Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 07:37, 26 December 2024

Back River Wastewater Treatment Plant
Back River in 2008
General information
Status	Operational
Address	8201 Eastern Ave, Baltimore, Maryland, U.S.
Coordinates	39°17′36.3″N 76°29′35.7″W / 39.293417°N 76.493250°W / 39.293417; -76.493250
Groundbreaking	October 23, 1906 (1906-10-23)
Opened	October 27, 1911 (1911-10-27)
Cost	$23 million
Owner	City of Baltimore
Grounds	466 acres (189 ha)

The Back River Wastewater Treatment Plant is a wastewater treatment plant in Baltimore, Maryland, United States. It serves the city of Baltimore, which owns and operates the facility, as well as Baltimore County, Maryland, and discharges treated water into the Back River and the Patapsco River.

History

Early proposals

Several proposals to build a wastewater treatment system in Baltimore were made leading up to the 20th century as the city experienced explosive growth in population and economic production. In the absence of storm sewers, winter storms would cause ice pileups in the city's streets and alleys, impeding the movement of business vehicles and emergency services and thereby increasing the cost of transportation and business in the city. This issue limited Baltimore's ability to attract outside business, as business owners told local officials that they would not move to Baltimore until sewage and other improvements were made to the city's physical plant. National efforts to quarantine people with communicable diseases, especially during smallpox epidemics, contributed to calls to build a sewer system in the city and spurred the creation of the 1893 Baltimore Sewerage Commission.

Baltimore's political systems largely ignored calls to build a city-wide sewer system. The city government was organized along geographic rather than functional lines up until 1898, which contributed to fragmentation in government and limited the mayor's ability to spur the city council to act on behalf of the whole city. Proposals to build a city-wide sewer system also saw opposition from local interest groups, wealthy communities, and the Maryland General Assembly, with the Baltimore City Delegation clashing with other legislators on how much eminent domain power to give to the city to build the sewer system and on the makeup of the sewerage commission board. Other opposition came from those concerned about the estimated $10 million cost of the project and how the city would afford to build the sewer system. Property owners pushed against any changes to the city's tax code to pay for a city-wide sewer system, with wealthier residents fearing that tax code changes may close loopholes that allowed them to evade city taxes by listing their permanent residence in Baltimore County. Proposals to build a city-wide sewer system did not appear viable until 1903, when both gubernatorial and mayoral candidates pledged to support the project.

1905 referendum and construction

1905 Baltimore sewer loan referendum

Choice	Votes	%
Yes	37,177	59.55
No	25,253	40.45
Total votes	62,430	100.00

The Great Baltimore Fire in February 1904 triggered a downtown rebuilding campaign that proved Baltimore's willingness to pursue large projects and renewed a sense of urgency among city officials to compete with other cities for economic development through infrastructure improvements. In April 1905, Baltimore voters approved a referendum permitting a $10 million bond issue to build a municipal sewer system, with 59.6 percent of residents approving the measure. No major organization publicly opposed the referendum, with many newspapers, ministers, businesspersons, and politicians rallying behind the vote. Shortly after it passed, Mayor E. Clay Timanus appointed a commission to determine how the sewer system should be designed; the commission eventually decided on a plan of dual and connected sewers, with one carrying stormwater and the other carrying human and industrial wastes.

On November 4, 1905, Calvin W. Hendrick was unanimously elected as chief engineer for the construction of the Baltimore sewage system. Surveying work for the sewer system started on January 15, 1906, and construction began on October 23, 1906. The sewerage system went into service on October 27, 1911, initially serving about 2,500 homes in northeast Baltimore. Approximately 800 miles of sewer drains were built and more than 100,000 houses were connected to the system by August 1916, at a cost of $23 million.

Function

The Back River Wastewater Treatment Plant is designed to treat 180 million gallons of wastewater per day, but can receive up to 400 million gallons daily with decreased treatment. The plant includes six fine screens to remove large objects from wastewater flowing into the plant, which then makes its way into grit removal basins to settle out sand and other particles; debris removed from the wastewater are taken to the Quarantine Road Landfill in south Baltimore. Next, the wastewater is distributed among eleven primary sedimentation tanks, wherein approximately 65% of organic material settles, which is taken to solid processing while the wastewater continues to Secondary Treatment. In Secondary Treatment, wastewater is transferred into three fine bubble-activated sludge facilities—where microorganisms metabolize organic pollutants and compromise activated sludge, which is separated from the affluent through sedimentation—before making its way to Advanced Treatment, where water is distributed between 48 sand beds, each containing 11 inches of sand, which traps most of the remaining suspended solids. The wastewater finally makes its way into the Final Treatment stage, where it is disinfected, dechlorinated, and aerated before flowing into Back River.

Environmental issues

Back River was selected to receive effluent from the adjacent Wastewater Treatment Plant in the early 1900s because it was in a sparsely populated area and would function as a polishing system for the plant's effluent from its trickling filter process. As time went on and the Baltimore metropolitan area continued to grow, flows increased and the Back River water quality suffered from silt build-ups in the upper tidal portion of the river, especially after the area's post-World War II growth explosion. Despite lawsuit sand other environmental actions, water quality in the Back River remained poor with odors, algal blooms, and floating solids. In fact, before upgrades were completed on the wastewater treatment plant in 1998, algal blooms would sometimes turn the river a shade of iridescent green that would accumulate along the shoreline on windy days. In addition, chlorophyll concentrations in the river would sometimes exceed 200 μg/L and occasionally 300 μg/L; today, chlorophyll concentrations now average 50 to 75 μg/L, which is still above the ideal range of 25 to 35 μg/L.

In 2002, the city of Baltimore entered into a consent decree with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, the U.S. Department of Justice, and the Maryland Department of the Environment, which required the city to upgrade its sewage system and eliminate sewage overflows by 2016. This deadline was later moved back to 2030. In February 2010, the Maryland Department of the Environment identified the Back River Wastewater Treatment Plant as the primary contributor to nutrient inputs to the river, as well as a contributor to water quality degradation in the Back River. Enhanced Nutrient Removal improvements were made to the Back River plant to reduce nutrient inputs through a denitrification process that coverts filtered nutrients to nitrogen gas.

According to a June 2022 report by the Maryland Department of the Environment, the Back River Wastewater Plant has suffered from severe staffing shortages and persistent repair and maintenance issues since 2019, worsened by the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic in Maryland and a 2019 ransomware attack against Baltimore City. In January 2022, the Maryland Department of the Environment and Maryland attorney general Brian Frosh filed a lawsuit against the city of Baltimore, seeking civil penalties against the city and an order requiring the city to take steps that would make the Back River Wastewater Treatment Plant comply with the state's environmental laws. In November 2023, the city of Baltimore and the Department of the Environment reached a settlement that included $4.75 million in civil penalties against the city and required city officials to adopt a timeline for improvements at the Back River plant.

In March 2022, the Maryland Department of Environment conducted an induction of operations at the Back River plant, during which state inspectors found malfunctioning nitrogen filters, heavily amounts of scum at different parts of the plant, and "unacceptable algae and vegetation growth" on equipment meant to treat sewage. Following this, the department issued an order giving the city of Baltimore 48 hours to end illegal discharges of water pollution into the Back River, and a few days later, the department announced that the Maryland Environmental Service would temporarily take control of the Back River Wastewater Treatment Plant. The Maryland Environmental Service was tasked with overseeing the operation, maintenance, and improvements to the plant, ensuring that the city complies with the terms of its discharge agreement, and ceasing all illegal discharges from the plant into the river. By September 2022, the plant was once again complying with federal and state environmental regulations, according to city and state environmental officials.

References

Footnotes

1. This amount is roughly equivalent to $644 million in 2023 when taking into account inflation.

Citations

1. ^ Euchner, Charles C. (1991). "The Politics of Urban Expansion: Baltimore and the Sewerage Question, 1859–1905" (PDF). Maryland Historical Magazine. pp. 270–291. Retrieved June 21, 2024 – via Maryland State Archives.
2. "History of Wastewater Removal and Treatment". Baltimore City Department of Public Works. Retrieved June 21, 2024.
3. "Triumph for loans; council Democratic". The Baltimore Sun. May 3, 1905. Retrieved June 21, 2024 – via Newspapers.com.
4. "Calvin W. Hendrick elected". The Baltimore Sun. November 5, 1905. p. 11. Retrieved September 8, 2024 – via Newspapers.com.
5. "Surveying for sewer work". The Baltimore Sun. January 16, 1906. p. 14. Retrieved September 8, 2024 – via Newspapers.com.
6. "Sewers actually begun". The Baltimore Sun. October 23, 1906. p. 7. Retrieved December 25, 2024 – via Newspapers.com.
7. "Service of great sewers in 10 days". The Evening Sun. October 17, 1911. p. 2. Retrieved December 25, 2024.
8. "All sewer fund spent". The Baltimore Sun. August 30, 1916. p. 14. Retrieved December 25, 2024.
9. "Lower Back River Neck Community Action Plan" (PDF). baltimorecounty.gov. Lower Back River Neck Community Action Plan Advisory Committee. May 3, 2010. p. 33. Retrieved December 25, 2024.
10. Martin, John (Spring 2010). "Back River Water Quality: Some progress, but a long way to go" (PDF). Ecoletter. Retrieved December 25, 2024.
11. Shwe, Elizabeth (May 11, 2021). "Baltimore Water Treatment Plant Upgrade Expected to Dramatically Reduce Sewage Overflows". Maryland Matters. Retrieved December 25, 2024.
12. "Tidal Back River Small Watershed Action Plan" (PDF). mde.maryland.gov. Maryland Department of the Environment. February 2010.
13. "Strategic Plan for MDE Compliance at Back River Wastewater Treatment Plant" (PDF). mde.maryland.gov. Maryland Department of the Environment. 2021. Retrieved December 25, 2024.
14. "Baltimore's Wastewater Treatment Plants". www.cbf.org. Chesapeake Bay Foundation. Retrieved December 25, 2024.
15. Shwe, Elizabeth (January 21, 2022). "Maryland Files Lawsuit Against Baltimore for Wastewater Treatment Plant Failures". Maryland Matters. Retrieved December 25, 2024.
16. Azhar, Aman (November 7, 2023). "Baltimore City, Maryland Department of the Environment Settle Lawsuits Over City-Operated Sewage Treatment Plants". Inside Climate News. Retrieved December 25, 2024.
17. Shwe, Elizabeth (March 25, 2022). "Md. Environment Secretary Orders Baltimore Wastewater Plant to Comply Within 48 Hours". Maryland Matters. Retrieved December 25, 2024.
18. Kurtz, Josh (March 28, 2022). "State to Temporarily Take Control of City's Wastewater Treatment Plant". Maryland Matters. Retrieved December 25, 2024.
19. Kurtz, Josh (September 22, 2022). "Lawmakers tour troubled wastewater treatment plant and ponder more state help". Maryland Matters. Retrieved December 25, 2024.

External links

• Media related to Back River Wastewater Treatment Plant at Wikimedia Commons

v t e City of Baltimore
Topics	Accent Culture Crime Ethnicities Events Film Flag Seal Markets Media Music Neighborhoods People
Attractions	Churches Federal Hill Fells Point Fort McHenry Harborplace Inner Harbor Johns Hopkins Hospital Museums Baltimore Museum of Art Baltimore Streetcar Museum B&O Railroad Museum Public art Maryland Center for History and Culture Maryland Science Center Mount Vernon National Aquarium Port Discovery Ships Skyscrapers Walters Art Museum Washington Monument Zoo
Entertainment	Arch Social Club Charm City Art Space Hammerjack's Hippodrome Lithuanian Hall MECU-Pier Six Meyerhoff Symphony Hall Lyric Ottobar Power Plant Live! Rams Head Live!
Education	Enoch Pratt Free Library Baltimore City Public Schools Private Schools Colleges and Universities City Community College
Government	Mayor (Brandon Scott) City Council City Hall Delegates Senators Archives Courts Fire Health Police Sheriff's Office State's Attorney Transportation State Agencies
History	National Register sites Baltimore City Landmarks Historical timeline Battle of Baltimore Defenders Day Baltimore riot of 1861 Baltimore Crew Great Baltimore Fire Fort Holabird Baltimore riot of 1968 Howard Street Tunnel fire 2015 Baltimore protests Francis Scott Key Bridge collapse
Industry	Back River Wastewater Treatment Plant Baltimore and Ohio Railroad Bethlehem Steel Constellation CoverGirl DeBaufre Bakeries Hecht's Grace Chemicals JoS. A. Bank Clothiers Legg Mason McCormick & Company Schmidt Bakeries T. Rowe Price Royal Farms Under Armour
Parks	Carroll Clifton Cylburn Druid Hill Gwynns Falls Leakin Herring Run Patterson Sherwood Wyman
Sports	Orioles (Camden Yards) Ravens (M&T Bank Stadium) Blast (SECU Arena) Marathon Baltimore Grand Prix Johns Hopkins mens' lacrosse and womens' lacrosse (Homewood Field) Kinetic Race Maryland Cycling Classic Preakness (Pimlico Race Course)
Transportation	Metro SubwayLink Light RailLink Buses MARC Train Penn Station BWI Thurgood Marshall Airport Martin State Airport Port of Baltimore Baltimore Belt Line
Misc.	Baltimore metropolitan area Baltimore–Washington metropolitan area
Baltimore portal Category

• 1911 establishments in Maryland
• Baltimore
• Environment of Maryland
• Government buildings in Baltimore
• Industrial buildings and structures in Maryland
• Sewage treatment plants in the United States
• Waste management in the United States