Misplaced Pages

Theism: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 21:46, 24 December 2023 editPython Drink (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users2,189 edits DeismTags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit← Previous edit Latest revision as of 18:07, 24 December 2024 edit undoFaithlesselector (talk | contribs)23 edits Autotheism: Edited subsection on Autotheism to read more encyclopedic. Added relevant Citations and links.Tag: Visual edit 
(33 intermediate revisions by 22 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Short description|Belief in the existence of at least one deity}} {{Short description|Belief in the existence of at least one deity}}
{{Use dmy dates|date=January 2024}}
{{Expert needed|religion|reason=to prune redundant content and deal with large tracts of unsourced and ] text and in-text lists|date=September 2022}}
{{Religion sidebar|expanded = schools}}

] depicted by ] in 1860]] ] depicted by ] in 1860]]
'''Theism''' is broadly defined as the ] in the existence of at least one ].<ref>, {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211212143951/http://www.dictionary.com/browse/theism |date=2021-12-12 }} ''Dictionary.com''. Retrieved 2016-10-21.</ref><ref> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110514194441/http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/theism |date=2011-05-14 }} ''Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary''. Retrieved 2011-03-18.</ref> In common parlance, or when contrasted with '']'', the term often describes the classical conception of ] that is found in ] (also referred to as ]) — or ] found in ] religions — a belief in God or in gods without the rejection of ] as is characteristic of deism.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.dictionary.com/browse/theism?s=t |title=Dictionary.com Online Dictionary |access-date=2016-10-21 |archive-date=2021-12-16 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211216052754/https://www.dictionary.com/browse/theism?s=t |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.dictionary.com/browse/deism?s=t |title=Dictionary.com Online Dictionary |access-date=2016-11-23 |archive-date=2021-12-16 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211216052745/https://www.dictionary.com/browse/deism?s=t |url-status=live }}</ref> '''Theism''' is broadly defined as the ] in the existence of at least one ].<ref>, {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211212143951/http://www.dictionary.com/browse/theism |date=12 December 2021 }} ''Dictionary.com''. Retrieved 21 October 2016.</ref><ref> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110514194441/http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/theism |date=14 May 2011 }} ''Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary''. Retrieved 18 March 2011.</ref> In common parlance, or when contrasted with '']'', the term often describes the philosophical conception of ] that is found in ]—or the conception found in ]—or ] found in ] religions—or a belief in God or gods without the rejection of ], as is characteristic of deism.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.dictionary.com/browse/theism?s=t |title=Dictionary.com Online Dictionary |access-date=21 October 2016 |archive-date=16 December 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211216052754/https://www.dictionary.com/browse/theism?s=t |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.dictionary.com/browse/deism?s=t |title=Dictionary.com Online Dictionary |access-date=23 November 2016 |archive-date=16 December 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211216052745/https://www.dictionary.com/browse/deism?s=t |url-status=live }}</ref>


] is commonly understood as non-acceptance or rejection of theism in the broadest sense of theism, i.e. non-acceptance or rejection of belief in God or gods.<ref>{{Cite encyclopedia |first=Kai |last=Nielsen |author-link=Kai Nielsen (philosopher) |encyclopedia=] |title=Atheism |url=http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/40634/atheism |year=2010 |access-date=2011-01-26 |quote=Atheism, in general, the critique and denial of metaphysical beliefs in God or spiritual beings.... Instead of saying that an atheist is someone who believes that it is false or probably false that there is a God, a more adequate characterization of atheism consists in the more complex claim that to be an atheist is to be someone who rejects belief in God for the following reasons (which reason is stressed depends on how God is being conceived)...}}</ref><ref>{{Cite encyclopedia |title=Atheism |first=Paul |last=Edwards |author-link=Paul Edwards (philosopher) |publisher=MacMillan Reference USA (Gale)|editor=Donald M. Borchert |orig-year=1967 |year=2005 |edition=2nd |encyclopedia=] |volume=1 |page=359 |isbn=9780028657806 |quote=On our definition, an 'atheist' is a person who rejects belief in God, regardless of whether or not his reason for the rejection is the claim that 'God exists' expresses a false proposition. People frequently adopt an attitude of rejection toward a position for reasons other than that it is a false proposition. It is common among contemporary philosophers, and indeed it was not uncommon in earlier centuries, to reject positions on the ground that they are meaningless. Sometimes, too, a theory is rejected on such grounds as that it is sterile or redundant or capricious, and there are many other considerations which in certain contexts are generally agreed to constitute good grounds for rejecting an assertion.}}(page 175 in 1967 edition)</ref> Related, but separate, is the claim that the existence of any deity is unknown or unknowable: ].<ref name="Hepburn">{{Cite encyclopedia|title=Agnosticism|first=Ronald W.|last=Hepburn|publisher=MacMillan Reference USA (Gale)|editor=Donald M. Borchert|orig-year=1967|year=2005|edition=2nd|encyclopedia=]|volume=1|page=92|isbn=9780028657806|quote=In the most general use of the term, agnosticism is the view that we do not know whether there is a God or not.}}(page 56 in 1967 edition)</ref><ref name="RoweRoutledge">{{cite encyclopedia| url=https://books.google.com/books?id=VQ-GhVWTH84C&pg=PA122 |title=Agnosticism|first=William L.|last=Rowe|author-link=William L. Rowe|encyclopedia=]|isbn=978-0-415-07310-3|publisher=Taylor & Francis|year=1998|editor=Edward Craig|quote=In the popular sense, an agnostic is someone who neither believes nor disbelieves in God, whereas an atheist disbelieves in God. In the strict sense, however, agnosticism is the view that human reason is incapable of providing sufficient rational grounds to justify either the belief that God exists or the belief that God does not exist. In so far as one holds that our beliefs are rational only if they are sufficiently supported by human reason, the person who accepts the philosophical position of agnosticism will hold that neither the belief that God exists nor the belief that God does not exist is rational.}}</ref> Combined with theism, it becomes ]. ] is commonly understood as non-acceptance or outright rejection of theism in the broadest sense of the term (i.e., non-acceptance or rejection of belief in God or gods).<ref>{{Cite encyclopedia |first=Kai |last=Nielsen |author-link=Kai Nielsen (philosopher) |encyclopedia=] |title=Atheism |url=http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/40634/atheism |year=2010 |access-date=26 January 2011 |quote=Atheism, in general, the critique and denial of metaphysical beliefs in God or spiritual beings.... Instead of saying that an atheist is someone who believes that it is false or probably false that there is a God, a more adequate characterization of atheism consists in the more complex claim that to be an atheist is to be someone who rejects belief in God for the following reasons (which reason is stressed depends on how God is being conceived)...}}</ref><ref>{{Cite encyclopedia |title=Atheism |first=Paul |last=Edwards |author-link=Paul Edwards (philosopher) |publisher=MacMillan Reference USA (Gale)|editor=Donald M. Borchert |orig-year=1967 |year=2005 |edition=2nd |encyclopedia=] |volume=1 |page=359 |isbn=9780028657806 |quote=On our definition, an 'atheist' is a person who rejects belief in God, regardless of whether or not his reason for the rejection is the claim that 'God exists' expresses a false proposition. People frequently adopt an attitude of rejection toward a position for reasons other than that it is a false proposition. It is common among contemporary philosophers, and indeed it was not uncommon in earlier centuries, to reject positions on the ground that they are meaningless. Sometimes, too, a theory is rejected on such grounds as that it is sterile or redundant or capricious, and there are many other considerations which in certain contexts are generally agreed to constitute good grounds for rejecting an assertion.}}(page 175 in 1967 edition)</ref> Related (but separate) is the claim that the existence of any deity is unknown or unknowable; a stance known as ].<ref name="Hepburn">{{Cite encyclopedia|title=Agnosticism|first=Ronald W.|last=Hepburn|publisher=MacMillan Reference USA (Gale)|editor=Donald M. Borchert|orig-year=1967|year=2005|edition=2nd|encyclopedia=]|volume=1|page=92|isbn=9780028657806|quote=In the most general use of the term, agnosticism is the view that we do not know whether there is a God or not.}}(page 56 in 1967 edition)</ref><ref name="RoweRoutledge">{{cite encyclopedia| url=https://books.google.com/books?id=VQ-GhVWTH84C&pg=PA122 |title=Agnosticism|first=William L.|last=Rowe|author-link=William L. Rowe|encyclopedia=]|isbn=978-0-415-07310-3|publisher=Taylor & Francis|year=1998|editor=Edward Craig|quote=In the popular sense, an agnostic is someone who neither believes nor disbelieves in God, whereas an atheist disbelieves in God. In the strict sense, however, agnosticism is the view that human reason is incapable of providing sufficient rational grounds to justify either the belief that God exists or the belief that God does not exist. In so far as one holds that our beliefs are rational only if they are sufficiently supported by human reason, the person who accepts the philosophical position of agnosticism will hold that neither the belief that God exists nor the belief that God does not exist is rational.}}</ref> ''Agnostic theism'' is a personal belief in one or more deities along with acceptance that the existence or non-existence of the deity or deities is fundamentally unknowable.


==Etymology== ==Etymology==
The term ''theism'' derives from the Greek {{lang|grk|θεός}}<ref>{{cite EB1911 |wstitle=Theism |volume=26 |page=744 |first=Robert |last=Mackintosh }}</ref> (''theós'') or ''theoi'' meaning "god" or "gods". The term ''theism'' was first used by ] (1617–1688).<ref> The term ''theism'' derives from the Greek {{lang|grk|θεός}}<ref>{{cite EB1911 |wstitle=Theism |volume=26 |page=744 |first=Robert |last=Mackintosh }}</ref> (''theós'') or ''theoi'' meaning 'god' or 'gods'. The term ''theism'' was first used by ] (1617–1688).<ref>
{{cite book|last=Halsey|first=William|author2=Robert H. Blackburn |author3=Sir Frank Francis | title =Collier's Encyclopedia|editor=Louis Shores|publisher=Crowell-Collier Educational Corporation|year=1969| edition =20|volume=22|pages=266–7|editor-link=Louis Shores}} {{cite book|last=Halsey|first=William|author2=Robert H. Blackburn |author3=Sir Frank Francis | title =Collier's Encyclopedia|editor=Louis Shores|publisher=Crowell-Collier Educational Corporation|year=1969| edition =20|volume=22|pages=266–7|editor-link=Louis Shores}}
</ref> In Cudworth's definition, they are "strictly and properly called Theists, who affirm, that a perfectly conscious understanding being, or mind, existing of itself from eternity, was the cause of all other things".<ref>Cudworth, Ralph (1678). ''The True Intellectual System of the Universe, Vol. I''. New York: Gould & Newman, 1837, p. 267.</ref> </ref> In Cudworth's definition, they are "strictly and properly called Theists, who affirm that a perfectly conscious understanding being, or mind, existing of itself from eternity, was the cause of all other things".<ref>Cudworth, Ralph (1678). ''The True Intellectual System of the Universe, Vol. I''. New York: Gould & Newman, 1837, p. 267.</ref>


==Types of theism== ==Types of theism==

=== Classical theism ===
{{Main|Classical theism}}
Classical theism is the form of theism that describes God as the Absolute Being. Central insights of classical theistic ] includes ] and ].<ref name=":3">{{Cite book |last=Feser |first=Edward |title=Five Proofs of the Existence of God |publisher=IGNATIUS PRESS |year=2017 |isbn=978-1-62164-133-9 |location=San Francisco |language=en}}</ref><ref name=":02">{{Cite book |last=] |first=David Bentley |title=The Experience of God: Being, Consciousness, Bliss |date=September 24, 2013 |publisher=] }}</ref> Classical theistic traditions can be observed in major religions and philosophies, such as ] in ], ] in ], ] in general, and ].

===Monotheism=== ===Monotheism===
{{Main|Monotheism}} {{Main|Monotheism}}
Monotheism (from ] {{lang|grc|]}}) is the belief in ] that only one ] exists.<ref>"Monotheism", in Britannica, 15th ed. (1986), 8:266.</ref> Some modern day ] religions include ], ], ], ], ], ], some sects of ], and ]. Monotheism (from ] {{lang|grc|]}}) is the belief in theology that only one ] exists.<ref>"Monotheism", in Britannica, 15th ed. (1986), 8:266.</ref> Some modern day ] religions include ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], some sects of ], and ].


===Polytheism=== ===Polytheism===
Line 19: Line 28:
] is the belief in multiple ], which are usually assembled into a ], along with their own ]s and ]s. Polytheism was the typical form of religion before the development and spread of the ] of ], ], and ], which enforce monotheism. It is well documented throughout history; from ] and the earliest records of ] and ] to the religions prevalent during ], such as ] and ], and in ] such as ], ], and ] and ]s. ] is the belief in multiple ], which are usually assembled into a ], along with their own ]s and ]s. Polytheism was the typical form of religion before the development and spread of the ] of ], ], and ], which enforce monotheism. It is well documented throughout history; from ] and the earliest records of ] and ] to the religions prevalent during ], such as ] and ], and in ] such as ], ], and ] and ]s.


Notable polytheistic religions practiced today include ], ] or ], Japanese ], ], most ],<ref>{{cite journal|last=Kimmerle|first=Heinz|date=2006-04-11|title=The world of spirits and the respect for nature: towards a new appreciation of animism|journal=The Journal for Transdisciplinary Research in Southern Africa|language=en-US|volume=2|issue=2|pages=15|doi=10.4102/td.v2i2.277|issn=2415-2005|doi-access=free}}</ref> and various ] faiths such as ], ], ], and ]. ], while popularly held as polytheistic, cannot be exclusively categorised as such as some Hindus consider themselves to be ] and others consider themselves to be monotheists. Both are compatible with Hindu texts since there exists no consensus of standardisation in the faith. ], the most dominant school of Hinduism, offers a combination of monotheism and polytheism, holding that ] is the sole ''ultimate reality'' of the universe, yet unity with it can be reached by worshipping multiple gods and goddesses. Notable polytheistic religions practiced today include ], ] or ], Japanese ], ], most ],<ref>{{cite journal|last=Kimmerle|first=Heinz|date=11 April 2006|title=The world of spirits and the respect for nature: towards a new appreciation of animism|journal=The Journal for Transdisciplinary Research in Southern Africa|language=en-US|volume=2|issue=2|pages=15|doi=10.4102/td.v2i2.277|issn=2415-2005|doi-access=free}}</ref> and various ] faiths such as ], ], ], and ]. ], while popularly held as polytheistic, cannot be exclusively categorised as such as some Hindus consider themselves to be ] and others consider themselves to be monotheists. Both are compatible with Hindu texts since there exists no consensus of standardisation in the faith. Advaita Vedanta, a philosophy in Hinduism, offers a combination of monotheism and polytheism, holding that ] is the sole ''ultimate reality'' of the universe, yet unity with it can be reached by worshipping multiple Devas and Devies.


A major division in modern polytheistic practices is between so-called soft polytheism and hard polytheism.<ref>{{cite journal|url=https://digilib.phil.muni.cz/handle/11222.digilib/138049|title=Modern Pagan religious conversion revisited|last=Galtsin|first=Dmitry|date=2018-06-21|journal=Sacra|volume=14 |issue=2 |pages=7–17 |access-date=2019-02-05|archive-date=2019-02-07|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190207015038/https://digilib.phil.muni.cz/handle/11222.digilib/138049|url-status=live}}</ref><ref name=":0">{{cite book|title=Seeking the mystery : an introduction to Pagan theologies|last=Hoff|first=Kraemer, Christine|date=2012|publisher=Patheos Press|isbn=9781939221186|location=Englewood, CO|oclc=855412257}}</ref> "Soft" polytheism is the belief that different gods may either be psychological ], personifications of natural forces, or as being one essential god interpreted though the lenses of different cultures (e.x. ], ], and ] all being the same god as interpreted by Germanic, Greek, and Indic peoples respectively) – known as ].<ref>{{cite journal|last=Negedu|first=I. A.|date=2014-01-01|title=The Igala traditional religious belief system: Between monotheism and polytheism|url=https://www.ajol.info/index.php/og/article/view/109609|journal=OGIRISI: A New Journal of African Studies|language=en|volume=10|issue=1|pages=116–129|issn=1597-474X|doi=10.4314/og.v10i1.7|doi-access=free|access-date=2023-02-24|archive-date=2023-02-24|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230224223707/https://www.ajol.info/index.php/og/article/view/109609|url-status=live}}</ref> In this way, gods may be interchangeable for one another across cultures.<ref name=":0" /> "Hard" polytheism is the belief that gods are distinct, separate, real divine beings, rather than psychological archetypes or personifications of natural forces. Hard polytheists reject the idea that "all gods are one essential god" and may also ].<ref name=":0" /> A major division in modern polytheistic practices is between so-called ''soft'' polytheism and ''hard'' polytheism.<ref>{{cite journal|url=https://digilib.phil.muni.cz/handle/11222.digilib/138049|title=Modern Pagan religious conversion revisited|last=Galtsin|first=Dmitry|date=21 June 2018|journal=Sacra|volume=14 |issue=2 |pages=7–17 |access-date=5 February 2019|archive-date=7 February 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190207015038/https://digilib.phil.muni.cz/handle/11222.digilib/138049|url-status=live}}</ref><ref name=":0">{{cite book|title=Seeking the mystery : an introduction to Pagan theologies|last=Hoff|first=Kraemer, Christine|date=2012|publisher=Patheos Press|isbn=9781939221186|location=Englewood, CO|oclc=855412257}}</ref> "Soft" polytheism is the belief that different gods may be ], personifications of natural forces, or fundamentally one deity in different cultural contexts (e.g., ], ], and ] all being the same god as interpreted by Germanic, Greek, and Indic peoples, respectively)—known as ].<ref>{{cite journal|last=Negedu|first=I. A.|date=1 January 2014|title=The Igala traditional religious belief system: Between monotheism and polytheism|url=https://www.ajol.info/index.php/og/article/view/109609|journal=OGIRISI: A New Journal of African Studies|language=en|volume=10|issue=1|pages=116–129|issn=1597-474X|doi=10.4314/og.v10i1.7|doi-access=free|access-date=24 February 2023|archive-date=24 February 2023|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230224223707/https://www.ajol.info/index.php/og/article/view/109609|url-status=live}}</ref> In this way, gods may be interchangeable for one another across cultures.<ref name=":0" /> "Hard" polytheism is the belief that gods are distinct, separate, real divine beings rather than psychological archetypes or personifications of natural forces. Hard polytheists reject the idea that "all gods are one essential god" and may also ].<ref name=":0" />


Polytheism is further divided according to how the individual deities are regarded: Polytheism is further divided according to how the individual deities are regarded:


; ]: Henotheism is the belief that there may be more than one deity, but that only one of them is to be worshiped. ] is an example. ; ]: Henotheism is the belief that there may be more than one deity but only one of them is to be worshiped. ] is sometimes considered an example.
; ]: Kathenotheism is the belief that there is more than one deity, but only one deity is worshiped at a time or ever, and another may be worthy of worship at another time or place. If they are worshiped one at a time, then each is supreme in turn. ; ]: Kathenotheism is the belief that there is more than one deity, but only one deity is worshiped at a time (or ever) and another may be worthy of worship in another time or place. If they are worshiped one at a time, then each is supreme in turn.
; ]: Monolatrism is the belief that there may be more than one deity, but that only one is worthy of being worshiped. Most of the modern ] religions may have begun as monolatric ones, although this is disputed.{{Citation needed|date=February 2018}} ; ]: Monolatrism is the belief that there may be more than one deity but only one is worthy of being worshiped. Most of the modern ] religions may have begun as monolatrous ones, but this is disputed.{{Citation needed|date=February 2018}}


] ]
Line 33: Line 42:
===Pantheism=== ===Pantheism===
{{Main|Pantheism}} {{Main|Pantheism}}
Pantheism is the belief that ], the ] and the ] are identical to ] and a ] or entity, pointing to the universe as being an immanent ] who is still expanding and creating, which has existed since the beginning of time,<ref>{{cite book |title=The New ] |publisher=] |year=1998 |isbn=978-0-19-861263-6 |location=Oxford |page=1341}} "The term 'pantheist' designates one who holds both that everything constitutes a unity and that this unity is divine."</ref> or that ] compose an all-encompassing, ] god or goddess and regards the universe as a manifestation of a deity.<ref name="Edwards">{{Cite book|title = Encyclopedia of Philosophy ed. Paul Edwards |publisher=Macmillan and Free Press |year = 1967 |location = New York|page=34}}</ref><ref>{{cite book|last=Reid-Bowen|first=Paul|title=Goddess as Nature: Towards a Philosophical Thealogy|page=70|publisher=]|date=April 15, 2016|isbn=9781317126348}}</ref> This includes all ] being viewed as part of a sole deity. The worship of all gods of every religion is another definition but it is more precisely termed ].<ref>{{cite web| url=https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/pantheism| title=Definition of Pantheism| access-date=2023-02-24| archive-date=2022-11-03| archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20221103001704/https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/pantheism| url-status=live}}</ref> Pantheism is the belief that ], the ] and the ] are identical to ] and a ] or entity. Pointing to the universe as being an ] ] in and of itself, the deity is understood as still expanding, creating, and eternal,<ref>{{cite book |title=The New ] |publisher=] |year=1998 |isbn=978-0-19-861263-6 |location=Oxford |page=1341}} "The term 'pantheist' designates one who holds both that everything constitutes a unity and that this unity is divine."</ref> or that ] compose an all-encompassing, immanent god or goddess that is manifested as the universe.<ref name="Edwards">{{Cite book|title = Encyclopedia of Philosophy ed. Paul Edwards |publisher=Macmillan and Free Press |year = 1967 |location = New York|page=34}}</ref><ref>{{cite book|last=Reid-Bowen|first=Paul|title=Goddess as Nature: Towards a Philosophical Thealogy|page=70|publisher=]|date=15 April 2016|isbn=9781317126348}}</ref> As such, even ]s are viewed as part of the sole deity. The worship of all gods of every religion has been conceived as a form of pantheism, but such a system is more akin to ].<ref>{{cite web| url=https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/pantheism| title=Definition of Pantheism| access-date=24 February 2023| archive-date=3 November 2022| archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20221103001704/https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/pantheism| url-status=live}}</ref>
Pantheist ] does not recognize a distinct ],<ref>{{cite book |title=A Companion to Philosophy of Religion |editor1=Charles Taliaferro |editor2=Paul Draper |editor3=Philip L. Quinn |page=340 |quote=They deny that God is "totally other" than the world or ontologically distinct from it.}}</ref> ] or otherwise, but instead characterizes a broad range of doctrines differing in forms of relationships between reality and divinity.<ref name="LevineDetailed">{{citation |last=Levine |first=Michael |title=Pantheism: A Non-Theistic Concept of Deity |publisher=Psychology Press |date=1994 |isbn=9780415070645 |pages=44, 274–275}}: Pantheist ] does not recognize a distinct ],<ref>{{cite book |title=A Companion to Philosophy of Religion |editor1=Charles Taliaferro |editor2=Paul Draper |editor3=Philip L. Quinn |page=340 |quote=They deny that God is "totally other" than the world or ontologically distinct from it.}}</ref> ] or otherwise, but instead characterizes a broad range of doctrines differing in forms of relationships between reality and divinity.<ref name="LevineDetailed">{{citation |last=Levine |first=Michael |title=Pantheism: A Non-Theistic Concept of Deity |publisher=Psychology Press |date=1994 |isbn=9780415070645 |pages=44, 274–275}}:


* "The idea that Unity that is rooted in nature is what types of nature mysticism (e.g. Wordsworth, Robinson Jeffers, Gary Snyder) have in common with more philosophically robust versions of pantheism. It is why nature mysticism and philosophical pantheism are often conflated and confused for one another." * "The idea that Unity that is rooted in nature is what types of nature mysticism (e.g. Wordsworth, Robinson Jeffers, Gary Snyder) have in common with more philosophically robust versions of pantheism. It is why nature mysticism and philosophical pantheism are often conflated and confused for one another."
* " pantheism is distant from Spinoza's identification of God with nature, and much closer to nature mysticism. In fact it is nature mysticism." * " pantheism is distant from Spinoza's identification of God with nature, and much closer to nature mysticism. In fact it is nature mysticism."
* "Nature mysticism, however, is as compatible with theism as it is with pantheism."</ref> Pantheistic concepts date back thousands of years, and pantheistic elements have been identified in various religious traditions. The term ''pantheism'' was coined by mathematician ] in 1697<ref name="Taylor">{{cite book|last1=Taylor|first1=Bron|title=Encyclopedia of Religion and Nature|date=2008|publisher=A&C Black|isbn=978-1441122780|pages=1341–1342|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=i4mvAwAAQBAJ&pg=PA1342|access-date=27 July 2017}}</ref><ref name=Thomson>Ann Thomson; Bodies of Thought: Science, Religion, and the Soul in the Early Enlightenment, 2008, page 54.</ref> and since then, it has been used to describe the beliefs of a variety of people and organizations. Pantheism was popularized in ] as a ] and philosophy based on the work of the 17th-century philosopher ], in particular, his book '']''.<ref name="Genevieve Lloyd 1996">{{cite book |first=Genevieve |last=Lloyd |title=Routledge Philosophy GuideBook to Spinoza and The Ethics |series=Routledge Philosophy Guidebooks |publisher=] |edition=1st |date=2 October 1996 |isbn=978-0-415-10782-2 |page=24}}</ref> A pantheistic stance was also taken in the 16th century by philosopher and cosmologist ].<ref>{{cite web |last=Birx |first=Jams H. |url=http://www.theharbinger.org/xvi/971111/birx.html |title=Giordano Bruno |publisher=The Harbinger |location=] |date=11 November 1997 |quote=Bruno was burned to death at the stake for his pantheistic stance and cosmic perspective. |access-date=5 February 2019 |archive-date=27 July 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170727101806/http://www.theharbinger.org/xvi/971111/birx.html |url-status=dead }}</ref> * "Nature mysticism, however, is as compatible with theism as it is with pantheism."</ref> Pantheistic concepts date back thousands of years, and pantheistic elements have been identified in various religious traditions. The term ''pantheism'' was coined by mathematician ] in 1697,<ref name="Taylor">{{cite book|last1=Taylor|first1=Bron|title=Encyclopedia of Religion and Nature|date=2008|publisher=A&C Black|isbn=978-1441122780|pages=1341–1342|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=i4mvAwAAQBAJ&pg=PA1342|access-date=27 July 2017}}</ref><ref name=Thomson>Ann Thomson; Bodies of Thought: Science, Religion, and the Soul in the Early Enlightenment, 2008, page 54.</ref> and since then has been used to describe the beliefs of a variety of individuals and organizations. Pantheism was popularized in ] as a ] and philosophy based on the work of the 17th-century philosopher ]—in particular, his book '']''.<ref name="Genevieve Lloyd 1996">{{cite book |first=Genevieve |last=Lloyd |title=Routledge Philosophy GuideBook to Spinoza and The Ethics |series=Routledge Philosophy Guidebooks |publisher=] |edition=1st |date=2 October 1996 |isbn=978-0-415-10782-2 |page=24}}</ref> A pantheistic stance was also expressed by the 16th-century by philosopher and ] ].<ref>{{cite web |last=Birx |first=Jams H. |url=http://www.theharbinger.org/xvi/971111/birx.html |title=Giordano Bruno |publisher=The Harbinger |location=] |date=11 November 1997 |quote=Bruno was burned to death at the stake for his pantheistic stance and cosmic perspective. |access-date=5 February 2019 |archive-date=27 July 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170727101806/http://www.theharbinger.org/xvi/971111/birx.html |url-status=dead }}</ref>


===Deism=== ===Deism===
{{Main|Deism}} {{Main|Deism}}
; Classical Deism: Classical deism is the belief that one ] exists and created the world, but that the Creator does not alter the original plan for the universe, but presides over it in the form of ]; however, some classical deists did believe in divine intervention.<ref></ref> ; Classical Deism: Classical deism is the belief that one ] exists and created the world, but that the Creator does not alter the original plan for the universe. Instead, the deity presides over it in the form of ]; some classical deists, however, did believe in divine intervention.<ref></ref>
Deism typically rejects supernatural events (such as prophecies, miracles, and divine revelations) prominent in organized religion. Instead, deism holds that religious beliefs must be founded on human reason and observed features of the natural world, and that these sources reveal the existence of a supreme being as creator.<ref>{{cite book |title=Webster's New International Dictionary of the English Language |publisher=G.&C. Merriam |year=1924}} Deism typically rejects supernatural events (such as prophecies, miracles, and divine revelations) prominent in organized religion. Instead, deism holds that religious beliefs must be founded on human reason and observed features of the natural world, and that these sources reveal the existence of a supreme being as creator.<ref>{{cite book |title=Webster's New International Dictionary of the English Language |publisher=G.&C. Merriam |year=1924}}
: :
Line 49: Line 58:
: :
Although Webster's lists '''deism''' as a type of ''theism'', deism is completely different from theism. If anything, theism would be an off-shoot of deism since it takes beliefs a step further to include miracles and divine revelation, with deism being the 'base' belief in (a) God.</ref> Although Webster's lists '''deism''' as a type of ''theism'', deism is completely different from theism. If anything, theism would be an off-shoot of deism since it takes beliefs a step further to include miracles and divine revelation, with deism being the 'base' belief in (a) God.</ref>
; ]: Pandeism is the belief that God preceded the universe and created it, but is now equivalent with it. ; ]: Pandeism is the belief that God preceded the universe and created it but is now equivalent with it.
; ]:Polydeism is the belief that multiple gods exist, but do not intervene in the universe. ; ]: Polydeism is the belief that multiple gods exist but do not intervene in the universe.


===Autotheism=== ===Autotheism===
{{Essay-like|section|date=September 2022}}
{{Main|Egotheism}} {{Main|Egotheism}}
;Autotheism: Autotheism is the viewpoint that ], whether also external or not, is inherently within 'oneself' and that one has the ability to become godlike. Indian religions like ] and ] are Autotheistic. This can be in a selfless way, a way following the implications of statements attributed to ethical, philosophical, and religious leaders (such as ]). Autotheism is the belief that ] exists within oneself and that individuals can achieve a godlike state. It is found in various philosophical and religious traditions emphasizing personal divinity or spiritual progression.

In ], a Hindu philosophical school, the phrase ''] ("''I am Brahman") expresses the unity of the individual self ('']'') with the ultimate reality ('']'').<ref>{{cite book |author=Gurumayum Ranjit Sharma |year=1987 |title=The Idealistic Philosophy of Swami Vivekananda |publisher=Atlantic |page=180 |id=GGKEY:PSWXE5NTFF4 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=ORYOsJHi53sC&pg=PA180}}</ref>


In ], the doctrine of ] suggests that faithful individuals can attain godhood in the afterlife.<ref>{{cite book |last=Davies |first=Douglas J. |date=23 October 2003 |title=An Introduction to Mormonism |isbn=9780521817387 |page=79 |publisher=Cambridge University Press |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=fw8DIziwEDsC&dq=apotheosis+mormon&pg=PA79 |via=Google Books |access-date=16 March 2022}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |title=Chapter 47: Exaltation |url=https://www.churchofjesuschrist.org/study/manual/gospel-principles/chapter-47-exaltation?lang=eng |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20241219084234/https://www.churchofjesuschrist.org/study/manual/gospel-principles/chapter-47-exaltation?lang=eng |archive-date=December 19, 2024 |access-date=2024-12-24 |website=ChurchofJesusChrist.org |language=en}}</ref>
Autotheism can also refer to the belief that one's self is a deity, within the context of ]. ]s use the term, "'']''" which means, "I am ]".<ref>{{cite book |author=Gurumayum Ranjit Sharma |year=1987 |title=The Idealistic Philosophy of Swami Vivekananda |publisher=Atlantic |page=180 |id=GGKEY:PSWXE5NTFF4 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=ORYOsJHi53sC&pg=PA180}}</ref>


Autotheistic ideas also appear in ], which emphasizes self-knowledge (''gnosis'') as the path to recognizing one’s divine nature<ref>{{Cite book |last=Hans |first=Jonas |title=The Gnostic Religion: The Message of the Alien God and the Beginnings of Christianity |publisher=Beacon Press |year=2001 |isbn=0807058017 |edition=3rd}}</ref>, and in Friedrich Nietzsche’s concept of the '']'', which advocates transcending human limitations to create one’s own values.
] teach a type of Autotheism called '']'', where humans can attain godhood.<ref>{{cite book |last=Davies |first=Douglas J. |date=23 October 2003 |title=An Introduction to Mormonism |isbn=9780521817387 |page=79 |publisher=Cambridge University Press |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=fw8DIziwEDsC&dq=apotheosis+mormon&pg=PA79 |via=Google Books |access-date=2022-03-16}}</ref>


===Value-judgment theisms=== ===Value-judgment Theisms===
; Eutheism: Eutheism is the belief that a deity is wholly benevolent. ; Eutheism: Eutheism is the belief that a deity is wholly benevolent.
; ]: ] is the belief that a deity is not wholly good, and is possibly evil. ; ]: ] is the belief that a deity is not wholly good, and is possibly evil.
; ]: ] is the belief that a deity exists, but is wholly malicious. ; ]: ] is the belief that a deity exists but is wholly malicious.
; ]: ] is active hatred for God or gods. ; ]: ] is active hatred toward and for God, gods, and/or other divine beings.


===Non-theism and atheism === ===Non-theism and atheism ===
; ] : ] is the lack of belief in supernatural powers such as deities, gods / goddesses, or messiahs. Some atheists express an active disbelief or rejection of the existence of such entities. ; ] : ] is the lack of belief in supernatural powers such as deities, gods, goddesses, and ]s. Some atheists express an ] of the existence of such entities.


; ]: ] is the belief in no gods or god. ; ]: ] is the belief in no gods or god.


; ] : ] is the belief that it is not possible for any person to genuinely know whether deities or the supernatural are actually true to their descriptions, or are mere fabrications, regardless of sincerity. ] reject either theistic or deistic beliefs as established facts, and only accept such as unsubstantiated opinion, whether regarding their own beliefs or others'. ; ] : ] is the belief that it is impossible for any person to genuinely know whether deities or the supernatural are genuinely true to their descriptions or mere fabrications regardless of sincerity. ] reject both theistic and deistic beliefs as established facts, and accept such as only unsubstantiated opinion whether regarding their own beliefs or others'.


=== Alterity theism === === Alterity theism ===
] theism is a belief that god is radically transcendent, radically other, to such an extent that god cannot be recognized with any ]. ] theism is a belief that the supreme being is radically ] to the point that it cannot be recognized as having any genuine ] at all.


==See also== ==See also==
*]
*] *]
*] *]
Line 84: Line 95:
*] *]
*] *]
*]


==References== ==References==

Latest revision as of 18:07, 24 December 2024

Belief in the existence of at least one deity

This article needs attention from an expert in religion. The specific problem is: to prune redundant content and deal with large tracts of unsourced and unverified text and in-text lists. WikiProject Religion may be able to help recruit an expert. (September 2022)
Part of a series on
Religion
Religions
Abrahamic
Indic
Eastern
Schools
Concepts
Founding figures
This is a subseries on philosophy. In order to explore related topics, please visit navigation.

God the Father depicted by Julius Schnorr von Carolsfeld in 1860

Theism is broadly defined as the belief in the existence of at least one deity. In common parlance, or when contrasted with deism, the term often describes the philosophical conception of God that is found in classical theism—or the conception found in monotheism—or gods found in polytheistic religions—or a belief in God or gods without the rejection of revelation, as is characteristic of deism.

Atheism is commonly understood as non-acceptance or outright rejection of theism in the broadest sense of the term (i.e., non-acceptance or rejection of belief in God or gods). Related (but separate) is the claim that the existence of any deity is unknown or unknowable; a stance known as agnosticism. Agnostic theism is a personal belief in one or more deities along with acceptance that the existence or non-existence of the deity or deities is fundamentally unknowable.

Etymology

The term theism derives from the Greek θεός (theós) or theoi meaning 'god' or 'gods'. The term theism was first used by Ralph Cudworth (1617–1688). In Cudworth's definition, they are "strictly and properly called Theists, who affirm that a perfectly conscious understanding being, or mind, existing of itself from eternity, was the cause of all other things".

Types of theism

Classical theism

Main article: Classical theism

Classical theism is the form of theism that describes God as the Absolute Being. Central insights of classical theistic theology includes emanationism and divine simplicity. Classical theistic traditions can be observed in major religions and philosophies, such as Sufism in Islam, Vaishnavism in Hinduism, Sikhism in general, and Platonism.

Monotheism

Main article: Monotheism

Monotheism (from Greek μόνος) is the belief in theology that only one deity exists. Some modern day monotheistic religions include Christianity, Judaism, Islam, Mandaeism, Druze, Baháʼí Faith, Sikhism, Zoroastrianism, Rastafari, some sects of Hinduism, and Eckankar.

Polytheism

Main article: Polytheism

Polytheism is the belief in multiple deities, which are usually assembled into a pantheon, along with their own religious sects and rituals. Polytheism was the typical form of religion before the development and spread of the Abrahamic religions of Judaism, Christianity, and Islam, which enforce monotheism. It is well documented throughout history; from prehistory and the earliest records of ancient Egyptian religion and ancient Mesopotamian religion to the religions prevalent during Classical antiquity, such as ancient Greek religion and ancient Roman religion, and in ethnic religions such as Germanic, Slavic, and Baltic paganism and Native American religions.

Notable polytheistic religions practiced today include Taoism, Shenism or Chinese folk religion, Japanese Shinto, Santería, most traditional African religions, and various neopagan faiths such as Wicca, Druidry, Romuva, and Hellenism. Hinduism, while popularly held as polytheistic, cannot be exclusively categorised as such as some Hindus consider themselves to be pantheists and others consider themselves to be monotheists. Both are compatible with Hindu texts since there exists no consensus of standardisation in the faith. Advaita Vedanta, a philosophy in Hinduism, offers a combination of monotheism and polytheism, holding that Brahman is the sole ultimate reality of the universe, yet unity with it can be reached by worshipping multiple Devas and Devies.

A major division in modern polytheistic practices is between so-called soft polytheism and hard polytheism. "Soft" polytheism is the belief that different gods may be psychological archetypes, personifications of natural forces, or fundamentally one deity in different cultural contexts (e.g., Odin, Zeus, and Indra all being the same god as interpreted by Germanic, Greek, and Indic peoples, respectively)—known as omnitheism. In this way, gods may be interchangeable for one another across cultures. "Hard" polytheism is the belief that gods are distinct, separate, real divine beings rather than psychological archetypes or personifications of natural forces. Hard polytheists reject the idea that "all gods are one essential god" and may also reject the existence of gods outside their own pantheon altogether.

Polytheism is further divided according to how the individual deities are regarded:

Henotheism
Henotheism is the belief that there may be more than one deity but only one of them is to be worshiped. Zoroastrianism is sometimes considered an example.
Kathenotheism
Kathenotheism is the belief that there is more than one deity, but only one deity is worshiped at a time (or ever) and another may be worthy of worship in another time or place. If they are worshiped one at a time, then each is supreme in turn.
Monolatrism
Monolatrism is the belief that there may be more than one deity but only one is worthy of being worshiped. Most of the modern monotheistic religions may have begun as monolatrous ones, but this is disputed.
The philosophy of Baruch Spinoza is often regarded as pantheist.

Pantheism

Main article: Pantheism

Pantheism is the belief that reality, the universe and the cosmos are identical to divinity and a supreme being or entity. Pointing to the universe as being an immanent creator deity in and of itself, the deity is understood as still expanding, creating, and eternal, or that all things compose an all-encompassing, immanent god or goddess that is manifested as the universe. As such, even astronomical objects are viewed as part of the sole deity. The worship of all gods of every religion has been conceived as a form of pantheism, but such a system is more akin to Omnism. Pantheist belief does not recognize a distinct personal god, anthropomorphic or otherwise, but instead characterizes a broad range of doctrines differing in forms of relationships between reality and divinity. Pantheistic concepts date back thousands of years, and pantheistic elements have been identified in various religious traditions. The term pantheism was coined by mathematician Joseph Raphson in 1697, and since then has been used to describe the beliefs of a variety of individuals and organizations. Pantheism was popularized in Western culture as a theology and philosophy based on the work of the 17th-century philosopher Baruch Spinoza—in particular, his book Ethics. A pantheistic stance was also expressed by the 16th-century by philosopher and cosmologist Giordano Bruno.

Deism

Main article: Deism
Classical Deism
Classical deism is the belief that one God exists and created the world, but that the Creator does not alter the original plan for the universe. Instead, the deity presides over it in the form of Providence; some classical deists, however, did believe in divine intervention.

Deism typically rejects supernatural events (such as prophecies, miracles, and divine revelations) prominent in organized religion. Instead, deism holds that religious beliefs must be founded on human reason and observed features of the natural world, and that these sources reveal the existence of a supreme being as creator.

Pandeism
Pandeism is the belief that God preceded the universe and created it but is now equivalent with it.
Polydeism
Polydeism is the belief that multiple gods exist but do not intervene in the universe.

Autotheism

Main article: Egotheism

Autotheism is the belief that divinity exists within oneself and that individuals can achieve a godlike state. It is found in various philosophical and religious traditions emphasizing personal divinity or spiritual progression.

In Advaita Vedanta, a Hindu philosophical school, the phrase aham Brahmāsmi ("I am Brahman") expresses the unity of the individual self (atman) with the ultimate reality (Brahman).

In Mormonism, the doctrine of exaltation suggests that faithful individuals can attain godhood in the afterlife.

Autotheistic ideas also appear in Gnosticism, which emphasizes self-knowledge (gnosis) as the path to recognizing one’s divine nature, and in Friedrich Nietzsche’s concept of the Übermensch, which advocates transcending human limitations to create one’s own values.

Value-judgment Theisms

Eutheism
Eutheism is the belief that a deity is wholly benevolent.
Dystheism
Dystheism is the belief that a deity is not wholly good, and is possibly evil.
Maltheism
Maltheism is the belief that a deity exists but is wholly malicious.
Misotheism
Misotheism is active hatred toward and for God, gods, and/or other divine beings.

Non-theism and atheism

Atheism
Atheism is the lack of belief in supernatural powers such as deities, gods, goddesses, and messiahs. Some atheists express an active disbelief or rejection of the existence of such entities.
Non-theism
Non-theism is the belief in no gods or god.
Agnosticism
Agnosticism is the belief that it is impossible for any person to genuinely know whether deities or the supernatural are genuinely true to their descriptions or mere fabrications regardless of sincerity. Agnostics reject both theistic and deistic beliefs as established facts, and accept such as only unsubstantiated opinion whether regarding their own beliefs or others'.

Alterity theism

Alterity theism is a belief that the supreme being is radically transcendent to the point that it cannot be recognized as having any genuine being at all.

See also

References

  1. "theism", Archived 12 December 2021 at the Wayback Machine Dictionary.com. Retrieved 21 October 2016.
  2. "theism," Archived 14 May 2011 at the Wayback Machine Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary. Retrieved 18 March 2011.
  3. "Dictionary.com Online Dictionary". Archived from the original on 16 December 2021. Retrieved 21 October 2016.
  4. "Dictionary.com Online Dictionary". Archived from the original on 16 December 2021. Retrieved 23 November 2016.
  5. Nielsen, Kai (2010). "Atheism". Encyclopædia Britannica. Retrieved 26 January 2011. Atheism, in general, the critique and denial of metaphysical beliefs in God or spiritual beings.... Instead of saying that an atheist is someone who believes that it is false or probably false that there is a God, a more adequate characterization of atheism consists in the more complex claim that to be an atheist is to be someone who rejects belief in God for the following reasons (which reason is stressed depends on how God is being conceived)...
  6. Edwards, Paul (2005) . "Atheism". In Donald M. Borchert (ed.). The Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Vol. 1 (2nd ed.). MacMillan Reference USA (Gale). p. 359. ISBN 9780028657806. On our definition, an 'atheist' is a person who rejects belief in God, regardless of whether or not his reason for the rejection is the claim that 'God exists' expresses a false proposition. People frequently adopt an attitude of rejection toward a position for reasons other than that it is a false proposition. It is common among contemporary philosophers, and indeed it was not uncommon in earlier centuries, to reject positions on the ground that they are meaningless. Sometimes, too, a theory is rejected on such grounds as that it is sterile or redundant or capricious, and there are many other considerations which in certain contexts are generally agreed to constitute good grounds for rejecting an assertion.(page 175 in 1967 edition)
  7. Hepburn, Ronald W. (2005) . "Agnosticism". In Donald M. Borchert (ed.). The Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Vol. 1 (2nd ed.). MacMillan Reference USA (Gale). p. 92. ISBN 9780028657806. In the most general use of the term, agnosticism is the view that we do not know whether there is a God or not.(page 56 in 1967 edition)
  8. Rowe, William L. (1998). "Agnosticism". In Edward Craig (ed.). Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Taylor & Francis. ISBN 978-0-415-07310-3. In the popular sense, an agnostic is someone who neither believes nor disbelieves in God, whereas an atheist disbelieves in God. In the strict sense, however, agnosticism is the view that human reason is incapable of providing sufficient rational grounds to justify either the belief that God exists or the belief that God does not exist. In so far as one holds that our beliefs are rational only if they are sufficiently supported by human reason, the person who accepts the philosophical position of agnosticism will hold that neither the belief that God exists nor the belief that God does not exist is rational.
  9. Mackintosh, Robert (1911). "Theism" . In Chisholm, Hugh (ed.). Encyclopædia Britannica. Vol. 26 (11th ed.). Cambridge University Press. p. 744.
  10. Halsey, William; Robert H. Blackburn; Sir Frank Francis (1969). Louis Shores (ed.). Collier's Encyclopedia. Vol. 22 (20 ed.). Crowell-Collier Educational Corporation. pp. 266–7.
  11. Cudworth, Ralph (1678). The True Intellectual System of the Universe, Vol. I. New York: Gould & Newman, 1837, p. 267.
  12. Feser, Edward (2017). Five Proofs of the Existence of God. San Francisco: IGNATIUS PRESS. ISBN 978-1-62164-133-9.
  13. Hart, David Bentley (24 September 2013). The Experience of God: Being, Consciousness, Bliss. Yale University Press.
  14. "Monotheism", in Britannica, 15th ed. (1986), 8:266.
  15. Kimmerle, Heinz (11 April 2006). "The world of spirits and the respect for nature: towards a new appreciation of animism". The Journal for Transdisciplinary Research in Southern Africa. 2 (2): 15. doi:10.4102/td.v2i2.277. ISSN 2415-2005.
  16. Galtsin, Dmitry (21 June 2018). "Modern Pagan religious conversion revisited". Sacra. 14 (2): 7–17. Archived from the original on 7 February 2019. Retrieved 5 February 2019.
  17. ^ Hoff, Kraemer, Christine (2012). Seeking the mystery : an introduction to Pagan theologies. Englewood, CO: Patheos Press. ISBN 9781939221186. OCLC 855412257.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  18. Negedu, I. A. (1 January 2014). "The Igala traditional religious belief system: Between monotheism and polytheism". OGIRISI: A New Journal of African Studies. 10 (1): 116–129. doi:10.4314/og.v10i1.7. ISSN 1597-474X. Archived from the original on 24 February 2023. Retrieved 24 February 2023.
  19. Picton, James Allanson (1905). Pantheism: its story and significance. Chicago: Archibald Constable & CO LTD. ISBN 978-1419140082.
  20. *Fraser, Alexander Campbell "Philosophy of Theism", William Blackwood and Sons, 1895, p 163.
  21. The New Oxford Dictionary of English. Oxford: Clarendon Press. 1998. p. 1341. ISBN 978-0-19-861263-6. "The term 'pantheist' designates one who holds both that everything constitutes a unity and that this unity is divine."
  22. Encyclopedia of Philosophy ed. Paul Edwards. New York: Macmillan and Free Press. 1967. p. 34.
  23. Reid-Bowen, Paul (15 April 2016). Goddess as Nature: Towards a Philosophical Thealogy. Taylor & Francis. p. 70. ISBN 9781317126348.
  24. "Definition of Pantheism". Archived from the original on 3 November 2022. Retrieved 24 February 2023.
  25. Charles Taliaferro; Paul Draper; Philip L. Quinn (eds.). A Companion to Philosophy of Religion. p. 340. They deny that God is "totally other" than the world or ontologically distinct from it.
  26. Levine, Michael (1994), Pantheism: A Non-Theistic Concept of Deity, Psychology Press, pp. 44, 274–275, ISBN 9780415070645:
    • "The idea that Unity that is rooted in nature is what types of nature mysticism (e.g. Wordsworth, Robinson Jeffers, Gary Snyder) have in common with more philosophically robust versions of pantheism. It is why nature mysticism and philosophical pantheism are often conflated and confused for one another."
    • " pantheism is distant from Spinoza's identification of God with nature, and much closer to nature mysticism. In fact it is nature mysticism."
    • "Nature mysticism, however, is as compatible with theism as it is with pantheism."
  27. Taylor, Bron (2008). Encyclopedia of Religion and Nature. A&C Black. pp. 1341–1342. ISBN 978-1441122780. Retrieved 27 July 2017.
  28. Ann Thomson; Bodies of Thought: Science, Religion, and the Soul in the Early Enlightenment, 2008, page 54.
  29. Lloyd, Genevieve (2 October 1996). Routledge Philosophy GuideBook to Spinoza and The Ethics. Routledge Philosophy Guidebooks (1st ed.). Routledge. p. 24. ISBN 978-0-415-10782-2.
  30. Birx, Jams H. (11 November 1997). "Giordano Bruno". Mobile, AL: The Harbinger. Archived from the original on 27 July 2017. Retrieved 5 February 2019. Bruno was burned to death at the stake for his pantheistic stance and cosmic perspective.
  31. AskOxford: deism
  32. Webster's New International Dictionary of the English Language. G.&C. Merriam. 1924.
    defines deism as
    'belief in the existence of a personal god, with disbelief in Christian teaching, or with a purely rationalistic interpretation of Scripture'.
    Although Webster's lists deism as a type of theism, deism is completely different from theism. If anything, theism would be an off-shoot of deism since it takes beliefs a step further to include miracles and divine revelation, with deism being the 'base' belief in (a) God.
  33. Gurumayum Ranjit Sharma (1987). The Idealistic Philosophy of Swami Vivekananda. Atlantic. p. 180. GGKEY:PSWXE5NTFF4.
  34. Davies, Douglas J. (23 October 2003). An Introduction to Mormonism. Cambridge University Press. p. 79. ISBN 9780521817387. Retrieved 16 March 2022 – via Google Books.
  35. "Chapter 47: Exaltation". ChurchofJesusChrist.org. Archived from the original on 19 December 2024. Retrieved 24 December 2024.
  36. Hans, Jonas (2001). The Gnostic Religion: The Message of the Alien God and the Beginnings of Christianity (3rd ed.). Beacon Press. ISBN 0807058017.
God
Religion portal
Theology
Conceptions of God
Theism
Forms
Concepts
Singular god
theologies
By faith
Concepts
God as
Trinitarianism
Eschatology
By religion
Feminist
Other concepts
Names of God in
By faith
Christian
Hindu
Islamic
Jewish
Pagan
Religion portal
Religion
Religious groups and denominations
Western
Abrahamic
Judaism
Christianity
Islam
Other
Iranian
Zoroastrian
Kurdish
Other
Eastern
East Asian
Chinese
Japonic
Korean
Vietnamese
Indian
Hinduism
Buddhism
Other
Ethnic
Altaic
Austroasiatic
Austronesian
Native
American
Tai and Miao
Tibeto-Burmese
Traditional
African
North African
Sub-Saharan
African
Other ethnic
New
religious
movements
Syncretic
Modern
paganism
De novo
Historical religions
Topics
Aspects
Theism
Religious
studies
Religion
and society
Secularism
and irreligion
Overviews
and lists
Religion by country
Africa
Asia
Europe
North America
Oceania
South America
Philosophy of religion
Concepts in religion
Conceptions of God
God in
Existence of God
For
Against
Theology
Religious language
Problem of evil
Philosophers
of religion

(by date active)
Ancient and
medieval
Early modern
1800
1850
1880
1900
1920
postwar
1970
1990
2010
Related topics
Portals:Theism at Misplaced Pages's sister projects: Category: