Revision as of 02:58, 8 December 2009 view sourceHamiltonstone (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers23,271 edits →Fedora Project GA review: new section← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 01:16, 25 December 2024 view source ClueBot III (talk | contribs)Bots1,372,580 editsm Archiving 1 discussion to User talk:AmandaNP/Archives/2024. (BOT) | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Administrator topicon}}{{top icon | |||
{{Warning|This user will be going through two GA Reviews today, and will rereview any requests of previous GAs in the next few days. --] (]) 22:31, 30 November 2009 (UTC)}} | |||
| imagename = Animated-Flag-Canada.gif | |||
{{Busyweekdays}} | |||
| description = This user is proudly Canadian. | |||
{{Talk header}} | |||
| sortkey = 2 | |||
| width = 30 | |||
}} | |||
{{User:AmandaNP/Menu}}<br /><br /> | |||
<!--{{User:AmandaNP/StatusTemplate}}--> | |||
{{clear}}<br /> | |||
{{User talk:AmandaNP/Protection}} | |||
{{User:AmandaNP/Templates/Off and On WikiBreak|level={{User:AmandaNP/health}}}} | |||
{{cot|]}} | |||
{{User talk:AmandaNP/Archives}} | |||
{{cob}} | |||
{{bots|deny=DPL bot}} | |||
{{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveThis | |||
| age=168 | |||
| archiveprefix=User talk:AmandaNP/Archives/ | |||
| format=Y | |||
}} | |||
{{TOC right}} | |||
== Season's Greetings == | |||
==Welcome== | |||
<div style="border-style:solid; border-color:#FF4646; background-color:#F6F0F7; border-width:2px; text-align:left; padding:7px; border-radius:1em; box-shadow: 0.1em 0.1em 0.5em rgba(0,0,0,0.75);;" class="plainlinks">]]]{{Center|]}} | |||
'''Hello AmandaNP:''' Enjoy the ''']''' and ''']''' if it's occurring in your area of the world, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Misplaced Pages. Cheers, ] (]) 01:54, 23 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
]{{paragraph break}} | |||
</div> | |||
<div style="padding-left: 2em; margin-top: 1em; font-size: 88%; font-style: italic">Spread the WikiLove; use {{tls|Season's Greetings}} to send this message</div>{{-}} | |||
== A barnstar for you! == | |||
'''Welcome!''' | |||
{| style="border: 1px solid gray; background-color: #fdffe7;" | |||
Hello, {{BASEPAGENAME}}, and ] to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: | |||
|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align:middle;" | ] | |||
*] | |||
|rowspan="2" | | |||
*] | |||
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" | '''The Admin's Barnstar''' | |||
*] | |||
|- | |||
*] | |||
|style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | For taking care of the socking ]. Your hard work is appreciated. ] (]) 04:48, 23 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
*] | |||
|} | |||
*] | |||
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a ]! Please ] on talk pages using four tildes (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out ], ask me on my talk page, or place <code><nowiki>{{helpme}}</nowiki></code> on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! - ] (]) 01:09, 2 January 2009 (UTC) | |||
==Question== | |||
{{tlx|helpme}} | |||
<br>Where did you get wind of me? | |||
<br>What major groups on wiki are you part of? | |||
<br>This helpers group, how does it work/what does it do? | |||
<br>Please reply soon Ahunt. | |||
<br>Thanks, ] (]) 02:48, 2 January 2009 (UTC) | |||
:We answer questions about the use of wikipedia and how to do things. If you would like to ask Ahunt a question, the better place to ask it is on their talkpage, as Ahunt may not be monitoring this page. --]] 02:52, 2 January 2009 (UTC) | |||
::It just so happens because I started this page that I am still watching it. I saw your to ] and just thought I would welcome you to Misplaced Pages, since no one else had done it before. Most of us try to be ] to new editors, mostly because we need the help here making the encyclopedia better! - ] (]) 14:21, 2 January 2009 (UTC) | |||
==User Committed Identity== | |||
{{tl|helpme}} | |||
<br>I cannot under stand the page on how to do a User Committed Identity. I just need to know what to do and what to put where. Can anyone help me? ] (]) 15:50, 21 February 2009 (UTC) | |||
:#Pick a sentence that only you know the wording to | |||
:#Find an online hasher (google Sha-256 generator) | |||
:#Put your phrase into that and get the result | |||
:#Put the resulting phrase (into a template) on your user page. | |||
:In short, that the process. - ] <sup>(], ])</sup> 17:35, 21 February 2009 (UTC) | |||
== Rollback == | |||
You still have not received an answer by a ] so try to get more anti-vandalism edits and wait for one to reply on your request. <small><span style="border:1px solid #0000ff;padding:1px;">] : ] </span></small> 19:48, 22 November 2009 (UTC) | |||
:Ok, I will remove my last message, and do some more. Thanks, ] (]) 19:51, 22 November 2009 (UTC) | |||
::I've declined your request at this time, without prejudice to future application. Sorry, and happy editing! <small><span style="border:1px solid #0000ff;padding:1px;">] : ] </span></small> 23:01, 22 November 2009 (UTC) | |||
== Talkback == | |||
] (]) 01:11, 23 November 2009 (UTC) | |||
== Re: ArbCom Mentorship == | |||
Hey, MWOAP, sorry for the long delay. I've taken a look at your edits, and to be entirely honest, you don't have anywhere near enough experience yet. I can see that your account was registered back in 2007, but you've only been regularly editing since this year, and not very heavily at that. Arbitration Clerks are ideally users who have a wide range of experiences on the project, particularly within dispute resolution, and are users who have demonstrated that they hold the community's trust to be a dependable user. Clerks are also often administrators, as the tools assist in the execution of our duties. If this is something you'd like to get involved in at some point in the future, keep in mind that positions on the clerk corps are offered by the clerk corps based on a list of potential candidates we and ArbCom maintain. My advice to you would be to remain active, with particular attention to the "back-lines" duties, clearing out backlogs and the like. After a year or so, consider admin coaching or an RFA to gauge your standing in the community. Thanks for your interest. ] <sup>(]/]/])</sup> 03:52, 23 November 2009 (UTC) | |||
== Mil Palabras con sus dientes == | |||
Just a friendly note on ]. I declined the speedy deletion request because it doesn't meet ]. --] | ] 23:42, 24 November 2009 (UTC) | |||
:Oops, sorry. My slip up there. I will try to be more careful. I understand the reasoning. --] (]) 02:57, 25 November 2009 (UTC) | |||
==]== | |||
] | |||
This is an automated message from ]. I have performed a web search with the contents of ], and it appears to be very similar to another Misplaced Pages page: ]. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally moving or duplicating content, please be sure you have followed the procedure at ] by acknowledging the duplication of material in ] to preserve attribution history. | |||
This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on ]. ] (]) 21:00, 29 November 2009 (UTC) | |||
:I was moving a page. I thought I did it right. --] (]) 21:23, 29 November 2009 (UTC) | |||
::Hi. I'm clearing out the SCV listings for this day and came upon this particular article. Given your note here, it seems perhaps you may not fully grasp the attribution requirements for ]. While you noted the split at , attribution requires at minimum a direct link to the source article in the edit summary. (Something like "Material copied from <nowiki>]</nowiki>" would do.) creates an even worse situation, as the deletion of the article means that the attribution history is lost. Without that, the article is a copyright violation. Misplaced Pages's contributors don't release their text into public domain, but only grant permission for reuse if the licensing conditions (including attribution) are met. In a case like this one, it is better to simply ] the page, which doesn't require copying & pasting material at all, but is a mechanical function that any autoconfirmed user can do (except where there's already a page at the destination point or the article has been protected against it.) | |||
::I've eliminating the copyright problem by restoring the deleted article and merging it into the new location for the text, ]. But if you've moved articles or split them without proper attribution before, please let me know or take steps to provide proper attribution. Otherwise, we can't legally display it. :) - | |||
::I'll be watching your talk page for a time if you have any questions about this. -] <sup>]</sup> 13:45, 7 December 2009 (UTC) | |||
:::Wow, ok, I didn't realize I screwed up this bad. I forgot about this article after I made the move. I saw the page of copying within wiki a few days ago when dealing with other page moves & stuff. I have not made this mistake on any other articles. The State that you left the article in as of now is awesome, and again I am so sorry about my screw up there. Thanks for you help. --] (]) 22:25, 7 December 2009 (UTC) | |||
== GA review of ] == | |||
{{tlp|helpme}} | |||
I just listed myself properly to be the first reviewer. Though on the talk page link to the GA assessment, someone has already posted there in progress of a review. Do I override this or what? --] (]) 22:17, 29 November 2009 (UTC) | |||
<br>] | |||
:Just canceled request, I will just remove my name and go for another article. --] (]) 22:30, 29 November 2009 (UTC) | |||
== Talkback == | |||
(Cleared TB) | |||
---]]] 01:02, 1 December 2009 (UTC) | |||
== GA review of ] == | |||
MWOAP, thanks for your GA review of ]. I have currently fixed all of the issues with the article that you pointed out, with the exception of the OR and NPOV issues (which I aim to tackle tomorrow evening). The only thing I disagree with you on is that the article has a long way to go to get to GA. I don't expect that the remainder of the issues you've listed will take very long to fix. I would urge you to place the GA review ] for a few days while the article is being fixed. Hopefully, within a few days I can either cite or eliminate the OR and NPOV from the article. If there are any other remaining issues with the article that you haven't listed in your review, please let me know. Thanks! ] <small>]</small> 03:54, 1 December 2009 (UTC) | |||
::I have now fully addressed all of your comments on the GA review for this article. Please take a look at my comments on the ], and review the changes in the article. Let me know if you have any further issues with this article. Thanks. ] <small>]</small> 22:02, 1 December 2009 (UTC) | |||
== ] GA Table Suggestion == | |||
On your GA review, you suggested using a table. Is this (]) the kind of thing you want?--<font face="Comic Sans MS">]<sup>]</sup></font> 01:05, 2 December 2009 (UTC) | |||
:Yes, but I think it could have a little more, i.e. preinstalled oem vendor info, grace period applies to, etc | |||
==TB== | |||
TB removed. Author: COMPFUNK2 | |||
--] (]) 23:00, 6 December 2009 (UTC) | |||
== ] Review == | |||
I believe I have corrected the deficiencies you noted in the ]. Thank you for your review! --] (]) 01:52, 7 December 2009 (UTC) | |||
== Fedora Project GA review == | |||
Hi there. Wanted to raise a couple of things about the GA review you've just undertaken at the above article. First, when concluding a review, don't in the course of the review. It is useful for the page to document what was wrong with the article and what got fixed. Second, while every reviewer has to interpret the GA criteria, I would not have thought this article was even close to GA status. A few examples of issues: | |||
* Most of the (very few) references in the article are to internal company or project sources and may not meet either reliability criteria, or be considered independent of the subject. | |||
* The bulk of the article comprises embedded lists, which are not ideal for the nature of the article. See ] and ]. | |||
* Much of the list material reads like promotional text for the Fedora Project (for example "Printing to create a good printing experience on Fedora") | |||
* Almost nothing in the "Subprojects & Special interest groups" section is referenced, and there is no indication why any of the detailed information is in any way notable. | |||
I would in fact suggest it most likely that the entire article should be merged as a section of ] or ]. I will raise this at the GAN talk page, which may lead to the article going to the ], seeking delisting. If you've any queries, let me know. Cheers. ] (]) 02:58, 8 December 2009 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 01:16, 25 December 2024
Editing without logging in or an autoconfirmed account requires you to use the IP SubpageBecause of vandals and illegitimate users posting messages to my talkpage, my talkpage has been protected and redirects you to post your message on the IP subpage. If you are a legitimate IP user attempting to contact me, my apologies, and I will be as prompt as I can in responding to your messages. -- Amanda (she/her) |
This user talk page might be watched by friendly talk page stalkers, which means that someone other than me might reply to your query. Their input is welcome and their help with messages that I cannot reply to quickly is appreciated. |
Archives |
---|
|
Season's Greetings
Hello AmandaNP: Enjoy the holiday season and winter solstice if it's occurring in your area of the world, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Misplaced Pages. Cheers, AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 01:54, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Season's Greetings}} to send this messageA barnstar for you!
The Admin's Barnstar | ||
For taking care of the socking here. Your hard work is appreciated. JeffSpaceman (talk) 04:48, 23 December 2024 (UTC) |