Misplaced Pages

Battle of Callinicum: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 07:39, 30 March 2022 editWonderCanada (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users4,066 editsm Grammar editsTag: Visual edit← Previous edit Revision as of 16:04, 26 December 2024 edit undoWin8x (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers4,337 edits Reverted 2 edits by 5.62.228.32 (talk): Rv spamTags: Twinkle UndoNext edit →
(44 intermediate revisions by 24 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Short description|Battle of the Iberian War (531 AD)}} {{Short description|Battle of the Iberian War (531 AD)}}
{{for|the battle in 296|Battle of Carrhae (296)}} {{for|the battle in 296|Battle of Carrhae (296)}}
{{more footnotes|date=April 2015}} {{more footnotes needed|date=April 2015}}
{{infobox military conflict {{infobox military conflict
| conflict = Battle of Callinicum | conflict = Battle of Callinicum
| partof = the ] | partof = the ]
| image = | image =
| caption = | caption =
| date = 19 April 531 AD | date = 19 April 531 AD
| place = Callinicum, ], ] (modern ], northern ]) | place = Callinicum, ], ] (modern ], northern ])
| coordinates = | coordinates =
| map_type = | map_type =
| map_relief = | map_relief =
| latitude = | latitude =
| longitude = | longitude =
| map_size = | map_size =
| map_marksize = | map_marksize =
| map_caption = | map_caption =
| map_label = | map_label =
| territory = No immediate change in territorial possessions | territory =
| result = ] Sasanian victory<ref>''The Empire at War'', A.D. Lee, '''The Cambridge Companion to the Age of Justinian''', ed. Michael Maas, (Cambridge University Press, 2005), 122.</ref> | result = Sasanian victory<ref>''The Empire at War'', A.D. Lee, ''The Cambridge Companion to the Age of Justinian'', ed. Michael Maas, (Cambridge University Press, 2005), 122.</ref>
| combatant2 = ]<br>]
*Tactical Sasanian victory
| combatant1 = ]<br>]
*The apparent objective of capture of Antioch failed<ref>{{cite book |last1=Rawlinson |first1=George |title=The Seventh Great Oriental Monarchy: Geography, History, and Antiquities of the Sassanian Or New Persian Empire |date=1876 |publisher=Longmans, Green |page=-376 |url=https://archive.org/details/in.ernet.dli.2015.49541 |language=en}}</ref>
| commander2 = ]<br>]
*The war turns in favour of the Sasanians<ref>{{Cite book|title=Belisarius : the last Roman general|last=Hughes, Ian (Historian)|date=2009|publisher=Westholme|isbn=978-1-59416-085-1|location=Yardley, Pa.|pages=Chapter 4 Section: The Battle of Callinicum|oclc=294885267}}</ref>
| commander1 = ]<br>]<br>] & ]<br>]{{KIA}}<br/>]<br/>Longinus{{KIA}}<br/>Stephanacius{{KIA}}<br/>]<br>]{{POW}}<ref name="GreatrexLieu2002" />
| combatant2 = ]<br>]
| strength2 = 15,000<ref name="Hughes, Ian Historian">{{Cite book|title=Belisarius : the last Roman general|last=Hughes, Ian (Historian)|isbn=9781473822979|location=Barnsley|oclc=903161296}}</ref> or 20,000<ref name="Greatrex">Geoffrey Greatrex and Samuel N.C. Lieu, ''The Roman Eastern Frontier and the Persian Wars AD 363–628'', Part 2, (Routledge, 2002), 92.</ref><ref>According to Zacharias, just before the battle begins, the Romans found the Sasanians like a "little flock".</ref>
| combatant1 = ]<br>]
| commander2 = ]<br>]
| commander1 = ]<br>]<br>] & Simmas<br>Ascan{{KIA}}<br/>Petrus<br/>Longinus{{KIA}}<br/>Stephanacius{{KIA}}<br/>]<br>]{{POW}}<ref name="GreatrexLieu2002" />
| strength2 = 15,000<ref>{{Cite book|title=Belisarius : the last Roman general|last=Hughes, Ian (Historian)|isbn=9781473822979|location=Barnsley|oclc=903161296}}</ref> or 20,000<ref name="Greatrex">Geoffrey Greatrex and Samuel N.C. Lieu, ''The Roman Eastern Frontier and the Persian Wars Ad 363-628'', Part 2, (Routledge, 2002), 92.</ref>*<ref>According to Zacharias, just before the battle begins, the Romans found the Sasanians like a "little flock".</ref>
*10,000 or 15,000 ] *10,000 or 15,000 ]
*5,000 Lakhmid cavalry *5,000 Lakhmid cavalry
| strength1 = 20,000<ref>''Quraysh and the Roman Army: Making Sense of the Meccan Leather Trade'', Patricia Crone, '''Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies''', University of London Vol. 70, No. 1 (2007), 73.</ref> or 25,000<ref>{{Cite book|title=Belisarius : the last Roman general|last=Hughes, Ian (Historian)|isbn=9781473822979|location=Barnsley|oclc=903161296}}</ref> | strength1 = 20,000<ref>''Quraysh and the Roman Army: Making Sense of the Meccan Leather Trade'', Patricia Crone, ''Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies'', University of London Vol. 70, No. 1 (2007), 73.</ref> or 25,000<ref name="Hughes, Ian Historian">{{Cite book|title=Belisarius : the last Roman general|last=Hughes, Ian (Historian)|isbn=9781473822979|location=Barnsley|oclc=903161296}}</ref>
*13,000 Byzantine infantry & cavalry *13,000 Byzantine infantry & cavalry
*5,000 Ghassanid cavalry *5,000 Ghassanid cavalry
*2,000 ]n infantry *2,000 ]n infantry
| casualties2 = Heavy | casualties2 = Heavy
| casualties1 = Heavy | casualties1 = Heavy
| notes = | notes =
| campaignbox = {{Campaignbox Iberian War}} | campaignbox = {{Campaignbox Iberian War}}
{{Campaignbox Wars of Justinian I}} {{Campaignbox Wars of Justinian I}}
}} }}
The '''Battle of Callinicum''' took place on Easter Saturday, 19 April 531 AD, between the armies of the ] under ] and a ] cavalry force under ]. After a defeat at the ], the Sasanians moved to invade ] in an attempt to turn the tide of the war. Belisarius' rapid response foiled the plan, and his troops pushed the Persians to the edge of Syria through maneuvering before forcing a battle in which the Sasanians proved to be the pyrrhic victors. The '''Battle of Callinicum''' took place on Easter Saturday, 19 April 531 AD, between an army of the ] under ] and a ] cavalry force commanded by ]. After being defeated at the ], the Sasanians moved to invade ] in an attempt to turn the tide of the war. Belisarius' rapid response foiled the plan, and his troops pushed the Persians to the Syrian border through maneuvering before forcing a battle in which the Sasanians won a ].


== Prelude == == Prelude ==
In April 531 AD, the Persian king ] sent an army under ], consisting of a cavalry force numbering about 15,000 ] with an additional group of 5,000 ] Arab cavalry<ref name="Greatrex" /> under Al-Mundhir, to start a campaign, this time not through the heavily fortified frontier cities of ], but through the less conventional but also less defended route in ]<ref>{{Cite book|title=Belisarius : the last Roman general|last=Hughes, Ian (Historian)|isbn=9781473822979|location=Barnsley|oclc=903161296}}</ref> in order to capture Syrian cities like ]. In April 531 AD, the Persian king ] sent an army under Azarethes, consisting of a cavalry force numbering about 15,000 ] with an additional 5,000 ] Arab cavalry <ref name="Greatrex" /> under Al-Mundhir, to invade Syria, not through the heavily fortified frontier cities of ], but through the less conventional but also less-defended route in ]<ref name="Hughes, Ian Historian">{{Cite book|title=Belisarius : the last Roman general|last=Hughes, Ian (Historian)|isbn=9781473822979|location=Barnsley|oclc=903161296}}</ref> in order to capture Syrian cities such as ].


The Persian army crossed the frontier at ] on the ] and marched north. As they neared ], Belisarius, who commanded the Byzantine army, set out to follow them as they advanced westwards. Belisarius' forces consisted of about 5,000 men and another 3,000 ] Arab allies, for the remainder of his army had been left to secure ]. The Byzantines finally blocked the Persian advance at ], where reinforcements under ] also arrived, bringing the Byzantine force to some 20,000 men. The Persians were forced to withdraw, and the Byzantines followed them east. The Persian army crossed the frontier at ] on the ] and marched north. As they neared ], Belisarius set out to follow them as they advanced westwards. Belisarius' forces consisted of about 5,000 men and another 3,000 ] Arab allies, for the remainder of his army had been left to secure ]. The Byzantines blocked the Persian advance at ], where reinforcements under ] also arrived, bringing the Byzantine force to some 20,000 men. The Persians were forced to withdraw to the east, followed by the Byzantines.


The battle would occur on Easter Sunday, and the convention at the time was too fast on the day and well into the night. Due to this, if ] were to give battle he would have to fight using inevitably hungry troops.<ref>{{Cite book|title=History of the Wars|last=Caesarea|first=Procopius|publisher=Seltzer Books|year=2018|isbn=9781455407699|pages=86}}</ref> Azarethes sent a message to Belisarius asking to honor the fast for the sake of the ] and ] in his army, as well as the Christian forces of Belisarius himself. Belisarius was willing to agree<ref name="GreatrexLieu2002">{{cite book |last1=Greatrex |first1=Geoffrey |last2=Lieu |first2=Samuel N. C. |title=The Roman eastern frontier and the Persian Wars. Part II, AD 363-630 : a narrative sourcebook |date=2002 |publisher=Routledge |location=London |isbn=0-415-14687-9 |page=92-93}}</ref> and originally intended to drive off the Persians without a risky battle. The Byzantine troops, however, were restless and anxious, and had become over-confident after their recent victories at Dara and Stala, and clamored for battle. After failing to convince his men, and realizing they would not fight, and possibly mutiny unless he agreed,<ref>{{Cite book|title=The Generalship Of Belisarius|last=Brogna|first=Anthony|publisher=Hauraki Publishing|year=1995}}</ref> Belisarius prepared his force for battle. The battle would occur on Easter Sunday, and the convention at the time was to fast on the day and well into the night. Due to this, if ] were to give battle he would have to fight using hungry troops.<ref>{{Cite book|title=History of the Wars|last=Caesarea|first=Procopius|publisher=Seltzer Books|year=2018|isbn=9781455407699|pages=86}}</ref> Azarethes sent a message to Belisarius asking him to honor the fast for the sake of the Christians and Jews in his army, as well as the Christian forces of Belisarius himself. Belisarius was willing to agree<ref name="GreatrexLieu2002">{{cite book |last1=Greatrex |first1=Geoffrey |last2=Lieu |first2=Samuel N. C. |title=The Roman eastern frontier and the Persian Wars. Part II, AD 363–630 : a narrative sourcebook |date=2002 |publisher=Routledge |location=London |isbn=0-415-14687-9 |pages=92–93}}</ref> and originally intended to drive off the Persians without a risky battle. The Byzantine troops, however, were over-confident after their recent victories at Dara and ] and clamored for battle. After failing to convince his men, and realizing they would possibly ] unless he agreed,<ref>{{Cite book|title=The Generalship Of Belisarius|last=Brogna|first=Anthony|publisher=Hauraki Publishing|year=1995}}</ref> Belisarius prepared his force for battle.


== Deployment == == Deployment ==


Belisarius anchored his left flank, composed of the Byzantine infantry under command of Jusitinian's bodyguard Peter, on the Euphrates. His center was composed of his cavalry. The right flank was composed of the Ghasanid cavalry.<ref name="Elton327">{{cite book |last1=Elton |first1=Hugh |title=The Roman Empire in Late Antiquity: A Political and Military History |date=2018 |publisher=Cambridge University Press |isbn=978-0-521-89931-4 |page=327 |language=en}}</ref> Unlike his deployment at Dara (530), he concentrated his best cavalry in the center and infantry on the wings, possibly because he anticipated the infantry and Ghassanid cavalry could flee.<ref name="Greatrex202" /> The two armies met outside Callinicum on 19 April 531. Belisarius anchored his left flank on the Euphrates, composed of the Byzantine heavy infantry under the command of the emperor ]'s bodyguard Petrus. The Byzantine cavalry was stationed in the center, many of which were ]s under the command of ]. Next were the ]n and/or ]n infantry under Stephanacius and Longinus, positioned such that their right was anchored on a rising slope occupied by the army's right wing, which consisted of the 5,000 allied Ghassanid cavalry. Belisarius himself took up a position in the center of his army.<ref name="Elton327">{{cite book |last1=Elton |first1=Hugh |title=The Roman Empire in Late Antiquity: A Political and Military History |date=2018 |publisher=Cambridge University Press |isbn=978-0-521-89931-4 |page=327 |language=en}}</ref> Unlike his deployment at Dara, he concentrated his best cavalry in the center and the infantry and allied cavalry on the wings, possibly because he anticipated the infantry and Ghassanid cavalry could flee.<ref name="Greatrex202" />


Azarethes's deployment was similar; his left flank was composed of Lakhmid cavalry under al-Mundhir and corresponded to the Ghassanid section of his opposing force, while his own cavalry was in the center.<ref name="Elton327" /><ref name="Greatrex202">{{cite book |title=Rome and Persia at War, 502-532 |date=1998 |publisher=Francis Cairns |isbn=978-0-905205-93-9 |page=202 |language=en}}</ref> Azarethes, who was an "exceptionally able warrior" according to Byzantine historian and chronicler ], chose a more conventional deployment by dividing his army into three equal parts: the allied Lakhmid cavalry under Al-Mundhir forming the Sasanian left wing, opposing the Ghassanids, while his own cavalry formed the center and right flank.<ref name="Elton327" /><ref name="Greatrex202">{{cite book |title=Rome and Persia at War, 502–532 |date=1998 |publisher=Francis Cairns |isbn=978-0-905205-93-9 |page=202 |language=en}}</ref> It is possible that he also held a reserve of elite Aswaran behind his center.


== Battle ==
The two armies met outside Callinicum on 19 April 531 AD. Both armies formed up differently, Belisarius again choosing an "odd" formation that confused the opposing general. In this case, he anchored his left flank on the bank of the river with heavy Byzantine infantry, to their right the army's center, all of the Byzantine cavalry, many of which were ]s under the command of Ascan. Linking the center to the Byzantine right was a detachment of ]n and/or ]n infantry (under Stephanacius and Longinus), positioned such that their right was anchored on a rising slope occupied by the army's right wing, which consisted of the 5,000 Ghassanid allies. Belisarius himself took up a position in the center of his deployment.


], who was an "exceptionally able warrior" according to Byzantine historian and chronicler Procopius, chose a much more conventional deployment by dividing his army into three equal parts with the Lakhmid allies under Al-Mundhir's command constituting the left wing such that they corresponded to the Ghassanid section of the Byzantine army. It is possible that he also held an elite tactical reserve behind his divisions of Persian Savārān.

== Battle ==
] ]
] ]


The battle began with extensive exchange of arrow shots,<ref name=Hughes /> with Procopius noting the rapidness of the Persian archery. This difference in archery is also mentioned ], who advises to close in with the Persians without any delay.<ref name="Elton327" /> This, combined with a westerly wind, caused the Byzantine side to suffer more casualties at this stage.<ref name="Greatrex202" /> According to Ian Hughes, however, the casualties were balanced due to the greater penetrative force of Byzantine archery.<ref name=Hughes>{{cite book |last1=Hughes |first1=Ian |title=Belisarius: The Last Roman General |date=2009 |publisher=Pen and Sword |isbn=978-1-84468-941-5 |page=55-59 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=1bfNDwAAQBAJ&pg=PT59 |language=en}}</ref> The battle began with extensive exchange of arrow shots,<ref name=Hughes /> with Procopius noting the rapidness of the Persian archery. This difference in archery is also mentioned in the ], who had advised closing in with the Persians without any delay.<ref name="Elton327" /> This, combined with a westerly wind, caused the Byzantine side to suffer more casualties at this stage.<ref name="Greatrex202" /> According to Ian Hughes, however, the casualties were balanced due to the greater penetrative force of Byzantine archery.<ref name=Hughes>{{cite book |last1=Hughes |first1=Ian |title=Belisarius: The Last Roman General |date=2009 |publisher=Pen and Sword |isbn=978-1-84468-941-5 |pages=55–59 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=1bfNDwAAQBAJ&pg=PT59 |language=en}}</ref>


Later, after "two-thirds of the day" had elapsed, Azarethes found a weak spot in the Byzantine force and redeployed some of his cavalry to his left wing; this was a similar tactic used at Dara (530), where the Persians tried to find a weak spot and overwhelm it by creating local superiority in that spot. This maneuver was unobserved by Belisarius and proved to be a turning point. The Ghassanids were routed off the field with such ease as to later inspire accusations of treachery. This exposed the right flank of the Lycaonian infantry, who were no match for the Persian cavalry and were routed, while their commanders were killed. Ascan's heavy cavalry was now exposed and showed some resistance, but he was killed and his force was defeated too.<ref name=Hughes /> Later, after "two-thirds of the day" had elapsed, Azarethes found a weak spot in the Byzantine force and redeployed some of his cavalry to his left wing; this was a similar tactic used at Dara, where the Persians tried to find a weak spot and overwhelm it by creating local numerical superiority. This maneuver was not observed by Belisarius and proved to be a turning point. The Ghassanids were ]ed off the field with such ease as to later inspire accusations of treachery. This exposed the right flank of the Lycaonian infantry, who were no match for the Persian cavalry and were also routed, while their commanders were killed. The right flank of Ascan's heavy cavalry was now exposed; they fought as best they could, but Ascan was killed and his force defeated.<ref name=Hughes />


The Persian cavalry and their Lakhmid allies were now placed upon the rising ground looking down on the rest of the Byzantine force. As the rest of the Byzantine cavalry fled and Belisarius failed to reform his line, the Byzantine infantrymen found themselves pressed against the river. The formed a U-shaped '']'' (''fulcum'') formation to defend against the missile attacks, with the top of the "U" being closed by the river and foot-archers at the center of the "U" firing supporting arrow shots at the attacking forces, withstanding the Persian attacks until nightfall when they safely escaped across the river to Callinicum.<ref name=Hughes /> Apparently, repeated charges by the Persian cavalry did not result in much more than mounting casualties on both sides. The Persian cavalry and their Lakhmid allies now controlled the rising ground looking down on the rest of the Byzantine force. As the remainder of the Byzantine cavalry fled and Belisarius was unable to reform his line, the Byzantine infantrymen found themselves pressed against the river. They formed a U-shaped '']'' (''fulcum'') formation to defend against the missile attacks, with the top of the "U" being closed by the river and foot-archers in the center of the "U" loosing arrows at the attacking Persians. They withstood the Persian attacks until nightfall, when they safely escaped across the Euphrates to Callinicum.<ref name=Hughes /> Apparently, the repeated charges by the Persian cavalry against the Byzantine infantry did not achieve anything more than increasing the casualties on both sides.


The primary sources reporting this phase of the battle are confusing. According to Procopius, Belisarius dismounted and fought alongside the infantry until nightfall, while Malalas reports that Belisarius had fled using a boat earlier, while Sunnicas and Simmas dismounted and fought alongside the infantry. According to Hughes argues the latter to be more probable.<ref name=Hughes /><ref>{{Cite book | url=https://books.google.com/books?id=kiBL4va4B14C&pg=PA158 |title = Procopius and the Sixth Century|isbn = 9780520055179|last1 = Cameron|first1 = Averil|date = January 1985}}</ref> The primary sources reporting this phase of the battle are confusing. According to Procopius, Belisarius dismounted and fought alongside the infantry until nightfall, while Malalas reports that Belisarius had fled earlier across the Euphrates on a boat, while his subordinates Sunnicas and ] dismounted and fought alongside the infantry. Hughes argues this latter scenario is more probable.<ref name=Hughes /><ref>{{Cite book | url=https://books.google.com/books?id=kiBL4va4B14C&pg=PA158 |title = Procopius and the Sixth Century|isbn = 9780520055179|last1 = Cameron|first1 = Averil|date = 1985| publisher=University of California Press }}</ref>


] said of the battle: "'' turned and fled before the Persian attack. Many fell into the Euphrates and were drowned, and others were killed.''"<ref>''Historia'' IX.4,95.4-95.26</ref> However, it is unknown what stage of the battle Zachariah was referring to. ] said of the battle: " turned and fled before the Persian attack. Many fell into the Euphrates and were drowned, and others were killed."<ref>''Historia'' IX.4, 95.4–95.26</ref> However, it is unknown what stage of the battle Zachariah was referring to.


The factuality of Procopius's description of the events in this battle has been questioned.<ref name=Hughes /> Both Procopius and Malalas provide a detailed description of the events, but their emphasis is different: Procopius emphasizes Belisarius' success in preventing a rout and the losses in Sasanian forces, while Malalas emphasizes Belisarius' early fleeing from the battlefield, noting that the successful prevention of the rout was led by Sunicas and Simmas. Both accounts agree on the poor performance of the Lycoaninan infantry and possible treachery on part of the Ghassanids.<ref name="GreatrexLieu2002" /> The factuality of Procopius's description of the events in this battle has been questioned.<ref name=Hughes /> Both Procopius and Malalas provide a detailed description of the events, but their emphasis is different: Procopius emphasizes Belisarius' success in preventing a complete rout and the Sasanian losses, while Malalas emphasizes Belisarius' early flight from the battlefield, noting that the successful prevention of the rout was led by the '']'' Sunicas and Simmas. Both accounts agree on the poor performance of the Lycaonian infantry and possible treachery by the Ghassanids.<ref name="GreatrexLieu2002"/>


== Aftermath == == Aftermath ==


The Byzantine defeat wiped out the benefits of the victory at Dara (530) and gave the initiative once again to the Persians.<ref name=Hughes /> The strategic outcome of the battle was something of a stalemate; the Byzantine army had lost many soldiers and would not be in fighting condition again for months, but the Persian army had also taken such heavy losses that it was useless for its original purpose, the invasion of Syria. The Byzantine defeat wiped out the benefits of the victory at Dara and gave the initiative once again to the Persians.<ref name=Hughes /> The strategic outcome of the battle was something of a stalemate; the Byzantine army had lost many soldiers and would not be in fighting condition again for months, but the Persian army had also taken such heavy losses that it was useless for its original purpose of the invasion of Syria.

Following the battle, an inquiry against Belisarius was held under Constantoilus due to the defeats at Thannuris and Callinicum. Belisarius blamed the troops for their impetuous urge to engage in battle in Callinicum and thus was cleared from the blame, but was recalled from his position of '']'' and was recalled by Emperor Justinian I in Constantinople.<ref name=Hughes />


Following the battle, an inquiry headed by Constantoilus was made against Belisarius due to the defeat at Callinicum and his earlier loss at ]. Belisarius blamed the troops for their impetuous urge to engage in battle at Callinicum and was cleared by the inquiry; however he was relieved of his position as '']'' and was recalled to Constantinople by Justinian.<ref name=Hughes/>
Emperor ] removed General Āzārethes from command and stripped him of his honors, as the casualties were high.


The Sasanian emperor ] removed Āzārethes from command and stripped him of his honors, due to the very high Persian casualties.
This mutual disaster was the first of Emperor ] series of (relatively) unsuccessful wars against Sassanids, which led Byzantium to pay heavy tributes in exchange for a peace treaty and the remaining Byzantine land still in Persian hands.


Callinicum ended the first of Belisarius' Persian campaigns, returning all of the land lost to them to Byzantine rule under ] in the ] agreement signed in summer 532 AD. The mutual disaster of Callinicum ended the first of Justinian's series of relatively unsuccessful wars against the Sassanids, leading Byzantium to pay heavy tributes in exchange for the ] treaty signed in the summer of 532.


==See also== ==See also==
Line 112: Line 104:
] ]
] ]
]

Revision as of 16:04, 26 December 2024

Battle of the Iberian War (531 AD) For the battle in 296, see Battle of Carrhae (296).
This article includes a list of general references, but it lacks sufficient corresponding inline citations. Please help to improve this article by introducing more precise citations. (April 2015) (Learn how and when to remove this message)
Battle of Callinicum
Part of the Iberian War
Date19 April 531 AD
LocationCallinicum, Syria, Byzantine Empire (modern Raqqa, northern Syria)
Result Sasanian victory
Belligerents
Byzantine Empire
Ghassanids
Sasanian Empire
Lakhmids
Commanders and leaders
Belisarius
Hermogenes
Sunicas & Simmas
Ascan 
Peter
Longinus 
Stephanacius 
Al-Harith ibn Jabalah
Domnentiolus (POW)
Azarethes
Al-Mundhir III ibn al-Nu'man
Strength

20,000 or 25,000

  • 13,000 Byzantine infantry & cavalry
  • 5,000 Ghassanid cavalry
  • 2,000 Lycaonian infantry

15,000 or 20,000

Casualties and losses
Heavy Heavy
Iberian War
Wars of Justinian I
Iberian War
Vandalic War and Moorish Wars
Gothic War
Sasanian war of 540–562

Lazic War

Other

The Battle of Callinicum took place on Easter Saturday, 19 April 531 AD, between an army of the Byzantine Empire under Belisarius and a Sasanian cavalry force commanded by Azarethes. After being defeated at the Battle of Dara, the Sasanians moved to invade Roman Syria in an attempt to turn the tide of the war. Belisarius' rapid response foiled the plan, and his troops pushed the Persians to the Syrian border through maneuvering before forcing a battle in which the Sasanians won a Pyrrhic victory.

Prelude

In April 531 AD, the Persian king Kavadh I sent an army under Azarethes, consisting of a cavalry force numbering about 15,000 Aswaran with an additional 5,000 Lakhmid Arab cavalry under Al-Mundhir, to invade Syria, not through the heavily fortified frontier cities of Roman Mesopotamia, but through the less conventional but also less-defended route in Commagene in order to capture Syrian cities such as Antioch.

The Persian army crossed the frontier at Circesium on the Euphrates and marched north. As they neared Callinicum, Belisarius set out to follow them as they advanced westwards. Belisarius' forces consisted of about 5,000 men and another 3,000 Ghassanid Arab allies, for the remainder of his army had been left to secure Dara. The Byzantines blocked the Persian advance at Chalcis, where reinforcements under Hermogenes also arrived, bringing the Byzantine force to some 20,000 men. The Persians were forced to withdraw to the east, followed by the Byzantines.

The battle would occur on Easter Sunday, and the convention at the time was to fast on the day and well into the night. Due to this, if Belisarius were to give battle he would have to fight using hungry troops. Azarethes sent a message to Belisarius asking him to honor the fast for the sake of the Christians and Jews in his army, as well as the Christian forces of Belisarius himself. Belisarius was willing to agree and originally intended to drive off the Persians without a risky battle. The Byzantine troops, however, were over-confident after their recent victories at Dara and Satala and clamored for battle. After failing to convince his men, and realizing they would possibly mutiny unless he agreed, Belisarius prepared his force for battle.

Deployment

The two armies met outside Callinicum on 19 April 531. Belisarius anchored his left flank on the Euphrates, composed of the Byzantine heavy infantry under the command of the emperor Justinian's bodyguard Petrus. The Byzantine cavalry was stationed in the center, many of which were cataphracts under the command of Ascan. Next were the Lycaonian and/or Isaurian infantry under Stephanacius and Longinus, positioned such that their right was anchored on a rising slope occupied by the army's right wing, which consisted of the 5,000 allied Ghassanid cavalry. Belisarius himself took up a position in the center of his army. Unlike his deployment at Dara, he concentrated his best cavalry in the center and the infantry and allied cavalry on the wings, possibly because he anticipated the infantry and Ghassanid cavalry could flee.

Azarethes, who was an "exceptionally able warrior" according to Byzantine historian and chronicler Procopius, chose a more conventional deployment by dividing his army into three equal parts: the allied Lakhmid cavalry under Al-Mundhir forming the Sasanian left wing, opposing the Ghassanids, while his own cavalry formed the center and right flank. It is possible that he also held a reserve of elite Aswaran behind his center.

Battle

Azarethes reinforces his left wing and the Byzantine right wing is beaten back.
The Byzantine center, including the cavalry, is exposed and routed. Infantry led by Petrus delay the Persian advance for some defenders to retreat.

The battle began with extensive exchange of arrow shots, with Procopius noting the rapidness of the Persian archery. This difference in archery is also mentioned in the Strategikon of Maurice, who had advised closing in with the Persians without any delay. This, combined with a westerly wind, caused the Byzantine side to suffer more casualties at this stage. According to Ian Hughes, however, the casualties were balanced due to the greater penetrative force of Byzantine archery.

Later, after "two-thirds of the day" had elapsed, Azarethes found a weak spot in the Byzantine force and redeployed some of his cavalry to his left wing; this was a similar tactic used at Dara, where the Persians tried to find a weak spot and overwhelm it by creating local numerical superiority. This maneuver was not observed by Belisarius and proved to be a turning point. The Ghassanids were routed off the field with such ease as to later inspire accusations of treachery. This exposed the right flank of the Lycaonian infantry, who were no match for the Persian cavalry and were also routed, while their commanders were killed. The right flank of Ascan's heavy cavalry was now exposed; they fought as best they could, but Ascan was killed and his force defeated.

The Persian cavalry and their Lakhmid allies now controlled the rising ground looking down on the rest of the Byzantine force. As the remainder of the Byzantine cavalry fled and Belisarius was unable to reform his line, the Byzantine infantrymen found themselves pressed against the river. They formed a U-shaped phoulkon (fulcum) formation to defend against the missile attacks, with the top of the "U" being closed by the river and foot-archers in the center of the "U" loosing arrows at the attacking Persians. They withstood the Persian attacks until nightfall, when they safely escaped across the Euphrates to Callinicum. Apparently, the repeated charges by the Persian cavalry against the Byzantine infantry did not achieve anything more than increasing the casualties on both sides.

The primary sources reporting this phase of the battle are confusing. According to Procopius, Belisarius dismounted and fought alongside the infantry until nightfall, while Malalas reports that Belisarius had fled earlier across the Euphrates on a boat, while his subordinates Sunnicas and Simmas dismounted and fought alongside the infantry. Hughes argues this latter scenario is more probable.

Zacharias of Mytilene said of the battle: " turned and fled before the Persian attack. Many fell into the Euphrates and were drowned, and others were killed." However, it is unknown what stage of the battle Zachariah was referring to.

The factuality of Procopius's description of the events in this battle has been questioned. Both Procopius and Malalas provide a detailed description of the events, but their emphasis is different: Procopius emphasizes Belisarius' success in preventing a complete rout and the Sasanian losses, while Malalas emphasizes Belisarius' early flight from the battlefield, noting that the successful prevention of the rout was led by the doukes Sunicas and Simmas. Both accounts agree on the poor performance of the Lycaonian infantry and possible treachery by the Ghassanids.

Aftermath

The Byzantine defeat wiped out the benefits of the victory at Dara and gave the initiative once again to the Persians. The strategic outcome of the battle was something of a stalemate; the Byzantine army had lost many soldiers and would not be in fighting condition again for months, but the Persian army had also taken such heavy losses that it was useless for its original purpose of the invasion of Syria.

Following the battle, an inquiry headed by Constantoilus was made against Belisarius due to the defeat at Callinicum and his earlier loss at Thannuris. Belisarius blamed the troops for their impetuous urge to engage in battle at Callinicum and was cleared by the inquiry; however he was relieved of his position as magister militum per Orientem and was recalled to Constantinople by Justinian.

The Sasanian emperor Kavadh I removed Āzārethes from command and stripped him of his honors, due to the very high Persian casualties.

The mutual disaster of Callinicum ended the first of Justinian's series of relatively unsuccessful wars against the Sassanids, leading Byzantium to pay heavy tributes in exchange for the Perpetual Peace treaty signed in the summer of 532.

See also

References

  1. The Empire at War, A.D. Lee, The Cambridge Companion to the Age of Justinian, ed. Michael Maas, (Cambridge University Press, 2005), 122.
  2. ^ Greatrex, Geoffrey; Lieu, Samuel N. C. (2002). The Roman eastern frontier and the Persian Wars. Part II, AD 363–630 : a narrative sourcebook. London: Routledge. pp. 92–93. ISBN 0-415-14687-9.
  3. Quraysh and the Roman Army: Making Sense of the Meccan Leather Trade, Patricia Crone, Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London Vol. 70, No. 1 (2007), 73.
  4. ^ Hughes, Ian (Historian). Belisarius : the last Roman general. Barnsley. ISBN 9781473822979. OCLC 903161296.
  5. ^ Geoffrey Greatrex and Samuel N.C. Lieu, The Roman Eastern Frontier and the Persian Wars AD 363–628, Part 2, (Routledge, 2002), 92.
  6. According to Zacharias, just before the battle begins, the Romans found the Sasanians like a "little flock".
  7. Caesarea, Procopius (2018). History of the Wars. Seltzer Books. p. 86. ISBN 9781455407699.
  8. Brogna, Anthony (1995). The Generalship Of Belisarius. Hauraki Publishing.
  9. ^ Elton, Hugh (2018). The Roman Empire in Late Antiquity: A Political and Military History. Cambridge University Press. p. 327. ISBN 978-0-521-89931-4.
  10. ^ Rome and Persia at War, 502–532. Francis Cairns. 1998. p. 202. ISBN 978-0-905205-93-9.
  11. ^ Hughes, Ian (2009). Belisarius: The Last Roman General. Pen and Sword. pp. 55–59. ISBN 978-1-84468-941-5.
  12. Cameron, Averil (1985). Procopius and the Sixth Century. University of California Press. ISBN 9780520055179.
  13. Historia IX.4, 95.4–95.26

Sources

35°57′00″N 39°01′00″E / 35.9500°N 39.0167°E / 35.9500; 39.0167

Categories: