| Revision as of 18:19, 1 December 2024 editUpd Edit (talk | contribs)320 edits →Request for Administrator Review: NPOV← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 23:45, 24 December 2024 edit undoAbishe (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers36,849 edits →Happy Holidays: new sectionTag: New topic | ||
| (42 intermediate revisions by 14 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{User:MiszaBot/config | {{User:MiszaBot/config | ||
| |maxarchivesize = 30K | |maxarchivesize = 30K | ||
| |counter = |
|counter = 97 | ||
| |minthreadsleft = 1 | |minthreadsleft = 1 | ||
| |algo = old(48h) | |algo = old(48h) | ||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
| }} | }} | ||
| == |
== ] updates == | ||
| You |
You are receiving this message because you are on ] for ]. The drafters note that the scope of the case was somewhat unclear, and clarify that the scope is {{tqq|The interaction of named parties in the ] topic area and examination of the ] process that led to ] ] to ]}}. Because this was unclear, two changes are being made: | ||
| ⚫ | <!-- Message sent by User: |
||
| First, '''the Committee will accept submissions for new parties for the next three days''', until '''23:59, 10 December 2024 (UTC)'''. Anyone who wishes to suggest a party to the case may do so by creating a new section on ], providing a reason with ] as to why the user should be added, and notifying the user. After the three-day period ends, no further submission of parties will be considered except in exceptional circumstances. Because the Committee only hears disputes that have failed to be resolved by the usual means, proposed parties should have been recently taken to AE/AN/ANI, and either not sanctioned, or incompletely sanctioned. If a proposed party has not been taken to AE/AN/ANI, evidence is needed as to why such an attempt would have been ineffective. | |||
| == Request for Administrator Review == | |||
| Second, the ] '''has been extended by a week''', and will now close at '''23:59, 21 December 2024 (UTC)'''. For the Arbitration Committee, <b>]]</b> (] • he/they) 03:20, 8 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| Hello, | |||
| ⚫ | <!-- Message sent by User:HouseBlaster@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Palestine-Israel_articles_5/Update_list&oldid=1260342644 --> | ||
| I kindly request administrative review of the ongoing content dispute on the {{pagelinks|Shahi Jama Masjid}} article. This matter is particularly sensitive due to current incidents (]) surrounding the site, Which caused 5/6 deaths. | |||
| ==Happy Birthday!== | |||
| The user {{userlinks|Upd Edit}} has made edits asserting that the mosque was built over a Hindu temple, citing certain historical books (not freely accessible) and Indian media sources. However, the reliability of these sources are questionable. Additionally the issue is further complicated by the following factors: | |||
| <!-- ##RW UNDERDATE## --> | |||
| *{{small|Hindu petitioners lack historical evidence to substantiate their claims and so they have demanded a 'survey' of the mosque.<ref>https://www.voanews.com/amp/india-s-top-court-weighs-in-on-mosque-temple-controversy/7882935.html</ref> This suggests that the citations provided by the user is not trustworthy.}}<br> | |||
| <div style="background-color:#E6E6FA; border: 1px solid #7D00B3; margin: 0.5em auto; padding: 0.5em; width:90%; text-align: center">]<span style="font-weight:bold;font-size:125%;">Happy First Edit Day!</span>] | |||
| *{{small|The applicability of the ] and ], which prohibits altering the character of places of worship.}} | |||
| Have a very happy first edit anniversary! | |||
| *{{small|The potential risk of misleading readers by including speculative pre-Islamic claims without proper verifiability.}} | |||
| From the ], ] (]) 00:31, 24 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| Moreover, the user {{userlinks|Upd Edit}} appears to be acting intentionally disruptive, as their contributions are solely focused on this article. Despite multiple reverts by other editors, they continue to persist, causing significant disruption.<br>1. <br> | |||
| </div> | |||
| 2. <br> | |||
| 3. <br> | |||
| 4. <br> | |||
| 5. … | |||
| == Happy Holidays == | |||
| While attempting to preserve the article’s integrity, I inadvertently breached the ] rule.<br>It should also be noted that {{userlinks|Upd Edit}} reverted edits of ''4 individual users'' more than 5 times prior to this. | |||
| {| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 4px solid #FFD700;" | |||
| Another user, {{userlinks|Kautilya3}}, has also been involved in the dispute. {{small|But, I have concerns about their neutrality due to the content on their userpage indicating their religious affiliation. This raises questions about potential bias in their approach.}} - (Personal opinion) | |||
| |rowspan="2" style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 2px;" | ] | |||
| |style="font-size: x-large; padding: 2px 2px 0 2px; height: 1.5em;" | '''Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2025!''' | |||
| |- | |||
| |style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | | |||
| ---- | |||
| '''Hello Black Kite, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this ]. Spread the ] by wishing another user a ] and a ], whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2025. <br />Happy editing,'''<br /> | |||
| ] (]) 23:45, 24 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ''{{resize|96%|Spread the love by adding {{tls|Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.}}'' | |||
| Given the complexity and sensitivity of this matter, I believe administrative oversight is necessary to ensure neutrality and adherence to Misplaced Pages's policies. | |||
| |} ] (]) 23:45, 24 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| Thank you for your time and consideration. I look forward to your insights. '''- ] • ]''' 15:34, 1 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| :Till a day ago, your user page your name to be "Abrar", a . Let's say that it would have been bigoted of me to claim that you are biased because you are ... | |||
| :All the books that I cited are available online and at Libgen / IA. If you feel that my sources are unreliable (they are not), why not discuss at the talk page despite multiple requests (, , , and )? | |||
| :Of the four editors, ] (per their own admission) and Jannatulbaqi (again, per their own admission). That leaves two: you and another editor who never showed up at the talk-page like you. | |||
| :On an aside, Indian legislation does not determine how our articles are written; Misplaced Pages policies do. If you believe that the claims in the article are unverifiable or not supported by reliable sources, you are free to discuss at the talk-page. Additionally, I did not make edits "asserting that the mosque was built over a Hindu temple"; ]. ] (]) 16:57, 1 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 23:45, 24 December 2024
 | "And while I'm alive, I'll make tiny changes to earth." Frightened Rabbit |
| Black Kite Hi, I'm an administrator here, and have been since 2007. I'll try to answer any questions here as soon as I can, though I do have periods where I'm not available. For admins: if you think I've done something really f***ing stupid and I don't respond to a question about it, please feel free to reverse it ... we can work it out later on. |
| For Talk Page Archives, click here. |
| If you email me via Misplaced Pages, please leave me a note here (unless there's a good reason you do not want that fact to be public). I do check my Misplaced Pages email fairly regularly, but not that regularly. |
Palestine-Israel articles 5 updates
You are receiving this message because you are on the update list for Palestine-Israel articles 5. The drafters note that the scope of the case was somewhat unclear, and clarify that the scope is The interaction of named parties in the WP:PIA topic area and examination of the WP:AE process that led to two referrals to WP:ARCA
. Because this was unclear, two changes are being made:
First, the Committee will accept submissions for new parties for the next three days, until 23:59, 10 December 2024 (UTC). Anyone who wishes to suggest a party to the case may do so by creating a new section on the evidence talk page, providing a reason with WP:DIFFS as to why the user should be added, and notifying the user. After the three-day period ends, no further submission of parties will be considered except in exceptional circumstances. Because the Committee only hears disputes that have failed to be resolved by the usual means, proposed parties should have been recently taken to AE/AN/ANI, and either not sanctioned, or incompletely sanctioned. If a proposed party has not been taken to AE/AN/ANI, evidence is needed as to why such an attempt would have been ineffective.
Second, the evidence phase has been extended by a week, and will now close at 23:59, 21 December 2024 (UTC). For the Arbitration Committee, HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 03:20, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
Happy Birthday!
Have a very happy first edit anniversary!
From the Birthday Committee, DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 00:31, 24 December 2024 (UTC)
Happy Holidays
|
Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2025! |
|
Hello Black Kite, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2025. Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages. |