Revision as of 01:39, 2 October 2008 view sourceNexxt 1 (talk | contribs)211 edits added refereces to Hinduism as the world's oldest religion← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 22:32, 21 December 2024 view source Jreiss17 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users667 edits →Middle Vedic period (c. 1200–850 BCE): Conforming date consistently to BCETag: 2017 wikitext editor | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Short description|Religions that originated on the Indian subcontinent}} | |||
{{Cleanup|date=November 2007}} | |||
{{About|the religions that originated in the Indian subcontinent|religious demographics of the Republic of India|Religion in India|the book|The Religion of India{{!}}''The Religion of India''|the religions of indigenous peoples of North America|Native American religions}} | |||
{{sprotected2}} | |||
{{Pp|small=yes}} | |||
{{for|religious demographics of the Republic of India|Religion in India}} | |||
{{Use dmy dates|date=March 2022}} | |||
], ]]] | |||
{{Use Indian English|date=June 2013}} | |||
] deity ] in ], ] attracts thousands of devotees.]] | |||
] | |||
'''Indian religions''', also called '''Dharmic religions''', are the related religious traditions that originated in the ]<ref name = EB>Adams, C. J., , ], 2007. Accessed: ] ]</ref>, namely ], ], ] and ], inclusive of their sub-schools and various related traditions. They form a subgroup of the larger class of "]". Indian religions have similarities in core beliefs, modes of worship, and associated practices, mainly due to their common history of origin and mutual influence. | |||
{{Pie chart | |||
| caption = Indian religions as a percentage of world population | |||
| label1 = Hinduism | |||
| value1 = 16 | |||
| color1 = orange | |||
| label2 = Buddhism | |||
| value2 = 7.1 | |||
| color2 = yellow | |||
| label3 = Sikhism | |||
| value3 = 0.35 | |||
| color3 = DarkKhaki | |||
| label4 = Jainism | |||
| value4 = 0.06 | |||
| color4 = LightCoral | |||
| other = yes | |||
| other-label = Non-Indian religions | |||
}} | |||
'''Indian religions''', sometimes also termed '''Dharmic religions''' or '''Indic religions''', are the ]s that originated in the ]. These religions, which include ], ], ], and ],<ref group=web name = EB>Adams, C. J., ({{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150707224218/https://www.britannica.com/topic/classification-of-religions |date=7 July 2015 }}), '']'', 2007. Retrieved 15 July 2010.</ref>{{refn|group=note|Adams: "Indian religions, including early Buddhism, Hinduism, Jainism, and Sikhism, and sometimes also Theravāda Buddhism and the Hindu- and Buddhist-inspired religions of South and Southeast Asia".}} are also classified as ]. Although Indian religions are connected through the ], they constitute a wide range of religious communities, and are not confined to the Indian subcontinent.<ref group=web name="EB" /> | |||
The documented history of Indian religions begins with ], the religious practices of the early ], which were collected and later ] into the ], four canonical collections of hymns or ]s. The language used, archaic ], also stems from the same period. The period of the advent, spread, and eventual establishment of this religion lasted from 1,500 BCE to about 500 BCE. | |||
{| class="wikitable floatright" | |||
The period from 1000-800 BCE onwards marked the beginning of the Upanisadic or ] period, and which ended around 500 BC (though prolonged seminaries lasted at much dates). <ref> ''Passage to India, Module 11''. "Upanishads came to be composed already in the ninth and eighth century B.C.E. and continued to be composed well into the first centuries of the Common Era. The Brahmanas and Aranyakas are somewhat older, reaching back to the eleventh and even twelfth century B.C.E."</ref> <ref>Paul Deussen, ''Philosophy of the Upanishads'', Pg. 51. "these treatises are not the work of a single genius, but the total philosophical product of an entire epoch which extends approximately 1000 or 800 BC, to c.500 BC, but which is prolonged in its offshoots far beyond this last limit of time."</ref> This period heralded the beginning of much of what became classical Hinduism, with the composition of the ], later the ], still later followed by the ]. | |||
|+ Indian religions by number of followers (2020 survey)<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.nepszamlalas.hu/eng/volumes/26/tables/load4_1_1.html |title=Központi Statisztikai Hivatal |publisher=Nepszamlalas.hu |access-date=2 October 2013 |archive-date=7 January 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190107065121/http://www.ksh.hu/nepszamlalas/ }}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.gordonconwell.edu/resources/documents/1IBMR2015.pdf |title=Christianity 2015: Religious Diversity and Personal Contact |date=January 2015 |access-date=29 May 2015 |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20170525141543/http://www.gordonconwell.edu/resources/documents/1IBMR2015.pdf |archive-date=25 May 2017|website=gordonconwell.edu}}</ref><ref>{{cite news| url = https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-india-57817615| title = Viewpoint: Why Sikhs celebrate kindness |publisher = BBC News| date = 15 July 2021| access-date = 17 July 2021| archive-date = 28 June 2023| archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20230628103028/http://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-india-57817615| url-status = live}}</ref><ref>{{cite web| url = https://www.worldatlas.com/articles/countries-with-the-largest-jain-populations.html| title = Countries with the Largest Jain Populations |work=WorldAtlas | date = 11 June 2020| access-date = 17 July 2021| archive-date = 4 July 2023| archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20230704065357/https://www.worldatlas.com/articles/countries-with-the-largest-jain-populations.html| url-status = live}}</ref> | |||
|- | |||
! Religion | |||
! Population | |||
|- | |||
| ] ] | |||
| 1.25 billion | |||
|- | |||
| ] ] | |||
| 520 million | |||
|- | |||
| ] ] | |||
| 30 million | |||
|- | |||
| ]] | |||
| 6 million | |||
|- | |||
| Others | |||
| 4 million | |||
|- | |||
| Total | |||
| '''1.81 billion''' | |||
|} | |||
Evidence attesting to ] in the Indian subcontinent derives from scattered ] rock paintings. The ]n people of the ], which lasted from 3300 to 1300 BCE (mature period 2600–1900 BCE), had an early urbanized culture which predates the Vedic religion.<ref>{{cite news |title=Rude Travel: Down The Sages |url=https://www.hindustantimes.com/brunch/rude-travel-down-the-sages/story-SYVGGDouZrOTgJogiul6IN.html |newspaper=Hindustan Times |author=Vir Sanghvi |access-date=2 July 2021 |archive-date=24 March 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190324162028/https://www.hindustantimes.com/brunch/rude-travel-down-the-sages/story-SYVGGDouZrOTgJogiul6IN.html |url-status=live }}</ref>{{Better source needed|reason=Vir Singhvi is a journalist, not a scholar.|date=February 2017}} | |||
Jainism and Buddhism arose from the ] culture. Buddhism was historically founded by ], a ] prince-turned-ascetic, and was spread beyond India through missionaries. It later experienced a ] in India, but survived in ] and ], and remains more widespread in ] and ]. According to Jain religious beliefs Jainism was established by a lineage of 24 enlightened beings culminating with ] (9th century BCE) and ] (6th century BCE).<ref>] (2007) Light from the East: Eastern Wisdom for the Modern West, ], Inc. ISBN 1933316225 – "Over time, apparent misunderstandings have arisen over the origins of Jainism and relationship with its sister religions of Hinduism and Buddhism. There has been an ongoing debate between Jainism and Vedic Hinduism as to which revelation preceded the other. What is historically known is that there was a tradition along with Vedic Hinduism known as Sramana Dharma. Essentially, the sramana tradition included it its fold, the Jain and Buddhist traditions, which disagreed with the eternality of the Vedas, the needs for ritual sacrifices and the supremacy of the Brahmins." Page 141</ref> | |||
The documented history of Indian religions begins with the ], the religious practices of the early ], which were collected and later ] into the '']'', as well as the ] of ] origin. The period of the composition, redaction, and commentary of these texts is known as the ], which lasted from roughly 1750 to 500 BCE.{{sfn|Michaels|2004|p=33}} The philosophical portions of the Vedas were summarized in ], which are commonly referred to as '']'', variously interpreted to mean either the "last chapters, parts of the Veda" or "the object, the highest purpose of the Veda".<ref>Max Muller, , Part 1, Oxford University Press, page LXXXVI footnote 1</ref> The early Upanishads all predate the Common Era, five{{refn|group=note|The pre-Buddhist Upanishads are: Brihadaranyaka, Chandogya, Kaushitaki, Aitareya, and Taittiriya Upanishads.{{sfn|Olivelle|2014|pp=12–14}}}} of the eleven ] were composed in all likelihood before 6th century BCE,{{sfn|Olivelle|2014|pp=12–14}}{{sfn|King|1995|p=52}} and contain the earliest mentions of ] and ].{{sfn|Olivelle|1998|p=xxiii}} | |||
Most scholars believe that Hinduism is the oldest religion in the world.<ref> P. 386 ''Transcultural Concepts in Nursing Care'' By Margaret M. Andrews, Joyceen S. Boyle </ref><ref> P. 484 ''Merriam-Webster's Encyclopedia of World Religions'' By Wendy Doniger, M. Webster, Merriam-Webster, Inc </ref><ref> P. 285 ''Communication for Development in the Third World'' By Srinivas R. Melkote, H. Leslie Steeves </ref><ref> P. xvi ''The Complete Idiot's Guide to Hinduism'' By Linda Johnsen </ref><ref> P. 951 ''Dancing With Siva'' By Satguru Sivaya Subramuniyaswami </ref><ref> P. 219 ''Faith, Religion & Theology'' By Brennan Hill, Paul F. Knitter, William Madges </ref>, with origins perhaps as far back as 5000 years.<ref> P. 22 ''The Complete Idiot's Guide to Geography'' By Joseph Gonzalez, Michael D Smith, Thomas E. Sherer </ref> Hinduism is divided into numerous ], primarily ], ], ], ] and much smaller groups like the conservative ]. ] and ] are more recent. About 90% of Hindus reside in the ], accounting for 83% of its population.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.adherents.com/Religions_By_Adherents.html |title=Major Religions of the World Ranked by Number of Adherents |accessdate=2007-07-10 |work= |publisher=Adherents.com }}</ref> | |||
The ] period between 800 and 200 BCE marks a "turning point between the Vedic Hinduism and Puranic Hinduism".{{sfn|Michaels|2004|p=38}} The Shramana movement, an ancient Indian religious movement parallel to but separate from Vedic tradition, often defied many of the Vedic and Upanishadic concepts of soul (Atman) and the ultimate reality (Brahman). In 6th century BCE, the Shramnic movement matured into Jainism{{sfn|Jain|2008|p=210}} and Buddhism{{sfn|Svarghese|2008|pp=259–60}} and was responsible for the schism of Indian religions into two main philosophical branches of astika, which venerates Veda (e.g., six orthodox schools of Hinduism) and ] (e.g., Buddhism, Jainism, Charvaka, etc.). However, both branches shared the related concepts of yoga, '']'' (the cycle of birth and death) and ''moksha'' (liberation from that cycle).{{refn|group=note|The shared concepts include rebirth, samsara, karma, meditation, renunciation and moksha.{{sfn|Olivelle|1998|pp=xx–xxiv}}}}{{refn|group=note|The Upanishadic, Buddhist and Jain renunciation traditions form parallel traditions, which share some common concepts and interests. While ]-], at the central Ganges Plain, formed the center of the early Upanishadic tradition, ]-] at the central Ganges Plain formed the center of the other ] traditions.{{sfn|Samuel|2010}}}}{{refn|group=note|]}} | |||
] was founded in the 15th century; its founder, ], was born in the town of ] in present day ]. The vast majority of its adherents originate in the ]. | |||
The Puranic Period (200 BCE – 500 CE) and Early Medieval period (500–1100 CE) gave rise to new configurations of Hinduism, especially ] and ], ], ], ], and smaller groups like the conservative ]. | |||
==Common traits== | |||
Sometimes summarised as "Dharmic" religions or dharmic traditions (even though the meaning of ''dharma/dhamma'' differs per religion), Hinduism, Buddhism, Jainism and Sikhism share certain key concepts, which are interpreted differently by different groups and individuals.<ref>]. From the River of Heaven: Hindu and Vedic Knowledge for the Modern Age. Pg 27. Berkeley, California: Book Passage Press, 1990. ISBN 1878423010.</ref><!--- note that only parts of the preceding long sentence are supported by the listed references. user: Andries 16 Sept.2007--><ref>] "Buddhism, Jainism, and Sikhism share with Hinduism the concept of dharma along with other key concepts, and the four religions may be said to belong to the dharmic tradition."</ref><ref>Westerlund, David ''Questioning the Secular State: The Worldwide Resurgence of Religion in Politics'' page 16 "may provide some possibilities for co-operation with Sikhs, Jains and Buddhists, who like Hindus are regarded as adherents of ‘dharmic' religions."</ref> Common traits can also be observed in both the ritual and the literary sphere. For example, the head-anointing ritual of '']'' is of importance in three distinct traditions. Other noteworthy rituals are the cremation of the dead, the wearing of vermilion on the head by married women, and various marital rituals. In literature, many classical Hindu narratives have Buddhist or Jain versions.<ref>c.f. ], s.v. "Jainism > Jainism, Hinduism, and Buddhism"</ref> All three traditions have notions of '']'', '']'', '']'', '']'' and various '']''. Of course, these terms may be perceived differently by different religions. For instance, for a Hindu, ''dharma'' is his duty. For a Jain, ''dharma'' is his conduct. For a Buddhist, ''dharma'' is piety{{Fact|date=August 2008}}. For a Jain, ''dharma'' is righteousness. Similarly, for a Hindu, yoga is the cessation of all thought activities of the mind.<ref>"yogascittavrttinirodhah" Sutra 1 of Patanjali's Yogadarshana </ref> | |||
The early Islamic period (1100–1500 CE) also gave rise to new movements. Sikhism was founded in the 15th century on the teachings of ] and the nine successive ] in ].<ref group=web name="ADR">{{cite web |author=Adherents.com |url=http://www.adherents.com/misc/rel_by_adh_CSM.html |title=Religions by adherents |format=PHP |access-date=9 February 2007 |url-status=usurped |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20111229121302/http://www.adherents.com/misc/rel_by_adh_CSM.html |archive-date=29 December 2011}}</ref> The vast majority of its adherents originate in the ]. During the period of ], a ] arose, which aided the ]. | |||
] is a heroic figure in all religions. In Hinduism and Sikhism, he is the God-incarnate as a princely king, in Buddhism, he is a bodhisattva-incarnate, in Jainism, he is the perfect human. Buddhist ]s are ''Vessantarajataka''<ref> Pollock, P. 661 ''Literary Cultures in History:'' </ref>, ], ], ], ], etc. There also exists the ''Khamti Ramayana'' among the Khamti tribe of Asom wherein Rama is an avatar of a Bodhisattva who incarnates to punish the demon king Ravana (B.Datta 1993). The ''Tai Ramayana'' another book retelling the divine story in Asom. | |||
== History == | == History == | ||
{{See also|Outline of South Asian history|History of India|History of Hinduism|History of Buddhism}} | |||
===Prehistory=== | |||
{{History of South Asia}} | |||
<!-- Deleted image removed: ] (roughly 2000 BCE), showing a figure often called ], after the epithet of Shiva and Rudra, and sitting in what resembles a ] posture.]] --> | |||
Evidence attesting to ] in the Indian subcontinent derives from scattered ] rock paintings such as at ], depicting dances and rituals. ] agriculturalists inhabiting the ] Valley buried their dead in a manner suggestive of spiritual practices that incorporated notions of an afterlife and belief in magic.<ref name="Heehs_2002_39">{{harvnb|Heehs|2002|p=39}}.</ref> Other ] sites, such as the ] in central ] and the ] of eastern Karnataka, contain rock art portraying religious rites and evidence of possible ritualised music.<ref>{{cite news |title=Ancient Indians made 'rock music' |publisher=] |date=] ] |url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/3520384.stm |accessdate=2007-08-07}}</ref> The ]n people of the ], which lasted from 3300–1300 BCE (mature period, 2600-1900 BCE) and was centered around the ] and ] river valleys, may have worshiped an important ] symbolising fertility,<ref>{{harvnb|Fowler|1997|p=90}}.</ref> a concept that has recently been challenged.<ref> Sharri R. Clark, The social lives of figurines : recontextualizing the third millennium BC terracotta figurines from Harappa, Pakistan. PhD dissertation, Harvard 2007 </ref> Excavations of Indus Valley Civilization sites show small tablets with animals and altars, indicating rituals associated with animal sacrifice. | |||
=== |
=== Periodisation === | ||
{{Main|Periodisation of Hinduism}} | |||
{{main|Historical Vedic religion}} | |||
The ] is most significant for the composition of the four ], ] and the older ] (both presented as discussions on the rituals, mantras and concepts found in the four Vedas), which today are some of the most important ] of Hinduism, and are the codification of much of what developed into the core beliefs of Hinduism. | |||
Scottish historian ], in his seminal work '']'' (1817), distinguished three phases in the history of India, namely the Hindu, Muslim, and British periods. This periodisation has been criticised, for the misconceptions it has given rise to. Another periodisation is the division into "ancient, classical, medieval, and modern periods", although this periodization has also received criticism.{{sfn|Thapar|1978|pp=19–20}} | |||
The ]s reflect the ] and ritual of ] to ] ] speaking peoples in India. Religious practices were dominated by the ] administering domestic ]/rites and solemn ]s. The ], ] and some of the older ]s (such as ], ], ]) are also placed in this period. Many elements of Vedic religion reach back to early Bronze Age ] times. The Vedic period is held to have ended around 500 BCE. | |||
] notes that the division of Hindu-Muslim-British periods of Indian history gives too much weight to "ruling dynasties and foreign invasions",{{sfn|Thapar|1978|p=19}} neglecting the social-economic history which often showed a strong continuity.{{sfn|Thapar|1978|p=19}} The division in Ancient-Medieval-Modern overlooks the fact that the Muslim conquests took place between the eight and the fourteenth centuries, while the south was never completely conquered.{{sfn|Thapar|1978|p=19}} According to Thapar, a periodisation could also be based on "significant social and economic changes", which are not strictly related to a change of ruling powers.{{sfn|Thapar|1978|p=20}}{{refn|group=note|See also Tanvir Anjum, ''''.}} | |||
Specific rituals and sacrifices of the Vedic religion include: | |||
* The '']'' cult described in the ], descended from a common ] practice (cf. the Iranian haoma ritual) . | |||
* ]s, also a common Indo-Iranian practice (See ]): | |||
** The '']'' or ] to ]. | |||
** The '']'' or ] sacrifice (including animal sacrifice) . | |||
** The '']'', the sophisticated ritual of piling the Uttara ]. | |||
* The Darsapaurnamasa, the fortnightly New and Full Moon sacrifice | |||
* The Caturmasya or seasonal sacrifices (every four months) | |||
* a large number of sacrifices for special wishes (Kāmyeṣṭi) | |||
* The '']'' or ] sacrifice. | |||
* The '']'', or sacrifice of a man, imitating that of the cosmic ] and Ashvamedha | |||
* The rites referred to in the ] are concerned with medicine and healing practices, as well as some ] and sorcery (white and black ]). | |||
* The domestic (grihya) rituals deal with the rites of passage from conception to death and beyond. | |||
Smart and Michaels seem to follow Mill's periodisation, while Flood and Muesse follow the "ancient, classical, mediaeval and modern periods" periodisation. An elaborate periodisation may be as follows:{{sfn|Michaels|2004}} | |||
===Vedanta=== | |||
{{main|Vedanta}} | |||
The period of ''Vedanta'' (Sanskrit : end of Vedas), typically thought to have begun around 900 BCE, marked the end of the evolution of the Vedas, much as it also marked the end of the semi-nomadic nature of the Indo-Aryan tribes as they formed permanent settlements in the Indo-Gangetic plain and other parts of Northern India. This period began in earnest with Brahmanas seeing the four canonical ] in a new light, and finally led to the ]. While the ritualistic status of the four Vedas remained undiminished, the early Upanishads sought to offer spiritual insights. At this time, the concepts of ], ], ], and ] were widely accepted in ancient India outside the sphere of the priestly establishment i.e. the Brahmana class, and were most probably developed by the class of aborigines outside the caste system often called Yogis or Kesins. They were eventually accepted by Brahmin orthodoxy, and were to form much of the core philosophies of the later epics, Hinduism, Buddhism and Jainism itself.<ref>“This confirms that the doctrine of transmigration is non-aryan and was accepted by non-vedics like Ajivikism, Jainism and Buddhism. The Indo-aryans have borrowed the theory of re-birth after coming in contact with the aboriginal inhabitants of India. Certainly Jainism and non-vedics accepted the doctrine of rebirth as supreme postulate or article of faith.” Masih, page 37.</ref> | |||
* Indian pre-history including ] (until c. 1750 BCE) | |||
===The Shramana tradition=== | |||
* Iron Age including ] (c. 1750–600 BCE) | |||
{{main|Shramana}} | |||
* "Second Urbanisation" (c. 600–200 BCE) | |||
Vedic Brahmanism of Iron Age India co-existed and closely interacted with the parallel non-Vedic ] traditions.<ref>S. Cromwell Crawford, review of L. M. Joshi, ''Brahmanism, Buddhism and Hinduism'', Philosophy East and West (1972): "Alongside Brahmanism was the non-Aryan Shramanic culture with its roots going back to prehistoric times."</ref><ref>Y. Masih (2000) In : A Comparative Study of Religions, Motilal Banarsidass Publ : Delhi, ISBN 8120808150 Page 18. "There is no evidence to show that Jainism and Buddhism ever subscribed to vedic sacrifices, vedic deities or caste. They are parallel or native religions of India and have contributed to much to the growth of even classical Hinduism of the present times."</ref><ref>Dr. Kalghatgi, T. G. 1988 In: Study of Jainism, Prakrit Bharti Academy, Jaipur</ref><ref>P.S. Jaini, (1979), The Jaina Path to Purification, Motilal Banarsidass, Delhi, p. 169 "Jainas themselves have no memory of a time when they fell within the Vedic fold. Any theory that attempts to link the two traditions, moreover fails to appreciate rather distinctive and very non-vedic character of Jaina cosmology, soul theory, karmic doctrine and atheism" </ref> These were not direct outgrowths of Vedism, but separate movements that influenced it and were influenced by it.<ref>S. Cromwell Crawford, review of L. M. Joshi, Brahmanism, Buddhism and Hinduism, Philosophy East and West (1972): "Alongside Brahmanism was the non-Aryan Shramanic culture with its roots going back to prehistoric times." </ref> The ]s were wandering ascetics. Buddhism and Jainism are a continuation of the Shramana tradition, and the early Upanishadic movement was influenced by it.<ref>Karel Werner, ''The Longhaired Sage'' in ''The Yogi and the Mystic.'' Karel Werner, ed., Curzon Press, 1989, page 34. "Rahurkar speaks of them as belonging to two distinct 'cultural strands' ... Wayman also found evidence for two distinct approaches to the spiritual dimension in ancient India and calls them the traditions of 'truth and silence.' He traces them particularly in the older Upanishads, in early Buddhism, and in some later literature."</ref><ref>Gavin D. Flood (1996), An Introduction to Hinduism, Cambridge University - Press : UK ISBN 0521438780 - “The origin and doctrine of Karma and Samsara are obscure. These concepts were certainly circulating amongst sramanas, and Jainism and Buddhism developed specific and sophisticated ideas about the process of transmigration. It is very possible that the karmas and reincarnation entered the mainstream brahaminical thought from the sramana or the renouncer traditions.” Page 86.</ref><ref>Padmanabh S. Jaini 2001 “Collected Paper on Buddhist Studies” Motilal Banarsidass Publ 576 pages ISBN 8120817761: "Yajnavalkya’s reluctance and manner in expounding the doctrine of karma in the assembly of Janaka (a reluctance not shown on any other occasion) can perhaps be explained by the assumption that it was, like that of the transmigration of soul, of non-brahmanical origin. In view of the fact that this doctrine is emblazoned on almost every page of sramana scriptures, it is highly probable that it was derived from them." Page 51.</ref><ref>Govind Chandra Pande, (1994) Life and Thought of Sankaracarya, Motilal Banarsidass ISBN 8120811046 : Early Upanishad thinkers like Yajnavalkya were acquainted with the sramanic thinking and tried to incorporate these ideals of Karma, Samsara and Moksa into the vedic thought implying a disparagement of the vedic ritualism and recognising the mendicancy as an ideal. Page 135.</ref><ref>A History of Yoga By Vivian Worthington 1982 Routledge ISBN 071009258X - "The Upanishads were like a breath of fresh air blowing through the stuffy corridors of power of the vedic brahminism. They were noticed by the Brahmin establishment because the yogis did not owe allegiance to any established religion or mode of thought.. So although, the Upanishads came to be noticed by Brahmin establishment, they were very largely saying what may well have been current among other sramanic groups at that time. It can be said that this atheistic doctrine was evidently very acceptable to the authors of Upanishads, who made use of many of its concepts." Page 27.</ref><ref>A History of Yoga By Vivian Worthington 1982 Routledge ISBN 071009258X: "The idea of re-incarnation, so central to the older sramanic creeds is still new to many people throughout the world. The Aryans of the Vedic age knew nothing of it. When the Brahmins began to accept it, they declared it as a secret doctrine. It will be seen from this short account of Jains, that they had fully developed the ideas of karma and reincarnation very early in history. The earliest Upanishads were probably strongly influenced by their teachings. Jainism the religion, Samkhya the philosophy and yoga the way to self discipline and enlightenment dominated the spiritual life of Indian during the Dravidian times. They were to be overshadowed for over thousand years by the lower form of religion that was foisted on the local inhabitants by the invading Aryans, but in the end it was Sramanic disiplines that triumphed. They did so by surviving in their own right and by their ideas being fully adopted by the Brahmins who steadily modified their own vedic religion." Page 35.</ref> The 24th Jain ], ] (599–527 BCE), stressed five vows, including '']'' (non-violence), '']'' (truthfulness), '']'' (non-stealing) and '']'' (non-attachment). | |||
* Classical period (c. 200 BCE – 1200 CE){{refn|group=note|Different periods are designated as "classical Hinduism": | |||
* Smart calls the period between 1000 BCE and 100 CE "pre-classical". It is the formative period for the Upanishads and Brahmanism{{refn|group=subnote|Smart distinguishes "Brahmanism" from the Vedic religion, connecting "Brahmanism" with the Upanishads.{{sfn|Smart|2003|pp=52, 83–86}}}} Jainism and Buddhism. For Smart, the "classical period" lasts from 100 to 1000 CE, and coincides with the flowering of "classical Hinduism" and the flowering and deterioration of Mahayana-buddhism in India.{{sfn|Smart|2003|p=52}} | |||
* For Michaels, the period between 500 BCE and 200 BCE is a time of "Ascetic reformism",{{sfn|Michaels|2004|p=36}} whereas the period between 200 BCE and 1100 CE is the time of "classical Hinduism", since there is "a turning point between the Vedic religion and Hindu religions".{{sfn|Michaels|2004|p=38}} | |||
* Muesse discerns a longer period of change, namely between 800 BCE and 200 BCE, which he calls the "Classical Period". According to Muesse, some of the fundamental concepts of Hinduism, namely karma, reincarnation and "personal enlightenment and transformation", which did not exist in the Vedic religion, developed in this time.{{sfn|Muesse|2003|p=14}}}} | |||
** Pre-Classical period (c. 200 BCE – 320 CE) | |||
** "Golden Age" (Gupta Empire) (c. 320–650 CE) | |||
** Late-Classical period (c. 650–1200 CE) | |||
* Medieval period (c. 1200–1500 CE) | |||
* Early Modern (c. 1500–1850) | |||
* Modern period (British Raj and independence) (from c. 1850) | |||
=== Prevedic religions (before c. 1750 BCE) === | |||
The historical ], who was a ], was born into the ] clan of ]-and-] lineage<ref> ''The Life of Buddha as Legend and History'', by Edward Joseph Thomas </ref>, just before the kingdom of ] (which lasted from 546–324 BCE) rose to power. His family was native to Kapilavastu and ], in what is now southern ]. | |||
==== Prehistory ==== | |||
The ]s and ]s belonged to another ] tradtion, both of which did not survive. | |||
The earliest religion followed by the peoples of the Indian subcontinent, including those of the ] and ], was likely ] ] that did not have ].<ref name=":02">{{Cite book |last=Harari |first=Yuval Noah |title=Sapiens: A Brief History of Humankind |publisher=Penguin Random House UK |year=2015 |isbn=978-0-09-959008-8 |location=London |pages=235–236 |translator-last=Harari |translator-first=Yuval Noah |oclc=910498369 |author-link=Yuval Noah Harari |translator-last2=Purcell |translator-first2=John |translator-last3=Watzman |translator-first3=Haim |translator-link=Yuval Noah Harari |translator-link3=Haim Watzman}}</ref> | |||
]]] | |||
====Rise and spread of Jainism and Buddhism==== | |||
{{main|Buddhism in India|Silk Road transmission of Buddhism|Greco-Buddhism}} | |||
{{main|Jain community}} | |||
{{see|Mauryan period|Gupta period}} | |||
Both Jainism and Buddhism in their present form, spread throughout India during the period of the ]. | |||
Evidence attesting to ] in the Indian subcontinent derives from scattered ] rock paintings such as at ], depicting dances and rituals. ] agriculturalists inhabiting the ] Valley buried their dead in a manner suggestive of spiritual practices that incorporated notions of an afterlife and belief in magic.{{sfn|Heehs|2002|p=39}} Other ] sites, such as the ] in central ] and the ] of eastern Karnataka, contain rock art portraying religious rites and evidence of possible ritualised music.<ref group=web>{{cite news |title=Ancient Indians made 'rock music' |work=] |date=19 March 2004 |url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/3520384.stm |access-date=7 August 2007 |archive-date=27 December 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171227021009/http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/3520384.stm |url-status=live }}</ref> | |||
Scholars Jeffrey Brodd and Gregory Sobolewski write that ''"Jainism shares many of the basic doctrines of Hinduism and Buddhism.''"<ref> P. 93 ''World Religions'' By Jeffrey Brodd, Gregory Sobolewski </ref> Jainism derives its title from the Sanskrit verb root "ji", meaning ''to conquer''.<ref>P. 103 ''Students' Britannica India'' By Dale Hoiberg, Indu Ramchandani</ref> According to the ], Jainism was present in ] before the arrival of Thera ].<ref>http://www.lakehouse.lk/budusarana/2006/09/07/Budu23.pdf A comparative study in Jainism and Buddhism, Rohan Jayetilleke, September 07, 2006</ref> Early Tamil Brahmi Jain inscriptions in ] are dated to second century BCE.<ref>Early Tamil Epigraphy. ''From the Earliest Times to the Sixth Century A.D.'' by Iravatham Mahadevan; Chennai: A-Cref and the Department of Sanskrit and Indian Studies, Harvard University</ref> Jainism has declined since the 12th century in many regions, but continues to be an influential religion in ], ], ], ] and ]. Certain scholarship holds that the practices, emblems and architecture now commonly associated with the Hindu pantheon and Jainism may go back as far as ] times to the period 2000-1500 BCE. <ref>, "Passage to India" One is left largely with scholarly guesses, but it is intriguing to entertain the possibility that traditions of ritual bathing, some sort of tradition of meditation or Yoga, possible proto-types of Shiva and a mother goddess, and a cult of sacred animals, all of which are prominent features in later Hindu traditions, may indeed be traceable ultimately all the way back to the third millenium B.C.E., and possibly earlier to the Baluchistan and Sind village cultures that go back to time immemorial. </ref><ref> , Module 6 ''The passage to India'': "As mentioned earlier in our brief summary of the religions of India, the Jain tradition is one of the oldest traditions in India and may go back as far as Indus Valley times, that is, to the second millenium Before the Common Era (2000-1500 BCE), although the precise origins of the tradition are not yet fully known"</ref> | |||
==== Indus Valley civilisation ==== | |||
] in India spread during the reign of ] of the ], who patronised ] and unified the Indian subcontinent in the 3rd century BCE. He sent missionaries abroad, allowing Buddhism to spread across Asia.<ref name="Heehs_2002_106">{{harvnb|Heehs|2002|p=106}}.</ref> ] started declining following the rise of ] during the ], but continued to have a significant presence in some regions of India until the 12th century. Scholar James Bird writes, "''But when primitive Buddhism originated from Hindu schools of philosophy, it differed as widely from that of later times, as did the Brahmanism of the Vedas from that of the Puranas and Tantras.''"<ref> P. 66 ''Historical researches on the origin and principles of the Bauddha and Jaina religions: embracing the leading tenets of their system, as found prevailing in various countries; illustrated by descriptive accounts of the sculptures in the caves of western India, with translations of the inscriptions ... which indicate their connexion with the coins and topes of the Panjab and Afghanistan.''by James Bird </ref> | |||
{{Further|Prehistoric religion}} | |||
The religion and belief system of the Indus Valley people has received considerable attention, especially from the view of identifying precursors to deities and religious practices of Indian religions that later developed in the area. However, due to the sparsity of evidence, which is open to varying interpretations, and the fact that the ] remains undeciphered, the conclusions are partly speculative and largely based on a retrospective view from a much later Hindu perspective.{{Sfn|Wright|2009|pp=281–282}} An early and influential work in the area that set the trend for Hindu interpretations of archaeological evidence from the Harrapan sites{{sfn|Ratnagar|2004}} was that of ], who in 1931 identified the following as prominent features of the Indus religion: a Great Male God and a Mother Goddess; deification or veneration of animals and plants; symbolic representation of the phallus (]) and vulva (]); and, use of baths and water in religious practice. Marshall's interpretations have been much debated, and sometimes disputed over the following decades.{{sfn|Marshall|1931|pp=48–78}}{{sfn|Possehl|2002|pp=141–156}} | |||
===Period after 200 BCE=== | |||
{{main|decline of Buddhism in India|Hindu philosophy|Pala Empire}} | |||
{{see|Puranas}} | |||
After 200 CE several schools of thought were formally codified in ], including ], ], ], ], ] and ].<ref name="Radhaxviii-xxi">{{harvnb|Radhakrishnan|Moore|1967|p=xviii–xxi}}.</ref> Hinduism, otherwise a highly polytheistic, pantheistic or monotheistic religion, also tolerated ]; the thoroughly ] and anti-religious philosophical ] school that originated around the 6th century BCE is the most explicitly atheistic school of Indian philosophy. Cārvāka is classified as a '']'' ("heterodox") system; it is not included among the six schools of Hinduism generally regarded as orthodox. It is noteworthy as evidence of a materialistic movement within Hinduism.<ref name="Radha227">{{harvnb|Radhakrishnan|Moore|1967|p=227–249}}.</ref> Our understanding of Cārvāka philosophy is fragmentary, based largely on criticism of the ideas by other schools, and it is no longer a living tradition.<ref name="RChatterjee55">{{harvnb|Chatterjee|Datta|1984|p=55}}.</ref> Other Indian philosophies generally regarded as atheistic include ] and ]. | |||
] figure, surrounded by animals.]] | |||
Between 400 CE and 1000 CE Hinduism expanded as the ] continued.<ref name="BBC ethics2">{{cite web |title=The rise of Buddhism and Jainism |work=Religion and Ethics—Hinduism: Other religious influences |publisher=BBC |date=] ] |accessdate=2007-04-21 |url=http://www.bbc.co.uk/religion/religions/hinduism/history/history_2.shtml }}</ref> Buddhism subsequently became effectively extinct in India but survived in Nepal and Sri Lanka. | |||
One Indus valley seal shows a seated figure with a horned headdress, surrounded by animals. Marshall identified the figure as an early form of the Hindu god ] (or ]), who is associated with asceticism, ], and linga; regarded as a lord of animals; and often depicted as having three eyes. The seal has hence come to be known as the ], after '']'' (lord of all animals), an epithet of Shiva.{{sfn|Marshall|1931|pp=48–78}}{{sfn|Possehl|2002|pp=141–144}} While Marshall's work has earned some support, many critics and even supporters have raised several objections. ] has argued that the figure does not have three faces, or yogic posture, and that in ] Rudra was not a protector of wild animals.{{sfn|Srinivasan|1975}}{{sfn|Srinivasan|1997|pp=180–181}} Herbert Sullivan and ] also rejected Marshall's conclusions, with the former claiming that the figure was female, while the latter associated the figure with ''Mahisha'', the Buffalo God and the surrounding animals with ]s (vehicles) of deities for the four cardinal directions.{{sfn|Sullivan|1964}}{{sfn|Hiltebeitel|2011|pp=399–432}} Writing in 2002, ] concluded that while it would be appropriate to recognise the figure as a deity, its association with the water buffalo, and its posture as one of ritual discipline, regarding it as a proto-Shiva would be going too far.{{sfn|Possehl|2002|pp=141–144}} Despite the criticisms of Marshall's association of the seal with a proto-Shiva icon, it has been interpreted as the ] ] by Jains and Vilas Sangave<ref>{{cite book|author= Vilas Sangave|year=2001 |title=Facets of Jainology: Selected Research Papers on Jain Society, Religion, and Culture|publisher=Popular Prakashan|place=Mumbai|isbn=978-81-7154-839-2 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=2FGSGmP4jNcC}}</ref> or an early ] by Buddhists.{{sfn|Ratnagar|2004}} Historians like ], ] are of the opinion that there exists some link between first ] Tirthankara Rishabha and Indus Valley civilisation.{{sfn|Zimmer|1969|pp=60, 208–209}}<ref>] (2002) ''The Shape of Ancient Thought: Comparative Studies in Greek and Indian Philosophies''. Allworth Communications, Inc. 816 pages; {{ISBN|1-58115-203-5}}</ref> | |||
There were several Buddhistic kings who worshiped Vishnu, such as the Gupta, Pala, Malla, Somavanshi, and Sattvahana.<ref> Durga Prasad, P. 116, ''History of the Andhras upto 1565 A. D.'' </ref> Buddhism survived followed by Hindus. ''National Geographic''<ref> January 2008, VOL. 213, #1 </ref> edition reads, "''The flow between faiths was such that for hundreds of years, almost all Buddhist temples, including the ones at ], were built under the rule and patronage of Hindu kings.''" | |||
Marshall hypothesized the existence of a cult of Mother Goddess worship based upon excavation of several female figurines, and thought that this was a precursor of the Hindu sect of ]. However the function of the female figurines in the life of Indus Valley people remains unclear, and Possehl does not regard the evidence for Marshall's hypothesis to be "terribly robust".{{sfn|Possehl|2002|pp=141–145}} Some of the ]s interpreted by Marshall to be sacred phallic representations are now thought to have been used as pestles or game counters instead, while the ring stones that were thought to symbolise ''yoni'' were determined to be architectural features used to stand pillars, although the possibility of their religious symbolism cannot be eliminated.{{sfn|McIntosh|2008|pp=286–287}} | |||
====Sectarian Development==== | |||
Several texts were being composed as tributaries to the ]. Devotion to particular deities was reflected from the composition of texts composed to their worship. For example the ''Ganapati Purana'' was written for devotion to Ganapati (or ]). Popular deities of this era were ], ], ], ], ], and ] (including the forms/incarnations of these deities.) | |||
Many Indus Valley seals show animals, with some depicting them being carried in processions, while others show ].<ref name=":100">{{Cite book |title=World Religions: Eastern Traditions |publisher=] |editor=Willard Gurdon Oxtoby |year=2002 |isbn=0-19-541521-3 |edition=2nd |location=Don Mills, Ontario |pages=18–19 |oclc=46661540}}</ref> One seal from Mohen-jodaro shows a half-human, half-buffalo monster attacking a tiger, which may be a reference to the ] of such a monster created by goddess ] to fight ].{{sfn|Marshall|1931|p=67}} Some seals show a man wearing a hat with two horns and a plant sitting on a throne with animals surrounding him.<ref name=":1002">{{Cite book |title=World Religions: Eastern Traditions |publisher=] |editor=Willard Gurdon Oxtoby |year=2002 |isbn=0-19-541521-3 |edition=2nd |location=Don Mills, Ontario |page=18 |oclc=46661540}}</ref> Some scholars theorize that this was a predecessor to Shiva wearing a hat worn by some Sumerian divine beings and kings.<ref name=":1002" /> | |||
====Bhakti Movement==== | |||
The ] began with the emphasis on the worship of God, regardless of one's status - whether priestly or laypeople, men or women, higher social status or lower social status. | |||
In contrast to contemporary ] and ] civilisations, the Indus Valley lacks any monumental palaces, even though excavated cities indicate that the society possessed the requisite engineering knowledge.{{sfn|Possehl|2002|p=18}}{{sfn|Thapar|2004|p=85}} This may suggest that religious ceremonies, if any, may have been largely confined to individual homes, small temples, or the open air. Several sites have been proposed by Marshall and later scholars as possibly devoted to religious purpose, but at present only the ] at Mohenjo-daro is widely thought to have been so used, as a place for ritual purification.{{sfn|Possehl|2002|pp=141–145}}{{sfn|McIntosh|2008|pp=275–277, 292}} The funerary practices of the Harappan civilisation is marked by its diversity with evidence of supine burial; fractional burial in which the body is reduced to skeletal remains by exposure to the elements before final interment; and even cremation.{{sfn|Possehl|2002|pp=152, 157–176}}{{sfn|McIntosh|2008|pp=293–299}} | |||
The movements were mainly centered around the forms of Vishnu (] and ]) and ]. There were however popular devotees of this era of Durga. | |||
=== Vedic period (1750–800 BCE) === | |||
=====Vaishnavism===== | |||
{{Main|Vedic period|Historical Vedic religion}} | |||
The most well-known devotees are the ] from southern India. The most popular Vaishnava teacher of the south was ], while of the north it was ]. | |||
{{See also|Proto-Indo-European mythology|Proto-Indo-Iranian religion}} | |||
The documented history of Indian religions begins with the ], the religious practices of the early ], which were collected and later ] into the '']'' (usually known as the ]), four canonical collections of hymns or ]s composed in archaic ]. These texts are the central '']'' (revealed) texts of ]. The period of the composition, redaction, and commentary of these texts is known as the ], which lasted from roughly 1750 to 500 BCE.{{sfn|Michaels|2004|p=33}} | |||
Several important icons were women. For example, within the Mahanubhava sect, the women outnumbered the men<ref> Ramaswamy, P. 204 ''Walking Naked'' </ref>, and administration was many times composed mainly of women.<ref> Ramaswamy, P. 210 ''Walking Naked'' </ref> Mirabai is the most popular female saint in India. | |||
The ] is most significant for the composition of the four Vedas, Brahmanas and the older Upanishads (both presented as discussions on the rituals, mantras and concepts found in the four Vedas), which today are some of the most important ] of Hinduism, and are the codification of much of what developed into the core beliefs of Hinduism.<ref name="Witzel">] and ] in Arvind Sharma, editor, ''The Study of Hinduism''. University of South Carolina Press, 2003, page 65</ref> | |||
] (1479 - 1531) is a very important figure from this era. He founded the ] school of ] thought. | |||
Some modern Hindu scholars use the "Vedic religion" synonymously with "Hinduism".<ref>Kapur, Kamlesh (2010). ''Portraits of a Nation: History of Ancient India'', 1st ed. New Delhi: Sterling Publishers Private Ltd. {{OCLC|707924398}}. {{ISBN|978-8120752122}}.</ref> According to Sundararajan, Hinduism is also known as the Vedic religion.<ref>K. R. Sundararajan; Bithika Mukerji, eds. ''Hindu Spirituality: Vedas Through Vedanta''. Volume 1. p. 382.</ref> Other authors state that the Vedas contain "the fundamental truths about Hindu Dharma"{{refn|group=note|Ashim Kumar Bhattacharyya declares that Vedas contain the fundamental truths about Hindu Dharma.<ref>{{cite book |page=6 |title=Hindu Dharma: Introduction to Scriptures And Theology |author=Ashim Kumar Bhattacharyya}}</ref>}} which is called "the modern version of the ancient Vedic Dharma"<ref>P. 46 ''I Am Proud To Be A Hindu'' By J. Agarwal</ref> The ] is recognize the Vedic religion as true Hinduism.<ref>''Hinduism: An Alphabetical Guide'', Roshen Dalal, p. 41</ref> Nevertheless, according to Jamison and Witzel | |||
=====Shiavism===== | |||
The most well-known devotees are the ] from southern India. The most popular Shiava teacher of the south was ], while of the north it was ]. | |||
{{Blockquote|... to call this period Vedic Hinduism is a contradiction in terms since Vedic religion is very different from what we generally call Hindu religion – at least as much as Old Hebrew religion is from medieval and modern Christian religion. However, Vedic religion is treatable as a predecessor of Hinduism."<ref name="Witzel" />{{refn|group=note|] notes: "Consequently, it remains an anachronism to project the notion of "Hinduism" as it is commonly understood into pre-colonial history."{{sfn|King|1999|p=176}}}}}} | |||
Female saints include figures like ], ] and ]. | |||
==== Early Vedic period – early Vedic compositions (c. 1750–1200 BCE) ==== | |||
===Modern India===<!-- Not sure this section belongs in this article --> | |||
{{Main|Vedas|Samhitas}} | |||
{{main|Religion in India|Hindu reform movements|Hindutva|Communalism (South Asia)}} | |||
Communalism has played a key role in shaping the religious history of modern India. ] was ] along religious lines into two states, the Muslim-majority ] (comprising what is now the ] and the ]) and the Hindu majority ] (later the Republic of India). The 1947 ] inaugurated rioting among Hindus, Muslims, and Sikhs in Punjab, Bengal, Delhi and other parts of India, and 500,000 died as a result of the violence. The twelve million ] that moved between the newly founded nations of India and Pakistan composed one of the largest mass migrations in modern history.{{cref|Δ}}<ref name="Symonds_1950_74">{{harvnb|Symonds|1950|p=74}}.</ref> Since its independence, India has periodically witnessed large-scale violence sparked by underlying tensions between sections of its majority Hindu and minority Muslim communities. The Republic of India is secular, though it is often considered a Hindu holy land ('']'') or '']'', its government recognises no official religion. In recent decades, communal tensions and religion-based politics have become more prominent.<ref name="Ludden_1996_253">{{harvnb|Ludden|1996|p=253}}.</ref> | |||
The ]s, the composers of the hymns of the ], were considered inspired poets and seers.{{refn|group=note|In post-Vedic times understood as "hearers" of an eternally existing Veda, '']'' means "what is heard"}} | |||
The modern era has given rise to dozens of Hindu saints with international influence. For example, ] established the Brahma Kumaris, one of the largest new Hindu religious movements teaches the discipline of ] to millions. ] founded the ] movement, also international with many followers. Anandamurti, founder of the Ananda Marga, has influenced many worldwide. ] has his ashrams also, around the world, preeching the message of peace, brotherhood and worship. Through all these new Hindu denominations traveling international, many Hindu practices such as yoga, meditation, mantra, divination, vegetarianism have become absorbed by new coverts and others influenced. | |||
The mode of worship was the performance of ], sacrifices which involved sacrifice and sublimation of the havana sámagri (herbal preparations)<ref>{{Cite book |last=Parmar |first=Manish Singh |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=hutUDwAAQBAJ&dq=The+mode+of+worship+was+the+performance+of+Yajna%2C+sacrifices+which+involved+sacrifice+and+sublimation+of+the+havana+s%C3%A1magri+%28herbal+preparations%29&pg=PP13 |title=Ancient India: A Glimpse of Indias' Glorious Ancient Past |date=2018-04-10 |publisher=BookRix |isbn=978-3-7438-6452-8 |language=en |access-date=17 December 2022 |archive-date=29 October 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231029100619/https://books.google.com/books?id=hutUDwAAQBAJ&dq=The+mode+of+worship+was+the+performance+of+Yajna,+sacrifices+which+involved+sacrifice+and+sublimation+of+the+havana+s%C3%A1magri+(herbal+preparations)&pg=PP13 |url-status=live }}</ref> in the fire, accompanied by the singing of ] and 'mumbling' of ], the sacrificial mantras. The sublime meaning of the word yajna is derived from the Sanskrit verb yaj, which has a three-fold meaning of worship of deities (devapujana), unity (saògatikaraña), and charity (dána).<ref>Nigal, S.G. Axiological Approach to the Vedas. Northern Book Centre, 1986. P. 81. {{ISBN|81-85119-18-X}}.</ref> An essential element was the sacrificial fire – the divine ] – into which oblations were poured, as everything offered into the fire was believed to reach God.{{Citation needed|date=June 2023}} | |||
==Astika and Nastika categorization== | |||
{{see|Astika|Hindu philosophy|Buddhism and Hinduism}} | |||
Central concepts in the Vedas are ] and ]. ''Satya'' is derived from ], the present participle of the verbal root ''as'', "to be, to exist, to live".{{sfn|Zimmer|1989|p=166}} ''Sat'' means "that which really exists the really existent truth; the Good",{{sfn|Zimmer|1989|p=166}} and ''Sat-ya'' means "is-ness".{{sfn|Zimmer|1989|p=167}} ''Rta'', "that which is properly joined; order, rule; truth", is the principle of natural order which regulates and coordinates the operation of the universe and everything within it.{{sfn|Holdrege|2004|p=215}} "Satya (truth as being) and rita (truth as law) are the primary principles of Reality and its manifestation is the background of the canons of dharma, or a life of righteousness."{{sfn|Krishnananda|1994|p=17}} "Satya is the principle of integration rooted in the Absolute, rita is its application and function as the rule and order operating in the universe."{{sfn|Krishnananda|1994|p=24}} Conformity with Ṛta would enable progress whereas its violation would lead to punishment. Panikkar remarks: | |||
''Astika'' and ''nastika'' are sometimes used to categorise Indian religions. Those religions that believe that God is the central actor in this world are termed as '']''. Those religions that do not believe that God is the prime mover and actor are classified as '']'' religions. From this point of view the Vedic religion (and Hinduism) is an ''astika'' religion, whereas Buddhism and Jainism are ''nastika'' religions. | |||
{{Blockquote|''Ṛta'' is the ultimate foundation of everything; it is "the supreme", although this is not to be understood in a static sense. It is the expression of the primordial dynamism that is inherent in everything...."{{sfn|Panikkar|2001|pp=350–351}}}} | |||
Another definition of the terms ''astika'' and ''nastika'', followed by ], classifies religions and persons as ''astika'' and ''nastika'' according to whether they accept the authority of the main Hindu texts, the ] as supreme revealed scriptures, or not. By this definition, ], ], ], ], ] and ] are classified as ''astika'' schools, while ] is classified as a ''nastika'' schools. By this definition, both Buddhism and Jainism are classified as ''nastika'' religions since they do not accept the authority of the Vedas. | |||
The term rta is inherited from the ], the religion of the ] prior to the earliest Vedic (Indo-Aryan) and ] (Iranian) scriptures. "]" is the ] term (corresponding to ] ]) for a concept of cardinal importance<ref name="DG_1963_46">{{harvnb|Duchesne-Guillemin|1963|p=46}}.</ref> to Zoroastrian theology and doctrine. The term "dharma" was already used in Brahmanical thought, where it was conceived as an aspect of Rta.{{sfn|Day|1982|pp=42–45}} | |||
All three religions, Hinduism, Buddhism and Jainism, agree that Jainism, Buddhism and Sikhism (as well as several Hindu denominations) do not accept the authority of the Vedas. | |||
Major philosophers of this era were Rishis Narayana, Kanva, ], ], and ].<ref>P. 285 ''Indian sociology through Ghurye, a dictionary'' By S. Devadas Pillai</ref> | |||
==Sikhism == | |||
{{main|Sikhism}} | |||
{{see|Sikhism and Jainism|Sikhism and Hinduism}} | |||
==== Middle Vedic period (c. 1200–850 BCE) ==== | |||
Sikhism originated in ] ] with the teachings of ] and nine successive ]. The principal belief in Sikhism is faith in '']''— represented by the sacred symbol of ''{{unicode|]}}'' . Sikhism's traditions and teachings are distinctly associated with the history, society and culture of the ]. Adherents of Sikhism are known as ]s (''students'' or ''disciples'') and number over 23 million across the world. | |||
{{See also|Painted Grey Ware culture}} | |||
During the Middle Vedic period, the mantras of the Yajurveda and the older Brahmana texts were composed.{{sfn|Michaels|2004|p=34}} The ] became powerful intermediairies.{{sfn|Michaels|2004|p=35}} | |||
Although it began as a relatively neutral faith system that proposed to inculcate the best practices of ] and ], over time, its Gurus led followers in various rebellions and battles against the Islamic ] rulers of the time, most notably against ]. | |||
Historical roots of ] is traced back to 9th-century BCE with the rise of ] and his non-violent philosophy.{{sfn|Dundas|2002|p=30}}{{sfn|Zimmer|1953|p=182-183}} | |||
== Status in India == | |||
{{See also|Legal Status of Jainism as a Distinct Religion}} | |||
Societally, there is little distinction or separation of class between Hindus, Sikhs, Jains and Buddhists owing to near congruence in beliefs and practices.<ref> "Although for the purpose of many personal laws, Jains and Hindus have been treated alike, it is not because they are denominations of Hinduism,"</ref><ref> "Sikhs and Jains, in fact, have throughout been treated as part of the wider Hindu community which has different sects, sub-sects, faiths, | |||
modes of worship and religious philosophies."</ref> Cross-worship and intermarriages are common.{{Fact|date=March 2008}} | |||
==== Late Vedic period (from 850 BCE) ==== | |||
In a judicial reminder, the Indian Supreme Court observed Sikhism and Jainism to be sub-sects or ''special'' faiths within the larger Hindu fold,<ref> In various codified customary laws like Hindu Marriage Act, Hindu Succession Act, Hindu Adoption and Maintenance Act and other laws of pre and post- | |||
The Vedic religion evolved into Hinduism and ], a religious path considering itself the 'essence' of the Vedas, interpreting the Vedic pantheon as a unitary view of the universe with 'God' (Brahman) seen as immanent and transcendent in the forms of ] and ]. This post-Vedic systems of thought, along with the ] and later texts like the ] (the ] and the ]), is a major component of modern Hinduism. The ritualistic traditions of Vedic religion are preserved in the conservative ] tradition.{{Citation needed|date=June 2023}} | |||
Constitution period, the definition of 'Hindu' included all sects and sub-sects of Hindu religions including Sikhs and Jains | |||
</ref> and that Jainism is a denomination within the Hindu fold.<ref> The Supreme Court observed in a judgment pertaining to case of Bal Patil vs. Union of India: "Thus, 'Hinduism' can be called a general religion and common faith of India whereas 'Jainism' is a special religion formed on the basis of quintessence of Hindu religion. Jainism places greater emphasis on non-violence ('Ahimsa') and compassion ('Karuna'). Their only difference from Hindus is that Jains do not believe in any creator like God but worship only the perfect human-being whom they called Tirathankar."</ref> Although the government of British India counted Jains in India as a major religious community right from the first Census conducted in 1873, after independence in 1947 Sikhs and Jains were not treated as national minorities.<ref> The so-called minority communities like Sikhs and Jains were not treated as national minorities at the time of framing the Constitution.</ref> In 2005 the ] declined to issue a ] granting Jains the status of a religious minority throughout India. The Court however left it to the respective ] to decide on the minority status of Jain religion.<ref>{{cite news|publisher=]|url=http://www.tribuneindia.com/2005/20051125/edit.htm#4 |title=Minority rights are indivisible|author=Syed Shahabuddin }}</ref><ref> In an extra-judicial observation not forming part of the judgment the court observed :"Thus, 'Hinduism' can be called a general religion and common faith of India whereas 'Jainism' is a special religion formed on the basis of quintessence of Hindu religion. Jainism places greater emphasis on non-violence ('Ahimsa') and compassion ('Karuna'). Their only | |||
difference from Hindus is that Jains do not believe in any creator like | |||
God but worship only the perfect human-being whom they called | |||
Tirathankar."</ref> | |||
=== Sanskritization === | |||
However, some individual states have over the past few decades differed on whether Jains, Buddhists and Sikhs are religious minorities or not, by either pronouncing judgments or passing legislation. One example is the judgment passed by the Supreme Court in 2006, in a case pertaining to the state of Uttar Pradesh, which declared Jainism to be undisputably distinct from Hinduism, but mentioned that, "The question as to whether the Jains are part of the Hindu religion is open to debate.<ref name="judis_basic_shiksha">(para 25, Committee of Management Kanya Junior High School Bal Vidya Mandir, Etah, U.P. v. Sachiv, U.P. Basic Shiksha Parishad, Allahabad, U.P. and Ors., Per Dalveer Bhandari J., Civil Appeal No. 9595 of 2003, decided On: 21.08.2006, Supreme Court of India) </ref> However, the Supreme Court also noted various court cases that have held ]. | |||
{{Main|Sanskritization}} | |||
Since Vedic times, "people from many strata of society throughout the subcontinent tended to adapt their religious and social life to Brahmanic norms", a process sometimes called ].<ref name="EBHinbduism6">{{Cite web |url=https://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/266312/Hinduism/8975/Other-sources-the-process-of-Sanskritization |title=Encyclopædia Britannica, ''Other sources: the process of "Sanskritization"''. |access-date=23 June 2022 |archive-date=26 April 2015 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150426181105/http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/266312/Hinduism/8975/Other-sources-the-process-of-Sanskritization |url-status=live }}</ref> It is reflected in the tendency to identify local deities with the gods of the Sanskrit texts.<ref name="EBHinbduism6" /> | |||
Another example is the ], that is an amendment to a legislation that sought to define Jains and Buddhists as denominations within Hinduism.<ref> </ref> Ultimately on ] ], finding it not in conformity with the concept of freedom of religion as embodied in Article 25 (1) of the Constitution, Governor Naval Kishore Sharma returned back the Gujarat Freedom of Religion (Amendment) Bill, 2006 citing the widespread protests by the Jains<ref>{{cite news | |||
| url = http://www.indianexpress.com/story/207905.html | |||
| title = Religious freedom Bill returned | |||
| work = | |||
| publisher = The Indian Express | |||
| pages = | |||
| page = | |||
| date = 2007-07-31 | |||
| accessdate = 2007-09-15}} | |||
</ref> as well as Supreme Court's extra-judicial observation that Jainism is a "special religion formed on the basis of quintessence of Hindu religion by the Supreme Court"<ref> In his letter dated ] ] he had said Jainism has been regarded as "special religion formed on the basis of quintessence of Hindu religion by the Supreme Court". </ref> | |||
=== Shramanic period (c. 800–200 BCE) === | |||
==See also== | |||
{{multiple image |total_width=300 | |||
* ] | |||
| align = right | |||
* ] | |||
| image1 = Buddha in Sarnath Museum (Dhammajak Mutra).jpg | |||
* ] | |||
| alt1 = | |||
* ] | |||
| caption1 = A statue of ] from ], ], India, 4th century CE. | |||
* ] | |||
| image2 = Mahavir.jpg | |||
* ] | |||
| alt2 = | |||
* ] | |||
| caption2 = The idol of ], the 24th and last ] of ]. | |||
| footer = | |||
}} | |||
During the time of the shramanic reform movements "many elements of the Vedic religion were lost".{{sfn|Michaels|2004|p=38}} According to Michaels, "it is justified to see a turning point between the Vedic religion and Hindu religions".{{sfn|Michaels|2004|p=38}} | |||
==== Late Vedic period – Brahmanas and Upanishads – Vedanta (850–500 BCE) ==== | |||
{{Main|Brahmanas|Upanishads|Vedanta}} | |||
The late Vedic period (9th to 6th centuries BCE) marks the beginning of the Upanisadic or ] period.<ref group=web name="Indiana10"> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090801152905/http://www.indiana.edu/~isp/cd_rom/mod_10/mod_10_x.htm |date=1 August 2009 }} ''Passage to India, Module 10''.</ref>{{refn|group=note|"Upanishads came to be composed already in the ninth and eighth century B.C.E. and continued to be composed well into the first centuries of the Common Era. The ]s and ]s are somewhat older, reaching back to the eleventh and even twelfth century BCE."<ref group=web name="Indiana10" />}}{{sfn|Deussen|1966|p={{page needed|date=March 2021}}}}{{refn|group=note|Deussen: "these treatises are not the work of a single genius, but the total philosophical product of an entire epoch which extends approximately 1000 or 800 BC, to c. 500 BCE, but which is prolonged in its offshoots far beyond this last limit of time."{{sfn|Deussen |1966|p=}}}} This period heralded the beginning of much of what became classical Hinduism, with the composition of the ],<ref>{{cite book |last=Neusner|first=Jacob|year=2009|title=World Religions in America: An Introduction |isbn=978-0-664-23320-4 |publisher=Westminster John Knox Press |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=34vGv_HDGG8C&pg=PA183 |page=183}}</ref> later the ], still later followed by the ]. | |||
Upanishads form the speculative-philosophical basis of classical Hinduism and are known as ] (conclusion of the ]).<ref>{{citation|last1=Melton|first1=J. Gordon|last2=Baumann|first2=Martin |title=Religions of the World, Second Edition: A Comprehensive Encyclopedia of Beliefs and Practices |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=v2yiyLLOj88C&pg=PA1324|year=2010|publisher=ABC-CLIO|isbn=978-1-59884-204-3|page=1324}}</ref> The older Upanishads launched attacks of increasing intensity on the ritual. Anyone who worships a divinity other than the Self is called a domestic animal of the gods in the Brihadaranyaka Upanishad. The Mundaka launches the most scathing attack on the ritual by comparing those who value sacrifice with an unsafe boat that is endlessly overtaken by old age and death.<ref>{{citation |title=History of Philosophy Eastern and Western|first=T.M.P|last=Mahadevan|editor=Sarvepalli Radhakrishnan |year=1956|publisher=George Allen & Unwin Ltd|page=57}}</ref> | |||
Scholars believe that ], the 23rd Jain ''tirthankara'' lived during this period in the 9th century BCE.{{sfn|von Glasenapp|1999|p=16}} | |||
==== Rise of Shramanic tradition (7th to 5th centuries BCE) ==== | |||
{{See also|Shramana|Magadha}} | |||
] | |||
] and ] belong to the śramaṇa traditions. These religions rose into prominence in 700–500 BCE {{sfn|Jain|2008|p=210}}{{sfn|Svarghese|2008|p=259-60}}{{sfn|Mallinson|2007|pp=17–18, 32–33}} in the ] kingdom., reflecting "the cosmology and anthropology of a much older, pre-Aryan upper class of northeastern India",{{sfn|Zimmer|1989|p=217}} and were responsible for the related concepts of '']'' (the cycle of birth and death) and '']'' (liberation from that cycle).{{sfn|Flood|Olivelle|2003|p=273–274}}{{refn|group=note|Gavin Flood and ]: "The second half of the first millennium BCE was the period that created many of the ideological and institutional elements that characterize later Indian religions. The renouncer tradition played a central role during this formative period of Indian religious history.... Some of the fundamental values and beliefs that we generally associate with Indian religions in general and Hinduism in particular were in part the creation of the renouncer tradition. These include the two pillars of Indian theologies: samsara – the belief that life in this world is one of suffering and subject to repeated deaths and births (rebirth); moksa/nirvana – the goal of human existence...."{{sfn|Flood|Olivelle|2003|p=273–274}}}} | |||
The shramana movements challenged the orthodoxy of the rituals.{{sfn|Flood|1996|p=}} The shramanas were wandering ascetics distinct from Vedism.<ref name="ReferenceA">Kalghatgi, T. G. 1988 In: Study of Jainism, Prakrit Bharti Academy, Jaipur</ref><ref name="Cromwell">S. Cromwell Crawford, review of L. M. Joshi, ''Brahmanism, Buddhism and Hinduism'', Philosophy East and West (1972)</ref>{{refn|group=note|Cromwell Crwaford: "Alongside Brahmanism was the non-Aryan Shramanic (self reliant) culture with its roots going back to prehistoric times."<ref name="Cromwell" />}}<ref name="Masih">Y. Masih (2000). In: ''A Comparative Study of Religions''. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass Publ. p. 18. {{ISBN|81-208-0815-0}}.</ref>{{refn|group=note|Masih: "There is no evidence to show that Jainism and Buddhism ever subscribed to vedic sacrifices, vedic deities or caste. They are parallel or native religions of India and have contributed to much to the growth of even classical Hinduism of the present times."<ref name="Masih" />}}<ref name="Jaini">Padmanabh S. Jaini, (1979), The Jaina Path to Purification, Motilal Banarsidass, Delhi, p. 169</ref>{{refn|group=note |Padmanabh S. Jaini: "Jainas themselves have no memory of a time when they fell within the Vedic fold. Any theory that attempts to link the two traditions, moreover fails to appreciate rather distinctive and very non-vedic character of Jaina cosmology, soul theory, karmic doctrine and atheism".<ref name="Jaini" />}} Mahavira, proponent of Jainism, and ] (c. 563-483), founder of Buddhism were the most prominent icons of this movement. | |||
Shramana gave rise to the concept of the cycle of birth and death, the concept of ], and the concept of liberation.{{sfn|Flood|Olivelle|2003|p=273–274}}{{refn|group=note|Flood: "The second half of the first millennium BCE was the period that created many of the ideological and institutional elements that characterise later Indian religions. The renouncer tradition played a central role during this formative period of Indian religious history.... Some of the fundamental values and beliefs that we generally associate with Indian religions in general and Hinduism in particular were in part the creation of the renouncer tradition. These include the two pillars of Indian theologies: samsara – the belief that life in this world is one of suffering and subject to repeated deaths and births (rebirth); moksa/nirvana – the goal of human existence...."{{sfn|Flood|Olivelle|2003|p=273–274}}}}{{sfn|Flood|1996|p={{page needed|date=March 2021}}}}{{refn|group=note|Flood: "The origin and doctrine of Karma and Samsara are obscure. These concepts were certainly circulating among sramanas, and Jainism and Buddhism developed specific and sophisticated ideas about the process of transmigration. It is very possible that the karmas and reincarnation entered the mainstream brahaminical thought from the sramana or the renouncer traditions."{{sfn|Flood|1996|p=86}}}}{{sfn|Jaini|2001|p={{page needed|date=March 2021}}}}{{refn|group=note|Padmanabh S. Jaini: "Yajnavalkya's reluctance and manner in expounding the doctrine of karma in the assembly of Janaka (a reluctance not shown on any other occasion) can perhaps be explained by the assumption that it was, like that of the transmigration of soul, of non-brahmanical origin. In view of the fact that this doctrine is emblazoned on almost every page of sramana scriptures, it is highly probable that it was derived from them."{{sfn|Jaini|2001|p=51}}}}{{refn|group=note|Jeffrey Brodd and Gregory Sobolewski: "Jainism shares many of the basic doctrines of Hinduism and Buddhism."<ref>P. 93 ''World Religions'' By Jeffrey Brodd, Gregory Sobolewski.</ref>}} The influence of Upanishads on Buddhism has been a subject of debate among scholars. While ], ] and ] were convinced of Upanishadic influence on the Buddhist canon, ] and ] highlighted the points where Buddhism was opposed to Upanishads.<ref>{{citation |last=Pratt |first=James Bissett |title=The Pilgrimage of Buddhism and a Buddhist Pilgrimage |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=cLXwU9e6D4sC&pg=PA90 |year=1996 |publisher=Asian Educational Services |isbn=978-81-206-1196-2 |page=90 |access-date=7 November 2015 |archive-date=23 December 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231223183102/https://books.google.com/books?id=cLXwU9e6D4sC&pg=PA90#v=onepage&q&f=false |url-status=live }}</ref> Buddhism may have been influenced by some Upanishadic ideas, it however discarded their orthodox tendencies.<ref>{{citation|last=Upadhyaya|first=Kashi Nath |year=1998 |title=Early Buddhism and the Bhagavadgītā |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=JBbznHuPrTYC&pg=PA103 |publisher=Motilal Banarsidass|isbn=978-81-208-0880-5|pages=103–104}}</ref> In Buddhist texts Buddha is presented as rejecting avenues of salvation as "pernicious views".<ref>Hajime Nakamura, ''A History of Early Vedānta Philosophy: Part One.'' Reprint by Motilal Banarsidass Publ., 1990, page 139.</ref> | |||
===== Jainism ===== | |||
{{Main|Mahavira|Jainism|Timeline of Jainism|Jain community}} | |||
Jainism was established by a lineage of 24 enlightened beings culminating with ] (9th century BCE) and ] (6th century BCE).<ref name="Oldmeadow">] (2007) Light from the East: Eastern Wisdom for the Modern West, ], Inc. {{ISBN|1-933316-22-5}}</ref>{{refn|group=note|Oldmeadow: "Over time, apparent misunderstandings have arisen over the origins of Jainism and relationship with its sister religions of Hinduism and Buddhism. There has been an ongoing debate between Jainism and Vedic Hinduism as to which revelation preceded the other. What is historically known is that there was a tradition along with Vedic Hinduism known as ]. Essentially, the sramana tradition included it its fold, the Jain and Buddhist traditions, which disagreed with the eternality of the Vedas, the needs for ritual sacrifices and the supremacy of the Brahmins."<ref name="Oldmeadow" /> Page 141}} | |||
The 24th ] of Jainism, Mahavira, stressed five vows, including '']'' (non-violence), '']'' (truthfulness), '']'' (non-stealing), and '']'' (non-attachment). As per Jain tradition, the teachings of the Tirthankaras predates all known time. The scholars believe ], accorded status as the 23rd Tirthankara, was a historical figure. The Vedas are believed to have documented a few Tirthankaras and an ascetic order similar to the ] movement.<ref name="Fisher">Mary Pat Fisher (1997). , 3rd ed. I. B. Tauris: London. {{ISBN|1-86064-148-2}}. {{OCLC|41293467}}.</ref>{{refn|group=note|Fisher: "The extreme antiquity of Jainism as a non-vedic, indigenous Indian religion is well documented. Ancient Hindu and Buddhist scriptures refer to Jainism as an existing tradition which began long before Mahavira."<ref name="Fisher" />|p=.}} | |||
===== Buddhism ===== | |||
{{Main|Gautama Buddha|Buddhism|Pre-sectarian Buddhism|History of Buddhism|History of Buddhism in India}} | |||
] | |||
Buddhism was historically founded by ], a ] prince-turned-ascetic,<ref name="Encyclopedia Britannica 1997 a829">{{cite web | title=Life of Gautama Buddha and the origin of Buddhism | website=Encyclopedia Britannica | date=July 1, 1997 | url=https://www.britannica.com/summary/Buddha-founder-of-Buddhism | access-date=February 1, 2024 | archive-date=1 February 2024 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240201164308/https://www.britannica.com/summary/Buddha-founder-of-Buddhism | url-status=live }}</ref> and was spread beyond India through missionaries.<ref name="Learman_2005">{{cite book |last=Learman L.(Ed.) |first=Linda |date=2005 |title=Buddhist Missionaries in the Era of Globalization |url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctvvn4jw |publisher=University of Hawaiʻi Press |page= |jstor=j.ctvvn4jw |isbn=978-0-8248-2810-3 |access-date=1 February 2024 |archive-date=1 February 2024 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240201165225/https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctvvn4jw |url-status=live }}</ref> It later experienced a ] in India, but survived in ]<ref name="Jain 2011 p955">{{cite web | last=Jain | first=Pankaj | title=Buddhism: Origin, Spread And Decline | website=HuffPost | date=September 1, 2011 | url=https://www.huffpost.com/entry/buddhism-origin-spread-decline_b_939679 | access-date=February 1, 2024 | archive-date=1 February 2024 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240201165748/https://www.huffpost.com/entry/buddhism-origin-spread-decline_b_939679 | url-status=live }}</ref> and ], and remains more widespread in ] and ].<ref name="Encyclopedia Britannica 1998 d788">{{cite web | title=Buddhism | website=Encyclopedia Britannica | date=September 28, 1998 | url=https://www.britannica.com/topic/Buddhism/The-demise-of-Buddhism-in-India | access-date=February 1, 2024 | archive-date=1 February 2024 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240201165748/https://www.britannica.com/topic/Buddhism/The-demise-of-Buddhism-in-India | url-status=live }}</ref> | |||
], who was called an "awakened one" (]), was born into the ] clan living at Kapilavastu and Lumbini in what is now southern Nepal. The Buddha was born at Lumbini, as emperor ]'s Lumbini pillar records, just before the kingdom of ] (which traditionally is said to have lasted from c. 546–324 BCE) rose to power. The Shakyas claimed ]a and ] lineage,<ref>''The Life of Buddha as Legend and History'', by ]</ref> via descent from the royal lineage of Ayodhya. | |||
Buddhism emphasises enlightenment (nibbana, nirvana) and liberation from the rounds of rebirth. This objective is pursued through two schools, Theravada, the Way of the Elders (practiced in Sri Lanka, Burma, Thailand, SE Asia, etc.) <ref>{{Cite book |last1=Keown |first1=Damien |title=A dictionary of Buddhism |last2=Hodge |first2=Stephen |last3=Jones |first3=Charles |last4=Tinti |first4=Paola |date=2003 |publisher=Oxford Univ. Press |isbn=978-0-19-860560-7 |edition=1. publ |location=Oxford |chapter=Theravāda}}</ref> and Mahayana, the Greater Way (practiced in Tibet, China, Japan, etc.).<ref>{{Cite book |last1=Keown |first1=Damien |title=A dictionary of Buddhism |last2=Hodge |first2=Stephen |last3=Jones |first3=Charles |last4=Tinti |first4=Paola |date=2003 |publisher=Oxford Univ. Press |isbn=978-0-19-860560-7 |edition=1. publ |location=Oxford |chapter=Mahāyāna}}</ref> There may be some differences in the practice between the two schools in reaching the objective.{{Citation needed|date=June 2023}} | |||
==== Spread of Jainism and Buddhism (500–200 BCE) ==== | |||
{{Main|Maurya Empire|Silk Road transmission of Buddhism}} | |||
{{multiple image |total_width=300 | |||
| align = right | |||
| image1 = Mahabodhitemple.jpg | |||
| alt1 = | |||
| caption1 = ] ], ], ] | |||
| image2 = Palitana.jpg | |||
| alt2 = | |||
| caption2 = ] ], ] hill, ] | |||
| footer = | |||
}} | |||
Both Jainism and Buddhism spread throughout India during the period of the ] empire.{{Citation needed|date=June 2023}} | |||
Buddhism flourished during the reign of Ashoka of the ], who patronised Buddhist teachings and unified the Indian subcontinent in the 3rd century BCE. He sent missionaries abroad, allowing Buddhism to spread across Asia.<ref name="Heehs_2002_106">{{harvnb|Heehs|2002|p=106}}.</ref> | |||
Jainism began its golden period during the reign of Emperor ] of ] in the 2nd century BCE due to his significant patronage of the religion. His reign is considered a period of growth and influence for the religion, although Jainism had flourished for centuries before and continued to develop in prominence after his time.<ref>{{cite web |title=Kharavela – The Great Philanthropic Emperor |url=https://magazines.odisha.gov.in/orissareview/apr-2007/engpdf/page40-41.pdf |access-date=10 March 2024 |archive-date=10 March 2024 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240310235038/https://magazines.odisha.gov.in/orissareview/apr-2007/engpdf/page40-41.pdf |url-status=live }}</ref> | |||
==== Dravidian culture ==== | |||
{{See also|South India|Dravidian peoples|Dravidian folk religion|Dravidian languages}} | |||
The early Dravidian religion constituted of non-] form of ] in that they were either historically or are at present ]. The Agamas are non-] in origin<ref>{{cite book |editor=Mudumby Narasimhachary |year=1976 |title=Āgamaprāmāṇya of Yāmunācārya |series=Issue 160 of Gaekwad's Oriental Series |publisher=Oriental Institute, Maharaja Sayajirao University of Baroda}}</ref> and have been dated either as post-vedic texts.<ref>{{cite book |last=Tripath |first=S.M. |year=2001 |title=Psycho-Religious Studies Of Man, Mind And Nature |publisher=Global Vision Publishing House |isbn=978-81-87746-04-1 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=zWFM_SaX24AC&pg=PA54 |access-date=15 November 2015 |archive-date=7 October 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231007192931/https://books.google.com/books?id=zWFM_SaX24AC&pg=PA54 |url-status=live }}{{page needed|date=March 2021}}</ref> or as pre-vedic oral compositions.<ref>{{cite web |last=Nagalingam |first=Pathmarajah |year=2009 |title=Chapter 3 |work=The Religion of the Agamas |publisher=Siddhanta Publications |url=http://www.siddha.com.my/forum/religionoftheagamas/chapter3.html |access-date=27 July 2015 |archive-date=19 October 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191019035505/http://www.siddha.com.my/forum/religionoftheagamas/chapter3.html |url-status=live }}</ref> The ''Agamas'' are a collection of ] and later ] ] chiefly constituting the methods of temple construction and creation of '']'', worship means of deities, philosophical doctrines, meditative practices, attainment of sixfold desires and four kinds of yoga.<ref>{{cite book |last=Grimes |first=John A. |year=1996 |title=A Concise Dictionary of Indian Philosophy: Sanskrit Terms Defined in English |publisher=SUNY Press |isbn=978-0-7914-3068-2 |lccn=96012383 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=eP5p0ev3nJEC}}{{page needed|date=March 2021}}</ref> The worship of ], sacred flora and fauna in Hinduism is also recognized as a survival of the pre-Vedic Dravidian religion.<ref>{{cite book|title=The Modern review: Volume 28|year=1920 |publisher=Prabasi Press}}{{full citation needed|date=March 2021}}</ref> | |||
] | |||
Ancient Tamil grammatical works ], the ten anthologies ], the eight anthologies ] also sheds light on early religion of ancient Dravidians. '']'' was glorified as ''the red god seated on the blue peacock, who is ever young and resplendent,'' as ''the favored god of the Tamils.''<ref name="Kanchan Sinha 1979">Kanchan Sinha, Kartikeya in Indian art and literature, Delhi: Sundeep Prakashan (1979).</ref> ] was also seen as the supreme God.<ref name="Kanchan Sinha 1979" /> Early iconography of ]<ref>{{cite web |last=Mahadevan |first=Iravatham |title=A Note on the Muruku Sign of the Indus Script in light of the Mayiladuthurai Stone Axe Discovery |date=6 May 2006 |url=http://www.harappa.com/arrow/stone_celt_indus_signs.html |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060904034700/http://www.harappa.com/arrow/stone_celt_indus_signs.html |archive-date=4 September 2006 |website=harappa.com}}</ref> and Sivan<ref name="Ranbir Vohra 2000 15">{{cite book |title=The Making of India: A Historical Survey |author=Ranbir Vohra |publisher=M.E. Sharpe |year=2000 |page=15}}</ref><ref name="Grigorii Maksimovich Bongard-Levin 1985 45">{{cite book |title=Ancient Indian Civilization |author=Grigorii Maksimovich Bongard-Levin |publisher=Arnold-Heinemann |year=1985 |page=45}}</ref><ref name="Steven Rosen, Graham M. Schweig 2006 45">{{cite book |title=Essential Hinduism |author1=Steven Rosen |author2=Graham M. Schweig |year=2006 |publisher=Greenwood Publishing Group |page=45}}</ref>{{sfn|Singh|1989}}<ref>Kenoyer, Jonathan Mark. ''Ancient Cities of the Indus Valley Civilization''. Karachi: Oxford University Press, 1998.</ref> and their association with native flora and fauna goes back to Indus Valley Civilization.<ref name="Ranbir Vohra 2000 15" /><ref name="Steven Rosen, Graham M. Schweig 2006 45" />{{sfn|Basham|1967|pp=11–14}}<ref>{{cite book |title=Plants of life, plants of death |author=Frederick J. Simoons |year=1998 |page=363}}</ref>{{sfn|Flood|1996|p=29, Figure 1: Drawing of the seal}}<ref name="Grigorii Maksimovich Bongard-Levin 1985 45" /><ref>{{cite book |title=India: A History |publisher=Grove Press |author=John Keay|page=14}}{{full citation needed|date=March 2021}}</ref> The ] was classified into five categories, ''thinais'', based on the mood, the season and the land. Tolkappiyam, mentions that each of these ''thinai'' had an associated deity such Seyyon in ''Kurinji''-the hills, ] in ''Mullai''-the forests, and ] in ''Marutham''-the plains, and ] in the ''Neithal''-the coasts and the seas. Other gods mentioned were ] and ] who were all assimilated into Hinduism over time. Dravidian linguistic influence<ref name="Q. Adams, 1997 p.308">J.P. Mallory and D. Q. Adams, ''Encyclopedia of Indo-European Culture'' (1997), p.308.</ref> on early Vedic religion is evident, many of these features are already present in the oldest known ], the language of the '']'' (c. 1500 BCE),<ref name="Q. Adams, 1997 p.308" /> which also includes over a dozen words borrowed from Dravidian.<ref>K. Zvelebil, ''Dravidian Linguistics: an Introduction'', (Pondicherry: Pondicherry Institute of Linguistics and Culture 1990), p. 81.</ref> {{sfn|Krishnamurti|2003|p=6}} This represents an early religious and cultural fusion{{sfn|Lockard|2007|p=50}}{{refn|group=note|name=Lockard|Lockard: "The encounters that resulted from Aryan migration brought together several very different peoples and cultures, reconfiguring Indian society. Over many centuries a fusion of ] and ] occurred, a complex process that historians have labeled the Indo-Aryan synthesis."{{sfn|Lockard|2007|p=50}} Lockard: "Hinduism can be seen historically as a synthesis of Aryan beliefs with Harappan and other Dravidian traditions that developed over many centuries."{{sfn|Lockard|2007|p=52}}}} or synthesis{{sfn|Hiltebeitel|2007|p=12}} between ancient Dravidians and Indo-Aryans, which became more evident over time with sacred iconography, traditions, philosophy, flora, and fauna that went on to influence Hinduism, Buddhism, Charvaka, Sramana, and Jainism.{{sfn|Tiwari|2002|p=v}}{{sfn|Lockard|2007|p=52}}{{sfn|Zimmer|1951|p=218-219}}{{sfn|Larson|1995|p=81}} | |||
] | |||
Throughout ], a king was considered to be divine by nature and possessed religious significance.<ref>{{cite book |last=Harman |first=William P. |title=The sacred marriage of a Hindu goddess |year=1992 |publisher=Motilal Banarsidass |page=6}}</ref> The king was 'the representative of God on earth' and lived in a "koyil", which means the "residence of a god". The Modern Tamil word for temple is ]. Titual worship was also given to kings.<ref>{{cite book |last=Anand |first=Mulk Raj |title=Splendours of Tamil Nadu |year=1980 |publisher=Marg Publications |url=https://www.google.co.uk/search?tbm=bks&q=The+king+is+%27the+representative+of+God+on+earth%27+and+lives+in+a+palace+called+%27+Koyil%27%2C+which+means+the+residence+of+God.+The+ritual+worship+of+God |access-date=21 July 2022 |archive-date=21 July 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220721183333/https://www.google.co.uk/search?tbm=bks&q=The+king+is+%27the+representative+of+God+on+earth%27+and+lives+in+a+palace+called+%27+Koyil%27%2C+which+means+the+residence+of+God.+The+ritual+worship+of+God |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite book |last=Chopra |first=Pran Nath |title=History of South India |year=1979 |publisher=S. Chand |url=}}</ref> Modern words for god like "kō" ("king"), "iṟai" ("emperor"), and "āṇḍavar" ("conqueror") now primarily refer to gods. These elements were incorporated later into Hinduism like the legendary marriage of ] to Queen Mīnātchi who ruled ] or ], a god who later merged into ].<ref>{{cite book |last=Bate |first=Bernard |title=Tamil oratory and the Dravidian aesthetic: democratic practice in south India |year=2009 |publisher=Columbia University Press}}</ref> ] refers to the ] as the "Three Glorified by Heaven".<ref>{{cite book |last=A. Kiruṭṭin̲an̲ |title=Tamil culture: religion, culture, and literature |year=2000 |publisher=Bharatiya Kala Prakashan |page=17}}</ref> In the Dravidian-speaking South, the concept of divine kingship led to the assumption of major roles by state and temple.<ref>{{cite book |last=Embree |first=Ainslie Thomas |author-link=Ainslie Embree |title=Encyclopedia of Asian history: Volume 1 |year=1988 |publisher=Scribner |isbn=978-0-684-18898-0 |url=https://archive.org/details/encyclopediaofas0000embr |url-access=registration}}</ref> | |||
The cult of the mother goddess is treated as an indication of a society which venerated femininity. This mother goddess was conceived as a virgin, one who has given birth to all and one, typically associated with ].<ref>{{cite book |last=Thiruchandran |first=Selvy |title=Ideology, caste, class, and gender |year=1997 |publisher=Vikas Pub. House}}</ref> The temples of the Sangam days, mainly of Madurai, seem to have had priestesses to the deity, which also appear predominantly a goddess.<ref>{{cite book |last=Manickam |first=Valliappa Subramaniam |title=A glimpse of Tamilology |year=1968 |publisher=Academy of Tamil Scholars of Tamil Nadu |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=bIQOAAAAYAAJ&q=sangam+priestess |page=75}}</ref> In the Sangam literature, there is an elaborate description of the rites performed by the Kurava priestess in the shrine Palamutircholai.<ref>{{cite book |last=Lal |first=Mohan |year=2006 |title=The Encyclopaedia Of Indian Literature, Volume 5 (Sasay To Zorgot) |publisher=Sahitya Akademi |isbn=81-260-1221-8 |page=4396}}</ref> Among the early Dravidians the practice of erecting memorial stones ''Natukal'' or '']'' had appeared, and it continued for quite a long time after the Sangam age, down to about 16th century.<ref>{{cite book |last=Shashi |first=S. S. |title=Encyclopaedia Indica: India, Pakistan, Bangladesh: Volume 100 |year=1996 |publisher=Anmol Publications}}</ref> It was customary for people who sought victory in war to worship these hero stones to bless them with victory.<ref>{{cite book |last=Subramanium |first=N. |year=1980 |title=Śaṅgam polity: the administration and social life of the Śaṅgam Tamils |publisher=Ennes Publications}}</ref> | |||
=== Epic and Early Puranic Period (200 BCE – 500 CE) === | |||
{{Main|Pala Empire|Gupta Empire}} | |||
], 5th century, Gupta period.]] | |||
] flanked by ] and ], Pala era.]] | |||
Flood and Muesse take the period between 200 BCE and 500 BCE as a separate period,{{sfn|Flood|1996}}{{sfn|Muesse|2011}} in which the epics and the first puranas were being written.{{sfn|Muesse|2011}} Michaels takes a greater timespan, namely the period between 200 BCE and 1100 CE,{{sfn|Michaels|2004|p=38}} which saw the rise of so-called "Classical Hinduism",{{sfn|Michaels|2004|p=38}} with its "golden age"{{sfn|Michaels|2004|p=40}} during the Gupta Empire.{{sfn|Michaels|2004|p=40}} | |||
According to ], a period of consolidation in the development of Hinduism took place between the time of the late Vedic Upanishad (c. 500 BCE) and the period of the rise of the ] (c. 320–467 CE), which he calls the "Hindus synthesis", "Brahmanic synthesis", or "orthodox synthesis".{{sfn|Hiltebeitel|2002|p=12}} It develops in interaction with other religions and peoples: | |||
{{blockquote|The emerging self-definitions of Hinduism were forged in the context of continuous interaction with heterodox religions (Buddhists, Jains, Ajivikas) throughout this whole period, and with foreign people (Yavanas, or Greeks; Sakas, or Scythians; Pahlavas, or Parthians; and Kusanas, or Kushans) from the third phase on .{{sfn|Hiltebeitel|2002|p=13}}}} | |||
The end of the Vedantic period around the 2nd century CE spawned a number of branches that furthered Vedantic philosophy, and which ended up being seminaries in their own right. Prominent among these developers were ], ], ], and the medieval ] movement.{{Citation needed|date=June 2023}} | |||
==== Smriti ==== | |||
The ''smriti'' texts of the period between 200 BCE and 100 CE proclaim the authority of the Vedas, and "nonrejection of the Vedas comes to be one of the most important touchstones for defining Hinduism over and against the heterodoxies, which rejected the Vedas."{{sfn|Hiltebeitel|2002|p=14}} Of the six Hindu darsanas, the Mimamsa and the Vedanta "are rooted primarily in the Vedic ''sruti'' tradition and are sometimes called ''smarta'' schools in the sense that they develop ''smarta'' orthodox current of thoughts that are based, like ''smriti'', directly on ''sruti''."{{sfn|Hiltebeitel|2002|p=18}} According to Hiltebeitel, "the consolidation of Hinduism takes place under the sign of ''bhakti''."{{sfn|Hiltebeitel|2002|p=20}} It is the ''Bhagavadgita'' that seals this achievement. The result is a universal achievement that may be called '']''. It views Shiva and Vishnu as "complementary in their functions but ontologically identical".{{sfn|Hiltebeitel|2002|p=20}} | |||
==== Vedanta – Brahma sutras (200 BCE) ==== | |||
{{Main|Vedanta}} | |||
In earlier writings, ] 'Vedānta' simply referred to the ]s, the most speculative and philosophical of the Vedic texts. However, in the medieval period of Hinduism, the word Vedānta came to mean the school of philosophy that interpreted the Upanishads. Traditional Vedānta considers ] ] (]) as the most authentic means of knowledge, while ] (]) and ] (logical ]) are considered to be subordinate (but valid).{{sfn|Puligandla|1997}}{{sfn|Raju|1992}} | |||
The systematisation of Vedantic ideas into one coherent treatise was undertaken by ] in the ] which was composed around 200 BCE.<ref>{{Citation |first=S. |last=Rādhākrishnan |author-link=Sarvepalli Radhakrishnan |title=Indian Philosophy, Volume II |year=1996 |publisher=Oxford University Press |isbn=0-19-563820-4}}</ref> The cryptic aphorisms of the Brahma Sutras are open to a variety of interpretations. This resulted in the formation of numerous Vedanta schools, each interpreting the texts in its own way and producing its own sub-commentaries.{{Citation needed|date=June 2023}} | |||
==== Indian philosophy ==== | |||
{{Main|Indian philosophy}} | |||
After 200 CE several schools of thought were formally codified in Indian philosophy, including ], ], ], ], ] and ].<ref name="Radhaxviii-xxi">{{harvnb|Radhakrishnan|Moore|1967|p=xviii–xxi}}.</ref> Hinduism, otherwise a highly polytheistic, pantheistic or monotheistic religion, also tolerated ]. The thoroughly ] and anti-religious philosophical ] school that originated around the 6th century BCE is the most explicitly atheistic school of Indian philosophy. Cārvāka is classified as a '']'' ("heterodox") system; it is not included among the six schools of Hinduism generally regarded as orthodox. It is noteworthy as evidence of a materialistic movement within Hinduism.<ref name="Radha227">{{harvnb|Radhakrishnan|Moore|1967|pp=227–249}}.</ref> Our understanding of Cārvāka philosophy is fragmentary, based largely on criticism of the ideas by other schools, and it is no longer a living tradition.<ref name="RChatterjee55">{{harvnb|Chatterjee|Datta|1984|p=55}}.</ref> Other Indian philosophies generally regarded as atheistic include Samkhya and Mimāṃsā.{{Citation needed|date=June 2023}} | |||
==== Hindu literature ==== | |||
{{Main|Mahabharata|Ramayana|Puranas}} | |||
] at ].]] | |||
Two of Hinduism's most revered ''epics'', the ] and ] were compositions of this period. Devotion to particular deities was reflected from the composition of texts composed to their worship. For example, the ''Ganapati Purana'' was written for devotion to Ganapati (or ]). Popular deities of this era were ], ], ], ], ], and ] (including the forms/incarnations of these deities).{{Citation needed|date=June 2023}} | |||
In the latter Vedantic period, several texts were also composed as summaries/attachments to the Upanishads. These texts collectively called as ] allowed for a divine and mythical interpretation of the world, not unlike the ancient Hellenic or Roman religions. Legends and epics with a multitude of gods and goddesses with human-like characteristics were composed.{{Citation needed|date=June 2023}} | |||
==== Jainism and Buddhism ==== | |||
{{Main|Buddhism and Jainism|Decline of Buddhism in India}} | |||
The Gupta period marked a watershed of Indian culture: the Guptas performed Vedic sacrifices to legitimize their rule, but they also patronized ], which continued to provide an alternative to Brahmanical orthodoxy. Buddhism continued to have a significant presence in some regions of India until the 12th century.{{Citation needed|date=June 2023}} | |||
There were several Buddhistic kings who ], such as the ], ], ], ], and ].<ref>Durga Prasad, P. 116, ''History of the Andhras up to 1565 A. D.''</ref> Buddhism survived followed by Hindus.<ref>''National Geographic'' January 2008, VOL. 213, NO. 1 "The flow between faiths was such that for hundreds of years, almost all Buddhist temples, including the ones at ], were built under the rule and patronage of Hindu kings."{{full citation needed|date=March 2021}}</ref> | |||
==== Tantra ==== | |||
{{Main|Tantra}} | |||
Tantrism originated in the early centuries CE and developed into a fully articulated tradition by the end of the ]. According to Michaels this was the "Golden Age of Hinduism"{{sfn|Michaels|2004|p=40-41}} (c. 320–650 CE{{sfn|Michaels|2004|p=40-41}}), which flourished during the Gupta Empire{{sfn|Michaels|2004|p=40}} (320 to 550 CE) until the fall of the ] Empire{{sfn|Michaels|2004|p=40}} (606 to 647 CE). During this period, power was centralised, along with a growth of far distance trade, standardizarion of legal procedures, and general spread of literacy.{{sfn|Michaels|2004|p=40}} Mahayana Buddhism flourished, but the orthodox Brahmana culture began to be rejuvenated by the patronage of the Gupta Dynasty.{{sfn|Nakamura|2004|p=687}} The position of the Brahmans was reinforced,{{sfn|Michaels|2004|p=40}} and the first Hindu temples emerged during the late Gupta age.{{sfn|Michaels|2004|p=40}} | |||
=== Medieval and Late Puranic Period (500–1500 CE) === | |||
==== Late-Classical Period (c. 650–1100 CE) ==== | |||
{{See also|History of India#Late Middle Kingdoms – The Late-Classical Age|History of Hinduism#Middle Ages|label 1=Late-Classical Age|label 2=Hinduism Middle Ages}} | |||
After the end of the Gupta Empire and the collapse of the Harsha Empire, power became decentralised in India. Several larger kingdoms emerged, with "countless vasal states".{{sfn|Michaels|2004|p=41}}{{refn|group=note|In the east the ]{{sfn|Michaels|2004|p=41}} (770–1125 CE{{sfn|Michaels|2004|p=41}}), in the west and north the ]{{sfn|Michaels|2004|p=41}} (7th–10th century{{sfn|Michaels|2004|p=41}}), in the southwest the ]{{sfn|Michaels|2004|p=41}} (752–973{{sfn|Michaels|2004|p=41}}), in the Dekkhan the ]{{sfn|Michaels|2004|p=41}} (7th–8th century{{sfn|Michaels|2004|p=41}}), and in the south the ]{{sfn|Michaels|2004|p=41}} (7th–9th century{{sfn|Michaels|2004|p=41}}) and the ]{{sfn|Michaels|2004|p=41}} (9th century{{sfn|Michaels|2004|p=41}}).}} The kingdoms were ruled via a feudal system. Smaller kingdoms were dependent on the protection of the larger kingdoms. "The great king was remote, was exalted and deified",{{sfn|Michaels|2004|p=41}} as reflected in the Tantric ], which could also depict the king as the centre of the mandala.{{sfn|White|2000|pp=25–28}} | |||
The disintegration of central power also lead to regionalisation of religiosity, and religious rivalry.{{sfn|Michaels|2004|p=42}}{{refn|group=note|This resembles the development of ] during the ] and the ], during which power became decentralised end new Chán-schools emerged.{{sfn|McRae|2003}}}} Local cults and languages were enhanced, and the influence of "Brahmanic ritualistic Hinduism"{{sfn|Michaels|2004|p=42}} was diminished.{{sfn|Michaels|2004|p=42}} Rural and devotional movements arose, along with ], ], ], and Tantra,{{sfn|Michaels|2004|p=42}} though "sectarian groupings were only at the beginning of their development".{{sfn|Michaels|2004|p=42}} Religious movements had to compete for recognition by the local lords.{{sfn|Michaels|2004|p=42}} Buddhism lost its position, and began to disappear in India.{{sfn|Michaels|2004|p=42}} | |||
===== Vedanta ===== | |||
{{See also|Advaita Vedanta|Ajativada}} | |||
In the same period ] changed, incorporating Buddhist thought and its emphasis on consciousness and the working of the mind.{{sfn|Scheepers|2000}} Buddhism, which was supported by the ancient Indian urban civilisation lost influence to the traditional religions, which were rooted in the countryside.{{sfn|Scheepers|2000|p=127-129}} In Bengal, Buddhism was even prosecuted. But at the same time, Buddhism was incorporated into Hinduism, when Gaudapada used Buddhist philosophy to reinterpret the Upanishads.{{sfn|Scheepers|2000}} This also marked a shift from Atman and Brahman as a "living substance"{{sfn|Scheepers|2000|p=123}} to "maya-vada"{{refn|group=note|The term "maya-vada" is primarily being used by non-Advaitins. See <ref group=web>{{Cite web |url=https://harekrishnatemple.com/chapter21.html |title=Mayavada Philosophy |access-date=2 July 2021 |archive-date=9 July 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210709185604/https://harekrishnatemple.com/chapter21.html |url-status=live }}</ref><ref group=web>{{Cite web |url=https://gosai.com/writings/the-self-defeating-philosophy-of-mayavada |title=The Self-Defeating Philosophy of Mayavada |access-date=2 July 2021 |archive-date=9 July 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210709183434/https://gosai.com/writings/the-self-defeating-philosophy-of-mayavada |url-status=live }}</ref><ref group=web>{{cite web |url=http://gaudiyatouchstone.net/mayavada-and-buddhism-%E2%80%93-are-they-one-and-same |title=Mayavada and Buddhism – Are They One and the Same? |access-date=13 November 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170706152155/http://gaudiyatouchstone.net/mayavada-and-buddhism-%E2%80%93-are-they-one-and-same |archive-date=6 July 2017}}</ref>}}, where Atman and Brahman are seen as "pure knowledge-consciousness".{{sfn|Scheepers|2000|pp=123–124}} According to Scheepers, it is this "maya-vada" view which has come to dominate Indian thought.{{sfn|Scheepers|2000|p=127-129}} | |||
===== Buddhism ===== | |||
{{Main|Decline of Buddhism in India}} | |||
Between 400 and 1000 CE Hinduism expanded as the ] continued.<ref name="BBC ethics2">{{cite web |title=The rise of Buddhism and Jainism |work=Religion and Ethics—Hinduism: Other religious influences |publisher=BBC |date=26 July 2004 |access-date=21 April 2007 |url=http://www.bbc.co.uk/religion/religions/hinduism/history/history_2.shtml |archive-date=5 August 2011 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110805180420/http://www.bbc.co.uk/religion/religions/hinduism/history/history_1.shtml |url-status=live }}</ref> Buddhism subsequently became effectively extinct in India but survived in Nepal and Sri Lanka.{{Citation needed|date=June 2023}} | |||
===== Bhakti ===== | |||
{{Main|Bhakti movement|Alwars|Nayanars}} | |||
The ] began with the emphasis on the worship of God, regardless of one's status – whether priestly or laypeople, men or women, higher social status or lower social status. The movements were mainly centered on the forms of Vishnu (] and ]) and Shiva. There were however popular devotees of this era of ].{{citation needed|date=November 2013}} The best-known proponents of this movement were the ] and the ] from southern India. The most popular Shaiva teacher of the south was ], while of the north it was ].{{citation needed|date=November 2013}} Female saints include figures like ], ] and ].{{Citation needed|date=June 2023}} | |||
The Alvars ({{langx|ta|ஆழ்வார்கள்}}, ''āḻvārkaḷ'' {{IPA-ta|aːɻʋaːr|}}, those immersed in god) were the ] poet-saints of south India, who lived between the 6th and 9th centuries CE and espoused "emotional devotion" or ] to Vishnu-Krishna in their songs of longing, ecstasy and service.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.mahavidya.ca/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/Nippard-Andrea-The-Alvars-Yes.pdf |title=The Alvars |author=Andrea Nippard |access-date=20 April 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131203001609/http://www.mahavidya.ca/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/Nippard-Andrea-The-Alvars-Yes.pdf |archive-date=3 December 2013}}</ref> The most popular Vaishnava teacher of the south was ], while of the north it was ].{{Citation needed|date=June 2023}} | |||
Several important icons were women. For example, within the Mahanubhava sect, the women outnumbered the men,<ref>Ramaswamy, P. 204 ''Walking Naked''</ref> and administration was many times composed mainly of women.<ref>Ramaswamy, P. 210 ''Walking Naked''</ref> Mirabai is the most popular female saint in India.{{Citation needed|date=June 2023}} | |||
] (1479–1531) is a very important figure from this era. He founded the ] school of Vedanta thought. | |||
According to ''The Centre for Cultural Resources and Training'', | |||
{{blockquote|Vaishanava bhakti literature was an all-India phenomenon, which started in the 6th–7th century A.D. in the Tamil-speaking region of South India, with twelve Alvar (one immersed in God) saint-poets, who wrote devotional songs. The religion of ] poets, which included a woman poet, Andal, was devotion to God through love (bhakti), and in the ecstasy of such devotions they sang hundreds of songs which embodied both depth of feeling and felicity of expressions.<ref group=web> {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130515213735/http://ccrtindia.gov.in/literaryarts.htm |date=15 May 2013}}</ref>}} | |||
==== Early Islamic rule (c. 1100–1500 CE) ==== | |||
{{Main|Muslim conquest of India|Islamic Empires in India|Bahmani Sultanate|Deccan Sultanates|Delhi Sultanate|Sufism in India|Islam in India}} | |||
In the 12th and 13th centuries, ] and ] invaded parts of northern India and established the ] in the former ] holdings.<ref> {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080423014415/http://www.sfusd.k12.ca.us/schwww/sch618/Ibn_Battuta/Battuta%27s_Trip_Seven.html |date=23 April 2008}}</ref> The subsequent ] of ] managed to conquer large areas of northern India, approximately equal in extent to the ancient ], while the ] conquered most of central India but were ultimately unsuccessful in conquering and uniting the subcontinent. The Sultanate ushered in a period of Indian cultural renaissance. The resulting "Indo-Muslim" fusion of cultures left lasting syncretic monuments in architecture, music, literature, religion, and clothing.{{Citation needed|date=June 2023}} | |||
===== Bhakti movement ===== | |||
{{More citations needed|section|date=June 2013}} | |||
During the 14th to 17th centuries, a great ''Bhakti'' movement swept through central and northern India, initiated by a loosely associated group of teachers or '']''. ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], and other mystics spearheaded the Bhakti movement in the North while ], ], ], and others propagated Bhakti in the South. They taught that people could cast aside the heavy burdens of ritual and caste, and the subtle complexities of philosophy, and simply express their overwhelming love for God. This period was also characterized by a spate of devotional literature in vernacular prose and poetry in the ethnic languages of the various Indian states or provinces. | |||
===== Lingayatism ===== | |||
{{Main|Lingayatism}} | |||
Lingayatism is a distinct Shaivite tradition in India, established in the 12th century by the philosopher and social reformer Basavanna.{{Citation needed|date=June 2023}} The adherents of this tradition are known as Lingayats. The term is derived from Lingavantha in Kannada, meaning "one who wears ''Ishtalinga'' on their body" (''Ishtalinga'' is the representation of the God). In Lingayat theology, ''Ishtalinga'' is an oval-shaped emblem symbolising Parasiva, the absolute reality. Contemporary Lingayatism follows a progressive reform–based theology propounded, which has great influence in South India, especially in the state of Karnataka.<ref>M. R. Sakhare, History and Philosophy of the Lingayat Religion, Prasaranga, Karnataka University, Dharwad</ref> | |||
===== Unifying Hinduism ===== | |||
{{Main|Unifying Hinduism}} | |||
] from the top of the southern ], looking north. The temple was rebuilt by the Vijayanagar Empire.|alt=aerial image of a temple campus.]] | |||
According to Nicholson, already between the 12th and 16th century, | |||
{{blockquote|... certain thinkers began to treat as a single whole the diverse philosophival teachings of the Upanishads, epics, Puranas, and the schools known retrospectively as the "six systems" (''saddarsana'') of mainstream Hindu philosophy.{{sfn|Nicholson|2010|p=2}}}} | |||
The tendency of "a blurring of philosophical distinctions" has also been noted by ].{{sfn|Burley|2007|p=34}} Lorenzen locates the origins of a distinct Hindu identity in the interaction between Muslims and Hindus,{{sfn|Lorenzen|2006|p=24-33}} and a process of "mutual self-definition with a contrasting Muslim other",{{sfn|Lorenzen|2006|p=27}} which started well before 1800.{{sfn|Lorenzen|2006|p=26-27}} Both the Indian and the European thinkers who developed the term "Hinduism" in the 19th century were influenced by these philosophers.{{sfn|Nicholson|2010|p=2}} | |||
===== Sikhism (15th century) ===== | |||
{{Main|Sikhism}} | |||
{{See also|History of Sikhism|Sikhism and Jainism|Sikhism and Hinduism|Sikhism in India}} | |||
] (''The Golden Temple'') is culturally the most significant place of worship for the ].]] | |||
Sikhism originated in 15th-century ], Delhi Sultanate (present-day ] and ]) with the teachings of ] and nine successive ]. The principal belief in Sikhism is faith in '']''— represented by the sacred symbol of '']'' . Sikhism's traditions and teachings are distinctly associated with the history, society and culture of the ]. Adherents of Sikhism are known as ] (''students'' or ''disciples'') and number over 27 million across the world.{{Citation needed|date=June 2023}} | |||
=== Modern period (1500–present) === | |||
==== Early modern period ==== | |||
{{Main|Mughal period|Maratha Empire}} | |||
According to ], the modern period in India begins with the first contacts with western nations around 1500.{{sfn|Flood|1996}}{{sfn|Muesse|2011}} The period of Mughal rule in India{{sfn|Michaels|2004|p=43}} saw the rise of new forms of religiosity.{{sfn|Michaels|2004|p=43-44}} | |||
==== Modern India (after 1800) ==== | |||
]. Mahamagam Festival, which is held at ]. This festival is also called as Kumbamela of South.<ref>{{cite web |title=Mahamagam Festival |url=http://blessingsonthenet.com/indian-festival/festival/id/227/mahamagam-festival/ |access-date=14 February 2014}}</ref><ref>{{Citation|title=Fairs and Festivals of India|page=326|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=jAbgAAAAMAAJ&q=maha+magam |author1=Madan Prasad Bezbaruah |author2=Krishna Gopal |author3=Phal S. Girota |year=2003 |publisher=Gyan Publishing House |isbn=978-81-212-0809-3|access-date=14 February 2014}}</ref>]] | |||
] held in ] attracted around 70 million Hindus from around the world.]] | |||
===== Hinduism ===== | |||
{{Main|Hindu reform movements|Neo-Vedanta|Hindutva|Communalism (South Asia)}} | |||
In the 19th century, under influence of the colonial forces, a synthetic vision of Hinduism was formulated by ], ], ], ] and ].{{sfn|King|1999}} These thinkers have tended to take an inclusive view of India's religious history, emphasising the similarities between the various Indian religions.{{sfn|King|1999}} | |||
The modern era has given rise to dozens of Hindu saints with international influence.{{sfn|Michaels|2004|p={{page needed|date=March 2021}}}} For example, ] established the Brahma Kumaris, one of the largest new Hindu religious movements which teaches the discipline of ] to millions.{{citation needed|date=June 2013}} Representing traditional ], ] founded the ] movement, another organisation with a global reach. In late 18th-century India, ] founded the ]. ], founder of the ], has also influenced many worldwide. Through the international influence of all of these new Hindu denominations, many Hindu practices such as yoga, meditation, mantra, divination, and vegetarianism have been adopted by new converts.{{Citation needed|date=June 2023}} | |||
===== Jainism ===== | |||
{{See also|Hinduism and Jainism}} | |||
Jainism continues to be an influential religion and Jain communities live in Indian states ], ], ], ], ], and ]. Jains authored several classical books in different Indian languages for a considerable period of time.{{Citation needed|date=June 2023}} | |||
===== Buddhism ===== | |||
{{Main|Navayana}} | |||
The Dalit Buddhist movement also referred to as ]<ref name="Buddhism in India : Challenging Brahmanism and Caste">Omvedt, Gail. ''Buddhism in India: Challenging Brahmanism and Caste''. 3rd ed. London/New Delhi/Thousand Oaks: Sage, 2003. pp. 2, 3–7, 8, 14–15, 19, 240, 266, 271</ref> is a 19th- and 20th-century ] revival movement in India. It received its most substantial impetus from ]'s call for the conversion of ]s to ] in 1956 and the opportunity to escape the ]-based society that considered them to be the lowest in the hierarchy.<ref>{{Citation |title=Political Ideas in Modern India: thematic explorations |author1=Thomas Pantham |author2=Vrajendra Raj Mehta |author3=Vrajendra Raj Mehta |year=2006 |publisher=Sage Publications |isbn=0-7619-3420-0 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=KJejtAaonsEC&q=%22Self-respect+movement%22&pg=PA48 |access-date=26 October 2020 |archive-date=18 September 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230918044504/https://books.google.com/books?id=KJejtAaonsEC&q=%22Self-respect+movement%22&pg=PA48 |url-status=live }}</ref> | |||
== Similarities and differences == | |||
] (pink) and Indian religions (yellow) in each country]] | |||
According to Tilak, the religions of India can be interpreted "differentially" or "integrally",{{sfn|Sherma|Sarma|2008|p=239}} that is by either highlighting the differences or the similarities.{{sfn|Sherma|Sarma|2008|p=239}} According to Sherma and Sarma, western Indologists have tended to emphasise the differences, while Indian Indologists have tended to emphasise the similarities.{{sfn|Sherma|Sarma|2008|p=239}} | |||
=== Similarities === | |||
], ], ], and ] share certain key concepts, which are interpreted differently by different groups and individuals.{{sfn|Sherma|Sarma|2008|p=239}} Until the 19th century, adherents of those various religions did not tend to label themselves as in opposition to each other, but "perceived themselves as belonging to the same extended cultural family."{{sfn|Lipner|1998|p=12}} | |||
==== Dharma ==== | |||
{{Unreferenced section|date=May 2021}} | |||
], reading a stack of holy books ("Chalisa" of various god) at the Kumbh Mela]] | |||
The spectrum of these religions are called Dharmic religions because of their overlap over the core concept of ]. It has various meanings depending on the context. For example it could mean duty, righteousness, spiritual teachings, conduct, etc. | |||
==== Soteriology ==== | |||
Hinduism, Buddhism, Jainism, and Sikhism share the concept of ], liberation from the cycle of rebirth.{{sfn|Tiwari|1983|p=210}} They differ however on the exact nature of this liberation.{{sfn|Tiwari|1983|p=210}} | |||
==== Ritual ==== | |||
Common traits can also be observed in ritual. The head-anointing ritual of '']'' is of importance in three of these distinct traditions, excluding Sikhism (in Buddhism it is found within ]).<ref name=":0">{{Cite book |last=Others |first=Muzaffar H. Syed & |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=Sy5gEAAAQBAJ |title=History of Indian Nation: Ancient India |date=2022-02-20 |publisher=K.K. Publications |page=358 |language=en |access-date=1 December 2023 |archive-date=23 September 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230923090519/https://books.google.com/books?id=Sy5gEAAAQBAJ |url-status=live }}</ref> Other noteworthy rituals are the cremation of the dead, the wearing of vermilion on the head by married women, and various marital rituals.<ref name=":0" /> In literature, many classical narratives and purana have Hindu, Buddhist or Jain versions.<ref group=web>c.f. '']'', s.v. "Jainism > Jainism, Hinduism, and Buddhism"</ref> All four traditions have notions of '']'', ''dharma'', '']'', ''moksha'' and various ''forms of ]''.<ref name=":0" /> | |||
==== Mythology ==== | |||
] is a heroic figure in all of these religions. In Hinduism he is the God-incarnate in the form of a princely king; in Buddhism, he is a ]-incarnate; in Jainism, he is the perfect human being. Among the Buddhist ]s are: ''Vessantarajataka'',<ref>Pollock, P. 661 ''Literary Cultures in History:''</ref> ], ], ], ], etc. There also exists the ''Khamti Ramayana'' among the Khamti tribe of Asom wherein Rama is an ] of a Bodhisattva who incarnates to punish the demon king Ravana (B.Datta 1993). The ''Tai Ramayana'' is another book retelling the divine story in Asom.{{Citation needed|date=June 2023}} | |||
=== Differences === | |||
Critics point out that there exist vast differences between and even within the various Indian religions.{{sfn|Larson|2012|pp=313–314}}{{sfn|Yelle|2012|pp=338–339}} All major religions are composed of innumerable sects and subsects.{{sfn|Rodriques|Harding|2008|p=14}} | |||
==== Mythology ==== | |||
Indian mythology also reflects the competition between the various Indian religions. A popular story tells how ] kills ], a manifestation of Shiva depicted as an evil being.{{sfn|Davidson|2004|pp=148–153}}{{sfn|Kalupahana|1994|p=220}} The story occurs in several scriptures, most notably the ''Sarvatathagatatattvasamgraha'' and the ''Vajrapany-abhiseka-mahatantra''.{{sfn|Davidson|2004|p=148}}{{refn|group=note|The story begins with the transformation of the Bodhisattva Samantabhadra into Vajrapani by Vairocana, the cosmic Buddha, receiving a ] and the name "Vajrapani".{{sfn|Davidson|2004|pp=148–150}} Vairocana then requests Vajrapani to generate his adamantine family, to establish a ]. Vajrapani refuses, because Mahesvara (Shiva) "is deluding beings with his deceitfull religious doctrines and engaging in all kinds of violent criminal conduct".{{sfn|Davidson|2004|p=150}} Mahesvara and his entourage are dragged to ], and all but Mahesvara submit. Vajrapani and Mahesvara engage in a magical combat, which is won by Vajrapani. Mahesvara's retinue become part of Vairocana's mandala, except for Mahesvara, who is killed, and his life transferred to another realm where he becomes a buddha named Bhasmesvara-nirghosa, the "Soundless Lord of Ashes".{{sfn|Davidson|2004|p=151}}}} According to Kalupahana, the story "echoes" the story of the conversion of Ambattha.{{sfn|Kalupahana|1994|p=220}} It is to be understood in the context of the competition between Buddhist institutions and ].{{sfn|Davidson|2004|p=152}} | |||
== ''Āstika'' and ''nāstika'' categorisation == | |||
{{Main|Āstika and nāstika|Hindu philosophy|Buddhism and Hinduism}} | |||
{{See also|Adi Shankara|Charvaka}} | |||
''Āstika'' and ''nāstika'' are variously defined terms sometimes used to categorise Indian religions. The traditional definition, followed by ], classifies religions and persons as ''āstika'' and ''nāstika'' according to whether they accept the authority of the main Hindu texts, the Vedas, as supreme revealed scriptures, or not. By this definition, ], ], ], ], ] and ] are classified as ''āstika'' schools, while ] is classified as a ''nāstika'' school. Buddhism and Jainism are also thus classified as ''nāstika'' religions since they do not accept the authority of the Vedas.{{Citation needed|date=June 2023}} | |||
Another set of definitions—notably distinct from the usage of Hindu philosophy—loosely characterise ''āstika'' as "]" and ''nāstika'' as "]". By these definitions, ''Sāṃkhya'' can be considered a ''nāstika'' philosophy, though it is traditionally classed among the Vedic ''āstika'' schools. From this point of view, Buddhism and Jainism remain ''nāstika'' religions.{{Citation needed|date=June 2023}} | |||
Buddhists and Jains have disagreed that they are nastika and have redefined the phrases āstika and nāstika in their own view. Jains assign the term nastika to one who is ignorant of the meaning of the religious texts,<ref>Page i, ''Forms of Indian Philosophical Literature and Other Papers'' by V.S. Kambi</ref> or those who deny the existence of the soul was well known to the Jainas.<ref>P. 163 ''Mahāvīra: His Life and Teachings'' by Bimala Churn Law</ref> | |||
== Use of term "Dharmic religions" == | |||
{{See also|Saffronization}} | |||
Frawley and Malhotra use the term "Dharmic traditions" to highlight the similarities between the various Indian religions.{{sfn|Frawley|1990|p=27}}{{sfn|Malhotra|2011}}{{refn|group=note|Occasionally the term is also being used by other authors. David Westerlund: "... may provide some possibilities for co-operation with Sikhs, Jains and Buddhists, who like Hindus are regarded as adherents of 'dharmic' religions."<ref>Westerlund, David ''Questioning the Secular State: The Worldwide Resurgence of Religion in Politics'' page 16</ref>}} According to Frawley, "all religions in India have been called the Dharma",{{sfn|Frawley|1990|p=27}} and can be | |||
{{blockquote|... put under the greater umbrella of "Dharmic traditions" which we can see as Hinduism or the spiritual traditions of India in the broadest sense.{{sfn|Frawley|1990|p=27}}}} | |||
According to Paul Hacker, as described by Halbfass, the term "dharma" | |||
{{blockquote|... assumed a fundamentally new meaning and function in modern Indian thought, beginning with ] in the nineteenth century. This process, in which ''dharma'' was presented as an equivalent of, but also a response to, the western notion of "religion", reflects a fundamental change in the Hindu sense of identity and in the attitude toward other religious and cultural traditions. The foreign tools of "religion" and "nation" became tools of self-definition, and a new and precarious sense of the "unity of Hinduism" and of national as well as religious identity took root.{{sfn|Halbfass|1995|p=10}}}} | |||
The emphasis on the similarities and integral unity of the dharmic faiths has been criticised for neglecting the vast differences between and even within the various Indian religions and traditions.{{sfn|Larson|2012|pp=313–314}}{{sfn|Yelle|2012|pp=338–339}} According to ] it is typical of the "inclusivist appropriation of other traditions"{{sfn|King|1999}} of ]: | |||
{{blockquote|The inclusivist appropriation of other traditions, so characteristic of neo-Vedanta ideology, appears on three basic levels. First, it is apparent in the suggestion that the (Advaita) Vedanta philosophy of Sankara (c. eighth century CE) constitutes the central philosophy of Hinduism. Second, in an Indian context, neo-Vedanta philosophy subsumes Buddhist philosophies in terms of its own Vedantic ideology. The Buddha becomes a member of the Vedanta tradition, merely attempting to reform it from within. Finally, at a global level, neo-Vedanta colonizes the religious traditions of the world by arguing for the centrality of a non-dualistic position as the '']'' underlying all cultural differences.{{sfn|King|1999}}}} | |||
The "Council of Dharmic Faiths" (UK) regards ], while not originating in the Indian subcontinent, also as a Dharmic religion.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://councilofdharmicfaithsuk.com/the-dharmic-faiths.php |title=Council of Dharmic Faiths UK |website=councilofdharmicfaithsuk.com |access-date=27 May 2017 |archive-date=13 July 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170713113751/http://councilofdharmicfaithsuk.com/the-dharmic-faiths.php }}</ref> | |||
== Status of non-Hindus in the Republic of India == | |||
{{Main|Religion in India}} | |||
{{See also|Legal status of Jainism as a distinct religion in India}} | |||
The inclusion of ], ], and ] within Hinduism is part of the Indian legal system. The 1955 Hindu Marriage Act " as Hindus all Buddhists, Jains, Sikhs and anyone who is not a ], ], Parsee (]) or ]".{{sfn|Cavanaugh|2009|p=88}} And the ] says that "reference to Hindus shall be construed as including a reference to persons professing the Sikh, Jaina or Buddhist religion".{{sfn|Cavanaugh|2009|p=88}} | |||
In a judicial reminder, the Indian Supreme Court observed Sikhism and Jainism to be sub-sects or ''special'' faiths within the larger Hindu fold,<ref group=web name="Supreme Court">{{cite web |url=http://www.judis.nic.in/supremecourt/qrydisp.asp?tfnm=27098 |title=Supreme Court of India, in the judgement of Bal Patil vs. Union of India, Dec 2005 |access-date=29 March 2008 |archive-date=2 May 2008 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080502180453/http://judis.nic.in/supremecourt/qrydisp.asp?tfnm=27098}}</ref>{{refn|group=note|In various codified customary laws like Hindu Marriage Act, Hindu Succession Act, Hindu Adoption and Maintenance Act and other laws of pre and post-Constitution period, the definition of 'Hindu' included all sects and sub-sects of Hindu religions including Sikhs and Jains<ref group=web name="Supreme Court" />}} and that Jainism is a denomination within the Hindu fold.<ref group=web name="Supreme Court" />{{refn|group=note|The Supreme Court observed in a judgment pertaining to case of ''Bal Patil vs. Union of India'': "Thus, 'Hinduism' can be called a general religion and common faith of India whereas 'Jainism' is a special religion formed on the basis of quintessence of Hindu religion. Jainism places greater emphasis on non-violence ('Ahimsa') and compassion ('Karuna'). Their only difference from Hindus is that Jains do not believe in any creator like God but worship only the perfect human-being whom they called Tirathankar."<ref group=web name="Supreme Court" />}} Although the Indian Government counted Jains in India as a major religious community right from the first Census conducted in 1873, after independence in 1947 Sikhs and Jains were not treated as national minorities.<ref group=web name="Supreme Court" />{{refn|group=note|The so-called minority communities like Sikhs and Jains were not treated as national minorities at the time of framing the Constitution.<ref group=web name="Supreme Court" />}} In 2005, the ] declined to issue a ] granting Jains the status of a religious minority throughout India. The Court however left it to the respective ] to decide on the minority status of Jain religion.<ref>{{cite news |newspaper=] |url=https://www.tribuneindia.com/2005/20051125/edit.htm#4 |title=Minority rights are indivisible |author=Syed Shahabuddin |access-date=2 July 2021 |archive-date=8 March 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210308110842/https://www.tribuneindia.com/2005/20051125/edit.htm#4 |url-status=live }}</ref><ref group=web name="Supreme Court" />{{refn|group=note|In an extra-judicial observation not forming part of the judgment the court observed: "Thus, 'Hinduism' can be called a general religion and common faith of India whereas 'Jainism' is a special religion formed on the basis of quintessence of Hindu religion. Jainism places greater emphasis on non-violence ('Ahimsa') and compassion ('Karuna'). Their only difference from Hindus is that Jains do not believe in any creator like God but worship only the perfect human-being whom they called Tirathankar."<ref group=web name="Supreme Court" />}} | |||
However, some individual states have over the past few decades differed on whether Jains, Buddhists, and Sikhs are religious minorities or not, by either pronouncing judgments or passing legislation. One example is the judgment passed by the Supreme Court in 2006, in a case pertaining to the state of Uttar Pradesh, which declared Jainism to be indisputably distinct from Hinduism, but mentioned that, "The question as to whether the Jains are part of the Hindu religion is open to debate.<ref name="judis_basic_shiksha">(para 25, Committee of Management Kanya Junior High School Bal Vidya Mandir, Etah, U.P. v. Sachiv, U.P. Basic Shiksha Parishad, Allahabad, U.P. and Ors., Per Dalveer Bhandari J., Civil Appeal No. 9595 of 2003, decided On: 21 August 2006, Supreme Court of India) {{cite web|url=http://judis.nic.in/supremecourt/qrydisp.asp?tfnm%3D27962 |title=CASE NO.: Appeal (civil) 9595 of 2003 |access-date=29 March 2008 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070311225548/http://judis.nic.in/supremecourt/qrydisp.asp?tfnm=27962 |archive-date=11 March 2007}}</ref> However, the Supreme Court also noted various court cases that have held ].<ref>{{Cite web |last=IQTIDAR KARAMAT CHEEMA |date=2017 |title=Constitutional and Legal Challenges Faced by Religious Minorities in India |url=https://www.uscirf.gov/sites/default/files/Constitutional%20and%20Legal%20Challenges%20Faced%20by%20Religious%20Minorities%20in%20India.pdf |access-date=January 11, 2024 |archive-date=20 September 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230920084503/https://www.uscirf.gov/sites/default/files/Constitutional%20and%20Legal%20Challenges%20Faced%20by%20Religious%20Minorities%20in%20India.pdf |url-status=live }}</ref> | |||
Another example is the ], that is an amendment to a legislation that sought to define Jains and Buddhists as denominations within Hinduism.<ref group=web>{{dead link|date=November 2017 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes}}</ref> Ultimately on 31 July 2007, finding it not in conformity with the concept of freedom of religion as embodied in Article 25 (1) of the Constitution, ] ] returned the Gujarat Freedom of Religion (Amendment) Bill, 2006 citing the widespread protests by the Jains<ref group=web>{{cite news |url=https://indianexpress.com/article/news-archive/religious-freedom-bill-returned/ |title=Religious freedom Bill returned |newspaper=The Indian Express |date=31 July 2007 |access-date=15 September 2007 |archive-date=26 February 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210226192527/https://indianexpress.com/article/news-archive/religious-freedom-bill-returned/ |url-status=live }}</ref> as well as Supreme Court's extrajudicial observation that Jainism is a "special religion formed on the basis of quintessence of Hindu religion by the Supreme Court".<ref group=web> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210710111705/https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/Gujarat_govt_revokes_conversion_amendment/articleshow/2853456.cms |date=10 July 2021 }} In his letter dated 27 July 2007 he had said Jainism has been regarded as "special religion formed on the basis of quintessence of Hindu religion by the Supreme Court".</ref> | |||
== See also == | |||
{{Portal|India|Religion|Hinduism|Sikhism}} | |||
{{Div col|colwidth=22em}} | |||
* ], a similar term used to refer Judaism, Christianity, and Islam | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | * ] | ||
* ] | * ] | ||
* ] | * ] | ||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
** ] | |||
** ] | |||
** ] | |||
** ] | |||
** ] | |||
** ] | |||
** ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ], a similar terms used to refer to East Asian religions such as Taoism, Shintoism and Muism | |||
* ] | |||
{{Div col end}} | |||
== Notes == | == Notes == | ||
{{Reflist|group=subnote}} | |||
{{reflist|2}} | |||
{{Reflist|group=note|30em}} | |||
== References == | == References == | ||
{{Reflist|30em}} | |||
* {{Harvard reference | |||
| surname1=Chatterjee | |||
| given1=S | |||
| surname2=Datta | |||
| given2= D | |||
| year=1984 | |||
| title=An Introduction to Indian Philosophy | |||
| publisher=] | |||
| edition=8th | |||
| id=ASIN: B0007BFXK4 | |||
}} | |||
* {{Harvard reference | |||
| surname1=Fowler | |||
| given1=JD | |||
| year=1997 | |||
| title=Hinduism: Beliefs and Practices | |||
| publisher=Sussex Academic Press | |||
| isbn=1-898-72360-5 | |||
| url=http://books.google.com/books?id=RmGKHu20hA0C | |||
}} | |||
* {{Harvard reference | |||
| surname1=Heehs | |||
| given1=P | |||
| year=2002 | |||
| title=Indian Religions: A Historical Reader of Spiritual Expression and Experience | |||
| publisher=New York University Press | |||
| location=New York | |||
| isbn=0-814-73650-5 | |||
}} | |||
* {{Harvard reference | |||
| surname1=Oberlies | |||
| given1=T | |||
| year=1998 | |||
| title=Die Religion des Rgveda | |||
| publisher=Wien | |||
}} | |||
== Sources == | |||
* {{Harvard reference | |||
| surname1=Radhakrishnan | |||
| given1=S | |||
| surname2=Moore | |||
| given2= CA | |||
| authorlink=Sarvepalli Radhakrishnan | |||
| year=1967 | |||
| title=A Sourcebook in Indian Philosophy | |||
| publisher=Princeton University Press | |||
| isbn=0-691-01958-4 | |||
}} | |||
* {{Harvard reference | |||
| surname1=Rinehart | |||
| given1=R | |||
| year=2004 | |||
| title=Contemporary Hinduism: Ritual, Culture, and Practice | |||
| publisher=ABC-Clio | |||
| isbn=1-57607-905-8 | |||
}} | |||
== |
=== Printed sources === | ||
{{Refbegin|30em}} | |||
* {{cite book |last=Basham |first=A.L. |title=The Wonder that was India |publisher=Sidgwick & Jackson |location=London |year=1967}} | |||
* {{citation |last=Burley |first=Mikel |author-link=Mikel Burley |year=2007 |title=Classical Samkhya and Yoga: An Indian Metaphysics of Experience |publisher=Taylor & Francis}} | |||
* {{citation |last=Cavanaugh |first=William T. |year=2009 |title=The Myth of Religious Violence: Secular Ideology and the Roots of Modern Conflict: Secular Ideology and the Roots of Modern Conflict |publisher=Oxford University Press}} | |||
* {{citation |last1=Chatterjee |first1=S. |last2=Datta |first2=D. |year=1984 |title=An Introduction to Indian Philosophy |publisher=] |edition=8th |id=ASIN: B0007BFXK4}} | |||
* {{citation |last=Davidson |first=Ronald M. |year=2004 |title=Indian Esoteric Buddhism: Social History of the Tantric Movement |publisher=Motilal Banarsidass Publ.}} | |||
* {{cite book |last=Day |first=Terence P. |year=1982 |title=The Conception of Punishment in Early Indian Literature |place=Ontario |publisher=Wilfrid Laurier University Press |isbn=0-919812-15-5}} | |||
* {{cite book |last=Deussen |first=Paul |year=1966 |orig-date=1906 |title=Philosophy of the Upanishads |location=New York |publisher=Dover Publications |isbn=978-0-486-21616-4 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=B0QzAQAAMAAJ }} | |||
* {{citation |last=Duchesne-Guillemin |first=Jacques |title=Heraclitus and Iran |journal=History of Religions |volume=3 |issue=1 |date=Summer 1963 |pages=34–49 |doi=10.1086/462470 |s2cid=62860085}} | |||
* {{citation |last=Dundas |first=Paul |author-link=Paul Dundas |title=The Jains |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=X8iAAgAAQBAJ |edition=Second |year=2002 |orig-date=1992 |publisher=] |isbn=0-415-26605-X |location=] and ] |access-date=1 September 2017 |archive-date=2 July 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230702114824/https://books.google.com/books?id=X8iAAgAAQBAJ |url-status=live }} | |||
* {{citation |last=Flood |first=Gavin D. |year=1996 |title=An Introduction to Hinduism |publisher=Cambridge University Press |author-link=Gavin Flood |isbn=978-0-521-43878-0 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=KpIWhKnYmF0C |access-date=7 November 2015 |archive-date=23 December 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231223184710/https://books.google.com/books?id=KpIWhKnYmF0C |url-status=live }} | |||
* {{citation |last1=Flood |first1=Gavin |last2=Olivelle |first2=Patrick |year=2003 |title=The Blackwell Companion to Hinduism |place=Malden |publisher=Blackwell}} | |||
* {{citation |last=Fowler |first=J.D. |year=1997 |title=Hinduism: Beliefs and Practices |publisher=Sussex Academic Press |isbn=1-898723-60-5 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=RmGKHu20hA0C }}{{Dead link|date=January 2023 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }} | |||
* {{citation |last=Frawley |first=David |year=1990 |title=From the River of Heaven: Hindu and Vedic Knowledge for the Modern Age |place=Berkeley, California |publisher=Book Passage Press |isbn=1-878423-01-0}} | |||
* {{citation |last=Halbfass |first=Wilhelm |year=1995 |title=Philology and Confrontation: Paul Hacker on Traditional and Modern Vedānta |publisher=SUNY Press}} | |||
* {{citation |last=Heehs |first=Peter |year=2002 |title=Indian Religions: A Historical Reader of Spiritual Expression and Experience |publisher=New York University Press |location=New York |isbn=978-0-8147-3650-0 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=-Ec9DAAAQBAJ }} | |||
* {{Harvc |last=Hiltebeitel |first=Alf |author-link=Alf Hiltebeitel |year=2002 |c=Hinduism |in=Kitagawa}} | |||
* {{Harvc |last=Hiltebeitel |first=Alf |author-link=Alf Hiltebeitel |year=2007 |c=Hinduism |in=Kitagawa}} | |||
* {{cite book |last=Hiltebeitel |first=Alf |author-link=Alf Hiltebeitel |editor=Adluri, Vishwa |editor2=Bagchee, Joydeep |title=When the Goddess was a Woman: Mahabharata Ethnographies – Essays by Alf Hiltebeitel |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=ZupXwid01CoC |year=2011 |publisher=Brill |isbn=978-90-04-19380-2 |chapter=The Indus Valley "Proto-Śiva", Re-examined through Reflections on the Goddess, the Buffalo, and the Symbolism of vāhanas |access-date=10 March 2021 |archive-date=20 January 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230120224137/https://books.google.com/books?id=ZupXwid01CoC |url-status=live }} | |||
* {{citation |last=Holdrege |first=Barbara A. |year=2004 |chapter=Dharma |editor-last1=Mittal |editor-first1=S. |editor-last2=Thursby |editor-first2=G. |title=The Hindu World |pages=213–248 |place=New York |publisher=Routledge |isbn=0-415-21527-7}} | |||
* {{citation |last=Jain |first=Champat Rai |author-link=Champat Rai Jain |year=2008 |title=Risabha Deva |publisher=Bhagwan Rishabhdeo Granth Mala |location=India |isbn=978-81-7772-022-8 |edition=2nd}} | |||
* {{cite book |editor-last=Jaini |editor-first=Padmanabh S. |year=2001 |title=Collected Paper on Buddhist Studies |publisher=Motilal Banarsidass |isbn=978-81-208-1776-0}} | |||
* {{citation |last=Kalupahana |first=David J. |year=1994 |title=A history of Buddhist philosophy |place=Delhi |publisher=Motilal Banarsidass Publishers Private Limited}} | |||
* {{citation |last=Khanna |first=Meenakshi |year=2007 |title=Cultural History Of Medieval India |publisher=Berghahn Books}} | |||
* {{cite book |last=King |first=Richard |year=1995 |title=Early Advaita Vedānta and Buddhism: The Mahāyāna Context of the Gauḍapādīya-kārikā |publisher=SUNY Press}} | |||
* {{citation |last=King |first=Richard |year=1999 |title=Orientalism and Religion: Post-Colonial Theory, India and "The Mystic East" |publisher=Routledge}} | |||
* {{citation |last=Kitagawa |first=Joseph |year=2002 |title=The Religious Traditions of Asia: Religion, History, and Culture |publisher=Routledge |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=kfyzAAAAQBAJ |isbn=978-1-136-87597-7 |access-date=30 May 2020 |archive-date=11 January 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230111053959/https://books.google.com/books?id=kfyzAAAAQBAJ |url-status=live }} | |||
* {{citation |last=Kitagawa |first=Joseph |year=2007 |title=The Religious Traditions of Asia: Religion, History, and Culture |publisher=Routledge |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=9fyzAAAAQBAJ |isbn=978-1-136-87590-8 |access-date=10 March 2021 |archive-date=3 July 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230703151449/https://books.google.com/books?id=9fyzAAAAQBAJ |url-status=live }} | |||
* {{citation |last=Krishnamurti |first=Bhadriraju |year=2003 |title=The Dravidian Languages |author-link=Bhadriraju Krishnamurti |publisher=Cambridge University Press |isbn=0-521-77111-0}} | |||
* {{citation |last=Krishnananda |year=1994 |title=A Short History of Religious and Philosophic Thought in India |publisher=Divine Life Society |url=https://www.swami-krishnananda.org/hist_0.html |access-date=2 July 2021 |archive-date=9 July 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210709183213/https://www.swami-krishnananda.org/hist_0.html |url-status=live }} | |||
* {{citation |last1=Kulke |first1=Hermann |last2=Rothermund |first2=Dietmar |year=2004 |title=A History of India |publisher=Routledge}} | |||
* {{cite book |last=Larson |first=Gerald |year=1995 |title=India's Agony Over Religion |publisher=SUNY Press |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=wIOSb97ph3EC |isbn=978-0-7914-2411-7 }} | |||
* {{citation |last=Larson |first=Gerald James |title=The Issue of Not Being Different Enough: Some Reflections on Rajiv Malhotra's Being Different |journal=International Journal of Hindu Studies |date=December 2012 |doi=10.1007/s11407-012-9129-8 |volume=16 |issue=3 |pages=311–322 |s2cid=144728948}} | |||
* {{cite book |last=Lockard |first=Craig A. |year=2007 |title=Societies, Networks, and Transitions |volume=I: to 1500 |publisher=Cengage Learning |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=yJPlCpzOY_QC&pg=PA50 |isbn=978-0-618-38612-3 |access-date=10 March 2021 |archive-date=3 July 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230703151955/https://books.google.com/books?id=yJPlCpzOY_QC&pg=PA50 |url-status=live }} | |||
* {{citation |last=Lipner |first=Julis |year=1998 |title=Hindus: their religious beliefs and practices |publisher=Routledge}} | |||
* {{citation |last=Lorenzen |first=David N. |year=2006 |title=Who Invented Hinduism: Essays on Religion in History |publisher=Yoda Press |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=SO-YmMWpcVEC&q=origins+of+hinduism |isbn=978-81-902272-6-1 }} | |||
* {{citation |last=Malhotra |first=Rajiv |year=2011 |title=Being Different: An Indian Challenge to Western Universalism |publisher=HarperCollins Publishers India}} | |||
* {{citation |last=Mallinson |first=James |year=2007 |title=The Khecarīvidyā of Ādinātha}} | |||
* {{cite book |editor-last=Marshall |editor-first=John |editor-link=John Marshall (archaeologist) |year=1931 |title=Mohenjo-Daro and the Indus Civilization: Being an Official Account of Archaeological Excavations at Mohenjo-Daro Carried Out by the Government of India Between the Years 1922 and 1927 |publisher=Arthur Probsthain |location=London |url=https://archive.org/details/in.ernet.dli.2015.722 }} | |||
* {{cite book |last=McIntosh |first=Jane |year=2008 |title=The Ancient Indus Valley: New Perspectives |publisher=ABC-CLIO |isbn=978-1-57607-907-2 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=1AJO2A-CbccC }} | |||
* {{citation |last=McRae |first=John |year=2003 |title=Seeing Through Zen |publisher=The University Press Group}} | |||
* {{citation |last=Michaels |first=Axel |year=2004 |title=Hinduism. Past and present |place=Princeton, New Jersey |publisher=Princeton University Press}} | |||
* {{citation |last=Misra |first=Amalendu |year=2004 |title=Identity and Religion: Foundations of Anti-Islamism in India |publisher=SAGE}} | |||
* {{citation |last=Muesse |first=Mark William |year=2003 |title=Great World Religions: Hinduism |url=https://archive.org/details/LearningCourses }} | |||
* {{citation |last=Muesse |first=Mark W. |year=2011 |title=The Hindu Traditions: A Concise Introduction |publisher=Fortress Press}} | |||
* {{citation |last=Nakamura |first=Hajime |year=2004 |title=A History of Early Vedanta Philosophy. Part Two |place=Delhi |publisher=Motilal Banarsidass Publishers Private Limited}} | |||
* {{citation |last=Nicholson |first=Andrew J. |year=2010 |title=] |publisher=Columbia University Press}} | |||
* {{citation |last=Nussbaum |first=Martha C. |year=2009 |title=The Clash Within: Democracy, Religious Violence, and India's Future |publisher=Harvard University Press |isbn=978-0-674-03059-6}} | |||
* {{citation |last=Oberlies |first=T. |year=1998 |title=Die Religion des Rgveda |publisher=Wien}} | |||
* {{citation |last=Olivelle |first=Patrick |year=1998 |title=Upanis̥ads |publisher=Oxford University Press |isbn=978-0-19-283576-5 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=f9-2jV7sRuEC |access-date=10 March 2021 |archive-date=16 January 2024 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240116181308/https://books.google.com/books?id=f9-2jV7sRuEC |url-status=live }} | |||
* {{citation |last=Olivelle |first=Patrick |year=2014 |title=The Early Upanishads |publisher=Oxford University Press |isbn=978-0-19-512435-4}} | |||
* {{citation |last=Panikkar |first=Raimundo |year=2001 |title=The Vedic Experience: Mantramañjari |place=Bangalore |publisher=Motilal Banarsidass |isbn=81-208-1280-8}} | |||
* {{cite book |last=Possehl |first=Gregory L. |author-link=Gregory Possehl |year=2002 |title=The Indus Civilization: A Contemporary Perspective |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=XVgeAAAAQBAJ&pg=PA154 |publisher=Rowman Altamira |isbn=978-0-7591-1642-9 |access-date=10 March 2021 |archive-date=20 January 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230120224137/https://books.google.com/books?id=XVgeAAAAQBAJ&pg=PA154 |url-status=live }} | |||
* {{citation |last=Puligandla |first=Ramakrishna |year=1997 |title=Fundamentals of Indian Philosophy |place=New Delhi |publisher=D.K. Printworld}} | |||
* {{citation |last1=Radhakrishnan |first1=S. |last2=Moore |first2=C.A. |author-link=Sarvepalli Radhakrishnan |year=1967 |title=A Sourcebook in Indian Philosophy |publisher=Princeton University Press |isbn=0-691-01958-4 |url-access=registration |url=https://archive.org/details/sourcebookinindi00radh }} | |||
* {{citation |last=Raju |first=P.T. |year=1992 |title=The Philosophical Traditions of India |place=Delhi |publisher=Motilal Banarsidass Publishers Private Limited}} | |||
* {{cite journal |last=Ratnagar |first=Shereen |date=April 2004 |title=Archaeology at the Heart of a Political Confrontation The Case of Ayodhya |journal=Current Anthropology |volume=45 |issue=2 |pages=239–259 |doi=10.1086/381044 |jstor=10.1086/381044 |s2cid=149773944 |url=https://dro.dur.ac.uk/5696/1/5696.pdf |access-date=2 July 2021 |archive-date=19 June 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210619150222/https://dro.dur.ac.uk/5696/1/5696.pdf |url-status=live }} | |||
* {{citation |last=Rinehart |first=R. |year=2004 |title=Contemporary Hinduism: Ritual, Culture, and Practice |publisher=ABC-Clio |isbn=1-57607-905-8}} | |||
* {{citation |last1=Rodriques |first1=Hillary |last2=Harding |first2=John S. |year=2008 |title=Introduction to the Study of Religion |publisher=Routledge}} | |||
* {{citation |last=Samuel |first=Geoffrey |year=2010 |title=The Origins of Yoga and Tantra. Indic Religions to the Thirteenth Century |publisher=Cambridge University Press}} | |||
* {{citation |last=Scheepers |first=Alfred |year=2000 |title=De Wortels van het Indiase Denken |publisher=Olive Press}} | |||
* {{citation |last1=Sherma |first1=Rita D. |last2=Sarma |first2=Aravinda |year=2008 |title=Hermeneutics and Hindu Thought: Toward a Fusion of Horizons |publisher=Springer}} | |||
* {{cite journal |last=Singh |first=S.P. |year=1989 |title=Rgvedic Base of the Pasupati Seal of Mohenjo-Daro |journal=Purātattva |volume=19 |pages=19–26}} | |||
* {{citation |last=Smart |first=Ninian |year=2003 |title=Godsdiensten van de wereld (The World's religions) |place=Kampen |publisher=Uitgeverij Kok}} | |||
* {{cite journal |last=Srinivasan |first=Doris |year=1975 |title=The so-called Proto-Śiva seal from Mohenjo-Daro: An iconological assessment |journal=Archives of Asian Art |volume=29 |pages=47–58 |author-link=Doris Meth Srinivasan |jstor=20062578}} | |||
* {{cite book |last=Srinivasan |first=Doris Meth |year=1997 |title=Many Heads, Arms and Eyes: Origin, Meaning and Form in Multiplicity in Indian Art |publisher=Brill |isbn=978-90-04-10758-8 |author-link=Doris Meth Srinivasan |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=vZheP9dIX9wC |access-date=10 March 2021 |archive-date=20 January 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230120224139/https://books.google.com/books?id=vZheP9dIX9wC |url-status=live }} | |||
* {{cite journal |last=Sullivan |first=Herbert P. |title=A Re-Examination of the Religion of the Indus Civilization |journal=History of Religions |year=1964 |volume=4 |issue=1 |pages=115–125 |jstor=1061875 |doi=10.1086/462498 |s2cid=162278147}} | |||
* {{citation |last=Svarghese |first=Alexander P. |year=2008 |title=India: History, Religion, Vision And Contribution To The World}} | |||
* {{citation |last=Sweetman |first=Will |title=The prehistory of Orientalism: Colonialism and the Textual Basis for Bartholomaus Ziegenbalg's Account of Hinduism |journal=New Zealand Journal of Asian Studies |volume=6 |issue=2 |date=December 2004 |pages=12–38}} | |||
* {{citation |last=Thapar |first=Romila |year=1978 |title=Ancient Indian Social History: Some Interpretations |publisher=Orient Blackswan |url=http://www.philoshistorydepartment.weebly.com/uploads/1/2/8/7/12870319/ancient_indian_social_history_some_interpretation_by_romila_thapar.pdf |access-date=14 February 2015 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150214082038/http://www.philoshistorydepartment.weebly.com/uploads/1/2/8/7/12870319/ancient_indian_social_history_some_interpretation_by_romila_thapar.pdf |archive-date=14 February 2015 }} | |||
* {{cite book |last=Thapar |first=Romila |author-link=Romila Thapar |year=2004 |title=Early India: From the Origins to AD 1300 |publisher=University of California Press |isbn=978-0-520-24225-8 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=-5irrXX0apQC&pg=FA85 |access-date=10 March 2021 |archive-date=20 January 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230120224144/https://books.google.com/books?id=-5irrXX0apQC&pg=FA85 |url-status=live }} | |||
* {{citation |last=Tiwari |first=K.N. |year=1983 |title=Comparative Religion |publisher=Motilal Banarsidass |isbn=978-0-89581-634-4}} | |||
* {{cite book |last=Tiwari |first=Shiv Kumar |year=2002 |title=Tribal Roots Of Hinduism |publisher=Sarup & Sons |isbn=978-81-7625-299-7 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=n0gwfmPFTLgC }} | |||
* {{cite book |last=von Glasenapp |first=Helmuth |title=Jainism: An Indian Religion of Salvation |year=1999 |location=Delhi |publisher=Motilal Banarsidass |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=WzEzXDk0v6sC |isbn=81-208-1376-6 }} | |||
* {{citation |editor-last=White |editor-first=David Gordon |year=2000 |title=Tantra in Practice |publisher=Princeton University Press |isbn=0-691-05779-6}} | |||
* {{cite book |last=Wright |first=Rita P. |author-link=Rita P. Wright |title=The Ancient Indus: Urbanism, Economy, and Society |year=2009 |publisher=Cambridge University Press |isbn=978-0-521-57219-4 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=gAgFPQAACAAJ }} | |||
* {{citation |last=Yelle |first=Robert A. |title=Comparative Religion as Cultural Combat: Occidentalism and Relativism in Rajiv Malhotra's Being Different |journal=International Journal of Hindu Studies |date=December 2012 |doi=10.1007/s11407-012-9133-z |volume=16 |issue=3 |pages=335–348 |s2cid=144950049}} | |||
* {{citation |last=Zimmer |first=Heinrich |year=1951 |title=Philosophies of India |publisher=Princeton University Press}} | |||
* {{citation |last=Zimmer |first=Heinrich |author-link=Heinrich Zimmer |title=Philosophies Of India |year=1953 |orig-date=April 1952 |editor-first=Joseph |editor-last=Campbell |editor-link=Joseph Campbell |publisher=] & Kegan Paul Ltd |location=London |url=https://archive.org/details/Philosophy.of.India.by.Heinrich.Zimmer |isbn=978-81-208-0739-6 }} | |||
* {{cite book |last=Zimmer |first=Heinrich |year=1969 |title=Philosophies of India |publisher=Princeton University Press |isbn=978-0-691-01758-7 |editor-first=Joseph |editor-last=Campbell}} | |||
* {{citation |last=Zimmer |first=Heinrich |year=1989 |title=Philosophies of India |edition=reprint |publisher=Princeton University Press}} | |||
{{Refend}} | |||
=== Web sources === | |||
;Statistics | |||
{{Reflist|group=web}} | |||
* {{cite web |title=Census of India 2001: Data on religion |work=Government of India (Office of the Registrar General) |url=http://www.censusindia.gov.in/|accessdate=2007-05-28 }} | |||
== External links == | |||
;Constitution and law | |||
; Statistics | |||
* {{cite web |title=Constitution of India |work=Government of India (Ministry of Law and Justice) |url=http://indiacode.nic.in/coiweb/welcome.html |accessdate=2007-05-28 }} | |||
* {{cite web |title=Census of India 2001: Data on religion |publisher=Government of India (Office of the Registrar General) |url=http://www.censusindia.gov.in/ |access-date=28 May 2007 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070514045222/http://www.censusindia.gov.in/ |archive-date=14 May 2007}} | |||
; Constitution and law | |||
;Reports | |||
* {{cite web |title=Constitution of India |publisher=Government of India (Ministry of Law and Justice) |url=http://indiacode.nic.in/coiweb/welcome.html |access-date=28 May 2007 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150223171017/http://indiacode.nic.in/coiweb/welcome.html |archive-date=23 February 2015}} | |||
* {{cite web |title=International Religious Freedom Report 2006: India |work=United States Department of State |url=http://www.state.gov/g/drl/rls/irf/2006/71440.htm |accessdate=2007-05-28 }} | |||
; Reports | |||
{{Template group | |||
* {{cite web |title=International Religious Freedom Report 2006: India |publisher=United States Department of State |url=https://2001-2009.state.gov/g/drl/rls/irf/2006/71440.htm |access-date=28 May 2007 |archive-date=12 October 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191012182709/https://2001-2009.state.gov/g/drl/rls/irf/2006/71440.htm |url-status=live }} | |||
|list = | |||
{{Asia topic|Religion in}} | |||
{{South Asian topics}} | |||
{{Religion topics}} | {{Religion topics}} | ||
{{Authority control}} | |||
{{Asia in topic|Religion in}} | |||
{{Life in India}} | |||
}} | |||
<!--Categories--> | |||
] | ] | ||
] | ] | ||
<!--Interwikis--> | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] |
Latest revision as of 22:32, 21 December 2024
Religions that originated on the Indian subcontinent This article is about the religions that originated in the Indian subcontinent. For religious demographics of the Republic of India, see Religion in India. For the book, see The Religion of India. For the religions of indigenous peoples of North America, see Native American religions.
Indian religions as a percentage of world population
Hinduism (16%) Buddhism (7.1%) Sikhism (0.35%) Jainism (0.06%) Non-Indian religions (76.49%)Indian religions, sometimes also termed Dharmic religions or Indic religions, are the religions that originated in the Indian subcontinent. These religions, which include Buddhism, Hinduism, Jainism, and Sikhism, are also classified as Eastern religions. Although Indian religions are connected through the history of India, they constitute a wide range of religious communities, and are not confined to the Indian subcontinent.
Religion | Population |
---|---|
Hindus | 1.25 billion |
Buddhists | 520 million |
Sikhs | 30 million |
Jains | 6 million |
Others | 4 million |
Total | 1.81 billion |
Evidence attesting to prehistoric religion in the Indian subcontinent derives from scattered Mesolithic rock paintings. The Harappan people of the Indus Valley civilisation, which lasted from 3300 to 1300 BCE (mature period 2600–1900 BCE), had an early urbanized culture which predates the Vedic religion.
The documented history of Indian religions begins with the historical Vedic religion, the religious practices of the early Indo-Aryan peoples, which were collected and later redacted into the Vedas, as well as the Agamas of Dravidian origin. The period of the composition, redaction, and commentary of these texts is known as the Vedic period, which lasted from roughly 1750 to 500 BCE. The philosophical portions of the Vedas were summarized in Upanishads, which are commonly referred to as Vedānta, variously interpreted to mean either the "last chapters, parts of the Veda" or "the object, the highest purpose of the Veda". The early Upanishads all predate the Common Era, five of the eleven principal Upanishads were composed in all likelihood before 6th century BCE, and contain the earliest mentions of yoga and moksha.
The śramaṇa period between 800 and 200 BCE marks a "turning point between the Vedic Hinduism and Puranic Hinduism". The Shramana movement, an ancient Indian religious movement parallel to but separate from Vedic tradition, often defied many of the Vedic and Upanishadic concepts of soul (Atman) and the ultimate reality (Brahman). In 6th century BCE, the Shramnic movement matured into Jainism and Buddhism and was responsible for the schism of Indian religions into two main philosophical branches of astika, which venerates Veda (e.g., six orthodox schools of Hinduism) and nastika (e.g., Buddhism, Jainism, Charvaka, etc.). However, both branches shared the related concepts of yoga, saṃsāra (the cycle of birth and death) and moksha (liberation from that cycle).
The Puranic Period (200 BCE – 500 CE) and Early Medieval period (500–1100 CE) gave rise to new configurations of Hinduism, especially bhakti and Shaivism, Shaktism, Vaishnavism, Smarta, and smaller groups like the conservative Shrauta.
The early Islamic period (1100–1500 CE) also gave rise to new movements. Sikhism was founded in the 15th century on the teachings of Guru Nanak and the nine successive Sikh Gurus in Northern India. The vast majority of its adherents originate in the Punjab region. During the period of British rule in India, a reinterpretation and synthesis of Hinduism arose, which aided the Indian independence movement.
History
See also: Outline of South Asian history, History of India, History of Hinduism, and History of BuddhismPeriodisation
Main article: Periodisation of HinduismScottish historian James Mill, in his seminal work The History of British India (1817), distinguished three phases in the history of India, namely the Hindu, Muslim, and British periods. This periodisation has been criticised, for the misconceptions it has given rise to. Another periodisation is the division into "ancient, classical, medieval, and modern periods", although this periodization has also received criticism.
Romila Thapar notes that the division of Hindu-Muslim-British periods of Indian history gives too much weight to "ruling dynasties and foreign invasions", neglecting the social-economic history which often showed a strong continuity. The division in Ancient-Medieval-Modern overlooks the fact that the Muslim conquests took place between the eight and the fourteenth centuries, while the south was never completely conquered. According to Thapar, a periodisation could also be based on "significant social and economic changes", which are not strictly related to a change of ruling powers.
Smart and Michaels seem to follow Mill's periodisation, while Flood and Muesse follow the "ancient, classical, mediaeval and modern periods" periodisation. An elaborate periodisation may be as follows:
- Indian pre-history including Indus Valley civilisation (until c. 1750 BCE)
- Iron Age including Vedic period (c. 1750–600 BCE)
- "Second Urbanisation" (c. 600–200 BCE)
- Classical period (c. 200 BCE – 1200 CE)
- Pre-Classical period (c. 200 BCE – 320 CE)
- "Golden Age" (Gupta Empire) (c. 320–650 CE)
- Late-Classical period (c. 650–1200 CE)
- Medieval period (c. 1200–1500 CE)
- Early Modern (c. 1500–1850)
- Modern period (British Raj and independence) (from c. 1850)
Prevedic religions (before c. 1750 BCE)
Prehistory
The earliest religion followed by the peoples of the Indian subcontinent, including those of the Indus Valley and Ganges Valley, was likely local animism that did not have missionaries.
Evidence attesting to prehistoric religion in the Indian subcontinent derives from scattered Mesolithic rock paintings such as at Bhimbetka, depicting dances and rituals. Neolithic agriculturalists inhabiting the Indus River Valley buried their dead in a manner suggestive of spiritual practices that incorporated notions of an afterlife and belief in magic. Other South Asian Stone Age sites, such as the Bhimbetka rock shelters in central Madhya Pradesh and the Kupgal petroglyphs of eastern Karnataka, contain rock art portraying religious rites and evidence of possible ritualised music.
Indus Valley civilisation
Further information: Prehistoric religionThe religion and belief system of the Indus Valley people has received considerable attention, especially from the view of identifying precursors to deities and religious practices of Indian religions that later developed in the area. However, due to the sparsity of evidence, which is open to varying interpretations, and the fact that the Indus script remains undeciphered, the conclusions are partly speculative and largely based on a retrospective view from a much later Hindu perspective. An early and influential work in the area that set the trend for Hindu interpretations of archaeological evidence from the Harrapan sites was that of John Marshall, who in 1931 identified the following as prominent features of the Indus religion: a Great Male God and a Mother Goddess; deification or veneration of animals and plants; symbolic representation of the phallus (linga) and vulva (yoni); and, use of baths and water in religious practice. Marshall's interpretations have been much debated, and sometimes disputed over the following decades.
One Indus valley seal shows a seated figure with a horned headdress, surrounded by animals. Marshall identified the figure as an early form of the Hindu god Shiva (or Rudra), who is associated with asceticism, yoga, and linga; regarded as a lord of animals; and often depicted as having three eyes. The seal has hence come to be known as the Pashupati Seal, after Pashupati (lord of all animals), an epithet of Shiva. While Marshall's work has earned some support, many critics and even supporters have raised several objections. Doris Srinivasan has argued that the figure does not have three faces, or yogic posture, and that in Vedic literature Rudra was not a protector of wild animals. Herbert Sullivan and Alf Hiltebeitel also rejected Marshall's conclusions, with the former claiming that the figure was female, while the latter associated the figure with Mahisha, the Buffalo God and the surrounding animals with vahanas (vehicles) of deities for the four cardinal directions. Writing in 2002, Gregory L. Possehl concluded that while it would be appropriate to recognise the figure as a deity, its association with the water buffalo, and its posture as one of ritual discipline, regarding it as a proto-Shiva would be going too far. Despite the criticisms of Marshall's association of the seal with a proto-Shiva icon, it has been interpreted as the Tirthankara Rishabha by Jains and Vilas Sangave or an early Buddha by Buddhists. Historians like Heinrich Zimmer, Thomas McEvilley are of the opinion that there exists some link between first Jain Tirthankara Rishabha and Indus Valley civilisation.
Marshall hypothesized the existence of a cult of Mother Goddess worship based upon excavation of several female figurines, and thought that this was a precursor of the Hindu sect of Shaktism. However the function of the female figurines in the life of Indus Valley people remains unclear, and Possehl does not regard the evidence for Marshall's hypothesis to be "terribly robust". Some of the baetyls interpreted by Marshall to be sacred phallic representations are now thought to have been used as pestles or game counters instead, while the ring stones that were thought to symbolise yoni were determined to be architectural features used to stand pillars, although the possibility of their religious symbolism cannot be eliminated.
Many Indus Valley seals show animals, with some depicting them being carried in processions, while others show chimeric creations. One seal from Mohen-jodaro shows a half-human, half-buffalo monster attacking a tiger, which may be a reference to the Sumerian myth of such a monster created by goddess Aruru to fight Gilgamesh. Some seals show a man wearing a hat with two horns and a plant sitting on a throne with animals surrounding him. Some scholars theorize that this was a predecessor to Shiva wearing a hat worn by some Sumerian divine beings and kings.
In contrast to contemporary Egyptian and Mesopotamian civilisations, the Indus Valley lacks any monumental palaces, even though excavated cities indicate that the society possessed the requisite engineering knowledge. This may suggest that religious ceremonies, if any, may have been largely confined to individual homes, small temples, or the open air. Several sites have been proposed by Marshall and later scholars as possibly devoted to religious purpose, but at present only the Great Bath at Mohenjo-daro is widely thought to have been so used, as a place for ritual purification. The funerary practices of the Harappan civilisation is marked by its diversity with evidence of supine burial; fractional burial in which the body is reduced to skeletal remains by exposure to the elements before final interment; and even cremation.
Vedic period (1750–800 BCE)
Main articles: Vedic period and Historical Vedic religion See also: Proto-Indo-European mythology and Proto-Indo-Iranian religionThe documented history of Indian religions begins with the historical Vedic religion, the religious practices of the early Indo-Aryans, which were collected and later redacted into the Samhitas (usually known as the Vedas), four canonical collections of hymns or mantras composed in archaic Sanskrit. These texts are the central shruti (revealed) texts of Hinduism. The period of the composition, redaction, and commentary of these texts is known as the Vedic period, which lasted from roughly 1750 to 500 BCE.
The Vedic Period is most significant for the composition of the four Vedas, Brahmanas and the older Upanishads (both presented as discussions on the rituals, mantras and concepts found in the four Vedas), which today are some of the most important canonical texts of Hinduism, and are the codification of much of what developed into the core beliefs of Hinduism.
Some modern Hindu scholars use the "Vedic religion" synonymously with "Hinduism". According to Sundararajan, Hinduism is also known as the Vedic religion. Other authors state that the Vedas contain "the fundamental truths about Hindu Dharma" which is called "the modern version of the ancient Vedic Dharma" The Arya Samaj is recognize the Vedic religion as true Hinduism. Nevertheless, according to Jamison and Witzel
... to call this period Vedic Hinduism is a contradiction in terms since Vedic religion is very different from what we generally call Hindu religion – at least as much as Old Hebrew religion is from medieval and modern Christian religion. However, Vedic religion is treatable as a predecessor of Hinduism."
Early Vedic period – early Vedic compositions (c. 1750–1200 BCE)
Main articles: Vedas and SamhitasThe rishis, the composers of the hymns of the Rigveda, were considered inspired poets and seers.
The mode of worship was the performance of Yajna, sacrifices which involved sacrifice and sublimation of the havana sámagri (herbal preparations) in the fire, accompanied by the singing of Samans and 'mumbling' of Yajus, the sacrificial mantras. The sublime meaning of the word yajna is derived from the Sanskrit verb yaj, which has a three-fold meaning of worship of deities (devapujana), unity (saògatikaraña), and charity (dána). An essential element was the sacrificial fire – the divine Agni – into which oblations were poured, as everything offered into the fire was believed to reach God.
Central concepts in the Vedas are Satya and Rta. Satya is derived from Sat, the present participle of the verbal root as, "to be, to exist, to live". Sat means "that which really exists the really existent truth; the Good", and Sat-ya means "is-ness". Rta, "that which is properly joined; order, rule; truth", is the principle of natural order which regulates and coordinates the operation of the universe and everything within it. "Satya (truth as being) and rita (truth as law) are the primary principles of Reality and its manifestation is the background of the canons of dharma, or a life of righteousness." "Satya is the principle of integration rooted in the Absolute, rita is its application and function as the rule and order operating in the universe." Conformity with Ṛta would enable progress whereas its violation would lead to punishment. Panikkar remarks:
Ṛta is the ultimate foundation of everything; it is "the supreme", although this is not to be understood in a static sense. It is the expression of the primordial dynamism that is inherent in everything...."
The term rta is inherited from the Proto-Indo-Iranian religion, the religion of the Indo-Iranian peoples prior to the earliest Vedic (Indo-Aryan) and Zoroastrian (Iranian) scriptures. "Asha" is the Avestan language term (corresponding to Vedic language ṛta) for a concept of cardinal importance to Zoroastrian theology and doctrine. The term "dharma" was already used in Brahmanical thought, where it was conceived as an aspect of Rta.
Major philosophers of this era were Rishis Narayana, Kanva, Rishaba, Vamadeva, and Angiras.
Middle Vedic period (c. 1200–850 BCE)
See also: Painted Grey Ware cultureDuring the Middle Vedic period, the mantras of the Yajurveda and the older Brahmana texts were composed. The Brahmans became powerful intermediairies.
Historical roots of Jainism in India is traced back to 9th-century BCE with the rise of Parshvanatha and his non-violent philosophy.
Late Vedic period (from 850 BCE)
The Vedic religion evolved into Hinduism and Vedanta, a religious path considering itself the 'essence' of the Vedas, interpreting the Vedic pantheon as a unitary view of the universe with 'God' (Brahman) seen as immanent and transcendent in the forms of Ishvara and Brahman. This post-Vedic systems of thought, along with the Upanishads and later texts like the epics (the Ramayana and the Mahabharata), is a major component of modern Hinduism. The ritualistic traditions of Vedic religion are preserved in the conservative Śrauta tradition.
Sanskritization
Main article: SanskritizationSince Vedic times, "people from many strata of society throughout the subcontinent tended to adapt their religious and social life to Brahmanic norms", a process sometimes called Sanskritization. It is reflected in the tendency to identify local deities with the gods of the Sanskrit texts.
Shramanic period (c. 800–200 BCE)
A statue of Gautama Buddha from Sarnath, Uttar Pradesh, India, 4th century CE.The idol of Mahavira, the 24th and last Tirthankara of Jainism.During the time of the shramanic reform movements "many elements of the Vedic religion were lost". According to Michaels, "it is justified to see a turning point between the Vedic religion and Hindu religions".
Late Vedic period – Brahmanas and Upanishads – Vedanta (850–500 BCE)
Main articles: Brahmanas, Upanishads, and VedantaThe late Vedic period (9th to 6th centuries BCE) marks the beginning of the Upanisadic or Vedantic period. This period heralded the beginning of much of what became classical Hinduism, with the composition of the Upanishads, later the Sanskrit epics, still later followed by the Puranas.
Upanishads form the speculative-philosophical basis of classical Hinduism and are known as Vedanta (conclusion of the Vedas). The older Upanishads launched attacks of increasing intensity on the ritual. Anyone who worships a divinity other than the Self is called a domestic animal of the gods in the Brihadaranyaka Upanishad. The Mundaka launches the most scathing attack on the ritual by comparing those who value sacrifice with an unsafe boat that is endlessly overtaken by old age and death.
Scholars believe that Parsva, the 23rd Jain tirthankara lived during this period in the 9th century BCE.
Rise of Shramanic tradition (7th to 5th centuries BCE)
See also: Shramana and MagadhaJainism and Buddhism belong to the śramaṇa traditions. These religions rose into prominence in 700–500 BCE in the Magadha kingdom., reflecting "the cosmology and anthropology of a much older, pre-Aryan upper class of northeastern India", and were responsible for the related concepts of saṃsāra (the cycle of birth and death) and moksha (liberation from that cycle).
The shramana movements challenged the orthodoxy of the rituals. The shramanas were wandering ascetics distinct from Vedism. Mahavira, proponent of Jainism, and Buddha (c. 563-483), founder of Buddhism were the most prominent icons of this movement.
Shramana gave rise to the concept of the cycle of birth and death, the concept of samsara, and the concept of liberation. The influence of Upanishads on Buddhism has been a subject of debate among scholars. While Radhakrishnan, Oldenberg and Neumann were convinced of Upanishadic influence on the Buddhist canon, Eliot and Thomas highlighted the points where Buddhism was opposed to Upanishads. Buddhism may have been influenced by some Upanishadic ideas, it however discarded their orthodox tendencies. In Buddhist texts Buddha is presented as rejecting avenues of salvation as "pernicious views".
Jainism
Main articles: Mahavira, Jainism, Timeline of Jainism, and Jain communityJainism was established by a lineage of 24 enlightened beings culminating with Parshvanatha (9th century BCE) and Mahavira (6th century BCE).
The 24th Tirthankara of Jainism, Mahavira, stressed five vows, including ahimsa (non-violence), satya (truthfulness), asteya (non-stealing), and aparigraha (non-attachment). As per Jain tradition, the teachings of the Tirthankaras predates all known time. The scholars believe Parshva, accorded status as the 23rd Tirthankara, was a historical figure. The Vedas are believed to have documented a few Tirthankaras and an ascetic order similar to the shramana movement.
Buddhism
Main articles: Gautama Buddha, Buddhism, Pre-sectarian Buddhism, History of Buddhism, and History of Buddhism in IndiaBuddhism was historically founded by Siddhartha Gautama, a Kshatriya prince-turned-ascetic, and was spread beyond India through missionaries. It later experienced a decline in India, but survived in Nepal and Sri Lanka, and remains more widespread in Southeast and East Asia.
Gautama Buddha, who was called an "awakened one" (Buddha), was born into the Shakya clan living at Kapilavastu and Lumbini in what is now southern Nepal. The Buddha was born at Lumbini, as emperor Ashoka's Lumbini pillar records, just before the kingdom of Magadha (which traditionally is said to have lasted from c. 546–324 BCE) rose to power. The Shakyas claimed Angirasa and Gautama Maharishi lineage, via descent from the royal lineage of Ayodhya.
Buddhism emphasises enlightenment (nibbana, nirvana) and liberation from the rounds of rebirth. This objective is pursued through two schools, Theravada, the Way of the Elders (practiced in Sri Lanka, Burma, Thailand, SE Asia, etc.) and Mahayana, the Greater Way (practiced in Tibet, China, Japan, etc.). There may be some differences in the practice between the two schools in reaching the objective.
Spread of Jainism and Buddhism (500–200 BCE)
Main articles: Maurya Empire and Silk Road transmission of Buddhism Buddhist Mahabodhi Temple, Bodh Gaya, BiharJain Palitana temples, Shatrunjaya hill, GujaratBoth Jainism and Buddhism spread throughout India during the period of the Magadha empire.
Buddhism flourished during the reign of Ashoka of the Maurya Empire, who patronised Buddhist teachings and unified the Indian subcontinent in the 3rd century BCE. He sent missionaries abroad, allowing Buddhism to spread across Asia.
Jainism began its golden period during the reign of Emperor Kharavela of Kalinga in the 2nd century BCE due to his significant patronage of the religion. His reign is considered a period of growth and influence for the religion, although Jainism had flourished for centuries before and continued to develop in prominence after his time.
Dravidian culture
See also: South India, Dravidian peoples, Dravidian folk religion, and Dravidian languagesThe early Dravidian religion constituted of non-Vedic form of Hinduism in that they were either historically or are at present Āgamic. The Agamas are non-vedic in origin and have been dated either as post-vedic texts. or as pre-vedic oral compositions. The Agamas are a collection of Tamil and later Sanskrit scriptures chiefly constituting the methods of temple construction and creation of murti, worship means of deities, philosophical doctrines, meditative practices, attainment of sixfold desires and four kinds of yoga. The worship of tutelary deity, sacred flora and fauna in Hinduism is also recognized as a survival of the pre-Vedic Dravidian religion.
Ancient Tamil grammatical works Tolkappiyam, the ten anthologies Pattuppāṭṭu, the eight anthologies Eṭṭuttokai also sheds light on early religion of ancient Dravidians. Seyon was glorified as the red god seated on the blue peacock, who is ever young and resplendent, as the favored god of the Tamils. Sivan was also seen as the supreme God. Early iconography of Seyyon and Sivan and their association with native flora and fauna goes back to Indus Valley Civilization. The Sangam landscape was classified into five categories, thinais, based on the mood, the season and the land. Tolkappiyam, mentions that each of these thinai had an associated deity such Seyyon in Kurinji-the hills, Thirumaal in Mullai-the forests, and Kotravai in Marutham-the plains, and Wanji-ko in the Neithal-the coasts and the seas. Other gods mentioned were Mayyon and Vaali who were all assimilated into Hinduism over time. Dravidian linguistic influence on early Vedic religion is evident, many of these features are already present in the oldest known Indo-Aryan language, the language of the Rigveda (c. 1500 BCE), which also includes over a dozen words borrowed from Dravidian. This represents an early religious and cultural fusion or synthesis between ancient Dravidians and Indo-Aryans, which became more evident over time with sacred iconography, traditions, philosophy, flora, and fauna that went on to influence Hinduism, Buddhism, Charvaka, Sramana, and Jainism.
Throughout Tamilakam, a king was considered to be divine by nature and possessed religious significance. The king was 'the representative of God on earth' and lived in a "koyil", which means the "residence of a god". The Modern Tamil word for temple is koil. Titual worship was also given to kings. Modern words for god like "kō" ("king"), "iṟai" ("emperor"), and "āṇḍavar" ("conqueror") now primarily refer to gods. These elements were incorporated later into Hinduism like the legendary marriage of Shiva to Queen Mīnātchi who ruled Madurai or Wanji-ko, a god who later merged into Indra. Tolkappiyar refers to the Three Crowned Kings as the "Three Glorified by Heaven". In the Dravidian-speaking South, the concept of divine kingship led to the assumption of major roles by state and temple.
The cult of the mother goddess is treated as an indication of a society which venerated femininity. This mother goddess was conceived as a virgin, one who has given birth to all and one, typically associated with Shaktism. The temples of the Sangam days, mainly of Madurai, seem to have had priestesses to the deity, which also appear predominantly a goddess. In the Sangam literature, there is an elaborate description of the rites performed by the Kurava priestess in the shrine Palamutircholai. Among the early Dravidians the practice of erecting memorial stones Natukal or Hero Stone had appeared, and it continued for quite a long time after the Sangam age, down to about 16th century. It was customary for people who sought victory in war to worship these hero stones to bless them with victory.
Epic and Early Puranic Period (200 BCE – 500 CE)
Main articles: Pala Empire and Gupta EmpireFlood and Muesse take the period between 200 BCE and 500 BCE as a separate period, in which the epics and the first puranas were being written. Michaels takes a greater timespan, namely the period between 200 BCE and 1100 CE, which saw the rise of so-called "Classical Hinduism", with its "golden age" during the Gupta Empire.
According to Alf Hiltebeitel, a period of consolidation in the development of Hinduism took place between the time of the late Vedic Upanishad (c. 500 BCE) and the period of the rise of the Guptas (c. 320–467 CE), which he calls the "Hindus synthesis", "Brahmanic synthesis", or "orthodox synthesis". It develops in interaction with other religions and peoples:
The emerging self-definitions of Hinduism were forged in the context of continuous interaction with heterodox religions (Buddhists, Jains, Ajivikas) throughout this whole period, and with foreign people (Yavanas, or Greeks; Sakas, or Scythians; Pahlavas, or Parthians; and Kusanas, or Kushans) from the third phase on .
The end of the Vedantic period around the 2nd century CE spawned a number of branches that furthered Vedantic philosophy, and which ended up being seminaries in their own right. Prominent among these developers were Yoga, Dvaita, Advaita, and the medieval Bhakti movement.
Smriti
The smriti texts of the period between 200 BCE and 100 CE proclaim the authority of the Vedas, and "nonrejection of the Vedas comes to be one of the most important touchstones for defining Hinduism over and against the heterodoxies, which rejected the Vedas." Of the six Hindu darsanas, the Mimamsa and the Vedanta "are rooted primarily in the Vedic sruti tradition and are sometimes called smarta schools in the sense that they develop smarta orthodox current of thoughts that are based, like smriti, directly on sruti." According to Hiltebeitel, "the consolidation of Hinduism takes place under the sign of bhakti." It is the Bhagavadgita that seals this achievement. The result is a universal achievement that may be called smarta. It views Shiva and Vishnu as "complementary in their functions but ontologically identical".
Vedanta – Brahma sutras (200 BCE)
Main article: VedantaIn earlier writings, Sanskrit 'Vedānta' simply referred to the Upanishads, the most speculative and philosophical of the Vedic texts. However, in the medieval period of Hinduism, the word Vedānta came to mean the school of philosophy that interpreted the Upanishads. Traditional Vedānta considers shabda pramāṇa (scriptural evidence) as the most authentic means of knowledge, while pratyakṣa (perception) and anumāna (logical inference) are considered to be subordinate (but valid).
The systematisation of Vedantic ideas into one coherent treatise was undertaken by Badarāyana in the Brahma Sutras which was composed around 200 BCE. The cryptic aphorisms of the Brahma Sutras are open to a variety of interpretations. This resulted in the formation of numerous Vedanta schools, each interpreting the texts in its own way and producing its own sub-commentaries.
Indian philosophy
Main article: Indian philosophyAfter 200 CE several schools of thought were formally codified in Indian philosophy, including Samkhya, Yoga, Nyaya, Vaisheshika, Mimāṃsā and Advaita Vedanta. Hinduism, otherwise a highly polytheistic, pantheistic or monotheistic religion, also tolerated atheistic schools. The thoroughly materialistic and anti-religious philosophical Cārvāka school that originated around the 6th century BCE is the most explicitly atheistic school of Indian philosophy. Cārvāka is classified as a nāstika ("heterodox") system; it is not included among the six schools of Hinduism generally regarded as orthodox. It is noteworthy as evidence of a materialistic movement within Hinduism. Our understanding of Cārvāka philosophy is fragmentary, based largely on criticism of the ideas by other schools, and it is no longer a living tradition. Other Indian philosophies generally regarded as atheistic include Samkhya and Mimāṃsā.
Hindu literature
Main articles: Mahabharata, Ramayana, and PuranasTwo of Hinduism's most revered epics, the Mahabharata and Ramayana were compositions of this period. Devotion to particular deities was reflected from the composition of texts composed to their worship. For example, the Ganapati Purana was written for devotion to Ganapati (or Ganesha). Popular deities of this era were Shiva, Vishnu, Durga, Surya, Skanda, and Ganesha (including the forms/incarnations of these deities).
In the latter Vedantic period, several texts were also composed as summaries/attachments to the Upanishads. These texts collectively called as Puranas allowed for a divine and mythical interpretation of the world, not unlike the ancient Hellenic or Roman religions. Legends and epics with a multitude of gods and goddesses with human-like characteristics were composed.
Jainism and Buddhism
Main articles: Buddhism and Jainism and Decline of Buddhism in IndiaThe Gupta period marked a watershed of Indian culture: the Guptas performed Vedic sacrifices to legitimize their rule, but they also patronized Buddhism, which continued to provide an alternative to Brahmanical orthodoxy. Buddhism continued to have a significant presence in some regions of India until the 12th century.
There were several Buddhistic kings who worshiped Vishnu, such as the Gupta Empire, Pala Empire, Chalukyas, Somavanshi, and Satavahana. Buddhism survived followed by Hindus.
Tantra
Main article: TantraTantrism originated in the early centuries CE and developed into a fully articulated tradition by the end of the Gupta period. According to Michaels this was the "Golden Age of Hinduism" (c. 320–650 CE), which flourished during the Gupta Empire (320 to 550 CE) until the fall of the Harsha Empire (606 to 647 CE). During this period, power was centralised, along with a growth of far distance trade, standardizarion of legal procedures, and general spread of literacy. Mahayana Buddhism flourished, but the orthodox Brahmana culture began to be rejuvenated by the patronage of the Gupta Dynasty. The position of the Brahmans was reinforced, and the first Hindu temples emerged during the late Gupta age.
Medieval and Late Puranic Period (500–1500 CE)
Late-Classical Period (c. 650–1100 CE)
See also: Late-Classical Age and Hinduism Middle AgesAfter the end of the Gupta Empire and the collapse of the Harsha Empire, power became decentralised in India. Several larger kingdoms emerged, with "countless vasal states". The kingdoms were ruled via a feudal system. Smaller kingdoms were dependent on the protection of the larger kingdoms. "The great king was remote, was exalted and deified", as reflected in the Tantric Mandala, which could also depict the king as the centre of the mandala.
The disintegration of central power also lead to regionalisation of religiosity, and religious rivalry. Local cults and languages were enhanced, and the influence of "Brahmanic ritualistic Hinduism" was diminished. Rural and devotional movements arose, along with Shaivism, Vaisnavism, Bhakti, and Tantra, though "sectarian groupings were only at the beginning of their development". Religious movements had to compete for recognition by the local lords. Buddhism lost its position, and began to disappear in India.
Vedanta
See also: Advaita Vedanta and AjativadaIn the same period Vedanta changed, incorporating Buddhist thought and its emphasis on consciousness and the working of the mind. Buddhism, which was supported by the ancient Indian urban civilisation lost influence to the traditional religions, which were rooted in the countryside. In Bengal, Buddhism was even prosecuted. But at the same time, Buddhism was incorporated into Hinduism, when Gaudapada used Buddhist philosophy to reinterpret the Upanishads. This also marked a shift from Atman and Brahman as a "living substance" to "maya-vada", where Atman and Brahman are seen as "pure knowledge-consciousness". According to Scheepers, it is this "maya-vada" view which has come to dominate Indian thought.
Buddhism
Main article: Decline of Buddhism in IndiaBetween 400 and 1000 CE Hinduism expanded as the decline of Buddhism in India continued. Buddhism subsequently became effectively extinct in India but survived in Nepal and Sri Lanka.
Bhakti
Main articles: Bhakti movement, Alwars, and NayanarsThe Bhakti movement began with the emphasis on the worship of God, regardless of one's status – whether priestly or laypeople, men or women, higher social status or lower social status. The movements were mainly centered on the forms of Vishnu (Rama and Krishna) and Shiva. There were however popular devotees of this era of Durga. The best-known proponents of this movement were the Alvars and the Nayanars from southern India. The most popular Shaiva teacher of the south was Basava, while of the north it was Gorakhnath. Female saints include figures like Akkamadevi, Lalleshvari and Molla.
The Alvars (Tamil: ஆழ்வார்கள், āḻvārkaḷ [aːɻʋaːr], those immersed in god) were the Tamil poet-saints of south India, who lived between the 6th and 9th centuries CE and espoused "emotional devotion" or bhakti to Vishnu-Krishna in their songs of longing, ecstasy and service. The most popular Vaishnava teacher of the south was Ramanuja, while of the north it was Ramananda.
Several important icons were women. For example, within the Mahanubhava sect, the women outnumbered the men, and administration was many times composed mainly of women. Mirabai is the most popular female saint in India.
Sri Vallabha Acharya (1479–1531) is a very important figure from this era. He founded the Shuddha Advaita (Pure Non-dualism) school of Vedanta thought.
According to The Centre for Cultural Resources and Training,
Vaishanava bhakti literature was an all-India phenomenon, which started in the 6th–7th century A.D. in the Tamil-speaking region of South India, with twelve Alvar (one immersed in God) saint-poets, who wrote devotional songs. The religion of Alvar poets, which included a woman poet, Andal, was devotion to God through love (bhakti), and in the ecstasy of such devotions they sang hundreds of songs which embodied both depth of feeling and felicity of expressions.
Early Islamic rule (c. 1100–1500 CE)
Main articles: Muslim conquest of India, Islamic Empires in India, Bahmani Sultanate, Deccan Sultanates, Delhi Sultanate, Sufism in India, and Islam in IndiaIn the 12th and 13th centuries, Turks and Afghans invaded parts of northern India and established the Delhi Sultanate in the former Rajput holdings. The subsequent Slave dynasty of Delhi managed to conquer large areas of northern India, approximately equal in extent to the ancient Gupta Empire, while the Khalji dynasty conquered most of central India but were ultimately unsuccessful in conquering and uniting the subcontinent. The Sultanate ushered in a period of Indian cultural renaissance. The resulting "Indo-Muslim" fusion of cultures left lasting syncretic monuments in architecture, music, literature, religion, and clothing.
Bhakti movement
This section needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources in this section. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. Find sources: "Indian religions" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR (June 2013) (Learn how and when to remove this message) |
During the 14th to 17th centuries, a great Bhakti movement swept through central and northern India, initiated by a loosely associated group of teachers or Sants. Ramananda, Ravidas, Srimanta Sankardeva, Chaitanya Mahaprabhu, Vallabha Acharya, Sur, Meera, Kabir, Tulsidas, Namdev, Dnyaneshwar, Tukaram, and other mystics spearheaded the Bhakti movement in the North while Annamacharya, Bhadrachala Ramadas, Tyagaraja, and others propagated Bhakti in the South. They taught that people could cast aside the heavy burdens of ritual and caste, and the subtle complexities of philosophy, and simply express their overwhelming love for God. This period was also characterized by a spate of devotional literature in vernacular prose and poetry in the ethnic languages of the various Indian states or provinces.
Lingayatism
Main article: LingayatismLingayatism is a distinct Shaivite tradition in India, established in the 12th century by the philosopher and social reformer Basavanna. The adherents of this tradition are known as Lingayats. The term is derived from Lingavantha in Kannada, meaning "one who wears Ishtalinga on their body" (Ishtalinga is the representation of the God). In Lingayat theology, Ishtalinga is an oval-shaped emblem symbolising Parasiva, the absolute reality. Contemporary Lingayatism follows a progressive reform–based theology propounded, which has great influence in South India, especially in the state of Karnataka.
Unifying Hinduism
Main article: Unifying HinduismAccording to Nicholson, already between the 12th and 16th century,
... certain thinkers began to treat as a single whole the diverse philosophival teachings of the Upanishads, epics, Puranas, and the schools known retrospectively as the "six systems" (saddarsana) of mainstream Hindu philosophy.
The tendency of "a blurring of philosophical distinctions" has also been noted by Mikel Burley. Lorenzen locates the origins of a distinct Hindu identity in the interaction between Muslims and Hindus, and a process of "mutual self-definition with a contrasting Muslim other", which started well before 1800. Both the Indian and the European thinkers who developed the term "Hinduism" in the 19th century were influenced by these philosophers.
Sikhism (15th century)
Main article: Sikhism See also: History of Sikhism, Sikhism and Jainism, Sikhism and Hinduism, and Sikhism in IndiaSikhism originated in 15th-century Punjab, Delhi Sultanate (present-day India and Pakistan) with the teachings of Nanak and nine successive gurus. The principal belief in Sikhism is faith in Vāhigurū— represented by the sacred symbol of ēk ōaṅkār . Sikhism's traditions and teachings are distinctly associated with the history, society and culture of the Punjab. Adherents of Sikhism are known as Sikhs (students or disciples) and number over 27 million across the world.
Modern period (1500–present)
Early modern period
Main articles: Mughal period and Maratha EmpireAccording to Gavin Flood, the modern period in India begins with the first contacts with western nations around 1500. The period of Mughal rule in India saw the rise of new forms of religiosity.
Modern India (after 1800)
Hinduism
Main articles: Hindu reform movements, Neo-Vedanta, Hindutva, and Communalism (South Asia)In the 19th century, under influence of the colonial forces, a synthetic vision of Hinduism was formulated by Raja Ram Mohan Roy, Swami Vivekananda, Sri Aurobindo, Sarvepalli Radhakrishnan and Mahatma Gandhi. These thinkers have tended to take an inclusive view of India's religious history, emphasising the similarities between the various Indian religions.
The modern era has given rise to dozens of Hindu saints with international influence. For example, Brahma Baba established the Brahma Kumaris, one of the largest new Hindu religious movements which teaches the discipline of Raja Yoga to millions. Representing traditional Gaudiya Vaishnavism, Prabhupada founded the Hare Krishna movement, another organisation with a global reach. In late 18th-century India, Swaminarayan founded the Swaminarayan Sampraday. Anandamurti, founder of the Ananda Marga, has also influenced many worldwide. Through the international influence of all of these new Hindu denominations, many Hindu practices such as yoga, meditation, mantra, divination, and vegetarianism have been adopted by new converts.
Jainism
See also: Hinduism and JainismJainism continues to be an influential religion and Jain communities live in Indian states Gujarat, Rajasthan, Madhya Pradesh, Maharashtra, Karnataka, and Tamil Nadu. Jains authored several classical books in different Indian languages for a considerable period of time.
Buddhism
Main article: NavayanaThe Dalit Buddhist movement also referred to as Navayana is a 19th- and 20th-century Buddhist revival movement in India. It received its most substantial impetus from B. R. Ambedkar's call for the conversion of Dalits to Buddhism in 1956 and the opportunity to escape the caste-based society that considered them to be the lowest in the hierarchy.
Similarities and differences
According to Tilak, the religions of India can be interpreted "differentially" or "integrally", that is by either highlighting the differences or the similarities. According to Sherma and Sarma, western Indologists have tended to emphasise the differences, while Indian Indologists have tended to emphasise the similarities.
Similarities
Hinduism, Buddhism, Jainism, and Sikhism share certain key concepts, which are interpreted differently by different groups and individuals. Until the 19th century, adherents of those various religions did not tend to label themselves as in opposition to each other, but "perceived themselves as belonging to the same extended cultural family."
Dharma
This section does not cite any sources. Please help improve this section by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. (May 2021) (Learn how and when to remove this message) |
The spectrum of these religions are called Dharmic religions because of their overlap over the core concept of Dharma. It has various meanings depending on the context. For example it could mean duty, righteousness, spiritual teachings, conduct, etc.
Soteriology
Hinduism, Buddhism, Jainism, and Sikhism share the concept of moksha, liberation from the cycle of rebirth. They differ however on the exact nature of this liberation.
Ritual
Common traits can also be observed in ritual. The head-anointing ritual of abhiseka is of importance in three of these distinct traditions, excluding Sikhism (in Buddhism it is found within Vajrayana). Other noteworthy rituals are the cremation of the dead, the wearing of vermilion on the head by married women, and various marital rituals. In literature, many classical narratives and purana have Hindu, Buddhist or Jain versions. All four traditions have notions of karma, dharma, samsara, moksha and various forms of Yoga.
Mythology
Rama is a heroic figure in all of these religions. In Hinduism he is the God-incarnate in the form of a princely king; in Buddhism, he is a Bodhisattva-incarnate; in Jainism, he is the perfect human being. Among the Buddhist Ramayanas are: Vessantarajataka, Reamker, Ramakien, Phra Lak Phra Lam, Hikayat Seri Rama, etc. There also exists the Khamti Ramayana among the Khamti tribe of Asom wherein Rama is an Avatar of a Bodhisattva who incarnates to punish the demon king Ravana (B.Datta 1993). The Tai Ramayana is another book retelling the divine story in Asom.
Differences
Critics point out that there exist vast differences between and even within the various Indian religions. All major religions are composed of innumerable sects and subsects.
Mythology
Indian mythology also reflects the competition between the various Indian religions. A popular story tells how Vajrapani kills Mahesvara, a manifestation of Shiva depicted as an evil being. The story occurs in several scriptures, most notably the Sarvatathagatatattvasamgraha and the Vajrapany-abhiseka-mahatantra. According to Kalupahana, the story "echoes" the story of the conversion of Ambattha. It is to be understood in the context of the competition between Buddhist institutions and Shaivism.
Āstika and nāstika categorisation
Main articles: Āstika and nāstika, Hindu philosophy, and Buddhism and Hinduism See also: Adi Shankara and CharvakaĀstika and nāstika are variously defined terms sometimes used to categorise Indian religions. The traditional definition, followed by Adi Shankara, classifies religions and persons as āstika and nāstika according to whether they accept the authority of the main Hindu texts, the Vedas, as supreme revealed scriptures, or not. By this definition, Nyaya, Vaisheshika, Samkhya, Yoga, Purva Mimamsa and Vedanta are classified as āstika schools, while Charvaka is classified as a nāstika school. Buddhism and Jainism are also thus classified as nāstika religions since they do not accept the authority of the Vedas.
Another set of definitions—notably distinct from the usage of Hindu philosophy—loosely characterise āstika as "theist" and nāstika as "atheist". By these definitions, Sāṃkhya can be considered a nāstika philosophy, though it is traditionally classed among the Vedic āstika schools. From this point of view, Buddhism and Jainism remain nāstika religions.
Buddhists and Jains have disagreed that they are nastika and have redefined the phrases āstika and nāstika in their own view. Jains assign the term nastika to one who is ignorant of the meaning of the religious texts, or those who deny the existence of the soul was well known to the Jainas.
Use of term "Dharmic religions"
See also: SaffronizationFrawley and Malhotra use the term "Dharmic traditions" to highlight the similarities between the various Indian religions. According to Frawley, "all religions in India have been called the Dharma", and can be
... put under the greater umbrella of "Dharmic traditions" which we can see as Hinduism or the spiritual traditions of India in the broadest sense.
According to Paul Hacker, as described by Halbfass, the term "dharma"
... assumed a fundamentally new meaning and function in modern Indian thought, beginning with Bankim Chandra Chatterjee in the nineteenth century. This process, in which dharma was presented as an equivalent of, but also a response to, the western notion of "religion", reflects a fundamental change in the Hindu sense of identity and in the attitude toward other religious and cultural traditions. The foreign tools of "religion" and "nation" became tools of self-definition, and a new and precarious sense of the "unity of Hinduism" and of national as well as religious identity took root.
The emphasis on the similarities and integral unity of the dharmic faiths has been criticised for neglecting the vast differences between and even within the various Indian religions and traditions. According to Richard E. King it is typical of the "inclusivist appropriation of other traditions" of Neo-Vedanta:
The inclusivist appropriation of other traditions, so characteristic of neo-Vedanta ideology, appears on three basic levels. First, it is apparent in the suggestion that the (Advaita) Vedanta philosophy of Sankara (c. eighth century CE) constitutes the central philosophy of Hinduism. Second, in an Indian context, neo-Vedanta philosophy subsumes Buddhist philosophies in terms of its own Vedantic ideology. The Buddha becomes a member of the Vedanta tradition, merely attempting to reform it from within. Finally, at a global level, neo-Vedanta colonizes the religious traditions of the world by arguing for the centrality of a non-dualistic position as the philosophia perennis underlying all cultural differences.
The "Council of Dharmic Faiths" (UK) regards Zoroastrianism, while not originating in the Indian subcontinent, also as a Dharmic religion.
Status of non-Hindus in the Republic of India
Main article: Religion in India See also: Legal status of Jainism as a distinct religion in IndiaThe inclusion of Buddhists, Jains, and Sikhs within Hinduism is part of the Indian legal system. The 1955 Hindu Marriage Act " as Hindus all Buddhists, Jains, Sikhs and anyone who is not a Christian, Muslim, Parsee (Zoroastrian) or Jew". And the Indian Constitution says that "reference to Hindus shall be construed as including a reference to persons professing the Sikh, Jaina or Buddhist religion".
In a judicial reminder, the Indian Supreme Court observed Sikhism and Jainism to be sub-sects or special faiths within the larger Hindu fold, and that Jainism is a denomination within the Hindu fold. Although the Indian Government counted Jains in India as a major religious community right from the first Census conducted in 1873, after independence in 1947 Sikhs and Jains were not treated as national minorities. In 2005, the Supreme Court of India declined to issue a writ of Mandamus granting Jains the status of a religious minority throughout India. The Court however left it to the respective states to decide on the minority status of Jain religion.
However, some individual states have over the past few decades differed on whether Jains, Buddhists, and Sikhs are religious minorities or not, by either pronouncing judgments or passing legislation. One example is the judgment passed by the Supreme Court in 2006, in a case pertaining to the state of Uttar Pradesh, which declared Jainism to be indisputably distinct from Hinduism, but mentioned that, "The question as to whether the Jains are part of the Hindu religion is open to debate. However, the Supreme Court also noted various court cases that have held Jainism to be a distinct religion.
Another example is the Gujarat Freedom of Religion Bill, that is an amendment to a legislation that sought to define Jains and Buddhists as denominations within Hinduism. Ultimately on 31 July 2007, finding it not in conformity with the concept of freedom of religion as embodied in Article 25 (1) of the Constitution, Governor Naval Kishore Sharma returned the Gujarat Freedom of Religion (Amendment) Bill, 2006 citing the widespread protests by the Jains as well as Supreme Court's extrajudicial observation that Jainism is a "special religion formed on the basis of quintessence of Hindu religion by the Supreme Court".
See also
- Abrahamic religions, a similar term used to refer Judaism, Christianity, and Islam
- Ahimsa
- Bon
- Demographics of India
- Indology
- Iranian religions
- Kalasha (religion)
- Proto-Indo-European mythology
- Proto-Indo-Iranian religion
- Religion in India
- Religion in South Asia
- Sanamahism
- Taoic religions, a similar terms used to refer to East Asian religions such as Taoism, Shintoism and Muism
- Vegetarianism
Notes
- Smart distinguishes "Brahmanism" from the Vedic religion, connecting "Brahmanism" with the Upanishads.
- Adams: "Indian religions, including early Buddhism, Hinduism, Jainism, and Sikhism, and sometimes also Theravāda Buddhism and the Hindu- and Buddhist-inspired religions of South and Southeast Asia".
- The pre-Buddhist Upanishads are: Brihadaranyaka, Chandogya, Kaushitaki, Aitareya, and Taittiriya Upanishads.
- The shared concepts include rebirth, samsara, karma, meditation, renunciation and moksha.
- The Upanishadic, Buddhist and Jain renunciation traditions form parallel traditions, which share some common concepts and interests. While Kuru-Panchala, at the central Ganges Plain, formed the center of the early Upanishadic tradition, Kosala-Magadha at the central Ganges Plain formed the center of the other shramanic traditions.
- Buddhism and Hinduism Similarities
- See also Tanvir Anjum, Temporal Divides: A Critical Review of the Major Schemes of Periodization in Indian History.
- Different periods are designated as "classical Hinduism":
- Smart calls the period between 1000 BCE and 100 CE "pre-classical". It is the formative period for the Upanishads and Brahmanism Jainism and Buddhism. For Smart, the "classical period" lasts from 100 to 1000 CE, and coincides with the flowering of "classical Hinduism" and the flowering and deterioration of Mahayana-buddhism in India.
- For Michaels, the period between 500 BCE and 200 BCE is a time of "Ascetic reformism", whereas the period between 200 BCE and 1100 CE is the time of "classical Hinduism", since there is "a turning point between the Vedic religion and Hindu religions".
- Muesse discerns a longer period of change, namely between 800 BCE and 200 BCE, which he calls the "Classical Period". According to Muesse, some of the fundamental concepts of Hinduism, namely karma, reincarnation and "personal enlightenment and transformation", which did not exist in the Vedic religion, developed in this time.
- Ashim Kumar Bhattacharyya declares that Vedas contain the fundamental truths about Hindu Dharma.
- Richard E. King notes: "Consequently, it remains an anachronism to project the notion of "Hinduism" as it is commonly understood into pre-colonial history."
- In post-Vedic times understood as "hearers" of an eternally existing Veda, Śrauta means "what is heard"
- "Upanishads came to be composed already in the ninth and eighth century B.C.E. and continued to be composed well into the first centuries of the Common Era. The Brahmanas and Aranyakas are somewhat older, reaching back to the eleventh and even twelfth century BCE."
- Deussen: "these treatises are not the work of a single genius, but the total philosophical product of an entire epoch which extends approximately 1000 or 800 BC, to c. 500 BCE, but which is prolonged in its offshoots far beyond this last limit of time."
- Gavin Flood and Patrick Olivelle: "The second half of the first millennium BCE was the period that created many of the ideological and institutional elements that characterize later Indian religions. The renouncer tradition played a central role during this formative period of Indian religious history.... Some of the fundamental values and beliefs that we generally associate with Indian religions in general and Hinduism in particular were in part the creation of the renouncer tradition. These include the two pillars of Indian theologies: samsara – the belief that life in this world is one of suffering and subject to repeated deaths and births (rebirth); moksa/nirvana – the goal of human existence...."
- Cromwell Crwaford: "Alongside Brahmanism was the non-Aryan Shramanic (self reliant) culture with its roots going back to prehistoric times."
- Masih: "There is no evidence to show that Jainism and Buddhism ever subscribed to vedic sacrifices, vedic deities or caste. They are parallel or native religions of India and have contributed to much to the growth of even classical Hinduism of the present times."
- Padmanabh S. Jaini: "Jainas themselves have no memory of a time when they fell within the Vedic fold. Any theory that attempts to link the two traditions, moreover fails to appreciate rather distinctive and very non-vedic character of Jaina cosmology, soul theory, karmic doctrine and atheism".
- Flood: "The second half of the first millennium BCE was the period that created many of the ideological and institutional elements that characterise later Indian religions. The renouncer tradition played a central role during this formative period of Indian religious history.... Some of the fundamental values and beliefs that we generally associate with Indian religions in general and Hinduism in particular were in part the creation of the renouncer tradition. These include the two pillars of Indian theologies: samsara – the belief that life in this world is one of suffering and subject to repeated deaths and births (rebirth); moksa/nirvana – the goal of human existence...."
- Flood: "The origin and doctrine of Karma and Samsara are obscure. These concepts were certainly circulating among sramanas, and Jainism and Buddhism developed specific and sophisticated ideas about the process of transmigration. It is very possible that the karmas and reincarnation entered the mainstream brahaminical thought from the sramana or the renouncer traditions."
- Padmanabh S. Jaini: "Yajnavalkya's reluctance and manner in expounding the doctrine of karma in the assembly of Janaka (a reluctance not shown on any other occasion) can perhaps be explained by the assumption that it was, like that of the transmigration of soul, of non-brahmanical origin. In view of the fact that this doctrine is emblazoned on almost every page of sramana scriptures, it is highly probable that it was derived from them."
- Jeffrey Brodd and Gregory Sobolewski: "Jainism shares many of the basic doctrines of Hinduism and Buddhism."
- Oldmeadow: "Over time, apparent misunderstandings have arisen over the origins of Jainism and relationship with its sister religions of Hinduism and Buddhism. There has been an ongoing debate between Jainism and Vedic Hinduism as to which revelation preceded the other. What is historically known is that there was a tradition along with Vedic Hinduism known as Sramana Dharma. Essentially, the sramana tradition included it its fold, the Jain and Buddhist traditions, which disagreed with the eternality of the Vedas, the needs for ritual sacrifices and the supremacy of the Brahmins." Page 141
- Fisher: "The extreme antiquity of Jainism as a non-vedic, indigenous Indian religion is well documented. Ancient Hindu and Buddhist scriptures refer to Jainism as an existing tradition which began long before Mahavira."
- Lockard: "The encounters that resulted from Aryan migration brought together several very different peoples and cultures, reconfiguring Indian society. Over many centuries a fusion of Aryan and Dravidian occurred, a complex process that historians have labeled the Indo-Aryan synthesis." Lockard: "Hinduism can be seen historically as a synthesis of Aryan beliefs with Harappan and other Dravidian traditions that developed over many centuries."
- In the east the Pala Empire (770–1125 CE), in the west and north the Gurjara-Pratihara (7th–10th century), in the southwest the Rashtrakuta Dynasty (752–973), in the Dekkhan the Chalukya dynasty (7th–8th century), and in the south the Pallava dynasty (7th–9th century) and the Chola dynasty (9th century).
- This resembles the development of Chinese Chán during the An Lu-shan rebellion and the Five Dynasties and Ten Kingdoms Period (907–960/979), during which power became decentralised end new Chán-schools emerged.
- The term "maya-vada" is primarily being used by non-Advaitins. See
- The story begins with the transformation of the Bodhisattva Samantabhadra into Vajrapani by Vairocana, the cosmic Buddha, receiving a vajra and the name "Vajrapani". Vairocana then requests Vajrapani to generate his adamantine family, to establish a mandala. Vajrapani refuses, because Mahesvara (Shiva) "is deluding beings with his deceitfull religious doctrines and engaging in all kinds of violent criminal conduct". Mahesvara and his entourage are dragged to Mount Sumeru, and all but Mahesvara submit. Vajrapani and Mahesvara engage in a magical combat, which is won by Vajrapani. Mahesvara's retinue become part of Vairocana's mandala, except for Mahesvara, who is killed, and his life transferred to another realm where he becomes a buddha named Bhasmesvara-nirghosa, the "Soundless Lord of Ashes".
- Occasionally the term is also being used by other authors. David Westerlund: "... may provide some possibilities for co-operation with Sikhs, Jains and Buddhists, who like Hindus are regarded as adherents of 'dharmic' religions."
- In various codified customary laws like Hindu Marriage Act, Hindu Succession Act, Hindu Adoption and Maintenance Act and other laws of pre and post-Constitution period, the definition of 'Hindu' included all sects and sub-sects of Hindu religions including Sikhs and Jains
- The Supreme Court observed in a judgment pertaining to case of Bal Patil vs. Union of India: "Thus, 'Hinduism' can be called a general religion and common faith of India whereas 'Jainism' is a special religion formed on the basis of quintessence of Hindu religion. Jainism places greater emphasis on non-violence ('Ahimsa') and compassion ('Karuna'). Their only difference from Hindus is that Jains do not believe in any creator like God but worship only the perfect human-being whom they called Tirathankar."
- The so-called minority communities like Sikhs and Jains were not treated as national minorities at the time of framing the Constitution.
- In an extra-judicial observation not forming part of the judgment the court observed: "Thus, 'Hinduism' can be called a general religion and common faith of India whereas 'Jainism' is a special religion formed on the basis of quintessence of Hindu religion. Jainism places greater emphasis on non-violence ('Ahimsa') and compassion ('Karuna'). Their only difference from Hindus is that Jains do not believe in any creator like God but worship only the perfect human-being whom they called Tirathankar."
References
- "Központi Statisztikai Hivatal". Nepszamlalas.hu. Archived from the original on 7 January 2019. Retrieved 2 October 2013.
- "Christianity 2015: Religious Diversity and Personal Contact" (PDF). gordonconwell.edu. January 2015. Archived from the original (PDF) on 25 May 2017. Retrieved 29 May 2015.
- "Viewpoint: Why Sikhs celebrate kindness". BBC News. 15 July 2021. Archived from the original on 28 June 2023. Retrieved 17 July 2021.
- "Countries with the Largest Jain Populations". WorldAtlas. 11 June 2020. Archived from the original on 4 July 2023. Retrieved 17 July 2021.
- Vir Sanghvi. "Rude Travel: Down The Sages". Hindustan Times. Archived from the original on 24 March 2019. Retrieved 2 July 2021.
- ^ Michaels 2004, p. 33.
- Max Muller, The Upanishads, Part 1, Oxford University Press, page LXXXVI footnote 1
- ^ Olivelle 2014, pp. 12–14.
- King 1995, p. 52.
- Olivelle 1998, p. xxiii.
- ^ Michaels 2004, p. 38.
- ^ Jain 2008, p. 210.
- Svarghese 2008, pp. 259–60.
- Olivelle 1998, pp. xx–xxiv.
- Samuel 2010.
- Thapar 1978, pp. 19–20.
- ^ Thapar 1978, p. 19.
- Thapar 1978, p. 20.
- Michaels 2004.
- Smart 2003, pp. 52, 83–86.
- Smart 2003, p. 52.
- Michaels 2004, p. 36.
- Muesse 2003, p. 14.
- Harari, Yuval Noah (2015). Sapiens: A Brief History of Humankind. Translated by Harari, Yuval Noah; Purcell, John; Watzman, Haim. London: Penguin Random House UK. pp. 235–236. ISBN 978-0-09-959008-8. OCLC 910498369.
- Heehs 2002, p. 39.
- Wright 2009, pp. 281–282.
- ^ Ratnagar 2004.
- ^ Marshall 1931, pp. 48–78.
- Possehl 2002, pp. 141–156.
- ^ Possehl 2002, pp. 141–144.
- Srinivasan 1975.
- Srinivasan 1997, pp. 180–181.
- Sullivan 1964.
- Hiltebeitel 2011, pp. 399–432.
- Vilas Sangave (2001). Facets of Jainology: Selected Research Papers on Jain Society, Religion, and Culture. Mumbai: Popular Prakashan. ISBN 978-81-7154-839-2.
- Zimmer 1969, pp. 60, 208–209.
- Thomas McEvilley (2002) The Shape of Ancient Thought: Comparative Studies in Greek and Indian Philosophies. Allworth Communications, Inc. 816 pages; ISBN 1-58115-203-5
- ^ Possehl 2002, pp. 141–145.
- McIntosh 2008, pp. 286–287.
- Willard Gurdon Oxtoby, ed. (2002). World Religions: Eastern Traditions (2nd ed.). Don Mills, Ontario: Oxford University Press. pp. 18–19. ISBN 0-19-541521-3. OCLC 46661540.
- Marshall 1931, p. 67.
- ^ Willard Gurdon Oxtoby, ed. (2002). World Religions: Eastern Traditions (2nd ed.). Don Mills, Ontario: Oxford University Press. p. 18. ISBN 0-19-541521-3. OCLC 46661540.
- Possehl 2002, p. 18.
- Thapar 2004, p. 85.
- McIntosh 2008, pp. 275–277, 292.
- Possehl 2002, pp. 152, 157–176.
- McIntosh 2008, pp. 293–299.
- ^ Stephanie W. Jamison and Michael Witzel in Arvind Sharma, editor, The Study of Hinduism. University of South Carolina Press, 2003, page 65
- Kapur, Kamlesh (2010). Portraits of a Nation: History of Ancient India, 1st ed. New Delhi: Sterling Publishers Private Ltd. OCLC 707924398. ISBN 978-8120752122.
- K. R. Sundararajan; Bithika Mukerji, eds. Hindu Spirituality: Vedas Through Vedanta. Volume 1. p. 382.
- Ashim Kumar Bhattacharyya. Hindu Dharma: Introduction to Scriptures And Theology. p. 6.
- P. 46 I Am Proud To Be A Hindu By J. Agarwal
- Hinduism: An Alphabetical Guide, Roshen Dalal, p. 41
- King 1999, p. 176.
- Parmar, Manish Singh (10 April 2018). Ancient India: A Glimpse of Indias' Glorious Ancient Past. BookRix. ISBN 978-3-7438-6452-8. Archived from the original on 29 October 2023. Retrieved 17 December 2022.
- Nigal, S.G. Axiological Approach to the Vedas. Northern Book Centre, 1986. P. 81. ISBN 81-85119-18-X.
- ^ Zimmer 1989, p. 166.
- Zimmer 1989, p. 167.
- Holdrege 2004, p. 215.
- Krishnananda 1994, p. 17.
- Krishnananda 1994, p. 24.
- Panikkar 2001, pp. 350–351.
- Duchesne-Guillemin 1963, p. 46.
- Day 1982, pp. 42–45.
- P. 285 Indian sociology through Ghurye, a dictionary By S. Devadas Pillai
- Michaels 2004, p. 34.
- Michaels 2004, p. 35.
- Dundas 2002, p. 30.
- Zimmer 1953, p. 182-183.
- ^ "Encyclopædia Britannica, Other sources: the process of "Sanskritization"". Archived from the original on 26 April 2015. Retrieved 23 June 2022.
- Deussen 1966, p. .
- Deussen 1966, p. 51.
- Neusner, Jacob (2009). World Religions in America: An Introduction. Westminster John Knox Press. p. 183. ISBN 978-0-664-23320-4.
- Melton, J. Gordon; Baumann, Martin (2010), Religions of the World, Second Edition: A Comprehensive Encyclopedia of Beliefs and Practices, ABC-CLIO, p. 1324, ISBN 978-1-59884-204-3
- Mahadevan, T.M.P (1956), Sarvepalli Radhakrishnan (ed.), History of Philosophy Eastern and Western, George Allen & Unwin Ltd, p. 57
- von Glasenapp 1999, p. 16.
- Svarghese 2008, p. 259-60.
- Mallinson 2007, pp. 17–18, 32–33.
- Zimmer 1989, p. 217.
- ^ Flood & Olivelle 2003, p. 273–274.
- Flood 1996, p. 82.
- Kalghatgi, T. G. 1988 In: Study of Jainism, Prakrit Bharti Academy, Jaipur
- ^ S. Cromwell Crawford, review of L. M. Joshi, Brahmanism, Buddhism and Hinduism, Philosophy East and West (1972)
- ^ Y. Masih (2000). In: A Comparative Study of Religions. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass Publ. p. 18. ISBN 81-208-0815-0.
- ^ Padmanabh S. Jaini, (1979), The Jaina Path to Purification, Motilal Banarsidass, Delhi, p. 169
- Flood 1996, p. .
- Flood 1996, p. 86.
- Jaini 2001, p. .
- Jaini 2001, p. 51.
- P. 93 World Religions By Jeffrey Brodd, Gregory Sobolewski.
- Pratt, James Bissett (1996), The Pilgrimage of Buddhism and a Buddhist Pilgrimage, Asian Educational Services, p. 90, ISBN 978-81-206-1196-2, archived from the original on 23 December 2023, retrieved 7 November 2015
- Upadhyaya, Kashi Nath (1998), Early Buddhism and the Bhagavadgītā, Motilal Banarsidass, pp. 103–104, ISBN 978-81-208-0880-5
- Hajime Nakamura, A History of Early Vedānta Philosophy: Part One. Reprint by Motilal Banarsidass Publ., 1990, page 139.
- ^ Harry Oldmeadow (2007) Light from the East: Eastern Wisdom for the Modern West, World Wisdom, Inc. ISBN 1-933316-22-5
- ^ Mary Pat Fisher (1997). Living Religions: An Encyclopedia of the World's Faiths, 3rd ed. I. B. Tauris: London. ISBN 1-86064-148-2. OCLC 41293467.
- "Life of Gautama Buddha and the origin of Buddhism". Encyclopedia Britannica. 1 July 1997. Archived from the original on 1 February 2024. Retrieved 1 February 2024.
- Learman L.(Ed.), Linda (2005). Buddhist Missionaries in the Era of Globalization. University of Hawaiʻi Press. ISBN 978-0-8248-2810-3. JSTOR j.ctvvn4jw. Archived from the original on 1 February 2024. Retrieved 1 February 2024.
- Jain, Pankaj (1 September 2011). "Buddhism: Origin, Spread And Decline". HuffPost. Archived from the original on 1 February 2024. Retrieved 1 February 2024.
- "Buddhism". Encyclopedia Britannica. 28 September 1998. Archived from the original on 1 February 2024. Retrieved 1 February 2024.
- The Life of Buddha as Legend and History, by Edward Joseph Thomas
- Keown, Damien; Hodge, Stephen; Jones, Charles; Tinti, Paola (2003). "Theravāda". A dictionary of Buddhism (1. publ ed.). Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press. ISBN 978-0-19-860560-7.
- Keown, Damien; Hodge, Stephen; Jones, Charles; Tinti, Paola (2003). "Mahāyāna". A dictionary of Buddhism (1. publ ed.). Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press. ISBN 978-0-19-860560-7.
- Heehs 2002, p. 106.
- "Kharavela – The Great Philanthropic Emperor" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on 10 March 2024. Retrieved 10 March 2024.
- Mudumby Narasimhachary, ed. (1976). Āgamaprāmāṇya of Yāmunācārya. Issue 160 of Gaekwad's Oriental Series. Oriental Institute, Maharaja Sayajirao University of Baroda.
- Tripath, S.M. (2001). Psycho-Religious Studies Of Man, Mind And Nature. Global Vision Publishing House. ISBN 978-81-87746-04-1. Archived from the original on 7 October 2023. Retrieved 15 November 2015.
- Nagalingam, Pathmarajah (2009). "Chapter 3". The Religion of the Agamas. Siddhanta Publications. Archived from the original on 19 October 2019. Retrieved 27 July 2015.
- Grimes, John A. (1996). A Concise Dictionary of Indian Philosophy: Sanskrit Terms Defined in English. SUNY Press. ISBN 978-0-7914-3068-2. LCCN 96012383.
- The Modern review: Volume 28. Prabasi Press. 1920.
- ^ Kanchan Sinha, Kartikeya in Indian art and literature, Delhi: Sundeep Prakashan (1979).
- Mahadevan, Iravatham (6 May 2006). "A Note on the Muruku Sign of the Indus Script in light of the Mayiladuthurai Stone Axe Discovery". harappa.com. Archived from the original on 4 September 2006.
- ^ Ranbir Vohra (2000). The Making of India: A Historical Survey. M.E. Sharpe. p. 15.
- ^ Grigorii Maksimovich Bongard-Levin (1985). Ancient Indian Civilization. Arnold-Heinemann. p. 45.
- ^ Steven Rosen; Graham M. Schweig (2006). Essential Hinduism. Greenwood Publishing Group. p. 45.
- Singh 1989.
- Kenoyer, Jonathan Mark. Ancient Cities of the Indus Valley Civilization. Karachi: Oxford University Press, 1998.
- Basham 1967, pp. 11–14.
- Frederick J. Simoons (1998). Plants of life, plants of death. p. 363.
- Flood 1996, p. 29, Figure 1: Drawing of the seal.
- John Keay. India: A History. Grove Press. p. 14.
- ^ J.P. Mallory and D. Q. Adams, Encyclopedia of Indo-European Culture (1997), p.308.
- K. Zvelebil, Dravidian Linguistics: an Introduction, (Pondicherry: Pondicherry Institute of Linguistics and Culture 1990), p. 81.
- Krishnamurti 2003, p. 6.
- ^ Lockard 2007, p. 50.
- ^ Lockard 2007, p. 52.
- Hiltebeitel 2007, p. 12.
- Tiwari 2002, p. v.
- Zimmer 1951, p. 218-219.
- Larson 1995, p. 81.
- Harman, William P. (1992). The sacred marriage of a Hindu goddess. Motilal Banarsidass. p. 6.
- Anand, Mulk Raj (1980). Splendours of Tamil Nadu. Marg Publications. Archived from the original on 21 July 2022. Retrieved 21 July 2022.
- Chopra, Pran Nath (1979). History of South India. S. Chand.
- Bate, Bernard (2009). Tamil oratory and the Dravidian aesthetic: democratic practice in south India. Columbia University Press.
- A. Kiruṭṭin̲an̲ (2000). Tamil culture: religion, culture, and literature. Bharatiya Kala Prakashan. p. 17.
- Embree, Ainslie Thomas (1988). Encyclopedia of Asian history: Volume 1. Scribner. ISBN 978-0-684-18898-0.
- Thiruchandran, Selvy (1997). Ideology, caste, class, and gender. Vikas Pub. House.
- Manickam, Valliappa Subramaniam (1968). A glimpse of Tamilology. Academy of Tamil Scholars of Tamil Nadu. p. 75.
- Lal, Mohan (2006). The Encyclopaedia Of Indian Literature, Volume 5 (Sasay To Zorgot). Sahitya Akademi. p. 4396. ISBN 81-260-1221-8.
- Shashi, S. S. (1996). Encyclopaedia Indica: India, Pakistan, Bangladesh: Volume 100. Anmol Publications.
- Subramanium, N. (1980). Śaṅgam polity: the administration and social life of the Śaṅgam Tamils. Ennes Publications.
- ^ Flood 1996.
- ^ Muesse 2011.
- ^ Michaels 2004, p. 40.
- Hiltebeitel 2002, p. 12.
- Hiltebeitel 2002, p. 13.
- Hiltebeitel 2002, p. 14.
- Hiltebeitel 2002, p. 18.
- ^ Hiltebeitel 2002, p. 20.
- Puligandla 1997.
- Raju 1992.
- Rādhākrishnan, S. (1996), Indian Philosophy, Volume II, Oxford University Press, ISBN 0-19-563820-4
- Radhakrishnan & Moore 1967, p. xviii–xxi.
- Radhakrishnan & Moore 1967, pp. 227–249.
- Chatterjee & Datta 1984, p. 55.
- Durga Prasad, P. 116, History of the Andhras up to 1565 A. D.
- National Geographic January 2008, VOL. 213, NO. 1 "The flow between faiths was such that for hundreds of years, almost all Buddhist temples, including the ones at Ajanta, were built under the rule and patronage of Hindu kings."
- ^ Michaels 2004, p. 40-41.
- Nakamura 2004, p. 687.
- ^ Michaels 2004, p. 41.
- White 2000, pp. 25–28.
- ^ Michaels 2004, p. 42.
- McRae 2003.
- ^ Scheepers 2000.
- ^ Scheepers 2000, p. 127-129.
- Scheepers 2000, p. 123.
- Scheepers 2000, pp. 123–124.
- "The rise of Buddhism and Jainism". Religion and Ethics—Hinduism: Other religious influences. BBC. 26 July 2004. Archived from the original on 5 August 2011. Retrieved 21 April 2007.
- Andrea Nippard. "The Alvars" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 3 December 2013. Retrieved 20 April 2013.
- Ramaswamy, P. 204 Walking Naked
- Ramaswamy, P. 210 Walking Naked
- Battuta's Travels: Delhi, capital of Muslim India Archived 23 April 2008 at the Wayback Machine
- M. R. Sakhare, History and Philosophy of the Lingayat Religion, Prasaranga, Karnataka University, Dharwad
- ^ Nicholson 2010, p. 2.
- Burley 2007, p. 34.
- Lorenzen 2006, p. 24-33.
- Lorenzen 2006, p. 27.
- Lorenzen 2006, p. 26-27.
- Michaels 2004, p. 43.
- Michaels 2004, p. 43-44.
- "Mahamagam Festival". Retrieved 14 February 2014.
- Madan Prasad Bezbaruah; Krishna Gopal; Phal S. Girota (2003), Fairs and Festivals of India, Gyan Publishing House, p. 326, ISBN 978-81-212-0809-3, retrieved 14 February 2014
- ^ King 1999.
- Michaels 2004, p. .
- Omvedt, Gail. Buddhism in India: Challenging Brahmanism and Caste. 3rd ed. London/New Delhi/Thousand Oaks: Sage, 2003. pp. 2, 3–7, 8, 14–15, 19, 240, 266, 271
- Thomas Pantham; Vrajendra Raj Mehta; Vrajendra Raj Mehta (2006), Political Ideas in Modern India: thematic explorations, Sage Publications, ISBN 0-7619-3420-0, archived from the original on 18 September 2023, retrieved 26 October 2020
- ^ Sherma & Sarma 2008, p. 239.
- Lipner 1998, p. 12.
- ^ Tiwari 1983, p. 210.
- ^ Others, Muzaffar H. Syed & (20 February 2022). History of Indian Nation: Ancient India. K.K. Publications. p. 358. Archived from the original on 23 September 2023. Retrieved 1 December 2023.
- Pollock, P. 661 Literary Cultures in History:
- ^ Larson 2012, pp. 313–314.
- ^ Yelle 2012, pp. 338–339.
- Rodriques & Harding 2008, p. 14.
- Davidson 2004, pp. 148–153.
- ^ Kalupahana 1994, p. 220.
- Davidson 2004, p. 148.
- Davidson 2004, pp. 148–150.
- Davidson 2004, p. 150.
- Davidson 2004, p. 151.
- Davidson 2004, p. 152.
- Page i, Forms of Indian Philosophical Literature and Other Papers by V.S. Kambi
- P. 163 Mahāvīra: His Life and Teachings by Bimala Churn Law
- ^ Frawley 1990, p. 27.
- Malhotra 2011.
- Westerlund, David Questioning the Secular State: The Worldwide Resurgence of Religion in Politics page 16
- Halbfass 1995, p. 10.
- "Council of Dharmic Faiths UK". councilofdharmicfaithsuk.com. Archived from the original on 13 July 2017. Retrieved 27 May 2017.
- ^ Cavanaugh 2009, p. 88.
- Syed Shahabuddin. "Minority rights are indivisible". The Tribune. Archived from the original on 8 March 2021. Retrieved 2 July 2021.
- (para 25, Committee of Management Kanya Junior High School Bal Vidya Mandir, Etah, U.P. v. Sachiv, U.P. Basic Shiksha Parishad, Allahabad, U.P. and Ors., Per Dalveer Bhandari J., Civil Appeal No. 9595 of 2003, decided On: 21 August 2006, Supreme Court of India) "CASE NO.: Appeal (civil) 9595 of 2003". Archived from the original on 11 March 2007. Retrieved 29 March 2008.
- IQTIDAR KARAMAT CHEEMA (2017). "Constitutional and Legal Challenges Faced by Religious Minorities in India" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on 20 September 2023. Retrieved 11 January 2024.
Sources
Printed sources
- Basham, A.L. (1967). The Wonder that was India. London: Sidgwick & Jackson.
- Burley, Mikel (2007), Classical Samkhya and Yoga: An Indian Metaphysics of Experience, Taylor & Francis
- Cavanaugh, William T. (2009), The Myth of Religious Violence: Secular Ideology and the Roots of Modern Conflict: Secular Ideology and the Roots of Modern Conflict, Oxford University Press
- Chatterjee, S.; Datta, D. (1984), An Introduction to Indian Philosophy (8th ed.), University of Calcutta, ASIN: B0007BFXK4
- Davidson, Ronald M. (2004), Indian Esoteric Buddhism: Social History of the Tantric Movement, Motilal Banarsidass Publ.
- Day, Terence P. (1982). The Conception of Punishment in Early Indian Literature. Ontario: Wilfrid Laurier University Press. ISBN 0-919812-15-5.
- Deussen, Paul (1966) . Philosophy of the Upanishads. New York: Dover Publications. ISBN 978-0-486-21616-4.
- Duchesne-Guillemin, Jacques (Summer 1963), "Heraclitus and Iran", History of Religions, 3 (1): 34–49, doi:10.1086/462470, S2CID 62860085
- Dundas, Paul (2002) , The Jains (Second ed.), London and New York: Routledge, ISBN 0-415-26605-X, archived from the original on 2 July 2023, retrieved 1 September 2017
- Flood, Gavin D. (1996), An Introduction to Hinduism, Cambridge University Press, ISBN 978-0-521-43878-0, archived from the original on 23 December 2023, retrieved 7 November 2015
- Flood, Gavin; Olivelle, Patrick (2003), The Blackwell Companion to Hinduism, Malden: Blackwell
- Fowler, J.D. (1997), Hinduism: Beliefs and Practices, Sussex Academic Press, ISBN 1-898723-60-5
- Frawley, David (1990), From the River of Heaven: Hindu and Vedic Knowledge for the Modern Age, Berkeley, California: Book Passage Press, ISBN 1-878423-01-0
- Halbfass, Wilhelm (1995), Philology and Confrontation: Paul Hacker on Traditional and Modern Vedānta, SUNY Press
- Heehs, Peter (2002), Indian Religions: A Historical Reader of Spiritual Expression and Experience, New York: New York University Press, ISBN 978-0-8147-3650-0
- Hiltebeitel, Alf. "Hinduism". In Kitagawa (2002).
- Hiltebeitel, Alf. "Hinduism". In Kitagawa (2007).
- Hiltebeitel, Alf (2011). "The Indus Valley "Proto-Śiva", Re-examined through Reflections on the Goddess, the Buffalo, and the Symbolism of vāhanas". In Adluri, Vishwa; Bagchee, Joydeep (eds.). When the Goddess was a Woman: Mahabharata Ethnographies – Essays by Alf Hiltebeitel. Brill. ISBN 978-90-04-19380-2. Archived from the original on 20 January 2023. Retrieved 10 March 2021.
- Holdrege, Barbara A. (2004), "Dharma", in Mittal, S.; Thursby, G. (eds.), The Hindu World, New York: Routledge, pp. 213–248, ISBN 0-415-21527-7
- Jain, Champat Rai (2008), Risabha Deva (2nd ed.), India: Bhagwan Rishabhdeo Granth Mala, ISBN 978-81-7772-022-8
- Jaini, Padmanabh S., ed. (2001). Collected Paper on Buddhist Studies. Motilal Banarsidass. ISBN 978-81-208-1776-0.
- Kalupahana, David J. (1994), A history of Buddhist philosophy, Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass Publishers Private Limited
- Khanna, Meenakshi (2007), Cultural History Of Medieval India, Berghahn Books
- King, Richard (1995). Early Advaita Vedānta and Buddhism: The Mahāyāna Context of the Gauḍapādīya-kārikā. SUNY Press.
- King, Richard (1999), Orientalism and Religion: Post-Colonial Theory, India and "The Mystic East", Routledge
- Kitagawa, Joseph (2002), The Religious Traditions of Asia: Religion, History, and Culture, Routledge, ISBN 978-1-136-87597-7, archived from the original on 11 January 2023, retrieved 30 May 2020
- Kitagawa, Joseph (2007), The Religious Traditions of Asia: Religion, History, and Culture, Routledge, ISBN 978-1-136-87590-8, archived from the original on 3 July 2023, retrieved 10 March 2021
- Krishnamurti, Bhadriraju (2003), The Dravidian Languages, Cambridge University Press, ISBN 0-521-77111-0
- Krishnananda (1994), A Short History of Religious and Philosophic Thought in India, Divine Life Society, archived from the original on 9 July 2021, retrieved 2 July 2021
- Kulke, Hermann; Rothermund, Dietmar (2004), A History of India, Routledge
- Larson, Gerald (1995). India's Agony Over Religion. SUNY Press. ISBN 978-0-7914-2411-7.
- Larson, Gerald James (December 2012), "The Issue of Not Being Different Enough: Some Reflections on Rajiv Malhotra's Being Different", International Journal of Hindu Studies, 16 (3): 311–322, doi:10.1007/s11407-012-9129-8, S2CID 144728948
- Lockard, Craig A. (2007). Societies, Networks, and Transitions. Vol. I: to 1500. Cengage Learning. ISBN 978-0-618-38612-3. Archived from the original on 3 July 2023. Retrieved 10 March 2021.
- Lipner, Julis (1998), Hindus: their religious beliefs and practices, Routledge
- Lorenzen, David N. (2006), Who Invented Hinduism: Essays on Religion in History, Yoda Press, ISBN 978-81-902272-6-1
- Malhotra, Rajiv (2011), Being Different: An Indian Challenge to Western Universalism, HarperCollins Publishers India
- Mallinson, James (2007), The Khecarīvidyā of Ādinātha
- Marshall, John, ed. (1931). Mohenjo-Daro and the Indus Civilization: Being an Official Account of Archaeological Excavations at Mohenjo-Daro Carried Out by the Government of India Between the Years 1922 and 1927. London: Arthur Probsthain.
- McIntosh, Jane (2008). The Ancient Indus Valley: New Perspectives. ABC-CLIO. ISBN 978-1-57607-907-2.
- McRae, John (2003), Seeing Through Zen, The University Press Group
- Michaels, Axel (2004), Hinduism. Past and present, Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press
- Misra, Amalendu (2004), Identity and Religion: Foundations of Anti-Islamism in India, SAGE
- Muesse, Mark William (2003), Great World Religions: Hinduism
- Muesse, Mark W. (2011), The Hindu Traditions: A Concise Introduction, Fortress Press
- Nakamura, Hajime (2004), A History of Early Vedanta Philosophy. Part Two, Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass Publishers Private Limited
- Nicholson, Andrew J. (2010), Unifying Hinduism: Philosophy and Identity in Indian Intellectual History, Columbia University Press
- Nussbaum, Martha C. (2009), The Clash Within: Democracy, Religious Violence, and India's Future, Harvard University Press, ISBN 978-0-674-03059-6
- Oberlies, T. (1998), Die Religion des Rgveda, Wien
- Olivelle, Patrick (1998), Upanis̥ads, Oxford University Press, ISBN 978-0-19-283576-5, archived from the original on 16 January 2024, retrieved 10 March 2021
- Olivelle, Patrick (2014), The Early Upanishads, Oxford University Press, ISBN 978-0-19-512435-4
- Panikkar, Raimundo (2001), The Vedic Experience: Mantramañjari, Bangalore: Motilal Banarsidass, ISBN 81-208-1280-8
- Possehl, Gregory L. (2002). The Indus Civilization: A Contemporary Perspective. Rowman Altamira. ISBN 978-0-7591-1642-9. Archived from the original on 20 January 2023. Retrieved 10 March 2021.
- Puligandla, Ramakrishna (1997), Fundamentals of Indian Philosophy, New Delhi: D.K. Printworld
- Radhakrishnan, S.; Moore, C.A. (1967), A Sourcebook in Indian Philosophy, Princeton University Press, ISBN 0-691-01958-4
- Raju, P.T. (1992), The Philosophical Traditions of India, Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass Publishers Private Limited
- Ratnagar, Shereen (April 2004). "Archaeology at the Heart of a Political Confrontation The Case of Ayodhya" (PDF). Current Anthropology. 45 (2): 239–259. doi:10.1086/381044. JSTOR 10.1086/381044. S2CID 149773944. Archived (PDF) from the original on 19 June 2021. Retrieved 2 July 2021.
- Rinehart, R. (2004), Contemporary Hinduism: Ritual, Culture, and Practice, ABC-Clio, ISBN 1-57607-905-8
- Rodriques, Hillary; Harding, John S. (2008), Introduction to the Study of Religion, Routledge
- Samuel, Geoffrey (2010), The Origins of Yoga and Tantra. Indic Religions to the Thirteenth Century, Cambridge University Press
- Scheepers, Alfred (2000), De Wortels van het Indiase Denken, Olive Press
- Sherma, Rita D.; Sarma, Aravinda (2008), Hermeneutics and Hindu Thought: Toward a Fusion of Horizons, Springer
- Singh, S.P. (1989). "Rgvedic Base of the Pasupati Seal of Mohenjo-Daro". Purātattva. 19: 19–26.
- Smart, Ninian (2003), Godsdiensten van de wereld (The World's religions), Kampen: Uitgeverij Kok
- Srinivasan, Doris (1975). "The so-called Proto-Śiva seal from Mohenjo-Daro: An iconological assessment". Archives of Asian Art. 29: 47–58. JSTOR 20062578.
- Srinivasan, Doris Meth (1997). Many Heads, Arms and Eyes: Origin, Meaning and Form in Multiplicity in Indian Art. Brill. ISBN 978-90-04-10758-8. Archived from the original on 20 January 2023. Retrieved 10 March 2021.
- Sullivan, Herbert P. (1964). "A Re-Examination of the Religion of the Indus Civilization". History of Religions. 4 (1): 115–125. doi:10.1086/462498. JSTOR 1061875. S2CID 162278147.
- Svarghese, Alexander P. (2008), India: History, Religion, Vision And Contribution To The World
- Sweetman, Will (December 2004), "The prehistory of Orientalism: Colonialism and the Textual Basis for Bartholomaus Ziegenbalg's Account of Hinduism", New Zealand Journal of Asian Studies, 6 (2): 12–38
- Thapar, Romila (1978), Ancient Indian Social History: Some Interpretations (PDF), Orient Blackswan, archived from the original (PDF) on 14 February 2015, retrieved 14 February 2015
- Thapar, Romila (2004). Early India: From the Origins to AD 1300. University of California Press. ISBN 978-0-520-24225-8. Archived from the original on 20 January 2023. Retrieved 10 March 2021.
- Tiwari, K.N. (1983), Comparative Religion, Motilal Banarsidass, ISBN 978-0-89581-634-4
- Tiwari, Shiv Kumar (2002). Tribal Roots Of Hinduism. Sarup & Sons. ISBN 978-81-7625-299-7.
- von Glasenapp, Helmuth (1999). Jainism: An Indian Religion of Salvation. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass. ISBN 81-208-1376-6.
- White, David Gordon, ed. (2000), Tantra in Practice, Princeton University Press, ISBN 0-691-05779-6
- Wright, Rita P. (2009). The Ancient Indus: Urbanism, Economy, and Society. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-57219-4.
- Yelle, Robert A. (December 2012), "Comparative Religion as Cultural Combat: Occidentalism and Relativism in Rajiv Malhotra's Being Different", International Journal of Hindu Studies, 16 (3): 335–348, doi:10.1007/s11407-012-9133-z, S2CID 144950049
- Zimmer, Heinrich (1951), Philosophies of India, Princeton University Press
- Zimmer, Heinrich (1953) , Campbell, Joseph (ed.), Philosophies Of India, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul Ltd, ISBN 978-81-208-0739-6
- Zimmer, Heinrich (1969). Campbell, Joseph (ed.). Philosophies of India. Princeton University Press. ISBN 978-0-691-01758-7.
- Zimmer, Heinrich (1989), Philosophies of India (reprint ed.), Princeton University Press
Web sources
- ^ Adams, C. J., "Classification of religions: Geographical" (Archived 7 July 2015 at the Wayback Machine), Encyclopædia Britannica, 2007. Retrieved 15 July 2010.
- Adherents.com. "Religions by adherents". Archived from the original on 29 December 2011. Retrieved 9 February 2007.
{{cite web}}
: CS1 maint: unfit URL (link) - "Ancient Indians made 'rock music'". BBC News. 19 March 2004. Archived from the original on 27 December 2017. Retrieved 7 August 2007.
- ^ Indiana University "India Studies Program" Archived 1 August 2009 at the Wayback Machine Passage to India, Module 10.
- "Mayavada Philosophy". Archived from the original on 9 July 2021. Retrieved 2 July 2021.
- "The Self-Defeating Philosophy of Mayavada". Archived from the original on 9 July 2021. Retrieved 2 July 2021.
- "Mayavada and Buddhism – Are They One and the Same?". Archived from the original on 6 July 2017. Retrieved 13 November 2013.
- The Centre for Cultural Resources and Training, Indian Literature Through the Ages Archived 15 May 2013 at the Wayback Machine
- c.f. Encyclopædia Britannica, s.v. "Jainism > Jainism, Hinduism, and Buddhism"
- ^ "Supreme Court of India, in the judgement of Bal Patil vs. Union of India, Dec 2005". Archived from the original on 2 May 2008. Retrieved 29 March 2008.
- Gujarat Freedom of religions Act, 2003
- "Religious freedom Bill returned". The Indian Express. 31 July 2007. Archived from the original on 26 February 2021. Retrieved 15 September 2007.
- The Times of India, 11 Mar, 2008 Archived 10 July 2021 at the Wayback Machine In his letter dated 27 July 2007 he had said Jainism has been regarded as "special religion formed on the basis of quintessence of Hindu religion by the Supreme Court".
External links
- Statistics
- "Census of India 2001: Data on religion". Government of India (Office of the Registrar General). Archived from the original on 14 May 2007. Retrieved 28 May 2007.
- Constitution and law
- "Constitution of India". Government of India (Ministry of Law and Justice). Archived from the original on 23 February 2015. Retrieved 28 May 2007.
- Reports
- "International Religious Freedom Report 2006: India". United States Department of State. Archived from the original on 12 October 2019. Retrieved 28 May 2007.
Religion in Asia | |
---|---|
Sovereign states |
|
States with limited recognition | |
Dependencies and other territories | |
South Asian topics | ||
---|---|---|
Countries and regions |
| |
Ethnic groups | ||
Culture | ||
Environment | ||
Economy and Politics | ||
History | ||
Religion | ||
Sports | ||
Education | ||
Military | ||
Science and technology |
Religion | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||