Misplaced Pages

Internet video: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 23:43, 12 December 2022 editCoffeeWithMarkets (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users20,082 edits See also← Previous edit Latest revision as of 05:07, 24 December 2024 edit undo2a00:23c8:a7b3:df01:948:aa10:5977:4de4 (talk) See alsoTags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit 
(27 intermediate revisions by 22 users not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:


{{Multiple issues| {{Multiple issues|

{{Original research|date=February 2017}} {{Original research|date=February 2017}}
{{Update|date=November 2020}} {{Update|date=November 2020}}
{{Lead rewrite|date=September 2024}}
{{Lead extra info|date=September 2024}}
}} }}
'''Internet video''' ('''online video''' / '''cloud-based video''') is the general field that deals with the transmission of ] over the ]. Internet video exists in several formats, the most notable being ], ], ], and ]. '''Internet video''' (also known as '''online video''') is ] that is distributed over the ]. Internet video exists in several formats, the most notable being ], ], ], and ].


There are several ], including ], as well as ], ], and ]. In recent years, the platform of internet video has been used to stream live events. As a result of the popularity of online video, notable events like the ] have been streamed live on the internet. Additionally, internet video has played an important role in the ] as a medium to watch ]s and gain popularity for songs There are several ], including ]. In recent years, the platform of internet video has been used to stream live events. As a result of the popularity of online video, notable events like the ] have been streamed live on the internet. Additionally, internet video has played an important role in the ] as a medium to watch ]s and increase exposure of songs.


==Video file formats== ==Video file formats==
Line 23: Line 24:
{{Main|AVCHD}} {{Main|AVCHD}}


], or Advanced Video Coding High Definition, uses one of the more efficient ]s. It was announced in May 2006 and since then has grown into a high-quality video format that can compete with other professional forms of media. The AVCHD is geared towards consumer shooters; this is largely because the AVCHD format capitalizes on the H.264/MPEG-4 video that is able to compress video to smaller sizes in order to allow more video to be stored in the same storage capacity.<ref>{{cite web|last1=Montgomery|first1=Mark|title=If You're Looking For More Info About The AVCHD Codec|url=http://www.videomaker.com/article/14250-if-youre-looking-for-more-info-about-the-avchd-codec-read-this|website=videomaker.com|access-date=22 October 2014}}</ref> ], or Advanced Video Coding High Definition, uses one of the more efficient ]s. It was announced in May 2006 and since then has grown into a high-quality video format that can compete with other professional forms of media. The AVCHD is geared towards consumer shooters; this is largely because the AVCHD format capitalizes on the H.264/MPEG-4 video that is able to compress video to smaller sizes in order to allow more video to be stored in the same storage capacity.<ref>{{cite web|last1=Montgomery|first1=Mark|title=If You're Looking For More Info About The AVCHD Codec|url=http://www.videomaker.com/article/14250-if-youre-looking-for-more-info-about-the-avchd-codec-read-this|website=videomaker.com|date=November 2009|access-date=22 October 2014|archive-date=21 October 2014|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20141021205544/http://www.videomaker.com/article/14250-if-youre-looking-for-more-info-about-the-avchd-codec-read-this|url-status=live}}</ref>


===FLV (Flash Video)=== ===FLV (Flash Video)===
Line 32: Line 33:
{{Main|MPEG-4 Part 14|MPEG-4}} {{Main|MPEG-4 Part 14|MPEG-4}}


] is known as a sharing format for the internet. In recent years an increasing number of camcorder and cameras began employ it. Moreover, ] recommends using the MP4 Format (Although it accepts multiple formats, YouTube either converts them to .flv or .mp4 files). ] is another company that has backed MP4 by using it in its ] player.<ref>{{cite web|title=The MPEG-4 Format|url=http://www.mediacollege.com/video/format/mpeg4/|website=mediacollege.com|access-date=22 October 2014}}</ref> ] is known as a sharing format for the internet. In recent years an increasing number of camcorder and cameras began employ it. Moreover, ] recommends using the MP4 Format (Although it accepts multiple formats, YouTube either converts them to .flv or .mp4 files). ] is another company that has backed MP4 by using it in its ] player.<ref>{{cite web|title=The MPEG-4 Format|url=http://www.mediacollege.com/video/format/mpeg4/|website=mediacollege.com|access-date=22 October 2014|archive-date=13 April 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150413054045/http://www.mediacollege.com/video/format/mpeg4/|url-status=live}}</ref>


==YouTube== ==YouTube==
Line 39: Line 40:
] was founded in 2005 by ], ], and ]. The first video on the platform was "]" uploaded by Karim on the first ], ], in April 2005. ] was founded in 2005 by ], ], and ]. The first video on the platform was "]" uploaded by Karim on the first ], ], in April 2005.


In October 2005, ] became the first major company to embrace YouTube as a promotional platform. They were the first company to do this and since then YouTube has provided a means of displaying internet video in order to help companies promote their products. ] purchased YouTube for $1.65 billion in October 2006 and since then it has developed it even further.<ref>{{cite web|last1=Lidsky|first1=David|title=The Brief But Impactful History of YouTube|url=http://www.fastcompany.com/1514469/brief-impactful-history-youtube|website=fastcompany.com|access-date=22 October 2014}}</ref> Since then, it has become the most popular website for watching internet video. For example, the hours of video watched per month on YouTube totaled 6 billion.<ref>{{cite web|last1=Smith|first1=Craig|title=By The Numbers: 60 Amazing YouTube Statistics|url=http://expandedramblings.com/index.php/youtube-statistics/#.VEO0KmTF9yR|website=expandedramblings.com|access-date=22 October 2014}}</ref> As of 2014, there were one billion unique users to YouTube each month. According to Nielsen, YouTube reaches more U.S. adults aged 18–34 years old than any cable network.<ref>{{cite web|title=Statistics|url=https://www.youtube.com/yt/press/en-GB/statistics.html|website=YouTube.com|access-date=22 October 2014}}</ref> In October 2005, ] became the first major company to embrace YouTube as a promotional platform. They were the first company to do this and since then YouTube has provided a means of displaying internet video in order to help companies promote their products. ] purchased YouTube for $1.65 billion in October 2006 and since then it has developed it even further.<ref>{{cite web|last1=Lidsky|first1=David|title=The Brief But Impactful History of YouTube|url=http://www.fastcompany.com/1514469/brief-impactful-history-youtube|website=fastcompany.com|access-date=22 October 2014|archive-date=22 February 2014|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140222052143/http://www.fastcompany.com/1514469/brief-impactful-history-youtube|url-status=live}}</ref> Since then, it has become the most popular website for watching internet video. For example, the hours of video watched per month on YouTube totaled 6 billion.<ref>{{cite web|last1=Smith|first1=Craig|title=By The Numbers: 60 Amazing YouTube Statistics|url=http://expandedramblings.com/index.php/youtube-statistics/#.VEO0KmTF9yR|website=expandedramblings.com|access-date=22 October 2014|archive-date=17 October 2014|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20141017091239/http://expandedramblings.com/index.php/youtube-statistics/#.VEO0KmTF9yR|url-status=live}}</ref> As of 2014, there were one billion unique users to YouTube each month. According to Nielsen, YouTube reaches more U.S. adults aged 18–34 years old than any cable network.<ref>{{cite web|title=Statistics|url=https://www.youtube.com/yt/press/en-GB/statistics.html|website=YouTube.com|access-date=22 October 2014|archive-date=20 October 2014|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20141020150124/https://www.youtube.com/yt/press/en-GB/statistics.html|url-status=live}}</ref>


==Other video platforms== ==Other video platforms==
{{See also|List of video hosting services}} {{See also|List of video hosting services}}


Aside from YouTube, there are several other ]s, which despite being less popular, are still used by many.
Aside from YouTube, there are several other internet video platforms, which despite being less popular, are still used by many. ] is a key example of this. Vimeo has over thirty million registered members and has a global reach of over 170 million each month. Their mission statement is to “empower and inspire people around the world to create, share, and discover videos”.<ref>{{cite web|title=Vimeo: Overview|url=http://iac.com/brand/vimeo|website=iac.com|access-date=22 October 2014}}</ref> Another online internet video platform which was founded in June 2012 is ]. It involves a short video on a six-second loop. Once the "Vine" is uploaded, it can be published on social media. Social media played a large role in making this a more popular internet video service.


==Live streaming== ==Live streaming==
{{See also|Live streaming}} {{See also|Live streaming}}


Live streaming is another important aspect of internet video. This is when particular events are streamed using a live form of internet video. A key example of this is that in 2008 and 2012, during the Presidential election, the debates between the two candidates were live-streamed on YouTube. Live streaming is another important aspect of internet video. This is when particular events are streamed using a live form of internet video. A key example of this is that in 2008 and 2012, during the presidential election, the debates between the two candidates were live-streamed on YouTube.


Live streaming has also been used as a means of promoting exposure for a particular product or business. This is largely because platforms such as YouTube provide a cheap, and usually free, means to access millions of users. Whether that be potential customers on laptops, smartphones, tablets, and ]s. A study conducted by SocialMediaExaminer supports this hypothesis using YouTube as a particular example.<ref>{{cite web|last1=Colligan|first1=Paul|title=How to Use YouTube Live Streaming to Boost Your Exposure|url=http://www.socialmediaexaminer.com/youtube-live-streaming/|website=socialmediaexaminer.com|access-date=22 October 2014}}</ref> Live streaming has also been used as a means of promoting exposure for a particular product or business. This is largely because platforms such as YouTube provide a cheap, and usually free, means to access millions of users. Whether that be potential customers on laptops, smartphones, tablets, and ]s. A study conducted by SocialMediaExaminer supports this hypothesis using YouTube as a particular example.<ref>{{cite news|last1=Colligan|first1=Paul|title=How to Use YouTube Live Streaming to Boost Your Exposure|url=http://www.socialmediaexaminer.com/youtube-live-streaming/|newspaper=Social Media Examiner|access-date=22 October 2014|archive-date=21 October 2014|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20141021194201/http://www.socialmediaexaminer.com/youtube-live-streaming/|url-status=live}}</ref>


A sign of the growth of importance of internet video live streaming refers to the change in business model of the ] (WWE).<ref>{{cite web|last1=VanDerWerff|first1=Emily|title=Why don't we have a standalone HBO Go? Look to the WWE Network for an answer|url=https://www.vox.com/2014/8/1/5957791/wwe-network-numbers-hbo-go-explained|website=vox.com|access-date=22 October 2014}}</ref> Previously the WWE’s business model involved receiving huge numbers of pay-per-view buys for special events hosted once per month and charging approx. $44.95 (Dependent on retailer) for each.<ref>{{cite web|title=Events/TV/PPV|url=http://www.wwe.com/help/eventstvppv|website=WWE.com|access-date=22 October 2014}}</ref> However, in February 2014 they launched a 24/7 streaming network charging $9.99 per month in order to get access to every "special event". This shows that one of the largest entertainment companies was willing to adopt to a live streaming/internet video model in order to support their business. Many other companies such as ] (with iPlayer), ] (with ITV Player) and ] (with 4oD) have made use of internet video to allow users to livestream content, or watch on demand later. A sign of the growth of importance of internet video live streaming refers to the change in business model of the ] (WWE).<ref>{{cite web|last1=VanDerWerff|first1=Emily|title=Why don't we have a standalone HBO Go? Look to the WWE Network for an answer|url=https://www.vox.com/2014/8/1/5957791/wwe-network-numbers-hbo-go-explained|website=vox.com|date=August 2014|access-date=22 October 2014|archive-date=21 October 2014|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20141021195101/http://www.vox.com/2014/8/1/5957791/wwe-network-numbers-hbo-go-explained|url-status=live}}</ref> Previously the WWE's business model involved receiving huge numbers of pay-per-view buys for special events hosted once per month and charging approx. $44.95 (Dependent on retailer) for each.<ref>{{cite web|title=Events/TV/PPV|url=http://www.wwe.com/help/eventstvppv|website=WWE.com|access-date=22 October 2014|archive-date=22 November 2014|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20141122191038/http://www.wwe.com/help/eventstvppv|url-status=live}}</ref> However, in February 2014 they launched a 24/7 streaming network charging $9.99 per month in order to get access to every "special event". This shows that one of the largest entertainment companies was willing to adopt to a live streaming/internet video model in order to support their business. Many other companies such as ] (with iPlayer), ] (with ITV Player) and ] (with 4oD) have made use of internet video to allow users to livestream content, or watch on demand later.


==Controversy== ==Controversy==


Both ] and internet videos have faced controversy in recent years, largely because it is extremely difficult to access all the live-streams which show particular events. This infringes on the issue of copyright. Rights-holders face the challenge of content, which includes audio, TV shows and sporting events, being streamed live to the public.<ref>{{cite web|last1=Bailey|first1=Jonathan|title=Livestreaming and Copyright Issues|url=http://www.blogherald.com/2009/08/24/livestreaming-and-copyright-issues/|website=theblogherald.com|access-date=22 October 2014}}</ref> As a result, streaming website Justin.TV partnered with content matching service Vobile in order to filter out infringing material.<ref>{{cite web|last1=Albrecht|first1=Chris|title=Justin.tv Placates Copyright Holders With Anti-piracy Tech|url=https://gigaom.com/2009/08/12/justin-tv-placates-copyright-holders-with-anti-piracy-tech/|website=gigaom.com|access-date=22 October 2014}}</ref> Another example of a copyright issue which occurred to online streaming was when ] were sued by a boxing promoter in August 2009 for allowing 2,337 users to view a broadcast of the fight Roy Jones Jr. vs Omar Sheika.<ref>{{cite web|last1=Kincaid|first1=Jason|title=Ustream Sued By Boxing Promoter Over Pirated Broadcast|url=https://techcrunch.com/2009/08/17/ustream-sued-by-boxing-promoter-over-pirated-broadcast/|website=techcrunch.com|access-date=22 October 2014}}</ref> Both ] and internet videos have faced controversy in recent years, largely because it is extremely difficult to access all the live-streams which show particular events. This infringes on the issue of copyright. Rights-holders face the challenge of content, which includes audio, TV shows and sporting events, being streamed live to the public.<ref>{{cite web|last1=Bailey|first1=Jonathan|title=Livestreaming and Copyright Issues|url=http://www.blogherald.com/2009/08/24/livestreaming-and-copyright-issues/|website=theblogherald.com|date=24 August 2009|access-date=22 October 2014|archive-date=13 October 2014|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20141013142814/http://www.blogherald.com/2009/08/24/livestreaming-and-copyright-issues/|url-status=live}}</ref> As a result, streaming website Justin.TV partnered with content matching service Vobile in order to filter out infringing material.<ref>{{cite web|last1=Albrecht|first1=Chris|title=Justin.tv Placates Copyright Holders With Anti-piracy Tech|url=https://gigaom.com/2009/08/12/justin-tv-placates-copyright-holders-with-anti-piracy-tech/|website=gigaom.com|access-date=22 October 2014|archive-date=10 March 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150310113219/https://gigaom.com/2009/08/12/justin-tv-placates-copyright-holders-with-anti-piracy-tech/|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |title=watch free movies online |url=https://ww4.fmovies.co/16/ |access-date=10 April 2023 |archive-date=10 April 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230410015845/https://ww4.fmovies.co/16/ |url-status=live }}</ref> Another example of a copyright issue which occurred to online streaming was when ] were sued by a boxing promoter in August 2009 for allowing 2,337 users to view a broadcast of the fight Roy Jones Jr. vs Omar Sheika.<ref>{{cite web|last1=Kincaid|first1=Jason|title=Ustream Sued By Boxing Promoter Over Pirated Broadcast|url=https://techcrunch.com/2009/08/17/ustream-sued-by-boxing-promoter-over-pirated-broadcast/|website=techcrunch.com|date=17 August 2009|access-date=22 October 2014|archive-date=5 November 2014|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20141105123935/http://techcrunch.com/2009/08/17/ustream-sued-by-boxing-promoter-over-pirated-broadcast/|url-status=live}}</ref>


YouTube has also faced issues surrounding ]. For example, in December 2013,<ref>{{cite web|last1=Totilo|first1=Stephen|title=YouTube Channels Crippled By Copyright Claims|url=http://kotaku.com/youtube-channels-crippled-by-copyright-claims-1480717110|website=kotaku.com|access-date=22 October 2014}}</ref> many YouTubers who published footage of video games for either review or tutorial purposes were punished and crippled by copyright claims. In the past, YouTube has also faced issues with the music industry over users publishing videos without the permission of the music industry. The issues can be seen by the fact that since 2007, YouTube has paid out one billion dollars to copyright holders.<ref>{{cite web|last1=Wagstaff|first1=Keith|title=YouTube Has Paid $1 Billion to Copyright Holders Since 2007|url=http://www.nbcnews.com/tech/internet/youtube-has-paid-1-billion-copyright-holders-2007-n225706|website=NBCNews.com|access-date=22 October 2014}}</ref> Saying that, the formation of Vevo has aided YouTube in terms of issues with the music industry by allowing artists/labels to get a share of revenue. YouTube has also faced issues surrounding ]. For example, in December 2013,<ref>{{cite web|last1=Totilo|first1=Stephen|title=YouTube Channels Crippled By Copyright Claims|url=http://kotaku.com/youtube-channels-crippled-by-copyright-claims-1480717110|website=kotaku.com|date=11 December 2013|access-date=22 October 2014|archive-date=22 October 2014|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20141022003802/http://kotaku.com/youtube-channels-crippled-by-copyright-claims-1480717110|url-status=live}}</ref> many YouTubers who published footage of video games for either review or tutorial purposes were punished and crippled by copyright claims. In the past, YouTube has also faced issues with the music industry over users publishing videos without the permission of the music industry. The issues can be seen by the fact that since 2007, YouTube has paid out one billion dollars to copyright holders.<ref>{{cite web|last1=Wagstaff|first1=Keith|title=YouTube Has Paid $1 Billion to Copyright Holders Since 2007|url=http://www.nbcnews.com/tech/internet/youtube-has-paid-1-billion-copyright-holders-2007-n225706|website=NBCNews.com|date=14 October 2014 |access-date=22 October 2014|archive-date=22 October 2014|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20141022090822/http://www.nbcnews.com/tech/internet/youtube-has-paid-1-billion-copyright-holders-2007-n225706|url-status=live}}</ref> Saying that, the formation of Vevo has aided YouTube in terms of issues with the music industry by allowing artists/labels to get a share of revenue.


==The importance of video in the music industry== ==The importance of video in the music industry==


The growth of internet video has provided a platform to help elevate the ]. This has most particularly been seen through the platform of YouTube. Chris Maxcy, YouTube’s partner development director stated that “YouTube is the ideal place for labels to promote music and for fans to discover new artists and old favourites”. Moreover, Rio Caraeff, who heads up Universal’s digital group described YouTube as a “revenue stream, a commercial business. It's growing tremendously. It's up almost 80 percent for us year-over-year in the U.S. in terms of our revenue from this category”.<ref>{{cite web|last1=Sandoval|first1=Greg|title=Universal Music seeing 'tens of millions' from YouTube|url=http://www.cnet.com/news/universal-music-seeing-tens-of-millions-from-youtube/|website=cnet.com|access-date=22 October 2014}}</ref> In addition, an article published in 2011,<ref>{{cite web|last1=Wong|first1=Brittany|title=Three Ways YouTube Has Changed the Music Industry|url=http://group3info.blogspot.co.uk/2011/11/three-ways-youtube-has-changed-music.html|website=group3info.blogspot.com|access-date=22 October 2014}}</ref> believes that YouTube has changed the music industry citing three ways; YouTube allows people to listen to the native music of India, for example, and other regions which would otherwise be difficult to discover. Brittany Wong also believes that YouTube helps to allow people get discovered. This is largely because it allows anybody to post an online video for the world to see. Finally it mentions that the convenience of the platform allows many people to listen to the music, which has increased potential audiences. The growth of internet video has provided a platform to help elevate the ]. This has most particularly been seen through the platform of YouTube. Chris Maxcy, YouTube's partner development director stated that “YouTube is the ideal place for labels to promote music and for fans to discover new artists and old favourites”. Moreover, Rio Caraeff, who heads up Universal's digital group described YouTube as a “revenue stream, a commercial business. It's growing tremendously. It's up almost 80 percent for us year-over-year in the U.S. in terms of our revenue from this category”.<ref>{{cite web|last1=Sandoval|first1=Greg|title=Universal Music seeing 'tens of millions' from YouTube|url=http://www.cnet.com/news/universal-music-seeing-tens-of-millions-from-youtube/|website=cnet.com|access-date=22 October 2014|archive-date=21 October 2014|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20141021190851/http://www.cnet.com/news/universal-music-seeing-tens-of-millions-from-youtube/|url-status=live}}</ref> In addition, an article published in 2011,<ref>{{cite web|last1=Wong|first1=Brittany|title=Three Ways YouTube Has Changed the Music Industry|url=http://group3info.blogspot.co.uk/2011/11/three-ways-youtube-has-changed-music.html|website=group3info.blogspot.com|date=14 November 2011|access-date=22 October 2014|archive-date=4 March 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160304125802/http://group3info.blogspot.co.uk/2011/11/three-ways-youtube-has-changed-music.html|url-status=live}}</ref> believes that YouTube has changed the music industry citing three ways; YouTube allows people to listen to the native music of India, for example, and other regions which would otherwise be difficult to discover. Brittany Wong also believes that YouTube allows people to get discovered. This is largely because it allows anybody to post an online video for the world to see. Finally, it mentions that the convenience of the platform allows many people to listen to music, which has increased potential audiences.


Mike Masnik, the CEO and founder of ], recognized the importance of YouTube in the music industry.<ref>{{cite web|last1=Masnick|first1=Mike|title=How the record labels spurned the YouTube opportunity|url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/google/6832196/How-the-record-labels-spurned-the-YouTube-opportunity.html |archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/archive/20220112/https://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/google/6832196/How-the-record-labels-spurned-the-YouTube-opportunity.html |archive-date=2022-01-12 |url-access=subscription |url-status=live|website=Telegraph.co.uk|access-date=22 October 2014}}{{cbignore}}</ref> In this article he recognizes the potential ability of YouTube in order to allow musicians to increase exposure, and ]s to make money. However, they were naive and did not fully embrace it. Mike Masnik, the CEO and founder of ], recognized the importance of YouTube in the music industry.<ref>{{cite web|last1=Masnick|first1=Mike|title=How the record labels spurned the YouTube opportunity|url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/google/6832196/How-the-record-labels-spurned-the-YouTube-opportunity.html |archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/archive/20220112/https://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/google/6832196/How-the-record-labels-spurned-the-YouTube-opportunity.html |archive-date=2022-01-12 |url-access=subscription |url-status=live|website=Telegraph.co.uk|date=17 December 2009 |access-date=22 October 2014}}{{cbignore}}</ref> In this article he recognizes the potential ability of YouTube in order to allow musicians to increase exposure, and ]s to make money. However, they were naïve and did not fully embrace it.


==See also== ==See also==
Line 74: Line 75:
* ] * ]
* ] * ]
* ] * ]
* ] * ]
* ] * ]

Latest revision as of 05:07, 24 December 2024

Transmission of digital video over the internet
This article has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page. (Learn how and when to remove these messages)
This article possibly contains original research. Please improve it by verifying the claims made and adding inline citations. Statements consisting only of original research should be removed. (February 2017) (Learn how and when to remove this message)
This article needs to be updated. Please help update this article to reflect recent events or newly available information. (November 2020)
The article's lead section may need to be rewritten. Please help improve the lead and read the lead layout guide. (September 2024) (Learn how and when to remove this message)
This article's lead section contains information that is not included elsewhere in the article. If the information is appropriate for the lead of the article, this information should also be included in the body of the article. (September 2024) (Learn how and when to remove this message)
(Learn how and when to remove this message)

Internet video (also known as online video) is digital video that is distributed over the internet. Internet video exists in several formats, the most notable being MPEG-4i AVC, AVCHD, FLV, and MP4.

There are several online video hosting services, including YouTube. In recent years, the platform of internet video has been used to stream live events. As a result of the popularity of online video, notable events like the 2012 U.S. presidential debates have been streamed live on the internet. Additionally, internet video has played an important role in the music industry as a medium to watch music videos and increase exposure of songs.

Video file formats

Main articles: Video coding format and Timeline of online video

Practical online video streaming was only made possible with advances in data compression, due to the impractically high bandwidth requirements of uncompressed video. Raw digital video requires a bandwidth of 168 Mbit/s for SD video, and over 1 Gbit/s for FHD video.

MPEG-4 AVC (Advanced Video Coding)

Main articles: H.264/MPEG-4 AVC and MPEG-4

H.264/MPEG-4 AVC is the most widely used video coding format on the Internet. It was developed in 2003 by a number of organizations.

AVCHD (Advanced Video Coding High Definition)

Main article: AVCHD

AVCHD, or Advanced Video Coding High Definition, uses one of the more efficient video coding formats. It was announced in May 2006 and since then has grown into a high-quality video format that can compete with other professional forms of media. The AVCHD is geared towards consumer shooters; this is largely because the AVCHD format capitalizes on the H.264/MPEG-4 video that is able to compress video to smaller sizes in order to allow more video to be stored in the same storage capacity.

FLV (Flash Video)

Flash Video (FLV) is video encoded by Adobe Flash software in order to play within the Adobe Flash Player. Popular in the past, and used by several video sites, including YouTube, the Adobe Flash Player has been replaced by HTML5 and this format has been abandoned.

MPEG-4 Part 14 (MP4)

Main articles: MPEG-4 Part 14 and MPEG-4

MPEG-4 is known as a sharing format for the internet. In recent years an increasing number of camcorder and cameras began employ it. Moreover, YouTube recommends using the MP4 Format (Although it accepts multiple formats, YouTube either converts them to .flv or .mp4 files). Apple is another company that has backed MP4 by using it in its QuickTime player.

YouTube

Main article: YouTube

YouTube was founded in 2005 by Chad Hurley, Steve Chen, and Jawed Karim. The first video on the platform was "Me at the zoo" uploaded by Karim on the first YouTube channel, jawed, in April 2005.

In October 2005, Nike became the first major company to embrace YouTube as a promotional platform. They were the first company to do this and since then YouTube has provided a means of displaying internet video in order to help companies promote their products. Google purchased YouTube for $1.65 billion in October 2006 and since then it has developed it even further. Since then, it has become the most popular website for watching internet video. For example, the hours of video watched per month on YouTube totaled 6 billion. As of 2014, there were one billion unique users to YouTube each month. According to Nielsen, YouTube reaches more U.S. adults aged 18–34 years old than any cable network.

Other video platforms

See also: List of video hosting services

Aside from YouTube, there are several other internet video platforms, which despite being less popular, are still used by many.

Live streaming

See also: Live streaming

Live streaming is another important aspect of internet video. This is when particular events are streamed using a live form of internet video. A key example of this is that in 2008 and 2012, during the presidential election, the debates between the two candidates were live-streamed on YouTube.

Live streaming has also been used as a means of promoting exposure for a particular product or business. This is largely because platforms such as YouTube provide a cheap, and usually free, means to access millions of users. Whether that be potential customers on laptops, smartphones, tablets, and smart TVs. A study conducted by SocialMediaExaminer supports this hypothesis using YouTube as a particular example.

A sign of the growth of importance of internet video live streaming refers to the change in business model of the World Wrestling Entertainment (WWE). Previously the WWE's business model involved receiving huge numbers of pay-per-view buys for special events hosted once per month and charging approx. $44.95 (Dependent on retailer) for each. However, in February 2014 they launched a 24/7 streaming network charging $9.99 per month in order to get access to every "special event". This shows that one of the largest entertainment companies was willing to adopt to a live streaming/internet video model in order to support their business. Many other companies such as BBC (with iPlayer), ITV (with ITV Player) and Channel 4 (with 4oD) have made use of internet video to allow users to livestream content, or watch on demand later.

Controversy

Both live streaming and internet videos have faced controversy in recent years, largely because it is extremely difficult to access all the live-streams which show particular events. This infringes on the issue of copyright. Rights-holders face the challenge of content, which includes audio, TV shows and sporting events, being streamed live to the public. As a result, streaming website Justin.TV partnered with content matching service Vobile in order to filter out infringing material. Another example of a copyright issue which occurred to online streaming was when uStream were sued by a boxing promoter in August 2009 for allowing 2,337 users to view a broadcast of the fight Roy Jones Jr. vs Omar Sheika.

YouTube has also faced issues surrounding copyright. For example, in December 2013, many YouTubers who published footage of video games for either review or tutorial purposes were punished and crippled by copyright claims. In the past, YouTube has also faced issues with the music industry over users publishing videos without the permission of the music industry. The issues can be seen by the fact that since 2007, YouTube has paid out one billion dollars to copyright holders. Saying that, the formation of Vevo has aided YouTube in terms of issues with the music industry by allowing artists/labels to get a share of revenue.

The importance of video in the music industry

The growth of internet video has provided a platform to help elevate the music industry. This has most particularly been seen through the platform of YouTube. Chris Maxcy, YouTube's partner development director stated that “YouTube is the ideal place for labels to promote music and for fans to discover new artists and old favourites”. Moreover, Rio Caraeff, who heads up Universal's digital group described YouTube as a “revenue stream, a commercial business. It's growing tremendously. It's up almost 80 percent for us year-over-year in the U.S. in terms of our revenue from this category”. In addition, an article published in 2011, believes that YouTube has changed the music industry citing three ways; YouTube allows people to listen to the native music of India, for example, and other regions which would otherwise be difficult to discover. Brittany Wong also believes that YouTube allows people to get discovered. This is largely because it allows anybody to post an online video for the world to see. Finally, it mentions that the convenience of the platform allows many people to listen to music, which has increased potential audiences.

Mike Masnik, the CEO and founder of Techdirt, recognized the importance of YouTube in the music industry. In this article he recognizes the potential ability of YouTube in order to allow musicians to increase exposure, and record labels to make money. However, they were naïve and did not fully embrace it.

See also

References

  1. Lee, Jack (2005). Scalable Continuous Media Streaming Systems: Architecture, Design, Analysis and Implementation. John Wiley & Sons. p. 25. ISBN 9780470857649.
  2. Montgomery, Mark (November 2009). "If You're Looking For More Info About The AVCHD Codec". videomaker.com. Archived from the original on 21 October 2014. Retrieved 22 October 2014.
  3. "The MPEG-4 Format". mediacollege.com. Archived from the original on 13 April 2015. Retrieved 22 October 2014.
  4. Lidsky, David. "The Brief But Impactful History of YouTube". fastcompany.com. Archived from the original on 22 February 2014. Retrieved 22 October 2014.
  5. Smith, Craig. "By The Numbers: 60 Amazing YouTube Statistics". expandedramblings.com. Archived from the original on 17 October 2014. Retrieved 22 October 2014.
  6. "Statistics". YouTube.com. Archived from the original on 20 October 2014. Retrieved 22 October 2014.
  7. Colligan, Paul. "How to Use YouTube Live Streaming to Boost Your Exposure". Social Media Examiner. Archived from the original on 21 October 2014. Retrieved 22 October 2014.
  8. VanDerWerff, Emily (August 2014). "Why don't we have a standalone HBO Go? Look to the WWE Network for an answer". vox.com. Archived from the original on 21 October 2014. Retrieved 22 October 2014.
  9. "Events/TV/PPV". WWE.com. Archived from the original on 22 November 2014. Retrieved 22 October 2014.
  10. Bailey, Jonathan (24 August 2009). "Livestreaming and Copyright Issues". theblogherald.com. Archived from the original on 13 October 2014. Retrieved 22 October 2014.
  11. Albrecht, Chris. "Justin.tv Placates Copyright Holders With Anti-piracy Tech". gigaom.com. Archived from the original on 10 March 2015. Retrieved 22 October 2014.
  12. "watch free movies online". Archived from the original on 10 April 2023. Retrieved 10 April 2023.
  13. Kincaid, Jason (17 August 2009). "Ustream Sued By Boxing Promoter Over Pirated Broadcast". techcrunch.com. Archived from the original on 5 November 2014. Retrieved 22 October 2014.
  14. Totilo, Stephen (11 December 2013). "YouTube Channels Crippled By Copyright Claims". kotaku.com. Archived from the original on 22 October 2014. Retrieved 22 October 2014.
  15. Wagstaff, Keith (14 October 2014). "YouTube Has Paid $1 Billion to Copyright Holders Since 2007". NBCNews.com. Archived from the original on 22 October 2014. Retrieved 22 October 2014.
  16. Sandoval, Greg. "Universal Music seeing 'tens of millions' from YouTube". cnet.com. Archived from the original on 21 October 2014. Retrieved 22 October 2014.
  17. Wong, Brittany (14 November 2011). "Three Ways YouTube Has Changed the Music Industry". group3info.blogspot.com. Archived from the original on 4 March 2016. Retrieved 22 October 2014.
  18. Masnick, Mike (17 December 2009). "How the record labels spurned the YouTube opportunity". Telegraph.co.uk. Archived from the original on 2022-01-12. Retrieved 22 October 2014.
Category: