Misplaced Pages

Criticism of Islam: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 23:15, 6 August 2005 edit-Ril- (talk | contribs)10,465 edits its the content that was at Criticism of Islam, an article that was VFD'd - second edit is clearly a move← Previous edit Latest revision as of 16:31, 22 December 2024 edit undoDaddynnoob (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users1,037 editsmNo edit summaryTag: Visual edit 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Short description|none}}
{{deletebecause|recreation of properly VFD'd content a second time - go to Votes for undeletion if you want it back}}
{{Use dmy dates|date=June 2022}}
{{Islam}}
{{Islam |related |width=22.0em}}
{{Criticism of Islam}}
'''Criticism of ]''' can take many forms, including academic critiques, political criticism, religious criticism, and personal opinions. Subjects of criticism include Islamic beliefs, practices, and doctrines.


Criticism of Islam has been present since its formative stages, and early expressions of disapproval were made by ], ], and some ] like ].<ref name="John of Damascus2">De Haeresibus by ]. See ]. '']'', vol. 94, 1864, cols 763–73. An English translation by the Reverend John W Voorhis appeared in ''The Moslem World'' for October 1954, pp. 392–98.</ref> Subsequently, the ] itself faced criticism after the ].<ref name="WarraqPoetry">{{cite book|last=Warraq|first=Ibn |title=Leaving Islam: Apostates Speak Out |url=https://archive.org/details/leavingislamapos00warr|url-access=limited|publisher=Prometheus Books |year=2003 |isbn=1-59102-068-9 |page=}}</ref><ref name="Ibn Kammuna">Ibn Kammuna, ''Examination of the Three Faiths'', trans. ] (Berkeley and Los Angeles, 1971), pp. 148–49</ref><ref name="Oussani">, by Gabriel Oussani, ''Catholic Encyclopedia''. Retrieved 16 April 2006.</ref><ref name="fried1">{{cite book|first1=Yohanan|last1=Friedmann|year=2003|title=Tolerance and Coercion in Islam: Interfaith Relations in the Muslim Tradition|url=https://archive.org/details/tolerancecoercio00frie|url-access=limited|publisher=Cambridge University Press|page=, 35|isbn=978-0-521-02699-4}}</ref>
'''Criticism of''' or '''opposition to ]''', in the narrow sense is theological criticism of Islamic ] and the ], but in the wider sense may also refer to political criticism of Islamic society, the ] and political ] and militant ], and opposition to a perceived 'Islamic' agenda. Negative views of Islam are sometimes termed with the ] ].


Criticism of Islam has been aimed at the life of ], the prophet of Islam, in both his public and personal lives.<ref name="Oussani" /><ref name="WarraqQuest">Ibn Warraq, The Quest for Historical Muhammad (Amherst, Mass.:Prometheus, 2000), 103.</ref> Issues relating to the authenticity and morality of the ], both the ] and the ]s, are also discussed by critics.<ref name="BibleInQuran">, by Kaufmann Kohler Duncan B. McDonald, ''Jewish Encyclopedia''. Retrieved 22 April 2006.</ref> Criticisms of Islam have also been directed at historical practices, like the recognition of ]<ref name="eois">Brunschvig. 'Abd; '']''</ref><ref name=OEIW>{{cite encyclopedia|author=Dror Ze'evi|title=Slavery|encyclopedia=The Oxford Encyclopedia of the Islamic World|editor=John L. Esposito|publisher=Oxford University Press|location=Oxford|year=2009|url=http://bridgingcultures.neh.gov/muslimjourneys/items/show/214|access-date=23 February 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170223125519/http://bridgingcultures.neh.gov/muslimjourneys/items/show/214|archive-date=23 February 2017|url-status=dead}}</ref><ref>, in ].</ref><ref>, in ]</ref> as well as ] impacting indigenous cultures.<ref name="Islamic-Imperialism">{{cite book|url=https://yalebooks.yale.edu/book/9780300198171/islamic-imperialism|title=Islamic Imperialism: A History|last=Karsh|first=Ephraim|year=2007|publisher=Yale University Press|isbn=9780300198171}}</ref> More recently, ] regarding ], ], ], and God's ] have received criticism for their apparent ] and scientific inconsistencies.<ref>
==History==
{{cite book
Criticism of the central beliefs of Islam predate Islam, as the religion shares many characteristics of other earlier religions and religion itself. In this sense, criticisms against belief in the supernatural, or in the omnipotent creator God of Islam - in other words, atheism - date back to the writings of the ancient Greek philosophers, such as ]. Medieval Islamic scholars would indeed struggle to reconcile with or to reject the works of the ancient Greeks, just as Christianity did.
| last1 = Fitzgerald
| first1 = Timothy
| year = 2000
| title = The Ideology of Religious Studies
| url = https://books.google.com/books?id=R7A1f6Evy84C
| location = New York
| publisher = Oxford University Press
| publication-date = 2003
| page = 235
| isbn = 9780195347159
| access-date = 30 Apr 2019
| quote = this book consists mainly of a critique of the concept of religion .
}}
</ref><ref name="Ruthven">{{cite web|title=Voltaire's Fanaticism, or Mahomet the Prophet:A New Translation; Preface: Voltaire and Islam|first=Malise|last=Ruthven|url=http://litwinbooks.com/mahomet-preface.php|accessdate=12 August 2015}}</ref>


Other criticisms center on the treatment of individuals within modern ], including issues which are related to ], particularly in relation to the application of ].<ref name="fried1"/> As of 2014, 26% of the world's countries had ], and 13% of them also had ]. By 2017, 13 Muslim countries imposed the death penalty for ] or ].<ref>, ], 29 July 2016.</ref><ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.indy100.com/article/the-countries-where-apostasy-is-punishable-by-death--Z110j2Uwxb|title=The countries where apostasy is punishable by death|first1=Louis|last1=Doré|date=May 2017|access-date=15 March 2018|newspaper=]}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.freedomhouse.org/template.cfm?page=22&year=2005&country=6825|title=Saudi Arabia|access-date=7 October 2006|archive-date=9 November 2011|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20111109034847/http://www.freedomhouse.org/template.cfm?page=22&year=2005&country=6825|url-status=dead}}</ref><ref name="IslamInEurope">{{cite magazine| magazine=] | date=5 October 2006 | title=Islam in Europe | author=Timothy Garton Ash | url=http://www.nybooks.com/articles/19371}}</ref> Amid the contemporary embrace of ], there has been criticism regarding how Islam may affect the willingness or ability of Muslim immigrants to ] in host nations.<ref name="Modood">{{cite book| title=Multiculturalism, Muslims and Citizenship: A European Approach | url=https://archive.org/details/multiculturalism00modo | url-access=limited | author=Tariq Modood | publisher=Routledge | edition=1st | date=6 April 2006 | isbn=978-0-415-35515-5 | page=}}</ref><ref>{{cite book|title=Russia and Islam: State, Society and Radicalism|page=94|publisher=Taylor & Francis|year=2010}} by Roland Dannreuther, Luke March</ref>
The earliest recorded, explicit criticisms and oppostions to Islam come from what the early Muslims wrote of their pagan Arabian advesaries, as well as the ] inhabitants of south Arabia at the time (particularly the Jewish tribes of ]).


== Historical background ==
The earliest non-Muslim sources of criticism and opposition come from ] ] ] writings of Eastern Christians, such as in ], who had come under the dominion of the ], or their fellow coreligionists in Europe who were becoming increasingly aware of the growing Islamic Empire (see ], ]). At first they saw Islam as a military threat, a pagan scourge sent by God as a punishment against Christians for their sins. Eventually the Islamic empire conquered present day ] (see ]) and the Church became increasingly aware of the religion of Islam itself. As a result, Islam began to be seen as not just a military threat but as a religious threat as well. Many medieval ecclastical writers began to portray Islam and ] as "precursor of the ]" or the Antichrist himself, and Muhammad was frequently described as having been possessed by ]. In later centuries, criticism and opposition to Islam would continue to be expounded by Christians writers. Other religions, particularly ], would also develop similar criticsms of their own, as a result of the increasing Islamic conquests outside of Arabia.


The earliest surviving written criticisms of Islam are found in the writings of ] such as ]. He viewed Islamic doctrines as a mix of ideas taken from the Bible and claimed that Muhammad was influenced by an Arian monk.<ref name="Writings by St John of Damascus">{{cite book|chapter-url=http://www.orthodoxinfo.com/general/stjohn_islam.aspx|chapter= St. John of Damascus's Critique of Islam|title=Writings by St John of Damascus|series=The Fathers of the Church|volume=37|location=Washington, DC|publisher=Catholic University of America Press|year=1958|pages= 153–160|access-date=8 July 2019}}</ref>
In the modern era, European and American ] would examine the claims of Islam from a ], ] perspective. In the 21st century, political and military conflicts have caused Islam and Islamic practices to come under a increased scrutiny around the world and have generally been the focus of greatly increased attention in the non-Muslim media.
Other notable early critics included arabs like ] and ].<ref name="Doubt">{{cite book |last=Hecht |first=Jennifer Michael |url=https://archive.org/details/doubthistory00jenn |title=Doubt: A History: The Great Doubters and Their Legacy of Innovation from Socrates and Jesus to Thomas Jefferson and Emily Dickinson |publisher=Harper San Francisco |year=2003 |isbn=0-06-009795-7 |page=224 |author-link=Jennifer Michael Hecht}}</ref>{{rp|224}} ], an eleventh-century ] and critic of all religions. His poetry was known for its "pervasive pessimism."<ref name=":3">{{Cite web|title = Abu-L-Ala al-Maarri Facts|url = http://biography.yourdictionary.com/abu-l-ala-al-maarri|website = biography.yourdictionary.com|access-date = 13 July 2015}}</ref><ref>{{Cite book|url=https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2021/entries/abu-bakr-al-razi/|title=The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy|first=Peter|last=Adamson|chapter=Abu Bakr al-Razi |editor-first=Edward N.|editor-last=Zalta|date=1 November 2021|publisher=Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University|via=Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.nationalgeographic.com/adventure/article/150301-aristotle-archimedes-einstein-darwin-ptolemy-razi-ngbooktalk|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210303021204/https://www.nationalgeographic.com/adventure/article/150301-aristotle-archimedes-einstein-darwin-ptolemy-razi-ngbooktalk|url-status=dead|archive-date=3 March 2021|title=Is Islam Hostile to Science?|date=28 February 2015|website=Adventure}}</ref> He believed that Islam does not have a monopoly on truth.<ref name="WarraqPoetry"/><ref>{{Cite book| last=Moosa| first= Ebrahim | title=Ghazālī and the Poetics of Imagination | publisher=UNC Press | year= 2005 | isbn=0-8078-2952-8| page=9}}</ref><ref name="Doubt">{{cite book |last=Hecht |first=Jennifer Michael |url=https://archive.org/details/doubthistory00jenn |title=Doubt: A History: The Great Doubters and Their Legacy of Innovation from Socrates and Jesus to Thomas Jefferson and Emily Dickinson |publisher=Harper San Francisco |year=2003 |isbn=0-06-009795-7 |page=224 |author-link=Jennifer Michael Hecht}}</ref>{{rp|224}} ] writings, attributed to the philosopher ] ({{Died in|{{circa|756}}}}), include defenses of Manichaeism against Islam and critiques of the Islamic concept of God, characterizing the Quranic deity in highly critical terms.<ref>Tilman Nagel ''Geschichte der islamischen Theologie: von Mohammed bis zur Gegenwart'' C.H. Beck 1994 {{ISBN|9783406379819}} p. 215</ref><ref>], ], ], ] ''Accusations of Unbelief in Islam: A Diachronic Perspective on ''Takfīr'' '' Brill, 30 October 2015 {{ISBN|9789004307834}} p. 61</ref> The Jewish philosopher ], criticized Islam,<ref name="Ibn Warraq p. 3">Ibn Warraq. ''Why I Am Not a Muslim'', p. 3. Prometheus Books, 1995. {{ISBN|0-87975-984-4}}</ref><ref>Norman A. Stillman. ''The Jews of Arab Lands: A History and Source Book'' p. 261. Jewish Publication Society, 1979{{ISBN|0-8276-0198-0}}</ref> reasoning that Sharia was incompatible with the principles of justice.<ref name="Ibn Warraq p. 3"/><ref>Norman A. Stillman. ''The Jews of Arab Lands: A History and Source Book'' p. 261. Jewish Publication Society, 1979 {{ISBN|0-8276-0198-0}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal|doi=10.3390/rel10010063|doi-access=free|title=Muhammad, the Jews, and the Composition of the Qur'an: Sacred History and Counter-History|year=2019|last1=Firestone|first1=Reuven|journal=Religions|volume=10|page=63}}</ref>


During the ], Christian church officials commonly represented Islam as a Christian ] or a form of idolatry.<ref>{{Cite book|author=Erwin Fahlbusch|title=The Encyclopedia of Christianity, Volume 2|publisher=Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing|year=1999|url={{google books |plainurl=y |id=yaecVMhMWaEC|page=759}}|page=759| isbn=9789004116955}}</ref><ref name=":1">Christian Lange ''Paradise and Hell in Islamic Traditions'' Cambridge University Press, 2015 {{ISBN|9780521506373}} pp. 18–20</ref> They viewed Islam to be a material, rather than spiritual, religion and often explained it in apocalyptic terms.<ref name=":1">Christian Lange ''Paradise and Hell in Islamic Traditions'' Cambridge University Press, 2015 {{ISBN|9780521506373}} pp. 18–20</ref><ref>{{Cite book|author=Erwin Fahlbusch|title=The Encyclopedia of Christianity, Volume 2|publisher=Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing|year=1999|url={{google books |plainurl=y |id=yaecVMhMWaEC|page=759}}|page=759| isbn=9789004116955}}</ref> In the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, European academics often portrayed Islam as an exotic Eastern religion distinct from Western religions like Judaism and Christianity, sometimes classifying it as a "Semitic" religion.<ref name="Campo xxi – xxxii">{{cite book|last=Campo|first=Juan Eduardo|title=Encyclopedia of Islam|year=2009|publisher=Infobase Publishing|pages= xxi – xxxii |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=OZbyz_Hr-eIC|isbn=9781438126968}}</ref><ref>{{Cite book|author=Erwin Fahlbusch|title=The Encyclopedia of Christianity, Volume 2|publisher=Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing|year=1999|url={{google books |plainurl=y |id=yaecVMhMWaEC|page=759}}|page=759| isbn=9789004116955}}</ref> The term "Mohammedanism" was used by many to criticize Islam by focusing on Muhammad's actions, reducing Islam to merely a derivative of Christianity rather than acknowledging it as a successor of Abrahamic monotheisms.<ref name="Campo xxi – xxxii">{{cite book|last=Campo|first=Juan Eduardo|title=Encyclopedia of Islam|year=2009|publisher=Infobase Publishing|pages= xxi – xxxii |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=OZbyz_Hr-eIC|isbn=9781438126968}}</ref><ref name="Campo 477">{{cite book|last=Campo|first=Juan Eduardo|title=Encyclopedia of Islam|year=2009|publisher=Infobase Publishing|page= 477|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=OZbyz_Hr-eIC|isbn=9781438126968}}</ref> By contrast, many academics nowadays study Islam as an Abrahamic religion in relation to Judaism and Christianity.<ref name="Campo xxi – xxxii"/> The Christian apologist ] criticized Islam as a heresy or parody of Christianity,<ref name="Chesterton 1925">], '']'', 1925, Chapter V, ''The Escape from Paganism'', </ref><ref>{{cite web |last1=Villis |first1=Tom |title=G. K. Chesterton and Islam |url=https://www.researchgate.net/publication/336105840 |website=Research Gate |publisher=Modern Intellectual History |access-date=January 16, 2014 |year=2019}}</ref> ] ({{Died in|1776}}), both a ] and a ],<ref>{{Cite book| edition = Summer 2017| publisher = Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University|editor= Edward N. Zalta | last1 = Russell| first1 = Paul| last2 = Kraal| first2 = Anders| title = The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy| chapter = Hume on Religion| access-date = 3 December 2018| date = 2017| chapter-url = https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2017/entries/hume-religion/}}</ref> considered ] religions to be more "comfortable to sound reason" than ] but also found Islam to be more "ruthless" than Christianity.<ref>{{Cite book| publisher = Routledge| isbn = 978-1-134-60914-7| last1 = MacEoin| first1 = Denis| last2 = Al-Shahi| first2 = Ahmed| title = Islam in the Modern World (RLE Politics of Islam)| date = 24 July 2013 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=AZQqAAAAQBAJ&pg=PA22}}</ref>
==Ethical and Theological Criticism==
Criticism of Islamic theology may come from within Islam (in which case it does not qualify as opposition to Islam as such, of course, but as ] or ]), from a ] viewpoint, or from the point of view of another religion.


The ] bishop ] accepted Muhammed as a prophet, but did not consider his mission to be universal and regarded Christian law superior to Islamic law.<ref>Hugh Goddard ''A History of Christian-Muslim Relations'' New Amsterdam Books, 5 September 2000 {{ISBN|9781461636212}} p. 65.</ref> ], a twelfth-century ], did not question the strict monotheism of Islam, and considered Islam to be a instrument of divine providence for bringing all of humankind to the worship of the one true God, but was critical of the practical ] of Muslim regimes and considered ] and politics to be inferior to their Jewish counterparts.<ref name="Maimonides">, by David Novak. Retrieved 29 April 2006.</ref>
===Muhammad===
The '']'' (1911) states that he was inspired by an imperfect understanding of ] and ], and that he was prone to epileptic fits. Many medieval and early modern critics are either motivated by extreme hatred, or extreme admiration of Muhammad. Outspoken as always, ] refers to Muhammad as "a devil and first-born child of ]". The Catholic Encyclopedia goes on to state that Luther's ] is itself rather similar to Muhammad's theology, and that such indiscriminate abuse is unsupported by facts and that later scholars, such as Sprenger, Noldeke, Weil, Muir, Koelle, Grimme and Margoliouth, give a more unbiased estimate of Mohammed's life and character, and substantially agree as to his motives, prophetic call, personal qualifications, and sincerity.
According to Sir William Muir, Marcus Dods, and some others, Muhammad was at first sincere, but later, carried away by success, he practised deception wherever it would gain his end. Koelle "finds the key to the first period of Muhammad's life in Khadija, his first wife", after whose death he became a prey to his evil passions. Sprenger attributes the alleged revelations to epileptic fits, or to "a paroxysm of cataleptic insanity". Zwemer (1907) goes on to criticize the life of Muhammad by the standards, first, of the ] and ]s, both of which Muhammad acknowledged as Divine ]; second, by the ] morality of his ]ian compatriots; lastly, by the new law of which he pretended to be the "divinely appointed medium and custodian". According to this author, the prophet was false even to the ethical traditions of the idolatrous brigands among whom he lived, and grossly violated the easy sexual morality of his own system. After this, it is hardly necessary to say that, in Zwemer's opinion, Muhammad fell very far short of the most elementary requirements of Scriptural morality. Quoting Johnstone, Zwemer concludes by remarking that the judgment of these modern scholars, however harsh, rests on evidence which "comes all from the lips and the pens of his own devoted adherents".


In his essay ''Islam Through Western Eyes'', the cultural critic ] suggests that the Western view of Islam is particularly hostile for a range of religious, psychological and political reasons, all deriving from a sense "that so far as the West is concerned, Islam represents not only a formidable competitor but also a late-coming challenge to Christianity." In his view, the general basis of ] thought forms a study structure in which Islam is placed in an inferior position as an object of study, thus forming a considerable bias in Orientalist writings as a consequence of the scholars' cultural make-up.<ref>{{cite web |author=Edward W. Said |date=2 January 1998 |title=Islam Through Western Eyes |url=http://www.thenation.com/article/islam-through-western-eyes?page=full |work=The Nation}}</ref>
=== The Qur'an ===
Modern ] is just beginning to be carried out on the ]. This scholarship questions some traditional claims about its composition and content, contending that the Qur'an incorporates material from both the ] and the ], and that the text of the Qur'an developed both during and after ]'s lifetime. For example, Islamic history records that ] collected all variants of the Qur'an and destroyed those that he did not approve of. Parts of certain ] collections refer to chapters (suras) that are no longer extant in the Qur'an.


=== Hadith === ==Points of criticism==
===The expansion of Islam===
Secondary in importance to the Qur'an for most Muslim schools of thought are the oral traditions of Muhammad, called hadith. After ] was performed on Christian texts a set of scholars began to focus on those of other religions. ] is the best known of these turn-of-the-century iconclasts, who also included D.S. Margoliuth, Henri Lammens, and Leone Caetani. Goldziher writes, in his ''Muslim Studies'',
In an alleged dialogue between the Byzantine emperor ] ({{Reign|1391|1425}}) and a Persian scholar, the emperor criticized Islam as a faith spread by the sword.<ref>Dialogue 7 of Twenty-six Dialogues with a Persian (1399), for the Greek text see Trapp, E., ed. 1966. Manuel II. Palaiologos: Dialoge mit einem "Perser." Wiener Byzantinische Studien 2. Vienna, for a Greek text with accompanying French translation see Th. Khoury "Manuel II Paléologue, Entretiens avec un Musulman. 7e Controverse", Sources Chrétiennes n. 115, Paris 1966, for an English translation see Manuel Paleologus, Dialogues with a Learned Moslem. Dialogue 7 (2009), chapters 1–18 (of 37), translated by Roger Pearse available at the ] , at , and also {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131211201618/http://www.scribd.com/doc/40389472/Manuel-Paleologus-Dialogue-with-a-Learned-Muslim-Scholar-Dialogue-7-15th-century |date=11 December 2013 }}. A somewhat more complete translation into French is found {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160303210137/http://www.cypress.fr/UserFiles/File/manuel-paleologue.html |date=2016-03-03 }}</ref><!-- It might be good to mention the primary source which cites this dialogue. --> This matches the common view in Europe during the ] about Islam, then synonymous with the ], as a bloody, ruthless, and intolerant religion.<ref name="Hume 2007">{{Cite book| publisher = Clarendon Press| isbn = 978-0-19-925188-9| last = Hume| first = David| title = A Dissertation on the Passions: The Natural History of Religion : a Critical Edition| date = 2007 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=K-VbQ2TPA70C&pg=PA139}}</ref> More recently, in 2006, a similar statement of Manuel II,{{efn|"Show me just what Muhammad brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached," he said.}} quoted publicly by ], prompted a negative response from Muslim figures who viewed the remarks as an insulting mischaracterization of Islam.<ref name="news.bbc.co.uk">{{Cite news |date=16 September 2006 |title=In quotes: Muslim reaction to Pope |url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/5348436.stm |via=news.bbc.co.uk}}</ref><ref name="BBC1">{{Cite news |date=17 September 2006 |title=Pope sorry for offending Muslims |url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/5353208.stm |via=news.bbc.co.uk}}</ref> In this vein, the ]n social reformer ] ({{Died in|1897}}) thought that Islam was grown through violence and desire for wealth,<ref>"Américo Castro and the Meaning of Spanish Civilization", by José Rubia Barcia, Selma Margaretten, p. 150.</ref> while the ]n author ] considers Islam as a "superstition" that it is mainly spread with violence and force.<ref>"Debating the African Condition: Race, gender, and culture conflict", by Alamin M. Mazrui, Willy Mutunga, p. 105</ref>


This "conquest by the sword" thesis is opposed by some historians who consider the transregional development of Islam a multi-faceted and complex phenomenon.<ref name="Campo xxi – xxxii"/> The first wave of expansion, the migration of the early Muslims to ] to escape persecution in ] and the subsequent conversion of Medina, was indeed peaceful. In the years to come, Muslims defended themselves against frequent Meccan incursions until Mecca's peaceful surrender in 630. By the time of his death in 632, many of the Arabian tribes had formed political alliances with Muhammad and adopted Islam peacefully, which also paved the way for the subsequent conquests of ], ], ] and (the rest of ]) after the death of Muhammad.<ref name="Campo xxi – xxxii"/> Islam nevertheless often remained a minority religion in conquered territories for several centuries after the initial waves of conquest, indicating that the conquest of territories beyond the Arabian Peninsula did not instantly result in large conversions to Islam.{{efn|Scholarly research suggests that there was an inverse relationship between where Muslim political power centres were and where the most conversions occurred, which was on the political periphery.<ref name="Campo xxi – xxxii"/> According to the Encyclopaedia of Islam, conquest was just one of several elements that helped Islam spread throughout the world. The systematisation of Islamic tradition, trade, interfaith marriage, political patronage, urbanisation, and the pursuit of knowledge must also be acknowledged. Along trade routes and even in the most isolated regions, Sufis contributed to the spread of Islam. The yearly hajj to Mecca, which brought together scholars, mystics, businesspeople, and regular believers from various nations, should be particularly noted as a contributing factor. Despite taking on more contemporary forms, these factors are still in force today. The expansion of Islam into western Europe, the Americas, Australia, and New Zealand has been facilitated by them.<ref name="Campo xxi – xxxii"/>}}<ref name="Campo xxi – xxxii"/>
:''... it is not surprising that, among the hotly debated controversial issues of Islam, whether political or doctrinal, there is not one in which the champions of the various views are unable to cite a number of traditions, all equipped with imposing ''isnads''.


=== Scripture ===
The next generations of Western scholars were also sceptics, on the whole: ], in his ''Origins of Muhammadan Jurisprudence'' (1959), argued that isnads going back to Muhammad were in fact ''more'' likely to be spurious than isnads going back to the companions. ], in the 1970s, and his students ] and ] were even more sweeping in their dismissal of Muslim tradition, arguing that even the Qur'an was likely to have been collected later than claimed.
]n Quran]]


{{Main|Criticism of the Quran}}
Contemporary Western scholars of hadith include:
{{See also|History of the Quran|The Syro-Aramaic Reading of the Koran|Historicity of Muhammad}}
* Herbert Berg, ''The Development of Exegesis in Early Islam'' (2000)
In the lifetime of Muhammad, the Quran was primarily preserved orally and the written compilation of the whole Quran in its current form took place some 150 to 300 years later, according to some sources.<ref>] "Towards a Prehistory of Islam," Jerusalem Studies in Arabic and Islam, vol.17, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, 1994 p. 108.</ref><ref>] The Sectarian Milieu: Content and Composition of Islamic Salvation History, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1978 p. 119</ref><ref>], ''Meccan Trade and the Rise of Islam,'' Princeton University Press, 1987 p. 204.</ref> Alternatively, others believe that the Quran was compiled shortly after the death of Muhammad in 632 and canonized by end of the caliphate of ] ({{Reign|644|656}}).{{Sfn|Modarressi|1993|pp=16{{ndash}}18}}{{Sfn|Amir-Moezzi|2009|p=14}}{{Sfn|Pakatchi|2015}} The idea that Quran is perfect and impossible to imitate as asserted in the Quran itself is disputed by critics.<ref>See the verses {{Cite quran|2|2|style=ns}}, {{Cite quran|17|88|end=89|style=ns}}, {{Cite quran|29|47|style=ns}}, {{Cite quran|28|49|style=ns}}</ref> One such criticism is that sentences about God in the Quran are sometimes followed immediately by those in which God is the speaker.<ref name="JE">. From the ''Jewish Encyclopedia''. Retrieved 21 January 2008.</ref> The modern historian ] believes that the Quran is in part a ] of other sacred scriptures, in particular the ] scriptures.<ref>Wansbrough, John (1977). ''Quranic Studies: Sources and Methods of Scriptural Interpretation''</ref><ref name="Wansbrough">Wansbrough, John (1978). ''The Sectarian Milieu: Content and Composition of Islamic Salvation History''.</ref> The Christian theologian ] ({{Died in|1893}}) praises the Quran for its poetic beauty, religious fervor, and wise counsel, but considers this mixed with "absurdities, bombast, unmeaning images, and low sensuality."<ref name="Schaff 1910 4.III.44">Schaff, P., & Schaff, D. S. (1910). History of the Christian church. Third edition. New York: Charles Scribner's Sons. Volume 4, Chapter III, section 44 "The Koran, And The Bible"</ref> The Iranian journalist ] ({{Died in|1982}}) criticized the Quran, saying that "the speaker cannot have been God" in certain passages.<ref name="Warraq - Why I am Not">{{cite book|last1=Warraq|title=Why I am Not a Muslim|publisher=Prometheus Books|isbn=0-87975-984-4|page=106|url=http://download.iranville.com/books/%DA%A9%D8%AA%D8%A7%D8%A8%E2%80%8C%D9%87%D8%A7%DB%8C%20%D8%A7%D9%86%DA%AF%D9%84%DB%8C%D8%B3%DB%8C/Ibn%20Warraq%20-%20Why%20I%20Am%20Not%20a%20Muslim.pdf|year=1995|access-date=16 January 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150117072713/http://download.iranville.com/books/%DA%A9%D8%AA%D8%A7%D8%A8%E2%80%8C%D9%87%D8%A7%DB%8C%20%D8%A7%D9%86%DA%AF%D9%84%DB%8C%D8%B3%DB%8C/Ibn%20Warraq%20-%20Why%20I%20Am%20Not%20a%20Muslim.pdf|archive-date=17 January 2015|url-status=dead}}</ref> Similarly, the secular author ] gives Surah ] as an example of a passage which is "clearly addressed to God, in the form of a prayer."<ref name="Warraq - Why I am Not" /> The orientalist ] believes that the Quran contains many verses which are incomprehensible, a view rejected by Muslims and many other orientalists.<ref name="Lester">{{cite magazine |last=Lester |first=Toby |author-link=Toby Lester |date=January 1999 |title=What is the Koran? |url=https://www.theatlantic.com/doc/199901/koran |magazine=]}}</ref> '']'', a medieval polemical work, describes the narratives in the Quran as "all jumbled together and intermingled," and regards this as "evidence that many different hands have been at work therein."<ref>Quoted in A. Rippin, ''Muslims: their religious beliefs and practices: Volume 1'', London, 1991, p. 26.</ref>
* Fred M. Donner, ''Narratives of Islamic Origins'' (1998)
* ], ''Succession to Muhammad'' (1997)


====Pre-existing sources====
although Madelung is less critical than the rest.
]
Critics point to various pre-existing sources to argue against the ]. Some scholars have calculated that one third of the Quran has pre-Islamic Christian origins.<ref>G. Luling asserts that a third of the Quran is of pre-Islamic Christian origins, see ''Über den Urkoran'', Erlangen, 1993, 1st ed., 1973, p. 1.</ref> Aside from the Bible, the Quran relies on several ]l and sources, like the ],<ref name="Leirvik 2010, pp. 33–34">Leirvik 2010, pp. 33–34.</ref> ],<ref name="Leirvik 2010, pp. 33–34"/> and several ]s.<ref>Leirvik 2010, p. 33.</ref> Several narratives rely on Jewish ] sources, like the narrative of Cain learning to bury the body of Abel in ].<ref>Samuel A. Berman, Midrash Tanhuma-Yelammedenu (KTAV Publishing House, 1996), 31–32.</ref><ref>Gerald Friedlander, Pirḳe de-R. Eliezer, (The Bloch Publishing Company, 1916) 156</ref> ] argues that the dependence of the Quran on preexisting sources is one evidence of a purely human origin.<ref>Geisler, N. L. (1999). "Qur'an, Alleged Divine Origin of". In: ''Baker Encyclopedia of Christian Apologetics''. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Books.</ref> ] regards this reliance on pre-Islamic Christian sources as evidence that Islam derived from a ] sect of Christianity.<ref>, in ''richardcarrier.info''</ref>


==== Criticism of the Hadith ====
A very minor Islamic sect that maintains a ] view has rejected hadith not ony because of suspected invalidity. Some members of this belief system cite that the Qur'an calls itself complete and that it would be ] to take another source of guidance other than it.
{{Main|Criticism of Hadith}}{{See also|Historiography of early Islam}}


It has been suggested that there exists around the ] (Muslim traditions relating to the '']'' (words and deeds) of Muhammad) three major sources of corruption: political conflicts, sectarian prejudice, and the desire to translate the underlying meaning, rather than the original words verbatim.<ref name="fedex">Brown, Daniel W. "Rethinking Tradition in Modern Islamic Thought", 1999. pp. 113, 134.</ref>
===Relation to Christianity===
The theology of the Qur'an is strictly ], and denounces the Christian ] as ] (]). Naturally, this view has been rejected by Christians, who claim that it is based on an imperfect understanding of the concept of the Trinity. A result of this difference is the Islamic reverence for ] (]) but the rejection of Jesus as the "Son of God" as a blasphemous concept.


Muslim critics of the hadith, known as ], reject its authority on theological grounds, arguing that the Quran itself is sufficient for guidance, as it claims that nothing essential has been omitted.<ref>Quran, ]: 38</ref> They believe that reliance on the Hadith has caused people to deviate from the original intent of God's revelation to Muhammad, which they see as adherence to the Quran alone.<ref>Donmez, Amber C. "The Difference Between Quran-Based Islam and Hadith-Based Islam"</ref><ref>Quran, ]: 38</ref> ] was one of these critics and was denounced as a non-believer by thousands of orthodox clerics.<ref>Ahmad, Aziz. "Islamic Modernism in India and Pakistan, 1857–1964". London: Oxford University Press.</ref> In his work ''Maqam-e Hadith'' he considered any hadith that goes against the teachings of Quran to have been falsely attributed to the Prophet.<ref>Pervez, Ghulam Ahmed. {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20111113215748/http://www.tolueislam.com/Parwez/mh/mh.htm |date=13 November 2011 }}, {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20111004044003/http://www.tolueislam.com/Urdu/mhadith/mh.htm |date=4 October 2011 }}</ref> Kassim Ahmad argued that some hadith promote ideas that conflict with science and create sectarian issues.<ref name="call">Latif, Abu Ruqayyah Farasat. , Masters Assertion, September 2006</ref><ref name="kiss">Ahmad, Kassim. "Hadith: A Re-evaluation", 1986. English translation 1997</ref>
Islamic theology has been compared to ] or ] Christianity, and in this sense Christian criticism of Islam may be considered as based on common ] religious principles, and Islam as typologically belonging to a number of Christian sects declared ] by the post-] Christian ].


] argues that modern Western scholarship has raised doubts about the historicity and authenticity of hadith,{{sfn|Esposito|1998|p=67}} while ] argued that there is no evidence of legal traditions prior to 722. Schacht concluded that the Sunna attributed to the Prophet consists of material from later periods rather than the actual words and deeds of the Prophet.{{sfn|Esposito|1998|p=67}} However, scholars like ] have argued that a complete dismissal of hadith as late fiction is "unjustified".<ref>{{cite book | last=Madelung| first=Wilferd | title=The Succession to Muhammad: A Study of the Early Caliphate | publisher=Cambridge University Press | year=1997 | isbn=0-521-64696-0 | page=xi}}</ref>
Atheist criticism of Islam is naturally much more fundamental, disputing the ], and applicable to Christianity and other religions just as much as to Islam.
Orthodox Muslims do not deny the existence of false hadith, but believe that through the scholars' work, these false hadith have been largely eliminated.<ref>By Nasr, Seyyed Vali Reza, "Shi'ism", 1988. p. 35.</ref><ref>{{cite book | last=Madelung| first=Wilferd | title=The Succession to Muhammad: A Study of the Early Caliphate | publisher=Cambridge University Press | year=1997 | isbn=0-521-64696-0 | page=xi}}</ref>


]s of the Quran]]
==Political Criticism==
The traditional view of Islam has faced scrutiny due to a lack of consistent supporting evidence, such as limited archaeological finds and some discrepancies with non-Muslim sources.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.opendemocracy.net/faith-europe_islam/mohammed_3866.jsp|title=What do we actually know about Mohammed?|work=openDemocracy|access-date=13 November 2007|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090421171853/http://www.opendemocracy.net/faith-europe_islam/mohammed_3866.jsp|archive-date=21 April 2009|url-status=dead}}</ref><ref name="Donner 1998">Donner, Fred ''Narratives of Islamic Origins: The Beginnings of Islamic Historical Writing'', Darwin Press, 1998</ref>{{rp|23}} In the 1970s, a number of scholars began to re-evaluate established Islamic history, proposing that earlier accounts may have been altered over time.<ref name="Donner 1998">Donner, Fred ''Narratives of Islamic Origins: The Beginnings of Islamic Historical Writing'', Darwin Press, 1998</ref>{{rp|23}}<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.opendemocracy.net/faith-europe_islam/mohammed_3866.jsp|title=What do we actually know about Mohammed?|work=openDemocracy|access-date=13 November 2007|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090421171853/http://www.opendemocracy.net/faith-europe_islam/mohammed_3866.jsp|archive-date=21 April 2009|url-status=dead}}</ref> They sought to reconstruct early Islamic history using alternative sources like coins, inscriptions, and non-Islamic texts. Prominent among these scholars was ].<ref name="Donner 1998"/>{{rp|38}} Additionally, ] study of the Sana'a manuscripts revealed some variations in text and verse order, suggesting that the Quranic text may have evolved over time.<ref name="Lester" />
] and militant ], especially ], are sometimes criticized as outgrowths of Islam rather than political phenomena.


=== Criticism of Muhammad ===
] attempt criticism of Islamic society from within, typically differentiating religious issues from issues of traditional society.
{{See also|Criticism of Muhammad}}
Points often mentioned in critical discussion of Islamic society are ] and ].
The Christian missionary ] and the former Muslim ] have criticized Muhammad's actions as immoral.<ref name="Oussani"/><ref name="WarraqQuest"/> In one instance, the Jewish poet ] provoked the Meccan tribe of ] to fight Muslims and wrote ] poetry about their women,<ref name="Ashraf">{{cite encyclopedia |title=Ka'b ibn al-Ashraf |encyclopedia=] Online |publisher=Brill Academic Publishers |author-link=William Montgomery Watt |editor=P.J. Bearman |issn=1573-3912 |author=William Montgomery Watt |editor2=Th. Bianquis |editor3=] |editor4=E. van Donzel |editor5=W.P. Heinrichs}}</ref> and was apparently plotting to assassinate Muhammad.<ref name="Rubin">Uri Rubin, The Assassination of Kaʿb b. al-Ashraf, Oriens, Vol. 32. (1990), pp. 65–71.</ref> Muhammad called upon his followers to kill Ka'b,<ref name="Ashraf" /> and he was consequently assassinated by ], an early Muslim.<ref>{{cite book |author=Ibn Hisham |title=Al-Sira al-Nabawiyya |year=1955 |volume=2 |location=Cairo |pages=51–57 |author-link=Ibn Hisham}} English translation from Stillman (1979), pp. 125–26.</ref> Such criticisms were countered by the historian ], who argues on the basis of ] that Muhammad should be judged by the standards and norms of his own time and geography, rather than ours.<ref>{{Cite book |last=Watt |first=W. Montgomery |url=https://archive.org/details/muhammadprophets00watt/page/229 |title=Muhammad: Prophet and Statesman |publisher=Oxford University Press |year=1961 |isbn=0-19-881078-4 |page= |access-date=27 May 2010}}</ref> The fourteenth-century poem '']'' by the ] poet ] contains defamatory images of Muhammad, picturing him the eighth circle of hell, along with his cousin and son-in-law ].<ref name="auto">G. Stone ''Dante's Pluralism and the Islamic Philosophy of Religion'' Springer, 12 May 2006 {{ISBN|9781403983091}} p. 132</ref><ref name="ReferenceH">Minou Reeves, P. J. Stewart ''Muhammad in Europe: A Thousand Years of Western Myth-Making'' NYU Press, 2003 {{ISBN|9780814775646}} p. 93–96</ref> Dante does not blame Islam as a whole but accuses Muhammad of ] for establishing another religion after Christianity.<ref name="auto" /> Some medieval ecclesiastical writers portrayed Muhammad as possessed by ], a "precursor of the ]" or the Antichrist himself.<ref name="Oussani" /> ']'', an ] manuscript of unknown origins, describes how Muhammad (called Ozim, from ]) was tricked by Satan into adulterating an originally pure divine revelation: God was concerned about the spiritual fate of the Arabs and wanted to correct their deviation from the faith. He then sent an angel to the Christian monk Osius who ordered him to preach to the Arabs. Osius, however, was in ill-health and instead ordered a young monk, Ozim, to carry out the angel's orders. Ozim set out to follow his orders, but was stopped by an evil angel on the way. The ignorant Ozim believed him to be the same angel that had spoken to Osius before. The evil angel modified and corrupted the original message given to Ozim by Osius, and renamed Ozim Muhammad. From this followed the erroneous teachings of Islam, according to ''Tultusceptru''.<ref>J. Tolan, ''Medieval Christian Perceptions of Islam'' (1996) pp. 100–01</ref>


===Contemporary Critics=== ===Islamic ethics===
{{Main|Islamic ethics}}
*US conservatives
]]]
**]
According to the ], while there is much to be admired and affirmed in Islamic ethics, its originality or superiority is rejected.<ref>. From the ''Catholic Encyclopedia''. Retrieved 21 January 2008.</ref>
**]
Critics stated that the ] allows Muslim men to discipline their wives by striking them.<ref>Kathir, Ibn, "Tafsir of Ibn Kathir", Al-Firdous Ltd., London, 2000, 50–53 – Ibn Kathir states "dharbun ghayru nubrah" strike/admonish lightly</ref> There is however evidence from Islamic hadiths and scholars such as Ibn Kathir that demonstrates that only a twig or leaf can be used by a man to "strike" their wife and this is not allowed to cause pain or injure their wife but to show their frustration.<ref name="Domestic Violence and the Islamic T">{{cite journal|date=2017| title =Domestic Violence and the Islamic Tradition: Book Review|journal= Journal of Islamic Ethics| volume=1|issue=(1-2)|pages= 203–207| doi= 10.1163/24685542-12340009|doi-access=free}}</ref> Moreover, confusion amongst translations of Quran with the original Arabic term "wadribuhunna" being translated as "to go away from them",<ref>Laleh Bakhtiar, The Sublime Quran, 2007 translation</ref> "beat",<ref>"The Holy Quran: Text, Translation and Commentary", Abdullah Yusuf Ali, Amana Corporation, Brentwood, MD, 1989. {{ISBN|0-915957-03-5}}, passage was quoted from commentary on 4:34 – Abdullah Yusuf Ali in his Quranic commentary also states that: "In case of family jars four steps are mentioned, to be taken in that order. (1) Perhaps verbal advice or admonition may be sufficient; (2) if not, sex relations may be suspended; (3) if this is not sufficient, some slight physical correction may be administered; but Imam Shafi'i considers this inadvisable, though permissible, and all authorities are unanimous in deprecating any sort of cruelty, even of the nagging kind, as mentioned in the next clause; (4) if all this fails, a family council is recommended in 4:35 below." Abdullah Yusuf Ali, The Holy Quran: Text, Translation and Commentary (commentary on 4:34), Amana Corporation, Brentwood, MD, 1989. {{ISBN|0-915957-03-5}}.</ref> "strike lightly" and "separate".<ref>Ammar, Nawal H. (May 2007). "Wife Battery in Islam: A Comprehensive Understanding of Interpretations". Violence Against Women 13 (5): 519–23</ref> The film '']'' critiqued this and similar verses of the Quran by displaying them painted on the bodies of abused Muslim women.<ref name=submission_script>{{cite web|url=http://www.opzij.nl/opzij/show?id=23669&framenoid=19755|title=Welkom bij Opzij|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070927225432/http://www.opzij.nl/opzij/show?id=23669&framenoid=19755|archive-date=27 September 2007}}</ref>
*Jewish
Some critics argue that the Quran is incompatible with other religious scriptures as it attacks and advocates hate against people of other religions.<ref name="BibleInQuran"/><ref>Gerber (1986), pp. 78–79</ref><ref>"Anti-Semitism". ]</ref><ref> {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090318224903/http://www.hudson.org/files/pdf_upload/saudi_textbooks_final.pdf |date=18 March 2009 }} (pdf), ], May 2006, pp. 24–25.</ref> ] interprets certain verses of the Quran as sanctioning military action against unbelievers as it said "Fight those who do not believe in Allah or in the Last Day and who do not consider unlawful what Allah and His Messenger have made unlawful and who do not adopt the religion of truth from those who were given the Scripture – until they give the jizyah willingly while they are humbled."(])<ref name="Who Are the Moderate Muslims?">Sam Harris </ref> However, the Islamic hadiths and scholars such as Dr Zakir Naik refer to fighting and not to trust "non-believers" and Christians in certain situations or events such as during times of war.<ref>Understanding the Qurán - Page xii, Ahmad Hussein Sakr - 2000</ref>
**]
*ex-Muslims
**]
**]
**]
**] (pseudonym of a self-described Iranian ex-Muslim expounding his views on his website)
**] (pseudonym of an ex-Muslim, author of bestselling books critical of Islam)


] is a tax for "protection" paid by non-Muslims to a Muslim ruler, for the exemption from military service for non-Muslims, and for the permission to practice a non-Muslim faith with some communal autonomy in a Muslim state.<ref name=anveremon>Anver M. Emon, Religious Pluralism and Islamic Law: Dhimmis and Others in the Empire of Law, Oxford University Press, {{ISBN|978-0199661633}}, pp. 99–109.</ref><ref name="ArnoldPoI3">{{cite book | first=Thomas | last=Walker Arnold | author-link=Thomas Walker Arnold | publisher=] | date=1913 | title=Preaching of Islam: A History of the Propagation of the Muslim Faith | url=https://archive.org/details/preachingofislam00arno | pages=–1 | quote=This tax was not imposed on the Christians, as some would have us think, as a penalty for their refusal to accept the Muslim faith, but was paid by them in common with the other <u>dh</u>immīs or non-Muslim subjects of the state whose religion precluded them from serving in the army, in return for the protection secured for them by the arms of the Musalmans.}} ()</ref>{{sfn|Esposito|1998|p=34|ps=. "They replaced the conquered countries, indigenous rulers and armies, but preserved much of their government, bureaucracy, and culture. For many in the conquered territories, it was no more than an exchange of masters, one that brought peace to peoples demoralized and disaffected by the casualties and heavy taxation that resulted from the years of Byzantine-Persian warfare. Local communities were free to continue to follow their own way of life in internal, domestic affairs. In many ways, local populations found Muslim rule more flexible and tolerant than that of Byzantium and Persia. Religious communities were free to practice their faith to worship and be governed by their religious leaders and laws in such areas as marriage, divorce, and inheritance. In exchange, they were required to pay tribute, a poll tax (''jizya'') that entitled them to Muslim protection from outside aggression and exempted them from military service. Thus, they were called the "protected ones" (''dhimmi''). In effect, this often meant lower taxes, greater local autonomy, rule by fellow Semites with closer linguistic and cultural ties than the hellenized, Greco-Roman élites of Byzantium, and greater religious freedom for Jews and indigenous Christians."}}
==See also==
Harris argues that ] is simply a consequence of taking the Quran literally, and is skeptical that moderate Islam is possible.{{efn|Various calls to arms were identified in the Quran by US citizen ], all of which were cited as "most relevant to my actions on March 3, 2006" (],<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.usc.edu/org/cmje/religious-texts/quran/verses/009-qmt.php#009.044|title=Center for Muslim-Jewish Engagement|date=4 June 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160604194024/http://www.usc.edu/org/cmje/religious-texts/quran/verses/009-qmt.php#009.044 |archive-date=4 June 2016 }}</ref> ],<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.usc.edu/org/cmje/religious-texts/quran/verses/009-qmt.php#009.019|title=Center for Muslim-Jewish Engagement|date=4 June 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160604194024/http://www.usc.edu/org/cmje/religious-texts/quran/verses/009-qmt.php#009.019 |archive-date=4 June 2016 }}</ref> ],<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.usc.edu/org/cmje/religious-texts/quran/verses/057-qmt.php#057.010|title=Center for Muslim-Jewish Engagement|date=13 April 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160413235435/http://www.usc.edu/org/cmje/religious-texts/quran/verses/057-qmt.php#057.010 |archive-date=13 April 2016 }}</ref> ],<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.usc.edu/org/cmje/religious-texts/quran/verses/008-qmt.php#008.072|title=Center for Muslim-Jewish Engagement|date=30 December 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151230210409/http://www.usc.edu/org/cmje/religious-texts/quran/verses/008-qmt.php#008.072 |archive-date=30 December 2015 }}</ref> ],<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.usc.edu/org/cmje/religious-texts/quran/verses/009-qmt.php#009.120|title=Center for Muslim-Jewish Engagement|date=4 June 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160604194024/http://www.usc.edu/org/cmje/religious-texts/quran/verses/009-qmt.php#009.120 |archive-date=4 June 2016 }}</ref> ],<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.usc.edu/org/cmje/religious-texts/quran/verses/003-qmt.php#003.167|title=Center for Muslim-Jewish Engagement|date=4 June 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160604194019/http://www.usc.edu/org/cmje/religious-texts/quran/verses/003-qmt.php#003.167 |archive-date=4 June 2016 }}</ref> ],<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.usc.edu/org/cmje/religious-texts/quran/verses/004-qmt.php#004.066|title=Center for Muslim-Jewish Engagement|date=1 May 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150501064500/http://www.usc.edu/org/cmje/religious-texts/quran/verses/004-qmt.php#004.066 |archive-date=1 May 2015 }}</ref> ],<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.usc.edu/org/cmje/religious-texts/quran/verses/004-qmt.php#004.104|title=Center for Muslim-Jewish Engagement|date=1 May 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150501064500/http://www.usc.edu/org/cmje/religious-texts/quran/verses/004-qmt.php#004.104 |archive-date=1 May 2015 }}</ref> ],<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.usc.edu/org/cmje/religious-texts/quran/verses/009-qmt.php#009.081|title=Center for Muslim-Jewish Engagement|date=4 June 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160604194024/http://www.usc.edu/org/cmje/religious-texts/quran/verses/009-qmt.php#009.081 |archive-date=4 June 2016 }}</ref> ],<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.usc.edu/org/cmje/religious-texts/quran/verses/009-qmt.php#009.093|title=Center for Muslim-Jewish Engagement|date=4 June 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160604194024/http://www.usc.edu/org/cmje/religious-texts/quran/verses/009-qmt.php#009.093 |archive-date=4 June 2016 }}</ref> ],<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.usc.edu/org/cmje/religious-texts/quran/verses/009-qmt.php#009.100|title=Center for Muslim-Jewish Engagement|date=4 June 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160604194024/http://www.usc.edu/org/cmje/religious-texts/quran/verses/009-qmt.php#009.100 |archive-date=4 June 2016 }}</ref> ],<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.usc.edu/org/cmje/religious-texts/quran/verses/016-qmt.php#016.110|title=Center for Muslim-Jewish Engagement|date=26 October 2012|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121026012552/http://www.usc.edu/org/cmje/religious-texts/quran/verses/016-qmt.php#016.110 |archive-date=26 October 2012 }}</ref> ],<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.usc.edu/org/cmje/religious-texts/quran/verses/061-qmt.php#061.011|title=Center for Muslim-Jewish Engagement|date=30 April 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160430041717/http://www.usc.edu/org/cmje/religious-texts/quran/verses/061-qmt.php#061.011 |archive-date=30 April 2016 }}</ref> ]).<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.usc.edu/org/cmje/religious-texts/quran/verses/047-qmt.php#047.035|title=Center for Muslim-Jewish Engagement|date=2 May 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160502163036/http://www.usc.edu/org/cmje/religious-texts/quran/verses/047-qmt.php#047.035 |archive-date=2 May 2016 }}</ref><ref>{{cite wikisource |wslink=Mohammed Reza Taheri-azar- Letter to The daily Tar Heel |title=Letter to The daily Tar Heel |first=Mohammed Reza |last=Taheri-azar |authorlink=Mohammed Reza Taheri-azar SUV attack#Perpetrator |year=2006}}</ref>}}<ref name=Harris1>{{Cite book | last=Harris | first=Sam | title=The End of Faith: Religion, Terror, and the Future of Reason | pages= | publisher=W. W. Norton; Reprint edition | year=2005 | isbn=0-393-32765-5 | url=https://archive.org/details/endoffaithreligi00harr/page/31 }}</ref>
*Topics of Islam and controversy
Max I. Dimont interprets that the ]s described in the Quran are specifically dedicated to "male pleasure".<ref>The Indestructible Jews, by Max I. Dimont, p. 134</ref> According to Pakistani Islamic scholar Maulana Umar Ahmed Usmani "Hur" or "hurun" is the plural of both "ahwaro" which is a masculine form and also "haurao" which is a feminine, meaning both pure males and pure females. Basically, the word 'hurun' means white, he says.<ref name="dawn-houri-20">{{cite web |title=Are all 'houris' female? |url=https://www.dawn.com/news/635343 |website=Dawn.com |access-date=22 April 2019 |date=9 June 2011}}</ref>
**]
**]
**]
**]


=== Views on slavery ===
*Criticism of other religions
{{Main|Islamic views on slavery|History of slavery in the Muslim world|History of concubinage in the Muslim world|Mamluk}}
**], ]
] in ]]]
**]
**]
**]


According to ], the Islamic injunctions against the enslavement of Muslims led to massive importation of slaves from the outside.<ref>Lewis, Bernard (1990). Race and Slavery in the Middle East. New York: Oxford University Press. {{ISBN|0-19-505326-5}}, p. 10.</ref> Also ] believes that Islam seems to have done more to protect and expand slavery than the reverse.<ref>Manning, Patrick (1990). Slavery and African Life: Occidental, Oriental, and African Slave Trades. Cambridge University Press. {{ISBN|0-521-34867-6}}, p. 28</ref>
*]
Brockopp, on the other hand believe that the idea of using alms for the manumission of slaves appears to be unique to the Quran ({{Quran-usc|2|177}} and {{Quran-usc|9|60}}). Similarly, the practice of freeing slaves in atonement for certain sins appears to be introduced by the Quran (but compare Exod 21:26-7).<ref name="Brockopp"/> Also the forced prostitution of female slaves, a Near Eastern custom of great antiquity, is condemned in the Quran.<ref name="Esposito">John L Esposito (1998) p. 79</ref> According to Brockopp "the placement of slaves in the same category as other weak members of society who deserve protection is unknown outside the Qur'an.<ref name="Brockopp">], ''Slaves and Slavery''</ref> Some slaves had high social status in the ], such as the ] ] ],<ref name="Levanoni 2010">{{cite book |last=Levanoni |first=Amalia |year=2010 |chapter=PART II: EGYPT AND SYRIA (ELEVENTH CENTURY UNTIL THE OTTOMAN CONQUEST) – The Mamlūks in Egypt and Syria: the Turkish Mamlūk sultanate (648–784/1250–1382) and the Circassian Mamlūk sultanate (784–923/1382–1517) |editor-last=Fierro |editor-first=Maribel |title=The New Cambridge History of Islam, Volume 2: The Western Islamic World, Eleventh to Eighteenth Centuries |location=] and ] |publisher=] |pages=237–284 |doi=10.1017/CHOL9780521839570.010 |isbn=978-1-139-05615-1 |quote=The Arabic term ''mamlūk'' literally means 'owned' or 'slave', and was used for the ] ] ] of ], purchased from ] and the ] by ] to serve as soldiers in their armies. Mamlūk units formed an integral part of Muslim armies from the third/ninth century, and Mamlūk involvement in government became an increasingly familiar occurrence in the ] ]. The road to absolute rule lay open before them ] when the Mamlūk establishment gained military and political domination during the reign of the ], al-Ṣāliḥ Ayyūb (r. 637–47/1240–9).}}</ref> who were assigned high-ranking military and administrative duties by the ruling Arab and ] dynasties.<ref name="Ayalon 2012">{{cite encyclopedia |author-last=Ayalon |author-first=David |author-link=David Ayalon |year=2012 |origyear=1991 |title=Mamlūk |editor1-last=Bosworth |editor1-first=C. E. |editor1-link=Clifford Edmund Bosworth |editor2-last=van Donzel |editor2-first=E. J. |editor2-link=Emeri Johannes van Donzel |editor3-last=Heinrichs |editor3-first=W. P. |editor3-link=Wolfhart Heinrichs |editor4-last=Lewis |editor4-first=B. |editor4-link=Bernard Lewis |editor5-last=Pellat |editor5-first=Ch. |editor5-link=Charles Pellat |encyclopedia=] |location=] |publisher=] |volume=6 |doi=10.1163/1573-3912_islam_COM_0657 |isbn=978-90-04-08112-3}}</ref>
**]
**]


Critics argue unlike Western societies there have been no anti-slavery movements in Muslim societies,<ref>Murray Gordon, "Slavery in the Arab World." New Amsterdam Press, New York, 1989. Originally published in French by Editions Robert Laffont, S.A. Paris, 1987, p. 21.</ref>
==Literature==
which according to Gordon was due to the fact that it was deeply anchored in Islamic law, thus there was no ideological challenge ever mounted against slavery.<ref>Murray Gordon, "Slavery in the Arab World." New Amsterdam Press, New York, 1989. Originally published in French by Editions Robert Laffont, S.A. Paris, 1987, pp. 44–45.</ref> According to sociologist Rodney Stark, "the fundamental problem facing Muslim theologians vis-à-vis the morality of slavery" is that Muhammad himself engaged in activities such as purchasing, selling, and owning slaves, and that his followers saw him as the perfect example to emulate. Stark contrasts Islam with ], writing that Christian theologians wouldn't have been able to "work their way around the biblical acceptance of slavery" if ] had owned slaves, as Muhammad did.<ref>Rodney Stark, "For the Glory of God: How Monotheism Led to Reformations, Science, Witch-Hunts, and the End of Slavery", p. 338, 2003, ], {{ISBN|0691114366}}</ref>
*Zwemer ''Islam, a Challenge to Faith'' (New York, 1907)
*], '']'' (1995)
* &mdash;, '']''
{{catholic}}


Only in the early 20th century did slavery gradually became outlawed and suppressed in Muslim lands, with Muslim-majority ] being the last country in the world to formally abolish slavery in 1981.<ref name="eois" />
==External links==
Murray Gordon characterizes Muhammad's approach to slavery as reformist rather than revolutionary that abolish slavery, but rather improved the conditions of slaves by urging his followers to treat their slaves humanely and free them as a way of expiating one's sins.<ref>{{cite book|author=Murray Gordon|title=Slavery in the Arab World|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=5l81hwFPvzYC&pg=PA19|pages=19–20|publisher=Rowman & Littlefield|year=1989|isbn=9780941533300}}</ref>
In ], slavery was theoretically an exceptional condition under the dictum ''The basic principle is liberty''.<ref>{{Cite encyclopedia|author=Brunschvig, R.| year=1986 | title=ʿAbd |encyclopedia=Encyclopaedia of Islam| edition=2nd|publisher=Brill |editor=P. Bearman |editor2=Th. Bianquis |editor3=C.E. Bosworth |editor4=E. van Donzel |editor5=W.P. Heinrichs|volume=1|pages=26}}</ref><ref name=OEIW/>
Reports from Sudan and Somalia showing practice of slavery is in border areas as a result of continuing war<ref>], ''slavery'', p. 298</ref> and not Islamic belief. In recent years, except for some conservative ] Islamic scholars,{{efn|In a 2014 issue of their digital magazine '']'', the ] explicitly claimed religious justification for enslaving ] women.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.newsweek.com/islamic-state-seeks-justify-enslaving-yazidi-women-and-girls-iraq-277100|title=Islamic State Seeks to Justify Enslaving Yazidi Women and Girls in Iraq|work=]|date=13 October 2014}}</ref><ref>Allen McDuffee, '']'', 13 October 2014</ref><ref>Salma Abdelaziz, '']'', 13 October 2014</ref><ref>Richard Spencer, '']'', 13 October 2014.</ref>}}
most Muslim scholars found the practice "inconsistent with Qur'anic morality".<ref>Abou el Fadl, ''Great Theft'', HarperSanFrancisco, 2005.</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.lse.ac.uk/collections/economicHistory/GEHN/GEHNPDF/Islam&SlaveryWGCS.pdf|title=Department of Economic History|access-date=9 March 2022|archive-date=25 March 2009|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090325013630/http://www.lse.ac.uk/collections/economicHistory/GEHN/GEHNPDF/Islam%26SlaveryWGCS.pdf|url-status=dead}}</ref><ref>Khaled Abou El Fadl and William Clarence-Smith</ref>


=== Apostasy ===
*Christian academic sources
])", a painting by ]]]
**Catholic Encyclopedia
{{Main|Apostasy in Islam}}
***
{{See also|Freedom of religion#Islam}}
***

In Islam, apostasy along with heresy and blasphemy (verbal insult to religion) is considered a form of disbelief. The Qur'an states that apostasy would bring punishment in the Afterlife, but takes a relatively lenient view of apostasy in this life (Q 9:74; 2:109).<ref name="Campo48"/>
While Shafi'i interprets verse ]<ref>{{Quran-usc|2|217|style=ns}}</ref> as adducing the main evidence for the death penalty in Quran, the historian W. Heffening states that ] threatens apostates with punishment in the next world only.,<ref>W. Heffening, in Encyclopedia of Islam</ref> the historian Wael Hallaq states the later addition of death penalty "reflects a later reality and does not stand in accord with the deeds of the Prophet."<ref>Encyclopedia of the Quran, Apostasy</ref>

According to ], ] is identified by a list of actions such as conversion to another religion, denying the existence of ], rejecting the ], mocking God or the prophets, idol worship, rejecting the ], or permitting behavior that is forbidden by the sharia, such as ] or the eating of forbidden foods or drinking of alcoholic beverages.<ref name="relianceA2">{{cite web |author=], ] |date=1368 |title=A Classic Manual of Islamic Sacred Law |url=http://dailyrollcall.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/the-reliance-of-the-traveller.pdf |access-date=14 May 2020 |work=Shafiifiqh.com |page=517, Chapter O8.0: Apostasy from Islam (Ridda)}}</ref><ref name="relianceA1">{{cite web|url=http://www.catheyallison.com/Reliance_of_the_Traveller.pdf |title=Reliance of the Traveller |author=], ] |date =1368|work=Amana Publications |access-date=14 May 2020}}</ref><ref name="Campo48">{{cite book|last=Campo|first=Juan Eduardo|title=Encyclopedia of Islam|year=2009|publisher=Infobase Publishing|page=48|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=OZbyz_Hr-eIC|isbn=9781438126968}}</ref> The majority of Muslim scholars hold to the traditional view that apostasy is ] or imprisonment until repentance, at least for adults of sound mind.<ref>{{cite book|author=Abdullahi Ahmed An-Na'im|title=Toward an Islamic Reformation: Civil Liberties, Human Rights, and International Law|publisher= Syracuse University Press|year= 1996|page= 183 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=U4e7Ph4lXzUC&pg=PA183|isbn=9780815627067}}</ref><ref name="KEY">{{cite book|last1=Kecia |first1=Ali |first2= Oliver |last2=Leaman|title=Islam: the key concepts|publisher= Routledge|year= 2008|page= 10 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=H5-CdzqmuXsC&pg=PA10|isbn=9780415396387 }}</ref><ref>{{cite book|first=John L. |last=Esposito|title=The Oxford dictionary of Islam|publisher= Oxford University Press|year=2004 |page= 22 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=6VeCWQfVNjkC&pg=PA22|isbn=9780195125597}}</ref>
Also ] and ] scholars, agree on the difference of punishment between male and female.<ref>{{cite encyclopedia | encyclopedia=Encyclopaedia of Islam | year=2003 | title=Murtadd}}</ref>

Some widely held interpretations of Islam are inconsistent with Human Rights conventions that recognize the right to change religion.<ref>, in Human Rights Library - University of Minnesota</ref> In particular article 18 of the ]<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.un.org/Overview/rights.html|title=UN Universal Declaration of Human Rights}}</ref>
Some contemporary Islamic jurists, such as ]<ref>, by Mahdi Jami, In Persian, ''BBC Persian'', 2 February 2005. Retrieved 25 April 2006.</ref> have argued or issued ]s that state that either the changing of religion is not punishable or is only punishable under restricted circumstances.<ref>, by Mahdi Jami, In Persian, ''BBC Persian'', 2 February 2005. Retrieved 25 April 2006.
* , by Magdi Abdelhadi, BBC Arab affairs analyst, 27 March 2006. Retrieved 25 April 2006.
* S. A. Rahman in "Punishment of Apostasy in Islam", Institute of Islamic Culture, Lahore, 1972, pp. 10–13
* {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090926233750/http://www.islamicperspectives.com/Apostasy1.htm |date=26 September 2009 }}, View of Dr. Ahmad Shafaat on apostasy.
* Religious Tolerance.org, , by B.A. Robinson, ''Religious Tolerance.org'', 7 April 2006. Retrieved 16 April 2006.</ref>
According to ], "The real predicament facing modern Muslims with liberal convictions is not the existence of stern laws against apostasy in medieval Muslim books of law, but rather the fact that accusations of apostasy and demands to punish it are heard time and again from radical elements in the contemporary Islamic world."<ref name="Yohanan Friedmann p.5">Yohanan Friedmann, ''Tolerance and Coercion in Islam'', Cambridge University Press, p. 5</ref>

] noted that "state officials could not punish an unmanifested belief even if they wanted to".<ref name="kadri-249">{{cite book|last1=Kadri|first1=Sadakat|title=Heaven on Earth: A Journey Through Shari'a Law from the Deserts of Ancient Arabia ..|date=2012 |publisher=Macmillan|isbn=9780099523277 |page=249 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=ztCRZOhJ10wC&q=Heaven+on+Earth%3A+A+Journey+Through+Shari%27a+Law}}</ref>
The kind of apostasy which the jurists generally deemed punishable was of the political kind, although there were considerable legal differences of opinion on this matter.<ref name="afsaruddin1">] (2013), ''Striving in the Path of God: Jihad and Martyrdom in Islamic Thought'', p. 242. ]. {{ISBN|0199730938}}.</ref>
] states that " a culture whose lynchpin is religion, religious principles and religious morality, apostasy is in some way equivalent to high treason in the modern nation-state".<ref name="waelhallaq">{{cite book|last1= Wael|first1= B. Hallaq|title= Sharī'a: Theory, Practice and Transformations|date= 2009|publisher= ]|isbn= 978-0-521-86147-2|page= 319|author1-link= Wael Hallaq}}</ref>
Also ] consider the apostasy as a treason and "a withdrawal, a denial of allegiance as well as of religious belief and loyalty".<ref name=autogenerated1>{{cite magazine| last=Lewis | first=Bernard | title=Islamic Revolution | date=1998-01-21 | magazine=The New York Review of Books | url=http://www.nybooks.com/articles/4557}}</ref>
The English historian ] suggests the traditional view of apostasy hampered the development of Islamic learning, like philosophy and natural science, "out of fear that these could evolve into potential toe-holds for ], those people who reject God."<ref>C. E. Bosworth: Untitled review of "The Rise of Colleges. Institutions of Learning in Islam and the West by George Makdisi", ''Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society of Great Britain and Ireland'', No. 2 (1983), pp. 304–05</ref>
While in 13 Muslim-majority countries atheism is punishable by death,<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/12/10/atheists-death-penalty-_n_4417994.html|title=Atheists Face Death Penalty In 13 Countries, Discrimination Around The World According To Freethought Report|date=12 October 2013|work=The Huffington Post}}</ref>
according to legal historian ], executions were rare because "it was widely believed" that any accused apostate "who repented by articulating the '']''" (''LA ILAHA ILLALLAH'' "There is no God but God") "had to be forgiven" and their punishment delayed until after Judgement Day.<ref> {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150904045814/http://www.sunnah.org/aqida/forty_hadith_merits_tahlil.htm |date=4 September 2015 }}| Compiled by Dr. G.F. Haddad| (Hadith 26, Narrated by Bukhari, Muslim, Ahmad, Tayalisi, Abu Dawud, Nasa'i, al-`Adni, Abu `Awana, al-Tahawi, al-Hakim, and Bayhaqi.)</ref><ref name="kadri-239">{{cite book|last1=Kadri|first1=Sadakat|title=Heaven on Earth: A Journey Through Shari'a Law from the Deserts of Ancient Arabia ..|date=2012|publisher=Macmillan|isbn=9780099523277|page=239|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=ztCRZOhJ10wC&q=Heaven+on+Earth%3A+A+Journey+Through+Shari%27a+Law|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161202174508/https://books.google.com/books?id=ztCRZOhJ10wC&printsec=frontcover&dq=Heaven+on+Earth:+A+Journey+Through+Shari%27a+Law&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0CC0Q6AEwAWoVChMIob7syrnZxwIVhg6SCh0fYg3Z#v=onepage&q=Heaven%20on%20Earth%3A%20A%20Journey%20Through%20Shari'a%20Law&f=false|archive-date=2 December 2016}}</ref>
] states that "In Islamic teaching, such penalties may have been suitable for the age in which Muhammad lived."<ref> {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110807045042/http://www.alastairmcintosh.com/articles/2000_watt.htm |date=7 August 2011 }}, by Bashir Maan & Alastair McIntosh</ref>

=== Islam and violence ===
{{Main|Islam and violence|Supremacism#Islamic}}
] led to debate on whether Islam promotes violence.]]
Quran's teachings on matters of war and peace have become topics of heated discussion in recent years. On the one hand, some critics claim that certain verses of the Quran sanction military action against unbelievers as a whole both during the lifetime of Muhammad and after.<ref name="Who Are the Moderate Muslims?"/><ref name="BAR">''Warrant for terror: fatwās of radical Islam and the duty of jihād'', p. 68, Shmuel Bar, 2006</ref>
], an ], is a religious duty of ]s meaning "striving for the sake of God".<ref>{{cite book|title=Essential Islam: a comprehensive guide to belief and practice|last=Morgan |first=Diane|year=2010|publisher=ABC-CLIO|isbn=978-0-313-36025-1|page= |url=https://archive.org/details/essentialislamco0000morg|url-access=registration|access-date=5 January 2011}}</ref><ref name="Merriam">{{cite encyclopedia | editor=] | title=Merriam-Webster's Encyclopedia of World Religions | publisher=] | year=1999 | isbn=0-87779-044-2 | url=https://archive.org/details/isbn_9780877790440 }}, ''Jihad'', p. 571</ref><ref name="MIC">{{cite encyclopedia | editor=] | title=Medieval Islamic Civilization: An Encyclopedia | publisher=] | year=2005 | isbn=0-415-96690-6}}, ''Jihad'', p. 419</ref><ref name="jih">](2005), ''Islam: The Straight Path,'' p. 93</ref><ref name="ember">{{cite book |title=Encyclopedia of diasporas: immigrant and refugee cultures around the world. Diaspora communities|volume= 2 |last1=Ember |first1=Melvin |first2=Carol R. |last2=Ember|first3= Ian |last3=Skoggard |year=2005 |publisher=Springer|isbn=0-306-48321-1 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=7QEjPVyd9YMC&pg=PA183}}</ref>
It is perceived in a military sense (not spiritual sense) by ]<ref>Bernard Lewis, ''The Political Language of Islam'' (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1988), p. 72.</ref><ref>Lewis, Bernard, '']'', 2001 Chapter 2</ref> and David Cook.<ref name="Cook166">Cook, David. ''Understanding Jihad''. ], 2005. Retrieved from ] on 27 November 2011. {{ISBN|0-520-24203-3}}, {{ISBN|978-0-520-24203-6}}.</ref> Also Fawzy Abdelmalek<ref>{{cite book |title=The Turning Point: Islam & Jesus Salvation|first=Fawzy T. |last=Abdelmalek |publisher=AuthorHouse |year=2008 |page=210 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=REW7sYxFyBYC&q=Quran+violence&pg=PA210|isbn=9781468534290 }}</ref> and ] argue against Islam being a ] and not of violence.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.nationalreview.com/article/436571/orlando-shooting-left-gives-islam-free-pass|title=What If the Orlando Murderer Had Been a Christian?|website=]|date=13 June 2016}}</ref> John R. Neuman, a scholar on religion, describes Islam as "a perfect anti-religion" and "the antithesis of Buddhism".<ref>John Newman, ""{{Dead link|date=November 2019 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }}, Journal of the International Association of Buddhist Studies, Vol. 21, No. 2, 1998</ref> ] argued that role of ] literature in Saudi schools contributing suspicion and hate violence against non-Muslims as non-believers or infidels and anyone who "disagrees with Wahhabism is either an infidel or a deviant, who should repent or be killed."<ref>{{Cite news|url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/7093423.stm|title=Jihad and the Saudi petrodollar|date=15 November 2007|via=news.bbc.co.uk}}</ref>

Most Muslim scholars, on the other hand, argue that such verses of the Quran are interpreted out of context,<ref name="Boundries_Princeton">Sohail H. Hashmi, David Miller, ''Boundaries and Justice: diverse ethical perspectives'', Princeton University Press, p. 197</ref><ref name="www-rohan.sdsu.edu">{{cite web|url=http://www-rohan.sdsu.edu/~khaleel/|title=Khaleel Mohammed|publisher=San Diego State University Religious Studies Department|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080708102707/http://www-rohan.sdsu.edu/~khaleel/|archive-date=8 July 2008}}</ref> and argue that when the verses are read in context it clearly appears that the Quran prohibits aggression,<ref name="aaiil.org">Ali, Maulana Muhammad; {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180421092242/http://aaiil.org/text/books/mali/religionislam/religionislammuhammadali.shtml |date=21 April 2018 }} (6th Edition), Ch V "Jihad" p. 414 "When shall war cease". Published by '']''</ref><ref name="Sadr-u-Din, Maulvi page 8">{{cite book|last=Sadr-u-Din|first=Maulvi|title=Qur'an and War|page=8|publisher=The Muslim Book Society, Lahore, Pakistan|url=http://www.aaiil.org/text/books/others/sadrdin/quranwar/quranwar.shtml|access-date=8 October 2012|archive-date=8 March 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160308202015/http://www.aaiil.org/text/books/others/sadrdin/quranwar/quranwar.shtml|url-status=dead}}</ref><ref> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170829203630/http://www.aaiil.org/uk/newsletters/2002/0302.shtml |date=29 August 2017 }} by Dr. G. W. Leitner (founder of The Oriental Institute, UK) published in Asiatic Quarterly Review, 1886. ("Jihad, even when explained as a righteous effort of waging war in self-defense against the grossest outrage on one's religion, is strictly limited..")</ref> and allows fighting only in self-defense.<ref name="The Qur p. 228-232"> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180426223211/http://www.aaiil.org/text/articles/bash/quraniccommandmentswarjihad.shtml |date=26 April 2018 }} An English rendering of an Urdu article appearing in Basharat-e-Ahmadiyya Vol. I, pp. 228–32, by Dr. Basharat Ahmad; published by the Lahore Ahmadiyya Movement for the Propagation of Islam</ref><ref name="Ali, Maulana Muhammad Pages 411-413">{{cite book|first=Ali|last=Maulana Muhammad|title=The Religion of Islam (6th Edition), Ch V "Jihad"|pages=411–13|publisher=The Lahore Ahmadiyya Movement|url=http://www.aaiil.org/text/books/mali/religionislam/religionislammuhammadali.html}}{{Dead link|date=April 2019 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }}</ref>
Charles Mathewes characterizes the peace verses as saying that "if others want peace, you can accept them as peaceful even if they are not Muslim." As an example, Mathewes cites the second sura, which commands believers not to transgress limits in warfare: "fight in God's cause against those who fight you, but do not transgress limits ; God does not love transgressors" (2:190).<ref name=Mathewes>{{cite book |title=Understanding Religious Ethics |first=Charles T. |last=Mathewes|publisher=John Wiley and Sons |year=2010 |page=197 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=EyCsZE_iHp4C&q=Koran+%22sword+verses%22&pg=PA197|isbn=9781405133517 }}</ref>

] ] described the ] as the "stage at which Islam became a menace to the whole world".<ref name="Margoliouth 1905 p. 362-363">], D. S. (1905). Mohammed and the Rise of Islam (Third Edition., pp. 362–63). New York; London: G. P. Putnam's Sons; The Knickerbocker Press.</ref> In the battle reportedly Muslims beheaded Jews.<ref>{{Cite book |last=Faizer |first=Rizwi |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=gZknAAAAQBAJ |title=The Life of Muhammad: Al-Waqidi's Kitab Al-Maghazi |date=5 September 2013 |publisher=Routledge |isbn=978-1-136-92114-8 |pages=252 |language=en}}</ref><ref>{{Cite book |last=Ashath |first=Hafiz Abu Dawud Sulaiman |url=http://archive.org/details/SunanAbuDawudVol.111160EnglishArabic |title=Sunan Abu Dawud |date=12 October 2014 |volume=5 |pages=45 |language=en, ar}}</ref> Margoliouth argues that the Jews of Khaybar had done nothing to harm Muhammad or his followers, and ascribes the attack to a desire for ]<ref name="Margoliouth 1905 p. 362-363"/><ref>
He wrote that this became an excuse for unfettered conquest."That plea would cover attacks on the whole world outside Medinah and its neighbourhood: and on leaving Khaibar the Prophet seemed to see the world already in his grasp. This was a great advance from the early days of Medinah, when the Jews were to be tolerated as equals, and even idolators to be left unmolested, so long as they manifested no open hostility. Now the fact that a community was idolatrous, or Jewish, or anything but Mohammedan, warranted a murderous attack upon it: the passion for fresh conquests dominated the Prophet as it dominated an Alexander before him or a Napoleon after him." ] (1905). Mohammed and the Rise of Islam (Third Edition., p. 363). New York; London: G. P. Putnam's Sons; The Knickerbocker Press.</ref>
] on the other hand, believes Jews' intriguing and use of their wealth to incite tribes against Muhammad left him no choice but to attack.<ref>Watt 189</ref>
Vaglieri and ] concur that one reason for attack was that the Jews of Khaybar were responsible for the Confederates that attacked Muslims during the ].<ref name="EI">Veccia Vaglieri, L. "Khaybar", ]</ref><ref name="Nomani 1979, vol. II, pg. 156">Nomani (1979), vol. II, pg. 156</ref><ref name="Sameul">Samuel Rosenblatt, ''Essays on Antisemitism: The Jews of Islam'', p. 112</ref> Rabbi Samuel Rosenblatt has said that Muhammad's policies were not directed exclusively against Jews (referring to his conflicts with Jewish tribes) and that Muhammad was more severe with his pagan Arab kinsmen.<ref name="Sameul">Samuel Rosenblatt, ''Essays on Antisemitism: The Jews of Islam'', p. 112</ref><ref name="Rosenblatt">Pinson; Rosenblatt (1946) pp. 112–119</ref>

The ] have resulted in many non-Muslims' indictment of Islam as a violent religion.<ref>{{cite book |title=Religion, power & violence: expression of politics in contemporary times|first=Ram |last=Puniyani |publisher=SAGE |year=2005 |pages=97–98 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=Fd5Fm79VMk8C&q=Islam+%22violent+religion%22&pg=PA98 |isbn=9780761933380}}</ref>
In the European view, Islam lacked divine authority and regarded the sword as the route to heaven.<ref name="Hume 2007"/>

], tracing what she believes to be the West's long history of hostility toward Islam, finds in Muhammad's teachings a theology of peace and tolerance. Armstrong holds that the "holy war" urged by the Quran alludes to each Muslim's duty to fight for a just, decent society.<ref>{{Cite book| last=Armstrong | first=Karen | title=Muhammad: A Biography of the Prophet | url=https://archive.org/details/muhammadbiograph00kare | url-access=limited | publisher=HarperSanFrancisco | year=1993 | isbn=0-06-250886-5 | page=}}</ref>
According to ], the leader of the 20th-century Indian independence movement, although non-violence is dominant in the Qur'an, thirteen hundred years of imperialist expansion have made Muslims a militant body.<ref>''The Gandhian Moment'', p. 117, by Ramin Jahanbegloo.</ref><ref>''Gandhi's responses to Islam'', p. 110, by Sheila McDonough</ref><ref>''Cold War Assemblages: Decolonization to Digital'', p. 81, ], Routledge.</ref>

Other self-described Muslim organisations have emerged more recently, and some of them have been associated with jihadist and extreme Islamist groups. Compared to the entire Muslim community, these groups are sparsely populated. They have, however, received more attention from governments, international organisations, and the international media than other Muslim groups. This is as a result of their participation in actions intended to combat alleged enemies of Islam both at home and abroad.<ref name="Campo xxi – xxxii"/>

Years later however, Al-Qaeda has yet to succeed in gaining the support of the majority of Muslims and continues to differ from other Islamist organizations in terms of both philosophy and strategy.<ref name="Campo xxi – xxxii"/>

==== Temporary and Contractual Marriages ====
{{Main|Nikah mut'ah|Nikah Misyar}}
{{transliteration|ar|DIN|Nikāḥ al-Mutʿah}} is a fixed-term or short-term contractual ] in ]. The duration of this type of marriage is fixed at its inception and is then automatically dissolved upon completion of its term. For this reason, nikah mut'ah has been widely criticised as the religious cover and legalization of ].<ref>, by ], BBC News, Last Updated: 2 June 2007.
* , by Nancy Trejos, The Washington Post, 20 January 2007.</ref><ref>, by Shahla Haeri, p. 6.
* , by Malcolm Clark.
* , by ].</ref> Shi'a and Sunnis agree that Mut'ah was legal in early times, but Sunnis consider that it was abrogated.<ref>], Volume 1 p. 74 {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120502030724/http://www.answering-ansar.org/answers/mutah/en/chap4.php |date=2 May 2012 }}</ref> Currently, however, mut'ah is one of the distinctive features of ].<ref name="Mutahhari7">{{cite web |url=http://www.al-islam.org/rightsofwomeninislam/7.htm |title=The rights of woman in Islam, Fixed-Term marriage and the problem of the harem |first=Morteza |last= Motahhari |publisher=al-islam.org |access-date=10 January 2011}}</ref>
]s believe that Muhammad later abolished this type of marriage at several different large events, Most Sunnis believe that Umar later was merely enforcing a prohibition that was established during Muhammad's time.<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.zawaj.com/articles/mutah.html|title=ZAWAJ.COM: Articles and Essays|website=www.zawaj.com}}</ref>

Shia contest the criticism that nikah mut'ah is a cover for prostitution, and argue that the unique legal nature of temporary marriage distinguishes Mut'ah ideologically from prostitution.<ref name=Iranica>, '']''</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.al-islam.org/muta-temporary-marriage-islamic-law-sachiko-murata|title=Muta', Temporary Marriage in Islamic Law|date=27 September 2012|website=www.al-islam.org}}</ref>
Children born of temporary marriages are considered legitimate, and have equal status in law with their siblings born of permanent marriages, and do inherit from both parents. Women must observe a period of celibacy (idda) to allow for the identification of a child's legitimate father, and a woman can only be married to one person at a time, be it temporary or permanent. Some Shia scholars also view Mut'ah as a means of eradicating prostitution from society.<ref>Said Amir Arjomand (1984), ''From nationalism to revolutionary Islam'', page 171</ref>

Nikah Misyar is a type of ] (marriage) in Sunni Islam only carried out through the normal contractual procedure, with the provision that the husband and wife give up several rights by their own free will, such as living together, equal division of nights between wives in cases of ], the wife's rights to housing, and maintenance money (''"]"''), and the husband's right of homekeeping and access.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://fiqh.islamonline.net/en/misyar-marriage/|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20110104035953/http://www.islamonline.net/servlet/Satellite?pagename=IslamOnline-English-Ask_Scholar%2FFatwaE%2FFatwaE&cid=1119503544160|url-status=dead|title=Misyar Marriage|date=6 July 2006|archivedate=4 January 2011|website=Fiqh}}</ref> Essentially the couple continue to live separately from each other, as before their contract, and see each other to fulfil their needs in a legally permissible (]) manner when they please.
Misyar has been suggested by some western authors to be a comparable marriage with ] and that they find it for the sole purpose of "sexual gratification in a licit manner"<ref>{{cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=zEkmJAeJYBkC&q=misyar+muta&pg=PA59|title=Islam and the West|isbn=9781612046235|last1=Lodi|first1=Mushtaq K.|date=1 July 2011|publisher=Strategic Book }}</ref><ref>{{cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=S2kZfdrEBlAC&q=campaigns+Encyclopedia+&pg=PA51|title=The Islamic Shield|isbn=9781599424118|last1=Elhadj|first1=Elie|year=2006|publisher=Universal-Publishers }}</ref><ref>{{cite book | url=https://books.google.com/books?id=n4Eye4ilLVkC&q=Mutah&pg=PA50 | title=Muslim World: Modern Muslim Societies | publisher=Marshall Cavendish | date=1 September 2010 | access-date=5 April 2013 | author=Pohl, Florian | pages=52–53| isbn=9780761479277 }}</ref>
Islamic scholars like ] or ] claim that misyar marriage may be legal, but not moral.<ref name="BinMenie">, ]{{dead link|date=March 2018|bot=InternetArchiveBot|fix-attempted=yes}}) (in Arabic) {{dead link|date=March 2018|bot=InternetArchiveBot|fix-attempted=yes}}</ref>

====Age of Muhammad's wife Aisha====
{{See also|Criticism of Muhammad#Aisha|l1=Criticism of Muhammad (Aisha)|Child marriage}}
According to Sunni ] sources, Aisha was six or seven years old when she was married to Muhammad and nine when the marriage was consummated.<ref name=armstrong157>{{harvnb|Armstrong|1992|p=157}}</ref><ref name=spellberg40>{{harvnb|Spellberg|1996|p=40}}</ref><ref>{{harvnb|Watt|1960}}</ref><ref>{{harvnb|Barlas|2002|pp=125–26}}</ref> The Muslim historian ] ({{Died in|923}}) reports that she was ten,<ref name=spellberg40/> while ] ({{Died in|845}}) and ] ({{Died in|1282}}), two other Muslim historians, write that she was nine years old at marriage and twelve at consummation.<ref name="Afsaruddin2014">{{harvnb|Afsaruddin|2014}}</ref> ] ({{Died in|1951}}), a modern Muslim author, argues that a new interpretation of the Hadith compiled by ], Wali-ud-Din Muhammad ibn Abdullah Al-Khatib, could indicate that Aisha would have been nineteen.<ref>{{harvnb|Ali|1997|p=150}}</ref> Similarly, on the basis of a hadith about her age difference with her sister ], some have estimated Aisha's age to have been eighteen or nineteen at the time of her marriage.<ref>{{cite book |first=Asma |last=Barlas |date=2012 |title="Believing Women" in Islam: Unreading Patriarchal Interpretations of the Qur'an |publisher=University of Texas Press |page=126 |quote=On the other hand, however, Muslims who calculate 'Ayesha's age based on details of her sister Asma's age, about whom more is known, as well as on details of the Hijra (the Prophet's migration from Mecca to Madina), maintain that she was over thirteen and perhaps between seventeen and nineteen when she got married. Such views cohere with those Ahadith that claim that at her marriage Ayesha had "good knowledge of Ancient Arabic poetry and genealogy" and "pronounced the fundamental rules of Arabic Islamic ethics.}}</ref>{{sfn|Ali|1997|p=150}}<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.valiasr-aj.com/fa/page.php?bank=question&id=699 |title=Ayesha married the Prophet when she was young? (In Persian and Arabic) |last=Ayatollah Qazvini |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100926234317/http://www.valiasr-aj.com/fa/page.php?bank=question&id=699 |archive-date=26 September 2010 }}</ref><ref>{{cite book |last1=A.C. Brown |first1=Jonathan |author-link=Jonathan A.C. Brown |title=Misquoting Muhammad: The Challenge and Choices of Interpreting the Prophet's Legacy |date=2014 |publisher=] |isbn=978-1-78074-420-9 |pages= |url=https://archive.org/details/misquotingmuhamm0000brow/page/146 }}</ref> At any rate, Muhammad's marriage to Aisha may have not been considered improper by his contemporaries, for such marriages between an older man and a young girl were common among the ]s.<ref>C. (Colin) Turner, ''Islam: The Basics'', Routledge Press, p.34–35</ref> In particular, ], an author on comparative religion, writes, "There was no impropriety in Muhammad's marriage to Aisha. Marriages conducted in absentia to seal an alliance were often contracted at this time between adults and minors who were even younger than Aisha."<ref name=":0">Karen Armstrong, ''Muhammad: Prophet for Our Time'', HarperPress, 2006, p. 167 {{ISBN|0-00-723245-4}}.</ref>

=== Women in Islam ===
{{Main|Women in Islam}}{{See also|Islam and domestic violence|Muslim women in sport}}
The meaning of ] has been the subject of intense debate among experts. While many scholars<ref name=hajjar2004>Hajjar, Lisa. "Religion, state power, and domestic violence in Muslim societies: A framework for comparative analysis." Law & Social Inquiry 29.1 (2004); see pp. 1–38</ref><ref>Treacher, Amal. "Reading the Other Women, Feminism, and Islam." Studies in Gender and Sexuality 4.1 (2003); pp. 59–71</ref> claim Shari'a law encourages domestic violence against women,<ref>John C. Raines & Daniel C. Maguire (Ed), Farid Esack, What Men Owe to Women: Men's Voices from World Religions, State University of New York (2001), see pp. 201–03</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.alim.org/library/quran/ayah/compare/4/34/men-are-given-authority-over-women-and-corrective-measures-for-disobedient-women-and-arbitration-in-family-disputes|title=Surah 4:34 (An-Nisaa), Alim&nbsp;— Translated by Mohammad Asad, Gibraltar (1980)|access-date=31 March 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130927231420/http://www.alim.org/library/quran/ayah/compare/4/34/men-are-given-authority-over-women-and-corrective-measures-for-disobedient-women-and-arbitration-in-family-disputes|archive-date=27 September 2013|url-status=dead}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.eui.eu/DepartmentsAndCentres/RobertSchumanCentre/Research/InternationalTransnationalRelations/MediterraneanProgramme/MRM/MRM2011/ws04.aspx|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20130927154118/http://www.eui.eu/DepartmentsAndCentres/RobertSchumanCentre/Research/InternationalTransnationalRelations/MediterraneanProgramme/MRM/MRM2011/ws04.aspx|url-status=dead|title=Salhi and Grami (2011), Gender and Violence in the Middle East and North Africa, Florence (Italy), European University Institute|archivedate=27 September 2013}}</ref> many Muslim scholars arguing that it acts as a deterrent against domestic violence motivated by rage.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://yaqeeninstitute.org/tesneem-alkiek/islam-and-violence-against-women-a-critical-look-at-domestic-violence-and-honor-killings-in-the-muslim-community/#.Xk6BVBdKgb0 |title=Islam and Violence Against Women: A Critical Look at Domestic Violence and Honor Killings in the Muslim Community |author1=Tesneem Alkiek |author2=Dalia Mogahed |author3=Omar Suleiman |author4=Jonathan Brown |publisher=Yaqeen Institute |date=May 22, 2017 |access-date=February 23, 2020}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/10/20/AR2006102001261.html|newspaper=]|title=Clothes Aren't the Issue|date=22 October 2006|first=Asra Q.|last=Nomani}}</ref>
Shari'a is the basis for personal status laws such as rights of women in matters of marriage, divorce and child custody which was described as discriminatory against women from a human rights perspective in a 2011 ] report.<ref name=unicef2011>{{cite web|url=http://www.unicef.org/gender/files/REGIONAL-Gender-Eqaulity-Profile-2011.pdf|title=MENA Gender Equality Profile – Status of Girls and Women in the Middle East and North Africa, UNICEF|date=October 2011|publisher=unicef.org|access-date=31 March 2015|archive-date=9 October 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171009235624/https://www.unicef.org/gender/files/REGIONAL-Gender-Eqaulity-Profile-2011.pdf|url-status=dead}}</ref>
Allowing girls under 18 to marry by religious courts is another criticism of Islam<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.quandl.com/c/society/age-at-first-marriage-female-by-country|title=Age at First Marriage – Female By Country – Data from Quandl|access-date=22 March 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150206030116/https://www.quandl.com/c/society/age-at-first-marriage-female-by-country|archive-date=6 February 2015|url-status=dead}}</ref>
Sharia grants women the right to inherit property<ref>Horrie, Chris; Chippindale, Peter (1991). p. 49.</ref> but a daughter's inheritance is usually half that of her brother's but that is because the brother needs to care of his family and her sister if a male guardian isn't present and take care of her needs.{{Quran-usc|4|11}}<ref name=davidpowers>David Powers (1993), Islamic Inheritance System: A Socio-Historical Approach, The Arab Law Quarterly, 8, p 13</ref>
Furthermore, slave women were not granted the same legal rights.<ref name=blbr>
* Bernard Lewis (2002), What Went Wrong?, {{ISBN|0-19-514420-1}}, pp. 82–83;
* Brunschvig. 'Abd; Encyclopedia of Islam, Brill, 2nd Edition, Vol 1, pp. 13–40.</ref><ref>{{Quran-usc|16|71}}</ref><ref name="Quran-usc|24|33">{{Quran-usc|24|33}}</ref><ref>{{Quran-usc|30|28}}</ref> On 14 January 2009, the Catholic Portuguese cardinal ] directed a warning to young women to "think twice" before ].<ref name=Reuters>{{cite news |url=http://in.reuters.com/article/worldNews/idINIndia-37448920090114 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090116031142/http://in.reuters.com/article/worldNews/idINIndia-37448920090114 |url-status=dead |archive-date=16 January 2009 |title=Portugal cardinal warns of marriage with Muslims |work=] |date=14 January 2009 }}</ref><ref name=Spiegel>{{cite news |url=http://www.spiegel.de/international/europe/0,1518,601423,00.html |work=] |date=15 January 2009 |title=Portuguese Catholic Leader: 'Think Twice about Marrying a Muslim' }}</ref>

In contrast to the widespread Western belief that women in Muslim societies are oppressed and denied opportunities to realize their full potential, many Muslims believe their faith to be liberating or fair to women, and some find it offensive that Westerners criticize it without fully understanding the historical and contemporary realities of Muslim women's lives. Conservative Muslims in particular (in common with some Christians and Jews) see women in the West as being economically exploited for their labor, sexually abused, and commodified through the media's fixation on the female body.<ref name=lapidus>{{Cite book| author1=Ira M. Lapidus|author2= Lena Salaymeh | title = A History of Islamic Societies | publisher = Cambridge University Press (Kindle edition) | year = 2014| isbn=978-0-521-51430-9 | page=145}}</ref>

=== Islam and multiculturalism ===
] has criticised the effects of multiculturalism and Islam in the West.]]
{{See also|Multiculturalism and Islam|Islamophobia#Regional trends}}
Muslim immigration to Western countries has led some critics to label Islam incompatible with secular Western society.<ref name=autogenerated3>{{Cite book| title=Multiculturalism, Muslims and Citizenship: A European Approach | url=https://archive.org/details/multiculturalism00modo | url-access=limited | author=Tariq Modood | publisher=Routledge | edition=1st | date=6 April 2006 | isbn=978-0-415-35515-5 | pages=, 29, 46}}</ref><ref>{{cite book | last =Kilpatrick | first =William | title =The Politically Incorrect Guide to Jihad | publisher =Regnery | date =2016 | pages =256 | isbn =978-1621575771 }}</ref> This criticism has been partly influenced by a stance against ] closely linked to the heritage of ]. Recent critics include ]<ref> appeared originally in German in the online magazine ''Perlentaucher'' on 24 January 2007.</ref><ref>Pascal Bruckner – A reply to ] and Timothy Garton Ash: "At the heart of the issue is the fact that in certain countries Islam is becoming Europe's second religion. As such, its adherents are entitled to freedom of religion, to decent locations and to all of our respect. On the condition, that is, that they themselves respect the rules of our republican, secular culture, and that they do not demand a status of extraterritoriality that is denied other religions, or claim special rights and prerogatives"</ref><ref>Pascal Bruckner – A reply to Ian Buruma and Timothy Garton Ash "It's so true that many English, Dutch and German politicians, shocked by the excesses that the wearing of the Islamic veil has given way to, now envisage similar legislation curbing religious symbols in public space. The separation of the spiritual and corporeal domains must be strictly maintained, and belief must confine itself to the private realm."</ref><ref name=mnali>{{cite news | title = Extremism flourished as UK lost Christianity | author-link = Michael Nazir-Ali | first = Michael | last = Nazir-Ali | url = https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2008/01/06/nislam206.xml | archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20080110080819/http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2008/01/06/nislam206.xml | url-status = dead | archive-date = 10 January 2008 | newspaper = ] | date = 6 January 2008 | location=London}}</ref> and ].<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.libertarian.nl/NL/archives/000198.php|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20071013124744/http://libertarian.nl/NL/archives/000198.php|url-status=dead|title=Paul Cliteur, Moderne Papoea's, Dilemma's van een multiculturele samenleving, De Uitgeverspers, 2002|archivedate=October 13, 2007}}</ref>
] ] criticize Islam as a semitic religion, which forced Turks to submission to an alien culture. Further, since Islam mentions semitic history as if it were the history of all mankind, but disregards components of other cultures and spirituality, the international approach of Islam is seen as a threat.<ref>Dudolgnon Islam In Politics In Russia Routledge, <!--September 15, 2002--> 5 November 2013 {{ISBN|9781136888786}} p. 301–304.</ref>
], founder of the Turkish Republic, described Islam as the religion of the Arabs that loosened the national nexus of Turkish nation, got national excitement numb.<ref>Afet İnan, ''Medenî Bilgiler ve M. Kemal Atatürk'ün El Yazıları'', Türk Tarih Kurumu, 1998, p. 364.<!-- ISBN needed --></ref>

In the early 20th century, the prevailing view among Europeans was that Islam was the root cause of Arab "backwardness". They saw Islam as an obstacle to assimilation, a view that was expressed by one of the spokesmen of colonial ] named ].<ref>{{Cite book| publisher = Syracuse University Press| isbn = 978-0-8156-3074-6| last = Lorcin| first = Patricia M. E.| title = Algeria & France, 1800-2000: Identity, Memory, Nostalgia| date = 2006 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=rj2LRm6EOUYC&pg=PA71}}</ref>
The ] ] Sir ] criticised Islam for what he perceived to be an inflexible nature, which he held responsible for stifling progress and impeding social advancement in Muslim countries.<ref name="muir"> p. 458</ref>

], in her study of discrimination against Muslims in Europe,<ref name=CesariStudy>{{cite web|url= http://www.euro-islam.info/wp-content/uploads/pdfs/securitization_and_religious_divides_in_europe.pdf |title=Muslims In Western Europe After 9/11: Why the term Islamophobia is more a predicament than an explanation }}</ref> finds that anti-Islamic sentiment may be difficult to separate from other drivers of discrimination because Muslims are mainly from immigrant backgrounds and the largest group of immigrants in many Western European countries, ] overlaps with Islamophobia, and a person may have one, the other, or both.<ref>{{cite web |last1=Mason |first1=Rowena |title=Nigel Farage: Indian and Australian immigrants better than eastern Europeans |url=https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2015/apr/22/nigel-farage-immigrants-india-australia-better-than-eastern-Europeans |website=Theguardian |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150424083806/https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2015/apr/22/nigel-farage-immigrants-india-australia-better-than-eastern-Europeans |archive-date=2015-04-24}}</ref>

== See also ==
{{columns-list|
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
** ]
** ]
* ]
}}

==References==
===Footnotes===
{{notelist}}

===Citations===
{{Reflist}}
Saeed, Abu Hayyan, Orientalism., Murder of History.. Facts behind the Gossips and Realities. (October 20, 2023). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4608350 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4608350

===Sources===
{{refbegin}}
* {{cite encyclopedia |last1=Afsaruddin |first1=Asma |author1-link=Asma Afsaruddin |entry=ʿĀʾisha bt. Abī Bakr |title=Encyclopaedia of Islam |edition=3 |publisher=] |year=2014 |url=http://referenceworks.brillonline.com/entries/encyclopaedia-of-islam-3/a-isha-bt-abi-bakr-COM_23459 |editor-last=Fleet|editor-first=Kate |editor2-last=Krämer |editor2-first=Gudrun |editor3-last=Matringe |editor3-first=Denis |editor4-last=Nawas |editor4-first=John |editor5-last=Rowson |editor5-first=Everett |access-date=11 January 2015 |url-access=subscription }}
* {{cite book |last1=Ali |first1=Muhammad |author1-link=Muhammad Ali (writer) |title=Muhammad the Prophet |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=od6dAQKgK-YC&pg=PT150 |year=1997 |publisher=Ahamadiyya Anjuman Ishaat Islam |isbn=978-0913321072}}
* {{cite book |last1=Armstrong |first1=Karen |author1-link=Karen Armstrong |title=Muhammad: A Biography of the Prophet |year=1992 |publisher=] |isbn=978-0062500144 |title-link=Muhammad: A Biography of the Prophet}}
* {{Cite book |last1=Asmani |first1=Ibrahim Lethome |last2=Abdi |first2=Maryam Sheikh |date=2008 |title=De-linking Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting from Islam |publisher=Frontiers in Reproductive Health, USAID |location=Washington |url=http://www.unfpa.org/sites/default/files/pub-pdf/De-linking%20FGM%20from%20Islam%20final%20report.pdf |access-date=26 July 2015|archive-date=21 February 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170221230457/http://www.unfpa.org/sites/default/files/pub-pdf/De-linking%20FGM%20from%20Islam%20final%20report.pdf |url-status=live}}
* {{cite book |last1=Barlas |first1=Asma |title=Believing women in Islam : unreading patriarchal interpretations of the Qur'ān |date=2002 |publisher=University of Texas Press |location=Austin, TX |isbn=9781477315927}}
* {{Cite book| last=Cohen | first=Mark R. | author-link=Mark R. Cohen | title=Under Crescent and Cross | publisher=Princeton University Press; Reissue edition | year=1995 | isbn=978-0-691-01082-3}}
* {{Cite book |last=Esposito |first=John |title=Islam: The Straight Path |publisher=Oxford University Press |year=1998 |isbn=0-19-511234-2}}
* {{Cite book| last=Lockman | first=Zachary | title=Contending Visions of the Middle East: The History and Politics of Orientalism | publisher=Cambridge University Press | year=2004 | isbn=978-0-521-62937-9}}
* {{Cite book |last2=Schmidtke |first2=Sabine |last1=Pourjavady |first1=Reza |editor2-last=Schmidtke |editor2-first=Sabine |editor1-last=Pourjavady |editor1-first=Reza |year=2006 |title=A Jewish philosopher of Baghdad: 'Izz al-Dawla Ibn Kammūna (d. 683/1284) and his writings |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=3OppTioUPy4C |publisher=BRILL |isbn=978-90-04-15139-0 |access-date=2011-06-12}}
* {{Cite book| last=Rippin | first=Andrew | author-link=Andrew Rippin | title=Muslims: Their Religious Beliefs and Practices | publisher=Routledge | edition=2nd | year=2001 | isbn=978-0-415-21781-1}}
* {{cite book |last1=Rispler-Chaim |first1=Vardit |title=Islamic medical ethics in the twentieth century |date=1993 |publisher=E.J. Brill |location=Leiden |isbn=978-9004096080}}
* {{cite book |last1=Roald |first1=Ann-Sofie |title=Women in Islam: The Western Experience |date=2003 |publisher=Routledge |location=London}}
* {{cite book |last1=Spellberg |first1=Denise A. |title=Politics, gender, and the Islamic past : the Legacy of ʻAʼisha bint Abi Bakr |date=1996 |publisher=Columbia University Press |location=New York |isbn=978-0-231-07999-0}}
* {{cite book |last1=Watt |first1=William Montgomery |author1-link=William Montgomery Watt |title=ʿĀʾis̲h̲a Bint Abī Bakr |url=http://referenceworks.brillonline.com/entries/encyclopaedia-of-islam-2/aisha-bint-abi-bakr-SIM_0440 |year=1960 |publisher=] Online |isbn=978-9004161214 |edition=2nd}}
* {{Cite journal| last=Westerlund | first=David | year=2003 | title=Ahmed Deedat's Theology of Religion: Apologetics through Polemics | journal=Journal of Religion in Africa | volume=33 | issue=3| doi=10.1163/157006603322663505| pages=263–278}}
{{refend}}
* {{Cite journal |last=Modarressi |first=Hossein |title=Early Debates on the Integrity of the Qur'ān: A Brief Survey |journal=Studia Islamica |publisher=JSTOR |volume=77 |pages=5–39 |year=1993 |issue=77 |doi=10.2307/1595789 |jstor=1595789 |url=https://doi.org/10.2307/1595789}}
* {{cite book |title=Revelation and Falsification |author1-first=Mohammad Ali|author1-last=Amir-Moezzi |editor1-first=Etan |isbn=9789004167827 |editor1-last=Kohlberg |editor2-first=Mohammad Ali |editor2-last=Amir-Moezzi |author-link= |url=https://archive.org/details/KohlbergMoezziREVELATIONANDFALSIFICATIONTheKitabAlQiratOfAhmadB.MuhammadAlSayyariLeiden2009./mode/2up |url-access=registration |year=2009 |publisher=Brill|chapter=Information, Doubts and Contradictions in Islamic Sources|pages=12{{ndash}}23}}
* {{cite encyclopedia|first1= A.|last1=Pakatchi|year=2015|title= 'Alī b. Abī Ṭālib 4. Qur'ān and Ḥadīth Sciences|editor-last= Daftary| editor-first=F.|editor-link=Farhad Daftary|encyclopedia=Encyclopaedia Islamica|translator-last= Valey|translator-first= M.I.|doi=10.1163/1875-9831_isla_COM_0252|url=https://referenceworks.brillonline.com/entries/encyclopaedia-islamica/*-COM_0252|url-access=subscription}}

==Further reading==
{{refbegin}}
* {{Cite book
|last = Esposito
|first = John L.
|year = 1995
|title = The Islamic Threat: Myth or Reality?
|publisher = Oxford University Press
|isbn = 0-19-510298-3
|url = https://archive.org/details/islamicthreatmyt00espo_0
}}
* {{Cite book
|last = Halliday
|first = Fred
|year = 2003
|title = Islam and the Myth of Confrontation: Religion and Politics of the Middle East
|publisher = I.B. Tauris, New York
|isbn = 1-86064-868-1
}}
* {{Cite book
|last = Esposito
|first = John L.
|year = 2003
|title = Unholy War: Terror in the Name of Islam
|publisher = Oxford University Press, USA
|isbn = 0-19-516886-0
}}
* {{Cite book
| first=Norman L.
| last=Geisler
| year=2002
| title=Answering Islam: The Crescent in Light of the Cross
| publisher=Baker Books
| isbn=0-8010-6430-9
}}
* ] (2002). '']''. ]. {{isbn|0-674-00877-4}}.
* ] (2004). '']''. ]. {{isbn|0-674-01575-4}}.
* ] (1995). '']''. Prometheus Books. {{isbn|0-87975-984-4}}.
* ] (2003). '']''. Prometheus Books. {{isbn|1-59102-068-9}}.
* Cox, Caroline & Marks, John (2003). . Civitas. {{isbn|1-903 386-29 2}}.
*
{{refend}}
* {{cite journal | last1 = Yılmaz | first1 = Halil İbrahim | last2 = İzgi | first2 = Mahmut Cihat | last3 = Erbay | first3 = Enes Ensar | last4 = Şenel | first4 = Samet | title = Studying early Islam in the third millennium: a bibliometric analysis | journal = Humanities and Social Sciences Communications | year = 2024 | volume = 11 | issue = 1 | pages = Article 1521 | doi = 10.1057/s41599-024-04058-2 | url = https://www.nature.com/articles/s41599-024-04058-2 | doi-access = free }}

==External links==
*A collection of
* {{Commons category-inline}}
{{Wikiquote}}


{{Islam topics |collapsed}}
*directories of anti-Islamic sites
{{Criticism of religion}}
**
{{Authority control}}
**


] ]
]
]

Latest revision as of 16:31, 22 December 2024

Part of a series on
Islam
Beliefs
Practices
History
Culture and society
Related topics
This article is of a series on
Criticism of religion
By religion
By religious figure
By text
Religious violence
Bibliographies
Related topics

Criticism of Islam can take many forms, including academic critiques, political criticism, religious criticism, and personal opinions. Subjects of criticism include Islamic beliefs, practices, and doctrines.

Criticism of Islam has been present since its formative stages, and early expressions of disapproval were made by Christians, Jews, and some former Muslims like Ibn al-Rawandi. Subsequently, the Muslim world itself faced criticism after the September 11 attacks.

Criticism of Islam has been aimed at the life of Muhammad, the prophet of Islam, in both his public and personal lives. Issues relating to the authenticity and morality of the scriptures of Islam, both the Quran and the hadiths, are also discussed by critics. Criticisms of Islam have also been directed at historical practices, like the recognition of slavery as an institution as well as Arab imperialism impacting indigenous cultures. More recently, Islamic beliefs regarding human origins, predestination, God's existence, and God's nature have received criticism for their apparent philosophical and scientific inconsistencies.

Other criticisms center on the treatment of individuals within modern Muslim-majority countries, including issues which are related to human rights in the Islamic world, particularly in relation to the application of Islamic law. As of 2014, 26% of the world's countries had anti-blasphemy laws, and 13% of them also had anti-apostasy laws. By 2017, 13 Muslim countries imposed the death penalty for apostasy or blasphemy. Amid the contemporary embrace of multiculturalism, there has been criticism regarding how Islam may affect the willingness or ability of Muslim immigrants to assimilate in host nations.

Historical background

The earliest surviving written criticisms of Islam are found in the writings of Christians such as John of Damascus. He viewed Islamic doctrines as a mix of ideas taken from the Bible and claimed that Muhammad was influenced by an Arian monk. Other notable early critics included arabs like Abu Isa al-Warraq and Ibn al-Rawandi. al-Ma'arri, an eleventh-century antinatalist and critic of all religions. His poetry was known for its "pervasive pessimism." He believed that Islam does not have a monopoly on truth. Apologetic writings, attributed to the philosopher Abd-Allah ibn al-Muqaffa (d.c. 756), include defenses of Manichaeism against Islam and critiques of the Islamic concept of God, characterizing the Quranic deity in highly critical terms. The Jewish philosopher Ibn Kammuna, criticized Islam, reasoning that Sharia was incompatible with the principles of justice.

During the Middle Ages, Christian church officials commonly represented Islam as a Christian heresy or a form of idolatry. They viewed Islam to be a material, rather than spiritual, religion and often explained it in apocalyptic terms. In the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, European academics often portrayed Islam as an exotic Eastern religion distinct from Western religions like Judaism and Christianity, sometimes classifying it as a "Semitic" religion. The term "Mohammedanism" was used by many to criticize Islam by focusing on Muhammad's actions, reducing Islam to merely a derivative of Christianity rather than acknowledging it as a successor of Abrahamic monotheisms. By contrast, many academics nowadays study Islam as an Abrahamic religion in relation to Judaism and Christianity. The Christian apologist G. K. Chesterton criticized Islam as a heresy or parody of Christianity, David Hume (d. 1776), both a naturalist and a sceptic, considered monotheistic religions to be more "comfortable to sound reason" than polytheism but also found Islam to be more "ruthless" than Christianity.

The Greek Orthodox bishop Paul of Antioch accepted Muhammed as a prophet, but did not consider his mission to be universal and regarded Christian law superior to Islamic law. Maimonides, a twelfth-century rabbi, did not question the strict monotheism of Islam, and considered Islam to be a instrument of divine providence for bringing all of humankind to the worship of the one true God, but was critical of the practical politics of Muslim regimes and considered Islamic ethics and politics to be inferior to their Jewish counterparts.

In his essay Islam Through Western Eyes, the cultural critic Edward Said suggests that the Western view of Islam is particularly hostile for a range of religious, psychological and political reasons, all deriving from a sense "that so far as the West is concerned, Islam represents not only a formidable competitor but also a late-coming challenge to Christianity." In his view, the general basis of Orientalist thought forms a study structure in which Islam is placed in an inferior position as an object of study, thus forming a considerable bias in Orientalist writings as a consequence of the scholars' cultural make-up.

Points of criticism

The expansion of Islam

In an alleged dialogue between the Byzantine emperor Manuel II Palaiologos (r. 1391–1425) and a Persian scholar, the emperor criticized Islam as a faith spread by the sword. This matches the common view in Europe during the Enlightenment period about Islam, then synonymous with the Ottoman Empire, as a bloody, ruthless, and intolerant religion. More recently, in 2006, a similar statement of Manuel II, quoted publicly by Pope Benedict XVI, prompted a negative response from Muslim figures who viewed the remarks as an insulting mischaracterization of Islam. In this vein, the Indian social reformer Pandit Lekh Ram (d. 1897) thought that Islam was grown through violence and desire for wealth, while the Nigerian author Wole Soyinka considers Islam as a "superstition" that it is mainly spread with violence and force.

This "conquest by the sword" thesis is opposed by some historians who consider the transregional development of Islam a multi-faceted and complex phenomenon. The first wave of expansion, the migration of the early Muslims to Medina to escape persecution in Mecca and the subsequent conversion of Medina, was indeed peaceful. In the years to come, Muslims defended themselves against frequent Meccan incursions until Mecca's peaceful surrender in 630. By the time of his death in 632, many of the Arabian tribes had formed political alliances with Muhammad and adopted Islam peacefully, which also paved the way for the subsequent conquests of Syria, Iran, Egypt and (the rest of North Africa) after the death of Muhammad. Islam nevertheless often remained a minority religion in conquered territories for several centuries after the initial waves of conquest, indicating that the conquest of territories beyond the Arabian Peninsula did not instantly result in large conversions to Islam.

Scripture

12th-century Andalusian Quran
Main article: Criticism of the Quran See also: History of the Quran, The Syro-Aramaic Reading of the Koran, and Historicity of Muhammad

In the lifetime of Muhammad, the Quran was primarily preserved orally and the written compilation of the whole Quran in its current form took place some 150 to 300 years later, according to some sources. Alternatively, others believe that the Quran was compiled shortly after the death of Muhammad in 632 and canonized by end of the caliphate of Uthman (r. 644–656). The idea that Quran is perfect and impossible to imitate as asserted in the Quran itself is disputed by critics. One such criticism is that sentences about God in the Quran are sometimes followed immediately by those in which God is the speaker. The modern historian John Wansbrough believes that the Quran is in part a redaction of other sacred scriptures, in particular the Judaeo-Christian scriptures. The Christian theologian Philip Schaff (d. 1893) praises the Quran for its poetic beauty, religious fervor, and wise counsel, but considers this mixed with "absurdities, bombast, unmeaning images, and low sensuality." The Iranian journalist Ali Dashti (d. 1982) criticized the Quran, saying that "the speaker cannot have been God" in certain passages. Similarly, the secular author Ibn Warraq gives Surah al-Fatiha as an example of a passage which is "clearly addressed to God, in the form of a prayer." The orientalist Gerd Puin believes that the Quran contains many verses which are incomprehensible, a view rejected by Muslims and many other orientalists. Apology of al-Kindy, a medieval polemical work, describes the narratives in the Quran as "all jumbled together and intermingled," and regards this as "evidence that many different hands have been at work therein."

Pre-existing sources

Critics see the reliance of Quran on various pre-existing sources as evidence for a human origin.

Critics point to various pre-existing sources to argue against the traditional narrative of revelation from God. Some scholars have calculated that one third of the Quran has pre-Islamic Christian origins. Aside from the Bible, the Quran relies on several Apocryphal and sources, like the Protoevangelium of James, Gospel of Pseudo-Matthew, and several infancy gospels. Several narratives rely on Jewish Midrash Tanhuma sources, like the narrative of Cain learning to bury the body of Abel in Quran 5:31. Norman Geisler argues that the dependence of the Quran on preexisting sources is one evidence of a purely human origin. Richard Carrier regards this reliance on pre-Islamic Christian sources as evidence that Islam derived from a Torah-observant sect of Christianity.

Criticism of the Hadith

Main article: Criticism of HadithSee also: Historiography of early Islam

It has been suggested that there exists around the Hadith (Muslim traditions relating to the Sunnah (words and deeds) of Muhammad) three major sources of corruption: political conflicts, sectarian prejudice, and the desire to translate the underlying meaning, rather than the original words verbatim.

Muslim critics of the hadith, known as Quranists, reject its authority on theological grounds, arguing that the Quran itself is sufficient for guidance, as it claims that nothing essential has been omitted. They believe that reliance on the Hadith has caused people to deviate from the original intent of God's revelation to Muhammad, which they see as adherence to the Quran alone. Ghulam Ahmed Pervez was one of these critics and was denounced as a non-believer by thousands of orthodox clerics. In his work Maqam-e Hadith he considered any hadith that goes against the teachings of Quran to have been falsely attributed to the Prophet. Kassim Ahmad argued that some hadith promote ideas that conflict with science and create sectarian issues.

John Esposito argues that modern Western scholarship has raised doubts about the historicity and authenticity of hadith, while Joseph Schacht argued that there is no evidence of legal traditions prior to 722. Schacht concluded that the Sunna attributed to the Prophet consists of material from later periods rather than the actual words and deeds of the Prophet. However, scholars like Wilferd Madelung have argued that a complete dismissal of hadith as late fiction is "unjustified". Orthodox Muslims do not deny the existence of false hadith, but believe that through the scholars' work, these false hadith have been largely eliminated.

Sana'a manuscripts of the Quran

The traditional view of Islam has faced scrutiny due to a lack of consistent supporting evidence, such as limited archaeological finds and some discrepancies with non-Muslim sources. In the 1970s, a number of scholars began to re-evaluate established Islamic history, proposing that earlier accounts may have been altered over time. They sought to reconstruct early Islamic history using alternative sources like coins, inscriptions, and non-Islamic texts. Prominent among these scholars was John Wansbrough. Additionally, Gerd R. Puin's study of the Sana'a manuscripts revealed some variations in text and verse order, suggesting that the Quranic text may have evolved over time.

Criticism of Muhammad

See also: Criticism of Muhammad

The Christian missionary Sigismund Koelle and the former Muslim Ibn Warraq have criticized Muhammad's actions as immoral. In one instance, the Jewish poet Ka'b ibn al-Ashraf provoked the Meccan tribe of Quraysh to fight Muslims and wrote erotic poetry about their women, and was apparently plotting to assassinate Muhammad. Muhammad called upon his followers to kill Ka'b, and he was consequently assassinated by Muhammad ibn Maslama, an early Muslim. Such criticisms were countered by the historian William M. Watt, who argues on the basis of moral relativism that Muhammad should be judged by the standards and norms of his own time and geography, rather than ours. The fourteenth-century poem Divine Comedy by the Italian poet Dante Alighieri contains defamatory images of Muhammad, picturing him the eighth circle of hell, along with his cousin and son-in-law Ali ibn Abi Talib. Dante does not blame Islam as a whole but accuses Muhammad of schism for establishing another religion after Christianity. Some medieval ecclesiastical writers portrayed Muhammad as possessed by Satan, a "precursor of the Antichrist" or the Antichrist himself. 'Tultusceptru de libro domni Metobii, an Andalusian manuscript of unknown origins, describes how Muhammad (called Ozim, from Hashim) was tricked by Satan into adulterating an originally pure divine revelation: God was concerned about the spiritual fate of the Arabs and wanted to correct their deviation from the faith. He then sent an angel to the Christian monk Osius who ordered him to preach to the Arabs. Osius, however, was in ill-health and instead ordered a young monk, Ozim, to carry out the angel's orders. Ozim set out to follow his orders, but was stopped by an evil angel on the way. The ignorant Ozim believed him to be the same angel that had spoken to Osius before. The evil angel modified and corrupted the original message given to Ozim by Osius, and renamed Ozim Muhammad. From this followed the erroneous teachings of Islam, according to Tultusceptru.

Islamic ethics

Main article: Islamic ethics
9th-century Quran in Reza Abbasi Museum

According to the Catholic Encyclopedia, while there is much to be admired and affirmed in Islamic ethics, its originality or superiority is rejected. Critics stated that the Quran 4:34 allows Muslim men to discipline their wives by striking them. There is however evidence from Islamic hadiths and scholars such as Ibn Kathir that demonstrates that only a twig or leaf can be used by a man to "strike" their wife and this is not allowed to cause pain or injure their wife but to show their frustration. Moreover, confusion amongst translations of Quran with the original Arabic term "wadribuhunna" being translated as "to go away from them", "beat", "strike lightly" and "separate". The film Submission critiqued this and similar verses of the Quran by displaying them painted on the bodies of abused Muslim women. Some critics argue that the Quran is incompatible with other religious scriptures as it attacks and advocates hate against people of other religions. Sam Harris interprets certain verses of the Quran as sanctioning military action against unbelievers as it said "Fight those who do not believe in Allah or in the Last Day and who do not consider unlawful what Allah and His Messenger have made unlawful and who do not adopt the religion of truth from those who were given the Scripture – until they give the jizyah willingly while they are humbled."(Quran 9:29) However, the Islamic hadiths and scholars such as Dr Zakir Naik refer to fighting and not to trust "non-believers" and Christians in certain situations or events such as during times of war.

Jizya is a tax for "protection" paid by non-Muslims to a Muslim ruler, for the exemption from military service for non-Muslims, and for the permission to practice a non-Muslim faith with some communal autonomy in a Muslim state. Harris argues that Muslim extremism is simply a consequence of taking the Quran literally, and is skeptical that moderate Islam is possible. Max I. Dimont interprets that the Houris described in the Quran are specifically dedicated to "male pleasure". According to Pakistani Islamic scholar Maulana Umar Ahmed Usmani "Hur" or "hurun" is the plural of both "ahwaro" which is a masculine form and also "haurao" which is a feminine, meaning both pure males and pure females. Basically, the word 'hurun' means white, he says.

Views on slavery

Main articles: Islamic views on slavery, History of slavery in the Muslim world, History of concubinage in the Muslim world, and Mamluk
13th-century slave market in Yemen

According to Bernard Lewis, the Islamic injunctions against the enslavement of Muslims led to massive importation of slaves from the outside. Also Patrick Manning believes that Islam seems to have done more to protect and expand slavery than the reverse. Brockopp, on the other hand believe that the idea of using alms for the manumission of slaves appears to be unique to the Quran ( and ). Similarly, the practice of freeing slaves in atonement for certain sins appears to be introduced by the Quran (but compare Exod 21:26-7). Also the forced prostitution of female slaves, a Near Eastern custom of great antiquity, is condemned in the Quran. According to Brockopp "the placement of slaves in the same category as other weak members of society who deserve protection is unknown outside the Qur'an. Some slaves had high social status in the Muslim world, such as the Mamluk enslaved mercenaries, who were assigned high-ranking military and administrative duties by the ruling Arab and Ottoman dynasties.

Critics argue unlike Western societies there have been no anti-slavery movements in Muslim societies, which according to Gordon was due to the fact that it was deeply anchored in Islamic law, thus there was no ideological challenge ever mounted against slavery. According to sociologist Rodney Stark, "the fundamental problem facing Muslim theologians vis-à-vis the morality of slavery" is that Muhammad himself engaged in activities such as purchasing, selling, and owning slaves, and that his followers saw him as the perfect example to emulate. Stark contrasts Islam with Christianity, writing that Christian theologians wouldn't have been able to "work their way around the biblical acceptance of slavery" if Jesus had owned slaves, as Muhammad did.

Only in the early 20th century did slavery gradually became outlawed and suppressed in Muslim lands, with Muslim-majority Mauritania being the last country in the world to formally abolish slavery in 1981. Murray Gordon characterizes Muhammad's approach to slavery as reformist rather than revolutionary that abolish slavery, but rather improved the conditions of slaves by urging his followers to treat their slaves humanely and free them as a way of expiating one's sins. In Islamic jurisprudence, slavery was theoretically an exceptional condition under the dictum The basic principle is liberty. Reports from Sudan and Somalia showing practice of slavery is in border areas as a result of continuing war and not Islamic belief. In recent years, except for some conservative Salafi Islamic scholars, most Muslim scholars found the practice "inconsistent with Qur'anic morality".

Apostasy

"Execution of a Moroccan Jewess (Sol Hachuel)", a painting by Alfred Dehodencq
Main article: Apostasy in Islam See also: Freedom of religion § Islam

In Islam, apostasy along with heresy and blasphemy (verbal insult to religion) is considered a form of disbelief. The Qur'an states that apostasy would bring punishment in the Afterlife, but takes a relatively lenient view of apostasy in this life (Q 9:74; 2:109). While Shafi'i interprets verse Quran 2:217 as adducing the main evidence for the death penalty in Quran, the historian W. Heffening states that Quran threatens apostates with punishment in the next world only., the historian Wael Hallaq states the later addition of death penalty "reflects a later reality and does not stand in accord with the deeds of the Prophet."

According to Islamic law, apostasy is identified by a list of actions such as conversion to another religion, denying the existence of God, rejecting the prophets, mocking God or the prophets, idol worship, rejecting the sharia, or permitting behavior that is forbidden by the sharia, such as adultery or the eating of forbidden foods or drinking of alcoholic beverages. The majority of Muslim scholars hold to the traditional view that apostasy is punishable by death or imprisonment until repentance, at least for adults of sound mind. Also Sunni and Shi'a scholars, agree on the difference of punishment between male and female.

Some widely held interpretations of Islam are inconsistent with Human Rights conventions that recognize the right to change religion. In particular article 18 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights Some contemporary Islamic jurists, such as Hussein-Ali Montazeri have argued or issued fatwas that state that either the changing of religion is not punishable or is only punishable under restricted circumstances. According to Yohanan Friedmann, "The real predicament facing modern Muslims with liberal convictions is not the existence of stern laws against apostasy in medieval Muslim books of law, but rather the fact that accusations of apostasy and demands to punish it are heard time and again from radical elements in the contemporary Islamic world."

Sadakat Kadri noted that "state officials could not punish an unmanifested belief even if they wanted to". The kind of apostasy which the jurists generally deemed punishable was of the political kind, although there were considerable legal differences of opinion on this matter. Wael Hallaq states that " a culture whose lynchpin is religion, religious principles and religious morality, apostasy is in some way equivalent to high treason in the modern nation-state". Also Bernard Lewis consider the apostasy as a treason and "a withdrawal, a denial of allegiance as well as of religious belief and loyalty". The English historian C. E. Bosworth suggests the traditional view of apostasy hampered the development of Islamic learning, like philosophy and natural science, "out of fear that these could evolve into potential toe-holds for kufr, those people who reject God." While in 13 Muslim-majority countries atheism is punishable by death, according to legal historian Sadakat Kadri, executions were rare because "it was widely believed" that any accused apostate "who repented by articulating the shahada" (LA ILAHA ILLALLAH "There is no God but God") "had to be forgiven" and their punishment delayed until after Judgement Day. William Montgomery Watt states that "In Islamic teaching, such penalties may have been suitable for the age in which Muhammad lived."

Islam and violence

Main articles: Islam and violence and Supremacism § Islamic
The September 11 attacks led to debate on whether Islam promotes violence.

Quran's teachings on matters of war and peace have become topics of heated discussion in recent years. On the one hand, some critics claim that certain verses of the Quran sanction military action against unbelievers as a whole both during the lifetime of Muhammad and after. Jihad, an Islamic term, is a religious duty of Muslims meaning "striving for the sake of God". It is perceived in a military sense (not spiritual sense) by Bernard Lewis and David Cook. Also Fawzy Abdelmalek and Dennis Prager argue against Islam being a religion of peace and not of violence. John R. Neuman, a scholar on religion, describes Islam as "a perfect anti-religion" and "the antithesis of Buddhism". Lawrence Wright argued that role of Wahhabi literature in Saudi schools contributing suspicion and hate violence against non-Muslims as non-believers or infidels and anyone who "disagrees with Wahhabism is either an infidel or a deviant, who should repent or be killed."

Most Muslim scholars, on the other hand, argue that such verses of the Quran are interpreted out of context, and argue that when the verses are read in context it clearly appears that the Quran prohibits aggression, and allows fighting only in self-defense. Charles Mathewes characterizes the peace verses as saying that "if others want peace, you can accept them as peaceful even if they are not Muslim." As an example, Mathewes cites the second sura, which commands believers not to transgress limits in warfare: "fight in God's cause against those who fight you, but do not transgress limits ; God does not love transgressors" (2:190).

Orientalist David Margoliouth described the Battle of Khaybar as the "stage at which Islam became a menace to the whole world". In the battle reportedly Muslims beheaded Jews. Margoliouth argues that the Jews of Khaybar had done nothing to harm Muhammad or his followers, and ascribes the attack to a desire for plunder Montgomery Watt on the other hand, believes Jews' intriguing and use of their wealth to incite tribes against Muhammad left him no choice but to attack. Vaglieri and Shibli Numani concur that one reason for attack was that the Jews of Khaybar were responsible for the Confederates that attacked Muslims during the Battle of the Trench. Rabbi Samuel Rosenblatt has said that Muhammad's policies were not directed exclusively against Jews (referring to his conflicts with Jewish tribes) and that Muhammad was more severe with his pagan Arab kinsmen.

The September 11 attacks have resulted in many non-Muslims' indictment of Islam as a violent religion. In the European view, Islam lacked divine authority and regarded the sword as the route to heaven.

Karen Armstrong, tracing what she believes to be the West's long history of hostility toward Islam, finds in Muhammad's teachings a theology of peace and tolerance. Armstrong holds that the "holy war" urged by the Quran alludes to each Muslim's duty to fight for a just, decent society. According to Mahatma Gandhi, the leader of the 20th-century Indian independence movement, although non-violence is dominant in the Qur'an, thirteen hundred years of imperialist expansion have made Muslims a militant body.

Other self-described Muslim organisations have emerged more recently, and some of them have been associated with jihadist and extreme Islamist groups. Compared to the entire Muslim community, these groups are sparsely populated. They have, however, received more attention from governments, international organisations, and the international media than other Muslim groups. This is as a result of their participation in actions intended to combat alleged enemies of Islam both at home and abroad.

Years later however, Al-Qaeda has yet to succeed in gaining the support of the majority of Muslims and continues to differ from other Islamist organizations in terms of both philosophy and strategy.

Temporary and Contractual Marriages

Main articles: Nikah mut'ah and Nikah Misyar

Nikāḥ al-Mutʿah is a fixed-term or short-term contractual marriage in Shia Islam. The duration of this type of marriage is fixed at its inception and is then automatically dissolved upon completion of its term. For this reason, nikah mut'ah has been widely criticised as the religious cover and legalization of prostitution. Shi'a and Sunnis agree that Mut'ah was legal in early times, but Sunnis consider that it was abrogated. Currently, however, mut'ah is one of the distinctive features of Ja'fari jurisprudence. Sunnis believe that Muhammad later abolished this type of marriage at several different large events,Bukhari 059.527 Most Sunnis believe that Umar later was merely enforcing a prohibition that was established during Muhammad's time.

Shia contest the criticism that nikah mut'ah is a cover for prostitution, and argue that the unique legal nature of temporary marriage distinguishes Mut'ah ideologically from prostitution. Children born of temporary marriages are considered legitimate, and have equal status in law with their siblings born of permanent marriages, and do inherit from both parents. Women must observe a period of celibacy (idda) to allow for the identification of a child's legitimate father, and a woman can only be married to one person at a time, be it temporary or permanent. Some Shia scholars also view Mut'ah as a means of eradicating prostitution from society.

Nikah Misyar is a type of Nikah (marriage) in Sunni Islam only carried out through the normal contractual procedure, with the provision that the husband and wife give up several rights by their own free will, such as living together, equal division of nights between wives in cases of polygamy, the wife's rights to housing, and maintenance money ("nafaqa"), and the husband's right of homekeeping and access. Essentially the couple continue to live separately from each other, as before their contract, and see each other to fulfil their needs in a legally permissible (halal) manner when they please. Misyar has been suggested by some western authors to be a comparable marriage with Nikah mut'ah and that they find it for the sole purpose of "sexual gratification in a licit manner" Islamic scholars like Ibn Uthaimeen or Al-Albani claim that misyar marriage may be legal, but not moral.

Age of Muhammad's wife Aisha

See also: Criticism of Muhammad (Aisha) and Child marriage

According to Sunni hadith sources, Aisha was six or seven years old when she was married to Muhammad and nine when the marriage was consummated. The Muslim historian al-Tabari (d. 923) reports that she was ten, while Ibn Sa'd (d. 845) and Ibn Khallikan (d. 1282), two other Muslim historians, write that she was nine years old at marriage and twelve at consummation. Muhammad Ali (d. 1951), a modern Muslim author, argues that a new interpretation of the Hadith compiled by Mishkat al-Masabih, Wali-ud-Din Muhammad ibn Abdullah Al-Khatib, could indicate that Aisha would have been nineteen. Similarly, on the basis of a hadith about her age difference with her sister Asma, some have estimated Aisha's age to have been eighteen or nineteen at the time of her marriage. At any rate, Muhammad's marriage to Aisha may have not been considered improper by his contemporaries, for such marriages between an older man and a young girl were common among the Bedouins. In particular, Karen Armstrong, an author on comparative religion, writes, "There was no impropriety in Muhammad's marriage to Aisha. Marriages conducted in absentia to seal an alliance were often contracted at this time between adults and minors who were even younger than Aisha."

Women in Islam

Main article: Women in IslamSee also: Islam and domestic violence and Muslim women in sport

The meaning of Quran 4:34 has been the subject of intense debate among experts. While many scholars claim Shari'a law encourages domestic violence against women, many Muslim scholars arguing that it acts as a deterrent against domestic violence motivated by rage. Shari'a is the basis for personal status laws such as rights of women in matters of marriage, divorce and child custody which was described as discriminatory against women from a human rights perspective in a 2011 UNICEF report. Allowing girls under 18 to marry by religious courts is another criticism of Islam Sharia grants women the right to inherit property but a daughter's inheritance is usually half that of her brother's but that is because the brother needs to care of his family and her sister if a male guardian isn't present and take care of her needs. Furthermore, slave women were not granted the same legal rights. On 14 January 2009, the Catholic Portuguese cardinal José Policarpo directed a warning to young women to "think twice" before marrying Muslim men.

In contrast to the widespread Western belief that women in Muslim societies are oppressed and denied opportunities to realize their full potential, many Muslims believe their faith to be liberating or fair to women, and some find it offensive that Westerners criticize it without fully understanding the historical and contemporary realities of Muslim women's lives. Conservative Muslims in particular (in common with some Christians and Jews) see women in the West as being economically exploited for their labor, sexually abused, and commodified through the media's fixation on the female body.

Islam and multiculturalism

French philosopher Pascal Bruckner has criticised the effects of multiculturalism and Islam in the West.
See also: Multiculturalism and Islam and Islamophobia § Regional trends

Muslim immigration to Western countries has led some critics to label Islam incompatible with secular Western society. This criticism has been partly influenced by a stance against multiculturalism closely linked to the heritage of New Philosophers. Recent critics include Pascal Bruckner and Paul Cliteur. Tatar Tengrist criticize Islam as a semitic religion, which forced Turks to submission to an alien culture. Further, since Islam mentions semitic history as if it were the history of all mankind, but disregards components of other cultures and spirituality, the international approach of Islam is seen as a threat. Mustafa Kemal Atatürk, founder of the Turkish Republic, described Islam as the religion of the Arabs that loosened the national nexus of Turkish nation, got national excitement numb.

In the early 20th century, the prevailing view among Europeans was that Islam was the root cause of Arab "backwardness". They saw Islam as an obstacle to assimilation, a view that was expressed by one of the spokesmen of colonial French Algeria named André Servier. The Victorian orientalist scholar Sir William Muir criticised Islam for what he perceived to be an inflexible nature, which he held responsible for stifling progress and impeding social advancement in Muslim countries.

Jocelyne Cesari, in her study of discrimination against Muslims in Europe, finds that anti-Islamic sentiment may be difficult to separate from other drivers of discrimination because Muslims are mainly from immigrant backgrounds and the largest group of immigrants in many Western European countries, xenophobia overlaps with Islamophobia, and a person may have one, the other, or both.

See also

References

Footnotes

  1. "Show me just what Muhammad brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached," he said.
  2. Scholarly research suggests that there was an inverse relationship between where Muslim political power centres were and where the most conversions occurred, which was on the political periphery. According to the Encyclopaedia of Islam, conquest was just one of several elements that helped Islam spread throughout the world. The systematisation of Islamic tradition, trade, interfaith marriage, political patronage, urbanisation, and the pursuit of knowledge must also be acknowledged. Along trade routes and even in the most isolated regions, Sufis contributed to the spread of Islam. The yearly hajj to Mecca, which brought together scholars, mystics, businesspeople, and regular believers from various nations, should be particularly noted as a contributing factor. Despite taking on more contemporary forms, these factors are still in force today. The expansion of Islam into western Europe, the Americas, Australia, and New Zealand has been facilitated by them.
  3. Various calls to arms were identified in the Quran by US citizen Mohammed Reza Taheri-azar, all of which were cited as "most relevant to my actions on March 3, 2006" (Q9:44, 9:19, 57:10–11, 8:72–73, 9:120, 3:167–75, 4:66, 4:104, 9:81, 9:93–94, 9:100, 16:110, 61:11–12, 47:35).
  4. In a 2014 issue of their digital magazine Dabiq, the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant explicitly claimed religious justification for enslaving Yazidi women.

Citations

  1. De Haeresibus by John of Damascus. See Migne. Patrologia Graeca, vol. 94, 1864, cols 763–73. An English translation by the Reverend John W Voorhis appeared in The Moslem World for October 1954, pp. 392–98.
  2. ^ Warraq, Ibn (2003). Leaving Islam: Apostates Speak Out. Prometheus Books. p. 67. ISBN 1-59102-068-9.
  3. Ibn Kammuna, Examination of the Three Faiths, trans. Moshe Perlmann (Berkeley and Los Angeles, 1971), pp. 148–49
  4. ^ Mohammed and Mohammedanism, by Gabriel Oussani, Catholic Encyclopedia. Retrieved 16 April 2006.
  5. ^ Friedmann, Yohanan (2003). Tolerance and Coercion in Islam: Interfaith Relations in the Muslim Tradition. Cambridge University Press. p. 18, 35. ISBN 978-0-521-02699-4.
  6. ^ Ibn Warraq, The Quest for Historical Muhammad (Amherst, Mass.:Prometheus, 2000), 103.
  7. ^ Bible in Mohammedian Literature., by Kaufmann Kohler Duncan B. McDonald, Jewish Encyclopedia. Retrieved 22 April 2006.
  8. ^ Brunschvig. 'Abd; Encyclopedia of Islam
  9. ^ Dror Ze'evi (2009). "Slavery". In John L. Esposito (ed.). The Oxford Encyclopedia of the Islamic World. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Archived from the original on 23 February 2017. Retrieved 23 February 2017.
  10. Focus on the slave trade, in BBC News.
  11. The persistence of history, in The Economist
  12. Karsh, Ephraim (2007). Islamic Imperialism: A History. Yale University Press. ISBN 9780300198171.
  13. Fitzgerald, Timothy (2000). The Ideology of Religious Studies. New York: Oxford University Press (published 2003). p. 235. ISBN 9780195347159. Retrieved 30 April 2019. this book consists mainly of a critique of the concept of religion .
  14. Ruthven, Malise. "Voltaire's Fanaticism, or Mahomet the Prophet:A New Translation; Preface: Voltaire and Islam". Retrieved 12 August 2015.
  15. Which countries still outlaw apostasy and blasphemy?, Pew Research Center, 29 July 2016.
  16. Doré, Louis (May 2017). "The countries where apostasy is punishable by death". The Independent. Retrieved 15 March 2018.
  17. "Saudi Arabia". Archived from the original on 9 November 2011. Retrieved 7 October 2006.
  18. Timothy Garton Ash (5 October 2006). "Islam in Europe". The New York Review of Books.
  19. Tariq Modood (6 April 2006). Multiculturalism, Muslims and Citizenship: A European Approach (1st ed.). Routledge. p. 29. ISBN 978-0-415-35515-5.
  20. Russia and Islam: State, Society and Radicalism. Taylor & Francis. 2010. p. 94. by Roland Dannreuther, Luke March
  21. "St. John of Damascus's Critique of Islam". Writings by St John of Damascus. The Fathers of the Church. Vol. 37. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press. 1958. pp. 153–160. Retrieved 8 July 2019.
  22. ^ Hecht, Jennifer Michael (2003). Doubt: A History: The Great Doubters and Their Legacy of Innovation from Socrates and Jesus to Thomas Jefferson and Emily Dickinson. Harper San Francisco. p. 224. ISBN 0-06-009795-7.
  23. "Abu-L-Ala al-Maarri Facts". biography.yourdictionary.com. Retrieved 13 July 2015.
  24. Adamson, Peter (1 November 2021). "Abu Bakr al-Razi". In Zalta, Edward N. (ed.). The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University – via Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
  25. "Is Islam Hostile to Science?". Adventure. 28 February 2015. Archived from the original on 3 March 2021.
  26. Moosa, Ebrahim (2005). Ghazālī and the Poetics of Imagination. UNC Press. p. 9. ISBN 0-8078-2952-8.
  27. Tilman Nagel Geschichte der islamischen Theologie: von Mohammed bis zur Gegenwart C.H. Beck 1994 ISBN 9783406379819 p. 215
  28. Camilla Adang, Hassan Ansari, Maribel Fierro, Sabine Schmidtke Accusations of Unbelief in Islam: A Diachronic Perspective on Takfīr Brill, 30 October 2015 ISBN 9789004307834 p. 61
  29. ^ Ibn Warraq. Why I Am Not a Muslim, p. 3. Prometheus Books, 1995. ISBN 0-87975-984-4
  30. Norman A. Stillman. The Jews of Arab Lands: A History and Source Book p. 261. Jewish Publication Society, 1979ISBN 0-8276-0198-0
  31. Norman A. Stillman. The Jews of Arab Lands: A History and Source Book p. 261. Jewish Publication Society, 1979 ISBN 0-8276-0198-0
  32. Firestone, Reuven (2019). "Muhammad, the Jews, and the Composition of the Qur'an: Sacred History and Counter-History". Religions. 10: 63. doi:10.3390/rel10010063.
  33. Erwin Fahlbusch (1999). The Encyclopedia of Christianity, Volume 2. Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing. p. 759. ISBN 9789004116955.
  34. ^ Christian Lange Paradise and Hell in Islamic Traditions Cambridge University Press, 2015 ISBN 9780521506373 pp. 18–20
  35. Erwin Fahlbusch (1999). The Encyclopedia of Christianity, Volume 2. Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing. p. 759. ISBN 9789004116955.
  36. ^ Campo, Juan Eduardo (2009). Encyclopedia of Islam. Infobase Publishing. pp. xxi–xxxii. ISBN 9781438126968.
  37. Erwin Fahlbusch (1999). The Encyclopedia of Christianity, Volume 2. Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing. p. 759. ISBN 9789004116955.
  38. Campo, Juan Eduardo (2009). Encyclopedia of Islam. Infobase Publishing. p. 477. ISBN 9781438126968.
  39. G. K. Chesterton, The Everlasting Man, 1925, Chapter V, The Escape from Paganism, Online text
  40. Villis, Tom (2019). "G. K. Chesterton and Islam". Research Gate. Modern Intellectual History. Retrieved 16 January 2014.
  41. Russell, Paul; Kraal, Anders (2017). "Hume on Religion". In Edward N. Zalta (ed.). The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2017 ed.). Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. Retrieved 3 December 2018.
  42. MacEoin, Denis; Al-Shahi, Ahmed (24 July 2013). Islam in the Modern World (RLE Politics of Islam). Routledge. ISBN 978-1-134-60914-7.
  43. Hugh Goddard A History of Christian-Muslim Relations New Amsterdam Books, 5 September 2000 ISBN 9781461636212 p. 65.
  44. The Mind of Maimonides, by David Novak. Retrieved 29 April 2006.
  45. Edward W. Said (2 January 1998). "Islam Through Western Eyes". The Nation.
  46. Dialogue 7 of Twenty-six Dialogues with a Persian (1399), for the Greek text see Trapp, E., ed. 1966. Manuel II. Palaiologos: Dialoge mit einem "Perser." Wiener Byzantinische Studien 2. Vienna, for a Greek text with accompanying French translation see Th. Khoury "Manuel II Paléologue, Entretiens avec un Musulman. 7e Controverse", Sources Chrétiennes n. 115, Paris 1966, for an English translation see Manuel Paleologus, Dialogues with a Learned Moslem. Dialogue 7 (2009), chapters 1–18 (of 37), translated by Roger Pearse available at the Christian Classics Ethereal Library here, at The Tertullian Project here, and also here Archived 11 December 2013 at the Wayback Machine. A somewhat more complete translation into French is found here Archived 2016-03-03 at the Wayback Machine
  47. ^ Hume, David (2007). A Dissertation on the Passions: The Natural History of Religion : a Critical Edition. Clarendon Press. ISBN 978-0-19-925188-9.
  48. "In quotes: Muslim reaction to Pope". 16 September 2006 – via news.bbc.co.uk.
  49. "Pope sorry for offending Muslims". 17 September 2006 – via news.bbc.co.uk.
  50. "Américo Castro and the Meaning of Spanish Civilization", by José Rubia Barcia, Selma Margaretten, p. 150.
  51. "Debating the African Condition: Race, gender, and culture conflict", by Alamin M. Mazrui, Willy Mutunga, p. 105
  52. Yehuda D. Nevo "Towards a Prehistory of Islam," Jerusalem Studies in Arabic and Islam, vol.17, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, 1994 p. 108.
  53. John Wansbrough The Sectarian Milieu: Content and Composition of Islamic Salvation History, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1978 p. 119
  54. Patricia Crone, Meccan Trade and the Rise of Islam, Princeton University Press, 1987 p. 204.
  55. Modarressi 1993, pp. 16–18.
  56. Amir-Moezzi 2009, p. 14.
  57. Pakatchi 2015.
  58. See the verses Quran 2:2, Quran 17:88–89, Quran 29:47, Quran 28:49
  59. "Koran". From the Jewish Encyclopedia. Retrieved 21 January 2008.
  60. Wansbrough, John (1977). Quranic Studies: Sources and Methods of Scriptural Interpretation
  61. Wansbrough, John (1978). The Sectarian Milieu: Content and Composition of Islamic Salvation History.
  62. Schaff, P., & Schaff, D. S. (1910). History of the Christian church. Third edition. New York: Charles Scribner's Sons. Volume 4, Chapter III, section 44 "The Koran, And The Bible"
  63. ^ Warraq (1995). Why I am Not a Muslim (PDF). Prometheus Books. p. 106. ISBN 0-87975-984-4. Archived from the original (PDF) on 17 January 2015. Retrieved 16 January 2015.
  64. ^ Lester, Toby (January 1999). "What is the Koran?". The Atlantic.
  65. Quoted in A. Rippin, Muslims: their religious beliefs and practices: Volume 1, London, 1991, p. 26.
  66. G. Luling asserts that a third of the Quran is of pre-Islamic Christian origins, see Über den Urkoran, Erlangen, 1993, 1st ed., 1973, p. 1.
  67. ^ Leirvik 2010, pp. 33–34.
  68. Leirvik 2010, p. 33.
  69. Samuel A. Berman, Midrash Tanhuma-Yelammedenu (KTAV Publishing House, 1996), 31–32.
  70. Gerald Friedlander, Pirḳe de-R. Eliezer, (The Bloch Publishing Company, 1916) 156
  71. Geisler, N. L. (1999). "Qur'an, Alleged Divine Origin of". In: Baker Encyclopedia of Christian Apologetics. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Books.
  72. Did Muhammad Exist? (Why That Question Is Hard to Answer), in richardcarrier.info
  73. Brown, Daniel W. "Rethinking Tradition in Modern Islamic Thought", 1999. pp. 113, 134.
  74. Quran, Chapter 6. The Cattle: 38
  75. Donmez, Amber C. "The Difference Between Quran-Based Islam and Hadith-Based Islam"
  76. Quran, Chapter 6. The Cattle: 38
  77. Ahmad, Aziz. "Islamic Modernism in India and Pakistan, 1857–1964". London: Oxford University Press.
  78. Pervez, Ghulam Ahmed. Maqam-e Hadith Archived 13 November 2011 at the Wayback Machine, Urdu version Archived 4 October 2011 at the Wayback Machine
  79. Latif, Abu Ruqayyah Farasat. The Quraniyun of the Twentieth Century, Masters Assertion, September 2006
  80. Ahmad, Kassim. "Hadith: A Re-evaluation", 1986. English translation 1997
  81. ^ Esposito 1998, p. 67.
  82. Madelung, Wilferd (1997). The Succession to Muhammad: A Study of the Early Caliphate. Cambridge University Press. p. xi. ISBN 0-521-64696-0.
  83. By Nasr, Seyyed Vali Reza, "Shi'ism", 1988. p. 35.
  84. Madelung, Wilferd (1997). The Succession to Muhammad: A Study of the Early Caliphate. Cambridge University Press. p. xi. ISBN 0-521-64696-0.
  85. "What do we actually know about Mohammed?". openDemocracy. Archived from the original on 21 April 2009. Retrieved 13 November 2007.
  86. ^ Donner, Fred Narratives of Islamic Origins: The Beginnings of Islamic Historical Writing, Darwin Press, 1998
  87. "What do we actually know about Mohammed?". openDemocracy. Archived from the original on 21 April 2009. Retrieved 13 November 2007.
  88. ^ William Montgomery Watt. "Ka'b ibn al-Ashraf". In P.J. Bearman; Th. Bianquis; C.E. Bosworth; E. van Donzel; W.P. Heinrichs (eds.). Encyclopaedia of Islam Online. Brill Academic Publishers. ISSN 1573-3912.
  89. Uri Rubin, The Assassination of Kaʿb b. al-Ashraf, Oriens, Vol. 32. (1990), pp. 65–71.
  90. Ibn Hisham (1955). Al-Sira al-Nabawiyya. Vol. 2. Cairo. pp. 51–57.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link) English translation from Stillman (1979), pp. 125–26.
  91. Watt, W. Montgomery (1961). Muhammad: Prophet and Statesman. Oxford University Press. p. 229. ISBN 0-19-881078-4. Retrieved 27 May 2010.
  92. ^ G. Stone Dante's Pluralism and the Islamic Philosophy of Religion Springer, 12 May 2006 ISBN 9781403983091 p. 132
  93. Minou Reeves, P. J. Stewart Muhammad in Europe: A Thousand Years of Western Myth-Making NYU Press, 2003 ISBN 9780814775646 p. 93–96
  94. J. Tolan, Medieval Christian Perceptions of Islam (1996) pp. 100–01
  95. "Mohammed and Mohammedanism". From the Catholic Encyclopedia. Retrieved 21 January 2008.
  96. Kathir, Ibn, "Tafsir of Ibn Kathir", Al-Firdous Ltd., London, 2000, 50–53 – Ibn Kathir states "dharbun ghayru nubrah" strike/admonish lightly
  97. "Domestic Violence and the Islamic Tradition: Book Review". Journal of Islamic Ethics. 1 ((1-2)): 203–207. 2017. doi:10.1163/24685542-12340009.
  98. Laleh Bakhtiar, The Sublime Quran, 2007 translation
  99. "The Holy Quran: Text, Translation and Commentary", Abdullah Yusuf Ali, Amana Corporation, Brentwood, MD, 1989. ISBN 0-915957-03-5, passage was quoted from commentary on 4:34 – Abdullah Yusuf Ali in his Quranic commentary also states that: "In case of family jars four steps are mentioned, to be taken in that order. (1) Perhaps verbal advice or admonition may be sufficient; (2) if not, sex relations may be suspended; (3) if this is not sufficient, some slight physical correction may be administered; but Imam Shafi'i considers this inadvisable, though permissible, and all authorities are unanimous in deprecating any sort of cruelty, even of the nagging kind, as mentioned in the next clause; (4) if all this fails, a family council is recommended in 4:35 below." Abdullah Yusuf Ali, The Holy Quran: Text, Translation and Commentary (commentary on 4:34), Amana Corporation, Brentwood, MD, 1989. ISBN 0-915957-03-5.
  100. Ammar, Nawal H. (May 2007). "Wife Battery in Islam: A Comprehensive Understanding of Interpretations". Violence Against Women 13 (5): 519–23
  101. "Welkom bij Opzij". Archived from the original on 27 September 2007.
  102. Gerber (1986), pp. 78–79
  103. "Anti-Semitism". Encyclopaedia Judaica
  104. Saudi Arabia's Curriculum of Intolerance Archived 18 March 2009 at the Wayback Machine (pdf), Freedom House, May 2006, pp. 24–25.
  105. ^ Sam Harris Who Are the Moderate Muslims?
  106. Understanding the Qurán - Page xii, Ahmad Hussein Sakr - 2000
  107. Anver M. Emon, Religious Pluralism and Islamic Law: Dhimmis and Others in the Empire of Law, Oxford University Press, ISBN 978-0199661633, pp. 99–109.
  108. Walker Arnold, Thomas (1913). Preaching of Islam: A History of the Propagation of the Muslim Faith. Constable & Robinson Ltd. pp. 60–1. This tax was not imposed on the Christians, as some would have us think, as a penalty for their refusal to accept the Muslim faith, but was paid by them in common with the other dhimmīs or non-Muslim subjects of the state whose religion precluded them from serving in the army, in return for the protection secured for them by the arms of the Musalmans. (online)
  109. Esposito 1998, p. 34. "They replaced the conquered countries, indigenous rulers and armies, but preserved much of their government, bureaucracy, and culture. For many in the conquered territories, it was no more than an exchange of masters, one that brought peace to peoples demoralized and disaffected by the casualties and heavy taxation that resulted from the years of Byzantine-Persian warfare. Local communities were free to continue to follow their own way of life in internal, domestic affairs. In many ways, local populations found Muslim rule more flexible and tolerant than that of Byzantium and Persia. Religious communities were free to practice their faith to worship and be governed by their religious leaders and laws in such areas as marriage, divorce, and inheritance. In exchange, they were required to pay tribute, a poll tax (jizya) that entitled them to Muslim protection from outside aggression and exempted them from military service. Thus, they were called the "protected ones" (dhimmi). In effect, this often meant lower taxes, greater local autonomy, rule by fellow Semites with closer linguistic and cultural ties than the hellenized, Greco-Roman élites of Byzantium, and greater religious freedom for Jews and indigenous Christians."
  110. "Center for Muslim-Jewish Engagement". 4 June 2016. Archived from the original on 4 June 2016.
  111. "Center for Muslim-Jewish Engagement". 4 June 2016. Archived from the original on 4 June 2016.
  112. "Center for Muslim-Jewish Engagement". 13 April 2016. Archived from the original on 13 April 2016.
  113. "Center for Muslim-Jewish Engagement". 30 December 2015. Archived from the original on 30 December 2015.
  114. "Center for Muslim-Jewish Engagement". 4 June 2016. Archived from the original on 4 June 2016.
  115. "Center for Muslim-Jewish Engagement". 4 June 2016. Archived from the original on 4 June 2016.
  116. "Center for Muslim-Jewish Engagement". 1 May 2015. Archived from the original on 1 May 2015.
  117. "Center for Muslim-Jewish Engagement". 1 May 2015. Archived from the original on 1 May 2015.
  118. "Center for Muslim-Jewish Engagement". 4 June 2016. Archived from the original on 4 June 2016.
  119. "Center for Muslim-Jewish Engagement". 4 June 2016. Archived from the original on 4 June 2016.
  120. "Center for Muslim-Jewish Engagement". 4 June 2016. Archived from the original on 4 June 2016.
  121. "Center for Muslim-Jewish Engagement". 26 October 2012. Archived from the original on 26 October 2012.
  122. "Center for Muslim-Jewish Engagement". 30 April 2016. Archived from the original on 30 April 2016.
  123. "Center for Muslim-Jewish Engagement". 2 May 2016. Archived from the original on 2 May 2016.
  124. Taheri-azar, Mohammed Reza (2006). Letter to The daily Tar Heel  – via Wikisource.
  125. Harris, Sam (2005). The End of Faith: Religion, Terror, and the Future of Reason. W. W. Norton; Reprint edition. pp. 31, 149. ISBN 0-393-32765-5.
  126. The Indestructible Jews, by Max I. Dimont, p. 134
  127. "Are all 'houris' female?". Dawn.com. 9 June 2011. Retrieved 22 April 2019.
  128. Lewis, Bernard (1990). Race and Slavery in the Middle East. New York: Oxford University Press. ISBN 0-19-505326-5, p. 10.
  129. Manning, Patrick (1990). Slavery and African Life: Occidental, Oriental, and African Slave Trades. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0-521-34867-6, p. 28
  130. ^ Encyclopedia of the Qur'an, Slaves and Slavery
  131. John L Esposito (1998) p. 79
  132. Levanoni, Amalia (2010). "PART II: EGYPT AND SYRIA (ELEVENTH CENTURY UNTIL THE OTTOMAN CONQUEST) – The Mamlūks in Egypt and Syria: the Turkish Mamlūk sultanate (648–784/1250–1382) and the Circassian Mamlūk sultanate (784–923/1382–1517)". In Fierro, Maribel (ed.). The New Cambridge History of Islam, Volume 2: The Western Islamic World, Eleventh to Eighteenth Centuries. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press. pp. 237–284. doi:10.1017/CHOL9780521839570.010. ISBN 978-1-139-05615-1. The Arabic term mamlūk literally means 'owned' or 'slave', and was used for the White Turkish slaves of Pagan origins, purchased from Central Asia and the Eurasian steppes by Muslim rulers to serve as soldiers in their armies. Mamlūk units formed an integral part of Muslim armies from the third/ninth century, and Mamlūk involvement in government became an increasingly familiar occurrence in the medieval Middle East. The road to absolute rule lay open before them in Egypt when the Mamlūk establishment gained military and political domination during the reign of the Ayyūbid ruler of Egypt, al-Ṣāliḥ Ayyūb (r. 637–47/1240–9).
  133. Ayalon, David (2012) . "Mamlūk". In Bosworth, C. E.; van Donzel, E. J.; Heinrichs, W. P.; Lewis, B.; Pellat, Ch. (eds.). Encyclopaedia of Islam, Second Edition. Vol. 6. Leiden: Brill Publishers. doi:10.1163/1573-3912_islam_COM_0657. ISBN 978-90-04-08112-3.
  134. Murray Gordon, "Slavery in the Arab World." New Amsterdam Press, New York, 1989. Originally published in French by Editions Robert Laffont, S.A. Paris, 1987, p. 21.
  135. Murray Gordon, "Slavery in the Arab World." New Amsterdam Press, New York, 1989. Originally published in French by Editions Robert Laffont, S.A. Paris, 1987, pp. 44–45.
  136. Rodney Stark, "For the Glory of God: How Monotheism Led to Reformations, Science, Witch-Hunts, and the End of Slavery", p. 338, 2003, Princeton University Press, ISBN 0691114366
  137. Murray Gordon (1989). Slavery in the Arab World. Rowman & Littlefield. pp. 19–20. ISBN 9780941533300.
  138. Brunschvig, R. (1986). "ʿAbd". In P. Bearman; Th. Bianquis; C.E. Bosworth; E. van Donzel; W.P. Heinrichs (eds.). Encyclopaedia of Islam. Vol. 1 (2nd ed.). Brill. p. 26.
  139. The Oxford Dictionary of Islam, slavery, p. 298
  140. "Islamic State Seeks to Justify Enslaving Yazidi Women and Girls in Iraq". Newsweek. 13 October 2014.
  141. Allen McDuffee, "ISIS Is Now Bragging About Enslaving Women and Children," The Atlantic, 13 October 2014
  142. Salma Abdelaziz, "ISIS states its justification for the enslavement of women," CNN, 13 October 2014
  143. Richard Spencer, "Thousands of Yazidi women sold as sex slaves 'for theological reasons', says Isil," The Daily Telegraph, 13 October 2014.
  144. Abou el Fadl, Great Theft, HarperSanFrancisco, 2005.
  145. "Department of Economic History" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 25 March 2009. Retrieved 9 March 2022.
  146. Khaled Abou El Fadl and William Clarence-Smith
  147. ^ Campo, Juan Eduardo (2009). Encyclopedia of Islam. Infobase Publishing. p. 48. ISBN 9781438126968.
  148. Quran 2:217
  149. W. Heffening, in Encyclopedia of Islam
  150. Encyclopedia of the Quran, Apostasy
  151. Ahmad ibn Naqib al-Misri, Nuh Ha Mim Keller (1368). "A Classic Manual of Islamic Sacred Law" (PDF). Shafiifiqh.com. p. 517, Chapter O8.0: Apostasy from Islam (Ridda). Retrieved 14 May 2020.
  152. Ahmad ibn Naqib al-Misri, Nuh Ha Mim Keller (1368). "Reliance of the Traveller" (PDF). Amana Publications. Retrieved 14 May 2020.
  153. Abdullahi Ahmed An-Na'im (1996). Toward an Islamic Reformation: Civil Liberties, Human Rights, and International Law. Syracuse University Press. p. 183. ISBN 9780815627067.
  154. Kecia, Ali; Leaman, Oliver (2008). Islam: the key concepts. Routledge. p. 10. ISBN 9780415396387.
  155. Esposito, John L. (2004). The Oxford dictionary of Islam. Oxford University Press. p. 22. ISBN 9780195125597.
  156. "Murtadd". Encyclopaedia of Islam. 2003.
  157. STUDY GUIDE:Freedom of Religion or Belief, in Human Rights Library - University of Minnesota
  158. "UN Universal Declaration of Human Rights".
  159. Ayatollah Montazeri: "Not Every Conversion is Apostasy", by Mahdi Jami, In Persian, BBC Persian, 2 February 2005. Retrieved 25 April 2006.
  160. Grand Ayatollah Hossein-Ali Montazeri: "Not Every Conversion is Apostasy", by Mahdi Jami, In Persian, BBC Persian, 2 February 2005. Retrieved 25 April 2006.
  161. Yohanan Friedmann, Tolerance and Coercion in Islam, Cambridge University Press, p. 5
  162. Kadri, Sadakat (2012). Heaven on Earth: A Journey Through Shari'a Law from the Deserts of Ancient Arabia . Macmillan. p. 249. ISBN 9780099523277.
  163. Asma Afsaruddin (2013), Striving in the Path of God: Jihad and Martyrdom in Islamic Thought, p. 242. Oxford University Press. ISBN 0199730938.
  164. Wael, B. Hallaq (2009). Sharī'a: Theory, Practice and Transformations. Cambridge University Press. p. 319. ISBN 978-0-521-86147-2.
  165. Lewis, Bernard (21 January 1998). "Islamic Revolution". The New York Review of Books.
  166. C. E. Bosworth: Untitled review of "The Rise of Colleges. Institutions of Learning in Islam and the West by George Makdisi", Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society of Great Britain and Ireland, No. 2 (1983), pp. 304–05
  167. "Atheists Face Death Penalty In 13 Countries, Discrimination Around The World According To Freethought Report". The Huffington Post. 12 October 2013.
  168. Forty Hadiths on the Merit of Saying La Ilaha Illallah Archived 4 September 2015 at the Wayback Machine| Compiled by Dr. G.F. Haddad| (Hadith 26, Narrated by Bukhari, Muslim, Ahmad, Tayalisi, Abu Dawud, Nasa'i, al-`Adni, Abu `Awana, al-Tahawi, al-Hakim, and Bayhaqi.)
  169. Kadri, Sadakat (2012). Heaven on Earth: A Journey Through Shari'a Law from the Deserts of Ancient Arabia . Macmillan. p. 239. ISBN 9780099523277. Archived from the original on 2 December 2016.
  170. Interview: William Montgomery Watt Archived 7 August 2011 at the Wayback Machine, by Bashir Maan & Alastair McIntosh
  171. Warrant for terror: fatwās of radical Islam and the duty of jihād, p. 68, Shmuel Bar, 2006
  172. Morgan, Diane (2010). Essential Islam: a comprehensive guide to belief and practice. ABC-CLIO. p. 87. ISBN 978-0-313-36025-1. Retrieved 5 January 2011.
  173. Wendy Doniger, ed. (1999). Merriam-Webster's Encyclopedia of World Religions. Merriam-Webster. ISBN 0-87779-044-2., Jihad, p. 571
  174. Josef W. Meri, ed. (2005). Medieval Islamic Civilization: An Encyclopedia. Routledge. ISBN 0-415-96690-6., Jihad, p. 419
  175. John Esposito(2005), Islam: The Straight Path, p. 93
  176. Ember, Melvin; Ember, Carol R.; Skoggard, Ian (2005). Encyclopedia of diasporas: immigrant and refugee cultures around the world. Diaspora communities. Vol. 2. Springer. ISBN 0-306-48321-1.
  177. Bernard Lewis, The Political Language of Islam (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1988), p. 72.
  178. Lewis, Bernard, The Crisis of Islam, 2001 Chapter 2
  179. Cook, David. Understanding Jihad. University of California Press, 2005. Retrieved from Google Books on 27 November 2011. ISBN 0-520-24203-3, ISBN 978-0-520-24203-6.
  180. Abdelmalek, Fawzy T. (2008). The Turning Point: Islam & Jesus Salvation. AuthorHouse. p. 210. ISBN 9781468534290.
  181. "What If the Orlando Murderer Had Been a Christian?". National Review. 13 June 2016.
  182. John Newman, "Islam in the Kālacakra Tantra", Journal of the International Association of Buddhist Studies, Vol. 21, No. 2, 1998
  183. "Jihad and the Saudi petrodollar". 15 November 2007 – via news.bbc.co.uk.
  184. Sohail H. Hashmi, David Miller, Boundaries and Justice: diverse ethical perspectives, Princeton University Press, p. 197
  185. "Khaleel Mohammed". San Diego State University Religious Studies Department. Archived from the original on 8 July 2008.
  186. Ali, Maulana Muhammad; The Religion of Islam Archived 21 April 2018 at the Wayback Machine (6th Edition), Ch V "Jihad" p. 414 "When shall war cease". Published by The Lahore Ahmadiyya Movement
  187. Sadr-u-Din, Maulvi. Qur'an and War. The Muslim Book Society, Lahore, Pakistan. p. 8. Archived from the original on 8 March 2016. Retrieved 8 October 2012.
  188. Article on Jihad Archived 29 August 2017 at the Wayback Machine by Dr. G. W. Leitner (founder of The Oriental Institute, UK) published in Asiatic Quarterly Review, 1886. ("Jihad, even when explained as a righteous effort of waging war in self-defense against the grossest outrage on one's religion, is strictly limited..")
  189. The Qur'anic Commandments Regarding War/Jihad Archived 26 April 2018 at the Wayback Machine An English rendering of an Urdu article appearing in Basharat-e-Ahmadiyya Vol. I, pp. 228–32, by Dr. Basharat Ahmad; published by the Lahore Ahmadiyya Movement for the Propagation of Islam
  190. Maulana Muhammad, Ali. The Religion of Islam (6th Edition), Ch V "Jihad". The Lahore Ahmadiyya Movement. pp. 411–13.
  191. Mathewes, Charles T. (2010). Understanding Religious Ethics. John Wiley and Sons. p. 197. ISBN 9781405133517.
  192. ^ Margoliouth, D. S. (1905). Mohammed and the Rise of Islam (Third Edition., pp. 362–63). New York; London: G. P. Putnam's Sons; The Knickerbocker Press.
  193. Faizer, Rizwi (5 September 2013). The Life of Muhammad: Al-Waqidi's Kitab Al-Maghazi. Routledge. p. 252. ISBN 978-1-136-92114-8.
  194. Ashath, Hafiz Abu Dawud Sulaiman (12 October 2014). Sunan Abu Dawud (in English and Arabic). Vol. 5. p. 45.
  195. He wrote that this became an excuse for unfettered conquest."That plea would cover attacks on the whole world outside Medinah and its neighbourhood: and on leaving Khaibar the Prophet seemed to see the world already in his grasp. This was a great advance from the early days of Medinah, when the Jews were to be tolerated as equals, and even idolators to be left unmolested, so long as they manifested no open hostility. Now the fact that a community was idolatrous, or Jewish, or anything but Mohammedan, warranted a murderous attack upon it: the passion for fresh conquests dominated the Prophet as it dominated an Alexander before him or a Napoleon after him." Margoliouth, D. S. (1905). Mohammed and the Rise of Islam (Third Edition., p. 363). New York; London: G. P. Putnam's Sons; The Knickerbocker Press.
  196. Watt 189
  197. Veccia Vaglieri, L. "Khaybar", Encyclopaedia of Islam
  198. Nomani (1979), vol. II, pg. 156
  199. ^ Samuel Rosenblatt, Essays on Antisemitism: The Jews of Islam, p. 112
  200. Pinson; Rosenblatt (1946) pp. 112–119
  201. Puniyani, Ram (2005). Religion, power & violence: expression of politics in contemporary times. SAGE. pp. 97–98. ISBN 9780761933380.
  202. Armstrong, Karen (1993). Muhammad: A Biography of the Prophet. HarperSanFrancisco. p. 165. ISBN 0-06-250886-5.
  203. The Gandhian Moment, p. 117, by Ramin Jahanbegloo.
  204. Gandhi's responses to Islam, p. 110, by Sheila McDonough
  205. Cold War Assemblages: Decolonization to Digital, p. 81, Bhakti Shringarpure, Routledge.
  206. Iran talks up temporary marriages, by Frances Harrison, BBC News, Last Updated: 2 June 2007.
  207. Law of desire: temporary marriage in Shi'i Iran, by Shahla Haeri, p. 6.
  208. Tafsir al-Qur'an al-Azim, Volume 1 p. 74 answering-ansar.org Archived 2 May 2012 at the Wayback Machine
  209. Motahhari, Morteza. "The rights of woman in Islam, Fixed-Term marriage and the problem of the harem". al-islam.org. Retrieved 10 January 2011.
  210. "ZAWAJ.COM: Articles and Essays". www.zawaj.com.
  211. Temporary marriage, Encyclopædia Iranica
  212. "Muta', Temporary Marriage in Islamic Law". www.al-islam.org. 27 September 2012.
  213. Said Amir Arjomand (1984), From nationalism to revolutionary Islam, page 171
  214. "Misyar Marriage". Fiqh. 6 July 2006. Archived from the original on 4 January 2011.
  215. Lodi, Mushtaq K. (1 July 2011). Islam and the West. Strategic Book. ISBN 9781612046235.
  216. Elhadj, Elie (2006). The Islamic Shield. Universal-Publishers. ISBN 9781599424118.
  217. Pohl, Florian (1 September 2010). Muslim World: Modern Muslim Societies. Marshall Cavendish. pp. 52–53. ISBN 9780761479277. Retrieved 5 April 2013.
  218. Bin Menie, Abdullah bin Sulaïman : fatwa concerning the misyar marriage (and opinions by Ibn Uthaymeen, Al-albany) (in Arabic) Yet another marriage with no strings – fatwa committee of al azhar against misyar
  219. Armstrong 1992, p. 157
  220. ^ Spellberg 1996, p. 40
  221. Watt 1960
  222. Barlas 2002, pp. 125–26
  223. Afsaruddin 2014
  224. Ali 1997, p. 150
  225. Barlas, Asma (2012). "Believing Women" in Islam: Unreading Patriarchal Interpretations of the Qur'an. University of Texas Press. p. 126. On the other hand, however, Muslims who calculate 'Ayesha's age based on details of her sister Asma's age, about whom more is known, as well as on details of the Hijra (the Prophet's migration from Mecca to Madina), maintain that she was over thirteen and perhaps between seventeen and nineteen when she got married. Such views cohere with those Ahadith that claim that at her marriage Ayesha had "good knowledge of Ancient Arabic poetry and genealogy" and "pronounced the fundamental rules of Arabic Islamic ethics.
  226. Ali 1997, p. 150.
  227. Ayatollah Qazvini. "Ayesha married the Prophet when she was young? (In Persian and Arabic)". Archived from the original on 26 September 2010.
  228. A.C. Brown, Jonathan (2014). Misquoting Muhammad: The Challenge and Choices of Interpreting the Prophet's Legacy. Oneworld Publications. pp. 146–47. ISBN 978-1-78074-420-9.
  229. C. (Colin) Turner, Islam: The Basics, Routledge Press, p.34–35
  230. Karen Armstrong, Muhammad: Prophet for Our Time, HarperPress, 2006, p. 167 ISBN 0-00-723245-4.
  231. Hajjar, Lisa. "Religion, state power, and domestic violence in Muslim societies: A framework for comparative analysis." Law & Social Inquiry 29.1 (2004); see pp. 1–38
  232. Treacher, Amal. "Reading the Other Women, Feminism, and Islam." Studies in Gender and Sexuality 4.1 (2003); pp. 59–71
  233. John C. Raines & Daniel C. Maguire (Ed), Farid Esack, What Men Owe to Women: Men's Voices from World Religions, State University of New York (2001), see pp. 201–03
  234. "Surah 4:34 (An-Nisaa), Alim — Translated by Mohammad Asad, Gibraltar (1980)". Archived from the original on 27 September 2013. Retrieved 31 March 2015.
  235. "Salhi and Grami (2011), Gender and Violence in the Middle East and North Africa, Florence (Italy), European University Institute". Archived from the original on 27 September 2013.
  236. Tesneem Alkiek; Dalia Mogahed; Omar Suleiman; Jonathan Brown (22 May 2017). "Islam and Violence Against Women: A Critical Look at Domestic Violence and Honor Killings in the Muslim Community". Yaqeen Institute. Retrieved 23 February 2020.
  237. Nomani, Asra Q. (22 October 2006). "Clothes Aren't the Issue". Washington Post.
  238. "MENA Gender Equality Profile – Status of Girls and Women in the Middle East and North Africa, UNICEF" (PDF). unicef.org. October 2011. Archived from the original (PDF) on 9 October 2017. Retrieved 31 March 2015.
  239. "Age at First Marriage – Female By Country – Data from Quandl". Archived from the original on 6 February 2015. Retrieved 22 March 2015.
  240. Horrie, Chris; Chippindale, Peter (1991). p. 49.
  241. David Powers (1993), Islamic Inheritance System: A Socio-Historical Approach, The Arab Law Quarterly, 8, p 13
    • Bernard Lewis (2002), What Went Wrong?, ISBN 0-19-514420-1, pp. 82–83;
    • Brunschvig. 'Abd; Encyclopedia of Islam, Brill, 2nd Edition, Vol 1, pp. 13–40.
  242. "Portugal cardinal warns of marriage with Muslims". Reuters. 14 January 2009. Archived from the original on 16 January 2009.
  243. "Portuguese Catholic Leader: 'Think Twice about Marrying a Muslim'". Der Spiegel. 15 January 2009.
  244. Ira M. Lapidus; Lena Salaymeh (2014). A History of Islamic Societies. Cambridge University Press (Kindle edition). p. 145. ISBN 978-0-521-51430-9.
  245. Tariq Modood (6 April 2006). Multiculturalism, Muslims and Citizenship: A European Approach (1st ed.). Routledge. pp. 3, 29, 46. ISBN 978-0-415-35515-5.
  246. Kilpatrick, William (2016). The Politically Incorrect Guide to Jihad. Regnery. p. 256. ISBN 978-1621575771.
  247. Pascal Bruckner – Enlightenment fundamentalism or racism of the anti-racists? appeared originally in German in the online magazine Perlentaucher on 24 January 2007.
  248. Pascal Bruckner – A reply to Ian Buruma and Timothy Garton Ash: "At the heart of the issue is the fact that in certain countries Islam is becoming Europe's second religion. As such, its adherents are entitled to freedom of religion, to decent locations and to all of our respect. On the condition, that is, that they themselves respect the rules of our republican, secular culture, and that they do not demand a status of extraterritoriality that is denied other religions, or claim special rights and prerogatives"
  249. Pascal Bruckner – A reply to Ian Buruma and Timothy Garton Ash "It's so true that many English, Dutch and German politicians, shocked by the excesses that the wearing of the Islamic veil has given way to, now envisage similar legislation curbing religious symbols in public space. The separation of the spiritual and corporeal domains must be strictly maintained, and belief must confine itself to the private realm."
  250. Nazir-Ali, Michael (6 January 2008). "Extremism flourished as UK lost Christianity". The Sunday Telegraph. London. Archived from the original on 10 January 2008.
  251. "Paul Cliteur, Moderne Papoea's, Dilemma's van een multiculturele samenleving, De Uitgeverspers, 2002". Archived from the original on 13 October 2007.
  252. Dudolgnon Islam In Politics In Russia Routledge, 5 November 2013 ISBN 9781136888786 p. 301–304.
  253. Afet İnan, Medenî Bilgiler ve M. Kemal Atatürk'ün El Yazıları, Türk Tarih Kurumu, 1998, p. 364.
  254. Lorcin, Patricia M. E. (2006). Algeria & France, 1800-2000: Identity, Memory, Nostalgia. Syracuse University Press. ISBN 978-0-8156-3074-6.
  255. Asia. 2d ed., rev. and corrected. Published 1909 by E. Stanford in London. p. 458
  256. "Muslims In Western Europe After 9/11: Why the term Islamophobia is more a predicament than an explanation" (PDF).
  257. Mason, Rowena. "Nigel Farage: Indian and Australian immigrants better than eastern Europeans". Theguardian. Archived from the original on 24 April 2015.

Saeed, Abu Hayyan, Orientalism., Murder of History.. Facts behind the Gossips and Realities. (October 20, 2023). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4608350 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4608350

Sources

Further reading

External links

Islam topics
Outline of Islam
Beliefs
Five Pillars
Religious texts
Denominations
Economics
Hygiene
Other aspects
 Islamic studies
Arts
Medieval science
Philosophy
Other areas
 Other
Other religions
Apostasy
Related topics
Criticism of religion
By religion
Religious texts
Religious figures
Religious discrimination
Religious violence
Books
Movements
  • Agnosticism
  • Antitheism
  • Atheism
  • Cārvāka
  • New Atheism
  • Nontheistic religions
  • Parody religion
  • Related topics
    Categories: