Misplaced Pages

Russia and weapons of mass destruction: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 03:34, 15 April 2024 edit173.66.219.210 (talk)No edit summaryTags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit← Previous edit Revision as of 04:43, 25 December 2024 edit undo2001:999:500:8d52:753a:9bd7:9d61:823b (talk)No edit summaryTags: Reverted Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web editNext edit →
(41 intermediate revisions by 32 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Short description|none}} {{Short description|none}}
{{see also|Soviet atomic bomb project}}
{{Use mdy dates|date=October 2013}} {{Use mdy dates|date=May 2024}}
{{also|Soviet atomic bom project}}
{{Infobox nukes {{Infobox nukes
|country_name=]<br />{{nobold|{{small|(originally the ])}}}} |country_name={{ubl| ] | {{nobold| <small>(originally the ])</small>}} }}
|image_location=Russian Federation (orthographic projection) - All Territorial Disputes.svg |image_location=Russian Federation (orthographic projection) - All Territorial Disputes.svg
|program_start=1943<ref name="nuclearweaponarchives">{{cite web|last1=Sublette|first1=Carey|title=The Soviet Nuclear Weapons Program|url=http://nuclearweaponarchive.org/Russia/Sovwpnprog.html|website=nuclearweaponarchive.org|publisher=nuclearweaponarchives|access-date=20 April 2017|language=en|date=12 December 1997}}</ref> |program_start=1942<ref name="nuclearweaponarchives">{{cite web|last1=Sublette|first1=Carey|title=The Soviet Nuclear Weapons Program|url=http://nuclearweaponarchive.org/Russia/Sovwpnprog.html|website=nuclearweaponarchive.org|publisher=nuclearweaponarchives|access-date=20 April 2017|language=en|date=12 December 1997}}</ref>
|last_test=October 24, 1990 |last_test=October 24, 1990
|largest_yield={{convert|50|MtonTNT|PJ|abbr=on|lk=on}}<br />(]) |largest_yield={{ubl| {{convert|50|MtonTNT|PJ|abbr=on|lk=on}} | (]) }}
|total_tests=715 detonations |total_tests='''715''' detonations
|first_test=August 29, 1949 |first_test=August 29, 1949
|first_fusion=November 22, 1955 |first_fusion=November 22, 1955
|peak_stockpile=46,000 warheads (1975)<br />45,000 warheads (1990) |peak_stockpile=
|current_stockpile='''5,580'''<ref>{{cite web|url=https://thebulletin.org/premium/2024-03/russian-nuclear-weapons-2024/ |title=Nuclear Notebook: Russian nuclear weapons, 2024 }}</ref> (2024) |current_stockpile='''5,800'''<ref name="auto">{{Cite web|url=https://thebulletin.org/premium/2024-03/russian-nuclear-weapons-2024/|title=Russian nuclear weapons, 2024}}</ref> (2025)
|current_usable_stockpile=
|current_usable_stockpile='''1,710'''<ref>{{cite web|url=https://thebulletin.org/premium/2024-03/russian-nuclear-weapons-2024/ |title=Nuclear Notebook: Russian nuclear weapons, 2024 }}</ref> (2024)
|maximum_range='''18,000 km'''<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.armyrecognition.com/army-2019_news_russia_online_show_daily_media_partner/army_2019_russian_army_discloses_rs-28_sarmat_icbm_characteristics.html|title=Army 2019: Russian army discloses RS-28 Sarmat ICBM characteristics|date=2 July 2019|website=Army Recognition}}</ref> |maximum_range='''18,000 km'''<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.armyrecognition.com/army-2019_news_russia_online_show_daily_media_partner/army_2019_russian_army_discloses_rs-28_sarmat_icbm_characteristics.html|title=Army 2019: Russian army discloses RS-28 Sarmat ICBM characteristics|date=2 July 2019|website=Army Recognition}}</ref>
|NPT_party=Yes (1968, one of five recognized powers) |NPT_party=Yes (1968, one of five recognized powers)
Line 19: Line 19:
{{Weapons of mass destruction}} {{Weapons of mass destruction}}


The ] is known to possess or have possessed three types of ]: ]s, ], and ]. It is one of the five ] recognized under the ]. The ] is known to possess or have possessed three types of ]: ]s, ], and ]. It is one of the five ] recognized under the ] and one of ] wielding a ].


Russia possesses a total of 5,580 nuclear warheads as of 2024,<ref>{{cite web|url=https://thebulletin.org/premium/2024-03/russian-nuclear-weapons-2024/ |title=Nuclear Notebook: Russian nuclear weapons, 2024 }}</ref> the largest confirmed stockpile of nuclear warheads in the world. Russia's deployed missiles (those actually ready to be launched) number about 1,710, also the largest confirmed ] arsenal in the world as of 2024.<ref name=FAS>{{cite web|url=https://fas.org/initiative/status-world-nuclear-forces/ |title=Status of World Nuclear Forces Federation Of American Scientists |publisher=Fas.org}}</ref><ref name=armscontrol>{{cite web|url=https://www.armscontrol.org/factsheets/Nuclearweaponswhohaswhat |title=Nuclear Weapons: Who Has What at a Glance|publisher=armscontrol.org}}</ref> The remaining weapons are either in reserve stockpiles, or have been retired and are slated for dismantling. Russia's predecessor state, the ], reached a peak stockpile of about 45,000 nuclear warheads in 1986.<ref name="NorrisKristensenGlobal">{{Cite journal|url=https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.2968/062004017|doi = 10.2968/062004017|title = Global nuclear stockpiles, 1945-2006|year = 2006|last1 = Kristensen|first1 = Hans M.|last2 = Norris|first2 = Robert S.|journal = Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists|volume = 62|issue = 4|pages = 64–66|bibcode = 2006BuAtS..62d..64N| s2cid=145147992 }}</ref> The number of weapons Russia may possess is currently controlled by the bilateral ] treaty with the United States. Russia possesses a total of 5,800 nuclear warheads as of 2025, the largest confirmed stockpile of nuclear warheads in the world. Russia's deployed missiles (those actually ready to be launched) number about 1,710, also the largest confirmed ] arsenal in the world as of 2024.<ref name=FAS>{{cite web|url=https://fas.org/initiative/status-world-nuclear-forces/ |title=Status of World Nuclear Forces |website=Federation Of American Scientists FAS}}</ref><ref name=armscontrol>{{cite web|url=https://www.armscontrol.org/factsheets/Nuclearweaponswhohaswhat |title=Nuclear Weapons: Who Has What at a Glance|website=Armscontrol.org}}</ref> The remaining weapons are either in reserve stockpiles, or have been retired and are slated for dismantling. Russia's predecessor state, the ], reached a peak stockpile of about 45,000 nuclear warheads in 1986.<ref name="NorrisKristensenGlobal">{{Cite news |url=https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.2968/062004017|doi = 10.2968/062004017|title = Global nuclear stockpiles, 1945–2006|year = 2006|last1 = Kristensen|first1 = Hans M.|last2 = Norris|first2 = Robert S.|work = Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists|volume = 62|issue = 4|pages = 64–66|bibcode = 2006BuAtS..62d..64N| s2cid=145147992 }}</ref> The number of weapons Russia may possess is currently controlled by the bilateral ] treaty with the United States.


The Soviet Union ratified the ]—prohibiting the use of biological and chemical weapons in interstate conflicts—on April 5, 1928, with reservations that were later dropped on January 18, 2001.<ref>{{Cite web|last=|first=|date=|title=Disarmament Treaties Database: 1925 Geneva Protocol|url=http://disarmament.un.org/treaties/t/1925|access-date=2021-02-07|website=]}}</ref> Russia is also party to the 1972 ] and the 1993 ].<ref>{{Cite web|title=Disarmament Treaties Database: Biological Weapons Convention|url=http://disarmament.un.org/treaties/t/bwc|access-date=2021-02-16|website=]}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|last=|first=|date=|title=Disarmament Treaties Database: Chemical Weapons Convention|url=http://disarmament.un.org/treaties/t/cwc|access-date=2021-02-07|website=]}}</ref> The ] violated the Biological Weapons Convention and was the world's largest, longest, and most sophisticated program of its kind.<ref name=":0">Leitenberg, M., Zilinskas, R., & Kuhn, J. (2012). "Conclusion". In ''The Soviet Biological Weapons Program'' (pp. 698–712). Cambridge, Massachusetts; London, England: Harvard University Press. Retrieved February 7, 2021, from {{JSTOR|j.ctt2jbscf.30}}</ref> At its peak, the program employed up to 65,000 people.<ref name=":0" /> The Soviet Union ratified the ]—prohibiting the use of biological and chemical weapons in interstate conflicts—on April 5, 1928, with reservations that were later dropped on January 18, 2001.<ref>{{Cite web|title=Disarmament Treaties Database: 1925 Geneva Protocol|url=http://disarmament.un.org/treaties/t/1925|access-date=2021-02-07|website=]}}</ref> Russia is also party to the 1972 ] and the 1993 ].<ref>{{Cite web|title=Disarmament Treaties Database: Biological Weapons Convention|url=http://disarmament.un.org/treaties/t/bwc|access-date=2021-02-16|website=]}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|title=Disarmament Treaties Database: Chemical Weapons Convention|url=http://disarmament.un.org/treaties/t/cwc|access-date=2021-02-07|website=]}}</ref> The ] violated the Biological Weapons Convention and was the world's largest, longest, and most sophisticated program of its kind.<ref name=":0">Leitenberg, M., Zilinskas, R., & Kuhn, J. (2012). "Conclusion". In ''The Soviet Biological Weapons Program'' (pp. 698–712). Cambridge, Massachusetts; London, England: Harvard University Press. Retrieved February 7, 2021, from {{JSTOR|j.ctt2jbscf.30}}</ref> At its peak, the program employed up to 65,000 people.<ref name=":0" />


Despite being a signatory to the Chemical Weapons Convention, Russia has continued to hold and occasionally use chemical weapons. In 1997, Russia declared an arsenal of 39,967 tons of ]s, which it worked in part to decrease.<ref name="NTIchem" /><ref name="CSP16">{{cite web|url=http://www.opcw.org/index.php?eID=dam_frontend_push&docID=15203|title=Opening Statement by the Director-General to the Conference of the States Parties at its Sixteenth Session|date=28 November 2011|access-date=1 May 2012|publisher=]}}</ref> Its stock of weapons was officially declared destroyed in 2017. The ] in 2018 and the ] in 2020, both carried out by Russia, revealed that the country maintained an illicit chemical weapons program.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Syria, Russia, and the Global Chemical Weapons Crisis |publisher=Arms Control Association |url=https://www.armscontrol.org/act/2021-09/features/syria-russia-global-chemical-weapons-crisis |access-date=2022-03-01}}</ref> Russian forces also used chemical weapons during the ]. Despite being a signatory to the Chemical Weapons Convention, Russia has continued to hold, and occasionally use{{Citation needed|date=September 2024}}, chemical weapons. In 1997, Russia declared an arsenal of 39,967 tons of ]s, which it worked in part to decrease.<ref name="NTIchem" /><ref name="CSP16">{{cite web|url=http://www.opcw.org/index.php?eID=dam_frontend_push&docID=15203|title=Opening Statement by the Director-General to the Conference of the States Parties at its Sixteenth Session|date=28 November 2011|access-date=1 May 2012|website=]}}</ref> Its stock of weapons was officially declared destroyed in 2017. The ] in 2018 and the ] in 2020, both carried out by Russia, revealed that the country maintained an illicit chemical weapons program.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Syria, Russia, and the Global Chemical Weapons Crisis |website=Arms Control Association |url=https://www.armscontrol.org/act/2021-09/features/syria-russia-global-chemical-weapons-crisis |access-date=2022-03-01}}</ref>{{Failed verification|date=July 2024}} Russian forces also used, and admitted to using, chemical weapons during the ].<ref name="Field 2024 s609"/>


==Nuclear weapons== ==Nuclear weapons==
Line 37: Line 37:
At the ] in 1991, Soviet nuclear weapons were deployed in four of the new republics: Russia, ], ] and ]. In May 1992, these four states signed the ], agreeing to join the ], with Russia the ] to the Soviet Union as a nuclear state, and the other three states joining as non-nuclear states. At the ] in 1991, Soviet nuclear weapons were deployed in four of the new republics: Russia, ], ] and ]. In May 1992, these four states signed the ], agreeing to join the ], with Russia the ] to the Soviet Union as a nuclear state, and the other three states joining as non-nuclear states.


Ukraine agreed to give up its weapons to Russia, in exchange for guarantees of Ukrainian territory from Russia, the United Kingdom, and the United States, known as the ]. China and France also made statements in support of the memorandum.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.voanews.com/content/the-budapest-memorandum-and-crimea/1862439.html|title=The Budapest Memorandum and Crimea|work=VOA|date=March 2, 2014 |access-date=October 24, 2014}}</ref> Ukraine agreed to give up its weapons to Russia, in exchange for guarantees of Ukrainian territory from Russia, the United Kingdom, and the United States, known as the ]. China and France also made statements in support of the memorandum.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.voanews.com/content/the-budapest-memorandum-and-crimea/1862439.html|title=The Budapest Memorandum and Crimea|work=VOA News|date=March 2, 2014 |access-date=24 October 2014}}</ref>


=== Arms reduction === === Arms reduction ===
{{Main|Megatons to Megawatts Program}} {{Main|Megatons to Megawatts Program}}


The threat of ] was a persistent and terrifying threat during the ]. At its height, the Soviet Union and United States each mustered tens of thousands of warheads, under the doctrine of ]. By the 1980s, both the United States and Soviet Union sought to reduce the number of weapons the other was fielding. This led to the opening of arms reduction talks in 1982.<ref name="START I">{{Cite web |title=START I |url=https://www.nti.org/education-center/treaties-and-regimes/treaties-between-united-states-america-and-union-soviet-socialist-republics-strategic-offensive-reductions-start-i-start-ii/ |access-date=2022-03-01 |website=The Nuclear Threat Initiative |language=en}}</ref> The threat of ] was a persistent and terrifying threat during the ]. At its height, the Soviet Union and United States each mustered tens of thousands of warheads, under the doctrine of ]. By the 1980s, both the United States and Soviet Union sought to reduce the number of weapons the other was fielding. This led to the opening of arms reduction talks in 1982.<ref name="START I">{{Cite web |title=START I |url=https://www.nti.org/education-center/treaties-and-regimes/treaties-between-united-states-america-and-union-soviet-socialist-republics-strategic-offensive-reductions-start-i-start-ii/ |access-date=2022-03-01 |website= Nuclear Threat Initiative |language=en}}</ref>


This culminated in the signing of the ] treaty in 1991: the first nuclear arms reduction treaty between the two global powers. This first treaty limited the number of deployed warheads in each nation to 6,000, nearly halving the prior 10,000 to 12,000 being fielded in 1991.<ref name="START I"/> The considerable success of START I, combined with the ] in 1991, led to the ] treaty. Russia never ratified the treaty, and it did not go into effect. An attempted ] was attempted but could not get past negotiations.<ref>{{Cite web |title=START II |url=https://www.nti.org/education-center/treaties-and-regimes/treaty-between-united-states-america-and-union-soviet-socialist-republics-strategic-offensive-reductions-start-ii/ |access-date=2022-03-01 |website=The Nuclear Threat Initiative |language=en}}</ref> This culminated in the signing of the ] treaty in 1991: the first nuclear arms reduction treaty between the two global powers. This first treaty limited the number of deployed warheads in each nation to 6,000, nearly halving the prior 10,000 to 12,000 being fielded in 1991.<ref name="START I"/> The considerable success of START I, combined with the ] in 1991, led to the ] treaty. Russia never ratified the treaty, and it did not go into effect. An attempted ] was attempted but could not get past negotiations.<ref>{{Cite web |title=START II |url=https://www.nti.org/education-center/treaties-and-regimes/treaty-between-united-states-america-and-union-soviet-socialist-republics-strategic-offensive-reductions-start-ii/ |access-date=2022-03-01 |website=Nuclear Threat Initiative |language=en}}</ref>


Instead, the ] was passed in 2002, capping warheads at 2,200.<ref>{{Cite web |title=SORT |url=https://www.nti.org/education-center/treaties-and-regimes/strategic-offensive-reductions-treaty-sort/ |access-date=2022-03-01 |website=The Nuclear Threat Initiative |language=en}}</ref> The current limitations stem from the ] treaty, ratified in 2010. It limits each side to 1,550 weapons. Nuclear bombers only count as one weapon each, even though they may carry up to 20, so the actual limit on the countries is slightly higher. The treaty is in force through to 2026.<ref>{{Cite web |title=New START at a Glance {{!}} Arms Control Association |url=https://www.armscontrol.org/factsheets/NewSTART |access-date=2022-03-01 |website=www.armscontrol.org}}</ref> Instead, the ] was passed in 2002, capping warheads at 2,200.<ref>{{Cite web |title=SORT |url=https://www.nti.org/education-center/treaties-and-regimes/strategic-offensive-reductions-treaty-sort/ |access-date=2022-03-01 |website= Nuclear Threat Initiative |language=en}}</ref> The current limitations stem from the ] treaty, ratified in 2010. It limits each side to 1,550 weapons. Nuclear bombers only count as one weapon each, even though they may carry up to 20, so the actual limit on the countries is slightly higher. The treaty is in force through to 2026.<ref>{{Cite web |title=New START at a Glance |website= Arms Control Association |url= https://www.armscontrol.org/factsheets/NewSTART |access-date=2022-03-01}}</ref>


After U.S. President ] withdrew from the 1972 ], Russia responded by building-up their ], in such a way as to counterbalance U.S. capabilities.<ref>{{cite news |last=Majumdar |first=Dave |date=1 March 2018 |title=Russia's Nuclear Weapons Buildup Is Aimed at Beating U.S. Missile Defenses |work=The National Interest |location=USA |url=https://nationalinterest.org/blog/the-buzz/russias-nuclear-weapons-buildup-aimed-beating-us-missile-24716 |access-date=26 October 2018}}</ref> Russia decided not to sign the UN ], which was adopted on 7 July 2017 by 122 States.<ref>{{cite news |date=7 July 2017 |title=122 countries adopt 'historic' UN treaty to ban nuclear weapons |work=CBC News |url=https://www.cbc.ca/news/world/un-treaty-ban-nuclear-weapons-1.4192761}}</ref> Most analysts agree that Russia's nuclear strategy under Putin eventually brought it into violation of the 1987 ] (although this is not confirmed).<ref>{{Cite web |date=2019-02-07 |title=Russia may have violated the INF Treaty. Here's how the United States appears to have done the same. |url=https://thebulletin.org/2019/02/russia-may-have-violated-the-inf-treaty-heres-how-the-united-states-appears-to-have-done-the-same/ |website=Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists |language=en-US}}</ref> After U.S. President ] withdrew from the 1972 ], Russia responded by building-up their ], in such a way as to counterbalance U.S. capabilities.<ref>{{cite news |last=Majumdar |first=Dave |date=1 March 2018 |title=Russia's Nuclear Weapons Buildup Is Aimed at Beating U.S. Missile Defenses |work=The National Interest |location=USA |url=https://nationalinterest.org/blog/the-buzz/russias-nuclear-weapons-buildup-aimed-beating-us-missile-24716 |access-date=26 October 2018}}</ref> Russia decided not to sign the UN ], which was adopted on July 7, 2017, by 122 States.<ref>{{cite news |date=7 July 2017 |title=122 countries adopt 'historic' UN treaty to ban nuclear weapons |work=CBC News |url=https://www.cbc.ca/news/world/un-treaty-ban-nuclear-weapons-1.4192761}}</ref> Most analysts agree that Russia's nuclear strategy under Putin eventually brought it into violation of the 1987 ] (although this is not confirmed).<ref>{{Cite news |date=2019-02-07 |title=Russia may have violated the INF Treaty. Here's how the United States appears to have done the same |work=Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists |url=https://thebulletin.org/2019/02/russia-may-have-violated-the-inf-treaty-heres-how-the-united-states-appears-to-have-done-the-same/ |language=en-US}}</ref>


According to Russian officials, the American decision to deploy ] in Europe was a violation of the treaty.<ref>{{cite news |last1=Kramer |first1=Andrew E. |title=Russia Calls New U.S. Missile Defense System a 'Direct Threat' |newspaper=The New York Times |date=May 12, 2016 |agency=NYT |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2016/05/13/world/europe/russia-nato-us-romania-missile-defense.html}}</ref> U.S. President ] announced on 20 October 2018 that the U.S. would no longer consider itself bound by the treaty's provisions, raising nuclear tensions between the two powers.<ref>{{cite news |last=Hurlbert |first=Heather |date=26 October 2018 |title=Russia Violated an Arms Treaty. Trump Ditched It, Making the Nuclear Threat Even Worse. |work=New York Magazine |location=USA |url=https://nationalinterest.org/blog/the-buzz/russias-nuclear-weapons-buildup-aimed-beating-us-missile-24716 |access-date=26 October 2018}}</ref> According to Russian officials, the American decision to deploy ] in Europe was a violation of the treaty.<ref>{{cite news |last1=Kramer |first1=Andrew E. |title=Russia Calls New U.S. Missile Defense System a 'Direct Threat' |newspaper=The New York Times |date=May 12, 2016 |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2016/05/13/world/europe/russia-nato-us-romania-missile-defense.html}}</ref> U.S. President ] announced on October 20, 2018, that the U.S. would no longer consider itself bound by the treaty's provisions, raising nuclear tensions between the two powers.<ref>{{cite news |last=Hurlbert |first=Heather |date=26 October 2018 |title=Russia Violated an Arms Treaty. Trump Ditched It, Making the Nuclear Threat Even Worse. |work=New York Magazine |location=USA |url=https://nationalinterest.org/blog/the-buzz/russias-nuclear-weapons-buildup-aimed-beating-us-missile-24716 |access-date=26 October 2018}}</ref>


On November 2, 2023, Putin signed a law that withdraws Russia's ratification of the ].<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/putin-revokes-russias-ratification-nuclear-test-ban-treaty-2023-11-02/|title=Putin withdraws Russia's ratification of global nuclear test ban treaty|author=Andrew Osborn|website=] |date=November 2, 2023}}</ref> On November 2, 2023, Putin signed a law that withdraws Russia's ratification of the ].<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/putin-revokes-russias-ratification-nuclear-test-ban-treaty-2023-11-02/|title=Putin withdraws Russia's ratification of global nuclear test ban treaty|author=Andrew Osborn|website=] |date=November 2, 2023}}</ref>


===Nuclear arsenal of Russia=== ===Nuclear arsenal of Russia===
The exact number of nuclear warheads is a ] and is therefore a matter of guesswork. As of 2024, the ] estimates that Russia possesses 5,580 nuclear weapons, while the United States has 5,428; Russia and the U.S. each have about 1,600 active deployed strategic nuclear warheads. Russia's stockpile is growing in size, while the United States' is shrinking.<ref name=FAS /> Russia has six nuclear missile fields in ], ], ], ], ], and ]; nuclear missile submarines patrolling from three naval bases at ], ], and ]; and nuclear bombers at ] and ] air bases.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Cirincione |first1=Joseph |title=Nuclear Nightmares: Securing the World Before It Is Too Late |date=October 22, 2013 |publisher=Columbia University Press |location=New York |isbn=978-0-231-16404-7 |page=53 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=dbwJAgAAQBAJ |access-date=March 15, 2022}}</ref> As of 2024, Russia operates 12 nuclear-powered, nuclear-armed ballistic missile submarines, comprising five ] and seven ] vessels.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://thebulletin.org/premium/2024-03/russian-nuclear-weapons-2024/#post-heading |title=Russian Nuclear Weapons, 2024|publisher=The Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists}}.</ref> The exact number of nuclear warheads is a ] and is therefore a matter of guesswork. {{As of|2024}}, the ] estimates that Russia possesses 5,580 nuclear weapons, while the United States has 5,428; Russia and the U.S. each have about 1,600 active deployed strategic nuclear warheads. Russia's stockpile is growing in size, while the United States' is shrinking.<ref name=FAS /> Russia has six nuclear missile fields in ], ], ], ], ], and ]; nuclear missile submarines patrolling from three naval bases at ], ], and ]; and nuclear bombers at ] and ] air bases.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Cirincione |first1=Joseph |title=Nuclear Nightmares: Securing the World Before It Is Too Late |date=October 22, 2013 |publisher=Columbia University Press |location=New York |isbn=978-0-231-16404-7 |page=53 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=dbwJAgAAQBAJ |access-date=March 15, 2022}}</ref> As of 2024, Russia operates 12 nuclear-powered, nuclear-armed ballistic missile submarines, comprising five ] and seven ] vessels.<ref>{{cite news |url=https://thebulletin.org/premium/2024-03/russian-nuclear-weapons-2024/#post-heading |title=Russian Nuclear Weapons, 2024 |work=The Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists}}.</ref>


The ]<ref name=RS28> '']'', 2 Feb 2015.</ref> (Russian: РС-28 Сармат; ]: SATAN 2), is a Russian ], ]-equipped, ] ] armed ] in development by the ]<ref name="RS28" /> since 2009,<ref>{{cite web|url=http://militaryrussia.ru/blog/topic-435.html|title=РС-28 / ОКР Сармат, ракета 15А28 - SS-X-30 (проект) - MilitaryRussia.Ru — отечественная военная техника (после 1945г.)}}</ref> intended to replace the previous ]. Its large payload would allow for up to 10 heavy ]s or 15 lighter ones,<ref>{{cite news |last1=Gady |first1=Franz-Stefan |title=Russia to Test-Launch 16 Intercontinental Ballistic Missiles in 2016 |url=https://thediplomat.com/2016/01/russia-to-test-launch-16-intercontinental-ballistic-missiles-in-2016/ |work=] |date=January 12, 2016}}</ref> or a combination of warheads and massive amounts of ]s designed to defeat ].<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.globalsecurity.org/wmd/world/russia/ss-30.htm|title=SS-30 ?? / R-X-? Sarmat New Heavy ICBM|publisher=globalsecurity.org|access-date=17 January 2015|archive-date=February 5, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200205165020/https://www.globalsecurity.org/wmd/world/russia/ss-30.htm|url-status=dead}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.reuters.com/article/us-russia-missiles-idUSBRE9BG0SH20131217|title=Russia plans new ICBM to replace Cold War 'Satan' missile|publisher=Reuters|date=17 Dec 2013|access-date=17 January 2015}}</ref> It was heralded by the Russian military as a response to the U.S. ].<ref name=invuln>{{cite web|url=http://newsru.com/arch/russia/31may2014/sarmat.html|title=Минобороны рассказало о тяжелой баллистической ракете - неуязвимом для ПРО ответе США|date=May 31, 2014}}</ref> The ]<ref name=RS28> '']'', 2 Feb 2015.</ref> (Russian: РС-28 Сармат; ]: SATAN 2), is a Russian ], ]-equipped, ] ] armed ] in development by the ]<ref name="RS28" /> since 2009,<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://militaryrussia.ru/blog/topic-435.html|title=MilitaryRussia.Ru — отечественная военная техника (после 1945г.) &#124; Статьи|website=militaryrussia.ru}}</ref> intended to replace the previous ]. Its large payload would allow for up to 10 heavy ]s or 15 lighter ones,<ref>{{cite news |last1=Gady |first1=Franz-Stefan |title=Russia to Test-Launch 16 Intercontinental Ballistic Missiles in 2016 |url=https://thediplomat.com/2016/01/russia-to-test-launch-16-intercontinental-ballistic-missiles-in-2016/ |work=] |date=January 12, 2016}}</ref> or a combination of warheads and massive amounts of ]s designed to defeat ].<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.globalsecurity.org/wmd/world/russia/ss-30.htm|title=SS-30 ?? / R-X-? Sarmat New Heavy ICBM|website=globalsecurity.org|access-date=17 January 2015|archive-date=February 5, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200205165020/https://www.globalsecurity.org/wmd/world/russia/ss-30.htm|url-status=dead}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |work=Reuters World |url=https://www.reuters.com/article/us-russia-missiles-idUSBRE9BG0SH20131217 |title=Russia plans new ICBM to replace Cold War 'Satan' missile |agency=Reuters |date=17 Dec 2013|access-date=17 January 2015}}</ref> It was heralded by the Russian military as a response to the U.S. ].<ref name=invuln>{{cite news|url=http://newsru.com/arch/russia/31may2014/sarmat.html |script-title=ru: Минобороны рассказало о тяжелой баллистической ракете неуязвимом для ПРО ответе США|date=May 31, 2014 |trans-title=The Ministry of Defense spoke about a heavy ballistic missile – an invulnerable response to the US missile defense|work=NewsRu}}</ref>


In 2015, information emerged that Russia may be developing a new ], the ],<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.globalsecurity.org/wmd/world/russia/status-6.htm|title=Status-6 Ocean Multipurpose System|author=John Pike}}</ref><ref name="FTA">Why A Russian Super-Radioactive Atomic Torpedo Isn't The News You Think It Is </ref><ref name=BBC>{{cite news|url=https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-34797252|title=Russia reveals nuclear torpedo plan|work=BBC News|date=November 12, 2015}}</ref> codenamed "Kanyon" by Pentagon officials.<ref name=Diplomat>{{cite web|url=https://thediplomat.com/2015/11/revealed-russias-top-secret-nuclear-torpedo/|title=Revealed: Russia's Top Secret Nuclear Torpedo|first=Franz-Stefan Gady, The|last=Diplomat|website=The Diplomat}}</ref><ref name=USNI20151204/> This weapon is designed to create a ] up to 500m tall that will radioactively contaminate a wide area on an enemy coasts with ], and to be immune to anti-missile defense systems such as ]s and ]s that might disable an ].<ref name=FTA/><ref name=BBC/><ref name=USNI20151204/><ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.valuewalk.com/2015/12/purpose-of-russia-status-6-torpedo/|title=What Is The Purpose Of Russia's Deadly Status-6 Torpedo|date=December 8, 2015}}</ref><ref name="Pifer20151118">{{cite web|url=http://www.brookings.edu/blogs/order-from-chaos/posts/2015/11/18-russias-perhaps-not-real-super-torpedo-pifer |title=Russia's perhaps-not-real super torpedo |last=Pifer |first=Steven |website=] |date=November 18, 2015 |access-date=July 5, 2019}}</ref> Two potential carrier submarines, the Project 09852 '']'', and the Project 09851 '']'', are new boats laid down in 2012 and 2014 respectively.<ref name=Diplomat/><ref name="USNI20151204">Russian Mystery Submarine Likely Deployment Vehicle for New Nuclear Torpedo. USNI News. </ref><ref name="Oliphant">Oliphant R. Secret Russian radioactive doomsday torpedo leaked on television. Telegraph. 13 Nov 2015 </ref> In 2015, information emerged that Russia may be developing a new ], the ],<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.globalsecurity.org/wmd/world/russia/status-6.htm|title=Status-6 Ocean Multipurpose System|author=John Pike}}</ref><ref name="FTA">Why A Russian Super-Radioactive Atomic Torpedo Isn't The News You Think It Is </ref><ref name=BBC>{{cite news|url=https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-34797252|title=Russia reveals nuclear torpedo plan|work=BBC News|date=November 12, 2015}}</ref> codenamed "Kanyon" by Pentagon officials.<ref name=Diplomat>{{cite web|url=https://thediplomat.com/2015/11/revealed-russias-top-secret-nuclear-torpedo/|title=Revealed: Russia's Top Secret Nuclear Torpedo|first=Franz-Stefan|last=Gady|date=November 2015|website=The Diplomat}}</ref><ref name=USNI20151204/> This weapon is designed to create a ] up to 500m tall that will radioactively contaminate a wide area on an enemy coasts with ], and to be immune to anti-missile defense systems such as ]s and ]s that might disable an ].<ref name=FTA/><ref name=BBC/><ref name=USNI20151204/><ref>{{cite news |first=Vikas |last=Shukla |date=December 8, 2015 |work=Value Work |url=https://www.valuewalk.com/purpose-of-russia-status-6-torpedo/|title=What Is The Purpose Of Russia's Deadly Status-6 Torpedo}}</ref><ref name="Pifer20151118">{{cite web|url=http://www.brookings.edu/blogs/order-from-chaos/posts/2015/11/18-russias-perhaps-not-real-super-torpedo-pifer |title=Russia's perhaps-not-real super torpedo |last=Pifer |first=Steven |website=] |date=November 18, 2015 |access-date=July 5, 2019}}</ref> Two potential carrier submarines, the Project 09852 '']'', and the Project 09851 '']'', are new boats laid down in 2012 and 2014 respectively.<ref name=Diplomat/><ref name="USNI20151204">. ''USNI News'' December 4, 2015.</ref><ref name="Oliphant">{{cite news |last1=Oliphant |first1=Roland |title=Secret Russian radioactive doomsday torpedo leaked on television |url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/russia/11991729/Secret-Russian-radioactive-doomsday-torpedo-leaked-on-television.html |access-date=30 November 2024 |work=The Telegraph |date=13 November 2015 |language=en}}</ref>


Status 6 appears to be a deterrent weapon of last resort.<ref name=Pifer20151118/><ref name=Oliphant/> It appears to be a torpedo-shaped robotic mini-submarine, that can travel at speeds of {{convert|185|km/h|knot|abbr=on}}.<ref name=Pifer20151118/><ref name=Oliphant/><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.businessinsider.com.au/trump-tweet-us-nuclear-weapons-vs-russia-2016-12|title=Trump questions the US's nuclear arsenal: Here's how the US's nukes compare to Russia's|first=Alex|last=Lockie|date=December 24, 2016|access-date=December 26, 2016|archive-date=September 4, 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170904205656/https://www.businessinsider.com.au/trump-tweet-us-nuclear-weapons-vs-russia-2016-12|url-status=dead}}</ref> More recent information suggests a top speed of {{convert|100|km/h|knot|abbr=on}}, with a range of {{convert|10000|km|abbr=on}} and a depth maximum of {{convert|1000|m|abbr=on}}.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.popularmechanics.com/military/weapons/a24216/pentagon-confirm-russia-submarine-nuke/|title=Pentagon Confirms Russia's Thermonuclear Submarine Bomb Is Real|date=December 8, 2016}}</ref> This underwater drone is cloaked by stealth technology to elude acoustic tracking devices.<ref name=FTA/><ref name=Oliphant/> Status 6 appears to be a deterrent weapon of last resort.<ref name=Pifer20151118/><ref name=Oliphant/> It appears to be a torpedo-shaped robotic mini-submarine, that can travel at speeds of {{convert|185|km/h|knot|abbr=on}}.<ref name=Pifer20151118/><ref name=Oliphant/><ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.businessinsider.com/trump-tweet-us-nuclear-weapons-vs-russia-2016-12|title=Trump questions the US's nuclear arsenal: Here's how the US's nukes compare to Russia's|first=Alex|last=Lockie|website=] |date=December 24, 2016|access-date=December 26, 2016|archive-date=September 4, 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170904205656/https://www.businessinsider.com.au/trump-tweet-us-nuclear-weapons-vs-russia-2016-12|url-status=live}}</ref> More recent information suggests a top speed of {{convert|100|km/h|knot|abbr=on}}, with a range of {{convert|10000|km|abbr=on}} and a depth maximum of {{convert|1000|m|abbr=on}}.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.popularmechanics.com/military/weapons/a24216/pentagon-confirm-russia-submarine-nuke/|title=Pentagon Confirms Russia's Thermonuclear Submarine Bomb Is Real|date=December 8, 2016}}</ref> This underwater drone is cloaked by stealth technology to elude acoustic tracking devices.<ref name=FTA/><ref name=Oliphant/>


During an annual ] given on March 1, 2018, President ] publicly claimed that Russia was now in possession of several new classes of nuclear weapons, including some with capabilities previously speculated to exist. Putin discussed several new or upgraded weapons, including a ] known as the ], capable of performing sharp maneuvers while traveling at 20 times the speed of sound making it "absolutely invulnerable for any missile defense system."<ref>{{cite web |url=http://abcnews.go.com/International/wireStory/putin-boasts-russian-nuclear-weapons-53433951 |title=Putin boasts of new Russian nuclear weapons - ABC News |website=abcnews.go.com |access-date=15 January 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180301144604/http://abcnews.go.com/International/wireStory/putin-boasts-russian-nuclear-weapons-53433951 |archive-date=1 March 2018 |url-status=dead}}</ref> During an annual ] given on March 1, 2018, President ] publicly claimed that Russia was now in possession of several new classes of nuclear weapons, including some with capabilities previously speculated to exist. Putin discussed several new or upgraded weapons, including a ] known as the ], capable of performing sharp maneuvers while traveling at 20 times the speed of sound making it "absolutely invulnerable for any missile defense system."<ref>{{cite news |work=ABC News (US) |url=http://abcnews.go.com/International/wireStory/putin-boasts-russian-nuclear-weapons-53433951 |title=Putin boasts of new Russian nuclear weapons |access-date=15 January 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180301144604/http://abcnews.go.com/International/wireStory/putin-boasts-russian-nuclear-weapons-53433951 |archive-date=1 March 2018 |url-status=dead}}</ref>


Putin discussed the existence of a nuclear powered underwater torpedo and a nuclear powered ] (]), both with effectively unlimited range. He discussed that Russia had tested a new class of traditional ] called the ], which expanded upon the range and carrying capability of the Soviet-era Satan ICBM. Animations of these weapons were shown in front of the live and televised audience. Putin suggested that an online poll be conducted to give them official public names.<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-43239331|title=Russia has 'invincible' nuclear weapons|work=BBC News|date=March 1, 2018}}</ref> Putin discussed the existence of a nuclear powered underwater torpedo and a nuclear powered ] (]), both with effectively unlimited range. He discussed that Russia had tested a new class of traditional ] called the ], which expanded upon the range and carrying capability of the Soviet-era Satan ICBM. Animations of these weapons were shown in front of the live and televised audience. Putin suggested that an online poll be conducted to give them official public names.<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-43239331|title=Russia has 'invincible' nuclear weapons|work=BBC News|date=March 1, 2018}}</ref>
Line 73: Line 73:
===Nuclear proliferation=== ===Nuclear proliferation===
{{Main|Russia-China relations|Russia-India relations|Russia-North Korea relations|Russia-Iran relations}} {{Main|Russia-China relations|Russia-India relations|Russia-North Korea relations|Russia-Iran relations}}
] ]
After the ], the ] transferred nuclear technology and weapons to the ] as an adversary of the United States and ]. According to ], "Khrushchev's nuclear-proliferation process started with Communist China in April 1955, when the new ruler in the Kremlin consented to supply Beijing a sample atomic bomb and to help with its mass production. Subsequently, the Soviet Union built all the essentials of China's new ]."<ref name="bomb"> {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090606154259/http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=YmU3NjM4ZTg3NjViMTUyNWJmYWYzMDE4ZmRhOTQxZmI= |date=June 6, 2009 }} - by ], '']'', October 17, 2006</ref> After the ], the ] transferred nuclear technology and weapons to the ] as an adversary of the United States and ]. According to ], "Khrushchev's nuclear-proliferation process started with Communist China in April 1955, when the new ruler in the Kremlin consented to supply Beijing a sample atomic bomb and to help with its mass production. Subsequently, the Soviet Union built all the essentials of China's new ]."<ref name="bomb"> {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090606154259/http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=YmU3NjM4ZTg3NjViMTUyNWJmYWYzMDE4ZmRhOTQxZmI= |date=June 6, 2009 }} - by ], '']'', October 17, 2006</ref>


Russia is one of the five "Nuclear Weapons States" (NWS) under the ] (NPT), which Russia ratified (as the ]) in 1968. Russia is one of the five "Nuclear Weapons States" (NWS) under the ] (NPT), which Russia ratified (as the ]) in 1968.


Following the dissolution of the Soviet Union in 1991, a number of Soviet-era nuclear warheads remained on the territories of Belarus, Ukraine, and Kazakhstan. Under the terms of the ] to the NPT, and following the 1995 Trilateral Agreement between Russia, Belarus, and the US, these were transferred to Russia, leaving Russia as the sole inheritor of the Soviet nuclear arsenal. It is estimated that the Soviet Union had approximately 45,000 nuclear weapons stockpiled at the time of its collapse, according to Victor Mikhailov, head of ].<ref name="Management and Disposition of Excess Weapons Plutonium">{{cite book |author1=Committee on International Security and Arms Control |title=Management and Disposition of Excess Weapons Plutonium |date=January 15, 1994 |publisher=National Academies Press |location=41 |isbn=978-0-309-05042-5 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=IYEOUEgYhloC |access-date=14 December 2023 |language=En |format=Paperback |quote=... Victor Mikhailov, head of the Russian Ministry of Atomic Energy (MINATOM), reportedly indicated that the Russian ... Soviet Atom Arsenal Was Larger Than West Estimated," The New York Times, September 26, 1993. Mikhailov's figures are ...}}</ref> Following the dissolution of the Soviet Union in 1991, a number of Soviet-era nuclear warheads remained on the territories of Belarus, Ukraine, and Kazakhstan. Under the terms of the ] to the NPT, and following the 1995 Trilateral Agreement between Russia, Belarus, and the US, these were transferred to Russia, leaving Russia as the sole inheritor of the Soviet nuclear arsenal. It is estimated that the Soviet Union had approximately 45,000 nuclear weapons stockpiled at the time of its collapse, according to ], head of the ].<ref name="CISAC Manage Plutonium">{{multiref2
| 1 = {{citation |author1=((Committee on International Security and Arms Control)) |title= Management and Disposition of Excess Weapons Plutonium |date=January 15, 1994 |publisher=National Academies Press |location=Washington, DC |isbn=978-0-309-05042-5 |ref=none |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=IYEOUEgYhloC |access-date=14 December 2023 |language=en |quote=...{{nbsp}}Victor Mikhailov, head of the Russian Ministry of Atomic Energy (MINATOM), reportedly indicated that the Russian{{nbsp}}... Mikhailov's figures are ...}}
| 2 = {{cite news|title=Soviet Atom Arsenal Was Larger Than West Estimated |work= The New York Times |date=September 26, 1993|ref=none}}
}}</ref>

The collapse of the Soviet Union allowed for a warming of relations with NATO. Fears of a ] lessened. In September 1997, the former secretary of the Russian Security Council ] claimed 100 "suitcase sized" nuclear weapons were unaccounted for. He said he was attempting to inventory the weapons when he was fired by President Boris Yeltsin in October 1996.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.armscontrol.org/act/1997_09/lebedsept|title=Russian Officials Deny Claims Of Missing Nuclear Weapons|access-date=October 24, 2014}}</ref> Indeed, several US politicians have expressed worries and promised legislation addressing the threat.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://belfercenter.ksg.harvard.edu/publication/1010/nuclear_dangers.html?breadcrumb=%2F|title=Nuclear Dangers: Fear Increases of Terrorists Getting Hands on 'Loose' Warheads as Security Slips|date=October 19, 1997|access-date=October 24, 2014|archive-date=December 30, 2013|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131230234553/http://belfercenter.ksg.harvard.edu/publication/1010/nuclear_dangers.html?breadcrumb=%2F|url-status=dead}}</ref> The collapse of the Soviet Union allowed for a warming of relations with NATO. Fears of a ] lessened. In September 1997, the former secretary of the Russian Security Council ] claimed 100 "suitcase sized" nuclear weapons were unaccounted for. He said he was attempting to inventory the weapons when he was fired by President Boris Yeltsin in October 1996.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.armscontrol.org/act/1997_09/lebedsept|title=Russian Officials Deny Claims Of Missing Nuclear Weapons|access-date=October 24, 2014}}</ref> Indeed, several US politicians have expressed worries and promised legislation addressing the threat.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://belfercenter.ksg.harvard.edu/publication/1010/nuclear_dangers.html?breadcrumb=%2F|title=Nuclear Dangers: Fear Increases of Terrorists Getting Hands on 'Loose' Warheads as Security Slips|date=October 19, 1997|access-date=October 24, 2014|archive-date=December 30, 2013|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131230234553/http://belfercenter.ksg.harvard.edu/publication/1010/nuclear_dangers.html?breadcrumb=%2F|url-status=dead}}</ref>
] with ] after signing the ] treaty in Prague, 2010]] ] with ] after signing the ] treaty in Prague, 2010]]
There were allegations that Russia contributed to the ], selling it the equipment for the safe storage and transportation of ].<ref name="Korea"> - by a Special Correspondent in Pyongyang and Michael Hirst, ''Telegraph'', September 7, 2006.</ref> Nevertheless, Russia has condemned North Korean nuclear tests since then.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/2009-05/28/content_11446860.htm|title=Russia expresses serious concern over DPRK nuke issue|access-date=October 24, 2014|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160304095937/http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/2009-05/28/content_11446860.htm|archive-date=March 4, 2016|df=mdy-all}}</ref> The Russian Federation has also wider commercial interests in selling the nuclear technology to India and ], reaching understanding memorandums in training their technicians in their respected nuclear programs. Russia is allegedly making efforts to build its influential hold in Africa for earning several billions of pounds by selling nuclear technology to developing African countries.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.kyivpost.com/russia/guardian-russia-pushing-unsuitable-nuclear-power-in-africa.html|title=Guardian: Russia pushing 'unsuitable' nuclear power in Africa|date=August 28, 2019 |access-date=28 August 2019|publisher=Kyiv Post}}</ref> There were allegations that Russia contributed to the ], selling it the equipment for the safe storage and transportation of ]s.<ref name="Korea"> - by a Special Correspondent in Pyongyang and Michael Hirst, ''Telegraph'', September 7, 2006.</ref> Nevertheless, Russia has condemned North Korean nuclear tests since then.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/2009-05/28/content_11446860.htm|title=Russia expresses serious concern over DPRK nuke issue|access-date=October 24, 2014|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160304095937/http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/2009-05/28/content_11446860.htm|archive-date=March 4, 2016|df=mdy-all}}</ref> The Russian Federation has also wider commercial interests in selling the nuclear technology to India and ], reaching understanding memorandums in training their technicians in their respected nuclear programs. Russia is allegedly making efforts to build its influential hold in Africa for earning several billions of pounds by selling nuclear technology to developing African countries.<ref>{{cite news |date=28 August 2019 |last1=Shepeleva |first1=Anastasia |title=Guardian: Russia pushing 'unsuitable' nuclear power in Africa |url=https://archive.kyivpost.com/eastern-europe/guardian-russia-pushing-unsuitable-nuclear-power-in-africa.html |access-date=30 November 2024 |work=Kyiv Post}}</ref>

Russia has reportedly trained its navy to target European sites with nuclear-capable missiles in a potential conflict with NATO, according to leaked documents. The plans reveal a strategy for strikes across Western Europe, emphasizing Russia's reliance on nuclear weapons due to its conventional military limitations.<ref>{{Cite news |last1=Seddon |first1=Max |last2=Chris |first2=Cook |date=2024-08-12 |title=Russian navy trained to target sites inside Europe with nuclear-capable missiles |language=en |work=Financial Times|url=https://www.ft.com/content/237e1e55-401d-4eeb-875b-03fe68f81575 |access-date=2024-08-20}}</ref>


===Nuclear sabotage allegations=== ===Nuclear sabotage allegations===
Line 91: Line 95:
In a 2004 interview, colonel general of ] ] said that Soviet small-scale nuclear bombs have only been operated by the Army. All such devices have been stored in a weapons depot within Russia, and only left it for checks at the plant which produced them.<ref>{{cite news |last1=Novikova |first1=Inna |title=Куда исчезли 'ядерные чемоданчики'? |url=https://military.pravda.ru/46851-sadm/ |work=] |date=March 29, 2004 |language=ru}}</ref> In a 2004 interview, colonel general of ] ] said that Soviet small-scale nuclear bombs have only been operated by the Army. All such devices have been stored in a weapons depot within Russia, and only left it for checks at the plant which produced them.<ref>{{cite news |last1=Novikova |first1=Inna |title=Куда исчезли 'ядерные чемоданчики'? |url=https://military.pravda.ru/46851-sadm/ |work=] |date=March 29, 2004 |language=ru}}</ref>


===2020 Russian nuclear deterrence state policy=== ===2020 Russian nuclear deterrence state policy===


On June 2, 2020, President Putin signed an ] formally titled "Fundamentals of Russia’s Nuclear Deterrence State Policy", in an unprecedented public release of an official document on Russia's nuclear policy.<ref>{{cite web | url=https://thediplomat.com/2020/06/whats-in-russias-new-nuclear-deterrence-basic-principles/ | title=What's in Russia's New Nuclear Deterrence 'Basic Principles'? }}</ref> The six-page document identified the range of threats that Russia seeks to deter with its nuclear forces, clarified Russia’s general approach to nuclear deterrence, and articulated conditions under which Russia might use of nuclear weapons.<ref>{{cite web | url=https://warontherocks.com/2020/06/revelations-about-russias-nuclear-deterrence-policy/ | title=Revelations about Russia's Nuclear Deterrence Policy | date=June 19, 2020 }}</ref> The policy endorses the use of nuclear weapons in response to a non-nuclear strike due to the improved capabilities of U.S. conventional weapons.<ref>{{cite web | url=https://apnews.com/article/vladimir-putin-moscow-international-news-nuclear-weapons-politics-4f1772d79852e63ad9338ac557e009f1 | title=Putin signs Russia's nuclear deterrent policy | website=] | date=April 21, 2021 }}</ref> On June 2, 2020, President Putin signed an ] formally titled "Fundamentals of Russia’s Nuclear Deterrence State Policy", in an unprecedented public release of an official document on Russia's nuclear policy.<ref>{{cite web | url=https://thediplomat.com/2020/06/whats-in-russias-new-nuclear-deterrence-basic-principles/ | title=What's in Russia's New Nuclear Deterrence 'Basic Principles'? }}</ref> The six-page document identified the range of threats that Russia seeks to deter with its nuclear forces, clarified Russia's general approach to nuclear deterrence, and articulated conditions under which Russia might use of nuclear weapons.<ref>{{cite web | url=https://warontherocks.com/2020/06/revelations-about-russias-nuclear-deterrence-policy/ | title=Revelations about Russia's Nuclear Deterrence Policy | date=June 19, 2020 }}</ref> The policy endorses the use of nuclear weapons in response to a non-nuclear strike due to the improved capabilities of U.S. conventional weapons.<ref>{{cite web | url=https://apnews.com/article/vladimir-putin-moscow-international-news-nuclear-weapons-politics-4f1772d79852e63ad9338ac557e009f1 | title=Putin signs Russia's nuclear deterrent policy | website=] | date=April 21, 2021 }}</ref>


===Radiological weapons=== ===Radiological weapons===
Line 99: Line 103:


===Russian invasion of Ukraine=== ===Russian invasion of Ukraine===
{{see also|Nuclear threats during the Russian invasion of Ukraine}} {{see also|Nuclear risk during the Russian invasion of Ukraine}}
] in September 2022]] ] in September 2022]]
During the ] that began in 2022, Russian President ] placed ]'s ] units on high alert, a move heavily condemned internationally.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.9news.com.au/world/russia-ukraine-update-peace-talks-kremlin-arrive-belarus-president-zelenskyy-refuses-location/6686c934-0364-45ea-90dc-2233fe745b16|title = West slams Putin 'dangerous rhetoric' after Russian leader puts nuclear forces on alert| date=February 28, 2022 }}</ref> Putin warned that "whoever tries to hinder us in ] would see consequences, you have never seen in your history".<ref>{{cite news |title=Putin implies nuclear attack if West interferes in Ukraine. Why it's not just an empty threat |url=https://www.cbc.ca/news/world/putin-ukraine-nato-nuclear-weapons-1.6362890 |publisher=CBC News |date=25 February 2022}}</ref> According to the US Director of National Intelligence, ], Putin could potentially turn to nuclear weapons if he perceived an "existential threat" to the Russian state or regime;<ref>{{cite news |title=Putin prepping 'prolonged conflict' beyond Donbas, could escalate nuclear threats: Top US intel official |url=https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/putin-prepping-prolonged-conflict-donbas-escalate-nuclear-threats/story?id=84626300 |work=ABC News |date=10 May 2022}}</ref> there has been speculation that he could regard defeat in Ukraine as an existential threat to his regime.<ref>{{cite news |title=Putin could use nuclear weapon if he felt war being lost – US intelligence chief |url=https://www.theguardian.com/world/2022/may/10/putin-nuclear-weapons-us-intelligence-avril-haines |work=The Guardian |date=10 May 2022}}</ref> During the ] that began in 2022, Russian President ] placed ]'s ] units on high alert, a move heavily condemned internationally.<ref>{{Cite news |url= https://www.9news.com.au/world/russia-ukraine-update-peace-talks-kremlin-arrive-belarus-president-zelenskyy-refuses-location/6686c934-0364-45ea-90dc-2233fe745b16 |title = West slams Putin 'dangerous rhetoric' after Russian leader puts nuclear forces on alert| date=February 28, 2022 |work=9News|agency= Associated Press }}</ref> Putin warned that "whoever tries to hinder us in ] would see consequences, you have never seen in your history".<ref>{{cite news |title=Putin implies nuclear attack if West interferes in Ukraine. Why it's not just an empty threat |url=https://www.cbc.ca/news/world/putin-ukraine-nato-nuclear-weapons-1.6362890 |work=CBC News |date=25 February 2022}}</ref> According to the US Director of National Intelligence, ], Putin could potentially turn to nuclear weapons if he perceived an "existential threat" to the Russian state or regime;<ref>{{cite news |title=Putin prepping 'prolonged conflict' beyond Donbas, could escalate nuclear threats: Top US intel official |url=https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/putin-prepping-prolonged-conflict-donbas-escalate-nuclear-threats/story?id=84626300 |work=ABC News |date=10 May 2022}}</ref> there has been speculation that he could regard defeat in Ukraine as an existential threat to his regime.<ref>{{cite news |title=Putin could use nuclear weapon if he felt war being lost – US intelligence chief |first=Julian |last=Borger |url=https://www.theguardian.com/world/2022/may/10/putin-nuclear-weapons-us-intelligence-avril-haines |work=The Guardian |date=10 May 2022}}</ref>


According to a peer-reviewed study published in the journal '']'' in August 2022,<ref>{{cite journal |title=Global food insecurity and famine from reduced crop, marine fishery and livestock production due to climate disruption from nuclear war soot injection |journal=] |date=15 August 2022 |doi=10.1038/s43016-022-00573-0 |last1=Xia |first1=Lili |last2=Robock |first2=Alan |last3=Scherrer |first3=Kim |last4=Harrison |first4=Cheryl S. |last5=Bodirsky |first5=Benjamin Leon |last6=Weindl |first6=Isabelle |last7=Jägermeyr |first7=Jonas |last8=Bardeen |first8=Charles G. |last9=Toon |first9=Owen B. |last10=Heneghan |first10=Ryan |volume=3 |issue=8 |pages=586–596 |pmid=37118594 |s2cid=251601831 |doi-access=free |hdl=11250/3039288 |hdl-access=free }}</ref> a full-scale nuclear war between the ] and ], which together hold more than 90% of the world's nuclear weapons, would kill 360 million people directly and more than 5 billion indirectly by starvation during a ].<ref>{{cite news |last1=Diaz-Maurin |first1=François |title=Nowhere to hide: How a nuclear war would kill you — and almost everyone else |url=https://thebulletin.org/2022/10/nowhere-to-hide-how-a-nuclear-war-would-kill-you-and-almost-everyone-else/ |work=] |date=20 October 2022}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |title=World Nuclear war between the U.S. and Russia would kill more than 5 billion people – just from starvation, study finds |url=https://www.cbsnews.com/news/nuclear-war-5-billion-people-starvation-deaths-study/ |work=CBS News |date=16 August 2022}}</ref> According to a peer-reviewed study published in the journal '']'' in August 2022,<ref>{{cite journal |title=Global food insecurity and famine from reduced crop, marine fishery and livestock production due to climate disruption from nuclear war soot injection |journal=] |date=15 August 2022 |doi=10.1038/s43016-022-00573-0 |last1=Xia |first1=Lili |last2=Robock |first2=Alan |last3=Scherrer |first3=Kim |last4=Harrison |first4=Cheryl S. |last5=Bodirsky |first5=Benjamin Leon |last6=Weindl |first6=Isabelle |last7=Jägermeyr |first7=Jonas |last8=Bardeen |first8=Charles G. |last9=Toon |first9=Owen B. |last10=Heneghan |first10=Ryan |volume=3 |issue=8 |pages=586–596 |pmid=37118594 |s2cid=251601831 |doi-access=free |hdl=11250/3039288 |hdl-access=free }}</ref> a full-scale nuclear war between the ] and ], which together hold more than 90% of the world's nuclear weapons, would kill 360 million people directly and more than 5 billion indirectly by starvation during a ].<ref>{{cite news |last1=Diaz-Maurin |first1=François |title=Nowhere to hide: How a nuclear war would kill you — and almost everyone else |url=https://thebulletin.org/2022/10/nowhere-to-hide-how-a-nuclear-war-would-kill-you-and-almost-everyone-else/ |work=] |date=20 October 2022}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |title=World Nuclear war between the U.S. and Russia would kill more than 5 billion people – just from starvation, study finds |url=https://www.cbsnews.com/news/nuclear-war-5-billion-people-starvation-deaths-study/ |work=CBS News |date=16 August 2022}}</ref>


In September 2022, Putin announced the ], and threatened nuclear retaliation against the west if Russia's territorial integrity was threatened.<ref>{{cite web | url=https://www.theguardian.com/world/2022/sep/21/putin-announces-partial-mobilisation-in-russia-in-escalation-of-ukraine-war | title=Putin announces partial mobilisation and threatens nuclear retaliation in escalation of Ukraine war | website=] | date=September 21, 2022 }}</ref> In September 2022, Putin announced the ], and threatened nuclear retaliation against the west if Russia's territorial integrity was threatened.<ref>{{cite news | first= Pjotr |last=Sauer |url=https://www.theguardian.com/world/2022/sep/21/putin-announces-partial-mobilisation-in-russia-in-escalation-of-ukraine-war | title=Putin announces partial mobilisation and threatens nuclear retaliation in escalation of Ukraine war | work=] | date=21 September 2022 }}</ref>


On February 21, 2023, Putin suspended Russia's participation in the ] ] treaty with the United States,<ref>{{cite news |title=Putin pulls back from last remaining nuclear arms control pact with the US |url=https://edition.cnn.com/2023/02/21/europe/putin-russia-new-start-nuclear-pact-intl/index.html |work=CNN |date=21 February 2023}}</ref> saying that Russia would not allow the US and NATO to inspect its nuclear facilities.<ref>{{cite news |title=Putin defends Ukraine invasion, warns West in address |language=en |publisher=] |url=https://www3.nhk.or.jp/nhkworld/en/news/20230221_43/ |date=21 February 2023}}</ref> On 25 March 2023, Putin announced that Russia would be stationing tactical nuclear operations in Belarus.<ref>{{Cite news |date=25 March 2023 |title=Putin Says Russia to Place Tactical Nuclear Arms in Belarus |work=] |url=https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2023-03-25/putin-says-russia-will-station-tactical-nuclear-arms-in-belarus?srnd=fixed-income#xj4y7vzkg |access-date=25 March 2023}}</ref> On 14 June 2023, Belarusian President ] stated that Belarus had started to take delivery of nuclear weapons in a TV interview with ], ].<ref>{{Cite news |date=14 June 2023 |title=Belarus starts taking delivery of Russian nuclear weapons |work=] |url=https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/belarus-has-started-taking-delivery-russian-tactical-nuclear-weapons-president-2023-06-14/ |access-date=28 June 2023}}</ref> On February 21, 2023, Putin suspended Russia's participation in the ] ] treaty with the United States,<ref>{{cite news |title=Putin pulls back from last remaining nuclear arms control pact with the US |url=https://edition.cnn.com/2023/02/21/europe/putin-russia-new-start-nuclear-pact-intl/index.html |work=CNN |date=21 February 2023}}</ref> saying that Russia would not allow the US and NATO to inspect its nuclear facilities.<ref>{{cite news |title=Putin defends Ukraine invasion, warns West in address |language=en |work=] |url=https://www3.nhk.or.jp/nhkworld/en/news/20230221_43/ |date=21 February 2023| archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230221133553/https://www3.nhk.or.jp/nhkworld/en/news/20230221_43/ |archive-date=21 February 2023}}</ref> On March 25, 2023, Putin announced that Russia would be stationing tactical nuclear operations in Belarus.<ref>{{Cite news |date=25 March 2023 |title=Putin Says Russia to Place Tactical Nuclear Arms in Belarus |work=] |url=https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2023-03-25/putin-says-russia-will-station-tactical-nuclear-arms-in-belarus?srnd=fixed-income#xj4y7vzkg |access-date=25 March 2023}}</ref> On June 14, 2023, Belarusian President ] stated that Belarus had started to take delivery of nuclear weapons in a TV interview with ], ].<ref>{{Cite news |date=14 June 2023 |title=Belarus starts taking delivery of Russian nuclear weapons |work=] |url=https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/belarus-has-started-taking-delivery-russian-tactical-nuclear-weapons-president-2023-06-14/ |access-date=28 June 2023}}</ref>


==Biological weapons== ==Biological weapons==
{{Main|Soviet biological weapons program}} {{Main|Soviet biological weapons program}}


The Soviet Union covertly operated the world's largest, longest, and most sophisticated biological weapons programs.<ref name=":0"/> The program began in the 1920s and lasted until at least September 1992 but has possibly been continued by Russia after that.<ref name=":0" /> Thereby, the Soviet Union violated its obligations under the ], which it had signed on April 10, 1972, and ratified on March 26, 1975.<ref>{{Cite web|last=|first=|date=|title=Status of the Biological Weapons Convention|url=http://disarmament.un.org/treaties/t/bwc|access-date=2021-02-07|website=]}}</ref> The Soviet Union covertly operated the world's largest, longest, and most sophisticated biological weapons programs.<ref name=":0"/> The program began in the 1920s and lasted until at least September 1992 but has possibly been continued by Russia after that.<ref name=":0" /> Thereby, the Soviet Union violated its obligations under the ], which it had signed on April 10, 1972, and ratified on March 26, 1975.<ref>{{Cite web|title=Status of the Biological Weapons Convention|url=http://disarmament.un.org/treaties/t/bwc|access-date=2021-02-07|website=]}}</ref>


In the early 1970s, the Soviet Union significantly enlarged its offensive biological weapons programs.<ref>Leitenberg, M., Zilinskas, R., & Kuhn, J. (2012). Beginnings of the “Modern” Soviet BW program, 1970–1977. In ''The Soviet Biological Weapons Program'' (pp. 51-78). Cambridge, Massachusetts; London, England: Harvard University Press. Retrieved February 7, 2021, from http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt2jbscf.7</ref> After 1975, the program of biological weapons was run primarily by the "civilian" ] agency, although it also included numerous facilities run by the ], ], ], ], and ].<ref name="Alibek">Alibek, K. and S. Handelman. Biohazard: The Chilling True Story of the Largest Covert Biological Weapons Program in the World– Told from Inside by the Man Who Ran it. Delta (2000) {{ISBN|0-385-33496-6}}</ref> In the early 1970s, the Soviet Union significantly enlarged its offensive biological weapons programs.<ref>Leitenberg, M., Zilinskas, R., & Kuhn, J. (2012). Beginnings of the “Modern” Soviet BW program, 1970–1977. In ''The Soviet Biological Weapons Program'' (pp. 51-78). Cambridge, Massachusetts; London, England: Harvard University Press. Retrieved February 7, 2021, from http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt2jbscf.7</ref> After 1975, the program of biological weapons was run primarily by the "civilian" ] agency, although it also included numerous facilities run by the ], ], ], ], and ].<ref name="Alibek">Alibek, K. and S. Handelman. Biohazard: The Chilling True Story of the Largest Covert Biological Weapons Program in the World– Told from Inside by the Man Who Ran it. Delta (2000) {{ISBN|0-385-33496-6}}</ref>
Line 120: Line 124:
In 1993, the story about the ] was published in Russia. The incident occurred when ]s of ] were accidentally released from a military facility in the city of Sverdlovsk (formerly, and now again, ]) {{convert|1500|km|abbr=on}} east of Moscow on April 2, 1979. The ensuing outbreak of the disease resulted in 94 people becoming infected, 64 of whom died over a period of six weeks.<ref name="Alibek"/> In 1993, the story about the ] was published in Russia. The incident occurred when ]s of ] were accidentally released from a military facility in the city of Sverdlovsk (formerly, and now again, ]) {{convert|1500|km|abbr=on}} east of Moscow on April 2, 1979. The ensuing outbreak of the disease resulted in 94 people becoming infected, 64 of whom died over a period of six weeks.<ref name="Alibek"/>


In 2022 Russian Ministry of Defense started construction of a new massive facility at Sergiev Posad-6 site that hosted bioweapons research in Soviet times.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Satellite images show major expansion at Russian site with secret bioweapons past |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/interactive/2024/russia-biological-chemical-weapons-laboratory-expansion/ |website=The Washington Post}}</ref> The site belonging to ] (48 ЦНИИ) of the Russian Ministry of Defense, featuring biological security labs was even featured on Russian TV when a delegation from the ministry, then led by Sergei Shoigu visited it.<ref>{{Cite news |last=Krutov |first=Mark |last2=Dobrynin |first2=Sergei |date=2024-12-17 |title=Inside A Secret, Expanding Russian Lab Site With A Bioweapons Legacy |url=https://www.rferl.org/a/russia-biological-weapons-laboratory-sergiyev-posad-shoigu-visit/33236030.html |access-date=2024-12-17 |work=Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty |language=en}}</ref> Also in 2022 the 48th Institute has registered a patent for "protective medium for freeze-drying of ]", a common biological weapon pathogen.<ref>{{Cite web |title=RU2800372C1 - ПРОТЕКТИВНАЯ СРЕДА ДЛЯ СУБЛИМАЦИОННОГО ВЫСУШИВАНИЯ КЛЕТОК Y. PESTIS ШТАММА EV - Яндекс.Патенты |url=https://yandex.ru/patents/doc/RU2800372C1_20230720 |access-date=2024-12-17 |website=yandex.ru}}</ref>
As of 2021, the ] "assesses that the Russian Federation (Russia) maintains an offensive program and is in violation of its obligation under Articles I and II of the BWC. The issue of compliance by Russia with the BWC has been of concern for many years".<ref>{{Cite web|title=2021 Adherence to and Compliance With Arms Control, Nonproliferation, and Disarmament Agreements and Commitments|url=https://www.state.gov/2021-adherence-to-and-compliance-with-arms-control-nonproliferation-and-disarmament-agreements-and-commitments/|access-date=2021-10-30|website=United States Department of State|language=en}}</ref>

As of 2024, the ] "assesses that the Russian Federation (Russia) maintains an offensive program and is in violation of its obligation under Articles I and II of the BWC. The issue of compliance by Russia with the BWC has been of concern for many years."<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.state.gov/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/2024-Arms-Control-Treaty-Compliance-Report.pdf |title=2024 Arms Control Treaty Compliance Report |date=April 2024 |publisher=U.S. Department of State |access-date=2024-11-01}}</ref>


==Chemical weapons== ==Chemical weapons==
Line 130: Line 136:
] was followed by three years of inaction on chemical weapons destruction because of the ]. ] was followed by three years of inaction on chemical weapons destruction because of the ].


Russia met its treaty obligations by destroying 1% of its chemical agents by the Chemical Weapons Convention's 2002 deadline,<ref> {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20040406043031/http://www.opcw.org/html/global/ra_frameset.html |date=April 6, 2004 }}</ref> but requested technical and financial assistance and extensions on the deadlines of 2004 and 2007 due to the environmental challenges of chemical disposal. This extension procedure spelled out in the treaty has been utilized by other countries, including the ]. The extended deadline for complete destruction (April 2012) was not met.<ref name=sixty> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100711085547/http://www.opcw.org/nc/news/article/global-campaign-to-destroy-chemical-weapons-passes-60-percent-mark/ |date=July 11, 2010 }}. '']''. July 8, 2010. Retrieved August 19, 2010.</ref> As of October 2011, Russia had destroyed 57% of its stockpile. Russia also destroyed all of its declared Category 2 (10,616 MTs) and Category 3 chemicals.<ref name=CSP16 /> Russia met its treaty obligations by destroying 1% of its chemical agents by the Chemical Weapons Convention's 2002 deadline,<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.opcw.org/html/global/ra_frameset.html|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20040406043031/http://www.opcw.org/html/global/ra_frameset.html|title=Recent Updates|archive-date=April 6, 2004}}</ref> but requested technical and financial assistance and extensions on the deadlines of 2004 and 2007 due to the environmental challenges of chemical disposal. This extension procedure spelled out in the treaty has been utilized by other countries, including the ]. The extended deadline for complete destruction (April 2012) was not met.<ref name=sixty> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100711085547/http://www.opcw.org/nc/news/article/global-campaign-to-destroy-chemical-weapons-passes-60-percent-mark/ |date=July 11, 2010 }}. '']''. July 8, 2010. Retrieved August 19, 2010.</ref> As of October 2011, Russia had destroyed 57% of its stockpile. Russia also destroyed all of its declared Category 2 (10,616 MTs) and Category 3 chemicals.<ref name=CSP16 />


Russia has stored its chemical weapons (or the required chemicals) which it declared within the CWC at 8 locations: in ] (]) (2.9% of the declared stockpile by mass) and ] (]) (15.9%) stockpiles already have been destroyed. In ] (]) (13.6%), ] (]) (17.4%) and ] (]) (17.2%) destruction takes place, while installations are under construction in ] (]) (18.8%) and ] (]) (14.2%).<ref name=NTIchem>{{cite web|url=http://www.nti.org/e_research/profiles/russia/chemical/index.html/|title=Russia profile|publisher=NTI.org|year=2009|access-date=2010-09-17|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110605083958/http://www.nti.org/e_research/profiles/Russia/Chemical/index.html|archive-date=June 5, 2011|df=mdy-all}}</ref> Russia has stored its chemical weapons (or the required chemicals) which it declared within the CWC at eight locations. In ] (]) (2.9% of the declared stockpile by mass) and ] (]) (15.9%) stockpiles have already been destroyed. In ] (]) (13.6%), ] (]) (17.4%) and {{ill|Leonidovka, Bessonovsky District|ru|Леонидовка (село, Пензенская область)}} (]) (17.2%) destruction takes place, while installations are under construction in ] (]) (18.8%) and ] (]) (14.2%).<ref name=NTIchem>{{cite web|url=http://www.nti.org/e_research/profiles/russia/chemical/index.html/|title=Russia profile |website=Nuclear Threat Initiative – NTI.org|year=2009|access-date=2010-09-17|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110605083958/http://www.nti.org/e_research/profiles/Russia/Chemical/index.html|archive-date=June 5, 2011|df=mdy-all}}</ref>


The last Russian chemical disposal facility in ], ], was opened in December 2013.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.opcw.org/news/article/new-chemical-weapons-destruction-facility-opens-at-kizner-in-the-russian-federation/|title=New Chemical Weapons Destruction Facility Opens at Kizner in the Russian Federation}}</ref> The last Russian chemical disposal facility in ], ], was opened in December 2013.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.opcw.org/media-centre/news/2013/12/new-chemical-weapons-destruction-facility-opens-kizner-russian-federation|title=New Chemical Weapons Destruction Facility Opens at Kizner in the Russian Federation|website=OPCW}}</ref>


On September 27, 2017, OPCW announced that Russia had destroyed its entire declared chemical weapons stockpile,<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.rbc.ru/society/27/09/2017/59cb9f2b9a79472490943b5b|title=Путин поучаствовал в уничтожении последнего в России килограмма химоружия|website=РБК|date=September 27, 2017 |access-date=2018-01-15}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.opcw.org/media-centre/news/2017/09/opcw-director-general-commends-major-milestone-russia-completes|title=OPCW Director-General Commends Major Milestone as Russia Completes Destruction of Chemical Weapons Stockpile under OPCW Verification|website=OPCW}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.opcw.org/fileadmin/OPCW/CSP/C-22/national_statements/UK_Statement.pdf|title=UK Delegation to the OPCW}}</ref> even though they continued using ]s. Ukraine claims Russia used chemical weapons in Mariupol.<ref>{{cite web | url=https://www.theguardian.com/world/2022/apr/12/did-russia-really-use-chemical-weapons-mariupol-ukraine-expert-remain-sceptical | title=Did Russia really use chemical weapons in Ukraine? Experts are sceptical | website=] | date=April 12, 2022 }}</ref> On September 27, 2017, OPCW announced that Russia had destroyed its entire declared chemical weapons stockpile,<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.rbc.ru/society/27/09/2017/59cb9f2b9a79472490943b5b|title=Путин поучаствовал в уничтожении последнего в России килограмма химоружия|website=РБК|date=September 27, 2017 |access-date=2018-01-15}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.opcw.org/media-centre/news/2017/09/opcw-director-general-commends-major-milestone-russia-completes|title=OPCW Director-General Commends Major Milestone as Russia Completes Destruction of Chemical Weapons Stockpile under OPCW Verification|website=OPCW}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.opcw.org/fileadmin/OPCW/CSP/C-22/national_statements/UK_Statement.pdf|title=UK Delegation to the OPCW}}</ref> even though they continued using ]s. Ukraine claims Russia used chemical weapons in Mariupol.<ref>{{cite news | first=Dan |last= Sabbagh |url=https://www.theguardian.com/world/2022/apr/12/did-russia-really-use-chemical-weapons-mariupol-ukraine-expert-remain-sceptical | title=Did Russia really use chemical weapons in Ukraine? Experts are sceptical | work=] | date=April 12, 2022 }}</ref>


===Novichok agents=== ===Novichok agents===
{{Main|Novichok agent}} {{Main|Novichok agent}}


A range of Novichok agents were developed and tested in the 1970s and 1980s, but the intended Novichok weapons production site at the Pavlodar Chemical Plant in ] was still under construction when it was decided to demolish the chemical weapons building in 1987 in view of the forthcoming ].<ref name=nti-201504>{{cite web |url=http://www.nti.org/learn/countries/kazakhstan/chemical/ |title=Kazakhstan – Chemical |publisher=Nuclear Threat Initiative |date=April 2015 |access-date=14 March 2018}}</ref><ref name=bozheyeva-2000>{{cite report |url=https://www.nonproliferation.org/wp-content/uploads/npr/72bozh.pdf |title=The Pavlodar Chemical Weapons Plant in Kazakhstan: History and Legacy |last=Bozheyeva |first=Gulbarshyn |publisher=The Nonproliferation Review |date=Summer 2000 |access-date=14 March 2018}}</ref> A range of Novichok agents were developed and tested in the 1970s and 1980s, but the intended Novichok weapons production site at the Pavlodar Chemical Plant in ] was still under construction when it was decided to demolish the chemical weapons building in 1987 in view of the forthcoming ].<ref name=nti-201504>{{cite web|title=Kazakhstan – Chemical |website=Nuclear Threat Initiative |url=http://www.nti.org/learn/countries/kazakhstan/chemical/ |date=April 2015 |access-date=14 March 2018}}</ref><ref name=bozheyeva-2000>{{cite journal |pages= 136–145 |last=Bozheyeva |first=Gulbarshyn |issn=1073-6700 |journal=The Nonproliferation Review |url=https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/10736700008436816 |title=The Pavlodar Chemical Weapons Plant in Kazakhstan: History and Legacy |volume=7 |issue=2 |date=Summer 2000 |access-date=30 November 2024 |doi= 10.1080/10736700008436816}} </ref>

In March 2018, former ] agent ] and his daughter ] in ], United Kingdom by a chemical agent later confirmed to be Novichok.<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-43741140|title=Inspectors back UK in spy poisoning row|work=BBC News|date=April 12, 2018}}</ref> The incident raised new controversy over Russia's potential production and use of chemical weapons, with the ] accusing the Russian government or rogue Russian agents of orchestrating the attack, a claim Russia repeatedly denied.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.dw.com/en/the-curious-case-of-yulia-skripals-recorded-phone-call/a-43287554|title=The curious case of Yulia Skripal's recorded phone call|date=April 6, 2018|website=Deutsche Welle}}</ref>


In August 2020, Russian opposition figure and anti-corruption activist ] ] in ], Russia by a chemical agent later confirmed to be Novichok.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.reuters.com/article/us-russia-politics-navalny-chemicalweapo-idUSKBN26R2GQ|title=Chemical weapons body confirms nerve agent Novichok in Navalny's blood|date=October 6, 2020|website=reuters.com|access-date=December 22, 2020}}</ref> A joint investigation by ], ], ], and ] with contributions from ] implicates Russia's ] (FSB) in the near-fatal nerve-agent poisoning,<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.bellingcat.com/news/uk-and-europe/2020/12/14/fsb-team-of-chemical-weapon-experts-implicated-in-alexey-navalny-novichok-poisoning/|title=FSB Team of Chemical Weapon Experts Implicated in Alexey Navalny Novichok Poisoning|date=December 14, 2020|work=Bellingcat Investigations|access-date=December 22, 2020}}</ref> a fact denied by Russia. Navalny later called what appears to be one of the FSB agents responsible for the cleanup operation who indicates they were tasked to clean Navalny's underpants of Novichok.<ref>{{cite news |last1= Lister |first1=Tim |first2= Clarissa |last2= Ward |first3=Sebastian |last3=Shukla |title=Russian opposition leader Alexey Navalny dupes spy into revealing how he was poisoned|date=21 December 2020 |work=] |url= https://edition.cnn.com/2020/12/21/europe/russia-navalny-poisoning-underpants-ward/index.html |access-date=December 22, 2020}}</ref>
In March 2018, former ] agent ] and his daughter ] in ], United Kingdom by a chemical agent later confirmed to be Novichok.<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-43741140|title=Inspectors back UK in spy poisoning row|work=BBC News|date=April 12, 2018}}</ref> The incident raised new controversy over Russia's potential production and use of chemical weapons, with the ] accusing the Russian government or rogue Russian agents of orchestrating the attack, a claim Russia repeatedly denied.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.dw.com/en/the-curious-case-of-yulia-skripals-recorded-phone-call/a-43287554|title=The curious case of Yulia Skripal's recorded phone call|date=April 6, 2018|website=DW.COM}}</ref>


Another Russia chemical weapon is ], an ]ized ] incapacitating agent though to be ].<ref name="Schwenk2018">{{cite journal | vauthors = Schwenk M | title = Chemical warfare agents. Classes and targets | journal = Toxicol Lett | volume = 293 | issue = | pages = 253–263 | date = September 2018 | pmid = 29197625 | doi = 10.1016/j.toxlet.2017.11.040 | url = }}</ref>
In August 2020, Russian opposition figure and anti-corruption activist ] ] in ], Russia by a chemical agent later confirmed to be Novichok.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.reuters.com/article/us-russia-politics-navalny-chemicalweapo-idUSKBN26R2GQ|title=Chemical weapons body confirms nerve agent Novichok in Navalny's blood|date=October 6, 2020|website=reuters.com|access-date=December 22, 2020}}</ref> A joint investigation by ], ], ], and ] with contributions from ] implicates Russia's ] (FSB) in the near-fatal nerve-agent poisoning,<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.bellingcat.com/news/uk-and-europe/2020/12/14/fsb-team-of-chemical-weapon-experts-implicated-in-alexey-navalny-novichok-poisoning/|title=FSB Team of Chemical Weapon Experts Implicated in Alexey Navalny Novichok Poisoning|date=December 14, 2020|website=bellingcat.com|access-date=December 22, 2020}}</ref> a fact denied by Russia. Navalny later called what appears to be one of the FSB agents responsible for the cleanup operation who indicates they were tasked to clean Navalny's underpants of Novichok.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://edition.cnn.com/2020/12/21/europe/russia-navalny-poisoning-underpants-ward/index.html|title=Russian opposition leader Alexey Navalny dupes spy into revealing how he was poisoned|date=December 21, 2020|publisher=]|access-date=December 22, 2020}}</ref>


=== Use during the invasion of Ukraine=== === Use during the invasion of Ukraine===
In the ], Russian forces reportedly used chemical weapons 465 times between 24 February 2022 and December 2023, usually as ] grenades.<ref name="Hambling 2023 z855">{{cite web | last=Hambling | first=David | title=What We Know About Russian Chemical Weapon Attacks | website=Forbes | date=29 December 2023 | url=https://www.forbes.com/sites/davidhambling/2023/12/29/what-we-know-about-russian-chemical-weapon-attacks/ | access-date=23 March 2024}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last=Kondrat |first=Anastasiia |date=2023-12-27 |title=Russia has launched 465 chemical attacks since the start of the full-scale invasion |url=https://svidomi.in.ua/en/page/russia-has-launched-465-chemical-attacks-since-the-start-of-the-full-scale-invasion |access-date=2023-12-27 |website=Svidomi |language=en}}</ref> The use of tear gas is banned by international ] and considered a chemical weapon if applied by military forces during warfare.<ref name="Field 2024 s609">{{cite web | last=Field | first=Matt | title=Russia appears to be using chemical weapons in Ukraine. And admitting it. | website=Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists | date=15 March 2024 | url=https://thebulletin.org/2024/03/russia-appears-to-be-using-chemical-weapons-in-ukraine-and-admitting-it/ | access-date=23 March 2024}}</ref> In the ], Russian forces reportedly used chemical weapons 465 times between February 24, 2022, and December 2023, usually as ] grenades.<ref name="Hambling 2023 z855">{{cite web | last=Hambling | first=David | title=What We Know About Russian Chemical Weapon Attacks | website=Forbes | date=29 December 2023 | url=https://www.forbes.com/sites/davidhambling/2023/12/29/what-we-know-about-russian-chemical-weapon-attacks/ | access-date=23 March 2024}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last=Kondrat |first=Anastasiia |date=2023-12-27 |title=Russia has launched 465 chemical attacks since the start of the full-scale invasion |url=https://svidomi.in.ua/en/page/russia-has-launched-465-chemical-attacks-since-the-start-of-the-full-scale-invasion |access-date=2023-12-27 |website=Svidomi |language=en}}</ref> In May 2023, a television report on Russia's ] showed a Russian battalion commander talking about the effectiveness of chemicals used as weapons. The report also showed a drone dropping a tear gas grenade on a dugout.<ref name="Field 2024 s609"/><ref>{{Cite web |title=Выпуск программы «Время» в 21:00, 2 мая 2023 года |url=https://www.1tv.ru/news/issue/2023-05-02/21:00#6 |date=2023-05-02}}</ref> In December 2023, the Russian ] wrote about its use of drones to drop K-51 grenades containing ] tear gas on Ukrainian positions.<ref>{{Cite web |title=A Russian brigade admits dropping tear gas on Ukrainian troops, which would violate the UN Chemical Weapons Convention |url=https://www.businessinsider.com/russia-admits-to-using-tear-gas-chemical-weapons-on-ukrainian-troops-2023-12 |last=Shoaib |first=Alia |date=2023-12-24 |website=Business Insider}}</ref> The use of tear gas is banned by international ] and considered a chemical weapon if applied by military forces during warfare.<ref name="Field 2024 s609">{{cite news | last=Field | first=Matt | title=Russia appears to be using chemical weapons in Ukraine. And admitting it | work=Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists | date=15 March 2024 | url=https://thebulletin.org/2024/03/russia-appears-to-be-using-chemical-weapons-in-ukraine-and-admitting-it/ | access-date=23 March 2024}}</ref> The United States accused Russia of also using ] as a chemical weapon in Ukraine.<ref>{{cite news | last=Murphy | first=Matt| date=2 May 2024 | title=Russia using chemical choking agents in Ukraine, US says | work=BBC News |url=https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-68941220 | access-date=14 May 2024}}</ref>


==See also== ==See also==
Line 178: Line 186:
{{Soviet Atomic Bomb Project}} {{Soviet Atomic Bomb Project}}
{{Soviet nuclear weapons}} {{Soviet nuclear weapons}}
{{U.S.S.R. biological weapons}}
{{Russian and Soviet missiles}} {{Russian and Soviet missiles}}
{{Armed Forces of the Russian Federation}} {{Armed Forces of the Russian Federation}}
Line 185: Line 194:
] ]
] ]
]
] ]
] ]

Revision as of 04:43, 25 December 2024

See also: Soviet atomic bomb project

Nuclear program start date1942
First nuclear weapon testAugust 29, 1949
First thermonuclear weapon testNovember 22, 1955
Last nuclear testOctober 24, 1990
Largest yield test
Total tests715 detonations
Current stockpile5,800 (2025)
Maximum missile range18,000 km
NPT partyYes (1968, one of five recognized powers)
Weapons of mass destruction
By type
By country
Proliferation
Treaties

The Russian Federation is known to possess or have possessed three types of weapons of mass destruction: nuclear weapons, biological weapons, and chemical weapons. It is one of the five nuclear-weapon states recognized under the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons and one of the four countries wielding a nuclear triad.

Russia possesses a total of 5,800 nuclear warheads as of 2025, the largest confirmed stockpile of nuclear warheads in the world. Russia's deployed missiles (those actually ready to be launched) number about 1,710, also the largest confirmed strategically deployed arsenal in the world as of 2024. The remaining weapons are either in reserve stockpiles, or have been retired and are slated for dismantling. Russia's predecessor state, the Soviet Union, reached a peak stockpile of about 45,000 nuclear warheads in 1986. The number of weapons Russia may possess is currently controlled by the bilateral New START treaty with the United States.

The Soviet Union ratified the Geneva Protocol—prohibiting the use of biological and chemical weapons in interstate conflicts—on April 5, 1928, with reservations that were later dropped on January 18, 2001. Russia is also party to the 1972 Biological Weapons Convention and the 1993 Chemical Weapons Convention. The Soviet biological weapons program violated the Biological Weapons Convention and was the world's largest, longest, and most sophisticated program of its kind. At its peak, the program employed up to 65,000 people.

Despite being a signatory to the Chemical Weapons Convention, Russia has continued to hold, and occasionally use, chemical weapons. In 1997, Russia declared an arsenal of 39,967 tons of chemical weapons, which it worked in part to decrease. Its stock of weapons was officially declared destroyed in 2017. The poisoning of Sergei and Yulia Skripal in 2018 and the poisoning of Alexei Navalny in 2020, both carried out by Russia, revealed that the country maintained an illicit chemical weapons program. Russian forces also used, and admitted to using, chemical weapons during the invasion of Ukraine.

Nuclear weapons

History

Soviet era

Main article: Soviet atomic bomb project

Post-Soviet era

At the dissolution of the Soviet Union in 1991, Soviet nuclear weapons were deployed in four of the new republics: Russia, Ukraine, Belarus and Kazakhstan. In May 1992, these four states signed the Lisbon Protocol, agreeing to join the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons, with Russia the successor state to the Soviet Union as a nuclear state, and the other three states joining as non-nuclear states.

Ukraine agreed to give up its weapons to Russia, in exchange for guarantees of Ukrainian territory from Russia, the United Kingdom, and the United States, known as the Budapest Memorandum on Security Assurances. China and France also made statements in support of the memorandum.

Arms reduction

Main article: Megatons to Megawatts Program

The threat of nuclear warfare was a persistent and terrifying threat during the Cold War. At its height, the Soviet Union and United States each mustered tens of thousands of warheads, under the doctrine of mutual assured destruction. By the 1980s, both the United States and Soviet Union sought to reduce the number of weapons the other was fielding. This led to the opening of arms reduction talks in 1982.

This culminated in the signing of the START I treaty in 1991: the first nuclear arms reduction treaty between the two global powers. This first treaty limited the number of deployed warheads in each nation to 6,000, nearly halving the prior 10,000 to 12,000 being fielded in 1991. The considerable success of START I, combined with the dissolution of the Soviet Union in 1991, led to the START II treaty. Russia never ratified the treaty, and it did not go into effect. An attempted START III was attempted but could not get past negotiations.

Instead, the Strategic Offensive Reductions Treaty was passed in 2002, capping warheads at 2,200. The current limitations stem from the New START treaty, ratified in 2010. It limits each side to 1,550 weapons. Nuclear bombers only count as one weapon each, even though they may carry up to 20, so the actual limit on the countries is slightly higher. The treaty is in force through to 2026.

After U.S. President George W. Bush withdrew from the 1972 Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty, Russia responded by building-up their nuclear capabilities, in such a way as to counterbalance U.S. capabilities. Russia decided not to sign the UN treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons, which was adopted on July 7, 2017, by 122 States. Most analysts agree that Russia's nuclear strategy under Putin eventually brought it into violation of the 1987 Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty (although this is not confirmed).

According to Russian officials, the American decision to deploy the missile defense system in Europe was a violation of the treaty. U.S. President Donald Trump announced on October 20, 2018, that the U.S. would no longer consider itself bound by the treaty's provisions, raising nuclear tensions between the two powers.

On November 2, 2023, Putin signed a law that withdraws Russia's ratification of the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty.

Nuclear arsenal of Russia

The exact number of nuclear warheads is a state secret and is therefore a matter of guesswork. As of 2024, the Federation of American Scientists estimates that Russia possesses 5,580 nuclear weapons, while the United States has 5,428; Russia and the U.S. each have about 1,600 active deployed strategic nuclear warheads. Russia's stockpile is growing in size, while the United States' is shrinking. Russia has six nuclear missile fields in Kozelsk, Tatishchevo, Uzhur, Dombarovsky, Kartalay, and Aleysk; nuclear missile submarines patrolling from three naval bases at Nerpich'ya, Yagel'Naya, and Rybachiy; and nuclear bombers at Ukrainka and Engels air bases. As of 2024, Russia operates 12 nuclear-powered, nuclear-armed ballistic missile submarines, comprising five Delta-class and seven Borei-class vessels.

The RS-28 Sarmat (Russian: РС-28 Сармат; NATO reporting name: SATAN 2), is a Russian liquid-fueled, MIRV-equipped, super-heavy thermonuclear armed intercontinental ballistic missile in development by the Makeyev Rocket Design Bureau since 2009, intended to replace the previous R-36 missile. Its large payload would allow for up to 10 heavy warheads or 15 lighter ones, or a combination of warheads and massive amounts of countermeasures designed to defeat anti-missile systems. It was heralded by the Russian military as a response to the U.S. Prompt Global Strike.

In 2015, information emerged that Russia may be developing a new nuclear torpedo, the Status-6 Ocean Multipurpose System, codenamed "Kanyon" by Pentagon officials. This weapon is designed to create a tsunami wave up to 500m tall that will radioactively contaminate a wide area on an enemy coasts with cobalt-60, and to be immune to anti-missile defense systems such as laser weapons and railguns that might disable an ICBM. Two potential carrier submarines, the Project 09852 Belgorod, and the Project 09851 Khabarovsk, are new boats laid down in 2012 and 2014 respectively.

Status 6 appears to be a deterrent weapon of last resort. It appears to be a torpedo-shaped robotic mini-submarine, that can travel at speeds of 185 km/h (100 kn). More recent information suggests a top speed of 100 km/h (54 kn), with a range of 10,000 km (6,200 mi) and a depth maximum of 1,000 m (3,300 ft). This underwater drone is cloaked by stealth technology to elude acoustic tracking devices.

During an annual state-of-the-nation address given on March 1, 2018, President Vladimir Putin publicly claimed that Russia was now in possession of several new classes of nuclear weapons, including some with capabilities previously speculated to exist. Putin discussed several new or upgraded weapons, including a hypersonic glide vehicle known as the Avangard, capable of performing sharp maneuvers while traveling at 20 times the speed of sound making it "absolutely invulnerable for any missile defense system."

Putin discussed the existence of a nuclear powered underwater torpedo and a nuclear powered cruise missile (9M730 Burevestnik), both with effectively unlimited range. He discussed that Russia had tested a new class of traditional ICBM called the RS-28 Sarmat, which expanded upon the range and carrying capability of the Soviet-era Satan ICBM. Animations of these weapons were shown in front of the live and televised audience. Putin suggested that an online poll be conducted to give them official public names.

Nuclear weapons in Russian military doctrine

Main article: Military doctrine of Russia

According to a Russian military doctrine stated in 2010, nuclear weapons could be used by Russia "in response to the use of nuclear and other types of weapons of mass destruction against it or its allies, and also in case of aggression against Russia with the use of conventional weapons when the very existence of the state is threatened". Most military analysts believe that, in this case, Russia would pursue an 'escalate to de-escalate' strategy, initiating limited nuclear exchange to bring adversaries to the negotiating table. Russia will also threaten nuclear conflict to discourage initial escalation of any major conventional conflict.

Nuclear proliferation

Main articles: Russia-China relations, Russia-India relations, Russia-North Korea relations, and Russia-Iran relations
Nations with large nuclear stockpiles with global range (dark blue)

After the Korean War, the Soviet Union transferred nuclear technology and weapons to the People's Republic of China as an adversary of the United States and NATO. According to Ion Mihai Pacepa, "Khrushchev's nuclear-proliferation process started with Communist China in April 1955, when the new ruler in the Kremlin consented to supply Beijing a sample atomic bomb and to help with its mass production. Subsequently, the Soviet Union built all the essentials of China's new military nuclear industry."

Russia is one of the five "Nuclear Weapons States" (NWS) under the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT), which Russia ratified (as the Soviet Union) in 1968.

Following the dissolution of the Soviet Union in 1991, a number of Soviet-era nuclear warheads remained on the territories of Belarus, Ukraine, and Kazakhstan. Under the terms of the Lisbon Protocol to the NPT, and following the 1995 Trilateral Agreement between Russia, Belarus, and the US, these were transferred to Russia, leaving Russia as the sole inheritor of the Soviet nuclear arsenal. It is estimated that the Soviet Union had approximately 45,000 nuclear weapons stockpiled at the time of its collapse, according to Viktor Mikhaylov, head of the Federal Agency on Atomic Energy (Russia). The collapse of the Soviet Union allowed for a warming of relations with NATO. Fears of a nuclear holocaust lessened. In September 1997, the former secretary of the Russian Security Council Alexander Lebed claimed 100 "suitcase sized" nuclear weapons were unaccounted for. He said he was attempting to inventory the weapons when he was fired by President Boris Yeltsin in October 1996. Indeed, several US politicians have expressed worries and promised legislation addressing the threat.

Dmitry Medvedev with Barack Obama after signing the New START treaty in Prague, 2010

There were allegations that Russia contributed to the North Korean nuclear program, selling it the equipment for the safe storage and transportation of nuclear materials. Nevertheless, Russia has condemned North Korean nuclear tests since then. The Russian Federation has also wider commercial interests in selling the nuclear technology to India and Iran, reaching understanding memorandums in training their technicians in their respected nuclear programs. Russia is allegedly making efforts to build its influential hold in Africa for earning several billions of pounds by selling nuclear technology to developing African countries.

Russia has reportedly trained its navy to target European sites with nuclear-capable missiles in a potential conflict with NATO, according to leaked documents. The plans reveal a strategy for strikes across Western Europe, emphasizing Russia's reliance on nuclear weapons due to its conventional military limitations.

Nuclear sabotage allegations

The highest-ranking GRU defector Stanislav Lunev described alleged Soviet plans for using tactical nuclear weapons for sabotage against the United States in the event of war. He described Soviet-made suitcase nukes identified as RA-115s (or RA-115-01s for submersible weapons) which weigh 50–60 pounds (23–27 kg). These portable bombs can last for many years if wired to an electric source. "In case there is a loss of power, there is a battery backup. If the battery runs low, the weapon has a transmitter that sends a coded message – either by satellite or directly to a GRU post at a Russian embassy or consulate."

Lunev was personally looking for hiding places for weapons caches in the Shenandoah Valley area. He said that "it is surprisingly easy to smuggle nuclear weapons into the US" either across the Mexican border or using a small transport missile that can slip though undetected when launched from a Russian airplane. Searches of the areas identified by Lunev – who admits he never planted any weapons in the US – have been conducted, "but law-enforcement officials have never found such weapons caches, with or without portable nuclear weapons" in the US.

In a 2004 interview, colonel general of RVSN Viktor Yesin said that Soviet small-scale nuclear bombs have only been operated by the Army. All such devices have been stored in a weapons depot within Russia, and only left it for checks at the plant which produced them.

2020 Russian nuclear deterrence state policy

On June 2, 2020, President Putin signed an Executive Order formally titled "Fundamentals of Russia’s Nuclear Deterrence State Policy", in an unprecedented public release of an official document on Russia's nuclear policy. The six-page document identified the range of threats that Russia seeks to deter with its nuclear forces, clarified Russia's general approach to nuclear deterrence, and articulated conditions under which Russia might use of nuclear weapons. The policy endorses the use of nuclear weapons in response to a non-nuclear strike due to the improved capabilities of U.S. conventional weapons.

Radiological weapons

The assassination of Alexander Litvinenko by Russian state agents with radioactive polonium was described as the beginning of an era of nuclear terrorism using radiological weapons.

Russian invasion of Ukraine

See also: Nuclear risk during the Russian invasion of Ukraine
Vladimir Putin in September 2022

During the Russian invasion of Ukraine that began in 2022, Russian President Vladimir Putin placed Strategic Rocket Forces's nuclear deterrence units on high alert, a move heavily condemned internationally. Putin warned that "whoever tries to hinder us in Ukraine would see consequences, you have never seen in your history". According to the US Director of National Intelligence, Avril Haines, Putin could potentially turn to nuclear weapons if he perceived an "existential threat" to the Russian state or regime; there has been speculation that he could regard defeat in Ukraine as an existential threat to his regime.

According to a peer-reviewed study published in the journal Nature Food in August 2022, a full-scale nuclear war between the United States and Russia, which together hold more than 90% of the world's nuclear weapons, would kill 360 million people directly and more than 5 billion indirectly by starvation during a nuclear winter.

In September 2022, Putin announced the mobilization of Russian forces, and threatened nuclear retaliation against the west if Russia's territorial integrity was threatened.

On February 21, 2023, Putin suspended Russia's participation in the New START nuclear arms reduction treaty with the United States, saying that Russia would not allow the US and NATO to inspect its nuclear facilities. On March 25, 2023, Putin announced that Russia would be stationing tactical nuclear operations in Belarus. On June 14, 2023, Belarusian President Aleksander Lukashenko stated that Belarus had started to take delivery of nuclear weapons in a TV interview with Russian state channel, Russia-1.

Biological weapons

Main article: Soviet biological weapons program

The Soviet Union covertly operated the world's largest, longest, and most sophisticated biological weapons programs. The program began in the 1920s and lasted until at least September 1992 but has possibly been continued by Russia after that. Thereby, the Soviet Union violated its obligations under the Biological Weapons Convention, which it had signed on April 10, 1972, and ratified on March 26, 1975.

In the early 1970s, the Soviet Union significantly enlarged its offensive biological weapons programs. After 1975, the program of biological weapons was run primarily by the "civilian" Biopreparat agency, although it also included numerous facilities run by the Soviet Ministry of Defense, Ministry of Agriculture, Ministry of Chemical Industry, Ministry of Health, and Soviet Academy of Sciences.

According to Ken Alibek, who was deputy-director of Biopreparat, the Soviet biological weapons agency, and who defected to the United States in 1992, weapons were developed in labs in isolated areas of the Soviet Union including mobilization facilities at Omutninsk, Penza and Pokrov and research facilities at Moscow, Stirzhi and Vladimir. These weapons were tested at several facilities most often at "Rebirth Island" (Vozrozhdeniya) in the Aral Sea by firing the weapons into the air above monkeys tied to posts, the monkeys would then be monitored to determine the effects. According to Alibek, although Soviet offensive program was officially ended in 1992, Russia may be still involved in the activities prohibited by BWC.

In 1993, the story about the Sverdlovsk anthrax leak was published in Russia. The incident occurred when spores of anthrax were accidentally released from a military facility in the city of Sverdlovsk (formerly, and now again, Yekaterinburg) 1,500 km (930 mi) east of Moscow on April 2, 1979. The ensuing outbreak of the disease resulted in 94 people becoming infected, 64 of whom died over a period of six weeks.

In 2022 Russian Ministry of Defense started construction of a new massive facility at Sergiev Posad-6 site that hosted bioweapons research in Soviet times. The site belonging to 48th Central Scientific Research Institute (48 ЦНИИ) of the Russian Ministry of Defense, featuring biological security labs was even featured on Russian TV when a delegation from the ministry, then led by Sergei Shoigu visited it. Also in 2022 the 48th Institute has registered a patent for "protective medium for freeze-drying of Yersinia pestis", a common biological weapon pathogen.

As of 2024, the United States Department of State "assesses that the Russian Federation (Russia) maintains an offensive program and is in violation of its obligation under Articles I and II of the BWC. The issue of compliance by Russia with the BWC has been of concern for many years."

Chemical weapons

Russia signed the Chemical Weapons Convention on January 13, 1993, and ratified it on November 5, 1997. Russia declared an arsenal of 39,967 tons of chemical weapons in 1997 consisting of:

Ratification was followed by three years of inaction on chemical weapons destruction because of the August 1998 Russian financial crisis.

Russia met its treaty obligations by destroying 1% of its chemical agents by the Chemical Weapons Convention's 2002 deadline, but requested technical and financial assistance and extensions on the deadlines of 2004 and 2007 due to the environmental challenges of chemical disposal. This extension procedure spelled out in the treaty has been utilized by other countries, including the United States. The extended deadline for complete destruction (April 2012) was not met. As of October 2011, Russia had destroyed 57% of its stockpile. Russia also destroyed all of its declared Category 2 (10,616 MTs) and Category 3 chemicals.

Russia has stored its chemical weapons (or the required chemicals) which it declared within the CWC at eight locations. In Gorny (Saratov Oblast) (2.9% of the declared stockpile by mass) and Kambarka (Udmurt Republic) (15.9%) stockpiles have already been destroyed. In Shchuchye (Kurgan Oblast) (13.6%), Maradykovsky (Kirov Oblast) (17.4%) and Leonidovka, Bessonovsky District [ru] (Penza Oblast) (17.2%) destruction takes place, while installations are under construction in Pochep (Bryansk Oblast) (18.8%) and Kizner (Udmurt Republic) (14.2%).

The last Russian chemical disposal facility in Kizner, Udmurtia, was opened in December 2013.

On September 27, 2017, OPCW announced that Russia had destroyed its entire declared chemical weapons stockpile, even though they continued using Novichok agents. Ukraine claims Russia used chemical weapons in Mariupol.

Novichok agents

Main article: Novichok agent

A range of Novichok agents were developed and tested in the 1970s and 1980s, but the intended Novichok weapons production site at the Pavlodar Chemical Plant in Soviet Kazakhstan was still under construction when it was decided to demolish the chemical weapons building in 1987 in view of the forthcoming Chemical Weapons Convention.

In March 2018, former GRU agent Sergei Skripal and his daughter were poisoned in Salisbury, United Kingdom by a chemical agent later confirmed to be Novichok. The incident raised new controversy over Russia's potential production and use of chemical weapons, with the United Kingdom accusing the Russian government or rogue Russian agents of orchestrating the attack, a claim Russia repeatedly denied.

In August 2020, Russian opposition figure and anti-corruption activist Alexei Navalny was poisoned in Tomsk, Russia by a chemical agent later confirmed to be Novichok. A joint investigation by Bellingcat, CNN, Der Spiegel, and The Insider with contributions from El País implicates Russia's Federal Security Service (FSB) in the near-fatal nerve-agent poisoning, a fact denied by Russia. Navalny later called what appears to be one of the FSB agents responsible for the cleanup operation who indicates they were tasked to clean Navalny's underpants of Novichok.

Another Russia chemical weapon is Kolokol-1, an aerosolized opioid incapacitating agent though to be carfentanil.

Use during the invasion of Ukraine

In the Russian invasion of Ukraine, Russian forces reportedly used chemical weapons 465 times between February 24, 2022, and December 2023, usually as tear gas grenades. In May 2023, a television report on Russia's Channel One showed a Russian battalion commander talking about the effectiveness of chemicals used as weapons. The report also showed a drone dropping a tear gas grenade on a dugout. In December 2023, the Russian 810th Guards Naval Infantry Brigade wrote about its use of drones to drop K-51 grenades containing CS tear gas on Ukrainian positions. The use of tear gas is banned by international Chemical Weapons Convention and considered a chemical weapon if applied by military forces during warfare. The United States accused Russia of also using Chloropicrin as a chemical weapon in Ukraine.

See also

References

  1. Sublette, Carey (December 12, 1997). "The Soviet Nuclear Weapons Program". nuclearweaponarchive.org. nuclearweaponarchives. Retrieved April 20, 2017.
  2. "Russian nuclear weapons, 2024".
  3. "Army 2019: Russian army discloses RS-28 Sarmat ICBM characteristics". Army Recognition. July 2, 2019.
  4. ^ "Status of World Nuclear Forces". Federation Of American Scientists FAS.
  5. "Nuclear Weapons: Who Has What at a Glance". Armscontrol.org.
  6. Kristensen, Hans M.; Norris, Robert S. (2006). "Global nuclear stockpiles, 1945–2006". Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. Vol. 62, no. 4. pp. 64–66. Bibcode:2006BuAtS..62d..64N. doi:10.2968/062004017. S2CID 145147992.
  7. "Disarmament Treaties Database: 1925 Geneva Protocol". United Nations Office for Disarmament Affairs. Retrieved February 7, 2021.
  8. "Disarmament Treaties Database: Biological Weapons Convention". United Nations Office for Disarmament Affairs. Retrieved February 16, 2021.
  9. "Disarmament Treaties Database: Chemical Weapons Convention". United Nations Office for Disarmament Affairs. Retrieved February 7, 2021.
  10. ^ Leitenberg, M., Zilinskas, R., & Kuhn, J. (2012). "Conclusion". In The Soviet Biological Weapons Program (pp. 698–712). Cambridge, Massachusetts; London, England: Harvard University Press. Retrieved February 7, 2021, from JSTOR j.ctt2jbscf.30
  11. ^ "Russia profile". Nuclear Threat Initiative – NTI.org. 2009. Archived from the original on June 5, 2011. Retrieved September 17, 2010.
  12. ^ "Opening Statement by the Director-General to the Conference of the States Parties at its Sixteenth Session". OPCW. November 28, 2011. Retrieved May 1, 2012.
  13. "Syria, Russia, and the Global Chemical Weapons Crisis". Arms Control Association. Retrieved March 1, 2022.
  14. ^ Field, Matt (March 15, 2024). "Russia appears to be using chemical weapons in Ukraine. And admitting it". Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. Retrieved March 23, 2024.
  15. "The Budapest Memorandum and Crimea". VOA News. March 2, 2014. Retrieved October 24, 2014.
  16. ^ "START I". Nuclear Threat Initiative. Retrieved March 1, 2022.
  17. "START II". Nuclear Threat Initiative. Retrieved March 1, 2022.
  18. "SORT". Nuclear Threat Initiative. Retrieved March 1, 2022.
  19. "New START at a Glance". Arms Control Association. Retrieved March 1, 2022.
  20. Majumdar, Dave (March 1, 2018). "Russia's Nuclear Weapons Buildup Is Aimed at Beating U.S. Missile Defenses". The National Interest. USA. Retrieved October 26, 2018.
  21. "122 countries adopt 'historic' UN treaty to ban nuclear weapons". CBC News. July 7, 2017.
  22. "Russia may have violated the INF Treaty. Here's how the United States appears to have done the same". Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. February 7, 2019.
  23. Kramer, Andrew E. (May 12, 2016). "Russia Calls New U.S. Missile Defense System a 'Direct Threat'". The New York Times.
  24. Hurlbert, Heather (October 26, 2018). "Russia Violated an Arms Treaty. Trump Ditched It, Making the Nuclear Threat Even Worse". New York Magazine. USA. Retrieved October 26, 2018.
  25. Andrew Osborn (November 2, 2023). "Putin withdraws Russia's ratification of global nuclear test ban treaty". Reuters.
  26. Cirincione, Joseph (October 22, 2013). Nuclear Nightmares: Securing the World Before It Is Too Late. New York: Columbia University Press. p. 53. ISBN 978-0-231-16404-7. Retrieved March 15, 2022.
  27. "Russian Nuclear Weapons, 2024". The Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists..
  28. ^ Новую тяжелую ракету "Сармат" будут делать в Красноярске Rossiyskaya Gazeta, 2 Feb 2015.
  29. "MilitaryRussia.Ru — отечественная военная техника (после 1945г.) | Статьи". militaryrussia.ru.
  30. Gady, Franz-Stefan (January 12, 2016). "Russia to Test-Launch 16 Intercontinental Ballistic Missiles in 2016". The Diplomat.
  31. "SS-30 ?? / R-X-? Sarmat New Heavy ICBM". globalsecurity.org. Archived from the original on February 5, 2020. Retrieved January 17, 2015.
  32. "Russia plans new ICBM to replace Cold War 'Satan' missile". Reuters World. Reuters. December 17, 2013. Retrieved January 17, 2015.
  33. Минобороны рассказало о тяжелой баллистической ракете – неуязвимом для ПРО ответе США [The Ministry of Defense spoke about a heavy ballistic missile – an invulnerable response to the US missile defense]. NewsRu. May 31, 2014.
  34. John Pike. "Status-6 Ocean Multipurpose System".
  35. ^ Why A Russian Super-Radioactive Atomic Torpedo Isn't The News You Think It Is
  36. ^ "Russia reveals nuclear torpedo plan". BBC News. November 12, 2015.
  37. ^ Gady, Franz-Stefan (November 2015). "Revealed: Russia's Top Secret Nuclear Torpedo". The Diplomat.
  38. ^ "Russian Mystery Submarine Likely Deployment Vehicle for New Nuclear Torpedo". USNI News December 4, 2015.
  39. Shukla, Vikas (December 8, 2015). "What Is The Purpose Of Russia's Deadly Status-6 Torpedo". Value Work.
  40. ^ Pifer, Steven (November 18, 2015). "Russia's perhaps-not-real super torpedo". Brookings Institution. Retrieved July 5, 2019.
  41. ^ Oliphant, Roland (November 13, 2015). "Secret Russian radioactive doomsday torpedo leaked on television". The Telegraph. Retrieved November 30, 2024.
  42. Lockie, Alex (December 24, 2016). "Trump questions the US's nuclear arsenal: Here's how the US's nukes compare to Russia's". Business Insider. Archived from the original on September 4, 2017. Retrieved December 26, 2016.
  43. "Pentagon Confirms Russia's Thermonuclear Submarine Bomb Is Real". December 8, 2016.
  44. "Putin boasts of new Russian nuclear weapons". ABC News (US). Archived from the original on March 1, 2018. Retrieved January 15, 2022.
  45. "Russia has 'invincible' nuclear weapons". BBC News. March 1, 2018.
  46. Russian military doctrine (in Russian)
  47. Gessen, Masha (October 19, 2018). "Putin Lied About His Nuclear Doctrine and Promised Russians That They Would Go to Heaven". The New Yorker.
  48. "Read the fine print: Russia's nuclear weapon use policy". Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. March 10, 2022.
  49. Blank, Stephen (February 25, 2018). "Getting Russia's nuclear strategy mostly right". The Hill. USA. Retrieved October 26, 2018.
  50. Tyrants and the Bomb Archived June 6, 2009, at the Wayback Machine - by Ion Mihai Pacepa, National Review, October 17, 2006
    • Committee on International Security and Arms Control (January 15, 1994), Management and Disposition of Excess Weapons Plutonium, Washington, DC: National Academies Press, ISBN 978-0-309-05042-5, retrieved December 14, 2023, ... Victor Mikhailov, head of the Russian Ministry of Atomic Energy (MINATOM), reportedly indicated that the Russian ... Mikhailov's figures are ...
    • "Soviet Atom Arsenal Was Larger Than West Estimated". The New York Times. September 26, 1993.
  51. "Russian Officials Deny Claims Of Missing Nuclear Weapons". Retrieved October 24, 2014.
  52. "Nuclear Dangers: Fear Increases of Terrorists Getting Hands on 'Loose' Warheads as Security Slips". October 19, 1997. Archived from the original on December 30, 2013. Retrieved October 24, 2014.
  53. Russia secretly offered North Korea nuclear technology - by a Special Correspondent in Pyongyang and Michael Hirst, Telegraph, September 7, 2006.
  54. "Russia expresses serious concern over DPRK nuke issue". Archived from the original on March 4, 2016. Retrieved October 24, 2014.
  55. Shepeleva, Anastasia (August 28, 2019). "Guardian: Russia pushing 'unsuitable' nuclear power in Africa". Kyiv Post. Retrieved November 30, 2024.
  56. Seddon, Max; Chris, Cook (August 12, 2024). "Russian navy trained to target sites inside Europe with nuclear-capable missiles". Financial Times. Retrieved August 20, 2024.
  57. ^ Stanislav Lunev. Through the Eyes of the Enemy: The Autobiography of Stanislav Lunev, Regnery, 1998. ISBN 0-89526-390-4.
  58. Steve Goldstein and Chris Mondics, "Some Weldon-backed allegations unconfirmed; Among them: A plot to crash planes into a reactor, and missing suitcase-size Soviet atomic weapons". Philadelphia Inquirer (15 March 2006) A7.
  59. Novikova, Inna (March 29, 2004). "Куда исчезли 'ядерные чемоданчики'?". Pravda (in Russian).
  60. "What's in Russia's New Nuclear Deterrence 'Basic Principles'?".
  61. "Revelations about Russia's Nuclear Deterrence Policy". June 19, 2020.
  62. "Putin signs Russia's nuclear deterrent policy". Associated Press. April 21, 2021.
  63. "Ushering in the era of nuclear terrorism", by Patterson, Andrew J. MD, PhD, Critical Care Medicine, v. 35, p. 953-954, 2007.
  64. "Beyond the Dirty Bomb: Re-thinking Radiological Terror", by James M. Acton; M. Brooke Rogers; Peter D. Zimmerman, doi:10.1080/00396330701564760, Survival, Volume 49, Issue 3 September 2007, pp. 151 – 168
  65. Radiological Terrorism: 'Soft Killers' by Morten Bremer Mærli, Bellona Foundation
  66. "West slams Putin 'dangerous rhetoric' after Russian leader puts nuclear forces on alert". 9News. Associated Press. February 28, 2022.
  67. "Putin implies nuclear attack if West interferes in Ukraine. Why it's not just an empty threat". CBC News. February 25, 2022.
  68. "Putin prepping 'prolonged conflict' beyond Donbas, could escalate nuclear threats: Top US intel official". ABC News. May 10, 2022.
  69. Borger, Julian (May 10, 2022). "Putin could use nuclear weapon if he felt war being lost – US intelligence chief". The Guardian.
  70. Xia, Lili; Robock, Alan; Scherrer, Kim; Harrison, Cheryl S.; Bodirsky, Benjamin Leon; Weindl, Isabelle; Jägermeyr, Jonas; Bardeen, Charles G.; Toon, Owen B.; Heneghan, Ryan (August 15, 2022). "Global food insecurity and famine from reduced crop, marine fishery and livestock production due to climate disruption from nuclear war soot injection". Nature Food. 3 (8): 586–596. doi:10.1038/s43016-022-00573-0. hdl:11250/3039288. PMID 37118594. S2CID 251601831.
  71. Diaz-Maurin, François (October 20, 2022). "Nowhere to hide: How a nuclear war would kill you — and almost everyone else". Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists.
  72. "World Nuclear war between the U.S. and Russia would kill more than 5 billion people – just from starvation, study finds". CBS News. August 16, 2022.
  73. Sauer, Pjotr (September 21, 2022). "Putin announces partial mobilisation and threatens nuclear retaliation in escalation of Ukraine war". The Guardian.
  74. "Putin pulls back from last remaining nuclear arms control pact with the US". CNN. February 21, 2023.
  75. "Putin defends Ukraine invasion, warns West in address". NHK World. February 21, 2023. Archived from the original on February 21, 2023.
  76. "Putin Says Russia to Place Tactical Nuclear Arms in Belarus". Bloomberg News. March 25, 2023. Retrieved March 25, 2023.
  77. "Belarus starts taking delivery of Russian nuclear weapons". Reuters. June 14, 2023. Retrieved June 28, 2023.
  78. "Status of the Biological Weapons Convention". United Nations Office for Disarmament Affairs. Retrieved February 7, 2021.
  79. Leitenberg, M., Zilinskas, R., & Kuhn, J. (2012). Beginnings of the “Modern” Soviet BW program, 1970–1977. In The Soviet Biological Weapons Program (pp. 51-78). Cambridge, Massachusetts; London, England: Harvard University Press. Retrieved February 7, 2021, from http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt2jbscf.7
  80. ^ Alibek, K. and S. Handelman. Biohazard: The Chilling True Story of the Largest Covert Biological Weapons Program in the World– Told from Inside by the Man Who Ran it. Delta (2000) ISBN 0-385-33496-6
  81. "Satellite images show major expansion at Russian site with secret bioweapons past". The Washington Post.
  82. Krutov, Mark; Dobrynin, Sergei (December 17, 2024). "Inside A Secret, Expanding Russian Lab Site With A Bioweapons Legacy". Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty. Retrieved December 17, 2024.
  83. "RU2800372C1 - ПРОТЕКТИВНАЯ СРЕДА ДЛЯ СУБЛИМАЦИОННОГО ВЫСУШИВАНИЯ КЛЕТОК Y. PESTIS ШТАММА EV - Яндекс.Патенты". yandex.ru. Retrieved December 17, 2024.
  84. "2024 Arms Control Treaty Compliance Report" (PDF). U.S. Department of State. April 2024. Retrieved November 1, 2024.
  85. "Recent Updates". Archived from the original on April 6, 2004.
  86. "Global Campaign to Destroy Chemical Weapons Passes 60 Percent Mark" Archived July 11, 2010, at the Wayback Machine. OPCW. July 8, 2010. Retrieved August 19, 2010.
  87. "New Chemical Weapons Destruction Facility Opens at Kizner in the Russian Federation". OPCW.
  88. "Путин поучаствовал в уничтожении последнего в России килограмма химоружия". РБК. September 27, 2017. Retrieved January 15, 2018.
  89. "OPCW Director-General Commends Major Milestone as Russia Completes Destruction of Chemical Weapons Stockpile under OPCW Verification". OPCW.
  90. "UK Delegation to the OPCW" (PDF).
  91. Sabbagh, Dan (April 12, 2022). "Did Russia really use chemical weapons in Ukraine? Experts are sceptical". The Guardian.
  92. "Kazakhstan – Chemical". Nuclear Threat Initiative. April 2015. Retrieved March 14, 2018.
  93. Bozheyeva, Gulbarshyn (Summer 2000). "The Pavlodar Chemical Weapons Plant in Kazakhstan: History and Legacy". The Nonproliferation Review. 7 (2): 136–145. doi:10.1080/10736700008436816. ISSN 1073-6700. Retrieved November 30, 2024. PDF file link
  94. "Inspectors back UK in spy poisoning row". BBC News. April 12, 2018.
  95. "The curious case of Yulia Skripal's recorded phone call". Deutsche Welle. April 6, 2018.
  96. "Chemical weapons body confirms nerve agent Novichok in Navalny's blood". reuters.com. October 6, 2020. Retrieved December 22, 2020.
  97. "FSB Team of Chemical Weapon Experts Implicated in Alexey Navalny Novichok Poisoning". Bellingcat Investigations. December 14, 2020. Retrieved December 22, 2020.
  98. Lister, Tim; Ward, Clarissa; Shukla, Sebastian (December 21, 2020). "Russian opposition leader Alexey Navalny dupes spy into revealing how he was poisoned". CNN.com. Retrieved December 22, 2020.
  99. Schwenk M (September 2018). "Chemical warfare agents. Classes and targets". Toxicol Lett. 293: 253–263. doi:10.1016/j.toxlet.2017.11.040. PMID 29197625.
  100. Hambling, David (December 29, 2023). "What We Know About Russian Chemical Weapon Attacks". Forbes. Retrieved March 23, 2024.
  101. Kondrat, Anastasiia (December 27, 2023). "Russia has launched 465 chemical attacks since the start of the full-scale invasion". Svidomi. Retrieved December 27, 2023.
  102. "Выпуск программы «Время» в 21:00, 2 мая 2023 года". May 2, 2023.
  103. Shoaib, Alia (December 24, 2023). "A Russian brigade admits dropping tear gas on Ukrainian troops, which would violate the UN Chemical Weapons Convention". Business Insider.
  104. Murphy, Matt (May 2, 2024). "Russia using chemical choking agents in Ukraine, US says". BBC News. Retrieved May 14, 2024.

Further reading

  • Kostenko, Y., & D’Anieri, P. (2021). Ukraine’s Nuclear Disarmament: A History (S. Krasynska, L. Wolanskyj, & O. Jennings, Trans.). Cambridge: Harvard Ukrainian Research Institute.

External links

Soviet program of nuclear weapons
Sites
Administrators
Scientists
Soviets
Germans
(Russian Alsos)
Spy ring
Intelligence
Related articles
See also: Nuclear weapons program of the Soviet Union
Soviet nuclear weapons
Programs
Fission
Gravity bombs
Thermonuclear
Gravity bombs
Soviet program of biological weapons
Weaponized agents
Researched agents
Operations and projects
Facilities and test sites
Administrators
Scientists
Accidents
Related topics
NATO designation for Russian and former Soviet Union missiles
Air-to-air
(full list)
Air-
to-surface

(full list)
Anti-tank
guided

(full list)
Surface-
to-air

(full list)
Ground-
based
Naval-
based
Anti-
ballistic
Surface-
to-surface

(full list)
Ground-
based
Naval-
based
Ship-
to-ship
Russian Armed Forces
Leadership
Commander-in-Chief of the Aerospace Forces
General
Military
Military districts
Previous
  • Volga–Ural (Volga
  • Ural)
  • North Caucasus
  • Siberian
  • Far Eastern
  • Kaliningrad Special Region
  • Current
    Fleets of the Navy
    Military ranks and insignia
    Services
    Ground Forces troops
    Navy
    Aerospace Forces
    Special Forces
    IndependentAirborne Forces (Commander)  • Strategic Rocket Forces (Commander)
    Logistical Support troops
    Departments in the
    Ministry of Defence
    and General Staff
    Equipment
    Military academy
    Previous
    Current
    Russian invasion of Ukraine
    Part of the Russo-Ukrainian War
    Overview
    General
    Prelude
    Background
    Foreign
    relations
    Military engagements
    Southern
    Ukraine
    Eastern
    Ukraine
    Northern
    Ukraine
    Russia
    Airstrikes
    by city
    Airstrikes
    on military
    targets
    Resistance
    Russian-occupied Ukraine
    Belarus and Russia
    Russian
    occupations
    Ongoing
    Previous
    Potentially
    related
    Other
    War crimes
    General
    Attacks on
    civilians
    Crimes
    against
    soldiers
    Legal cases
    Reactions
    States
    and
    official
    entities
    General
    Ukraine
    Russia
    United States
    Other countries
    United Nations
    International
    organizations
    Other
    Public
    Protests
    Companies
    Technology
    Spies
    Other
    Impact
    Effects
    Human
    rights
    Terms and
    phrases
    Popular
    culture
    Songs
    Films
    Other
    Key people
    Ukrainians
    Russians
    Other
    Related
    Categories: