| Revision as of 07:11, 26 December 2024 editMedxvo (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users6,735 edits reply← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 15:53, 26 December 2024 edit undoCatchMe (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users6,698 editsNo edit summary | ||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| ==GA Review== | ==GA Review== | ||
| {{atopg | |||
| | status = | |||
| | result = Passed. ] (] · ]) 15:53, 26 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| }} | |||
| {{Good article tools}} | {{Good article tools}} | ||
| <noinclude>{{al|{{#titleparts:Marjorie (song)/GA1|-1}}|noname=yes}}<br/></noinclude><includeonly>:''This review is ] from ]. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''</includeonly> | <noinclude>{{al|{{#titleparts:Marjorie (song)/GA1|-1}}|noname=yes}}<br/></noinclude><includeonly>:''This review is ] from ]. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''</includeonly> | ||
| Line 10: | Line 14: | ||
| * Ref 1 doesn't specifically support the preceding sentence as ref 2 does. | * Ref 1 doesn't specifically support the preceding sentence as ref 2 does. | ||
| ** Removed it, please tell me if I should replace it with another source | ** Removed it, please tell me if I should replace it with another source | ||
| *** The ref supports the sentence completely so it's fine as it is! | |||
| * "...{{tq|the pop maximalist sound}}..." - "the maximalist pop sound"? | * "...{{tq|the pop maximalist sound}}..." - "the maximalist pop sound"? | ||
| ** Done | ** Done | ||
| Line 25: | Line 30: | ||
| This article is almost perfect for GA! I didn't even had to separate in sections as I usually do.. All good in the verifiable (and no copyright violations according to Earwig's Copyvio), broad, neutral, stable, and illustrated criteria. I will put this {{on hold}} until some minor issues are addressed! ] (] · ]) 06:05, 26 December 2024 (UTC) | This article is almost perfect for GA! I didn't even had to separate in sections as I usually do.. All good in the verifiable (and no copyright violations according to Earwig's Copyvio), broad, neutral, stable, and illustrated criteria. I will put this {{on hold}} until some minor issues are addressed! ] (] · ]) 06:05, 26 December 2024 (UTC) | ||
| :Hey, {{u|CatchMe}}! I believe I've addressed all of your comments, let me know if anything needs further adjustments. Thanks so much for the review, I greatly appreciate it :)) ] (]) 07:11, 26 December 2024 (UTC) | :Hey, {{u|CatchMe}}! I believe I've addressed all of your comments, let me know if anything needs further adjustments. Thanks so much for the review, I greatly appreciate it :)) ] (]) 07:11, 26 December 2024 (UTC) | ||
| ::{{ping|Medxvo}} Excellent work! I see everything is fine so I will {{pass}} this. Congrats and happy holidays!! ] (] · ]) 15:50, 26 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| {{abot}} | |||
Latest revision as of 15:53, 26 December 2024
GA Review
Passed. CatchMe (talk · contribs) 15:53, 26 December 2024 (UTC)The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Nominator: Medxvo (talk · contribs) 10:52, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
Reviewer: CatchMe (talk · contribs) 06:05, 26 December 2024 (UTC)
- Ref 1 doesn't specifically support the preceding sentence as ref 2 does.
- Removed it, please tell me if I should replace it with another source
- The ref supports the sentence completely so it's fine as it is!
- Removed it, please tell me if I should replace it with another source
- "...
the pop maximalist sound
..." - "the maximalist pop sound"?- Done
- "
After filming, the three celebrated by drinking and unexpectedly continued writing
..." - is the drinking part relevant?- Replaced with "celeberated Folklore's success and and unexpectedly ..."
- "...
was composed from
..." - "was composed using"?- Done
- I have seen GAs using "synthesizers" instead of "synths".
- Done
- "...
and one of Swift's better songs
" - "and one of Swift's best songs".- Done
- "
nine out of 274
" - change "nine" to "9" for consistency and per MOS:NUMNOTES.- Done. I completely forgot about MOS:NUMNOTES
This article is almost perfect for GA! I didn't even had to separate in sections as I usually do.. All good in the verifiable (and no copyright violations according to Earwig's Copyvio), broad, neutral, stable, and illustrated criteria. I will put this 
On hold until some minor issues are addressed! CatchMe (talk · contribs) 06:05, 26 December 2024 (UTC)
- Hey, CatchMe! I believe I've addressed all of your comments, let me know if anything needs further adjustments. Thanks so much for the review, I greatly appreciate it :)) Medxvo (talk) 07:11, 26 December 2024 (UTC)
- @Medxvo: Excellent work! I see everything is fine so I will ✓ Pass this. Congrats and happy holidays!! CatchMe (talk · contribs) 15:50, 26 December 2024 (UTC)