Misplaced Pages

An Ideal Husband (1947 film): Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 08:18, 23 May 2022 edit2a02:c7d:d627:9100:b8f2:2f1c:57ba:f019 (talk)No edit summary← Previous edit Latest revision as of 16:44, 21 December 2024 edit undoSporkBot (talk | contribs)Bots1,244,869 editsm Remove template per TFD outcome 
(22 intermediate revisions by 13 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{EngvarB|date=September 2013}} {{EngvarB|date=September 2013}}
{{Use dmy dates|date=September 2013}} {{Use dmy dates|date=May 2024}}
{{Infobox film {{Infobox film
| name = An Ideal Husband | name = An Ideal Husband
Line 20: Line 20:
| country = United Kingdom | country = United Kingdom
| language = English | language = English
| budget = £500,000<ref name = "strike">{{cite news |url=http://nla.gov.au/nla.news-article30519793 |title=REFUSE TO WORK WITH ALIEN. |newspaper=] |location=Adelaide |date=27 March 1947 |access-date=7 July 2012 |page=4 |publisher=National Library of Australia}}</ref> or £506,000<ref name="sue">{{cite book|title=British Cinema of The 1950s The Decline of Deference|first1=Sue|last1= Harper|first2=Vincent|last2= Porter|publisher=Oxford University Press USA|year=2003|page=275}}</ref> | budget = £506,000<ref name="money">Chapman, J. (2022). The Money Behind the Screen: A History of British Film Finance, 1945-1985. Edinburgh University Press p 354</ref><ref name = "strike">{{cite news |url=http://nla.gov.au/nla.news-article30519793 |title=REFUSE TO WORK WITH ALIEN. |newspaper=] |location=Adelaide |date=27 March 1947 |access-date=7 July 2012 |page=4 |via=National Library of Australia}}</ref><ref name="sue">{{cite book|title=British Cinema of The 1950s The Decline of Deference|first1=Sue|last1= Harper|first2=Vincent|last2= Porter|publisher=Oxford University Press USA|year=2003|page=275}}</ref>
| gross = £241,994 (UK)<ref>Vincent Porter, 'The Robert Clark Account', ''Historical Journal of Film, Radio and Television'', Vol 20 No 4, 2000 p484</ref> or £206,637 (worldwide)<ref name="sue"/> | gross = £241,994 (UK)<ref>Vincent Porter, 'The Robert Clark Account', ''Historical Journal of Film, Radio and Television'', Vol 20 No 4, 2000 p484</ref> or £206,637 (worldwide)<ref name="sue"/>
}} }}


'''''An Ideal Husband''''', also known as '''''Oscar Wilde's An Ideal Husband''''', is a 1947 British ] adaptation of the ] by ]. It was made by ] and distributed by ] (UK) and ] (USA). It was produced and directed by ] from a screenplay by ] from Wilde's play. The music score was by ], the cinematography by ], the editing by ] and the costume design by ]. This was Korda's last completed film as a director, although he continued producing films into the next decade.<ref>{{Cite web|last=|first=|date=|title=Alexander Korda: Filmography|url=https://www.imdb.com/name/nm0466099/?ref_=nmbio_bio_nm|url-status=live|archive-url=|archive-date=|access-date=January 16, 2021|website=Internet Movie Database (IMDb)}}</ref> '''''An Ideal Husband''''', also known as '''''Oscar Wilde's An Ideal Husband''''', is a 1947 British ] adaptation of the ] by ]. It was made by ] and distributed by ] (UK) and ] (USA). It was produced and directed by ] from a screenplay by ] from Wilde's play. The music score was by ], the cinematography by ], the editing by ] and the costume design by ]. This was Korda's last completed film as a director, although he continued producing films into the next decade.<ref>{{Cite web|title=Alexander Korda: Filmography|url=https://www.imdb.com/name/nm0466099/?ref_=nmbio_bio_nm|access-date=16 January 2021|publisher=IMDb}}</ref>


The film stars ], ], ], ], ], ] and ]. The film stars ], ], ], ], ], ] and ].


==Plot== ==Plot==
⚫ The story takes place in London, 1895. The main characters are Mrs. Laura Cheveley, who has recently returned to Britain after living in Vienna; Sir Robert Chiltern, a government minister with a reputation for honesty; his wife Gertrude, who disapproves strongly of immorality and dishonesty; Mabel Chiltern, Sir Robert's younger sister; Arthur, Viscount Goring, an unmarried and unconventional young man; and his father, the Earl of Caversham, who is eager to have his son marry and settle down.
{{Long plot|date=April 2022}}
⚫ A ] narrator announces the opening setting as "], 1895 . . . the centre of the universe," when "]'s in session . . . ] reigns, but fashion is supreme." Members of the British upper class are seen riding on horseback or in carriages, and most of the main characters are introduced. These include Mrs. Laura Cheveley (]), who has recently returned to Britain after living in Vienna; Sir Roger Chiltern (]), a government minister with a reputation for honesty; his wife Lady Gertrude (]), who disapproves strongly of immorality and dishonesty; Mabel Chiltern (]), Sir Robert's younger sister; Lord Arthur Goring (]), an unmarried and unconventional young man; and his father, the Earl of Caversham (]), who is eager to have his son marry and settle down.


Later at a lavish party hosted by the Chilterns, Mrs. Cheveley attempts to extort Sir Roger into supporting a bill to provide government financing for a proposed canal in Argentina, which Sir Roger considers to be a fraudulent scheme. Mrs. Cheveley has incriminating letters that Sir Roger wrote many years earlier that allowed him to use advance knowledge of the financing of the ] to establish his fortune and career. Sir Roger initially refuses but gives in rather than ruin his reputation. Before leaving the party, Mrs. Cheveley tells Lady Gertrude, a former schoolmate, that her husband will support the canal scheme, which surprises the politician's wife. As the party ends, Arthur and Mabel notice an unusual ] that someone had lost. Goring knows that he had given that brooch to someone in the past and keeps it, hoping that it will be asked for. Sir Roger, confronted by his wife about his change of position on the canal bill, writes a letter to Lady Cheverley to tell her that he will speak against the bill. At a lavish party hosted by the Chilterns, Mrs. Cheveley tries to extort Sir Robert into supporting a bill to provide government financing for what he considers to be a fraudulent scheme. Mrs. Cheveley has incriminating letters that he wrote many years earlier that allowed him to use advance knowledge of the financing of the ] to establish his fortune and career. He initially refuses but gives in to save his reputation. Before leaving the party, Mrs. Cheveley tells Lady Chiltern, a former schoolmate, that her husband will support the canal scheme, which surprises the politician's wife. As the party ends, Arthur and Mabel notice an unusual ] that someone had lost. Goring knows that he had given that brooch to someone in the past and keeps it, hoping that it will be asked for. Sir Robert, confronted by his wife about his change of position, writes a letter to Lady Cheveley to tell her that he will speak against the bill.


The next morning, Sir Robert reveals Lady Cheveley's blackmail attempt to Arthur, who urges him to let his wife know about his own past indiscretion, even if it will ruin her regard for her husband. Sir Robert, not wanting to let his wife know about his past dishonesty, tells Arthur that he will look for some way to blackmail Mrs. Cheveley herself, though Arthur, who was once engaged to her, does not think any scandal will matter to her. Soon, Mrs. Cheveley arrives to ask if anyone has found a brooch she had lost at the party, but Lady Gertrude tells the woman that she has despised her dishonesty ever since they were in school together and that Sir Robert will speak against the bill in Parliament that night. Mrs. Cheveley retaliates by telling her how her "ideal" husband made his fortune. Sir Robert orders Mrs. Cheveley to leave, but his wife is repelled by his past behavior, even though he tells her that no one could live up to the ideal image she had of him. The next morning, Sir Robert reveals Mrs. Cheveley's blackmail attempt to Arthur, who urges him to let his wife know about his own past indiscretion, even if it will ruin her regard for her husband. Sir Robert refuses to tell her the truth and decides to look for some way to blackmail Mrs. Cheveley instead. Arthur, who was once engaged to her, thinks that plan will not work. Mrs. Cheveley arrives to ask if anyone has found a brooch she had lost at the party. Lady Chiltern tells the woman that she has despised her dishonesty ever since they were at school together and that Sir Robert will speak against the bill in Parliament that night. Mrs. Cheveley retaliates by telling her how her husband made his fortune. Sir Robert orders Mrs. Cheveley to leave. His wife is repelled by his past behavior and he says that no one could live up to the ideal image she had of him.


That evening, Lady Gertrude writes an unsigned note to Arthur asking for his help, but when most of the main characters come to Arthur's home at one time or another, that note and other actions lead some characters to have mistaken assumptions about the motives and actions of others. Arthur tells Mrs. Cheveley that he has her brooch and knows that she stole it from an important society woman, locking it on her wrist with a secret catch. He removes the incriminating brooch when she gives him the letter she was using to blackmail Sir Robert. She, however, takes Lady Gertrude's note as she leaves, believing it will convince Sir Robert that his wife was having an affair with Arthur. Lady Gertrude in turn now says that she has learned the power of forgiveness. That evening, Lady Chiltern writes an unsigned note to Arthur asking for his help. Arthur tells Mrs. Cheveley that he has her brooch and knows that she stole it from an important society woman. He removes the incriminating brooch when she gives him the letter she was using to blackmail Sir Robert. She, however, takes Lady Chiltern's note as she leaves, planning to use it to make Sir Robert believe that his wife is having an affair with Arthur. Lady Chiltern in turn says that she has learned the power of forgiveness.


That night, Mrs. Cheveley watches from the women's gallery in the ] as Sir Robert denounces the canal scheme. The next day, Lord Caversham again admonishes his son to marry, and Arthur agrees to propose to Mabel, which he does after some feigned resistance from her. Lady Gertrude arrives and Arthur tells her of Mrs. Cheveley's intention to destroy her marriage, using the note she took from Arthur. When she gives the note to Sir Robert, though, he takes the unsigned letter to be proof his of wife's need and love for him. Now willing to give up his position in society and live a contented life with Lady Gertrude, Sir Robert is offered an important Cabinet position by Lord Caversham. Arthur persuades her to let her husband remain in public life. Lady Cheveley leaves, not apparently upset that her schemes have failed. That night, Mrs. Cheveley watches from the women's gallery in the ] as Sir Robert denounces the canal scheme. The next day, Lord Caversham again admonishes his son to marry. Arthur complies and proposes to Mabel. Lady Chiltern arrives and Arthur tells her of Mrs. Cheveley's intention to destroy her marriage, using the unsigned note. When she gives it to Sir Robert, though, he takes the letter to be proof of his wife's need and love for him. Now willing to give up his position in society and live a contented life with Lady Chiltern, Sir Robert is offered an important Cabinet position by Lord Caversham. Arthur persuades her to let her husband remain in public life. Mrs. Cheveley leaves, not apparently upset that her schemes have failed.


==Cast== ==Cast==
* ] as Mrs. Laura Cheveley * ] as Mrs. Laura Cheveley
* ] as Viscount Arthur Goring * ] as Arthur, Viscount Goring
* ] as Lady Gertrude Chiltern * ] as Gertrude, Lady Chiltern
* ] as Sir Robert Chiltern * ] as Sir Robert Chiltern
* ] as Earl of Caversham, Goring's Father * ] as the Earl of Caversham, Lord Goring's Father
* ] as Miss Mabel Chiltern, Sir Robert's sister * ] as Miss Mabel Chiltern, Sir Robert's sister
* ] as Lady Markby * ] as Lady Markby
* ] as Mrs. Margaret Marchmont * ] as Mrs. Margaret Marchmont
* Harriette Johns as Olivia, Countess of Basildon * Harriette Johns as Olivia, Countess of Basildon
* ] as Duke of Nonesuch * ] as the Duke of Nonesuch
* Michael Anthony as Vicomte de Nanjac * Michael Anthony as Vicomte de Nanjac
* Peter Hobbes as Mr. Eddie Montford * Peter Hobbes as Mr. Eddie Montford
Line 58: Line 57:


==Production== ==Production==
The costly production was held up due to a strike from the crew. The union objected to American actress Paulette Goddard's personal, Swedish-born hairdresser, claiming an English person could do the job.<ref name="strike"/><ref name=":0">{{Cite web|last=LoBianco|first=Lorraine|date=May 4, 2011|title=An Ideal Husband (1947)|url=https://www.tcm.com/tcmdb/title/78933/an-ideal-husband#articles-reviews?articleId=409060|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110723090125/http://www.tcm.com:80/tcmdb/title/78933/An-Ideal-Husband/ |archive-date=23 July 2011 |access-date=January 16, 2021|website=Turner Classic Movies (TCM)}}</ref> Korda was also criticized for halting shooting to procure a genuine emerald necklace for Goddard to wear in one scene, a controversial extravagance during Britain's post-war austerity period.<ref name=":0" /> However, Korda's use of the ] in an outdoor scene was so impressive that the company wore the uniforms from the film for the royal wedding of ] to ].<ref>{{cite news|date=26 June 1948|title=Film Costumes Used For Royal Wedding.|page=14|newspaper=]|publisher=National Library of Australia|location=Perth|url=http://nla.gov.au/nla.news-article76033346|access-date=7 July 2012}}</ref> The costly production was held up due to a strike by the crew. The union objected to American actress Paulette Goddard's personal, Swedish-born hairdresser, claiming an English person could do the job.<ref name="strike"/><ref name=":0">{{Cite web|last=LoBianco|first=Lorraine|date=4 May 2011|title=An Ideal Husband (1947)|url=https://www.tcm.com/tcmdb/title/78933/an-ideal-husband#articles-reviews?articleId=409060|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110723090125/http://www.tcm.com:80/tcmdb/title/78933/An-Ideal-Husband/ |archive-date=23 July 2011 |access-date=16 January 2021|website=Turner Classic Movies (TCM)}}</ref> Korda was also criticised for halting shooting to procure a genuine emerald necklace for Goddard to wear in one scene, a controversial extravagance during Britain's post-war austerity period.<ref name=":0" /> However, Korda's use of the ] in an outdoor scene was so impressive that the company wore the uniforms from the film for the royal wedding of ] to ].<ref>{{cite news|date=26 June 1948|title=Film Costumes Used For Royal Wedding.|page=14|newspaper=]|via=National Library of Australia|location=Perth|url=http://nla.gov.au/nla.news-article76033346|access-date=7 July 2012}}</ref>


Shooting took 66 days. Goddard's husband, ], was making '']'' for Korda at the same time. After filming, the two of them appeared on stage in Dublin in '']''.<ref>{{cite news |url=http://nla.gov.au/nla.news-article55894512 |title=KORDA BREAKS TECHNICOLOR RECORD. |newspaper=] |location=Adelaide |date=23 August 1947 |access-date=7 July 2012 |page=2 Supplement: Magazine |publisher=National Library of Australia}}</ref> Shooting took 66 days. Goddard's husband, ], was making '']'' for Korda at the same time. After filming, the two of them appeared on stage in Dublin in '']''.<ref>{{cite news |url=http://nla.gov.au/nla.news-article55894512 |title=KORDA BREAKS TECHNICOLOR RECORD. |newspaper=] |location=Adelaide |date=23 August 1947 |access-date=7 July 2012 |page=2 Supplement: Magazine |via=National Library of Australia}}</ref>


==Reception== ==Reception==
The film, along with two others from Korda, '']'' and '']'', as well as other British films, were picketed in some American cities by the ] Boycott Committee, headed by , who was active in supporting the establishment of the ]. The group wanted to draw American attention to British policies in the ].<ref>{{Cite web|last=Smertenko|first=Johan J.|date=October 20, 1948|title=Letter to the Editor: Boycott of British Films|url=https://timesmachine.nytimes.com/timesmachine/1948/10/28/issue.html|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210927233103/https://timesmachine.nytimes.com/timesmachine/1948/10/28/issue.html |archive-date=27 September 2021 |access-date=January 17, 2021|website=New York Times}}</ref> Korda, however, suggested that the boycott might also be used by American interests in retaliation for distribution quotas imposed on American films by Britain.<ref>{{cite news|date=21 August 1948|title=UK bitter at US picketing of films.|page=4|newspaper=]|publisher=National Library of Australia|location=Melbourne|url=http://nla.gov.au/nla.news-article22691761|access-date=7 July 2012}}</ref> The film's American distributor, Twentieth Century Fox, did pull Korda's films from its theaters. Smertenko and the Sons of Liberty announced an end to the boycott in December 1948.<ref>{{Cite web|last=|first=|date=December 22, 1948|title=Sons of Liberty End British Film Boycott|url=https://timesmachine.nytimes.com/timesmachine/1948/12/22/94652484.html?pageNumber=31|url-status=live|archive-url=|archive-date=|access-date=January 17, 2021|website=New York Times}}</ref> The film, along with two others from Korda, '']'' and '']'', as well as other British films, were picketed in some American cities by the ] Boycott Committee, headed by , who was active in supporting the establishment of the ]. The group wanted to draw American attention to British policies in the ].<ref>{{Cite web|last=Smertenko|first=Johan J.|date=20 October 1948|title=Letter to the Editor: Boycott of British Films|url=https://timesmachine.nytimes.com/timesmachine/1948/10/28/issue.html|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210927233103/https://timesmachine.nytimes.com/timesmachine/1948/10/28/issue.html |archive-date=27 September 2021 |access-date=17 January 2021|website=The New York Times}}</ref> Korda, however, suggested that the boycott might also be used by American interests in retaliation for distribution quotas imposed on American films by Britain.<ref>{{cite news|date=21 August 1948|title=UK bitter at US picketing of films.|page=4|newspaper=]|via=National Library of Australia|location=Melbourne|url=http://nla.gov.au/nla.news-article22691761|access-date=7 July 2012}}</ref> The film's American distributor, Twentieth Century Fox, did pull Korda's films from its theaters. Smertenko and the Sons of Liberty announced an end to the boycott in December 1948.<ref>{{Cite web|date=22 December 1948|title=Sons of Liberty End British Film Boycott|url=https://timesmachine.nytimes.com/timesmachine/1948/12/22/94652484.html?pageNumber=31|access-date=17 January 2021|website=The New York Times}}</ref>


===Box Office=== ===Box office===
The film was one of the most popular movies at the British box office in 1948.<ref>{{cite news |url=http://nla.gov.au/nla.news-article49930940 |title=THE STARRY WAY. |newspaper=] |location=Brisbane |date=8 January 1949 |access-date=11 July 2012 |page=2 |publisher=National Library of Australia}}</ref> According to ''Kinematograph Weekly'', the most successful at the box office in 1948 Britain was ''The Best Years of Our Lives'', with ''Spring in Park Lane'' being the best British film and next best being ''It Always Rains on Sunday'', ''My Brother Jonathan'', ''Road to Rio'', ''Miranda'', ''An Ideal Husband'', ''Naked City'', ''The Red Shoes'', ''Green Dolphin Street'', ''Forever Amber'', ''Life with Father'', ''The Weaker Sex'', ''Oliver Twist'', ''The Fallen Idol'' and ''The Winslow Boy''.<ref>{{cite book|page=232|title=Blackout : reinventing women for wartime British cinema|last=Lant|first= Antonia|year=1991 |publisher=Princeton University Press }}</ref> The film was one of the most popular movies at the British box office in 1948.<ref>{{cite news |url=http://nla.gov.au/nla.news-article49930940 |title=THE STARRY WAY. |newspaper=] |location=Brisbane |date=8 January 1949 |access-date=11 July 2012 |page=2 |via=National Library of Australia}}</ref> According to ''Kinematograph Weekly'', the most successful at the box office in 1948 Britain was ''The Best Years of Our Lives'', with ''Spring in Park Lane'' being the best British film and next best being ''It Always Rains on Sunday'', ''My Brother Jonathan'', ''Road to Rio'', ''Miranda'', ''An Ideal Husband'', ''Naked City'', ''The Red Shoes'', ''Green Dolphin Street'', ''Forever Amber'', ''Life with Father'', ''The Weaker Sex'', ''Oliver Twist'', ''The Fallen Idol'' and ''The Winslow Boy''.<ref>{{cite book|page=232|title=Blackout : reinventing women for wartime British cinema|last=Lant|first= Antonia|year=1991 |publisher=Princeton University Press }}</ref> As of 30 June 1949 the film earned £215,555 in the UK of which £149,559 went to the producer.<ref name="money"/>


However, it performed disappointingly in other markets.<ref> accessed 7 July 2012</ref><ref>{{cite magazine|url=https://archive.org/details/Screen_Volume_32_Issue_3/page/n17|magazine=Screen|page=258|volume=32|issue=3|title=The popular cash and culture in the postwar British cinema industry|first=Janet|last=Thumim}}</ref> However, it performed disappointingly in other markets.<ref> accessed 7 July 2012</ref><ref>{{cite magazine|url=https://archive.org/details/Screen_Volume_32_Issue_3/page/n17|magazine=Screen|page=258|volume=32|issue=3|title=The popular cash and culture in the postwar British cinema industry|first=Janet|last=Thumim}}</ref>
Line 75: Line 74:
==External links== ==External links==
* {{IMDb title|id=0039485|title=An Ideal Husband}} * {{IMDb title|id=0039485|title=An Ideal Husband}}
⚫ * {{TCMDb title|id=78933|title=An Ideal Husband}}
* {{amg movie|96197}}
⚫ * {{tcmdb title|id=78933|title=An Ideal Husband}}


{{Alexander Korda}} {{Alexander Korda}}
{{An Ideal Husband}} {{An Ideal Husband}}


{{DEFAULTSORT:Ideal Husband, An}} {{DEFAULTSORT:Ideal Husband (1947 film), An}}
] ]
⚫ ]
⚫ ]
] ]
] ]
] ]
] ]
] ]
] ]
] ]
⚫ ]
⚫ ]
]

Latest revision as of 16:44, 21 December 2024

1947 British film
An Ideal Husband
Original French film poster
Directed byAlexander Korda
Screenplay byLajos Bíró
Based onAn Ideal Husband
1895 play
by Oscar Wilde
Produced byAlexander Korda
StarringPaulette Goddard
Michael Wilding
Diana Wynyard
CinematographyGeorges Périnal
Edited byOswald Hafenrichter
Music byArthur Benjamin
Color processTechnicolor
Production
company		London Film Productions
Distributed byBritish Lion Films Corporation
(UK)
20th Century Fox
(US)
Release dates
  • 13 November 1947 (1947-11-13) (London)
  • 14 November 1947 (1947-11-14) (United Kingdom)
  • 14 January 1948 (1948-01-14) (New York City)
  • February 1948 (1948-02) (United Kingdom)
Running time96 minutes
CountryUnited Kingdom
LanguageEnglish
Budget£506,000
Box office£241,994 (UK) or £206,637 (worldwide)

An Ideal Husband, also known as Oscar Wilde's An Ideal Husband, is a 1947 British comedy film adaptation of the 1895 play by Oscar Wilde. It was made by London Film Productions and distributed by British Lion Films (UK) and Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corporation (USA). It was produced and directed by Alexander Korda from a screenplay by Lajos Bíró from Wilde's play. The music score was by Arthur Benjamin, the cinematography by Georges Périnal, the editing by Oswald Hafenrichter and the costume design by Cecil Beaton. This was Korda's last completed film as a director, although he continued producing films into the next decade.

The film stars Paulette Goddard, Michael Wilding, Diana Wynyard, Hugh Williams, C. Aubrey Smith, Glynis Johns and Constance Collier.

Plot

The story takes place in London, 1895. The main characters are Mrs. Laura Cheveley, who has recently returned to Britain after living in Vienna; Sir Robert Chiltern, a government minister with a reputation for honesty; his wife Gertrude, who disapproves strongly of immorality and dishonesty; Mabel Chiltern, Sir Robert's younger sister; Arthur, Viscount Goring, an unmarried and unconventional young man; and his father, the Earl of Caversham, who is eager to have his son marry and settle down.

At a lavish party hosted by the Chilterns, Mrs. Cheveley tries to extort Sir Robert into supporting a bill to provide government financing for what he considers to be a fraudulent scheme. Mrs. Cheveley has incriminating letters that he wrote many years earlier that allowed him to use advance knowledge of the financing of the Suez Canal to establish his fortune and career. He initially refuses but gives in to save his reputation. Before leaving the party, Mrs. Cheveley tells Lady Chiltern, a former schoolmate, that her husband will support the canal scheme, which surprises the politician's wife. As the party ends, Arthur and Mabel notice an unusual brooch that someone had lost. Goring knows that he had given that brooch to someone in the past and keeps it, hoping that it will be asked for. Sir Robert, confronted by his wife about his change of position, writes a letter to Lady Cheveley to tell her that he will speak against the bill.

The next morning, Sir Robert reveals Mrs. Cheveley's blackmail attempt to Arthur, who urges him to let his wife know about his own past indiscretion, even if it will ruin her regard for her husband. Sir Robert refuses to tell her the truth and decides to look for some way to blackmail Mrs. Cheveley instead. Arthur, who was once engaged to her, thinks that plan will not work. Mrs. Cheveley arrives to ask if anyone has found a brooch she had lost at the party. Lady Chiltern tells the woman that she has despised her dishonesty ever since they were at school together and that Sir Robert will speak against the bill in Parliament that night. Mrs. Cheveley retaliates by telling her how her husband made his fortune. Sir Robert orders Mrs. Cheveley to leave. His wife is repelled by his past behavior and he says that no one could live up to the ideal image she had of him.

That evening, Lady Chiltern writes an unsigned note to Arthur asking for his help. Arthur tells Mrs. Cheveley that he has her brooch and knows that she stole it from an important society woman. He removes the incriminating brooch when she gives him the letter she was using to blackmail Sir Robert. She, however, takes Lady Chiltern's note as she leaves, planning to use it to make Sir Robert believe that his wife is having an affair with Arthur. Lady Chiltern in turn says that she has learned the power of forgiveness.

That night, Mrs. Cheveley watches from the women's gallery in the House of Commons as Sir Robert denounces the canal scheme. The next day, Lord Caversham again admonishes his son to marry. Arthur complies and proposes to Mabel. Lady Chiltern arrives and Arthur tells her of Mrs. Cheveley's intention to destroy her marriage, using the unsigned note. When she gives it to Sir Robert, though, he takes the letter to be proof of his wife's need and love for him. Now willing to give up his position in society and live a contented life with Lady Chiltern, Sir Robert is offered an important Cabinet position by Lord Caversham. Arthur persuades her to let her husband remain in public life. Mrs. Cheveley leaves, not apparently upset that her schemes have failed.

Cast

Production

The costly production was held up due to a strike by the crew. The union objected to American actress Paulette Goddard's personal, Swedish-born hairdresser, claiming an English person could do the job. Korda was also criticised for halting shooting to procure a genuine emerald necklace for Goddard to wear in one scene, a controversial extravagance during Britain's post-war austerity period. However, Korda's use of the Royal Household Cavalry in an outdoor scene was so impressive that the company wore the uniforms from the film for the royal wedding of Princess Elizabeth to Philip, Duke of Edinburgh.

Shooting took 66 days. Goddard's husband, Burgess Meredith, was making Mine Own Executioner for Korda at the same time. After filming, the two of them appeared on stage in Dublin in Winterset.

Reception

The film, along with two others from Korda, Mine Own Executioner and Anna Karenina, as well as other British films, were picketed in some American cities by the Sons of Liberty Boycott Committee, headed by Johan J. Smertenko, who was active in supporting the establishment of the State of Israel. The group wanted to draw American attention to British policies in the Palestine Mandate. Korda, however, suggested that the boycott might also be used by American interests in retaliation for distribution quotas imposed on American films by Britain. The film's American distributor, Twentieth Century Fox, did pull Korda's films from its theaters. Smertenko and the Sons of Liberty announced an end to the boycott in December 1948.

Box office

The film was one of the most popular movies at the British box office in 1948. According to Kinematograph Weekly, the most successful at the box office in 1948 Britain was The Best Years of Our Lives, with Spring in Park Lane being the best British film and next best being It Always Rains on Sunday, My Brother Jonathan, Road to Rio, Miranda, An Ideal Husband, Naked City, The Red Shoes, Green Dolphin Street, Forever Amber, Life with Father, The Weaker Sex, Oliver Twist, The Fallen Idol and The Winslow Boy. As of 30 June 1949 the film earned £215,555 in the UK of which £149,559 went to the producer.

However, it performed disappointingly in other markets.

References

  1. ^ Chapman, J. (2022). The Money Behind the Screen: A History of British Film Finance, 1945-1985. Edinburgh University Press p 354
  2. ^ "REFUSE TO WORK WITH ALIEN". The Advertiser. Adelaide. 27 March 1947. p. 4. Retrieved 7 July 2012 – via National Library of Australia.
  3. ^ Harper, Sue; Porter, Vincent (2003). British Cinema of The 1950s The Decline of Deference. Oxford University Press USA. p. 275.
  4. Vincent Porter, 'The Robert Clark Account', Historical Journal of Film, Radio and Television, Vol 20 No 4, 2000 p484
  5. "Alexander Korda: Filmography". IMDb. Retrieved 16 January 2021.
  6. ^ LoBianco, Lorraine (4 May 2011). "An Ideal Husband (1947)". Turner Classic Movies (TCM). Archived from the original on 23 July 2011. Retrieved 16 January 2021.
  7. "Film Costumes Used For Royal Wedding". The Mirror. Perth. 26 June 1948. p. 14. Retrieved 7 July 2012 – via National Library of Australia.
  8. "KORDA BREAKS TECHNICOLOR RECORD". The Mail. Adelaide. 23 August 1947. p. 2 Supplement: Magazine. Retrieved 7 July 2012 – via National Library of Australia.
  9. Smertenko, Johan J. (20 October 1948). "Letter to the Editor: Boycott of British Films". The New York Times. Archived from the original on 27 September 2021. Retrieved 17 January 2021.
  10. "UK bitter at US picketing of films". The Argus. Melbourne. 21 August 1948. p. 4. Retrieved 7 July 2012 – via National Library of Australia.
  11. "Sons of Liberty End British Film Boycott". The New York Times. 22 December 1948. Retrieved 17 January 2021.
  12. "THE STARRY WAY". The Courier-Mail. Brisbane. 8 January 1949. p. 2. Retrieved 11 July 2012 – via National Library of Australia.
  13. Lant, Antonia (1991). Blackout : reinventing women for wartime British cinema. Princeton University Press. p. 232.
  14. Lorraine LoBianco, "An Ideal Husband", Turner Classic Movies accessed 7 July 2012
  15. Thumim, Janet. "The popular cash and culture in the postwar British cinema industry". Screen. Vol. 32, no. 3. p. 258.

External links

Films by Alexander Korda
As director
As producer only
Oscar Wilde's An Ideal Husband
Films
Categories: