Revision as of 22:48, 26 December 2024 editHandThatFeeds (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers12,432 edits →Comments by other users: IP exposedTag: 2017 wikitext editor← Previous edit | Revision as of 22:53, 26 December 2024 edit undoHazar Sam (talk | contribs)156 edits →Comments by other users: ReplyTags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit ReplyNext edit → | ||
Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
, they've exposed their IP directly. — <b>]:<sup>]</sup></b> 22:48, 26 December 2024 (UTC) | , they've exposed their IP directly. — <b>]:<sup>]</sup></b> 22:48, 26 December 2024 (UTC) | ||
:I’ve exposed my IP because I have nothing to hide—I’m an open book, just not a very exciting one. Yes, sometimes I comment without logging in (who doesn’t enjoy a little anonymous fun?), and this IP is mine, but all the others? Nope, not me. I can’t wait for the checkusers to confirm what I already know: I’m just one person, not some IP-collecting mastermind! Huzzah ] (]) 22:53, 26 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
====<big>Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</big>==== | ====<big>Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</big>==== |
Revision as of 22:53, 26 December 2024
Hazar Sam
Hazar Sam (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
24 December 2024
– A user has requested CheckUser. An SPI clerk will shortly look at the case and endorse or decline the request.
Suspected sockpuppets
- Tortino66 (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- 2A02:C7C:AAE0:5600:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · tag · contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · proxy check · block user · spi block · block log · cross-wiki contribs · CheckUser (log))
- 185.127.194.162 (talk · tag · contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · proxy check · block user · spi block · block log · cross-wiki contribs · CheckUser (log))
- Shpah elnour (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- 102.188.124.44 (talk · tag · contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · proxy check · block user · spi block · block log · cross-wiki contribs · CheckUser (log))
- Tools: Editor interaction utility · Interaction Timeline · SPI Tools
Same behaviour and writing style at Talk:Randa Kassis and connected pages. See also here 1? 2, 3, 4 Psychloppos (talk) 18:45, 24 December 2024 (UTC)
Comments by other users
- Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
I have been accused by Psychloppos of being the same individual as Tortino66, I want to state unequivocally that this accusation is unfounded. This issue arose after I noticed that Psychloppos was engaging in defamatory edits on the Misplaced Pages page of Randa Kassis. Upon carefully reviewing all the articles cited, I found no evidence to support the claim that she has been labelled as pro-Assad by the opposition. In fact, her page references credible sources like RFI, France 24, Spiegel, and others, which confirm her active role since 2011 in forming coalitions against Assad. Numerous additional sources in Arabic and French further reinforce this.
As a woman, I am acutely aware of the challenges Randa Kassis has faced. In the Arab world, strong and outspoken women often become targets of misogyny. Her willingness to address controversial topics and challenge societal norms has undoubtedly drawn criticism, particularly from those who seek to undermine her achievements. This pattern of attack against powerful women is sadly all too familiar.
Her connection to Russia has been well-documented by respected outlets such as the Wall Street Journal and other publications. However, these references do not support the baseless accusations made by Joseph Bahout. It’s important to note that Bahout, a Lebanese academic, made these claims without presenting any supporting evidence. In revising her Misplaced Pages page, I ensured neutrality by citing credible and official sources, including findings from the Mueller investigation, which directly contradict the allegations against her.
Despite this, Psychloppos continues to assert his views without providing evidence. He also misrepresented secondary sources—such as widely recognised news articles—as primary sources, which undermines the credibility of his edits. This practice not only misleads readers but also contradicts Misplaced Pages’s guidelines for reliable sourcing.
I urge the administrators to approach this matter with fairness and impartiality. Misplaced Pages is a platform I have long respected for its commitment to neutrality and credibility. It is disheartening to see these principles compromised by personal bias and unsubstantiated claims. I hope this issue can be resolved in a manner that upholds the platform’s standards and ensures the accuracy of the information it provides. Hazar — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hazar Sam (talk • contribs) 14:23, December 25, 2024 (UTC)
Given this diff, they've exposed their IP directly. — The Hand That Feeds You: 22:48, 26 December 2024 (UTC)
- I’ve exposed my IP because I have nothing to hide—I’m an open book, just not a very exciting one. Yes, sometimes I comment without logging in (who doesn’t enjoy a little anonymous fun?), and this IP is mine, but all the others? Nope, not me. I can’t wait for the checkusers to confirm what I already know: I’m just one person, not some IP-collecting mastermind! Huzzah HS (talk) 22:53, 26 December 2024 (UTC)
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
I've added Shpah elnour as a possible sock, same SPA promotion of Kassis, and am requesting CU because without technical corroboration I don't think there's enough to block.--Bbb23 (talk) 14:44, 26 December 2024 (UTC)
Categories: