| Revision as of 17:17, 13 October 2023 editRublamb (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers108,045 edits OneClickArchiver archived The UT Tyler campus setting is definitely suburban -- not urban. to Talk:University of Texas at Tyler/Archive 1← Previous edit |
Latest revision as of 04:21, 24 December 2024 edit undoExtraordinary Writ (talk | contribs)Administrators74,796 edits →Requested move 22 December 2024: Closing discussion (DiscussionCloser v.1.7.3-6) |
| (9 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
|
{{Talk header}} |
|
{{Talk header}} |
|
{{WikiProject Universities|class=start}} |
|
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=Start| |
|
{{WikiProject United States|class=Start|importance=Mid|TX=yes|TX-importance=Mid}} |
|
{{WikiProject Higher education}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject United States|importance=Mid|TX=yes|TX-importance=Mid}} |
|
|
}} |
|
== Two more years gone by and barely any change or update to this article. == |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
== Requested move 22 December 2024 == |
|
Does anyone who works at or attends UT Tyler even have a digital camera to take a few pics of the campus buildings that would prove to skeptics that this school really exists? How about mentioning the new construction happening on the south edge of the campus (Spring and Fall 2017)? How about mentioning UT Tyler's Houston Engineering Center? How about UT Tyler's STEM charter school, Innovation Academy? Here's my point: many people who have only heard that there is a branch of the University of Texas located in Tyler will look up this Misplaced Pages article to get a first, and possibly only, impression of this school, and conclude that there just really isn't anything noteworthy going on there. Are UT Tyler faculty, staff, and students embarrassed or ashamed of this school, so that they would rather not show the world what UT Tyler is really like? Or is it just laziness, or ineptitude by the Tyler community that has kept this article almost identical for over ten years now? Perhaps this article really does accurately reflect the spirit of this school. Prospective students who have a choice should apply elsewhere.] (]) 18:02, 13 September 2017 (UTC) |
|
|
|
<div class="boilerplate mw-archivedtalk" style="background-color: var(--background-color-success-subtle, #efe); color: var(--color-base, inherit); margin: 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px dotted var(--border-color-subtle, #AAAAAA);"><!-- Template:RM top --> |
|
|
:''The following is a closed discussion of a ]. <span style="color: var(--color-error, red);">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a ] '''after''' discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.'' |
|
|
|
|
|
|
The result of the move request was: '''not moved''' per ], considered in ]. ] (]) 04:21, 24 December 2024 (UTC) |
|
>> With respect, either make the updates yourself or quit complaining about it. You don't have to be formally associated with an institution to make Misplaced Pages updates (and it's probably best if updates are made by those aren't employed by said institution). ] (]) <!--Template:Undated--><small class="autosigned">—Preceding ] comment added 15:40, 6 December 2017 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|
|
|
---- |
|
|
|
|
|
== Orphaned references in ] == |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
] → {{no redirect|UT Tyler}} – ]. ] (]) 15:09, 22 December 2024 (UTC) |
|
I check pages listed in ] to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for ] in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of ]'s orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for ''this'' article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article. |
|
|
|
*'''Oppose'''. The full name provides a ] consistent naming convention across all articles on ]. Many reliable sources like and still use the full name. The OP has also made numerous individual RMs on this same issue like this one, which may violate ] or use a shorter common name that is rarely used outside a sports/athletic context. Better to stick to the status quo. ] (]) 15:10, 22 December 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
*'''Oppose''' as unnecessary, unwise, and unhelpful for readers. ] (]) 15:21, 22 December 2024 (UTC) |
|
<b>Reference named "Carnegie":</b><ul> |
|
|
|
*'''Oppose''', per the comments of Zzyzx11. —] (he/him) <small>If you ], add <code><small>{{reply to|Eyer}}</small></code> to your message.</small> 15:57, 22 December 2024 (UTC) |
|
<li>From ]: {{cite web |title=Carnegie Classifications Institution Lookup |url=https://carnegieclassifications.iu.edu/lookup/view_institution.php?unit_id=228778 |publisher=Center for Postsecondary Education |website=carnegieclassifications.iu.edu |accessdate=19 July 2020}}</li> |
|
|
|
*'''Oppose''' per ], ], and what Zzyzx11 said. I see no reason why we need to make the title ''more'' ambiguous, since the acronym means nothing to the vast majority of people who are unfamiliar with the university. – ] (]) 16:15, 23 December 2024 (UTC) |
|
<li>From ]: Carnegie Foundation University Classification|accessdate=2011-02-06</li> |
|
|
|
{{abot}} |
|
<li>From ]: {{cite web |url=http://classifications.carnegiefoundation.org/lookup_listings/srp.php?clq={%22first_letter%22:%22U%22} |title=Carnegie Foundation University Classification |access-date = 2011-02-06}}</li> |
|
|
<li>From ]: {{cite web|last1=Barton|first1=Kristen|title=Tech achieves Tier One Carnegie Designation|url=http://www.dailytoreador.com/news/tech-achieves-tier-one-carnegie-designation/article_1887ac2c-c9f9-11e5-a2d3-c354417c3e35.html|website=DailyToreador.com|publisher=The Daily Toreador|accessdate=February 2, 2016}}</li> |
|
|
</ul> |
|
|
|
|
|
I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. ]] 08:16, 18 December 2020 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Questionable neutrality == |
|
|
|
|
|
Neutral, bias-free language is the foundation of Misplaced Pages and must be employed in every article on Misplaced Pages. However, there are several sections and passages in this particular article that are anything but neutral. Many of these sections come across as heavily biased and promotional, reading almost like an advertisement or self-promotional material. It is urged that neutrality be improved. ] (]) 15:31, 29 May 2022 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
:The language I'm seeing is mostly pretty neutral. The article goes into some detail about the school's accomplishments, but it seems to be based on reliable sources, and I don't think it uses particularly promotional language. There are a couple of spots in the Campus section where there is subjective wording, and there is some mention of trivial items (like the individual members of the debate teams). Am I missing other examples? Remember that you can go into the article yourself and provide alternative wording. ] (]) 17:43, 29 May 2022 (UTC) |
|
