lat. (the southern boundary of Missouri). The acquisition of vast new lands after the ] (1846–1848), however, reopened the debate—now focused on the proposed ], which would have banned slavery in territories annexed from Mexico. Though it never passed, the Wilmot Proviso aroused angry debate. Northerners argued that slavery would provide unfair competition for free migrants to the territories; slaveholders claimed Congress had no right to discriminate against them by preventing them from bringing their legal property there. | |||
The Davis government of the new Confederacy sent delegates to Washington to negotiate a peace treaty. Lincoln rejected negotiations, because he claimed that the Confederacy was not a legitimate government and to make a treaty with it would recognize it as such.{{sfn|Potter|Fehrenbacher|1976|pp=572–573}} Lincoln instead attempted to negotiate directly with the governors of seceded states, whose administrations he continued to recognize.<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Harris |first=William C. |date=Winter 2000 |title=The Hampton Roads Peace Conference: A Final Test of Lincoln's Presidential Leadership |url=http://hdl.handle.net/2027/spo.2629860.0021.104 |journal=Journal of the Abraham Lincoln Association |volume=21 |issue=1 |issn=1945-7987 |hdl=2027/spo.2629860.0021.104}}</ref> | |||
The dispute led to open warfare in the ] after it was organized by the ] of 1854. This act repealed the prohibition on slavery there under the Missouri Compromise, and put the fate of slavery in the hands of the territory's settlers, a process known as "]". Fighting erupted between proslavery "border ruffians" from neighboring Missouri and antislavery immigrants from the North (including ], among other abolitionists). Tensions between North and South now were violent. | |||
Complicating Lincoln's attempts to defuse the crisis was Secretary of State ], who had been Lincoln's rival for the Republican ]. Embittered by his defeat, Seward agreed to support Lincoln's candidacy only after he was guaranteed the executive office then considered the second most powerful. In the early stages of Lincoln's presidency Seward held little regard for him, due to his perceived inexperience. Seward viewed himself as the de facto head of government, the "]" behind the throne. Seward attempted to engage in unauthorized and indirect negotiations that failed.{{sfn|Potter|Fehrenbacher|1976|pp=572–573}} Lincoln was determined to hold all remaining Union-occupied forts in the Confederacy: ] in Virginia, ], ], and ] in Florida, and ] in South Carolina.<ref>{{Cite book |last=Hardyman |first=Robyn |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=D11iDwAAQBAJ |title=What Caused the Civil War? |year=2016 |publisher=Gareth Stevens |isbn=978-1-4824-5180-1 |page=27}}</ref> | |||
===Slavery and antislavery=== | |||
The institution of slavery, introduced into colonial North America in 1619, had become a contentious issue between the North and the South early in the 1800s. The ] included a new, stronger ] that required federal agents to capture and return slaves that escaped into northern free states. | |||
===Battle of Fort Sumter=== | |||
The Supreme Court decision of 1857 in ] added to the controversy. ] decision said that slaves "have no rights which any white man is bound to respect",<ref>Dred Scott v. Sandford, U. S. Supreme Court, Roger Taney's decision, 1857</ref> and that slaves could be taken to free states and territories. Lincoln warned that "the next ''Dred Scott'' decision"<ref>First Lincoln Douglas Debate at Ottawa, Illinois August 21, 1858</ref> could threaten northern states with slavery. | |||
{{Main|Battle of Fort Sumter}} | |||
{{See also|President Lincoln's 75,000 volunteers}} | |||
]]] | |||
The American Civil War began on April 12, 1861, when Confederate forces opened fire on the Union-held Fort Sumter. Fort Sumter is located in the harbor of ], South Carolina.{{Sfn|McPherson|1988|p=264}} Its status had been contentious for months. Outgoing President Buchanan had dithered in reinforcing its garrison, commanded by Major ]. Anderson took matters into his own hands and on December 26, 1860, under the cover of darkness, sailed the garrison from the poorly placed ] to the stalwart island Fort Sumter.{{Sfn|McPherson|1988|p=265}} Anderson's actions catapulted him to hero status in the North. An attempt to resupply the fort on January 9, 1861, failed and nearly started the war then, but an informal truce held.{{Sfn|McPherson|1988|p=266}} On March 5, Lincoln was informed the fort was low on supplies.{{Sfn|McPherson|1988|p=267}} | |||
Since fewer than 800 of the almost 4 million<ref></ref> slaves escaped in 1860, the fugitive slave controversy was not a practical reason for secession. (More had escaped in previous years; see ].) The number that escaped was offset by free Northern blacks who were kidnapped as slaves. And secession only did away with enforcement of the fugitive slave law altogether. Kansas had only two slaves in 1860 because the territories had the wrong soil and climate for labor-intensive forms of agriculture.<ref>J. G. Randall, ''Lincoln the President,'' (1997), vol 1, pages 237-241 </ref> Allan Nevins summarizes this argument by concluding that "Both sides were equally guilty of hysteria." <ref>Nevins, ''Ordeal of the Union'' 1:383; Pressly, 123-33, 278-81</ref> | |||
There was a strong correlation between the number of plantations in a region and the degree of support for secession. The states of the deep south had the greatest concentration of plantations and were the first to secede. The upper South slave states of ], ], ], and ] had fewer plantations and rejected secession until the ] crisis forced them to choose sides. Border states had fewer plantations still and never seceded.<ref>James M. McPherson, ''Battle Cry of Freedom'' 1988 p 242, 255, 282-83. Maps on page 101 (The Southern Economy) and page 236 (The Progress of Secession) are also relevant</ref> | |||
Fort Sumter proved a key challenge to Lincoln's administration.{{Sfn|McPherson|1988|p=267}} Back-channel dealing by Seward with the Confederates undermined Lincoln's decision-making; Seward wanted to pull out.{{Sfn|McPherson|1988|p=268}} But a firm hand by Lincoln tamed Seward, who was a staunch Lincoln ally. Lincoln decided holding the fort, which would require reinforcing it, was the only workable option. On April 6, Lincoln informed the Governor of South Carolina that a ship with food but no ammunition would attempt to supply the fort. Historian McPherson describes this win-win approach as "the first sign of the mastery that would mark Lincoln's presidency"; the Union would win if it could resupply and hold the fort, and the South would be the aggressor if it opened fire on an unarmed ship supplying starving men.{{Sfn|McPherson|1988|p=272}} An April 9 Confederate cabinet meeting resulted in Davis ordering General ] to take the fort before supplies reached it.{{Sfn|McPherson|1988|p=273}} | |||
===Rejection of compromise=== | |||
Until ], ], the political system had always successfully handled inter-regional crises. All but one crisis involved slavery, starting with debates on the three-fifths clause in the Constitutional Convention of 1787. Congress had solved the crisis over the admission of Missouri as a slave state in 1819-21, the controversy over South Carolina's nullification of the tariff in 1832, the acquisition of ] in 1845, and the status of slavery in the territory acquired from ] in 1850.<ref> William E. Gienapp, "The Crisis of American Democracy: The Political System and the Coming of the Civil War." in Boritt ed. ''Why the Civil War Came'' 79-123</ref> | |||
]]] | |||
At 4:30 am on April 12, Confederate forces fired the first of 4,000 shells at the fort; it fell the next day. The loss of Fort Sumter lit a patriotic fire under the North.{{Sfn|McPherson|1988|pp=273–274}} On April 15, Lincoln called on the states to field ] troops for 90 days; impassioned Union states met the quotas quickly.{{sfn|McPherson|1988|p=274}} On May 3, 1861, Lincoln called for an additional 42,000 volunteers for three years.<ref name="Presidency.ucsb.edu" />{{sfn|McPherson|1988|p=278}} Shortly after this, ], ], ], and ] seceded and joined the Confederacy. To reward Virginia, the Confederate capital was moved to ].{{sfn|McPherson|1988|pp=276–307}} | |||
However, in 1854, the old ] broke down after passage of the ]. The ] disappeared, and the new ] arose in its place. It was the nation's first major party with only sectional appeal and a commitment to stop the expansion of slavery. | |||
===Attitude of the border states=== | |||
One Republican leader, ] ], was violently attacked and nearly killed at his desk in the Senate by ] ] of South Carolina. Brooks attacked Sumner with a gold-knobbed ] cane, which his Southern admirers replaced with similar canes with inscriptions like "Hit him again."<ref>Fox Butterfield; ''All God's Children'' page 17</ref> | |||
{{Main|Border states (American Civil War)}} | |||
] vs. the ] | |||
{{legend|#1A3E7A| Union states}} | |||
{{legend|#6895c9| Union territories not permitting slavery}} | |||
{{legend|#EDD200| Southern ]}} (One of these states, ], was created in 1863, while KY, WV and MO had dual competing Confederate and Unionist governments) | |||
{{legend|#C95200| Confederate states}} | |||
{{legend|#EDB360| Union territories that permitted slavery (claimed by Confederacy) at the start of the war, but where slavery was outlawed by the U.S. in 1862}}]] | |||
], ], ], ] and ] were slave states whose people had divided loyalties to Northern and Southern businesses and family members. Some men enlisted in the ] and others in the Confederate Army.{{sfn|Jones|2011|pp=203–204}} ] separated from ] and was admitted to the ] on June 20, 1863, though half its counties were secessionist.{{sfn|Jones|2011|p=21}} | |||
Open warfare in the ] ("]"), the ] of 1857, ] in 1859 and the split in the ] in 1860 polarized the nation between North and South. The ] was the final trigger for secession. During the secession crisis, many sought compromise—of these attempts, the best known was the "]"—but all failed. | |||
Maryland's territory surrounded ], and could cut it off from the North.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Civil War and the Maryland General Assembly |url=http://msa.maryland.gov/msa/stagser/s1259/121/7590/html/0000.html |access-date=May 28, 2017 |website=Maryland State Archives}}</ref> It had anti-Lincoln officials who tolerated anti-army ] and the burning of bridges, both aimed at hindering the passage of troops to the South. Maryland's legislature voted overwhelmingly to stay in the Union, but rejected hostilities with its southern neighbors, voting to close Maryland's rail lines to prevent their use for war.<ref name="MarylandArchives2005">{{Cite web |year=2005 |title=Teaching American History in Maryland – Documents for the Classroom: ''Arrest of the Maryland Legislature, 1861'' |url=http://teachingamericanhistorymd.net/000001/000000/000017/html/t17.html |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080111110628/http://teachingamericanhistorymd.net/000001/000000/000017/html/t17.html |archive-date=January 11, 2008 |access-date=February 6, 2008 |publisher=Maryland State Archives}}</ref> Lincoln responded by establishing ] and unilaterally suspending ] in Maryland, along with sending in militia units.{{sfn|McPherson|1988|pp=284–287}} Lincoln took control of Maryland and the District of Columbia by seizing prominent figures, including arresting one-third of the members of the ] on the day it reconvened.<ref name="MarylandArchives2005" /><ref>{{Cite book |last=Harris |first=William C. |title=Lincoln and the Border States: Preserving the Union |year=2011 |publisher=University Press of Kansas |page=71}}</ref> All were held without trial, with Lincoln ignoring a ruling on June 1, 1861, by Supreme Court Chief Justice ], not speaking for the Court,{{efn|Historians disagree as to whether Roger Taney heard ''Ex parte Merryman'' as a U.S. circuit judge or as a Supreme Court justice in chambers.<ref>{{Cite book |last=White |first=Jonathan W. |title=Abraham Lincoln and Treason in the Civil War: The Trials of John Merryman |year=2011 |publisher=Louisiana State University Press |location=Baton Rouge |pages=38–39}}</ref><ref>{{Cite magazine |last=Vladeck |first=Stephen I. |author-link=Steve Vladeck |date=Summer 2007 |title=The Field Theory: Martial Law, The Suspension Power, and The Insurrection Act |url=https://www.templelawreview.org/article/80-2_vladeck/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220927142538/https://www.templelawreview.org/article/80-2_vladeck/ |archive-date=September 27, 2022 |magazine=Temple Law Review |page=391, n. 2 |volume=80 |issue=2}}</ref>}} that only Congress could suspend habeas corpus ('']''). Federal troops imprisoned a Baltimore newspaper editor, ], after he criticized Lincoln in an editorial for ignoring Taney's ruling.<ref>{{Cite book |last=Howard |first=F. K. |url=https://archive.org/details/fourteenmonthsin00inhowa |title=Fourteen Months in American Bastiles |year=1863 |publisher=H. F. Mackintosh |location=London |access-date=August 18, 2014}}</ref> | |||
A deeper reason for the rejection of compromise was the fear that conspiracies threatened to destroy the republic. By the 1850s, two loomed most threatening: the South feared the supposedly abolitionist Republican Party (the "Black Republicans"); Republicans in the North feared what they called the ].<ref> Gienapp, "Crisis of American Democracy" p. 92; McPherson, pp 228-9</ref> | |||
In Missouri, an ] on secession voted to remain in the Union. When pro-Confederate Governor ] called out the state militia, it was attacked by federal forces under General ], who chased the governor and rest of the State Guard to the southwestern corner of Missouri (see ]). Early in the war the Confederacy controlled southern Missouri through the ] but was driven out after 1862. In the resulting vacuum, the convention on secession reconvened and took power as the Unionist provisional government of Missouri.<ref name="Nevins1959 pp. 119–129" /> | |||
===Abolitionism=== | |||
The ] of the 1820s and 1830s in religion inspired reform movements, one of the most notable of which was the abolitionists; these were later supported by ]. Unfortunately, "abolitionist" had several meanings at the time, and still retains some ambiguity. The followers of ], including ] and ], demanded the "immediate abolition of slavery", hence the name. Others, like ] and ], wanted immediate action, but that action might well be a program of gradual emancipation, with a long intermediate stage. "Antislavery men", like ], did what they could to limit slavery and end it where possible. In the last years before the war, "antislavery" could mean the Northern majority, like ], who opposed ''expansion'' of slavery or its influence, as by the Kansas-Nebraska Act, or the Fugitive Slave Act. Many Southerners called all these abolitionists, without distinguishing them from the Garrisonians. | |||
Kentucky did not secede, it declared itself neutral. When Confederate forces entered in September 1861, neutrality ended and the state reaffirmed its Union status while maintaining slavery. During an invasion by Confederate forces in 1861, Confederate sympathizers and delegates from 68 Kentucky counties organized the secession Russellville Convention, formed the shadow ], inaugurated a governor, and Kentucky was admitted into the Confederacy on December 10, 1861. Its jurisdiction extended only as far as Confederate battle lines in the Commonwealth, which at its greatest extent was over half the state, and it went into exile after October 1862.<ref name="Nevins1959 pp. 129–136" /> | |||
] explains the abolitionists' deep beliefs: "All people were equal in God's sight; the souls of black folks were as valuable as those of whites; for one of God's children to enslave another was a violation of the Higher Law, even if it was sanctioned by the Constitution."<ref>McPherson, ''Battle Cry'' p. 8; James Brewer Stewart, ''Holy Warriors: The Abolitionists and American Slavery'' (1976); Pressly, 270ff</ref> | |||
After Virginia's secession, a ] in ] asked 48 counties to vote on an ordinance to create a new state in October 1861. A voter turnout of 34% approved the statehood bill (96% approving).<ref>{{Cite web |title=A State of Convenience, The Creation of West Virginia |url=http://www.wvculture.org/History/statehood/statehood10.html |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120518153656/http://www.wvculture.org/History/statehood/statehood10.html |archive-date=May 18, 2012 |access-date=April 20, 2012 |publisher=West Virginia Archives & History}}</ref> Twenty-four secessionist counties were included in the new state,<ref name="Curry1964" /> and the ensuing guerrilla war engaged about 40,000 federal troops for much of the war.{{sfn|McPherson|1988|p=303}}{{sfn|Weigley|2004|p=55}} Congress admitted West Virginia to the Union on June 20, 1863. West Virginians provided about 20,000 soldiers to each side in the war.<ref name="Snell2011" /> A Unionist secession attempt occurred in ], but was suppressed by the Confederacy, which arrested over 3,000 men suspected of loyalty to the Union; they were held without trial.{{sfn|Neely|1993|pp=10–11}} | |||
Slaveowners were angry over the attacks on their "peculiar institution" of slavery. Starting in the 1830s, there was a vehement and growing ideological defense of slavery.<ref> David Brion Davis, ''Inhuman Bondage'' (2006) pp 186-192.</ref> Slaveowners claimed that slavery was a positive good for masters and slaves alike, and that it was explicitly sanctioned by God. Biblical arguments were made in defense of slavery by religious leaders such as the Rev. Fred A. Ross and political leaders such as ].<ref>Mitchell Snay, "American Thought and Southern Distinctiveness: The Southern Clergy and the Sanctification of Slavery," ''Civil War History'' (1989) 35(4): 311-328; Elizabeth Fox-Genovese and Eugene D. Genovese, ''The Mind of the Master Class: History and Faith in the Southern Slaveholders' Worldview'' (2005), pp 505-27. </ref> | |||
== War == | |||
Beginning in the 1830s, the U.S. ] refused to allow the mails to carry abolition pamphlets to the South.<ref>Schlesinger ''Age of Jackson'', p.190</ref> Northern teachers suspected of any tinge of abolitionism were expelled from the South, and abolitionist literature was banned. Southerners rejected the denials of Republicans that they were abolitionists, and pointed to ] attempt in 1859 to start a slave uprising as proof that multiple Northern conspiracies were afoot to ignite bloody slave rebellions. Although some abolitionists did call for slave revolts, no evidence of any other actual Brown-like conspiracy has been discovered.<ref> David Brion Davis, ''Inhuman Bondage'' (2006) p 197, 409; Stanley Harrold, ''The Abolitionists and the South, 1831-1861'' (1995) p. 62; Jane H. and William H. Pease, "Confrontation and Abolition in the 1850's" ''Journal of American History'' (1972) 58(4): 923-937. </ref> The North felt threatened as well, for as Eric Foner concludes, "Northerners came to view slavery as the very antithesis of the good society, as well as a threat to their own fundamental values and interests".<ref> Eric Foner. ''Free Soil, Free Labor, Free Men: The Ideology of the Republican Party Before the Civil War'' (1970), p. 9</ref> | |||
{{See also|List of American Civil War battles|Military leadership in the American Civil War}} | |||
The Civil War was marked by intense and frequent battles. Over four years, 237 named battles were fought, along with many smaller actions, often characterized by their bitter intensity and high casualties. Historian ] described it as "one of the most ferocious wars ever fought," where, in many cases, the only target was the enemy's soldiers.<ref>{{harvnb|Keegan|2009|p=73}}. "Over 10,000 military engagements took place during the war, 40 percent of them in Virginia and Tennessee."</ref><ref>Gabor Boritt (ed.). ''War Comes Again'' (1995), p. 247.</ref> | |||
=== |
=== Mobilization === | ||
{{See also|Economic history of the American Civil War}} | |||
The most famous antislavery novel was ] (]) by ]. Inspired by the Fugitive Slave Law of 1850 which made the escape narrative part of everyday news, Stowe emphasized the horrors that abolitionists had long claimed about slavery. Her depiction of the evil slaveowner Simon Legree, a transplanted Yankee who kills the ]-like Uncle Tom, outraged slaveowners.<ref>Curti, p. 381; Heidler, pp 1991-3.</ref> Stowe made Simon Legree a transplanted Yankee to show that she was attacking not the southern people but slavery as an institution. She published a Key to ''Uncle Tom’s Cabin'' to prove that, even though the book was fiction, many events in the book were based on fact.<ref>McPherson, ''Battle Cry'' pages 88-91</ref><ref> Most of her slaveowners are "decent, honorable people, themselves victims" of that institution. Much of her description was based on personal observation, and the descriptions of Southerners; she herself calls them and Legree representatives of different types of masters.;Gerson, ''Harriet Beecher Stowe'', p.68; Stowe, ''Key to Uncle Tom's Cabin'' (1953) p. 39</ref> According to Stowe's son, when President Lincoln met her in 1862, he commented, "So you're the little woman who wrote the book that made this great war!"<ref> Charles Edward Stowe, ''Harriet Beecher Stowe: The Story of Her Life'' (1911) p. 203. Historians are undecided whether Lincoln said the line. </ref> In response to Stowe's book, novelist ] published a widely-read, but largely now forgotten, work entitled ''The Planter's Northern Bride'' in 1854, countering many of Stowe's depictions of the slavery institution. | |||
] of 1863|alt=Building on fire as rioters look on, one holds a sign that says "no draft"]] | |||
===Jordan Brown=== | |||
] | |||
] has been called "the most controversial of all nineteenth-century Americans."<ref>Frederick J. Blue in ''American Historical Review'' (April 2006) v. 111 p 481-2.</ref> His attempt to start a slave rebellion in 1859 electrified the nation. Uniquely among the Garrisonians, he resorted to violence. Most historians depict Brown as a bloodthirsty zealot and madman who briefly stepped into history but did little to influence it. Some scholars, however, glorify Brown, giving him credit for starting the Civil War and arguing "it is misleading to identify Brown with modern terrorists."<ref> David S. Reynolds, ''John Brown, Abolitionist: The Man Who Killed Slavery, Sparked the Civil War, and Seeded Civil Rights'' (2005). </ref> | |||
As the Confederate states organized, the U.S. Army numbered 16,000, while Northern governors began mobilizing their militias.<ref>{{Cite book |title=American Military History |pages=199–221 |chapter=The Civil War, 1861 |quote=With an actual strength of 1,080 officers and 14,926 enlisted men on June 30, 1860, the Regular Army... |chapter-url=http://www.history.army.mil/html/bookshelves/resmat/civil_war/extracts/the_civil_war_1861_(pg_199-221).pdf |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121017195124/http://www.history.army.mil/html/bookshelves/resmat/civil_war/extracts/the_civil_war_1861_(pg_199-221).pdf |archive-date=October 17, 2012 |url-status=live}}</ref> The Confederate Congress authorized up to 100,000 troops in February. By May, Jefferson Davis was pushing for another 100,000 soldiers for one year or the duration, and the U.S. Congress responded in kind.<ref>{{Cite book |last1=Nicolay |first1=John George |url={{google books|plainurl=y|id=9lAfAQAAIAAJ|page=264}} |title=Abraham Lincoln: A History |last2=Hay |first2=John |year=1890 |publisher=Century |page=264}}</ref>{{sfn|Coulter|1950|p=308}} | |||
John Brown started his fight against slavery in Kansas in 1856, during the ] crisis. ]s used bowie knives and vote fraud to establish a pro-slavery government at ]. There was Border Ruffian violence in Lawrence, Kansas, in 1855 and 1856 (see ]). And Border Ruffians kidnapped and killed six Free-State men. In response, Brown and his band killed five pro-slavery people at ]. | |||
In the first year of the war, both sides had more volunteers than they could effectively train and equip. After the initial enthusiasm faded, relying on young men who came of age each year was not enough. Both sides enacted draft laws (conscription) to encourage or force volunteering, though relatively few were drafted. The Confederacy passed a draft law in April 1862 for men aged 18–35, with exemptions for overseers, government officials, and clergymen. The U.S. Congress followed in July, authorizing a militia draft within states that could not meet their quota with volunteers. European ] joined the Union Army in large numbers, including 177,000 born in Germany and 144,000 in Ireland.<ref>{{Cite book |last=Faust |first=Albert Bernhardt |url={{google books|plainurl=y|id=4xgOAAAAIAAJ|page=523}} |title=The German Element in the United States: With Special Reference to Its Political, Moral, Social, and Educational Influence |year=1909 |publisher=Houghton Mifflin}}</ref> About 50,000 Canadians served, around 2,500 of whom were black.<ref>{{Cite book |last=Reid |first=Richard M. |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=bi9nAwAAQBAJ |title=African Canadians in Union Blue: Volunteering for the Cause in the Civil War |publisher=University of British Columbia Press |year=2014 |isbn=978-0-7748-2745-4 |location=Vancouver |pages=4–5, 40}}</ref> | |||
His famous raid in October 1859, involved a band of 22 men who seized the federal arsenal at ] knowing it contained tens of thousands of weapons. Brown, like his Boston supporters, believed that the South was on the verge of a gigantic slave uprising and that one spark would set it off. Brown's raid, says historian David Potter, "was meant to be of vast magnitude and to produce a revolutionary slave uprising throughout the South." The raid was a fiasco. Not a single slave revolted. Instead, Brown was quickly captured, tried for treason (against the state of Virginia) and hanged. At his trial, Brown exuded a remarkable strength of character that impressed Southerners, even as they feared he might be right about an impending slave revolt. Shortly before his execution, Brown prophesied, "the crimes of this guilty land : will never be purged away; but with Blood."<ref>David Potter, ''The Impending Crisis: 1848-1861'' (1976), chapter 14, quote from p. 367. Allan Nevins, ''Ordeal of the Union: A House Dividing,'' pages 472-477 and ''The Emergence of Lincoln,'' vol 2, pages 71-97</ref> | |||
When the ] went into effect in January 1863, ex-slaves were energetically recruited to meet state quotas. States and local communities offered higher cash bonuses for white volunteers. Congress tightened the draft law in March 1863. Men selected in the draft could provide substitutes or, until mid-1864, pay commutation money. Many eligibles pooled their money to cover the cost of anyone drafted. Families used the substitute provision to select which man should go into the army and which should stay home. There was much evasion and resistance to the draft, especially in Catholic areas. The ] in July 1863 involved Irish immigrants who had been signed up as citizens to swell the vote of the ], not realizing it made them liable for the draft.{{sfn|Schecter|2007|p={{page needed|date=September 2024}}}} Of the 168,649 men procured for the Union through the draft, 117,986 were substitutes, leaving only 50,663 who were conscripted.<ref name="Murdock1971" /> | |||
===Arguments for and against slavery=== | |||
William Lloyd Garrison, the leading abolitionist, was motivated by a belief in the growth of democracy. Because the Constitution had a three-fifths clause, a fugitive slave clause and a 20-year extension of the Atlantic slave trade, Garrison once publicly burned a copy of the ] and called it "a covenant with death and an agreement with hell."<ref>''Against Slavery: An Abolitionist Reader,'' (2000), page 26</ref> | |||
In 1854, he said<blockquote>I am a believer in that portion of the Declaration of American Independence in which it is set forth, as among self-evident truths, "that all men are created equal; that they are endowed by their Creator with certain inalienable rights; that among these are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness." Hence, I am an abolitionist. Hence, I cannot but regard oppression in every form—and most of all, that which turns a man into a thing—with indignation and abhorrence.<ref>http://members.aol.com/jfepperson/garrison.html</ref></blockquote> | |||
], one of the most ardent abolitionists, attacked the ] and presaged disunion as early as 1845: | |||
<blockquote> The experience of the fifty years… shows us the slaves trebling in numbers—slaveholders monopolizing the offices and dictating the policy of the Government—prostituting the strength and influence of the Nation to the support of slavery here and elsewhere—trampling on the rights of the free States, and making the courts of the country their tools. To continue this disastrous alliance longer is madness.… Why prolong the experiment?<ref> Wendell Phillips, "No Union With Slaveholders," Jan. 15, 1845, in Louis Ruchames, ed. ''The Abolitionists'' (1963) p. 196. </ref> </blockquote> | |||
In the North and South, draft laws were highly unpopular. In the North, some 120,000 men evaded conscription, many fleeing to Canada, and another 280,000 soldiers deserted during the war.<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Hallock |first=Judith Lee |year=1983 |title=The Role of the Community in Civil War Desertion |url=http://mtw160-198.ippl.jhu.edu/journals/civil_war_history/v029/29.2.hallock.pdf |journal=Civil War History |volume=29 |issue=2 |pages=123–134 |doi=10.1353/cwh.1983.0013}}</ref> At least 100,000 Southerners deserted, about 10 percent of the total. Southern desertion was high because many soldiers were more concerned about the fate of their local area than the Southern cause.<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Bearman |first=Peter S. |year=1991 |title=Desertion as Localism: Army Unit Solidarity and Group Norms in the U.S. Civil War |journal=Social Forces |volume=70 |issue=2 |pages=321–342 |doi=10.1093/sf/70.2.321 |jstor=2580242}}</ref> In the North, "]s" enlisted to collect the generous bonus, deserted, then re-enlisted under a different name for a second bonus; 141 were caught and executed.<ref name="Fantina2006" /> | |||
Confederate ] ] said that the cornerstone of the South was "That the Negro is not equal to the white man; that slavery—subordination to the superior race—is his natural and normal condition."<ref> Alexander Stephen's Cornerstone Speech, Savannah; Georgia, March 21, 1861</ref> | |||
From a tiny frontier force in 1860, the Union and Confederate armies grew into the "largest and most efficient armies in the world" within a few years. Some European observers at the time dismissed them as amateur and unprofessional,<ref>{{Cite web |last=Nadeau |first=Ryan |date=January 5, 2015 |title=A Prussian Observes the American Civil War |url=https://gettysburgcompiler.org/2015/01/05/a-prussian-observes-the-american-civil-war/ |access-date=January 6, 2022 |website=The Gettysburg Compiler}}</ref> but historian John Keegan concluded that each outmatched the French, Prussian, and Russian armies, and without the Atlantic, could have threatened any of them with defeat.{{sfn|Keegan|2009|p=57}} | |||
Jefferson Davis said slavery "…was established by decree of Almighty God… it is sanctioned in the Bible, in both Testaments, from Genesis to Revelation… it has existed in all ages, has been found among the people of the highest civilization, and in nations of the highest proficiency in the arts."<ref>Dunbar Rowland, ''Jefferson Davis,'' Vol. 1, pages 286 and 316-317</ref> | |||
=== Southern Unionists === | |||
Robert E. Lee said, "There are few, I believe, in this enlightened age, who will not acknowledge that slavery as an institution is a moral and political evil."<ref>http://www.civilwarhome.com/leepierce.htm 1856 letter by Lee in which he further states that slavery is worse for the white man than for the black, and that the blacks are better off in the US than in Africa</ref> | |||
{{Main|Southern Unionist}} | |||
Unionism was strong in certain areas within the Confederacy. As many as 100,000 men living in states under Confederate control served in the Union Army or pro-Union guerrilla groups. Although they came from all classes, most Southern Unionists differed socially, culturally, and economically from their region’s dominant prewar, slave-owning planter class.<ref>Scott, E. Carole. . ''Warfare History Network''. Retrieved November 11, 2024.</ref> | |||
=== |
=== Prisoners === | ||
{{Main|American Civil War prison camps}} | |||
]'''<br>16th President (1861–1865)]] | |||
At the war's start, a parole system operated, under which captives agreed not to fight until exchanged. They were held in camps run by their army, paid, but not allowed to perform any military duties.<ref>{{Cite book |last=Pickenpaugh |first=Roger |url={{google books|plainurl=y|id=pWOfsOceCNUC|page=57}} |title=Captives in Blue: The Civil War Prisons of the Confederacy |publisher=University of Alabama Press |year=2013 |isbn=978-0-8173-1783-6 |pages=57–73}}</ref> The system of exchanges collapsed in 1863 when the Confederacy refused to exchange black prisoners. After that, about 56,000 of the 409,000 POWs died in prisons, accounting for 10 percent of the conflict's fatalities.{{sfn|Tucker|Pierpaoli|White|2010|p=1466}} | |||
===Women=== | |||
====Regional economic differences==== | |||
{{See also|Women in the military#United States|Gender issues in the American Civil War}} | |||
The South, Midwest, and Northeast had quite different economic structures. ] in the 1920s made a highly influential argument to the effect that these differences caused the war (rather than slavery or constitutional debates). He saw the industrial Northeast forming a coalition with the agrarian Midwest against the Plantation South. Critics pointed out that his image of a unified Northeast was incorrect because the region was highly diverse with many different competing economic interests. In 1860-61, most business interests in the Northeast opposed war. After 1950, only a few historians accepted the Beard interpretation, though it was picked up by libertarian economists.<ref> Woodworth, ed. ''The American Civil War: A Handbook of Literature and Research'' (1996), 145 151 505 512 554 557 684; Richard Hofstadter, ''The Progressive Historians: Turner, Beard, Parrington'' (1969); for one dissenter see Marc Egnal, . "The Beards Were Right: Parties in the North, 1840-1860." ''Civil War History'' 47, no. 1. (2001): 30-56.</ref> As Historian Kenneth Stampp—who abandoned Beardianism after 1950, sums up the scholarly consensus:<ref> Kenneth M. Stampp, ''The Imperiled Union: Essays on the Background of the Civil War'' (1981) p 198</ref><blockquote> | |||
Historian ] writes that between 500 and 1,000 women enlisted as soldiers on both sides, disguised as men.{{sfn|Leonard|1999|pp=165, 310–311}} Women also served as spies, resistance activists, nurses, and hospital personnel.{{sfn|Leonard|1999|p=240}} Women served on the Union hospital ship '']'' and nursed Union and Confederate troops at field hospitals.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Highlights in the History of Military Women |url=http://www.womensmemorial.org/Education/timeline.html |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130403045042/http://www.womensmemorial.org/Education/timeline.html |archive-date=April 3, 2013 |access-date=June 22, 2013 |website=Women In Military Service For America Memorial}}</ref> ], the only woman ever to receive the ], served in the Union Army and was given the medal for treating the wounded during the war.<ref>{{Cite book |last=Pennington |first=Reina |title=Amazons to Fighter Pilots: A Biographical Dictionary of Military Women |publisher=Greenwood |year=2003 |isbn=0-313-32708-4 |volume=2 |pages=474–475}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |date=June 4, 1977 |title=The Case of Dr. Walker, Only Woman to Win (and Lose) the Medal of Honor |url=https://www.nytimes.com/1977/06/04/archives/the-case-of-dr-walker-only-woman-to-win-and-lose-the-medal-of-honor.html |access-date=January 6, 2018 |work=]}}</ref> One woman, Jennie Hodgers, fought for the Union under the name Albert D. J. Cashier. After she returned to civilian life, she continued to live as a man until she died in 1915 at the age of 71.<ref>Blanton, DeAnne, "A Life on His Own Terns: Albert D. J. Cashier, 95th Illinois Infantry", in Brian Matthew Jordan and Jonathan W. White, eds., ''Final Resting Places: Reflections on the Meaning of Civil War Graves''. Athen, Georgia: The University of Georgia Press, 2023, pp. 47-53.</ref> | |||
Most historians of the sectional conflict, whatever differences they may have on other matters, now see no compelling reason why the divergent economies of the North and South should have led to disunion and ]; rather, they find stronger practical reasons why the sections, whose economies neatly complemented one another, should have found it advantageous to remain united. Beard oversimplified the controversies relating to federal economic policy, for neither section unanimously supported or opposed measures such as the protective tariff, appropriations for internal improvements, or the creation of a national banking system. Except for the nullification crisis of 1832-33, economic issues, though sometimes present, were not crucial in the various sectional confrontations. During the 1850s, Federal economic policy gave no substantial cause for southern disaffection, for policy was largely determined by pro-Southern Congresses and administrations. Finally, the characteristic posture of the conservative northeastern business community was far from anti-Southern. Most merchants, bankers, and manufacturers were outspoken in their hostility to antislavery agitation and eager for sectional compromise in order to maintain their profitable business connections with the South. The conclusion seems inescapable that if economic differences, real though they were, had been all that troubled relations between North and South, there would be no substantial basis for the idea of an irrepressible conflict.</blockquote> | |||
===Naval tactics=== | |||
The South, in addition to much subsistence agriculture, depended upon large-scale production of export crops, primarily cotton and (to a lesser extent) tobacco, raised by slaves. The slaveowning plantations—which comprised less than a third of the white population—were export-dependent. Plantation owners typically accepted the theory that protective tariffs on iron and textiles hurt them, though they bought very little iron and only the cheapest cloth for the slaves. They believed cotton was in such heavy demand that Britain and France had no choice but to buy expensive southern cotton. James M. McPherson suggests that what South Carolina nullifiers really feared was not so much high tariffs but centralization of Federal government power, which might eventually threaten slavery itself.<ref>McPherson, ''Ordeal by Fire: The Civil War and Reconstruction'' (1992)</ref> | |||
] | |||
The small ] of 1861 rapidly expanded to 6,000 officers and 45,000 sailors by 1865, with 671 vessels totaling 510,396 tons.<ref>{{Cite magazine |last=Welles |first=Gideon |author-link=Gideon Welles |date=January 1865 |title=Secretary of the Navy's Report |url={{google books|plainurl=y|id=u4gfAAAAYAAJ}} |magazine=The Sailors' Magazine and Seamen's Friend |publisher=American Seamen's Friend Society |page=152 |volume=37 |issue=5}}</ref>{{sfn|Tucker|Pierpaoli|White|2010|p=462}} Its mission was to blockade Confederate ports, control the river system, defend against Confederate raiders on the high seas, and be ready for a possible war with the British ].{{sfn|Canney|1998|p={{page needed|date=September 2024}}}} The main riverine war was fought in the West, where major rivers gave access to the Confederate heartland. The U.S. Navy eventually controlled the Red, Tennessee, Cumberland, Mississippi, and Ohio rivers. In the East, the Navy shelled Confederate forts and supported coastal army operations.<ref>{{Cite encyclopedia |title=American Civil War: The naval war |url=https://www.britannica.com/event/American-Civil-War/The-naval-war |access-date=January 24, 2022 |encyclopedia=Encyclopædia Britannica}}</ref> | |||
Tariffs were low and did not protect northern industry before 1861. The Tariff of 1857 was the lowest since 1816 and a great victory for the South. However the ] energized the iron protectionists to fight back. <ref>Huston, James L. ''The Panic of 1857 and The Coming of the Civil War'' (1987)</ref> The ] passed the House of Representatives on a strictly sectional vote on ], ]. Pressures to pass the bill in the Senate quickly became a campaign issue for the Republican Party in the Northeast, while Southerners delayed voting on the tariff in the Senate until the following year. A heated battle of rhetoric from both sides compounded the tariff issue. Economist ] led the protectionist charge in Northern newspapers by blaming free trade for the economic recession and accompanying budget shortfalls. Southerners circulated copies of ]'s 1857 book ''Southern Wealth and Northern Profits'', which argued that protective tariffs unduly burdened the slave states to the benefit of the north. The Morrill Tariff did not pass until after the deep South seceded—it was signed by ] (a Democrat) in March 1861 and took effect in April, the same month the fighting started. The tariff was rarely mentioned in the heated debates of 1860-61 over secession, although ] of Georgia did denounce "the infamous Morrill bill" as where "the robber and the incendiary struck hands, and united in joint raid against the South." The tariff also appeared in two secession documents of the states. South Carolina's secession convention published a declaration by ] that listed as its reason for secession "the consolidation of the North to rule the South, by the tariff and Slavery issues." Georgia also published a declaration listing economic grievances such as the tariff , though it emphasized the future of slavery as the main cause. | |||
The Civil War occurred during the early stages of the industrial revolution, leading to naval innovations, notably the ]. The Confederacy, recognizing the need to counter the Union's naval superiority, built or converted over 130 vessels, including 26 ironclads.{{sfn|Nelson|2005|p=92}} Despite these efforts, Confederate ships were largely unsuccessful against Union ironclads.{{sfn|Anderson|1989|p=300}} The Union Navy used timberclads, tinclads, and armored gunboats. Shipyards in Cairo, Illinois, and St. Louis built or modified ]s.<ref>Myron J. Smith, ''Tinclads in the Civil War: Union Light-Draught Gunboat Operations on Western Waters, 1862–1865'' (2009).</ref> | |||
Alexander Stephens, for example, mentioned tariffs in his "Cornerstone Speech", but said the main cause was slavery. Stephens had been previously sympathetic to tariffs though, and had argued against Toombs's critique of the Morrill bill (as well as secession itself) a few months prior. | |||
The Confederacy experimented with the submarine {{ship|CSS|Hunley}}, which was not successful, and with the ironclad {{ship|CSS|Virginia}}, rebuilt from the sunken Union ship {{USS|Merrimack|1855|2}}.<ref>Gerald F. Teaster and Linda and James Treaster Ambrose, ''The Confederate Submarine H. L. Hunley'' (1989).</ref> On March 8, 1862, ''Virginia'' inflicted significant damage on the Union's wooden fleet, but the next day, the first Union ironclad, {{USS|Monitor}}, arrived to challenge it in the ]. The resulting three-hour ] was a draw, proving ironclads were effective warships.{{sfn|Nelson|2005|p=345}} The Confederacy scuttled the ''Virginia'' to prevent its capture, while the Union built many copies of the ''Monitor''. The Confederacy's efforts to obtain warships from ] failed, as Britain had no interest in selling warships to a nation at war with a stronger enemy and feared souring relations with the U.S.{{sfn|Fuller|2008|p=36}} | |||
The many compromises proposed to resolve the crisis in 1860-61 never included the tariff, but instead always focused on the slavery issue.<ref> Donald 2001 pp 134-38</ref> Economic historian Lee A. Craig points out, "In fact, numerous studies by economic historians over the past several decades reveal that economic conflict was not an inherent condition of North-South relations during the antebellum era and did not cause the Civil War."<ref> Woodworth, ed. ''The American Civil War: A Handbook of Literature and Research'' (1996), p. 505</ref> | |||
=== Union blockade === | |||
====Free labor vs. pro-slavery arguments==== | |||
{{Main|Union blockade}} | |||
Historian ] (1970) has argued that a free-labor ideology dominated thinking in the North, which emphasized economic opportunity. By contrast, Southerners described free labor as "greasy mechanics, filthy operators, small-fisted farmers, and moonstruck theorists."<ref>Stephen B. Oates, ''Abraham Lincoln, The Man Behind the Myths,'' 1994, page 69</ref> They strongly opposed the homestead laws that were proposed to give free farms in the west, fearing the small farmers would oppose plantation slavery. Indeed, opposition to homestead laws was far more common in ] rhetoric than opposition to tariffs. <ref> Richard Hofstadter, "The Tariff Issue on the Eve of the Civil War," ''The American Historical Review'' Vol. 44, No. 1 (1938), pp. 50-55 </ref> | |||
], featuring a tightening naval blockade, forcing rebels out of Missouri along the Mississippi River, Kentucky Unionists sit on the fence, idled cotton industry illustrated in Georgia.|alt=A cartoon map of the South surrounded by a snake.]] | |||
They argued that only a slave-owning society allowed the leisure for education and cultural refinement. They depicted slavery as a positive good for the slaves themselves, especially the Christianizing that had rescued them from the paganism of Africa. | |||
By early 1861, General ] had devised the ] to win the war with minimal bloodshed, calling for a blockade of the Confederacy to suffocate the South into surrender.{{sfn|Richter|2009|p=49}} Lincoln adopted parts of the plan but opted for a more active war strategy.{{sfn|Johnson|1998|p=228}} In April 1861, Lincoln announced a blockade of all Southern ports; commercial ships could not get insurance, ending regular traffic. The South blundered by embargoing cotton exports before the blockade was fully effective; by the time they reversed this decision, it was too late. "]" was dead, as the South could export less than 10% of its cotton. The blockade shut down the ten Confederate seaports with railheads that moved almost all the cotton. By June 1861, warships were stationed off the principal Southern ports, and a year later nearly 300 ships were in service.{{sfn|Anderson|1989|pp=288–289, 296–298}} | |||
===Southern fears of modernization=== | |||
In a broader sense, the North was rapidly modernizing in a manner deeply threatening to the South, for the North was not only becoming more economically powerful; it was developing new modernizing, urban values while the South was clinging more and more to the old rural traditional values of the Jeffersonian yeoman.<ref>J. Mills Thornton III, ''Politics and Power in a Slave Society: Alabama, 1800-1860'' (1978)</ref> As James McPherson argues:<ref>James McPherson, "Antebellum Southern Exceptionalism: A New Look at an Old Question," ''Civil War History'' 29 (Sept. 1983)</ref> | |||
: The ascension to power of the Republican Party, with its ideology of competitive, egalitarian free-labor capitalism, was a signal to the South that the Northern majority had turned irrevocably towards this frightening, revolutionary future. | |||
==== Blockade runners ==== | |||
===Southern fears of Republican control=== | |||
{{Main|Blockade runners of the American Civil War}} | |||
Southern secession was triggered by the election of Republican ] because regional leaders feared that he would make good on his promise to stop the expansion of slavery and would thus put it on a course toward extinction. Many Southerners thought that even if Lincoln did not abolish slavery, sooner or later another Northerner would do so, and that it was thus time to quit the Union. The slave states, which had already become a minority in the House of Representatives, were now facing a future as a perpetual minority in the Senate and Electoral College against an increasingly powerful North. | |||
] off Charleston. Continuous blockade of all major ports was sustained by North's overwhelming war production. |alt=Panoramic view of ships in harbor during battle]] | |||
The Confederates began the war short on military supplies, which the agrarian South could not produce. Northern arms manufacturers were restricted by an embargo, ending existing and future contracts with the South. The Confederacy turned to foreign sources, connecting with financiers and companies like ] and the ] in Britain, becoming the Confederacy's main source of arms.{{sfn|Wise|1991|p=49}}{{sfn|Mendelsohn|2012|pp=43–44}} | |||
==A house divided against itself== | |||
To transport arms safely to the Confederacy, British investors built small, fast, steam-driven ] that traded arms and supplies from Britain, through Bermuda, Cuba, and the Bahamas in exchange for high-priced cotton. Many were lightweight and designed for speed, only carrying small amounts of cotton back to England.{{sfn|Stern|1962|pp=224–225}} When the Union Navy seized a blockade runner, the ship and cargo were condemned as a ] and sold, with proceeds given to the Navy sailors; the captured crewmen, mostly British, were released.<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Neely |first=Mark E. |date=June 1986 |title=The Perils of Running the Blockade: The Influence of International Law in an Era of Total War |journal=Civil War History |volume=32 |issue=2 |pages=101–118 |doi=10.1353/cwh.1986.0012}}</ref> | |||
[[Image:Secession Map of the United States, 1861.png|250px|thumb|right|Status of the states, 1861. | |||
{{legend|#37A54A|States that seceded before April 15, 1861}} | |||
{{legend|#79B322|States that seceded after April 15, 1861}} | |||
{{legend|#A6C02F|Union states that permitted slavery}} | |||
{{legend|#AE0000|Union states that banned slavery}} | |||
{{legend|#CCCCCC|Territories}}]] | |||
==== Economic impact ==== | |||
[[Image:American Civil War map.png|250px|thumb|right|State and territory boundaries, 1864-5. | |||
The Southern economy nearly collapsed during the war due to multiple factors, the most notable being severe food shortages, failing railroads, loss of control over key rivers, foraging by Northern armies, and the seizure of animals and crops by Confederate forces.{{sfn|Wise|1991|p={{page needed|date=August 2024}}}} Historians agree the blockade was a major factor in ruining the Confederate economy; however, Wise argues blockade runners provided enough of a lifeline to allow Lee to continue fighting for additional months, thanks to supplies like 400,000 rifles, lead, blankets, and boots that the homefront economy could no longer supply.{{sfn|Wise|1991|p={{page needed|date=August 2024}}}} | |||
{{legend|#00f|] states}} | |||
{{legend|#0080ff|Union territories}} | |||
<br> | |||
{{legend|#f00|Union border states that permitted slavery}} | |||
{{legend|#8000ff|], which entered the Union as a free state after the ] crisis}} | |||
<br> | |||
{{legend|#c60|]}} | |||
{{legend|#cd9453|Confederate claimed and sometimes held territories}}]] | |||
Surdam contends that the blockade was a powerful weapon that eventually ruined the Southern economy, costing few lives in combat. The Confederate cotton crop became nearly useless, cutting off the Confederacy's primary income source. Critical imports were scarce, and coastal trade largely ended as well.<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Surdam |first=David G. |year=1998 |title=The Union Navy's blockade reconsidered |journal=Naval War College Review |volume=51 |issue=4 |pages=85–107}}</ref> The blockade's success was not measured by the few ships that slipped through but by the thousands that never tried. European merchant ships could not get insurance and were too slow to evade the blockade, so they stopped calling at Confederate ports.<ref>{{Cite book |last=Surdam |first=David G. |title=Northern Naval Superiority and the Economics of the American Civil War |year=2001 |publisher=University of South Carolina Press}}</ref> | |||
===Secession winter=== | |||
Before Lincoln took office, seven states declared their secession from the Union, and established a Southern government, the ] on ], ]. They took control of federal forts and other properties within their boundaries, with little resistance from President Buchanan, whose term ended on ], ]. Buchanan asserted, "The South has no right to secede, but I have no power to prevent them." One quarter of the U.S. Army—the entire garrison in Texas—was surrendered to state forces by its commanding general, ], who then joined the Confederacy. By seceding, the rebel states would reduce the strength of their claim to the Western territories that were in dispute, cancel any obligation for the North to return fugitive slaves to the Confederacy, and assure easy passage in Congress of many bills and amendments they had long opposed. | |||
To fight an offensive war, the Confederacy purchased arms in Britain and converted British-built ships into ]s. The smuggling of 600,000 arms enabled the Confederacy to fight on for two more years,<ref>{{Cite news |last=Keys |first=David |date=24 June 2014 |title=Historians reveal secrets of UK gun-running which lengthened the American civil war by two years |url=https://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/archaeology/historians-reveal-secrets-of-uk-gunrunning-which-lengthened-the-american-civil-war-by-two-years-9557937.html |work=]}}</ref><ref>{{Cite book |last=Kevin Dougherty |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=2pMqE2E63XgC&pg=PA87 |title=Weapons of Mississippi |publisher=] |year=2010 |isbn=9-7816-0473-4522 |page=87}}</ref> and the commerce raiders targeted ] ships in the Atlantic and Pacific oceans. Insurance rates soared, and the American flag virtually disappeared from international waters, though reflagging ships with European flags allowed them to continue operating unmolested.{{sfn|Anderson|1989|p=300}} After the war, the U.S. government demanded Britain compensate it for the damage caused by blockade runners and raiders outfitted in British ports. Britain paid the U.S. $15 million in 1871, but only for commerce raiding.{{sfn|Jones|2002|p=225}} | |||
===The Confederacy=== | |||
{{main|Confederate States of America}} | |||
Dinçaslan argues that another outcome of the blockade was the rise of oil as a prominent commodity. The declining whale oil industry took a blow as many old whaling ships were used in blockade efforts, such as the ], and Confederate raiders harassed Union whalers. Oil products, especially kerosene, began replacing whale oil in lamps, increasing oil's importance long before it became fuel for combustion engines.{{sfn|Dinçaslan|2022|p=73}} | |||
Seven ] cotton states seceded by February 1861, starting with ], ], ], ], ], ], and ]. These seven states formed the ] (] ]), with ] as president, and a ] closely modeled on the ]. In April and May 1861, four more slave states seceded and joined the Confederacy: ], ], ] and ]. Virginia was split in two, with the eastern portion of that state seceding to the Confederacy and the northwestern part joining the Union as the new state of ] on June 20, 1863. | |||
=== |
===Diplomacy=== | ||
{{ |
{{Main|Diplomacy of the American Civil War}} | ||
{{further|United Kingdom and the American Civil War|France and the American Civil War}} | |||
There were 23 states that remained loyal to the Union during the war: ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], and ]. During the war, ] and ] joined as new states of the Union. ] and ] were returned to Union control early in the war. | |||
]. ], at right, warns ], "You do what's right, my son, or I'll blow you out of the water."]] | |||
The territories of ], ], ], ], ], ], and ] fought on the Union side. Several slave-holding ] tribes supported the Confederacy, giving the Indian territory (now ]) a small bloody civil war. | |||
Although the Confederacy hoped Britain and France would join them against the Union, this was never likely, so they sought to bring them in as mediators.{{sfn|McPherson|1988|pp=546–557}}{{sfn|Herring|2011|p=237}} The Union worked to block this and threatened war if any country recognized the Confederacy. In 1861, Southerners voluntarily embargoed cotton shipments, hoping to start an economic depression in Europe that would force Britain to enter the war, but this failed. Worse, Europe turned to Egypt and India for cotton, which they found superior, hindering the South's post-war recovery.{{sfn|McPherson|1988|p=386}}<ref name="Nevins1959 pp. 263–264" /> | |||
===Border states=== | |||
''Main article: ]'' | |||
] proved a failure as Europe had a surplus of cotton, while the 1860–62 crop failures in Europe made the North's grain exports critically important. It also helped turn European opinion against the Confederacy. It was said that "King Corn was more powerful than King Cotton," as U.S. grain went from a quarter to almost half of British imports.{{sfn|McPherson|1988|p=386}} Meanwhile, the war created jobs for arms makers, ironworkers, and ships to transport weapons.<ref name="Nevins1959 pp. 263–264" /> | |||
The ] in the Union comprised ] (which broke away from Virginia and became a separate state), and four of the five northernmost slave states (], ], ], and ]). | |||
Lincoln's administration initially struggled to appeal to European public opinion. At first, diplomats explained that the U.S. was not committed to ending slavery and emphasized legal arguments about the unconstitutionality of secession. Confederate representatives, however, focused on their struggle for liberty, commitment to free trade, and the essential role of cotton in the European economy.{{sfn|Doyle|2015|pp=69–70}} The European aristocracy was "absolutely gleeful in pronouncing the American debacle as proof that the entire experiment in popular government had failed. European government leaders welcomed the fragmentation of the ascendant American Republic."{{sfn|Doyle|2015|p=8}} However, a European public with liberal sensibilities remained, which the U.S. sought to appeal to by building connections with the international press. By 1861, Union diplomats like ] realized emphasizing the war against slavery was the Union's most effective moral asset in swaying European public opinion. Seward was concerned an overly radical case for reunification would distress European merchants with cotton interests; even so, he supported a widespread campaign of public diplomacy.{{sfn|Doyle|2015|pp=70–74}} | |||
] had numerous pro-Confederate officials who tolerated anti-Union ] and the burning of bridges. Lincoln responded with ] and called for troops. Militia units that had been drilling in the North rushed toward Washington and Baltimore. Before the Confederate government realized what was happening, Lincoln had seized firm control of Maryland (and the separate ]), by arresting the entire Maryland statehouse and holding them without trial. | |||
U.S. ] to Britain ] proved adept and convinced Britain not to challenge the Union blockade. The Confederacy purchased warships from commercial shipbuilders in Britain, with the most famous being the {{ship|CSS|Alabama}}, which caused considerable damage and led to serious ]. However, public opinion against slavery in Britain created a political liability for politicians, where the ] was powerful.<ref>Richard Huzzeym, ''Freedom Burning: Anti-Slavery and Empire in Victorian Britain'' (2013).</ref> | |||
In Missouri, an elected convention on secession voted decisively to remain within the Union. When pro-Confederate Governor ] called out the state militia, it was attacked by federal forces under General ], who chased the governor and the rest of the State Guard to the southwestern corner of the state. (''See also: ]''). In the resulting vacuum the convention on secession reconvened and took power as the Unionist provisional government of Missouri. | |||
War loomed in late 1861 between the U.S. and Britain over the ], which began when U.S. Navy personnel boarded the British ship {{RMS|Trent||2}} and seized two Confederate diplomats. However, London and Washington smoothed this over after Lincoln released the two men.<ref name="Oates" /> ] left his deathbed to ] to ] during the ''Trent'' affair. His request was honored, and, as a result, the British response to the U.S. was toned down, helping avert war.<ref>{{Cite web |date=January 5, 2022 |title=The Trent Affair: Diplomacy, Britain, and the American Civil War – National Museum of American Diplomacy |url=https://diplomacy.state.gov/u-s-diplomacy-stories/the-trent-affair-diplomacy-britain-and-the-american-civil-war/ |access-date=January 18, 2022}}</ref> In 1862, the British government considered mediating between the Union and Confederacy, though such an offer would have risked war with the U.S. British Prime Minister ] reportedly read ''Uncle Tom's Cabin'' three times when deciding what his decision would be.<ref name="Oates" /> | |||
Kentucky did not secede; for a time, it declared itself neutral. However, the Confederates broke the neutrality by seizing ] in September 1861. That turned opinion against the Confederacy, and the state reaffirmed its loyal status, while trying to maintain slavery. During a brief invasion by Confederate forces, Confederate sympathizers organized a secession convention, inaugurated a governor, and gained recognition from the Confederacy. The rebel government soon went into exile and never controlled the state. | |||
The Union victory at the ] caused the British to delay this decision. The Emancipation Proclamation increased the political liability of supporting the Confederacy. Realizing that Washington could not intervene in ] as long as the Confederacy controlled Texas, ] in 1861 and installed the ] Austrian archduke ] as emperor.<ref>] (2021). ''The Last Emperor of Mexico: The Dramatic Story of the Habsburg Archduke Who Created a Kingdom in the New World''. New York: Basic Books. {{ISBN|978-1541-674196}}. Also titled ''The Last Emperor of Mexico: A Disaster in the New World''. London: Faber & Faber, 2022.</ref> Washington repeatedly protested France's violation of the ]. Despite sympathy for the Confederacy, France's seizure of Mexico ultimately deterred it from war with the Union. Confederate offers late in the war to end slavery in return for diplomatic recognition were not seriously considered by London or Paris. After 1863, the ] further distracted the European powers and ensured they remained neutral.{{sfn|Herring|2011|p=261}} | |||
Counties in the northwestern portion of Virginia opposed secession and formed a pro-Union government shortly after Richmond's secession in 1861. Unlike the remainder of Virginia, residents in this mountainous region were poor subsistence farmers. These counties were admitted to the Union in 1863 as ]. Similar secessions appeared in ], but were suppressed by the Confederacy. Jefferson Davis arrested over 3,000 men suspected of being loyal to the Union and held them without trial.<ref>Mark Neely, ''Confederate Bastille: Jefferson Davis and Civil Liberties'' 1993 p. 10-11</ref> | |||
] supported the Union, largely because it believed the U.S. served as a counterbalance to its geopolitical rival, the U.K. In 1863, the ]'s Baltic and Pacific fleets wintered in the American ports of New York and San Francisco, respectively.<ref>Norman E. Saul, Richard D. McKinzie, eds. ''Russian-American Dialogue on Cultural Relations, 1776–1914''. Columbia, Missouri, and London, UK: University of Missouri Press, p. 95. {{ISBN|978-0826210975}}.</ref> | |||
==Overview== | |||
] Union army chaplain celebrating a Mass.]] | |||
Some 10,000 military engagements took place during the war, 40% of them in Virginia and Tennessee.<ref> Gabor Boritt, ed. ''War Comes Again'' (1995) p 247</ref> Separate articles deal with every major battle and some minor ones. This article only gives the broad outline. For more information see ]. | |||
== |
==Eastern theater== | ||
{{Further|Eastern theater of the American Civil War}} | |||
:''For more details on this topic, see ]'' | |||
] map of Civil War battles by theater and year|alt=Map of the United States with counties colored]] | |||
Lincoln's victory in the ] triggered South Carolina's declaration of secession from the Union. By February 1861, six more Southern states made similar declarations. On February 7, the seven states adopted a provisional constitution for the ] and established their temporary capital at ]. A pre-war February ] met in Washington in a failed attempt at resolving the crisis. The remaining eight slave states rejected pleas to join the Confederacy. Confederate forces seized all but three Federal forts within their boundaries (they did not take Fort Sumter); President Buchanan protested but made no military response aside from a failed attempt to resupply Fort Sumter via the ship ], and no serious military preparations. However, governors in Massachusetts, New York, and Pennsylvania began buying weapons and training militia units to ready them for immediate action. | |||
The Eastern theater refers to the military operations east of the ], including Virginia, West Virginia, Maryland, and ], the ], and the coastal fortifications and seaports of ].<ref>{{Cite web |title=Eastern Theater of the Civil War |url=https://www.legendsofamerica.com/ah-easterntheater/ |access-date=2024-04-22 |website=Legends of America}}</ref> | |||
On ], ], Abraham Lincoln was sworn in as President. In his ], he argued that the Constitution was a '']'' than the earlier ], that it was a binding contract, and called any secession "legally void". He stated he had no intent to invade Southern states, nor did he intend to end slavery where it existed, but that he would use force to maintain possession of federal property. His speech closed with a plea for restoration of the bonds of union. | |||
=== Background === | |||
The South sent delegations to Washington and offered to pay for the federal properties and enter into a peace treaty with the United States. Lincoln rejected any negotiations with Confederate agents on the grounds that the Confederacy was not a legitimate government, and that making any treaty with it would be tantamount to recognition of it as a sovereign government. | |||
====Army of the Potomac==== | |||
Maj. Gen. ] took command of the Union ] on July 26, 1861, and the war began in earnest in 1862. The 1862 Union strategy called for simultaneous advances along four axes:{{sfn|Anderson|1989|p=91}} | |||
# McClellan would lead the main thrust in Virginia towards Richmond. | |||
] in Charleston, South Carolina, was one of the three remaining Union-held forts in the Confederacy, and Lincoln was determined to hold it. Under orders from Confederate President ], Confederates under ] bombarded the fort with artillery on ], forcing ]. Northerners reacted quickly to this attack on the flag, and rallied behind Lincoln, who called for all of the states to send troops to recapture the forts and to preserve the Union. With the scale of the rebellion apparently small so far, Lincoln called for 74,000 volunteers for 90 days. For months before that, several Northern governors had discreetly readied their state militias; they began to move forces the next day. | |||
# Ohio forces would advance through Kentucky into Tennessee. | |||
# The Missouri Department would drive south along the Mississippi River. | |||
# The westernmost attack would originate from Kansas. | |||
====Army of Northern Virginia==== | |||
Four states in the upper South (Tennessee, Arkansas, North Carolina, and Virginia) which had repeatedly rejected Confederate overtures, now refused to send forces against their neighbors, declared their secession, and joined the Confederacy. To reward Virginia, the Confederate capital was moved to ]. The city was the symbol of the Confederacy; if it fell, the new nation would lose legitimacy. Richmond was in a highly vulnerable location at the end of a tortuous supply line. | |||
]|alt=Old man with gray beard and military uniform]] | |||
===Anaconda Plan and blockade, 1861=== | |||
:''For more details on this topic, see ], ] and ]'' | |||
]"]] | |||
The primary Confederate force in the Eastern theater was the ]. The Army originated as the ], which was organized on June 20, 1861, from all operational forces in Northern Virginia. On July 20 and 21, the ] and forces from the District of Harpers Ferry were added. Units from the ] were merged into the Army of the Potomac between March 14 and May 17, 1862. The Army of the Potomac was renamed ''Army of Northern Virginia'' on March 14. The ] was merged into it on April 12, 1862. | |||
], the commanding general of the U.S. Army, devised the ] to win the war with as little bloodshed as possible. His idea was that a ] of the main ports would strangle the rebel economy; then the capture of the Mississippi River would split the South. Lincoln adopted the plan, but overruled Scott's warnings against an immediate attack on Richmond. | |||
When Virginia declared its secession in April 1861, ] chose to follow his home state, despite his desire for the country to remain intact and an offer of a senior Union command. Lee's biographer, ], asserts that the army received its final name from Lee when he issued orders assuming command on June 1, 1862.<ref>{{Cite book |last=Freeman |first=Douglas Southall |url=https://penelope.uchicago.edu/Thayer/E/Gazetteer/People/Robert_E_Lee/FREREL/home.html |title=R. E. Lee: A Biography |publisher=Charles Scribner's Sons |year=1934 |volume=II |location=New York |page=78 and footnote 6}}</ref> However, Freeman does admit that Lee corresponded with Brigadier General ], his predecessor in army command, before that date and referred to Johnston's command as the Army of Northern Virginia. Part of the confusion results from the fact Johnston commanded the Department of Northern Virginia (as of October 22, 1861) and the name Army of Northern Virginia can be seen as an informal consequence of its parent department's name. Jefferson Davis and Johnston did not adopt the name, but it is clear the organization of units as of March 14 was the same organization that Lee received on June 1, and thus it is generally referred to today as the Army of Northern Virginia, even if that is correct only in retrospect. | |||
In May 1861, Lincoln proclaimed the ] of all southern ports, which immediately shut down almost all international shipping to the Confederate ports. Violators risked seizure of the ship and cargo, and insurance probably would not cover the losses. Almost no large ships were owned by Confederate interests. By late 1861, the blockade shut down most local port-to-port traffic as well. Although few naval battles were fought and few men were killed, the blockade shut down ] and ruined the southern economy. Some British investors built small, very fast "blockade runners" that brought in military supplies (and civilian luxuries) from Cuba and the Bahamas and took out some cotton and tobacco. When the U.S. Navy did capture blockade runners, the ships and cargo were sold and the proceeds given to the Union sailors. The British crews were released. The ironclad ] maiden voyage sank the blockade ship ] and burned the ] on her "trial run." The second day, the ] took place between the ironclads ] and the CSS ''Virginia'' in March 1862, ending in a tactical draw; it was a strategic Union victory, for the blockade was sustained. Other naval battles included ], ], ], ], and ]. The ] virtually ended blockade running. | |||
On July 4 at Harper's Ferry, Colonel ] assigned ] to command all the cavalry companies of the Army of the Shenandoah. He eventually commanded the Army of Northern Virginia's cavalry. | |||
===Eastern Theater 1861–1863=== | |||
{{see details|Eastern Theater of the American Civil War}} | |||
Because of the fierce resistance of a few initial Confederate forces at ], in July 1861, a march by Union troops under the command of ] ] on the Confederate forces there was halted in the ], or ''First Manassas'', whereupon they were forced back to ], by Confederate troops under the command of Generals ] and P.G.T. Beauregard. It was in this battle that Confederate General ] received the ] of "Stonewall" because he stood like a stone wall against Union troops. Alarmed at the loss, and in an attempt to prevent more slave states from leaving the Union, the ] passed the ] on ] of that year, which stated that the war was being fought to preserve the Union and not to end slavery. | |||
=== Battles === | |||
Maj. Gen. ] took command of the Union ] on ] (he was briefly general-in-chief of all the Union armies, but was subsequently relieved of that post in favor of Maj. Gen. ]), and the war began in earnest in 1862. | |||
In July 1861, in of the first highly visible battles, Union troops under the command of ] ] attacking Confederate forces led by Beauregard near Washington were repulsed at the ]. | |||
The Union had the upper hand at first, nearly pushing Confederate forces holding a defensive position into a rout, but Confederate reinforcements under Joseph E. Johnston arrived from the ] by railroad, and the course of the battle quickly changed. A ] under the relatively unknown brigadier general from the ], Thomas J. Jackson, stood its ground, which resulted in Jackson's receiving his famous nickname, "Stonewall". | |||
Upon the strong urging of President Lincoln to begin offensive operations, McClellan attacked Virginia in the spring of 1862 by way of the ] between the ] and ], southeast of Richmond. Although McClellan's army reached the gates of Richmond in the ], Confederate General ] halted his advance at the ], then General ] defeated him in the ] and forced his retreat. McClellan was stripped of many of his troops to reinforce General ] Union ]. Pope was beaten spectacularly by Lee in the ] and the ] in August. | |||
Upon the urging of Lincoln to begin offensive operations, McClellan attacked Virginia in the spring of 1862 by way of the ] between the ] and ], southeast of Richmond. McClellan's army reached the gates of Richmond in the ].{{sfn|Foote|1974|pp=464–519}}<ref name="Catton" />{{sfn|McPherson|1988|pp=424–427}} | |||
] | |||
], the Civil War's deadliest one-day fight|alt=Painting of battlefield scene]] | |||
Emboldened by Second Bull Run, the Confederacy made its first invasion of the North, when General Lee led 45,000 men of the ] across the ] into Maryland on ]. Lincoln then restored Pope's troops to McClellan. McClellan and Lee fought at the ] near ], on ] ], the bloodiest single day in United States military history. Lee's army, checked at last, returned to Virginia before McClellan could destroy it. Antietam is considered a Union victory because it halted Lee's invasion of the North and provided an opportunity for Lincoln to announce his ]. | |||
Also in the spring of 1862, in the Shenandoah Valley, Stonewall Jackson led his ]. Audaciously employing rapid, unpredictable movements on interior lines, Jackson's 17,000 troops marched 646 miles (1,040 km) in 48 days and won minor battles as they successfully engaged three Union armies (52,000 men), including those of ] and ], preventing them from reinforcing the Union offensive against Richmond. The swiftness of Jackson's men earned them the nickname of "]". | |||
When the cautious McClellan failed to follow up on Antietam, he was replaced by Maj. Gen. ]. Burnside was soon defeated at the ] on ], ], when over twelve thousand Union soldiers were killed or wounded. After the battle, Burnside was replaced by Maj. Gen. ]. Hooker, too, proved unable to defeat Lee's army; despite outnumbering the Confederates by more than two to one, he was humiliated in the ] in May 1863. He was replaced by Maj. Gen. ] during Lee's second invasion of the North, in June. Meade defeated Lee at the ] (] to ], ]), the bloodiest battle in United States history, which is sometimes considered the war's ]. ] on ] is often recalled as the high-water mark of the Confederacy, not just because it signaled the end of Lee's plan to pressure Washington from the north, but also because Vicksburg, Mississippi, the key stronghold to control of the Mississippi fell the following day. Lee's army suffered some 28,000 casualties (versus Meade's 23,000). However, Lincoln was angry that Meade failed to intercept Lee's retreat, and after Meade's inconclusive fall campaign, Lincoln decided to turn to the Western Theater for new leadership. | |||
Johnston halted McClellan's advance at the ], but he was wounded in the battle, and Robert E. Lee assumed his position of command. Lee and top subordinates ] and Stonewall Jackson defeated McClellan in the ] and forced his retreat.{{sfn|McPherson|1988|pp=538–544}} | |||
===Western Theater 1861–1863=== | |||
{{see details|Western Theater of the American Civil War}} | |||
While the Confederate forces had numerous successes in the Eastern theater, they crucially failed in the West. They were driven from Missouri early in the war as a result of the ]. ]'s invasion of ] enraged the citizens there who previously had declared neutrality in the war, turning that state against the Confederacy. | |||
The ], which included the ], ended in yet another victory for the South.{{sfn|McPherson|1988|pp=528–533}} McClellan resisted General-in-Chief Halleck's orders to send reinforcements to ] Union ], which made it easier for Lee's Confederates to defeat twice the number of combined enemy troops.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Overview of the Battle |url=https://history.army.mil/books/Staff-Rides/2Manassas/2mns-ov.htm |access-date=2024-09-13 |website=history.army.mil |quote=On 3 August, General Halleck directed General McClellan to begin his final withdrawal from the Peninsula and to return to Northern Virginia to support Pope. McClellan protested and did not begin his redeployment until 14 August. The situation created an opportunity for General Lee. The removal of the Army of the Potomac as a threat meant that there would be a short period when he could turn on Pope's force and actually outnumber it before the merger of the two Federal armies.}}</ref> | |||
], fell to the Union early in 1862. Most of the ] was opened with the taking of ] and ], and then ]. The ] captured ] without a major fight in May 1862, allowing the Union forces to begin moving up the Mississippi as well. Only the fortress city of ], prevented unchallenged Union control of the entire river. | |||
Emboldened by Second Bull Run, the Confederacy made its first invasion of the North with the ]. Lee led 45,000 troops of the Army of Northern Virginia across the ] into Maryland on September 5. Lincoln then restored Pope's troops to McClellan. McClellan and Lee fought at the Battle of Antietam near ], Maryland, on September 17, 1862, the bloodiest single day in US military history.{{sfn|McPherson|1988|pp=538–544}}{{sfn|McPherson|1988|pp=543–545}} Lee's army, checked at last, returned to Virginia before McClellan could destroy it. Antietam is considered a Union victory because it halted Lee's invasion of the North and provided an opportunity for Lincoln to announce his Emancipation Proclamation.{{sfn|McPherson|1988|pp=557–558}} | |||
General ]'s second Confederate invasion of Kentucky was repulsed by Maj. Gen. ] at the confused and bloody ], and he was narrowly defeated by Maj. Gen. ] at the ] in ]. | |||
When the cautious McClellan failed to follow up on Antietam, he was replaced by Maj. Gen. ]. Burnside was defeated at the ]{{sfn|McPherson|1988|pp=571–574}} on December 13, 1862, when more than 12,000 Union soldiers were killed or wounded during futile frontal assaults against Marye's Heights.<ref>], ''A Worse Place Than Hell: How the Civil War Battle of Fredericksburg Changed a Nation'', New York: W. W. Norton and Company, 2021.</ref> After the battle, Burnside was replaced by Maj. Gen. ].<ref>{{Cite book |last=Jones |first=Wilmer L. |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=neq3DAAAQBAJ&pg=PA237 |title=Generals in Blue and Gray: Lincoln's Generals |publisher=Stackpole |year=2006 |isbn=978-1-4617-5106-9 |pages=237–238}}</ref> | |||
The one clear Confederate victory in the West was the ]. Bragg, reinforced by Lt. Gen. ]'s corps (from Lee's army in the east), defeated Rosecrans, despite the heroic defensive stand of Maj. Gen. ]. Rosecrans retreated to ], which Bragg then besieged. | |||
]|alt=Cavalry charges on a battlefield]] | |||
The Union's key strategist and tactician in the West was Maj. Gen. ], who won victories at Forts ] and ], by which the Union seized control of the ] and ] Rivers; ]; the ], cementing Union control of the Mississippi River and considered one of the ] of the war. Grant marched to the relief of Rosecrans and defeated Bragg at the ], driving Confederate forces out of Tennessee and opening a route to Atlanta and the heart of the Confederacy. | |||
Hooker, too, proved unable to defeat Lee's army; despite outnumbering the Confederates by more than two to one, his Chancellorsville Campaign proved ineffective, and he was humiliated in the ] in May 1863.{{sfn|McPherson|1988|pp=639–645}} Chancellorsville is known as Lee's "perfect battle" because his risky decision to divide his army in the presence of a much larger enemy force resulted in a significant Confederate victory. Stonewall Jackson was shot in the left arm and right hand by friendly fire during the battle. The arm was amputated, but he died of pneumonia.<ref>{{Cite book |last=Noyalas |first=Jonathan A. |url={{google books|plainurl=y|id=EHRDCgAAQBAJ|page=93}} |title=Stonewall Jackson's 1862 Valley Campaign |year=2010 |publisher=Arcadia |isbn=978-1-61423-040-3 |page=93}}</ref> Lee famously said: "He has lost his left arm, but I have lost my right arm."<ref>{{Cite book |last=Thomas |first=Emory M. |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=2tJZ_TCHUjAC&pg=PA287 |title=Robert E. Lee: A Biography |year=1997 |publisher=W. W. Norton |isbn=978-0-393-31631-5 |page=287}}</ref> | |||
===Trans-Mississippi Theater 1861–1865=== | |||
{{see details| Trans-Mississippi Theater of the American Civil War}} | |||
Though geographically isolated from the battles to the east, a few small-scale military actions took place west of the Mississippi River. Confederate incursions into Arizona and New Mexico were repulsed in 1862. ] activity turned much of Missouri and Indian Territory (Oklahoma) into a battleground. Late in the war, the Union ] was a failure. Texas remained in Confederate hands throughout the war, but was cut off from the rest of the Confederacy after the capture of Vicksburg in 1863 gave the Union control of the Mississippi River. | |||
The fiercest fighting of the battle—and the second bloodiest day of the Civil War—occurred on May 3 as Lee launched multiple attacks against the Union position at Chancellorsville. That same day, ] advanced across the ], defeated the small Confederate force at Marye's Heights in the ], and then moved to the west. The Confederates fought a successful delaying action at the ].<ref>{{Cite web |date=October 5, 2021 |title=Salem Church |url=https://www.nps.gov/frsp/learn/historyculture/sc.htm |access-date=March 30, 2022 |website=National Park Service}}</ref> | |||
===End of the war 1864–1865=== | |||
], first and only President of the ]]] | |||
Gen. Hooker was replaced by Maj. Gen. ] during Lee's ], in June. Meade defeated Lee at the ] (July 1863).{{sfn|McPherson|1988|pp=653–663}} This was the bloodiest battle and has been called the war's ]. ] on July 3 is considered the ] because it signaled the collapse of serious Confederate threats of victory. Lee's army suffered 28,000 casualties, versus Meade's 23,000.{{sfn|McPherson|1988|p=664}} | |||
At the beginning of 1864, Lincoln made Grant commander of all Union armies. Grant made his headquarters with the Army of the Potomac, and put Maj. Gen. ] in command of most of the western armies. Grant understood the concept of ] and believed, along with Lincoln and Sherman, that only the utter defeat of Confederate forces and their economic base would bring an end to the war.<ref>Mark E. Neely Jr.; "Was the Civil War a Total War?" ''Civil War History'', Vol. 50, 2004 pp 434+</ref> | |||
Grant devised a coordinated strategy that would strike at the heart of the Confederacy from multiple directions: Generals George Meade and ] were ordered to move against Lee near Richmond; General ] (and later ]) were to ]; General Sherman was to capture ] and march to the sea (Atlantic ocean); Generals ] and ] were to operate against railroad supply lines in ]; and Maj. Gen. ] was to capture ]. | |||
==Western theater== | |||
Union forces in the East attempted to maneuver past Lee and fought several battles during that phase ("Grant's ]") of the Eastern campaign. Grant's battles of attrition at the Wilderness, Spotsylvania, and Cold Harbor resulted in heavy Union losses, but forced Lee's Confederates to fall back again and again. An attempt to outflank Lee from the south failed under Butler, who was trapped inside the ] river bend. Grant was tenacious and, despite astonishing losses (over 66,000 casualties in six weeks), kept pressing Lee's Army of Northern Virginia back to Richmond. He pinned down the Confederate army in the ], where the two armies engaged in ] for over nine months. | |||
{{Further|Western theater of the American Civil War}} | |||
The Western theater refers to military operations between the Appalachian Mountains and the Mississippi River, including ], ], ], ], North Carolina, Kentucky, ], ], and parts of ].<ref name="Bowery2014">{{Cite book |last=Bowery |first=Charles R. |title=The Civil War in the Western Theater, 1862 |year=2014 |publisher=Center of Military History |isbn=978-0160923166 |location=Washington, D.C. |pages=58–72}}</ref> | |||
=== Background === | |||
Grant finally found a commander, General ], aggressive enough to prevail in the ]. Sheridan proved to be more than a match for Maj. Gen. ], and defeated him in a series of battles, including a final decisive defeat at ]. Sheridan then proceeded to destroy the agricultural base of the ], a strategy similar to the tactics Sherman later employed in Georgia. | |||
====Army of the Tennessee and Army of the Cumberland==== | |||
]]] | |||
The primary Union forces in this theater were the ] and ], named for the two rivers, ] and ]. After Meade's inconclusive fall campaign, Lincoln turned to the Western theater for new leadership. At the same time, the Confederate stronghold of Vicksburg surrendered, giving the Union control of the Mississippi River, permanently isolating the western Confederacy, and producing the new leader Lincoln needed, ].<ref name="BattlefieldTrust">{{Cite web |title=Vicksburg |url=https://www.battlefields.org/learn/civil-war/battles/vicksburg |access-date=2022-09-27 |publisher=American Battlefield Trust}}</ref> | |||
====Army of Tennessee==== | |||
Meanwhile, Sherman marched from Chattanooga to Atlanta, defeating Confederate Generals ] and ] along the way. ], on ], ], was a significant factor in the reelection of Lincoln as president. Hood left the Atlanta area to menace Sherman's supply lines and invade Tennessee in the ]. Union Maj. Gen. ] defeated Hood at ], and George H. "Pap" Thomas dealt Hood a massive defeat at ], effectively destroying Hood's army. | |||
The primary Confederate force in the Western theater was the ]. The army was formed on November 20, 1862, when General ] renamed the former ]. While the Confederate forces had successes in the Eastern theater, they were defeated many times in the West.<ref name="Bowery2014" /> | |||
=== Battles === | |||
Leaving Atlanta, and his base of supplies, Sherman's army marched with an unknown destination, laying waste to about 20% of the farms in Georgia in his celebrated "]". He reached the Atlantic Ocean at ] in December 1864. Sherman's army was followed by thousands of freed slaves; there were no major battles along the March. When Sherman turned north through South Carolina and North Carolina to approach the Confederate Virginia lines from the south, it was the end for Lee and his men. | |||
The Union's key strategist and tactician in the West was Ulysses S. Grant, who won victories at Forts ] (February 6, 1862) and ] (February 11 to 16, 1862), earning him the nickname of "Unconditional Surrender" Grant. With these victories the Union gained control of the Tennessee and Cumberland Rivers.{{sfn|McPherson|1988|pp=405–413}} ] rallied nearly 4,000 Confederate troops and led them to escape across the Cumberland. ] and central Tennessee thus fell to the Union, leading to attrition of local food supplies and livestock and a breakdown in social organization.{{citation needed|date=January 2022}} | |||
Confederate general ]'s invasion of ] ended Kentucky's policy of neutrality and turned it against the Confederacy. Grant used river transport and ]'s gunboats of the Western Flotilla, to threaten the Confederacy's "Gibraltar of the West" at Columbus, Kentucky. Although rebuffed at Belmont, Grant cut off Columbus. The Confederates, lacking their gunboats, were forced to retreat and the Union took control of west Kentucky and opened Tennessee in March 1862.<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Whitsell |first=Robert D. |year=1963 |title=Military and Naval Activity between Cairo and Columbus |journal=Register of the Kentucky Historical Society |volume=62 |issue=2 |pages=107–121}}</ref> | |||
Lee's army, thinned by desertion and casualties, was now much smaller than Grant's. Union forces won a decisive victory at the ] on April 1, forcing Lee to evacuate Petersburg and Richmond. The Confederate capital fell to the ], comprised of black troops. The remaining Confederate units fled west and after a defeat at ], it became clear to Robert E. Lee that continued fighting against the United States was both tactically and logistically impossible. | |||
At the ], in Shiloh, Tennessee in April 1862, the Confederates made a surprise attack that pushed Union forces against the river as night fell. Overnight, the Navy landed reinforcements, and Grant counterattacked. Grant and the Union won a decisive victory—the first battle with the high casualty rates that would occur repeatedly.{{sfn|Frank|Reaves|2003|p= 170}} The Confederates lost ], considered their finest general before the emergence of Lee.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Death of Albert Sidney Johnston – Tour Stop #17 |url=https://www.nps.gov/places/death-of-albert-sidney-johnston-tour-stop-17.htm |access-date=March 12, 2022 |publisher=National Park Service}}</ref> | |||
Lee surrendered his Army of Northern Virginia on ], ], at ]. In an untraditional gesture and as a sign of Grant's respect and anticipation of folding the Confederacy back into the Union with dignity and peace, Lee was permitted to keep his officer's saber and his near-legendary horse, ]. Johnston surrendered his troops to Sherman on ], ], in ]. On ], ], at ] in the Choctaw Nations' area of the ], ] signed a cease-fire agreement with Union representatives, becoming the last Confederate general in the field to stand down. The last Confederate naval force to surrender was the ] on ], ], in ], ]. | |||
], the highest two-day losses]] | |||
==Slavery during the war== | |||
{{main|History of slavery in the United States}} | |||
One of the early Union objectives was to capture the Mississippi River to cut the Confederacy in half. The Mississippi was opened to Union traffic to the southern border of Tennessee with the taking of ] and ], Missouri, and then ].{{sfn|McPherson|1988|pp=418–420}} | |||
Lincoln initially declared his official purpose to be the preservation of the Union, not emancipation. He had no wish to alienate the thousands of slaveholders in the Union border states. | |||
In April 1862, the Union Navy ].{{sfn|McPherson|1988|pp=418–420}} "The key to the river was New Orleans, the South's largest port greatest industrial center."<ref>Kennedy, p. 58.{{full citation needed|date=August 2024}}</ref> U.S. Naval forces under ] ran past Confederate defenses south of New Orleans. Confederate forces abandoned the city, giving the Union a critical anchor in the deep South,{{sfn|Symonds|Clipson|2001|p=92}} which allowed Union forces to move up the Mississippi. ] on June 6, 1862, and became a key base for further advances south along the Mississippi. Only the fortress city of ], Mississippi, prevented Union control of the entire river.<ref>{{Cite web |date=2013-01-31 |title=10 Facts: The Vicksburg Campaign |url=https://www.battlefields.org/learn/articles/10-facts-vicksburg-campaign |access-date=2022-09-13 |publisher=American Battlefield Trust}}</ref> | |||
The issue of what to do with Southern slaves, however, would not go away: As early as May 1861, some slaves working on Confederate fortifications escaped to the Union lines, and their owner, a Confederate colonel, demanded their return under the Fugitive Slave Act. The response was to declare them "contraband of war"—effectively freeing them. Congress eventually approved this for slaves used by the Confederate military. | |||
Bragg's second invasion of Kentucky in the ] included initial successes such as ]'s triumph at the ] and the capture of the Kentucky capital of Frankfort on September 3, 1862.<ref>{{Cite book |last=Brown |first=Kent Masterson |url=https://archive.org/details/civilwarinkentuc0000unse/mode/2up |title=The Civil War in Kentucky: Battle for the Bluegrass State |publisher=Savas |year=2000 |isbn=978-1-882810-47-5 |location=Mason City, IA |page=95}}</ref> However, the campaign ended with a meaningless victory over Maj. Gen. ] at the ]. Bragg was forced to end his attempt at invading Kentucky and retreat, due to lack of logistical support and infantry recruits.{{sfn|McPherson|1988|pp=419–420}} Bragg was narrowly defeated by Maj. Gen. ] at the ] in Tennessee, the culmination of the ].{{sfn|McPherson|1988|pp=480–483}} | |||
By 1862, when it became clear that this would be a long war, the question became more general. The Southern economy and military effort depended on slave labor; was it reasonable to protect slavery while blockading Southern commerce and destroying Southern production? As one Congressman put it, the slaves "…cannot be neutral. As laborers, if not as soldiers, they will be allies of the rebels, or of the Union."<ref>MacPherson, ''Battle Cry of Freedom'' page 495</ref> | |||
Naval forces assisted Grant in the long, complex ] that resulted in the Confederates surrendering at the ] in July 1863, which cemented Union control of the Mississippi and is one of the turning points of the war.<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Mangum |first=Ronald Scott |year=1991 |title=The Vicksburg Campaign: A Study In Joint Operations |url=https://carlisle-www.army.mil/usawc/Parameters/Articles/1991/1991%20mangum.pdf |journal=Parameters: U.S. Army War College |volume=21 |issue=3 |pages=74–86 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121127192600/https://carlisle-www.army.mil/usawc/Parameters/Articles/1991/1991%20mangum.pdf |archive-date=November 27, 2012}}</ref><ref>] ''Vicksburg: Grant's Campaign that Broke the Confederacy''. New York: Simon & Schuster, 2019. {{ISBN|978-1-4516-4137-0}}.</ref> | |||
There was a range of positions on the final settlement of slavery; the same Congressman—and his fellow radicals—felt the victory would be profitless if the Slave Power continued. Conservative Republicans still hoped that the states could end slavery and send the freedmen abroad. Lincoln, and many others, agreed with both the aversion to slavery and to colonization; but all factions came rapidly to agree that the slaves of Confederates must be freed.<ref>McPherson, ''Battle Cry'' page 355, 494-6, quote from ] on 495. </ref> | |||
The one clear Confederate victory in the West was the ]. After Rosecrans' successful ], Bragg, reinforced by Lt. Gen. ], defeated Rosecrans, despite the defensive stand of Maj. Gen. ].{{citation needed|date=January 2022}} | |||
At first, Lincoln reversed attempts at emancipation by Secretary of War Cameron and Generals Fremont and Hunter in order to keep the loyalty of the border states and the War Democrats. Lincoln then tried to persuade the border states to accept his plan of gradual, compensated emancipation and voluntary colonization, while warning them that stronger measures would be needed if the moderate approach was rejected. Only the District of Columbia accepted Lincoln's gradual plan, and Lincoln issued his final Emancipation Proclamation on January 1 of 1863. In his letter to Hodges, Lincoln explained his belief that "If slavery is not wrong, nothing is wrong … And yet I have never understood that the Presidency conferred upon me an unrestricted right to act officially upon this judgment and feeling ... I claim not to have controlled events, but confess plainly that events have controlled me."<ref> Lincoln's Letter to A. G. Hodges, April 4, 1864</ref> | |||
Rosecrans retreated to ], which Bragg then besieged in the ]. Grant marched to the relief of Rosecrans and defeated Bragg at the Third Battle of Chattanooga,{{sfn|McPherson|1988|pp=677–680}} eventually causing Longstreet to abandon his ] and driving Confederate forces out of Tennessee and opening a route to Atlanta and the heart of the Confederacy.<ref>{{Cite web |date=September 17, 2014 |title=Sherman's March to the Sea |url=https://www.battlefields.org/learn/articles/shermans-march-sea |publisher=American Battlefield Trust}}</ref> | |||
The Emancipation Proclamation, announced in September 1862 and put into effect four months later, ended the Confederacy's hope of getting aid from Britain or France. Lincoln's moderate approach succeeded in getting border states, War Democrats and emancipated slaves fighting on the same side for the Union. | |||
==Trans-Mississippi theater== | |||
The Union-controlled border states (Kentucky, Missouri, Maryland, Delaware and West Virginia) were not covered by the Emancipation Proclamation. All abolished slavery on their own, except Kentucky. The great majority of the 4 million slaves were freed by the Emancipation Proclamation, as Union armies moved South. The ], ratified ], ], finally freed the remaining 40,000 slaves in Kentucky, as well as 1,000 or so in Delaware. | |||
{{further|Trans-Mississippi theater of the American Civil War}} | |||
=== Background === | |||
==Threat of international intervention == | |||
The ] refers to military operations west of the Mississippi, encompassing most of Missouri, ], most of Louisiana, and the ] in present-day ]. The ] was formed by the ] to better coordinate ]'s command of troops in Arkansas and Louisiana, ]'s ], as well as the portion of Earl Van Dorn's command that included the Indian Territory and excluded the Army of the West. The Union's command was the Trans-Mississippi Division, or the ].{{sfn|Jones|2011|p=1476}} | |||
The best chance for Confederate victory was entry into the war by Britain and France. The Union, under Lincoln and Secretary of State ] worked to block this, and threatened war if any country officially recognized the existence of the Confederate States of America. (None ever did.) In 1861, Southerners voluntarily embargoed cotton shipments, hoping to start an economic depression in Europe that would force Britain to enter the war in order to get cotton. ] proved a failure as Europe had a surplus of cotton, while the 1860-62 crop failures in Europe made the North's grain exports of critical importance. It was said that "King Corn was more powerful than King Cotton", as US grain went from a quarter of the British import trade to almost half.<ref> McPherson, ''Battle Cry'' 386</ref> | |||
=== Battles === | |||
When the UK did face a cotton shortage, it was temporary; being replaced by increased cultivation in Egypt and India. The war created employment for arms makers, iron workers, and British ships to transport weapons.<ref>Allen Nevins, ''War for the Union 1862-1863,'' pages 263-264</ref> | |||
] secured docks and arsenal in ], leading ] forces to expel the Missouri Confederate forces and government.{{sfn|Keegan|2009|p=100}}]] | |||
The first battle of the Trans-Mississippi theater was the ] (August 1861). The Confederates were driven from Missouri early in the war as a result of the ].{{sfn|McPherson|1988|pp=404–405}} | |||
Extensive ] characterized the trans-Mississippi region, as the Confederacy lacked the troops and logistics to support regular armies that could challenge Union control.<ref>{{Cite book |last=Martin |first=James B. |title=Third War: Irregular Warfare on the Western Border 1861–1865 |year=2012 |publisher=Combat Studies Institute Press |series=Leavenworth papers |volume=23 |location=Fort Leavenworth, KS |oclc=1029877004}}</ref><ref>{{Cite book |last=Fellman |first=Michael |title=Inside War: The Guerrilla Conflict in Missouri during the Civil War |year=1989 |publisher=Oxford University Press |location=New York |quote=Missouri alone was the scene of over 1,000 engagements between regular units, and uncounted numbers of guerrilla attacks and raids by informal pro-Confederate bands, especially in the recently settled western counties.}}</ref> Roving Confederate bands such as ] terrorized the countryside, striking military installations and civilian settlements.<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Bohl |first=Sarah |year=2004 |title=A War on Civilians: Order Number 11 and the Evacuation of Western Missouri |journal=Prologue |volume=36 |issue=1 |pages=44–51}}</ref> The "Sons of Liberty" and "Order of the American Knights" attacked pro-Union people, elected officeholders, and unarmed uniformed soldiers. These partisans could not be driven out of Missouri, until an entire regular Union infantry division was engaged. By 1864, these violent activities harmed the nationwide antiwar movement organizing against the re-election of Lincoln. Missouri not only stayed in the Union, but Lincoln took 70 percent of the vote to win re-election.{{sfn|Keegan|2009|p=270}} | |||
Lincoln's announcement of a ], a clear act of war, enabled Britain—followed by other European powers—to announce their neutrality in the dispute. This in turn enabled the Confederacy to begin to attempt to gain support and funds in Europe. President Jefferson Davis replaced his first two secretaries of state (] and ]) with ] in early 1862. Although Benjamin had more international knowledge and legal experience, he failed to create a dynamic foreign policy for the Confederacy. | |||
Small-scale military actions south and west of Missouri sought to control ] and ] for the Union. The ] was the decisive battle of the ]. The Union repulsed Confederate incursions into New Mexico in 1862, and the exiled Arizona government withdrew into Texas. In the Indian Territory, civil war broke out within tribes. About 12,000 Indian warriors fought for the Confederacy but fewer for the Union.<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Graves |first=William H. |year=1991 |title=Indian Soldiers for the Gray Army: Confederate Recruitment in Indian Territory |journal=Chronicles of Oklahoma |volume=69 |issue=2 |pages=134–145}}</ref> The most prominent Cherokee was Brigadier General ], the last Confederate general to surrender.<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Neet |first=J. Frederick Jr. |year=1996 |title=Stand Watie: Confederate General in the Cherokee Nation |journal=Great Plains Journal |volume=6 |issue=1 |pages=36–51}}</ref> | |||
The first attempts to achieve European recognition of the Confederacy were dispatched on ], ], and led by ], ], and ]. The British foreign minister ] met with them, and the French foreign minister ] received the group unofficially. Neither Britain nor France ever promised formal recognition, for that meant war with the Union. | |||
After the fall of Vicksburg in July 1863, Jefferson Davis informed General Kirby Smith in Texas that he could expect no further help from east of the Mississippi. Although he lacked resources to beat Union armies, he built up a formidable arsenal at Tyler, along with his own Kirby Smithdom economy, a virtual "independent fiefdom" in Texas, including railroad construction and international smuggling. The Union, in turn, did not directly engage him.{{sfn|Keegan|2009|pp=220–221}} Its 1864 ] to take Shreveport, Louisiana, failed and Texas remained in Confederate hands throughout the war.<ref>{{Cite encyclopedia |title=Red River Campaign |encyclopedia=Encyclopedia Britannica |url=https://www.britannica.com/event/Red-River-Campaign |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220327234657/https://www.britannica.com/event/Red-River-Campaign |archive-date=March 27, 2022 |url-status=live}}</ref> | |||
] proved particularly adept as ] to Britain for the Union, and Britain was reluctant to boldly challenge the Union's blockade. Independent British maritime interests spent hundreds of millions of pounds to build and operate highly profitable ] — commercial ships flying the British flag and carrying supplies to the Confederacy by slipping through the blockade. The officers and crews were British and when captured they were released. The Confederacy purchased several warships from commercial ship builders in Britain; the most famous, the ], did considerable damage and led to serious | |||
]. The Confederacy sent journalists ] and ] to open propaganda stations to feed news media in Paris and London. However, public opinion against slavery created a political liability for European politicians, especially in Britain. War loomed in late 1861 between the U.S. and Britain over the ], involving the Union boarding of a British mail steamer to seize two Confederate diplomats. However, London and Washington were able to smooth over the problem after Lincoln released the two diplomats. | |||
== Lower seaboard theater == | |||
In 1862, the British considered mediation—though even such an offer would have risked war with the U.S. ] read '']'' three times when deciding on this. The Union victory in the ] caused them to delay this decision. The ] further reinforced the political liability of supporting the Confederacy. As the war continued, the Confederacy's chances with Britain grew hopeless, and they focused increasingly on France. ] proposed to offer mediation in January 1863, but this was dismissed by Seward. Despite some sympathy for the Confederacy, France's own ] ultimately deterred them from war with the Union. Confederate offers late in the war to end slavery in return for diplomatic recognition were not seriously considered by London or Paris. | |||
{{further|Lower seaboard theater of the American Civil War}} | |||
=== Background === | |||
==Analysis of the Outcome== | |||
The lower seaboard theater refers to military and naval operations that occurred near the coastal areas of the Southeast as well as the southern part of the Mississippi. Union naval activities were dictated by the Anaconda Plan.<ref>{{Cite book |last=Symonds |first=Craig L. |title=The Civil War at Sea |year=2012 |publisher=Oxford University Press |isbn=978-0-19-993168-2 |location=New York |pages=110}}</ref> | |||
Could the South have won? A significant number of scholars believe that the Union held an insurmountable advantage over the Confederacy in terms of industrial strength, population, and the determination to win. Confederate actions, they argue, could only delay defeat. Southern historian ] expressed this view succinctly in Ken Burns's television series on the Civil War: "I think that the North fought that war with one hand behind its back.… If there had been more Southern victories, and a lot more, the North simply would have brought that other hand out from behind its back. I don't think the South ever had a chance to win that War."<ref>Ward 1990 p 272</ref> After Lincoln defeated McClellan in the election of 1864, the threat of a political victory for the South was ended. At this point, Lincoln had succeeded in getting the support of the border states, War Democrats, Republicans, emancipated slaves and Britain and France. By defeating the Democrats and McClellan, he also defeated the ] and their secessionist party platform. And he found military leaders like Grant and Sherman that were a match for Lee. From the end of 1864 on, there was no hope for the South. | |||
=== Battles === | |||
The goals were not symmetric. To win independence, the South had to convince the North it could not win, but did ''not'' have to invade the North. To restore the Union, the North had to conquer vast stretches of territory. In the short run (a matter of months), the two sides were evenly matched. But in the long run (a matter of years), the North had advantages that increasingly came into play, while it prevented the South from gaining diplomatic recognition in Europe. | |||
]]] | |||
One of the earliest battles was fought at ] (November 1861), south of Charleston. Much of the war along the South Carolina coast concentrated on capturing ]. In attempting to capture Charleston, the Union military tried two approaches: by land over James or Morris Islands or through the harbor. However, the Confederates were able to drive back each attack. A famous land attack was the ], in which the ] took part. The Union suffered a serious defeat, losing 1,515 soldiers while the Confederates lost only 174. However, the 54th was hailed for its valor, which encouraged the general acceptance of the recruitment of African American soldiers into the Union Army, which reinforced the Union's numerical advantage.<ref>{{Cite encyclopedia |title=Second Battle of Fort Wagner |url=https://www.britannica.com/topic/Second-Battle-of-Fort-Wagner |access-date=January 25, 2022 |encyclopedia=Encyclopædia Britannica}}</ref> | |||
Fort Pulaski on the Georgia coast was an early target for the Union navy. Following the capture of Port Royal, an expedition was organized with engineer troops under the command of Captain ], forcing a Confederate surrender. The Union army occupied the fort for the rest of the war after repairing it.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Lattimore |first=Ralston B. |title=Battle for Fort Pulaski – Fort Pulaski National Monument |url=https://www.nps.gov/fopu/learn/historyculture/battle-for-fort-pulaski.htm |access-date=2022-04-20 |website=National Park Service}}</ref> | |||
===Long-term economic factors=== | |||
Both sides had long-term advantages but the Union had more. To win the Union had to use its long-term resources to accomplish multiple goals, including control of the entire coastline, control of most of the population centers, control of the main rivers (especially the Mississippi and Tennessee), defeat of all the main Confederate armies, and finally seizure of Richmond. As the occupying force they had to station hundreds of thousands of soldiers to control railroads, supply lines, and major towns and cities. The long-term advantages widely credited by historians to have contributed to the Union's success include: | |||
] | |||
*The more industrialized economy of the North aided in the production of arms, munitions and supplies, as well as finances, and transportation. The graph shows the relative advantage of the USA over the Confederate States of America (CSA) at the start of the war. The advantages widened rapidly during the war, as the Northern economy grew, and Confederate territory shrank and its economy weakened. | |||
*The Union population was 22 million and the South 9 million in 1861; the Southern population included more than 3.5 million slaves thus leaving the South's white population outnumbered by a ratio of more than four to one. The disparity grew as the Union controlled more and more southern territory with garrisons, and cut off the trans-Mississippi part of the Confederacy. | |||
*The Union at the start controlled over 80% of the shipyards, steamships, river boats, and the Navy. It augmented these by a massive shipbuilding program. This enabled the Union to control the river systems and to blockade the entire southern coastline.<ref> McPherson 313-16, 392-3</ref> | |||
*Excellent railroad links between Union cities allowed for the quick and cheap movement of troops and supplies. Transportation was much slower and more difficult in the South which was unable to augment its much smaller rail system, repair damage, or even perform routine maintenance.<ref>Heidler, 1591-98 | |||
</ref> | |||
In April 1862, a Union naval task force commanded by Commander ] attacked ], which guarded the river approach to ] from the south. While part of the fleet bombarded the forts, other vessels forced a break in the obstructions in the river and enabled the rest of the fleet to steam upriver to the city. A Union army force commanded by Major General ] landed near the forts and forced their surrender. Butler's controversial command of New Orleans earned him the nickname "Beast".<ref>{{Cite book |last=Trefousse |first=Hans L. |author-link=Hans L. Trefousse |title=Ben Butler: The South Called Him Beast! |publisher=Twayne |year=1957 |location=New York |oclc=371213}}</ref> | |||
===Political and diplomatic factors=== | |||
*The Union's more established government, particularly a mature executive branch which accumulated even greater power during wartime, gave a more streamlined conduct of the war, with minimal bickering between Lincoln and the governors. The failure of Davis to maintain positive and productive relationships with state governors damaged his ability to draw on regional resources.<ref> McPherson 432-44</ref> | |||
*A strong ] enabled the Republicans to mobilize soldiers and support at the grass roots, even when the war became unpopular. The Confederacy deliberately did not use parties.<ref>Eric L. McKitrick, "Party Politics and the Union and Confederate War Efforts," in William Nisbet Chambers and Walter Dean Burnham, eds. ''The American party Systems'' (1965); Beringer 1988 p 93</ref> | |||
*The failure to win diplomatic or military support from any foreign powers cut the Confederacy from access to markets and to most imports. Its "]" misperception of the world economy led to bad diplomacy, such as the refusal to ship cotton before the blockade started.<ref>Heidler, 598-603</ref> | |||
===Military factors=== | |||
*Strategically, the location of the capital Richmond tied Lee to a highly exposed position at the end of supply lines. Loss of its national capital was unthinkable for the Confederacy, for it would lose legitimacy as an independent nation. Washington was equally vulnerable, but if it had been captured, the Union would not have collapsed. <ref>Heidler, 1643-47</ref> | |||
*The Confederacy's tactic of invading the North (Antietam 1862, Gettysburg 1863, Nashville 1864) drained manpower strength, when it could not replace its losses.<ref> Grady McWhiney and Perry D. Jamieson. '' Attack and Die: Civil War Military Tactics and the Southern Heritage'' (1982)</ref> | |||
*The Union devoted much more of its resources to medical needs, thereby overcoming the unhealthy disease environment that sickened (and killed) more soldiers than combat did.<ref> Resch 2: 112-14; Heidler, 603-4</ref> | |||
*Despite the Union's many tactical blunders (like the ]), those committed by Confederate generals (such as Lee's miscalculations at the Battles of ] and ]) were far more serious—if for no other reason than that the Confederates could so little afford the losses.<ref> Grady McWhiney and Perry D. Jamieson. '' Attack and Die: Civil War Military Tactics and the Southern Heritage'' (1982)</ref> | |||
*Lincoln proved more adept than Davis in replacing unsuccessful generals with better ones.<ref>Weigley</ref> | |||
*Lincoln grew as a grand strategist, in contrast to Davis. The Confederacy never developed an overall strategy. It never had a plan to deal with the blockade. Davis failed to respond in a coordinated fashion to serious threats (such as Grant's campaign against Vicksburg in 1863; in the face of which, he allowed Lee to invade Pennsylvania).<ref>Heidler, 564-72, 1185-90; T. Harry Williams, ''Lincoln and His Generals'' (1952)</ref> | |||
* The Emancipation Proclamation enabled African-Americans, both free blacks and escaped slaves, to join the Union Army. About 190,000 volunteered, further enhancing the numerical advantage the Union armies enjoyed over the Confederates. They fought in several key battles in the last two years of the war. <ref> John Hope Franklin, ''The Emancipation Proclamation'' (1965) </ref> | |||
* Finally, the Confederacy may have lacked the total commitment needed to win the war.<ref>Beringer et al (1986)</ref> Lincoln and his team never wavered in their commitment to victory. | |||
The following year, the Union ] commanded by Major General Nathaniel P. Banks laid ] for nearly eight weeks, the longest siege in US military history. The Confederates attempted to defend with the ] but surrendered after Vicksburg. These surrenders gave the Union control over the Mississippi.<ref name="BattlefieldTrust"/> | |||
==Civil War leaders and soldiers== | |||
:''For more details on this topic, see ]'' | |||
Several small skirmishes but no major battles were fought in Florida. The biggest was the ] in early 1864.{{citation needed|date=January 2022}} | |||
Most of the important generals on both sides had formerly served in the ]—some, including ] and ], during the ] between 1846 and 1848. Most were graduates of the ] at West Point. | |||
==Pacific coast theater== | |||
The senior Southern military commanders and strategists included ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], and ]. | |||
{{further|Pacific coast theater of the American Civil War}} | |||
The Pacific coast theater refers to military operations on the Pacific Ocean and in the states and Territories west of the Continental Divide.<ref>{{Cite web |title=War in the West · Civil War · Digital Exhibits |url=http://digitalexhibits.wsulibs.wsu.edu/exhibits/show/civilwar/war-in-the-west/war-in-the-west |access-date=March 7, 2022 |website=digitalexhibits.wsulibs.wsu.edu}}</ref> | |||
==Conquest of Virginia== | |||
The senior Northern military commanders and strategists included ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], and ]. | |||
]]] | |||
At the beginning of 1864, Lincoln made Grant commander of all Union armies. Grant made his headquarters with the Army of the Potomac and put Maj. Gen. ] in command of most of the western armies. Grant understood the concept of ] and believed, along with Lincoln and Sherman, that only the utter defeat of Confederate forces and their economic base would end the war.<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Neely |first=Mark E. |date=December 2004 |title=Was the Civil War a Total War? |journal=Civil War History |volume=50 |issue=4 |pages=434–458 |doi=10.1353/cwh.2004.0073}}</ref> This was total war not in killing civilians, but in taking provisions and forage and destroying homes, farms, and railroads, that Grant said "would otherwise have gone to the support of secession and rebellion. This policy I believe exercised a material influence in hastening the end."<ref>{{Cite book |last=Grant |first=Ulysses S. |url=https://archive.org/details/memoirsselectedl00gran_0 |title=Personal Memoirs of U.S. Grant; Selected Letters |publisher=Library of America |year=1990 |isbn=978-0-940450-58-5 |page=}}</ref> | |||
Grant devised a coordinated strategy that would strike at the entire Confederacy from multiple directions. Generals Meade and ] were ordered to move against Lee near Richmond, General ] was to ], General Sherman was to capture Atlanta and march to the Atlantic Ocean, Generals ] and ] were to operate against railroad supply lines in West Virginia, and Maj. Gen. Nathaniel P. Banks was to capture ], Alabama.<ref>{{Cite book |last=Field |first=Ron |title=Petersburg 1864–65: The Longest Siege |publisher=Osprey |year=2013 |isbn=978-1-4728-0305-4 |page=6}}</ref> | |||
After 1980, scholarly attention turned to ordinary soldiers, women, and African Americans involved with the War. As James McPherson observed "The profound irony of the Civil War was that Confederate and Union soldiers… interpreted the heritage of 1776 in opposite ways. Confederates fought for liberty and independence from what they regarded as a tyrannical government; Unionists fought to preserve the nation created by the founders from dismemberment and destruction."<ref>McPherson 1994 p 24.</ref> | |||
=== Grant's Overland Campaign === | |||
==Nature of the war== | |||
The traditional definition of a ] is a war in which two governments fight for control over the same state. The Government of ] viewed the conflict as a Civil War, with both sides fighting to govern the ]. The other side, the Government of ], viewed it as a war in which one sovereign nation (the United States) invaded another (the ]). | |||
Grant's army set out on the ] intending to draw Lee into a defense of Richmond, where they would attempt to pin down and destroy the Confederate army. The Union army first attempted to maneuver past Lee and fought several battles, notably at the ], ], and ]. These resulted in heavy losses on both sides and forced Lee's Confederates to fall back repeatedly.{{sfn|McPherson|1988|pp=724–735}} At the ], the Confederates lost Jeb Stuart.{{sfn|McPherson|1988|p=728}} | |||
==Aftermath== | |||
The fighting ended with the surrender of the conventional Confederate forces. There was no significant guerrilla warfare. Many senior Confederate leaders escaped to ], to ], or even to ]; Davis was captured and imprisoned for two years, but never brought to trial. Indeed, there were no ] trials for anyone. | |||
An attempt to outflank Lee from the south failed under Butler, who was trapped inside the ] river bend. Each battle resulted in setbacks for the Union that mirrored those they had suffered under prior generals, though unlike them, Grant chose to fight on rather than retreat. Grant was tenacious and kept pressing Lee's Army of Northern Virginia back to Richmond. While Lee was preparing for an attack on Richmond, Grant unexpectedly turned south to cross the James River and began the protracted ], where the two armies engaged in ] for over nine months.{{sfn|McPherson|1988|pp=724–742}} | |||
===Reconstruction=== | |||
{{main|Reconstruction}} | |||
=== Sheridan's Valley Campaign === | |||
Northern leaders agreed that victory would require more than the end of fighting. It had to encompass the two war goals: Southern nationalism had to be totally repudiated, and all forms of slavery had to be eliminated. They disagreed sharply on the criteria for these goals. They also disagreed on the degree of federal control that should be imposed on the South, and the process by which Southern states should be reintegrated into the Union. | |||
]]] | |||
To deny the Confederacy continued use of the ] as a base from which to launch invasions of Maryland and the Washington area, and to threaten Lee's supply lines for his forces, Grant launched the ] in the spring of 1864. Initial efforts led by Gen. Sigel were repelled at the ] by Confederate Gen. ]. The Battle of New Market was the Confederacy's last major victory, and included a charge by teenage ] cadets. After relieving Sigel, and following mixed performances by his successor, Grant finally found a commander, General ], aggressive enough to prevail against the army of Maj. Gen. ]. After a cautious start, Sheridan defeated Early in a series of battles in September and October 1864, including a decisive defeat at the ]. Sheridan then proceeded through that winter to destroy the agricultural base of the Shenandoah Valley, a strategy similar to the tactics Sherman later employed in Georgia.{{sfn|McPherson|1988|pp=778–779}} | |||
=== Sherman's March to the Sea === | |||
Reconstruction, which began early in the war and ended in 1877, involved a complex and rapidly changing series of federal and state policies. The long-term result came in the three "Civil War" amendments to the ] (the XIII, which abolished slavery, the XIV, which extended federal legal protections to citizens regardless of race, and the XV, which abolished racial restrictions on voting). Reconstruction ended in the different states at different times, the last three by the ]. For details on why the ] and ] were largely ineffective until the ], see ], ], ], ], ] and ]. | |||
Meanwhile, Sherman maneuvered from Chattanooga to Atlanta, defeating Confederate Generals Joseph E. Johnston and ]. The ] on September 2, 1864, guaranteed the reelection of Lincoln.{{sfn|McPherson|1988|pp=773–776}} Hood left the Atlanta area to swing around and menace Sherman's supply lines and invade Tennessee in the ]. Union Maj. Gen. ] defeated Hood at the ], and George H. Thomas dealt Hood a massive defeat at the ], effectively destroying Hood's army.{{sfn|McPherson|1988|pp=812–815}} | |||
===Memories of the war=== | |||
The war had a lasting impact on United States culture. Lincoln and Lee became iconic heroes. Every town and city built memorials to its heroic soldiers, battlefields became sacred places, and stories of the war became part of national folklore. By the 1890s, the veterans of the North and South had reconciled and were holding joint reunions. The South's strong support for the ] in 1898 convinced the remaining doubters that the South was patriotic.<ref>Paul Herman Buck, ''The Road to Reunion, 1865-1900'' (1937)</ref> | |||
], ] depicts a Union and Confederate soldier shaking hands.]] | |||
Leaving Atlanta, and his base of supplies, Sherman's army marched, with no destination set, laying waste to about 20% of the farms in Georgia in his "]". He reached the Atlantic at ], Georgia, in December 1864. Sherman's army was followed by thousands of freed slaves; there were no major battles along the march. Sherman turned north through South Carolina and North Carolina, to approach the Confederate Virginia lines from the south, increasing the pressure on Lee's army.{{sfn|McPherson|1988|pp=825–830}} | |||
However, for decades after the war, some Republican politicians "waved the ]," bringing up wartime casualties as an electoral tactic. Memories of the war and Reconstruction held the segregated South together as a Democratic block—the "]"—in national politics for another century. A few debates surrounding the legacy of the war continue into the 21st century, especially regarding memorials and celebrations of Confederate heroes and ]. | |||
=== The Waterloo of the Confederacy === | |||
Lee's army, thinned by desertion and casualties, was now much smaller than Grant's. One last Confederate attempt to break the Union hold on Petersburg failed at the decisive ] on April 1. The Union now controlled the entire perimeter surrounding Richmond–Petersburg, completely cutting it off from the Confederacy. Realizing the capital was now lost, Lee's army and the Confederate government were forced to evacuate. The Confederate capital fell on April 2–3, to the ], composed of black troops. The remaining Confederate units fled west after a defeat at ] on April 6.{{sfn|McPherson|1988|pp=846–847}} | |||
==End of the war== | |||
{{Main|Conclusion of the American Civil War}} | |||
{{multiple image | |||
| align = right | |||
| direction = horizontal | |||
| total_width =400 | |||
| image1 = 18650410 Surrender of General Lee and His Whole Army - The New York Times.png | |||
| alt1 = | |||
| width1 = | |||
| caption1 = This ''New York Times'' front page celebrated Lee's surrender, headlining how Grant let Confederate officers retain their sidearms and "paroled" the Confederate officers and men.<ref>{{Cite news |date=April 10, 1865 |title=Union / Victory! / Peace! / Surrender of General Lee and His Whole Army |url=https://newspaperarchive.com/new-york-times-apr-10-1865-p-1/ |work=The New York Times |page=1}}</ref> | |||
| image2 = 18650416 Lee Has Surrendered to Grant - Savannah Daily Herald.png | |||
| caption2 = News of Lee's April 9 surrender reached this southern newspaper (Savannah, Georgia) on April 15—after the April 14 shooting of President Lincoln. The article quotes Grant's terms of surrender.<ref>{{Cite news |date=April 16, 1865 |title=Most Glorious News of the War / Lee Has Surrendered to Grant ! / All Lee's Officers and Men Are Paroled |url=https://newspaperarchive.com/savannah-daily-herald-apr-16-1865-p-1/ |url-access=subscription |work=Savannah Daily Herald |location=Savannah, GA |pages=1, 4}}</ref> | |||
}} | |||
Lee did not intend to surrender, but planned to regroup at ], where supplies were to be waiting, and then continue the war. Grant chased Lee and got in front of him, so that when Lee's army reached the ], they were surrounded. After ], Lee decided the fight was hopeless, and surrendered his Army of Northern Virginia to Grant on April 9, 1865, during a conference at the ].<ref>{{Cite book |last=Simpson |first=Brooks D. |title=Let Us Have Peace: Ulysses S. Grant and the Politics of War and Reconstruction, 1861–1868 |publisher=The University of North Carolina Press |year=1991 |location=Chapel Hill |page=84}}</ref><ref>William Marvel (2002) ''Lee's Last Retreat: The Flight to Appomattox'', pp. 158–181.</ref> In an untraditional gesture and as a sign of Grant's respect and anticipation of peacefully restoring Confederate states to the Union, Lee was permitted to keep his sword and horse, ]. His men were ]d, and a chain of Confederate surrenders began.<ref>{{Cite book |last=Winik |first=Jay |title=April 1865: the month that saved America |year=2001 |publisher=HarperCollins |isbn=0-06-018723-9 |location=New York |pages=188–189}}</ref> | |||
On April 14, 1865, Lincoln ] by ], a Confederate sympathizer. Lincoln died early the next morning. Lincoln's vice president, ], was unharmed, because his would-be assassin, ], lost his nerve, so Johnson was immediately sworn in as president. | |||
Meanwhile, Confederate forces across the South surrendered, as news of Lee's surrender reached them.<ref group="lower-alpha">Unaware of the surrender of Lee, on April 16 the last major battles of the war were fought at the ], and the ].</ref> On April 26, the same day Sergeant ] killed Booth at a tobacco barn, Johnston surrendered nearly 90,000 troops of the ] to Sherman at ], near present-day Durham, North Carolina. It proved to be the largest surrender of Confederate forces. On May 4, all remaining Confederate forces in Alabama, Mississippi, and Louisiana east of the Mississippi, under the command of Lt. General ], surrendered.{{sfn|Long|1971|p=685}} Confederate president Davis was captured in retreat at ] on May 10.<ref>{{Cite book |last1=Arnold |first1=James R. |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=35LvCgAAQBAJ |title=Understanding U.S. Military Conflicts through Primary Sources |last2=Wiener |first2=Roberta |publisher=ABC-CLIO |year=2016 |isbn=978-1-61069-934-1 |page=15}}</ref> | |||
The final land battle was fought on May 13, 1865, at the ] in Texas.{{sfn|Long|1971|p=688}}{{sfn|Bradley|2015|p=68}}{{sfn|Hunt|2015|p=5}} On May 26, 1865, Confederate Lt. Gen. ], acting for Edmund Smith, signed a military convention surrendering Confederate forces in the ].{{sfn|Long|1971|p=690}}{{sfn|Dunkerly|2015|p=117}} This date is often cited by contemporaries and historians as the effective end date of the war.{{efn|name=End1}}{{efn|name=End2}} On June 2, with most of his troops having already gone home, a reluctant Kirby Smith had little choice but to sign the official surrender document.{{sfn|Long|1971|p=692}}<ref>{{Cite web |date=April 17, 2009 |title=Ulysses S. Grant: The Myth of 'Unconditional Surrender' Begins at Fort Donelson |url=https://www.battlefields.org/learn/articles/ulysses-s-grant-myth-unconditional-surrender-begins-fort-donelson |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160207004144/http://www.civilwar.org/education/history/end-of-war/smith-surrenders.html |archive-date=February 7, 2016 |publisher=American Battlefield Trust}}</ref> On June 23, ] leader and Brig. General ] became the last Confederate general to surrender his forces.<ref>{{Cite book |last=Morris |first=John Wesley |url={{google books|plainurl=y|id=fSqmnpHFEF0C|page=68}} |title=Ghost Towns of Oklahoma |year=1977 |publisher=University of Oklahoma Press |isbn=978-0-8061-1420-0 |page=68}}</ref><ref>{{harvnb|Bradley|2015|p=69}}. "The 58-year-old Cherokee chieftain was the last Confederate general to lay down his arms. The last Confederate-affiliated tribe to surrender was the Chickasaw nation, which capitulated on 14 July."</ref> | |||
On June 19, 1865, Union Maj. Gen. ] announced ], bringing the Emancipation Proclamation into effect in Texas and freeing the last slaves of the Confederacy.<ref>Conner, Robert C. ''General Gordon Granger: The Savior of Chickamauga and the Man Behind "Juneteenth"''. Havertown, PA: Casemate Publishers, 2013. {{ISBN|978-1-61200-186-9}}. p. 177.</ref> The anniversary of this date is now celebrated as ].<ref>{{Cite web |last=Gates |first=Henry Louis Jr. |author-link=Henry Louis Gates Jr. |date=January 16, 2013 |title=What Is Juneteenth? |url=https://www.pbs.org/wnet/african-americans-many-rivers-to-cross/history/what-is-juneteenth/ |access-date=June 12, 2020 |publisher=]}}</ref> | |||
The naval part of the war ended more slowly. It had begun on April 11, two days after Lee's surrender, when Lincoln proclaimed that foreign nations had no further "claim or pretense" to deny equality of maritime rights and hospitalities to U.S. warships and, in effect, that rights extended to Confederate ships to use neutral ports as safe havens from U.S. warships should end.{{sfn|Neff|2010|p=205}}<ref name="PresidencyProject1865a" /> Having no response to Lincoln's proclamation, President Johnson issued a similar proclamation dated May 10, more directly stating that the war was almost at an end and insurgent cruisers still at sea, and prepared to attack U.S. ships, should not have rights to do so through use of safe foreign ports or waters.<ref name="PresidencyProject1865b" /> Britain finally responded on June 6, by transmitting a letter from Foreign Secretary ], to the Lords of the ] withdrawing rights to Confederate warships to enter British ports and waters.<ref>{{Cite journal |date=June 24, 1865 |title=Withdrawal of Belligerent Rights by Great Britain |url=https://archive.org/details/sim_armed-forces-journal_1865-06-24_2_44 |journal=] |location=New York |publisher=American News Company |volume=2 |issue=44 |page=695 |access-date=July 25, 2022}}</ref> U.S. Secretary of State Seward welcomed the withdrawal of concessions to the Confederates.<ref>{{Cite journal |date=July 22, 1865 |title=England and the Termination of the Rebellion |url=https://archive.org/details/sim_armed-forces-journal_1865-07-22_2_48 |journal=] |location=New York |publisher=American News Company |volume=2 |issue=48 |page=763 |access-date=July 25, 2022}}</ref> Finally, on October 18, Russell advised the Admiralty that the time specified in his June message had elapsed and "all measures of a restrictive nature on vessels of war of the United States in British ports, harbors, and waters, are now to be considered as at an end".<ref>{{Cite journal |date=November 4, 1865 |title=Withdrawal of British Restrictions Upon American Naval Vessels |url=https://archive.org/details/sim_armed-forces-journal_1865-11-04_3_11 |journal=] |location=New York |publisher=American News Company |volume=3 |issue=11 |page=172 |access-date=July 25, 2022}}</ref> Nonetheless, the final Confederate surrender was in Liverpool, England where ], the captain of ], surrendered the cruiser to British authorities on November 6.{{sfn|Heidler|Heidler|Coles|2002|pp=703–706}} | |||
Legally, the war did not end until August 20, 1866, when President Johnson issued a proclamation that declared "that the said insurrection is at an end and that peace, order, tranquillity, and civil authority now exist in and throughout the whole of the United States of America".{{efn|{{multiref2|{{harvnb|Murray|1967|p=}} | {{harvnb|Neff|2010|p=207}} | {{harvnb|Trudeau|1994|p=396}}. In ''United States v. Anderson'', 76 U.S. 56 (1869), "The U.S. attorneys argued that the Rebellion had been suppressed following the surrender of the Trans-Mississippi Department, as established in the surrender document negotiated on May 26, 1865." | {{harvnb|Trudeau|1994|p=397}}. The Supreme Court decided that the "legal end of the American Civil War had been decided by Congress to be August 20, 1866—the date of Andrew Johnson's final proclamation on the conclusion of the Rebellion."}}}} | |||
==Union victory== | |||
] | |||
The ], reasons for its outcome, and even ] are subjects of lingering contention. The North and West grew wealthy while the once-rich South became poor for a century. The national political power of the slaveowners and rich Southerners ended. Historians are less sure about the results of postwar Reconstruction, especially regarding the second-class citizenship of the freedmen and their poverty.{{sfn|McPherson|1988|p=851}} | |||
Historians have debated whether the Confederacy could have won the war. Most scholars, including ], argue Confederate victory was possible.{{sfn|McPherson|1988|p=855}} McPherson argues that the North's advantage in population and resources made Northern victory likely, but not guaranteed. He argues that if the Confederacy had fought using unconventional tactics, it would have more easily been able to hold out long enough to exhaust the Union.<ref name="Boritt" /> Confederates did not need to invade and hold enemy territory to win, but only to fight a defensive war to convince the North the cost of winning was too high. The North needed to conquer and hold vast stretches of enemy territory and defeat Confederate armies to win.<ref name="Boritt" /> Lincoln was not a military dictator and could fight only as long as the American public supported the war. The Confederacy sought to win independence by outlasting Lincoln; however, after Atlanta fell and Lincoln defeated McClellan in the election of 1864, hope for a political victory for the South ended. Lincoln had secured the support of the Republicans, War Democrats, border states, emancipated slaves, and the neutrality of Britain and France. By defeating the Democrats and McClellan, he defeated the ], who had wanted a negotiated peace with the Confederacy.{{sfn|McPherson|1988|pp=771–772}} | |||
{| class="wikitable floatright" style="border-collapse: collapse; margin: 0 0 1em 1em; padding: 10px; border: 1px solid #ccc;" | |||
|+ Comparison of Union and Confederacy, 1860–1864<ref name="Manufactures1860" /><ref name="Carter2006" /> | |||
! | |||
! scope="col" | Year | |||
! scope="col" | Union | |||
! scope="col" | Confederacy | |||
|- | |||
|rowspan="2"|'''Population''' | |||
|1860 | |||
| 22,100,000 (71%) | |||
| 9,100,000 (29%) | |||
|- | |||
|1864 | |||
| 28,800,000 (90%){{refn|name=UnionPop|group=lower-alpha|"Union population 1864" aggregates 1860 population, average annual immigration 1855–1864, and population governed formerly by CSA per Kenneth Martis source. Contrabands and after the Emancipation Proclamation freedmen, migrating into Union control on the coasts and to the advancing armies, and natural increase are excluded.}} | |||
| 3,000,000 (10%)<ref>{{Cite book |last=Martis |first=Kenneth C. |title=The Historical Atlas of the Congresses of the Confederate States of America: 1861–1865 |publisher=Simon & Schuster |year=1994 |isbn=978-0-13-389115-7 |page=27}} At the beginning of 1865, the Confederacy controlled one third of its congressional districts, which were apportioned by population. The major slave populations found in Louisiana, Mississippi, Tennessee, and Alabama were effectively under Union control by the end of 1864.</ref> | |||
|- | |||
| '''Free''' | |||
|1860 | |||
| 21,700,000 (98%) | |||
| 5,600,000 (62%) | |||
|- | |||
|rowspan="2"| '''Slave''' | |||
|1860 | |||
| 490,000 (2%) | |||
| 3,550,000 (38%) | |||
|- | |||
|1864 | |||
| ''negligible'' | |||
| 1,900,000{{refn|name=CSASlaves|group=lower-alpha|"Slave 1864, CSA" aggregates 1860 slave census of Virginia, North Carolina, South Carolina, Georgia and Texas. It omits losses from contraband and after the Emancipation Proclamation, freedmen migrating to the Union controlled coastal ports and those joining advancing Union armies, especially in the Mississippi Valley.}} | |||
|- | |||
| '''Soldiers''' | |||
| 1860–64 | |||
| 2,100,000 (67%) | |||
| 1,064,000 (33%) | |||
|- | |||
|rowspan="2"| '''Railroad miles'''<ref>{{Cite book |url=https://archive.org/details/17951895onehundr0001unse/page/111/mode/2up |title=One Hundred Years of American Commerce 1795–1895 |year=1968 |publisher=Greenwood |editor-last=Depew |editor-first=Chauncey |editor-link=Chauncey Depew |location=New York |page=111}}</ref> | |||
|1860 | |||
| 21,800 (71%) | |||
| 8,800 (29%) | |||
|- | |||
|1864 | |||
| 29,100 (98%){{efn|"Total Union railroad miles" aggregates existing track reported 1860 @ 21800 plus new construction 1860–1864 @ 5000, plus southern railroads administered by USMRR @ 2300.<ref>{{Cite web |title=U.S. Railroad Construction, 1860–1880 |url=http://www.dhr.history.vt.edu/modules/us/mod05_industry/images/railroad_construction.jpg |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160611102443/http://www.dhr.history.vt.edu/modules/us/mod05_industry/images/railroad_construction.jpg |archive-date=June 11, 2016 |access-date=August 21, 2012 |website=Digital History Reader |publisher=Virginia Tech}}</ref>}} | |||
| ''negligible'' | |||
|- | |||
|rowspan="2"| '''Manufactures''' | |||
|1860 | |||
| 90% | |||
| 10% | |||
|- | |||
|1864 | |||
| 98% | |||
| 2% | |||
|- | |||
|rowspan="2"| '''Arms production''' | |||
|1860 | |||
| 97% | |||
| 3% | |||
|- | |||
|1864 | |||
| 98% | |||
| 2% | |||
|- | |||
|rowspan="2"| '''Cotton bales''' | |||
|1860 | |||
| ''negligible'' | |||
| 4,500,000 | |||
|- | |||
|1864 | |||
| 300,000 | |||
| ''negligible'' | |||
|- | |||
|rowspan="2"| '''Exports''' | |||
|1860 | |||
| 30% | |||
| 70% | |||
|- | |||
|1864 | |||
| 98% | |||
| 2% | |||
|} | |||
Some scholars argue the Union held an insurmountable long-term advantage over the Confederacy in industrial strength and population. Confederate actions, they argue, only delayed defeat.{{sfn|Murray|Bernstein|Knox|1996|p=235}}{{sfn|Heidler|Heidler|Coles|2002|pp=1207–1210}} Historian ] expressed this view succinctly: {{blockquote|I think that the North fought that war with one hand behind its back .... If there had been more Southern victories, and a lot more, the North simply would have brought that other hand out from behind its back. I don't think the South ever had a chance to win that War.{{sfn|Ward|1990|p=272}}}} | |||
A minority view among historians is that the Confederacy lost because, as ] put it, "people did not will hard enough and long enough to win."{{sfn|Coulter|1950|p=566}}<ref>{{Cite book |last1=Beringer |first1=Richard E. |title=Why the South Lost the Civil War |last2=Hattaway |first2=Herman |last3=Jones |first3=Archer |last4=Still |first4=William N. Jr. |year=1991 |at=ch. 1}}</ref> However, most historians reject the argument.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Farmer |first=Alan |year=2005 |title=Why was the Confederacy Defeated? |url=http://www.historytoday.com/alan-farmer/why-was-confederacy-defeated |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140323165319/http://www.historytoday.com/alan-farmer/why-was-confederacy-defeated |archive-date=March 23, 2014 |website=History Review |pages=15–20 |via=History Today |issue=52}}</ref> McPherson, after reading thousands of letters written by Confederate soldiers, found strong patriotism that continued to the end; they truly believed they were fighting for freedom and liberty. Even as the Confederacy was visibly collapsing in 1864–65, most Confederate soldiers were fighting hard.{{sfn|McPherson|1997|pp=169–172}} Historian ] cites General Sherman, who in early 1864 commented, "The devils seem to have a determination that cannot but be admired." Despite their loss of slaves and wealth, with starvation looming, Sherman continued, "yet I see no sign of let-up—some few deserters—plenty tired of war, but the masses determined to fight it out."<ref>{{Cite book |last=Gallagher |first=Gary W. |author-link=Gary W. Gallagher |url={{google books|plainurl=y|id=QHNEtpvEB30C|page=57}} |title=The Confederate War |publisher=Harvard University Press |year=1999 |isbn=978-0-674-16056-9 |location=Cambridge, MA |page=57}}</ref> | |||
Also important were Lincoln's eloquence in articulating the national purpose and his skill in keeping the border states committed to the Union cause. The Emancipation Proclamation was an effective use of the President's war powers.<ref name="Fehrenbacher2004" /> The Confederate government failed to get Europe involved militarily. Southern leaders needed to get European powers to help break the blockade the Union had created around Southern ports. Lincoln's naval blockade was 95 percent effective at stopping trade goods; as a result, imports and exports to the South declined significantly. The abundance of European cotton and Britain's hostility to slavery, along with Lincoln's naval blockades, severely decreased any chance that Britain or France would enter the war.{{sfn|McPherson|1988|pp=382–388}} | |||
Historian Don H. Doyle has argued that the Union victory had a major impact on world history.{{sfn|Doyle|2015}} The Union victory energized popular democratic forces. A Confederate victory, on the other hand, would have meant a new birth of slavery, not freedom. Historian Fergus Bordewich, following Doyle, argues that: | |||
{{blockquote|The North's victory decisively proved the durability of democratic government. Confederate independence, on the other hand, would have established an American model for reactionary politics and race-based repression that would likely have cast an international shadow into the 20th century and perhaps beyond.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Bordewich |first=Fergus M. |date=February 6, 2015 |title=The World Was Watching: America's Civil War slowly came to be seen as part of a global struggle against oppressive privilege |url=https://www.wsj.com/articles/book-review-the-cause-of-all-nations-by-don-h-doyle-1423260658 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170221081620/https://www.wsj.com/articles/book-review-the-cause-of-all-nations-by-don-h-doyle-1423260658 |archive-date=February 21, 2017 |website=The Wall Street Journal}}</ref>}} Scholars have debated what the effects of the war were on political and economic power in the South.<ref name="Dupont2018">{{Cite journal |last1=Dupont |first1=Brandon |last2=Rosenbloom |first2=Joshua L. |year=2018 |title=The Economic Origins of the Postwar Southern Elite |url=https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/econ_las_pubs/644 |journal=Explorations in Economic History |volume=68 |pages=119–131 |doi=10.1016/j.eeh.2017.09.002}}</ref> The prevailing view is that the southern planter elite retained its powerful position in the South.<ref name="Dupont2018" /> However, a 2017 study challenges this, noting that while some Southern elites retained their economic status, the turmoil of the 1860s created greater opportunities for economic mobility in the South, than in the North.<ref name="Dupont2018" /> | |||
== Casualties == | |||
{{multiple image | |||
| total_width = 550 | |||
| align = right | |||
| image1 = Alfred A. Stratton.jpg | |||
| alt1 = | |||
| caption1 = One in thirteen veterans were amputees. | |||
| image2 = Cold Harbor, Va. African Americans collecting bones.jpg | |||
| alt2 = | |||
| caption2 = Remains of both sides were reinterred. | |||
| image3 = Andersonville National Cemetery.jpg | |||
| alt3 = | |||
| caption3 = ], Georgia | |||
| footer = | |||
}} | |||
{| class="wikitable floatright" style="border-collapse: collapse; margin: 0 0 1em 1em;" | |||
|+ Casualties according to the US National Park Service<ref name="NationalParkService" /> | |||
! scope="col" | Category | |||
! scope="col" | Union | |||
! scope="col" | Confederate | |||
|- | |||
! scope="row" | Killed in action | |||
| 110,100 | |||
| 94,000 | |||
|- | |||
! scope="row" | Disease | |||
| 224,580 | |||
| 164,000 | |||
|- | |||
! scope="row" | Wounded in action | |||
| 275,154 | |||
| 194,026 | |||
|- | |||
! scope="row" | Captured <br />(inc those who died as POWs) | |||
| 211,411 <br />(30,192) | |||
| 462,634 <br />(31,000) | |||
|- | |||
! scope="row" | Total | |||
| 821,245 | |||
| 914,660 | |||
|} | |||
{{Further|Environmental history of the United States#Civil War}} | |||
Exact casualty figures were collected for the Union, but Confederate records were poorly kept, or lost in the chaos of defeat. Thus, the casualty figures are imprecise and based on statistical extrapolation. Neither side kept a tally of civilian deaths due to the war. In the 19th century, the death toll had been estimated at a lower 620,000.<ref name="Nofi2001" /> In 2011, the death toll was recalculated based on a 1% sample of census data, yielding approximately 750,000 soldier deaths, 20 percent higher than traditionally estimated, and possibly as high as 850,000.<ref name="Hacker2011" /><ref>{{Cite web |date=September 22, 2011 |title=U.S. Civil War Took Bigger Toll Than Previously Estimated, New Analysis Suggests |url=https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2011/09/110921120124.htm |access-date=September 22, 2011 |website=Science Daily}}</ref> The figure was recalculated to 698,000 soldier deaths in 2024 after examining newly available full census records. Mortality rates among men were as high as 19 percent in Louisiana, and 16.6–16.7 percent in Georgia and South Carolina respectively.<ref>{{Cite web |date=2024-11-19 |title=Civil War Toll Much Worse in Confederate States, New Estimates Show -… |url=https://archive.today/20241119193351/https://www.nytimes.com/2024/11/19/health/civil-war-death-toll.html#selection-835.50-835.66 |access-date=2024-11-27 |website=archive.ph}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Barceló |first1=Joan |last2=Jensen |first2=Jeffrey L. |last3=Peisakhin |first3=Leonid |last4=Zhai |first4=Haoyu |date=2024-11-26 |title=New Estimates of US Civil War mortality from full-census records |journal=Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences |volume=121 |issue=48 |pages=e2414919121 |doi=10.1073/pnas.2414919121|pmid=39556740 |doi-access=free |pmc=11621511 }}</ref> | |||
The war resulted in at least 1,030,000 casualties (3 percent of the population), including an estimated 698,000 soldier deaths—two-thirds by disease.<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Barceló |first1=Joan |last2=Jensen |first2=Jeffrey L. |last3=Peisakhin |first3=Leonid |last4=Zhai |first4=Haoyu |date=2024-11-26 |title=New Estimates of US Civil War mortality from full-census records |journal=Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences |volume=121 |issue=48 |pages=e2414919121 |doi=10.1073/pnas.2414919121|pmid=39556740 |doi-access=free |pmc=11621511 }}</ref><ref name="Nofi2001" /> Based on 1860 census figures, 8 percent of all white men aged 13–43 died in the war, including 6 percent in the North and 18 percent in the South.{{sfn|Vinovskis|1990|p=7}}<ref name="Fox2008" /> About 56,000 soldiers ] during the War.<ref name="NationalGeographic2003" /> An estimated 60,000 soldiers lost limbs.<ref>{{Cite news |last=Riordan |first=Teresa |date=March 8, 2004 |title=When Necessity Meets Ingenuity: Art of Restoring What's Missing |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2004/03/08/business/technology-when-necessity-meets-ingenuity-art-of-restoring-what-s-missing.html |access-date=December 23, 2013 |website=The New York Times |agency=]}}</ref> As McPherson notes, the war's "cost in American lives was as great as in all of the nation's other wars combined through ]".{{Sfn|McPherson|1988|p=854}} | |||
Of the 359,528 Union Army dead, amounting to 15 percent of the over two million who served:<ref name="Fox1889" /> | |||
* 110,070 were killed in action (67,000) or died of wounds (43,000). | |||
* 199,790 died of disease (75 percent was due to the war, the remainder would have occurred in civilian life anyway) | |||
* 24,866 died in Confederate prison camps | |||
* 9,058 were killed by accidents or drowning | |||
* 15,741 other/unknown deaths | |||
In addition, there were 4,523 deaths in the Navy (2,112 in battle) and 460 in the Marines (148 in battle).<ref name="DCAS" /> | |||
After the Emancipation Proclamation authorized freed slaves to "be received into the armed service of the United States", former slaves who escaped from plantations or were liberated by the Union Army were recruited into the ] regiments of the Union Army, as were black men who had not been slaves. The US Colored Troops made up 10 percent of the Union death toll—15 percent of Union deaths from disease and less than 3 percent of those killed in battle.<ref name="Fox1889" /> Losses among ]s were high. In the last year and a half and from all reported casualties, approximately 20 percent of all African Americans enrolled in the military died during the war. Their mortality rate was significantly higher than white soldiers. While 15 percent of US Volunteers and just 9 percent of white Regular Army troops died, 21 percent of US Colored Troops died.<ref>{{cite journal |first=Herbert |last=Aptheker |author-link=Herbert Aptheker |title=Negro Casualties in the Civil War |journal=The Journal of Negro History |volume=32 |issue=1 |date=January 1947 |pages=10–80 |doi=10.2307/2715291 | |||
|jstor=2715291 |publisher=University of Chicago Press |issn=0022-2992}}</ref>{{Rp|16}} | |||
] battlefield in 1862]] | |||
While the figures of 360,000 army deaths for the Union and 260,000 for the Confederacy remained commonly cited, they are incomplete. In addition to many Confederate records being missing, partly as a result of Confederate widows not reporting deaths due to being ineligible for benefits, both armies only counted troops who died during their service and not the tens of thousands who died of wounds or diseases after being discharged. This often happened only days or weeks later. ], superintendent of the 1870 census, used census and surgeon general data to estimate a minimum of 500,000 Union military deaths and 350,000 Confederate military deaths, a total of 850,000 soldiers. While Walker's estimates were originally dismissed because of the 1870 census's undercounting, it was later found that the census was only off by 6.5 percent and that the data Walker used would be roughly accurate.<ref name="Hacker2011" /> | |||
Losses were far higher than during the war with Mexico, which saw roughly 13,000 American deaths, including fewer than two thousand killed in battle, between 1846 and 1848. One reason for the high number of battle deaths in the civil war was the continued use of tactics similar to those of the ], such as ]. With the advent of more accurate rifled barrels, ]s, and (near the end of the war for the Union) repeating firearms such as the ] and the ], soldiers were mowed down when standing in lines in the open. This led to the adoption of trench warfare, a style of fighting that defined much of ].<ref>{{Cite web |title=American Civil War Fortifications |url=https://ospreypublishing.com/american-civil-war-fortifications-2 |website=Osprey}}</ref> | |||
Deaths among former slaves has proven hard to estimate, due to the lack of reliable census data, though they were known to be considerable, as former slaves were set free or escaped in massive numbers in areas where the Union army did not have sufficient shelter, doctors, or food for them. Professor ] states that tens of thousands to hundreds of thousands of slaves died during the war from disease, starvation, or exposure, and that if these deaths are counted in the war's total, the death toll would exceed 1 million.<ref>Jim Downs, ''Sick from Freedom: African-American Illness and Suffering during the Civil War and Reconstruction'', Oxford University Press, 2012.</ref> | |||
It is estimated that during the war, of the ] killed, including horses, mules, donkeys and even confiscated children's ], over 32,600 of them belonged to the Union and 45,800 the Confederacy. However, other estimates place the total at 1,000,000.<ref>{{Cite web |date=2013-06-25 |title=The Battle of Gettysburg & the History of the Civil War Horse |url=https://thehorsemenscorral.com/2013/06/25/the-battle-of-gettysburg-the-history-of-the-cival-war-horse/ |access-date=2024-01-02}}</ref> | |||
It is estimated that 544 ] were captured during the war by the Union. The flags were sent to the ] in Washington.<ref>{{Cite book |title=Southern Historical Society Papers |editor-last=Jones |editor-first=J. William |volume=32 |chapter=1.37: Confederate States' flags |access-date=2024-01-09 |chapter-url=https://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Perseus:text:2001.05.0290:chapter=1.37 |via=Perseus Digital Library}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |title=Returned Flags Booklet, 1905 |url=https://www.pbslearningmedia.org/resource/ket-history-civilwar58/returned-flags-booklet/ |access-date=2024-01-09 |via=PBS LearningMedia}}</ref> The Union flags captured by the Confederates were sent to Richmond.{{citation needed|date=September 2024}} | |||
== Emancipation == | |||
[[File:Abolition of slavery in the United States SVG map.svg|thumb|upright=2|Abolition of slavery in the various states over time:{{Legend|#84c6c9|Abolition of slavery during or shortly after the American Revolution}} | |||
{{Legend|#7be3de|The Northwest Ordinance, 1787}} | |||
{{Legend|#64e5c5|Gradual emancipation in New York (starting 1799, completed 1827) and New Jersey (starting 1804, completed by Thirteenth Amendment, 1865)}} | |||
{{Legend|#7ab377|The Missouri Compromise, 1821}} | |||
{{Legend|#5f9b4a|Effective abolition of slavery by Mexican or joint US/British authority}} | |||
{{Legend|#97cf2d|Abolition of slavery by Congressional action, 1861}} | |||
{{Legend|#c7dd47|Abolition of slavery by Congressional action, 1862}} | |||
{{Legend|#ffe86d|Emancipation Proclamation as originally issued, January 1, 1863}} | |||
{{Legend|#f1c84e|Subsequent operation of the Emancipation Proclamation in 1863}} | |||
{{Legend|#d39c59|Abolition of slavery by state action during the Civil War}} | |||
{{Legend|#f7b360|Operation of the Emancipation Proclamation in 1864}} | |||
{{Legend|#f6a89a|Operation of the Emancipation Proclamation in 1865}} | |||
{{Legend|#d3595f|Thirteenth Amendment to the US constitution, December 18, 1865}} | |||
{{Legend|#bca4b1|Territory incorporated into the US after the passage of the Thirteenth Amendment}}]] | |||
Abolishing slavery was not a Union war goal from the outset, but quickly became one.{{Sfn|McPherson|1988|pp=vii–viii}} Lincoln's initial claims were that preserving the Union was the central goal.{{sfn|Foner|2010|p=74}} In contrast, the South fought to preserve slavery.{{Sfn|McPherson|1988|pp=vii–viii}} While not all Southerners saw themselves as fighting for slavery, most officers and over a third of the rank and file in Lee's army had close family ties to slavery. To Northerners, the motivation was primarily to preserve the Union, not to abolish slavery.{{sfn|Foner|1981|p={{page needed|date=September 2024}}}} However, as the war dragged on, and it became clear slavery was central to the conflict, and that emancipation was (to quote the Emancipation Proclamation) "a fit and necessary war measure for suppressing rebellion," Lincoln and his cabinet made ending slavery a war goal, culminating in the Emancipation Proclamation.{{Sfn|McPherson|1988|pp=vii–viii}}{{sfn|McPherson|1988|pp=506–508}} Lincoln's decision to issue the Proclamation angered ] ("Copperheads") and ], but energized most Republicans.{{sfn|McPherson|1988|pp=506–508}} By warning that free blacks would flood the North, Democrats made gains in the ], but they did not gain control of Congress. The Republicans' counterargument that slavery was the mainstay of the enemy steadily gained support, with the Democrats losing decisively in the 1863 elections in the Northern state of Ohio, when they tried to resurrect anti-black sentiment.{{sfn|McPherson|1988|p=686}} | |||
=== Emancipation Proclamation === | |||
{{Main|Emancipation Proclamation}} | |||
The Emancipation Proclamation legally freed the slaves in states "in rebellion," but, as a practical matter, slavery for the 3.5 million black people in the South effectively ended in each area when Union armies arrived. The last Confederate slaves were freed on June 19, 1865, celebrated as the modern holiday of Juneteenth. Slaves in the border states and those in some former Confederate territory occupied before the Emancipation Proclamation were freed by state action or (on December 6, 1865) by the ].<ref>{{Cite news |last=Cathey |first=Libby |date=June 17, 2021 |title=Biden signs bill making Juneteenth, marking the end of slavery, a federal holiday |url=https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/biden-sign-bill-making-juneteenth-federal-holiday-commemorating/story?id=78335485 |access-date=June 17, 2021 |work=]}}</ref><ref>], "The economics of emancipation." ''The Journal of Economic History'' 33#1 (1973): 66–85.</ref> The Emancipation Proclamation enabled African Americans, both free blacks and escaped slaves, to join the Union Army. About 190,000 volunteered, further enhancing the numerical advantage the Union armies enjoyed over the Confederates, who did not dare emulate the equivalent manpower source for fear of undermining the legitimacy of slavery.{{efn|In spite of the South's shortage of soldiers, most Southern leaders—until 1865—opposed enlisting slaves. They used them as laborers to support the war effort. As ] said, "If slaves will make good soldiers our whole theory of slavery is wrong." Confederate generals ] and ] argued in favor of arming blacks late in the war, and ] was eventually persuaded to support plans for arming slaves to avoid military defeat. The Confederacy surrendered at ] before this plan could be implemented.{{sfn|McPherson|1988|pp=831–837}}}} | |||
During the war, sentiment concerning slaves, enslavement, and emancipation in the United States was divided. Lincoln's fears of making slavery a war issue were based on a harsh reality: abolition did not enjoy wide support in the west, the territories, and the border states.{{Sfn|Donald|1995|pp=417–419}}<ref name=":4" group="lower-alpha" /> In 1861, Lincoln worried that premature attempts at emancipation would mean the loss of the border states, and that "to lose Kentucky is nearly the same as to lose the whole game."<ref name=":4" group="lower-alpha">{{multiref2 |Lincoln's letter to O. H. Browning, September 22, 1861. | {{harvnb|Wittke|1952|p={{page needed|date=September 2024}}}}. "Sentiment among ] was largely antislavery especially among ], resulting in hundreds of thousands of German Americans volunteering to fight for the Union." | {{harvnb|Keller|2009}}. | for primary sources, see Walter D. Kamphoefner and Wolfgang Helbich, eds., ''Germans in the Civil War: The Letters They Wrote Home'' (2006). "On the other hand, many of the recent immigrants in the North viewed freed slaves as competition for scarce jobs, and as the reason why the Civil War was being fought." | {{harvnb|Baker|2003}}. "Due in large part to this fierce competition with free blacks for labor opportunities, the poor and working class ] generally opposed emancipation. When the draft began in the summer of 1863, they launched ] that was suppressed by the military, as well as much smaller protests in other cities." | {{harvnb|Schecter|2007|loc=ch. 6}}. "Many Catholics in the North had volunteered to fight in 1861, sending thousands of soldiers to the front and suffering high casualties, especially at ]; their volunteering fell off after 1862."}}</ref> Copperheads and some War Democrats opposed emancipation, although the latter eventually accepted it as part of the total war needed to save the Union.{{sfn|Baker|2003}} | |||
At first, Lincoln reversed attempts at emancipation by Secretary of War ] and Generals ] and ], to keep the loyalty of the border states and the War Democrats. Lincoln warned the border states that a more radical type of emancipation would happen if his plan of gradual compensated emancipation and ] was rejected.<ref>McPherson, James M., "Lincoln and the Strategy of Unconditional Surrender", in ] (ed.). ''Lincoln, the War President'', pp. 52–54; also in McPherson, James M., ''Abraham Lincoln and the Second American Revolution'', pp. 83–85.</ref> But compensated emancipation occurred only in the District of Columbia, where Congress had the power to enact it. When Lincoln told his cabinet about his proposed emancipation proclamation, which would apply to the states still in rebellion on January 1, 1863, Seward advised Lincoln to wait for a Union military victory before issuing it, as to do otherwise would seem like "our last shriek on the retreat".<ref>], ''Abraham Lincoln: The Man Behind the Myths'', p. 106.</ref> Walter Stahr, however, writes, "There are contemporary sources, however, that suggest others were involved in the decision to delay", and Stahr quotes them.<ref>Stahr, Walter, ''Stanton: Lincoln's War Secretary'', New York: Simon & Schuster, 2017, p. 226.</ref> | |||
{{multiple image | |||
| align = right | |||
| total_width = 500 | |||
| image1 = Contrabands at Headquarters of General Lafayette by Mathew Brady.jpg | |||
| alt1 = | |||
| caption1 = ], who were fugitive slaves, including cooks, laundresses, laborers, teamsters, railroad repair crews, fled to the ], but were not legally freed until the ], which Lincoln signed on January 1, 1863, more than two years before the end of the Civil War. | |||
| image2 = Soldiers White Black 1861.jpg | |||
| alt2 = | |||
| caption2 = In 1863, the ] accepted ]; seen here are black and white teenaged soldiers who volunteered to fight for the Union. | |||
}} | |||
Lincoln laid the groundwork for public support in an open letter published in response to ]'s "The Prayer of Twenty Millions"; the letter stated that Lincoln's goal was to save the Union, and that, if he freed the slaves, it would be as a means to that end.<ref>{{Cite web |date=June 14, 2022 |title=Horace Greeley (1811–1872). "The Prayer of Twenty Millions". Stedman and Hutchinson, eds. 1891. A Library of American Literature: An Anthology in 11 Volumes |url=https://www.bartleby.com/400/prose/1279.html |website=www.bartleby.com}}</ref><ref>Lincoln's letter was published first in the ''Washington National Intelligencer'' on August 23, 1862. ], ''Lincoln and the Power of the Press: The War for Public Opinion'', New York: Simon & Schuster, 2014, p. 401.</ref><ref><!-- Lincoln (1862-08-23) A LETTER FROM PRESIDENT LINCOLN.; Reply to Horace Greeley. Slavery and the Union The Restoration of the Union the Paramount Object.-->{{cite Q|Q116965145}}</ref> He also had a meeting at the White House with five African American representatives on August 14, 1862. Arranging for a reporter to be present, he urged his visitors to agree to the voluntary colonization of black people. Lincoln's motive for both his letter to Greeley and his statement to the black visitors was apparently to make his forthcoming Emancipation Proclamation more palatable to racist ].<ref>White, Jonathan W., ''A House Built by Slaves: African American Visitors to the Lincoln White House'', Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 2022, ch. 3.</ref> A Union victory in the Battle of Antietam on September 17, 1862, provided Lincoln with an opportunity to issue the preliminary Emancipation Proclamation, and the ] added support for the proclamation.<ref>Pulling, Sr. Anne Frances, ''Altoona: Images of America'', Arcadia Publishing, 2001, 10.</ref> | |||
Lincoln issued his preliminary Emancipation Proclamation on September 22, 1862. It stated that slaves in all states in rebellion on January 1, 1863, would be free. He issued his final Emancipation Proclamation on January 1, 1863, keeping his promise. In his letter to Albert G. Hodges, Lincoln explained his belief that "If slavery is not wrong, nothing is wrong .... And yet I have never understood that the Presidency conferred upon me an unrestricted right to act officially upon this judgment and feeling .... I claim not to have controlled events, but confess plainly that events have controlled me."<ref>Lincoln's Letter to A. G. Hodges, April 4, 1864.</ref>{{efn|In late March 1864 Lincoln met with ], Archibald Dixon, and Albert G. Hodges, to discuss recruitment of African American soldiers in the state of Kentucky. In a letter dated April 4, 1864, Lincoln summarized his stance on slavery, at Hodges' request.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Lincoln Lore – Albert G. Hodges |url=https://apps.legislature.ky.gov/LegislativeMoments/moments08RS/49_web_leg_moments.htm |access-date=January 20, 2022 |website=Kentucky Legislature}}</ref>}} | |||
Lincoln's moderate approach succeeded in inducing the border states to remain in the Union and War Democrats to support the Union. The border states, which included Kentucky, Missouri, Maryland, Delaware, and Union-controlled regions around New Orleans, ], and elsewhere, were not covered by the Emancipation Proclamation. Nor was Tennessee, which had come under Union control.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Andrew Johnson and Emancipation in Tennessee – Andrew Johnson National Historic Site |url=https://www.nps.gov/anjo/learn/historyculture/johnson-and-tn-emancipation.htm |website=National Park Service}}</ref> Missouri and Maryland abolished slavery on their own; Kentucky and Delaware did not.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Harper |first=Douglas |year=2003 |title=Slavery in Delaware |url=http://www.slavenorth.com/delaware.htm |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20071016062740/http://slavenorth.com/delaware.htm |archive-date=October 16, 2007 |access-date=October 16, 2007}}</ref> Still, the proclamation did not enjoy universal support. It caused much unrest in what were then considered western states, where racist sentiments led to a great fear of abolition. There was some concern that the proclamation would lead to the secession of western states, and its issuance prompted the stationing of Union troops in Illinois in case of rebellion.{{Sfn|Donald|1995|pp=417–419}} | |||
Since the Emancipation Proclamation was based on the President's war powers, it applied only in territory held by Confederates at the time it was issued. However, the Proclamation became a symbol of the Union's growing commitment to add emancipation to the Union's definition of liberty.<ref>{{Cite magazine |last=McPherson |first=James |author-link=James M. McPherson |date=March 1990 |title=A War that Never Goes Away |url=https://www.americanheritage.com/war-never-goes-away |magazine=American Heritage Magazine |volume=41 |issue=2}}</ref> The Emancipation Proclamation greatly reduced the Confederacy's hope of being recognized or otherwise aided by Britain or France.{{sfn|Asante|Mazama|2004|p=82}} By late 1864, Lincoln was playing a leading role in getting the House of Representatives to vote for the Thirteenth Amendment, which mandated the ending of chattel slavery.{{sfn|Holzer|Gabbard|2007|pp=172–174}} | |||
== Reconstruction == | |||
{{Main|Reconstruction era}} | |||
], Northern teachers traveled into the South to provide education and training for the newly freed population.]] | |||
The war devastated the South and posed serious questions of how it would be reintegrated into the Union. The war destroyed much of the South's wealth, in part because wealth held in enslaved people (at least $1,000 each for a healthy adult prior to the war) was wiped off the books.<ref>{{Cite news |last=Rhodes-Pitts |first=Sharifa |date=2014-10-09 |title=The Worth of Black Men, From Slavery to Ferguson |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2014/10/12/magazine/the-worth-of-black-men-from-slavery-to-ferguson.html |access-date=2023-12-25 |work=The New York Times |issn=0362-4331}}</ref> All accumulated investment in Confederate bonds was forfeited; most banks and railroads were bankrupt. The income per person dropped to less than 40 percent of that of the North, and that lasted into the 20th century. Southern influence in the ], previously considerable, was greatly diminished until the second half of the 20th century.<ref name="Economist2011" /> Reconstruction began during the war, with the Emancipation Proclamation of January 1863, and it continued until 1877.<ref>], ''Historical Dictionary of Reconstruction'' (Greenwood, 1991) covers all the main events and leaders.</ref> It comprised multiple complex methods to resolve the outstanding issues of the aftermath, the most important of which were the three "]" to the Constitution: the ] outlawing slavery (1865), the ] guaranteeing citizenship to former slaves (1868), and the ] prohibiting the denial of voting rights "on account of race, color, or previous condition of servitude" (1870). From the Union perspective, the goals of Reconstruction were to consolidate victory by reuniting the Union, to guarantee a "republican form of government" for the ex-Confederate states, and to permanently end slavery—and prevent semi-slavery status.<ref>Eric Foner's ''A Short History of Reconstruction'' (1990) is a brief survey—an abridgement of his ''Reconstruction: America's Unfinished Revolution, 1863-1877'' (1988).</ref> | |||
President Johnson, who took office in April 1865, took a lenient approach and saw the achievement of the main war goals as realized in 1865, when each ex-rebel state repudiated secession and ratified the Thirteenth Amendment. ] demanded proof that Confederate nationalism was dead and that the slaves were truly free. They ] of ], and the House ] him, although the Senate did not convict him. In 1868 and 1872, the Republican candidate Grant won the presidency. In 1872, the ] argued that the war goals had been achieved and Reconstruction should end. They chose ] to head a presidential ticket in 1872 but were decisively defeated. In 1874, Democrats, primarily Southern, took control of Congress and opposed further reconstruction. The ] closed with a national consensus, except on the part of former slaves, that the war had finally ended.<ref>], ''Reunion and Reaction: The Compromise of 1877 and the End of Reconstruction'' (2nd ed. 1991).</ref> With the withdrawal of federal troops, however, whites retook control of every Southern legislature, and the Jim Crow era of ] and legal segregation was ushered in.<ref>{{Cite book |last1=Williams |first1=Susan Millar |title=Upheaval in Charleston: Earthquake and Murder on the Eve of Jim Crow |last2=Hoffius |first2=Stephen G. |year=2011 |publisher=University of Georgia Press |isbn=978-0-8203-3715-9 |jstor=j.ctt46nc9q}}</ref> | |||
The war had a demonstrable impact on American politics. Many veterans on both sides were elected to political office, including five U.S. Presidents: Ulysses Grant, ], ], ], and ].<ref>{{Cite web |title=Presidents Who Were Civil War Veterans |url=https://www.essentialcivilwarcurriculum.com/presidents-who-were-civil-war-veterans.html |website=Essential Civil War Curriculum}}</ref> | |||
==Memory and historiography== | |||
{{multiple image | |||
| align = right | |||
| total_width = 470 | |||
| image1 = Grand Army of the Republic by Swatjester.jpg | |||
| alt1 = | |||
| caption1 = ] to the ], a Union veteran organization | |||
| image2 = Cherokee Confederates Reunion.gif | |||
| alt2 = | |||
| caption2 = ] reunion in ] in 1903 | |||
| footer = | |||
}} | |||
The war is a central event in American collective memory. There are innumerable statues, commemorations, books, and archival collections. The memory includes the home front, military affairs, the treatment of soldiers, both living and dead, in the war's aftermath, depictions of the war in literature and art, evaluations of heroes and villains, and considerations of the moral and political lessons of the war.<ref name="Joan Waugh and Gary W" /> The last theme includes moral evaluations of ] and slavery, heroism in combat and behind the lines, and issues of democracy and minority rights, as well as the notion of an "]" influencing the world.<ref name="Blight2001" /> | |||
Historians have paid more attention to the causes of the war than to the war itself. Military history has largely developed outside academia, leading to a proliferation of studies by non-scholars who nevertheless are familiar with the primary sources and pay close attention to battles and campaigns and who write for the general public.{{sfn|Woodworth|1996|p=208}}<ref>{{Cite book |last=Cushman |first=Stephen |url={{google books|plainurl=y|id=95l6BAAAQBAJ|page=5}} |title=Belligerent Muse: Five Northern Writers and How They Shaped Our Understanding of the Civil War |publisher=University of North Carolina Press |year=2014 |isbn=978-1-4696-1878-4 |pages=5–6}}</ref> Practically every major figure in the war, both North and South, has had a serious biographical study.{{citation needed|date=September 2024|reason=Previous source "Provides short biographies and historiographical summaries."}} | |||
Even the name used for the conflict has been controversial, with ]. During and immediately after the war, Northern historians often used a term like "War of the Rebellion". Writers in rebel states often referred to the "War for Southern Independence". Some Southerners have described it as the "War of Northern Aggression".<ref><!-- Harvard Guide to American History-->{{cite Q|Q118746838 |pages=385–398}}</ref> | |||
===Lost Cause=== | |||
{{main|Lost Cause of the Confederacy}} | |||
The memory of the war in the white South crystallized in the myth of the "Lost Cause": that the Confederate cause was just and heroic. The myth shaped regional identity and race relations for generations.<ref name="Foster1988" /> ] notes that the Lost Cause was expressly a rationalization, a cover-up to vindicate the name and fame of those in rebellion. Some claims revolve around the insignificance of slavery as a cause; some appeals highlight cultural differences between North and South; the military conflict by Confederate actors is idealized; in any case, secession was said to be lawful.{{sfn|Nolan|2000|pp=14–19}} Nolan argues that the adoption of the Lost Cause perspective facilitated the reunification of the North and the South while excusing the ], sacrificing black American progress to white man's reunification. He also deems the Lost Cause "a caricature of the truth. This caricature wholly misrepresents and distorts the facts of the matter" in every instance.{{sfn|Nolan|2000|pp=28–29}} The Lost Cause myth was formalized by Charles A. Beard and Mary R. Beard, whose ''The Rise of American Civilization'' (1927) spawned "Beardian historiography". The Beards downplayed slavery, abolitionism, and issues of morality. Though this interpretation was abandoned by the Beards in the 1940s, and by historians generally by the 1950s, Beardian themes still echo among Lost Cause writers.<ref>Charles A. Beard and Mary R. Beard, ''The Rise of American Civilization'' (1927), 2:54.</ref><ref>{{Cite book |last=Hofstadter |first=Richard |url={{google books|plainurl=y|id=iLdMzbv2IDQC|page=459}} |title=Progressive Historians |publisher=Knopf Doubleday |year=2012 |isbn=978-0-307-80960-5 |page=304 |orig-year=1968}}</ref>{{additional citation needed|reason=Pinning the "formalization" of the Lost Cause myth on the Beards is a very bold claim; at best, other sources state that their orthogonal economic perspective served as an element for others to synthesize.|date=July 2023}} | |||
'''The United Daughters of the Confederacy''' | |||
] (UDC) is a Southern heritage organization founded in 1894 in Nashville, Tennessee, by a group of women whose stated mission was to honor Confederate veterans and preserve their memory. The organization quickly grew in influence during the late 19th and early 20th centuries and ended up playing a pivotal role in shaping the collective memory of the American Civil War. | |||
The UDC focused on erecting Confederate monuments, funding the education of Confederate descendants, and promoting Confederate history through textbooks and public ceremonies. The group emphasized the valor of Confederate soldiers and the righteousness of the Southern cause, often omitting or downplaying the central role of slavery in the conflict. | |||
The UDC became a major proponent of the ] ideology, a narrative that romanticized the Confederacy as a noble, states'-rights-driven effort rather than a rebellion to preserve slavery. Through speeches, publications, and curriculum influence, the UDC worked to recast the Confederacy in a sympathetic light, framing the Civil War as a struggle against Northern aggression. | |||
This effort contributed to the widespread proliferation of Confederate symbols and a sanitized portrayal of Southern history in public spaces and schools. Critics argue that the UDC's activities perpetuated racist ideologies by fostering nostalgia for the antebellum South and minimizing the horrors of slavery. | |||
In recent years, the role of the UDC and the Lost Cause myth has come under scrutiny amid debates over Confederate monuments and systemic racism in the United States. Many of the monuments and historical markers the UDC sponsored have been reevaluated and removed, sparking ongoing discussions about memory, heritage, and justice. | |||
===Battlefield preservation=== | |||
{{Main|American Civil War battlefield preservation}} | |||
] released ]s for five famous battles, each issued on the 100th anniversary of the respective battle.]] | |||
The first efforts at Civil War battlefield preservation and memorialization came during the war, with the establishment of National Cemeteries at Gettysburg, Mill Springs and Chattanooga. Soldiers began erecting markers on battlefields beginning with the First Battle of Bull Run in 1861. The oldest surviving monument is the ] near ] in ], built in the summer of 1863 by soldiers in Union Col. ] brigade to mark the spot where they buried their dead, following the Battle of Stones River.<ref>{{Cite news |last=West |first=Mike |date=April 27, 2007 |title=Hazen's Monument a rare, historic treasure |url=https://www.murfreesboropost.com/community/hazen-s-monument-a-rare-historic-treasure/article_0498c498-c95b-5569-8d8a-ce0830be17d7.html |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181118185935/https://www.murfreesboropost.com/community/hazen-s-monument-a-rare-historic-treasure/article_0498c498-c95b-5569-8d8a-ce0830be17d7.html |archive-date=November 18, 2018 |access-date=May 30, 2018 |work=Murfreesboro Post}}</ref> | |||
In the 1890s, the government established five Civil War battlefield parks under the jurisdiction of the War Department, beginning with the creation of the ] at ], and the ] in Sharpsburg, Maryland, in 1890. The ] was established in 1894 in ], followed by the ] in 1895, and ] in 1899. In 1933, these five parks and other national monuments were transferred to the National Park Service.<ref>Timothy B. Smith, "The Golden Age of Battlefield Preservation" (2008; The University of Tennessee Press).</ref> Chief among modern efforts to preserve Civil War sites has been the ], with more than 130 battlefields in 24 states.<ref>Bob Zeller, "Fighting the Second Civil War: A History of Battlefield Preservation and the Emergence of the Civil War Trust", (2017: Knox Press)</ref><ref>{{Cite web |title=Saved Land |url=https://www.battlefields.org/preserve/saved-land |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190812162007/https://www.battlefields.org/preserve/saved-land |archive-date=August 12, 2019 |access-date=May 30, 2018 |publisher=American Battlefield Trust}}</ref> The five major battlefield parks operated by the National Park Service had a combined 3 million visitors in 2018, down 70% from 10 million in 1970.<ref>{{Cite news |last=McWhirter |first=Cameron |date=May 25, 2019 |title=Civil War Battlefields Lose Ground as Tourist Draws |url=https://www.wsj.com/articles/civil-war-battlefields-lose-ground-as-tourist-draws-11558776600?mod=searchresults&page=1&pos=2 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191010233320/https://www.wsj.com/articles/civil-war-battlefields-lose-ground-as-tourist-draws-11558776600?mod=searchresults&page=1&pos=2 |archive-date=October 10, 2019 |work=The Wall Street Journal}}</ref> | |||
===Commemoration=== | |||
{{Further|Commemoration of the American Civil War|Commemoration of the American Civil War on postage stamps}} | |||
{{multiple image | |||
| align = right | |||
| total_width = 230 | |||
| direction = vertical | |||
| image1 = Grand Army of the Republic issue 1948 3c.JPG | |||
| alt1 = | |||
| caption1 = Grand Army of the Republic (Union) | |||
| image2 = United Confederate Veterans 1951 3c.JPG | |||
| alt2 = | |||
| caption2 = United Confederate Veterans | |||
| caption_align = center | |||
| footer = | |||
}} | |||
The Civil War has been commemorated in many capacities, ranging from the reenactment of battles to statues and memorial halls erected, films, stamps and coins with Civil War themes being issued, all of which helped to shape public memory. These commemorations occurred in greater numbers on the 100th and 150th anniversaries of the war.<ref name="Gallagher2008" /> | |||
]'s take on the war has been especially influential in shaping public memory, as in such film classics as '']'' (1915), '']'' (1939), and '']'' (2012). ]'s ] television series '']'' (1990) is well-remembered, though criticized for its historical inaccuracy.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Debate over Ken Burns Civil War doc continues over decades |url=https://www.spokesman.com/stories/2017/nov/04/debate-over-ken-burns-civil-war-doc-continues-over/ |access-date=May 4, 2020 |website=The Spokesman-Review}}</ref><ref>{{Cite magazine |last=Merritt |first=Keri Leigh |title=Why We Need a New Civil War Documentary |url=https://www.smithsonianmag.com/history/why-we-need-new-civil-war-documentary-180971996/ |access-date=May 4, 2020 |magazine=Smithsonian Magazine}}</ref> | |||
===Technological significance=== | |||
Technological innovations during the war had a great impact on 19th-century science. The war was an early example of an "]", in which technological might is used to achieve military supremacy.<ref>{{Cite book |last1=Bailey |first1=Thomas |title=The American Pageant |last2=Kennedy |first2=David |year=1987 |page=434}}{{full citation needed|date=August 2024 |reason=Several volumes, several editions, none with this date.}}</ref> New inventions, such as the ] and ], delivered soldiers, supplies and messages at a time when horses had been the fastest way to travel.<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Dome |first=Steam |year=1974 |title=A Civil War Iron Clad Car |journal=Railroad History |publisher=The Railway & Locomotive Historical Society |volume=130 |issue=Spring 1974 |pages=51–53}}</ref><ref>William Rattle Plum, ''The Military Telegraph During the Civil War in the United States'', Christopher H. Sterling (ed.) (New York: Arno Press, 1974) vol. 1 p. 63.</ref> It was also in this war that aerial warfare, in the form of reconnaissance ], was first used.<ref>{{Cite book |last=Buckley |first=John |url={{google books|plainurl=y|id=YSSPAgAAQBAJ|page=6}} |title=Air Power in the Age of Total War |publisher=Routledge |year=2006 |isbn=978-1-135-36275-1 |pages=6, 24}}</ref> It saw the first action involving steam-powered ] in naval warfare history.<ref>Sondhaus, ''Naval Warfare 1815–1914'' p. 77.</ref> ] such as the Henry rifle, Spencer rifle, ], ] and others, first appeared during the Civil War; they were a revolutionary invention that would soon replace ] and ] firearms. The war saw the first appearances of rapid-firing weapons and ]s such as the ] and ].{{sfn|Keegan|2009|p=75}} | |||
==In works of culture and art== | |||
]'' by ] portrays, from left to right, Sherman, Grant, Lincoln, and ] discussing plans for the last weeks of the Civil War aboard the steamer '']'' in March 1865. It currently hangs in the ] dining room.|alt=Painting of four men conferring in a ship's cabin, entitled "The Peacemakers".]] | |||
The Civil War is one of the most studied events in American history, and the collection of cultural works around it is enormous.<ref>{{Cite book |last=Hutchison |first=Coleman |url={{google books|plainurl=y|id=ovYTCwAAQBAJ|page=278}} |title=A History of American Civil War Literature |publisher=Cambridge University Press |year=2015 |isbn=978-1-316-43241-9}}</ref> This section gives an abbreviated overview of the most notable works. | |||
===Literature=== | |||
* '']'' and '']'' (1865) by ], famous eulogies to Lincoln | |||
* '']'' (1866) poetry by ] | |||
* '']'' (1881) by ] | |||
* '']'' (1885) by ] | |||
* '']'' (1887) by ] | |||
* '']'' (1890) by ] | |||
* '']'' (1895) by ] | |||
* '']'' (1917) by ] | |||
* '']'' (1936) by ] | |||
* '']'' (1982) by ] | |||
* '']'' (2005) by ], fictionalized account of ] | |||
===Film=== | |||
{{colbegin|colwidth=25em}} | |||
* '']'' (1915, US) | |||
* '']'' (1926, US) | |||
* '']'' (1934, US) | |||
* '']'' (1939, US) | |||
* '']'' (1951, US) | |||
* '']'' (1959, US) | |||
* '']'' (1965, US) | |||
* '']'' (1966, Italy-Spain-FRG) | |||
* '']'' (1971, US) | |||
* '']'' (1976, US) | |||
* '']'' (miniseries; 1985–1994, US) | |||
* '']'' (1989, US) | |||
* '']'' (1990, US) | |||
* '']'' (1993, US) | |||
* '']'' (1993, US) | |||
* '']'' (2003, US) | |||
* '']'' (2003, US) | |||
* '']'' (2012, US) | |||
* '']'' (2016, US) | |||
{{colend}} | |||
===Music=== | |||
{{See also|Music of the American Civil War}} | |||
{{colbegin|colwidth=28em}} | |||
* "]" | |||
* "]" | |||
* "]" | |||
* "]" | |||
* "]" | |||
* "]" | |||
* "]" | |||
* "]" | |||
{{colend}} | |||
===Video games=== | |||
{{colbegin}} | |||
* '']'' (1989, FR) | |||
* '']'' (1997, US) | |||
* '']'' (1999, US) | |||
* '']'' (2006, US) | |||
* '']'' (2006, US) | |||
* '']'' (2006, US) | |||
* '']'' (2007, US/FR) | |||
* '']'' (2008, US) | |||
* '']'' (2009, US) | |||
* '']'' (2009, US) | |||
* '']'' (2011, US) | |||
* '']'' (2013, US/FR) | |||
* '']'' (2014, UKR) | |||
* '']'' (2016, UKR) | |||
* '']'' (TBD, US) | |||
{{colend}} | |||
==See also== | ==See also== | ||
{{stack|{{portal|American Civil War}}}} | |||
*] | * ] | ||
*] | * ] | ||
*] | *] | ||
*] | *] | ||
*] | |||
*] | |||
*] | * ] | ||
*] | *] | ||
*] | *] | ||
*] | **] | ||
*] | **] | ||
*] | * ] | ||
*] | * ] | ||
*] | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
==Notes== | ==Notes== | ||
{{reflist|30em|group=lower-alpha}} | |||
<div class="references-small"> | |||
<references/> | |||
</div> | |||
==References== | ==References== | ||
{{reflist|24em|refs= | |||
===Overviews=== | |||
<div class="references-small"> | |||
* Beringer, Richard E., Archer Jones, and Herman Hattaway, ''Why the South Lost the Civil War'' (1986) influential analysis of factors; ''The Elements of Confederate Defeat: Nationalism, War Aims, and Religion'' (1988), abridged version, more readily available | |||
* ], ''The Civil War'', American Heritage, 1960, ISBN 0-8281-0305-4, illustrated narrative | |||
* Donald, David ed. ''Why the North Won the Civil War'' (1977) (ISBN 0-02-031660-7), short interpretive essays | |||
* Donald, David ''et al.'' ''The Civil War and Reconstruction'' (latest edition 2001); 700 page survey | |||
* Eicher, David J., ''The Longest Night: A Military History of the Civil War'', (2001), ISBN 0-684-84944-5. | |||
* Fellman, Michael ''et al.'' ''This Terrible War: The Civil War and its Aftermath'' (2003), 400 page survey | |||
* ]. '']'' (3 volumes), (1974), ISBN 0-394-74913-8. Highly detailed narrative covering all fronts | |||
* ] ''Battle Cry of Freedom: The Civil War Era'' (1988), 900 page survey; Pulitzer prize | |||
* ]. '']'', an 8-volume set (1947-1971). the most detailed political, economic and military narrative; by Pulitzer Prize winner | |||
** 1. Fruits of Manifest Destiny, 1847-1852; 2. A House Dividing, 1852-1857; 3. Douglas, Buchanan, and Party Chaos, 1857-1859; 4. Prologue to Civil War, 1859-1861; 5. The Improvised War, 1861-1862; 6. War Becomes Revolution, 1862-1863; 7. The Organized War, 1863-1864; 8. The Organized War to Victory, 1864-1865 | |||
* {{cite book | |||
| title = Abraham Lincoln: a History | |||
| year = 1890 | |||
| first = John | |||
| last = Hay | |||
| authorlink = John Hay | |||
| coauthors= ] | |||
}} | |||
** {{cite web | |||
| url = http://www.gutenberg.org/etext/6812 | |||
| title = Volume 1 | |||
}} to 1856; strong coverage of national politics | |||
** {{cite web | |||
| url = http://www.gutenberg.org/etext/11708 | |||
| title = Volume 2 | |||
}} covers 1856 to early 1861; very detailed coverage of national politics; part of 10 volume "life and times" written by Lincoln's top aides | |||
<ref name="Presidency.ucsb.edu">{{Cite web |title=Abraham Lincoln: Proclamation 83 – Increasing the Size of the Army and Navy |url=http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/index.php?pid=70123 |access-date=November 3, 2011 |publisher=Presidency.ucsb.edu}}</ref> | |||
* Rhodes, James Ford. , Pulitzer Prize; a short version of his 5-volume history | |||
* Ward, Geoffrey C. ''The Civil War'' (Alfred Knopf, 1990), based on PBS series by ]; visual emphasis | |||
* Weigley, Russell Frank. ''A Great Civil War: A Military and Political History, 1861-1865'' (2004); primarily military | |||
</div> | |||
<ref name="Nofi2001">{{Cite web |last=Nofi |first=Al |author-link=Albert Nofi |date=June 13, 2001 |title=Statistics on the War's Costs |url=http://www.cwc.lsu.edu/other/stats/warcost.htm |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070711050249/http://www.cwc.lsu.edu/other/stats/warcost.htm |archive-date=July 11, 2007 |access-date=October 14, 2007 |publisher=Louisiana State University}}</ref> | |||
===Reference books and bibliographies=== | |||
<div class="references-small"> | |||
* Blair, Jayne E. ''The Essential Civil War: A Handbook to the Battles, Armies, Navies And Commanders'' (2006) | |||
* Carter, Alice E. and Richard Jensen. ''The Civil War on the Web: A Guide to the Very Best Sites-'' 2nd ed. (2003) | |||
* Current, Richard N., et al eds. ''Encyclopedia of the Confederacy'' (1993) (4 Volume set; also 1 vol abridged version) (ISBN 0-13-275991-8) | |||
* Faust, Patricia L. (ed.) ''Historical Times Illustrated Encyclopedia of the Civil War'' (1986) (ISBN 0-06-181261-7) 2000 short entries | |||
* Fuller, J.F.C., General, B.A. ''Military History of the Western World''. (1957) Brief article on the war. | |||
* Esposito, Vincent J. , these maps are online | |||
* Heidler, David Stephen, ed. ''Encyclopedia of the American Civil War: A Political, Social, and Military History'' (2002), 1600 entries in 2700 pages in 5 vol or 1-vol editions | |||
* Resch, John P. ''et al.'', ''Americans at War: Society, Culture and the Homefront vol 2: 1816-1900'' (2005) | |||
* Tulloch, Hugh. ''The Debate on the American Civil War Era'' (1999), historiography | |||
* Wagner, Margaret E. Gary W. Gallagher, and Paul Finkelman, eds. ''The Library of Congress Civil War Desk Reference'' (2002) | |||
* Woodworth, Steven E. ed. ''American Civil War: A Handbook of Literature and Research'' (1996) (ISBN 0-313-29019-9), 750 pages of historiography and bibliography | |||
</div> | |||
<ref name="Fehrenbacher2004">{{Cite journal |last=Fehrenbacher |first=Don |year=2004 |title=Lincoln's Wartime Leadership: The First Hundred Days |url=http://quod.lib.umich.edu/cgi/t/text/text-idx?c=jala;view=text;rgn=main;idno=2629860.0009.103 |journal=Journal of the Abraham Lincoln Association |publisher=University of Illinois |volume=9 |issue=1 |access-date=October 16, 2007}}</ref> | |||
===Biographies=== | |||
<div class="references-small"> | |||
* Warner, Ezra J., ''Generals in Blue: Lives of the Union Commanders'', Louisiana State University Press, 1964, ISBN 0-8071-0822-7 | |||
* Warner, Ezra J., ''Generals in Gray: Lives of the Confederate Commanders'', Louisiana State University Press, 1959, ISBN 0-8071-0823-5 | |||
</div> | |||
<ref name="Blight2001">] (2001) ''Race and Reunion: The Civil War in American Memory''.</ref> | |||
===Soldiers=== | |||
<div class="references-small"> | |||
* Frank, Joseph Allan and George A. Reaves. ''Seeing the Elephant: Raw Recruits at the Battle of Shiloh'' (1989) | |||
* Hess, Earl J. ''The Union Soldier in Battle: Enduring the Ordeal of Combat'' (1997) | |||
* McPherson, James. ''What They Fought For, 1861-1865'' (Louisiana State University Press, 1994) | |||
* McPherson, James. ''For Cause and Comrades: Why Men Fought in the Civil War '' (1998) | |||
* Wiley, Bell Irvin. ''The Life of Johnny Reb: The Common Soldier of the Confederacy'' (1962) (ISBN 0-8071-0475-2) | |||
* Wiley, Bell Irvin. ''Life of Billy Yank: The Common Soldier of the Union'' (1952) (ISBN 0-8071-0476-0) | |||
</div> | |||
===Primary sources=== | |||
<div class="references-small"> | |||
* U.S. War Dept., , U.S. Government Printing Office, 1880–1901. 70 very large volumes of letters and reports written by both armies. Online at | |||
* , a remarkable collection of reports on each state, Congress, and military activities, and many other topics; annual issues from 1861 to 1901 in major libraries | |||
* Commager, Henry Steele (ed.). ''The Blue and the Gray. The Story of the Civil War as Told by Participants.'' (1950), excerpts from primary sources | |||
* Eisenschiml, Otto; Ralph Newman; eds. ''The American Iliad: The Epic Story of the Civil War as Narrated by Eyewitnesses and Contemporaries'' (1947), excerpts from primary sources | |||
* Hesseltine, William B. ed.; ''The Tragic Conflict: The Civil War and Reconstruction'' (1962), excerpts from primary sources | |||
*Woodword, C. Vann, Ed., ''Mary Chesnut's Civil War'', Yale University Press, 1981, ISBN 0-300-02979-9 Pulitzer Prize | |||
</div> | |||
<ref name="Oates">], ''The Approaching Fury: Voices of the Storm 1820–1861'', p. 125.</ref> | |||
===Novels about the war=== | |||
<div class="references-small"> | |||
*], '']'' | |||
*], '']'' | |||
*], '']'' | |||
*], '']'' | |||
*], ''The Titans'' ISBN 0-515-04827-5 | |||
*], '']'' | |||
*], '']'' | |||
*], ] | |||
*], '']'' | |||
*], '']'' | |||
*], ] | |||
*], ''Flight to Canada'' | |||
*], ''Freedom: A Novel of Abraham Lincoln and the Civil War'' (1987) ISBN 0-385-15903-X | |||
*], '']''; '']'' | |||
*], '']'' | |||
*], ''By Valour and Arms'' | |||
*], ''Fort Pillow'' | |||
*], '']'' (''Nord Contre Sud'') | |||
*], ''Lincoln'' | |||
</div> | |||
<ref name="Manufactures1860">{{Cite web |title=Manufactures of the United States in 1860; Compiled from the original returns of the Eight Census |url=http://www2.census.gov/prod2/decennial/documents/1860c-01.pdf |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170817153653/https://www2.census.gov/prod2/decennial/documents/1860c-01.pdf |archive-date=August 17, 2017}}</ref> | |||
===Poems about the war=== | |||
<div class="references-small"> | |||
*], ''John Brown's Body'' | |||
*], , currently a work-in-progress | |||
</div> | |||
<ref name="Carter2006">Carter, Susan B. (ed.). ''The Historical Statistics of the United States: Millennial Edition'' (5 vols), 2006.</ref> | |||
===Songs about the war=== | |||
<div class="references-small"> | |||
*The final three songs of ], an album from the American heavy metal band ], form a trilogy entitled "Gettysburg (1863)." They each represent one day in the Battle of Gettysburg. | |||
*The song "]" by country songwriter ] and popularised by ] is about the American Civil War. | |||
</div> | |||
<ref name="Snell2011">Snell, Mark A. (2011), ''West Virginia and the Civil War'', History Press, Charleston, SC, p. 28.</ref> | |||
==Cinema and television== | |||
===Films about the war=== | |||
<div class="references-small"> | |||
*'']'' (1915) | |||
*'']'' (1939) | |||
*'']'' (1956) | |||
*'']'' (1966) | |||
*'']'' (1982) | |||
*'']'' (1989) | |||
*'']'' (1993) | |||
*'']'' (1999) | |||
*'']'' (2003) | |||
*'']'' (2003) | |||
</div> | |||
<ref name="Boritt">] (ed.). ''Why the Confederacy Lost''.</ref> | |||
===Documentaries about the war=== | |||
<div class="references-small"> | |||
*'']'', directed by ] | |||
*'']'', directed by ] | |||
</div> | |||
* '', featuring Civil War expert Wynn Ward, produced by Tom Pieper and J. L. Palermo | |||
<ref name="Foster1988">Gaines M. Foster (1988), ''Ghosts of the Confederacy: Defeat, the Lost Cause and the Emergence of the New South, 1865–1913''.</ref> | |||
{{American Civil War Menu}} | |||
<!--ref name="confederate36">Mark A. Weitz (2005), ''More Damning than Slaughter: Desertion in the Confederate Army''.</ref--> | |||
==External links== | |||
* | |||
* | |||
* | |||
* | |||
* | |||
*, from U Tennessee | |||
* | |||
* at the ] | |||
* | |||
* at the ] | |||
* | |||
* | |||
* | |||
* | |||
* | |||
*, a ] documentary by ] | |||
* Individual state's contributions to the Civil War: , , , , , | |||
*State declarations of the causes of secession: , , , | |||
* | |||
* — A project to map out sites related to the Civil War in Maryland, Virginia, and North Carolina | |||
* | |||
* | |||
* | |||
* A digital collection of first person narrative accounts from Wisconsin soldiers and citizens, documenting their wartime experiences. | |||
* | |||
* | |||
* | |||
* | |||
* | |||
* | |||
* | |||
* | |||
</div> | |||
<ref name="Joan Waugh and Gary W">] and ], eds. (2009), ''Wars within a War: Controversy and Conflict over the American Civil War'' (University of North Carolina Press).</ref> | |||
{{UShistoryFooter}} | |||
<ref name="Curry1964">Curry, Richard Orr (1964), ''A House Divided: A Study of the Statehood Politics and the Copperhead Movement in West Virginia'', University of Pittsburgh Press, map on p. 49.</ref> | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
<!--<ref name="counterpoint">C. Vann Woodward (1971), ''American Counterpoint: Slavery and Racism in the North-South Dialogue'', p. 281.</ref>--> | |||
<!--ref name="desertion">Ella Lonn, ''Desertion During the Civil War'' (1928), pp. 205–06.</ref--> | |||
{{Link FA|he}} | |||
{{Link FA|pt}} | |||
<ref name="Fantina2006">Robert Fantina, ''Desertion and the American Soldier, 1776–2006'' (2006), p. 74.</ref> | |||
] | |||
] | |||
<ref name="Economist2011">{{Cite news |date=March 31, 2011 |title=Finally Passing |url=http://www.economist.com/node/18486035?story_id=18486035 |url-access=registration |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110420045142/http://www.economist.com/node/18486035?story_id=18486035 |archive-date=April 20, 2011 |newspaper=] |pages=23–25}}</ref> | |||
] | |||
] | |||
<ref name="Gallagher2008">Gary Gallagher, ''Causes Won, Lost, and Forgotten: How Hollywood and Popular Art Shape What We Know about the Civil War'' (Univ of North Carolina Press, 2008).</ref> | |||
] | |||
] | |||
<ref name="Lincoln1861">Abraham Lincoln, First Inaugural Address, Monday, March 4, 1861.</ref> | |||
] | |||
] | |||
<ref name="Murdock1971">Eugene Murdock, ''One Million Men: the Civil War draft in the North'' (1971).</ref> | |||
] | |||
] | |||
<ref name="NationalGeographic2003">{{Cite web |last=Yancey Hall |date=July 1, 2003 |title=U.S. Civil War Prison Camps Claimed Thousands |url=http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2003/07/0701_030701_civilwarprisons.html |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20030707041320/http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2003/07/0701_030701_civilwarprisons.html |archive-date=2003-07-07 |website=National Geographic News}}</ref> | |||
] | |||
] | |||
<ref name="Nevins1959 pp. 119–129">Nevins, ''The War for the Union'' (1959), 1:119–129.</ref> | |||
] | |||
] | |||
<ref name="Nevins1959 pp. 129–136">Nevins, ''The War for the Union'' (1959), 1:129–136.</ref> | |||
] | |||
] | |||
<ref name="Nevins1959 pp. 263–264">], ''War for the Union 1862–1863'', pp. 263–264.</ref> | |||
] | |||
] | |||
<ref name="Hacker2011">{{Cite news |last=Hacker |first=J. David |date=September 20, 2011 |title=Recounting the Dead |url=http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/09/20/recounting-the-dead/ |url-access=subscription |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110925090025/http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/09/20/recounting-the-dead/ |archive-date=September 25, 2011 |access-date=September 22, 2011 |work=The New York Times |agency=]}}</ref> | |||
] | |||
] | |||
<ref name="Fox2008">Richard Wightman Fox (2008). "". '']''.</ref> | |||
] | |||
] | |||
<ref name="Catton">], ''Terrible Swift Sword'', pp. 263–296.</ref> | |||
] | |||
] | |||
<ref name="Buchanan1860">{{Cite web |last=Buchanan |first=James |date=December 3, 1860 |title=Fourth Annual Message |url=http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/index.php?pid=29501 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20081220011320/http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/index.php?pid=29501 |archive-date=December 20, 2008 |access-date=November 28, 2012 |via=The American Presidency Project}}</ref> | |||
] | |||
] | |||
<ref name="PresidencyProject1865a">{{Cite web |last=Lincoln |first=Abraham |date=April 11, 1865 |others=Online by Gerhard Peters and John T. Woolley |title=Proclamation 128—Claiming Equality of Rights with All Maritime Nations |url=https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/node/202896 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20221116151716/https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/proclamation-128-claiming-equality-rights-with-all-maritime-nations |archive-date=November 16, 2022 |access-date=July 25, 2022 |website=The American Presidency Project |publisher=University of California, Santa Barbara}} The proclamation did not use the term "belligerent rights".</ref> | |||
] | |||
] | |||
<ref name="PresidencyProject1865b">{{Cite web |last=Johnson |first=Andrew |date=May 10, 1865 |others=Online by Gerhard Peters and John T. Woolley |title=Proclamation 132—Ordering the Arrest of Insurgent Cruisers |url=https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/node/203414 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20221116151715/https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/proclamation-132-ordering-the-arrest-insurgent-cruisers |archive-date=November 16, 2022 |access-date=July 25, 2022 |website=The American Presidency Project |publisher=University of California, Santa Barbara}} The proclamation did not use the term "belligerent rights".</ref> | |||
] | |||
] | |||
<!-- The following references appeared in the reflist but were not used in the prior text. Please return them to the reflist once they have been correctly cited in the main article. | |||
] | |||
<ref name="United States Volunteers – Indian Troops">{{Cite web |date=January 28, 2008 |title=United States Volunteers – Indian Troops |url=http://www.civilwararchive.com/Unreghst/unindtr.htm |access-date=August 10, 2008 |website=civilwararchive.com}}</ref> | |||
] | |||
<ref name="Forrest McDonald 2002">Forrest McDonald (2002) ''States' Rights and the Union: Imperium in Imperio, 1776–1876''.</ref> | |||
] | |||
<ref name="Lincoln's Call for Troops">{{Cite web |title=Lincoln's Call for Troops |url=http://www.civilwarhome.com/lincolntroops.htm}}</ref> | |||
] | |||
<ref name="Lincoln's Call to Arms">{{Cite web |last=Bornstein |first=David |date=April 14, 2011 |title=Lincoln's Call to Arms |url=http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/04/14/lincoln-declares-war/ |access-date=August 11, 2011 |website=]}}</ref> | |||
] | |||
<ref name="progressive">Kenneth M. Stampp, ''The Imperiled Union: Essays on the Background of the Civil War'' (1981), p. 198; Richard Hofstadter, ''The Progressive Historians: Turner, Beard, Parrington'' (1969).</ref> | |||
] | |||
<ref name="republican18">"Republican Platform of 1860", in Kirk H. Porter, and Donald Bruce Johnson, eds. ''National Party Platforms, 1840–1956'', (University of Illinois Press, 1956). p. 32.</ref> | |||
] | |||
<ref name="sectionalism">Charles S. Sydnor, ''The Development of Southern Sectionalism 1819–1848'' (1948).</ref> | |||
] | |||
<ref name="sectionalism17">Robert Royal Russel, ''Economic Aspects of Southern Sectionalism, 1840–1861'' (1973).</ref> | |||
] | |||
<ref name="southern">Bertram Wyatt-Brown, ''The Shaping of Southern Culture: Honor, Grace, and War, 1760s–1880s'' (2000).</ref> | |||
] | |||
<ref name="taussig">Frank Taussig, ''The Tariff History of the United States'' (1931), pp. 115–61</ref> | |||
] | |||
<ref name="nationalism">], ''The Growth of Southern Nationalism, 1848–1861'' (1953).</ref> | |||
] | |||
<ref name="nationalism19">Susan-Mary Grant, ''North over South: Northern Nationalism and American Identity in the Antebellum Era'' (2000); Melinda Lawson, ''Patriot Fires: Forging a New American Nationalism in the Civil War North'' (2005).</ref> | |||
] | |||
<ref name="infantry">Mark Johnson, ''That Body of Brave Men: the U.S. regular infantry and the Civil War in the West'' (2003), p. 575.</ref> | |||
] | |||
<ref name="proclamation">], "'Doing Less' and 'Doing More': The President and the Proclamation – Legally, Militarily and Politically", in ], ], and Frank J. Williams, ''The Emancipation Proclamation: Three Views'' (2006), pp. 74–75.</ref> | |||
] | |||
<ref name="teachinghistory">Hamner, Christopher. "." . Retrieved July 11, 2011.</ref> | |||
<ref name="abolitionists">David Brion Davis, ''Inhuman Bondage'' (2006). p. 197, 409; Stanley Harrold, ''The Abolitionists and the South, 1831–1861'' (1995) p. 62; Jane H. and William H. Pease, "Confrontation and Abolition in the 1850s" ''Journal of American History'' (1972) 58(4): 923–37.</ref> | |||
<ref name="civil-war">, The Civil War Home Page.</ref> | |||
<ref name="abraham">Abraham Lincoln, Speech at New Haven, Conn., March 6, 1860.</ref> | |||
<ref name="butterfield">Fox Butterfield; ''All God's Children'', p. 17.</ref> | |||
<ref name="trager">''The People's Chronology'', 1994 by James Trager.</ref> | |||
<ref name="secessionists">William W. Freehling, ''The Road to Disunion: Secessionists Triumphant, 1854–1861'', pp. 9–24.</ref> | |||
<ref name="Freehling">William W. Freehling, ''The Road to Disunion: Secessionists Triumphant, 1854-1861'', pp. 269–462, p. 274. (The quote about slave states "encircled by fire" is from the ''New Orleans Delta'', May 13, 1860.)</ref> | |||
<ref name="representatives">Most of her slave owners are "decent, honorable people, themselves victims" of that institution. Much of her description was based on personal observation, and the descriptions of Southerners; she herself calls them and Legree representatives of different types of masters.;Gerson, ''Harriet Beecher Stowe'', p. 68; Stowe, ''Key to Uncle Tom's Cabin'' (1953), p. 39.</ref> | |||
<ref name="american">Quoted in ], ''The Fiery Trial: Abraham Lincoln and American Slavery'' (2010), p. 100.</ref> | |||
<ref name="Voices from the Gathering Storm: The Coming of the American Civil War">{{Cite book |last=Linden |first=Glenn M. |url={{google books|plainurl=y|id=F20ZsA5ZeeEC|page=184}} |title=Voices from the Gathering Storm: The Coming of the American Civil War |publisher=Rowman & Littlefield |year=2001 |isbn=978-0-8420-2999-5 |location=United States |page=236 |quote=Prevent, as far as possible, any of our friends from demoralizing themselves, and our cause, by entertaining propositions for compromise of any sort, on slavery extension. There is no possible compromise upon it, but which puts us under again, and leaves all our work to do over again. Whether it be a Mo. Line, or Eli Thayer's Pop. Sov. It is all the same. Let either be done, & immediately filibustering and extending slavery recommences. On that point hold firm, as with a chain of steel. – Abraham Lincoln to Elihu B. Washburne, December 13, 1860}}</ref> | |||
<ref name="AvalonProject">Winkler, E. . ''Journal of the Secession Convention of Texas''. Retrieved October 16, 2007.</ref> | |||
<ref name="william">William C. Davis, ''Look Away'', pp. 130–40.</ref> | |||
<ref name="townsend">John Townsend, The Doom of Slavery in the Union, its Safety out of it, October 29, 1860.</ref> | |||
<ref name="secessionist">Lipset looked at the secessionist vote in each Southern state in 1860–61. In each state he divided the counties into high, medium or low proportion of slaves. He found that in the 181 high-slavery counties, the vote was 72% for secession. In the 205 low-slavery counties. the vote was only 37% for secession. (And in the 153 middle counties, the vote for secession was in the middle at 60%). Seymour Martin Lipset, ''Political Man: The Social Bases of Politics'' (Doubleday, 1960), p. 349.</ref> | |||
<ref name="schlesinger">Schlesinger ''Age of Jackson'', p. 190.</ref> | |||
<ref name="sandford">Roger B. Taney: Dred Scott v. Sandford (1857).</ref> | |||
<ref name="reconstruction">James G. Randall and David Donald, '' Civil War and Reconstruction'' (1961), p. 68.</ref> | |||
<ref name="republican">Eric Foner. ''Free Soil, Free Labor, Free Men: The Ideology of the Republican Party Before the Civil War'' (1970), p. 9.</ref> | |||
<ref name="randall">Randall and Donald, p. 67.</ref> | |||
<ref name="Texas12">A Declaration of the Causes which Impel the State of Texas to Secede from the Federal Union, February 2, 1861 – </ref> | |||
<ref name="photography">Kathleen Collins, "The Scourged Back", History of Photography 9 (January 1985): 43–45.</ref> | |||
<ref name="secession">Maury Klein, ''Days of Defiance: Sumter, Secession, and the Coming of the Civil War'' (1999).</ref> | |||
<ref name="profession">Allan Peskin, ''Winfield Scott and the profession of arms'' (2003), pp. 249–52.</ref> | |||
<ref name="international">Dean B. Mahin, ''One war at a time: the international dimensions of the American Civil War''(2000) ch 6</ref> | |||
<ref name="MissFacts">{{Cite web |year=1998 |title=Civil War in Missouri Facts |url=http://home.usmo.com/~momollus/MOFACTS.HTM |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20071016074650/http://home.usmo.com/~momollus/MOFACTS.HTM |archive-date=October 16, 2007 |access-date=October 16, 2007}}</ref> | |||
--> | |||
}} | |||
===Bibliography=== | |||
{{Main|Bibliography of the American Civil War|Bibliography of early American naval history#American Civil War|label2=Bibliography of American Civil War naval history}} | |||
====Sources referenced==== | |||
{{refbegin|30em}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last=Anderson |first=Bern |url={{google books|plainurl=y|id=41-3swEACAAJ}} |title=By Sea and By River: The naval history of the Civil War |publisher=Hachette |year=1989 |isbn=978-0-306-80367-3}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last1=Asante |first1=Molefi Kete |url={{google books|plainurl=y|id=RcBkDlJ7qjwC|page=82}} |title=Encyclopedia of Black Studies |last2=Mazama |first2=Ama |publisher=SAGE |year=2004 |isbn=978-0-7619-2762-4 |location=Thousand Oaks, CA}} | |||
* {{Cite magazine |last=Baker |first=Kevin |date=February–March 2003 |title=Violent City |url=http://americanheritage.com/articles/magazine/ah/2003/1/2003_1_17.shtml |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20101019000238/http://americanheritage.com/articles/magazine/ah/2003/1/2003_1_17.shtml |archive-date=October 19, 2010 |access-date=July 29, 2010 |magazine=American Heritage Magazine |volume=54 |issue=1}} | |||
* {{Cite journal |last=Blair |first=William A. |year=2015 |title=Finding the Ending of America's Civil War |journal=The American Historical Review |publisher=Oxford University Press |volume=120 |issue=5 |pages=1753–1766 |doi=10.1093/ahr/120.5.1753 |issn=0002-8762 |jstor=43697075}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last=Bradley |first=Mark L. |url=https://history.army.mil/html/books/075/75-17/cmhPub_75-17.pdf |title=The Civil War Ends |year=2015 |publisher=US Army, Center of Military History |access-date=26 May 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220526083556/https://history.army.mil/html/books/075/75-17/cmhPub_75-17.pdf |archive-date=2022-05-26 |url-status=live}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last=Canney |first=Donald L. |url={{google books|plainurl=y|id=o_fB_SD5QhIC}} |title=Lincoln's Navy: The Ships, Men and Organization, 1861–65 |publisher=Naval Institute Press |year=1998 |isbn=978-1-55750-519-4 |location=Annapolis, MD}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last1=Chambers |first1=John W. |url={{google books|plainurl=y|id=_Rzy_yNMKbcC}} |title=The Oxford Companion to American Military History |last2=Anderson |first2=Fred |publisher=Oxford University Press |year=1999 |isbn=978-0-19-507198-6}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last=Catton |first=Bruce |author-link=Bruce Catton |title=The Centennial History of the Civil War |volume=3: Never Call Retreat |year=1965 |publisher=Doubleday |location=Garden City, NY}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last=Coulter |first=E. Merton |url={{google books|plainurl=y|id=Z2_ZM0dWVrsC|page=308}} |title=The Confederate States of America, 1861–1865: A History of the South |publisher=Louisiana State University Press |year=1950 |isbn=978-0-8071-0007-3}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last=Davis |first=Jefferson |author-link=Jefferson Davis |title=The Rise And Fall Of The Confederate Government |date=1881 |publisher=D. Appleton & Co. |volume=II |location=New York |oclc=1249017603}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last=Dinçaslan |first=M. Bahadırhan |title=Amerikan İç Savaşı El Kitabı |publisher=Altınordu Yayınları Press |year=2022 |isbn=978-6-257-61066-7 |location=Ankara |language=tr |trans-title=American Civil War Handbook}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last=Donald |first=David Herbert |author-link=David Herbert Donald |title=Lincoln |publisher=Simon & Schuster |year=1995 |isbn=978-0-684-80846-8 |location=New York}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last=Doyle |first=Don H. |title=The Cause of All Nations: An International History of the American Civil War |year=2015 |publisher=Basic |location=New York}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last=Draper |first=John William |author-link=John William Draper |url=https://archive.org/details/in.ernet.dli.2015.278844 |title=History of the American Civil War |year=1870 |publisher=Harper & Brothers |volume=3 |location=New York |oclc=830251756 |access-date=July 28, 2022}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last=Dunkerly |first=Robert M. |title=To the Bitter End: Appomattox, Bennett Place and the Surrenders of the Confederacy |publisher=Savas Beatie |year=2015 |isbn=978-1-61121-252-5 |location=El Dorado Hills, CA}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last=Dyer |first=Frederick H. |author-link=Frederick H. Dyer |url=https://archive.org/details/08697590.3359.emory.edu |title=A compendium of the War of the Rebellion |year=1908 |publisher=Dyer |location=Des Moines, IA |oclc=8697590}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last=Foner |first=Eric |author-link=Eric Foner |url={{google books|plainurl=y|id=rQSYk-LWTxcC}} |title=Politics and Ideology in the Age of the Civil War |publisher=Oxford University Press |year=1981 |isbn=978-0-19-502926-0 |access-date=April 20, 2012}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last=Foner |first=Eric |url={{google books|plainurl=y|id=earytjxi6pEC}} |title=The Fiery Trial: Abraham Lincoln and American Slavery |publisher=W. W. Norton |year=2010 |isbn=978-0-393-34066-2 |location=New York}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last=Foote |first=Shelby |title=The Civil War: A Narrative |volume=1: Fort Sumter to Perryville |title-link=The Civil War: A Narrative |publisher=Vintage |year=1974 |isbn=978-0-394-74623-4 |location=New York}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last1=Frank |first1=Joseph Allan |url={{google books|plainurl=y|id=J_GlcVOb374C|page=170}} |title=Seeing the Elephant: Raw Recruits at the Battle of Shiloh |last2=Reaves |first2=George A. |publisher=University of Illinois Press |year=2003 |isbn=978-0-252-07126-3 |location=Urbana}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last=Fuller |first=Howard J. |title=Clad in Iron: The American Civil War and the Challenge of British Naval Power |publisher=Naval Institute Press |year=2008 |isbn=978-1-59114-297-3 |location=Annapolis, MD}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last1=Gallagher |first1=Gary W. |title=The American Civil War: This Mighty Scourge of War |last2=Engle |first2=Stephen D. |last3=Krick |first3=Robert K. |last4=Glatthaar |first4=Joseph T. |publisher=Osprey |year=2003 |isbn=978-1-84176-736-9 |location=New York}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last=Grant |first=Ulysses S. |author-link=Ulysses S. Grant |url=https://archive.org/details/in.ernet.dli.2015.160835 |title=Personal Memoirs of U.S. Grant |year=1886 |publisher=Charles L. Webster & Co. |volume=2 |location=New York |oclc=255136538}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last=Greeley |first=Horace |author-link=Horace Greeley |url=https://archive.org/details/americanconflic00greegoog |title=The American Conflict: A History of the Great Rebellion in the United States, 1860–'65 |date=1866 |publisher=O. D. Case & Co. |volume=II |location=Hartford |oclc=936872302}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last1=Heidler |first1=David S. |title=Encyclopedia of the American Civil War: A Political, Social, and Military History |last2=Heidler |first2=Jeanne T. |last3=Coles |first3=David J. |publisher=ABC-CLIO |year=2002 |isbn=978-1-57607-382-7 |location=Santa Barbara, CA}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last=Herring |first=George C. |title=From Colony to Superpower: U.S. Foreign Relations since 1776 |publisher=Oxford University Press |year=2011 |isbn=978-0-19-976553-9}} | |||
* {{Cite book |url={{google books|plainurl=y|id=xLbkXsn6xHAC|page=174}} |title=Lincoln and Freedom: Slavery, Emancipation, and the Thirteenth Amendment |publisher=Southern Illinois University Press |year=2007 |isbn=978-0-8093-2764-5 |editor-last=Holzer |editor-first=Harold |editor-link=Harold Holzer |location=Carbondale |editor-last2=Gabbard |editor-first2=Sara Vaughn}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last=Hunt |first=Jeffrey William |title=The Last Battle of the Civil War: Palmetto Ranch |year=2015 |publisher=University of Texas Press |isbn=978-0-292-73461-6 |location=Austin}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last=Johnson |first=Timothy D. |title=Winfield Scott: The Quest for Military Glory |publisher=University Press of Kansas |year=1998 |isbn=978-0-7006-0914-7 |location=Lawrence}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last=Jones |first=Howard |url={{google books|plainurl=y|id=TFyLOUrdGFwC|page=225}} |title=Crucible of Power: A History of American Foreign Relations to 1913 |publisher=Rowman & Littlefield |year=2002 |isbn=978-0-8420-2916-2 |location=Wilmington, DE}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last=Jones |first=Terry L. |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=ET6CDfczq9gC&pg=PA203 |title=Historical Dictionary of the Civil War |publisher=Scarecrow Press |year=2011 |isbn=978-0-8108-7953-9}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last=Keegan |first=John |url=https://archive.org/details/americancivilwar00keeg |title=The American Civil War: A Military History |publisher=Alfred A. Knopf |year=2009 |isbn=978-0-307-26343-8 |location=New York}} | |||
* {{Cite journal |last=Keller |first=Christian B. |date=January 2009 |title=Flying Dutchmen and Drunken Irishmen: The Myths and Realities of Ethnic Civil War Soldiers |journal=Journal of Military History |volume=73 |issue=1 |pages=117–145 |doi=10.1353/jmh.0.0194}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last=Leonard |first=Elizabeth D. |url=https://archive.org/details/alldaringofsoldi00leon/page/165/mode/1up |title=All the Daring of the Soldier: Women of the Civil War Armies |date=1999 |publisher=W.W. Norton & Co. |isbn=0-3930-4712-1 |url-access=registration}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last=Long |first=E. B. |title=The Civil War Day by Day: An Almanac, 1861–1865 |year=1971 |publisher=Doubleday |location=Garden City, NY |oclc=68283123}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last=McPherson |first=James M. |title=Battle Cry of Freedom: The Civil War Era |title-link=Battle Cry of Freedom: The Civil War Era |publisher=Oxford University Press |year=1988 |isbn=978-0-19-503863-7}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last=McPherson |first=James M. |url={{google books|plainurl=y|id=1qhEHVki8tEC}} |title=For Cause and Comrades: Why Men Fought in the Civil War |publisher=Oxford University Press |year=1997 |isbn=978-0-19-974105-2 |location=Oxford; New York}} | |||
* {{Cite journal |last=Mendelsohn |first=Adam |year=2012 |title=Samuel and Saul Isaac: International Jewish Arms Dealers, Blockade Runners, and Civil War Profiteers |url=https://www.jewishsouth.org/sites/default/files/sjh_v._15_2012_mendelsohn.pdf |url-status=live |journal=Journal of the Southern Jewish Historical Society |publisher=Southern Jewish Historical Society |volume=15 |pages=41–79 |archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/archive/20221009/https://www.jewishsouth.org/sites/default/files/sjh_v._15_2012_mendelsohn.pdf |archive-date=2022-10-09}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last=Murray |first=Robert B. |url=https://archive.org/details/northcarolinahis1967nort |title=The End of the Rebellion |date=Autumn 1967 |publisher=The North Carolina Historical Review}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last1=Murray |first1=Williamson |url={{google books|plainurl=y|id=ld8NPYqqUnMC|page=235}} |title=The Making of Strategy: Rulers, States, and War |last2=Bernstein |first2=Alvin |last3=Knox |first3=MacGregor |publisher=Cambridge University Press |year=1996 |isbn=978-0-521-56627-8}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last=Neely |first=Mark E. |author-link=Mark E. Neely Jr. |url={{google books|plainurl=y|id=zPV2AAAAMAAJ}} |title=Confederate Bastille: Jefferson Davis and Civil Liberties |publisher=Marquette University Press |year=1993 |isbn=978-0-87462-325-3 |location=Milwaukee, WI}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last=Neff |first=Stephen C. |title=Justice in Blue and Gray: A Legal History of the Civil War |publisher=Harvard University Press |year=2010 |isbn=978-1-61121-252-5 |location=Cambridge, MA}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last=Nelson |first=James L. |url={{google books|plainurl=y|id=d8XD-j--EVsC|page=149}} |title=Reign of Iron: The Story of the First Battling Ironclads, the Monitor and the Merrimack |publisher=HarperCollins |year=2005 |isbn=978-0-06-052404-3 |location=New York}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last=Nolan |first=Alan T. |title=The Myth of the Lost Cause and Civil War History |year=2000 |editor-last=Gallagher |editor-first=Gary W. |editor-last2=Nolan |editor-first2=Alan T.}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last1=Potter |first1=David M. |url=https://archive.org/details/impendingcrisis00pott |title=The Impending Crisis, 1848–1861 |last2=Fehrenbacher |first2=Don E. |publisher=Harper & Row |year=1976 |isbn=978-0-06-013403-7 |location=New York |url-access=registration}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last=Richter |first=William L. |url={{google books|plainurl=y|id=obFt-MmS6ygC|page=49}} |title=The A to Z of the Civil War and Reconstruction |publisher=Scarecrow |year=2009 |isbn=978-0-8108-6336-1 |location=Lanham}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last=Robertson |first=James I. Jr. |author-link=James I. Robertson Jr. |url=https://www.gutenberg.org/files/58549/58549-h/58549-h.htm#c10 |title=The Civil War |publisher=] |year=1963 |location=Washington, DC |oclc=299955768}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last=Schecter |first=Barnet |title=The Devil's Own Work: The Civil War Draft Riots and the Fight to Reconstruct America |year=2007}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last=Stephenson |first=Nathaniel W. |url=https://archive.org/details/dayconfederacya01stepgoog/page/n220/mode/2up?ref=ol&view=theater |title=The Day of the Confederacy''. Vol. 30, ''A Chronicle of the Embattled South |year=1919 |publisher=New Haven: Yale University Press; Toronto: Glasgow, Brook & Co.; London: Oxford University Press |series=The Chronicles Of America Series}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last=Stern |first=Phillip Van Doren |author-link=Philip Van Doren Stern |url={{google books|plainurl=y|id=GDeqAAAAIAAJ}} |title=The Confederate Navy |publisher=Doubleday |year=1962}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last1=Symonds |first1=Craig L. |author-link1=Craig Symonds |url={{google books|plainurl=y|id=q_HIcc8n3K4C}} |title=The Naval Institute Historical Atlas of the U.S. Navy |last2=Clipson |first2=William J. |publisher=Naval Institute Press |year=2001 |isbn=978-1-55750-984-0}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last=Trudeau |first=Noah Andre |author-link=Noah Andre Trudeau |title=Out of the Storm: The End of the Civil War, April–June 1865 |publisher=Little, Brown & Co. |year=1994 |isbn=978-0-316-85328-6 |location=Boston}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last1=Tucker |first1=Spencer C. |url={{google books|plainurl=y|id=q4mwAtj2r3UC|page=462}} |title=The Civil War Naval Encyclopedia |last2=Pierpaoli |first2=Paul G. |last3=White |first3=William E. |publisher=ABC-CLIO |year=2010 |isbn=978-1-59884-338-5 |location=Santa Barbara, CA}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last=Vinovskis |first=Maris |url={{google books|plainurl=y|id=9D4TAwc93VoC}} |title=Toward a Social History of the American Civil War: Exploratory Essays |publisher=Cambridge University Press |year=1990 |isbn=978-0-521-39559-5}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last=Ward |first=Geoffrey R. |title=The Civil War: An Illustrated History |publisher=Alfred A. Knopf |year=1990 |isbn=978-0-394-56285-8 |location=New York}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last=Weigley |first=Frank Russell |url=https://archive.org/details/greatcivilwarmil00russ |title=A Great Civil War: A Military and Political History, 1861–1865 |publisher=Indiana University Press |year=2004 |isbn=978-0-253-33738-2 |location=Bloomington}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last=Winters |first=John D. |url={{google books|plainurl=y|id=PjicJWUQhPYC&pg=PR3}} |title=The Civil War in Louisiana |publisher=] |year=1963 |isbn=978-0-8071-0834-5 |location=Baton Rouge}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last=Wise |first=Stephen R. |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=0i-KzgEACAAJ |title=Lifeline of the Confederacy: Blockade Running During the Civil War |publisher=University of South Carolina Press |year=1991 |isbn=978-0-8724-97993}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last=Wittke |first=Carl |title=Refugees of Revolution |publisher=University of Pennsylvania Press |year=1952 |isbn=978-1-5128-0874-2 |location=Philadelphia}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last=Woodworth |first=Steven E. |url={{google books|plainurl=y|id=rb3ANWoZt1YC}} |title=The American Civil War: A Handbook of Literature and Research |publisher=Greenwood |year=1996 |isbn=978-0-313-29019-0 |location=Wesport, CT}} | |||
{{refend}} | |||
===Web sources=== | |||
{{refbegin}} | |||
* {{Cite web |last=Downs |first=James |date=April 13, 2012 |title=Colorblindness in the demographic death toll of the Civil War |url=https://blog.oup.com/2012/04/black-white-demographic-death-toll-civil-war/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180119065611/https://blog.oup.com/2012/04/black-white-demographic-death-toll-civil-war/ |archive-date=January 19, 2018 |website=Oxford University Press blog}} | |||
{{refend}} | |||
===Further reading=== | |||
{{refbegin|30em}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last=Ahlstrom |first=Sydney E. |url={{google books|plainurl=y|id=5kFF6a1viGcC}} |title=A Religious History of the American People |publisher=Yale University Press |year=1972 |isbn=978-0-300-01762-5 |location=New Haven, CT}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last1=Beringer |first1=Richard E. |title=Why the South Lost the Civil War |last2=Hattaway |first2=Herman |last3=Jones |first3=Archer |last4=Still |first4=William N. Jr. |publisher=University of Georgia Press |year=1986 |isbn=9780820308159 |location=Athens}} Influential analysis of factors; an abridged version is {{Cite book |last=Beringer |first=Richard E. |title=The Elements of Confederate Defeat: Nationalism, War Aims, and Religion |publisher=University of Georgia Press |year=1988 |isbn=9780820310770 |location=Athens}} | |||
* {{Cite journal |last=Bestor |first=Arthur |year=1964 |title=The American Civil War as a Constitutional Crisis |journal=] |volume=69 |issue=2 |pages=327–352 |doi=10.2307/1844986 |jstor=1844986}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last=Gallagher |first=Gary W. |title=The Union War |publisher=Harvard University Press |year=2011 |isbn=978-0-674-06608-3 |location=Cambridge, MA}} | |||
* {{Cite book |title=New Perspectives on the Union War |publisher=Fordham University Press |year=2019 |isbn=9780823284566 |editor-last=Gallagher |editor-first=Gary W. |editor-link=Gary W. Gallagher |location=New York |doi=10.2307/j.ctvh1dnpx |jstor=j.ctvh1dnpx |editor-last2=Varon |editor-first2=Elizabeth R. |editor-link2=Elizabeth R. Varon}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last=Gara |first=Larry |title=Essays on the Civil War and Reconstruction |publisher=Holt, Rinehart and Winston |year=1964 |isbn=9780030796401 |editor-last=Unger |editor-first=Irwin |editor-link=Irwin Unger |location=New York |publication-date=1970 |chapter=The Fugitive Slave Law: A Double Paradox}} (originally published in ''Civil War History'', Vol. 10, No. 3, September 1964, pp. 229–240). | |||
* {{Cite journal |last=Hofstadter |first=Richard |author-link=Richard Hofstadter |year=1938 |title=The Tariff Issue on the Eve of the Civil War |journal=] |volume=44 |issue=1 |pages=50–55 |doi=10.2307/1840850 |jstor=1840850}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last=Johannsen |first=Robert W. |title=Stephen A. Douglas |publisher=Oxford University Press |year=1973 |isbn=978-0-19-501620-8 |location=New York}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last=Krannawitter |first=Thomas L. |url=https://archive.org/details/vindicatinglinco00kran |title=Vindicating Lincoln: defending the politics of our greatest president |publisher=Rowman & Littlefield |year=2008 |isbn=978-0-7425-5972-1 |location=Lanham, MD}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last=McPherson |first=James M. |author-link=James M. McPherson |url=https://archive.org/details/isbn_9780195313666 |title=This Mighty Scourge: Perspectives on the Civil War |publisher=Oxford University Press |year=2007 |isbn=978-0-19-539242-5 |url-access=registration}} | |||
* ]. '']'', an 8-volume set (1947–1971). the most detailed political, economic and military narrative; by Pulitzer Prize-winner. | |||
*# ''Ordeal of the Union: Fruits of Manifest Destiny, 1847–1852''; ; | |||
*# ''Ordeal of the Union: A House Dividing, 1852–1857''; | |||
*# ''The Emergence of Lincoln: Douglas, Buchanan, and Party Chaos, 1857–1859''; | |||
*# ''The Emergence of Lincoln: Prologue to Civil War, 1859–1861''; | |||
*# ''War for the Union: The Improvised War, 1861–1862''; | |||
*# ''War for the Union: War Becomes Revolution, 1862–1863''; ; | |||
*# ''War for the Union: The Organized War, 1863–1864''; | |||
*# ''War for the Union: The Organized War to Victory, 1864–1865'' | |||
* {{Cite book |last=Olsen |first=Christopher J. |url={{google books|plainurl=y|id=RrBb2ThDuCkC|page=237}} |title=Political Culture and Secession in Mississippi: Masculinity, Honor, and the Antiparty Tradition, 1830–1860 |publisher=Oxford University Press |year=2002 |isbn=978-0-19-516097-0}} | |||
* {{Cite journal |last=Potter |first=David M. |year=1962 |title=The Historian's Use of Nationalism and Vice Versa |journal=] |volume=67 |issue=4 |pages=924–950 |doi=10.2307/1845246 |jstor=1845246}} | |||
* {{Cite book |title=Leaders of the American Civil War: A Biographical and Historiographical Dictionary |date=1998 |editor-last=Ritter |editor-first=Charles F. |editor-last2=Wakelyn |editor-first2=Jon L.}} Provides short biographies and historiographical summaries. | |||
* {{Cite journal |last=Russell |first=Robert R. |year=1966 |title=Constitutional Doctrines with Regard to Slavery in Territories |journal=] |volume=32 |issue=4 |pages=466–486 |doi=10.2307/2204926 |jstor=2204926}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last=Sheehan-Dean |first=Aaron |url=https://www.wiley.com/en-us/A+Companion+to+the+U+S+Civil+War%2C+2+Volume+Set-p-9781444351316 |title=A Companion to the U.S. Civil War |date=April 2014 |publisher=Wiley-Blackwell |isbn=978-1-444-35131-6 |series=2-Volume Set |location=New York}} 1232 pp; 64 Topical chapters by scholars and experts; emphasis on historiography. | |||
* {{Cite book |last=Stampp |first=Kenneth M. |author-link=Kenneth M. Stampp |url=https://archive.org/details/americain185700kenn |title=America in 1857: A Nation on the Brink |publisher=Oxford University Press |year=1990 |isbn=978-0-19-503902-3 |url-access=registration}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last1=Thornton |first1=Mark |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=Tv_ZLOx8_ywC |title=Tariffs, Blockades, and Inflation: The Economics of the Civil War |last2=Ekelund |first2=Robert Burton |publisher=SR |year=2004 |isbn=978-0-8420-2961-2 |location=Wilmington, DE}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last=Varon |first=Elizabeth R. |author-link=Elizabeth R. Varon |title=Disunion!: The Coming of the American Civil War, 1789–1859 |publisher=University of North Carolina Press |year=2008 |isbn=978-0-8078-3232-5 |location=Chapel Hill}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last=Weeks |first=William E. |url={{google books|plainurl=y|id=e3thBAAAQBAJ}} |title=The New Cambridge History of American Foreign Relations |publisher=Cambridge University Press |year=2013 |isbn=978-1-107-00590-7 |volume=1 |location=Cambridge; New York}} | |||
{{refend}} | |||
===Soldier life: North and South=== | |||
{{refbegin}} | |||
* ] ''The War for the Common Soldier: How Men Thought, Fought, and Survived in Civil War Armies'' (UNC Press Books, 2018) | |||
* Frank, Joseph Allan, and George A. Reaves. ''Seeing the Elephant: Raw Recruits at the Battle of Shiloh'' (Greenwood, 1989) | |||
* Hesseltine, William Best (ed.). ''Civil War Prisons''. (Kent State University Press, 1972) | |||
* Linderman, Gerald. ''Embattled Courage: The Experience of Combat in the American Civil War'' (Free Press, 1987) | |||
* Livermore, Thomas Leonard. ''Numbers and Losses in the Civil War in America, 1861–65'' (Houghton, Mifflin, 1900) | |||
* McPherson, James M. ''For Cause and Comrades: Why Men Fought in the Civil War'' (Oxford University Press, 1997) | |||
* ]. ''What This Cruel War Was Over''. (Vintage, 2007) Uses letters, diaries, and regimental newspapers to probe the world view of soldiers—black and white, Yankee and Rebel. | |||
* Mitchell, Reid. ''Civil War Soldiers: Their Expectations and Their Experiences'' (Penguin, 1997) | |||
* Robertson, James I. ''Soldiers Blue and Gray'' (University of South Carolina Press, 1988) | |||
* Shively, Kathryn J. ''Nature's Civil War: Common Soldiers and the Environment in 1862 Virginia'' (UNC Press Books, 2013) | |||
* ] ''The Life of Johnny Reb'' and ''The Life of Billy Yank'' (1943 and 1951; reprint 1994), two standard scholarly histories combined; 960pp. | |||
{{refend}} | |||
==External links== | |||
{{sister project links|auto=1|wikt=y |commons=y |n=y |q=y |s=y |b=y |voy=y |v=y}} | |||
* | |||
* at the ] | |||
* from the at the Library of Congress | |||
* {{Internet Archive short film|id=gov.archives.arc.54756|name=A House Divided (1960)}} | |||
* , ] | |||
* , battlefields.org | |||
* | |||
* from the ] | |||
* – A non-profit land preservation and educational organization with two divisions, the Civil War Trust and the Revolutionary War Trust, dedicated to preserving America's battlefields through land acquisitions. | |||
* – This collection contains digital images of political cartoons, personal papers, pamphlets, maps, paintings and photographs from the Civil War Era held in Special Collections at Gettysburg College. | |||
* – site with 7,000 pages, including the complete run of Harper's Weekly newspapers from the Civil War | |||
{{American Civil War}} | |||
{{Foreign countries in the American Civil War}} | |||
{{American conflicts}} | |||
{{Authority control}} | |||
]<!--please leave the empty space as standard--> | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] |
Latest revision as of 02:38, 21 December 2024
1861–1865 conflict in the United States
American Civil War | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Clockwise from top:
| |||||||||
| |||||||||
Belligerents | |||||||||
United States | Confederate States | ||||||||
Commanders and leaders | |||||||||
Strength | |||||||||
|
| ||||||||
Casualties and losses | |||||||||
|
| ||||||||
|
Theaters of the American Civil War | |
---|---|
This article is part of a series on the | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
History of the United States | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Timeline and periods
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Topics | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Groups | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Places
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The American Civil War (April 12, 1861 – May 26, 1865; also known by other names) was a civil war in the United States between the Union ("the North") and the Confederacy ("the South"), which was formed in 1861 by states that had seceded from the Union. The central conflict leading to war was a dispute over whether slavery should be permitted to expand into the western territories, leading to more slave states, or be prohibited from doing so, which many believed would place slavery on a course of ultimate extinction.
Decades of controversy over slavery were brought to a head when Abraham Lincoln, who opposed slavery's expansion, won the 1860 presidential election. Seven Southern slave states responded to Lincoln's victory by seceding from the United States and forming the Confederacy. The Confederacy seized U.S. forts and other federal assets within their borders. The war began on April 12, 1861, when the Confederacy bombarded Fort Sumter in South Carolina. A wave of enthusiasm for war swept over the North and South, as military recruitment soared. Four more Southern states seceded after the war began and, led by its president, Jefferson Davis, the Confederacy asserted control over a third of the U.S. population in eleven states. Four years of intense combat, mostly in the South, ensued.
During 1861–1862 in the Western theater, the Union made permanent gains—though in the Eastern theater the conflict was inconclusive. The abolition of slavery became a Union war goal on January 1, 1863, when Lincoln issued the Emancipation Proclamation, which declared all slaves in rebel states to be free, applying to more than 3.5 million of the 4 million enslaved people in the country. To the west, the Union first destroyed the Confederacy's river navy by the summer of 1862, then much of its western armies, and seized New Orleans. The successful 1863 Union siege of Vicksburg split the Confederacy in two at the Mississippi River, while Confederate General Robert E. Lee's incursion north failed at the Battle of Gettysburg. Western successes led to General Ulysses S. Grant's command of all Union armies in 1864. Inflicting an ever-tightening naval blockade of Confederate ports, the Union marshaled resources and manpower to attack the Confederacy from all directions. This led to the fall of Atlanta in 1864 to Union General William Tecumseh Sherman, followed by his March to the Sea. The last significant battles raged around the ten-month Siege of Petersburg, gateway to the Confederate capital of Richmond. The Confederates abandoned Richmond, and on April 9, 1865, Lee surrendered to Grant following the Battle of Appomattox Court House, setting in motion the end of the war. Lincoln lived to see this victory but was shot by an assassin on April 14, dying the next day.
By the end of the war, much of the South's infrastructure was destroyed. The Confederacy collapsed, slavery was abolished, and four million enslaved black people were freed. The war-torn nation then entered the Reconstruction era in an attempt to rebuild the country, bring the former Confederate states back into the United States, and grant civil rights to freed slaves. The war is one of the most extensively studied and written about episodes in the history of the United States. It remains the subject of cultural and historiographical debate. Of continuing interest is the myth of the Lost Cause of the Confederacy. The war was among the first to use industrial warfare. Railroads, the electrical telegraph, steamships, the ironclad warship, and mass-produced weapons were widely used. The war left an estimated 698,000 soldiers dead, along with an undetermined number of civilian casualties, making the Civil War the deadliest military conflict in American history. The technology and brutality of the Civil War foreshadowed the coming World Wars.
Origins
Main article: Origins of the American Civil War Further information: Timeline of events leading to the American Civil War, Slave states and free states, Slavery in the United States, and Abolitionism in the United StatesThe origins of the war were rooted in the desire of the Southern states to preserve the institution of slavery. Historians in the 21st century overwhelmingly agree on the centrality of slavery in the conflict. They disagree on which aspects (ideological, economic, political, or social) were most important, and on the North's reasons for refusing to allow the Southern states to secede. The pseudo-historical Lost Cause ideology denies that slavery was the principal cause of the secession, a view disproven by historical evidence, notably some of the seceding states' own secession documents. After leaving the Union, Mississippi issued a declaration stating, "Our position is thoroughly identified with the institution of slavery—the greatest material interest of the world."
The principal political battle leading to Southern secession was over whether slavery would expand into the Western territories destined to become states. Initially Congress had admitted new states into the Union in pairs, one slave and one free. This had kept a sectional balance in the Senate but not in the House of Representatives, as free states outstripped slave states in numbers of eligible voters. Thus, at mid-19th century, the free-versus-slave status of the new territories was a critical issue, both for the North, where anti-slavery sentiment had grown, and for the South, where the fear of slavery's abolition had grown. Another factor leading to secession and the formation of the Confederacy was the development of white Southern nationalism in the preceding decades. The primary reason for the North to reject secession was to preserve the Union, a cause based on American nationalism.
Background factors in the run up to the Civil War were partisan politics, abolitionism, nullification versus secession, Southern and Northern nationalism, expansionism, economics, and modernization in the antebellum period. As a panel of historians emphasized in 2011, "while slavery and its various and multifaceted discontents were the primary cause of disunion, it was disunion itself that sparked the war."
Lincoln's election
Main article: 1860 United States presidential electionAbraham Lincoln won the 1860 presidential election. Southern leaders feared Lincoln would stop slavery's expansion and put it on a course toward extinction. His victory triggered declarations of secession by seven slave states of the Deep South, all of whose riverfront or coastal economies were based on cotton that was cultivated by slave labor. Lincoln was not inaugurated until March 4, 1861, giving the South time to prepare for war during the winter of 1860–1861. Nationalists in the North and "Unionists" in the South refused to accept the declarations of secession. No foreign government ever recognized the Confederacy. The U.S. government, under President James Buchanan, refused to relinquish its forts that were in territory claimed by the Confederacy. According to Lincoln, the American people had shown they had been successful in establishing and administering a republic, but a third challenge faced the nation: maintaining a republic based on the people's vote, in the face of an attempt to destroy it.
Outbreak of the war
Secession crisis
Main article: Ordinance of SecessionLincoln's election provoked South Carolina's legislature to call a state convention to consider secession. South Carolina had done more than any other state to advance the notion that a state had the right to nullify federal laws and even secede. On December 20, 1860, the convention unanimously voted to secede and adopted a secession declaration. It argued for states' rights for slave owners but complained about states' rights in the North in the form of resistance to the federal Fugitive Slave Act, claiming that Northern states were not fulfilling their obligations to assist in the return of fugitive slaves. The "cotton states" of Mississippi, Florida, Alabama, Georgia, Louisiana, and Texas followed suit, seceding in January and February 1861.
Among the ordinances of secession, those of Texas, Alabama, and Virginia mentioned the plight of the "slaveholding states" at the hands of Northern abolitionists. The rest made no mention of slavery but were brief announcements by the legislatures of the dissolution of ties to the Union. However, at least four—South Carolina, Mississippi, Georgia, and Texas—provided detailed reasons for their secession, all blaming the movement to abolish slavery and its influence over the North. Southern states believed that the Fugitive Slave Clause made slaveholding a constitutional right. These states agreed to form a new federal government, the Confederate States of America, on February 4, 1861. They took control of federal forts and other properties within their boundaries, with little resistance from outgoing President James Buchanan, whose term ended on March 4. Buchanan said the Dred Scott decision was proof the Southern states had no reason to secede and that the Union "was intended to be perpetual". He added, however, that "The power by force of arms to compel a State to remain in the Union" was not among the "enumerated powers granted to Congress". A quarter of the US army—the Texas garrison—was surrendered in February to state forces by its general, David E. Twiggs, who joined the Confederacy.
As Southerners resigned their Senate and House seats, Republicans could pass projects that had been blocked. These included the Morrill Tariff, land grant colleges, a Homestead Act, a transcontinental railroad, the National Bank Act, authorization of United States Notes by the Legal Tender Act of 1862, and the end of slavery in the District of Columbia. The Revenue Act of 1861 introduced income tax to help finance the war.
In December 1860, the Crittenden Compromise was proposed to re-establish the Missouri Compromise line, by constitutionally banning slavery in territories to the north of it, while permitting it to the south. The Compromise would likely have prevented secession, but Lincoln and the Republicans rejected it. Lincoln stated that any compromise that would extend slavery would bring down the Union. A February peace conference met in Washington, proposing a solution similar the Compromise; it was rejected by Congress. The Republicans proposed the Corwin Amendment, an alternative, not to interfere with slavery where it existed, but the South regarded it as insufficient. The remaining eight slave states rejected pleas to join the Confederacy, following a no-vote in Virginia's First Secessionist Convention on April 4.
On March 4, Lincoln was sworn in as president. In his inaugural address, he argued that the Constitution was a more perfect union than the earlier Articles of Confederation and Perpetual Union, was a binding contract, and called secession "legally void". He did not intend to invade Southern states, nor to end slavery where it existed, but he said he would use force to maintain possession of federal property, including forts, arsenals, mints, and customhouses that had been seized. The government would not try to recover post offices, and if resisted, mail delivery would end at state lines. Where conditions did not allow peaceful enforcement of federal law, US marshals and judges would be withdrawn. No mention was made of bullion lost from mints. He stated that it would be US policy "to collect the duties and imposts"; "there will be no invasion, no using of force against or among the people anywhere" that would justify an armed revolution. His speech closed with a plea for restoration of the bonds of union, famously calling on "the mystic chords of memory" binding the two regions.
The Davis government of the new Confederacy sent delegates to Washington to negotiate a peace treaty. Lincoln rejected negotiations, because he claimed that the Confederacy was not a legitimate government and to make a treaty with it would recognize it as such. Lincoln instead attempted to negotiate directly with the governors of seceded states, whose administrations he continued to recognize.
Complicating Lincoln's attempts to defuse the crisis was Secretary of State William H. Seward, who had been Lincoln's rival for the Republican nomination. Embittered by his defeat, Seward agreed to support Lincoln's candidacy only after he was guaranteed the executive office then considered the second most powerful. In the early stages of Lincoln's presidency Seward held little regard for him, due to his perceived inexperience. Seward viewed himself as the de facto head of government, the "prime minister" behind the throne. Seward attempted to engage in unauthorized and indirect negotiations that failed. Lincoln was determined to hold all remaining Union-occupied forts in the Confederacy: Fort Monroe in Virginia, Fort Pickens, Fort Jefferson, and Fort Taylor in Florida, and Fort Sumter in South Carolina.
Battle of Fort Sumter
Main article: Battle of Fort Sumter See also: President Lincoln's 75,000 volunteersThe American Civil War began on April 12, 1861, when Confederate forces opened fire on the Union-held Fort Sumter. Fort Sumter is located in the harbor of Charleston, South Carolina. Its status had been contentious for months. Outgoing President Buchanan had dithered in reinforcing its garrison, commanded by Major Robert Anderson. Anderson took matters into his own hands and on December 26, 1860, under the cover of darkness, sailed the garrison from the poorly placed Fort Moultrie to the stalwart island Fort Sumter. Anderson's actions catapulted him to hero status in the North. An attempt to resupply the fort on January 9, 1861, failed and nearly started the war then, but an informal truce held. On March 5, Lincoln was informed the fort was low on supplies.
Fort Sumter proved a key challenge to Lincoln's administration. Back-channel dealing by Seward with the Confederates undermined Lincoln's decision-making; Seward wanted to pull out. But a firm hand by Lincoln tamed Seward, who was a staunch Lincoln ally. Lincoln decided holding the fort, which would require reinforcing it, was the only workable option. On April 6, Lincoln informed the Governor of South Carolina that a ship with food but no ammunition would attempt to supply the fort. Historian McPherson describes this win-win approach as "the first sign of the mastery that would mark Lincoln's presidency"; the Union would win if it could resupply and hold the fort, and the South would be the aggressor if it opened fire on an unarmed ship supplying starving men. An April 9 Confederate cabinet meeting resulted in Davis ordering General P. G. T. Beauregard to take the fort before supplies reached it.
At 4:30 am on April 12, Confederate forces fired the first of 4,000 shells at the fort; it fell the next day. The loss of Fort Sumter lit a patriotic fire under the North. On April 15, Lincoln called on the states to field 75,000 volunteer troops for 90 days; impassioned Union states met the quotas quickly. On May 3, 1861, Lincoln called for an additional 42,000 volunteers for three years. Shortly after this, Virginia, Tennessee, Arkansas, and North Carolina seceded and joined the Confederacy. To reward Virginia, the Confederate capital was moved to Richmond.
Attitude of the border states
Main article: Border states (American Civil War)Maryland, Delaware, Missouri, West Virginia and Kentucky were slave states whose people had divided loyalties to Northern and Southern businesses and family members. Some men enlisted in the Union Army and others in the Confederate Army. West Virginia separated from Virginia and was admitted to the Union on June 20, 1863, though half its counties were secessionist.
Maryland's territory surrounded Washington, D.C., and could cut it off from the North. It had anti-Lincoln officials who tolerated anti-army rioting in Baltimore and the burning of bridges, both aimed at hindering the passage of troops to the South. Maryland's legislature voted overwhelmingly to stay in the Union, but rejected hostilities with its southern neighbors, voting to close Maryland's rail lines to prevent their use for war. Lincoln responded by establishing martial law and unilaterally suspending habeas corpus in Maryland, along with sending in militia units. Lincoln took control of Maryland and the District of Columbia by seizing prominent figures, including arresting one-third of the members of the Maryland General Assembly on the day it reconvened. All were held without trial, with Lincoln ignoring a ruling on June 1, 1861, by Supreme Court Chief Justice Roger Taney, not speaking for the Court, that only Congress could suspend habeas corpus (Ex parte Merryman). Federal troops imprisoned a Baltimore newspaper editor, Frank Key Howard, after he criticized Lincoln in an editorial for ignoring Taney's ruling.
In Missouri, an elected convention on secession voted to remain in the Union. When pro-Confederate Governor Claiborne Fox Jackson called out the state militia, it was attacked by federal forces under General Nathaniel Lyon, who chased the governor and rest of the State Guard to the southwestern corner of Missouri (see Missouri secession). Early in the war the Confederacy controlled southern Missouri through the Confederate government of Missouri but was driven out after 1862. In the resulting vacuum, the convention on secession reconvened and took power as the Unionist provisional government of Missouri.
Kentucky did not secede, it declared itself neutral. When Confederate forces entered in September 1861, neutrality ended and the state reaffirmed its Union status while maintaining slavery. During an invasion by Confederate forces in 1861, Confederate sympathizers and delegates from 68 Kentucky counties organized the secession Russellville Convention, formed the shadow Confederate Government of Kentucky, inaugurated a governor, and Kentucky was admitted into the Confederacy on December 10, 1861. Its jurisdiction extended only as far as Confederate battle lines in the Commonwealth, which at its greatest extent was over half the state, and it went into exile after October 1862.
After Virginia's secession, a Unionist government in Wheeling asked 48 counties to vote on an ordinance to create a new state in October 1861. A voter turnout of 34% approved the statehood bill (96% approving). Twenty-four secessionist counties were included in the new state, and the ensuing guerrilla war engaged about 40,000 federal troops for much of the war. Congress admitted West Virginia to the Union on June 20, 1863. West Virginians provided about 20,000 soldiers to each side in the war. A Unionist secession attempt occurred in East Tennessee, but was suppressed by the Confederacy, which arrested over 3,000 men suspected of loyalty to the Union; they were held without trial.
War
See also: List of American Civil War battles and Military leadership in the American Civil WarThe Civil War was marked by intense and frequent battles. Over four years, 237 named battles were fought, along with many smaller actions, often characterized by their bitter intensity and high casualties. Historian John Keegan described it as "one of the most ferocious wars ever fought," where, in many cases, the only target was the enemy's soldiers.
Mobilization
See also: Economic history of the American Civil WarAs the Confederate states organized, the U.S. Army numbered 16,000, while Northern governors began mobilizing their militias. The Confederate Congress authorized up to 100,000 troops in February. By May, Jefferson Davis was pushing for another 100,000 soldiers for one year or the duration, and the U.S. Congress responded in kind.
In the first year of the war, both sides had more volunteers than they could effectively train and equip. After the initial enthusiasm faded, relying on young men who came of age each year was not enough. Both sides enacted draft laws (conscription) to encourage or force volunteering, though relatively few were drafted. The Confederacy passed a draft law in April 1862 for men aged 18–35, with exemptions for overseers, government officials, and clergymen. The U.S. Congress followed in July, authorizing a militia draft within states that could not meet their quota with volunteers. European immigrants joined the Union Army in large numbers, including 177,000 born in Germany and 144,000 in Ireland. About 50,000 Canadians served, around 2,500 of whom were black.
When the Emancipation Proclamation went into effect in January 1863, ex-slaves were energetically recruited to meet state quotas. States and local communities offered higher cash bonuses for white volunteers. Congress tightened the draft law in March 1863. Men selected in the draft could provide substitutes or, until mid-1864, pay commutation money. Many eligibles pooled their money to cover the cost of anyone drafted. Families used the substitute provision to select which man should go into the army and which should stay home. There was much evasion and resistance to the draft, especially in Catholic areas. The New York City draft riots in July 1863 involved Irish immigrants who had been signed up as citizens to swell the vote of the city's Democratic political machine, not realizing it made them liable for the draft. Of the 168,649 men procured for the Union through the draft, 117,986 were substitutes, leaving only 50,663 who were conscripted.
In the North and South, draft laws were highly unpopular. In the North, some 120,000 men evaded conscription, many fleeing to Canada, and another 280,000 soldiers deserted during the war. At least 100,000 Southerners deserted, about 10 percent of the total. Southern desertion was high because many soldiers were more concerned about the fate of their local area than the Southern cause. In the North, "bounty jumpers" enlisted to collect the generous bonus, deserted, then re-enlisted under a different name for a second bonus; 141 were caught and executed.
From a tiny frontier force in 1860, the Union and Confederate armies grew into the "largest and most efficient armies in the world" within a few years. Some European observers at the time dismissed them as amateur and unprofessional, but historian John Keegan concluded that each outmatched the French, Prussian, and Russian armies, and without the Atlantic, could have threatened any of them with defeat.
Southern Unionists
Main article: Southern UnionistUnionism was strong in certain areas within the Confederacy. As many as 100,000 men living in states under Confederate control served in the Union Army or pro-Union guerrilla groups. Although they came from all classes, most Southern Unionists differed socially, culturally, and economically from their region’s dominant prewar, slave-owning planter class.
Prisoners
Main article: American Civil War prison campsAt the war's start, a parole system operated, under which captives agreed not to fight until exchanged. They were held in camps run by their army, paid, but not allowed to perform any military duties. The system of exchanges collapsed in 1863 when the Confederacy refused to exchange black prisoners. After that, about 56,000 of the 409,000 POWs died in prisons, accounting for 10 percent of the conflict's fatalities.
Women
See also: Women in the military § United States, and Gender issues in the American Civil WarHistorian Elizabeth D. Leonard writes that between 500 and 1,000 women enlisted as soldiers on both sides, disguised as men. Women also served as spies, resistance activists, nurses, and hospital personnel. Women served on the Union hospital ship Red Rover and nursed Union and Confederate troops at field hospitals. Mary Edwards Walker, the only woman ever to receive the Medal of Honor, served in the Union Army and was given the medal for treating the wounded during the war. One woman, Jennie Hodgers, fought for the Union under the name Albert D. J. Cashier. After she returned to civilian life, she continued to live as a man until she died in 1915 at the age of 71.
Naval tactics
The small U.S. Navy of 1861 rapidly expanded to 6,000 officers and 45,000 sailors by 1865, with 671 vessels totaling 510,396 tons. Its mission was to blockade Confederate ports, control the river system, defend against Confederate raiders on the high seas, and be ready for a possible war with the British Royal Navy. The main riverine war was fought in the West, where major rivers gave access to the Confederate heartland. The U.S. Navy eventually controlled the Red, Tennessee, Cumberland, Mississippi, and Ohio rivers. In the East, the Navy shelled Confederate forts and supported coastal army operations.
The Civil War occurred during the early stages of the industrial revolution, leading to naval innovations, notably the ironclad warship. The Confederacy, recognizing the need to counter the Union's naval superiority, built or converted over 130 vessels, including 26 ironclads. Despite these efforts, Confederate ships were largely unsuccessful against Union ironclads. The Union Navy used timberclads, tinclads, and armored gunboats. Shipyards in Cairo, Illinois, and St. Louis built or modified steamboats.
The Confederacy experimented with the submarine CSS Hunley, which was not successful, and with the ironclad CSS Virginia, rebuilt from the sunken Union ship Merrimack. On March 8, 1862, Virginia inflicted significant damage on the Union's wooden fleet, but the next day, the first Union ironclad, USS Monitor, arrived to challenge it in the Chesapeake Bay. The resulting three-hour Battle of Hampton Roads was a draw, proving ironclads were effective warships. The Confederacy scuttled the Virginia to prevent its capture, while the Union built many copies of the Monitor. The Confederacy's efforts to obtain warships from Great Britain failed, as Britain had no interest in selling warships to a nation at war with a stronger enemy and feared souring relations with the U.S.
Union blockade
Main article: Union blockadeBy early 1861, General Winfield Scott had devised the Anaconda Plan to win the war with minimal bloodshed, calling for a blockade of the Confederacy to suffocate the South into surrender. Lincoln adopted parts of the plan but opted for a more active war strategy. In April 1861, Lincoln announced a blockade of all Southern ports; commercial ships could not get insurance, ending regular traffic. The South blundered by embargoing cotton exports before the blockade was fully effective; by the time they reversed this decision, it was too late. "King Cotton" was dead, as the South could export less than 10% of its cotton. The blockade shut down the ten Confederate seaports with railheads that moved almost all the cotton. By June 1861, warships were stationed off the principal Southern ports, and a year later nearly 300 ships were in service.
Blockade runners
Main article: Blockade runners of the American Civil WarThe Confederates began the war short on military supplies, which the agrarian South could not produce. Northern arms manufacturers were restricted by an embargo, ending existing and future contracts with the South. The Confederacy turned to foreign sources, connecting with financiers and companies like S. Isaac, Campbell & Company and the London Armoury Company in Britain, becoming the Confederacy's main source of arms.
To transport arms safely to the Confederacy, British investors built small, fast, steam-driven blockade runners that traded arms and supplies from Britain, through Bermuda, Cuba, and the Bahamas in exchange for high-priced cotton. Many were lightweight and designed for speed, only carrying small amounts of cotton back to England. When the Union Navy seized a blockade runner, the ship and cargo were condemned as a prize of war and sold, with proceeds given to the Navy sailors; the captured crewmen, mostly British, were released.
Economic impact
The Southern economy nearly collapsed during the war due to multiple factors, the most notable being severe food shortages, failing railroads, loss of control over key rivers, foraging by Northern armies, and the seizure of animals and crops by Confederate forces. Historians agree the blockade was a major factor in ruining the Confederate economy; however, Wise argues blockade runners provided enough of a lifeline to allow Lee to continue fighting for additional months, thanks to supplies like 400,000 rifles, lead, blankets, and boots that the homefront economy could no longer supply.
Surdam contends that the blockade was a powerful weapon that eventually ruined the Southern economy, costing few lives in combat. The Confederate cotton crop became nearly useless, cutting off the Confederacy's primary income source. Critical imports were scarce, and coastal trade largely ended as well. The blockade's success was not measured by the few ships that slipped through but by the thousands that never tried. European merchant ships could not get insurance and were too slow to evade the blockade, so they stopped calling at Confederate ports.
To fight an offensive war, the Confederacy purchased arms in Britain and converted British-built ships into commerce raiders. The smuggling of 600,000 arms enabled the Confederacy to fight on for two more years, and the commerce raiders targeted U.S. Merchant Marine ships in the Atlantic and Pacific oceans. Insurance rates soared, and the American flag virtually disappeared from international waters, though reflagging ships with European flags allowed them to continue operating unmolested. After the war, the U.S. government demanded Britain compensate it for the damage caused by blockade runners and raiders outfitted in British ports. Britain paid the U.S. $15 million in 1871, but only for commerce raiding.
Dinçaslan argues that another outcome of the blockade was the rise of oil as a prominent commodity. The declining whale oil industry took a blow as many old whaling ships were used in blockade efforts, such as the Stone Fleet, and Confederate raiders harassed Union whalers. Oil products, especially kerosene, began replacing whale oil in lamps, increasing oil's importance long before it became fuel for combustion engines.
Diplomacy
Main article: Diplomacy of the American Civil War Further information: United Kingdom and the American Civil War and France and the American Civil WarAlthough the Confederacy hoped Britain and France would join them against the Union, this was never likely, so they sought to bring them in as mediators. The Union worked to block this and threatened war if any country recognized the Confederacy. In 1861, Southerners voluntarily embargoed cotton shipments, hoping to start an economic depression in Europe that would force Britain to enter the war, but this failed. Worse, Europe turned to Egypt and India for cotton, which they found superior, hindering the South's post-war recovery.
Cotton diplomacy proved a failure as Europe had a surplus of cotton, while the 1860–62 crop failures in Europe made the North's grain exports critically important. It also helped turn European opinion against the Confederacy. It was said that "King Corn was more powerful than King Cotton," as U.S. grain went from a quarter to almost half of British imports. Meanwhile, the war created jobs for arms makers, ironworkers, and ships to transport weapons.
Lincoln's administration initially struggled to appeal to European public opinion. At first, diplomats explained that the U.S. was not committed to ending slavery and emphasized legal arguments about the unconstitutionality of secession. Confederate representatives, however, focused on their struggle for liberty, commitment to free trade, and the essential role of cotton in the European economy. The European aristocracy was "absolutely gleeful in pronouncing the American debacle as proof that the entire experiment in popular government had failed. European government leaders welcomed the fragmentation of the ascendant American Republic." However, a European public with liberal sensibilities remained, which the U.S. sought to appeal to by building connections with the international press. By 1861, Union diplomats like Carl Schurz realized emphasizing the war against slavery was the Union's most effective moral asset in swaying European public opinion. Seward was concerned an overly radical case for reunification would distress European merchants with cotton interests; even so, he supported a widespread campaign of public diplomacy.
U.S. minister to Britain Charles Francis Adams proved adept and convinced Britain not to challenge the Union blockade. The Confederacy purchased warships from commercial shipbuilders in Britain, with the most famous being the CSS Alabama, which caused considerable damage and led to serious postwar disputes. However, public opinion against slavery in Britain created a political liability for politicians, where the anti-slavery movement was powerful.
War loomed in late 1861 between the U.S. and Britain over the Trent affair, which began when U.S. Navy personnel boarded the British ship Trent and seized two Confederate diplomats. However, London and Washington smoothed this over after Lincoln released the two men. Prince Albert left his deathbed to issue diplomatic instructions to Lord Lyons during the Trent affair. His request was honored, and, as a result, the British response to the U.S. was toned down, helping avert war. In 1862, the British government considered mediating between the Union and Confederacy, though such an offer would have risked war with the U.S. British Prime Minister Lord Palmerston reportedly read Uncle Tom's Cabin three times when deciding what his decision would be.
The Union victory at the Battle of Antietam caused the British to delay this decision. The Emancipation Proclamation increased the political liability of supporting the Confederacy. Realizing that Washington could not intervene in Mexico as long as the Confederacy controlled Texas, France invaded Mexico in 1861 and installed the Habsburg Austrian archduke Maximilian I as emperor. Washington repeatedly protested France's violation of the Monroe Doctrine. Despite sympathy for the Confederacy, France's seizure of Mexico ultimately deterred it from war with the Union. Confederate offers late in the war to end slavery in return for diplomatic recognition were not seriously considered by London or Paris. After 1863, the Polish revolt against Russia further distracted the European powers and ensured they remained neutral.
Russia supported the Union, largely because it believed the U.S. served as a counterbalance to its geopolitical rival, the U.K. In 1863, the Imperial Russian Navy's Baltic and Pacific fleets wintered in the American ports of New York and San Francisco, respectively.
Eastern theater
Further information: Eastern theater of the American Civil WarThe Eastern theater refers to the military operations east of the Appalachian Mountains, including Virginia, West Virginia, Maryland, and Pennsylvania, the District of Columbia, and the coastal fortifications and seaports of North Carolina.
Background
Army of the Potomac
Maj. Gen. George B. McClellan took command of the Union Army of the Potomac on July 26, 1861, and the war began in earnest in 1862. The 1862 Union strategy called for simultaneous advances along four axes:
- McClellan would lead the main thrust in Virginia towards Richmond.
- Ohio forces would advance through Kentucky into Tennessee.
- The Missouri Department would drive south along the Mississippi River.
- The westernmost attack would originate from Kansas.
Army of Northern Virginia
The primary Confederate force in the Eastern theater was the Army of Northern Virginia. The Army originated as the (Confederate) Army of the Potomac, which was organized on June 20, 1861, from all operational forces in Northern Virginia. On July 20 and 21, the Army of the Shenandoah and forces from the District of Harpers Ferry were added. Units from the Army of the Northwest were merged into the Army of the Potomac between March 14 and May 17, 1862. The Army of the Potomac was renamed Army of Northern Virginia on March 14. The Army of the Peninsula was merged into it on April 12, 1862.
When Virginia declared its secession in April 1861, Robert E. Lee chose to follow his home state, despite his desire for the country to remain intact and an offer of a senior Union command. Lee's biographer, Douglas S. Freeman, asserts that the army received its final name from Lee when he issued orders assuming command on June 1, 1862. However, Freeman does admit that Lee corresponded with Brigadier General Joseph E. Johnston, his predecessor in army command, before that date and referred to Johnston's command as the Army of Northern Virginia. Part of the confusion results from the fact Johnston commanded the Department of Northern Virginia (as of October 22, 1861) and the name Army of Northern Virginia can be seen as an informal consequence of its parent department's name. Jefferson Davis and Johnston did not adopt the name, but it is clear the organization of units as of March 14 was the same organization that Lee received on June 1, and thus it is generally referred to today as the Army of Northern Virginia, even if that is correct only in retrospect.
On July 4 at Harper's Ferry, Colonel Thomas J. Jackson assigned Jeb Stuart to command all the cavalry companies of the Army of the Shenandoah. He eventually commanded the Army of Northern Virginia's cavalry.
Battles
In July 1861, in of the first highly visible battles, Union troops under the command of Maj. Gen. Irvin McDowell attacking Confederate forces led by Beauregard near Washington were repulsed at the First Battle of Bull Run.
The Union had the upper hand at first, nearly pushing Confederate forces holding a defensive position into a rout, but Confederate reinforcements under Joseph E. Johnston arrived from the Shenandoah Valley by railroad, and the course of the battle quickly changed. A brigade of Virginians under the relatively unknown brigadier general from the Virginia Military Institute, Thomas J. Jackson, stood its ground, which resulted in Jackson's receiving his famous nickname, "Stonewall".
Upon the urging of Lincoln to begin offensive operations, McClellan attacked Virginia in the spring of 1862 by way of the peninsula between the York River and James River, southeast of Richmond. McClellan's army reached the gates of Richmond in the Peninsula campaign.
Also in the spring of 1862, in the Shenandoah Valley, Stonewall Jackson led his Valley Campaign. Audaciously employing rapid, unpredictable movements on interior lines, Jackson's 17,000 troops marched 646 miles (1,040 km) in 48 days and won minor battles as they successfully engaged three Union armies (52,000 men), including those of Nathaniel P. Banks and John C. Fremont, preventing them from reinforcing the Union offensive against Richmond. The swiftness of Jackson's men earned them the nickname of "foot cavalry".
Johnston halted McClellan's advance at the Battle of Seven Pines, but he was wounded in the battle, and Robert E. Lee assumed his position of command. Lee and top subordinates James Longstreet and Stonewall Jackson defeated McClellan in the Seven Days Battles and forced his retreat.
The Northern Virginia Campaign, which included the Second Battle of Bull Run, ended in yet another victory for the South. McClellan resisted General-in-Chief Halleck's orders to send reinforcements to John Pope's Union Army of Virginia, which made it easier for Lee's Confederates to defeat twice the number of combined enemy troops.
Emboldened by Second Bull Run, the Confederacy made its first invasion of the North with the Maryland Campaign. Lee led 45,000 troops of the Army of Northern Virginia across the Potomac River into Maryland on September 5. Lincoln then restored Pope's troops to McClellan. McClellan and Lee fought at the Battle of Antietam near Sharpsburg, Maryland, on September 17, 1862, the bloodiest single day in US military history. Lee's army, checked at last, returned to Virginia before McClellan could destroy it. Antietam is considered a Union victory because it halted Lee's invasion of the North and provided an opportunity for Lincoln to announce his Emancipation Proclamation.
When the cautious McClellan failed to follow up on Antietam, he was replaced by Maj. Gen. Ambrose Burnside. Burnside was defeated at the Battle of Fredericksburg on December 13, 1862, when more than 12,000 Union soldiers were killed or wounded during futile frontal assaults against Marye's Heights. After the battle, Burnside was replaced by Maj. Gen. Joseph Hooker.
Hooker, too, proved unable to defeat Lee's army; despite outnumbering the Confederates by more than two to one, his Chancellorsville Campaign proved ineffective, and he was humiliated in the Battle of Chancellorsville in May 1863. Chancellorsville is known as Lee's "perfect battle" because his risky decision to divide his army in the presence of a much larger enemy force resulted in a significant Confederate victory. Stonewall Jackson was shot in the left arm and right hand by friendly fire during the battle. The arm was amputated, but he died of pneumonia. Lee famously said: "He has lost his left arm, but I have lost my right arm."
The fiercest fighting of the battle—and the second bloodiest day of the Civil War—occurred on May 3 as Lee launched multiple attacks against the Union position at Chancellorsville. That same day, John Sedgwick advanced across the Rappahannock River, defeated the small Confederate force at Marye's Heights in the Second Battle of Fredericksburg, and then moved to the west. The Confederates fought a successful delaying action at the Battle of Salem Church.
Gen. Hooker was replaced by Maj. Gen. George Meade during Lee's second invasion of the North, in June. Meade defeated Lee at the Battle of Gettysburg (July 1863). This was the bloodiest battle and has been called the war's turning point. Pickett's Charge on July 3 is considered the high-water mark of the Confederacy because it signaled the collapse of serious Confederate threats of victory. Lee's army suffered 28,000 casualties, versus Meade's 23,000.
Western theater
Further information: Western theater of the American Civil WarThe Western theater refers to military operations between the Appalachian Mountains and the Mississippi River, including Alabama, Georgia, Florida, Mississippi, North Carolina, Kentucky, South Carolina, Tennessee, and parts of Louisiana.
Background
Army of the Tennessee and Army of the Cumberland
The primary Union forces in this theater were the Army of the Tennessee and Army of the Cumberland, named for the two rivers, Tennessee River and Cumberland River. After Meade's inconclusive fall campaign, Lincoln turned to the Western theater for new leadership. At the same time, the Confederate stronghold of Vicksburg surrendered, giving the Union control of the Mississippi River, permanently isolating the western Confederacy, and producing the new leader Lincoln needed, Ulysses S. Grant.
Army of Tennessee
The primary Confederate force in the Western theater was the Army of Tennessee. The army was formed on November 20, 1862, when General Braxton Bragg renamed the former Army of Mississippi. While the Confederate forces had successes in the Eastern theater, they were defeated many times in the West.
Battles
The Union's key strategist and tactician in the West was Ulysses S. Grant, who won victories at Forts Henry (February 6, 1862) and Donelson (February 11 to 16, 1862), earning him the nickname of "Unconditional Surrender" Grant. With these victories the Union gained control of the Tennessee and Cumberland Rivers. Nathan Bedford Forrest rallied nearly 4,000 Confederate troops and led them to escape across the Cumberland. Nashville and central Tennessee thus fell to the Union, leading to attrition of local food supplies and livestock and a breakdown in social organization.
Confederate general Leonidas Polk's invasion of Columbus ended Kentucky's policy of neutrality and turned it against the Confederacy. Grant used river transport and Andrew Hull Foote's gunboats of the Western Flotilla, to threaten the Confederacy's "Gibraltar of the West" at Columbus, Kentucky. Although rebuffed at Belmont, Grant cut off Columbus. The Confederates, lacking their gunboats, were forced to retreat and the Union took control of west Kentucky and opened Tennessee in March 1862.
At the Battle of Shiloh, in Shiloh, Tennessee in April 1862, the Confederates made a surprise attack that pushed Union forces against the river as night fell. Overnight, the Navy landed reinforcements, and Grant counterattacked. Grant and the Union won a decisive victory—the first battle with the high casualty rates that would occur repeatedly. The Confederates lost Albert Sidney Johnston, considered their finest general before the emergence of Lee.
One of the early Union objectives was to capture the Mississippi River to cut the Confederacy in half. The Mississippi was opened to Union traffic to the southern border of Tennessee with the taking of Island No. 10 and New Madrid, Missouri, and then Memphis, Tennessee.
In April 1862, the Union Navy captured New Orleans. "The key to the river was New Orleans, the South's largest port greatest industrial center." U.S. Naval forces under Farragut ran past Confederate defenses south of New Orleans. Confederate forces abandoned the city, giving the Union a critical anchor in the deep South, which allowed Union forces to move up the Mississippi. Memphis fell to Union forces on June 6, 1862, and became a key base for further advances south along the Mississippi. Only the fortress city of Vicksburg, Mississippi, prevented Union control of the entire river.
Bragg's second invasion of Kentucky in the Confederate Heartland Offensive included initial successes such as Kirby Smith's triumph at the Battle of Richmond and the capture of the Kentucky capital of Frankfort on September 3, 1862. However, the campaign ended with a meaningless victory over Maj. Gen. Don Carlos Buell at the Battle of Perryville. Bragg was forced to end his attempt at invading Kentucky and retreat, due to lack of logistical support and infantry recruits. Bragg was narrowly defeated by Maj. Gen. William Rosecrans at the Battle of Stones River in Tennessee, the culmination of the Stones River Campaign.
Naval forces assisted Grant in the long, complex Vicksburg Campaign that resulted in the Confederates surrendering at the Battle of Vicksburg in July 1863, which cemented Union control of the Mississippi and is one of the turning points of the war.
The one clear Confederate victory in the West was the Battle of Chickamauga. After Rosecrans' successful Tullahoma Campaign, Bragg, reinforced by Lt. Gen. James Longstreet's corps, defeated Rosecrans, despite the defensive stand of Maj. Gen. George Henry Thomas.
Rosecrans retreated to Chattanooga, which Bragg then besieged in the Chattanooga Campaign. Grant marched to the relief of Rosecrans and defeated Bragg at the Third Battle of Chattanooga, eventually causing Longstreet to abandon his Knoxville Campaign and driving Confederate forces out of Tennessee and opening a route to Atlanta and the heart of the Confederacy.
Trans-Mississippi theater
Further information: Trans-Mississippi theater of the American Civil WarBackground
The Trans-Mississippi theater refers to military operations west of the Mississippi, encompassing most of Missouri, Arkansas, most of Louisiana, and the Indian Territory in present-day Oklahoma. The Trans-Mississippi District was formed by the Confederate States Army to better coordinate Ben McCulloch's command of troops in Arkansas and Louisiana, Sterling Price's Missouri State Guard, as well as the portion of Earl Van Dorn's command that included the Indian Territory and excluded the Army of the West. The Union's command was the Trans-Mississippi Division, or the Military Division of West Mississippi.
Battles
The first battle of the Trans-Mississippi theater was the Battle of Wilson's Creek (August 1861). The Confederates were driven from Missouri early in the war as a result of the Battle of Pea Ridge.
Extensive guerrilla warfare characterized the trans-Mississippi region, as the Confederacy lacked the troops and logistics to support regular armies that could challenge Union control. Roving Confederate bands such as Quantrill's Raiders terrorized the countryside, striking military installations and civilian settlements. The "Sons of Liberty" and "Order of the American Knights" attacked pro-Union people, elected officeholders, and unarmed uniformed soldiers. These partisans could not be driven out of Missouri, until an entire regular Union infantry division was engaged. By 1864, these violent activities harmed the nationwide antiwar movement organizing against the re-election of Lincoln. Missouri not only stayed in the Union, but Lincoln took 70 percent of the vote to win re-election.
Small-scale military actions south and west of Missouri sought to control Indian Territory and New Mexico Territory for the Union. The Battle of Glorieta Pass was the decisive battle of the New Mexico Campaign. The Union repulsed Confederate incursions into New Mexico in 1862, and the exiled Arizona government withdrew into Texas. In the Indian Territory, civil war broke out within tribes. About 12,000 Indian warriors fought for the Confederacy but fewer for the Union. The most prominent Cherokee was Brigadier General Stand Watie, the last Confederate general to surrender.
After the fall of Vicksburg in July 1863, Jefferson Davis informed General Kirby Smith in Texas that he could expect no further help from east of the Mississippi. Although he lacked resources to beat Union armies, he built up a formidable arsenal at Tyler, along with his own Kirby Smithdom economy, a virtual "independent fiefdom" in Texas, including railroad construction and international smuggling. The Union, in turn, did not directly engage him. Its 1864 Red River Campaign to take Shreveport, Louisiana, failed and Texas remained in Confederate hands throughout the war.
Lower seaboard theater
Further information: Lower seaboard theater of the American Civil WarBackground
The lower seaboard theater refers to military and naval operations that occurred near the coastal areas of the Southeast as well as the southern part of the Mississippi. Union naval activities were dictated by the Anaconda Plan.
Battles
One of the earliest battles was fought at Port Royal Sound (November 1861), south of Charleston. Much of the war along the South Carolina coast concentrated on capturing Charleston. In attempting to capture Charleston, the Union military tried two approaches: by land over James or Morris Islands or through the harbor. However, the Confederates were able to drive back each attack. A famous land attack was the Second Battle of Fort Wagner, in which the 54th Massachusetts Infantry took part. The Union suffered a serious defeat, losing 1,515 soldiers while the Confederates lost only 174. However, the 54th was hailed for its valor, which encouraged the general acceptance of the recruitment of African American soldiers into the Union Army, which reinforced the Union's numerical advantage.
Fort Pulaski on the Georgia coast was an early target for the Union navy. Following the capture of Port Royal, an expedition was organized with engineer troops under the command of Captain Quincy Adams Gillmore, forcing a Confederate surrender. The Union army occupied the fort for the rest of the war after repairing it.
In April 1862, a Union naval task force commanded by Commander David Dixon Porter attacked Forts Jackson and St. Philip, which guarded the river approach to New Orleans from the south. While part of the fleet bombarded the forts, other vessels forced a break in the obstructions in the river and enabled the rest of the fleet to steam upriver to the city. A Union army force commanded by Major General Benjamin Butler landed near the forts and forced their surrender. Butler's controversial command of New Orleans earned him the nickname "Beast".
The following year, the Union Army of the Gulf commanded by Major General Nathaniel P. Banks laid siege to Port Hudson for nearly eight weeks, the longest siege in US military history. The Confederates attempted to defend with the Bayou Teche Campaign but surrendered after Vicksburg. These surrenders gave the Union control over the Mississippi.
Several small skirmishes but no major battles were fought in Florida. The biggest was the Battle of Olustee in early 1864.
Pacific coast theater
Further information: Pacific coast theater of the American Civil WarThe Pacific coast theater refers to military operations on the Pacific Ocean and in the states and Territories west of the Continental Divide.
Conquest of Virginia
At the beginning of 1864, Lincoln made Grant commander of all Union armies. Grant made his headquarters with the Army of the Potomac and put Maj. Gen. William Tecumseh Sherman in command of most of the western armies. Grant understood the concept of total war and believed, along with Lincoln and Sherman, that only the utter defeat of Confederate forces and their economic base would end the war. This was total war not in killing civilians, but in taking provisions and forage and destroying homes, farms, and railroads, that Grant said "would otherwise have gone to the support of secession and rebellion. This policy I believe exercised a material influence in hastening the end."
Grant devised a coordinated strategy that would strike at the entire Confederacy from multiple directions. Generals Meade and Benjamin Butler were ordered to move against Lee near Richmond, General Franz Sigel was to attack the Shenandoah Valley, General Sherman was to capture Atlanta and march to the Atlantic Ocean, Generals George Crook and William W. Averell were to operate against railroad supply lines in West Virginia, and Maj. Gen. Nathaniel P. Banks was to capture Mobile, Alabama.
Grant's Overland Campaign
Grant's army set out on the Overland Campaign intending to draw Lee into a defense of Richmond, where they would attempt to pin down and destroy the Confederate army. The Union army first attempted to maneuver past Lee and fought several battles, notably at the Wilderness, Spotsylvania, and Cold Harbor. These resulted in heavy losses on both sides and forced Lee's Confederates to fall back repeatedly. At the Battle of Yellow Tavern, the Confederates lost Jeb Stuart.
An attempt to outflank Lee from the south failed under Butler, who was trapped inside the Bermuda Hundred river bend. Each battle resulted in setbacks for the Union that mirrored those they had suffered under prior generals, though unlike them, Grant chose to fight on rather than retreat. Grant was tenacious and kept pressing Lee's Army of Northern Virginia back to Richmond. While Lee was preparing for an attack on Richmond, Grant unexpectedly turned south to cross the James River and began the protracted Siege of Petersburg, where the two armies engaged in trench warfare for over nine months.
Sheridan's Valley Campaign
To deny the Confederacy continued use of the Shenandoah Valley as a base from which to launch invasions of Maryland and the Washington area, and to threaten Lee's supply lines for his forces, Grant launched the Valley campaigns in the spring of 1864. Initial efforts led by Gen. Sigel were repelled at the Battle of New Market by Confederate Gen. John C. Breckinridge. The Battle of New Market was the Confederacy's last major victory, and included a charge by teenage VMI cadets. After relieving Sigel, and following mixed performances by his successor, Grant finally found a commander, General Philip Sheridan, aggressive enough to prevail against the army of Maj. Gen. Jubal A. Early. After a cautious start, Sheridan defeated Early in a series of battles in September and October 1864, including a decisive defeat at the Battle of Cedar Creek. Sheridan then proceeded through that winter to destroy the agricultural base of the Shenandoah Valley, a strategy similar to the tactics Sherman later employed in Georgia.
Sherman's March to the Sea
Meanwhile, Sherman maneuvered from Chattanooga to Atlanta, defeating Confederate Generals Joseph E. Johnston and John Bell Hood. The fall of Atlanta on September 2, 1864, guaranteed the reelection of Lincoln. Hood left the Atlanta area to swing around and menace Sherman's supply lines and invade Tennessee in the Franklin–Nashville Campaign. Union Maj. Gen. John Schofield defeated Hood at the Battle of Franklin, and George H. Thomas dealt Hood a massive defeat at the Battle of Nashville, effectively destroying Hood's army.
Leaving Atlanta, and his base of supplies, Sherman's army marched, with no destination set, laying waste to about 20% of the farms in Georgia in his "March to the Sea". He reached the Atlantic at Savannah, Georgia, in December 1864. Sherman's army was followed by thousands of freed slaves; there were no major battles along the march. Sherman turned north through South Carolina and North Carolina, to approach the Confederate Virginia lines from the south, increasing the pressure on Lee's army.
The Waterloo of the Confederacy
Lee's army, thinned by desertion and casualties, was now much smaller than Grant's. One last Confederate attempt to break the Union hold on Petersburg failed at the decisive Battle of Five Forks on April 1. The Union now controlled the entire perimeter surrounding Richmond–Petersburg, completely cutting it off from the Confederacy. Realizing the capital was now lost, Lee's army and the Confederate government were forced to evacuate. The Confederate capital fell on April 2–3, to the Union XXV Corps, composed of black troops. The remaining Confederate units fled west after a defeat at Sayler's Creek on April 6.
End of the war
Main article: Conclusion of the American Civil War This New York Times front page celebrated Lee's surrender, headlining how Grant let Confederate officers retain their sidearms and "paroled" the Confederate officers and men.News of Lee's April 9 surrender reached this southern newspaper (Savannah, Georgia) on April 15—after the April 14 shooting of President Lincoln. The article quotes Grant's terms of surrender.Lee did not intend to surrender, but planned to regroup at Appomattox Station, where supplies were to be waiting, and then continue the war. Grant chased Lee and got in front of him, so that when Lee's army reached the village of Appomattox Court House, they were surrounded. After an initial battle, Lee decided the fight was hopeless, and surrendered his Army of Northern Virginia to Grant on April 9, 1865, during a conference at the McLean House. In an untraditional gesture and as a sign of Grant's respect and anticipation of peacefully restoring Confederate states to the Union, Lee was permitted to keep his sword and horse, Traveller. His men were paroled, and a chain of Confederate surrenders began.
On April 14, 1865, Lincoln was shot by John Wilkes Booth, a Confederate sympathizer. Lincoln died early the next morning. Lincoln's vice president, Andrew Johnson, was unharmed, because his would-be assassin, George Atzerodt, lost his nerve, so Johnson was immediately sworn in as president.
Meanwhile, Confederate forces across the South surrendered, as news of Lee's surrender reached them. On April 26, the same day Sergeant Boston Corbett killed Booth at a tobacco barn, Johnston surrendered nearly 90,000 troops of the Army of Tennessee to Sherman at Bennett Place, near present-day Durham, North Carolina. It proved to be the largest surrender of Confederate forces. On May 4, all remaining Confederate forces in Alabama, Mississippi, and Louisiana east of the Mississippi, under the command of Lt. General Richard Taylor, surrendered. Confederate president Davis was captured in retreat at Irwinville, Georgia on May 10.
The final land battle was fought on May 13, 1865, at the Battle of Palmito Ranch in Texas. On May 26, 1865, Confederate Lt. Gen. Simon B. Buckner, acting for Edmund Smith, signed a military convention surrendering Confederate forces in the Trans-Mississippi Department. This date is often cited by contemporaries and historians as the effective end date of the war. On June 2, with most of his troops having already gone home, a reluctant Kirby Smith had little choice but to sign the official surrender document. On June 23, Cherokee leader and Brig. General Stand Watie became the last Confederate general to surrender his forces.
On June 19, 1865, Union Maj. Gen. Gordon Granger announced General Order No. 3, bringing the Emancipation Proclamation into effect in Texas and freeing the last slaves of the Confederacy. The anniversary of this date is now celebrated as Juneteenth.
The naval part of the war ended more slowly. It had begun on April 11, two days after Lee's surrender, when Lincoln proclaimed that foreign nations had no further "claim or pretense" to deny equality of maritime rights and hospitalities to U.S. warships and, in effect, that rights extended to Confederate ships to use neutral ports as safe havens from U.S. warships should end. Having no response to Lincoln's proclamation, President Johnson issued a similar proclamation dated May 10, more directly stating that the war was almost at an end and insurgent cruisers still at sea, and prepared to attack U.S. ships, should not have rights to do so through use of safe foreign ports or waters. Britain finally responded on June 6, by transmitting a letter from Foreign Secretary John Russell, 1st Earl Russell, to the Lords of the Admiralty withdrawing rights to Confederate warships to enter British ports and waters. U.S. Secretary of State Seward welcomed the withdrawal of concessions to the Confederates. Finally, on October 18, Russell advised the Admiralty that the time specified in his June message had elapsed and "all measures of a restrictive nature on vessels of war of the United States in British ports, harbors, and waters, are now to be considered as at an end". Nonetheless, the final Confederate surrender was in Liverpool, England where James Iredell Waddell, the captain of CSS Shenandoah, surrendered the cruiser to British authorities on November 6.
Legally, the war did not end until August 20, 1866, when President Johnson issued a proclamation that declared "that the said insurrection is at an end and that peace, order, tranquillity, and civil authority now exist in and throughout the whole of the United States of America".
Union victory
The causes of the war, reasons for its outcome, and even its name are subjects of lingering contention. The North and West grew wealthy while the once-rich South became poor for a century. The national political power of the slaveowners and rich Southerners ended. Historians are less sure about the results of postwar Reconstruction, especially regarding the second-class citizenship of the freedmen and their poverty.
Historians have debated whether the Confederacy could have won the war. Most scholars, including James M. McPherson, argue Confederate victory was possible. McPherson argues that the North's advantage in population and resources made Northern victory likely, but not guaranteed. He argues that if the Confederacy had fought using unconventional tactics, it would have more easily been able to hold out long enough to exhaust the Union. Confederates did not need to invade and hold enemy territory to win, but only to fight a defensive war to convince the North the cost of winning was too high. The North needed to conquer and hold vast stretches of enemy territory and defeat Confederate armies to win. Lincoln was not a military dictator and could fight only as long as the American public supported the war. The Confederacy sought to win independence by outlasting Lincoln; however, after Atlanta fell and Lincoln defeated McClellan in the election of 1864, hope for a political victory for the South ended. Lincoln had secured the support of the Republicans, War Democrats, border states, emancipated slaves, and the neutrality of Britain and France. By defeating the Democrats and McClellan, he defeated the Copperheads, who had wanted a negotiated peace with the Confederacy.
Year | Union | Confederacy | |
---|---|---|---|
Population | 1860 | 22,100,000 (71%) | 9,100,000 (29%) |
1864 | 28,800,000 (90%) | 3,000,000 (10%) | |
Free | 1860 | 21,700,000 (98%) | 5,600,000 (62%) |
Slave | 1860 | 490,000 (2%) | 3,550,000 (38%) |
1864 | negligible | 1,900,000 | |
Soldiers | 1860–64 | 2,100,000 (67%) | 1,064,000 (33%) |
Railroad miles | 1860 | 21,800 (71%) | 8,800 (29%) |
1864 | 29,100 (98%) | negligible | |
Manufactures | 1860 | 90% | 10% |
1864 | 98% | 2% | |
Arms production | 1860 | 97% | 3% |
1864 | 98% | 2% | |
Cotton bales | 1860 | negligible | 4,500,000 |
1864 | 300,000 | negligible | |
Exports | 1860 | 30% | 70% |
1864 | 98% | 2% |
Some scholars argue the Union held an insurmountable long-term advantage over the Confederacy in industrial strength and population. Confederate actions, they argue, only delayed defeat. Historian Shelby Foote expressed this view succinctly:
I think that the North fought that war with one hand behind its back .... If there had been more Southern victories, and a lot more, the North simply would have brought that other hand out from behind its back. I don't think the South ever had a chance to win that War.
A minority view among historians is that the Confederacy lost because, as E. Merton Coulter put it, "people did not will hard enough and long enough to win." However, most historians reject the argument. McPherson, after reading thousands of letters written by Confederate soldiers, found strong patriotism that continued to the end; they truly believed they were fighting for freedom and liberty. Even as the Confederacy was visibly collapsing in 1864–65, most Confederate soldiers were fighting hard. Historian Gary Gallagher cites General Sherman, who in early 1864 commented, "The devils seem to have a determination that cannot but be admired." Despite their loss of slaves and wealth, with starvation looming, Sherman continued, "yet I see no sign of let-up—some few deserters—plenty tired of war, but the masses determined to fight it out."
Also important were Lincoln's eloquence in articulating the national purpose and his skill in keeping the border states committed to the Union cause. The Emancipation Proclamation was an effective use of the President's war powers. The Confederate government failed to get Europe involved militarily. Southern leaders needed to get European powers to help break the blockade the Union had created around Southern ports. Lincoln's naval blockade was 95 percent effective at stopping trade goods; as a result, imports and exports to the South declined significantly. The abundance of European cotton and Britain's hostility to slavery, along with Lincoln's naval blockades, severely decreased any chance that Britain or France would enter the war.
Historian Don H. Doyle has argued that the Union victory had a major impact on world history. The Union victory energized popular democratic forces. A Confederate victory, on the other hand, would have meant a new birth of slavery, not freedom. Historian Fergus Bordewich, following Doyle, argues that:
The North's victory decisively proved the durability of democratic government. Confederate independence, on the other hand, would have established an American model for reactionary politics and race-based repression that would likely have cast an international shadow into the 20th century and perhaps beyond.
Scholars have debated what the effects of the war were on political and economic power in the South. The prevailing view is that the southern planter elite retained its powerful position in the South. However, a 2017 study challenges this, noting that while some Southern elites retained their economic status, the turmoil of the 1860s created greater opportunities for economic mobility in the South, than in the North.
Casualties
One in thirteen veterans were amputees.Remains of both sides were reinterred.Andersonville National Cemetery, GeorgiaCategory | Union | Confederate |
---|---|---|
Killed in action | 110,100 | 94,000 |
Disease | 224,580 | 164,000 |
Wounded in action | 275,154 | 194,026 |
Captured (inc those who died as POWs) |
211,411 (30,192) |
462,634 (31,000) |
Total | 821,245 | 914,660 |
Exact casualty figures were collected for the Union, but Confederate records were poorly kept, or lost in the chaos of defeat. Thus, the casualty figures are imprecise and based on statistical extrapolation. Neither side kept a tally of civilian deaths due to the war. In the 19th century, the death toll had been estimated at a lower 620,000. In 2011, the death toll was recalculated based on a 1% sample of census data, yielding approximately 750,000 soldier deaths, 20 percent higher than traditionally estimated, and possibly as high as 850,000. The figure was recalculated to 698,000 soldier deaths in 2024 after examining newly available full census records. Mortality rates among men were as high as 19 percent in Louisiana, and 16.6–16.7 percent in Georgia and South Carolina respectively.
The war resulted in at least 1,030,000 casualties (3 percent of the population), including an estimated 698,000 soldier deaths—two-thirds by disease. Based on 1860 census figures, 8 percent of all white men aged 13–43 died in the war, including 6 percent in the North and 18 percent in the South. About 56,000 soldiers died in prison camps during the War. An estimated 60,000 soldiers lost limbs. As McPherson notes, the war's "cost in American lives was as great as in all of the nation's other wars combined through Vietnam".
Of the 359,528 Union Army dead, amounting to 15 percent of the over two million who served:
- 110,070 were killed in action (67,000) or died of wounds (43,000).
- 199,790 died of disease (75 percent was due to the war, the remainder would have occurred in civilian life anyway)
- 24,866 died in Confederate prison camps
- 9,058 were killed by accidents or drowning
- 15,741 other/unknown deaths
In addition, there were 4,523 deaths in the Navy (2,112 in battle) and 460 in the Marines (148 in battle).
After the Emancipation Proclamation authorized freed slaves to "be received into the armed service of the United States", former slaves who escaped from plantations or were liberated by the Union Army were recruited into the United States Colored Troops regiments of the Union Army, as were black men who had not been slaves. The US Colored Troops made up 10 percent of the Union death toll—15 percent of Union deaths from disease and less than 3 percent of those killed in battle. Losses among African Americans were high. In the last year and a half and from all reported casualties, approximately 20 percent of all African Americans enrolled in the military died during the war. Their mortality rate was significantly higher than white soldiers. While 15 percent of US Volunteers and just 9 percent of white Regular Army troops died, 21 percent of US Colored Troops died.
While the figures of 360,000 army deaths for the Union and 260,000 for the Confederacy remained commonly cited, they are incomplete. In addition to many Confederate records being missing, partly as a result of Confederate widows not reporting deaths due to being ineligible for benefits, both armies only counted troops who died during their service and not the tens of thousands who died of wounds or diseases after being discharged. This often happened only days or weeks later. Francis Amasa Walker, superintendent of the 1870 census, used census and surgeon general data to estimate a minimum of 500,000 Union military deaths and 350,000 Confederate military deaths, a total of 850,000 soldiers. While Walker's estimates were originally dismissed because of the 1870 census's undercounting, it was later found that the census was only off by 6.5 percent and that the data Walker used would be roughly accurate.
Losses were far higher than during the war with Mexico, which saw roughly 13,000 American deaths, including fewer than two thousand killed in battle, between 1846 and 1848. One reason for the high number of battle deaths in the civil war was the continued use of tactics similar to those of the Napoleonic Wars, such as charging. With the advent of more accurate rifled barrels, Minié balls, and (near the end of the war for the Union) repeating firearms such as the Spencer repeating rifle and the Henry repeating rifle, soldiers were mowed down when standing in lines in the open. This led to the adoption of trench warfare, a style of fighting that defined much of World War I.
Deaths among former slaves has proven hard to estimate, due to the lack of reliable census data, though they were known to be considerable, as former slaves were set free or escaped in massive numbers in areas where the Union army did not have sufficient shelter, doctors, or food for them. Professor Jim Downs states that tens of thousands to hundreds of thousands of slaves died during the war from disease, starvation, or exposure, and that if these deaths are counted in the war's total, the death toll would exceed 1 million.
It is estimated that during the war, of the equines killed, including horses, mules, donkeys and even confiscated children's ponies, over 32,600 of them belonged to the Union and 45,800 the Confederacy. However, other estimates place the total at 1,000,000.
It is estimated that 544 Confederate flags were captured during the war by the Union. The flags were sent to the War Department in Washington. The Union flags captured by the Confederates were sent to Richmond.
Emancipation
Abolishing slavery was not a Union war goal from the outset, but quickly became one. Lincoln's initial claims were that preserving the Union was the central goal. In contrast, the South fought to preserve slavery. While not all Southerners saw themselves as fighting for slavery, most officers and over a third of the rank and file in Lee's army had close family ties to slavery. To Northerners, the motivation was primarily to preserve the Union, not to abolish slavery. However, as the war dragged on, and it became clear slavery was central to the conflict, and that emancipation was (to quote the Emancipation Proclamation) "a fit and necessary war measure for suppressing rebellion," Lincoln and his cabinet made ending slavery a war goal, culminating in the Emancipation Proclamation. Lincoln's decision to issue the Proclamation angered Peace Democrats ("Copperheads") and War Democrats, but energized most Republicans. By warning that free blacks would flood the North, Democrats made gains in the 1862 elections, but they did not gain control of Congress. The Republicans' counterargument that slavery was the mainstay of the enemy steadily gained support, with the Democrats losing decisively in the 1863 elections in the Northern state of Ohio, when they tried to resurrect anti-black sentiment.
Emancipation Proclamation
Main article: Emancipation ProclamationThe Emancipation Proclamation legally freed the slaves in states "in rebellion," but, as a practical matter, slavery for the 3.5 million black people in the South effectively ended in each area when Union armies arrived. The last Confederate slaves were freed on June 19, 1865, celebrated as the modern holiday of Juneteenth. Slaves in the border states and those in some former Confederate territory occupied before the Emancipation Proclamation were freed by state action or (on December 6, 1865) by the Thirteenth Amendment. The Emancipation Proclamation enabled African Americans, both free blacks and escaped slaves, to join the Union Army. About 190,000 volunteered, further enhancing the numerical advantage the Union armies enjoyed over the Confederates, who did not dare emulate the equivalent manpower source for fear of undermining the legitimacy of slavery.
During the war, sentiment concerning slaves, enslavement, and emancipation in the United States was divided. Lincoln's fears of making slavery a war issue were based on a harsh reality: abolition did not enjoy wide support in the west, the territories, and the border states. In 1861, Lincoln worried that premature attempts at emancipation would mean the loss of the border states, and that "to lose Kentucky is nearly the same as to lose the whole game." Copperheads and some War Democrats opposed emancipation, although the latter eventually accepted it as part of the total war needed to save the Union.
At first, Lincoln reversed attempts at emancipation by Secretary of War Simon Cameron and Generals John C. Frémont and David Hunter, to keep the loyalty of the border states and the War Democrats. Lincoln warned the border states that a more radical type of emancipation would happen if his plan of gradual compensated emancipation and voluntary colonization was rejected. But compensated emancipation occurred only in the District of Columbia, where Congress had the power to enact it. When Lincoln told his cabinet about his proposed emancipation proclamation, which would apply to the states still in rebellion on January 1, 1863, Seward advised Lincoln to wait for a Union military victory before issuing it, as to do otherwise would seem like "our last shriek on the retreat". Walter Stahr, however, writes, "There are contemporary sources, however, that suggest others were involved in the decision to delay", and Stahr quotes them.
Contrabands, who were fugitive slaves, including cooks, laundresses, laborers, teamsters, railroad repair crews, fled to the Union Army, but were not legally freed until the Emancipation Proclamation, which Lincoln signed on January 1, 1863, more than two years before the end of the Civil War.In 1863, the Union Army accepted Freedmen; seen here are black and white teenaged soldiers who volunteered to fight for the Union.Lincoln laid the groundwork for public support in an open letter published in response to Horace Greeley's "The Prayer of Twenty Millions"; the letter stated that Lincoln's goal was to save the Union, and that, if he freed the slaves, it would be as a means to that end. He also had a meeting at the White House with five African American representatives on August 14, 1862. Arranging for a reporter to be present, he urged his visitors to agree to the voluntary colonization of black people. Lincoln's motive for both his letter to Greeley and his statement to the black visitors was apparently to make his forthcoming Emancipation Proclamation more palatable to racist white people. A Union victory in the Battle of Antietam on September 17, 1862, provided Lincoln with an opportunity to issue the preliminary Emancipation Proclamation, and the War Governors' Conference added support for the proclamation.
Lincoln issued his preliminary Emancipation Proclamation on September 22, 1862. It stated that slaves in all states in rebellion on January 1, 1863, would be free. He issued his final Emancipation Proclamation on January 1, 1863, keeping his promise. In his letter to Albert G. Hodges, Lincoln explained his belief that "If slavery is not wrong, nothing is wrong .... And yet I have never understood that the Presidency conferred upon me an unrestricted right to act officially upon this judgment and feeling .... I claim not to have controlled events, but confess plainly that events have controlled me."
Lincoln's moderate approach succeeded in inducing the border states to remain in the Union and War Democrats to support the Union. The border states, which included Kentucky, Missouri, Maryland, Delaware, and Union-controlled regions around New Orleans, Norfolk, Virginia, and elsewhere, were not covered by the Emancipation Proclamation. Nor was Tennessee, which had come under Union control. Missouri and Maryland abolished slavery on their own; Kentucky and Delaware did not. Still, the proclamation did not enjoy universal support. It caused much unrest in what were then considered western states, where racist sentiments led to a great fear of abolition. There was some concern that the proclamation would lead to the secession of western states, and its issuance prompted the stationing of Union troops in Illinois in case of rebellion.
Since the Emancipation Proclamation was based on the President's war powers, it applied only in territory held by Confederates at the time it was issued. However, the Proclamation became a symbol of the Union's growing commitment to add emancipation to the Union's definition of liberty. The Emancipation Proclamation greatly reduced the Confederacy's hope of being recognized or otherwise aided by Britain or France. By late 1864, Lincoln was playing a leading role in getting the House of Representatives to vote for the Thirteenth Amendment, which mandated the ending of chattel slavery.
Reconstruction
Main article: Reconstruction eraThe war devastated the South and posed serious questions of how it would be reintegrated into the Union. The war destroyed much of the South's wealth, in part because wealth held in enslaved people (at least $1,000 each for a healthy adult prior to the war) was wiped off the books. All accumulated investment in Confederate bonds was forfeited; most banks and railroads were bankrupt. The income per person dropped to less than 40 percent of that of the North, and that lasted into the 20th century. Southern influence in the federal government, previously considerable, was greatly diminished until the second half of the 20th century. Reconstruction began during the war, with the Emancipation Proclamation of January 1863, and it continued until 1877. It comprised multiple complex methods to resolve the outstanding issues of the aftermath, the most important of which were the three "Reconstruction Amendments" to the Constitution: the 13th outlawing slavery (1865), the 14th guaranteeing citizenship to former slaves (1868), and the 15th prohibiting the denial of voting rights "on account of race, color, or previous condition of servitude" (1870). From the Union perspective, the goals of Reconstruction were to consolidate victory by reuniting the Union, to guarantee a "republican form of government" for the ex-Confederate states, and to permanently end slavery—and prevent semi-slavery status.
President Johnson, who took office in April 1865, took a lenient approach and saw the achievement of the main war goals as realized in 1865, when each ex-rebel state repudiated secession and ratified the Thirteenth Amendment. Radical Republicans demanded proof that Confederate nationalism was dead and that the slaves were truly free. They overrode Johnson's vetoes of civil rights legislation, and the House impeached him, although the Senate did not convict him. In 1868 and 1872, the Republican candidate Grant won the presidency. In 1872, the "Liberal Republicans" argued that the war goals had been achieved and Reconstruction should end. They chose Horace Greeley to head a presidential ticket in 1872 but were decisively defeated. In 1874, Democrats, primarily Southern, took control of Congress and opposed further reconstruction. The Compromise of 1877 closed with a national consensus, except on the part of former slaves, that the war had finally ended. With the withdrawal of federal troops, however, whites retook control of every Southern legislature, and the Jim Crow era of disenfranchisement and legal segregation was ushered in.
The war had a demonstrable impact on American politics. Many veterans on both sides were elected to political office, including five U.S. Presidents: Ulysses Grant, Rutherford B. Hayes, James A. Garfield, Benjamin Harrison, and William McKinley.
Memory and historiography
Monument to the Grand Army of the Republic, a Union veteran organizationCherokee Confederates reunion in New Orleans in 1903The war is a central event in American collective memory. There are innumerable statues, commemorations, books, and archival collections. The memory includes the home front, military affairs, the treatment of soldiers, both living and dead, in the war's aftermath, depictions of the war in literature and art, evaluations of heroes and villains, and considerations of the moral and political lessons of the war. The last theme includes moral evaluations of racism and slavery, heroism in combat and behind the lines, and issues of democracy and minority rights, as well as the notion of an "Empire of Liberty" influencing the world.
Historians have paid more attention to the causes of the war than to the war itself. Military history has largely developed outside academia, leading to a proliferation of studies by non-scholars who nevertheless are familiar with the primary sources and pay close attention to battles and campaigns and who write for the general public. Practically every major figure in the war, both North and South, has had a serious biographical study.
Even the name used for the conflict has been controversial, with many names used for it. During and immediately after the war, Northern historians often used a term like "War of the Rebellion". Writers in rebel states often referred to the "War for Southern Independence". Some Southerners have described it as the "War of Northern Aggression".
Lost Cause
Main article: Lost Cause of the ConfederacyThe memory of the war in the white South crystallized in the myth of the "Lost Cause": that the Confederate cause was just and heroic. The myth shaped regional identity and race relations for generations. Alan T. Nolan notes that the Lost Cause was expressly a rationalization, a cover-up to vindicate the name and fame of those in rebellion. Some claims revolve around the insignificance of slavery as a cause; some appeals highlight cultural differences between North and South; the military conflict by Confederate actors is idealized; in any case, secession was said to be lawful. Nolan argues that the adoption of the Lost Cause perspective facilitated the reunification of the North and the South while excusing the "virulent racism" of the 19th century, sacrificing black American progress to white man's reunification. He also deems the Lost Cause "a caricature of the truth. This caricature wholly misrepresents and distorts the facts of the matter" in every instance. The Lost Cause myth was formalized by Charles A. Beard and Mary R. Beard, whose The Rise of American Civilization (1927) spawned "Beardian historiography". The Beards downplayed slavery, abolitionism, and issues of morality. Though this interpretation was abandoned by the Beards in the 1940s, and by historians generally by the 1950s, Beardian themes still echo among Lost Cause writers.
The United Daughters of the Confederacy
The United Daughters of the Confederacy (UDC) is a Southern heritage organization founded in 1894 in Nashville, Tennessee, by a group of women whose stated mission was to honor Confederate veterans and preserve their memory. The organization quickly grew in influence during the late 19th and early 20th centuries and ended up playing a pivotal role in shaping the collective memory of the American Civil War. The UDC focused on erecting Confederate monuments, funding the education of Confederate descendants, and promoting Confederate history through textbooks and public ceremonies. The group emphasized the valor of Confederate soldiers and the righteousness of the Southern cause, often omitting or downplaying the central role of slavery in the conflict.
The UDC became a major proponent of the Lost Cause ideology, a narrative that romanticized the Confederacy as a noble, states'-rights-driven effort rather than a rebellion to preserve slavery. Through speeches, publications, and curriculum influence, the UDC worked to recast the Confederacy in a sympathetic light, framing the Civil War as a struggle against Northern aggression. This effort contributed to the widespread proliferation of Confederate symbols and a sanitized portrayal of Southern history in public spaces and schools. Critics argue that the UDC's activities perpetuated racist ideologies by fostering nostalgia for the antebellum South and minimizing the horrors of slavery.
In recent years, the role of the UDC and the Lost Cause myth has come under scrutiny amid debates over Confederate monuments and systemic racism in the United States. Many of the monuments and historical markers the UDC sponsored have been reevaluated and removed, sparking ongoing discussions about memory, heritage, and justice.
Battlefield preservation
Main article: American Civil War battlefield preservationThe first efforts at Civil War battlefield preservation and memorialization came during the war, with the establishment of National Cemeteries at Gettysburg, Mill Springs and Chattanooga. Soldiers began erecting markers on battlefields beginning with the First Battle of Bull Run in 1861. The oldest surviving monument is the Hazen Brigade Monument near Murfreesboro in Central Tennessee, built in the summer of 1863 by soldiers in Union Col. William B. Hazen's brigade to mark the spot where they buried their dead, following the Battle of Stones River.
In the 1890s, the government established five Civil War battlefield parks under the jurisdiction of the War Department, beginning with the creation of the Chickamauga and Chattanooga National Military Park at Fort Oglethorpe, Georgia, and the Antietam National Battlefield in Sharpsburg, Maryland, in 1890. The Shiloh National Military Park was established in 1894 in Shiloh, Tennessee, followed by the Gettysburg National Military Park in 1895, and Vicksburg National Military Park in 1899. In 1933, these five parks and other national monuments were transferred to the National Park Service. Chief among modern efforts to preserve Civil War sites has been the American Battlefield Trust, with more than 130 battlefields in 24 states. The five major battlefield parks operated by the National Park Service had a combined 3 million visitors in 2018, down 70% from 10 million in 1970.
Commemoration
Further information: Commemoration of the American Civil War and Commemoration of the American Civil War on postage stamps Grand Army of the Republic (Union)United Confederate VeteransThe Civil War has been commemorated in many capacities, ranging from the reenactment of battles to statues and memorial halls erected, films, stamps and coins with Civil War themes being issued, all of which helped to shape public memory. These commemorations occurred in greater numbers on the 100th and 150th anniversaries of the war. Hollywood's take on the war has been especially influential in shaping public memory, as in such film classics as The Birth of a Nation (1915), Gone with the Wind (1939), and Lincoln (2012). Ken Burns's PBS television series The Civil War (1990) is well-remembered, though criticized for its historical inaccuracy.
Technological significance
Technological innovations during the war had a great impact on 19th-century science. The war was an early example of an "industrial war", in which technological might is used to achieve military supremacy. New inventions, such as the train and telegraph, delivered soldiers, supplies and messages at a time when horses had been the fastest way to travel. It was also in this war that aerial warfare, in the form of reconnaissance balloons, was first used. It saw the first action involving steam-powered ironclad warships in naval warfare history. Repeating firearms such as the Henry rifle, Spencer rifle, Colt revolving rifle, Triplett & Scott carbine and others, first appeared during the Civil War; they were a revolutionary invention that would soon replace muzzle-loading and single-shot firearms. The war saw the first appearances of rapid-firing weapons and machine guns such as the Agar gun and Gatling gun.
In works of culture and art
The Civil War is one of the most studied events in American history, and the collection of cultural works around it is enormous. This section gives an abbreviated overview of the most notable works.
Literature
- When Lilacs Last in the Dooryard Bloom'd and O Captain! My Captain! (1865) by Walt Whitman, famous eulogies to Lincoln
- Battle-Pieces and Aspects of the War (1866) poetry by Herman Melville
- The Rise and Fall of the Confederate Government (1881) by Jefferson Davis
- The Private History of a Campaign That Failed (1885) by Mark Twain
- Texar's Revenge, or, North Against South (1887) by Jules Verne
- An Occurrence at Owl Creek Bridge (1890) by Ambrose Bierce
- The Red Badge of Courage (1895) by Stephen Crane
- The Challenge to Sirius (1917) by Sheila Kaye-Smith
- Gone with the Wind (1936) by Margaret Mitchell
- North and South (1982) by John Jakes
- The March: A Novel (2005) by E. L. Doctorow, fictionalized account of Sherman's March to the Sea
Film
- The Birth of a Nation (1915, US)
- The General (1926, US)
- Operator 13 (1934, US)
- Gone with the Wind (1939, US)
- The Red Badge of Courage (1951, US)
- The Horse Soldiers (1959, US)
- Shenandoah (1965, US)
- The Good, the Bad and the Ugly (1966, Italy-Spain-FRG)
- The Beguiled (1971, US)
- The Outlaw Josey Wales (1976, US)
- North and South (miniseries; 1985–1994, US)
- Glory (1989, US)
- The Civil War (1990, US)
- Gettysburg (1993, US)
- The Last Outlaw (1993, US)
- Cold Mountain (2003, US)
- Gods and Generals (2003, US)
- Lincoln (2012, US)
- Free State of Jones (2016, US)
Music
See also: Music of the American Civil War- "Dixie"
- "Battle Cry of Freedom"
- "Battle Hymn of the Republic"
- "The Bonnie Blue Flag"
- "John Brown's Body"
- "When Johnny Comes Marching Home"
- "Marching Through Georgia"
- "The Night They Drove Old Dixie Down"
Video games
- North & South (1989, FR)
- Sid Meier's Gettysburg! (1997, US)
- Sid Meier's Antietam! (1999, US)
- American Conquest: Divided Nation (2006, US)
- Forge of Freedom: The American Civil War (2006, US)
- The History Channel: Civil War – A Nation Divided (2006, US)
- AGEOD's American Civil War (2007, US/FR)
- History Civil War: Secret Missions (2008, US)
- Call of Juarez: Bound in Blood (2009, US)
- Darkest of Days (2009, US)
- Victoria II: A House Divided (2011, US)
- AGEOD's American Civil War II (2013, US/FR)
- Ultimate General: Gettysburg (2014, UKR)
- Ultimate General: Civil War (2016, UKR)
- War of Rights (TBD, US)
See also
- American Civil War by state
- Foreign enlistment in the American Civil War
- African Americans in the American Civil War
- German Americans in the American Civil War
- Hispanics in the American Civil War
- Irish Americans in the American Civil War
- Italian Americans in the Civil War
- Native Americans in the American Civil War
- Outline of the American Civil War
- Removal of Confederate monuments and memorials
Notes
- ^
- "End of the Rebellion; The Last Rebel Army Disbands". The New York Times. United States Department of War. May 29, 1865. Archived from the original on September 15, 2018. Retrieved July 29, 2022.
- Robertson 1963, p. 31. "Lee's surrender left Johnston with no place to go. On April 26, near Durham, N.C., the Army of Tennessee laid down its arms before Sherman's forces. With the surrender of isolated forces in the Trans-Mississippi West on May 4, 11, and 26, the most costly war in American history came to an end."
- Catton 1965, p. 445. "and on May 26 he surrendered and the war was over"
- Gallagher et al. 2003, p. 308. "By 26 May, General Edward Kirby Smith had surrendered the Rebel forces in the trans-Mississippi west. The war was over."
- Blair 2015, p. 9. "The sheer weight of scholarship has leaned toward portraying the surrenders of the Confederate armies as the end of the war."
- ^ Among the many other contemporary sources and later historians citing May 26, 1865 as the end date for the American Civil War hostilities are George Templeton Strong, who was a prominent New York lawyer; a founder, treasurer, and member of the Executive Committee of United States Sanitary Commission throughout the war; and a diarist. A diary excerpt is published in Gienapp, William E. (ed.). The Civil War and Reconstruction: A Documentary Collection. New York: W.W. Norton & Co., 2001, pp. 313–314 ISBN 978-0-393-97555-0. A footnote in Gienapp shows the excerpt was taken from an edited version of the diaries by Allan Nevins and Milton Halsey Thomas, eds., The Diary of George Templeton Strong, vol. 2 (New York: The Macmillan Company), pp. 600–601, which differs from the volume and page numbers of the original diaries; the page in Strong's original handwriting is shown at "Volume 4, pages 124–125: diary entries for May 23 (continued)–June 7, 1865". Archived from the original on November 16, 2022 – via New-York Historical Society Museum & Library.
- 211,411 Union soldiers were captured, and 30,218 died in prison. The ones who died have been excluded to prevent double-counting of casualties.
- 462,634 Confederate soldiers were captured and 25,976 died in prison. The ones who died have been excluded to prevent double-counting of casualties.
- The Union was the U.S. government and included the states that remained loyal to it, both the non-slave states and the border states (Missouri, Kentucky, Maryland, and Delaware) where slavery was legal. Missouri and Kentucky were also claimed by the Confederacy and given full state delegations in the Confederate Congress for the duration of the war.
- Appomattox is referred to symbolically as the end of the war, although arguably there are different dates for the war's conclusion. Lee's surrender to Grant set off a wave of Confederate surrenders. The last military department of the Confederacy, the Trans-Mississippi Department disbanded on May 26.
- This assumes that Union and Confederate casualties are counted together; more Americans were killed in World War II than in either the Union or Confederate Armies if their casualty totals are counted separately.
- Historians disagree as to whether Roger Taney heard Ex parte Merryman as a U.S. circuit judge or as a Supreme Court justice in chambers.
- Unaware of the surrender of Lee, on April 16 the last major battles of the war were fought at the Battle of Columbus, Georgia, and the Battle of West Point.
-
- Murray 1967, p. 336
- Neff 2010, p. 207
- Trudeau 1994, p. 396. In United States v. Anderson, 76 U.S. 56 (1869), "The U.S. attorneys argued that the Rebellion had been suppressed following the surrender of the Trans-Mississippi Department, as established in the surrender document negotiated on May 26, 1865."
- Trudeau 1994, p. 397. The Supreme Court decided that the "legal end of the American Civil War had been decided by Congress to be August 20, 1866—the date of Andrew Johnson's final proclamation on the conclusion of the Rebellion."
- "Union population 1864" aggregates 1860 population, average annual immigration 1855–1864, and population governed formerly by CSA per Kenneth Martis source. Contrabands and after the Emancipation Proclamation freedmen, migrating into Union control on the coasts and to the advancing armies, and natural increase are excluded.
- "Slave 1864, CSA" aggregates 1860 slave census of Virginia, North Carolina, South Carolina, Georgia and Texas. It omits losses from contraband and after the Emancipation Proclamation, freedmen migrating to the Union controlled coastal ports and those joining advancing Union armies, especially in the Mississippi Valley.
- "Total Union railroad miles" aggregates existing track reported 1860 @ 21800 plus new construction 1860–1864 @ 5000, plus southern railroads administered by USMRR @ 2300.
- In spite of the South's shortage of soldiers, most Southern leaders—until 1865—opposed enlisting slaves. They used them as laborers to support the war effort. As Howell Cobb said, "If slaves will make good soldiers our whole theory of slavery is wrong." Confederate generals Patrick Cleburne and Robert E. Lee argued in favor of arming blacks late in the war, and Jefferson Davis was eventually persuaded to support plans for arming slaves to avoid military defeat. The Confederacy surrendered at Appomattox before this plan could be implemented.
- ^
- Lincoln's letter to O. H. Browning, September 22, 1861.
- Wittke 1952, p. . "Sentiment among German Americans was largely antislavery especially among Forty-Eighters, resulting in hundreds of thousands of German Americans volunteering to fight for the Union."
- Keller 2009.
- for primary sources, see Walter D. Kamphoefner and Wolfgang Helbich, eds., Germans in the Civil War: The Letters They Wrote Home (2006). "On the other hand, many of the recent immigrants in the North viewed freed slaves as competition for scarce jobs, and as the reason why the Civil War was being fought."
- Baker 2003. "Due in large part to this fierce competition with free blacks for labor opportunities, the poor and working class Irish Catholics generally opposed emancipation. When the draft began in the summer of 1863, they launched a major riot in New York City that was suppressed by the military, as well as much smaller protests in other cities."
- Schecter 2007, ch. 6. "Many Catholics in the North had volunteered to fight in 1861, sending thousands of soldiers to the front and suffering high casualties, especially at Fredericksburg; their volunteering fell off after 1862."
- In late March 1864 Lincoln met with Governor Bramlette, Archibald Dixon, and Albert G. Hodges, to discuss recruitment of African American soldiers in the state of Kentucky. In a letter dated April 4, 1864, Lincoln summarized his stance on slavery, at Hodges' request.
References
- "Size of the Union Army in the American Civil War". Archived from the original on January 30, 2016.
Of which 131,000 were in the Navy and Marines, 140,000 were garrison troops and home defense militia, and 427,000 were in the field army
- ^ "Facts". National Park Service.
- "The war of the rebellion: a compilation of the official records of the Union and Confederate armies; Series 4 – Volume 2". United States War Dept. 1900. Archived from the original on July 25, 2017.
- Long 1971, p. 705.
- ^ Fox, William F. (1889). Regimental losses in the American Civil War. Archived from the original on May 25, 2017.
{{cite book}}
: CS1 maint: unfit URL (link) - ^ "U.S. Military Casualties: Principal Wars 1775–1991". Defence Casuality Analysis System (DCAS).
- Chambers & Anderson 1999, p. 849.
- ^ Rhodes, James Ford (1893). History of the United States from the Compromise of 1850. New York: Harper & Bros. pp. 507–508.
- ^ Nofi, Al (June 13, 2001). "Statistics on the War's Costs". Louisiana State University. Archived from the original on July 11, 2007. Retrieved October 14, 2007.
- Downs 2012. "The rough 19th century estimate was that 60,000 former slaves died from the epidemic, but doctors treating black patients often claimed that they were unable to keep accurate records due to demands on their time and the lack of manpower and resources. The surviving records only include the number of black patients whom doctors encountered; tens of thousands of other slaves had no contact with army doctors, leaving no records of their deaths."
- Toward a Social History of the American Civil War Exploratory Essays, Cambridge University Press, 1990, p. 4.
- ^ Hacker, J. David (September 20, 2011). "Recounting the Dead". The New York Times. Associated Press. Archived from the original on September 25, 2011. Retrieved September 22, 2011.
- Downs 2012. "An 2 April 2012 New York Times article, 'New Estimate Raises Civil War Death Toll', reports that a new study ratchets up the death toll from an estimated 650,000 to a staggering 850,000 people. As horrific as this new number is, it fails to reflect the mortality of former slaves during the war. If former slaves were included in this figure, the Civil War death toll would likely be over a million casualties ...".
- "The Declaration of Causes of Seceding States. Primary Sources". American Battlefield Trust. Retrieved December 30, 2023.
- Woods, Michael E. (August 20, 2012). "What Twenty-First-Century Historians Have Said about the Causes of Disunion: A Civil War Sesquicentennial Review of the Recent Literature". Journal of American History. 99 (2): 415–439. doi:10.1093/jahist/jas272. ISSN 0021-8723.
- Woods, M. E. (August 20, 2012). "What Twenty-First-Century Historians Have Said about the Causes of Disunion: A Civil War Sesquicentennial Review of the Recent Literature". Journal of American History. 99 (2): 415–439. doi:10.1093/jahist/jas272. ISSN 0021-8723.
- Aaron Sheehan-Dean, "A Book for Every Perspective: Current Civil War and Reconstruction Textbooks", Civil War History (2005) 51#3 pp. 317–324
- Loewen, James W. (2011). "Using Confederate Documents to Teach About Secession, Slavery, and the Origins of the Civil War". OAH Magazine of History. 25 (2): 35–44. doi:10.1093/oahmag/oar002. ISSN 0882-228X. JSTOR 23210244. Archived from the original on April 7, 2023. Retrieved April 7, 2023.
Confederate leaders themselves made it plain that slavery was the key issue sparking secession.
- Coates, Ta-Nehisi (June 23, 2015). "What This Cruel War Was Over". The Atlantic. Archived from the original on October 31, 2017.
- "A Declaration of the Immediate Causes which Induce and Justify the Secession of the State of Mississippi from the Federal Union". The Declaration of Causes of Seceding States. 1861. Retrieved September 12, 2024 – via American Battlefield Trust.
- Patrick Karl O'Brien (2002). Atlas of World History. Oxford University Press. p. 184. ISBN 978-0-19-521921-0. Archived from the original on September 5, 2015. Retrieved October 25, 2015.
- John McCardell, The Idea of a Southern Nation: Southern Nationalists and Southern Nationalism, 1830–1860 (1981)
- Susan-Mary Grant, North Over South: Northern Nationalism and American Identity in the Antebellum Era (2000)
- Elizabeth R. Varon, Bruce Levine, Marc Egnal, and Michael Holt at a plenary session of the organization of American Historians, March 17, 2011, reported by David A. Walsh "Highlights from the 2011 Annual Meeting of the Organization of American Historians in Houston, Texas" HNN online Archived December 4, 2011, at the Wayback Machine
- Potter & Fehrenbacher 1976, p. 485.
- McPherson 1988, pp. 254–255.
- ^ "1861 Time Line". Civil War Glass Negatives and Related Prints. Library of Congress. Retrieved January 22, 2022.
- Jaffa, Harry V. (2004). A New Birth of Freedom: Abraham Lincoln and the Coming of the Civil War. Rowman & Littlefield. p. 1. ISBN 978-0-8476-9953-7.
- "Ordinances of Secession of the 13 Confederate States of America". Archived from the original on June 11, 2004. Retrieved November 28, 2012.
- "Confederate States of America – Declaration of the Immediate Causes which Induce and Justify the Secession of South Carolina from the Federal Union". The Avalon Project. Archived from the original on February 20, 2019. Retrieved November 28, 2012.
- "A Declaration of the Immediate Causes which Induce and Justify the Secession of the State of Mississippi from the Federal Union". The Avalon Project. Archived from the original on October 10, 2014. Retrieved November 28, 2012.
- "Confederate States of America – Georgia Secession". The Avalon Project. Archived from the original on July 14, 2011. Retrieved November 28, 2012.
- "Confederate States of America – A Declaration of the Causes which Impel the State of Texas to Secede from the Federal Union". The Avalon Project. Archived from the original on August 11, 2011. Retrieved November 28, 2012.
- McPherson 1988, p. 24.
- Buchanan, James (December 3, 1860). "Fourth Annual Message". Archived from the original on December 20, 2008. Retrieved November 28, 2012 – via The American Presidency Project.
- Winters 1963, p. 28.
- "Profile Showing the Grades upon the Different Routes Surveyed for the Union Pacific Rail Road Between the Missouri River and the Valley of the Platte River". World Digital Library. 1865. Retrieved July 16, 2013.
- "Abraham Lincoln imposes first federal income tax". History.com. Retrieved June 12, 2021.
- McPherson 1988, pp. 252–254.
- McPherson 1988, p. 253.
- McPherson 1988, pp. 234–266.
- ^ Abraham Lincoln, First Inaugural Address, Monday, March 4, 1861.
- McPherson 1988, p. 262.
- ^ Potter & Fehrenbacher 1976, pp. 572–573.
- Harris, William C. (Winter 2000). "The Hampton Roads Peace Conference: A Final Test of Lincoln's Presidential Leadership". Journal of the Abraham Lincoln Association. 21 (1). hdl:2027/spo.2629860.0021.104. ISSN 1945-7987.
- Hardyman, Robyn (2016). What Caused the Civil War?. Gareth Stevens. p. 27. ISBN 978-1-4824-5180-1.
- McPherson 1988, p. 264.
- McPherson 1988, p. 265.
- McPherson 1988, p. 266.
- ^ McPherson 1988, p. 267.
- McPherson 1988, p. 268.
- McPherson 1988, p. 272.
- McPherson 1988, p. 273.
- McPherson 1988, pp. 273–274.
- McPherson 1988, p. 274.
- "Abraham Lincoln: Proclamation 83 – Increasing the Size of the Army and Navy". Presidency.ucsb.edu. Retrieved November 3, 2011.
- McPherson 1988, p. 278.
- McPherson 1988, pp. 276–307.
- Jones 2011, pp. 203–204.
- Jones 2011, p. 21.
- "Civil War and the Maryland General Assembly". Maryland State Archives. Retrieved May 28, 2017.
- ^ "Teaching American History in Maryland – Documents for the Classroom: Arrest of the Maryland Legislature, 1861". Maryland State Archives. 2005. Archived from the original on January 11, 2008. Retrieved February 6, 2008.
- McPherson 1988, pp. 284–287.
- Harris, William C. (2011). Lincoln and the Border States: Preserving the Union. University Press of Kansas. p. 71.
- White, Jonathan W. (2011). Abraham Lincoln and Treason in the Civil War: The Trials of John Merryman. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press. pp. 38–39.
- Vladeck, Stephen I. (Summer 2007). "The Field Theory: Martial Law, The Suspension Power, and The Insurrection Act". Temple Law Review. Vol. 80, no. 2. p. 391, n. 2. Archived from the original on September 27, 2022.
- Howard, F. K. (1863). Fourteen Months in American Bastiles. London: H. F. Mackintosh. Retrieved August 18, 2014.
- Nevins, The War for the Union (1959), 1:119–129.
- Nevins, The War for the Union (1959), 1:129–136.
- "A State of Convenience, The Creation of West Virginia". West Virginia Archives & History. Archived from the original on May 18, 2012. Retrieved April 20, 2012.
- Curry, Richard Orr (1964), A House Divided: A Study of the Statehood Politics and the Copperhead Movement in West Virginia, University of Pittsburgh Press, map on p. 49.
- McPherson 1988, p. 303.
- Weigley 2004, p. 55.
- Snell, Mark A. (2011), West Virginia and the Civil War, History Press, Charleston, SC, p. 28.
- Neely 1993, pp. 10–11.
- Keegan 2009, p. 73. "Over 10,000 military engagements took place during the war, 40 percent of them in Virginia and Tennessee."
- Gabor Boritt (ed.). War Comes Again (1995), p. 247.
- "The Civil War, 1861" (PDF). American Military History. pp. 199–221. Archived (PDF) from the original on October 17, 2012.
With an actual strength of 1,080 officers and 14,926 enlisted men on June 30, 1860, the Regular Army...
- Nicolay, John George; Hay, John (1890). Abraham Lincoln: A History. Century. p. 264.
- Coulter 1950, p. 308.
- Faust, Albert Bernhardt (1909). The German Element in the United States: With Special Reference to Its Political, Moral, Social, and Educational Influence. Houghton Mifflin.
- Reid, Richard M. (2014). African Canadians in Union Blue: Volunteering for the Cause in the Civil War. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press. pp. 4–5, 40. ISBN 978-0-7748-2745-4.
- Schecter 2007, p. .
- Eugene Murdock, One Million Men: the Civil War draft in the North (1971).
- Hallock, Judith Lee (1983). "The Role of the Community in Civil War Desertion" (PDF). Civil War History. 29 (2): 123–134. doi:10.1353/cwh.1983.0013.
- Bearman, Peter S. (1991). "Desertion as Localism: Army Unit Solidarity and Group Norms in the U.S. Civil War". Social Forces. 70 (2): 321–342. doi:10.1093/sf/70.2.321. JSTOR 2580242.
- Robert Fantina, Desertion and the American Soldier, 1776–2006 (2006), p. 74.
- Nadeau, Ryan (January 5, 2015). "A Prussian Observes the American Civil War". The Gettysburg Compiler. Retrieved January 6, 2022.
- Keegan 2009, p. 57.
- Scott, E. Carole. Southerner vs. Southerner: Union Supporters Below the Mason-Dixon Line. Warfare History Network. Retrieved November 11, 2024.
- Pickenpaugh, Roger (2013). Captives in Blue: The Civil War Prisons of the Confederacy. University of Alabama Press. pp. 57–73. ISBN 978-0-8173-1783-6.
- Tucker, Pierpaoli & White 2010, p. 1466.
- Leonard 1999, pp. 165, 310–311.
- Leonard 1999, p. 240.
- "Highlights in the History of Military Women". Women In Military Service For America Memorial. Archived from the original on April 3, 2013. Retrieved June 22, 2013.
- Pennington, Reina (2003). Amazons to Fighter Pilots: A Biographical Dictionary of Military Women. Vol. 2. Greenwood. pp. 474–475. ISBN 0-313-32708-4.
- "The Case of Dr. Walker, Only Woman to Win (and Lose) the Medal of Honor". The New York Times. June 4, 1977. Retrieved January 6, 2018.
- Blanton, DeAnne, "A Life on His Own Terns: Albert D. J. Cashier, 95th Illinois Infantry", in Brian Matthew Jordan and Jonathan W. White, eds., Final Resting Places: Reflections on the Meaning of Civil War Graves. Athen, Georgia: The University of Georgia Press, 2023, pp. 47-53.
- Welles, Gideon (January 1865). "Secretary of the Navy's Report". The Sailors' Magazine and Seamen's Friend. Vol. 37, no. 5. American Seamen's Friend Society. p. 152.
- Tucker, Pierpaoli & White 2010, p. 462.
- Canney 1998, p. .
- "American Civil War: The naval war". Encyclopædia Britannica. Retrieved January 24, 2022.
- Nelson 2005, p. 92.
- ^ Anderson 1989, p. 300.
- Myron J. Smith, Tinclads in the Civil War: Union Light-Draught Gunboat Operations on Western Waters, 1862–1865 (2009).
- Gerald F. Teaster and Linda and James Treaster Ambrose, The Confederate Submarine H. L. Hunley (1989).
- Nelson 2005, p. 345.
- Fuller 2008, p. 36.
- Richter 2009, p. 49.
- Johnson 1998, p. 228.
- Anderson 1989, pp. 288–289, 296–298.
- Wise 1991, p. 49.
- Mendelsohn 2012, pp. 43–44.
- Stern 1962, pp. 224–225.
- Neely, Mark E. (June 1986). "The Perils of Running the Blockade: The Influence of International Law in an Era of Total War". Civil War History. 32 (2): 101–118. doi:10.1353/cwh.1986.0012.
- ^ Wise 1991, p. .
- Surdam, David G. (1998). "The Union Navy's blockade reconsidered". Naval War College Review. 51 (4): 85–107.
- Surdam, David G. (2001). Northern Naval Superiority and the Economics of the American Civil War. University of South Carolina Press.
- Keys, David (June 24, 2014). "Historians reveal secrets of UK gun-running which lengthened the American civil war by two years". The Independent.
- Kevin Dougherty (2010). Weapons of Mississippi. University Press of Mississippi. p. 87. ISBN 9-7816-0473-4522.
- Jones 2002, p. 225.
- Dinçaslan 2022, p. 73.
- McPherson 1988, pp. 546–557.
- Herring 2011, p. 237.
- ^ McPherson 1988, p. 386.
- ^ Allan Nevins, War for the Union 1862–1863, pp. 263–264.
- Doyle 2015, pp. 69–70.
- Doyle 2015, p. 8.
- Doyle 2015, pp. 70–74.
- Richard Huzzeym, Freedom Burning: Anti-Slavery and Empire in Victorian Britain (2013).
- ^ Stephen B. Oates, The Approaching Fury: Voices of the Storm 1820–1861, p. 125.
- "The Trent Affair: Diplomacy, Britain, and the American Civil War – National Museum of American Diplomacy". January 5, 2022. Retrieved January 18, 2022.
- Shawcross, Edward (2021). The Last Emperor of Mexico: The Dramatic Story of the Habsburg Archduke Who Created a Kingdom in the New World. New York: Basic Books. ISBN 978-1541-674196. Also titled The Last Emperor of Mexico: A Disaster in the New World. London: Faber & Faber, 2022.
- Herring 2011, p. 261.
- Norman E. Saul, Richard D. McKinzie, eds. Russian-American Dialogue on Cultural Relations, 1776–1914. Columbia, Missouri, and London, UK: University of Missouri Press, p. 95. ISBN 978-0826210975.
- "Eastern Theater of the Civil War". Legends of America. Retrieved April 22, 2024.
- Anderson 1989, p. 91.
- Freeman, Douglas Southall (1934). R. E. Lee: A Biography. Vol. II. New York: Charles Scribner's Sons. p. 78 and footnote 6.
- Foote 1974, pp. 464–519.
- Bruce Catton, Terrible Swift Sword, pp. 263–296.
- McPherson 1988, pp. 424–427.
- ^ McPherson 1988, pp. 538–544.
- McPherson 1988, pp. 528–533.
- "Overview of the Battle". history.army.mil. Retrieved September 13, 2024.
On 3 August, General Halleck directed General McClellan to begin his final withdrawal from the Peninsula and to return to Northern Virginia to support Pope. McClellan protested and did not begin his redeployment until 14 August. The situation created an opportunity for General Lee. The removal of the Army of the Potomac as a threat meant that there would be a short period when he could turn on Pope's force and actually outnumber it before the merger of the two Federal armies.
- McPherson 1988, pp. 543–545.
- McPherson 1988, pp. 557–558.
- McPherson 1988, pp. 571–574.
- Matteson, John, A Worse Place Than Hell: How the Civil War Battle of Fredericksburg Changed a Nation, New York: W. W. Norton and Company, 2021.
- Jones, Wilmer L. (2006). Generals in Blue and Gray: Lincoln's Generals. Stackpole. pp. 237–238. ISBN 978-1-4617-5106-9.
- McPherson 1988, pp. 639–645.
- Noyalas, Jonathan A. (2010). Stonewall Jackson's 1862 Valley Campaign. Arcadia. p. 93. ISBN 978-1-61423-040-3.
- Thomas, Emory M. (1997). Robert E. Lee: A Biography. W. W. Norton. p. 287. ISBN 978-0-393-31631-5.
- "Salem Church". National Park Service. October 5, 2021. Retrieved March 30, 2022.
- McPherson 1988, pp. 653–663.
- McPherson 1988, p. 664.
- ^ Bowery, Charles R. (2014). The Civil War in the Western Theater, 1862. Washington, D.C.: Center of Military History. pp. 58–72. ISBN 978-0160923166.
- ^ "Vicksburg". American Battlefield Trust. Retrieved September 27, 2022.
- McPherson 1988, pp. 405–413.
- Whitsell, Robert D. (1963). "Military and Naval Activity between Cairo and Columbus". Register of the Kentucky Historical Society. 62 (2): 107–121.
- Frank & Reaves 2003, p. 170.
- "Death of Albert Sidney Johnston – Tour Stop #17". National Park Service. Retrieved March 12, 2022.
- ^ McPherson 1988, pp. 418–420.
- Kennedy, p. 58.
- Symonds & Clipson 2001, p. 92.
- "10 Facts: The Vicksburg Campaign". American Battlefield Trust. January 31, 2013. Retrieved September 13, 2022.
- Brown, Kent Masterson (2000). The Civil War in Kentucky: Battle for the Bluegrass State. Mason City, IA: Savas. p. 95. ISBN 978-1-882810-47-5.
- McPherson 1988, pp. 419–420.
- McPherson 1988, pp. 480–483.
- Mangum, Ronald Scott (1991). "The Vicksburg Campaign: A Study In Joint Operations" (PDF). Parameters: U.S. Army War College. 21 (3): 74–86. Archived from the original (PDF) on November 27, 2012.
- Miller, Donald L. Vicksburg: Grant's Campaign that Broke the Confederacy. New York: Simon & Schuster, 2019. ISBN 978-1-4516-4137-0.
- McPherson 1988, pp. 677–680.
- "Sherman's March to the Sea". American Battlefield Trust. September 17, 2014.
- Jones 2011, p. 1476.
- Keegan 2009, p. 100.
- McPherson 1988, pp. 404–405.
- Martin, James B. (2012). Third War: Irregular Warfare on the Western Border 1861–1865. Leavenworth papers. Vol. 23. Fort Leavenworth, KS: Combat Studies Institute Press. OCLC 1029877004.
- Fellman, Michael (1989). Inside War: The Guerrilla Conflict in Missouri during the Civil War. New York: Oxford University Press.
Missouri alone was the scene of over 1,000 engagements between regular units, and uncounted numbers of guerrilla attacks and raids by informal pro-Confederate bands, especially in the recently settled western counties.
- Bohl, Sarah (2004). "A War on Civilians: Order Number 11 and the Evacuation of Western Missouri". Prologue. 36 (1): 44–51.
- Keegan 2009, p. 270.
- Graves, William H. (1991). "Indian Soldiers for the Gray Army: Confederate Recruitment in Indian Territory". Chronicles of Oklahoma. 69 (2): 134–145.
- Neet, J. Frederick Jr. (1996). "Stand Watie: Confederate General in the Cherokee Nation". Great Plains Journal. 6 (1): 36–51.
- Keegan 2009, pp. 220–221.
- "Red River Campaign". Encyclopedia Britannica. Archived from the original on March 27, 2022.
- Symonds, Craig L. (2012). The Civil War at Sea. New York: Oxford University Press. p. 110. ISBN 978-0-19-993168-2.
- "Second Battle of Fort Wagner". Encyclopædia Britannica. Retrieved January 25, 2022.
- Lattimore, Ralston B. "Battle for Fort Pulaski – Fort Pulaski National Monument". National Park Service. Retrieved April 20, 2022.
- Trefousse, Hans L. (1957). Ben Butler: The South Called Him Beast!. New York: Twayne. OCLC 371213.
- "War in the West · Civil War · Digital Exhibits". digitalexhibits.wsulibs.wsu.edu. Retrieved March 7, 2022.
- Neely, Mark E. (December 2004). "Was the Civil War a Total War?". Civil War History. 50 (4): 434–458. doi:10.1353/cwh.2004.0073.
- Grant, Ulysses S. (1990). Personal Memoirs of U.S. Grant; Selected Letters. Library of America. p. 247. ISBN 978-0-940450-58-5.
- Field, Ron (2013). Petersburg 1864–65: The Longest Siege. Osprey. p. 6. ISBN 978-1-4728-0305-4.
- McPherson 1988, pp. 724–735.
- McPherson 1988, p. 728.
- McPherson 1988, pp. 724–742.
- McPherson 1988, pp. 778–779.
- McPherson 1988, pp. 773–776.
- McPherson 1988, pp. 812–815.
- McPherson 1988, pp. 825–830.
- McPherson 1988, pp. 846–847.
- "Union / Victory! / Peace! / Surrender of General Lee and His Whole Army". The New York Times. April 10, 1865. p. 1.
- "Most Glorious News of the War / Lee Has Surrendered to Grant ! / All Lee's Officers and Men Are Paroled". Savannah Daily Herald. Savannah, GA. April 16, 1865. pp. 1, 4.
- Simpson, Brooks D. (1991). Let Us Have Peace: Ulysses S. Grant and the Politics of War and Reconstruction, 1861–1868. Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina Press. p. 84.
- William Marvel (2002) Lee's Last Retreat: The Flight to Appomattox, pp. 158–181.
- Winik, Jay (2001). April 1865: the month that saved America. New York: HarperCollins. pp. 188–189. ISBN 0-06-018723-9.
- Long 1971, p. 685.
- Arnold, James R.; Wiener, Roberta (2016). Understanding U.S. Military Conflicts through Primary Sources [4 volumes]. ABC-CLIO. p. 15. ISBN 978-1-61069-934-1.
- Long 1971, p. 688.
- Bradley 2015, p. 68.
- Hunt 2015, p. 5.
- Long 1971, p. 690.
- Dunkerly 2015, p. 117.
- Long 1971, p. 692.
- "Ulysses S. Grant: The Myth of 'Unconditional Surrender' Begins at Fort Donelson". American Battlefield Trust. April 17, 2009. Archived from the original on February 7, 2016.
- Morris, John Wesley (1977). Ghost Towns of Oklahoma. University of Oklahoma Press. p. 68. ISBN 978-0-8061-1420-0.
- Bradley 2015, p. 69. "The 58-year-old Cherokee chieftain was the last Confederate general to lay down his arms. The last Confederate-affiliated tribe to surrender was the Chickasaw nation, which capitulated on 14 July."
- Conner, Robert C. General Gordon Granger: The Savior of Chickamauga and the Man Behind "Juneteenth". Havertown, PA: Casemate Publishers, 2013. ISBN 978-1-61200-186-9. p. 177.
- Gates, Henry Louis Jr. (January 16, 2013). "What Is Juneteenth?". PBS. Retrieved June 12, 2020.
- Neff 2010, p. 205.
- Lincoln, Abraham (April 11, 1865). "Proclamation 128—Claiming Equality of Rights with All Maritime Nations". The American Presidency Project. Online by Gerhard Peters and John T. Woolley. University of California, Santa Barbara. Archived from the original on November 16, 2022. Retrieved July 25, 2022. The proclamation did not use the term "belligerent rights".
- Johnson, Andrew (May 10, 1865). "Proclamation 132—Ordering the Arrest of Insurgent Cruisers". The American Presidency Project. Online by Gerhard Peters and John T. Woolley. University of California, Santa Barbara. Archived from the original on November 16, 2022. Retrieved July 25, 2022. The proclamation did not use the term "belligerent rights".
- "Withdrawal of Belligerent Rights by Great Britain". Army and Navy Journal. 2 (44). New York: American News Company: 695. June 24, 1865. Retrieved July 25, 2022.
- "England and the Termination of the Rebellion". Army and Navy Journal. 2 (48). New York: American News Company: 763. July 22, 1865. Retrieved July 25, 2022.
- "Withdrawal of British Restrictions Upon American Naval Vessels". Army and Navy Journal. 3 (11). New York: American News Company: 172. November 4, 1865. Retrieved July 25, 2022.
- Heidler, Heidler & Coles 2002, pp. 703–706.
- McPherson 1988, p. 851.
- McPherson 1988, p. 855.
- ^ Gabor S. Boritt (ed.). Why the Confederacy Lost.
- McPherson 1988, pp. 771–772.
- "Manufactures of the United States in 1860; Compiled from the original returns of the Eight Census" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on August 17, 2017.
- Carter, Susan B. (ed.). The Historical Statistics of the United States: Millennial Edition (5 vols), 2006.
- Martis, Kenneth C. (1994). The Historical Atlas of the Congresses of the Confederate States of America: 1861–1865. Simon & Schuster. p. 27. ISBN 978-0-13-389115-7. At the beginning of 1865, the Confederacy controlled one third of its congressional districts, which were apportioned by population. The major slave populations found in Louisiana, Mississippi, Tennessee, and Alabama were effectively under Union control by the end of 1864.
- Depew, Chauncey, ed. (1968). One Hundred Years of American Commerce 1795–1895. New York: Greenwood. p. 111.
- "U.S. Railroad Construction, 1860–1880". Digital History Reader. Virginia Tech. Archived from the original on June 11, 2016. Retrieved August 21, 2012.
- Murray, Bernstein & Knox 1996, p. 235.
- Heidler, Heidler & Coles 2002, pp. 1207–1210.
- Ward 1990, p. 272.
- Coulter 1950, p. 566.
- Beringer, Richard E.; Hattaway, Herman; Jones, Archer; Still, William N. Jr. (1991). Why the South Lost the Civil War. ch. 1.
- Farmer, Alan (2005). "Why was the Confederacy Defeated?". History Review. pp. 15–20. Archived from the original on March 23, 2014 – via History Today.
- McPherson 1997, pp. 169–172.
- Gallagher, Gary W. (1999). The Confederate War. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. p. 57. ISBN 978-0-674-16056-9.
- Fehrenbacher, Don (2004). "Lincoln's Wartime Leadership: The First Hundred Days". Journal of the Abraham Lincoln Association. 9 (1). University of Illinois. Retrieved October 16, 2007.
- McPherson 1988, pp. 382–388.
- Doyle 2015.
- Bordewich, Fergus M. (February 6, 2015). "The World Was Watching: America's Civil War slowly came to be seen as part of a global struggle against oppressive privilege". The Wall Street Journal. Archived from the original on February 21, 2017.
- ^ Dupont, Brandon; Rosenbloom, Joshua L. (2018). "The Economic Origins of the Postwar Southern Elite". Explorations in Economic History. 68: 119–131. doi:10.1016/j.eeh.2017.09.002.
- "U.S. Civil War Took Bigger Toll Than Previously Estimated, New Analysis Suggests". Science Daily. September 22, 2011. Retrieved September 22, 2011.
- "Civil War Toll Much Worse in Confederate States, New Estimates Show -…". archive.ph. November 19, 2024. Retrieved November 27, 2024.
- Barceló, Joan; Jensen, Jeffrey L.; Peisakhin, Leonid; Zhai, Haoyu (November 26, 2024). "New Estimates of US Civil War mortality from full-census records". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 121 (48): e2414919121. doi:10.1073/pnas.2414919121. PMC 11621511. PMID 39556740.
- Barceló, Joan; Jensen, Jeffrey L.; Peisakhin, Leonid; Zhai, Haoyu (November 26, 2024). "New Estimates of US Civil War mortality from full-census records". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 121 (48): e2414919121. doi:10.1073/pnas.2414919121. PMC 11621511. PMID 39556740.
- Vinovskis 1990, p. 7.
- Richard Wightman Fox (2008). "National Life After Death". Slate.
- Yancey Hall (July 1, 2003). "U.S. Civil War Prison Camps Claimed Thousands". National Geographic News. Archived from the original on July 7, 2003.
- Riordan, Teresa (March 8, 2004). "When Necessity Meets Ingenuity: Art of Restoring What's Missing". The New York Times. Associated Press. Retrieved December 23, 2013.
- McPherson 1988, p. 854.
- Aptheker, Herbert (January 1947). "Negro Casualties in the Civil War". The Journal of Negro History. 32 (1). University of Chicago Press: 10–80. doi:10.2307/2715291. ISSN 0022-2992. JSTOR 2715291.
- "American Civil War Fortifications". Osprey.
- Jim Downs, Sick from Freedom: African-American Illness and Suffering during the Civil War and Reconstruction, Oxford University Press, 2012.
- "The Battle of Gettysburg & the History of the Civil War Horse". June 25, 2013. Retrieved January 2, 2024.
- Jones, J. William (ed.). "1.37: Confederate States' flags". Southern Historical Society Papers. Vol. 32. Retrieved January 9, 2024 – via Perseus Digital Library.
- "Returned Flags Booklet, 1905". Retrieved January 9, 2024 – via PBS LearningMedia.
- ^ McPherson 1988, pp. vii–viii.
- Foner 2010, p. 74.
- Foner 1981, p. .
- ^ McPherson 1988, pp. 506–508.
- McPherson 1988, p. 686.
- Cathey, Libby (June 17, 2021). "Biden signs bill making Juneteenth, marking the end of slavery, a federal holiday". ABC News. Retrieved June 17, 2021.
- Claudia Goldin, "The economics of emancipation." The Journal of Economic History 33#1 (1973): 66–85.
- McPherson 1988, pp. 831–837.
- ^ Donald 1995, pp. 417–419.
- Baker 2003.
- McPherson, James M., "Lincoln and the Strategy of Unconditional Surrender", in Boritt, Gabor S. (ed.). Lincoln, the War President, pp. 52–54; also in McPherson, James M., Abraham Lincoln and the Second American Revolution, pp. 83–85.
- Oates, Stephen B., Abraham Lincoln: The Man Behind the Myths, p. 106.
- Stahr, Walter, Stanton: Lincoln's War Secretary, New York: Simon & Schuster, 2017, p. 226.
- "Horace Greeley (1811–1872). "The Prayer of Twenty Millions". Stedman and Hutchinson, eds. 1891. A Library of American Literature: An Anthology in 11 Volumes". www.bartleby.com. June 14, 2022.
- Lincoln's letter was published first in the Washington National Intelligencer on August 23, 1862. Holzer, Harold, Lincoln and the Power of the Press: The War for Public Opinion, New York: Simon & Schuster, 2014, p. 401.
- Abraham Lincoln (August 24, 1862). "A LETTER FROM PRESIDENT LINCOLN.; Reply to Horace Greeley. Slavery and the Union The Restoration of the Union the Paramount Object". The New York Times. The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Wikidata Q116965145.
- White, Jonathan W., A House Built by Slaves: African American Visitors to the Lincoln White House, Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 2022, ch. 3.
- Pulling, Sr. Anne Frances, Altoona: Images of America, Arcadia Publishing, 2001, 10.
- Lincoln's Letter to A. G. Hodges, April 4, 1864.
- "Lincoln Lore – Albert G. Hodges". Kentucky Legislature. Retrieved January 20, 2022.
- "Andrew Johnson and Emancipation in Tennessee – Andrew Johnson National Historic Site". National Park Service.
- Harper, Douglas (2003). "Slavery in Delaware". Archived from the original on October 16, 2007. Retrieved October 16, 2007.
- McPherson, James (March 1990). "A War that Never Goes Away". American Heritage Magazine. Vol. 41, no. 2.
- Asante & Mazama 2004, p. 82.
- Holzer & Gabbard 2007, pp. 172–174.
- Rhodes-Pitts, Sharifa (October 9, 2014). "The Worth of Black Men, From Slavery to Ferguson". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved December 25, 2023.
- "Finally Passing". The Economist. March 31, 2011. pp. 23–25. Archived from the original on April 20, 2011.
- Hans L. Trefousse, Historical Dictionary of Reconstruction (Greenwood, 1991) covers all the main events and leaders.
- Eric Foner's A Short History of Reconstruction (1990) is a brief survey—an abridgement of his Reconstruction: America's Unfinished Revolution, 1863-1877 (1988).
- C. Vann Woodward, Reunion and Reaction: The Compromise of 1877 and the End of Reconstruction (2nd ed. 1991).
- Williams, Susan Millar; Hoffius, Stephen G. (2011). Upheaval in Charleston: Earthquake and Murder on the Eve of Jim Crow. University of Georgia Press. ISBN 978-0-8203-3715-9. JSTOR j.ctt46nc9q.
- "Presidents Who Were Civil War Veterans". Essential Civil War Curriculum.
- Joan Waugh and Gary W. Gallagher, eds. (2009), Wars within a War: Controversy and Conflict over the American Civil War (University of North Carolina Press).
- David W. Blight (2001) Race and Reunion: The Civil War in American Memory.
- Woodworth 1996, p. 208.
- Cushman, Stephen (2014). Belligerent Muse: Five Northern Writers and How They Shaped Our Understanding of the Civil War. University of North Carolina Press. pp. 5–6. ISBN 978-1-4696-1878-4.
- Oscar Handlin; Arthur M. Schlesinger Sr.; Samuel Eliot Morison; Frederick Merk; Arthur M. Schlesinger; Paul Herman Buck (1954), Harvard Guide to American History, Belknap Press, pp. 385–398, Wikidata Q118746838
- Gaines M. Foster (1988), Ghosts of the Confederacy: Defeat, the Lost Cause and the Emergence of the New South, 1865–1913.
- Nolan 2000, pp. 14–19.
- Nolan 2000, pp. 28–29.
- Charles A. Beard and Mary R. Beard, The Rise of American Civilization (1927), 2:54.
- Hofstadter, Richard (2012) . Progressive Historians. Knopf Doubleday. p. 304. ISBN 978-0-307-80960-5.
- West, Mike (April 27, 2007). "Hazen's Monument a rare, historic treasure". Murfreesboro Post. Archived from the original on November 18, 2018. Retrieved May 30, 2018.
- Timothy B. Smith, "The Golden Age of Battlefield Preservation" (2008; The University of Tennessee Press).
- Bob Zeller, "Fighting the Second Civil War: A History of Battlefield Preservation and the Emergence of the Civil War Trust", (2017: Knox Press)
- "Saved Land". American Battlefield Trust. Archived from the original on August 12, 2019. Retrieved May 30, 2018.
- McWhirter, Cameron (May 25, 2019). "Civil War Battlefields Lose Ground as Tourist Draws". The Wall Street Journal. Archived from the original on October 10, 2019.
- Gary Gallagher, Causes Won, Lost, and Forgotten: How Hollywood and Popular Art Shape What We Know about the Civil War (Univ of North Carolina Press, 2008).
- "Debate over Ken Burns Civil War doc continues over decades". The Spokesman-Review. Retrieved May 4, 2020.
- Merritt, Keri Leigh. "Why We Need a New Civil War Documentary". Smithsonian Magazine. Retrieved May 4, 2020.
- Bailey, Thomas; Kennedy, David (1987). The American Pageant. p. 434.
- Dome, Steam (1974). "A Civil War Iron Clad Car". Railroad History. 130 (Spring 1974). The Railway & Locomotive Historical Society: 51–53.
- William Rattle Plum, The Military Telegraph During the Civil War in the United States, Christopher H. Sterling (ed.) (New York: Arno Press, 1974) vol. 1 p. 63.
- Buckley, John (2006). Air Power in the Age of Total War. Routledge. pp. 6, 24. ISBN 978-1-135-36275-1.
- Sondhaus, Naval Warfare 1815–1914 p. 77.
- Keegan 2009, p. 75.
- Hutchison, Coleman (2015). A History of American Civil War Literature. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-1-316-43241-9.
Bibliography
Main articles: Bibliography of the American Civil War and Bibliography of American Civil War naval historySources referenced
- Anderson, Bern (1989). By Sea and By River: The naval history of the Civil War. Hachette. ISBN 978-0-306-80367-3.
- Asante, Molefi Kete; Mazama, Ama (2004). Encyclopedia of Black Studies. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE. ISBN 978-0-7619-2762-4.
- Baker, Kevin (February–March 2003). "Violent City". American Heritage Magazine. Vol. 54, no. 1. Archived from the original on October 19, 2010. Retrieved July 29, 2010.
- Blair, William A. (2015). "Finding the Ending of America's Civil War". The American Historical Review. 120 (5). Oxford University Press: 1753–1766. doi:10.1093/ahr/120.5.1753. ISSN 0002-8762. JSTOR 43697075.
- Bradley, Mark L. (2015). The Civil War Ends (PDF). US Army, Center of Military History. Archived (PDF) from the original on May 26, 2022. Retrieved May 26, 2022.
- Canney, Donald L. (1998). Lincoln's Navy: The Ships, Men and Organization, 1861–65. Annapolis, MD: Naval Institute Press. ISBN 978-1-55750-519-4.
- Chambers, John W.; Anderson, Fred (1999). The Oxford Companion to American Military History. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-507198-6.
- Catton, Bruce (1965). The Centennial History of the Civil War. Vol. 3: Never Call Retreat. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
- Coulter, E. Merton (1950). The Confederate States of America, 1861–1865: A History of the South. Louisiana State University Press. ISBN 978-0-8071-0007-3.
- Davis, Jefferson (1881). The Rise And Fall Of The Confederate Government. Vol. II. New York: D. Appleton & Co. OCLC 1249017603.
- Dinçaslan, M. Bahadırhan (2022). Amerikan İç Savaşı El Kitabı [American Civil War Handbook] (in Turkish). Ankara: Altınordu Yayınları Press. ISBN 978-6-257-61066-7.
- Donald, David Herbert (1995). Lincoln. New York: Simon & Schuster. ISBN 978-0-684-80846-8.
- Doyle, Don H. (2015). The Cause of All Nations: An International History of the American Civil War. New York: Basic.
- Draper, John William (1870). History of the American Civil War. Vol. 3. New York: Harper & Brothers. OCLC 830251756. Retrieved July 28, 2022.
- Dunkerly, Robert M. (2015). To the Bitter End: Appomattox, Bennett Place and the Surrenders of the Confederacy. El Dorado Hills, CA: Savas Beatie. ISBN 978-1-61121-252-5.
- Dyer, Frederick H. (1908). A compendium of the War of the Rebellion. Des Moines, IA: Dyer. OCLC 8697590.
- Foner, Eric (1981). Politics and Ideology in the Age of the Civil War. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-502926-0. Retrieved April 20, 2012.
- Foner, Eric (2010). The Fiery Trial: Abraham Lincoln and American Slavery. New York: W. W. Norton. ISBN 978-0-393-34066-2.
- Foote, Shelby (1974). The Civil War: A Narrative. Vol. 1: Fort Sumter to Perryville. New York: Vintage. ISBN 978-0-394-74623-4.
- Frank, Joseph Allan; Reaves, George A. (2003). Seeing the Elephant: Raw Recruits at the Battle of Shiloh. Urbana: University of Illinois Press. ISBN 978-0-252-07126-3.
- Fuller, Howard J. (2008). Clad in Iron: The American Civil War and the Challenge of British Naval Power. Annapolis, MD: Naval Institute Press. ISBN 978-1-59114-297-3.
- Gallagher, Gary W.; Engle, Stephen D.; Krick, Robert K.; Glatthaar, Joseph T. (2003). The American Civil War: This Mighty Scourge of War. New York: Osprey. ISBN 978-1-84176-736-9.
- Grant, Ulysses S. (1886). Personal Memoirs of U.S. Grant. Vol. 2. New York: Charles L. Webster & Co. OCLC 255136538.
- Greeley, Horace (1866). The American Conflict: A History of the Great Rebellion in the United States, 1860–'65. Vol. II. Hartford: O. D. Case & Co. OCLC 936872302.
- Heidler, David S.; Heidler, Jeanne T.; Coles, David J. (2002). Encyclopedia of the American Civil War: A Political, Social, and Military History. Santa Barbara, CA: ABC-CLIO. ISBN 978-1-57607-382-7.
- Herring, George C. (2011). From Colony to Superpower: U.S. Foreign Relations since 1776. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-976553-9.
- Holzer, Harold; Gabbard, Sara Vaughn, eds. (2007). Lincoln and Freedom: Slavery, Emancipation, and the Thirteenth Amendment. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press. ISBN 978-0-8093-2764-5.
- Hunt, Jeffrey William (2015). The Last Battle of the Civil War: Palmetto Ranch. Austin: University of Texas Press. ISBN 978-0-292-73461-6.
- Johnson, Timothy D. (1998). Winfield Scott: The Quest for Military Glory. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas. ISBN 978-0-7006-0914-7.
- Jones, Howard (2002). Crucible of Power: A History of American Foreign Relations to 1913. Wilmington, DE: Rowman & Littlefield. ISBN 978-0-8420-2916-2.
- Jones, Terry L. (2011). Historical Dictionary of the Civil War. Scarecrow Press. ISBN 978-0-8108-7953-9.
- Keegan, John (2009). The American Civil War: A Military History. New York: Alfred A. Knopf. ISBN 978-0-307-26343-8.
- Keller, Christian B. (January 2009). "Flying Dutchmen and Drunken Irishmen: The Myths and Realities of Ethnic Civil War Soldiers". Journal of Military History. 73 (1): 117–145. doi:10.1353/jmh.0.0194.
- Leonard, Elizabeth D. (1999). All the Daring of the Soldier: Women of the Civil War Armies. W.W. Norton & Co. ISBN 0-3930-4712-1.
- Long, E. B. (1971). The Civil War Day by Day: An Almanac, 1861–1865. Garden City, NY: Doubleday. OCLC 68283123.
- McPherson, James M. (1988). Battle Cry of Freedom: The Civil War Era. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-503863-7.
- McPherson, James M. (1997). For Cause and Comrades: Why Men Fought in the Civil War. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-974105-2.
- Mendelsohn, Adam (2012). "Samuel and Saul Isaac: International Jewish Arms Dealers, Blockade Runners, and Civil War Profiteers" (PDF). Journal of the Southern Jewish Historical Society. 15. Southern Jewish Historical Society: 41–79. Archived (PDF) from the original on October 9, 2022.
- Murray, Robert B. (Autumn 1967). The End of the Rebellion. The North Carolina Historical Review.
- Murray, Williamson; Bernstein, Alvin; Knox, MacGregor (1996). The Making of Strategy: Rulers, States, and War. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-56627-8.
- Neely, Mark E. (1993). Confederate Bastille: Jefferson Davis and Civil Liberties. Milwaukee, WI: Marquette University Press. ISBN 978-0-87462-325-3.
- Neff, Stephen C. (2010). Justice in Blue and Gray: A Legal History of the Civil War. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. ISBN 978-1-61121-252-5.
- Nelson, James L. (2005). Reign of Iron: The Story of the First Battling Ironclads, the Monitor and the Merrimack. New York: HarperCollins. ISBN 978-0-06-052404-3.
- Nolan, Alan T. (2000). Gallagher, Gary W.; Nolan, Alan T. (eds.). The Myth of the Lost Cause and Civil War History.
- Potter, David M.; Fehrenbacher, Don E. (1976). The Impending Crisis, 1848–1861. New York: Harper & Row. ISBN 978-0-06-013403-7.
- Richter, William L. (2009). The A to Z of the Civil War and Reconstruction. Lanham: Scarecrow. ISBN 978-0-8108-6336-1.
- Robertson, James I. Jr. (1963). The Civil War. Washington, DC: Civil War Centennial Commission. OCLC 299955768.
- Schecter, Barnet (2007). The Devil's Own Work: The Civil War Draft Riots and the Fight to Reconstruct America.
- Stephenson, Nathaniel W. (1919). The Day of the Confederacy. Vol. 30, A Chronicle of the Embattled South. The Chronicles Of America Series. New Haven: Yale University Press; Toronto: Glasgow, Brook & Co.; London: Oxford University Press.
- Stern, Phillip Van Doren (1962). The Confederate Navy. Doubleday.
- Symonds, Craig L.; Clipson, William J. (2001). The Naval Institute Historical Atlas of the U.S. Navy. Naval Institute Press. ISBN 978-1-55750-984-0.
- Trudeau, Noah Andre (1994). Out of the Storm: The End of the Civil War, April–June 1865. Boston: Little, Brown & Co. ISBN 978-0-316-85328-6.
- Tucker, Spencer C.; Pierpaoli, Paul G.; White, William E. (2010). The Civil War Naval Encyclopedia. Santa Barbara, CA: ABC-CLIO. ISBN 978-1-59884-338-5.
- Vinovskis, Maris (1990). Toward a Social History of the American Civil War: Exploratory Essays. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-39559-5.
- Ward, Geoffrey R. (1990). The Civil War: An Illustrated History. New York: Alfred A. Knopf. ISBN 978-0-394-56285-8.
- Weigley, Frank Russell (2004). A Great Civil War: A Military and Political History, 1861–1865. Bloomington: Indiana University Press. ISBN 978-0-253-33738-2.
- Winters, John D. (1963). The Civil War in Louisiana. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press. ISBN 978-0-8071-0834-5.
- Wise, Stephen R. (1991). Lifeline of the Confederacy: Blockade Running During the Civil War. University of South Carolina Press. ISBN 978-0-8724-97993.
- Wittke, Carl (1952). Refugees of Revolution. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. ISBN 978-1-5128-0874-2.
- Woodworth, Steven E. (1996). The American Civil War: A Handbook of Literature and Research. Wesport, CT: Greenwood. ISBN 978-0-313-29019-0.
Web sources
- Downs, James (April 13, 2012). "Colorblindness in the demographic death toll of the Civil War". Oxford University Press blog. Archived from the original on January 19, 2018.
Further reading
- Ahlstrom, Sydney E. (1972). A Religious History of the American People. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. ISBN 978-0-300-01762-5.
- Beringer, Richard E.; Hattaway, Herman; Jones, Archer; Still, William N. Jr. (1986). Why the South Lost the Civil War. Athens: University of Georgia Press. ISBN 9780820308159. Influential analysis of factors; an abridged version is Beringer, Richard E. (1988). The Elements of Confederate Defeat: Nationalism, War Aims, and Religion. Athens: University of Georgia Press. ISBN 9780820310770.
- Bestor, Arthur (1964). "The American Civil War as a Constitutional Crisis". American Historical Review. 69 (2): 327–352. doi:10.2307/1844986. JSTOR 1844986.
- Gallagher, Gary W. (2011). The Union War. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. ISBN 978-0-674-06608-3.
- Gallagher, Gary W.; Varon, Elizabeth R., eds. (2019). New Perspectives on the Union War. New York: Fordham University Press. doi:10.2307/j.ctvh1dnpx. ISBN 9780823284566. JSTOR j.ctvh1dnpx.
- Gara, Larry (1964). "The Fugitive Slave Law: A Double Paradox". In Unger, Irwin (ed.). Essays on the Civil War and Reconstruction. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston (published 1970). ISBN 9780030796401. (originally published in Civil War History, Vol. 10, No. 3, September 1964, pp. 229–240).
- Hofstadter, Richard (1938). "The Tariff Issue on the Eve of the Civil War". American Historical Review. 44 (1): 50–55. doi:10.2307/1840850. JSTOR 1840850.
- Johannsen, Robert W. (1973). Stephen A. Douglas. New York: Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-501620-8.
- Krannawitter, Thomas L. (2008). Vindicating Lincoln: defending the politics of our greatest president. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield. ISBN 978-0-7425-5972-1.
- McPherson, James M. (2007). This Mighty Scourge: Perspectives on the Civil War. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-539242-5.
- Nevins, Allan. Ordeal of the Union, an 8-volume set (1947–1971). the most detailed political, economic and military narrative; by Pulitzer Prize-winner.
- Ordeal of the Union: Fruits of Manifest Destiny, 1847–1852; online;
- Ordeal of the Union: A House Dividing, 1852–1857;
- The Emergence of Lincoln: Douglas, Buchanan, and Party Chaos, 1857–1859;
- The Emergence of Lincoln: Prologue to Civil War, 1859–1861;
- War for the Union: The Improvised War, 1861–1862;
- War for the Union: War Becomes Revolution, 1862–1863; online;
- War for the Union: The Organized War, 1863–1864;
- War for the Union: The Organized War to Victory, 1864–1865
- Olsen, Christopher J. (2002). Political Culture and Secession in Mississippi: Masculinity, Honor, and the Antiparty Tradition, 1830–1860. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-516097-0.
- Potter, David M. (1962). "The Historian's Use of Nationalism and Vice Versa". American Historical Review. 67 (4): 924–950. doi:10.2307/1845246. JSTOR 1845246.
- Ritter, Charles F.; Wakelyn, Jon L., eds. (1998). Leaders of the American Civil War: A Biographical and Historiographical Dictionary. Provides short biographies and historiographical summaries.
- Russell, Robert R. (1966). "Constitutional Doctrines with Regard to Slavery in Territories". Journal of Southern History. 32 (4): 466–486. doi:10.2307/2204926. JSTOR 2204926.
- Sheehan-Dean, Aaron (April 2014). A Companion to the U.S. Civil War. 2-Volume Set. New York: Wiley-Blackwell. ISBN 978-1-444-35131-6. 1232 pp; 64 Topical chapters by scholars and experts; emphasis on historiography.
- Stampp, Kenneth M. (1990). America in 1857: A Nation on the Brink. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-503902-3.
- Thornton, Mark; Ekelund, Robert Burton (2004). Tariffs, Blockades, and Inflation: The Economics of the Civil War. Wilmington, DE: SR. ISBN 978-0-8420-2961-2.
- Varon, Elizabeth R. (2008). Disunion!: The Coming of the American Civil War, 1789–1859. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press. ISBN 978-0-8078-3232-5.
- Weeks, William E. (2013). The New Cambridge History of American Foreign Relations. Vol. 1. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-1-107-00590-7.
Soldier life: North and South
- Carmichael, Peter S. The War for the Common Soldier: How Men Thought, Fought, and Survived in Civil War Armies (UNC Press Books, 2018) online
- Frank, Joseph Allan, and George A. Reaves. Seeing the Elephant: Raw Recruits at the Battle of Shiloh (Greenwood, 1989)
- Hesseltine, William Best (ed.). Civil War Prisons. (Kent State University Press, 1972)
- Linderman, Gerald. Embattled Courage: The Experience of Combat in the American Civil War (Free Press, 1987)
- Livermore, Thomas Leonard. Numbers and Losses in the Civil War in America, 1861–65 (Houghton, Mifflin, 1900) online
- McPherson, James M. For Cause and Comrades: Why Men Fought in the Civil War (Oxford University Press, 1997) online
- Manning, Chandra. What This Cruel War Was Over. (Vintage, 2007) Uses letters, diaries, and regimental newspapers to probe the world view of soldiers—black and white, Yankee and Rebel. Interview with author
- Mitchell, Reid. Civil War Soldiers: Their Expectations and Their Experiences (Penguin, 1997)
- Robertson, James I. Soldiers Blue and Gray (University of South Carolina Press, 1988)
- Shively, Kathryn J. Nature's Civil War: Common Soldiers and the Environment in 1862 Virginia (UNC Press Books, 2013) online
- Wiley, Bell I. The Life of Johnny Reb and The Life of Billy Yank (1943 and 1951; reprint 1994), two standard scholarly histories combined; 960pp. online
External links
- West Point Atlas of Civil War Battles
- Civil War photos at the National Archives
- View images from the Civil War Photographs Collection at the Library of Congress
- The short film A House Divided (1960) is available for free viewing and download at the Internet Archive.
- "American Civil World" maps at the Persuasive Cartography, The PJ Mode Collection, Cornell University Library
- Statements of each state as to why they were seceding, battlefields.org
- National Park Service Civil War Places
- Civil War Battlefield Places from the National Park Service
- American Battlefield Trust – A non-profit land preservation and educational organization with two divisions, the Civil War Trust and the Revolutionary War Trust, dedicated to preserving America's battlefields through land acquisitions.
- Civil War Era Digital Collection at Gettysburg College – This collection contains digital images of political cartoons, personal papers, pamphlets, maps, paintings and photographs from the Civil War Era held in Special Collections at Gettysburg College.
- The Civil War – site with 7,000 pages, including the complete run of Harper's Weekly newspapers from the Civil War
International response to the American Civil War | |
---|---|
Armed conflicts involving the Armed Forces of the United States | |
---|---|
Listed chronologically | |
Domestic |
|
Foreign |
|
Related |
|
- American Civil War
- Abraham Lincoln
- Jefferson Davis
- Ulysses S. Grant
- Robert E. Lee
- Civil wars in the United States
- Conflicts in 1861
- Conflicts in 1862
- Conflicts in 1863
- Conflicts in 1864
- Conflicts in 1865
- 1860s in the United States
- 1860s conflicts
- Presidency of Abraham Lincoln
- Rebellions against the United States
- Separatist rebellion-based civil wars
- Wars involving the United States
- Wars of independence