Misplaced Pages

Rutherford B. Hayes: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 18:32, 9 February 2012 edit198.189.93.5 (talk)No edit summary← Previous edit Latest revision as of 12:18, 26 December 2024 edit undoZero Contradictions (talk | contribs)69 edits Added Georgists Category 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Short description|President of the United States from 1877 to 1881}}
{{Use mdy dates|date=April 2011}}
{{Redirect2|President Hayes|Rutherford Hayes|his son|Rutherford P. Hayes|the Department in Paraguay|Presidente Hayes Department|the attack transport|USS President Hayes{{!}}USS ''President Hayes''}}
{{Infobox Officeholder
{{Featured article}}
|name = Rutherford Hayes
{{Use mdy dates|date= March 2017}}
|image = President Rutherford Hayes 1870 - 1880 Restored.jpg
{{Infobox officeholder
|office = ] ]
| name = Rutherford B. Hayes
|vicepresident = ]
| image = President Rutherford Hayes 1870 - 1880.jpg
|term_start = March 4, 877
| caption = Portrait, {{circa|1870–1880}}
|term_end = March 4, 1991
| order = 19th
|predecessor = ]
| office = President of the United States
|successor = ]
|order2 = ] | vicepresident = ]
| term_start = March 4, 1877
|lieutenant2 = Thomas Dung
|term_start2 = January 10, 1876 | term_end = March 4, 1881
|term_end2 = March 2, 1877 | predecessor = ]
| successor = ]
|predecessor2 = ]
| order1 = 29th and 32nd
|successor2 = ]
| office1 = Governor of Ohio
|lieutenant3 = ]
|term_start3 = January 13, 1868 | term_start1 = January 10, 1876
|term_end3 = January 8, 1872 | term_end1 = March 2, 1877
| lieutenant1 = ]
|predecessor3 = ]
|successor3 = ] | predecessor1 = ]
|state4 = ] | successor1 = Thomas L. Young
| term_start2 = January 12, 1868
|district4 = ]
|term_start4 = March 4, 1865 | term_end2 = January 8, 1872
|term_end4 = July 20, 1867 | lieutenant2 = ]
|predecessor4 = ] | predecessor2 = ]
|successor4 = ] | successor2 = ]
| state3 = ]
|birth_date = {{birth date|1822|10|4}}
| district3 = {{ushr|OH|2|2nd}}
|birth_place = ], ], U.S.
| term_start3 = March 4, 1865
|death_date = {{death date and age|1893|1|17|1822|10|4}}
| term_end3 = July 20, 1867
|death_place = ], ], U.S.
| predecessor3 = ]
|party = ] <small>(1854–1893)</small>
| successor3 = ]
|otherparty = ] <small>(Before 1854)</small>
|spouse = ] | birth_name = Rutherford Birchard Hayes
| birth_date = {{birth date|1822|10|04|mf=y}}
|children = Birchard<br>]<br>Rutherford<br>Joseph<br>George<br>Fanny<br>Scott<br>Manning
| birth_place = ], U.S.
|alma_mater = ]<br>]
| death_date = {{death date and age|1893|01|17|1822|10|04|mf=y}}
|profession = ]
|religion = ] | death_place = ], U.S.
| resting_place = ]
|signature = Rutherford Birchard Hayes Signature.svg
| party = {{plainlist|
|signature_alt = Cursive signature in ink
|allegiance = ]<br>] * ] (until 1854)
|branch = ]<br>] * ] (from 1854)
}}
|serviceyears = 1861–1865
| spouse = {{marriage|]|December 30, 1852|June 25, 1889|end=died}}
|rank = ] ]
|unit = ]<br>] | children = 8, including ] and ]
| relatives = ] (great-great-great grandson)
|battles = ]<br>*]<br> {{*}}]<br> {{*}}]<br> {{*}}]<br> {{*}}]<br> {{*}}]
| education = {{plainlist|
* ] (])
* ] (])
}}
| occupation = {{hlist|Politician|lawyer}}
| signature = Rutherford Birchard Hayes Signature.svg
| signature_alt = Cursive signature in ink
| branch = {{Tree list}}
* ]
** ]
{{Tree list/end}}
| serviceyears = 1861–1865
| rank = {{plainlist|
* ]
* ] (])
}}
| unit_label = Regiments
| unit = ]
| commands = ]
| battles = {{collapsible list|title = {{nobold|''See list''}}|
{{tree list}}
* ]
** ]
** ]
** ]{{WIA}}
**]
**]
**]
**]
**]
**]
**]
{{tree list/end}}
}}
}} }}
'''Rutherford Birchard Hayes''' (October 4, 1822&nbsp;– January 17, 1893) was the ] ] (1877–1881). As president, he oversaw the end of ] and the United States' entry into the ]. Hayes was a reformer who began the efforts that would lead to civil service reform and attempted, unsuccessfully, to reconcile the divisions that had led to the ] fifteen years earlier.


'''Rutherford Birchard Hayes''' ({{IPAc-en|'|r|V|ð|ər|f|ər|d|audio=en-us-Rutherford.oga}}; October 4, 1822 – January 17, 1893) was the 19th ], serving from 1877 to 1881. A staunch ] from ], he was also a ] ] for the ] during the ].
Born in ], Hayes practiced law in Lower Sandusky (now ]) and was city solicitor of ] from 1858 to 1861. When the Civil War began, Hayes left a successful political career to join the ]. Wounded five times, most seriously at the ], he earned a reputation for bravery in combat and was promoted to the rank of ]. After the war, he served in the ] from 1865 to 1867 as a ]. Hayes left Congress to run for ] and was elected to two terms, serving from 1867 to 1871. After his second term had ended, he resumed the practice of law for a time, but returned to politics in 1875 to serve a third term as governor.


As an attorney in Ohio, Hayes served as ]'s city solicitor from 1858 to 1861. He was a staunch ] who defended refugee slaves in court proceedings.<ref>{{Cite web|title= Rutherford B. Hayes|url= https://www.whitehouse.gov/about-the-white-house/presidents/rutherford-b-hayes/|access-date=2021-05-19|website=The White House|language=en-US}}</ref> At the start of the Civil War, he left a fledgling political career to join the Union army as an officer. Hayes was wounded five times, most seriously at the ] in 1862. He earned a reputation for bravery in combat, rising in the ranks to serve as brevet major general. After the war, he earned a reputation in the ] as a prominent member of the "]" faction.<ref>Welch, Richard E., Jr. (1971). ''George Frisbie Hoar and the Half-Breed Republicans'', p. 91. Harvard University Press.</ref> He served in Congress from 1865 to 1867 and was elected governor of Ohio, serving two consecutive terms from 1868 to 1872 and half of a third two-year term from 1876 to 1877 before his swearing-in as president.
In 1876, Hayes was ] in one of the most contentious and hotly disputed elections in American history. Although he lost the popular vote to ] ], Hayes won the presidency by the narrowest of margins after a Congressional commission awarded him twenty disputed electoral votes. The result was the ], in which the Democrats acquiesced to Hayes's election and Hayes accepted the end of military occupation of the South.


Hayes won the Republican nomination for president in the ]. In the disputed{{sfn|Robinson|2001|pp=127–128}}{{sfnm|Robinson|2001|1pp=182–184|Foner|2002|2pp=580–581}} general election, he defeated ] nominee ] while losing the popular vote. Initially, neither candidate secured enough electoral votes to win the election, but Hayes prevailed after a ] awarded him 20 contested electoral votes in the ]. The electoral dispute was resolved in a backroom deal whereby both Southern Democrats and ] Republican businessmen acquiesced to Hayes's election on the condition that he end both federal support for ] and the military occupation of the former ].<ref>{{Cite web |title= "Betrayal of the Freedman: Rutherford B. Hayes and the End of Reconstruction"|url= https://www.rbhayes.org/hayes/betrayal-of-the-freedman-rutherford-b.-hayes-and-the-end-of-reconstruction/ |access-date= 2021-05-19|website= Rutherford B. Hayes Presidential Library & Museums|language= en}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|title=America's Gilded Age: Robber Barons and Captains of Industry|url=https://online.maryville.edu/business-degrees/americas-gilded-age/|access-date=2022-02-21|website=Maryville Online|language=en-US}}</ref>
Hayes believed in meritocratic government, equal treatment without regard to race, and improvement through education. He ordered federal troops to quell the ] and ordered them out of Southern capitals as Reconstruction ended. He implemented modest civil service reforms that laid the groundwork for further reform in the 1880s and 1890s. Hayes kept his pledge not to run for re-election. He retired to his home in Ohio and became an advocate of social and educational reform.


Hayes's administration was influenced by his belief in ] government and equal treatment without regard to wealth, social standing, or race. One of the defining events of his presidency was the ], which he resolved by calling in the ] against the railroad workers. It remains the deadliest conflict between workers and strikebreakers in American history. As president, Hayes implemented modest civil-service reforms that laid the groundwork for further reform in the 1880s and 1890s. He vetoed the ], which put silver money into circulation and raised nominal prices, but Congress overrode his veto. His policy toward western ] anticipated the assimilationist program of the ]. At the end of his term, Hayes kept his pledge not to run for reelection and retired to his home in Ohio. Historians and scholars generally ] Hayes as an average to below-average president.
==Family and early life==
===Childhood and family history===
Rutherford Birchard Hayes was born in ], ], on October 4, 1822, the son of Rutherford Hayes and Sophia Birchard. Hayes's father, a ] storekeeper, took the family to Ohio in 1817 but died ten weeks before his son's birth.<ref name=hoog7>], pp. 7–8</ref> Sophia took charge of the family, bringing up Hayes and his sister, Fanny, the only two of her four children to survive to adulthood.<ref name=hoog7/> She never remarried.<ref>], p. 10; ], pp. 76–77</ref> Sophia's younger brother, Sardis Birchard, lived with the family for a time.<ref>], p. 4</ref> Always close to Hayes, Sardis Birchard became a father figure to him, contributing to his early education.<ref>], pp. 20–21; ], pp. 27–31</ref>


== Early life and family ==
]
Through both his father and mother, Hayes was of ] colonial ancestry.<ref>], p. 41</ref> His earliest American ancestor emigrated to ] from ] in 1625.<ref>], p. 3</ref> Hayes's great-grandfather, Ezekiel Hayes, was a militia captain in Connecticut in the ], but Ezekiel's son (Hayes's grandfather, also named Rutherford) left his ] home during the war for the relative peace of Vermont.<ref>], p. 53</ref> His mother's ancestors arrived in Vermont at a similar time, and most of his close relatives outside Ohio would continue to live there. ], an uncle by marriage, had been his father's business partner in Vermont and was later elected to Congress.<ref name=hoog17>], pp. 17–18</ref> His first cousin, Mary Jane Noyes Mead, was the mother of sculptor ] and architect ].<ref name=hoog17/> ], the founder of the ], was also a first cousin.<ref>], pp. 62–63; ], p. 113</ref>


===Education and early law career=== === Childhood and family history ===
<!--]]]-->
Hayes attended the ]s in Delaware, Ohio, and enrolled in 1836 at the ] ] in ], Ohio.<ref>], pp. 4–5</ref> He did well at Norwalk, and the following year transferred to a ] in ], Connecticut, where he studied ] and ].<ref>], pp. 20–22; ], p. 5</ref> Returning to Ohio, Hayes entered ] in ] in 1838.<ref>], p. 25</ref> He enjoyed his time at Kenyon, and was successful scholastically;<ref>], pp. 107–113</ref> while there, he joined several student societies and became interested in ] politics.<ref>], pp. 33–43</ref> He graduated with highest honors in 1842 and addressed the class as its ].<ref>], p. 6</ref>
Rutherford Birchard Hayes was born in ], on October 4, 1822, to Rutherford Ezekiel Hayes, Jr. and Sophia Birchard. Hayes's father, a ] storekeeper, had taken the family to Ohio in 1817. He died ten weeks before Rutherford's birth. Sophia took charge of the family, raising Hayes and his sister, Fanny, the only two of the four children to survive to adulthood.{{sfn|Hoogenboom|1995|pp=7–8}} She never remarried,{{sfnm|Hoogenboom|1995|1p=10|Barnard|2005|2pp=76–77}} and Sophia's younger brother, Sardis Birchard, lived with the family for a time.{{sfn|Trefousse|2002|p=4}} He was always close to Hayes and became a father figure to him, contributing to his early education.{{sfnm|Hoogenboom|1995|1pp=20–21|Barnard|2005|2pp=27–31}}


Through each of his parents, Hayes was descended from ] colonists.{{sfn|Barnard|2005|p=41}} His earliest immigrant ancestor came to ] from ].{{sfn|Trefousse|2002|p=3}} Hayes's great-grandfather Ezekiel Hayes was a militia captain in Connecticut in the ], but Ezekiel's son (Hayes's grandfather, also named Rutherford) left his ] home during the war for the relative peace of Vermont.{{sfn|Barnard|2005|p=53}} His mother's ancestors migrated to Vermont at a similar time. Hayes wrote: "I have always thought of myself as Scotch, but of the fathers of my family who came to America about thirty were English and two only, Hayes and Rutherford, were of Scotch descent. This is on my father's side. On my mother's side, the whole thirty-two were probably all of other peoples besides the Scotch."<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.rbhayes.org/hayes/hayes-family-genealogy/|title = Hayes Family Genealogy}}</ref> Most of his close relatives outside Ohio continued to live there. ], an uncle by marriage, had been his father's business partner in Vermont and was later elected to Congress.{{sfn|Hoogenboom|1995|pp=17–18}} His first cousin, Mary Jane Mead, was the mother of sculptor ] and architect ].{{sfn|Hoogenboom|1995|pp=17–18}} ], the founder of the ], was also a first cousin.{{sfnm|Hoogenboom|1995|1pp=62–63|Barnard|2005|2p=113}}
After briefly ] in ], Ohio, Hayes moved east once more to attend ] in 1843.<ref>], pp. 43–51; ], pp. 131–138</ref> Graduating with an ], he was admitted to the Ohio ] in 1845 and opened his own law office in Lower Sandusky (now ]).<ref>], pp. 52–53</ref> Business was slow at first, but he gradually attracted a few clients and also represented his uncle Sardis in real estate litigation.<ref>], pp. 55–60</ref> In 1847, Hayes became ill with what his doctor thought to be ]. Thinking a change in climate would help, he considered enlisting in the ], but on his doctor's advice he instead visited family in New England.<ref>], pp. 62–66</ref> Returning from there, Hayes and his uncle Sardis made another long journey to ], where Hayes visited with ], a Kenyon classmate and distant relative.<ref>], pp. 66–70; ], p. 114</ref> Business remained meager on his return to Lower Sandusky, and Hayes decided to move to ].<ref>], p. 8</ref>


===Cincinnati law practice and marriage=== === Education and early law career ===
]
Hayes moved to Cincinnati in 1850, and opened a law office with John W. Herron, a lawyer from ].<ref>], p. 73.</ref>{{#tag:ref|Herron's daughter, ], would later marry ].<ref>], p. 167</ref>|group=note}} Later, Herron joined a more established firm and Hayes formed a new partnership with William K. Rogers and Richard M. Corwine.<ref name=barn184>], pp. 184–185</ref> Hayes found business better in Cincinnati, and enjoyed the social attractions of the larger city, joining the ] and the ].<ref name=hoog74>], pp. 74–75</ref> He also attended the ] in Cincinnati but did not become a member.<ref name=hoog74/> Hayes courted his future wife, ], during his time there.<ref name=hoog78>], pp. 78–86</ref> His mother had encouraged him to get to know Lucy years earlier, but Hayes had believed she was too young and focused his attention on other women.<ref>], pp. 61–62</ref> Four years later, Hayes began to spend more time with Lucy. They became engaged in 1851 and married on December 30, 1852, at the house of Lucy's mother.<ref name=hoog78/> Over the next five years, Lucy gave birth to three sons: Birchard Austin (1853), ] (1856), and Rutherford Platt (1858).<ref name=barn184/> Lucy, a ], ], and ], influenced her husband's views on those issues, although he never formally joined her church.<ref>], pp. 178–180, 187–188; ], pp. 93–95</ref>


Hayes attended the ]s in Delaware, Ohio, and enrolled in 1836 at the ] ] in ].{{sfn|Trefousse|2002|pp=4–5}} He did well at Norwalk, and the next year transferred to the Webb School, a ] in ], Connecticut, where he studied ] and ].{{sfnm|Hoogenboom|1995|1pp=20–22|Trefousse|2002|2p=5}} Returning to Ohio, he attended ] in ] in 1838.{{sfn|Hoogenboom|1995|p=25}} He enjoyed his time at Kenyon and was successful scholastically;{{sfn|Barnard|2005|pp=107–113}} while there, he joined several student societies and became interested in ] politics. His classmates included ] and ].<ref name="Topping1"> ''John Zachos Cincinnatian from Constantinople'' The Cincinnati Historical Society Bulletin Volumes 33–34 Cincinnati Historical Society 1975: p. 51</ref>{{sfn|Hoogenboom|1995|pp=33–43}} He graduated ] with the highest honors in 1842 and addressed the class as its ].{{sfn|Trefousse|2002|p=6}}
Hayes had begun his law practice dealing primarily with commercial cases but won greater prominence in Cincinnati as a criminal defense attorney,<ref>], p. 9</ref> defending several people accused of murder.<ref>], pp. 87–93</ref> In one, he used a form of the ] that saved the accused from the ], confining her instead to a mental institution.<ref>], p. 10</ref> Hayes found his services requested to defend escaped slaves accused under the recently passed ].<ref>], pp. 95–99; ], pp. 189–191</ref> As Cincinnati was just across the ] from ], a slave state, many such cases were tried in its courts. A staunch abolitionist, Hayes found his work on behalf of fugitive slaves personally gratifying as well as politically useful, as it raised his profile in the newly formed ].<ref>], pp. 196–197; ], pp. 14–15</ref> His political reputation rose with his professional plaudits. Hayes declined the Republican nomination for a judgeship in 1856.<ref>], p. 100</ref> Two years later, some Republicans proposed Hayes to fill a vacancy on the bench and he considered accepting the appointment until the office of ] also became vacant.<ref>], pp. 104–105; ], pp. 202–203</ref> The city council elected Hayes to fill the vacancy, and he won a full two-year term from the voters in April 1859 with a larger majority than other Republicans on the ].<ref>], p. 107; ], p. 204</ref>
{{-}}


After briefly ] in ], Ohio, Hayes moved east to attend ] in 1843.{{sfnm|Hoogenboom|1995|1pp=43–51|Barnard|2005|2pp=131–138}} Graduating with an ], he was ] to the Ohio bar in 1845 and opened his own law office in Lower Sandusky (now ]).{{sfn|Hoogenboom|1995|pp=52–53}} Business was slow at first, but he gradually attracted clients and also represented his uncle Sardis in real estate litigation.{{sfn|Hoogenboom|1995|pp=55–60}} In 1847 Hayes became ill with what his doctor thought was ]. Thinking a change in climate would help, he considered enlisting in the ], but on his doctor's advice instead visited family in New England.{{sfn|Hoogenboom|1995|pp=62–66}} Returning from there, Hayes and his uncle Sardis made a long journey to ], where Hayes visited with ], a Kenyon classmate and distant relative.{{sfnm|Hoogenboom|1995|1pp=66–70|Barnard|2005|2p=114}} Business remained meager on his return to Lower Sandusky, and Hayes decided to move to ].{{sfn|Trefousse|2002|p=8}}
==Civil War==
]


===West Virginia and South Mountain=== === Cincinnati law practice and marriage ===
Hayes moved to Cincinnati in 1850, and opened a law office with John W. Herron, a lawyer from ].{{sfn|Hoogenboom|1995|p=73}}{{efn|Herron's daughter, ], later married ].{{sfn|Barnard|2005|p=167}}}} Herron later joined a more established firm and Hayes formed a new partnership with William K. Rogers and Richard M. Corwine.{{sfn|Barnard|2005|pp=184–185}} He found business better in Cincinnati and enjoyed its social attractions, joining the ] and the ].{{sfn|Hoogenboom|1995|pp=74–75}} He also attended the ] in Cincinnati but did not become a member.{{sfn|Hoogenboom|1995|pp=74–75}}
As the Southern states began to secede after ]'s election to the Presidency in 1860, Hayes was lukewarm on the idea of a ] to restore the Union. Considering that the two sides might be irreconcilable, he suggested that the Union "et them go."<ref>], p. 113; ], p. 210</ref> Although Ohio had voted for Lincoln in 1860, the Cincinnati voters turned against the Republican party after secession, and the Democrats and ]s combined to sweep the city elections in April 1861, ejecting Hayes from the city solicitor's office.<ref name=hoog114>], p. 114; ], pp. 210–212</ref> Hayes formed a new law partnership with ] and returned to private practice.<ref name=hoog114/> After the ] ], Hayes resolved his doubts and joined a volunteer company composed of his Literary Society friends.<ref>], p. 115; ], pp. 213–214</ref> That June, Governor ] appointed several of the officers of the volunteer company to positions in the ]. Hayes was promoted to ], and his friend and college classmate ] was appointed ];<ref name=hoog116>], pp. 116–117</ref> also joining the regiment as a ] was another future president, ].<ref name=hoog116/>


]
After a month of training, Hayes and the 23rd Ohio set out for western Virginia in July 1861 as a part of the ].<ref>], pp. 120–121</ref> They passed the next few months out of contact with the enemy until September, when the regiment encountered Confederates at ] in present-day ] and drove them back.<ref>], pp. 125–126; ], p. 160</ref> In November, Hayes was promoted to lieutenant colonel (Matthews having been promoted to colonel of another regiment) and led his troops deeper into western Virginia, where they entered winter quarters.<ref>], pp. 128–130</ref> The division resumed its advance the following spring, and Hayes led several raids against the rebel forces, on one of which he sustained a minor injury to his knee.<ref>], pp. 136–141</ref> That September, Hayes's regiment was called east to reinforce General ]'s ] at the ].<ref name=hoog141>], pp. 141–143</ref> Although Hayes and his troops did not arrive in time for the battle, they joined the ] as it hurried north to cut off ]'s ], which was advancing into ].<ref name=hoog141/> Marching north, the 23rd was the lead regiment encountering the Confederates at the ] on September 14.<ref>], pp. 146–148</ref> Hayes led a charge against an entrenched position and was shot through his left arm, fracturing the bone.<ref>], pp. 146–147; ], p. 161</ref> The regiment continued on to ], but Hayes was out of action for the rest of the campaign.<ref>], pp. 149–153</ref> In October, he was promoted to ] and assigned to command of the first brigade of the Kanawha Division as a ] ].<ref>], p. 30</ref>


Hayes courted his future wife, ], during his time there.{{sfn|Hoogenboom|1995|pp=78–86}} His mother had encouraged him to get to know Lucy years earlier, but Hayes had believed she was too young and focused his attention on other women.{{sfn|Hoogenboom|1995|pp=61–62}} Four years later, Hayes began to spend more time with Lucy. They became engaged in 1851 and married on December 30, 1852, at Lucy's mother's house.{{sfn|Hoogenboom|1995|pp=78–86}} Over the next five years, Lucy gave birth to three sons: Birchard Austin (1853), ] (1856), and ] (1858).{{sfn|Barnard|2005|pp=184–185}} A ], Lucy was a ] and ]. She influenced her husband's views on those issues, though he never formally joined her church.{{sfnm|Barnard|2005|1pp=178–180, 187–188|Hoogenboom|1995|2pp=93–95}}
===Army of the Shenandoah===
] was Hayes's commander and the namesake of his fourth son.]]
The division spent the following winter and spring near ] (present-day West Virginia), out of contact with the enemy.<ref>], pp. 154–156</ref> Hayes saw little action until July 1863, when the division skirmished with ]'s cavalry at the ].<ref>], pp. 157–158</ref> Returning to Charleston for the rest of the summer, Hayes spent the fall encouraging the men of the 23rd Ohio to re-enlist, and many did so.<ref name=hoog159>], pp. 159–161</ref> In 1864, the Army command structure in West Virginia was reorganized, and Hayes's division was assigned to ]'s ].<ref name=hoog159/> Advancing into southwestern Virginia, they destroyed Confederate salt and lead mines there.<ref name=hoog162>], pp. 162–164; ], pp. 32–33</ref> On May 9, they engaged Confederate troops at ], where Hayes and his men charged the enemy entrenchments and drove the rebels from the field.<ref name=hoog162/> Following the rout, the Union forces destroyed Confederate supplies and skirmished with the enemy again successfully.<ref name=hoog162/>


Hayes had begun his law practice dealing primarily with commercial issues but won greater prominence in Cincinnati as a criminal defense attorney,{{sfn|Trefousse|2002|p=9}} defending several people accused of murder.{{sfn|Hoogenboom|1995|pp=87–93}} In one case, he used a form of the ] that saved the accused from the gallows; she was instead confined to a mental institution.{{sfn|Trefousse|2002|p=10}} Hayes also defended slaves who had escaped and been accused under the ].{{sfnm|Hoogenboom|1995|1pp=95–99|Barnard|2005|2pp=189–191}} Because Cincinnati was just across the ] from ], a slave state, it was a destination for escaping slaves, and many such cases were tried in its courts. A staunch abolitionist, Hayes found his work on behalf of fugitive slaves personally gratifying as well as politically useful, as it raised his profile in the newly formed ].{{sfnm|Barnard|2005|1pp=196–197|Trefousse|2002|2pp=14–15}}
Hayes and his brigade moved to the ] for the ]. Crook's corps was attached to Major General ]'s ] and soon back in contact with Confederate forces, capturing ] on June 11.<ref name=hoog166>], pp. 166–168</ref> They continued south toward ], tearing up railroad track as they advanced.<ref name=hoog166/> Hunter believed the troops at Lynchburg were too powerful, however, and Hayes and his brigade returned to West Virginia.<ref name=hoog166/> Hayes thought that Hunter lacked aggression, writing in a letter home that "General Crook would have taken Lynchburg."<ref name=hoog166/> Before the army could make another attempt, Confederate General ]'s raid into Maryland forced their recall to the north. Early's army surprised them at ] on July 24, where Hayes was slightly wounded from a bullet to the shoulder.<ref name=hoog168>], pp. 168–169</ref> Hayes also had a horse shot out from under him, and the army was defeated.<ref name=hoog168/> Retreating into Maryland, the army was reorganized again, with Major General ] replacing Hunter.<ref>], pp. 170–171</ref> By August, Early was retreating down the valley, with Sheridan in pursuit. Hayes's troops fended off a Confederate assault at ] and advanced to ], where they broke the enemy lines and pursued them farther south.<ref>], pp. 172–173</ref> They followed up the victory with another at ] on September 22, and one more at ] on October 19.<ref name=hoog174>], pp. 174–177</ref> At Cedar Creek, Hayes sprained his ankle after being thrown from a horse and was struck in the head by a spent round, which did not cause serious damage.<ref name=hoog174/> Hayes's conduct drew the attention of his superiors, with ] later writing of Hayes that "is conduct on the field was marked by conspicuous gallantry as well as the display of qualities of a higher order than that of mere personal daring."<ref>], p. 564</ref>


Hayes's political reputation rose with his professional plaudits. He declined a Republican nomination for a judgeship in 1856.{{sfn|Hoogenboom|1995|p=100}} Two years later, some Republicans proposed that Hayes fill a vacancy on the bench, and he considered accepting the appointment until the office of ] also became vacant.{{sfnm|Hoogenboom|1995|1pp=104–105|Barnard|2005|2pp=202–203}} The city council elected Hayes city solicitor to fill the vacancy, and he was elected to a full two-year term in April 1859 by a larger majority than other Republicans on the ticket.{{sfnm|Hoogenboom|1995|1p=107|Barnard|2005|2p=204}}
Cedar Creek marked the end of the campaign. Hayes was promoted to ] in October 1864 and brevetted ].<ref>], pp. 178–181</ref> Around this time, Hayes learned of the birth of another son, George Crook Hayes. The army went into winter quarters once more, and in spring 1865 the war quickly came to a close with Lee's surrender to Grant at Appomattox. Hayes visited ] that May and observed the ], after which he and the 23rd Ohio returned to their home state to be mustered out of the service.<ref>], pp. 186–188</ref>


==Post-war politics== == Civil War ==
]
===Congressman===
] and congressional Republicans disagreed vehemently over Reconstruction.]]
While serving in the Army of the Shenandoah in 1864, Hayes received the Republican nomination to the ] from ].<ref name=hoog171>], pp. 171–176; ], pp. 225–227</ref> Asked by friends in Cincinnati to leave the army to campaign, Hayes refused, saying that an "officer fit for duty who at this crisis would abandon his post to electioneer for a seat in Congress ought to be scalped."<ref name=hoog171/> Instead, Hayes wrote several letters to the voters explaining his political positions and was elected by a 2,400-vote majority over the incumbent Democrat, ].<ref name=hoog171/>


=== West Virginia and South Mountain ===
When the ] assembled in December 1865, Hayes was sworn in as a part of a large Republican majority. Hayes identified with the moderate wing of the party, but was willing to vote with the ] for the sake of party unity.<ref>], pp. 200–201; ], pp. 145–180</ref> The major legislative effort of the Congress was the ], for which Hayes voted and which passed both houses of Congress in June 1866.<ref>], pp. 200–201; ], pp. 41–44; ], pp. 17–18</ref> Hayes's beliefs were in line with his fellow Republicans on ] issues: that the South should be restored to the Union, but not without adequate protections for freedmen and other black southerners.<ref name=hoog203>], p. 203; ], pp. 40–41</ref> President ], to the contrary, wanted to readmit the seceded states quickly without first ensuring that they adopted laws protecting the newly freed slaves' civil rights and granted pardons to many of the leading former Confederates.<ref name=hoog203/> Hayes, along with congressional Republicans, disagreed. They worked to reject Johnson's vision of Reconstruction and to pass the ].<ref>], pp. 197–199; ], p. 42</ref> Re-elected in 1866, Hayes returned to the ] to vote for the ], which ensured that Johnson could not remove administration officials without the Senate's consent.<ref name=hoog204>], pp. 204–205</ref> He also voted for a ] bill that attracted the votes of many reform-minded Republicans, but did not pass.<ref>], pp. 204–205; ], pp. 493–494</ref> Hayes continued to vote with the majority in the ] on the ], but resigned in July 1867 to campaign for governor.<ref>], pp. 208–210</ref>
As the Southern states quickly began to secede after ]'s election to the presidency in 1860, Hayes was lukewarm about ] to restore the Union. Considering that the two sides might be irreconcilable, he suggested that the Union "et them go."{{sfnm|Hoogenboom|1995|1p=113|Barnard|2005|2p=210}} Though Ohio had voted for Lincoln in 1860, Cincinnati voters turned against the Republican party after secession. Its residents included many from the ], and they voted for the Democrats and ]s, who combined to sweep the city elections in April 1861, ejecting Hayes from the city solicitor's office.{{sfnm|Hoogenboom|1995|1p=114|Barnard|2005|2pp=210–212}}


Returning to private practice, Hayes formed a very brief law partnership with ], lasting three days before the war began.{{sfnm|Hoogenboom|1995|1p=114|Barnard|2005|2pp=210–212}} After the ] ], Hayes resolved his doubts and joined a volunteer company composed of his Literary Society friends.{{sfnm|Hoogenboom|1995|1p=115|Barnard|2005|2pp=213–214}} That June, Governor ] appointed several of the officers of the volunteer company to positions in the ]. Hayes was promoted to ], and his friend and college classmate ] was appointed ].{{sfn|Hoogenboom|1995|pp=116–117}} Joining the regiment as a ] was another future president, ].{{sfn|Hoogenboom|1995|pp=116–117}}
===Governor of Ohio===
A popular Congressman and former soldier, Hayes was considered by Ohio Republicans to be an excellent standard-bearer for the 1867 election campaign.<ref name=hoog201>], pp. 211–213; ], pp. 45–46</ref> Hayes's political views were more moderate than the Republican party's platform, although he agreed with the proposed amendment to the Ohio state constitution that would guarantee suffrage to black Ohioans.<ref name=hoog201/> Hayes's opponent, ], made the proposed amendment the centerpiece of the campaign, and both men campaigned vigorously, making speeches across the state, mostly focusing on the suffrage question.<ref name=hoog201/> The election was mostly a disappointment to Republicans, as the amendment failed to pass and Democrats gained a majority in the ].<ref name=hoog214>], p. 214; ], pp. 238–239</ref> Hayes thought at first that he, too, had lost, but the final tally showed that he had won the election by 2,983 votes of 484,603 votes cast.<ref name=hoog214/>


After a month of training, Hayes and the 23rd Ohio set out for western Virginia in July 1861 as a part of the ].{{sfn|Hoogenboom|1995|pp=120–121}} They did not meet the enemy until September, when the regiment encountered Confederates at ] in present-day ] and drove them back.{{sfnm|Hoogenboom|1995|1pp=125–126|Reid|1868|2p=160}} In November, Hayes was promoted to lieutenant colonel (Matthews having been promoted to colonel of another regiment) and led his troops deeper into western Virginia, where they entered winter quarters.{{sfn|Hoogenboom|1995|pp=128–130}} The division resumed its advance the following spring, and Hayes led several raids against the rebel forces, on one of which he sustained a minor injury to his knee.{{sfn|Hoogenboom|1995|pp=136–141}} That September, Hayes's regiment was called east to reinforce General ]'s ] at the ].{{sfn|Hoogenboom|1995|pp=141–143}} Hayes and his troops did not arrive in time for the battle, but joined the ] as it hurried north to cut off ]'s ], which was advancing into ].{{sfn|Hoogenboom|1995|pp=141–143}} Marching north, the 23rd was the lead regiment encountering the Confederates at the ] on September 14.{{sfn|Hoogenboom|1995|pp=146–148}} Hayes led a charge against an entrenched position and was shot through his left arm, fracturing the bone.{{sfnm|Hoogenboom|1995|1pp=146–147|Reid|1868|2p=161}} He had one of his men tie a handkerchief above the wound in an effort to stop the bleeding, and continued to lead his men in the battle. While resting, he ordered his men to meet a flanking attack, but instead his entire command moved backward, leaving Hayes lying in between the lines.
As a Republican governor with a Democratic legislature, Hayes had a limited role in governing, especially since ] had no ] power. Despite its restrictions, Hayes used his office to oversee the establishment of a school for deaf-mutes and a reform school for girls.<ref>], pp. 47–48</ref> He also endorsed the ] and urged his conviction, which failed by one vote in the United States Senate.<ref>], pp. 215–216</ref> Nominated for a second term in 1869, Hayes campaigned once more for equal rights for black Ohioans and sought to associate his Democratic opponent, ] with disunion and racism.<ref name=hoog218>], pp. 218–220; ], pp. 239–241</ref> Hayes was re-elected with an increased majority, and the Republicans took the legislature, ensuring Ohio's ratification of the ], which guaranteed black suffrage.<ref name=hoog218/> With a Republican legislature, Hayes's second term was more enjoyable, and he was gratified to see suffrage expanded and a state Agricultural and Mechanical College (later to become ]) established.<ref>], pp. 225–228</ref> He also proposed a reduction in state taxes and reform of the state prison system.<ref>], pp. 231–232</ref> Choosing not to seek re-election, Hayes looked forward to retiring from politics in 1872.<ref name=hoog236>], pp. 236–240</ref>


Eventually, his men brought Hayes back behind their lines, and he was taken to hospital. The regiment continued on to ], but Hayes was out of action for the rest of the campaign.{{sfn|Hoogenboom|1995|pp=149–153}} In October, he was promoted to ] and assigned to command of the first brigade of the Kanawha Division as a ] ].{{sfn|Trefousse|2002|p=30}}
===Private life and return to politics===
], in ].]]
As Hayes prepared to leave office, several delegations of reform-minded Republicans urged him to run against the incumbent Republican, ], for ].<ref name=hoog236/> Hayes declined the offers, preferring to preserve party unity and retire to private life.<ref name=hoog236/> Hayes especially looked forward to spending time with his children, two of whom (daughter Fanny and son Scott) had been born in the past five years.<ref>], pp. 241–242.</ref>{{#tag:ref|Two other sons, Joseph and George, had died in infancy.<ref>], pp. 31, 42</ref>|group=note}} Initially, Hayes tried to promote railway extensions to his hometown, Fremont, and spent the rest of his time managing some real estate he had acquired in ].<ref>], pp. 240–245; ], pp. 250–252</ref> Not entirely removed from politics, Hayes held out some hope of a ] appointment, but was disappointed to receive only an appointment as assistant U.S. treasurer at Cincinnati, which he turned down.<ref>], pp. 246–248</ref> He also allowed himself to be nominated for his old House seat in 1872 but was not disappointed when he lost the election to ], a fellow ] alumnus.<ref>], pp. 243–244; ], pp. 250–252</ref> In 1873, Lucy gave birth to another son, Manning Force Hayes.<ref>], pp. 249–250</ref>{{#tag:ref|He was named after Hayes's friend, ].<ref>], p. 59</ref>|group=note}} That same year, the ] hurt business prospects across the nation, including Hayes's. Sardis Birchard died that year and the Hayes family moved into ], the grand house Birchard had built with them in mind.<ref>], pp. 249–251</ref> Hayes hoped to remain out of politics in order to pay off the debts he had incurred during the Panic, but when the Republican state convention nominated him for governor in 1875, he accepted.<ref>], pp. 256–257; ], pp. 270–271</ref> The campaign against Democratic nominee ] focused primarily on Protestant fears of the possibility of ].<ref name=hoog257>], pp. 257–260; ], pp. 271–275; ], p. 557</ref> Hayes was against such funding and, while he was not known to be personally anti-], he allowed anti-Catholic fervor to contribute to the enthusiasm for his candidacy.<ref name=hoog257/> The campaign was a success, and Hayes was returned to the governorship by a 5,544-vote majority.<ref name=hoog257/>


==Election of 1876== === Army of the Shenandoah ===
] was Hayes's commander and the namesake of his fourth son]]
{{Main|United States presidential election, 1876}}


The division spent the following winter and spring near ] (present-day West Virginia), out of contact with the enemy.{{sfn|Hoogenboom|1995|pp=154–156}} Hayes saw little action until July 1863, when the division skirmished with ]'s cavalry at the ].{{sfn|Hoogenboom|1995|pp=157–158}} Returning to Charleston for the rest of the summer, Hayes spent the fall encouraging the men of the 23rd Ohio to reenlist, and many did.{{sfn|Hoogenboom|1995|pp=159–161}} In 1864, the Army command structure in West Virginia was reorganized, and Hayes's division was assigned to ]'s ].{{sfn|Hoogenboom|1995|pp=159–161}} Advancing into southwestern Virginia, they destroyed Confederate salt and lead mines there.{{sfnm|Hoogenboom|1995|1pp=162–164|Trefousse|2002|2pp=32–33}} On May 9, they engaged Confederate troops at ], where Hayes and his men charged the enemy entrenchments and drove the rebels from the field.{{sfnm|Hoogenboom|1995|1pp=162–164|Trefousse|2002|2pp=32–33}} Following the rout, the Union forces destroyed Confederate supplies and again successfully skirmished with the enemy.{{sfnm|Hoogenboom|1995|1pp=162–164|Trefousse|2002|2pp=32–33}}
===Republican nomination and campaign against Tilden===
]
Hayes's success in Ohio immediately elevated him to the top ranks of Republican politicians under consideration for the presidency in 1876.<ref>], p. 62</ref> The Ohio delegation to the ] was united behind him, and Senator ] did all in his power to bring Hayes the nomination.<ref>], pp. 260–261; ], p. 57</ref> In June 1876, the convention assembled with ] of ] as the favorite.<ref>], pp. 262–263; ], pp. 53–55</ref> Blaine started with a significant lead in the delegate count but could not muster a majority. As he failed to gain votes, the delegates looked elsewhere for a nominee and settled on Hayes on the seventh ballot.<ref>], pp. 263–264; ], pp. 61–63</ref> The convention then selected Representative ] of ] for Vice President, a man about whom Hayes had recently asked "I am ashamed to say: who is Wheeler?"<ref>], p. 260; ], p. 63</ref>


Hayes and his brigade moved to the ] for the ]. Crook's corps was attached to Major General ]'s ] and soon back in contact with Confederate forces, capturing ], on June 11.{{sfn|Hoogenboom|1995|pp=166–168}} They continued south toward ], tearing up railroad track as they advanced,{{sfn|Hoogenboom|1995|pp=166–168}} but Hunter believed the troops at Lynchburg were too powerful, and Hayes and his brigade returned to West Virginia.{{sfn|Hoogenboom|1995|pp=166–168}} Hayes thought Hunter lacked aggression, writing in a letter home that "General Crook would have taken Lynchburg."{{sfn|Hoogenboom|1995|pp=166–168}} Before the army could make another attempt, Confederate General ]'s raid into Maryland forced their recall to the north. Early's army surprised them at ] on July 24, where Hayes was slightly wounded by a bullet to the shoulder.{{sfn|Hoogenboom|1995|pp=168–169}} He also had a horse shot out from under him, and the army was defeated.{{sfn|Hoogenboom|1995|pp=168–169}} Retreating to Maryland, the army was reorganized again, with Major General ] replacing Hunter.{{sfn|Hoogenboom|1995|pp=170–171}} By August, Early was retreating up the valley, with Sheridan in pursuit. Hayes's troops fended off a Confederate assault at ] and advanced to ], where they broke the enemy lines and pursued them farther south.{{sfn|Hoogenboom|1995|pp=172–173}} They followed up the victory with another at ] on September 22, and one more at ] on October 19.{{sfn|Hoogenboom|1995|pp=174–177}} At Cedar Creek, Hayes sprained his ankle after being thrown from a horse and was struck in the head by a spent round, which did not cause serious damage.{{sfn|Hoogenboom|1995|pp=174–177}} His leadership and bravery drew his superiors' attention, with ] later writing of Hayes, "is conduct on the field was marked by conspicuous gallantry as well as the display of qualities of a higher order than that of mere personal daring."{{sfn|Grant|2003|p=564}}
The Democratic nominee was ], the Governor of New York. Tilden was considered a formidable adversary who, like Hayes, had a reputation for honesty.<ref name=hoog265>], pp. 64–68, 90–95</ref> Also like Hayes, Tilden was a ] man and supported civil service reform.<ref name=hoog265/> The campaign, in accordance with the custom of the time, was conducted by surrogates, with Hayes and Tilden remaining in their respective home towns.<ref>], pp. 97–98</ref> The poor economic conditions made the party in power unpopular and made Hayes suspect that he might lose the election.<ref>], p. 71</ref> Both candidates focused their attention on the swing states of ] and ], as well as the three southern states—], ], and ]—where ] governments still ruled.<ref>], p. 72–73; ], pp. 113–114</ref> The Republicans emphasized the danger of letting Democrats run the nation so soon after southern Democrats provoked the Civil War and, to a lesser extent, the danger a Democratic administration would pose to the recently won civil rights of southern blacks.<ref>], pp. 269–271</ref> Democrats, for their part, trumpeted Tilden's record of reform and contrasted it with the ].<ref>], pp. 99–102</ref>


Cedar Creek marked the end of the campaign. Hayes was promoted to ] in October 1864 and brevetted ].{{sfn|Hoogenboom|1995|pp=178–181}} Around this time, Hayes learned of the birth of his fourth son, George Crook Hayes. The army went into winter quarters once more, and in spring 1865 the war quickly came to a close with Lee's surrender to Grant at Appomattox. Hayes visited ], that May and observed the ], after which he and the 23rd Ohio returned to their home state to be mustered out of the service.{{sfn|Hoogenboom|1995|pp=186–188}}
As the returns were tallied on election day, it was clear that the race was close: Democrats had carried most of the South, as well as New York, Indiana, ], and ].<ref>], p. 74</ref> The popular vote also favored Tilden, but Republicans realized that if they held the three ] southern states together with some of the western states, they would emerge with an ] majority.<ref>], p. 75; ], pp. 119–123</ref>


== Post-war politics ==
===Disputed electoral votes===
{{main|Electoral Commission (United States)}}
On November 10, three days after election day, Tilden appeared to have won 184 electoral votes: one short of a majority.<ref name=rob126>], pp. 126–127</ref> Hayes appeared to have 166 votes, with the 19 votes of Florida, Louisiana, and South Carolina still in doubt.<ref name=rob126/> Because of fraud by both parties in the three disputed states, the results were uncertain, and Republicans and Democrats both claimed victories there.<ref>], pp. 131–142; ], pp. 277–279</ref> To further complicate matters, one of the three electors from ] (a state Hayes had won) was disqualified, reducing Hayes's total to 165, and raising the disputed votes to 20. <ref>], pp. 127–128</ref>{{#tag:ref|The elector, ], was disqualified because he held "an Office of Trust or Profit under the United States", in violation of ] of the U.S. Constitution.<ref>], p. 279</ref>|group=note}} If either candidate could claim the 20 disputed votes, he would be elected president.


=== U.S. Representative from Ohio===
]
While serving in the ] in 1864, Hayes was nominated by Republicans for the ] from ].{{sfnm|Hoogenboom|1995|1pp=171–176|Barnard|2005|2pp=225–227}} Asked by friends in Cincinnati to leave the army to campaign, he refused, saying that an "officer fit for duty who at this crisis would abandon his post to electioneer for a seat in Congress ought to be scalped."{{sfnm|Hoogenboom|1995|1pp=171–176|Barnard|2005|2pp=225–227}} Instead, Hayes wrote several letters to the voters explaining his political positions and was elected by a 2,400-vote majority over the incumbent, Democrat ].{{sfnm|Hoogenboom|1995|1pp=171–176|Barnard|2005|2pp=225–227}}
There was considerable debate about which person or house of Congress was authorized to decide between the competing slates of electors, with the Republican Senate and the Democratic House each claiming priority.<ref>], pp. 145–154; ], pp. 281–286</ref> By January 1877, with the question still unresolved, Congress and President ] agreed to submit the matter to a bipartisan ], which would be authorized to determine the fate of the disputed electoral votes.<ref>], p. 157</ref> The Commission was to be made up of five ], five ], and five ].<ref name=rob158>], p. 158</ref> To ensure partisan balance, there would be seven Democrats and seven Republicans, with Justice ], an independent respected by both parties, being the fifteenth member.<ref name=rob158/> The balance was upset when Democrats in the ] elected Davis to the Senate, hoping to sway his vote.<ref name=hoog286>], p. 286</ref> Davis disappointed Democrats by refusing to serve on the Commission on account of his election to the Senate.<ref name=hoog286/> As all of the remaining Justices were Republicans, Justice ], believed to be the most independent-minded of them, was selected to take Davis's place on the Commission.<ref>], pp. 159–161</ref> The Commission met in February and the eight Republicans voted to award all 20 electoral votes to Hayes.<ref>], pp. 166–171</ref> Democrats were outraged by the result and attempted a ] to prevent Congress from accepting the Commission's findings.<ref>], pp. 171–183</ref>


] and Radical Republicans fought over Reconstruction.]]
As the March 4 inauguration day neared, Republican and Democratic Congressional leaders met at ] in Washington to negotiate a ]. Republicans promised that, in exchange for Democratic acquiescence in the Committee's decision, Hayes would withdraw federal troops from the South and accept the election of Democratic governments in the last "unredeemed" states of the South.<ref>], pp. 182–184; ], pp. 580–581</ref> The Democrats agreed, and the filibuster was ended. Hayes was elected, but Reconstruction was finished.<ref>], pp. 185–189; ], pp. 581–587</ref>
{{-}}


When the ] assembled in December 1865, Hayes was sworn in as a part of a large Republican majority. Hayes identified with the party's ] wing, but was willing to vote with the ] for the sake of party unity.{{sfnm|Hoogenboom|1995|1pp=200–201|Conwell|1876|2pp=145–180}} The major legislative effort of the Congress was the ], for which Hayes voted and which passed both houses of Congress in June 1866.{{sfnm|Hoogenboom|1995|1pp=200–201|Trefousse|2002|2pp=41–44|Richardson|2001|3pp=17–18}} Hayes's beliefs were in line with his fellow Republicans on ] issues: that the South should be restored to the Union, but not without adequate protections for ] and other black southerners.{{sfnm|Hoogenboom|1995|1p=203|Trefousse|2002|2pp=40–41}} President ], who succeeded to office following Lincoln's assassination, to the contrary wanted to readmit the seceded states quickly without first ensuring that they adopted laws protecting the newly freed slaves' civil rights; he also granted pardons to many of the leading former Confederates.{{sfnm|Hoogenboom|1995|1p=203|Trefousse|2002|2pp=40–41}} Hayes, along with congressional Republicans, disagreed. They worked to reject Johnson's vision of Reconstruction and to pass the ].{{sfnm|Hoogenboom|1995|1pp=197–199|Trefousse|2002|2p=42}}
==Presidency 1877–1881==

===Inauguration===
Reelected in 1866, Hayes returned to the ]. On January 7, 1867, he voted for the resolution that authorized the ].<ref>{{cite web |title=To Pass a Resolution to Impeach the President. (P. 320-2, 321-2). -- House Vote #418 -- Jan 7, 1867 |url=https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/39-2/h418 |website=GovTrack.us |access-date=23 March 2022 |language=en}}</ref> He also voted during this time for the ], which ensured that Johnson could not remove administration officials without the Senate's consent,{{sfn|Hoogenboom|1995|pp=204–205}} and unsuccessfully pressed for a ] bill that attracted the votes of many reform-minded Republicans.{{sfnm|Hoogenboom|1995|1pp=204–205|Foner|2002|2pp=493–494}} Hayes continued to vote with the majority in the ] on the ], but resigned in July 1867 to run for governor of Ohio.{{sfn|Hoogenboom|1995|pp=208–210}}

=== Governor of Ohio ===
A popular Congressman and former Army officer, Hayes was considered by Ohio Republicans to be an excellent standard-bearer for the ].{{sfnm|Hoogenboom|1995|1pp=211–213|Trefousse|2002|2pp=45–46}} His political views were more moderate than the Republican party's platform, although he agreed with the proposed amendment to the Ohio state constitution that would guarantee ] to black male Ohioans.{{sfnm|Hoogenboom|1995|1pp=211–213|Trefousse|2002|2pp=45–46}} Hayes's opponent, ], made the proposed amendment the centerpiece of the campaign and opposed ]. Both men campaigned vigorously, making speeches across the state, mostly focusing on the suffrage question.{{sfnm|Hoogenboom|1995|1pp=211–213|Trefousse|2002|2pp=45–46}} The election was mostly a disappointment to Republicans, as the amendment failed to pass and Democrats gained a majority in the ].{{sfnm|Hoogenboom|1995|1p=214|Barnard|2005|2pp=238–239}} Hayes thought at first that he, too, had lost, but the final tally showed that he had won the election by 2,983 votes of 484,603 votes cast.{{sfnm|Hoogenboom|1995|1p=214|Barnard|2005|2pp=238–239}}

As a Republican governor with a Democratic legislature, Hayes had a limited role in governing, especially since ] had no ] power. Despite these constraints, he oversaw the establishment of a school for deaf-mutes and a ] for girls.{{sfn|Trefousse|2002|pp=47–48}} He endorsed the ] and urged his conviction, which failed by one vote in the United States Senate.{{sfn|Hoogenboom|1995|pp=215–216}} Nominated for a second term in 1869, Hayes campaigned again for equal rights for black Ohioans and sought to associate his Democratic opponent, ], with disunion and Confederate sympathies.{{sfnm|Hoogenboom|1995|1pp=218–220|Barnard|2005|2pp=239–241}} Hayes was reelected with an increased majority, and the Republicans took the legislature, ensuring Ohio's ratification of the ], which guaranteed black (male) suffrage.{{sfnm|Hoogenboom|1995|1pp=218–220|Barnard|2005|2pp=239–241}} With a Republican legislature, Hayes's second term was more enjoyable. Suffrage was expanded and a state Agricultural and Mechanical College (later to become ]) was established.{{sfn|Hoogenboom|1995|pp=225–228}} He also proposed a reduction in state taxes and reform of the state prison system.{{sfn|Hoogenboom|1995|pp=231–232}} Choosing not to seek reelection, Hayes looked forward to retiring from politics in 1872.{{sfn|Hoogenboom|1995|pp=236–240}}

=== Private life and return to politics ===
], in ]]]

As Hayes prepared to leave office, several delegations of reform-minded Republicans urged him to run for ] against the incumbent Republican, ].{{sfn|Hoogenboom|1995|pp=236–240}} Hayes declined, preferring to preserve party unity and retire to private life.{{sfn|Hoogenboom|1995|pp=236–240}} He especially looked forward to spending time with his children, two of whom (daughter Fanny and son Scott) had been born in the past five years.{{sfn|Hoogenboom|1995|pp=241–242}}{{efn|His first two sons, Joseph and George, had died in infancy.{{sfn|Trefousse|2002|pp=31, 42}}}} Initially, Hayes tried to promote railway extensions to his hometown, Fremont. He also managed some real estate he had acquired in ].{{sfnm|Hoogenboom|1995|1pp=240–245|Barnard|2005|2pp=250–252}} Not entirely removed from politics, Hayes held out some hope of a ] appointment, but was disappointed to receive only an appointment as assistant U.S. treasurer at Cincinnati, which he turned down.{{sfn|Hoogenboom|1995|pp=246–248}} He agreed to be nominated for his old House seat in 1872 but was disappointed when he lost the election to ], a fellow ] alumnus.{{sfnm|Hoogenboom|1995|1pp=243–244|Barnard|2005|2pp=250–252}}

In 1873, Lucy gave birth to another son, Manning Force Hayes.{{sfn|Hoogenboom|1995|pp=249–250}}{{efn|He was named after Hayes's friend, ].{{sfn|Trefousse|2002|p=59}}}} That same year, the ] hurt business prospects across the nation, including Hayes's. His uncle Sardis Birchard died that year, and the Hayes family moved into ], the grand house Birchard had built with them in mind.{{sfn|Hoogenboom|1995|pp=249–251}} That year Hayes announced his uncle's bequest of $50,000 in assets to endow a public library for Fremont, to be called the Birchard Library. It opened in 1874 on Front Street, and a new building was completed and opened in 1878 in Fort Stephenson State Park, as per the terms of the bequest. Hayes served as chairman of the library's board of trustees until his death.<ref> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180804170108/http://www.birchard.lib.oh.us/missionHistory.htm |date=August 4, 2018 }}, Birchard Library website</ref>

Hayes hoped to stay out of politics in order to pay off the debts he had incurred during the Panic, but when the Republican state convention nominated him for governor in 1875, he accepted.{{sfnm|Hoogenboom|1995|1pp=256–257|Barnard|2005|2pp=270–271}} His campaign against Democratic nominee ] focused primarily on Protestant fears about the possibility of ].{{sfnm|Hoogenboom|1995|1pp=257–260|Barnard|2005|2pp=271–275|Foner|2002|3p=557}} Hayes was against such funding and, while not known to be personally ], he allowed anti-Catholic fervor to contribute to the enthusiasm for his candidacy.{{sfnm|Hoogenboom|1995|1pp=257–260|Barnard|2005|2pp=271–275|Foner|2002|3p=557}} The campaign was a success, and on October 12, 1875, Hayes was returned to the governorship by a 5,544-vote majority.{{sfnm|Hoogenboom|1995|1pp=257–260|Barnard|2005|2pp=271–275|Foner|2002|3p=557}} The first person to earn a third term as governor of Ohio, Hayes reduced the state debt, reestablished the Board of Charities, and repealed the Geghan Bill, which had allowed for the appointment of Catholic priests to schools and penitentiaries.{{sfn|Trefousse|2002|pp=61–64}}

== Election of 1876 ==
{{main|1876 United States presidential election}}

=== Republican nomination and campaign against Tilden ===
] campaign poster depicting the Hayes-Wheeler ticket, the last and rarest in the firm's "Grand National Banner" series]]

Hayes's success in Ohio immediately elevated him to the top ranks of Republican politicians under consideration for the presidency in 1876.{{sfn|Trefousse|2002|p=62}} The Ohio delegation to the ] was united behind him, and Senator ] did all in his power to get Hayes the nomination.{{sfnm|Hoogenboom|1995|1pp=260–261|Robinson|2001|2p=57}} In June 1876, the convention assembled with ] of ] as the favorite.{{sfnm|Hoogenboom|1995|1pp=262–263|Robinson|2001|2pp=53–55}} Blaine started with a significant lead in the delegate count, but could not muster a majority. As he failed to gain votes, the delegates looked elsewhere for a nominee and settled on Hayes on the seventh ballot.{{sfnm|Hoogenboom|1995|1pp=263–264|Robinson|2001|2pp=61–63}} The convention selected Representative ] from ] for vice president, a man about whom Hayes had recently asked, "I am ashamed to say: who is Wheeler?"{{sfnm|Hoogenboom|1995|1p=260|Robinson|2001|2p=63}}

The campaign strategy of Hayes and Wheeler emphasized conciliatory appeals to the Southern Whiggish element, attempting to "detach" old Southern Whigs from Southern Democrats.<ref>. ''United States Senate'' via ''Internet Archive''. Retrieved February 24, 2022.</ref> When ] asked whether the Republican Party would continue its devotion to protecting black civil rights or "get along without the vote of the black man in the South", Hayes and Wheeler advocated the latter.

The Democratic nominee was ], the governor of New York. Tilden was considered a formidable adversary who, like Hayes, had a reputation for honesty.{{sfn|Robinson|2001|pp=64–68, 90–95}} Also like Hayes, Tilden was a ] man and supported civil service reform.{{sfn|Robinson|2001|pp=64–68, 90–95}} In accordance with the custom of the time, the campaign was conducted by surrogates, with Hayes and Tilden remaining in their respective hometowns.{{sfn|Robinson|2001|pp=97–98}} The poor economic conditions made the party in power unpopular and made Hayes suspect he would lose the election.{{sfn|Trefousse|2002|p=71}} Both candidates concentrated on the swing states of ] and ], as well as the three southern states—], ], and ]—where ] Republican governments still barely ruled, amid recurring political violence, including widespread efforts to suppress ] voting.{{sfnm|Trefousse|2002|1pp=72–73|Robinson|2001|2pp=113–114}} The Republicans emphasized the danger of letting Democrats run the nation so soon after Southern Democrats had provoked the Civil War and, to a lesser extent, the danger a Democratic administration would pose to the recently won civil rights of southern blacks.{{sfn|Hoogenboom|1995|pp=269–271}} Democrats, for their part, trumpeted Tilden's record of reform and contrasted it with the ].{{sfn|Robinson|2001|pp=99–102}}

As the returns were tallied on election day, it was clear that the race was close: Democrats had carried most of the South, as well as New York, Indiana, ], and ].{{sfn|Trefousse|2002|p=74}} In the ], an increasing number of immigrants and their descendants voted Democratic. Although Tilden won the popular vote and claimed 184 electoral votes, Republican leaders challenged the results and charged Democrats with fraud and voter suppression of blacks (who would otherwise have voted Republican) in Florida, Louisiana, and South Carolina.{{sfn|Sproat|1974|pp=163–164}} Republicans realized that if they held the three disputed ] southern states together with some of the western states, they would emerge with an ] majority.{{sfnm|Trefousse|2002|1p=75|Robinson|2001|2pp=119–123|Sproat|1974|3pp=163–164}}

=== Disputed electoral votes ===

{{main|Compromise of 1877|Electoral Commission (United States)}}
On November 11, three days after election day, Tilden appeared to have won 184 electoral votes, one short of a majority.{{sfn|Robinson|2001|pp=126–127}} Hayes appeared to have 166, with the 19 votes of Florida, Louisiana, and South Carolina still in doubt.{{sfn|Robinson|2001|pp=126–127}} Republicans and Democrats each claimed victory in the three latter states, but the results in those states were rendered uncertain because of fraud by both parties.{{sfnm|Robinson|2001|1pp=131–142|Hoogenboom|1995|2pp=277–279}} To further complicate matters, one of the three electors from ] (a state Hayes had won) was disqualified, reducing Hayes's total to 165, and raising the disputed votes to 20.{{sfn|Robinson|2001|pp=127–128}}{{efn|The elector, John W. Watts, was disqualified because he held "an Office of Trust or Profit under the United States", in violation of ] of the U.S. Constitution.{{sfn|Hoogenboom|1995|p=279}}}} If Hayes was not awarded all 20 disputed votes, Tilden would be elected president.

]

There was considerable debate about which person or house of Congress was authorized to decide between the competing slates of electors, with the Republican Senate and the Democratic House each claiming priority.{{sfnm|Robinson|2001|1pp=145–154|Hoogenboom|1995|2pp=281–286}} By January 1877, with the question still unresolved, Congress and President ] agreed to submit the matter to a bipartisan ], which would be authorized to determine the fate of the disputed electoral votes.{{sfn|Robinson|2001|p=157}} The commission was to be made up of five ], five ], and five ].{{sfn|Robinson|2001|p=158}} To ensure partisan balance, there would be seven Democrats and seven Republicans, with Justice ], an independent respected by both parties, as the 15th member.{{sfn|Robinson|2001|p=158}} The balance was upset when Democrats in the ] elected Davis to the Senate, hoping to sway his vote.{{sfn|Hoogenboom|1995|p=286}} Davis disappointed Democrats by refusing to serve on the Commission because of his election to the Senate.{{sfn|Hoogenboom|1995|p=286}} As all the remaining Justices were Republicans, Justice ], believed to be the most independent-minded of them, was selected to take Davis's place on the commission.{{sfn|Robinson|2001|pp=159–161}} The Commission met in February and the eight Republicans voted to award all 20 electoral votes to Hayes.{{sfn|Robinson|2001|pp=166–171}} Democrats, outraged by the result, attempted a ] to prevent Congress from accepting the commission's findings.{{sfn|Robinson|2001|pp=171–183}} Eventually, the filibusterers gave up, allowing the House and Senate to reassemble to complete the count of the electoral votes, and at 4:10 am on March 2, Senator ] announced that Hayes and Wheeler had been elected to the presidency and vice presidency by an electoral margin of 185–184.<ref>{{Cite web|title=HarpWeek {{!}} Hayes vs. Tilden: The Electoral College Controversy of 1876-1877|url=https://elections.harpweek.com/Controversy.htm|access-date=2021-05-06|website=elections.harpweek.com}}</ref>

As inauguration day neared, Republican and Democratic Congressional leaders met at ] in Washington to negotiate a ]. Republicans promised concessions in exchange for Democratic acquiescence to the committee's decision. The main concession Hayes promised was the withdrawal of federal troops from the South and an acceptance of the election of Democratic governments in the remaining "unredeemed" southern states.{{sfnm|Robinson|2001|1pp=182–184|Foner|2002|2pp=580–581}} The Democrats agreed, and on March 2, the filibuster was ended. Hayes was elected, but Reconstruction was finished, and freedmen were left at the mercy of white Democrats who did not intend to preserve their rights.{{sfnm|Robinson|2001|1pp=185–189|Foner|2002|2pp=581–587}} On April 3, Hayes ordered Secretary of War ] to withdraw federal troops stationed at the ] to their barracks. On April 20, he ordered McCrary to send the federal troops stationed at ]'s St. Louis Hotel to ].{{sfnm|Dodds|2013|1p=113|Clendenen|1969|2p=246}}
{{clear}}

== Presidency (1877–1881) ==
{{Main|Presidency of Rutherford B. Hayes}}

=== Inauguration ===
] administering the oath of office to Hayes]] ] administering the oath of office to Hayes]]
Because March 4, 1877 fell on a Sunday, Hayes took the oath of office privately on Saturday, March 3, in the ] of the ]. He took the oath publicly on the following Monday on the East Portico of the ].<ref>], pp. 295–297</ref> In his inaugural address, Hayes attempted to soothe the passions of the past few months, saying that "he serves his party best who serves his country best".<ref>], pp. 85–86</ref> He pledged to support "wise, honest, and peaceful local self-government" in the South, as well as reform of the ] and a full return to the ].<ref>], pp. 298–299</ref> Despite his message of conciliation, many Democrats never considered Hayes's election legitimate and referred to him as "Rutherfraud" or "His Fraudulency" for the next four years.<ref>], pp. 402–403</ref>


Because March 4, 1877, was a Sunday, Hayes took the oath of office privately on Saturday, March 3, in the ] of the ], the first president to do so in the Executive Mansion. He took the oath publicly on March 5 on the East Portico of the ].{{sfn|Hoogenboom|1995|pp=295–297}} In his inaugural address, Hayes attempted to soothe the passions of the past few months, saying that "he serves his party best who serves his country best".{{sfn|Trefousse|2002|pp=85–86}} He pledged to support "wise, honest, and peaceful local self-government" in the South, as well as reform of the ] and a full return to the ].{{sfn|Hoogenboom|1995|pp=298–299}} Despite his message of conciliation, many Democrats never considered Hayes's election legitimate and referred to him as "Rutherfraud" or "His Fraudulency" for the next four years.{{sfn|Barnard|2005|pp=402–403}}
===Civil rights and the end of Reconstruction===
Hayes had been a firm supporter of Republican ] policies throughout his political career, but the first major act of his presidency was an end to Reconstruction and the return of the South to home rule.<ref>], pp. 90–93</ref> Even without the conditions of the Wormley's Hotel agreement, Hayes would have been hard-pressed to continue the policies of his predecessors. The House of Representatives in the ] was controlled by a Democratic majority that refused to appropriate enough funds for the army to continue to garrison the South.<ref name=hoog304>], pp. 304–307; ], pp. 580–583; ], p. 142</ref> Even among Republicans, devotion to continued military Reconstruction was fading.<ref>], p. 138; ], p. 92</ref> Only two states were still under Reconstruction's sway when Hayes assumed the Presidency and, without troops to enforce the voting rights laws, these too soon fell.<ref>], p. 244</ref>{{#tag:ref|At the time of the 1876 election there were only three states, Florida, South Carolina, and Louisiana, in which the Reconstruction regime still survived. In Florida the Reconstructionists lost control as the Democrats won the election there, leaving South Carolina and Louisiana as the only states in which the regime was supported by Federal troops.<ref>], pp. 90–91</ref>|group=note}}


=== The South and the end of Reconstruction ===
Hayes's later attempts to protect the rights of southern blacks were ineffective, as were his attempts to rebuild Republican strength in the South.<ref>], pp. 317–318; ], pp. 141–143</ref> He did, however, defeat Congress's efforts to curtail federal power to monitor federal elections.<ref name=riders>], pp. 162–163; ], pp. 392–402; ], p. 161</ref> Democrats in Congress passed an army ] in 1879 with a ] that repealed the ].<ref name=riders/> Those Acts, passed during Reconstruction, made it a crime to prevent someone from voting because of his race. Hayes was determined to preserve the law protecting black voters, and he vetoed the appropriation.<ref name=riders/> The Democrats did not have enough votes to override the veto, but they passed a new bill with the same rider. Hayes vetoed this as well, and the process was repeated three times more.<ref name=riders/> Finally, Hayes signed an appropriation without the offensive rider, but Congress refused to pass another bill to fund federal marshals, who were vital to the enforcement of the Force Acts.<ref name=riders/> The election laws remained in effect, but the funds to enforce them were curtailed for the time being.<ref>], p. 402</ref>
Hayes had firmly supported Republican ] policies throughout his career, but the first major act of his presidency was an end to Reconstruction and the return of the South to "home rule".{{sfn|Trefousse|2002|pp=90–93}} Even without the conditions of the Wormley's Hotel agreement, Hayes would have been hard-pressed to continue his predecessors' policies. The House of Representatives in the ] was controlled by a majority of Democrats, and they refused to appropriate enough funds for the army to continue to garrison the South.{{sfnm|Hoogenboom|1995|1pp=304–307|Foner|2002|2pp=580–583|Davison|1972|3p=142}} Even among Republicans, devotion to continued military Reconstruction was fading in the face of persistent Southern insurgency and violence.{{sfnm|Davison|1972|1p=138|Trefousse|2002|2p=92}} Only two states, South Carolina and Louisiana, were still under Reconstruction's sway when Hayes assumed the presidency on March 5. On April 3, Hayes ordered Secretary of War ] to withdraw federal troops stationed at the ] to their barracks. On April 20, he ordered McCrary to send the federal troops stationed at ]'s St. Louis Hotel to ].{{sfnm|Dodds|2013|1p=113|Clendenen|1969|2p=246}}


At the time of the 1876 election only three states, Florida, South Carolina, and Louisiana, still had Republican governments. In Florida the Democrats won the governor's election and controlled the state house, leaving South Carolina and Louisiana as the only states where Republican regimes were still supported by federal troops.{{sfn|Trefousse|2002|pp=90–91}} Without troops to enforce the voting rights laws, these soon fell to Democratic control.{{sfn|Clendenen|1969|p=244}}
Hayes next attempted to reconcile the social ] of the South with the recently passed civil rights laws by distributing patronage among southern Democrats. "My task was to wipe out the color line, to abolish sectionalism, to end the war and bring peace," he wrote in his diary. "To do this, I was ready to resort to unusual measures and to risk my own standing and reputation within my party and the country."<ref>], p. 418</ref> All of his efforts were in vain; Hayes failed to convince the South to accept the idea of racial equality and failed to convince Congress to appropriate funds to enforce the ].<ref>], pp. 317–318</ref>


Hayes's later attempts to protect the rights of southern blacks were ineffective, as were his attempts to rebuild Republican strength in the South.{{sfnm|Hoogenboom|1995|1pp=317–318|Davison|1972|2pp=141–143}} But he did defeat Congress's efforts to curtail federal power to monitor federal elections.{{sfnm|Davison|1972|1pp=162–163|Hoogenboom|1995|2pp=392–402|Richardson|2001|3p=161}} Democrats in Congress passed an army ] in 1879 with a ] that would have repealed the ], which had been used to suppress the ]. Chapters had flourished across the South and it had been one of the insurgent groups that attacked and suppressed freedmen.{{sfnm|Davison|1972|1pp=162–163|Hoogenboom|1995|2pp=392–402|Richardson|2001|3p=161}} Those Acts, passed during Reconstruction, made it a crime to prevent someone from voting because of his race. Other paramilitary groups, such as the ] in the Carolinas, however, had intimidated freedmen and suppressed the vote. Hayes was determined to preserve the law protecting black voters, and vetoed the appropriation.{{sfnm|Davison|1972|1pp=162–163|Hoogenboom|1995|2pp=392–402|Richardson|2001|3p=161}}
===Civil service reform===
] out of the New York Custom House]]
Hayes took office determined to reform the system of civil service appointments, which had been based on the ] since ] was president.<ref>], pp. 93–94</ref> Instead of giving federal jobs to political supporters, Hayes wished to award them by merit according to an ] that all applicants would take.<ref name=hoog318>], pp. 318–319</ref> Immediately, Hayes's call for reform brought him into conflict with the ], or pro-spoils, branch of the Republican party. Senators of both parties were accustomed to being consulted about political appointments and turned against Hayes. Foremost among his enemies was New York Senator ], who fought Hayes's reform efforts at every turn.<ref>], p. 164–165</ref> To show his commitment to reform, Hayes appointed one of the best-known advocates of reform, ], to be ] and asked Schurz and ], his ], to lead a special cabinet committee charged with drawing up new rules for federal appointments.<ref>], p. 71</ref> ], the ], ordered ] to investigate the ], which was stacked with Conkling's spoilsmen.<ref name=hoog318/> Jay's report suggested that the New York Custom House was so overstaffed with political appointees that 20% of the employees were expendable.<ref name=hoog322>], pp. 322–325; ], pp. 164–165; ], pp. 95–96</ref>


The Democrats did not have enough votes to override the veto, but they passed a new bill with the same rider. Hayes vetoed that bill too, and the process was repeated three more times.{{sfnm|Davison|1972|1pp=162–163|Hoogenboom|1995|2pp=392–402|Richardson|2001|3p=161}} Finally, Congress passed a bill without the offensive rider, but refused to pass another bill to fund federal marshals, who were vital to the enforcement of the Enforcement Acts.{{sfnm|Davison|1972|1pp=162–163|Hoogenboom|1995|2pp=392–402|Richardson|2001|3p=161}} The election laws remained in effect, but the funds to enforce them were curtailed for the time being.{{sfn|Hoogenboom|1995|p=402}}
Although he could not convince Congress to outlaw the spoils system, Hayes issued an ] that forbade federal office holders from being required to make campaign contributions or otherwise taking part in party politics.<ref name=hoog322/> ], the ], and his subordinates ] and ], all Conkling supporters, refused to obey the president's order.<ref name=hoog322/> In September 1877, Hayes demanded the three men's resignations, which they refused to give. He submitted appointments of ], ], and ]—all supporters of Evarts, Conkling's New York rival—to the Senate for confirmation as their replacements.<ref>], p. 352; ], pp. 95–96</ref> The Senate's Commerce Committee, which Conkling chaired, voted unanimously to reject the nominees, and the full Senate rejected Roosevelt and Prince by a vote of 31–25, confirming Merritt only because Sharpe's term had expired.<ref>], pp. 353–355; ], pp. 100–101</ref>


Hayes tried to reconcile the social ] of the South with the recently passed civil rights laws by distributing patronage among southern Democrats. "My task was to wipe out the color line, to abolish sectionalism, to end the war and bring peace," he wrote in his diary. "To do this, I was ready to resort to unusual measures and to risk my own standing and reputation within my party and the country."{{sfn|Barnard|2005|p=418}} All his efforts were in vain; Hayes failed to persuade the South to accept legal racial equality or to convince Congress to appropriate funds to enforce the ].{{sfn|Hoogenboom|1995|pp=317–318}}
Hayes was forced to wait until July 1878 when, during a Congressional recess, he sacked Arthur and Cornell and replaced them by ]s of Merritt and ], respectively.<ref>], pp. 370–371</ref>{{#tag:ref|] filled Merritt's former position.<ref>], p. 370</ref>|group=note}} Conkling opposed the appointees' confirmation when the Senate reconvened in February 1879, but Merritt was approved by a vote of 31–25, as was Burt by 31–19, giving Hayes his most significant civil service reform victory.<ref>], pp. 382–384; ], p. 456</ref> For the remainder of his term, Hayes pressed Congress to enact permanent reform legislation, even using his last ] to Congress on December 6, 1880 to appeal for reform. While reform legislation did not pass during Hayes's presidency, his advocacy provided "a significant precedent as well as the political impetus for the ] of 1883," which was signed into law by President Chester Arthur.<ref>], pp. 73–74</ref>


=== Civil service reform ===
Hayes also dealt with ]. In 1880, Schurz and Senator ] asked Hayes to shut down the "]" rings, a system of corrupt contract profiteering in the Postal Service, and to fire Second Assistant Postmaster-General ], the alleged ring leader.<ref name=dfp>Detroit Free Press (June 5, 1881), ''The Star Route Business'', p. 2</ref> Hayes stopped granting new star route contracts, but let existing contracts continue to be enforced.<ref name=hoog439>], pp. 439–440</ref> Hayes' ], ], said that the public only cared their mail was delivered with "certainty, celerity, and security," not about the methods by which postal routes were contracted.<ref>{{cite newspaper |title=A Vast Scheme of Fraud |url=http://query.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.html?res=F20B12FB38581B7A93CBA9178ED85F458884F9 |newspaper=The New York Times |date=May 9, 1881 |accessdate=March 14, 2011}}</ref> The ''Detroit Free Press'' stated that Hayes delayed proper investigation so as not to injure Republican chances in the 1880 elections,<ref name=dfp/> but historian ] would later write that Hayes "hardly knew the chief suspect and certainly had no connection with the corruption."<ref>], p. 144</ref> Although Hayes and the Congress both looked into the contracts and found no compelling evidence of wrongdoing, Brady and others were indicted for conspiracy in 1882.<ref>{{cite news|title=The Brady Indictments|url=http://query.nytimes.com/mem/archive-free/pdf?res=9B07EEDD113EE433A25752C1A9629C94639FD7CF|accessdate=March 19, 2011|newspaper=New York Times|date=April 11, 1882}}</ref> After two trials, Brady was found not guilty in 1883.<ref>{{cite news|title=A Disappointing Verdict|url=http://query.nytimes.com/mem/archive-free/pdf?res=9906E0DE143DE533A25751C1A96F9C94639FD7CF|accessdate=March 19, 2011|newspaper=New York Times|date=September 12, 1882}}; {{cite news|title=Not Guilty as Indicted: The Members of the Star Ring Group Acquitted|url=http://query.nytimes.com/mem/archive-free/pdf?res=9C03E0DB1230E433A25756C1A9609C94629FD7CF|accessdate=March 19, 2011|newspaper=New York Times|date=June 15, 1883}}</ref>


Hayes took office determined to reform the system of civil service appointments, which had been based on the ] since ]'s presidency.{{sfn|Trefousse|2002|pp=93–94}}{{efn|Hayes's predecessor, President ], appointed the first ] in 1871, but it dissolved in 1874.{{sfn|Calhoun|2017|pp=293–294}}}} Instead of giving federal jobs to political supporters, Hayes wished to award them by merit according to an ] that all applicants would take.{{sfn|Hoogenboom|1995|pp=318–319}} Hayes's call for reform immediately brought him into conflict with the ], or pro-spoils, branch of the Republican party. Senators of both parties were accustomed to being consulted about political appointments and turned against Hayes. Foremost among his enemies was New York Senator ], who fought Hayes's reform efforts at every turn.{{sfn|Davison|1972|pp=164–165}}
===Great Railroad Strike===
]
In his first year in office, Hayes was faced with the United States' largest labor disturbance to date: the ].<ref>], p. 583; ], pp. 1–2; ], p. 121</ref> In order to make up for financial losses suffered since the panic of 1873, the major railroads cut their employees' wages several times in 1877.<ref>], pp. 326–327</ref> In July of that year, workers from the ] walked off the job in ] to protest their reduction in pay.<ref>], pp. 75–77; ], p. 117</ref> The ] quickly spread to workers of the ], ], and ] railroads, with the strikers soon numbering in the thousands.<ref name=hoog328>], pp. 328–333; ], pp. 145–153; ], pp. 445–447</ref> Fearing a ], Governor ] asked Hayes to send federal troops to Martinsburg, and Hayes did so, but when the troops arrived there was no riot, only a peaceful protest.<ref>], pp. 93–94</ref> In ], however, a riot did erupt on July 20 and Hayes ordered the troops at ] to assist the governor in its suppression; by the time they arrived, the riot had dispersed.<ref name=hoog328/> ] next exploded into riots, but Hayes was reluctant to send in troops without the governor first requesting them.<ref name=hoog328/> Other discontented citizens joined the railroad workers in rioting.<ref>], pp. 116–127; ], p. 328</ref> After a few days, he resolved to send in troops to protect federal property wherever it appeared to be threatened and gave Major General ] overall command of the situation, marking the first use of federal troops to break a strike against a private company.<ref name=hoog328/> The riot spread further, to ] and ], where strikers shut down railroad facilities.<ref name=hoog328/> By July 29, the riots had ended and federal troops returned to their barracks.<ref>], p. 585</ref> Although no federal troops had killed any of the strikers, or been killed themselves, clashes between state militia troops and strikers resulted in deaths on both sides.<ref>], pp. 148–150; ], p. 95</ref> The railroads were victorious in the short term, as the workers returned to their jobs and some wage cuts remained in effect, but the public blamed the railroads for the strikes and violence, and they were compelled to improve working conditions and attempted no further cuts.<ref>], p. 334; ], pp. 152–153</ref> Business leaders praised Hayes, but his own opinion was more equivocal; as he recorded in his diary: "The strikes have been put down by ''force;'' but now for the ''real'' remedy. Can't something done by education of strikers, by judicious control of capitalists, by wise general policy to end or diminish the evil? The railroad strikers, as a rule, are good men, sober, intelligent, and industrious."<ref>], pp. 446–447; ], v. 3, p. 440</ref>


To show his commitment to reform, Hayes appointed one of the best-known advocates of reform at the time, ], to be ] and asked Schurz and ] ] to lead a special cabinet committee charged with drawing up new rules for federal appointments.{{sfn|Paul|1998|p=71}} ] ] ordered ] to investigate the ], which was stacked with Conkling's spoilsmen.{{sfn|Hoogenboom|1995|pp=318–319}} Jay's report suggested that the New York Custom House was so overstaffed with political appointees that 20% of the employees were expendable.{{sfnm|Hoogenboom|1995|1pp=322–325|Davison|1972|2pp=164–165|Trefousse|2002|3pp=95–96}}
===Currency debate===

] out of the New York Custom House]]

Although he could not convince Congress to prohibit the spoils system, Hayes issued an ] that forbade federal office holders from being required to make campaign contributions or otherwise taking part in party politics.{{sfnm|Hoogenboom|1995|1pp=322–325|Davison|1972|2pp=164–165|Trefousse|2002|3pp=95–96}} ], the ], and his subordinates ] and ], all Conkling supporters, refused to obey the order.{{sfnm|Hoogenboom|1995|1pp=322–325|Davison|1972|2pp=164–165|Trefousse|2002|3pp=95–96}} In September 1877, Hayes demanded their resignations, which they refused to give. He submitted appointments of ], ], and ]—all supporters of Evarts, Conkling's New York rival—to the Senate for confirmation as their replacements.{{sfnm|Hoogenboom|1995|1p=352|Trefousse|2002|2pp=95–96}} The Senate's Commerce Committee, chaired by Conkling, voted unanimously to reject the nominees. The full Senate rejected Roosevelt and Prince by a vote of 31–25, and confirmed Merritt only because Sharpe's term had expired.{{sfnm|Hoogenboom|1995|1pp=353–355|Trefousse|2002|2pp=100–101}}

Hayes was forced to wait until July 1878, when he fired Arthur and Cornell during a Congressional recess and replaced them with ]s of Merritt and ], respectively.{{sfn|Hoogenboom|1995|pp=370–371}}{{efn|] filled Merritt's former position.{{sfn|Hoogenboom|1995|p=370}}}} Conkling opposed confirmation of the appointees when the Senate reconvened in February 1879, but Merritt was approved by a vote of 31–25 and Burt by 31–19, giving Hayes his most significant civil service reform victory.{{sfnm|Hoogenboom|1995|1pp=382–384|Barnard|2005|2p=456}}

For the remainder of his term, Hayes pressed Congress to enact permanent reform legislation and fund the ], even using his last ] to Congress in 1880 to appeal for reform. Reform legislation did not pass during Hayes's presidency, but his advocacy provided "a significant precedent as well as the political impetus for the ] of 1883," which was signed into law by President Chester Arthur.{{sfn|Paul|1998|pp=73–74}} Hayes allowed some exceptions to the ban on assessments, permitting ], secretary of the Republican Congressional Committee, to solicit campaign contributions from federal officeholders during the Congressional elections of 1878.{{sfn|Sproat|1974|pp=165–166}} In 1880, Hayes quickly forced ] ] to resign after Thompson accepted a $25,000 (~${{Format price|{{Inflation|index=US-GDP|value=25000|start_year=1880}}}} in {{Inflation/year|US-GDP}}) salary for a nominal job offered by French engineer ] to promote a French canal in Panama.{{sfn|Sproat|1974|pp=169–170}}

Hayes also dealt with ]. In 1880, Schurz and Senator ] asked Hayes to shut down the "]" rings, a system of corrupt contract profiteering in the Postal Service, and to fire Second Assistant Postmaster-General ], the alleged ringleader.{{sfn|Klotsche|1935|pp=409–411}} Hayes stopped granting new star route contracts but let existing contracts continue to be enforced.{{sfn|Hoogenboom|1995|pp=439–440}} Democrats accused him of delaying proper investigation so as not to damage Republicans' chances in the 1880 elections but did not press the issue in their campaign literature, as members of both parties were implicated in the corruption.{{sfn|Klotsche|1935|pp=409–411}} Historian ] later wrote that Hayes "hardly knew the chief suspect and certainly had no connection with the corruption."{{sfn|Trefousse|2002|p=144}} Although Hayes and the Congress both investigated the contracts and found no compelling evidence of wrongdoing, Brady and others were indicted for conspiracy in 1882.{{sfn|Klotsche|1935|pp=414–415}} After two trials, the defendants were acquitted in 1883.{{sfn|Klotsche|1935|p=416}}

=== Great Railroad Strike ===
{{Main|Great Railroad Strike of 1877}}
]

In his first year in office, Hayes was faced with the United States' largest labor uprising to date, the ].{{sfnm|Foner|2002|1p=583|Stowell|1999|2pp=1–2|Richardson|2001|3p=121}} To make up for financial losses suffered since the panic of 1873, the major railroads had cut their employees' wages several times in 1877.{{sfn|Hoogenboom|1995|pp=326–327}} In July of that year, workers at the ] walked off the job in ], to protest their reduction in pay.{{sfnm|Bruce|1989|1pp=75–77|Stowell|1999|2p=117}} The ] quickly spread to workers of the ], ], and ] railroads, with the strikers soon numbering in the thousands.{{sfnm|Hoogenboom|1995|1pp=328–333|Davison|1972|2pp=145–153|Barnard|2005|3pp=445–447}} Fearing a ], Governor ] asked Hayes to send federal troops to Martinsburg, and Hayes did so, but when the troops arrived there was no riot, only a peaceful protest.{{sfn|Bruce|1989|pp=93–94}} In ], however, ] on July 20, and Hayes ordered the troops at ] to assist the governor in suppressing it.{{sfnm|Hoogenboom|1995|1pp=328–333|Davison|1972|2pp=145–153|Barnard|2005|3pp=445–447}}

] exploded into riots next, but Hayes was reluctant to send in troops without the governor's request.{{sfnm|Hoogenboom|1995|1pp=328–333|Davison|1972|2pp=145–153|Barnard|2005|3pp=445–447}} Other discontented citizens joined the railroad workers in rioting.{{sfnm|Stowell|1999|1pp=116–127|Hoogenboom|1995|2p=328}} After a few days, Hayes resolved to send in troops to protect federal property wherever it appeared to be threatened and gave Major General ] overall command of the situation, marking the first use of federal troops to break a strike against a private company.{{sfnm|Hoogenboom|1995|1pp=328–333|Davison|1972|2pp=145–153|Barnard|2005|3pp=445–447}} The riots spread further, to ] and ], where strikers shut down railroad facilities.{{sfnm|Hoogenboom|1995|1pp=328–333|Davison|1972|2pp=145–153|Barnard|2005|3pp=445–447}}

By July 29, the riots had ended and federal troops returned to their barracks.{{sfn|Foner|2002|p=585}} No federal troops had killed any of the strikers, or been killed themselves, but clashes between state militia troops and strikers resulted in deaths on both sides.{{sfnm|Davison|1972|1pp=148–150|Trefousse|2002|2p=95}} The railroads were victorious in the short term, as the workers returned to their jobs and some wage cuts remained in effect. But the public blamed the railroads for the strikes and violence, and they were compelled to improve working conditions and make no further cuts.{{sfnm|Hoogenboom|1995|1p=334|Davison|1972|2pp=152–153}} Business leaders praised Hayes, but his own opinion was more equivocal; as he recorded in his diary:
<blockquote>"The strikes have been put down by ''force;'' but now for the ''real'' remedy. Can't something done by education of strikers, by judicious control of capitalists, by wise general policy to end or diminish the evil? The railroad strikers, as a rule, are good men, sober, intelligent, and industrious."{{sfnm|Barnard|2005|1pp=446–447|Hayes|1922|2loc=v. 3|2p=440}}</blockquote>

=== Currency debate ===
] worked with Hayes to return the country to the gold standard.]] ] worked with Hayes to return the country to the gold standard.]]
Hayes confronted two issues regarding the ]. The first was the ], and its relation to ]. In 1873, the ] stopped the coinage of silver for all coins worth a dollar or more, effectively tying the dollar to the value of gold. As a result, the ] and the effects of the Panic of 1873 grew worse, making it more expensive for debtors to pay debts they had contracted when currency was less valuable.<ref>], p. 356</ref> Farmers and laborers, especially, clamored for the return of coinage in both metals, believing the increased money supply would restore wages and property values.<ref>], p. 358</ref> Democratic Representative ] of ] proposed a bill that would require the United States to coin as much silver as miners could sell the government, thus increasing the money supply and aiding debtors.<ref name=dav176>], pp. 176–177</ref> ], a Republican from ] offered an amendment in the Senate limiting the coinage to two to four million dollars per month, and the resulting ] passed both houses of Congress in 1878.<ref name=dav176/> Hayes feared that the Act would cause ] that would be ruinous to business, effectively impairing contracts that were based on the gold dollar, as the silver dollar proposed in the bill would have an intrinsic value of 90 to 92 percent of the existing gold dollar.<ref name=hoog358>], pp. 358–360</ref> Further, Hayes believed that inflating the currency was an act of dishonesty, saying "xpediency and justice both demand an honest currency."<ref name=hoog358/> He vetoed the bill, but Congress overrode his veto, the only time it did so during his presidency.<ref name=dav176/>


Hayes confronted two issues regarding the ], the first of which was the ], and its relation to ]. In 1873, the ] stopped the coinage of silver for all coins worth a dollar or more, effectively tying the dollar to the value of gold. As a result, the ] and the effects of the Panic of 1873 grew worse, making it more expensive for debtors to pay debts they had contracted when currency was less valuable.{{sfn|Hoogenboom|1995|p=356}} Farmers and laborers, especially, clamored for the return of coinage in both metals, believing the increased money supply would restore wages and property values.{{sfn|Unger|2008|p=358}} Democratic Representative ] of ] proposed a bill to require the United States to coin as much silver as miners could sell the government, thus increasing the money supply and aiding debtors.{{sfn|Davison|1972|pp=176–177}} ], a Republican from ], offered an amendment in the Senate limiting the coinage to two to four million dollars per month, and the resulting ] passed both houses of Congress in 1878.{{sfn|Davison|1972|pp=176–177}} Hayes feared the Act would cause ] that would be ruinous to business, effectively impairing contracts that were based on the gold dollar, as the silver dollar proposed in the bill would have an intrinsic value of 90 to 92 percent of the existing gold dollar.{{sfn|Hoogenboom|1995|pp=358–360}} He also believed that inflating the currency was dishonest, saying, "xpediency and justice both demand an honest currency."{{sfn|Hoogenboom|1995|pp=358–360}} He vetoed the bill, but Congress overrode his veto, the only time it did so during his presidency.{{sfn|Davison|1972|pp=176–177}}
The second issue concerned ] (commonly called ]), a form of ] first issued during the Civil War. The government accepted these notes as valid for payment of taxes and tariffs, but unlike ordinary dollars, they were not redeemable in gold.<ref name=dav176/> The ] of 1875 required the treasury to redeem any outstanding greenbacks in gold, thus retiring them from circulation and restoring a single, gold-backed currency.<ref name=dav176/> Sherman agreed with Hayes's favorable opinion of the Act, and stockpiled gold in preparation for the exchange of greenbacks for gold.<ref name=hoog358/> Once the public was confident that they could redeem greenbacks for specie (gold), however, few did so; when the Act took effect in 1879, only $130,000 out of the $346,000,000 outstanding dollars in greenbacks were actually redeemed.<ref>], p. 107</ref> Together with the Bland–Allison Act, the successful specie resumption effected a workable compromise between inflationists and ] men and, as the world economy began to improve, agitation for more greenbacks and silver coinage quieted down for the rest of Hayes's term in office.<ref>], pp. 177–180</ref>

{{-}}
The second issue concerned ] (commonly called ]), a form of ] first issued during the Civil War. The government accepted these notes as valid for payment of taxes and tariffs, but unlike ordinary dollars, they were not redeemable in gold.{{sfn|Davison|1972|pp=176–177}} The ] of 1875 required the treasury to redeem any outstanding greenbacks in gold, thus retiring them from circulation and restoring a single, gold-backed currency.{{sfn|Davison|1972|pp=176–177}} Sherman agreed with Hayes's favorable opinion of the Act, and stockpiled gold in preparation for the exchange of greenbacks for gold.{{sfn|Hoogenboom|1995|pp=358–360}} But once the public was confident that they could redeem greenbacks for specie (gold), few did so; when the Act took effect in 1879, only $130,000 of the outstanding $346,000,000 in greenbacks were actually redeemed.{{sfn|Trefousse|2002|p=107}} Together with the Bland–Allison Act, the successful specie resumption effected a workable compromise between inflationists and ] men and, as the world economy began to improve, agitation for more greenbacks and silver coinage quieted down for the rest of Hayes's presidency.{{sfn|Davison|1972|pp=177–180}}


===Foreign policy=== === Foreign policy ===
] ]
Most of Hayes's foreign policy concerns involved ]. In 1878, following the ], he arbitrated a territorial dispute between ] and ].<ref name=hoog416>], p. 416</ref> Hayes awarded the disputed land in the ] region to Paraguay, and the Paraguayans honored him by renaming a city (]) and a ] (]) in his honor.<ref name=hoog416/> Hayes was also perturbed over the plans of ], the builder of the ], to construct a canal across the ], which was then owned by ].<ref name=hoog417>], pp. 417–418</ref> Concerned about a repetition of ], Hayes interpreted the ] firmly.<ref name=hoog420>], pp. 420–421; ], p. 442</ref> In a message to Congress, Hayes explained his opinion on the canal: "The policy of this country is a canal under American control&nbsp;... The United States cannot consent to the surrender of this control to any European power or any combination of European powers."<ref name=hoog420/>


Most of Hayes's foreign-policy concerns involved ]. In 1878, following the ], he arbitrated a territorial dispute between ] and ].{{sfn|Hoogenboom|1995|p=416}} Hayes awarded the disputed land in the ] region to Paraguay, and the Paraguayans honored him by renaming a city (]) and a ] (]) in his honor.{{sfn|Hoogenboom|1995|p=416}} Hayes became concerned over the plans of ], the builder of the ], to construct a canal across the ], then part of ].{{sfn|Hoogenboom|1995|pp=417–418}} Worried about a repetition of ], Hayes interpreted the ] firmly.{{sfnm|Hoogenboom|1995|1pp=420–421|Barnard|2005|2p=442}} In a message to Congress, Hayes explained his opinion on the canal: "The policy of this country is a canal under American control&nbsp;... The United States cannot consent to the surrender of this control to any European power or any combination of European powers."{{sfnm|Hoogenboom|1995|1pp=420–421|Barnard|2005|2p=442}}
The ] also drew Hayes's attention. Throughout the 1870s, "lawless bands" often crossed the border on raids into Texas.<ref name=hoog335>], p. 335; ], p. 443</ref> Three months after taking office, Hayes granted the Army the power to pursue ]s, even if it required crossing into Mexican territory.<ref name=hoog335/> ], the Mexican president, protested the order and sent troops to the border.<ref name=hoog335/> The situation calmed as Díaz and Hayes agreed to jointly pursue bandits and Hayes agreed not to allow Mexican revolutionaries to raise armies in the United States.<ref>], p. 337; ], p. 444</ref> The violence along the border decreased, and in 1880 Hayes revoked the order allowing pursuit into Mexico.<ref>], p. 338</ref>


The ] also drew Hayes's attention. Throughout the 1870s, "lawless bands" often crossed the border on raids into Texas.{{sfnm|Hoogenboom|1995|1p=335|Barnard|2005|2p=443}} Three months after taking office, Hayes granted the Army the power to pursue ]s, even if it required crossing into Mexican territory.{{sfnm|Hoogenboom|1995|1p=335|Barnard|2005|2p=443}} Mexican president ] protested the order and sent troops to the border.{{sfnm|Hoogenboom|1995|1p=335|Barnard|2005|2p=443}} The situation calmed as Díaz and Hayes agreed to jointly pursue bandits and Hayes agreed not to allow Mexican revolutionaries to raise armies in the United States.{{sfnm|Hoogenboom|1995|1p=337|Barnard|2005|2p=444}} The violence along the border decreased, and in 1880 Hayes revoked the order allowing pursuit into Mexico.{{sfn|Hoogenboom|1995|p=338}}
Outside of the Western hemisphere, Hayes's biggest foreign policy concern dealt with ]. In 1868, the Senate had ratified the ] with China, allowing an unrestricted flow of ] into the country. As the economy soured after the ], Chinese immigrants were blamed for depressing workmen's wages.<ref name=hoog387>], p. 387</ref> During the Great Railroad Strike of 1877, anti-Chinese riots broke out in ], and a ], the ], was formed with an emphasis on stopping Chinese immigration.<ref name=hoog387/> In response, Congress passed a Chinese Exclusion Act in 1879, abrogating the 1868 treaty.<ref name=hoog388>], pp. 388–389; ], pp. 447–449</ref> Hayes vetoed the bill, believing that the United States should not abrogate treaties without negotiation.<ref name=hoog388/> The veto drew praise among eastern liberals, but Hayes was bitterly denounced in the West.<ref name=hoog388/> In the subsequent furor, Democrats in the House of Representatives attempted to ] him, but narrowly failed when Republicans prevented a ] by refusing to vote.<ref name=hoog390>], pp. 390–391</ref> After the veto, ] ] suggested that both countries work together to reduce immigration, and he and ] negotiated with the Chinese to do so.<ref name=hoog390/> Congress passed a new law to that effect, the ] of 1882, after Hayes left office.<ref name=hoog390/>


Outside the ], Hayes's biggest foreign-policy concern dealt with China. In 1868 the Senate had ratified the ] with China, allowing an unrestricted flow of Chinese immigrants into the United States. As the economy soured after the ], Chinese immigrants were blamed in the American West for depressing workmen's wages.{{sfn|Hoogenboom|1995|p=387}} During the Great Railroad Strike of 1877, anti-Chinese riots broke out in ], and a ], the ], formed with an emphasis on stopping Chinese immigration.{{sfn|Hoogenboom|1995|p=387}} In response, Congress passed the ] in 1879, abrogating the 1868 treaty.{{sfnm|Hoogenboom|1995|1pp=388–389|Barnard|2005|2pp=447–449|Rhodes|1919|3pp=180–196}} Hayes vetoed the bill, believing that the United States should not abrogate treaties without negotiation.{{sfnm|Hoogenboom|1995|1pp=388–389|Barnard|2005|2pp=447–449}} The veto drew praise from Northeastern New England Republicans, but Hayes was bitterly denounced in the ].{{sfnm|Hoogenboom|1995|1pp=388–389|Barnard|2005|2pp=447–449}} In the subsequent furor, Democrats in the House of Representatives attempted to ] him, but narrowly failed when Republicans prevented a ] by refusing to vote.{{sfn|Hoogenboom|1995|pp=390–391}} After the veto, ] ] suggested that the countries work together to reduce immigration, and he and ] negotiated with the Chinese to do so.{{sfn|Hoogenboom|1995|pp=390–391}} Congress passed a new law to that effect, the ] of 1882, after Hayes had left office.{{sfn|Hoogenboom|1995|pp=390–391}}
===Indian policy===
]'s management of the Indian Bureau.]]
Interior Secretary ] carried out Hayes's ] policy, beginning with preventing the ] from taking over the ].<ref name=d184>], pp. 184–185</ref> Hayes and Schurz carried out a policy that included assimilation into white culture, educational training, and dividing Indian land into individual allotments.<ref name=t109>], p. 109; ], pp. 186–187</ref> Hayes believed that his policies would lead to self-sufficiency and peace between Indians and whites.<ref>], pp. 341–343; 449–450</ref> The ] was favored by liberal reformers at the time, including Schurz, but instead proved detrimental to American Indians as most of their land was later resold at low prices to white ].<ref>], pp. 452–454</ref>Hayes allowed Shurz to make neccessary reforms to break up fraud in the ]. <ref name=Hpp161-162>Hoogenboom (1988), pp. 161-162</ref> Indians for the first time were given responsibility for policing their understaffed reservations.<ref name=Hpp119_161-162>Hoogenboom (1988), pp. 119, 161-162</ref>


In 1877 former President ] embarked on a ] shortly after his second term. Hayes was aware of Grant's popularity in Europe and encouraged Grant to extend his tour in the hope that it would improve various foreign relations and strengthen American interests abroad.{{sfn|Campbell|2016|pp=xi–xii, 2–3}} When Grant was in ] he boarded ], a screw ] that Hayes had personally sent by for Grant's winter cruise about the Mediterranean and journey to Egypt.{{sfn|White|2016|p=597}}{{sfnm|McFeely|1981|1pp=464|White|2016|2pp=589, 599}}
Hayes dealt with several conflicts with Indian tribes. The ], led by ], began ] in June 1877 when Major General ] ordered them to move on to a ].<ref name=hoog338>], pp. 338–340</ref> Howard's men defeated the Nez Perce in battle, and the tribe began a 1700-mile retreat into ].<ref name=hoog338/> In October, after a decisive battle at ], ], Chief Joseph surrendered and General ] ordered the tribe transported to ], where they were forced to remain until 1885.<ref>], pp. 340–341</ref> The Nez Perce war was not the last conflict in the West, as the ] ] in Spring 1878 and raided nearby settlements before being defeated by Howard's army in July of that year.<ref name=d184/> War with the ] broke out in 1879 when the Utes killed Indian agent ], who had been attempting to convert them to Christianity.<ref name=t123>], p. 123</ref> The subsequent ] ended when Schurz negotiated peace with the Utes and prevented the white Coloradans from taking revenge for Meeker's death.<ref name=t123/>


=== Indian policy ===
Hayes also became involved in resolving the removal of the ] tribe from ] to ] (present-day ]) because of a misunderstanding during the Grant Administration.<ref name=s173>], pp. 450–454; ], p. 173</ref> The tribe's problems came to Hayes's attention after their chief, ], filed a lawsuit to contest Schurz's demand that they stay in Indian Territory. Overruling Schurz, Hayes set up a commission in 1880 that ruled Ponca were free to return to Nebraska or stay on their reservation in Indian Territory.<ref name=s173/> The Ponca were awarded compensation for their land rights, which had been previously granted to the ].<ref name=s173/> In a message to Congress in February 1881, Hayes insisted he would "give to these injured people that measure of redress which is required alike by justice and by humanity."<ref>], p. 124</ref>
]'s management of the Indian Bureau]]
{{-}}


Interior Secretary ] carried out Hayes's ] policy, beginning with preventing the ] from taking over the ].{{sfn|Davison|1972|pp=184–185}} Hayes and Schurz carried out a policy that included assimilation into white culture, educational training, and dividing Indian land into individual household allotments.{{sfnm|Trefousse|2002|1p=109|Davison|1972|2pp=186–187}} Hayes believed his policies would lead to self-sufficiency and peace between Indians and whites.{{sfn|Hoogenboom|1995|pp=341–343, 449–450}} The ] under the Dawes Act, later signed by President ] in 1887, was favored by liberal reformers at the time, including Schurz, but instead proved detrimental to American Indians. They lost much of their land through sales of what the government classified as "surplus lands", and more to unscrupulous white ] who tried to get the Indians to sell their allotments.{{sfn|Stuart|1977|pp=452–454}} Hayes and Schurz reformed the ] to reduce fraud and gave Indians responsibility for policing their reservations, but they were generally understaffed.{{sfn|Hoogenboom|1995|pp=343–344, 449}}
===Hayes's White House===
Hayes and his wife, ], were known for their policy of keeping an alcohol-free White House, giving rise to her nickname "Lemonade Lucy."<ref>], p. 3; ], p. xv</ref> The first reception at the Hayes White House included ].<ref>], p. 82; ], p. 480</ref> However, Hayes was dismayed at drunken behavior at receptions hosted by ambassadors around Washington, leading him to follow his wife's ] leanings.<ref name=hoog384>], p. 384</ref> Alcohol was not served again in the Hayes White House. Critics charged Hayes with parsimony, but Hayes spent more money (which came out of his personal budget) after the ban, ordering that any savings from eliminating alcohol be used on more lavish entertainment.<ref>], p. 385–386; ], p. 480</ref> His temperance policy also paid political dividends, strengthening his support among Protestant ministers.<ref name=hoog384/> Although Secretary Evarts quipped that at the White House dinners, "water flowed like wine," the policy was a success in convincing ] to vote Republican.<ref>], p. 458</ref>


Hayes dealt with several conflicts with Indian tribes. The ], led by ], began ] in June 1877 when Major General ] ordered them to move to a ]. Howard's men defeated the Nez Perce in battle, and the tribe began a 1,700-mile retreat to ].{{sfn|Hoogenboom|1995|pp=338–340}} In October, after a decisive battle at ], ], Chief Joseph surrendered and ] ordered the tribe transported to Indian Territory in ], where they were forced to remain until 1885.{{sfn|Hoogenboom|1995|pp=340–341}} The Nez Perce war was not the last conflict in the West, as the ] ] in spring 1878 in Idaho and raided nearby settlements before being defeated by Howard's army in July.{{sfn|Davison|1972|pp=184–185}} War with the ] broke out in Colorado in 1879 when some Ute killed Indian agent ], who had been attempting to convert them to Christianity. The subsequent ] ended when Schurz negotiated peace with the Ute and prevented white settlers from taking revenge for Meeker's death.{{sfn|Trefousse|2002|p=123}}
===Administration and Cabinet===
]
{{Infobox U.S. Cabinet
|align=left
|clear=yes
|Name=Hayes
|President=Rutherford B. Hayes
|President start=1877
|President end=1881
|Vice President=]
|Vice President start=1877
|Vice President end=1881
|State=]
|State start=1877
|State end=1881
|War=]
|War start=1877
|War end=1879
|War 2=]
|War start 2=1879
|War end 2=1881
|Treasury=]
|Treasury start=1877
|Treasury end=1881
|Justice=]
|Justice start=1877
|Justice end=1881
|Post=]
|Post start=1877
|Post end=1880
|Post 2=]
|Post start 2=1880
|Post end 2=1881
|Navy=]
|Navy start=1877
|Navy end=1880
|Navy 2=]
|Navy date 2=1881
|Interior=]
|Interior start=1877
|Interior end=1881
}}


Hayes also became involved in resolving the removal of the ] tribe from ] to ] (present-day ]) because of a misunderstanding during the Grant administration. The tribe's problems came to Hayes's attention after its chief, ], filed a lawsuit to contest Schurz's demand that they stay in Indian Territory. Overruling Schurz, Hayes set up a commission in 1880 that ruled the Ponca were free to return to their home territory in Nebraska or stay on their reservation in Indian Territory. The Ponca were awarded compensation for their land rights, which had been previously granted to the ].{{sfnm|Hoogenboom|1995|1pp=450–454|Sproat|1974|2p=173}} In a message to Congress in February 1881, Hayes insisted he would "give to these injured people that measure of redress which is required alike by justice and by humanity."{{sfn|Trefousse|2002|p=124}}
===Supreme Court appointments===
] confirmation to the Supreme Court was more difficult than Hayes expected.]]
Hayes appointed two ] to the ]. The first vacancy occurred when David Davis resigned to enter the Senate during the election controversy of 1876. On taking office, Hayes appointed ] to the seat. A former candidate for governor of Kentucky, Harlan had been ]'s campaign manager at the 1876 Republican convention, and Hayes had earlier considered him for ].<ref name=jmh>], pp. 130–132</ref> Hayes submitted the nomination in October 1877, but it aroused some dissent in the Senate because of Harlan's limited experience in public office.<ref name=jmh/> Harlan was nonetheless confirmed and served on the court for thirty-four years, in which he voted (usually in the minority) for an aggressive enforcement of the civil rights laws.<ref name=jmh/> In 1880, a second seat became vacant on the resignation of Justice ]. Hayes nominated ], a ] Republican ] judge from ].<ref name=wbw>], p. 132; ], p. 454</ref> Woods served six years on the Court, ultimately proving a disappointment to Hayes as he interpreted the Constitution in a manner more similar to that of Southern Democrats than to Hayes's own preferences.<ref>], pp. 268, 498</ref>


=== Great Western Tour of 1880 ===
Hayes attempted, unsuccessfully, to fill a third vacancy in 1881. Justice ] resigned with the expectation that Hayes would fill his seat by appointing ], who was a friend of both men.<ref name=dav129>], p. 129</ref> Many Senators objected to the appointment, believing that Mathews was too close to corporate and railroad interests, especially those of ].<ref>], pp. 498–499</ref> The Senate adjourned without voting on the nomination.<ref name=dav129/> The following year, when ] entered the White House, he re-submitted Mathews's nomination. This time, the Senate did vote, confirming Mathews by one vote, 24 to 23.<ref name=dav129/> Mathews served for eight years until his death in 1889. His opinion in '']'' in 1886 advanced his and Hayes's views on the protection of the rights of ethnic minorities.<ref>], p. 457</ref>
], 1881]]
{{-}}


In 1880, Hayes embarked on a 71-day tour of the ], becoming the second sitting president to travel west of the ]. (Hayes's immediate predecessor, Ulysses Grant, visited Utah in 1875.) Hayes's traveling party included his wife and ], who helped organize the trip. Hayes began his trip in September 1880, departing from Chicago on the ]. He journeyed across the continent, ultimately arriving in California, stopping first in Wyoming and then Utah and Nevada, reaching Sacramento and San Francisco. By railroad and stagecoach, the party traveled north to Oregon, arriving in Portland, and from there to Vancouver, Washington. Going by steamship, they visited Seattle, and then returned to San Francisco. Hayes then toured several southwestern states before returning to Ohio in November, in time to cast a vote in the 1880 presidential election.<ref>{{cite web|last1=Loftus|first1=David|title=Rutherford B. Hayes's visit to Oregon, 1880|url=http://www.oregonencyclopedia.org/articles/hayes_rutherford_b_visit_to_oregon_1880/|website=The Oregon Encyclopedia|access-date=February 17, 2016}}</ref>
==Post-Presidency==
]
Hayes decided not to seek re-election in ], keeping his pledge that he would not run for a second term. He was gratified with the election of James A. Garfield to succeed him, and consulted with him on appointments for the next administration.<ref>], pp. 447–465</ref> After Garfield's inauguration, Hayes and his family returned to ].<ref>], pp. 466–467</ref> Although he remained a loyal Republican, Hayes was not too disappointed in ]'s election to the Presidency in 1884, approving of the New York Democrat's views on civil service reform.<ref>], p. 483</ref> He was also pleased at the progress of the political career of ], his army comrade and political protégé.<ref>], pp. 524–525</ref>


=== Hayes's White House ===
Hayes became an active advocate for educational charities, advocating federal education subsidies for all children.<ref>], pp. 471–475; ], p. 156</ref> He believed that education was the best way to heal the rifts in American society and allow individuals to improve themselves.<ref>], pp. 154–156</ref> Hayes was appointed to the Board of Trustees of ], the school he helped found during his time as governor of Ohio, in 1887.<ref>], pp. 498–499</ref> He emphasized the need for ], as well as academic, education: "I preach the gospel of work," he wrote, "I believe in skilled labor as a part of education."<ref>], p. 506</ref> He urged Congress, unsuccessfully, to pass a bill written by Senator ] that would have allowed federal aid for education for the first time.<ref>], pp. 48–49</ref> Hayes gave a speech in 1889 encouraging black students to apply for scholarships from the ], one of the charities with which he was affiliated.<ref name=hoog518>], pp. 518–523</ref> One such student, ], received a scholarship in 1892.<ref name=hoog518/> Hayes also advocated ].<ref>], pp. 496–497; ], p. 151</ref>
Hayes and his wife ] were known for their policy of keeping an alcohol-free White House, giving rise to her nickname "Lemonade Lucy."{{sfnm|Hoogenboom|1995|1p=3|Davison|1972|2p=xv}} The first reception at the Hayes White House included wine,{{sfnm|Davison|1972|1p=82|Barnard|2005|2p=480}} but Hayes was dismayed at drunken behavior at receptions hosted by ambassadors around Washington, leading him to follow his wife's ] leanings.{{sfn|Hoogenboom|1995|p=384}} Alcohol was not served again in the Hayes White House. Critics charged Hayes with parsimony, but Hayes spent more money (which came out of his personal budget) after the ban, ordering that any savings from eliminating alcohol be used on more lavish entertainment.{{sfnm|Hoogenboom|1995|1pp=385–386|Barnard|2005|2p=480}} His temperance policy also paid political dividends, strengthening his support among ] ministers.{{sfn|Hoogenboom|1995|p=384}} Although Secretary Evarts quipped that at the White House dinners, "water flowed like wine," the policy was a success in convincing ] to vote Republican.{{sfn|Hoogenboom|1995|p=458}}


=== Judicial appointments ===
In retirement, Hayes was troubled by the disparity between the rich and the poor, saying in an 1886 speech that "free government cannot long endure if property is largely in a few hands and large masses of people are unable to earn homes, education, and a support in old age."<ref>], p. 513; ], p. 539</ref> The following year, Hayes recorded his thoughts on that subject in his diary:
{{main|List of federal judges appointed by Rutherford B. Hayes}}
<blockquote>"In church it occurred to me that it is time for the public to hear that the giant evil and danger in this country, the danger which transcends all others, is the vast wealth owned or controlled by a few persons. Money is power. In Congress, in state legislatures, in city councils, in the courts, in the political conventions, in the press, in the pulpit, in the circles of the educated and the talented, its influence is growing greater and greater. Excessive wealth in the hands of the few means extreme poverty, ignorance, vice, and wretchedness as the lot of the many. It is not yet time to debate about the remedy. The previous question is as to the danger—the evil. Let the people be fully informed and convinced as to the evil. Let them earnestly seek the remedy and it will be found. Fully to know the evil is the first step towards reaching its eradication. ] is strong when he portrays the rottenness of the present system. We are, to say the least, not yet ready for his remedy. We may reach and remove the difficulty by changes in the laws regulating corporations, descents of property, wills, trusts, taxation, and a host of other important interests, not omitting lands and other property."<ref>], v. 4, p. 354; ], pp. 46–47</ref></blockquote>
] confirmation to the Supreme Court was more difficult than Hayes expected.]]

Hayes appointed two ] to the ]. The first vacancy occurred when David Davis resigned to enter the Senate during the election controversy of 1876. On taking office, Hayes appointed ] to the seat. A former candidate for governor of Kentucky, Harlan had been ]'s campaign manager at the 1876 Republican convention, and Hayes had earlier considered him for ].{{sfn|Davison|1972|pp=130–132}} Hayes submitted the nomination in October 1877, but it aroused some dissent in the Senate because of Harlan's limited experience in public office.{{sfn|Davison|1972|pp=130–132}} Harlan was nonetheless confirmed and served on the court for 34 years, voting (usually in the minority) for aggressive enforcement of the civil rights laws.{{sfn|Davison|1972|pp=130–132}} In 1880, a second seat became vacant upon the resignation of Justice ]. Hayes nominated ], a ] Republican ] judge from ].{{sfnm|Davison|1972|1p=132|Hoogenboom|1995|2p=454}} Woods served six years on the Court, ultimately proving a disappointment to Hayes as he interpreted the Constitution in a manner more similar to that of Southern Democrats than to Hayes's own preferences.{{sfn|Barnard|2005|pp=268, 498}}

Hayes unsuccessfully attempted to fill a third vacancy in 1881. Justice ] resigned with the expectation that Hayes would fill his seat by appointing ], a friend of both men.{{sfn|Davison|1972|p=129}} Many senators objected to the appointment, believing that Matthews was too close to corporate and railroad interests, especially those of ],{{sfn|Barnard|2005|pp=498–499}} and the Senate adjourned without voting on the nomination.{{sfn|Davison|1972|p=129}} The following year, when ] entered the White House, he resubmitted Matthews's nomination to the Senate, which this time confirmed Matthews by one vote, 24 to 23.{{sfn|Davison|1972|p=129}} Matthews served for eight years until his death in 1889. His opinion in '']'' in 1886 advanced his and Hayes's views on the protection of ethnic minorities' rights.{{sfn|Hoogenboom|1995|p=457}}

== Post-presidency (1881–1893) ==
]
Hayes declined to seek reelection in ], keeping his pledge not to run for a second term.{{sfn|Calhoun|2017|p=549}} During the ], he opposed the nomination of both Conkling and Arthur for the Vice Presidency, as well as opposing Grant's attempt to run for a third term. Hayes considered Grant a failure as president, and believed the president should have a single six-year term.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Volume III Chapter XXXVIII |url=https://resources.ohiohistory.org/hayes/browse/chapterxxxviii.html |access-date=2023-10-20 |website=resources.ohiohistory.org}}</ref> He was gratified by the election of fellow Ohio Republican ] to succeed him, and consulted with him on appointments for the next administration.{{sfn|Hoogenboom|1995|pp=447–465}} After Garfield's inauguration, Hayes and his family returned to ].{{sfn|Hoogenboom|1995|pp=466–467}} In 1881, he was elected a companion of the ]. He served as commander-in-chief (national president) of the Loyal Legion from 1888 until his death in 1893. Although he remained a loyal Republican, Hayes was not too disappointed in Democrat ]'s election to the presidency in 1884, approving of Cleveland's views on civil service reform.{{sfn|Hoogenboom|1995|p=483}} He was also pleased at the progress of the political career of ], his army comrade and political protégé.{{sfn|Hoogenboom|1995|pp=524–525}}

Hayes became an advocate for educational charities and federal education subsidies for all children.{{sfnm|Hoogenboom|1995|1pp=471–475|Thelen|1970|2p=156}} He believed education was the best way to heal the rifts in American society and allow people to improve themselves.{{sfn|Thelen|1970|pp=154–156}} In 1887 Hayes was appointed to the Board of Trustees of ]<!--Wikipedians do not use "The" as part of Ohio State's name; it is considered a marketing gimmick, and routinely deleted.-->, the school he helped found as governor of Ohio.{{sfn|Hoogenboom|1995|pp=498–499}} He emphasized the need for ], as well as academic, education: "I preach the gospel of work," he wrote, "I believe in skilled labor as a part of education."{{sfn|Barnard|2005|p=506}} He urged Congress, unsuccessfully, to pass a bill written by Senator ] that would have allowed federal aid for education for the first time.{{sfn|Swint|1952|pp=48–49}} In 1889 Hayes gave a speech encouraging black students to apply for scholarships from the ], one of the charities with which he was affiliated.{{sfn|Hoogenboom|1995|pp=518–523}} One such student, ], received a scholarship in 1892.{{sfn|Hoogenboom|1995|pp=518–523}} Hayes also advocated ].{{sfnm|Hoogenboom|1995|1pp=496–497|Thelen|1970|2p=151}}

In retirement, Hayes was troubled by the disparity between the rich and the poor, saying in an 1886 speech, "free government cannot long endure if property is largely in a few hands and large masses of people are unable to earn homes, education, and a support in old age."{{sfnm|Barnard|2005|1p=513|Hoogenboom|1995|2p=539}} The next year, he recorded thoughts on that subject in his diary:

{{blockquote |
In church it occurred to me that it is time for the public to hear that the giant evil and danger in this country, the danger which transcends all others, is the vast wealth owned or controlled by a few persons. Money is power. In Congress, in state legislatures, in city councils, in the courts, in the political conventions, in the press, in the pulpit, in the circles of the educated and the talented, its influence is growing greater and greater. Excessive wealth in the hands of the few means extreme poverty, ignorance, vice, and wretchedness as the lot of the many. It is not yet time to debate about the remedy. The previous question is as to the danger—the evil. Let the people be fully informed and convinced as to the evil. Let them earnestly seek the remedy and it will be found. Fully to know the evil is the first step towards reaching its eradication. ] is strong when he portrays the rottenness of the present system. We are, to say the least, not yet ready for his remedy. We may reach and remove the difficulty by changes in the laws regulating corporations, descents of property, wills, trusts, taxation, and a host of other important interests, not omitting lands and other property.{{sfnm|Hayes|1922|1loc=v. 4|1p=354|Swint|1952|2pp=46–47}}
}}
]
{{anchor|Death}}Hayes was greatly saddened by his wife's death in 1889.{{sfn|Hoogenboom|1995|pp=508–510}} When she died, he wrote, "the soul had left ".{{sfn|Hoogenboom|1995|pp=508–510}} After Lucy's death, Hayes's daughter Fanny became his traveling companion, and he enjoyed visits from his grandchildren.{{sfn|Hoogenboom|1995|pp=509–520}} In 1890, he chaired the Lake Mohonk Conference on the Negro Question, a gathering of reformers that met in upstate New York to discuss racial issues.{{sfnm|Hoogenboom|1995|1pp=515–517|Foner|2002|2pp=605–606}} Hayes died of complications of a heart attack at his home on January 17, 1893, at the age of 70.{{sfn|Barnard|2005|pp=522–523}} His last words were "I know that I'm going where Lucy is."{{sfn|Barnard|2005|pp=522–523}} President-elect Cleveland and Ohio governor McKinley, who would be Cleveland's immediate successor in 1897, led the funeral procession that followed his body until Hayes was interred in ] in ].{{sfn|Hoogenboom|1995|pp=532–533}} In 1915, his remains were moved to his former home in ] for burial with his wife Lucy.<ref>{{CongBio|H000393|name=Rutherford B. Hayes|inline=1}}</ref><ref>{{cite book|url=|chapter=Hayes, Rutherford Birchard, #5668|title=Resting Places: The Burial Sites of More Than 14,000 Famous Persons|edition=3rd|first1=Scott|last1= Wilson|first2=Gregory W. (forward)|last2=Mank|date=2016|publisher=McFarland & Company, Inc.|isbn=978-0786479924|oclc=948561021}}</ref>


Hayes was greatly saddened by his wife's death in 1889.<ref name=hoog508>], pp. 508–510</ref> He wrote that "the soul had left " when she died.<ref name=hoog508/> After Lucy's death, Hayes's daughter, Fanny, became his traveling companion and he enjoyed visits from his grandchildren.<ref>], pp. 509–520</ref> In 1890, he chaired the Lake Mohonk Conference on the Negro Question, a gathering of reformers that discussed racial issues.<ref>], pp. 515–517; ] pp. 605–606</ref> Hayes died of complications of a heart attack at his home on January 17, 1893.<ref name=barn522>], pp. 522–523</ref> His last words were "I know that I'm going where Lucy is."<ref name=barn522/> President-elect Grover Cleveland and Ohio Governor William McKinley led the funeral procession that followed Hayes's body until he was interred in ].<ref>], pp. 532–533</ref> Following the donation of his home to the state of Ohio for the ], he was re-interred there in 1915.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.nps.gov/history/history/online_books/Presidents/site50.htm |title=National Park Service&nbsp;– The Presidents (Spiegel Grove) |date=January 24, 2004 |accessdate=November 22, 2010}}</ref> The following year the ], the first presidential library in the United States, was opened on the site, funded by contributions from the state of Ohio and Hayes' family.<ref>], pp. 485–488</ref>
{{clear}} {{clear}}


==Legacy and honors==
==Notes==
Biographer ] has written that Hayes's greatest achievement was to restore popular faith in the presidency and reverse the deterioration of executive power that had established itself after the ] in 1865. His supporters have praised his commitment to civil-service reform; his critics have derided his leniency toward former Confederate states as well as his withdrawal of federal support for ]' voting rights and civil rights.<ref>{{cite book | last= Hamilton |first= Neil A. |date=2010 | title= Presidents: A Biographical Dictionary |url= https://books.google.com/books?id=hikn4BGc2nUC&pg=PA163 |location= Washington, DC |publisher= Facts on File |page= 163 |isbn= 978-0-8160-7708-3}}</ref> Historians and scholars generally ] Hayes as an average to below-average president.<ref>{{cite news |date= November 16, 2000 |title= Rating the Presidents of the United States, 1789–2000: A Survey of Scholars in History, Political Science, and Law |url= https://fedsoc.org/commentary/publications/rating-the-presidents-of-the-united-states-1789-2000-a-survey-of-scholars-in-history-political-science-and-law |work= Federalist Society | location= Washington, DC}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|last = Otis|first = John|date = October 30, 2014|title = The Place Where Rutherford B. Hayes Is A Really Big Deal|url = https://www.npr.org/sections/parallels/2014/10/30/360126710/the-place-where-rutherford-b-hayes-is-a-really-big-deal |work = NPR |location = Washington, DC|quote = Rutherford B. Hayes, the 19th U.S. president, doesn't get much respect. He's remembered, if at all, for losing the popular vote in 1876 but winning the presidency through Electoral College maneuvering.}}
{{Reflist|group=note|colwidth=35em}}
</ref>


After the donation of his home to the state of Ohio for ], Hayes was reinterred there in 1915.<ref name="NPS 2004-01-24">{{cite web|title = The Presidents (Spiegel Grove)|date = January 24, 2004|publisher = National Park Service|work = Survey of Historic Sites and Buildings|url = http://www.nps.gov/history/history/online_books/Presidents/site50.htm|access-date = November 22, 2010}}</ref> The next year the ], the country's first presidential library, opened on the site, funded by contributions from the state of Ohio and Hayes's family.{{sfn|Smith|1980|pp=485–488}}
==References==
{{Reflist|colwidth=20em}}


In 1922 the U.S. Post Office issued its first postage stamp honoring Hayes, 29 years after his death, on the 100th anniversary of his birth. Another Hayes stamp, ], was ].<ref>{{cite book |last= |first= |editor=Bigalke, Jay |title=Scott Standard Postage Stamp Catalogue, 2024 |volume=1A |authorlink= |publisher=Amos Media |location=Sydney, Ohio |year=2023 |isbn= |url= |ref=scott2024}}</ref> In 2011, the U.S. Mint released a "Golden Dollar", the first item of U.S. currency to honor Hayes.<ref>{{cite web |first= |last= |title=2011 P Presidential Dollars : Rutherford B. Hayes Golden Dollar |publisher=USA Coin Book |year= |accessdate=December 2, 2023 |url=https://www.usacoinbook.com/coins/5272/dollars/presidential/2011-P/rutherford-b-hayes/ }}</ref>
==Sources==
{{refbegin}}
'''Books'''
* {{cite book |author=Barnard, Harry |title=Rutherford Hayes and his America |year=2005 |origyear=1954 |publisher=American Political Biography Press |location=Newtown, Connecticut |isbn=978-0-945707-05-9 |ref=barnard}}
* {{cite book |author=Bruce, Robert V. |title=1877: Year of Violence |year=1989 |origyear=1959 |publisher=Ivan R. Dee, Publisher |isbn=0-929587-05-7 |ref=bruce}}
* {{cite book |author=Conwell, Russell |authorlink=Russell Conwell |title=Life and public services of Gov. Rutherford B. Hayes |year=1876 |publisher=B. B. Russell |location=Boston |url=http://books.google.com/books?id=UUsTAAAAYAAJ |ref=conwell}}
* {{cite book |author=Davison, Kenneth E. |title=The Presidency of Rutherford B. Hayes |year=1972 |publisher=Greenwood Press |location=Westport, Connecticut |isbn=0-8371-6275-0 |ref=davison}}
* {{cite book |author=Foner, Eric |authorlink=Eric Foner |title=Reconstruction: America's Unfinished Revolution, 1863–1877 |year=2002 |origyear=1988 |publisher=Harper Perennial Modern Classics |location=New York |isbn=0-06-093716-5 |ref=foner}}
* {{cite book |author=Grant, Ulysses S. |authorlink=Ulysses S. Grant |title=Personal Memoirs |year=2003 |origyear=1885 |publisher=Barnes & Noble, Inc| location=New York |isbn=0-7607-4990-6 |ref=grant}}
* {{cite book |author=Hayes, Rutherford B. |title=The Diary and Letters of Rutherford B. Hayes, Nineteenth President of the United States |editor=Williams, Charles Richard |year=1922 |publisher=Ohio State Archeological and Historical Society |location=Columbus, Ohio |url=http://www.ohiohistory.org/onlinedoc/hayes/index.cfm |ref=diary}}
* {{cite book |author=Hoogenboom, Ari |title=Rutherford Hayes: Warrior and President|year=1995 |publisher=University Press of Kansas| location=Lawrence, Kansas |isbn=978-0-7006-0641-2 |ref=hoog}}
* {{cite book |author=Reid, Whitelaw |authorlink=Whitelaw Reid |title=Ohio in the War: The history of her regiments, and other military organizations |year=1868 |publisher=Moore, Wilstach & Baldwin |url=http://books.google.com/books?id=qvKxouViJBEC |ref=reid}}
* {{cite book |author=Richardson, Heather Cox |title=The Death of Reconstruction |year=2001 |publisher=Harvard University Press |location=Cambridge, Massachusetts |isbn=0-674-00637-2 |ref=rich}}
* {{cite book |author=Robinson, Lloyd |title=The Stolen Election: Hayes versus Tilden—1876 |year=2001 |origyear=1968 |publisher=Tom Doherty Associates |location=New York |isbn=0-7653-0206-3 |ref=robinson}}
* {{cite book |last=Sproat| first=John G. |editor-last=Woodward| editor-first=C. Vann |editor-link=C. Vann Woodward |title=Responses of the Presidents to Charges of Misconduct |publisher=Delacorte Press |location=New York |date=1974 |pages=163–176 |chapter=Rutherford B. Hayes: 1877–1881 |ref=sproat|isbn=0440059232}}
* {{cite book |author=Stowell, David O. |title=Streets, Railroads, and the Great Strike of 1877 |year=1999 |publisher=University Of Chicago Press |location=Chicago |isbn=0-226-77668-9 |ref=stowell}}
* {{cite book |author=Trefousse, Hans L. |authorlink=Hans L. Trefousse |title=Rutherford B. Hayes |year=2002 |publisher=Times Books |location=New York |isbn=0-8050-6907-0 |ref=trefousse}}
* {{cite book |author=Unger, Irwin |authorlink=Irwin Unger |title=The Greenback Era: A Social and Political History of American Finance, 1865–1879 |year=2008 |origyear=1964 |publisher=ACLS Humanities |location=New York |isbn=1-59740-431-4 |ref=unger}}


{| style="margin:auto"
'''Articles'''
| ], 1922 issue, 100th anniversary of birth ]]
* {{cite journal |title=President Hayes' "Withdrawal of the Troops": An Enduring Myth | journal=The South Carolina Historical Magazine |first=Clarence |last=Clendenen |volume=70 |issue=4 |month=October |year=1969 |page=244 |jstor=27566958 |ref=clendenen |pages=240–250}}
|&nbsp;&nbsp;
* {{cite journal |first=Ezra |last=Paul |title=Congressional Relations and Public Relations in the Administration of Rutherford B. Hayes (1877–81) |journal=Presidential Studies Quarterly |volume=28 |year=1998 |month=Winter |jstor=27551831 |ref=paul |issue=1 |pages=68–87}}
| ]
* {{cite journal |first=Thomas A. |last=Smith |title=Before Hyde Park: The Rutherford B. Hayes Library |journal=The American Archivist |volume=43 |year=1980 |month=Fall |url=http://archivists.metapress.com/content/b11374522623124h/fulltext.pdf |ref=smith |issue=4}}
|}
*{{cite journal |title=United States Indian Policy: From the Dawes Act to the American Indian Policy Review Commission |journal=Social Service Review |first=Paul |last=Stuart |volume=51 |issue=3 |month=September |year=1977 |page=451 |ref=stuart |jstor=30015511 |pages=451–463 |doi=10.1086/643524}}

* {{cite journal |title=Rutherford B. Hayes, Educator | journal=The Mississippi Valley Historical Review |first=Henry L. |last=Swint |volume=39 |issue=1 |month=June |year=1952 |page=45 |jstor=1902843 |ref=swint |pages=45–60 |doi=10.2307/1902843}}
Hayes had arbitrated and decided an 1878 dispute between Argentina and Paraguay in favor of Paraguay, giving Paraguay 60% of its current territory. This led to the naming of a province in the region after him: ] (capital: ]); an official holiday: ], the anniversary of the decision, celebrated in Presidente Hayes province; a local soccer team: ] (also known as "Los Yanquis"), based in the national capital, ]; a postage stamp, the design of which was chosen in a contest run by the U.S. Embassy; and even the granting of the wish of a young girl who came out of a coma—a trip to the Hayes Presidential Center in Fremont, Ohio.<ref>{{cite web|last1=Teeter|first1=R|title=Rutherford Hayes' other legacy|url=http://www.dailykos.com/story/2009/02/16/698197/-Rutherford-Hayes-other-legacy|publisher=Kos Media, LLC|access-date=October 24, 2014|date=February 16, 2009}}</ref>
* {{cite journal |title=Rutherford B. Hayes and the Reform Tradition in the Gilded Age | journal=American Quarterly |first=David P. |last=Thelen |volume=22 |issue=2 |month=Summer |year=1970 |page=150 |jstor=2711639 |ref=thelen |pages=150–165 |doi=10.2307/2711639}}

Also named for Hayes is ].<ref>{{cite book |last1=Gannett |first1=Henry |title=The Origin of Certain Place Names in the United States |date=1905 |publisher=Government Printing Office |location=Washington |page= |edition=2nd |url=https://archive.org/details/bub_gb_9V1IAAAAMAAJ |access-date=March 10, 2017}}</ref>

Hayes was elected a member of the ] on October 21, 1890.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.americanantiquarian.org/memberlisth|title=MemberListH &#124; American Antiquarian Society|website=www.americanantiquarian.org}}</ref>

] in Hayes's hometown of Delaware, Ohio, was named in his honor, as is ], built in 1893, at the Ohio State University. It is Ohio State's oldest remaining building, and was placed on the National Register of Historic Places on July 16, 1970, due to its front facade, which remains virtually untouched from its original appearance. Hayes knew the building would be named in his honor, but did not live to see it completed.<ref>{{cite web|title=History of Hayes Hall|url=https://design.osu.edu/about/history-hayes-hall|publisher=The Ohio State University|access-date=February 14, 2019}}</ref> The City of Delaware also erected a statue of Hayes.

== See also ==
* ]
* ]

== Notes ==
{{Notelist|30em}}

== References ==
{{Reflist|25em}}

==Bibliography ==

===Books===
{{refbegin|30em}}
* {{cite book | last = Barnard | first = Harry | date = 2005 | orig-year = 1954 | title = Rutherford Hayes and his America | publisher = American Political Biography Press | location = Newtown, Connecticut | isbn = 978-0-945707-05-9}}
* {{cite book | last = Bruce | first = Robert V. | date = 1989 | orig-year = 1959 | title = 1877: Year of Violence | publisher = Ivan R. Dee, Publisher | isbn = 978-0-929587-05-9}}
* {{cite book |last=Calhoun |first=Charles W. |author-link=Charles W. Calhoun |title=The Presidency of Ulysses S. Grant |publisher=University Press of Kansas |location=Lawrence, Kansas |date=2017 |isbn=978-0-7006-2484-3}}
* {{cite book |last=Campbell |first=Edwina S. |title=Citizen of a Wider Commonwealth: Ulysses S. Grant's Postpresidential Diplomacy |publisher=Southern Illinois University Press |location=Carbondale, Illinois |date=2016 |isbn=978-0809334780 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=aZS-CwAAQBAJ }}
* {{cite book |last=Conwell |first=Russell H. |title=Life and public services of Gov. Rutherford B. Hayes |volume= |authorlink=Russell H. Conwell |publisher=B. B. Russell; Philadelphia, Quaker city pub. house |location=B oston |year=1876 |url=https://archive.org/details/lifepublicservic02conw/page/n7/mode/2up }}
* {{cite book | last = Davison | first = Kenneth E. | date = 1972 | title = The Presidency of Rutherford B. Hayes | url = https://archive.org/details/presidencyofruth00davi | url-access = registration | publisher = Greenwood Press | location = Westport, Connecticut | isbn = 978-0-8371-6275-1}}
* {{cite book | last1 = Dodds | first1 = Graham G. | title = Take Up Your Pen: Unilateral Presidential Directives in American Politics | date = 2013 | publisher = University of Pennsylvania Press | location = Philadelphia | isbn = 978-0-8122-0815-3 | url = https://books.google.com/books?id=PcN42ujUhMAC}}
* {{cite book | last = Foner | first = Eric | author-link = Eric Foner | date = 2002 | orig-year = 1988 | title = Reconstruction: America's Unfinished Revolution, 1863–1877 | publisher = Harper Perennial Modern Classics | location = New York | isbn = 978-0-06-093716-4}}
* {{cite book | last = Grant | first = Ulysses S. | author-link = Ulysses S. Grant | date = 2003 | orig-year = 1885 | title = Personal Memoirs | publisher = Barnes & Noble, Inc | location = New York | isbn = 978-0-7607-4990-6}}
* {{cite book |last=Hayes |first=Rutherford B. |date=1922 |editor-last=Williams |editor-first=Charles Richard |title=The Diary and Letters of Rutherford B. Hayes, Nineteenth President of the United States |publisher=Ohio State Archeological and Historical Society |location=Columbus, Ohio |url=https://archive.org/details/diarylettersofru01haye/page/n9/mode/2up |volume=1}}
* {{cite book |last=Hayes |first=Rutherford B. |date=1922 |editor-last=Williams |editor-first=Charles Richard |author-mask=2 |editor-mask=2 |title=The Diary and Letters of Rutherford B. Hayes, Nineteenth President of the United States |publisher=Ohio State Archeological and Historical Society |location=Columbus, Ohio |url=https://archive.org/details/diarylettersofru00haye/page/n9/mode/2up |volume=2 |ref=none}}
* {{cite book |last=Hayes |first=Rutherford B. |date=1922 |editor-last=Williams |editor-first=Charles Richard |author-mask=2 |editor-mask=2 |title=The Diary and Letters of Rutherford B. Hayes, Nineteenth President of the United States |publisher=Ohio State Archeological and Historical Society |location=Columbus, Ohio |url=https://archive.org/details/rutherfordbirch03hayerich/page/n9/mode/2up |volume=3 |ref=none}}
* {{cite book | last = Hoogenboom | first = Ari | author-link = Ari Hoogenboom | date = 1995 | title = Rutherford Hayes: Warrior and President | publisher = University Press of Kansas | location = Lawrence, Kansas | isbn = 978-0-7006-0641-2 |url=https://archive.org/details/isbn_9780700606412}}
* {{cite book |last=McFeely |first=William S. |author-link=William S. McFeely |title=Grant: A Biography |location=New York |publisher= Norton |year=1981 |isbn=978-0-3933-4287-1 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=GdpmKTM5zTwC }}
* {{cite book | last = Reid | first = Whitelaw | author-link = Whitelaw Reid | date = 1868 | title = Ohio in the War: The history of her regiments, and other military organizations | publisher = Moore, Wilstach & Baldwin | url = https://archive.org/details/ohioinwarhersta01reidgoog}}
* {{cite book|last = Rhodes|first = J. F.|date = 1919|title = History of the United States from the Compromise of 1850: 1877–1896}}
* {{cite book | last = Richardson | first = Heather Cox | date = 2001 | title = The Death of Reconstruction | publisher = Harvard University Press | location = Cambridge, Massachusetts | isbn = 978-0-674-00637-9}}
* {{cite book | last = Robinson | first = Lloyd | date = 2001 | title = The Stolen Election: Hayes versus Tilden—1876 | orig-year = 1968 | publisher = Tom Doherty Associates | location = New York | isbn = 978-0-7653-0206-9 | url = https://archive.org/details/stolenelectionha0000robi}}
* {{cite book | last = Sproat | first = John G. | editor-last = Woodward | editor-first = C. Vann | editor-link = C. Vann Woodward | date = 1974 | title = Responses of the Presidents to Charges of Misconduct | publisher = Delacorte Press | location = New York | chapter = Rutherford B. Hayes: 1877–1881 | isbn = 978-0-440-05923-3}}
* {{cite book | last = Stowell | first = David O. | date = 1999 | title = Streets, Railroads, and the Great Strike of 1877 | publisher = University Of Chicago Press | location = Chicago | isbn = 978-0-226-77668-2}}
* {{cite book | last = Trefousse | first = Hans L. | author-link = Hans L. Trefousse | date = 2002 | title = Rutherford B. Hayes | publisher = Times Books | location = New York | isbn = 978-0-8050-6907-5 | url = https://archive.org/details/rutherfordbhayes00hans}}
* {{cite book | last = Unger | first = Irwin | author-link = Irwin Unger | date = 2008 | title = The Greenback Era: A Social and Political History of American Finance, 1865–1879 | orig-year = 1964 | publisher = ACLS Humanities | location = New York | isbn = 978-1-59740-431-0 | title-link = The Greenback Era: A Social and Political History of American Finance, 1865–1879}}
* {{cite book |title=American Ulysses: A Life of Ulysses S. Grant |last=White |first=Ronald C. |publisher=Random House Publishing Group |year=2016 |isbn=978-1-5883-6992-5 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=TPNRCwAAQBAJ }}
{{refend}} {{refend}}


==External links== ===Articles===
{{refbegin|30em}}
{{Sisterlinks|author=yes|n=no|b=no|species=no|v=no|wikt=no}}
* {{cite journal | last = Clendenen | first = Clarence | author-link = Clarence C. Clendenen |date=October 1969 | title = President Hayes' "Withdrawal" of the Troops: An Enduring Myth | journal = The South Carolina Historical Magazine | volume = 70 | issue = 4 | jstor = 27566958 | pages = 240–250}}
* {{Dmoz|Society/History/By_Region/North_America/United_States/Presidents/Hayes%2C_Rutherford_Birchard/}}
* {{cite journal | last = Klotsche | first = J. Martin | author-link = J. Martin Klotsche |date=December 1935 | title = The Star Route Cases | journal = The Mississippi Valley Historical Review | volume = 22 | issue = 3 | jstor = 1892626 | pages = 407–418 | doi = 10.2307/1892626}}
* from the Library of Congress
* {{cite journal | last = Paul | first = Ezra |date=Winter 1998 | title = Congressional Relations and Public Relations in the Administration of Rutherford B. Hayes (1877–81) | journal = Presidential Studies Quarterly | volume = 28 | jstor = 27551831 | issue = 1 | pages = 68–87}}
*
* at ]'s '']'' * Skidmore, Max J. "Rutherford B. Hayes." in ''Maligned Presidents: The Late 19th Century'' (2014): 50–62.
* {{cite journal |last=Smith |first=Thomas A. |date=1980 |title=Before Hyde Park: The Rutherford B. Hayes Library |journal=The American Archivist |volume=43 |pages=485–488 |jstor=40292342 |issue=4}}
*
* {{cite journal | last = Stuart | first = Paul |date=September 1977 | title = United States Indian Policy: From the Dawes Act to the American Indian Policy Review Commission | journal = Social Service Review | volume = 51 | issue = 3 | pages = 451–463 | jstor = 30015511 | doi = 10.1086/643524 | s2cid = 143506388}}
* {{cite journal | last = Swint | first = Henry L. |date=June 1952 | title = Rutherford B. Hayes, Educator | journal = The Mississippi Valley Historical Review | volume = 39 | issue = 1 | pages = 45–60 | jstor = 1902843 | doi = 10.2307/1902843}}
* {{cite journal | last = Thelen | first = David P. |date=Summer 1970 | title = Rutherford B. Hayes and the Reform Tradition in the Gilded Age | journal = American Quarterly | volume = 22 | issue = 2 | pages = 150–165 | jstor = 2711639 | doi = 10.2307/2711639}}
{{refend}}


== External links ==
{| class="navbox collapsible collapsed" style="width:100%; margin:auto;"
* {{CongBio|H000393}}
|-
*
! style="background:#ccf;"|{{space|12}}<span style="font-size:110%;">Offices and distinctions</span>
* from the ]
|-
* and shorter essays on each member of his cabinet and First Lady from the ]
|
*, from ]'s '']'', July 19, 1999
*
* {{Librivox author |id=11290}}
* {{Gutenberg author|id=1652}}

{{Rutherford B. Hayes}}
{{Navboxes
|title=Offices and distinctions
|list1=
{{s-start}} {{s-start}}
{{s-par|us-hs}} {{s-par|us-hs}}
{{s-bef|before=]}} {{s-bef|before=]}}
{{s-ttl|title=Member of the ]<br>from ]|years=1865–1867}} {{s-ttl|title=Member of the ]<br>from ]|years=1865–1867}}
{{s-aft|after=]}} {{s-aft|after=]}}

|-
{{s-ppo}}
{{s-bef|before=]}}
{{s-ttl|title=] ] for ]|years=], ]}}
{{s-aft|after=]}}

{{s-bef|before=]}}
{{s-ttl|title=] ] for Governor of Ohio |years=]}}
{{s-aft|after=]}}

{{s-bef|before=]}}
{{s-ttl|title=] ] for President of the United States|years=]}}
{{s-aft|after=]}}

{{s-off}} {{s-off}}
{{s-bef|before=]}} {{s-bef|before=]}}
{{s-ttl|title=]|years=1868–1872}} {{s-ttl|title=]|years=1868–1872}}
{{s-aft|after=]}} {{s-aft|after=]}}

|-
{{s-bef|before=]}} {{s-bef|before=]}}
{{s-ttl|title=]|years=1876–1877}} {{s-ttl|title=Governor of Ohio|years=1876–1877}}
{{s-aft|after=]}} {{s-aft|after=]}}

|-
{{s-bef|before=]}} {{s-bef|before=]}}
{{s-ttl|title=]|years=1877–1881}} {{s-ttl|title=]|years=1877–1881}}
{{s-aft|after=]}} {{s-aft|after=]}}
|-
{{s-ppo}}
{{s-bef|before=]}}
{{s-ttl|title=] ] for ]|years=]}}
{{s-aft|after=]}}
|-
{{s-hon}}
{{s-bef|before=]}}
{{s-ttl|title=]|years=1885–1893}}
{{s-aft|after=]}}
{{s-end}} {{s-end}}
|} }}


{{Navboxes {{Navboxes
|list=
|title=Articles and topics related to Rutherford Hayes
|state=collapsed
|list1=
{{US Presidents}} {{US Presidents}}
{{USRepPresNominees}} {{USRepPresNominees}}
{{Governors of Ohio}} {{Governors of Ohio}}
{{OhioRepresentatives02}}
{{Hayes cabinet}} {{Hayes cabinet}}
{{Reconstruction Era}}}}
}}
{{Subject bar|commons=y|q=y|s=y|portal1=Biography|portal2=American Civil War|portal5=Politics|portal6=Law|portal7=United States}}
{{Authority control |LCCN=n/50/25146 |VIAF=64803399}}
{{featured article}} {{Authority control}}

{{Persondata
|NAME=Hayes, Rutherford B.
|ALTERNATIVE NAMES=Rutherford Birchard Hayes
|SHORT DESCRIPTION=19th ]
|DATE OF BIRTH=October 4, 1822
|PLACE OF BIRTH=]
|DATE OF DEATH=January 17, 1893
|PLACE OF DEATH=]
}}
{{DEFAULTSORT:Hayes, Rutherford B.}} {{DEFAULTSORT:Hayes, Rutherford B.}}
] ]
] ]
]
]
] ]
] ]
] ]
] ]
] ]
] ]
]
] ]
]
]
]
]
]
] ]
] ]
] ]
]
]
]
]
]
] ]
]
]
]
]
] ]
] ]
]
] ]
] ]
] ]
] ]
]

]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]

Latest revision as of 12:18, 26 December 2024

President of the United States from 1877 to 1881 "President Hayes" and "Rutherford Hayes" redirect here. For his son, see Rutherford P. Hayes. For the Department in Paraguay, see Presidente Hayes Department. For the attack transport, see USS President Hayes.

Rutherford B. Hayes
Portrait, c. 1870–1880
19th President of the United States
In office
March 4, 1877 – March 4, 1881
Vice PresidentWilliam A. Wheeler
Preceded byUlysses S. Grant
Succeeded byJames A. Garfield
29th and 32nd Governor of Ohio
In office
January 10, 1876 – March 2, 1877
LieutenantThomas L. Young
Preceded byWilliam Allen
Succeeded byThomas L. Young
In office
January 12, 1868 – January 8, 1872
LieutenantJohn Calvin Lee
Preceded byJacob Dolson Cox
Succeeded byEdward Follansbee Noyes
Member of the U.S. House of Representatives
from Ohio's 2nd district
In office
March 4, 1865 – July 20, 1867
Preceded byAlexander Long
Succeeded bySamuel Fenton Cary
Personal details
BornRutherford Birchard Hayes
(1822-10-04)October 4, 1822
Delaware, Ohio, U.S.
DiedJanuary 17, 1893(1893-01-17) (aged 70)
Fremont, Ohio, U.S.
Resting placeSpiegel Grove
Political party
Spouse Lucy Ware Webb ​ ​(m. 1852; died 1889)
Children8, including Webb and Rutherford
RelativesCarl Edwards (great-great-great grandson)
Education
Occupation
  • Politician
  • lawyer
SignatureCursive signature in ink
Military service
Branch/service
Years of service1861–1865
Rank
Regiments23rd Ohio Infantry
CommandsKanawha Division
Battles/wars See list

Rutherford Birchard Hayes (/ˈrʌðərfərd/ ; October 4, 1822 – January 17, 1893) was the 19th president of the United States, serving from 1877 to 1881. A staunch abolitionist from Ohio, he was also a brevet major general for the Union army during the American Civil War.

As an attorney in Ohio, Hayes served as Cincinnati's city solicitor from 1858 to 1861. He was a staunch abolitionist who defended refugee slaves in court proceedings. At the start of the Civil War, he left a fledgling political career to join the Union army as an officer. Hayes was wounded five times, most seriously at the Battle of South Mountain in 1862. He earned a reputation for bravery in combat, rising in the ranks to serve as brevet major general. After the war, he earned a reputation in the Republican Party as a prominent member of the "Half-Breed" faction. He served in Congress from 1865 to 1867 and was elected governor of Ohio, serving two consecutive terms from 1868 to 1872 and half of a third two-year term from 1876 to 1877 before his swearing-in as president.

Hayes won the Republican nomination for president in the 1876 United States presidential election. In the disputed general election, he defeated Democratic nominee Samuel J. Tilden while losing the popular vote. Initially, neither candidate secured enough electoral votes to win the election, but Hayes prevailed after a Congressional Commission awarded him 20 contested electoral votes in the Compromise of 1877. The electoral dispute was resolved in a backroom deal whereby both Southern Democrats and Whiggish Republican businessmen acquiesced to Hayes's election on the condition that he end both federal support for Reconstruction and the military occupation of the former Confederate States.

Hayes's administration was influenced by his belief in meritocratic government and equal treatment without regard to wealth, social standing, or race. One of the defining events of his presidency was the Great Railroad Strike of 1877, which he resolved by calling in the U.S. Army against the railroad workers. It remains the deadliest conflict between workers and strikebreakers in American history. As president, Hayes implemented modest civil-service reforms that laid the groundwork for further reform in the 1880s and 1890s. He vetoed the Bland–Allison Act of 1878, which put silver money into circulation and raised nominal prices, but Congress overrode his veto. His policy toward western Indians anticipated the assimilationist program of the Dawes Act of 1887. At the end of his term, Hayes kept his pledge not to run for reelection and retired to his home in Ohio. Historians and scholars generally rank Hayes as an average to below-average president.

Early life and family

Childhood and family history

Rutherford Birchard Hayes was born in Delaware, Ohio, on October 4, 1822, to Rutherford Ezekiel Hayes, Jr. and Sophia Birchard. Hayes's father, a Vermont storekeeper, had taken the family to Ohio in 1817. He died ten weeks before Rutherford's birth. Sophia took charge of the family, raising Hayes and his sister, Fanny, the only two of the four children to survive to adulthood. She never remarried, and Sophia's younger brother, Sardis Birchard, lived with the family for a time. He was always close to Hayes and became a father figure to him, contributing to his early education.

Through each of his parents, Hayes was descended from New England colonists. His earliest immigrant ancestor came to Connecticut from Scotland. Hayes's great-grandfather Ezekiel Hayes was a militia captain in Connecticut in the American Revolutionary War, but Ezekiel's son (Hayes's grandfather, also named Rutherford) left his Branford home during the war for the relative peace of Vermont. His mother's ancestors migrated to Vermont at a similar time. Hayes wrote: "I have always thought of myself as Scotch, but of the fathers of my family who came to America about thirty were English and two only, Hayes and Rutherford, were of Scotch descent. This is on my father's side. On my mother's side, the whole thirty-two were probably all of other peoples besides the Scotch." Most of his close relatives outside Ohio continued to live there. John Noyes, an uncle by marriage, had been his father's business partner in Vermont and was later elected to Congress. His first cousin, Mary Jane Mead, was the mother of sculptor Larkin Goldsmith Mead and architect William Rutherford Mead. John Humphrey Noyes, the founder of the Oneida Community, was also a first cousin.

Education and early law career

Hayes attended the common schools in Delaware, Ohio, and enrolled in 1836 at the Methodist Norwalk Seminary in Norwalk, Ohio. He did well at Norwalk, and the next year transferred to the Webb School, a preparatory school in Middletown, Connecticut, where he studied Latin and Ancient Greek. Returning to Ohio, he attended Kenyon College in Gambier in 1838. He enjoyed his time at Kenyon and was successful scholastically; while there, he joined several student societies and became interested in Whig politics. His classmates included Stanley Matthews and John Celivergos Zachos. He graduated Phi Beta Kappa with the highest honors in 1842 and addressed the class as its valedictorian.

After briefly reading law in Columbus, Ohio, Hayes moved east to attend Harvard Law School in 1843. Graduating with an LL.B, he was admitted to the Ohio bar in 1845 and opened his own law office in Lower Sandusky (now Fremont). Business was slow at first, but he gradually attracted clients and also represented his uncle Sardis in real estate litigation. In 1847 Hayes became ill with what his doctor thought was tuberculosis. Thinking a change in climate would help, he considered enlisting in the Mexican–American War, but on his doctor's advice instead visited family in New England. Returning from there, Hayes and his uncle Sardis made a long journey to Texas, where Hayes visited with Guy M. Bryan, a Kenyon classmate and distant relative. Business remained meager on his return to Lower Sandusky, and Hayes decided to move to Cincinnati.

Cincinnati law practice and marriage

Hayes moved to Cincinnati in 1850, and opened a law office with John W. Herron, a lawyer from Chillicothe. Herron later joined a more established firm and Hayes formed a new partnership with William K. Rogers and Richard M. Corwine. He found business better in Cincinnati and enjoyed its social attractions, joining the Cincinnati Literary Society and the Odd Fellows Club. He also attended the Episcopal Church in Cincinnati but did not become a member.

Black-and-white picture of a man and a woman
Rutherford and Lucy Hayes on their wedding day

Hayes courted his future wife, Lucy Webb, during his time there. His mother had encouraged him to get to know Lucy years earlier, but Hayes had believed she was too young and focused his attention on other women. Four years later, Hayes began to spend more time with Lucy. They became engaged in 1851 and married on December 30, 1852, at Lucy's mother's house. Over the next five years, Lucy gave birth to three sons: Birchard Austin (1853), Webb Cook (1856), and Rutherford Platt (1858). A Methodist, Lucy was a teetotaler and abolitionist. She influenced her husband's views on those issues, though he never formally joined her church.

Hayes had begun his law practice dealing primarily with commercial issues but won greater prominence in Cincinnati as a criminal defense attorney, defending several people accused of murder. In one case, he used a form of the insanity defense that saved the accused from the gallows; she was instead confined to a mental institution. Hayes also defended slaves who had escaped and been accused under the Fugitive Slave Act of 1850. Because Cincinnati was just across the Ohio River from Kentucky, a slave state, it was a destination for escaping slaves, and many such cases were tried in its courts. A staunch abolitionist, Hayes found his work on behalf of fugitive slaves personally gratifying as well as politically useful, as it raised his profile in the newly formed Republican Party.

Hayes's political reputation rose with his professional plaudits. He declined a Republican nomination for a judgeship in 1856. Two years later, some Republicans proposed that Hayes fill a vacancy on the bench, and he considered accepting the appointment until the office of city solicitor also became vacant. The city council elected Hayes city solicitor to fill the vacancy, and he was elected to a full two-year term in April 1859 by a larger majority than other Republicans on the ticket.

Civil War

A bearded man in a 19th-century army uniform
Hayes in Civil War uniform in 1861

West Virginia and South Mountain

As the Southern states quickly began to secede after Lincoln's election to the presidency in 1860, Hayes was lukewarm about civil war to restore the Union. Considering that the two sides might be irreconcilable, he suggested that the Union "et them go." Though Ohio had voted for Lincoln in 1860, Cincinnati voters turned against the Republican party after secession. Its residents included many from the Southern United States, and they voted for the Democrats and Know-Nothings, who combined to sweep the city elections in April 1861, ejecting Hayes from the city solicitor's office.

Returning to private practice, Hayes formed a very brief law partnership with Leopold Markbreit, lasting three days before the war began. After the Confederates fired on Fort Sumter, Hayes resolved his doubts and joined a volunteer company composed of his Literary Society friends. That June, Governor William Dennison appointed several of the officers of the volunteer company to positions in the 23rd Regiment of Ohio Volunteer Infantry. Hayes was promoted to major, and his friend and college classmate Stanley Matthews was appointed lieutenant colonel. Joining the regiment as a private was another future president, William McKinley.

After a month of training, Hayes and the 23rd Ohio set out for western Virginia in July 1861 as a part of the Kanawha Division. They did not meet the enemy until September, when the regiment encountered Confederates at Carnifex Ferry in present-day West Virginia and drove them back. In November, Hayes was promoted to lieutenant colonel (Matthews having been promoted to colonel of another regiment) and led his troops deeper into western Virginia, where they entered winter quarters. The division resumed its advance the following spring, and Hayes led several raids against the rebel forces, on one of which he sustained a minor injury to his knee. That September, Hayes's regiment was called east to reinforce General John Pope's Army of Virginia at the Second Battle of Bull Run. Hayes and his troops did not arrive in time for the battle, but joined the Army of the Potomac as it hurried north to cut off Robert E. Lee's Army of Northern Virginia, which was advancing into Maryland. Marching north, the 23rd was the lead regiment encountering the Confederates at the Battle of South Mountain on September 14. Hayes led a charge against an entrenched position and was shot through his left arm, fracturing the bone. He had one of his men tie a handkerchief above the wound in an effort to stop the bleeding, and continued to lead his men in the battle. While resting, he ordered his men to meet a flanking attack, but instead his entire command moved backward, leaving Hayes lying in between the lines.

Eventually, his men brought Hayes back behind their lines, and he was taken to hospital. The regiment continued on to Antietam, but Hayes was out of action for the rest of the campaign. In October, he was promoted to colonel and assigned to command of the first brigade of the Kanawha Division as a brevet brigadier general.

Army of the Shenandoah

Black-and-white picture of a forked-bearded man in an army uniform
George Crook was Hayes's commander and the namesake of his fourth son

The division spent the following winter and spring near Charleston, Virginia (present-day West Virginia), out of contact with the enemy. Hayes saw little action until July 1863, when the division skirmished with John Hunt Morgan's cavalry at the Battle of Buffington Island. Returning to Charleston for the rest of the summer, Hayes spent the fall encouraging the men of the 23rd Ohio to reenlist, and many did. In 1864, the Army command structure in West Virginia was reorganized, and Hayes's division was assigned to George Crook's Army of West Virginia. Advancing into southwestern Virginia, they destroyed Confederate salt and lead mines there. On May 9, they engaged Confederate troops at Cloyd's Mountain, where Hayes and his men charged the enemy entrenchments and drove the rebels from the field. Following the rout, the Union forces destroyed Confederate supplies and again successfully skirmished with the enemy.

Hayes and his brigade moved to the Shenandoah Valley for the Valley Campaigns of 1864. Crook's corps was attached to Major General David Hunter's Army of the Shenandoah and soon back in contact with Confederate forces, capturing Lexington, Virginia, on June 11. They continued south toward Lynchburg, tearing up railroad track as they advanced, but Hunter believed the troops at Lynchburg were too powerful, and Hayes and his brigade returned to West Virginia. Hayes thought Hunter lacked aggression, writing in a letter home that "General Crook would have taken Lynchburg." Before the army could make another attempt, Confederate General Jubal Early's raid into Maryland forced their recall to the north. Early's army surprised them at Kernstown on July 24, where Hayes was slightly wounded by a bullet to the shoulder. He also had a horse shot out from under him, and the army was defeated. Retreating to Maryland, the army was reorganized again, with Major General Philip Sheridan replacing Hunter. By August, Early was retreating up the valley, with Sheridan in pursuit. Hayes's troops fended off a Confederate assault at Berryville and advanced to Opequon Creek, where they broke the enemy lines and pursued them farther south. They followed up the victory with another at Fisher's Hill on September 22, and one more at Cedar Creek on October 19. At Cedar Creek, Hayes sprained his ankle after being thrown from a horse and was struck in the head by a spent round, which did not cause serious damage. His leadership and bravery drew his superiors' attention, with Ulysses S. Grant later writing of Hayes, "is conduct on the field was marked by conspicuous gallantry as well as the display of qualities of a higher order than that of mere personal daring."

Cedar Creek marked the end of the campaign. Hayes was promoted to brigadier general in October 1864 and brevetted major general. Around this time, Hayes learned of the birth of his fourth son, George Crook Hayes. The army went into winter quarters once more, and in spring 1865 the war quickly came to a close with Lee's surrender to Grant at Appomattox. Hayes visited Washington, D.C., that May and observed the Grand Review of the Armies, after which he and the 23rd Ohio returned to their home state to be mustered out of the service.

Post-war politics

U.S. Representative from Ohio

While serving in the Army of the Shenandoah in 1864, Hayes was nominated by Republicans for the House of Representatives from Ohio's 2nd congressional district. Asked by friends in Cincinnati to leave the army to campaign, he refused, saying that an "officer fit for duty who at this crisis would abandon his post to electioneer for a seat in Congress ought to be scalped." Instead, Hayes wrote several letters to the voters explaining his political positions and was elected by a 2,400-vote majority over the incumbent, Democrat Alexander Long.

A photograph of a man in a black suit
Democratic President Andrew Johnson and Radical Republicans fought over Reconstruction.

When the 39th Congress assembled in December 1865, Hayes was sworn in as a part of a large Republican majority. Hayes identified with the party's moderate wing, but was willing to vote with the radicals for the sake of party unity. The major legislative effort of the Congress was the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, for which Hayes voted and which passed both houses of Congress in June 1866. Hayes's beliefs were in line with his fellow Republicans on Reconstruction issues: that the South should be restored to the Union, but not without adequate protections for freedmen and other black southerners. President Andrew Johnson, who succeeded to office following Lincoln's assassination, to the contrary wanted to readmit the seceded states quickly without first ensuring that they adopted laws protecting the newly freed slaves' civil rights; he also granted pardons to many of the leading former Confederates. Hayes, along with congressional Republicans, disagreed. They worked to reject Johnson's vision of Reconstruction and to pass the Civil Rights Act of 1866.

Reelected in 1866, Hayes returned to the lame-duck session. On January 7, 1867, he voted for the resolution that authorized the first impeachment inquiry against Andrew Johnson. He also voted during this time for the Tenure of Office Act, which ensured that Johnson could not remove administration officials without the Senate's consent, and unsuccessfully pressed for a civil service reform bill that attracted the votes of many reform-minded Republicans. Hayes continued to vote with the majority in the 40th Congress on the Reconstruction Acts, but resigned in July 1867 to run for governor of Ohio.

Governor of Ohio

A popular Congressman and former Army officer, Hayes was considered by Ohio Republicans to be an excellent standard-bearer for the 1867 election campaign. His political views were more moderate than the Republican party's platform, although he agreed with the proposed amendment to the Ohio state constitution that would guarantee suffrage to black male Ohioans. Hayes's opponent, Allen G. Thurman, made the proposed amendment the centerpiece of the campaign and opposed black suffrage. Both men campaigned vigorously, making speeches across the state, mostly focusing on the suffrage question. The election was mostly a disappointment to Republicans, as the amendment failed to pass and Democrats gained a majority in the state legislature. Hayes thought at first that he, too, had lost, but the final tally showed that he had won the election by 2,983 votes of 484,603 votes cast.

As a Republican governor with a Democratic legislature, Hayes had a limited role in governing, especially since Ohio's governor had no veto power. Despite these constraints, he oversaw the establishment of a school for deaf-mutes and a reform school for girls. He endorsed the impeachment of President Andrew Johnson and urged his conviction, which failed by one vote in the United States Senate. Nominated for a second term in 1869, Hayes campaigned again for equal rights for black Ohioans and sought to associate his Democratic opponent, George H. Pendleton, with disunion and Confederate sympathies. Hayes was reelected with an increased majority, and the Republicans took the legislature, ensuring Ohio's ratification of the Fifteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, which guaranteed black (male) suffrage. With a Republican legislature, Hayes's second term was more enjoyable. Suffrage was expanded and a state Agricultural and Mechanical College (later to become Ohio State University) was established. He also proposed a reduction in state taxes and reform of the state prison system. Choosing not to seek reelection, Hayes looked forward to retiring from politics in 1872.

Private life and return to politics

A large brick house surrounded by trees
Hayes's home, Spiegel Grove, in Fremont, Ohio

As Hayes prepared to leave office, several delegations of reform-minded Republicans urged him to run for United States Senate against the incumbent Republican, John Sherman. Hayes declined, preferring to preserve party unity and retire to private life. He especially looked forward to spending time with his children, two of whom (daughter Fanny and son Scott) had been born in the past five years. Initially, Hayes tried to promote railway extensions to his hometown, Fremont. He also managed some real estate he had acquired in Duluth, Minnesota. Not entirely removed from politics, Hayes held out some hope of a cabinet appointment, but was disappointed to receive only an appointment as assistant U.S. treasurer at Cincinnati, which he turned down. He agreed to be nominated for his old House seat in 1872 but was disappointed when he lost the election to Henry B. Banning, a fellow Kenyon College alumnus.

In 1873, Lucy gave birth to another son, Manning Force Hayes. That same year, the Panic of 1873 hurt business prospects across the nation, including Hayes's. His uncle Sardis Birchard died that year, and the Hayes family moved into Spiegel Grove, the grand house Birchard had built with them in mind. That year Hayes announced his uncle's bequest of $50,000 in assets to endow a public library for Fremont, to be called the Birchard Library. It opened in 1874 on Front Street, and a new building was completed and opened in 1878 in Fort Stephenson State Park, as per the terms of the bequest. Hayes served as chairman of the library's board of trustees until his death.

Hayes hoped to stay out of politics in order to pay off the debts he had incurred during the Panic, but when the Republican state convention nominated him for governor in 1875, he accepted. His campaign against Democratic nominee William Allen focused primarily on Protestant fears about the possibility of state aid to Catholic schools. Hayes was against such funding and, while not known to be personally anti-Catholic, he allowed anti-Catholic fervor to contribute to the enthusiasm for his candidacy. The campaign was a success, and on October 12, 1875, Hayes was returned to the governorship by a 5,544-vote majority. The first person to earn a third term as governor of Ohio, Hayes reduced the state debt, reestablished the Board of Charities, and repealed the Geghan Bill, which had allowed for the appointment of Catholic priests to schools and penitentiaries.

Election of 1876

Main article: 1876 United States presidential election

Republican nomination and campaign against Tilden

Sepia-toned picture of two men; one bearded, one clean-shaven
Original Currier & Ives campaign poster depicting the Hayes-Wheeler ticket, the last and rarest in the firm's "Grand National Banner" series

Hayes's success in Ohio immediately elevated him to the top ranks of Republican politicians under consideration for the presidency in 1876. The Ohio delegation to the 1876 Republican National Convention was united behind him, and Senator John Sherman did all in his power to get Hayes the nomination. In June 1876, the convention assembled with James G. Blaine of Maine as the favorite. Blaine started with a significant lead in the delegate count, but could not muster a majority. As he failed to gain votes, the delegates looked elsewhere for a nominee and settled on Hayes on the seventh ballot. The convention selected Representative William A. Wheeler from New York for vice president, a man about whom Hayes had recently asked, "I am ashamed to say: who is Wheeler?"

The campaign strategy of Hayes and Wheeler emphasized conciliatory appeals to the Southern Whiggish element, attempting to "detach" old Southern Whigs from Southern Democrats. When Frederick Douglass asked whether the Republican Party would continue its devotion to protecting black civil rights or "get along without the vote of the black man in the South", Hayes and Wheeler advocated the latter.

The Democratic nominee was Samuel J. Tilden, the governor of New York. Tilden was considered a formidable adversary who, like Hayes, had a reputation for honesty. Also like Hayes, Tilden was a hard-money man and supported civil service reform. In accordance with the custom of the time, the campaign was conducted by surrogates, with Hayes and Tilden remaining in their respective hometowns. The poor economic conditions made the party in power unpopular and made Hayes suspect he would lose the election. Both candidates concentrated on the swing states of New York and Indiana, as well as the three southern states—Louisiana, South Carolina, and Florida—where Reconstruction Republican governments still barely ruled, amid recurring political violence, including widespread efforts to suppress freedman voting. The Republicans emphasized the danger of letting Democrats run the nation so soon after Southern Democrats had provoked the Civil War and, to a lesser extent, the danger a Democratic administration would pose to the recently won civil rights of southern blacks. Democrats, for their part, trumpeted Tilden's record of reform and contrasted it with the corruption of the incumbent Grant administration.

As the returns were tallied on election day, it was clear that the race was close: Democrats had carried most of the South, as well as New York, Indiana, Connecticut, and New Jersey. In the Northeastern United States, an increasing number of immigrants and their descendants voted Democratic. Although Tilden won the popular vote and claimed 184 electoral votes, Republican leaders challenged the results and charged Democrats with fraud and voter suppression of blacks (who would otherwise have voted Republican) in Florida, Louisiana, and South Carolina. Republicans realized that if they held the three disputed unredeemed southern states together with some of the western states, they would emerge with an electoral college majority.

Disputed electoral votes

Main articles: Compromise of 1877 and Electoral Commission (United States)

On November 11, three days after election day, Tilden appeared to have won 184 electoral votes, one short of a majority. Hayes appeared to have 166, with the 19 votes of Florida, Louisiana, and South Carolina still in doubt. Republicans and Democrats each claimed victory in the three latter states, but the results in those states were rendered uncertain because of fraud by both parties. To further complicate matters, one of the three electors from Oregon (a state Hayes had won) was disqualified, reducing Hayes's total to 165, and raising the disputed votes to 20. If Hayes was not awarded all 20 disputed votes, Tilden would be elected president.

A map of the United States showing electoral results in 1876
Results of the 1876 election, with states won by Hayes in red, and those won by Tilden in blue

There was considerable debate about which person or house of Congress was authorized to decide between the competing slates of electors, with the Republican Senate and the Democratic House each claiming priority. By January 1877, with the question still unresolved, Congress and President Grant agreed to submit the matter to a bipartisan Electoral Commission, which would be authorized to determine the fate of the disputed electoral votes. The commission was to be made up of five representatives, five senators, and five Supreme Court justices. To ensure partisan balance, there would be seven Democrats and seven Republicans, with Justice David Davis, an independent respected by both parties, as the 15th member. The balance was upset when Democrats in the Illinois legislature elected Davis to the Senate, hoping to sway his vote. Davis disappointed Democrats by refusing to serve on the Commission because of his election to the Senate. As all the remaining Justices were Republicans, Justice Joseph P. Bradley, believed to be the most independent-minded of them, was selected to take Davis's place on the commission. The Commission met in February and the eight Republicans voted to award all 20 electoral votes to Hayes. Democrats, outraged by the result, attempted a filibuster to prevent Congress from accepting the commission's findings. Eventually, the filibusterers gave up, allowing the House and Senate to reassemble to complete the count of the electoral votes, and at 4:10 am on March 2, Senator Thomas W. Ferry announced that Hayes and Wheeler had been elected to the presidency and vice presidency by an electoral margin of 185–184.

As inauguration day neared, Republican and Democratic Congressional leaders met at Wormley's Hotel in Washington to negotiate a compromise. Republicans promised concessions in exchange for Democratic acquiescence to the committee's decision. The main concession Hayes promised was the withdrawal of federal troops from the South and an acceptance of the election of Democratic governments in the remaining "unredeemed" southern states. The Democrats agreed, and on March 2, the filibuster was ended. Hayes was elected, but Reconstruction was finished, and freedmen were left at the mercy of white Democrats who did not intend to preserve their rights. On April 3, Hayes ordered Secretary of War George W. McCrary to withdraw federal troops stationed at the South Carolina State House to their barracks. On April 20, he ordered McCrary to send the federal troops stationed at New Orleans's St. Louis Hotel to Jackson Barracks.

Presidency (1877–1881)

Main article: Presidency of Rutherford B. Hayes

Inauguration

A large crowd of people outside the United States Capitol building
Chief Justice Morrison R. Waite administering the oath of office to Hayes

Because March 4, 1877, was a Sunday, Hayes took the oath of office privately on Saturday, March 3, in the Red Room of the White House, the first president to do so in the Executive Mansion. He took the oath publicly on March 5 on the East Portico of the United States Capitol. In his inaugural address, Hayes attempted to soothe the passions of the past few months, saying that "he serves his party best who serves his country best". He pledged to support "wise, honest, and peaceful local self-government" in the South, as well as reform of the civil service and a full return to the gold standard. Despite his message of conciliation, many Democrats never considered Hayes's election legitimate and referred to him as "Rutherfraud" or "His Fraudulency" for the next four years.

The South and the end of Reconstruction

Hayes had firmly supported Republican Reconstruction policies throughout his career, but the first major act of his presidency was an end to Reconstruction and the return of the South to "home rule". Even without the conditions of the Wormley's Hotel agreement, Hayes would have been hard-pressed to continue his predecessors' policies. The House of Representatives in the 45th Congress was controlled by a majority of Democrats, and they refused to appropriate enough funds for the army to continue to garrison the South. Even among Republicans, devotion to continued military Reconstruction was fading in the face of persistent Southern insurgency and violence. Only two states, South Carolina and Louisiana, were still under Reconstruction's sway when Hayes assumed the presidency on March 5. On April 3, Hayes ordered Secretary of War George W. McCrary to withdraw federal troops stationed at the South Carolina State House to their barracks. On April 20, he ordered McCrary to send the federal troops stationed at New Orleans's St. Louis Hotel to Jackson Barracks.

At the time of the 1876 election only three states, Florida, South Carolina, and Louisiana, still had Republican governments. In Florida the Democrats won the governor's election and controlled the state house, leaving South Carolina and Louisiana as the only states where Republican regimes were still supported by federal troops. Without troops to enforce the voting rights laws, these soon fell to Democratic control.

Hayes's later attempts to protect the rights of southern blacks were ineffective, as were his attempts to rebuild Republican strength in the South. But he did defeat Congress's efforts to curtail federal power to monitor federal elections. Democrats in Congress passed an army appropriation bill in 1879 with a rider that would have repealed the Enforcement Acts, which had been used to suppress the Ku Klux Klan. Chapters had flourished across the South and it had been one of the insurgent groups that attacked and suppressed freedmen. Those Acts, passed during Reconstruction, made it a crime to prevent someone from voting because of his race. Other paramilitary groups, such as the Red Shirts in the Carolinas, however, had intimidated freedmen and suppressed the vote. Hayes was determined to preserve the law protecting black voters, and vetoed the appropriation.

The Democrats did not have enough votes to override the veto, but they passed a new bill with the same rider. Hayes vetoed that bill too, and the process was repeated three more times. Finally, Congress passed a bill without the offensive rider, but refused to pass another bill to fund federal marshals, who were vital to the enforcement of the Enforcement Acts. The election laws remained in effect, but the funds to enforce them were curtailed for the time being.

Hayes tried to reconcile the social mores of the South with the recently passed civil rights laws by distributing patronage among southern Democrats. "My task was to wipe out the color line, to abolish sectionalism, to end the war and bring peace," he wrote in his diary. "To do this, I was ready to resort to unusual measures and to risk my own standing and reputation within my party and the country." All his efforts were in vain; Hayes failed to persuade the South to accept legal racial equality or to convince Congress to appropriate funds to enforce the civil rights laws.

Civil service reform

Hayes took office determined to reform the system of civil service appointments, which had been based on the spoils system since Andrew Jackson's presidency. Instead of giving federal jobs to political supporters, Hayes wished to award them by merit according to an examination that all applicants would take. Hayes's call for reform immediately brought him into conflict with the Stalwart, or pro-spoils, branch of the Republican party. Senators of both parties were accustomed to being consulted about political appointments and turned against Hayes. Foremost among his enemies was New York Senator Roscoe Conkling, who fought Hayes's reform efforts at every turn.

To show his commitment to reform, Hayes appointed one of the best-known advocates of reform at the time, Carl Schurz, to be Secretary of the Interior and asked Schurz and Secretary of State William M. Evarts to lead a special cabinet committee charged with drawing up new rules for federal appointments. Treasury Secretary John Sherman ordered John Jay to investigate the New York Custom House, which was stacked with Conkling's spoilsmen. Jay's report suggested that the New York Custom House was so overstaffed with political appointees that 20% of the employees were expendable.

Cartoon of one man kicking another out of a building
A cartoon of Hayes kicking Chester A. Arthur out of the New York Custom House

Although he could not convince Congress to prohibit the spoils system, Hayes issued an executive order that forbade federal office holders from being required to make campaign contributions or otherwise taking part in party politics. Chester A. Arthur, the Collector of the Port of New York, and his subordinates Alonzo B. Cornell and George H. Sharpe, all Conkling supporters, refused to obey the order. In September 1877, Hayes demanded their resignations, which they refused to give. He submitted appointments of Theodore Roosevelt, Sr., L. Bradford Prince, and Edwin Merritt—all supporters of Evarts, Conkling's New York rival—to the Senate for confirmation as their replacements. The Senate's Commerce Committee, chaired by Conkling, voted unanimously to reject the nominees. The full Senate rejected Roosevelt and Prince by a vote of 31–25, and confirmed Merritt only because Sharpe's term had expired.

Hayes was forced to wait until July 1878, when he fired Arthur and Cornell during a Congressional recess and replaced them with recess appointments of Merritt and Silas W. Burt, respectively. Conkling opposed confirmation of the appointees when the Senate reconvened in February 1879, but Merritt was approved by a vote of 31–25 and Burt by 31–19, giving Hayes his most significant civil service reform victory.

For the remainder of his term, Hayes pressed Congress to enact permanent reform legislation and fund the United States Civil Service Commission, even using his last annual message to Congress in 1880 to appeal for reform. Reform legislation did not pass during Hayes's presidency, but his advocacy provided "a significant precedent as well as the political impetus for the Pendleton Act of 1883," which was signed into law by President Chester Arthur. Hayes allowed some exceptions to the ban on assessments, permitting George Congdon Gorham, secretary of the Republican Congressional Committee, to solicit campaign contributions from federal officeholders during the Congressional elections of 1878. In 1880, Hayes quickly forced Secretary of the Navy Richard W. Thompson to resign after Thompson accepted a $25,000 (~$677,772 in 2023) salary for a nominal job offered by French engineer Ferdinand de Lesseps to promote a French canal in Panama.

Hayes also dealt with corruption in the postal service. In 1880, Schurz and Senator John A. Logan asked Hayes to shut down the "star route" rings, a system of corrupt contract profiteering in the Postal Service, and to fire Second Assistant Postmaster-General Thomas J. Brady, the alleged ringleader. Hayes stopped granting new star route contracts but let existing contracts continue to be enforced. Democrats accused him of delaying proper investigation so as not to damage Republicans' chances in the 1880 elections but did not press the issue in their campaign literature, as members of both parties were implicated in the corruption. Historian Hans L. Trefousse later wrote that Hayes "hardly knew the chief suspect and certainly had no connection with the corruption." Although Hayes and the Congress both investigated the contracts and found no compelling evidence of wrongdoing, Brady and others were indicted for conspiracy in 1882. After two trials, the defendants were acquitted in 1883.

Great Railroad Strike

Main article: Great Railroad Strike of 1877
A burning building
Burning of Union Depot, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, July 21–22, 1877

In his first year in office, Hayes was faced with the United States' largest labor uprising to date, the Great Railroad Strike of 1877. To make up for financial losses suffered since the panic of 1873, the major railroads had cut their employees' wages several times in 1877. In July of that year, workers at the Baltimore & Ohio Railroad walked off the job in Martinsburg, West Virginia, to protest their reduction in pay. The strike quickly spread to workers of the New York Central, Erie, and Pennsylvania railroads, with the strikers soon numbering in the thousands. Fearing a riot, Governor Henry M. Mathews asked Hayes to send federal troops to Martinsburg, and Hayes did so, but when the troops arrived there was no riot, only a peaceful protest. In Baltimore, however, a riot did erupt on July 20, and Hayes ordered the troops at Fort McHenry to assist the governor in suppressing it.

Pittsburgh exploded into riots next, but Hayes was reluctant to send in troops without the governor's request. Other discontented citizens joined the railroad workers in rioting. After a few days, Hayes resolved to send in troops to protect federal property wherever it appeared to be threatened and gave Major General Winfield Scott Hancock overall command of the situation, marking the first use of federal troops to break a strike against a private company. The riots spread further, to Chicago and St. Louis, where strikers shut down railroad facilities.

By July 29, the riots had ended and federal troops returned to their barracks. No federal troops had killed any of the strikers, or been killed themselves, but clashes between state militia troops and strikers resulted in deaths on both sides. The railroads were victorious in the short term, as the workers returned to their jobs and some wage cuts remained in effect. But the public blamed the railroads for the strikes and violence, and they were compelled to improve working conditions and make no further cuts. Business leaders praised Hayes, but his own opinion was more equivocal; as he recorded in his diary:

"The strikes have been put down by force; but now for the real remedy. Can't something done by education of strikers, by judicious control of capitalists, by wise general policy to end or diminish the evil? The railroad strikers, as a rule, are good men, sober, intelligent, and industrious."

Currency debate

Black-and-white photograph of a man, seated
Treasury Secretary John Sherman worked with Hayes to return the country to the gold standard.

Hayes confronted two issues regarding the currency, the first of which was the coinage of silver, and its relation to gold. In 1873, the Coinage Act of 1873 stopped the coinage of silver for all coins worth a dollar or more, effectively tying the dollar to the value of gold. As a result, the money supply contracted and the effects of the Panic of 1873 grew worse, making it more expensive for debtors to pay debts they had contracted when currency was less valuable. Farmers and laborers, especially, clamored for the return of coinage in both metals, believing the increased money supply would restore wages and property values. Democratic Representative Richard P. Bland of Missouri proposed a bill to require the United States to coin as much silver as miners could sell the government, thus increasing the money supply and aiding debtors. William B. Allison, a Republican from Iowa, offered an amendment in the Senate limiting the coinage to two to four million dollars per month, and the resulting Bland–Allison Act passed both houses of Congress in 1878. Hayes feared the Act would cause inflation that would be ruinous to business, effectively impairing contracts that were based on the gold dollar, as the silver dollar proposed in the bill would have an intrinsic value of 90 to 92 percent of the existing gold dollar. He also believed that inflating the currency was dishonest, saying, "xpediency and justice both demand an honest currency." He vetoed the bill, but Congress overrode his veto, the only time it did so during his presidency.

The second issue concerned United States Notes (commonly called greenbacks), a form of fiat currency first issued during the Civil War. The government accepted these notes as valid for payment of taxes and tariffs, but unlike ordinary dollars, they were not redeemable in gold. The Specie Payment Resumption Act of 1875 required the treasury to redeem any outstanding greenbacks in gold, thus retiring them from circulation and restoring a single, gold-backed currency. Sherman agreed with Hayes's favorable opinion of the Act, and stockpiled gold in preparation for the exchange of greenbacks for gold. But once the public was confident that they could redeem greenbacks for specie (gold), few did so; when the Act took effect in 1879, only $130,000 of the outstanding $346,000,000 in greenbacks were actually redeemed. Together with the Bland–Allison Act, the successful specie resumption effected a workable compromise between inflationists and hard money men and, as the world economy began to improve, agitation for more greenbacks and silver coinage quieted down for the rest of Hayes's presidency.

Foreign policy

A Chinese man sitting outside a locked gate
A political cartoon from 1882, criticizing Chinese exclusion

Most of Hayes's foreign-policy concerns involved Latin America. In 1878, following the Paraguayan War, he arbitrated a territorial dispute between Argentina and Paraguay. Hayes awarded the disputed land in the Gran Chaco region to Paraguay, and the Paraguayans honored him by renaming a city (Villa Hayes) and a department (Presidente Hayes) in his honor. Hayes became concerned over the plans of Ferdinand de Lesseps, the builder of the Suez Canal, to construct a canal across the Isthmus of Panama, then part of Colombia. Worried about a repetition of French adventurism in Mexico, Hayes interpreted the Monroe Doctrine firmly. In a message to Congress, Hayes explained his opinion on the canal: "The policy of this country is a canal under American control ... The United States cannot consent to the surrender of this control to any European power or any combination of European powers."

The Mexican border also drew Hayes's attention. Throughout the 1870s, "lawless bands" often crossed the border on raids into Texas. Three months after taking office, Hayes granted the Army the power to pursue bandits, even if it required crossing into Mexican territory. Mexican president Porfirio Díaz protested the order and sent troops to the border. The situation calmed as Díaz and Hayes agreed to jointly pursue bandits and Hayes agreed not to allow Mexican revolutionaries to raise armies in the United States. The violence along the border decreased, and in 1880 Hayes revoked the order allowing pursuit into Mexico.

Outside the Western Hemisphere, Hayes's biggest foreign-policy concern dealt with China. In 1868 the Senate had ratified the Burlingame Treaty with China, allowing an unrestricted flow of Chinese immigrants into the United States. As the economy soured after the Panic of 1873, Chinese immigrants were blamed in the American West for depressing workmen's wages. During the Great Railroad Strike of 1877, anti-Chinese riots broke out in San Francisco, and a third party, the Workingman's Party, formed with an emphasis on stopping Chinese immigration. In response, Congress passed the Chinese Exclusion Act in 1879, abrogating the 1868 treaty. Hayes vetoed the bill, believing that the United States should not abrogate treaties without negotiation. The veto drew praise from Northeastern New England Republicans, but Hayes was bitterly denounced in the Western United States. In the subsequent furor, Democrats in the House of Representatives attempted to impeach him, but narrowly failed when Republicans prevented a quorum by refusing to vote. After the veto, Assistant Secretary of State Frederick W. Seward suggested that the countries work together to reduce immigration, and he and James Burrill Angell negotiated with the Chinese to do so. Congress passed a new law to that effect, the Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882, after Hayes had left office.

In 1877 former President Grant embarked on a world tour shortly after his second term. Hayes was aware of Grant's popularity in Europe and encouraged Grant to extend his tour in the hope that it would improve various foreign relations and strengthen American interests abroad. When Grant was in Nice he boarded USS Vandalia, a screw sloop-of-war that Hayes had personally sent by for Grant's winter cruise about the Mediterranean and journey to Egypt.

Indian policy

An 1881 political cartoon about Carl Schurz's management of the Indian Bureau

Interior Secretary Carl Schurz carried out Hayes's American Indian policy, beginning with preventing the War Department from taking over the Bureau of Indian Affairs. Hayes and Schurz carried out a policy that included assimilation into white culture, educational training, and dividing Indian land into individual household allotments. Hayes believed his policies would lead to self-sufficiency and peace between Indians and whites. The allotment system under the Dawes Act, later signed by President Grover Cleveland in 1887, was favored by liberal reformers at the time, including Schurz, but instead proved detrimental to American Indians. They lost much of their land through sales of what the government classified as "surplus lands", and more to unscrupulous white speculators who tried to get the Indians to sell their allotments. Hayes and Schurz reformed the Bureau of Indian Affairs to reduce fraud and gave Indians responsibility for policing their reservations, but they were generally understaffed.

Hayes dealt with several conflicts with Indian tribes. The Nez Perce, led by Chief Joseph, began an uprising in June 1877 when Major General Oliver O. Howard ordered them to move to a reservation. Howard's men defeated the Nez Perce in battle, and the tribe began a 1,700-mile retreat to Canada. In October, after a decisive battle at Bear Paw, Montana, Chief Joseph surrendered and William T. Sherman ordered the tribe transported to Indian Territory in Kansas, where they were forced to remain until 1885. The Nez Perce war was not the last conflict in the West, as the Bannock rose up in spring 1878 in Idaho and raided nearby settlements before being defeated by Howard's army in July. War with the Ute tribe broke out in Colorado in 1879 when some Ute killed Indian agent Nathan Meeker, who had been attempting to convert them to Christianity. The subsequent White River War ended when Schurz negotiated peace with the Ute and prevented white settlers from taking revenge for Meeker's death.

Hayes also became involved in resolving the removal of the Ponca tribe from Nebraska to Indian Territory (present-day Oklahoma) because of a misunderstanding during the Grant administration. The tribe's problems came to Hayes's attention after its chief, Standing Bear, filed a lawsuit to contest Schurz's demand that they stay in Indian Territory. Overruling Schurz, Hayes set up a commission in 1880 that ruled the Ponca were free to return to their home territory in Nebraska or stay on their reservation in Indian Territory. The Ponca were awarded compensation for their land rights, which had been previously granted to the Sioux. In a message to Congress in February 1881, Hayes insisted he would "give to these injured people that measure of redress which is required alike by justice and by humanity."

Great Western Tour of 1880

Portrait of Rutherford B. Hayes by Eliphalet Frazer Andrews, 1881

In 1880, Hayes embarked on a 71-day tour of the Western United States, becoming the second sitting president to travel west of the Rocky Mountains. (Hayes's immediate predecessor, Ulysses Grant, visited Utah in 1875.) Hayes's traveling party included his wife and William T. Sherman, who helped organize the trip. Hayes began his trip in September 1880, departing from Chicago on the transcontinental railroad. He journeyed across the continent, ultimately arriving in California, stopping first in Wyoming and then Utah and Nevada, reaching Sacramento and San Francisco. By railroad and stagecoach, the party traveled north to Oregon, arriving in Portland, and from there to Vancouver, Washington. Going by steamship, they visited Seattle, and then returned to San Francisco. Hayes then toured several southwestern states before returning to Ohio in November, in time to cast a vote in the 1880 presidential election.

Hayes's White House

Hayes and his wife Lucy were known for their policy of keeping an alcohol-free White House, giving rise to her nickname "Lemonade Lucy." The first reception at the Hayes White House included wine, but Hayes was dismayed at drunken behavior at receptions hosted by ambassadors around Washington, leading him to follow his wife's temperance leanings. Alcohol was not served again in the Hayes White House. Critics charged Hayes with parsimony, but Hayes spent more money (which came out of his personal budget) after the ban, ordering that any savings from eliminating alcohol be used on more lavish entertainment. His temperance policy also paid political dividends, strengthening his support among Protestant ministers. Although Secretary Evarts quipped that at the White House dinners, "water flowed like wine," the policy was a success in convincing prohibitionists to vote Republican.

Judicial appointments

Main article: List of federal judges appointed by Rutherford B. Hayes
Black-and-white photograph of a bearded man
Stanley Matthews's confirmation to the Supreme Court was more difficult than Hayes expected.

Hayes appointed two Associate Justices to the Supreme Court. The first vacancy occurred when David Davis resigned to enter the Senate during the election controversy of 1876. On taking office, Hayes appointed John Marshall Harlan to the seat. A former candidate for governor of Kentucky, Harlan had been Benjamin Bristow's campaign manager at the 1876 Republican convention, and Hayes had earlier considered him for attorney general. Hayes submitted the nomination in October 1877, but it aroused some dissent in the Senate because of Harlan's limited experience in public office. Harlan was nonetheless confirmed and served on the court for 34 years, voting (usually in the minority) for aggressive enforcement of the civil rights laws. In 1880, a second seat became vacant upon the resignation of Justice William Strong. Hayes nominated William Burnham Woods, a carpetbagger Republican circuit court judge from Alabama. Woods served six years on the Court, ultimately proving a disappointment to Hayes as he interpreted the Constitution in a manner more similar to that of Southern Democrats than to Hayes's own preferences.

Hayes unsuccessfully attempted to fill a third vacancy in 1881. Justice Noah Haynes Swayne resigned with the expectation that Hayes would fill his seat by appointing Stanley Matthews, a friend of both men. Many senators objected to the appointment, believing that Matthews was too close to corporate and railroad interests, especially those of Jay Gould, and the Senate adjourned without voting on the nomination. The following year, when James A. Garfield entered the White House, he resubmitted Matthews's nomination to the Senate, which this time confirmed Matthews by one vote, 24 to 23. Matthews served for eight years until his death in 1889. His opinion in Yick Wo v. Hopkins in 1886 advanced his and Hayes's views on the protection of ethnic minorities' rights.

Post-presidency (1881–1893)

Hayes in 1886

Hayes declined to seek reelection in 1880, keeping his pledge not to run for a second term. During the 1880 Republican National Convention, he opposed the nomination of both Conkling and Arthur for the Vice Presidency, as well as opposing Grant's attempt to run for a third term. Hayes considered Grant a failure as president, and believed the president should have a single six-year term. He was gratified by the election of fellow Ohio Republican James A. Garfield to succeed him, and consulted with him on appointments for the next administration. After Garfield's inauguration, Hayes and his family returned to Spiegel Grove. In 1881, he was elected a companion of the Military Order of the Loyal Legion of the United States. He served as commander-in-chief (national president) of the Loyal Legion from 1888 until his death in 1893. Although he remained a loyal Republican, Hayes was not too disappointed in Democrat Grover Cleveland's election to the presidency in 1884, approving of Cleveland's views on civil service reform. He was also pleased at the progress of the political career of William McKinley, his army comrade and political protégé.

Hayes became an advocate for educational charities and federal education subsidies for all children. He believed education was the best way to heal the rifts in American society and allow people to improve themselves. In 1887 Hayes was appointed to the Board of Trustees of Ohio State University, the school he helped found as governor of Ohio. He emphasized the need for vocational, as well as academic, education: "I preach the gospel of work," he wrote, "I believe in skilled labor as a part of education." He urged Congress, unsuccessfully, to pass a bill written by Senator Henry W. Blair that would have allowed federal aid for education for the first time. In 1889 Hayes gave a speech encouraging black students to apply for scholarships from the Slater Fund, one of the charities with which he was affiliated. One such student, W. E. B. Du Bois, received a scholarship in 1892. Hayes also advocated better prison conditions.

In retirement, Hayes was troubled by the disparity between the rich and the poor, saying in an 1886 speech, "free government cannot long endure if property is largely in a few hands and large masses of people are unable to earn homes, education, and a support in old age." The next year, he recorded thoughts on that subject in his diary:

In church it occurred to me that it is time for the public to hear that the giant evil and danger in this country, the danger which transcends all others, is the vast wealth owned or controlled by a few persons. Money is power. In Congress, in state legislatures, in city councils, in the courts, in the political conventions, in the press, in the pulpit, in the circles of the educated and the talented, its influence is growing greater and greater. Excessive wealth in the hands of the few means extreme poverty, ignorance, vice, and wretchedness as the lot of the many. It is not yet time to debate about the remedy. The previous question is as to the danger—the evil. Let the people be fully informed and convinced as to the evil. Let them earnestly seek the remedy and it will be found. Fully to know the evil is the first step towards reaching its eradication. Henry George is strong when he portrays the rottenness of the present system. We are, to say the least, not yet ready for his remedy. We may reach and remove the difficulty by changes in the laws regulating corporations, descents of property, wills, trusts, taxation, and a host of other important interests, not omitting lands and other property.

Grave at Spiegel Grove

Hayes was greatly saddened by his wife's death in 1889. When she died, he wrote, "the soul had left ". After Lucy's death, Hayes's daughter Fanny became his traveling companion, and he enjoyed visits from his grandchildren. In 1890, he chaired the Lake Mohonk Conference on the Negro Question, a gathering of reformers that met in upstate New York to discuss racial issues. Hayes died of complications of a heart attack at his home on January 17, 1893, at the age of 70. His last words were "I know that I'm going where Lucy is." President-elect Cleveland and Ohio governor McKinley, who would be Cleveland's immediate successor in 1897, led the funeral procession that followed his body until Hayes was interred in Oakwood Cemetery in Fremont, Ohio. In 1915, his remains were moved to his former home in Spiegel Grove for burial with his wife Lucy.

Legacy and honors

Biographer Ari Hoogenboom has written that Hayes's greatest achievement was to restore popular faith in the presidency and reverse the deterioration of executive power that had established itself after the assassination of Abraham Lincoln in 1865. His supporters have praised his commitment to civil-service reform; his critics have derided his leniency toward former Confederate states as well as his withdrawal of federal support for African Americans' voting rights and civil rights. Historians and scholars generally rank Hayes as an average to below-average president.

After the donation of his home to the state of Ohio for Spiegel Grove State Park, Hayes was reinterred there in 1915. The next year the Hayes Commemorative Library and Museum, the country's first presidential library, opened on the site, funded by contributions from the state of Ohio and Hayes's family.

In 1922 the U.S. Post Office issued its first postage stamp honoring Hayes, 29 years after his death, on the 100th anniversary of his birth. Another Hayes stamp, a 19-cent issue, was released in 1938. In 2011, the U.S. Mint released a "Golden Dollar", the first item of U.S. currency to honor Hayes.

Hayes postage stamp, 1922 issue, 100th anniversary of birth
  
Hayes Presidential "Golden Dollar",
Minted 2011

Hayes had arbitrated and decided an 1878 dispute between Argentina and Paraguay in favor of Paraguay, giving Paraguay 60% of its current territory. This led to the naming of a province in the region after him: Presidente Hayes Department (capital: Villa Hayes); an official holiday: Laudo Hayes Firm Day, the anniversary of the decision, celebrated in Presidente Hayes province; a local soccer team: Club Presidente Hayes (also known as "Los Yanquis"), based in the national capital, Asuncion; a postage stamp, the design of which was chosen in a contest run by the U.S. Embassy; and even the granting of the wish of a young girl who came out of a coma—a trip to the Hayes Presidential Center in Fremont, Ohio.

Also named for Hayes is Hayes County, Nebraska.

Hayes was elected a member of the American Antiquarian Society on October 21, 1890.

Rutherford B. Hayes High School in Hayes's hometown of Delaware, Ohio, was named in his honor, as is Hayes Hall, built in 1893, at the Ohio State University. It is Ohio State's oldest remaining building, and was placed on the National Register of Historic Places on July 16, 1970, due to its front facade, which remains virtually untouched from its original appearance. Hayes knew the building would be named in his honor, but did not live to see it completed. The City of Delaware also erected a statue of Hayes.

See also

Notes

  1. Herron's daughter, Helen, later married William Howard Taft.
  2. His first two sons, Joseph and George, had died in infancy.
  3. He was named after Hayes's friend, Manning Force.
  4. The elector, John W. Watts, was disqualified because he held "an Office of Trust or Profit under the United States", in violation of Article II, section 1, clause 2 of the U.S. Constitution.
  5. Hayes's predecessor, President Ulysses S. Grant, appointed the first Civil Service Commission in 1871, but it dissolved in 1874.
  6. Charles K. Graham filled Merritt's former position.

References

  1. "Rutherford B. Hayes". The White House. Retrieved May 19, 2021.
  2. Welch, Richard E., Jr. (1971). George Frisbie Hoar and the Half-Breed Republicans, p. 91. Harvard University Press.
  3. ^ Robinson 2001, pp. 127–128.
  4. ^ Robinson 2001, pp. 182–184; Foner 2002, pp. 580–581.
  5. ""Betrayal of the Freedman: Rutherford B. Hayes and the End of Reconstruction"". Rutherford B. Hayes Presidential Library & Museums. Retrieved May 19, 2021.
  6. "America's Gilded Age: Robber Barons and Captains of Industry". Maryville Online. Retrieved February 21, 2022.
  7. Hoogenboom 1995, pp. 7–8.
  8. Hoogenboom 1995, p. 10; Barnard 2005, pp. 76–77.
  9. Trefousse 2002, p. 4.
  10. Hoogenboom 1995, pp. 20–21; Barnard 2005, pp. 27–31.
  11. Barnard 2005, p. 41.
  12. Trefousse 2002, p. 3.
  13. Barnard 2005, p. 53.
  14. "Hayes Family Genealogy".
  15. ^ Hoogenboom 1995, pp. 17–18.
  16. Hoogenboom 1995, pp. 62–63; Barnard 2005, p. 113.
  17. Trefousse 2002, pp. 4–5.
  18. Hoogenboom 1995, pp. 20–22; Trefousse 2002, p. 5.
  19. Hoogenboom 1995, p. 25.
  20. Barnard 2005, pp. 107–113.
  21. "Topping, Eva Catafygiotu" John Zachos Cincinnatian from Constantinople The Cincinnati Historical Society Bulletin Volumes 33–34 Cincinnati Historical Society 1975: p. 51
  22. Hoogenboom 1995, pp. 33–43.
  23. Trefousse 2002, p. 6.
  24. Hoogenboom 1995, pp. 43–51; Barnard 2005, pp. 131–138.
  25. Hoogenboom 1995, pp. 52–53.
  26. Hoogenboom 1995, pp. 55–60.
  27. Hoogenboom 1995, pp. 62–66.
  28. Hoogenboom 1995, pp. 66–70; Barnard 2005, p. 114.
  29. Trefousse 2002, p. 8.
  30. Hoogenboom 1995, p. 73.
  31. Barnard 2005, p. 167.
  32. ^ Barnard 2005, pp. 184–185.
  33. ^ Hoogenboom 1995, pp. 74–75.
  34. ^ Hoogenboom 1995, pp. 78–86.
  35. Hoogenboom 1995, pp. 61–62.
  36. Barnard 2005, pp. 178–180, 187–188; Hoogenboom 1995, pp. 93–95.
  37. Trefousse 2002, p. 9.
  38. Hoogenboom 1995, pp. 87–93.
  39. Trefousse 2002, p. 10.
  40. Hoogenboom 1995, pp. 95–99; Barnard 2005, pp. 189–191.
  41. Barnard 2005, pp. 196–197; Trefousse 2002, pp. 14–15.
  42. Hoogenboom 1995, p. 100.
  43. Hoogenboom 1995, pp. 104–105; Barnard 2005, pp. 202–203.
  44. Hoogenboom 1995, p. 107; Barnard 2005, p. 204.
  45. Hoogenboom 1995, p. 113; Barnard 2005, p. 210.
  46. ^ Hoogenboom 1995, p. 114; Barnard 2005, pp. 210–212.
  47. Hoogenboom 1995, p. 115; Barnard 2005, pp. 213–214.
  48. ^ Hoogenboom 1995, pp. 116–117.
  49. Hoogenboom 1995, pp. 120–121.
  50. Hoogenboom 1995, pp. 125–126; Reid 1868, p. 160.
  51. Hoogenboom 1995, pp. 128–130.
  52. Hoogenboom 1995, pp. 136–141.
  53. ^ Hoogenboom 1995, pp. 141–143.
  54. Hoogenboom 1995, pp. 146–148.
  55. Hoogenboom 1995, pp. 146–147; Reid 1868, p. 161.
  56. Hoogenboom 1995, pp. 149–153.
  57. Trefousse 2002, p. 30.
  58. Hoogenboom 1995, pp. 154–156.
  59. Hoogenboom 1995, pp. 157–158.
  60. ^ Hoogenboom 1995, pp. 159–161.
  61. ^ Hoogenboom 1995, pp. 162–164; Trefousse 2002, pp. 32–33.
  62. ^ Hoogenboom 1995, pp. 166–168.
  63. ^ Hoogenboom 1995, pp. 168–169.
  64. Hoogenboom 1995, pp. 170–171.
  65. Hoogenboom 1995, pp. 172–173.
  66. ^ Hoogenboom 1995, pp. 174–177.
  67. Grant 2003, p. 564.
  68. Hoogenboom 1995, pp. 178–181.
  69. Hoogenboom 1995, pp. 186–188.
  70. ^ Hoogenboom 1995, pp. 171–176; Barnard 2005, pp. 225–227.
  71. Hoogenboom 1995, pp. 200–201; Conwell 1876, pp. 145–180.
  72. Hoogenboom 1995, pp. 200–201; Trefousse 2002, pp. 41–44; Richardson 2001, pp. 17–18.
  73. ^ Hoogenboom 1995, p. 203; Trefousse 2002, pp. 40–41.
  74. Hoogenboom 1995, pp. 197–199; Trefousse 2002, p. 42.
  75. "To Pass a Resolution to Impeach the President. (P. 320-2, 321-2). -- House Vote #418 -- Jan 7, 1867". GovTrack.us. Retrieved March 23, 2022.
  76. Hoogenboom 1995, pp. 204–205.
  77. Hoogenboom 1995, pp. 204–205; Foner 2002, pp. 493–494.
  78. Hoogenboom 1995, pp. 208–210.
  79. ^ Hoogenboom 1995, pp. 211–213; Trefousse 2002, pp. 45–46.
  80. ^ Hoogenboom 1995, p. 214; Barnard 2005, pp. 238–239.
  81. Trefousse 2002, pp. 47–48.
  82. Hoogenboom 1995, pp. 215–216.
  83. ^ Hoogenboom 1995, pp. 218–220; Barnard 2005, pp. 239–241.
  84. Hoogenboom 1995, pp. 225–228.
  85. Hoogenboom 1995, pp. 231–232.
  86. ^ Hoogenboom 1995, pp. 236–240.
  87. Hoogenboom 1995, pp. 241–242.
  88. Trefousse 2002, pp. 31, 42.
  89. Hoogenboom 1995, pp. 240–245; Barnard 2005, pp. 250–252.
  90. Hoogenboom 1995, pp. 246–248.
  91. Hoogenboom 1995, pp. 243–244; Barnard 2005, pp. 250–252.
  92. Hoogenboom 1995, pp. 249–250.
  93. Trefousse 2002, p. 59.
  94. Hoogenboom 1995, pp. 249–251.
  95. "Library History: Birchard Public Library of Sandusky County" Archived August 4, 2018, at the Wayback Machine, Birchard Library website
  96. Hoogenboom 1995, pp. 256–257; Barnard 2005, pp. 270–271.
  97. ^ Hoogenboom 1995, pp. 257–260; Barnard 2005, pp. 271–275; Foner 2002, p. 557.
  98. Trefousse 2002, pp. 61–64.
  99. Trefousse 2002, p. 62.
  100. Hoogenboom 1995, pp. 260–261; Robinson 2001, p. 57.
  101. Hoogenboom 1995, pp. 262–263; Robinson 2001, pp. 53–55.
  102. Hoogenboom 1995, pp. 263–264; Robinson 2001, pp. 61–63.
  103. Hoogenboom 1995, p. 260; Robinson 2001, p. 63.
  104. About the Vice President | William A. Wheeler, 19th Vice President (1877-1881). United States Senate via Internet Archive. Retrieved February 24, 2022.
  105. ^ Robinson 2001, pp. 64–68, 90–95.
  106. Robinson 2001, pp. 97–98.
  107. Trefousse 2002, p. 71.
  108. Trefousse 2002, pp. 72–73; Robinson 2001, pp. 113–114.
  109. Hoogenboom 1995, pp. 269–271.
  110. Robinson 2001, pp. 99–102.
  111. Trefousse 2002, p. 74.
  112. Sproat 1974, pp. 163–164.
  113. Trefousse 2002, p. 75; Robinson 2001, pp. 119–123; Sproat 1974, pp. 163–164.
  114. ^ Robinson 2001, pp. 126–127.
  115. Robinson 2001, pp. 131–142; Hoogenboom 1995, pp. 277–279.
  116. Hoogenboom 1995, p. 279.
  117. Robinson 2001, pp. 145–154; Hoogenboom 1995, pp. 281–286.
  118. Robinson 2001, p. 157.
  119. ^ Robinson 2001, p. 158.
  120. ^ Hoogenboom 1995, p. 286.
  121. Robinson 2001, pp. 159–161.
  122. Robinson 2001, pp. 166–171.
  123. Robinson 2001, pp. 171–183.
  124. "HarpWeek | Hayes vs. Tilden: The Electoral College Controversy of 1876-1877". elections.harpweek.com. Retrieved May 6, 2021.
  125. Robinson 2001, pp. 185–189; Foner 2002, pp. 581–587.
  126. ^ Dodds 2013, p. 113; Clendenen 1969, p. 246.
  127. Hoogenboom 1995, pp. 295–297.
  128. Trefousse 2002, pp. 85–86.
  129. Hoogenboom 1995, pp. 298–299.
  130. Barnard 2005, pp. 402–403.
  131. Trefousse 2002, pp. 90–93.
  132. Hoogenboom 1995, pp. 304–307; Foner 2002, pp. 580–583; Davison 1972, p. 142.
  133. Davison 1972, p. 138; Trefousse 2002, p. 92.
  134. Trefousse 2002, pp. 90–91.
  135. Clendenen 1969, p. 244.
  136. Hoogenboom 1995, pp. 317–318; Davison 1972, pp. 141–143.
  137. ^ Davison 1972, pp. 162–163; Hoogenboom 1995, pp. 392–402; Richardson 2001, p. 161.
  138. Hoogenboom 1995, p. 402.
  139. Barnard 2005, p. 418.
  140. Hoogenboom 1995, pp. 317–318.
  141. Trefousse 2002, pp. 93–94.
  142. Calhoun 2017, pp. 293–294.
  143. ^ Hoogenboom 1995, pp. 318–319.
  144. Davison 1972, pp. 164–165.
  145. Paul 1998, p. 71.
  146. ^ Hoogenboom 1995, pp. 322–325; Davison 1972, pp. 164–165; Trefousse 2002, pp. 95–96.
  147. Hoogenboom 1995, p. 352; Trefousse 2002, pp. 95–96.
  148. Hoogenboom 1995, pp. 353–355; Trefousse 2002, pp. 100–101.
  149. Hoogenboom 1995, pp. 370–371.
  150. Hoogenboom 1995, p. 370.
  151. Hoogenboom 1995, pp. 382–384; Barnard 2005, p. 456.
  152. Paul 1998, pp. 73–74.
  153. Sproat 1974, pp. 165–166.
  154. Sproat 1974, pp. 169–170.
  155. ^ Klotsche 1935, pp. 409–411.
  156. Hoogenboom 1995, pp. 439–440.
  157. Trefousse 2002, p. 144.
  158. Klotsche 1935, pp. 414–415.
  159. Klotsche 1935, p. 416.
  160. Foner 2002, p. 583; Stowell 1999, pp. 1–2; Richardson 2001, p. 121.
  161. Hoogenboom 1995, pp. 326–327.
  162. Bruce 1989, pp. 75–77; Stowell 1999, p. 117.
  163. ^ Hoogenboom 1995, pp. 328–333; Davison 1972, pp. 145–153; Barnard 2005, pp. 445–447.
  164. Bruce 1989, pp. 93–94.
  165. Stowell 1999, pp. 116–127; Hoogenboom 1995, p. 328.
  166. Foner 2002, p. 585.
  167. Davison 1972, pp. 148–150; Trefousse 2002, p. 95.
  168. Hoogenboom 1995, p. 334; Davison 1972, pp. 152–153.
  169. Barnard 2005, pp. 446–447; Hayes 1922, p. 440, v. 3.
  170. Hoogenboom 1995, p. 356.
  171. Unger 2008, p. 358.
  172. ^ Davison 1972, pp. 176–177.
  173. ^ Hoogenboom 1995, pp. 358–360.
  174. Trefousse 2002, p. 107.
  175. Davison 1972, pp. 177–180.
  176. ^ Hoogenboom 1995, p. 416.
  177. Hoogenboom 1995, pp. 417–418.
  178. ^ Hoogenboom 1995, pp. 420–421; Barnard 2005, p. 442.
  179. ^ Hoogenboom 1995, p. 335; Barnard 2005, p. 443.
  180. Hoogenboom 1995, p. 337; Barnard 2005, p. 444.
  181. Hoogenboom 1995, p. 338.
  182. ^ Hoogenboom 1995, p. 387.
  183. Hoogenboom 1995, pp. 388–389; Barnard 2005, pp. 447–449; Rhodes 1919, pp. 180–196.
  184. ^ Hoogenboom 1995, pp. 388–389; Barnard 2005, pp. 447–449.
  185. ^ Hoogenboom 1995, pp. 390–391.
  186. Campbell 2016, pp. xi–xii, 2–3.
  187. White 2016, p. 597.
  188. McFeely 1981, pp. 464; White 2016, pp. 589, 599.
  189. ^ Davison 1972, pp. 184–185.
  190. Trefousse 2002, p. 109; Davison 1972, pp. 186–187.
  191. Hoogenboom 1995, pp. 341–343, 449–450.
  192. Stuart 1977, pp. 452–454.
  193. Hoogenboom 1995, pp. 343–344, 449.
  194. Hoogenboom 1995, pp. 338–340.
  195. Hoogenboom 1995, pp. 340–341.
  196. Trefousse 2002, p. 123.
  197. Hoogenboom 1995, pp. 450–454; Sproat 1974, p. 173.
  198. Trefousse 2002, p. 124.
  199. Loftus, David. "Rutherford B. Hayes's visit to Oregon, 1880". The Oregon Encyclopedia. Retrieved February 17, 2016.
  200. Hoogenboom 1995, p. 3; Davison 1972, p. xv.
  201. Davison 1972, p. 82; Barnard 2005, p. 480.
  202. ^ Hoogenboom 1995, p. 384.
  203. Hoogenboom 1995, pp. 385–386; Barnard 2005, p. 480.
  204. Hoogenboom 1995, p. 458.
  205. ^ Davison 1972, pp. 130–132.
  206. Davison 1972, p. 132; Hoogenboom 1995, p. 454.
  207. Barnard 2005, pp. 268, 498.
  208. ^ Davison 1972, p. 129.
  209. Barnard 2005, pp. 498–499.
  210. Hoogenboom 1995, p. 457.
  211. Calhoun 2017, p. 549.
  212. "Volume III Chapter XXXVIII". resources.ohiohistory.org. Retrieved October 20, 2023.
  213. Hoogenboom 1995, pp. 447–465.
  214. Hoogenboom 1995, pp. 466–467.
  215. Hoogenboom 1995, p. 483.
  216. Hoogenboom 1995, pp. 524–525.
  217. Hoogenboom 1995, pp. 471–475; Thelen 1970, p. 156.
  218. Thelen 1970, pp. 154–156.
  219. Hoogenboom 1995, pp. 498–499.
  220. Barnard 2005, p. 506.
  221. Swint 1952, pp. 48–49.
  222. ^ Hoogenboom 1995, pp. 518–523.
  223. Hoogenboom 1995, pp. 496–497; Thelen 1970, p. 151.
  224. Barnard 2005, p. 513; Hoogenboom 1995, p. 539.
  225. Hayes 1922, p. 354, v. 4; Swint 1952, pp. 46–47.
  226. ^ Hoogenboom 1995, pp. 508–510.
  227. Hoogenboom 1995, pp. 509–520.
  228. Hoogenboom 1995, pp. 515–517; Foner 2002, pp. 605–606.
  229. ^ Barnard 2005, pp. 522–523.
  230. Hoogenboom 1995, pp. 532–533.
  231. United States Congress. "Rutherford B. Hayes (id: H000393)". Biographical Directory of the United States Congress.
  232. Wilson, Scott; Mank, Gregory W. (forward) (2016). "Hayes, Rutherford Birchard, #5668". Resting Places: The Burial Sites of More Than 14,000 Famous Persons (3rd ed.). McFarland & Company, Inc. ISBN 978-0786479924. OCLC 948561021.
  233. Hamilton, Neil A. (2010). Presidents: A Biographical Dictionary. Washington, DC: Facts on File. p. 163. ISBN 978-0-8160-7708-3.
  234. "Rating the Presidents of the United States, 1789–2000: A Survey of Scholars in History, Political Science, and Law". Federalist Society. Washington, DC. November 16, 2000.
  235. Otis, John (October 30, 2014). "The Place Where Rutherford B. Hayes Is A Really Big Deal". NPR. Washington, DC. Rutherford B. Hayes, the 19th U.S. president, doesn't get much respect. He's remembered, if at all, for losing the popular vote in 1876 but winning the presidency through Electoral College maneuvering.
  236. "The Presidents (Spiegel Grove)". Survey of Historic Sites and Buildings. National Park Service. January 24, 2004. Retrieved November 22, 2010.
  237. Smith 1980, pp. 485–488.
  238. Bigalke, Jay, ed. (2023). Scott Standard Postage Stamp Catalogue, 2024. Vol. 1A. Sydney, Ohio: Amos Media.
  239. "2011 P Presidential Dollars : Rutherford B. Hayes Golden Dollar". USA Coin Book. Retrieved December 2, 2023.
  240. Teeter, R (February 16, 2009). "Rutherford Hayes' other legacy". Kos Media, LLC. Retrieved October 24, 2014.
  241. Gannett, Henry (1905). The Origin of Certain Place Names in the United States (2nd ed.). Washington: Government Printing Office. p. 153. Retrieved March 10, 2017.
  242. "MemberListH | American Antiquarian Society". www.americanantiquarian.org.
  243. "History of Hayes Hall". The Ohio State University. Retrieved February 14, 2019.

Bibliography

Books

Articles

  • Clendenen, Clarence (October 1969). "President Hayes' "Withdrawal" of the Troops: An Enduring Myth". The South Carolina Historical Magazine. 70 (4): 240–250. JSTOR 27566958.
  • Klotsche, J. Martin (December 1935). "The Star Route Cases". The Mississippi Valley Historical Review. 22 (3): 407–418. doi:10.2307/1892626. JSTOR 1892626.
  • Paul, Ezra (Winter 1998). "Congressional Relations and Public Relations in the Administration of Rutherford B. Hayes (1877–81)". Presidential Studies Quarterly. 28 (1): 68–87. JSTOR 27551831.
  • Skidmore, Max J. "Rutherford B. Hayes." in Maligned Presidents: The Late 19th Century (2014): 50–62.
  • Smith, Thomas A. (1980). "Before Hyde Park: The Rutherford B. Hayes Library". The American Archivist. 43 (4): 485–488. JSTOR 40292342.
  • Stuart, Paul (September 1977). "United States Indian Policy: From the Dawes Act to the American Indian Policy Review Commission". Social Service Review. 51 (3): 451–463. doi:10.1086/643524. JSTOR 30015511. S2CID 143506388.
  • Swint, Henry L. (June 1952). "Rutherford B. Hayes, Educator". The Mississippi Valley Historical Review. 39 (1): 45–60. doi:10.2307/1902843. JSTOR 1902843.
  • Thelen, David P. (Summer 1970). "Rutherford B. Hayes and the Reform Tradition in the Gilded Age". American Quarterly. 22 (2): 150–165. doi:10.2307/2711639. JSTOR 2711639.

External links

Rutherford B. Hayes
Life
Presidency
Public image
Family
Offices and distinctions
U.S. House of Representatives
Preceded byAlexander Long Member of the U.S. House of Representatives
from Ohio's 2nd congressional district

1865–1867
Succeeded bySamuel Fenton Cary
Party political offices
Preceded byJacob Dolson Cox Republican nominee for Governor of Ohio
1867, 1869
Succeeded byEdward Follansbee Noyes
Preceded byEdward Follansbee Noyes Republican nominee for Governor of Ohio
1875
Succeeded byWilliam H. West
Preceded byUlysses S. Grant Republican nominee for President of the United States
1876
Succeeded byJames A. Garfield
Political offices
Preceded byJacob Dolson Cox Governor of Ohio
1868–1872
Succeeded byEdward Follansbee Noyes
Preceded byWilliam Allen Governor of Ohio
1876–1877
Succeeded byThomas L. Young
Preceded byUlysses S. Grant President of the United States
1877–1881
Succeeded byJames A. Garfield
Links to related articles
Presidents of the United States
Presidents and
presidencies
  1. George Washington (1789–1797)
  2. John Adams (1797–1801)
  3. Thomas Jefferson (1801–1809)
  4. James Madison (1809–1817)
  5. James Monroe (1817–1825)
  6. John Quincy Adams (1825–1829)
  7. Andrew Jackson (1829–1837)
  8. Martin Van Buren (1837–1841)
  9. William Henry Harrison (1841)
  10. John Tyler (1841–1845)
  11. James K. Polk (1845–1849)
  12. Zachary Taylor (1849–1850)
  13. Millard Fillmore (1850–1853)
  14. Franklin Pierce (1853–1857)
  15. James Buchanan (1857–1861)
  16. Abraham Lincoln (1861–1865)
  17. Andrew Johnson (1865–1869)
  18. Ulysses S. Grant (1869–1877)
  19. Rutherford B. Hayes (1877–1881)
  20. James A. Garfield (1881)
  21. Chester A. Arthur (1881–1885)
  22. Grover Cleveland (1885–1889)
  23. Benjamin Harrison (1889–1893)
  24. Grover Cleveland (1893–1897)
  25. William McKinley (1897–1901)
  26. Theodore Roosevelt (1901–1909)
  27. William Howard Taft (1909–1913)
  28. Woodrow Wilson (1913–1921)
  29. Warren G. Harding (1921–1923)
  30. Calvin Coolidge (1923–1929)
  31. Herbert Hoover (1929–1933)
  32. Franklin D. Roosevelt (1933–1945)
  33. Harry S. Truman (1945–1953)
  34. Dwight D. Eisenhower (1953–1961)
  35. John F. Kennedy (1961–1963)
  36. Lyndon B. Johnson (1963–1969)
  37. Richard Nixon (1969–1974)
  38. Gerald Ford (1974–1977)
  39. Jimmy Carter (1977–1981)
  40. Ronald Reagan (1981–1989)
  41. George H. W. Bush (1989–1993)
  42. Bill Clinton (1993–2001)
  43. George W. Bush (2001–2009)
  44. Barack Obama (2009–2017)
  45. Donald Trump (2017–2021)
  46. Joe Biden (2021–present)
Presidency
timelines
Republican Party
Presidential
tickets
,
national
conventions
,
and
presidential
primaries
Presidential
administrations
U.S. House
leaders
,
Speakers,
and
Conference
chairs
RNC
Chairs
Chair elections
Parties by
state and
territory
State
Territory
Affiliated
organizations
Congress
Fundraising
groups
Sectional
groups
Factional
groups
Related
Governors and lieutenant governors of Ohio
Governors

Lieutenant
governors
Members of the U.S. House of Representatives from Ohio's 2nd congressional district
Cabinet of President Rutherford B. Hayes (1877–1881)
Secretary of State
Secretary of the Treasury
Secretary of War
Attorney General
Postmaster General
Secretary of the Navy
Secretary of the Interior
Reconstruction era
Participants
Federal government
State governments
Others
Elections
Presidential
U.S. Senate
U.S. House
Gubernatorial
U.S. elections
Key events
Prelude
1863
1864
1865
1866
1867
1868
1869
1870
1871
1872
1873
1874
1875
1876
1877
Aftermath
Aspects
Historiography
Memory
Legacy
Other topics
Portals:Rutherford B. Hayes at Misplaced Pages's sister projects: Categories: