Revision as of 20:57, 15 June 2016 edit213.107.134.203 (talk) →Origins← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 02:14, 22 December 2024 edit undoDiscospinster (talk | contribs)Administrators464,288 editsm Reverted edits by 2600:8800:1580:2D70:809E:D145:2F2:14E6 (talk): not providing a reliable source (WP:CITE, WP:RS) (HG) (3.4.12)Tags: Huggle Rollback | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Short description|Modern calendar era}} | |||
{{Redirect|BCE}} | |||
{{Redirect| |
{{Redirect|BCE|other uses|BCE (disambiguation)}} | ||
{{Use dmy dates|date=November 2024 |cs1-dates=ll}} | |||
'''Common Era''' |
'''Common Era''' ('''CE''') and '''Before the Common Era''' ('''BCE''') are year notations for the ] (and its predecessor, the ]), the world's most widely used ]. Common Era and Before the Common Era are alternatives to the original ] (AD) and ] (BC) notations used for the same calendar era. The two notation systems are numerically equivalent: "{{CURRENTYEAR}} CE" and "AD {{CURRENTYEAR}}" each describe the current year; "400 BCE" and "400 BC" are the same year.<ref>{{cite encyclopedia |url = http://www.m-w.com/dictionary/Anno%20Domini |title = Anno Domini |encyclopedia = Merriam Webster Online Dictionary |year = 2003 |publisher = Merriam-Webster |quote = Etymology: Medieval Latin, in the year of the Lord |access-date = 4 October 2011}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.religioustolerance.org/ce.htm |title=Controversy over the use of the "CE/BCE" and "AD/BC" dating notation/ |publisher=Ontario Consultants on Religious Tolerance|access-date=12 November 2011}}</ref> | ||
{{cite web | |||
|url=http://www.religioustolerance.org/ce.htm | |||
|title=Controversy over the use of the "CE/BCE" and "AD/BC" dating notation/ | |||
|publisher=Ontario Consultants on Religious Tolerance|accessdate=2011-11-12}} | |||
</ref><ref> | |||
{{cite dictionary | |||
|title=Common Era | |||
|dictionary=American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language | |||
|edition = 3rd | |||
|date=1992 | |||
|publisher=Houghton Mifflin | |||
|location=Boston}} | |||
</ref> The system uses '''BCE''' as an abbreviation for "before the Common (or Current) Era" and '''CE''' as an abbreviation for "Common Era". The CE/BCE designation uses the same numeric values as the traditional ''Anno Domini'' year-numbering system introduced by the 6th-century ] ], intending the beginning{{efn|It is unclear whether Dionysius intended this to be the ] or ] of ], or if it would make a difference in counting the years.}} of the life of ] to be the ].<ref>{{cite web | url=http://asa.usno.navy.mil/SecM/Glossary.html#calendar-gregorian | work=The Astronomical Almanac: Online! | title=calendar, Gregorian | year=2010 | publisher=] | accessdate=2011-05-18 }} | |||
</ref><ref> | |||
{{cite book |quote=The Gregorian calendar today serves as an international standard for civil use....Years are counted from the initial epoch defined by Dionysius Exiguus |last=Doggett |first=L. E. |year=1992 |chapter=Calendars |editor=P. K. Seidelmann |title=Explanatory Supplement to the Astronomical Almanac |location=Sausalito, California |publisher=University Science Books |page=581 |isbn=0-935702-68-7}} | |||
</ref> Neither notation includes a ],{{efn|Two separate systems that also do not use religious titles, the ] and the ] standard, do use a year zero. The year 1 BCE (identical to the year 1 BC) is represented as 0 in the astronomical system, and as 0000 in ISO 8601. Presently, ISO 8601 dating requires use of the Gregorian calendar for all dates, however, whereas astronomical dating and Common Era dating allow use of either the Gregorian or Julian calendars.}} and the two notations (CE/BCE and AD/BC) are numerically equivalent; thus "{{currentyear}} CE" corresponds to "AD {{currentyear}}", and "400 BCE" corresponds to "400 BC". The ] and the year-numbering system associated with it is the calendar system with most widespread use in the world today. For decades, it has been the global standard, recognized by international institutions such as the ] and the ]. | |||
The expression can be traced back to 1615, when it first appears in a book by ] as the {{langx|la|annus aerae nostrae vulgaris}} ({{transliteration|la|year of our common era}}),<ref>{{cite web|last1=Coolman|first1=Robert|title=Keeping Time: The Origin of B.C. & A.D.|url=https://www.livescience.com/45510-anno-domini.html|website=Live Science|access-date=11 November 2017}}</ref><ref name=VulgarisAerae1 /> and to 1635 in English as "] Era".{{efn|From the Latin word {{lang|la|]}}, the common people{{snd}} to contrast it with the ] system of dating used by the government.}} The term "Common Era" can be found in English as early as 1708,<ref name=1708CommonInEnglish /> and became more widely used in the mid-19th century by Jewish religious scholars. Since the late 20th century, BCE and CE have become popular in academic and scientific publications on the grounds that BCE and CE are religiously neutral terms.<ref>{{cite web |title=Year dating conventions |first=Fred |last=Espenak | publisher= ] | date=25 February 2008 |url=https://eclipse.gsfc.nasa.gov/SEhelp/dates.html |access-date=24 August 2021}}</ref>{{efn|Two other systems that also do not use religious titles, the ] and the ] standard, do use a ]. The year 1 BCE (identical to the year 1 BC) is represented as 0 in the astronomical system, and as 0000 in ISO 8601. Presently, ISO 8601 dating requires use of the Gregorian calendar for all dates, however, whereas astronomical dating and Common Era dating allow use of either the Gregorian or Julian calendars.}} They have been promoted as more sensitive to non-Christians by not referring to ], the central figure of ], especially via the religious terms "]" and {{lang|la|]}} ("Lord") used by the other abbreviations.<ref>{{cite news |author=Herrmann |first=Andrew |date=27 May 2006 |title=BCE date designation called more sensitive |newspaper=Chicago Sun-Times |url=https://www.highbeam.com/doc/1P2-1620546.html |url-status=dead |access-date=18 September 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170810211537/https://www.highbeam.com/doc/1P2-1620546.html |archive-date=10 August 2017 |quote=The changes – showing up at museums, in academic circles and in school textbooks – have been touted as more sensitive to people of faiths outside of Christianity. ... The use of BCE and CE have rankled some Christians}}</ref><ref>{{Cite dictionary |page= |title=Westminster dictionary of theological terms |entry=C. E. |first=Donald K |last=McKim |year=1996 |publisher=Westminster John Knox Press |isbn=978-0-664-25511-4}}</ref>{{efn |name="nostri"|AD is shortened from {{lang|la|anno Domini nostri Jesu Christi}} ("in the year of Our Lord Jesus Christ").<ref name=Irvin />}} Nevertheless, its ] remains the same as ] era. | |||
The expression "Common Era" can be found as early as 1708 in English,<ref name=1708CommonInEnglish/> and traced back to Latin usage among European Christians to 1615, as ''vulgaris aerae'',<ref name=VulgarisAerae1/> and to 1635 in English as ''Vulgar Era''.{{efn|The word "Vulgar" (from Latin ''vulgaris'') originally meant ordinary, common-place, or not regal or ]. (See ])}} At those times, the expressions were all used interchangeably with "Christian Era". | |||
<!--NOTE TO CONTRIBUTORS: This article is about "Common Era" and "Before Common Era". It is NOT about the abbreviations CE and BCE, which have a separate article. Please do not add any alternative meanings of CE or BCE to this article. --> | |||
== History == | |||
Use of the CE abbreviation was introduced by Jewish academics in the mid-19th century. Since the later 20th century, use of CE and BCE has been popularized in academic and scientific publications and more generally by authors and publishers wishing to emphasize ] or sensitivity to non-Christians, because it does not explicitly make use of religious titles for Jesus, such as "Christ" and ''Dominus'' ("Lord"), which are used in the BC/AD notation, nor does it give implicit expression to the ] that Jesus is the ].<ref name=Irvin /><ref> | |||
=== Origins === | |||
{{cite news |url=http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qn4155/is_20060527/ai_n16436633 |title=BCE date designation called more sensitive |author=Andrew Herrmann |publisher=Chicago Sun-Times |date=27 May 2006 |quote=Herrmann observes, "The changes – showing up at museums, in academic circles and in school textbooks – have been touted as more sensitive to people of faiths outside of Christianity." However, Herrmann notes, "The use of BCE and CE have rankled some Christians" |accessdate=2011-05-18}}{{dead link|date=January 2016}}</ref><ref> | |||
{{Cite book |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=UJ9PYdzKf90C&pg=PA41|work=Westminster dictionary of theological terms |title=Common Era entry |first=Donald K |last=McKim |year=1996 |accessdate=2011-05-18 |isbn=978-0-664-25511-4}}</ref> | |||
==History== | |||
===Origins=== | |||
{{See also|Anno Domini}} | {{See also|Anno Domini}} | ||
The |
The idea of numbering years beginning from the date that he believed to be the ], was conceived around the year 525 by the Christian monk ]. He did this to replace the then dominant ] system, because he did not wish to continue the memory of a tyrant who persecuted Christians.<ref name=Pedersen />{{rp|50}} He numbered years from an initial reference date ("]"), an event he referred to as the ] of Jesus.<ref name=Pedersen /><ref>Doggett, L.E., (1992), in Seidelmann, P.K., ''The Explanatory Supplement to the Astronomical Almanac'', Sausalito CA: University Science Books, 2.1</ref><ref>{{cite book |page=|title=The International Standard Bible Encyclopedia |first=Geoffrey W. |last=Bromiley |publisher=Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing |year=1995 |isbn= 978-0-8028-3781-3}}</ref> Dionysius labeled the column of the table in which he introduced the new era as "''Anni Domini Nostri Jesu Christi''" (Of the year of our Lord Jesus Christ].<ref name=Pedersen />{{rp|52}} | ||
This way of numbering years became more widespread in Europe with its use by ] in England in 731. Bede also introduced the practice of dating years before what he supposed was the year of birth of Jesus,{{efn|Bede wrote of the Incarnation of Jesus, but treated it as synonymous with birth.<ref> Blackburn, B & Holford-Strevens, L, (2003), ''The Oxford Companion to the Year'', Oxford University Press, 778.</ref>}} without a ].{{efn|As noted in ], the use of zero in Western civilization was uncommon before the twelfth century.}} In 1422, ] became the last ]an country to ] begun by Dionysius.<ref name="CathEncy-Chron" /> | |||
Dionysius labeled the column of the Easter table in which he introduced the new era "''Anni Domini Nostri Jesu Christi''".<ref>Pedersen, O., (1983), "The Ecclesiastical Calendar and the Life of the Church" in Coyne, G.V. et al. (Eds.) , Vatican Observatory, p. 52.</ref> | |||
=== Vulgar Era === | |||
Numbering years in this manner became more widespread with its usage by ] in England in 731. Bede also introduced the practice of dating years before what he supposed was the year of birth<ref>Bede wrote of the Incarnation of Jesus, but treated it as synonymous with birth. Blackburn, B & Holford-Strevens, L, (2003), ''The Oxford Companion to the Year'', Oxford University Press, 778.</ref> of Jesus, and the practice of not using a year zero.{{efn|As noted in ], the use of zero in Western civilization was uncommon before the twelfth century.}} In 1422, ] became the last ]an country to ] begun by Dionysius.<ref name=CathEncy-Chron /> | |||
{{wikt|vulgar}} | |||
] 1571{{ndash}}1630, the German ], ], ], ] and writer on music.<ref>{{cite encyclopedia |last=Jeans |first=Susi |author-link=Susi Jeans |others=Revised by ] |year=2013 |orig-year=2001 |encyclopedia=] |title=Kepler , Johannes |publisher=] |location=Oxford |access-date=26 September 2021 |doi=10.1093/gmo/9781561592630.article.14903 |isbn=978-1-56159-263-0 |url-access=subscription |url=https://www.oxfordmusiconline.com/grovemusic/view/10.1093/gmo/9781561592630.001.0001/omo-9781561592630-e-0000014903 }} {{Grove Music subscription}}</ref>]] | |||
The term "Common Era" is traced back in English to its appearance as "] Era" to distinguish years of the Anno Domini era, which was in popular use, from dates of the ] (the year of the reign of a sovereign) typically used in national law.<ref>{{Cite web| last = Weatherall| first = Claire| title = Library: Archival Skills: Historical dates| access-date = 21 September 2024| url = https://libguides.hull.ac.uk/archival-skills/historical-dates |website=University of Hull |date = 18 May 2023}}</ref> | |||
(The word 'vulgar' originally meant 'of the ordinary people', with no derogatory associations.<ref name="OED vulgar" />) | |||
The first use of the Latin term {{lang|la|anno aerae nostrae vulgaris}}{{Efn|name=VulgarisAerae0|In Latin, 'Common Era' is written as {{lang|la|Aera Vulgaris}}. It also occasionally appears, in Latin declination, as {{lang|la|æræ vulgaris}}, {{lang|la|aerae vulgaris}}, {{lang|la|aeram vulgarem}}, {{lang|la|anni vulgaris}}, {{lang|la|vulgaris aerae Christianae}}, and {{lang|la|anni vulgatae nostrae aerae Christianas}}.}} may be that in a 1615 book by ].<ref name=VulgarisAerae1 /> Kepler uses it again, as {{lang|la|ab Anno vulgaris aerae}}, in a 1616 table of ],<ref>{{cite book |title=Ephemerides novae motuum caelestium, ab Ānno vulgaris aerae MDCXVII en observationibus potissimum Tychonis Brahei hypothesibus physicis, et tabulis Rudolphinis... |first=Johann |last=Kepler |publisher=Plancus |year=1616 <!--|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=0kElSQAACAAJ&q=vulgaris+aerae |url-status=dead --> }}</ref> and again, as {{lang|la|ab anno vulgaris aerae}}, in 1617.<ref>{{cite book |title=Ephemerides novae motuum coelestium, ab anno vulgaris aerae MDCXVII... |quote=Part 3 has title: Tomi L Ephemeridvm Ioannis Kepleri pars tertia, complexa annos à M.DC.XXIX. in M.DC.XXXVI. In quibus & tabb. Rudolphi jam perfectis, et sociâ operâ clariss. viri dn. Iacobi Bartschii ... Impressa Sagani Silesiorvm, in typographeio Ducali, svmptibvs avthoris, anno M.DC.XXX. |author-link=Johannes Kepler|first1=Johannes |last1=Keppler |first2=Jakob |last2=Bartsch |publisher=Johannes Plancus |year=1617 |trans-title= (per 1635 English edition): ''New Ephemerids for the Celestiall Motions, for the Yeeres of the Vulgar Era 1617–1636''}} (His third use of "vulgaris aerae" (Latin for Common Era) (1617))</ref> A 1635 English edition of that book has the title page in English that may be the earliest-found use of ''Vulgar Era'' in English.<ref>{{cite book |title=Ephemerides of the Celestiall Motions, for the Yeers of the Vulgar Era 1633 ... |author1=Johann Kepler |author2=Adriaan Vlacq |year=1635}}</ref>{{efn|As England did not adopt the Gregorian calendar ], "vulgar" dates were determined according to the ].}} A 1701 book edited by John Le Clerc includes the phrase "Before Christ according to the Vulgar Æra,{{nbsp}}6".<ref>{{cite book |title=The Harmony of the Evangelists |editor-first=John |editor-last=Le Clerc |location=London |publisher=Sam Buckley |page= |year=1701 |quote=Before Christ according to the Vulgar Æra, 6}}</ref> | |||
===Use of the term "vulgar era"=== | |||
] first used the name "Vulgar Era" to distinguish it from the ] systems typically used in national law.]] | |||
The term "Common Era" is traced back in English to its appearance as "Vulgar Era"{{efn|from the Latin word ''vulgus'', the common people, i.e., those who are not royalty.}} to distinguish it from the ] systems typically used in national law. | |||
The ] gives 1716 as the date of first use of the term "vulgar era" (which it defines as Christian era).<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/vulgarera |title=Merriam Webster Online entry for ''Vulgar Era'' | access-date=18 May 2011}}</ref>{{efn|The probable source is a 1716 book in English by Dean ] which refers to, "...the vulgar Æra of Christ's incarnation and not from the true time of it."<ref>{{cite book |title=The Old and New Testament Connected in the History of the Jews and Neighbouring Nations |author=Humphrey Prideaux, D.D.|author-link=Humphrey Prideaux |location=London | |||
The first use of the Latin term ''vulgaris aerae''{{Efn|name=VulgarisAerae0|In Latin, ''Common Era'' is written as ''Vulgaris Aerae''. It also occasionally appears as ''æræ vulgaris'', ''aerae vulgaris'', ''aeram vulgarem'', ''anni vulgaris'', ''vulgaris aerae Christianae'', and ''anni vulgatae nostrae aerae Christianas''.}} discovered so far was in a 1615 book by ].<ref name=VulgarisAerae1 | |||
|page= |volume=1|year=1716 |edition=Second}}</ref> This citation is given in the 1933 edition of Oxford English Dictionary but without any assertion of first use.<ref name="OED vulgar">{{cite dictionary |title=Oxford English Dictionary |page=326 |entry=Vulgar |entry-url=https://archive.org/details/the-oxford-english-dictionary-1933-all-volumes/The%20Oxford%20English%20Dictionary%20Volume%2012%20-%20Variant/page/n329/mode/1up? |volume=12 |date=1933}}</ref>}} | |||
/> Kepler uses it again in a 1616 table of ],<ref name=VulgarisAerae2> | |||
{{cite book | |||
|title=Second use of "vulgaris aerae" (Latin for Common Era) (1616) | |||
|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=0kElSQAACAAJ&dq=vulgaris+aerae|publisher=Plancus | |||
|author=Kepler, Johann | |||
|year=1616 | |||
|accessdate=2011-05-18}} | |||
The first published use of "Christian Era" may be the Latin phrase {{lang|la|annus aerae christianae}} on the title page of a 1584 theology book, {{lang|la|De Eucharistica controuersia}}.<ref>{{cite book |title={{lang|fr|Lire demain}}; Reading tomorrow |chapter=Common Era 2.0 |last=Clivaz |first=Claire |page= |quote=... the expression "Christian era" appears in Latin in a 1584 theology book (] and Beumler 1584) |publisher= EPFL Press |date=2012 |isbn=9782889141494}}</ref> In 1649, the Latin phrase {{lang|la|annus æræ Christianæ}} appeared in the title of an English almanac.<ref>{{cite book |title=Speculum uranicum, anni æræ Christianæ, 1649, or, An almanack and prognosication for the year of our Lord, 1649 being the first from bissextile or leap-year, and from the creation of the world 5598, wherein is contained many useful, pleasant and necessary observations, and predictions ... : calculated (according to art) for the meridian and latitude of the ancient borough town of Stamford in Lincolnshire ... and without sensible errour may serve the 3. kingdoms of England, Scotland, and Ireland. |last=WING |first=Vincent |year=1649 |location=London |publisher=J.L. for the Company of Stationers |quote=anni æræ Christianæ, 1649}}</ref> A 1652 ephemeris may be the first instance found so far of the English use of "Christian Era".<ref>{{cite book |title=A celestiall glasse, or, Ephemeris for the year of the Christian era 1652 being the bissextile or leap-year: contayning the lunations, planetary motions, configurations & ecclipses for this present year ... : with many other things very delightfull and necessary for most sorts of men: calculated exactly and composed for ... Rochester |author=Sliter, Robert |year=1652 |publisher=Printed for the Company of Stationers |location=London}}</ref> | |||
{{cite book | |||
|title=Ephemerides novae motuum caelestium, ab Ānno vulgaris aerae MDCXVII en observationibus potissimum Tychonis Brahei hypothesibus physicis, et tabulis Rudolphinis... |first=Johann |last=Kepler |publisher=Plancus |year=1616 }} | |||
</ref> | |||
and again in 1617.<ref name=VulgarisAerae3> | |||
The English phrase "Common Era" appears at least as early as 1708,<ref name=1708CommonInEnglish>{{cite book |title=The History of the Works of the Learned |volume=10 |number=9 |location=London |date=January 1708 |page= |quote=... to the fourth century of the Common Era}} (Possibly the first use of ''common era'' in English (1708))</ref> | |||
{{cite book | |||
and in a 1715 book on astronomy it is used interchangeably with "Christian Era" and "Vulgar Era".<ref>{{cite book |first=David|last=Gregory |title=The Elements of Astronomy, Physical and Geometrical |author2=John Nicholson|author3-link=John Morphew |author3= John Morphew |year=1715 |quote=Some say the World was created 3950 Years before the common Æra of Christ |page= |publisher=J. Nicholson |location=London |volume=1 }} ''Before Christ'' and ''Christian Era'' appear on the same page 252, while ''Vulgar Era'' appears on </ref> A 1759 history book uses ''common æra'' in a generic sense, to refer to "the common era of the Jews".<ref>{{cite book |title=An Universal History: From the Earliest Accounts to the Present Time |first=George|last=Sale|author-link=George Sale |author2=Psalmanazar, George |author3=Bower, Archibald |author4=Shelvocke, George |author5=Campbell, John |author6= Swinton, John |year=1759 |quote=And it doth not appear, that they began to reckon from the creation till after their '']'' was finished;at which time they fixed that for their common era |publisher=C. Bathurst |location=London |volume=13| page= |title-link=An Universal History: From the Earliest Accounts to the Present Time}} </ref> The first use of the phrase "before the common era" may be that in a 1770 work that also uses ''common era'' and ''vulgar era'' as synonyms, in a translation of a book originally written in German.<ref>{{cite book |last=Hooper|first=William |author2=Bielfeld, Jacob Friedrich |title=The Elements of Universal Erudition: Containing an Analytical Abridgment of the Sciences, Polite Arts, and Belles Lettres |volume=3 |pages=, |year=1770 |publisher=J Robson and B. Law |location=London |quote=The Spanish era began with the year of the world 3966, and 38 years before the common era (p63); 1796 years before the common era 776 before the vulgar era. (p105) }} </ref> The 1797 edition of the ] uses the terms ''vulgar era'' and ''common era'' synonymously.<ref>{{cite encyclopedia |encyclopedia=Encyclopædia Britannica |page= |entry=Peter |quote=St Peter died in the 66th year of the vulgar era |date=1797 |publisher=A. Bell and C. Macfarquhar |author1=MacFarquhar, Colin |author2=Gleig, George}}</ref><ref>{{cite encyclopedia |encyclopedia=Encyclopædia Britannica |page=|entry=Paul |quote=This happened in the 33rd year of the common era, some time after our Saviour's death. |date=1797 |publisher=A. Bell and C. Macfarquhar |author1=MacFarquhar, Colin |author2=Gleig, George }}</ref> | |||
|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=5w47twAACAAJ&dq=vulgaris+aerae|title=Third use of "vulgaris aerae" (Latin for Common Era) (1617) | |||
In 1835, in his book '']'', ], wrote: "The vulgar Era, or Anno Domini; the fourth year of Jesus Christ, the first of which was but eight days",<ref>{{cite book |url=https://www.mun.ca/rels/restmov/texts/acampbell/tlo4/TLO400L4.HTM |title=The Living Oracles, Fourth Edition |year=1835 |author=Alexander Campbell |pages=16–20 |access-date=18 May 2011|author-link=Alexander Campbell (Restoration movement) }}</ref> | |||
|publisher=sumptibus authoris, excudebat Iohannes Plancus | |||
and also refers to the ''common era'' as a synonym for ''vulgar era'' with "the fact that our Lord was born on the 4th year before the vulgar era, called Anno Domini, thus making (for example) the 42d year from his birth to correspond with the 38th of the common era".<ref>{{cite book |url=https://www.mun.ca/rels/restmov/texts/acampbell/tlo4/TLO400L3.HTM |title=The Living Oracles, Fourth Edition |year=1835 |author=Alexander Campbell |pages=15–16 |access-date=18 May 2011|author-link=Alexander Campbell (Restoration movement) }}</ref> The '']'' (1909) in at least one article reports all three terms (Christian, Vulgar, Common Era) being commonly understood by the early 20th century.<ref>{{cite Encyclopedia |title=Catholic Encyclopedia |entry-url=http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/03738a.htm#christian |entry=General Chronology |quote=Foremost among these is that which is now adopted by all civilized peoples and known as the Christian, Vulgar or Common Era, in the twentieth century of which we are now living}}.</ref> | |||
|author1=Kepler, Johannes | |||
|author2=Fabricus, David | |||
|year=1617 | |||
|accessdate=2011-05-18}} | |||
{{cite book | |||
|title=Ephemerides novae motuum coelestium, ab anno vulgaris aerae MDCXVII... | |||
|quote=Part 3 has title: Tomi L Ephemeridvm Ioannis Kepleri pars tertia, complexa annos à M.DC.XXIX. in M.DC.XXXVI. In quibus & tabb. Rudolphi jam perfectis, et sociâ operâ clariss. viri dn. Iacobi Bartschii ... Impressa Sagani Silesiorvm, in typographeio Ducali, svmptibvs avthoris, anno M.DC.XXX. | |||
|author=], Jakob Bartsch | |||
|publisher=Johannes Plancus | |||
|year=1617}} | |||
* Translation of title (per 1635 English edition): ''New Ephemerids for the Celestiall Motions, for the Yeeres of the Vulgar Era 1617–1636'' | |||
</ref> | |||
A 1635 English edition of that book has the title page in English – so far, the earliest-found usage of ''Vulgar Era'' in English.<ref name=1635VulgarinEnglish> | |||
{{cite book | |||
|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=prP9cQAACAAJ&dq=vulgar+era|title=Earliest so-far-found use of ''vulgar era'' in English (1635) | |||
|author1=Kepler, Johann | |||
|author2=Vlacq, Adriaan | |||
|year=1635 | |||
|accessdate=2011-05-18}} | |||
The phrase "common era", in ], also appeared in the 19th century in a "generic" sense, not necessarily to refer to the Christian Era, but to any system of dates in common use throughout a civilization. Thus, "the common era of the Jews",<ref>{{cite encyclopedia | entry=Epoch |entry-url=https://archive.org/details/popularencyclop13encygoog/page/207/mode/1up? |quote=the common era of the Jews places the creation in BC 3760 | title=Popular Encyclopedia or Conversations Lexicon |publisher=Oxford University Press |editor=A. Whitelaw |editor-link=Alexander Whitelaw (editor)|year=1874 |page=207 |volume=V}}</ref><ref>{{cite book |page= |title=The first and second Advent: or, The past and the future with reference to the Jew, the gentile, and the Church of God |date=1858 |quote=Hence the present year, 1858, in the common era of the Jews, is AM 5618–5619, a difference of more than 200 years from our commonly-received chronology. |publisher=Wertheim, MacIntosh & Hunt }}</ref> "the common era of the Mahometans",<ref>{{cite book |page= |title=Practical tables for the reduction of Mahometan dates to the Christian calendar |quote=Its epoch is the first of March old style. The common era of the Mahometans, as has already been stated, is that of the flight of Mahomet. |author1=Gumpach, Johannes von |date=1856 |publisher=Oxford University Press}}</ref> "common era of the world",<ref>{{cite book |page= |title=The Theological, Philosophical and Miscellaneous Works of the Rev. William Jones |url=https://archive.org/details/theologicalphil09jonegoog |first=William|last=Jones |date=1801 |location=London|publisher=Rivington}}</ref> "the common era of the foundation of Rome".<ref>{{cite book |page= |date=1854 |title=Universal History: From the Creation of the World to the Beginning of the Eighteenth Century |author=] |publisher=Fetridge and Company |location=Boston}}</ref> | |||
{{cite book | |||
When it did refer to the Christian Era, it was sometimes qualified, e.g., "common era of the Incarnation",<ref>{{cite book |page= | last=Baynes |first=Thomas Spencer |date=1833 |title=The Encyclopædia Britannica: A Dictionary of Arts, Sciences, and General Literature |location=New York |publisher=Henry G. Allen and Company |edition=9 |volume=V }}</ref> "common era of the Nativity",<ref>{{cite book |quote=It should be observed, however, that these years correspond to 492 and 493, a portion of the ] being counted from the Incarnation, and being, therefore, one year before the common era of the Nativity of our Lord. |last=Todd |first=James Henthorn |date=1864 |title=St. Patrick, Apostle of Ireland, A Memoir of his Life and Mission |url=https://archive.org/details/cu31924029424110 |pages={{ndash}}497 |publisher=Hodges, Smith & Co |location=Dublin |author-link=James Henthorn Todd }}</ref> or "common era of the birth of Christ".<ref>{{cite book |page= |title=Annotations on the Four Gospels and the Acts of the Apostles |author=Heneage Elsley |date=1812 |edition=2nd |publisher= T. Payne |location=London |no-pp=true}}</ref> | |||
|title=Ephemerides of the Celestiall Motions, for the Yeers of the Vulgar Era 1633... | |||
|author=Johann Kepler, Adriaan Vlacq | |||
|year=1635}} | |||
</ref> | |||
<!--- | |||
* A much later instance in Latin is in a 1762 book by ], entitled ''Ecclesiasticae historiae breviarium. Editio, post secundam venetam. Pars prima quae compectitur Chronologiae Rudimenta. Pars secunda quae progreditur usque ad unnum Vulgaris Aera''; See book title at http://www.antiqbook.de/boox/haker/207860.shtml – see Catholic Encyclopedia article on its author at http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/02522a.htm | |||
---> | |||
A 1701 book edited by John LeClerc includes "Before Christ according to the Vulgar Æra, 6".<ref> | |||
{{cite book | |||
|url=https://books.google.com/?id=jakGAAAAQAAJ&pg=PA5-IA4&dq=%22vulgar+era%22 | |||
|title=''vulgar era'' in English (1701) | |||
|author=Clerc, Jean Le | |||
|year=1701 | |||
|accessdate=2011-05-18}} | |||
An adapted translation of ''Common Era'' into ] as {{lang|la|Era Vulgaris}}{{efn|''era''{{snd}} or, with a ], {{lang|la|ēra}}{{snd}} being an alternative form of {{lang|la|aera}}; {{lang|la|aera}} is the usual form<ref>{{cite book |title=] |author=] |publisher=] |date=1934}}</ref>}} was adopted in the 20th century by some followers of ], and thus the abbreviation "e.v." or "EV" may sometimes be seen as a replacement for AD.<ref>{{cite book |title=The Weiser Concise Guide to Aleister Crowley |first=Richard |last=Kaczynski |page= |publisher=Weiser Books |date=1 April 2009}}</ref> | |||
{{cite book | |||
|title=The Harmony of the Evangelists | |||
|editor=John LeClerc |editor-link=John LeClerc | |||
|location=London |publisher=Sam Buckley | |||
|page=5 | |||
|year=1701 | |||
|quote=Before Christ according to the Vulgar AEra, 6}} | |||
</ref> | |||
A 1716 book in English by Dean ] says, "before the beginning of the vulgar æra, by which we now compute the years from his incarnation."<ref> | |||
{{cite book | |||
|url=https://books.google.com/?id=1DQHAAAAQAAJ&pg=PA5&vq=vulgar&dq | |||
|title=Prideaux use of "Vulgar Era" (1716) | |||
|year=1799|edition=reprint|quote=reckoning it backward from the vulgar era of Christ's incarnation | |||
|author1=Prideaux, Humphrey | |||
|accessdate=2011-05-18}} | |||
=== History of the use of the CE/BCE abbreviation === | |||
{{cite book | |||
Although ] have their own ], they often use the ] without the AD prefix.<ref>{{cite web |quote=Jews do not generally use the words 'A.D.' and 'B.C.' to refer to the years on the Gregorian calendar. 'A.D.' means 'the year of our ],' and we do not believe Jesus is the L-rd. Instead, we use the abbreviations C.E. (Common or Christian Era) and B.C.E. (Before the Common Era). |author=Tracey R Rich |url=http://www.jewfaq.org/calendar.htm#Years | title=Jewish Calendar |website=Judaism 101 | access-date=18 May 2011}}</ref> As early as 1825, the abbreviation VE (for Vulgar Era) was in use among Jews to denote years in the Western calendar.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.jewishgen.org/jcr-uk/susser/plymouthinscriptions.htm |title= Plymouth Hoe Old Jewish Cemetery Tombstone Inscriptions 3 |date=2003 |publisher=Jewish Communities & Records, Susser Archive |editor-first1=Bernard |editor-last1=Susser |quote=Here is buried his honour Judah ben his honour Joseph, a prince and honoured amongst philanthropists, who executed good deeds, died in his house in the City of Bath, Tuesday, and was buried here on Sunday, 19 Sivan in the year 5585. In memory of Lyon Joseph Esq (merchant of Falmouth, Cornwall). who died at Bath June AM 5585/VE 1825. Beloved and respected. |access-date=18 May 2011}} ] is 5 June 1825. VE is likely an abbreviation for ''Vulgar Era''.]</ref> {{As of|2005}}, Common Era notation has also been in use for Hebrew lessons for more than a century.<ref name=Gormley /> Jews have also used the term '''Current Era'''.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.bbc.co.uk/religion/religions/judaism/history/history_1.shtml#section_2 | title=History of Judaism 63 BCE – 1086 CE| date=8 February 2005 |author=BBC Team |work=BBC Religion & Ethics |publisher=British Broadcasting Corporation | access-date=20 April 2016}}</ref> | |||
|title=The Old and New Testament Connected in the History of the Jews and Neighbouring Nations | |||
|author=Humphrey Prideaux, D.D.|authorlink=Humphrey Prideaux | |||
|location=Edinburgh | |||
|quote=This happened in the seventh year after the building of Rome, and in the second year of the eighth Olympiad, which was the seven hundred forty-seventh year before Christ, i. e. before the beginning of the vulgar æra, by which we now compute the years from his incarnation. | |||
|page=1|volume=1|year=1716 | |||
|origyear=from Oxford University Press 1799 (1716 edition not online, 1749 online is Vol 2)}} | |||
== Contemporary usage == | |||
</ref><ref> | |||
Some academics in the fields of ], ], ] and ] have adopted CE and BCE notation despite some disagreement.<ref>See, for example, the Society for Historical Archaeology states in its more recent style guide "Do not use CE (common era), BP (before present), or BCE; convert these expressions to AD and BC." (In section I 5 the Society explains how to use "years BP" in connection with ].) {{cite web |url=https://sha.org/documents/SHAStyleGuide-Dec2011.pdf |title=Style Guide |author=Society for Historical Archaeology |date=December 2006 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160419052334/http://www.sha.org/documents/SHAStyleGuide-Dec2011.pdf |archive-date=19 April 2016 |access-date=16 January 2017 |url-status=live }} whereas the ] style guide takes a different approach, supporting the use of "CE" and "BCE." {{cite web |url=http://www.aaanet.org/publications/guidelines.cfm |title=AAA Style Guide |format=PDF |author=American Anthropological Society | |||
Merriam Webster accepts the date of 1716, but does not give the source. {{cite web |url=http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/vulgarera |title=Merriam Webster Online entry for ''Vulgar Era'' | accessdate=2011-05-18}} | |||
|date=2009 |access-date=26 May 2015 |page=3}}</ref> A study conducted in 2014 found that the BCE/CE notation is not growing at the expense of BC and AD notation in the scholarly literature, and that both notations are used in a relatively stable fashion.<ref>{{Cite journal |last= Cavacini|first= A. |title= Is the CE/BCE notation becoming a standard in scholarly literature? |journal= Scientometrics |date = 2015 |volume= 102 |issue= 2 |pages= 1661–1668 |doi= 10.1007/s11192-014-1352-1 |s2cid= 255011561 |url= https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-014-1352-1}}</ref> | |||
</ref> | |||
A 1796 book uses the term "vulgar era of the nativity".<ref> | |||
{{cite book | |||
|url=https://books.google.com/?id=nK6IPj-Wk-kC&pg=PA10&dq=%22vulgar+era+of+the+NATIVITY%22 | |||
|title="vulgar era of the nativity" (1796) | |||
|publisher=T. Cadell jun. and W. Davies | |||
|author1=Robert Walker (Rector of Shingham) | |||
|author2=Newton, Sir Isaac | |||
|author3=Falconer, Thomas | |||
|year=1796 | |||
|accessdate=2011-05-18}} | |||
===Australia=== | |||
{{cite book | |||
In 2011, media reports suggested that the BC/AD notation in Australian school textbooks would be replaced by BCE/CE notation.<ref>{{Cite news |last= Malkin |first= Bonnie |title= Anger in Australia as school books 'write Christ out of history' |work= The Telegraph |date = 2 September 2011 |location= London |access-date= 1 January 2020 |issn= 0307-1235 |url= https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/australiaandthepacific/australia/8736932/Anger-in-Australia-as-school-books-write-Christ-out-of-history.html}}</ref> The change drew opposition from some politicians and church leaders. Weeks after the story broke, the ] denied the rumours and stated that the BC/AD notation would remain, with CE and BCE as an optional suggested learning activity.<ref>{{cite news |url=http://www.theage.com.au/national/adbc-rock-solid-in-curriculum-20111020-1mab2.html |title=AD/BC rock solid in curriculum |date=21 October 2011|access-date=4 March 2012 |location=Melbourne |work=The Age}}</ref> | |||
|title=Analysis of Researches Into the Origin and Progress of Historical Time, from the Creation to ... | |||
|author=Rev. Robert Walker, Isaac Newton, Thomas Falconer | |||
|year=1796 | |||
|publisher=T. Cadell Jr. and W. Davies | |||
|page=10 | |||
|location=London | |||
|quote=Dionysius the Little brought the vulgar era of the nativity too low by four years.}}</ref> | |||
===Canada=== | |||
The first so-far-discovered usage of "Christian Era" is as the Latin phrase ''aerae christianae'' on the title page of a 1584 theology book.<ref> | |||
In 2013, the ] (now the Canadian Museum of History) in ] (opposite ]), which had previously switched to BCE/CE, decided to change back to BC/AD in material intended for the public while retaining BCE/CE in academic content.<ref>, by Sean Kilpatrick/The Canadian Press, ''National Post'', 27 February 2013</ref> | |||
{{cite web | |||
|url=http://www.worldcat.org/title/de-eucharistica-controuersia-capita-doctrinae-theologicae-de-quibus-mandatu-illustrissimi-principis-ac-domini-d-iohannis-casimiri-comites-palatini-ad-rhenum-ducis-bauariae-tutoris-administratoris-electoralis-palatinatus-octonis-publicis-disputationibus-quarum-prima-est-habita-4-apr-anno-aerae-christianae-1584-marco-beumlero-respondente-praeses-iohannes-iacobus-grynaeus-orthodoxae-fidei-rationem-interrogantibus-placide-reddidit-accessit-eiusdem-iohannis-iacobi-grynaeus-synopsis-orationis-quam-de-disputationis-euentu-congressione-nona-quae-indicit-in-15-aprilis-publice-habuit/oclc/123471534 | |||
|title=1584 Latin use of ''aerae christianae'' | |||
|accessdate=2011-05-18}} | |||
===Nepal=== | |||
{{cite book | |||
The notation is in particularly common use in ] in order to disambiguate dates from the local calendar, Bikram or Vikram Sambat. Disambiguation is needed because the era of the local calendar is quite close to the Common Era. | |||
|title=De Eucharistica controuersia, capita doctrinae theologicae de quibus mandatu, illustrissimi principis ac domini, D. Iohannis Casimiri, Comites Palatini ad Rhenum, Ducis Bauariae, tutoris & administratoris Electoralis Palatinatus, octonis publicis disputationibus (quarum prima est habita 4 Apr. anno aerae christianae 1584, Marco Beumlero respondente) praeses Iohannes Iacobus Grynaeus, orthodoxae fidei rationem interrogantibus placidè reddidit ; accessit eiusdem Iohannis Iacobi Grynaeus synopsis orationis, quam de disputationis euentu, congressione nona, quae indicit in 15 Aprilis, publicè habuit. | |||
|first=Johann Jacob|last=Grynaeus|authorlink=Johann Jakob Grynaeus | |||
|author2=Beumler, Marcus | |||
|language=Latin | |||
|location=Heidelbergae | |||
|publisher=Typis Iacobi Mylij | |||
|year=1584 | |||
|edition=Editio tertia | |||
|oclc=123471534 | |||
|quote=4 Apr. anno aerae christianae 1584}} | |||
===United Kingdom=== | |||
</ref> | |||
In 2002, an advisory panel for the religious education syllabus for ] recommended introducing BCE/CE dates to schools,<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/news/article-531644-ad-and-bc-become-cebce.do |title=AD and BC become CE/BCE |date=9 February 2002 |access-date=5 February 2012 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20111220120909/http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/news/article-531644-ad-and-bc-become-cebce.do |archive-date=20 December 2011 |work=This is London}}</ref> and by 2018 some local education authorities were using them.<ref name=Tel-NT /> | |||
In 1649, the Latin phrase ''æræ Christianæ'' appeared in the title of an English almanac.<ref> | |||
{{cite web | |||
|url=http://www.worldcat.org/title/speculum-uranicum-anni-r-christian-1649-or-an-almanack-and-prognosication-for-the-year-of-our-lord-1649-being-the-first-from-bissextile-or-leap-year-and-from-the-creation-of-the-world-5598-wherein-is-contained-many-useful-pleasant-and-necessary-observations-and-predictions-calculated-according-to-art-for-the-meridian-and-latitude-of-the-ancient-borrough-town-of-stamford-in-lincolnshire-and-without-sensible-errour-may-serve-the-3-kingdoms-of-england-scotland-and-ireland/oclc/18533017 | |||
|title=1649 use of ''æræ Christianæ'' in English book – 1st usage found in English | |||
|accessdate=2011-05-18}} | |||
In 2018, the ] said it would continue to use BC/AD as its house style.<ref name=Tel-NT>, '']'', by Henry Bodkin, 12 November 2018</ref> ] explains its era policy thus: "It might seem strange to use a Christian calendar system when referring to British prehistory, but the BC/AD labels are widely used and understood."<ref> English Heritage</ref> Some parts of the BBC use BCE/CE, but some presenters have said they will not.<ref name=Tel-NT /> As of October 2019, the BBC News style guide has entries for AD and BC, but not for CE or BCE.<ref>{{cite web |title=BBC News style guide |url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/academy/en/collections/news-style-guide |website=BBC |access-date=11 October 2019}}</ref> The style guide for '']'' says, under the entry for CE/BCE: "some people prefer CE (common era, current era, or Christian era) and BCE (before common era, etc.) to AD and BC, which, however, remain our style".<ref>{{cite web |title=Guardian style guide |url=https://www.theguardian.com/guardian-observer-style-guide-c |website=Guardian |access-date=5 October 2019}}</ref> | |||
{{cite book | |||
|title=Speculum uranicum, anni æræ Christianæ, 1649, or, An almanack and prognosication for the year of our Lord, 1649 being the first from bissextile or leap-year, and from the creation of the world 5598, wherein is contained many useful, pleasant and necessary observations, and predictions ... : calculated (according to art) for the meridian and latitude of the ancient borrough town of Stamford in Lincolnshire ... and without sensible errour may serve the 3. kingdoms of England, Scotland, and Ireland. | |||
|last=WING|first=Vincent | |||
|year=1649|location=London | |||
|publisher=J.L. for the Company of Stationers | |||
|quote=anni æræ Christianæ, 1649}} | |||
===United States=== | |||
</ref> | |||
In the United States, the use of the BCE/CE notation in ]s was reported in 2005 to be growing.<ref name=Gormley /> Some publications have transitioned to using it exclusively. For example, the 2007 ] was the first edition to switch to BCE/CE, ending a period of 138 years in which the traditional BC/AD dating notation was used. BCE/CE is used by the ] in its history tests,<ref>{{cite web |title= AP: World History |url=http://www.collegeboard.com/student/testing/ap/history_world/topic.html?worldhist |access-date=18 May 2011 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110505010633/http://www.collegeboard.com/student/testing/ap/history_world/topic.html?worldhist |archive-date= 5 May 2011 |url-status= dead}}</ref> and by the ]. Others have taken a different approach. The US-based ] uses BCE/CE notation in articles on non-Christian religious topics such as ].<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.history.com/topics/jerusalem |title=Jerusalem Timeline |publisher=History Channel |access-date=18 May 2011 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110520111303/http://www.history.com/topics/jerusalem |archive-date=20 May 2011 }};{{cite web|url=http://www.history.com/topics/jerusalem |title=Jerusalem: Biographies |publisher=History Channel |access-date=18 May 2011 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110520111303/http://www.history.com/topics/jerusalem |archive-date=20 May 2011 }}</ref> The 2006 style guide for the Episcopal Diocese ''Maryland Church News'' says that BCE and CE should be used.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.ang-md.org/mcn/style_guide.pdf |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060620230309/http://ang-md.org/mcn/style_guide.pdf |url-status=dead |archive-date=20 June 2006 |title=Maryland Church News Submission Guide & Style Manual |work=Maryland Church News |date=1 April 2005 |access-date=18 May 2011 }}</ref> | |||
A 1652 ephemeris is the first instance so-far-found for English usage of "Christian Era".<ref> | |||
{{cite book | |||
|url=http://www.google.com/products?q=Ephemeris+year+Christian+era+1652 | |||
|title=first appearance of "Christian Era" in English (1652) | |||
|accessdate=2011-05-18}} | |||
In June 2006, in the United States, the Kentucky State School Board reversed its decision to use BCE and CE in the state's new Program of Studies, leaving education of students about these concepts a matter of local discretion.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.tffky.org/articles/Press%20Releases/prs%2006-14-06%20MC.html |title=State School Board reverses itself on B.C./A.D. controversy |publisher=Family Foundation of Kentucky |access-date=18 May 2011 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110427032052/http://www.tffky.org/articles/Press%20Releases/prs%2006-14-06%20MC.html |archive-date=27 April 2011 }}</ref><ref>{{cite news |url=http://legacy.kctcs.edu/todaysnews/index.cfm?tn_date=2006-06-16#5119 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090710123618/http://legacy.kctcs.edu/todaysnews/index.cfm?tn_date=2006-06-16#5119 |url-status=dead |archive-date=10 July 2009 |title=School board keeps traditional historic designations |author=Joe Biesk |newspaper=Louisville Courier-Journal |date=15 June 2006 |access-date=18 May 2011 }}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://cpe.ky.gov/NR/rdonlyres/5F08162C-899F-47FE-9367-1DDD82DE74E6/0/6_CommissionerofEdReport.pdf|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060926165947/http://cpe.ky.gov/NR/rdonlyres/5F08162C-899F-47FE-9367-1DDD82DE74E6/0/6_CommissionerofEdReport.pdf|url-status=dead|archive-date=26 September 2006|title=Kentucky Board of Education Report |publisher=Kentucky Board of Education Report |date=10 June 2006 |access-date=18 May 2011}}</ref> | |||
{{cite book | |||
|title=A celestiall glasse, or, Ephemeris for the year of the Christian era 1652 being the bissextile or leap-year: contayning the lunations, planetary motions, configurations & ecclipses for this present year ... : with many other things very delightfull and necessary for most sorts of men: calculated exactly and composed for ... Rochester | |||
|author=Sliter, Robert | |||
|year=1652 | |||
|publisher=Printed for the Company of Stationers | |||
|location=London}}</ref> | |||
== Rationales == | |||
The English phrase "common Era" appears at least as early as 1708,<ref name=1708CommonInEnglish> | |||
<!-- Please do not add personal opinions or theories in favour or against this notation, as they will be deleted. Misplaced Pages is an encyclopedia, not an open forum. The article may only reflect the logically argued positions of subject experts, not just anyone with an opinion. --> | |||
{{cite book |title=first so-far-found use of ''common era'' in English (1708) |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=D_wvAAAAYAAJ&q=%22common+era%22#v=onepage&q=%22common%20era%22&f=false |publisher=Printed for H. Rhodes |year=1708 |accessdate=2011-05-18}} | |||
{{cite book |title=The History of the Works of the Learned |volume=10 |page=513 |location=London |date=January 1708}} | |||
</ref> | |||
and in a 1715 book on astronomy is used interchangeably with "Christian Era" and "Vulgar Era".<ref> | |||
{{cite book | |||
|url=https://books.google.com/?id=ze8ehe65hwcC&pg=RA2-PA252&dq=%22Common+Era%22+%22before+chrift%22++chriftian+common+era | |||
|first=David|last=Gregory | |||
|title=The Elements of Astronomy, Physical and Geometrical | |||
|author2=John Nicholson|author3= ] | |||
|year=1715 | |||
|quote=Some say the World was created 3950 Years before the common Æra of Christ | |||
|page=252 | |||
|publisher=printed for J. Nicholson, and sold by J. Morphew | |||
|location=London | |||
|volume=1 | |||
|accessdate=2011-05-18}} | |||
=== Support === | |||
''Before Christ'' and ''Christian Era'' appear on the same page 252, while ''Vulgar Era'' appears on | |||
The use of CE in Jewish scholarship was historically motivated by the desire to avoid the implicit "Our Lord" in the abbreviation ''AD''.{{efn| name="nostri"}} Although other aspects of dating systems are based in Christian origins, AD is a direct reference to ].<ref>{{cite book|title=The American and English Encyclopedia of Law and Practice|year=1910|page=1116|quote=It has been said of the Latin words anno Domini, meaning in the year of our Lord ...}}</ref><ref>{{cite book|title=World Religions At Your Fingertips|author1=Michael McDowell |author2=Nathan Robert Brown |publisher=Penguin|year=2009|isbn=978-1-101-01469-1|page=38|quote=Marked by the turn of the Common Era, C.E., originally referred to as A.D., an abbreviation of the Latin {{lang|la|Anno Domini}}, meaning 'Year of our God/Lord.' This was a shortening of {{lang|la|Anno Domini Nostri Jesu Christi}}, meaning 'Year of our God/Lord Jesus Christ.'}}</ref><ref name="Ostling">{{cite magazine |title=BC/AD Dating: In the year of whose Lord?|first=Michael|last=Ostling |magazine=History Today |volume=59 |issue=10 |date=October 2009 |url=https://www.historytoday.com/archive/bcad-dating-year-whose-lord |access-date=10 March 2023}}</ref> Proponents of the Common Era notation assert that the use of BCE/CE shows sensitivity to those who use the same year numbering system as the one that originated with and is currently used by ], but who are not themselves Christian.<ref name="RelTolrnc" /> Former United Nations Secretary-General ] has argued:<ref>{{cite news |last=Lefevere |first=Patricia |title=Annan: 'Peace is never a perfect achievement' – United Nations Secretary General Kofi Annan |newspaper=National Catholic Reporter |date=11 December 1998 |url=http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m1141/is_7_35/ai_53460476 |archive-url=https://archive.today/20120713031248/http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m1141/is_7_35/ai_53460476/ |url-status=dead |archive-date=13 July 2012 |access-date=26 February 2008 }}</ref> | |||
</ref> | |||
A 1759 history book uses ''common æra'' in a generic sense, to refer to the common era of the Jews.<ref> | |||
{{cite book | |||
|url=https://books.google.com/?id=tn0EAAAAYAAJ&pg=RA1-PA130&dq=%22Common+aEra%22+%22chrift%22 | |||
|title=1759 use of common æra | |||
|publisher=Printed for C. Bathurst | |||
|author1=Sale, George | |||
|author2=Psalmanazar, George | |||
|author3=Bower, Archibald | |||
|author4=Shelvocke, George | |||
|author5=Campbell, John | |||
|author6=Swinton, John | |||
|year=1759 | |||
|accessdate=2011-05-18}} | |||
{{blockquote|he Christian calendar no longer belongs exclusively to Christians. People of all faiths have taken to using it simply as a matter of convenience. There is so much interaction between people of different faiths and cultures – different civilizations, if you like – that some shared way of reckoning time is a necessity. And so the Christian Era has become the Common Era.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.un.org/News/ossg/sg/stories/articleFull.asp?TID=37 |title=Common values for a common era: Even as we cherish our diversity, we need to discover our shared values |last=Annan |first=Kofi A. |author-link=Kofi Annan |date=28 June 1999 |publisher=Civilization: The Magazine of the Library of Congress |access-date=2011-05-18 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110501020027/http://www.un.org/News/ossg/sg/stories/articleFull.asp?TID=37 |archive-date=2011-05-01 }}</ref>}} | |||
{{cite book | |||
|title=] | |||
|first=George|last=Sale|authorlink=George Sale | |||
|author2=Psalmanazar, George |author3=Bower, Archibald |author4=Shelvocke, George |author5=Campbell, John |author6= Swinton, John | |||
|year=1759 | |||
|quote=at which time they fixed that for their common era | |||
|publisher=C. Bathurst | |||
|location=London | |||
|volume=13|page=130}} | |||
Adena K. Berkowitz, in her application to argue before the ], opted to use BCE and CE because, "Given the multicultural society that we live in, the traditional Jewish designations{{snd}}B.C.E. and C.E.{{snd}} cast a wider net of inclusion."<ref>{{cite news |url=http://www.nytimes.com/1997/08/17/magazine/bc-ad-or-bce-ce.html |url-access=subscription |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180814202630/http://www.nytimes.com/1997/08/17/magazine/bc-ad-or-bce-ce.html |archive-date=14 August 2018 |title=B.C./A.D. or B.C.E./C.E.? |last=Safire |first= William |date=17 August 1997 |work=New York Times}}</ref> In the ], Joshua J. Mark wrote "Non-Christian scholars, especially, embraced because they could now communicate more easily with the Christian community. Jewish, Islamic, Hindu and Buddhist scholars could retain their calendar but refer to events using the Gregorian Calendar as BCE and CE without compromising their own beliefs about the divinity of Jesus of Nazareth."<ref>{{cite Encyclopedia |entry=The Origin & History of the BCE/CE Dating System. |title=World History Encyclopedia |first=Joshua J. |last=Mark |date=27 March 2017 |entry-url=https://www.worldhistory.org/article/1041/the-origin--history-of-the-bcece-dating-system/ |access-date=8 August 2022}}</ref> In '']'', Michael Ostling wrote: "BC/AD Dating: In the year of whose Lord? The continuing use of AD and BC is not only factually wrong but also offensive to many who are not Christians."<ref name="Ostling" /> | |||
In this case, ''their'' refers to the Jews. | |||
</ref> | |||
The first-so-far found usage of the phrase "before the common era" is in a 1770 work that also uses ''common era'' and ''vulgar era'' as synonyms, in a translation of a book originally written in German.<ref name=FirstBeforeCE> | |||
{{cite book | |||
|url=https://books.google.com/?id=gBETAAAAIAAJ&pg=PA105&dq=%22Common+Era%22+%22vulgar+Era%22+date:1-1800 | |||
|title=First-so-far found English usage of "before the common era", with "vulgar era" synonymous with "common era" (1770) | |||
|publisher=Printed by G. Scott, for J. Robson and B. Law | |||
|author1=Von), Jakob Friedrich Bielfeld (Freiherr | |||
|author2=Hooper, William | |||
|year=1770 | |||
|accessdate=2011-05-18}} | |||
=== Opposition === | |||
{{cite book | |||
Critics note the fact that there is no difference in the ] of the two systems—chosen to be close to the ]. Since the year numbers are the same, BCE and CE dates should be equally offensive to other religions as BC and AD.<ref name="Pollick-2024">{{Cite web |title=What is the Difference Between AD, BC, BCE, and CE in Identifying Historical Dates? |url=http://www.historicalindex.org/what-is-the-difference-between-ad-bc-bce-and-ce-in-identifying-historical-dates.htm |website=Historical Index |first=Michael |last=Pollick |date= 23 May 2024 |access-date=21 August 2024}}</ref> ] priest and writer on interfaith issues ] argued that the BCE/CE usage is the less inclusive option since they are still using the Christian calendar numbers and forcing it on other nations.<ref name=Panikkar>{{Cite book |first=Raimon |last=Panikkar |author-link=Raimon Panikkar |title=Christophany: The Fullness of Man |location=Maryville, NY |publisher=Orbis Books |year=2004 |page=173|quote=To call our age 'the Common Era,' even though for the Jews, the Chinese, the Tamil, the Muslims, and many others it is not a common era, constitutes the acme of colonialism.|isbn=978-1-57075-564-4}}</ref> In 1993, the English-language expert ] speculated a ] scenario in his style guide that, "if we do end by casting aside the AD/BC convention, almost certainly some will argue that we ought to cast aside as well the conventional numbering system itself, given its Christian basis."<ref name=Wilson /> | |||
|last=Hooper|first=William | |||
|author2=Bielfeld, Jacob Friedrich | |||
|title=The Elements of Universal Erudition: Containing an Analytical Abridgment of the Sciences, Polite Arts, and Belles Lettres | |||
|volume=2 |pages=105, 63 | |||
|year=1770 | |||
|publisher=G. Scott, printer, for J Robson, bookseller in New-Bond Street, and B. Law in Ave-Mary Lane | |||
|location=London | |||
|quote=in the year of the world 3692, and 312 years before the vulgar era.... The Spanish era began with the year of the world 3966, and 38 years before the common era (p63)}} | |||
Some ] are offended by the removal of the reference to Jesus,<ref>{{cite news|url=http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qn4188/is_20061202/ai_n16891064|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20071012132926/http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qn4188/is_20061202/ai_n16891064|url-status=dead|archive-date=12 October 2007|last=Whitney|first=Susan|title=Altering history? Changes have some asking 'Before what?'|newspaper=The Deseret News|date=2 December 2006|quote='I find this attempt to restructure history offensive,' Lori Weintz wrote, in a letter to National Geographic publishers. ... 'The forward to your book says B.C. and A.D. were removed so as to "not impose the standards of one culture on others." ... It's 2006 this year for anyone on Earth that is participating in day-to-day world commerce and communication. Two thousand six years since what? Most people know, regardless of their belief system, and aren't offended by a historical fact.'|access-date=18 May 2011}}</ref> including the ].<ref name="SBC" /> | |||
</ref> | |||
The 1797 edition of the ] uses the terms ''vulgar era'' and ''common era'' synonymously.<ref> | |||
{{cite book | |||
|url=https://books.google.com/?id=W3xMAAAAMAAJ&pg=RA1-PA228&dq=%22vulgar+era%22 | |||
|title="vulgar era" in 1797 EB | |||
|quote=St Peter died in the 66th year of the vulgar era | |||
|at=p. 228 v. 14 pt. 1 P (Peter) | |||
|year=1797 | |||
|publisher=A. Bell and C. Macfarquhar | |||
|author1=MacFarquhar, Colin | |||
|author2=Gleig, George | |||
|accessdate=2011-05-18}} | |||
<br /> | |||
{{cite book | |||
|url=https://books.google.com/?id=W3xMAAAAMAAJ&pg=PA50&dq=%22common+era%22 | |||
|title="common era" in 1797 EB | |||
|at=p. 50 v. 14 pt. 1 P (Paul) | |||
|quote=This happened in the 33rd year of the common era, fome time after our Saviour's death. | |||
|year=1797 | |||
|publisher=A. Bell and C. Macfarquhar | |||
|author1=MacFarquhar, Colin | |||
|author2=Gleig, George | |||
|accessdate=2011-05-18}} | |||
<br /> | |||
{{cite encyclopedia | |||
|encyclopedia=Encyclopædia Britannica: Or, A Dictionary of Arts, Sciences, and Miscellaneous Literature (Third Edition in 18 volumes) | |||
|year=1797 | |||
|at=v. 14 pt. 1 P | |||
|editor=George Gleig | |||
|location=Edinburgh}} | |||
== Conventions in style guides == | |||
</ref> | |||
The abbreviation BCE, just as with BC, always follows the year number. Unlike AD, which still often precedes the year number, CE always follows the year number (if context requires that it be written at all).<ref>{{cite book | title = Chicago Manual of Style | edition = 17th | isbn = 978-0-226-28705-8 | date = 2017 | publisher = University of Chicago Press | at = ¶ 9.34 }}</ref> Thus, the current year is written as {{CURRENTYEAR}} in both notations (or, if further clarity is needed, as {{CURRENTYEAR}} CE, or as AD {{CURRENTYEAR}}), and the year that ] died is represented as 399 BCE (the same year that is represented by 399 BC in the BC/AD notation). The abbreviations are sometimes written with small capital letters, or with ] (e.g., "<span style="font-size:87%;">B.C.E.</span>" or "C.E.").<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.chicagomanualofstyle.org/about15_rules.html |title=Major Rule Changes in The Chicago Manual of Style, Fifteenth Edition |year=2003 |publisher=University of Chicago Press |quote=Certain abbreviations traditionally set in small caps are now in full caps (AD, BCE, and the like), with small caps an option. |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20070909071543/http://www.chicagomanualofstyle.org/about15_rules.html|archive-date=9 September 2007|access-date=26 May 2015}}</ref> The US-based ] style guide for academic texts on religion prefers BCE/CE to BC/AD.<ref>''SBL Handbook of Style'' ] 1999 "8.1.2 ERAS – The preferred style is B.C.E. and C.E. (with periods). If you use A.D. and B.C., remember that A.D. precedes the date and B.C. follows it. (For the use of these abbreviations in titles, see § 7.1.3.2.)"</ref> | |||
In 1835, in his book '']'', ], wrote: "The vulgar Era, or Anno Domini; the fourth year of Jesus Christ, the first of which was but eight days",<ref> | |||
{{cite book |url=http://www.mun.ca/rels/restmov/texts/acampbell/tlo4/TLO400L4.HTM |title=The Living Oracles, Fourth Edition |year=1835 |author=] |pages=16–20 |accessdate=2011-05-18}} | |||
== Similar conventions in other languages == | |||
</ref> | |||
* In ], Jews in ] seem to have already been using words translating to "(before the) common era" in the 18th century, while others like ] opposed this usage as it would hinder the integration of Jews into German society.<ref name="Jewish Joke" /> The formulation seems to have persisted among German Jews in the 19th century in forms like {{lang|de|vor der gewöhnlichen Zeitrechnung}} (before the common chronology).<ref>{{lang|de|Allgemeine Zeitung des Judenthums. Ein unpartheiisches Organ für alles jüdische Interesse, II. Jahrgang, No. 60, Leipzig, 19. Mai 1838}} (19 May 1838). See page 175 in (Leipzig 1838).</ref><ref>{{aut|]}}, {{lang|de|Geschichte des Karäerthums von 900 bis 1575 der gewöhnlichen Zeitrechnung}} (Leipzig 1862–1869).</ref> In 1938 ], the use of this convention was also prescribed by the ].<ref>{{cite web |page=149 |first=Karl Ludwig Freiherr |last=von und zu Guttenberg |author-link=Karl Ludwig Freiherr von und zu Guttenberg |url=http://www.monarchieforum.org/ARCHIV/WeisseBlaetter/MAI1938.pdf |date=May 1938 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120119145938/http://www.monarchieforum.org/ARCHIV/WeisseBlaetter/MAI1938.pdf |archive-date=19 January 2012 |title=Weiße Blätter: Monatschrift für Geschichte, Tradition u. Staat |access-date=15 April 2018 }}</ref> However, it was soon discovered that many German Jews had been using the convention ever since the 18th century, and ] found it ironic to see "]s following Jewish example nearly 200 years later".<ref name="Jewish Joke">{{cite magazine |url=http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,759195,00.html |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100717061654/http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,759195,00.html |url-status=dead |archive-date=17 July 2010 |title=GERMANY: Jewish Joke |date=7 March 1938|access-date=5 February 2012 |magazine=Time}}</ref> | |||
and also refers to the ''common era'' as a synonym for ''vulgar era'' with "the fact that our Lord was born on the 4th year before the vulgar era, called Anno Domini, thus making (for example) the 42d year from his birth to correspond with the 38th of the common era..."<ref> | |||
* In ], common forms used for "BC" are {{Lang|es|a. C.}} and {{Lang|es|a. de C.}} (for "{{Lang|es|antes de Cristo}}", "before Christ"), with variations in punctuation and sometimes the use of {{Lang|es|J. C.}} ({{Lang|es|Jesucristo}}) instead of {{Lang|es|C}}. The {{Lang|es|]|italic=no}} also acknowledges the use of {{Lang|es|a. n. e.}} ({{Langx|es|antes de nuestra era|lit=before our era|label=none}}) and {{lang|es|d. n. e.}} ({{Langx|es|después de nuestra era|lit=after our era|label=none}}).<ref name="RAE">{{cite book |title=Ortografía de la lengua española |date=2010 |publisher=Real Academia Española y Asociación de Academias de la Lengua Española |page=695 |edition=online |url=http://aplica.rae.es/orweb/cgi-bin/z.cgi?t=4852746440070813319661357&s=2 |language=es}}</ref> In scholarly writing, {{Lang|es|a. e. c.}} is the equivalent of the English "BCE", "{{Lang|es|antes de la era común}}" or "Before the Common Era".<ref>{{cite web |url=http://spanish.about.com/od/writtenspanish/qt/dates.htm |title=Writing Dates in Spanish |access-date=5 February 2012 |archive-date=11 November 2011 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20111111060109/http://spanish.about.com/od/writtenspanish/qt/dates.htm |url-status=dead }}</ref> | |||
{{cite book |url=http://www.mun.ca/rels/restmov/texts/acampbell/tlo4/TLO400L3.HTM |title=The Living Oracles, Fourth Edition |year=1835 |author=] |pages=15–16 |accessdate=2011-05-18}} | |||
* In ], OC can be expanded to equivalents of both AD ({{lang|cy|Oed Crist}}) and CE ({{lang|cy|Oes Cyffredin}}); for dates before the Common Era, CC (traditionally, {{lang|cy|Cyn Crist}}) is used exclusively, as {{lang|cy|Cyn yr Oes Cyffredin}} would abbreviate to a mild obscenity.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?A2=welsh-termau-cymraeg;982a203b.0610 |title=Welsh-Termau-Cymraeg Archives |language=cy |publisher=JISCMail |date=19 October 2006 |access-date=29 February 2012}}</ref> {{Better source needed|date=June 2020}} | |||
* In ] since the ] (1917) {{lang|ru|до н.э. (до нашей эры}}, lit. ''before our era'') and {{lang|ru|н.э. (нашей эры,}} lit. ''of our era'') are used almost universally. Within Christian churches {{lang|ru|до Р.Х./от Р.Х. (до/от Рождества Христова}}, i.e. ''before/after the birth of Christ'', equivalent to {{langx|la|]}}) remains in use. | |||
* In ], "p.n.e." ({{lang|pl|przed naszą erą}}, lit. ''before our era'') and "n.e." ({{lang|pl|naszej ery}}, lit. ''of our era'') are commonly used in historical and scientific literature. {{lang|pl|Przed Chrystusem}} (''before Christ'') and {{lang|pl|po Chrystusie}} (''after Christ'') see sporadic usage, mostly in religious publications. | |||
*In ], upon the foundation of the ], the ] adopted the ] with 1912 designated as year 1, but used the Western calendar for international purposes. The translated term was {{lang-zh|西元}} ({{lang|zh|xī yuán}}, "Western Era"), which is still used in ] in formal documents. In 1949, the ] adopted {{lang|zh|公元}} ({{lang|zh|gōngyuán}}, "Common Era") for both internal and external affairs in ]. This notation was extended to Hong Kong in 1997 and Macau in 1999 (de facto extended in 1966) through Annex III of ] and ], thus eliminating the ROC calendar in these areas. BCE is translated into Chinese as {{lang|zh|公元前}} ({{lang|zh|gōngyuánqián}}, "Before the Common Era"). | |||
* In ], the "n. l." ({{lang|cs|našeho letopočtu}} which translates as ''of our year count'') and "př. n. l." or "před n. l." ({{lang|cs|před naším letopočtem}} meaning ''before our year count'') is used, always after the year number. The direct translation of AD ({{lang|cs|léta Páně}}, abbreviated as ''L. P.'') or BC ({{lang|cs|před Kristem}}, abbreviated as ''př. Kr.'') is seen as archaic.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://prirucka.ujc.cas.cz/?id=780|title=Jazyková příručka Ústavu pro jazyk český|access-date=15 May 2020}}</ref> | |||
*In ] the common form used for ''BC'' and ''AD'' are ''pr. Kr.'' (''prije Krista'', "before Christ")<ref>{{Cite web|title=pr. Kr. |website=Hrvatski jezični portal|url=http://hjp.znanje.hr/index.php?show=search_by_id&id=dl9nXRQ=|access-date=16 March 2021}}</ref> and ''p. Kr.'' (''poslije Krista'', ''after Christ'').<ref>{{Cite web|website=Hrvatski jezični portal|url=http://hjp.znanje.hr/index.php?show=search_by_id&id=eV1lWBA=|access-date=16 March 2021|title=p. Kr.}}</ref> The abbreviations ''pr. n. e.'' (''prije nove ere, before new era'')<ref>{{Cite web|title=pr. n. e. |website=Hrvatski jezični portal|url=http://hjp.znanje.hr/index.php?show=search_by_id&id=dl9nXxQ=|access-date=16 March 2021}}</ref> and ''n. e. (nove ere, (of the) new era'')<ref>{{Cite web|title=n. e. |website=Hrvatski jezični portal|url=http://hjp.znanje.hr/index.php?show=search_by_id&id=eF9iXRY=|access-date=16 March 2021}}</ref> have also recently been introduced. | |||
* In ], "f.v.t." ({{lang|da|før vor tidsregning}}, ''before our time reckoning'') and "e.v.t." ({{lang|da|efter vor tidsregning}}, ''after our time reckoning'') are used as BCE/CE are in English. Also commonly used are "f.Kr." ({{lang|da|før Kristus}}, ''before Christ'') and "e.Kr." ({{lang|da|efter Kristus}}, ''after Christ''), which are both placed after the year number in contrast with BC/AD in English. | |||
* In ], the terms "п.н.е." (пред нашата ера "before our era") and "н.е." (наша ера "our era") are used in every aspect.{{cn|date=March 2023}} | |||
* In ], "e.m.a." ({{lang|et|enne meie ajaarvamist}}, ''before our time reckoning'') and "m.a.j." ({{lang|et|meie ajaarvamise järgi}}, ''according to our time reckoning'') are used as BCE and CE, respectively. Also in use are terms "eKr" ({{lang|et|enne Kristust}}, ''before Christ'') and "pKr" ({{lang|et|pärast Kristust}}, ''after Christ''). In all cases, the abbreviation is written after the year number. | |||
* In ], "eaa." ({{lang|fi|ennen ajanlaskun alkua}}, ''before time reckoning'') and "jaa." ({{lang|fi|jälkeen ajanlaskun alun}}, ''after the start of time reckoning'') are used as BCE and CE, respectively. Also (decreasingly) in use are terms "eKr", ({{lang|fi|ennen Kristusta}}, ''before Christ'') and "jKr". ({{lang|fi|jälkeen Kristuksen}}, ''after Christ''). In all cases, the abbreviation is written after the year number. | |||
== See also == | |||
</ref> | |||
{{Portal|History}} | |||
The '']'' (1909) used the terms "Christian, Vulgar or Common Era" interchangeably.<ref>"Foremost among these is that which is now adopted by all civilized peoples and known as the Christian, Vulgar or Common Era, in the twentieth century of which we are now living".</ref> | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
The phrase "common era", in ], also appeared in the 19th century in a ''generic'' sense, not necessarily to refer to the Christian Era, but to any system of dates in common use throughout a civilization. Thus, "the common era of the Jews",<ref> | |||
{{cite book |url=https://books.google.com/?id=GMfyJ2PeD-cC&q=%22common+era+of+the+jews%22 |title="common era of the Jews" (1874) |quote=the common era of the Jews places the creation in BC 3760 |author1=Encyclopedia, Popular |year=1874 |accessdate=2011-05-18}} | |||
{{cite book |title=Conversations Lexicon |work=The Popular Encyclopedia |publisher=Oxford University Press |editor=]|year=1874 |page=207 |volume=V}} | |||
</ref><ref> | |||
{{cite book |url=https://books.google.com/?id=e6oCAAAAQAAJ&pg=PA176&dq=%22common+era+of+the+jews%22 |title="common era of the Jews" (1858) |quote=Hence the present year, 1858, in the common era of the Jews, is AM 5618-5619, a difference of more than 200 years from our commonly-received chronology. |publisher=Wertheim, MacIntosh & Hunt |year=1858 |accessdate=2011-05-18}} | |||
{{cite book |title=The first and second Advent: or, The past and the future with reference to the Jew, the Gentile, and the Church of God |author=Rev. Bourchier Wrey Savile, MA |year=1858 |page=176 |publisher=Wertheim, Macintosh and Hunt |location=London}} | |||
</ref> | |||
"the common era of the Mahometans",<ref> | |||
{{cite book |url=https://books.google.com/?id=4WEBAAAAQAAJ&dq=%22common+era+of+the%22&q=%22common+era+of+the+Mahometans%22 |title="common era of the Mahometans" (1856) |quote=Its epoch is the first of March old style. The common era of the Mahometans, as has already been stated, is that of the flight of Mahomet. |author1=Gumpach, Johannes von |year=1856 |accessdate=2011-05-18}} | |||
{{cite book |year=1856 |title=Practical tables for the reduction of Mahometan dates to the Christian calendar |page=4 |author=Johannes von Gumpach |publisher=Oxford University}} | |||
</ref> | |||
"common era of the world",<ref> | |||
{{cite book | |||
|url=https://books.google.com/?id=bXIAAAAAMAAJ&pg=PA354&dq=%22common+era+of+the%22 | |||
|title="common era of the world" (1801) | |||
|publisher=F. and C. Rivington | |||
|author1=Jones, William | |||
|year=1801 | |||
|accessdate=2011-05-18}} | |||
{{cite book | |||
|title=The Theological, Philosophical and Miscellaneous Works of the Rev. William Jones | |||
|first=William|last=Jones | |||
|year=1801 | |||
|location=London|publisher=Rivington}} | |||
</ref> | |||
"the common era of the foundation of Rome".<ref> | |||
{{cite book |url=https://books.google.com/?id=6FKHIeUQ2J0C&pg=PA284&dq=%22common+era+of+the+foundation+of+rome%22 |title="common era of the foundation of Rome" (1854) |author1=Alexander Fraser Tytler, HON |year=1854 |accessdate=2011-05-18}} | |||
{{cite book |title=Universal History: From the Creation of the World to the Beginning of the Eighteenth Century |author=], Lord Woodhouselee |publisher=Fetridge and Company |location=Boston |year=1854 |page=284}} | |||
</ref> | |||
When it did refer to the Christian Era, it was sometimes qualified, e.g., "common era of the Incarnation",<ref> | |||
{{cite book | |||
|url=https://books.google.com/?id=HKgMAAAAYAAJ&pg=PA711&dq=%22common+era+of+the+incarnation%22 | |||
|title="common era of the Incarnation" (1833) | |||
|publisher=A. & C. Black | |||
|author1=Baynes, Thomas Spencer | |||
|year=1833 | |||
|accessdate=2011-05-18}} | |||
{{cite book |title=The Encyclopaedia Britannica: A Dictionary of Arts, Sciences, and General Literature |location=New York |publisher=Henry G. Allen and Company |year=1833 |edition=9 |volume=V |page=711}} | |||
</ref> | |||
"common era of the Nativity",<ref> | |||
{{cite book |url=https://books.google.com/?id=um44AAAAMAAJ&dq=%22common+era+of+the+Nativity%22&q=%22common+era%22+%22of+the+Nativity%22 |title="common era" "of the Nativity" (1864) |quote=It should be observed, however, that these years correspond to 492 and 493, a portion of the annals of Ulster being counted from the Incarnation, and being, therefore, one year before the common era of the Nativity of our Lord. |publisher=Hodges, Smith & co. |author1=Todd, James Henthorn |year=1864 |accessdate=2011-05-18}} | |||
{{cite book |title=St. Patrick, Apostle of Ireland, A Memoir of his Life and Mission |author=] |year=1864 |pages=495, 496, 497 |publisher=Hodges, Smith & Co, Publishers to the University |location=Dublin}} | |||
</ref> | |||
or "common era of the birth of Christ".<ref> | |||
{{cite book | |||
|url=https://books.google.com/?id=PGdCAAAAIAAJ&pg=PR16&dq=%22common+era+of+the%22 | |||
|title="common era of the birth of Christ" (1812) | |||
|publisher=printed by A.J. Valpy for T. Payne | |||
|year=1812 | |||
|accessdate=2011-05-18}} | |||
{{cite book | |||
|title=Annotations on the Four Gospels and the Acts of the Apostles (2nd edition) | |||
|author=Heneage Elsley | |||
|year=1812 | |||
|edition=2nd | |||
|publisher=A. J. Valpy for T. Payne | |||
|location=London | |||
|page=xvi | |||
|nopp=true}}</ref> | |||
An adapted translation of ''Common Era'' into pseudo-Latin as ''Era Vulgaris'' (in Latin this means ''Common Mistress'')<ref>C.f. every good Latin dictionary, e.g., , , , or </ref> was adopted in the 20th century by some followers of ], and thus the abbreviation "e.v." or "EV" may sometimes be seen as a replacement for AD.<ref> | |||
{{cite web |url=http://www.thelema101.com/calendar |title=What is Thelema? | accessdate=2011-05-18}}</ref> | |||
===History of the use of the CE/BCE abbreviation=== | |||
Although Jews have their own ], they often use the Gregorian calendar.<ref>{{cite web | quote=Jews do not generally use the words "A.D." and "B.C." to refer to the years on the Gregorian calendar. "A.D." means "the year of our ]," and we do not believe Jesus is the L-rd. Instead, we use the abbreviations C.E. (Common or Christian Era) and B.C.E. (Before the Common Era). | author=Tracey R Rich | url=http://www.jewfaq.org/calendar.htm#Years | title=Judaism 101 | accessdate=2011-05-18}}</ref> | |||
As early as 1825, the abbreviation VE (for Vulgar Era) was in use among Jews to denote years in the Western calendar.<ref> | |||
{{cite web |url=http://www.jewishgen.org/jcr-uk/susser/plymouthinscriptions.htm |title=Plymouth, England Tombstone inscriptions |publisher=Jewish Communities & Records |quote=Here is buried his honour Judah ben his honour Joseph, a prince and honoured amongst philanthropists, who executed good deeds, died in his house in the City of Bath, Tuesday, and was buried here on Sunday, 19 Sivan in the year 5585. In memory of Lyon Joseph Esq (merchant of Falmouth, Cornwall). who died at Bath June AM 5585/VE 1825. Beloved and respected. |accessdate=2011-05-18}} | |||
<br />] is June 5, 1825. VE is likely an abbreviation for ''Vulgar Era''.]</ref> | |||
Common Era notation has also been in use for Hebrew lessons for "more than a century".<ref name=Gormley /> | |||
Some Jewish academics were already using the ''CE'' and ''BCE'' abbreviations by the mid-19th century, such as in 1856, when Rabbi and historian ] used the abbreviation in his book ''Post-Biblical History of The Jews''.<ref>Raphall, Morris Jacob (1856). Post-Biblical History of The Jews. Retrieved from https://books.google.com/books?id=r7CbDH5hTe8C&printsec=frontcover&dq=CE+BCE.</ref>{{efn|The term ''common era'' does not appear in this book; the term ''Christian era'' does appear a number of times. Nowhere in the book is the abbreviation explained or expanded directly. | |||
<ref>{{cite book |url=https://books.google.com/?id=r7CbDH5hTe8C&pg=PA75&vq=era |title=Search for ''era'' in this book. |publisher=Moss & Brother |author1=Raphall, Morris Jacob |year=1856 |accessdate=2011-05-18}}</ref>}} | |||
The ratio of usage of BCE to BC,<ref>{{cite web |url=https://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=BC%2CBCE&year_start=1800&year_end=2000&corpus=15&smoothing=3|title=Google Ngram Viewer |accessdate=2012-02-26}} | |||
</ref> | |||
CE to AD,<ref>{{cite web |url=https://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=CE%2CAD&year_start=1800&year_end=2000&corpus=15&smoothing=3 |title=Google Ngram Viewer |accessdate=2012-02-26}} | |||
</ref> | |||
Common Era to ''Anno Domini'',<ref>{{cite book |url=https://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=Anno+Domini%2CCommon+Era%2CChristian+Era%2CCurrent+Era%2Canno+domini&year_start=1800&year_end=2008&corpus=0&smoothing=3 |title=Google Ngram Viewer |accessdate=2012-02-26}} | |||
</ref> | |||
and Before Common Era to Before Christ<ref>{{cite book |url=https://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=Before+Christ%2CBefore+the+Common+Era%2CBefore+Common+Era%2CBefore+the+Christian+Era%2CBefore+the+Current+Era&year_start=1800&year_end=2008&corpus=0&smoothing=3 |title=Google Ngram Viewer |accessdate=2012-02-26}} | |||
</ref> | |||
in books has changed dramatically between the years 1800 and 2008, particularly since 1980, with the CE-related variants increasing in usage. | |||
==Contemporary usage== | |||
Some academics in the fields of ], ] and ] have adopted CE and BCE notation, although there is some disagreement.<ref>See, for example, the Society for Historical Archaeology states in its more recent style guide "Do not use C.E. (current era) ... or B.C.E.; convert these expressions to A.D. and B.C.", {{cite web |url=http://www.sha.org/publications/style_guide.htm#V-d |title=Style Guide |author=Society for Historical Archaeology |date=December 2006 |archiveurl = https://web.archive.org/web/20070618004627/http://www.sha.org/publications/style_guide.htm#V-d <!-- Bot retrieved archive --> | archivedate=2007-06-18 | accessdate=2011-05-18}} whereas the ] style guide takes a different approach calling for "C.E." and "B.C.E." {{cite web |url=http://www.aaanet.org/publications/guidelines.cfm |title=AAA Style Guide |format=PDF |author=American Anthropological Society |date=2009 |accessdate=2015-05-26 |page=3}} | |||
</ref> | |||
More visible uses of Common Era notation have recently surfaced at major museums in the English-speaking world: The ] prefers Common Era usage, though individual museums are not required to use it.<ref> | |||
{{cite web |url=http://www.smithsonianeducation.org/educators/field_trips/standards/world_history_standards.html |title=World History Standards |accessdate=2006-09-09 |author=Smithsonian Institution |work=Smithsonian Education |archiveurl = http://classic-web.archive.org/web/20070928000917/http://www.smithsonianeducation.org/educators/field_trips/standards/world_history_standards.html <!-- Bot retrieved archive --> |archivedate =2006-09-06}} | |||
</ref> | |||
Furthermore, several style guides now prefer or mandate its usage.<ref>{{cite journal|url=http://www.egyptstudy.org/ostracon/guidelines.html |journal=The Ostracon – Journal of the Egyptian Studies Society |title=Submission Guidelines for ''The Ostracon'' |quote=For dates, please use the now-standard "BCE–CE" notation, rather than "BC–AD." Authors with strong religious preferences may use "BC–AD," however. |accessdate=2011-05-18 |deadurl=yes |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20070612143226/http://www.egyptstudy.org/ostracon/guidelines.html |archivedate=June 12, 2007 }}</ref> | |||
Even some style guides for Christian churches prefer its use: for example, the Episcopal Diocese ''Maryland Church News''.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.ang-md.org/mcn/style_guide.pdf |title=Maryland Church News Submission Guide & Style Manual |work=Maryland Church News |format=PDF |date=1 April 2005 |accessdate=2011-05-18}}{{dead link|date=January 2016}}</ref> | |||
In the United States, the usage of the BCE/CE notation in ]s is growing.<ref name=Gormley /> Some publications have moved over to using it exclusively. For example, the 2007 World Almanac was the first edition to switch over to the BCE/CE usage, ending a 138-year usage of the traditional BC/AD dating notation. It is used by the ] in its history tests,<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.collegeboard.com/student/testing/ap/history_world/topic.html?worldhist |title=AP: World History |accessdate=2011-05-18}} | |||
</ref> | |||
and by the ]. | |||
Others have taken a different approach. The US-based ] uses BCE/CE notation in articles on non-Christian religious topics such as ].<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.history.com/topics/jerusalem |title=Jerusalem Timeline |publisher=History Channel |accessdate=2011-05-18 |deadurl=yes |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20110520111303/http://www.history.com/topics/jerusalem |archivedate=May 20, 2011 }};{{cite web |url=http://www.history.com/topics/jerusalem |title=Jerusalem: Biographies |publisher=History Channel |accessdate=2011-05-18}} | |||
</ref> | |||
In 2002, ] introduced the BCE/CE notation system into the official school curriculum.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/news/article-531644-ad-and-bc-become-cebce.do |title=AD and BC become CE/BCE |date=9 February 2002 |accessdate=2012-02-05 |deadurl=yes |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20111220120909/http://www.thisislondon.co.uk:80/news/article-531644-ad-and-bc-become-cebce.do |archivedate=December 20, 2011 }} | |||
</ref> | |||
In June 2006, in the United States, the Kentucky State School Board reversed its decision that would have included the designations BCE and CE as part of state law, leaving education of students about these concepts a matter of discretion at the local level.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.tffky.org/articles/Press%20Releases/prs%2006-14-06%20MC.html |title=State School Board reverses itself on B.C./A.D. controversy |publisher=Family Foundation of Kentucky |accessdate=2011-05-18 |deadurl=yes |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20110427032052/http://www.tffky.org/articles/Press%20Releases/prs%2006-14-06%20MC.html |archivedate=April 27, 2011 }} | |||
</ref><ref> | |||
{{cite web |url=http://legacy.kctcs.edu/todaysnews/index.cfm?tn_date=2006-06-16#5119 |title=School board keeps traditional historic designations |author=Joe Biesk |publisher=Louisville Courier-Journal |date=15 June 2006 |accessdate=2011-05-18}} | |||
</ref><ref> | |||
{{cite web |url=http://cpe.ky.gov/NR/rdonlyres/5F08162C-899F-47FE-9367-1DDD82DE74E6/0/6_CommissionerofEdReport.pdf |title=Kentucky Board of Education Report |publisher=Kentucky Board of Education Report |date=10 June 2006 |format=PDF |accessdate=2011-05-18}}</ref> | |||
Also in 2011, media reports suggested that the BC/AD notation in Australian school textbooks would be replaced by BCE/CE notation.<ref>{{cite news |url=http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2033225/Australia-goes-PC-ban-BC-Birth-Jesus-removed-reference-point-dates-school-history-books.html |title=Australia goes all PC with a ban on BC: Birth of Jesus to be removed as reference point for dates in school history books |date=2 September 2011|accessdate=2012-02-05 |location=London |work=Daily Mail}}</ref> The story became national news and drew opposition from some politicians and church leaders. Weeks after the story broke, the ] denied the rumour and stated that the BC/AD notation would remain, with CE and BCE as an optional suggested learning activity.<ref>{{cite news |url=http://www.theage.com.au/national/adbc-rock-solid-in-curriculum-20111020-1mab2.html |title=AD/BC rock solid in curriculum |date=21 October 2011|accessdate=2012-03-04 |location=Melbourne |work=The Age}}</ref> | |||
==Rationale== | |||
===Support=== | |||
] journal, '']'', published in ], ] (1883-1907), used the term Common Era to mark the year of publication.]] | |||
The use of CE in Jewish scholarship was historically motivated by the desire to avoid the implicit "Our Lord" in the abbreviation ''AD''.{{citation needed|date=October 2015}} Although other aspects of dating systems are based in Christian origins, AD is a direct reference to Jesus as Lord.<ref>{{cite book|title=The American and English Encyclopedia of Law and Practice|year=1910|page=1116|quote=It has been said of the Latin words anno Domini, meaning in the year of our Lord }}</ref><ref>{{cite book|title=World Religions At Your Fingertips|author=Michael McDowell, Nathan Robert Brown|publisher=Penguin|year=2009|isbn=9781101014691|page=38|quote=Marked by the turn of the Common Era, C.E., originally referred to as A.D., an abbreviation of the Latin ''Anno Domini'', meaning "Year of our God/Lord." This was a shortening of ''Anno Domini Nostri Jesu Christi'', meaning "Year of our God/Lord Jesus Christ."}}</ref> | |||
Proponents of the Common Era notation assert that the use of BCE/CE shows sensitivity to those who use the same year numbering system as the one that originated with and is currently used by ], but who are not themselves Christian.<ref name="RelTolrnc | |||
"/> | |||
In the 19th century, an ] journal, '']'', published in ], ] (1883-1907), used the term Common Era to mark the year of publication.<ref>Lucifer Whole No.716. Anarchy Archives. Retrieved from http://dwardmac.pitzer.edu/Anarchist_Archives/coldoffthepresses/lucifer716/index.html.</ref> | |||
Former United Nations Secretary-General ], himself a ],<ref name="kofifaith">{{Cite news|last=Lefevere |first=Patricia |title=Annan: 'Peace is never a perfect achievement' – United Nations Secretary General Kofi Annan |publisher=National Catholic Reporter |date=1998-12-11 |url=http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m1141/is_7_35/ai_53460476 |accessdate=2008-02-26}}{{dead link|date=January 2016}}</ref> has argued: | |||
<blockquote>he Christian calendar no longer belongs exclusively to Christians. People of all faiths have taken to using it simply as a matter of convenience. There is so much interaction between people of different faiths and cultures – different civilizations, if you like – that some shared way of reckoning time is a necessity. And so the Christian Era has become the Common Era.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.un.org/News/ossg/sg/stories/articleFull.asp?TID=37 |title=Common values for a common era: Even as we cherish our diversity, we need to discover our shared values |author=Annan, Kofi A., (then Secretary-General of the United Nations) |date=28 June 1999 |publisher=Civilization: The Magazine of the Library of Congress |accessdate=2011-05-18 |deadurl=yes |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20110501020027/http://www.un.org/News/ossg/sg/stories/articleFull.asp?TID=37 |archivedate=May 1, 2011 }}</ref></blockquote> | |||
The labels ''Anno Domini'' and "Before Christ" as such are arguably inaccurate, since the ] is generally considered to fall somewhere between 6 and 4 BC. | |||
===Opposition=== | |||
Some oppose the Common Era notation for explicitly religious reasons. Because the BC/AD notation is based on the traditional year of the conception or birth of Jesus, removing reference to him in era notation is offensive to some Christians.<ref> | |||
{{cite news | |||
|url=http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qn4188/is_20061202/ai_n16891064 | |||
|last=Whitney |first=Susan | |||
|title=Altering history? Changes have some asking 'Before what?' | |||
|publisher=The Deseret News | |||
|date=2 December 2006 | |||
|quote=I find this attempt to restructure history offensive," Lori Weintz wrote, in a letter to National Geographic publishers.... The forward to your book says B.C. and A.D. were removed so as to 'not impose the standards of one culture on others.'... It's 2006 this year for anyone on Earth that is participating in day-to-day world commerce and communication. Two thousand six years since what? Most people know, regardless of their belief system, and aren't offended by a historical fact. | |||
|accessdate=2011-05-18}}{{dead link|date=January 2016}}</ref> | |||
The ] supports retaining the BC/AD abbreviations as "a reminder of the preeminence of Christ and His gospel in world history".<ref name=SBC /> The Convention has criticized the use of BCE and CE as being the result of "secularization, anti-supernaturalism, religious pluralism, and political correctness" and encourages its members to "retain the traditional method of dating and avoid this revisionism".<ref name=SBC /> | |||
There are also secular concerns. English language expert ] speculated in his style guide that "if we do end by casting aside the A.D./B.C. convention, almost certainly some will argue that we ought to cast aside as well the conventional numbering system itself, given its Christian basis."<ref name=Wilson /> The short lived ], for example, began with the first year of the ] and rejected the seven-day week (with its connections to the ]) for a ten-day week. | |||
Astrobiologist ] argues further that if one is going to replace BC/AD with BCE/CE then one should reject all aspects of the dating system (including time of day, days of the week and months of the year), as they all have origins related to pagan, astrological, Jewish, or Christian beliefs. He rejects secular arguments against Christian-based BC/AD as selective. Steel makes note of the consistency of the ] (now rarely used), which removed all such references.<ref name=Steel> | |||
{{Cite book | |||
|url=https://books.google.com/?id=fsni_qV-FJoC&pg=PA111#v=onepage&q= | |||
|title=Marking time: the epic quest to invent the perfect calendar |year=1999 |page=111 |last1=Steel |first1=Duncan | |||
|publisher=John Wiley and Sons | |||
|isbn=978-0-471-29827-4 | |||
|postscript=<!--None--> | |||
|accessdate=2011-05-18}} | |||
</ref> | |||
Anthropologist ] argues that the substitution of BCE/CE for BC/AD is merely a ] that conceals the political implications without modifying the actual source of contention.<ref name=Delaney2004> | |||
{{cite book | |||
|url=https://books.google.com/?id=ETOrkt7DeN0C&pg=PA86&lpg=PA86&dq=common+era+euphemism | |||
|title=Investigating Culture: An Experiential Introduction to Anthropology | |||
|page=86 |year=2004 | |||
|first=Carol Lowery |last=Delaney |authorlink=Carol Delaney | |||
|publisher=Blackwell Publishing | |||
|isbn=0-631-22237-5 | |||
|quote=I find CE a euphemism because the common era still begins with Christ's birth and, thus, conceals the political implications. | |||
|accessdate=2011-05-18}} | |||
</ref><ref name=Delaney1998> | |||
{{cite book | |||
|url=https://books.google.com/?id=x8woAhT3jKAC&pg=PA267&dq=%22common+era%22+euphemism | |||
|title=Abraham on Trial: The Social Legacy of Biblical Myth | |||
|year=1998 | |||
|author=Carol Lowery Delaney | |||
|page=267 | |||
|publisher=Princeton University Press | |||
|isbn=0-691-07050-4 | |||
|accessdate=2011-05-18 }}</ref> | |||
Priest and writer on interfaith issues ] contends that using the designation BCE/CE is a "return... to the most bigoted Christian colonialism" towards non-Christians, who do not necessarily consider the time period following the beginning of the calendar to be a "common era".<ref name=Panikkar> | |||
{{Cite journal | |||
|url=https://books.google.com/?id=9-vYAAAAMAAJ&dq=Panikkar,+Raimon+(2004).+Christophany:+The+Fullness+of+Man. | |||
|last= Panikkar |first=Raimon |authorlink=Raimon Panikkar |title=Christophany: The Fullness of Man |location=Maryville, NY |publisher=Orbis Books |year=2004 |page=173 | |||
|quote=Here is an example of the incarnation's historical-sociological implications among those who feel themselves furthest from Christianity. In certain North American academic circles one can see a return-with repercussions elsewhere-to the most bigoted Christian colonialism, along with the good intention of overcoming it. It has been suggested that the terminology of the Western calendar, Christian in origin, be replaced by one that presumably would be neutral and universal. It is understandable that some would protest the use of A.D. (anno Domini), but by eliminating B.C. (before Christ) and substituting B.C.E. (Before the Common Era) scholars betray the depths of the cultural impact of the historico-Christian event. After all, Jesus was not born in the year 1. We select a single event but without any value judgment. To call our age "the Common Era," even though for the Jews, the Chinese, the Tamil, the Muslims, and many others it is not a common era, constitutes the acme of colonialism. | |||
|accessdate=2011-05-18 | |||
|isbn=978-1-57075-564-4}}</ref> | |||
Some critics assert that the use of identifiers which have common spellings is more ambiguous than the use of identifiers with divergent spellings. Both CE and BCE have in common the letters "CE", which is more likely to cause confusion, they claim, than identifiers with clearly different spelling.<ref name=RelTolrnc/> | |||
According to a '']'' report, it was a student's use of BCE/CE notation, inspired by its use within ], which prompted the history teacher ] to found ], a ] ].<ref> | |||
{{cite news | |||
|last=Simon |first=Stephanie |title=A conservative's answer to Misplaced Pages | |||
|url=http://articles.latimes.com/2007/jun/19/nation/na-schlafly19 |date=22 June 2007 |work=Los Angeles Times |accessdate=2011-05-18}} | |||
</ref> | |||
One of its "Conservapedia Commandments" is that users must always apply BC/AD notation, since its sponsors perceive BCE/CE notation to "deny the historical basis" of the dating system.<ref> at Conservapedia</ref> | |||
==Conventions in style guides== | |||
The abbreviation BCE, just as with BC, always follows the year number. Unlike AD, which traditionally precedes the year number, CE always follows the year number (if context requires that it be written at all).<ref name=Wilson /> | |||
Thus, the current year is written as {{CURRENTYEAR}} in both notations (or, if further clarity is needed, as {{CURRENTYEAR}} CE, or as AD {{CURRENTYEAR}}), and the year that ] died is represented as 399 BCE (the same year that is represented by 399 BC in the BC/AD notation). The abbreviations are sometimes written with small capital letters, or with ] (e.g., "<span style="font-size:87%;">BCE</span>" or "C.E.").<ref> | |||
{{cite web |url=http://www.chicagomanualofstyle.org/about15_rules.html |title=Major Rule Changes in The Chicago Manual of Style, Fifteenth Edition |year=2003 |publisher=University of Chicago Press |quote=Certain abbreviations traditionally set in small caps are now in full caps (AD, BCE, and the like), with small caps an option. | archiveurl = https://web.archive.org/web/20070909071543/http://www.chicagomanualofstyle.org/about15_rules.html|archivedate=9 September 2007|accessdate=26 May 2015}}</ref> Style guides for academic texts on religion generally prefer BCE/CE to BC/AD.<ref>''SBL Handbook of Style'' ] 1999 "8.1.2 ERAS - The preferred style is B.C.E. and C.E. (with periods). If you use A.D. and B.C., remember that A.D. precedes the date and B.C. follows it. (For the use of these abbreviations in titles, see §7.1.3.2.)"</ref> | |||
The terms "Common Era", "''Anno Domini''", "Before the Common Era", and "Before Christ" in contemporary English can be applied to dates that rely on either the ] or the Gregorian calendar. | |||
Modern dates are understood in the ] to be in the Gregorian calendar, but for older dates writers can specify the calendar used. Dates in the Gregorian calendar in the Western world have always used the era designated in English as ''Anno Domini'' or ''Common Era''. | |||
==Similar conventions in other languages== | |||
{{refimprove section|date=February 2012}} | |||
Several languages other than English also have both religious and non-religious ways of identifying the era used in dates. In some ]s during the ] period, usage of non-religious notation was mandated. | |||
* In ], the abbreviations "E.C." ("Era Comum", Common Era) and "A.E.C." ("Antes da Era Comum", Before Common Era) is generally used. | |||
* In ], بعد الميلاد (After the Birth) corresponds to CE, while قبل الميلاد (Before the Birth) corresponds to BCE. The "Birth" referenced is that of Jesus. This system is in widespread use in all Arab countries, but is accompanied by the ] system. Dates are often given in both in that order. In Saudi Arabia, however, the Hijri system is predominant. | |||
* In the Chinese language, common era (公元, gong yuan) has been predominantly used to refer to the western calendar without any religious connotation. | |||
* In ], ''př.Kr.'' (''před Kristem'') and ''l.P.'' (''léta Páně'') were partially replaced (especially ''l.P.'', being in conflict with ], remaining mostly on signs and cover art, used similary to est.) by ''př.n.l.'' and ''n.l.'', meaning ''před naším letopočtem'' and ''našeho letopočtu'', literally "before / of our year numbering"). ] has the ending ''-om'' instead of ''-em'' and unaccented ''leta'' and ''pred'', allowing use of the same abbreviations. | |||
* In ], the terms ''f.Kr.'' (''før Kristus'', before Christ) and ''e.Kr.'' (''efter Kristus'', after Christ) have traditionally been used. They are now in free variation with ''f.v.t.'' and ''e.v.t.'' (''før/efter vor tidsregning'', before/after our chronology). | |||
* In ] the terms ''v.Chr.'' (''voor Christus'', before Christ) and ''n.Chr.'' (''na Christus'', after Christ) have traditionally been used. There are alternatives ''v.g.j.'' and ''g.j.'' ('' gangbare/gewone jaartelling'', conventional/ordinary chronology), ''v.o.j.'' and ''n.o.j.'' (''vóór/na onze jaartelling'', before/after our chronology) and ''v.d.g.j.'' and ''n.d.g.j.'' (''vóór/na de gewone jaartelling'', before/after the ordinary chronology), but there is still no generally accepted alternative for the Christian notation. The notation v.Chr./n.Chr. remains generally used by the media and scientists. | |||
* In ], the terms ''eKr.'' (''ennen Kristusta'', before Christ) and ''jKr.'' (''jälkeen Kristuksen'', after Christ) were largely used until the 1980s but have been mostly replaced during the last couple of decades with terms ''eaa.'' (''ennen ajanlaskun alkua'', before start of chronology) and ''jaa.'' (''jälkeen ajanlaskun alun'', after start of chronology). | |||
* In ], Jews in ] seem to have already been using "(Before the) Common Era" in the 18th century, while others like ] opposed this usage as it would hinder the integration of Jews into German society.<ref name="Jewish Joke"/> The formulation seems to have persisted among German Jews in the 19th century in forms like ''vor der gewöhnlichen Zeitrechnung'' (before the common chronology.<ref>''Allgemeine Zeitung des Judenthums. Ein unpartheiisches Organ für alles jüdische Interesse'', II. Jahrgang, No. 60, Leipzig, 19. Mai 1838 (19 May 1838). See page 175 in (Leipzig 1838).</ref><ref>{{aut|]}}, ''Geschichte des Karäerthums von 900 bis 1575 der gewöhnlichen Zeitrechnung'' (Leipzig 1862-1869).</ref> | |||
In 1938 ], the use of this convention was also prescribed by the ].<ref>See page 149 in ] issue </ref> | |||
However, it was soon discovered that many German Jews had been using the convention ever since the 18th century, and they found it ironic to see "]s following Jewish example nearly 200 years later".<ref name="Jewish Joke">{{cite news |url=http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,759195,00.html |title=GERMANY: Jewish Joke |date=7 March 1938|accessdate=2012-02-05 |work=Time}}</ref> | |||
The ] (1949-1990) introduced the convention of ''v. u. Z.'' (''vor unserer Zeitrechnung'', before our chronology) and ''u. Z.'' (''unserer Zeitrechnung'', of our chronology) instead of ''v. Chr.'' (''vor Christus'', before Christ) and ''n. Chr.'' (''nach Christus/Christi Geburt'', after Christ/the Nativity of Christ). The use of these terms persists in contemporary German to some extent, differing regionally and ideologically. In Jewish contexts mostly "v. d. Z." ("vor der Zeitenwende") and "n. d. Z." ("nach der Zeitenwende") is used.{{citation needed|date=November 2012}} | |||
* In Hebrew, the most common term used to refer to BCE/CE is simply לספירה (according to '''the''' count) for CE, and לפני הספירה (before the count) for BCE. An alternative term, expressing an ideological (sometimes religious) approach aimed at distancing oneself from the source of the count, is למניינם (according to their count). The later is sometimes added after the former, especially in the case of BCE (e.g., שנת 150 לפני הספירה למנינם), due to technical linguistic reasons.{{citation needed|date=July 2012}} | |||
* In ], similarly to the Bulgarian case, ''i. e.'' (''időszámításunk előtt'', before our era) and ''i. sz.'' (''időszámításunk szerint'', according to our era) are still widely used instead of traditional ''Kr. e.'' (''Krisztus előtt'', Before Christ) and ''Kr. u.'' (''Krisztus után'', After Christ), which were unofficially reinstituted after the Communist period. | |||
* In ], the terms ''SM.'' (''Sebelum Masehi'', before Masehi, from Arabic ''Masih'', referring to Jesus) and ''M.'' (''Masehi'', after Masehi) were generally used. | |||
* In ], ''e.v.'' ("Era Volgare" from Latin expression "Aera Vulgaris") and ''p.e.v.'' ("Prima dell'Era Volgare", before the vulgar era) may be used (both in lower case), but the historical A.C./D.C. (Avanti Cristo/Dopo Cristo, before Christ/after Christ) are much more frequent. | |||
* In ], years reckoned by the Western calendar as opposed to the Japanese Imperial eras are indicated by, for example, 西暦2013年, where 西暦 (''seireki'') literally means "Western calendar" which carries no religious connotation, aside from the fact that Christianity is a Western religion. 紀元前 (''kigenzen'') is used to mean "before the common era (BCE)." "A.D.", and less commonly, "C.E.", are also occasionally seen, but the typical Japanese person would not care about the religious connotations. | |||
* In ], 기원전(紀元前, ''giwonjeon''), which means "preceding the era", is used to indicate years BCE. 서기(西紀, ''seogi''), "Western era", short for 서력기원(西暦紀元, ''seoryeokgiwon''), meaning " the origin year of the Western calendar", is used to indicate years CE. Christians use 주후 (''juhu''), meaning "after the Lord", as a shorthand calque of Anno Domini. | |||
* In ] the only term generally used is ''naszej ery/przed naszą erą'' (''of our era/before our era''). The terms ''przed Chrystusem/po Chrystusie'' (''before Christ/after Christ'') and ''roku Pańskiego'' (''year of the Lord'') are possible but almost never used in contemporary Poland. | |||
* In ], throughout most of the ] period, the preferred standard was to use the secularised ''î. e. n.'' (''înaintea erei noastre'', before our era) and ''e. n.'' (''era noastră'', our era). After the downfall of communism in the ], the original convention using ''î. Hr.'' (''înainte de Hristos'', before Christ) and ''d. Hr.'' (''după Hristos'', after Christ) has become more widespread. Alternatively, ''î. Cr.'' and ''d. Cr.'' are used, mainly due to an alternative spelling of ''Hristos'' (Christ) as ''Cristos'', the latter being preferred by the ] and ] ]. | |||
* In ], the terms ''до н.э.'' (''до нашей эры'', before our era) and ''н.э.'' (''нашей эры'', our era) are often used. Their use was nearly universal during Soviet rule, and while their use in mass media has to some extent been replaced by their Christian equivalents, the BCE/CE terms remain the strongly preferred version in scientific literature, business magazines and other "serious" texts. | |||
* In ], EC (Era Común) is used for CE, while AEC (antes de la Era Común) is equivalent to BCE.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://spanish.about.com/od/writtenspanish/qt/dates.htm |title=Writing Dates in Spanish |accessdate=2012-02-05}}</ref> | |||
* In ] the terms ''f.Kr.'' (''före Kristus'', before Christ) and ''e.Kr.'' (''efter Kristus'', after Christ) have traditionally been used. They are seldom replaced by ''f.v.t.'' and ''e.v.t.'' (''före/enligt vår tidräkning'', before/according to our chronology). | |||
* In ], the terms M.Ö. (Milattan Önce, before the birth (of Jesus)) and M.S. (Milattan Sonra, after the birth (of Jesus)) are commonly used. İ.Ö. (İsa'dan Önce, before Jesus) and İ.S. (İsa'dan Sonra, after Jesus) can also be seen in academic writing. | |||
* In ], OC can be expanded to equivalents of both AD (''Oed Crist'') and CE (''Oes Cyffredin''); for dates before the Common Era, CC (traditionally, ''Cyn Crist'') is used exclusively, as ''Cyn yr Oes Cyffredin'' would abbreviate to a mild obscenity.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?A2=welsh-termau-cymraeg;982a203b.0610 |title=Welsh-Termau-Cymraeg Archives |publisher=JISCMail |date=19 October 2006 |accessdate=2012-02-29}}</ref> | |||
==See also== | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | * ] | ||
* ] | |||
* ] | * ] | ||
* ] | * ] | ||
* ] | * ] | ||
== Explanatory notes == | |||
==Notes== | |||
{{Notelist|2}} | {{Notelist|2}} | ||
==References== | == References == | ||
{{Reflist|2|refs=<ref name=VulgarisAerae1>{{cite book| url=https://archive.org/details/bub_gb_rrkRjuY3p0gC/page/n10/ | |||
{{Reflist|2| | |||
|oclc = 62188677 |quote={{lang|la|Dabam Pragae Idibus Aprilibus, Anno vulgaris aerae MDCXII}} |author=Johannes Kepler|title=Joannis Keppleri Eclogae chronicae: (etc) |publisher=Tampach |location=Frankfurt |language=la |year=1615 |author-link=Johannes Kepler}} (Earliest-found use of "{{lang|la|vulgaris aerae}}", Latin for Common Era) (1615)</ref> | |||
refs= | |||
<ref name=Irvin>{{cite book|page= |title=History of the World Christian Movement |first1=Dale T. |last1=Irvin |last2=Sunquist |first2=Scott |date=2001 |publisher=Continuum International Publishing Group |isbn=0-567-08866-9 |quote=The influence of western culture and scholarship upon the rest of the world in turn led to this system of dating becoming the most widely used one across the globe today. Many scholars in historical and religious studies in the West in recent years have sought to lessen the explicitly Christian meaning of this system without abandoning the usefulness of a single, common, global form of dating. For this reason the terms ''common era'' and ''before the common era'', abbreviated as CE and BCE, have grown in popularity as designations. The terms are meant, in deference to non-Christians, to soften the explicit theological claims made by the older Latin terminology, while at the same time providing continuity with earlier generations of mostly western Christian historical research}}</ref> | |||
<ref name=VulgarisAerae1 > | |||
<ref name=Pedersen>{{cite book |title= Gregorian Reform of the Calendar: Proceedings of the Vatican Conference to commemorate its 400th anniversary |url=https://articles.adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-iarticle_query?journal=grc..&year=1983&volume=book&letter=.&db_key=PRE&page_ind=66&plate_select=NO&data_type=GIF&type=SCREEN_GIF&classic=YES |last=Pedersen |first=O. |date=1983 |chapter=The Ecclesiastical Calendar and the Life of the Church |chapter-url=https://articles.adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-iarticle_query?journal=grc..&year=1983&volume=book&letter=.&db_key=PRE&page_ind=34&plate_select=NO&data_type=GIF&type=SCREEN_GIF&classic=YES | |||
{{cite web | |||
|editor=Coyne, G.V. |display-editors= et al. |page= |publisher=Vatican Observatory |access-date=18 May 2011 |via=SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System (ADS)}}</ref> | |||
|url=http://www.worldcat.org/title/joannis-keppleri-eclogae-chronicae-ex-epistolis-doctissimorum-aliquot-virorum-suis-mutuis-quibus-examinantur-tempora-nobilissima-1-herodis-herodiadumque-2-baptismi-ministerii-christi-annorum-non-plus-2-14-3-passionis-mortis-et-resurrectionis-dn-n-iesu-christi-anno-aerae-nostrae-vulgaris-31-non-ut-vulgo-33-4-belli-iudaici-quo-funerata-fuit-cum-ierosolymis-templo-synagoga-iudaica-sublatumque-vetus-testamentum-inter-alia-commentarius-in-locum-epiphanii-obscurissimum-de-cyclo-veteri-iudaeorum/oclc/62188677 | |||
<ref name="CathEncy-Chron">{{cite book |chapter-url=http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/03738a.htm |chapter=General Chronology |title=New Advent Catholic Encyclopedia |date=1908 |volume=III |publisher=Robert Appleton Company |location=New York }}</ref> | |||
|title=Earliest-found use of "vulgaris aerae" (Latin for Common Era) (1615) | |||
<ref name=Gormley>{{cite news |first=Michael |last=Gormley |title=Use of B.C. and A.D. faces changing times |newspaper=] |date=24 April 2005 |url=https://www.chron.com/news/nation-world/article/Use-of-B-C-and-A-D-faces-changing-times-1643198.php |page=A–13 |access-date=18 May 2011}}</ref> | |||
|accessdate=2011-05-18}} | |||
<ref name=RelTolrnc>{{cite web |url=http://www.religioustolerance.org/ceintro.htm |title=Comments on the use of CE and BCE to identify dates in history |publisher=ReligiousTolerance.com |access-date=18 May 2011}}</ref> | |||
{{cite book | |||
<ref name=Wilson>{{cite book |title=The Columbia Guide to Standard American English – A.D., B.C., (A.)C.E., B.C.E. |first=Kenneth G. |last=Wilson |date=16 December 1993 |quote=A.D. appears either before or after the number of the year ... although conservative use has long preferred before only; B.C. always follows the number of the year. ... Common era (C.E.) itself needs a good deal of further justification, in view of its clearly Christian numbering. Most conservatives still prefer A.D. and B.C. Best advice: don't use B.C.E., C.E., or A.C.E. to replace B.C. and A.D. without translating the new terms for the very large number of readers who will not understand them. Note too that if we do end by casting aside the A.D./B.C. convention, almost certainly some will argue that we ought to cast aside as well the conventional numbering system itself, given its Christian basis. |publisher=Columbia University Press |isbn=978-0-231-06989-2 }}</ref> | |||
|quote=anno aerae nostrae vulgaris | |||
<ref name=SBC>{{cite web |url=https://www.sbc.net/resource-library/resolutions/on-retaining-the-traditional-method-of-calendar-dating-b-c-a-d/ |title=On Retaining The Traditional Method Of Calendar Dating (B.C./A.D.) |publisher=] |date=June 2000 |quote=This practice is the result of the secularization, anti-supernaturalism, religious pluralism, and political correctness pervasive in our society ... retention is a reminder to those in this secular age of the importance of Christ's life and mission and emphasizes to all that history is ultimately His Story.|access-date=18 May 2011}}</ref>}} | |||
|author=] | |||
|title=Joannis Keppleri Eclogae chronicae: ex epistolis doctissimorum aliquot virorum & suis mutuis, quibus examinantur tempora nobilissima: 1. Herodis Herodiadumque, 2. baptismi & ministerii Christi annorum non plus 2 1/4, 3. passionis, mortis et resurrectionis Dn. N. Iesu Christi, anno aerae nostrae vulgaris 31. non, ut vulgo 33., 4. belli Iudaici, quo funerata fuit cum Ierosolymis & Templo Synagoga Iudaica, sublatumque Vetus Testamentum. Inter alia & commentarius in locum Epiphanii obscurissimum de cyclo veteri Iudaeorum. | |||
|publisher=Francofurti : Tampach | |||
|language=Latin | |||
|year=1615}}</ref> | |||
<ref name=Irvin > | |||
{{cite book | |||
|url=https://books.google.com/?id=C2akvQfa-QMC&pg=PR11&dq=before+%22common+era%22+christian | |||
|title=History of the World Christian Movement | |||
|first=Dale T. | |||
|last=Irvin | |||
|author2=Sunquist, Scott | |||
|year=2001 | |||
|publisher=Continuum International Publishing Group | |||
|isbn=0-567-08866-9 | |||
|page=xi | |||
|quote=The influence of western culture and scholarship upon the rest of the world in turn led to this system of dating becoming the most widely used one across the globe today. Many scholars in historical and religious studies in the West in recent years have sought to lessen the explicitly Christian meaning of this system without abandoning the usefulness of a single, common, global form of dating. For this reason the terms ''common era'' and ''before the common era'', abbreviated as CE and BCE, have grown in popularity as designations. The terms are meant, in deference to non-Christians, to soften the explicit theological claims made by the older Latin terminology, while at the same time providing continuity with earlier generations of mostly western Christian historical research. | |||
|accessdate=2011-05-18}}</ref> | |||
<ref name=Pedersen > | |||
{{cite book | |||
|last=Pedersen |first=O. | |||
|year=1983 | |||
|contribution=The Ecclesiastical Calendar and the Life of the Church | |||
|editor=Coyne, G.V. et al. (Eds.) | |||
|url=http://articles.adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-iarticle_query?journal=grc..&year=1983&volume=book&letter=.&db_key=PRE&page_ind=66&plate_select=NO&data_type=GIF&type=SCREEN_GIF&classic=YES | |||
|title=The Gregorian Reform of the Calendar | |||
|publisher=Vatican Observatory | |||
|page=50 | |||
|accessdate=2011-05-18}}</ref> | |||
<ref name=CathEncy-Chron > | |||
{{cite book | |||
|url=http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/03738a.htm | |||
|chapter=General Chronology | |||
|title=New Advent Catholic Encyclopedia | |||
|year=1908 | |||
|volume=Vol III | |||
|publisher=Robert Appleton Company, New York | |||
|accessdate=2011-05-18}}</ref> | |||
<ref name=Gormley > | |||
{{cite news | |||
|first=Michael |last=Gormley | |||
|title=Use of B.C. and A.D. faces changing times | |||
|publisher=] | |||
|date=24 April 2005 | |||
|url=http://www.chron.com/CDA/archives/archive.mpl?id=2005_3864650 | |||
|page=A–13 | |||
|accessdate=2011-05-18}}</ref> | |||
<ref name=RelTolrnc > | |||
{{cite web | |||
|url=http://www.religioustolerance.org/ceintro.htm | |||
|title=Comments on the use of CE and BCE to identify dates in history | |||
|publisher=ReligiousTolerance.com | |||
|accessdate=2011-05-18}}</ref> | |||
<ref name=Wilson > | |||
{{cite book | |||
|title=The Columbia Guide to Standard American English – A.D., B.C., (A.)C.E., B.C.E. | |||
|url=https://books.google.com/?id=L2ChiO2yEZ0C&pg=PA11&lpg=PA11&dq=%22The+Columbia+Guide+to+Standard+American+English%22+BCE&q | |||
|year=1993 | |||
|last=Wilson |first=Kenneth G. | |||
|quote=A.D. appears either before or after the number of the year... although conservative use has long preferred before only; B.C. always follows the number of the year.... Common era (C.E.) itself needs a good deal of further justification, in view of its clearly Christian numbering. Most conservatives still prefer A.D. and B.C. Best advice: don't use B.C.E., C.E., or A.C.E. to replace B.C. and A.D. without translating the new terms for the very large number of readers who will not understand them. Note too that if we do end by casting aside the A.D./B.C. convention, almost certainly some will argue that we ought to cast aside as well the conventional numbering system itself, given its Christian basis. | |||
|publisher=Columbia University Press | |||
|isbn=978-0-231-06989-2 | |||
|accessdate=2011-05-18}}</ref> | |||
<ref name=SBC > | |||
{{cite web | |||
|url=http://www.sbc.net/resolutions/amResolution.asp?ID=298 | |||
|title=On Retaining The Traditional Method Of Calendar Dating (B.C./A.D.) | |||
|publisher=] | |||
|date=June 2000 | |||
|quote=This practice is the result of the secularization, anti-supernaturalism, religious pluralism, and political correctness pervasive in our society... retention is a reminder to those in this secular age of the importance of Christ's life and mission and emphasizes to all that history is ultimately His Story. | |||
|accessdate=2011-05-18}}</ref>}} | |||
==External links== | == External links == | ||
{{ |
{{Wiktionary|Common_Era#Translations}} | ||
* {{Cite magazine |title= From Our Readers: Ancient Manuscripts—How Are They Dated? |url=https://wol.jw.org/en/wol/d/r1/lp-e/102009094 |magazine=Awake! |publisher=] |date=2009 |quote=Although A.D. (Anno Domini, meaning 'in the year of our Lord') and B.C. (before Christ) are used in lands where professed Christianity predominates, we have chosen to use the terms C.E. (Common Era) and B.C.E. (Before the Common Era).}} | |||
* (United Church of Christ) | |||
{{Calendars}} | |||
{{Time Topics}} | {{Time Topics}} | ||
{{Chronology}} | {{Chronology}} | ||
{{Portal bar|Time|History}} | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | ] | ||
] | ] | ||
] | ] | ||
] | |||
] |
Latest revision as of 02:14, 22 December 2024
Modern calendar era "BCE" redirects here. For other uses, see BCE (disambiguation).
Common Era (CE) and Before the Common Era (BCE) are year notations for the Gregorian calendar (and its predecessor, the Julian calendar), the world's most widely used calendar era. Common Era and Before the Common Era are alternatives to the original Anno Domini (AD) and Before Christ (BC) notations used for the same calendar era. The two notation systems are numerically equivalent: "2024 CE" and "AD 2024" each describe the current year; "400 BCE" and "400 BC" are the same year.
The expression can be traced back to 1615, when it first appears in a book by Johannes Kepler as the Latin: annus aerae nostrae vulgaris (year of our common era), and to 1635 in English as "Vulgar Era". The term "Common Era" can be found in English as early as 1708, and became more widely used in the mid-19th century by Jewish religious scholars. Since the late 20th century, BCE and CE have become popular in academic and scientific publications on the grounds that BCE and CE are religiously neutral terms. They have been promoted as more sensitive to non-Christians by not referring to Jesus, the central figure of Christianity, especially via the religious terms "Christ" and Dominus ("Lord") used by the other abbreviations. Nevertheless, its epoch remains the same as that used for the Anno Domini era.
History
Origins
See also: Anno DominiThe idea of numbering years beginning from the date that he believed to be the date of birth of Jesus, was conceived around the year 525 by the Christian monk Dionysius Exiguus. He did this to replace the then dominant Era of Martyrs system, because he did not wish to continue the memory of a tyrant who persecuted Christians. He numbered years from an initial reference date ("epoch"), an event he referred to as the Incarnation of Jesus. Dionysius labeled the column of the table in which he introduced the new era as "Anni Domini Nostri Jesu Christi" (Of the year of our Lord Jesus Christ].
This way of numbering years became more widespread in Europe with its use by Bede in England in 731. Bede also introduced the practice of dating years before what he supposed was the year of birth of Jesus, without a year zero. In 1422, Portugal became the last Western European country to switch to the system begun by Dionysius.
Vulgar Era
The term "Common Era" is traced back in English to its appearance as "Vulgar Era" to distinguish years of the Anno Domini era, which was in popular use, from dates of the regnal year (the year of the reign of a sovereign) typically used in national law. (The word 'vulgar' originally meant 'of the ordinary people', with no derogatory associations.)
The first use of the Latin term anno aerae nostrae vulgaris may be that in a 1615 book by Johannes Kepler. Kepler uses it again, as ab Anno vulgaris aerae, in a 1616 table of ephemerides, and again, as ab anno vulgaris aerae, in 1617. A 1635 English edition of that book has the title page in English that may be the earliest-found use of Vulgar Era in English. A 1701 book edited by John Le Clerc includes the phrase "Before Christ according to the Vulgar Æra, 6".
The Merriam Webster Dictionary gives 1716 as the date of first use of the term "vulgar era" (which it defines as Christian era).
The first published use of "Christian Era" may be the Latin phrase annus aerae christianae on the title page of a 1584 theology book, De Eucharistica controuersia. In 1649, the Latin phrase annus æræ Christianæ appeared in the title of an English almanac. A 1652 ephemeris may be the first instance found so far of the English use of "Christian Era".
The English phrase "Common Era" appears at least as early as 1708, and in a 1715 book on astronomy it is used interchangeably with "Christian Era" and "Vulgar Era". A 1759 history book uses common æra in a generic sense, to refer to "the common era of the Jews". The first use of the phrase "before the common era" may be that in a 1770 work that also uses common era and vulgar era as synonyms, in a translation of a book originally written in German. The 1797 edition of the Encyclopædia Britannica uses the terms vulgar era and common era synonymously. In 1835, in his book Living Oracles, Alexander Campbell, wrote: "The vulgar Era, or Anno Domini; the fourth year of Jesus Christ, the first of which was but eight days", and also refers to the common era as a synonym for vulgar era with "the fact that our Lord was born on the 4th year before the vulgar era, called Anno Domini, thus making (for example) the 42d year from his birth to correspond with the 38th of the common era". The Catholic Encyclopedia (1909) in at least one article reports all three terms (Christian, Vulgar, Common Era) being commonly understood by the early 20th century.
The phrase "common era", in lower case, also appeared in the 19th century in a "generic" sense, not necessarily to refer to the Christian Era, but to any system of dates in common use throughout a civilization. Thus, "the common era of the Jews", "the common era of the Mahometans", "common era of the world", "the common era of the foundation of Rome". When it did refer to the Christian Era, it was sometimes qualified, e.g., "common era of the Incarnation", "common era of the Nativity", or "common era of the birth of Christ".
An adapted translation of Common Era into Latin as Era Vulgaris was adopted in the 20th century by some followers of Aleister Crowley, and thus the abbreviation "e.v." or "EV" may sometimes be seen as a replacement for AD.
History of the use of the CE/BCE abbreviation
Although Jews have their own Hebrew calendar, they often use the Gregorian calendar without the AD prefix. As early as 1825, the abbreviation VE (for Vulgar Era) was in use among Jews to denote years in the Western calendar. As of 2005, Common Era notation has also been in use for Hebrew lessons for more than a century. Jews have also used the term Current Era.
Contemporary usage
Some academics in the fields of theology, education, archaeology and history have adopted CE and BCE notation despite some disagreement. A study conducted in 2014 found that the BCE/CE notation is not growing at the expense of BC and AD notation in the scholarly literature, and that both notations are used in a relatively stable fashion.
Australia
In 2011, media reports suggested that the BC/AD notation in Australian school textbooks would be replaced by BCE/CE notation. The change drew opposition from some politicians and church leaders. Weeks after the story broke, the Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority denied the rumours and stated that the BC/AD notation would remain, with CE and BCE as an optional suggested learning activity.
Canada
In 2013, the Canadian Museum of Civilization (now the Canadian Museum of History) in Gatineau (opposite Ottawa), which had previously switched to BCE/CE, decided to change back to BC/AD in material intended for the public while retaining BCE/CE in academic content.
Nepal
The notation is in particularly common use in Nepal in order to disambiguate dates from the local calendar, Bikram or Vikram Sambat. Disambiguation is needed because the era of the local calendar is quite close to the Common Era.
United Kingdom
In 2002, an advisory panel for the religious education syllabus for England and Wales recommended introducing BCE/CE dates to schools, and by 2018 some local education authorities were using them.
In 2018, the National Trust said it would continue to use BC/AD as its house style. English Heritage explains its era policy thus: "It might seem strange to use a Christian calendar system when referring to British prehistory, but the BC/AD labels are widely used and understood." Some parts of the BBC use BCE/CE, but some presenters have said they will not. As of October 2019, the BBC News style guide has entries for AD and BC, but not for CE or BCE. The style guide for The Guardian says, under the entry for CE/BCE: "some people prefer CE (common era, current era, or Christian era) and BCE (before common era, etc.) to AD and BC, which, however, remain our style".
United States
In the United States, the use of the BCE/CE notation in textbooks was reported in 2005 to be growing. Some publications have transitioned to using it exclusively. For example, the 2007 World Almanac was the first edition to switch to BCE/CE, ending a period of 138 years in which the traditional BC/AD dating notation was used. BCE/CE is used by the College Board in its history tests, and by the Norton Anthology of English Literature. Others have taken a different approach. The US-based History Channel uses BCE/CE notation in articles on non-Christian religious topics such as Jerusalem and Judaism. The 2006 style guide for the Episcopal Diocese Maryland Church News says that BCE and CE should be used.
In June 2006, in the United States, the Kentucky State School Board reversed its decision to use BCE and CE in the state's new Program of Studies, leaving education of students about these concepts a matter of local discretion.
Rationales
Support
The use of CE in Jewish scholarship was historically motivated by the desire to avoid the implicit "Our Lord" in the abbreviation AD. Although other aspects of dating systems are based in Christian origins, AD is a direct reference to Jesus as Lord. Proponents of the Common Era notation assert that the use of BCE/CE shows sensitivity to those who use the same year numbering system as the one that originated with and is currently used by Christians, but who are not themselves Christian. Former United Nations Secretary-General Kofi Annan has argued:
he Christian calendar no longer belongs exclusively to Christians. People of all faiths have taken to using it simply as a matter of convenience. There is so much interaction between people of different faiths and cultures – different civilizations, if you like – that some shared way of reckoning time is a necessity. And so the Christian Era has become the Common Era.
Adena K. Berkowitz, in her application to argue before the United States Supreme Court, opted to use BCE and CE because, "Given the multicultural society that we live in, the traditional Jewish designations – B.C.E. and C.E. – cast a wider net of inclusion." In the World History Encyclopedia, Joshua J. Mark wrote "Non-Christian scholars, especially, embraced because they could now communicate more easily with the Christian community. Jewish, Islamic, Hindu and Buddhist scholars could retain their calendar but refer to events using the Gregorian Calendar as BCE and CE without compromising their own beliefs about the divinity of Jesus of Nazareth." In History Today, Michael Ostling wrote: "BC/AD Dating: In the year of whose Lord? The continuing use of AD and BC is not only factually wrong but also offensive to many who are not Christians."
Opposition
Critics note the fact that there is no difference in the epoch of the two systems—chosen to be close to the date of birth of Jesus. Since the year numbers are the same, BCE and CE dates should be equally offensive to other religions as BC and AD. Roman Catholic priest and writer on interfaith issues Raimon Panikkar argued that the BCE/CE usage is the less inclusive option since they are still using the Christian calendar numbers and forcing it on other nations. In 1993, the English-language expert Kenneth G. Wilson speculated a slippery slope scenario in his style guide that, "if we do end by casting aside the AD/BC convention, almost certainly some will argue that we ought to cast aside as well the conventional numbering system itself, given its Christian basis."
Some Christians are offended by the removal of the reference to Jesus, including the Southern Baptist Convention.
Conventions in style guides
The abbreviation BCE, just as with BC, always follows the year number. Unlike AD, which still often precedes the year number, CE always follows the year number (if context requires that it be written at all). Thus, the current year is written as 2024 in both notations (or, if further clarity is needed, as 2024 CE, or as AD 2024), and the year that Socrates died is represented as 399 BCE (the same year that is represented by 399 BC in the BC/AD notation). The abbreviations are sometimes written with small capital letters, or with periods (e.g., "B.C.E." or "C.E."). The US-based Society of Biblical Literature style guide for academic texts on religion prefers BCE/CE to BC/AD.
Similar conventions in other languages
- In Germany, Jews in Berlin seem to have already been using words translating to "(before the) common era" in the 18th century, while others like Moses Mendelssohn opposed this usage as it would hinder the integration of Jews into German society. The formulation seems to have persisted among German Jews in the 19th century in forms like vor der gewöhnlichen Zeitrechnung (before the common chronology). In 1938 Nazi Germany, the use of this convention was also prescribed by the National Socialist Teachers League. However, it was soon discovered that many German Jews had been using the convention ever since the 18th century, and Time magazine found it ironic to see "Aryans following Jewish example nearly 200 years later".
- In Spanish, common forms used for "BC" are a. C. and a. de C. (for "antes de Cristo", "before Christ"), with variations in punctuation and sometimes the use of J. C. (Jesucristo) instead of C. The Real Academia Española also acknowledges the use of a. n. e. (antes de nuestra era, 'before our era') and d. n. e. (después de nuestra era, 'after our era'). In scholarly writing, a. e. c. is the equivalent of the English "BCE", "antes de la era común" or "Before the Common Era".
- In Welsh, OC can be expanded to equivalents of both AD (Oed Crist) and CE (Oes Cyffredin); for dates before the Common Era, CC (traditionally, Cyn Crist) is used exclusively, as Cyn yr Oes Cyffredin would abbreviate to a mild obscenity.
- In Russian since the October Revolution (1917) до н.э. (до нашей эры, lit. before our era) and н.э. (нашей эры, lit. of our era) are used almost universally. Within Christian churches до Р.Х./от Р.Х. (до/от Рождества Христова, i.e. before/after the birth of Christ, equivalent to Latin: Ante Christum natum) remains in use.
- In Polish, "p.n.e." (przed naszą erą, lit. before our era) and "n.e." (naszej ery, lit. of our era) are commonly used in historical and scientific literature. Przed Chrystusem (before Christ) and po Chrystusie (after Christ) see sporadic usage, mostly in religious publications.
- In China, upon the foundation of the Republic of China, the Government in Nanking adopted the Republic of China calendar with 1912 designated as year 1, but used the Western calendar for international purposes. The translated term was Chinese: 西元 (xī yuán, "Western Era"), which is still used in Taiwan in formal documents. In 1949, the People's Republic of China adopted 公元 (gōngyuán, "Common Era") for both internal and external affairs in mainland China. This notation was extended to Hong Kong in 1997 and Macau in 1999 (de facto extended in 1966) through Annex III of Hong Kong Basic Law and Macau Basic Law, thus eliminating the ROC calendar in these areas. BCE is translated into Chinese as 公元前 (gōngyuánqián, "Before the Common Era").
- In Czech, the "n. l." (našeho letopočtu which translates as of our year count) and "př. n. l." or "před n. l." (před naším letopočtem meaning before our year count) is used, always after the year number. The direct translation of AD (léta Páně, abbreviated as L. P.) or BC (před Kristem, abbreviated as př. Kr.) is seen as archaic.
- In Croatian the common form used for BC and AD are pr. Kr. (prije Krista, "before Christ") and p. Kr. (poslije Krista, after Christ). The abbreviations pr. n. e. (prije nove ere, before new era) and n. e. (nove ere, (of the) new era) have also recently been introduced.
- In Danish, "f.v.t." (før vor tidsregning, before our time reckoning) and "e.v.t." (efter vor tidsregning, after our time reckoning) are used as BCE/CE are in English. Also commonly used are "f.Kr." (før Kristus, before Christ) and "e.Kr." (efter Kristus, after Christ), which are both placed after the year number in contrast with BC/AD in English.
- In Macedonian, the terms "п.н.е." (пред нашата ера "before our era") and "н.е." (наша ера "our era") are used in every aspect.
- In Estonian, "e.m.a." (enne meie ajaarvamist, before our time reckoning) and "m.a.j." (meie ajaarvamise järgi, according to our time reckoning) are used as BCE and CE, respectively. Also in use are terms "eKr" (enne Kristust, before Christ) and "pKr" (pärast Kristust, after Christ). In all cases, the abbreviation is written after the year number.
- In Finnish, "eaa." (ennen ajanlaskun alkua, before time reckoning) and "jaa." (jälkeen ajanlaskun alun, after the start of time reckoning) are used as BCE and CE, respectively. Also (decreasingly) in use are terms "eKr", (ennen Kristusta, before Christ) and "jKr". (jälkeen Kristuksen, after Christ). In all cases, the abbreviation is written after the year number.
See also
Explanatory notes
- From the Latin word vulgus, the common people – to contrast it with the regnal year system of dating used by the government.
- Two other systems that also do not use religious titles, the astronomical system and the ISO 8601 standard, do use a year zero. The year 1 BCE (identical to the year 1 BC) is represented as 0 in the astronomical system, and as 0000 in ISO 8601. Presently, ISO 8601 dating requires use of the Gregorian calendar for all dates, however, whereas astronomical dating and Common Era dating allow use of either the Gregorian or Julian calendars.
- ^ AD is shortened from anno Domini nostri Jesu Christi ("in the year of Our Lord Jesus Christ").
- Bede wrote of the Incarnation of Jesus, but treated it as synonymous with birth.
- As noted in History of the zero, the use of zero in Western civilization was uncommon before the twelfth century.
- In Latin, 'Common Era' is written as Aera Vulgaris. It also occasionally appears, in Latin declination, as æræ vulgaris, aerae vulgaris, aeram vulgarem, anni vulgaris, vulgaris aerae Christianae, and anni vulgatae nostrae aerae Christianas.
- As England did not adopt the Gregorian calendar until 1752, "vulgar" dates were determined according to the Julian calendar.
- The probable source is a 1716 book in English by Dean Humphrey Prideaux which refers to, "...the vulgar Æra of Christ's incarnation and not from the true time of it." This citation is given in the 1933 edition of Oxford English Dictionary but without any assertion of first use.
- era – or, with a macron, ēra – being an alternative form of aera; aera is the usual form
References
- "Anno Domini". Merriam Webster Online Dictionary. Merriam-Webster. 2003. Retrieved 4 October 2011.
Etymology: Medieval Latin, in the year of the Lord
- "Controversy over the use of the "CE/BCE" and "AD/BC" dating notation/". Ontario Consultants on Religious Tolerance. Retrieved 12 November 2011.
- Coolman, Robert. "Keeping Time: The Origin of B.C. & A.D." Live Science. Retrieved 11 November 2017.
- ^ Johannes Kepler (1615). Joannis Keppleri Eclogae chronicae: (etc) (in Latin). Frankfurt: Tampach. OCLC 62188677.
Dabam Pragae Idibus Aprilibus, Anno vulgaris aerae MDCXII
(Earliest-found use of "vulgaris aerae", Latin for Common Era) (1615) - ^ The History of the Works of the Learned. Vol. 10. London. January 1708. p. 513.
... to the fourth century of the Common Era
(Possibly the first use of common era in English (1708)) - Espenak, Fred (25 February 2008). "Year dating conventions". NASA. Retrieved 24 August 2021.
- Herrmann, Andrew (27 May 2006). "BCE date designation called more sensitive". Chicago Sun-Times. Archived from the original on 10 August 2017. Retrieved 18 September 2016.
The changes – showing up at museums, in academic circles and in school textbooks – have been touted as more sensitive to people of faiths outside of Christianity. ... The use of BCE and CE have rankled some Christians
- McKim, Donald K (1996). "C. E.". Westminster dictionary of theological terms. Westminster John Knox Press. p. 41. ISBN 978-0-664-25511-4.
- Irvin, Dale T.; Sunquist, Scott (2001). History of the World Christian Movement. Continuum International Publishing Group. p. xi. ISBN 0-567-08866-9.
The influence of western culture and scholarship upon the rest of the world in turn led to this system of dating becoming the most widely used one across the globe today. Many scholars in historical and religious studies in the West in recent years have sought to lessen the explicitly Christian meaning of this system without abandoning the usefulness of a single, common, global form of dating. For this reason the terms common era and before the common era, abbreviated as CE and BCE, have grown in popularity as designations. The terms are meant, in deference to non-Christians, to soften the explicit theological claims made by the older Latin terminology, while at the same time providing continuity with earlier generations of mostly western Christian historical research
- ^ Pedersen, O. (1983). "The Ecclesiastical Calendar and the Life of the Church". In Coyne, G.V.; et al. (eds.). Gregorian Reform of the Calendar: Proceedings of the Vatican Conference to commemorate its 400th anniversary. Vatican Observatory. p. 50. Retrieved 18 May 2011 – via SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System (ADS).
- Doggett, L.E., (1992), "Calendars" in Seidelmann, P.K., The Explanatory Supplement to the Astronomical Almanac, Sausalito CA: University Science Books, 2.1
- Bromiley, Geoffrey W. (1995). The International Standard Bible Encyclopedia. Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing. p. 686. ISBN 978-0-8028-3781-3.
- Blackburn, B & Holford-Strevens, L, (2003), The Oxford Companion to the Year, Oxford University Press, 778.
- "General Chronology". New Advent Catholic Encyclopedia. Vol. III. New York: Robert Appleton Company. 1908.
- Jeans, Susi (2013) . "Kepler [Keppler], Johannes". Grove Music Online. Revised by H. Floris Cohen. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/gmo/9781561592630.article.14903. ISBN 978-1-56159-263-0. Retrieved 26 September 2021. (subscription or UK public library membership required)
- Weatherall, Claire (18 May 2023). "Library: Archival Skills: Historical dates". University of Hull. Retrieved 21 September 2024.
- ^ "Vulgar". Oxford English Dictionary. Vol. 12. 1933. p. 326.
- Kepler, Johann (1616). Ephemerides novae motuum caelestium, ab Ānno vulgaris aerae MDCXVII en observationibus potissimum Tychonis Brahei hypothesibus physicis, et tabulis Rudolphinis... Plancus.
- Keppler, Johannes; Bartsch, Jakob (1617). Ephemerides novae motuum coelestium, ab anno vulgaris aerae MDCXVII... [(per 1635 English edition): New Ephemerids for the Celestiall Motions, for the Yeeres of the Vulgar Era 1617–1636]. Johannes Plancus.
Part 3 has title: Tomi L Ephemeridvm Ioannis Kepleri pars tertia, complexa annos à M.DC.XXIX. in M.DC.XXXVI. In quibus & tabb. Rudolphi jam perfectis, et sociâ operâ clariss. viri dn. Iacobi Bartschii ... Impressa Sagani Silesiorvm, in typographeio Ducali, svmptibvs avthoris, anno M.DC.XXX.
(His third use of "vulgaris aerae" (Latin for Common Era) (1617)) - Johann Kepler; Adriaan Vlacq (1635). Ephemerides of the Celestiall Motions, for the Yeers of the Vulgar Era 1633 ...
- Le Clerc, John, ed. (1701). The Harmony of the Evangelists. London: Sam Buckley. p. 5.
Before Christ according to the Vulgar Æra, 6
- "Merriam Webster Online entry for Vulgar Era". Retrieved 18 May 2011.
- Humphrey Prideaux, D.D. (1716). The Old and New Testament Connected in the History of the Jews and Neighbouring Nations. Vol. 1 (Second ed.). London. p. ii.
- Clivaz, Claire (2012). "Common Era 2.0". Lire demain; Reading tomorrow. EPFL Press. p. 38. ISBN 9782889141494.
... the expression "Christian era" appears in Latin in a 1584 theology book (Grynaeus and Beumler 1584)
- WING, Vincent (1649). Speculum uranicum, anni æræ Christianæ, 1649, or, An almanack and prognosication for the year of our Lord, 1649 being the first from bissextile or leap-year, and from the creation of the world 5598, wherein is contained many useful, pleasant and necessary observations, and predictions ... : calculated (according to art) for the meridian and latitude of the ancient borough town of Stamford in Lincolnshire ... and without sensible errour may serve the 3. kingdoms of England, Scotland, and Ireland. London: J.L. for the Company of Stationers.
anni æræ Christianæ, 1649
- Sliter, Robert (1652). A celestiall glasse, or, Ephemeris for the year of the Christian era 1652 being the bissextile or leap-year: contayning the lunations, planetary motions, configurations & ecclipses for this present year ... : with many other things very delightfull and necessary for most sorts of men: calculated exactly and composed for ... Rochester. London: Printed for the Company of Stationers.
- Gregory, David; John Nicholson; John Morphew (1715). The Elements of Astronomy, Physical and Geometrical. Vol. 1. London: J. Nicholson. p. 252.
Some say the World was created 3950 Years before the common Æra of Christ
Before Christ and Christian Era appear on the same page 252, while Vulgar Era appears on page 250 - Sale, George; Psalmanazar, George; Bower, Archibald; Shelvocke, George; Campbell, John; Swinton, John (1759). An Universal History: From the Earliest Accounts to the Present Time. Vol. 13. London: C. Bathurst p. 130.
And it doth not appear, that they began to reckon from the creation till after their Gemarrah was finished;at which time they fixed that for their common era
- Hooper, William; Bielfeld, Jacob Friedrich (1770). The Elements of Universal Erudition: Containing an Analytical Abridgment of the Sciences, Polite Arts, and Belles Lettres. Vol. 3. London: J Robson and B. Law. pp. 63, 105.
The Spanish era began with the year of the world 3966, and 38 years before the common era (p63); 1796 years before the common era 776 before the vulgar era. (p105)
- MacFarquhar, Colin; Gleig, George (1797). "Peter". Encyclopædia Britannica. A. Bell and C. Macfarquhar. p. 228.
St Peter died in the 66th year of the vulgar era
- MacFarquhar, Colin; Gleig, George (1797). "Paul". Encyclopædia Britannica. A. Bell and C. Macfarquhar. p. 50.
This happened in the 33rd year of the common era, some time after our Saviour's death.
- Alexander Campbell (1835). The Living Oracles, Fourth Edition. pp. 16–20. Retrieved 18 May 2011.
- Alexander Campbell (1835). The Living Oracles, Fourth Edition. pp. 15–16. Retrieved 18 May 2011.
- "General Chronology". Catholic Encyclopedia.
Foremost among these is that which is now adopted by all civilized peoples and known as the Christian, Vulgar or Common Era, in the twentieth century of which we are now living
. - A. Whitelaw, ed. (1874). "Epoch". Popular Encyclopedia or Conversations Lexicon. Vol. V. Oxford University Press. p. 207.
the common era of the Jews places the creation in BC 3760
- The first and second Advent: or, The past and the future with reference to the Jew, the gentile, and the Church of God. Wertheim, MacIntosh & Hunt. 1858. p. 176.
Hence the present year, 1858, in the common era of the Jews, is AM 5618–5619, a difference of more than 200 years from our commonly-received chronology.
- Gumpach, Johannes von (1856). Practical tables for the reduction of Mahometan dates to the Christian calendar. Oxford University Press. p. 4.
Its epoch is the first of March old style. The common era of the Mahometans, as has already been stated, is that of the flight of Mahomet.
- Jones, William (1801). The Theological, Philosophical and Miscellaneous Works of the Rev. William Jones. London: Rivington. p. 354.
- Alexander Fraser Tytler (1854). Universal History: From the Creation of the World to the Beginning of the Eighteenth Century. Boston: Fetridge and Company. p. 284.
- Baynes, Thomas Spencer (1833). The Encyclopædia Britannica: A Dictionary of Arts, Sciences, and General Literature. Vol. V (9 ed.). New York: Henry G. Allen and Company. p. 711.
- Todd, James Henthorn (1864). St. Patrick, Apostle of Ireland, A Memoir of his Life and Mission. Dublin: Hodges, Smith & Co. pp. –497.
It should be observed, however, that these years correspond to 492 and 493, a portion of the annals of Ulster being counted from the Incarnation, and being, therefore, one year before the common era of the Nativity of our Lord.
- Heneage Elsley (1812). Annotations on the Four Gospels and the Acts of the Apostles (2nd ed.). London: T. Payne. xvi.
- Félix Gaffiot (1934). Dictionnaire Illustré Latin-Français. Hachette.
- Kaczynski, Richard (1 April 2009). The Weiser Concise Guide to Aleister Crowley. Weiser Books. p. 48.
- Tracey R Rich. "Jewish Calendar". Judaism 101. Retrieved 18 May 2011.
Jews do not generally use the words 'A.D.' and 'B.C.' to refer to the years on the Gregorian calendar. 'A.D.' means 'the year of our L-rd,' and we do not believe Jesus is the L-rd. Instead, we use the abbreviations C.E. (Common or Christian Era) and B.C.E. (Before the Common Era).
- Susser, Bernard, ed. (2003). "Plymouth Hoe Old Jewish Cemetery Tombstone Inscriptions 3". Jewish Communities & Records, Susser Archive. Retrieved 18 May 2011.
Here is buried his honour Judah ben his honour Joseph, a prince and honoured amongst philanthropists, who executed good deeds, died in his house in the City of Bath, Tuesday, and was buried here on Sunday, 19 Sivan in the year 5585. In memory of Lyon Joseph Esq (merchant of Falmouth, Cornwall). who died at Bath June AM 5585/VE 1825. Beloved and respected.
- ^ Gormley, Michael (24 April 2005). "Use of B.C. and A.D. faces changing times". Houston Chronicle. p. A–13. Retrieved 18 May 2011.
- BBC Team (8 February 2005). "History of Judaism 63 BCE – 1086 CE". BBC Religion & Ethics. British Broadcasting Corporation. Retrieved 20 April 2016.
- See, for example, the Society for Historical Archaeology states in its more recent style guide "Do not use CE (common era), BP (before present), or BCE; convert these expressions to AD and BC." (In section I 5 the Society explains how to use "years BP" in connection with radiocarbon ages.) Society for Historical Archaeology (December 2006). "Style Guide" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on 19 April 2016. Retrieved 16 January 2017. whereas the American Anthropological Association style guide takes a different approach, supporting the use of "CE" and "BCE." American Anthropological Society (2009). "AAA Style Guide" (PDF). p. 3. Retrieved 26 May 2015.
- Cavacini, A. (2015). "Is the CE/BCE notation becoming a standard in scholarly literature?". Scientometrics. 102 (2): 1661–1668. doi:10.1007/s11192-014-1352-1. S2CID 255011561.
- Malkin, Bonnie (2 September 2011). "Anger in Australia as school books 'write Christ out of history'". The Telegraph. London. ISSN 0307-1235. Retrieved 1 January 2020.
- "AD/BC rock solid in curriculum". The Age. Melbourne. 21 October 2011. Retrieved 4 March 2012.
- "Museum of Civilization putting the 'Christ' back in history as BC and AD return", by Sean Kilpatrick/The Canadian Press, National Post, 27 February 2013
- "AD and BC become CE/BCE". This is London. 9 February 2002. Archived from the original on 20 December 2011. Retrieved 5 February 2012.
- ^ "National Trust tells properties to stop dropping BC and AD out of fear it might offend non-Christians", The Daily Telegraph, by Henry Bodkin, 12 November 2018
- Stonehenge glossary, "BC and AD" English Heritage
- "BBC News style guide". BBC. Retrieved 11 October 2019.
- "Guardian style guide". Guardian. Retrieved 5 October 2019.
- "AP: World History". Archived from the original on 5 May 2011. Retrieved 18 May 2011.
- "Jerusalem Timeline". History Channel. Archived from the original on 20 May 2011. Retrieved 18 May 2011.;"Jerusalem: Biographies". History Channel. Archived from the original on 20 May 2011. Retrieved 18 May 2011.
- "Maryland Church News Submission Guide & Style Manual" (PDF). Maryland Church News. 1 April 2005. Archived from the original (PDF) on 20 June 2006. Retrieved 18 May 2011.
- "State School Board reverses itself on B.C./A.D. controversy". Family Foundation of Kentucky. Archived from the original on 27 April 2011. Retrieved 18 May 2011.
- Joe Biesk (15 June 2006). "School board keeps traditional historic designations". Louisville Courier-Journal. Archived from the original on 10 July 2009. Retrieved 18 May 2011.
- "Kentucky Board of Education Report" (PDF). Kentucky Board of Education Report. 10 June 2006. Archived from the original (PDF) on 26 September 2006. Retrieved 18 May 2011.
- The American and English Encyclopedia of Law and Practice. 1910. p. 1116.
It has been said of the Latin words anno Domini, meaning in the year of our Lord ...
- Michael McDowell; Nathan Robert Brown (2009). World Religions At Your Fingertips. Penguin. p. 38. ISBN 978-1-101-01469-1.
Marked by the turn of the Common Era, C.E., originally referred to as A.D., an abbreviation of the Latin Anno Domini, meaning 'Year of our God/Lord.' This was a shortening of Anno Domini Nostri Jesu Christi, meaning 'Year of our God/Lord Jesus Christ.'
- ^ Ostling, Michael (October 2009). "BC/AD Dating: In the year of whose Lord?". History Today. Vol. 59, no. 10. Retrieved 10 March 2023.
- "Comments on the use of CE and BCE to identify dates in history". ReligiousTolerance.com. Retrieved 18 May 2011.
- Lefevere, Patricia (11 December 1998). "Annan: 'Peace is never a perfect achievement' – United Nations Secretary General Kofi Annan". National Catholic Reporter. Archived from the original on 13 July 2012. Retrieved 26 February 2008.
- Annan, Kofi A. (28 June 1999). "Common values for a common era: Even as we cherish our diversity, we need to discover our shared values". Civilization: The Magazine of the Library of Congress. Archived from the original on 1 May 2011. Retrieved 18 May 2011.
- Safire, William (17 August 1997). "B.C./A.D. or B.C.E./C.E.?". New York Times. Archived from the original on 14 August 2018.
- Mark, Joshua J. (27 March 2017). "The Origin & History of the BCE/CE Dating System.". World History Encyclopedia. Retrieved 8 August 2022.
- Pollick, Michael (23 May 2024). "What is the Difference Between AD, BC, BCE, and CE in Identifying Historical Dates?". Historical Index. Retrieved 21 August 2024.
- Panikkar, Raimon (2004). Christophany: The Fullness of Man. Maryville, NY: Orbis Books. p. 173. ISBN 978-1-57075-564-4.
To call our age 'the Common Era,' even though for the Jews, the Chinese, the Tamil, the Muslims, and many others it is not a common era, constitutes the acme of colonialism.
- Wilson, Kenneth G. (16 December 1993). The Columbia Guide to Standard American English – A.D., B.C., (A.)C.E., B.C.E. Columbia University Press. ISBN 978-0-231-06989-2.
A.D. appears either before or after the number of the year ... although conservative use has long preferred before only; B.C. always follows the number of the year. ... Common era (C.E.) itself needs a good deal of further justification, in view of its clearly Christian numbering. Most conservatives still prefer A.D. and B.C. Best advice: don't use B.C.E., C.E., or A.C.E. to replace B.C. and A.D. without translating the new terms for the very large number of readers who will not understand them. Note too that if we do end by casting aside the A.D./B.C. convention, almost certainly some will argue that we ought to cast aside as well the conventional numbering system itself, given its Christian basis.
- Whitney, Susan (2 December 2006). "Altering history? Changes have some asking 'Before what?'". The Deseret News. Archived from the original on 12 October 2007. Retrieved 18 May 2011.
'I find this attempt to restructure history offensive,' Lori Weintz wrote, in a letter to National Geographic publishers. ... 'The forward to your book says B.C. and A.D. were removed so as to "not impose the standards of one culture on others." ... It's 2006 this year for anyone on Earth that is participating in day-to-day world commerce and communication. Two thousand six years since what? Most people know, regardless of their belief system, and aren't offended by a historical fact.'
- "On Retaining The Traditional Method Of Calendar Dating (B.C./A.D.)". Southern Baptist Convention. June 2000. Retrieved 18 May 2011.
This practice is the result of the secularization, anti-supernaturalism, religious pluralism, and political correctness pervasive in our society ... retention is a reminder to those in this secular age of the importance of Christ's life and mission and emphasizes to all that history is ultimately His Story.
- Chicago Manual of Style (17th ed.). University of Chicago Press. 2017. ¶ 9.34. ISBN 978-0-226-28705-8.
- "Major Rule Changes in The Chicago Manual of Style, Fifteenth Edition". University of Chicago Press. 2003. Archived from the original on 9 September 2007. Retrieved 26 May 2015.
Certain abbreviations traditionally set in small caps are now in full caps (AD, BCE, and the like), with small caps an option.
- SBL Handbook of Style Society of Biblical Literature 1999 "8.1.2 ERAS – The preferred style is B.C.E. and C.E. (with periods). If you use A.D. and B.C., remember that A.D. precedes the date and B.C. follows it. (For the use of these abbreviations in titles, see § 7.1.3.2.)"
- ^ "GERMANY: Jewish Joke". Time. 7 March 1938. Archived from the original on 17 July 2010. Retrieved 5 February 2012.
- Allgemeine Zeitung des Judenthums. Ein unpartheiisches Organ für alles jüdische Interesse, II. Jahrgang, No. 60, Leipzig, 19. Mai 1838 (19 May 1838). See page 175 in Allgemeine Zeitung des Judenthums: Ein unpartheiisches Organ für alles jüdische Interesse in Betreff von Politik, Religion, Literatur, Geschichte, Sprachkunde und Belletristik, Volume 2 (Leipzig 1838).
- Julius Fürst, Geschichte des Karäerthums von 900 bis 1575 der gewöhnlichen Zeitrechnung (Leipzig 1862–1869).
- von und zu Guttenberg, Karl Ludwig Freiherr (May 1938). "Weiße Blätter: Monatschrift für Geschichte, Tradition u. Staat" (PDF). p. 149. Archived from the original (PDF) on 19 January 2012. Retrieved 15 April 2018.
- Ortografía de la lengua española (in Spanish) (online ed.). Real Academia Española y Asociación de Academias de la Lengua Española. 2010. p. 695.
- "Writing Dates in Spanish". Archived from the original on 11 November 2011. Retrieved 5 February 2012.
- "Welsh-Termau-Cymraeg Archives" (in Welsh). JISCMail. 19 October 2006. Retrieved 29 February 2012.
- "Jazyková příručka Ústavu pro jazyk český". Retrieved 15 May 2020.
- "pr. Kr". Hrvatski jezični portal. Retrieved 16 March 2021.
- "p. Kr". Hrvatski jezični portal. Retrieved 16 March 2021.
- "pr. n. e." Hrvatski jezični portal. Retrieved 16 March 2021.
- "n. e." Hrvatski jezični portal. Retrieved 16 March 2021.
External links
- "From Our Readers: Ancient Manuscripts—How Are They Dated?". Awake!. Jehovah's Witnesses. 2009.
Although A.D. (Anno Domini, meaning 'in the year of our Lord') and B.C. (before Christ) are used in lands where professed Christianity predominates, we have chosen to use the terms C.E. (Common Era) and B.C.E. (Before the Common Era).
Calendars | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Systems | |||||||
In wide use | |||||||
In more limited use |
| ||||||
Historical | |||||||
By specialty |
| ||||||
Reform proposals | |||||||
Displays and applications | |||||||
Year naming and numbering |
| ||||||
Fictional | |||||||
Time | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Key concepts | |||||||||
Measurement and standards |
| ||||||||
Philosophy of time | |||||||||
Human experience and use of time | |||||||||
Time in science |
| ||||||||
Related | |||||||||
Chronology | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Key topics | |||||||||
| |||||||||
Calendars |
| ||||||||
Astronomic time | |||||||||
Geologic time |
| ||||||||
Chronological dating |
| ||||||||
Genetic methods | |||||||||
Linguistic methods | |||||||||
Related topics |