Misplaced Pages

Afrocentrism: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 11:09, 25 May 2009 view sourceWoohookitty (talk | contribs)Administrators611,225 edits disam← Previous edit Latest revision as of 23:50, 26 December 2024 view source Marcin Rychlewicz (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users4,709 editsNo edit summaryTags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit 
(818 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Short description|African ethnocentrism}}
]
{{pp|small=yes}}
{{pp-semi-indef}}
{{for-multi|the study of African culture and history|African studies|the academic theory|Afrocentricity|the book|Afrocentricity (book)}}
{{Use dmy dates|date=June 2020}}
{{Pan-African}} {{Pan-African}}
{{Black Power sidebar}}
{{for|the study of African culture and history|African studies}}
'''Afrocentrism''' is a worldview that is centered on the history of people of African descent or a view that favors it over non-African civilizations.<ref>"Recent" here means in the last few thousand years, as opposed to in the ], for example ]</ref> It is in some respects a response to ] attitudes about ] and their historical contributions. It seeks to counter what it sees as mistakes and ideas perpetuated by the racist philosophical underpinnings of Western academic disciplines as they developed during and since Europe's ] as justifying rationales for the enslavement of other peoples, in order to enable more accurate accounts of not only African but all people's contributions to world history.<ref>CC Verharen, "Molefi Asante...”, The Western Journal of Black Studies, (24)4, 2000, pp. 223–238</ref> Afrocentricity deals primarily with ] and African agency and is a ] point of view for the study of culture, ], and history.<ref> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181123082650/http://www.asante.net/articles/1/afrocentricity/ |date=23 November 2018 }}.</ref><ref name="Africana">], and ] (eds), '']'' Volume 1, p. 111, Oxford University Press. 2005. {{ISBN|0-19-517055-5}}</ref>
'''Afrocentrism''', '''Afrocentricity''', or '''Africentrism'''<ref>this spelling is mostly associated with the "Africentric Theology" according to ].</ref> is a world view which emphasizes the importance of ], taken as a single group and often equated with "]", in culture, philosophy, and history.<ref name="Africana">'']'' Volume 1., p. 111 by ] (Editor), ] (Editor) Oxford University Press. 2005. ISBN 0195170555</ref> The roots of Afrocentrism lay in a reaction to the repression of Black people throughout the Western world in the 19th century and as a backlash against the ] of the period, which tended to attribute any advanced civilization to the immigration of ] and their descendants.<ref>Bard p. 106</ref> Part of this reaction involved reviewing history to document the contributions that Black people made to world civilization.<ref>Asante, Molefi Kete. ''Afrocentricity'', Trenton, NJ: Africa World Press, 1988.</ref>


Afrocentrism is a scholarly movement that seeks to conduct research and education on global history subjects, from the perspective of historical African peoples and polities. It takes a critical stance on Eurocentric assumptions and myths about world history, in order to pursue methodological studies of the latter. Some of the critics of the movement believe that it often denies or minimizes European, ]ern, and ] cultural influences while exaggerating certain aspects of historical African civilizations that independently accomplished a significant level of cultural and technological development. In general, Afrocentrism is usually manifested in a focus on the history of Africa and its role in contemporary African-American culture among others.
==History==
During the Colonial period Europeans encountered Africans in Africa living with relatively elementary technology. Based on their self-appraisal of the value of technology, industrialization, Western-type infrastructure and Western-type culture, these European nations assumed themselves to be superior to the peoples and cultures they encountered in Africa. Afrocentrists commonly contend that this initial Eurocentrism has led to the subsequent neglect or denial of the contributions of ].


What is today broadly called Afrocentrism evolved out of the work of African American intellectuals in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, but flowered into its modern form due to the activism of African American intellectuals in the U.S. ] and in the development of ] programs in universities. However, following the development of universities in African colonies in the 1950s, African scholars became major contributors to African historiography.<ref>General History of Africa, Vol 1, p41, UNESCO, 1981</ref> A notable pioneer is the professor ], who became chairman of the Committee on African Studies at Harvard in the 1970s.<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.nytimes.com/1983/11/13/obituaries/kenneth-o-dike-dies-in-a-nigerian-hospital.html|title=Kenneth O. Dike Dies in a Nigerian Hospital|date=13 November 1983|newspaper=The New York Times}}</ref> In strict terms Afrocentrism, as a distinct historiography, reached its peak in the 1980s and 1990s.{{citation needed|date=December 2019}} Today{{when|date=December 2017}} it is primarily associated with ], ], ] and ]. Asante, however, describes his theories as ].<ref>Molefi Asante, ''The Painful Demise of Eurocentrism: An Afrocentric Response to Critics'', foreword by ]: "Molefi Asante, the founding and preeminent theorist of Afrocentricity, is one of the most important intellectuals at work today. This work continues his tradition of combining an extraordinary intellectual range with an impressive ability to identify and clarify central issues in the current discourse on Afrocentricity, multiculturalism, race, culture, ethnicity and related themes. Dr. Asante offers an insightful and valuable response to Eurocentric critics of the Afrocentric initiative while simultaneously addressing a wide range of issues critical to understanding this important intellectual enterprise, including African agency, location, orientation, centerdness, subject-place and cultural groundedness. The volume is thoughtful, multifaceted and rewarding, and yields a rich sense of the contours and complexity of the Afrocentric project." --Dr. Maulana Karenga, Chair, Department of Black Studies, California State University, Long Beach."</ref>
] journal ''The Crisis'' depicting an Afrocentric artist's interpretation of "Ra-Maat-Neb, one of the kings of the Upper Nile"]]
Modern Afrocentricity has its origins in the work of ]n and ] intellectuals in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, following social changes in the United States and Africa due both to the end of slavery and the decline of colonialism. Wanting to further establish their own identities and distinguish African achievements apart from the influence of ] peoples,<ref> {{cite web|url=http://pages.prodigy.net/gmoses/moweb/unity.htm |title="Afrocentricity as a Quest for Cultural Unity: Reading Diop in English" |accessdate=2007-11-13 |last=Moses |first=Greg |publisher=National Association for African American Studies }}</ref> African Americans gathered together in communities, established their own church congregations, emphasised the importance of education and increasingly took more active public roles despite severe discrimination and segregation.<ref>W.E.B. Du Bois, ''Black Reconstruction in America, 1860-1880''.New York: Harcourt Brace, 1935; reprint New York: The Free Press, 1998 </ref><ref></ref>


Proponents of Afrocentrism support the claim that the contributions of various Black African people have been downplayed or discredited as part of the legacy of ] and slavery's ] of "writing Africans out of history".<ref>{{Cite journal |url=https://www.jstor.org/pss/3819303 |jstor=3819303 |last1=Andrade |first1=Susan Z. |title=Rewriting History, Motherhood, and Rebellion: Naming an African Women's Literary Tradition |journal=Research in African Literatures |date=1990 |volume=21 |issue=1 |pages=91–110 }}</ref><ref>{{cite book|last=Woodson|first=Carter Godwin|author-link=Carter G. Woodson|title=The Mis-education of the Negro|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=zF6J8Zge4XgC&pg=PA7|year=1933|publisher=ReadaClassic.com|page=7|id=GGKEY:LYULWKX4YJQ}}</ref>
As an ideology and political movement, Afrocentrism has its beginnings in activism among Black intellectuals, political figures and historians in the context of the US American ].
<ref>
|author=Olaniyan, T.
|year=2006
|title=From Black Aesthetics To Afrocentrism (or, A Small History Of An African And African American Discursivepractice)
|journal=West Africa Review
|issn = 1525-4488
}}</ref> According to US professor, Victor Oguejiofor Okafor, concepts of Afrocentricity lie at the core of disciplines such as ].<ref>Victor Oguejiofor Okafor, "The Place of Africalogy in the University Curriculum", ''Journal of Black Studies'', v26 n6, Jul 1999, pp. 688-712 </ref>


Major critics of Afrocentrism include ], who dismiss it as ],<ref>{{cite book|last=Howe|first=Stephen|title=Afrocentrism: Mythical Pasts and Imagined Homes|url=https://archive.org/details/afrocentrism00step|url-access=registration|year=1998|publisher=]|isbn=978-1-85984-228-7|page=}}</ref> reactive,<ref>{{cite book|last=Bracey|first=Earnest N.|title=Prophetic Insight: The Higher Education and Pedagogy of African Americans|url=https://archive.org/details/propheticinsight0000brac|url-access=registration|date=1 January 1999|publisher=]|location=]|isbn=978-0-7618-1384-2|page=}}</ref> and obstinately therapeutic.<ref name="autogenerated192">{{cite book|last=Marable|first=Manning|author-link=Manning Marable|title=Beyond Black and White: Transforming African-American Politics|url=https://archive.org/details/beyondblackwhite00mara|url-access=registration|year=1995|publisher=]|isbn=978-1-85984-924-8|page=}}</ref> Others, such as ], believe that Afrocentrism defeats its purpose of dismantling unipolar studies of world history by seeking to replace Eurocentricity with an equally ethnocentric and hierarchical curriculum, and negatively essentializes European culture and people of European descent. ] claims it to be "Eurocentrism in ]".<ref name="Banner-haley2003"/>
===Etymology===
The origins of the term "Afrocentrism" date to 1961 or 1962. The term "Afrocentric" appears in a typescript proposal for an '']''. ] may have been responsible for inserting the word.<ref>{{cite journal|title=Elegant Inconsistencies: Race, Nation, and Writing in Wilson Jeremiah Moses's Afrotopia|last=Levine|first=Robert|doi=10.1093/alh/ajn016 |url=http://alh.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/full/ajn016|year=2008|journal=American Literary History|volume=20|pages=497}}</ref>


==Terminology==
===Afrocentric Scholarship===
The term "Afrocentrism" dates to 1962.<ref>{{cite book|last=Moses|first=Wilson Jeremiah|title=Afrotopia: The Roots of African American Popular History|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=hx0LGNxO_mAC&pg=PA44|date=13 September 1998|publisher=Cambridge University Press|isbn=978-0-521-47941-7|pages=44–}}</ref> The adjective "Afrocentric" appears in a typescript proposal for an entry in '']'', possibly due to ].<ref>{{cite journal|title=Elegant Inconsistencies: Race, Nation, and Writing in Wilson Jeremiah Moses's Afrotopia|last=Levine|first=Robert|doi=10.1093/alh/ajn016|year=2008|journal=American Literary History|volume=20|page=497|issue=3|s2cid=143005947}}</ref> The abstract noun "Afrocentricity" dates to the 1970s,<ref>{{cite book|author=Thairu, Kihumbu|title=The African Civilization|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=yOk_AAAAYAAJ|year=1975|publisher=]}}</ref><ref name=":0">{{Cite book|last=Asante|first=Molefi K.|title=An Afrocentric Manifesto|publisher=Polity Press|year=2007|isbn=978-07456-4102-7|location=Cambridge, UK|pages=6}}</ref> and was popularized by ]'s ''Afrocentricity: The Theory of Social Change'' (1980). Molefi Kete Asante's theory, Afrocentricity, has been one developed in academic settings and may incorporate the terms Afrocentric to describe scholarship and Afrocentrists to describe scholars, but does not use Afrocentrism. According to Asante, though the two terms are often confused to mean the same, Afrocentrists are not adherents of Afrocentrism.<ref name=":0" /> This has caused confusing notions about who is considered an Afrocentrist, as various scholars who may or may not be associated with Asante and his works have been erroneously given the title, even by other academics.<ref name=":1">{{Cite book|last=Asante|first=Molefi K.|title=The Afrocentric Idea|publisher=Temple University Press|year=1998|isbn=1-56639-595-X|location=Philadelphia, PA|pages=ix-xiii}}</ref> Asante has written that Afrocentricity and Afrocentrism are not the same and neither do they share the same origin:
] is currently chairman of the Department of African American Studies at ]. In a lecture at the ] in 2000, entitled “Afrocentricity: Toward a New Understanding of African Thought in this Millennium,”<ref> http://www.asante.net/articles/Liverpool-Address.html Molefi Kete Asante, “Afrocentricity: Toward a New Understanding of African Thought in this Millennium", University of Liverpool, 2 Aug 2000, accessed 11 Feb 2009</ref> Asante stated many of his ideas:
* Africa has been betrayed by international commerce, by missionaries and imams, by the structure of knowledge imposed by the Western world, by its own leaders, and by the ignorance of its own people of its past.
* Philosophy itself originated in Africa and the first philosophers in the world were Africans.
* Afrocentricity constitutes a new way of examining data, a novel orientation to data, it carries with it assumptions about the current state of the African world.
* His aim is “to help lay out a plan for the recovery of African place, respectability, accountability, and leadership.”


<blockquote>By way of distinction, Afrocentricity should not be confused with the variant Afrocentrism. The term “Afrocentrism” was first used by the opponents of Afrocentricity who in their zeal saw it as an obverse of Eurocentrism. The adjective “Afrocentric” in the academic literature always referred to “Afrocentricity.” However, the use of “Afrocentrism” reflected a negation of the idea of Afrocentricity as a positive and progressive paradigm. The aim was to assign religious signification to the idea of African centeredness. However, it has come to refer to a broad cultural movement of the late twentieth century that has a set of philosophical, political, and artistic ideas which provides the basis for the musical, sartorial, and aesthetic dimensions of the African personality. On the other hand, Afrocentricity, as I have previously defined it, is a theory of agency, that is, the idea that African people must be viewed and view themselves as agents rather than spectators to historical revolution and change. To this end Afrocentricity seeks to examine every aspect of the subject place of Africans in historical, literary, architectural, ethical, philosophical, economic, and political life.<ref name=":2">{{Cite book|last=Asante|first=Molefi K.|title=An Afrocentric Manifesto|publisher=Polity Press|year=2007|isbn=978-07456-4102-7|location=Cambridge, UK|pages=17}}</ref> </blockquote>
Asante also stated that, “As a cultural configuration, the Afrocentric idea is distinguished by five characteristics:
# an intense interest in psychological location as determined by symbols, motifs, rituals, and signs.
# a commitment to finding the subject-place of Africans in any social, political, economic, or religious phenomenon with implications for questions of sex, gender, and class.
# a defence of African cultural elements as historically valid in the context of art, music, and literature.
# a celebration of centeredness and agency and a commitment to lexical refinement that eliminates pejoratives about Africans or other people.
# a powerful imperative from historical sources to revise the collective text of African people."


==History==
Another author whose ideas are considered by some to be radical is ]. In the preface to his book '']'',<ref>Yaacov Shavit, ''History in Black: African-Americans in Search of an Ancient Past'', Frank Cass Publishers, 2001 </ref> Shavit states:
] journal '']'' depicting "Ra-Maat-Neb, one of the kings of the Upper Nile", a copy of the relief portraying ] on ].]]
{{cquote|Thus, if historical myths and legends, or an invented history, play such a major role in the founding of every national reconstruction, the question that should concern us here is the nature of the distinct style in which black Americans imagine their past. The answer to this question is that radical Afrocentrism, the subject of this study, which plays a central role in shaping the modern historical world-view of a large section of the African-American (or Afro-American) community, is far more than an effort to follow the line taken by many ethnic groups and nations in modern rewriting, inventing or developing collective identity and national history. Rather, it is a large-scale historical project to rewrite the history of the whole of humankind from an Anthropometric point of view. The result is a new reconstruction of world history: it is a universal history.}}
Afrocentrism has its origins in the work of African and ] intellectuals in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, following social changes in the United States and Africa due both to the end of ] and the decline of ]. Following the ], African Americans in the ] gathered together in communities to evade white control, established their own church congregations, and worked hard to gain education. They increasingly took more active public roles despite severe racial discrimination and segregation.<ref>Du Bois, W. E. B., ''Black Reconstruction in America, 1860–1880''. New York: Harcourt Brace, 1935; reprint New York: The Free Press, 1998.</ref> American and African intellectuals looked to the African past for a re-evaluation of what its civilizations had achieved and what they meant for contemporary people.<ref>"". Accessed 19 November 2007. 2009-10-31.</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://pages.prodigy.net/gmoses/moweb/unity.htm |title=Afrocentricity as a Quest for Cultural Unity: Reading Diop in English |access-date=13 November 2007 |last=Moses |first=Greg |publisher=National Association for African American Studies |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20071212071725/http://pages.prodigy.net/gmoses/moweb/unity.htm |archive-date=12 December 2007 |url-status=dead }}</ref>
{{Blockquote|The combination of the European centuries gives us about four to five hundred years of solid European domination of intellectual concepts and philosophical ideas. Africa and Asia were subsumed under various headings of the European hierarchy. If a war between the European powers occurred it was called a World War and the Asians and Africans found their way on the side of one European power or the other. There was this sense of assertiveness about European culture that advanced with Europe's trade, religious, and military forces.<ref>.</ref>|Molefi Asante|"De-Westernizing Communication: Strategies for Neutralizing Cultural Myths"}}


As an ideology and political movement, Afrocentrism had its beginnings in activism among black intellectuals, political figures, and historians in the context of the US American ].<ref>{{cite journal|author=Olaniyan, T.
] is a Professor Emeritus of Government and Near Eastern Studies at ]. He has published several works, including a three-volume work entitled collectively '''''Black Athena: The Afroasiatic Roots of Classical Civilization'''''. According to Bernal, ancient Greece was colonized by northern invaders mixing with a colony established by ] (modern Lebanon). A major theme of the work is the alleged denial by Western academia of the African and (western) Asiatic influence on ancient Greek culture.
|year=2006
|title=From Black Aesthetics To Afrocentrism (or, A Small History of an African And African American Discursivepractice)
|journal=West Africa Review
|issn = 1525-4488}}
</ref>{{Page needed|date=October 2015}} According to U.S. professor Victor Oguejiofor Okafor, concepts of Afrocentricity lie at the core of disciplines such as ].<ref>Victor Oguejiofor Okafor, "The Place of Africalogy in the University Curriculum", ''Journal of Black Studies'', vol. 26 no. 6, July 1999, pp. 688–712.</ref> But ] claims that Afrocentrism roots are not exclusively African:
{{Blockquote|Despite the fulminations of ethno-chauvinists and other prejudiced persons, it remains a fact that the contributions of white scholars, like Boas, Malinowski, and Herskovits, were fundamental to that complex of ideas that we designate to days as Afrocentrism...Students of African and African American history have long appreciated the irony that much of what we now call Afrocentrism was developed during the 1930s by the Jewish American scholar ]{{citation needed|date=December 2019}}|Wilson J. Moses|''Historical Sketches of Afrocentrism''
}}


In 1987, ] published his '']'', in which he claims that ancient Greece was colonized by northern invaders mixing with a colony established by ] (modern Lebanon). A major theme of the work is the alleged denial by Western academia of the African and (western) Asiatic influence on ancient Greek culture.
The claims made in '']'' were refuted in '']'' (1996), a collection of essays edited by ], Professor Emerita of Classical Studies at ] in Massachusetts, and her colleague Guy MacLean Rogers.<ref>http://www.galtoninstitute.org.uk/Newsletters/GINL9709/black_athena.htm</ref>


==Aspects of Afrocentricity and Afrocentrism==
===Criticisms===
The Afrocentrism viewpoint has prompted challenges and criticism. Some Western mainstream scholars have assessed some Afrocentric ideas as ]. They especially find fault with claims that ] contributed directly to the development of Greek and Western culture, because in fact, the times of development do not align.<ref> {{cite web|url=http://dcn.davis.ca.us/~gizmo/2001/clarence.html |title=Clarence Walker encourages black Americans to discard Afrocentrism |accessdate=2007-11-13 |last=Sherwin |first=Elisabeth |publisher=Davis Community Network }}</ref><ref name=Ortiz1997>{{cite journal
|author=Ortiz de Montellano, Bernardo & Gabriel Haslip Viera & Warren Barbour
|year=1997
|title=They were NOT here before Columbus: Afrocentric hyper-diffusionism in the 1990s
|journal=Ethnohistory
|pages=199–234
|no= 2
|volume=44
|doi=10.2307/483368
}}</ref>


===Afrocentricity book===
Other critics contend that some Afrocentric historical research lacks merit. They suggest that Afrocentrism is grounded in ] and ] rather than scholarship.<ref name="Lefkowitz1996">{{cite journal
{{main|Afrocentricity (book)}}
|author=Lefkowitz, M.R.
|year=1996
|title=Not Out of Africa: How" Afrocentrism" Became an Excuse to Teach Myth as History
|url=http://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&id=LDWuwunDw1IC&oi=fnd&pg=PR9&dq=Not+Out+of+Africa:+How+Afrocentrism+Became+an+Excuse+to+Teach+Myth+as+History.&ots=FnJlEg_Sxl&sig=qPncgqbSqQtn59wgSb-pP6dEG0U
|accessdate=2007-11-13
}}</ref>


In 2000, African American Studies professor ], gave a lecture entitled "Afrocentricity: Toward a New Understanding of African Thought in this Millennium,"<ref>Kete Asante, Molefi, , University of Liverpool, 2 August 2000, accessed 11 February 2009 {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090302025412/http://www.asante.net/articles/Liverpool-Address.html |date=2 March 2009 }}.</ref> in which he presented many of his ideas:
In '']'', philosophy professor ] referred to Afrocentrism as "]". He argued that the prime goal of Afrocentrism was to encourage black nationalism as well as ethnic pride in order to effectively combat the destructive consequences of cultural and universal racism.<ref>Robert Todd Carroll (2003), ''The Skeptic's Dictionary: A Collection of Strange Beliefs, Amusing Deceptions, and Dangerous Delusions'', New York: John Wiley & Sons, ISBN 0-471-27242-6 (paperback)</ref><ref></ref>
* Africa has been betrayed by international commerce, by ] and ], by the structure of knowledge imposed by the Western world, by its own leaders, and by the ignorance of its own people of its past.
* ] originated in Africa and the first philosophers in the world were Africans.
* Afrocentricity constitutes a new way of examining data, and a novel orientation to data; it carries with it assumptions about the current state of the African world.
* His aim is "to help lay out a plan for the recovery of African place, respectability, accountability, and leadership."
* Afrocentricity can stand its ground among any ideology or religion: Marxism, ], ], ], or ]. Your Afrocentricity will emerge in the presence of these other ideologies because it is from you.
* Afrocentrism is the only ideology that can liberate African people.


Asante also stated:
African-American professor , who teaches history at the ], Davis, has stated that Afrocentrism is:
{{blockquote|As a cultural configuration, the Afrocentric idea is distinguished by five characteristics:
<blockquote>a mythology that is racist, reactionary, essentially therapeutic and is eurocentrism in black face.<ref name="Banner-haley2003"> {{cite journal
# an intense interest in psychological location as determined by symbols, motifs, rituals, and signs.
|author=Banner-haley, C.P.
# a commitment to finding the subject-place of Africans in any social, political, economic, or religious phenomenon with implications for questions of sex, gender, and class.
|year=2003
# a defence of African cultural elements as historically valid in the context of art, music, and literature.
|title=We Can't Go Home Again: An Argument about Afrocentrism.
# a celebration of centeredness and agency and a commitment to lexical refinement that eliminates pejoratives about Africans or other people.
|journal=Journal of Southern History
# a powerful imperative from historical sources to revise the collective text of African people.}}
|volume=69
However, Wilson J. Moses, said of Asante: "His second book, ''The Afrocentric Idea'' (1987), was a creative and in some respects brilliant but rambling theoretical work, much influenced by the revolution in "]" that occurred in American intellectual life during the late 1970s and early 1980s." Some also assert that the definition of Afrocentricity has never sat still long enough to be properly described and accurately critiqued.{{Citation needed|date=September 2015}}
|issue=3
|pages=663–665
|url=http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&se=gglsc&d=5002551537
|accessdate=2007-11-13

}}</ref></blockquote>

], Professor Emerita of Classical Studies at Wellesley College in Massachusetts, has rejected ]'s theories about Egypt contributing to Greek civilization because they are based on faulty scholarship. She notes that his sources predated the deciphering of Egyptian ], and that his theories supported by those sources were overturned by later findings, which he did not acknowledge. She contends that actual ancient Egyptian texts showed little similarity to Greek philosophy. Lefkowitz also pointed out that ] could not have stolen his ideas from the great ] as James suggested, because the library was founded ''after'' Aristotle's death. Because of such fundamental errors of fact, Lefkowitz has criticized Afrocentricity as "an excuse to teach myth as history."<ref name="Lefkowitz1996">
{{cite journal
|author=Lefkowitz, M.R.
|year=1996
|title=Not Out of Africa: How" Afrocentrism" Became an Excuse to Teach Myth as History
|url=http://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&id=LDWuwunDw1IC&oi=fnd&pg=PR9&dq=Not+Out+of+Africa:+How+Afrocentrism+Became+an+Excuse+to+Teach+Myth+as+History.&ots=FnJlEg_Sxl&sig=qPncgqbSqQtn59wgSb-pP6dEG0U
|accessdate=2007-11-13
}}</ref>

Cain Hope Felder, a Professor of New Testament Language and Literature at ] and supporter of Afrocentric ideas, has warned Afrocentrists to avoid certain pitfalls.<ref name="cain">Cain Hope Felder, ", ''The Princeton Seminary Bulletin'' (1994) Volume XV, Number 2.</ref> These include:

* Demonizing categorically all white people, without careful differentiation between persons of goodwill and those who consciously perpetuate racism.

* Adopting multiculturalism as a curricular alternative that eliminates, marginalizes, or vilifies European heritage to the point that Europe epitomizes all the evil in the world.

* Gross over-generalizations and using factually or incorrect material is bad history and bad scholarship.<ref name="cain">...</ref>

] writes that although Afrocentricity can mean many things, the popular press has generally given most attention to its most outlandish theories.<ref name="Glazer1997">Nathan Glazer, ''We Are All Multiculturalists Now'', Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1997 ISBN 067494836X</ref> Glazer agrees with many of the findings and conclusions by Mary Lefkowitz in her book ''Not Out of Africa''. He also recognizes that Afrocentricity may, at times, take the form of legitimate and relevant scholarship.<ref name="Glazer1997" />

Not all the claims of Afrocentrists are widely accepted within the African-American academic community. Some Afrocentrists also reject work which critics of Afrocentricity have characterized as bad scholarship. But, Adisa A. Alkebulan writes that critics have used claims of what he calls "a few non-Afrocentrists" as "an indictment against Afrocentricity."<ref name="DefendingtheParadigm">Adisa A. Alkebulan, "Defending the Paradigm," ''Journal of Black Studies'', Vol. 37, No. 3, pp. 410–427 (2007)</ref>

===Radical Afrocentrism===
According to Radical Afrocentrism, Africans were responsible for many of the great innovations in ancient philosophy, science, and technology, which were later stolen by European peoples.
Some of the scholars who are considered to be radical are ] and ].

In its most radical form, Radical Afrocentrism is associated with ].

==African-centered education==
{{main|African-Centered Education}}

The premise behind ] is the notion that human beings can be subjugated and made servile by limiting their ] of themselves and by imposing certain selective aspects of alien knowledge on them.<ref>Woodson, Dr. Carter G. (1933), ''The Mis-Education of the Negro'', Khalifah's Booksellers & Associates.</ref> Afrocentrists claim that what educates one group of people does not necessarily educate and empower another group of people.

The term "mis-education" was coined by Dr. ] to describe the process of systematically depriving ]s of their knowledge of self. Dr. Woodson believed that mis-education was the root of the problems of the masses of the African-American community and that if the masses of the African American-community had been given the correct knowledge and education from the beginning, they would not be in the situation that they find themselves in today. The problem concerning formal education is seen by Afrocentrists to be that African-American students are taught to perceive the world through the eyes of another culture, and unconsciously learn to see themselves as an insignificant part of their world. An Afrocentric education does not necessarily wish to isolate Africans from a Eurocentric education system. It wishes to assert the autonomy of Africans and encompass the cultural uniqueness of all learners. A school based on African values, it is believed, would eliminate the patterns of rejection and alienation that engulf so many African-American school children, especially males. The movement for African-centered education is based on the assumption that a school immersed in African traditions, rituals, values, and symbols will provide a learning environment that is more congruent with the lifestyles and values of African-American families.

In recent years ] or Africology<ref name="Africana">'']'' Volume 1. Page 115 by ] (Editor), ] (Editor) Oxford University Press. 2005. ISBN 0195170555</ref> departments at many major universities have grown out of the Afrocentric "Black Studies" departments formed in the 1970s. Rather than focusing on black topics in the African diaspora (often exclusively African American topics), these reformed departments aim to expand the field to encompass all of the African diaspora. They also seek to better align themselves with other University departments and find continuity and compromise between the radical Afrocentricity of the past decades and the ] scholarship found in many fields today.<ref>Delores P. Aldridge, Carlene Young, ''Out of the Revolution: The Development of Africana Studies'', Lexington Books 2000. ISBN 0739105477</ref>


==Afrocentric theology== ===Afrocentric education===
{{Main|Afrocentric education}}
{{see|Black theology|Black liberation theology|Black church}}
Afrocentric education is education designed to empower peoples of the African diaspora. A central premise behind it is that many Africans have been subjugated by limiting their awareness of themselves and indoctrinating them with ideas that work against them.<ref>Woodson, Dr. Carter G. (1933). ''The Mis-Education of the Negro''. Khalifah's Booksellers & Associates.</ref> To control a people's culture is to control their tools of self-determination in relationship to others.<ref>Akbar, Dr. Na'im (1998).</ref> Like ], proponents assert that what educates one group of people does not necessarily educate and empower another group–so they assert educational priorities distinctly for the Africans in a given context.


===Afrocentric theology===
The ] in the United States developed out of the ] of African spirituality and European-American Christianity; early members of the churches made certain stories their own. During the ] years, the idea of deliverance out of slavery, as in the story of ], was especially important. After ] and the restoration of white supremacy, their hope was based on deliverance from segregation and other abuses. They found much to respond to in the idea of a personal relationship with Jesus, and shaped their churches by the growth of music and worship styles that related to African as well as European-American traditions.
{{Further|Black theology|Black church}}
The ] in the United States developed out of the ] of African spirituality and European-American ]; early members of the churches made certain stories their own{{citation needed|date=December 2017}}. During the ] years, the idea of deliverance out of ], as in the story of ], was especially important{{citation needed|date=December 2017}}. After ] and the restoration of white supremacy, their hope was based on deliverance from segregation and other abuses{{citation needed|date=December 2017}}. They found much to respond to in the idea of a personal relationship with ], and shaped their churches by the growth of music and worship styles that related to African as well as European-American traditions.{{citation needed|date=September 2011}}


"Africentric approaches" to Christian theology and Christian preaching have been more deliberate. Writers and thinkers emphasize "Black presence" in the ], including the idea of a "]".<ref>Ronald Edward Peters (ed.), ''Africentric Approaches to Christian Ministry: Strengthening Urban Congregations in African American Communities'' University Press of America (2006), ISBN 9780761832645</ref> "Africentric theology" is the cornerstone of the self-proclaimed identity of the ], Chicago. Jeremiah Wright, the pastor for more than 30 years, based his emphasis on ]'s ''Black Theology & Black Power'' (1969).<ref>, American Thinker, accessed 22 February 2008</ref> Twentieth-century "Africentric approaches" to Christian ] and preaching have been more deliberate. Writers and thinkers emphasize "Black presence" in the ], including the idea of a "]".<ref>Peters, Ronald Edward (ed.), ''Africentric Approaches to Christian Ministry: Strengthening Urban Congregations in African American Communities'', University Press of America (2006), {{ISBN|978-0-7618-3264-5}}.</ref>{{Page needed|date=October 2015}}


===Kwanzaa===
==Views on race and the Pan-African identity==
In 1966 ] of the black separatist ] created ]; which became the first specifically African American holiday to be widely observed amongst African Americans.<ref>{{cite book|editor=Jaynes, Gerald D.|title=Encyclopedia of African American society|date=2005|publisher=]|location=]|isbn=1452265410|page=420|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=UZx2AwAAQBAJ&pg=PT520|access-date=26 September 2015}}</ref><ref name="Kwanzaa Date">{{cite news|url=https://select.nytimes.com/search/restricted/article?res=F00B1EFD395C0C738FDDAB0994DB484D81|work=]"|title=The Evening Hours|date=30 December 1983 |access-date=15 December 2006 | first=Ron | last=Alexander}}</ref> Karenga rejected liberation theology and considered the practice of Christianity anti-thetical to the creation of an African-American identity independent from white America.<ref>Karenga, Maulana (1967). "Religion". In Clyde Halisi, James Mtume. The Quotable Karenga. Los Angeles: University of Sankore Press. pp. 25. 23769.8.</ref> Karenga said his goal was to "give Blacks an alternative to the existing holiday and give Blacks an opportunity to celebrate themselves and history, rather than simply imitate the practice of the dominant society."<ref name="Mugane2015">{{cite book|last=Mugane|first=John M.|title=The Story of Swahili|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=zIwNCgAAQBAJ&pg=PA255|date=15 July 2015|publisher=]|location=]|isbn=978-0-89680-489-0|page=255}}</ref>
see also ]


===Race and Pan-African identity===
Afrocentricity contends that race exists primarily as a ] and political construct - that is, that race is important because of its cultural rather than its biological significance.<ref name="AchievingBlackness">...</ref> Many Afrocentrists seek to challenge concepts such as ], so-called ] perspectives, and race-neutral pedagogies. There are strong ties between Afrocentricity and ].<ref>''Critical Pedagogy and Race'' By Zeus Leonardo Page 129 ISBN 1405129689</ref>
{{anchor|race}}
{{Further|Ancient Egyptian race controversy|Pan-Africanism}}
Many Afrocentrists{{Who|date=October 2015}} seek to challenge concepts such as ], ] perspectives, and race-neutral pedagogies. There are strong ties between Afrocentricity and ].<ref>Leonardo, Zeus (2005). ''Critical Pedagogy and Race'', p. 129 {{ISBN|1-4051-2968-9}}.</ref>


Afrocentrists hold that Africans exhibit a range of types and physical characteristics, and that such elements as wavy hair or aquiline facial features are part of a continuum of African types that do not depend on admixture with Caucasian groups. They cite work by Hiernaux <ref name=Hiernaux>{{cite book Afrocentrists agree with the current scientific consensus that holds that Africans exhibit a range of types and physical characteristics, and that such elements as wavy hair or aquiline facial features are part of a continuum of African types that do not depend on admixture with Caucasian groups. They cite work by Hiernaux<ref name=Hiernaux>{{cite book
|author=Hiernaux, J. |author=Hiernaux, J.
|year=1974 |year=1974
|title=The People of Africa |title=The People of Africa
|publisher=Weidenfeld and Nicolson |publisher=Weidenfeld and Nicolson
}}</ref>{{Page needed|date=October 2015}} and Hassan<ref name="Hassan1988">{{cite journal|author=Hassan, F.A.|year=1988|title=The Predynastic of Egypt|journal=Journal of World Prehistory|volume=2|issue=2|pages=135–185|doi=10.1007/BF00975416|jstor=25800540|s2cid=153321928}}</ref> that they believe demonstrates that populations could vary based on micro-evolutionary principles (], drift, selection), and that such variations existed in both living and fossil Africans.<ref name=Keita1992>{{cite journal
|isbn=
}}</ref> and Hassan <ref name=Hassan1988>{{cite journal
|author=Hassan, F.A.
|year=1988
|title=The Predynastic of Egypt
|journal=Journal of World Prehistory
|volume=2
|issue=2
|pages=135–185
|url=http://www.springerlink.com/index/X47P55763452G668.pdf
|accessdate=2007-11-13
|doi=10.1007/BF00975416
|format=PDF}}</ref> which they believe demonstrates that populations could vary based on micro-evolutionary principles (climate adaptation, drift, selection), and that such variations existed in both living and fossil Africans.<ref name=Keita1992>{{cite journal
|author=Keita, S. |author=Keita, S.
|year=1992 |year=1992
Line 152: Line 90:
|pages=245–54 |pages=245–54
|doi=10.1002/ajpa.1330870302 |doi=10.1002/ajpa.1330870302
|pmid=1562056
}}</ref>
|issue=3
}}</ref>


Afrocentrists have condemned what they consider to be attempts at dividing African peoples into racial clusters as new versions of what they deem older, discredited theories, such as the "Hamitic Hypothesis" and the ]. These theories, they contend, attempted to identify certain African ethnicities, such as Nubians, Ethiopians and Somalis, as "Caucasoid" groups that entered Africa to bring civilization to the natives. They believe that Western academics have traditionally limited the peoples they defined as "Black" Africans, but used broader "Caucasoid" or related categories to classify peoples of Egypt or certain other African ethnicities. Afrocentrists also believe strongly in the work of certain anthropologists who have suggested that there is little evidence to support that these populations are closely related to "Caucasoids" of Europe and western Asia.<ref name="Hiernaux"/> Afrocentrists have condemned what they consider to be attempts at dividing African peoples into racial clusters as new versions of discredited theories, such as the ] and the ]. These theories, they contend, attempted to identify certain African ethnicities, such as Nubians, Ethiopians and Somalis, as "Caucasoid" groups that entered Africa to bring civilization to the natives. They believe that Western academics have traditionally limited the peoples they defined as "Black" Africans to those south of the ], but used broader "Caucasoid" or related categories to classify peoples of Egypt or North Africa. Afrocentrists also believe strongly in the work of certain anthropologists who have suggested that there is little evidence to support that the first North African populations were closely related to "Caucasoids" of Europe and western Asia.<ref name="Hiernaux"/>

Afrocentric scholar ] expressed a belief in a double standard as follows in 1964:
{{cquote|But it is only the most gratuitous theory which considers the Dinka, the Nouer and the Masai, among others, to be Caucasoids. What if an African ethnologist were to persist in recognising as white only the blond, blue-eyed Scandinavians, and systematically refused membership to the remaining Europeans, and Mediterraneans in particular--the French, Italians, Greek, Spanish, and Portuguese? Just as the inhabitants of Scandinavia and the Mediterranean countries must be considered as two extreme poles of the same anthropological reality, so should the Negroes of East and West Africa be considered as the two extremes in the reality of the Negro world. To say that a Shillouk, a Dinka, or a Nouer is a Caucasoid is for an African as devoid of sense and scientific interest as would be, to a European, an attitude which maintained that a Greek or a Latin were not of the same race."<ref>Evolution of the Negro world', ''Presence Africaine'' (1964)</ref>}}

French historian Jean Vercoutter has claimed that archaeological workers routinely classified Negroid remains as Mediterranean, even though they found such remains in substantial numbers with ancient artefacts. (Vercoutter 1978—The Peopling of ancient Egypt)<ref>Jean Vercoutter, The Peopling of Ancient Egypt and the Deciphering Meroitic Script. Paris: UNESCO, pp. 15–36.</ref>

More recent work by geneticists, however, provides evidence that Eurasians likely are descended from populations that migrated north and east out of the ]. Hence, certain shared genetic and phenotypical characteristics exist among Eurasians and Northeast African groups such as ]ns and ]s.<ref name=Cavalli-sforza1988>{{cite journal
|author=Cavalli-sforza, L.L.
|coauthors=Piazza, A.; Menozzi, P.; Mountain, J.
|year=1988
|title=Reconstruction of Human Evolution: Bringing Together Genetic, Archaeological, and Linguistic Data
|journal=Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
|volume=85
|issue=16
|pages=6002–6006
|doi=10.1073/pnas.85.16.6002
|accessdate=2007-11-16
|pmid = 3166138
}}</ref> Some phenotypical similarities among Somalis and Eurasians exist at a higher structural level, such as orthognathism<ref>Hanihara et al. (2000), Am J Phys Anthropol, 111, 105</ref>, tooth size<ref>Hanihara T., Ishida H., Metric dental variation of major human populations, Am J Phys Anthropol 2005, DOI: 10.1002/ajpa.20080</ref>, keen facial features and skull shape and size. According to anthropologist ]: <blockquote>When the non-adaptive aspects of craniofacial configuration are the basis for assessment, the Somalis cluster with Europeans before showing a tie with the people of West Africa or the Congo Basin.<ref>Brace CL, Tracer DP, Yaroch LA, Robb J, Brandt K, Nelson AR (1993). ''Clines and clusters versus "race:" a test in ancient Egypt and the case of a death on the Nile''. ''.</ref></blockquote>

Genetic analyses of male DNA in the 21st century have also indicated that ] carry considerable ], a ] ] characteristic of ], ], ], ]ish, ] and ] populations.<ref>Cruciani et al. (2004), Phylogeographic Analysis of Haplogroup E3b (E-M215) Y Chromosomes Reveals Multiple Migratory Events Within and Out of Africa, Am J Hum Genet; 74:1014-1022</ref> ''See also ].''

Afrocentrists argue against the classification of people they deem indigenous "Black" Africans as ''Caucasoid''. They advocate use of the term '']'' to encompass the varying phenotypes of both Negroid and proto-Caucasoid African populations, as well as phenotypically Negroid Australasian populations. They contend that it is more appropriate to name Africans in a manner which reflects their geographical origin, as are Asians as Mongoloids, and Europeans as Caucasians.

Some Afrocentrists have adopted a ] perspective that people of color are all "African people" or "] Africans," citing physical characteristics they exhibit in common with Black Africans. Afrocentric scholar ] writes that they are all part of the "global African community." Some Afrocentric writers include in the ] the ] of India, the people of the rest of the ], "]s" of Southeast Asia (], the ] and ]; and the ], aboriginal peoples of Melanesia, ], and ].

A few Afrocentrists claim that the ] of ] were a hybrid society of Native American peoples and Africans, although mainstream historians of Mesoamerica reject that view with detailed rebuttals.<ref name=Ortiz1997>{{cite journal
|author=Ortiz de Montellano, Bernardo & Gabriel Haslip Viera & Warren Barbour
|year=1997
|title=They were NOT here before Columbus: Afrocentric hyper-diffusionism in the 1990'es
|journal=Ethnohistory
|pages=199–234
|no= 2
|volume=44
|doi=10.2307/483368
}}</ref>


In 1964 Afrocentric scholar ] expressed a belief in such a double standard:
In 2003, geneticist ]' ] confirmed a clear DNA link between indigenous Africans and the Australoid peoples of India, Australia and Southeast Asia, tracing the DNA of ] bushmen from southeast Africa to India and on to Australia. However Wells' work indicates that the ancestors of Southeast Asian and Melanesian peoples migrated out of Africa ''before'' the ancestors of modern Europeans did. Earlier studies had shown that some of these darker-skinned ] cluster genetically more closely with neighboring ]ns than with indigenous Africans, due to millennia of intermingling with one another in relative isolation.{{Fact|date=February 2009}}
{{blockquote|But it is only the most gratuitous theory that considers the Dinka, the Nouer and the Masai, among others, to be Caucasoids. What if an African ethnologist were to persist in recognising as white only the blond, blue-eyed Scandinavians, and systematically refused membership to the remaining Europeans, and Mediterraneans in particular—the French, Italians, Greek, Spanish, and Portuguese? Just as the inhabitants of Scandinavia and the Mediterranean countries must be considered as two extreme poles of the same anthropological reality, so should the Negroes of East and West Africa be considered as the two extremes in the reality of the Negro world. To say that a Shillouk, a Dinka, or a Nouer is a Caucasoid is for an African as devoid of sense and scientific interest as would be, to a European, an attitude that maintained that a Greek or a Latin were not of the same race.{{citation needed|date=October 2015}}}}


French historian Jean Vercoutter has claimed that ] workers routinely classified Negroid remains as Mediterranean, even though they found such remains in substantial numbers with ancient artefacts.<ref>Jean Vercoutter, ''The Peopling of Ancient Egypt and the Deciphering Meroitic Script''. Paris: UNESCO, 1978, pp. 15–36.</ref>
Critics of Afrocentrism note that the Afrocentric designation of Southeast Asians and Melanesians as "African diaspora" is also made without reference to the self-identities of the peoples in question, who may not generally consider themselves African.


Some Afrocentrists{{Who|date=October 2015}} have adopted a ] perspective that people of color are all "African people" or "] Africans," citing physical characteristics they exhibit in common with Black Africans. Afrocentric scholar ] writes that they are all part of the "global African community." Some Afrocentric writers include in the ] the ] of India, "]s" of Southeast Asia (], the ] and ]); and the ] peoples of Australia and Melanesia.{{Citation needed|date=October 2015}}
==Pre-Columbian Africa-Americas contact theories==
{{main|Pre-Columbian Africa-Americas contact theories}}


===Pre-Columbian Africa-Americas theories===
In the 1970s, Van Sertima advanced the theory that the complex civilizations of the Americas were the result of trans-oceanic influence from the Egyptians or other African civilizations. Such a claim is his primary thesis in ''They Came Before Columbus'', published in 1978. The few ] writers seek to establish that the ] people, who built the first highly complex civilization in ] and are considered by some to be the mother civilization for all other civilizations of Mesoamerica, were deeply influenced by Africans. Van Sertima said that the Olmec civilization was a hybrid one of Africans and Native Americans. His theory of pre-Columbian American-African contact has since met with considerable and detailed opposition by scholars of Mesoamerica. Some have charged Van Sertima with "doctoring" and twisting data to fit his conclusions, with inventing evidence, and with ignoring the work of respected Central and South American scholars in the advance of his own theory.<ref name=Ortiz1997>{{cite journal
{{Main|Pre-Columbian Africa-Americas contact theories}}
|author=Ortiz de Montellano, Bernardo & Gabriel Haslip Viera & Warren Barbour
In the 1970s, ] advanced the theory that the complex civilizations of the Americas were the result of trans-oceanic influence from the Egyptians or other African civilizations. Such a claim is his primary thesis in ''They Came Before Columbus'', published in 1978. The few ] writers seek to establish that the ] people, who built the first highly complex civilization in ] and are considered by some to be the mother civilization for all other civilizations of Mesoamerica, were deeply influenced by Africans. Van Sertima said that the Olmec civilization was a hybrid one of Africans and Native Americans. His theory of pre-Columbian American-African contact has since met with considerable and detailed opposition by scholars of Mesoamerica. Van Sertima has been accused of "doctoring" and twisting data to fit his conclusions, inventing evidence, and ignoring the work of respected Central and South American scholars to advance his own theory.<ref name="Ortiz1997"/> Mainstream historians of Mesoamerica overwhelmingly reject that view with detailed rebuttals.<ref name="Ortiz1997">{{cite journal
|author1=Ortiz de Montellano, Bernardo
|author-link=Bernardo Ortiz de Montellano
|author2=Gabriel Haslip Viera
|author3=Warren Barbour
|year=1997 |year=1997
|title=They were NOT here before Columbus: Afrocentric hyper-diffusionism in the 1990s |title=They were NOT here before Columbus: Afrocentric hyper-diffusionism in the 1990s
|journal=Ethnohistory |journal=Ethnohistory
|pages=199–234 |pages=199–234
|no= 2
|volume=44 |volume=44
|doi=10.2307/483368 |doi=10.2307/483368
|issue=2
|jstor=483368
}}</ref> }}</ref>


Claims have been also forwarded contending that African civilizations were founding influences on the Chinese ] cultures.<ref name=Ortiz1997/><ref>{{cite web|url=http://dcn.davis.ca.us/~gizmo/2001/clarence.html |title=Clarence Walker encourages black Americans to discard Afrocentrism |access-date=13 November 2007 |last=Sherwin |first=Elisabeth |publisher=Davis Community Network | archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20071017065428/http://dcn.davis.ca.us/~gizmo/2001/clarence.html| archive-date= 17 October 2007 | url-status= live}}</ref>
==Afrocentrism and Ancient Egypt==

{{main|Ancient Egyptian race controversy}}


===Afrocentrism and Ancient Egypt===
{{Main|Ancient Egyptian race controversy}}
Several Afrocentrists have claimed that important cultural characteristics of ancient ] were indigenous to Africa and that these features were present in other early African civilizations<ref name=Diop1964>{{cite journal Several Afrocentrists have claimed that important cultural characteristics of ancient ] were indigenous to Africa and that these features were present in other early African civilizations<ref name=Diop1964>{{cite journal
|author=Diop, C.A. |author=Diop, C.A.
Line 221: Line 131:
|issue=51 |issue=51
|pages=5–15 |pages=5–15
}}</ref> such as the ] and the ] civilizations of ].<ref>Bruce Williams, 'The lost pharaohs of Nubia', in Ivan van Sertima (ed.), Egypt Revisited (New Brunswick, NJ, Transaction, 1993).</ref> Scholars who have held this view include ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ] and ]. }}</ref> such as the later ] and the ] civilizations of ].<ref>Bruce Williams, "The lost pharaohs of Nubia", in Ivan van Sertima (ed.), ''Egypt Revisited'' (New Brunswick, NJ, Transaction, 1993).</ref> Scholars who have held this view include ], ], ], ], ], and ] as well as the Afrocentrist writers ] and ]. The claim has also been made by many Afrocentric scholars that the Ancient Egyptians themselves were ] (sub-saharan African) rather than North African/Maghrebi, and that the various invasions on Egypt resulted in the "Africanity" of Ancient Egypt becoming diluted, resulting in the modern diversity seen today.<ref name="Ivan van Sertima 1994">{{cite book|author=Van Sertima, Ivan|title=Egypt, Child of Africa|author-link=Ivan van Sertima|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=Y7KmBTz2vUoC|year=1994|publisher=Transaction Publishers |isbn=1-56000-792-3}}</ref>{{Page needed|date=October 2015}} Examining this view, Egyptologist ], wrote that "Any characterization of race of the ancient Egyptians depends on modern cultural definitions, not on scientific study. Thus, by modern American standards it is reasonable to characterise the Egyptians as 'black', while acknowledging the scientific evidence for the physical diversity of Africans". Smith, however, expressed criticism of Egyptologists and Afrocentrists that defined ancient Egyptians "as members of an essentialist racial category" with perceived "Caucasoid" or "Negroid/Africoid" phenotypes".<ref>{{cite book |last=Smith |first=Stuart Tyson |date=2001 |title=The Oxford encyclopedia of ancient Egypt |volume=3 |editor-first=Donald |editor-last=Redford |publisher=] |pages=27–28}}</ref>
In '']'' (1996), a collection of essays edited by ], Professor Emerita of Classical Studies at Wellesley College in Massachusetts, and her colleague Guy MacLean Rogers, a number of Afrocentric claims are examined and criticised.<ref>http://www.galtoninstitute.org.uk/Newsletters/GINL9709/black_athena.htm</ref>


As historian ] argued, mainstream ] and other scholars strongly object to Afrocentric Egyptology, viewing it as "theurapetic mythology" for black people, since it fails to provide sufficient evidence or persuasive interpretations to back up its claims.<ref>{{Cite book |last=Fritze |first=Ronald H. |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=vkSkDQAAQBAJ&pg=PA333 |title=Egyptomania: A History of Fascination, Obsession and Fantasy |date=2021-02-04 |publisher=Reaktion Books |isbn=978-1-78023-685-8 |pages=333 |language=en |quote=Mainstream Egyptologists and other scholars strongly object to Afrocentric Egyptology. It is viewed as a 'therapeutic mythology' that is not based on convincing evidence or persuasive interpretations.}}</ref>
During the Dynastic period, which runs from 3150 B.C. to 30 B.C. there were several major migrations into and out of Egypt that had significant impacts on the Egyptian population. Libyans, Asiatics, Nubians, Assyrians, Persians and Greeks at various times conquered Egypt, and their people intermingled with the resident population. A number of DNA studies on modern Egyptians indicate that there has been significant gene in-flow from both sub-Saharan Africa and Asia. For much of the Dynastic period Egyptian kings ruled Nubia, but in the 8th Century BC Nubian kings conquered most of Egypt and ruled it for almost a hundred years as the ]. <ref name="krings">{{cite journal|year=|last=Krings|title=mtDNA Analysis of Nile River Valley Populations: Genetic Corridor or a Barrier to Migration?|url=http://genapps.uchicago.edu/labweb/pubs/krings.pdf|pmid=PMC1377841}}</ref> Several studies involving human remains have concluded that Egypt has been a heterogeneous population from pre-dynastic times, consisting of both Negroid and non-Negroid populations.


Stephen Howe, professor in the history and cultures of colonialism at Bristol University,<ref>{{Cite web|title=Author Page |url=https://www.opendemocracy.net/en/author/stephen-howe/|website=openDemocracy|date=23 June 2012 |access-date=2020-05-07}}</ref> writes that contrary to "Afrocentric speculation, depending on undocumented assertions that the relatively light-skinned people of the lower Nile today descend from ] rather than earlier residents". Howe also cited a 1995 publication which stated "the latest major synthetic work on African populations is firmly of the opinion that "It was not the Arabs physically displaced Egyptians. Instead the Egyptians were transformed by relatively small number of immigrants bringing in new ideas, which, when disseminated, created a wider ethnic identity".<ref>{{Cite book |last=Howe|first=Stephen|title=Afrocentrism: Mythical Pasts and Imagined Homes|publisher=Verso|year=1998|isbn=9781859848739|pages=137}}</ref>
] showing the four races of men, depicting (from top right): ], ], ], ], from the tomb of ].]]
There are a number of surviving copies of a sacred text from Dynastic times called the ]. These were usually carved and/or painted inside tombs, for the guidance of the soul of the deceased. These inscriptions clearly show that the Ancient Egyptians themselves were conscious of ethnicity, and that they saw fit to distinguish their race from the other races they knew - including the Nubians to the south of Egypt. In the chapter dealing with the Fifth Division of the Tuat, the work notes four different groups of men<ref>http://www.egyptologyonline.com/book_of_gates.htm</ref><ref>http://www.sacred-texts.com/egy/gate/gate20.htm</ref><ref>http://www.ancientegyptonline.co.uk/bookgates5.html</ref> (translation by E.A. Wallis Budge):


S.O.Y. Keita, a ] and research affilitate at the ] who has been described as sympathetic to Afrocentrism,<ref>{{Cite book |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=wRdJAAAAYAAJ&q=shomarka+keita+afrocentrist |title=Cornell University Courses of Study |date=1996 |publisher=Cornell University |pages=423 |language=en |quote=We shall then read from the works of "Afrocentrist" writers of history including Chancellor Williams, Yosef ben Yochanen and Chiekh Anta Diop as well as those of sympathetic scholars such as St. Clair Drake and Shomarka Keita.}}</ref> but defined his position as that "it is not a question of “African” “influence”; Ancient Egypt was organically African. Studying early Egypt in its ]n context is not “Afrocentric,” but simply correct".<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Kamugisha |first1=Aaron |title=Finally in Africa? Egypt, from Diop to Celenko |journal=Race & Class |date=July 2003 |volume=45 |issue=1 |pages=31–60 |doi=10.1177/0306396803045001002 |s2cid=145514370 |url=https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0306396803045001002 |language=en |issn=0306-3968}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=Finally in Africa? Egypt, from Diop to Celenko |url=https://wasalaam.wordpress.com/2007/01/16/finally-in-africa-egypt-from-diop-to-celenko/ |website=SEYFETTİN |language=en |date=16 January 2007}}</ref> Keita has argued that the original inhabitants of the Nile Valley were primarily a variety of indigenous Northeast Africans from the areas of the desiccating Sahara and more southerly areas. He reviewed studies on the biological affinities of the Ancient Egyptian population and described the skeletal morphologies of early dynastic Egyptian remains as a "Saharo-tropical African variant". He also noted that over time gene flow from the Near East and Europe added more genetic variability to the region.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Keita |first1=S. O. Y. |title=Studies and Comments on Ancient Egyptian Biological Relationships |journal=History in Africa |date=1993 |volume=20 |pages=129–154 |doi=10.2307/3171969 |jstor=3171969 |s2cid=162330365 |url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/3171969 |issn=0361-5413}}</ref> In 2022, Keita argued that some genetic studies have a "default racialist or racist approach" and should be interpreted in a framework with other sources of evidence.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Keita Shomarka. |title="Ancient Egyptian "Origins and "Identity" In Ancient Egyptian society : challenging assumptions, exploring approaches |date=2022 |isbn=978-0367434632 |location=Abingdon, Oxon |pages=124–135}}</ref> Several other academics, including ], ],
<blockquote>The first are RETH, the second are AAMU, the third are NEHESU, and the fourth are THEMEHU. The RETH are Egyptians, the AAMU are dwellers in the deserts to the east and north-east of Egypt, the NEHESU are the black races, and the THEMEHU are the fair-skinned Libyans.</blockquote>
Bruce Williams, ], ], Lanny Bell and A.J. Boyce across various disciplines have contended that Ancient Egypt was fundamentally an African civilization, with cultural and biological connections to Egypt's African neighbors.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Celenko |first1=Theodore |title=Egypt in Africa |date=1996 |publisher=Indianapolis Museum of Art |isbn=0936260645 |location=Indianapolis, Ind. |pages=1–134}}</ref>


Scholars have challenged the various assertions of Afrocentrists on the cultural and biological characteristics of Ancient Egyptian civilization and its people. At a ] Symposium in the 1970s, some of the participants, including ], ], ] and ] expressed "profound" disagreement with the "Black", homogeneous hypothesis.<ref>UNESCO, "Symposium on the Peopling of Ancient Egypt and the Deciphering of the Meroitic Script; Proceedings", (Paris, 1978), pp. 3–134.</ref> Despite contestations, ] decided to include his "Origin of the ancient Egyptians" in the General History of Africa, with an editorial comment mentioning the disagreement. However, Diop's chapter was credited as a "painstakingly researched contribution"<ref name="auto">{{cite book |title=Ancient civilizations of Africa |date=1990 |publisher=J. Currey |location=London |isbn=0852550928 |pages=43–46 |edition=Abridged}}</ref> in the general conclusion of the symposium report by the International Scientific Committee's Rapporteur, Professor Jean Devisse,<ref>{{cite book |last1=Mokhtar |first1=Gamal |title=Ancient Civilizations of Africa (Unesco International Scientific Committee for the Drafting of a General History of Africa) |date=1990 |publisher=Currey |isbn=978-0-85255-092-2 |page=33 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=gZWuVAL2GooC |language=en}}</ref> which nevertheless lead to a "real lack of balance" in the discussion among participants.<ref>{{cite book |title=The peopling of ancient Egypt and the deciphering of Meroitic script : proceedings of the symposium held in Cairo from 28 January to 3 February 1974. |date=1978 |publisher=Unesco |isbn=92-3-101605-9 |location=Paris |pages=86, 93–94, 99}}</ref> The ancient world did not employ racial categories such as "Black" or "White" as they had no conception of "race", but rather labeled groups according to their land of origin and cultural traits. However, Keita studying the controversy, finds simplistic political appellations (in the negative or affirmative) describing ancient populations as "black" or "white" to be inaccurate and instead focuses on the ancestry of ancient Egypt as being a part of the native and diverse biological variation of Africa, which includes a variety of phenotypes and skin gradients.<ref>{{cite journal |doi=10.1525/an.2007.48.9.19 |volume=48 |title=Advancing Biocultural Perspectives: Optimism from a Workshop |year=2007 |journal=Anthropology News |pages=19–20 |last1=Agustà |issue=9}}; see also "Forensic Misclassification of Ancient Nubian Crania: Implications for Assumptions About Human Variation", Frank L'Engle Williams, Robert L. Belcher, George J. Armelago's, Current Anthropology. (2005); An Analysis of Crania From Tell-Duweir Using Multiple Discriminant Functions, S. O. Y. Keita, ''American Journal of Physical Anthropology'', 75: 375–390 (1988); "Interpreting African Genetic Diversity, S. O. Y. Keita & Rick Kittles, ''African Archaeological Review'', Vol. 16, No. 2 (1999); "Race": Confusion About Zoological and Social Taxonomies, and Their Places in Science", S. O. Y. Keita, A. J. Boyce, Field Museum of Chicago Institute of Biological Anthropology, Oxford University, ''American Journal of Human Biology'', 13: 569–575 (2001).</ref>
==Human evolution==
Evolutionary psychologist ] states about Afrocentrism:


Egyptian Egyptologist ] has gone on record as saying that the Ancient Egyptians were not black and “We believe that the origin of Ancient Egyptians was purely Egyptian based on the discovery made by British Egyptologist ] at Naqada, and this is why the Ancient Egyptian civilisation did not occur in ], it occurred only here”.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Samil |first=Nehar |date=2021 |title=Claims that Ancient Egyptians were black untrue: Zahi Hawass |url=https://dailynewsegypt.com/2021/04/14/claims-that-ancient-egyptians-were-african-untrue-zahi-hawass/ |access-date=2022-09-08 |website=Daily News Egypt}}</ref> In 2022, Hawass reiterated his view that "Africans have nothing to do with the pyramids ]"<ref>{{cite web |title=Egyptians Create Viral Hashtag Against Kevin Hart's Cairo Performance |date=14 August 2024 |url=https://egyptianstreets.com/2022/12/19/egyptians-create-viral-hashtag-against-kevin-harts-cairo-performance/amp/}}</ref> and stated that Africans "ruled in Egypt in the late Era, at the time of the 25th dynasty". Hawass also accused some international figures of African descent that promoted Afrocentrism of ] and ] of Egyptian history.{{Citation needed|date=September 2023}}
''It should go without saying, but I’ll say it anyway: all of the significant evolution in our species occurred in populations with brown and black skins living in Africa. When language, music, and art evolved, they evolved in Africans. Lighter skins evolved in some European and Asian populations long after the human mind evolved its present capacities.''

''The skin color of our ancestors does not have much scientific importance. But it does have a political importance given the persistence of anti-black racism. I think that a powerful antidote to such racism is the realization that the human mind is a product of black African females favoring intelligence, kindness, creativity, and articulate language in black African males, and vice versa. Afrocentrism is an appropriate attitude to take when we are thinking about human evolution.''<ref>{{cite book|last=Miller|first=Geoffrey|authorlink=Geoffrey Miller (evolutionary psychologist)|title=The Mating Mind|year=2001|isbn=9780385495172|pages=Pages 222–223|publisher=Anchor Books|location=New York}}</ref>
In 2008, Stuart Tyson Smith expressed criticism of a facial reconstruction of Tutankhamun as "very light-skinned" which reflected "bias" and "predictably and justifiably, it has provoked protests from Afrocentrists" as "Egyptologists have been strangely reluctant to admit that the ancient Egyptians were rather dark-skinned Africans, especially the farther south one goes".<ref>{{cite web |last1=Smith |first1=Stuart Tyson |title=Review of From Slave to Pharaoh: The Black Experience of Ancient Egypt by Donald Redford. |url=https://www.academia.edu/43275262 |website=Near Eastern Archaeology 71:3 |date=1 January 2008}}</ref>

In 2011, ], professor of Egyptian Archaeology and Philology argued that the UNESCO-sponsored conference on the General History of Africa in 1974 "did not change the Eurocentric climate of research" and of the need to incorporate both African-centred studies and White European, academic perspectives. He later outlined that "research conferences and publications on the history and language of Kemet remain dominated ... by those brought up and trained in European, not African societies and languages (which include Arabic)".<ref>{{cite book |title=Egypt in its African context : proceedings of the conference held at the Manchester Museum, University of Manchester, 2–4 October 2009 |date=2011 |publisher=Archaeopress |location=Oxford |isbn=978-1407307602 |pages=7–9}}</ref>

=== African-American Afrocentric "hoteps" and the far-right ===
{{main|Hoteps}}

] who use the Black Egyptian hypothesis as a source of ] have been called "the ]" (after the Egyptian word '']'').<ref name="Lovett">{{cite journal |last1=Lovett |first1=Miranda |title=Reflecting on the Rise of the Hoteps |journal=Sapiens |date=July 21, 2020 |url=https://www.sapiens.org/culture/hotep/ |access-date=July 7, 2021}}</ref> The term has often been used disparagingly by non-hotep African-Americans,<ref name="Damon">{{cite news |last1=Young |first1=Damon |url= https://www.theroot.com/hotep-explained-1790854506 |title=Hotep, Explained |work=The Root |access-date=July 7, 2021 |date=2016-03-05}}</ref> some of whom have linked the ideology of the hotep community – which is ], ] and ] – to the ].<ref name="Sheffield">{{cite news |last1=Sheffield |first1=Matthew |title=Laura Ingraham meets the Afrocentric "alt-right" — and it's every bit as weird as it sounds |url=https://www.salon.com/2018/04/23/laura-ingraham-meets-the-afrocentric-alt-right-and-its-every-bit-as-weird-as-that-sounds/ |access-date=July 7, 2021 |work=Salon |date=April 23, 2018}}</ref> Hoteps have been described as promoting ] and ] about black people and black history.<ref name="Lovett" /> Some have argued hotep beliefs are too narrow-minded (focusing only on Egypt as opposed to other aspects of ]),<ref>{{cite news |last1=Bastién |first1=Angelica Jade |title='Insecure' Season 1, Episode 2: Failure to Change |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2016/10/16/arts/television/insecure-season-1-episode-2-failure-to-change.html |access-date=July 7, 2021 |work=The New York Times |date=October 17, 2016}}</ref> and ] argue that hoteps perpetuate ] by policing women's sexuality and not criticizing predatory black men.<ref>{{cite news |last1=Bowen |first1=Sesali |title=What Dear White People Got Right About Hoteps |url=https://www.refinery29.com/en-us/2018/05/198583/hotep-meaning-dear-white-people-slang |access-date=July 7, 2021 |work=refinery29 |date=May 8, 2018}}</ref>

===Alkebulan===
Among Afrocentrists the name 'Alkebulan' (also spelled 'Al Kebulan' or 'Alkebu Lan') is sometimes used a replacement for 'Africa.' Users often erroneously claim that it derives from the ] for 'Land of the Blacks' (in reality '']''), or alternatively that it comes from one or more indigenous African languages and means 'Garden of Life' or 'Motherland'.<ref>{{cite web |last1=Maku |first1=Bright |title=Alkebulan: Understanding the origins behind Africa's original name |url=https://www.skabash.com/alkebulan-africas-original-name/ |website=Skabash! |date=6 February 2023 |access-date=10 May 2024}}</ref> The earliest record of the term 'Alkebulan' is the introduction to an 1813 Spanish poem celebrating the ], in which the author claimed an Arabic origin of the term. In the 20th century it was popularized by ], though this is sometimes incorrectly credited to ] in a non-existent book called “The Kemetic History of Afrika”.<ref>{{cite web |title=The Ancient Name for Africa was "Alkebulan" meaning "Mother of Mankind" |url=https://theafricanhistory.com/770 |website=The African History |date=3 July 2020 |access-date=10 May 2024}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=Alkebulan: The Original Name Of Africa And How To Pronounce It |url=https://africaglobalradio.com/alkebulan-the-original-name-of-africa-and-how-to-pronounce-it/ |website=Africa Global Radio |date=15 March 2022 |access-date=10 May 2024}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |last1=Jacobs |first1=Frank |title=Africa, uncolonized: a detailed look at an alternate continent |url=https://bigthink.com/strange-maps/africa-uncolonized/ |website=Big Think |date=11 November 2014 |access-date=10 May 2024}}</ref>

==Reception==

Afrocentrism has encountered opposition from mainstream scholars who charge it with historical inaccuracy, scholarly ineptitude, and racism.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Early |first=Gerald |author-link=Gerald Early |date=17 May 2002 |title=Afrocentrism |url=https://www.britannica.com/event/Afrocentrism |access-date=2022-08-02 |website=] |language=en}}</ref>

], a critic of the movement, summarises its goals in the preface to his book '']'',<ref name="ReferenceA">Yaacov Shavit, ''History in Black: African-Americans in Search of an Ancient Past'', Frank Cass Publishers, 2001, pp. vii.</ref> in which he states:

{{blockquote|Thus, if historical myths and legends, or an invented history, play such a major role in the founding of every national reconstruction, the question that should concern us here is the nature of the distinct style in which black Americans imagine their past. The answer to this question is that radical Afrocentrism, the subject of this study, which plays a central role in shaping the modern historical world-view of a large section of the African-American (or Afro-American) community, is far more than an effort to follow the line taken by many ] groups and nations in modern rewriting, inventing or developing collective identity and national history. Rather, it is a large-scale historical project to rewrite the history of the whole of humankind from an Afrocentric point of view. The result is a new reconstruction of world history: it is a universal history.}}

Other critics, such as ], contend that the Afrocentric historical approach is entrenched in myth and fantasy.<ref name=":3">{{Cite book |last=Stearns |first=Peter N. |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=Qx4ZAQAAIAAJ |title=The Oxford Encyclopedia of the Modern World: 1750 to the Present |date=2008 |publisher=Oxford University Press |isbn=978-0-19-517632-2 |pages=59 |quote=Opponents of Afrocentrism claim that this approach is entrenched in myth and fantasy. Mary Lefkowitz, in ''Not Out of Africa'', argues that Afrocentrism is grounded in identity politics and not in sound scholarship. |language=en}}</ref> She argues that Afrocentrism is grounded in ] and ] rather than sound scholarship.<ref name=":3" /> In '']'',<ref name=":4">* by ], '']''.</ref> philosophy professor ] labeled Afrocentrism "]". He argued that Afrocentrism's prime goal was to encourage ] and ethnic pride in order to effectively combat the destructive consequences of cultural and universal racism.<ref name=":4" /><ref>Robert Todd Carroll (2003), ''The Skeptic's Dictionary: A Collection of Strange Beliefs, Amusing Deceptions, and Dangerous Delusions'', New York: John Wiley & Sons, {{ISBN|0-471-27242-6}} (paperback). p. 148</ref> Professor of history ] has described Afrocentrism as "a mythology that is racist, reactionary, essentially therapeutic" and "Eurocentrism in black face."<ref name="Banner-haley2003">{{cite journal
|author=Banner-haley, C.P.
|year=2003
|title=We Can't Go Home Again: An Argument about Afrocentrism
|journal=Journal of Southern History
|volume=69
|issue=3
|pages=663–665
|url=https://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&se=gglsc&d=5002551537
|access-date=13 November 2007
|doi=10.2307/30040016
|jstor=30040016
|last2=Walker
|first2=Clarence E.}}</ref>

Classicist ] rejects ]'s theories about Egyptian contributions to Greek civilization as being faulty scholarship. She writes that ancient Egyptian texts show little similarity to Greek philosophy. Lefkowitz states that ] could not have stolen his ideas from the great ] as James suggested, because the library was founded after Aristotle's death. On the basis of such errors, Lefkowitz calls Afrocentrism "an excuse to teach myth as history."<ref>Lefkowitz 1996, pp. 125–126, 137–141</ref> Mary Lefkowitz in 1997 whilst criticising elements of Afrocentrism had acknowledged that the origins of the ancient Egyptians were more clear due to the "recent evidence on skeletons and DNA suggests that the people who settled in the Nile valley, like all of humankind, came from somewhere south of the Sahara; they were not (as some nineteenth-century scholars had supposed) invaders from the North."<ref>{{cite book |last1=Lefkowitz |first1=Mary R. |title=Not out of Africa : how Afrocentrism became an excuse to teach myth as history |date=1996 |location=New York |isbn=046509838X |pages=242}}</ref>

In 2002, Ibrahim Sundiata wrote in the '']'' that:

{{blockquote|The word "Afrocentric" has been traced by Derrick Alridge to the American historian W.E.B. Du Bois, who employed it in the early 1960s. During the 1970s, Molefi Kete Asante appropriated the term, insisting that he was the only person equipped to define it, and asserting that even the holy archangels Du Bois and ] had an imperfect and immature grasp of a concept that finds ultimate expression in his own pontifications. Subsequently, it became a catchall "floating signifier," nebulous, unstable, and infinitely mutable.<ref>, ''American Historical Review'', (1996).</ref>}}

Literature and languages scholar ], a supporter of Afrocentric ideas, has warned Afrocentrists to avoid certain pitfalls,<ref name="cain">{{cite journal | last1 = Hope Felder | first1 = Cain | year = 1994 | title = Afrocentrism, the Bible, and the Politics of Difference | url = http://www.nathanielturner.com/twoscholarsdiscussafrocentrism.htm | journal = The Princeton Seminary Bulletin | volume = XV | issue = 2 }}</ref> including:
* Demonizing categorically all white people, without careful differentiation between persons of goodwill and those who consciously perpetuate racism.
* Adopting ] as a curricular alternative that eliminates, marginalizes, or vilifies European heritage to the point that Europe epitomizes all the evil in the world.
* Gross over-generalizations and using factually or incorrect material is bad history and bad scholarship.<ref name="cain"/>

] writes that although Afrocentricity can mean many things, the popular press has generally given most attention to its most outlandish theories.<ref name="Glazer1997">Nathan Glazer, ''We Are All Multiculturalists Now'', Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1997 {{ISBN|0-674-94836-X}}.</ref> Glazer agrees with many of the findings and conclusions presented in Lefkowitz's book ''Not Out of Africa''. Yet he also argues that Afrocentrism often presents legitimate and relevant scholarship.<ref name="Glazer1997"/> The late ] was also a critic of Afrocentrism. He wrote:

{{Blockquote|Populist Afrocentrism was the perfect social theory for the upwardly mobile black petty bourgeoisie. It gave them a sense of ethnic superiority and cultural originality, without requiring the hard, critical study of historical realities. It provided a philosophical blueprint to avoid concrete struggle within the real world... It was, in short, only the latest theoretical construct of a politics of racial identity, a world-view designed to discuss the world but never really to change it.<ref name="autogenerated192"/>}}

Some Afrocentrists{{Who|date=October 2015}} agree in rejecting those works which critics have characterized as examples of bad scholarship. Adisa A. Alkebulan states that the work of Afrocentric scholars is not fully appreciated because critics use the claims of "a few non-Afrocentrists" as "an indictment against Afrocentricity."<ref name="DefendingtheParadigm">Adisa A. Alkebulan, "Defending the Paradigm", ''Journal of Black Studies'', Vol. 37, No. 3, pp. 410–427 (2007).</ref>

In 1996, the historian ] critically reviewed the new work of Mary Lefkowitz on Afrocentrism as "Eurocentric". He criticized her book ''Not Out of Africa: How Afrocentrism Became an Excuse to Teach Myth as History'' for what he saw as her neglect of the African-American historic literature of the 19th and 20th centuries. Meier believes she fails to take the African-American experiences into account, to the extent that she "fails to answer the question raised in this book's subtitle."<ref>Meier, August, , ''Journal of American History'', December 1996.</ref>{{Irrelevant citation|reason=This is a section on Afrocentrism's reception. Not Lefkowitz's works.|date=August 2022}}

] describes the controversy over Afrocentrism as a ]. He believes certain "epistemologies" are warring with each other: the "epistemology of blackness" argues for the "responsibilities and potential of black peoples to function in and contribute to the progress of civilization."<ref>Maghan Keita, ''Race and the Writing of History: Riddling the Sphinx'', p. 7.</ref>


==List of prominent authors== ==List of prominent authors==
* ],<ref>.</ref>{{Better source needed|date=January 2021}} professor, author and activist: ''Yurugu: An Afrikan-centered Critique of European Cultural Thought and Behavior'' (Trenton: Africa World Press, 1994).
* ], professor, author: ''Afrocentricity: The theory of Social Change''; ''The Afrocentric Idea''; ''The Egyptian Philosophers: Ancient African Voices from Imhotep to Akhenaten''
* ], professor, author: ''Afrocentricity: The Theory of Social Change''; ''The Afrocentric Idea''; ''The Egyptian Philosophers: Ancient African Voices from Imhotep to Akhenaten''
* ], college professor and lecturer; founder, Temple of the Black Messiah, School of History and Religion; co-founder and creative director, Fourth Dynasty Publishing Company, Silver Spring, ]
* ], leader of the ], author of the "Journal of the Moorish Paradigm"
* ], Egyptologist; founding director of the Association for the Study of Classical African Civilization; founder and director of the Kemetic Institute, ] * ], Egyptologist; founding director of the Association for the Study of Classical African Civilization; founder and director of the Kemetic Institute, ]
* ] ,, author: ''The African Origin of Civilization: Myth or Reality''; ''Civilization or Barbarism: An Authentic Anthropology''; ''Precolonial Black Africa''; ''The Cultural Unity of Black Africa: The Domains of Patriarchy and of Matriarchy in Classical Antiquity''; ''The Peopling of Ancient Egypt & the Deciphering of the Meroitic Script'' * ],<ref>{{cite web|last1=Clarke|first1=John Henrik|author-link1=John Henrik Clarke|title=Cheikh Anta Diop and the New Light on African History|url=http://nbufront.org/html/MastersMuseums/JHClarke/Contemporaries/CheikhAntaDiop.html|website=nbufront.org|publisher=National Black United Front|access-date=15 October 2015|url-status=usurped|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090219211731/http://nbufront.org/html/MastersMuseums/JHClarke/Contemporaries/CheikhAntaDiop.html|archive-date=19 February 2009}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|title=Cheikh Anta Diop, The Pharoah of Knowledge|url=http://home3.inet.tele.dk/mcamara/antadiop.html|access-date=15 October 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070613205716/http://home3.inet.tele.dk/mcamara/antadiop.html|archive-date=13 June 2007}}</ref> author: ''The African Origin of Civilization: Myth or Reality''; ''Civilization or Barbarism: An Authentic Anthropology''; ''Precolonial Black Africa''; ''The Cultural Unity of Black Africa: The Domains of Patriarchy and of Matriarchy in Classical Antiquity''; ''The Peopling of Ancient Egypt & the Deciphering of the Meroitic Script''
* ], author: ''African Origins of Major "Western Religions"''; ''Black Man of the Nile and His Family''; ''Africa: Mother of Western Civilization''; ''New Dimensions in African History''; ''The Myth of Exodus and Genesis and the Exclusion of Their African Origins''; ''Abu Simbel to Ghizeh: A Guide Book and Manual''
* ], Harvard professor, biologist, author: ''Saga America'', 1980
* {{Cite book |last = Jones
* ], medical doctor and author: ''Echoes of the Old Darkland: Themes from the African Eden'' (1991), ''Africa and the Birth of Science and Technology'' (1991), ''The Star of Deep Beginnings'' (1998), ''Biblio Africana: An Annotated Reader's Guide to African Cultural History and Related Subjects'' (1999), ''The African Background to Medical Science: Essays on African History, Science & Civilizations'' (2000), ''The Afrikan Origins of the Major World Religions'' (with Yosef Ben-Jochannan and Modupe Oduyoye) (1987)
|first = Gayl
* ], lecturer, syndicated columnist, author: ''Wonderful Ethiopians of the Ancient Cushite Empire'', 1926.
|author-link = Gayl Jones
* ], author: ''African Origins of Major "Western Religions"''; ''Black Man of the Nile and His Family''; ''Africa: Mother of Western Civilization''; ''New Dimensions in African History''; ''The Myth of Exodus and Genesis and the Exclusion of Their African Origins''; ''Africa: Mother of Western Civilization''; ''Abu Simbel to Ghizeh: A Guide Book and Manual''
|title = The Healing
* ] , author: ''Introduction to African Civilizations''; ''The global African community: The African presence in Asia, Australia, and the South Pacific''
|publisher = Beacon Press
|year = 1998
|location = Boston
|url = https://archive.org/details/healing00jone
|isbn = 978-0-8070-6314-9
}} The protagonist of this novel describes her ongoing daily experiences in the US using a consistently Afrocentric perspective.
* ],<ref>{{cite web|last1=Rashidi|first1=Runoko|author-link1=Runoko Rashidi|title=The Global African Presence|url=http://www.cwo.com/%7Elucumi/runoko.html|website=cwo.com|access-date=15 October 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120114134424/http://www.cwo.com/~lucumi/runoko.html|archive-date=14 January 2012}}</ref> author: ''Introduction to African Civilizations''; ''The global African community: The African presence in Asia, Australia, and the South Pacific''
* ], author: ''Sex and Race: Negro-Caucasian Mixing in All Ages and All Lands: The Old World''; ''Nature Knows No Color Line''; ''Sex and Race: A History of White, Negro, and Indian Miscegenation in the Two Americas: The New World''; ''100 Amazing Facts About the Negro With Complete Proof: A Short Cut to the World History of the Negro'' * ], author: ''Sex and Race: Negro-Caucasian Mixing in All Ages and All Lands: The Old World''; ''Nature Knows No Color Line''; ''Sex and Race: A History of White, Negro, and Indian Miscegenation in the Two Americas: The New World''; ''100 Amazing Facts About the Negro With Complete Proof: A Short Cut to the World History of the Negro''
* ], author: ''They Came before Columbus: The African Presence in Ancient America'', '' ISBN 0887386644''; ''Blacks in Science Ancient and Modern''; ''African Presence in Early Asia''; ''African Presence in Early America''; ''Early America Revisited''; ''Egypt Revisited: Journal of African Civilizations''; ''Nile Valley Civilizations''; ''Egypt: Child of Africa (Journal of African Civilizations, V. 12)''; ''The Golden Age of the Moor (Journal of African Civilizations, Vol. 11, Fall 1991)''; ''Great Black Leaders: Ancient and Modern''; ''Great African Thinkers: Cheikh Anta Diop'' * ], author: ''They Came before Columbus: The African Presence in Ancient America'', '' {{ISBN|0-88738-664-4}}''; ''Blacks in Science Ancient and Modern''; ''African Presence in Early Asia''; ''African Presence in Early America''; ''Early America Revisited''; ''Egypt Revisited: Journal of African Civilizations''; ''Nile Valley Civilizations''; ''Egypt: Child of Africa (Journal of African Civilizations, V. 12)''; ''The Golden Age of the Moor (Journal of African Civilizations, Vol. 11, Fall 1991)''; ''Great Black Leaders: Ancient and Modern''; ''Great African Thinkers: Cheikh Anta Diop''<ref>{{cite web|last1=Sertima|first1=Ivan Van|author-link1=Ivan Van Sertima|title=Journal of African Civilizations|url=http://www.cwo.com/~lucumi/sertima.html|website=cwo.com|access-date=15 October 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060426084454/http://www.cwo.com/~lucumi/sertima.html|archive-date=26 April 2006}}</ref>
* ], author: ''The Destruction of Black Civilization: Great Issues of a Race from 4500 B.C. to 2000 A.D.'' * ], author: ''The Destruction of Black Civilization: Great Issues of a Race from 4500 B.C. to 2000 A.D.''
* ], author: "Afridentity: Essays on Africa" Silver Spring: Africa Reads Books, 2007.
* ], author: ''Ancient Egypt and Black Africa: a student's handbook for the study of Ancient Egypt in philosophy, linguistics, and gender relations'' * ], author: ''Ancient Egypt and Black Africa: a student's handbook for the study of Ancient Egypt in philosophy, linguistics, and gender relations''
* ], III, author: ''SBA: The Reawakening of the African Mind''; ''The Teachings of Ptahhotep'' * ], III, author: ''SBA: The Reawakening of the African Mind''; ''The Teachings of Ptahhotep''


==See also== ==See also==
{{div col|colwidth=22em}}
* ]
* ]
* ] * ]
* ] * ]
* ]
* ]
* ] * ]
* ] * ]
* ]
* ]
* ] * ]
* ]
* ]
* ] * ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ] * ]
* ] * ]
* ]
* ]
* ] * ]
* ] * ]
{{div col end}}


==Notes== ==References==
{{reflist|2}} {{reflist}}


==References== ==Literature==

===Primary===
* {{cite book|last=Ani|first=Marimba|title=Yurugu: An African-centered Critique of European Thought and Behavior|year=1994|publisher=Africa World Press|location=Trenton, N.J.|isbn=0-86543-248-1}} * {{cite book|last=Ani|first=Marimba|title=Yurugu: An African-centered Critique of European Thought and Behavior|year=1994|publisher=Africa World Press|location=Trenton, N.J.|isbn=0-86543-248-1}}
* {{cite book|last=Asante|first=Molefi Kete|authorlink=Molefi Kete Asante|title=Afrocentricity|year=1988|edition=rev.|publisher=Africa World Press|location=Trenton, N.J.|isbn=0-86543-067-5}} * {{cite book|last=Asante|first=Molefi Kete|author-link=Molefi Kete Asante|title=Afrocentricity|year=1988|edition=rev.|publisher=Africa World Press|location=Trenton, N.J.|isbn=0-86543-067-5}}
* {{cite book|last=Asante|first=Molefi Kete|title=Kemet, Afrocentricity, and Knowledge|year=1990|publisher=Africa World Press|location=Trenton, N.J.|isbn=0-86543-188-4}} * {{cite book|last=Asante|first=Molefi Kete|title=Kemet, Afrocentricity, and Knowledge|year=1990|publisher=Africa World Press|location=Trenton, N.J.|isbn=0-86543-188-4}}
* {{cite book|last=Asante|first=Molefi Kete|title=The Afrocentric Idea|year=1998|publisher=Temple University Press|location=Philadelphia|isbn=1-56639-594-1}} * {{cite book|last=Asante|first=Molefi Kete|title=The Afrocentric Idea|year=1998|publisher=Temple University Press|location=Philadelphia|isbn=1-56639-594-1|url=https://archive.org/details/afrocentricidea00asan}}
*Asante, Molefi Kete (2007). An Afrocentric Manifesto. Cambridge: Polity Press. {{ISBN|978-07456-4102-7}}
* {{cite book |author=Bailey, Randall C. (editor)|title=Yet with a steady beat: contemporary U.S. Afrocentric biblical interpretation|publisher=Society of Biblical Literature|year=2003}}
* {{cite book|last=Karenga|first=Maulana|author-link=Ron Karenga|title=Introduction to Black Studies|year=1993|edition=2nd|publisher=University of Sankore Press|location=Los Angeles|isbn=0-943412-16-1|url=https://archive.org/details/introductiontobl00kare}}
* {{cite book |author=Berlinerblau, Jacques|title=Heresy in the University: The Black Athena Controversy and the Responsibilities of American Intellectuals|publisher=Rutgers University Press|year=1999}}
* {{cite book |author=Binder, Amy J.|title=Contentious curricula: Afrocentrism and creationism in American public schools|publisher=|year=2002}}
* {{cite book |author=Browder, Anthony T.|title=Nile Valley Contributions To Civilization: Exploding the Myths, Volume 1|location=Washington, DC |publisher=Institute of Karmic Guidance|year=1992}}
* {{cite book |author=Crawford, Clinton|title=Recasting Ancient Egypt In The African Context: Toward A Model Curriculum Using Art And Language|publisher=Africa World Press|location=Trenton, New Jersey|year=1996}}
* {{cite book |author=Henderson, Errol Anthony|title=Afrocentrism and world politics: towards a new paradigm|publisher=Praeger|location=Westport, Connecticut|year=1995}}
* {{cite book |author=Henke, Holger and Fred Reno (editors)|title=Modern political culture in the Caribbean|publisher=University of the West Indies Press|year=2003}}
* {{cite book |author=Houston, Drusilla Dunjee|title=Wonderful Ethiopians of the Ancient Cushite Empire|publisher=Universal Publishing Company|location=Oklahoma|year=1926}}
* {{cite book |author=Howe, Stephen|title=Afrocentrism: mythical pasts and imagined homes|publisher=Verso|location=London|year=1998}}
* {{cite book|last=Karenga|first=Maulana|authorlink=Ron Karenga|title=Introduction to Black Studies |year=1993 |edition=2nd |publisher=University of Sankore Press |location=Los Angeles|isbn=0-943412-16-1}}
* {{cite journal|author=Kershaw, Terry|title="Afrocentrism and the Afrocentric method." ''Western Journal of Black Studies'' |year=1992 |volume=16 |issue=3 |pages=160–168}} * {{cite journal|author=Kershaw, Terry|title="Afrocentrism and the Afrocentric method." ''Western Journal of Black Studies'' |year=1992 |volume=16 |issue=3 |pages=160–168}}

* Konstan, David. "Inventing Ancient Greece: ", ''History and Theory'', Vol.&nbsp;36, No.&nbsp;2. (May, 1997), pp.&nbsp;261–269.
===Secondary===
*{{cite book |last=Lefkowitz |first=Mary |title=History Lesson: A Race Odyssey |authorlink=Mary Lefkowitz |publisher=Yale University Press |year=1996 |isbn=030012659X}}
* Adeleke, Tunde. (2009). The Case Against Afrocentrism. University Press of Mississippi. {{ISBN|978-1-60473-293-1}}
*{{cite book |last=Lefkowitz |first=Mary |title=Not Out of Africa: How Afrocentrism Became an Excuse to Teach Myth as History |year=1996 |publisher=Basic Books |location=New York |isbn=0465098371 }}
* {{cite book |author=Lefkowitz, Mary R. and Guy MacLean Rogers (editors)|title=Black Athena Revisited|publisher=University of North Carolina Press|year=1996|isbn=0807845558}} *{{cite book |editor=Bailey, Randall C.|title=Yet With a Steady Beat: Contemporary U.S. Afrocentric Biblical Interpretation|publisher=Society of Biblical Literature|year=2003}}
* {{cite book |author=Lewis, Martin W.|title=The myth of continents: a critique of metageography|publisher=University of California Press|year=1997}} * {{cite book |author=Berlinerblau, Jacques|title=Heresy in the University: The Black Athena Controversy and the Responsibilities of American Intellectuals|url=https://archive.org/details/heresyinuniversi00berl|url-access=registration|publisher=Rutgers University Press|year=1999}}
* {{cite book |author=Magida, Arthur J.|title=Prophet of rage a life of Louis Farrakhan and his nation|publisher=BasicBooks|location=New York|year=1996}} * {{cite book |author=Binder, Amy J.|title=Contentious curricula: Afrocentrism and creationism in American public schools|publisher=Princeton University Press|year=2002}}
* {{cite book |author=Browder, Anthony T.|title=Nile Valley Contributions To Civilization: Exploding the Myths, Volume 1|location=Washington, DC |publisher=Institute of Karmic Guidance|year=1992}}
* Morton, Eric. ." ''Journal on African Philosophy''. (2002) ISSN: 1533-1067. Africa Resource Center. Retrieved on ].
* {{cite book |author=Moses, Wilson Jeremiah|title=Afrotopia: the roots of African American popular history|publisher=Cambridge University Press|year=1998}} * {{cite book |author=Henderson, Errol Anthony|title=Afrocentrism and World Politics: towards a new paradigm|publisher=Praeger|location=Westport, Connecticut|year=1995}}
* {{cite book |author=Sniderman, Paul M. and Thomas Piazza|title=Black pride and black prejudice|publisher=Princeton University Press|year=2002}} * {{cite book |editor1=Henke, Holger |editor2=Reno, Fred|title=Modern political culture in the Caribbean|publisher=University of the West Indies Press|year=2003}}
* {{cite book |author=Spivey, Donald|title=Fire from the soul: a history of the African-American struggle|publisher=Carolina Academic Press|year=2003}} * {{cite book |author=Howe, Stephen|title=Afrocentrism: mythical pasts and imagined homes|url=https://archive.org/details/afrocentrism00step|url-access=registration|publisher=Verso|location=London|year=1998|isbn=9781859848739 }}
* Konstan, David. "Inventing Ancient Greece: ", ''History and Theory'', Vol.&nbsp;36, No.&nbsp;2. (May 1997), pp.&nbsp;261–269.
* {{cite book |author=Walker, Clarence E.|title=We Can't Go Home Again: An Argument about Afrocentrism|publisher=Oxford University Press|year=2000|isbn=0195095715}}
* {{cite book |author=Wells, Spencer|title=The Journey of Man: A Genetic Odyssey|publisher=Princeton University Press|year=2002}} *{{cite book |last=Lefkowitz |first=Mary |title=History Lesson: A Race Odyssey |author-link=Mary Lefkowitz |publisher=Yale University Press |year=1996 |isbn=0-300-12659-X}}
*{{cite book |last=Lefkowitz |first=Mary |title=Not Out of Africa: How Afrocentrism Became an Excuse to Teach Myth as History |year=1996 |publisher=Basic Books |location=New York |isbn=0-465-09837-1 |url=https://archive.org/details/notoutofafricaho00lefk_1 }}
* {{cite book |editor1=Lefkowitz, Mary R. |editor2=Guy MacLean Rogers|title=Black Athena Revisited|url=https://archive.org/details/blackathenarevis00lefk_0 |url-access=registration |publisher=University of North Carolina Press|year=1996|isbn=0-8078-4555-8}}
* {{cite book |author=Moses, Wilson Jeremiah|author-link=Wilson Jeremiah Moses|title=Afrotopia: the roots of African American popular history|publisher=Cambridge University Press|year=1998}}
* {{cite book |author1=Sniderman, Paul M.|author2=Piazza, Thomas|title=Black Pride and Black Prejudice|publisher=Princeton University Press|year=2002}}
* {{cite book |author=Walker, Clarence E.|title=We Can't Go Home Again: An Argument about Afrocentrism|publisher=Oxford University Press|year=2000|isbn=0-19-509571-5}}


==External links== ==External links==
{{wikiquote}}
*
* {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181123082650/http://www.asante.net/articles/1/afrocentricity/ |date=23 November 2018 }} by ], asante.net
* by ], '']''
* ] comments on the emergence of Afrocentric thought in the African American community.
*
*
*
*{{in lang|fr}}
*
* by T. A. Schmitz (])
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
;Afrocentric websites
*
*
*

{{Template group
|list =
{{Pan-Africanism}} {{Pan-Africanism}}
{{Influential geocultural perspectives of history & geography}}
{{Discrimination|state=collapsed}}
}}


{{Authority control}}
]

]
]
]
] ]
] ]
]
] ]
]
]
] ]
] ]
] ]
] ]
]

]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]

Latest revision as of 23:50, 26 December 2024

African ethnocentrism

For the study of African culture and history, see African studies. For the academic theory, see Afrocentricity. For the book, see Afrocentricity (book).

Part of the Politics series on
Pan-Africanism
Pan-African flag
Arts
Ideologies
Organizations
People
Dynamics
Related
This article is part of a series about
Black power
History
Ideologies
Organizations
People
Works
Related

Afrocentrism is a worldview that is centered on the history of people of African descent or a view that favors it over non-African civilizations. It is in some respects a response to Eurocentric attitudes about African people and their historical contributions. It seeks to counter what it sees as mistakes and ideas perpetuated by the racist philosophical underpinnings of Western academic disciplines as they developed during and since Europe's Early Renaissance as justifying rationales for the enslavement of other peoples, in order to enable more accurate accounts of not only African but all people's contributions to world history. Afrocentricity deals primarily with self-determination and African agency and is a pan-African point of view for the study of culture, philosophy, and history.

Afrocentrism is a scholarly movement that seeks to conduct research and education on global history subjects, from the perspective of historical African peoples and polities. It takes a critical stance on Eurocentric assumptions and myths about world history, in order to pursue methodological studies of the latter. Some of the critics of the movement believe that it often denies or minimizes European, Near Eastern, and Asian cultural influences while exaggerating certain aspects of historical African civilizations that independently accomplished a significant level of cultural and technological development. In general, Afrocentrism is usually manifested in a focus on the history of Africa and its role in contemporary African-American culture among others.

What is today broadly called Afrocentrism evolved out of the work of African American intellectuals in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, but flowered into its modern form due to the activism of African American intellectuals in the U.S. civil rights movement and in the development of African American studies programs in universities. However, following the development of universities in African colonies in the 1950s, African scholars became major contributors to African historiography. A notable pioneer is the professor Kenneth Dike, who became chairman of the Committee on African Studies at Harvard in the 1970s. In strict terms Afrocentrism, as a distinct historiography, reached its peak in the 1980s and 1990s. Today it is primarily associated with Cheikh Anta Diop, John Henrik Clarke, Ivan van Sertima and Molefi Kete Asante. Asante, however, describes his theories as Afrocentricity.

Proponents of Afrocentrism support the claim that the contributions of various Black African people have been downplayed or discredited as part of the legacy of colonialism and slavery's pathology of "writing Africans out of history".

Major critics of Afrocentrism include Mary Lefkowitz, who dismiss it as pseudohistory, reactive, and obstinately therapeutic. Others, such as Kwame Anthony Appiah, believe that Afrocentrism defeats its purpose of dismantling unipolar studies of world history by seeking to replace Eurocentricity with an equally ethnocentric and hierarchical curriculum, and negatively essentializes European culture and people of European descent. Clarence E. Walker claims it to be "Eurocentrism in blackface".

Terminology

The term "Afrocentrism" dates to 1962. The adjective "Afrocentric" appears in a typescript proposal for an entry in Encyclopedia Africana, possibly due to W. E. B. Du Bois. The abstract noun "Afrocentricity" dates to the 1970s, and was popularized by Molefi Asante's Afrocentricity: The Theory of Social Change (1980). Molefi Kete Asante's theory, Afrocentricity, has been one developed in academic settings and may incorporate the terms Afrocentric to describe scholarship and Afrocentrists to describe scholars, but does not use Afrocentrism. According to Asante, though the two terms are often confused to mean the same, Afrocentrists are not adherents of Afrocentrism. This has caused confusing notions about who is considered an Afrocentrist, as various scholars who may or may not be associated with Asante and his works have been erroneously given the title, even by other academics. Asante has written that Afrocentricity and Afrocentrism are not the same and neither do they share the same origin:

By way of distinction, Afrocentricity should not be confused with the variant Afrocentrism. The term “Afrocentrism” was first used by the opponents of Afrocentricity who in their zeal saw it as an obverse of Eurocentrism. The adjective “Afrocentric” in the academic literature always referred to “Afrocentricity.” However, the use of “Afrocentrism” reflected a negation of the idea of Afrocentricity as a positive and progressive paradigm. The aim was to assign religious signification to the idea of African centeredness. However, it has come to refer to a broad cultural movement of the late twentieth century that has a set of philosophical, political, and artistic ideas which provides the basis for the musical, sartorial, and aesthetic dimensions of the African personality. On the other hand, Afrocentricity, as I have previously defined it, is a theory of agency, that is, the idea that African people must be viewed and view themselves as agents rather than spectators to historical revolution and change. To this end Afrocentricity seeks to examine every aspect of the subject place of Africans in historical, literary, architectural, ethical, philosophical, economic, and political life.

History

A 1911 copy of the NAACP journal The Crisis depicting "Ra-Maat-Neb, one of the kings of the Upper Nile", a copy of the relief portraying Nebmaatre I on Meroe pyramid 17.

Afrocentrism has its origins in the work of African and African diaspora intellectuals in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, following social changes in the United States and Africa due both to the end of slavery and the decline of colonialism. Following the American Civil War, African Americans in the South gathered together in communities to evade white control, established their own church congregations, and worked hard to gain education. They increasingly took more active public roles despite severe racial discrimination and segregation. American and African intellectuals looked to the African past for a re-evaluation of what its civilizations had achieved and what they meant for contemporary people.

The combination of the European centuries gives us about four to five hundred years of solid European domination of intellectual concepts and philosophical ideas. Africa and Asia were subsumed under various headings of the European hierarchy. If a war between the European powers occurred it was called a World War and the Asians and Africans found their way on the side of one European power or the other. There was this sense of assertiveness about European culture that advanced with Europe's trade, religious, and military forces.

— Molefi Asante, "De-Westernizing Communication: Strategies for Neutralizing Cultural Myths"

As an ideology and political movement, Afrocentrism had its beginnings in activism among black intellectuals, political figures, and historians in the context of the US American civil rights movement. According to U.S. professor Victor Oguejiofor Okafor, concepts of Afrocentricity lie at the core of disciplines such as African American studies. But Wilson J. Moses claims that Afrocentrism roots are not exclusively African:

Despite the fulminations of ethno-chauvinists and other prejudiced persons, it remains a fact that the contributions of white scholars, like Boas, Malinowski, and Herskovits, were fundamental to that complex of ideas that we designate to days as Afrocentrism...Students of African and African American history have long appreciated the irony that much of what we now call Afrocentrism was developed during the 1930s by the Jewish American scholar Melville Herskovits

— Wilson J. Moses, Historical Sketches of Afrocentrism

In 1987, Martin Bernal published his Black Athena, in which he claims that ancient Greece was colonized by northern invaders mixing with a colony established by Phoenicia (modern Lebanon). A major theme of the work is the alleged denial by Western academia of the African and (western) Asiatic influence on ancient Greek culture.

Aspects of Afrocentricity and Afrocentrism

Afrocentricity book

Main article: Afrocentricity (book)

In 2000, African American Studies professor Molefi Kete Asante, gave a lecture entitled "Afrocentricity: Toward a New Understanding of African Thought in this Millennium," in which he presented many of his ideas:

  • Africa has been betrayed by international commerce, by missionaries and imams, by the structure of knowledge imposed by the Western world, by its own leaders, and by the ignorance of its own people of its past.
  • Philosophy originated in Africa and the first philosophers in the world were Africans.
  • Afrocentricity constitutes a new way of examining data, and a novel orientation to data; it carries with it assumptions about the current state of the African world.
  • His aim is "to help lay out a plan for the recovery of African place, respectability, accountability, and leadership."
  • Afrocentricity can stand its ground among any ideology or religion: Marxism, Islam, Christianity, Buddhism, or Judaism. Your Afrocentricity will emerge in the presence of these other ideologies because it is from you.
  • Afrocentrism is the only ideology that can liberate African people.

Asante also stated:

As a cultural configuration, the Afrocentric idea is distinguished by five characteristics:

  1. an intense interest in psychological location as determined by symbols, motifs, rituals, and signs.
  2. a commitment to finding the subject-place of Africans in any social, political, economic, or religious phenomenon with implications for questions of sex, gender, and class.
  3. a defence of African cultural elements as historically valid in the context of art, music, and literature.
  4. a celebration of centeredness and agency and a commitment to lexical refinement that eliminates pejoratives about Africans or other people.
  5. a powerful imperative from historical sources to revise the collective text of African people.

However, Wilson J. Moses, said of Asante: "His second book, The Afrocentric Idea (1987), was a creative and in some respects brilliant but rambling theoretical work, much influenced by the revolution in "critical theory" that occurred in American intellectual life during the late 1970s and early 1980s." Some also assert that the definition of Afrocentricity has never sat still long enough to be properly described and accurately critiqued.

Afrocentric education

Main article: Afrocentric education

Afrocentric education is education designed to empower peoples of the African diaspora. A central premise behind it is that many Africans have been subjugated by limiting their awareness of themselves and indoctrinating them with ideas that work against them. To control a people's culture is to control their tools of self-determination in relationship to others. Like educational leaders of other cultures, proponents assert that what educates one group of people does not necessarily educate and empower another group–so they assert educational priorities distinctly for the Africans in a given context.

Afrocentric theology

Further information: Black theology and Black church

The black church in the United States developed out of the creolization of African spirituality and European-American Christianity; early members of the churches made certain stories their own. During the antebellum years, the idea of deliverance out of slavery, as in the story of Exodus, was especially important. After Reconstruction and the restoration of white supremacy, their hope was based on deliverance from segregation and other abuses. They found much to respond to in the idea of a personal relationship with Jesus, and shaped their churches by the growth of music and worship styles that related to African as well as European-American traditions.

Twentieth-century "Africentric approaches" to Christian theology and preaching have been more deliberate. Writers and thinkers emphasize "Black presence" in the Christian Bible, including the idea of a "Black Jesus".

Kwanzaa

In 1966 Maulana Karenga of the black separatist US Organization created Kwanzaa; which became the first specifically African American holiday to be widely observed amongst African Americans. Karenga rejected liberation theology and considered the practice of Christianity anti-thetical to the creation of an African-American identity independent from white America. Karenga said his goal was to "give Blacks an alternative to the existing holiday and give Blacks an opportunity to celebrate themselves and history, rather than simply imitate the practice of the dominant society."

Race and Pan-African identity

Further information: Ancient Egyptian race controversy and Pan-Africanism

Many Afrocentrists seek to challenge concepts such as white privilege, color-blind perspectives, and race-neutral pedagogies. There are strong ties between Afrocentricity and Critical race theory.

Afrocentrists agree with the current scientific consensus that holds that Africans exhibit a range of types and physical characteristics, and that such elements as wavy hair or aquiline facial features are part of a continuum of African types that do not depend on admixture with Caucasian groups. They cite work by Hiernaux and Hassan that they believe demonstrates that populations could vary based on micro-evolutionary principles (climate adaptation, drift, selection), and that such variations existed in both living and fossil Africans.

Afrocentrists have condemned what they consider to be attempts at dividing African peoples into racial clusters as new versions of discredited theories, such as the Hamitic hypothesis and the Dynastic Race Theory. These theories, they contend, attempted to identify certain African ethnicities, such as Nubians, Ethiopians and Somalis, as "Caucasoid" groups that entered Africa to bring civilization to the natives. They believe that Western academics have traditionally limited the peoples they defined as "Black" Africans to those south of the Sahara, but used broader "Caucasoid" or related categories to classify peoples of Egypt or North Africa. Afrocentrists also believe strongly in the work of certain anthropologists who have suggested that there is little evidence to support that the first North African populations were closely related to "Caucasoids" of Europe and western Asia.

In 1964 Afrocentric scholar Cheikh Anta Diop expressed a belief in such a double standard:

But it is only the most gratuitous theory that considers the Dinka, the Nouer and the Masai, among others, to be Caucasoids. What if an African ethnologist were to persist in recognising as white only the blond, blue-eyed Scandinavians, and systematically refused membership to the remaining Europeans, and Mediterraneans in particular—the French, Italians, Greek, Spanish, and Portuguese? Just as the inhabitants of Scandinavia and the Mediterranean countries must be considered as two extreme poles of the same anthropological reality, so should the Negroes of East and West Africa be considered as the two extremes in the reality of the Negro world. To say that a Shillouk, a Dinka, or a Nouer is a Caucasoid is for an African as devoid of sense and scientific interest as would be, to a European, an attitude that maintained that a Greek or a Latin were not of the same race.

French historian Jean Vercoutter has claimed that archaeological workers routinely classified Negroid remains as Mediterranean, even though they found such remains in substantial numbers with ancient artefacts.

Some Afrocentrists have adopted a pan-Africanist perspective that people of color are all "African people" or "diasporic Africans," citing physical characteristics they exhibit in common with Black Africans. Afrocentric scholar Runoko Rashidi writes that they are all part of the "global African community." Some Afrocentric writers include in the African diaspora the Dravidians of India, "Negritos" of Southeast Asia (Thailand, the Philippines and Malaysia); and the aboriginal peoples of Australia and Melanesia.

Pre-Columbian Africa-Americas theories

Main article: Pre-Columbian Africa-Americas contact theories

In the 1970s, Ivan van Sertima advanced the theory that the complex civilizations of the Americas were the result of trans-oceanic influence from the Egyptians or other African civilizations. Such a claim is his primary thesis in They Came Before Columbus, published in 1978. The few hyper-diffusionist writers seek to establish that the Olmec people, who built the first highly complex civilization in Mesoamerica and are considered by some to be the mother civilization for all other civilizations of Mesoamerica, were deeply influenced by Africans. Van Sertima said that the Olmec civilization was a hybrid one of Africans and Native Americans. His theory of pre-Columbian American-African contact has since met with considerable and detailed opposition by scholars of Mesoamerica. Van Sertima has been accused of "doctoring" and twisting data to fit his conclusions, inventing evidence, and ignoring the work of respected Central and South American scholars to advance his own theory. Mainstream historians of Mesoamerica overwhelmingly reject that view with detailed rebuttals.

Claims have been also forwarded contending that African civilizations were founding influences on the Chinese Xia cultures.

Afrocentrism and Ancient Egypt

Main article: Ancient Egyptian race controversy

Several Afrocentrists have claimed that important cultural characteristics of ancient Egypt were indigenous to Africa and that these features were present in other early African civilizations such as the later Kerma and the Meroitic civilizations of Nubia. Scholars who have held this view include Marcus Garvey, George James, Martin Bernal, Ivan van Sertima, John Henrik Clarke, and Molefi Kete Asante as well as the Afrocentrist writers Cheikh Anta Diop and Chancellor Williams. The claim has also been made by many Afrocentric scholars that the Ancient Egyptians themselves were Black African (sub-saharan African) rather than North African/Maghrebi, and that the various invasions on Egypt resulted in the "Africanity" of Ancient Egypt becoming diluted, resulting in the modern diversity seen today. Examining this view, Egyptologist Stuart Tyson Smith, wrote that "Any characterization of race of the ancient Egyptians depends on modern cultural definitions, not on scientific study. Thus, by modern American standards it is reasonable to characterise the Egyptians as 'black', while acknowledging the scientific evidence for the physical diversity of Africans". Smith, however, expressed criticism of Egyptologists and Afrocentrists that defined ancient Egyptians "as members of an essentialist racial category" with perceived "Caucasoid" or "Negroid/Africoid" phenotypes".

As historian Ronald H. Fritze argued, mainstream Egyptologists and other scholars strongly object to Afrocentric Egyptology, viewing it as "theurapetic mythology" for black people, since it fails to provide sufficient evidence or persuasive interpretations to back up its claims.

Stephen Howe, professor in the history and cultures of colonialism at Bristol University, writes that contrary to "Afrocentric speculation, depending on undocumented assertions that the relatively light-skinned people of the lower Nile today descend from Arab conquerors rather than earlier residents". Howe also cited a 1995 publication which stated "the latest major synthetic work on African populations is firmly of the opinion that "It was not the Arabs physically displaced Egyptians. Instead the Egyptians were transformed by relatively small number of immigrants bringing in new ideas, which, when disseminated, created a wider ethnic identity".

S.O.Y. Keita, a biological anthropologist and research affilitate at the Smithsonian Institution who has been described as sympathetic to Afrocentrism, but defined his position as that "it is not a question of “African” “influence”; Ancient Egypt was organically African. Studying early Egypt in its African context is not “Afrocentric,” but simply correct". Keita has argued that the original inhabitants of the Nile Valley were primarily a variety of indigenous Northeast Africans from the areas of the desiccating Sahara and more southerly areas. He reviewed studies on the biological affinities of the Ancient Egyptian population and described the skeletal morphologies of early dynastic Egyptian remains as a "Saharo-tropical African variant". He also noted that over time gene flow from the Near East and Europe added more genetic variability to the region. In 2022, Keita argued that some genetic studies have a "default racialist or racist approach" and should be interpreted in a framework with other sources of evidence. Several other academics, including Christopher Ehret, Fekri Hassan, Bruce Williams, Frank Yurco, Molefi Kete Asante, Lanny Bell and A.J. Boyce across various disciplines have contended that Ancient Egypt was fundamentally an African civilization, with cultural and biological connections to Egypt's African neighbors.

Scholars have challenged the various assertions of Afrocentrists on the cultural and biological characteristics of Ancient Egyptian civilization and its people. At a UNESCO Symposium in the 1970s, some of the participants, including Jean Vercoutter, Serge Sauneron, Gunnar Säve-Söderbergh and Jean Leclant expressed "profound" disagreement with the "Black", homogeneous hypothesis. Despite contestations, UNESCO decided to include his "Origin of the ancient Egyptians" in the General History of Africa, with an editorial comment mentioning the disagreement. However, Diop's chapter was credited as a "painstakingly researched contribution" in the general conclusion of the symposium report by the International Scientific Committee's Rapporteur, Professor Jean Devisse, which nevertheless lead to a "real lack of balance" in the discussion among participants. The ancient world did not employ racial categories such as "Black" or "White" as they had no conception of "race", but rather labeled groups according to their land of origin and cultural traits. However, Keita studying the controversy, finds simplistic political appellations (in the negative or affirmative) describing ancient populations as "black" or "white" to be inaccurate and instead focuses on the ancestry of ancient Egypt as being a part of the native and diverse biological variation of Africa, which includes a variety of phenotypes and skin gradients.

Egyptian Egyptologist Zahi Hawass has gone on record as saying that the Ancient Egyptians were not black and “We believe that the origin of Ancient Egyptians was purely Egyptian based on the discovery made by British Egyptologist Flinders Petrie at Naqada, and this is why the Ancient Egyptian civilisation did not occur in Africa, it occurred only here”. In 2022, Hawass reiterated his view that "Africans have nothing to do with the pyramids scientifically" and stated that Africans "ruled in Egypt in the late Era, at the time of the 25th dynasty". Hawass also accused some international figures of African descent that promoted Afrocentrism of racism and fabrication of Egyptian history.

In 2008, Stuart Tyson Smith expressed criticism of a facial reconstruction of Tutankhamun as "very light-skinned" which reflected "bias" and "predictably and justifiably, it has provoked protests from Afrocentrists" as "Egyptologists have been strangely reluctant to admit that the ancient Egyptians were rather dark-skinned Africans, especially the farther south one goes".

In 2011, Stephen Quirke, professor of Egyptian Archaeology and Philology argued that the UNESCO-sponsored conference on the General History of Africa in 1974 "did not change the Eurocentric climate of research" and of the need to incorporate both African-centred studies and White European, academic perspectives. He later outlined that "research conferences and publications on the history and language of Kemet remain dominated ... by those brought up and trained in European, not African societies and languages (which include Arabic)".

African-American Afrocentric "hoteps" and the far-right

Main article: Hoteps

African-Americans who use the Black Egyptian hypothesis as a source of black pride have been called "the hoteps" (after the Egyptian word hotep). The term has often been used disparagingly by non-hotep African-Americans, some of whom have linked the ideology of the hotep community – which is anti-feminist, anti-gay and anti-Semitic – to the far-right. Hoteps have been described as promoting false histories and misinformation about black people and black history. Some have argued hotep beliefs are too narrow-minded (focusing only on Egypt as opposed to other aspects of African history), and black feminists argue that hoteps perpetuate rape culture by policing women's sexuality and not criticizing predatory black men.

Alkebulan

Among Afrocentrists the name 'Alkebulan' (also spelled 'Al Kebulan' or 'Alkebu Lan') is sometimes used a replacement for 'Africa.' Users often erroneously claim that it derives from the Arabic for 'Land of the Blacks' (in reality Bilad as-Sudan), or alternatively that it comes from one or more indigenous African languages and means 'Garden of Life' or 'Motherland'. The earliest record of the term 'Alkebulan' is the introduction to an 1813 Spanish poem celebrating the defenders of Zaragoza, in which the author claimed an Arabic origin of the term. In the 20th century it was popularized by Yosef Ben-Jochannan, though this is sometimes incorrectly credited to Cheikh Anta Diop in a non-existent book called “The Kemetic History of Afrika”.

Reception

Afrocentrism has encountered opposition from mainstream scholars who charge it with historical inaccuracy, scholarly ineptitude, and racism.

Yaacov Shavit, a critic of the movement, summarises its goals in the preface to his book History in Black, in which he states:

Thus, if historical myths and legends, or an invented history, play such a major role in the founding of every national reconstruction, the question that should concern us here is the nature of the distinct style in which black Americans imagine their past. The answer to this question is that radical Afrocentrism, the subject of this study, which plays a central role in shaping the modern historical world-view of a large section of the African-American (or Afro-American) community, is far more than an effort to follow the line taken by many ethnic groups and nations in modern rewriting, inventing or developing collective identity and national history. Rather, it is a large-scale historical project to rewrite the history of the whole of humankind from an Afrocentric point of view. The result is a new reconstruction of world history: it is a universal history.

Other critics, such as Mary Lefkowitz, contend that the Afrocentric historical approach is entrenched in myth and fantasy. She argues that Afrocentrism is grounded in identity politics and myth rather than sound scholarship. In The Skeptic's Dictionary, philosophy professor Robert Todd Carroll labeled Afrocentrism "pseudohistorical". He argued that Afrocentrism's prime goal was to encourage black nationalism and ethnic pride in order to effectively combat the destructive consequences of cultural and universal racism. Professor of history Clarence E. Walker has described Afrocentrism as "a mythology that is racist, reactionary, essentially therapeutic" and "Eurocentrism in black face."

Classicist Mary Lefkowitz rejects George James's theories about Egyptian contributions to Greek civilization as being faulty scholarship. She writes that ancient Egyptian texts show little similarity to Greek philosophy. Lefkowitz states that Aristotle could not have stolen his ideas from the great Library at Alexandria as James suggested, because the library was founded after Aristotle's death. On the basis of such errors, Lefkowitz calls Afrocentrism "an excuse to teach myth as history." Mary Lefkowitz in 1997 whilst criticising elements of Afrocentrism had acknowledged that the origins of the ancient Egyptians were more clear due to the "recent evidence on skeletons and DNA suggests that the people who settled in the Nile valley, like all of humankind, came from somewhere south of the Sahara; they were not (as some nineteenth-century scholars had supposed) invaders from the North."

In 2002, Ibrahim Sundiata wrote in the American Historical Review that:

The word "Afrocentric" has been traced by Derrick Alridge to the American historian W.E.B. Du Bois, who employed it in the early 1960s. During the 1970s, Molefi Kete Asante appropriated the term, insisting that he was the only person equipped to define it, and asserting that even the holy archangels Du Bois and Cheikh Anta Diop had an imperfect and immature grasp of a concept that finds ultimate expression in his own pontifications. Subsequently, it became a catchall "floating signifier," nebulous, unstable, and infinitely mutable.

Literature and languages scholar Cain Hope Felder, a supporter of Afrocentric ideas, has warned Afrocentrists to avoid certain pitfalls, including:

  • Demonizing categorically all white people, without careful differentiation between persons of goodwill and those who consciously perpetuate racism.
  • Adopting multiculturalism as a curricular alternative that eliminates, marginalizes, or vilifies European heritage to the point that Europe epitomizes all the evil in the world.
  • Gross over-generalizations and using factually or incorrect material is bad history and bad scholarship.

Nathan Glazer writes that although Afrocentricity can mean many things, the popular press has generally given most attention to its most outlandish theories. Glazer agrees with many of the findings and conclusions presented in Lefkowitz's book Not Out of Africa. Yet he also argues that Afrocentrism often presents legitimate and relevant scholarship. The late Manning Marable was also a critic of Afrocentrism. He wrote:

Populist Afrocentrism was the perfect social theory for the upwardly mobile black petty bourgeoisie. It gave them a sense of ethnic superiority and cultural originality, without requiring the hard, critical study of historical realities. It provided a philosophical blueprint to avoid concrete struggle within the real world... It was, in short, only the latest theoretical construct of a politics of racial identity, a world-view designed to discuss the world but never really to change it.

Some Afrocentrists agree in rejecting those works which critics have characterized as examples of bad scholarship. Adisa A. Alkebulan states that the work of Afrocentric scholars is not fully appreciated because critics use the claims of "a few non-Afrocentrists" as "an indictment against Afrocentricity."

In 1996, the historian August Meier critically reviewed the new work of Mary Lefkowitz on Afrocentrism as "Eurocentric". He criticized her book Not Out of Africa: How Afrocentrism Became an Excuse to Teach Myth as History for what he saw as her neglect of the African-American historic literature of the 19th and 20th centuries. Meier believes she fails to take the African-American experiences into account, to the extent that she "fails to answer the question raised in this book's subtitle."

Maghan Keita describes the controversy over Afrocentrism as a cultural war. He believes certain "epistemologies" are warring with each other: the "epistemology of blackness" argues for the "responsibilities and potential of black peoples to function in and contribute to the progress of civilization."

List of prominent authors

  • Marimba Ani, professor, author and activist: Yurugu: An Afrikan-centered Critique of European Cultural Thought and Behavior (Trenton: Africa World Press, 1994).
  • Molefi Kete Asante, professor, author: Afrocentricity: The Theory of Social Change; The Afrocentric Idea; The Egyptian Philosophers: Ancient African Voices from Imhotep to Akhenaten
  • Jacob Carruthers, Egyptologist; founding director of the Association for the Study of Classical African Civilization; founder and director of the Kemetic Institute, Chicago
  • Cheikh Anta Diop, author: The African Origin of Civilization: Myth or Reality; Civilization or Barbarism: An Authentic Anthropology; Precolonial Black Africa; The Cultural Unity of Black Africa: The Domains of Patriarchy and of Matriarchy in Classical Antiquity; The Peopling of Ancient Egypt & the Deciphering of the Meroitic Script
  • Yosef Ben-Jochannan, author: African Origins of Major "Western Religions"; Black Man of the Nile and His Family; Africa: Mother of Western Civilization; New Dimensions in African History; The Myth of Exodus and Genesis and the Exclusion of Their African Origins; Abu Simbel to Ghizeh: A Guide Book and Manual
  • Jones, Gayl (1998). The Healing. Boston: Beacon Press. ISBN 978-0-8070-6314-9. The protagonist of this novel describes her ongoing daily experiences in the US using a consistently Afrocentric perspective.
  • Runoko Rashidi, author: Introduction to African Civilizations; The global African community: The African presence in Asia, Australia, and the South Pacific
  • J.A. Rogers, author: Sex and Race: Negro-Caucasian Mixing in All Ages and All Lands: The Old World; Nature Knows No Color Line; Sex and Race: A History of White, Negro, and Indian Miscegenation in the Two Americas: The New World; 100 Amazing Facts About the Negro With Complete Proof: A Short Cut to the World History of the Negro
  • Ivan van Sertima, author: They Came before Columbus: The African Presence in Ancient America, African Presence in Early Europe ISBN 0-88738-664-4; Blacks in Science Ancient and Modern; African Presence in Early Asia; African Presence in Early America; Early America Revisited; Egypt Revisited: Journal of African Civilizations; Nile Valley Civilizations; Egypt: Child of Africa (Journal of African Civilizations, V. 12); The Golden Age of the Moor (Journal of African Civilizations, Vol. 11, Fall 1991); Great Black Leaders: Ancient and Modern; Great African Thinkers: Cheikh Anta Diop
  • Chancellor Williams, author: The Destruction of Black Civilization: Great Issues of a Race from 4500 B.C. to 2000 A.D.
  • Théophile Obenga, author: Ancient Egypt and Black Africa: a student's handbook for the study of Ancient Egypt in philosophy, linguistics, and gender relations
  • Asa Hilliard, III, author: SBA: The Reawakening of the African Mind; The Teachings of Ptahhotep

See also

References

  1. "Recent" here means in the last few thousand years, as opposed to in the Stone Age, for example 70,000 years ago
  2. CC Verharen, "Molefi Asante...”, The Western Journal of Black Studies, (24)4, 2000, pp. 223–238
  3. Asante on Afrocentricity Archived 23 November 2018 at the Wayback Machine.
  4. Gates, Henry Louis, and Kwame Anthony Appiah (eds), Africana: The Encyclopedia of the African and African-American Volume 1, p. 111, Oxford University Press. 2005. ISBN 0-19-517055-5
  5. General History of Africa, Vol 1, p41, UNESCO, 1981
  6. "Kenneth O. Dike Dies in a Nigerian Hospital". The New York Times. 13 November 1983.
  7. Molefi Asante, The Painful Demise of Eurocentrism: An Afrocentric Response to Critics, foreword by Maulana Karenga: "Molefi Asante, the founding and preeminent theorist of Afrocentricity, is one of the most important intellectuals at work today. This work continues his tradition of combining an extraordinary intellectual range with an impressive ability to identify and clarify central issues in the current discourse on Afrocentricity, multiculturalism, race, culture, ethnicity and related themes. Dr. Asante offers an insightful and valuable response to Eurocentric critics of the Afrocentric initiative while simultaneously addressing a wide range of issues critical to understanding this important intellectual enterprise, including African agency, location, orientation, centerdness, subject-place and cultural groundedness. The volume is thoughtful, multifaceted and rewarding, and yields a rich sense of the contours and complexity of the Afrocentric project." --Dr. Maulana Karenga, Chair, Department of Black Studies, California State University, Long Beach."
  8. Andrade, Susan Z. (1990). "Rewriting History, Motherhood, and Rebellion: Naming an African Women's Literary Tradition". Research in African Literatures. 21 (1): 91–110. JSTOR 3819303.
  9. Woodson, Carter Godwin (1933). The Mis-education of the Negro. ReadaClassic.com. p. 7. GGKEY:LYULWKX4YJQ.
  10. Howe, Stephen (1998). Afrocentrism: Mythical Pasts and Imagined Homes. Verso Books. p. 10. ISBN 978-1-85984-228-7.
  11. Bracey, Earnest N. (1 January 1999). Prophetic Insight: The Higher Education and Pedagogy of African Americans. Lanham, Maryland: University Press of America. p. 7. ISBN 978-0-7618-1384-2.
  12. ^ Marable, Manning (1995). Beyond Black and White: Transforming African-American Politics. Verso Books. p. 192. ISBN 978-1-85984-924-8.
  13. ^ Banner-haley, C.P.; Walker, Clarence E. (2003). "We Can't Go Home Again: An Argument about Afrocentrism". Journal of Southern History. 69 (3): 663–665. doi:10.2307/30040016. JSTOR 30040016. Retrieved 13 November 2007.
  14. Moses, Wilson Jeremiah (13 September 1998). Afrotopia: The Roots of African American Popular History. Cambridge University Press. pp. 44–. ISBN 978-0-521-47941-7.
  15. Levine, Robert (2008). "Elegant Inconsistencies: Race, Nation, and Writing in Wilson Jeremiah Moses's Afrotopia". American Literary History. 20 (3): 497. doi:10.1093/alh/ajn016. S2CID 143005947.
  16. Thairu, Kihumbu (1975). The African Civilization. East African Literature Bureau.
  17. ^ Asante, Molefi K. (2007). An Afrocentric Manifesto. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press. p. 6. ISBN 978-07456-4102-7.
  18. Asante, Molefi K. (1998). The Afrocentric Idea. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press. pp. ix–xiii. ISBN 1-56639-595-X.
  19. Asante, Molefi K. (2007). An Afrocentric Manifesto. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press. p. 17. ISBN 978-07456-4102-7.
  20. Du Bois, W. E. B., Black Reconstruction in America, 1860–1880. New York: Harcourt Brace, 1935; reprint New York: The Free Press, 1998.
  21. "Reconstruction". Accessed 19 November 2007. Archived 2009-10-31.
  22. Moses, Greg. "Afrocentricity as a Quest for Cultural Unity: Reading Diop in English". National Association for African American Studies. Archived from the original on 12 December 2007. Retrieved 13 November 2007.
  23. De-Westernizing Communication: Strategies for Neutralizing Cultural Myths.
  24. Olaniyan, T. (2006). "From Black Aesthetics To Afrocentrism (or, A Small History of an African And African American Discursivepractice)". West Africa Review. ISSN 1525-4488.
  25. Victor Oguejiofor Okafor, "The Place of Africalogy in the University Curriculum", Journal of Black Studies, vol. 26 no. 6, July 1999, pp. 688–712.
  26. Kete Asante, Molefi, "Afrocentricity: Toward a New Understanding of African Thought in this Millennium", University of Liverpool, 2 August 2000, accessed 11 February 2009 Archived 2 March 2009 at the Wayback Machine.
  27. Woodson, Dr. Carter G. (1933). The Mis-Education of the Negro. Khalifah's Booksellers & Associates.
  28. Akbar, Dr. Na'im (1998).
  29. Peters, Ronald Edward (ed.), Africentric Approaches to Christian Ministry: Strengthening Urban Congregations in African American Communities, University Press of America (2006), ISBN 978-0-7618-3264-5.
  30. Jaynes, Gerald D., ed. (2005). Encyclopedia of African American society. Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE Publications. p. 420. ISBN 1452265410. Retrieved 26 September 2015.
  31. Alexander, Ron (30 December 1983). "The Evening Hours". The New York Times". Retrieved 15 December 2006.
  32. Karenga, Maulana (1967). "Religion". In Clyde Halisi, James Mtume. The Quotable Karenga. Los Angeles: University of Sankore Press. pp. 25. 23769.8.
  33. Mugane, John M. (15 July 2015). The Story of Swahili. Athens, Ohio: Ohio University Press. p. 255. ISBN 978-0-89680-489-0.
  34. Leonardo, Zeus (2005). Critical Pedagogy and Race, p. 129 ISBN 1-4051-2968-9.
  35. ^ Hiernaux, J. (1974). The People of Africa. Weidenfeld and Nicolson.
  36. Hassan, F.A. (1988). "The Predynastic of Egypt". Journal of World Prehistory. 2 (2): 135–185. doi:10.1007/BF00975416. JSTOR 25800540. S2CID 153321928.
  37. Keita, S. (1992). "Further Studies of Crania From Ancient Northern Africa: An Analysis of Crania From First Dynasty Egyptian Tombs, Using Multiple Discriminant Functions". American Journal of Physical Anthropology. 87 (3): 245–54. doi:10.1002/ajpa.1330870302. PMID 1562056.
  38. Jean Vercoutter, The Peopling of Ancient Egypt and the Deciphering Meroitic Script. Paris: UNESCO, 1978, pp. 15–36.
  39. ^ Ortiz de Montellano, Bernardo; Gabriel Haslip Viera; Warren Barbour (1997). "They were NOT here before Columbus: Afrocentric hyper-diffusionism in the 1990s". Ethnohistory. 44 (2): 199–234. doi:10.2307/483368. JSTOR 483368.
  40. Sherwin, Elisabeth. "Clarence Walker encourages black Americans to discard Afrocentrism". Davis Community Network. Archived from the original on 17 October 2007. Retrieved 13 November 2007.
  41. Diop, C.A. (1964). "Evolution of the Negro world'". 23 (51): 5–15. {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  42. Bruce Williams, "The lost pharaohs of Nubia", in Ivan van Sertima (ed.), Egypt Revisited (New Brunswick, NJ, Transaction, 1993).
  43. Van Sertima, Ivan (1994). Egypt, Child of Africa. Transaction Publishers. ISBN 1-56000-792-3.
  44. Smith, Stuart Tyson (2001). Redford, Donald (ed.). The Oxford encyclopedia of ancient Egypt. Vol. 3. Oxford University Press. pp. 27–28.
  45. Fritze, Ronald H. (4 February 2021). Egyptomania: A History of Fascination, Obsession and Fantasy. Reaktion Books. p. 333. ISBN 978-1-78023-685-8. Mainstream Egyptologists and other scholars strongly object to Afrocentric Egyptology. It is viewed as a 'therapeutic mythology' that is not based on convincing evidence or persuasive interpretations.
  46. "Author Page". openDemocracy. 23 June 2012. Retrieved 7 May 2020.
  47. Howe, Stephen (1998). Afrocentrism: Mythical Pasts and Imagined Homes. Verso. p. 137. ISBN 9781859848739.
  48. Cornell University Courses of Study. Cornell University. 1996. p. 423. We shall then read from the works of "Afrocentrist" writers of history including Chancellor Williams, Yosef ben Yochanen and Chiekh Anta Diop as well as those of sympathetic scholars such as St. Clair Drake and Shomarka Keita.
  49. Kamugisha, Aaron (July 2003). "Finally in Africa? Egypt, from Diop to Celenko". Race & Class. 45 (1): 31–60. doi:10.1177/0306396803045001002. ISSN 0306-3968. S2CID 145514370.
  50. "Finally in Africa? Egypt, from Diop to Celenko". SEYFETTİN. 16 January 2007.
  51. Keita, S. O. Y. (1993). "Studies and Comments on Ancient Egyptian Biological Relationships". History in Africa. 20: 129–154. doi:10.2307/3171969. ISSN 0361-5413. JSTOR 3171969. S2CID 162330365.
  52. Keita Shomarka. (2022). "Ancient Egyptian "Origins and "Identity" In Ancient Egyptian society : challenging assumptions, exploring approaches. Abingdon, Oxon. pp. 124–135. ISBN 978-0367434632.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)
  53. Celenko, Theodore (1996). Egypt in Africa. Indianapolis, Ind.: Indianapolis Museum of Art. pp. 1–134. ISBN 0936260645.
  54. UNESCO, "Symposium on the Peopling of Ancient Egypt and the Deciphering of the Meroitic Script; Proceedings", (Paris, 1978), pp. 3–134.
  55. Ancient civilizations of Africa (Abridged ed.). London : J. Currey. 1990. pp. 43–46. ISBN 0852550928.
  56. Mokhtar, Gamal (1990). Ancient Civilizations of Africa (Unesco International Scientific Committee for the Drafting of a General History of Africa). Currey. p. 33. ISBN 978-0-85255-092-2.
  57. The peopling of ancient Egypt and the deciphering of Meroitic script : proceedings of the symposium held in Cairo from 28 January to 3 February 1974. Paris: Unesco. 1978. pp. 86, 93–94, 99. ISBN 92-3-101605-9.
  58. Agustà (2007). "Advancing Biocultural Perspectives: Optimism from a Workshop". Anthropology News. 48 (9): 19–20. doi:10.1525/an.2007.48.9.19.; see also "Forensic Misclassification of Ancient Nubian Crania: Implications for Assumptions About Human Variation", Frank L'Engle Williams, Robert L. Belcher, George J. Armelago's, Current Anthropology. (2005); An Analysis of Crania From Tell-Duweir Using Multiple Discriminant Functions, S. O. Y. Keita, American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 75: 375–390 (1988); "Interpreting African Genetic Diversity, S. O. Y. Keita & Rick Kittles, African Archaeological Review, Vol. 16, No. 2 (1999); "Race": Confusion About Zoological and Social Taxonomies, and Their Places in Science", S. O. Y. Keita, A. J. Boyce, Field Museum of Chicago Institute of Biological Anthropology, Oxford University, American Journal of Human Biology, 13: 569–575 (2001).
  59. Samil, Nehar (2021). "Claims that Ancient Egyptians were black untrue: Zahi Hawass". Daily News Egypt. Retrieved 8 September 2022.
  60. "Egyptians Create Viral Hashtag Against Kevin Hart's Cairo Performance". 14 August 2024.
  61. Smith, Stuart Tyson (1 January 2008). "Review of From Slave to Pharaoh: The Black Experience of Ancient Egypt by Donald Redford". Near Eastern Archaeology 71:3.
  62. Egypt in its African context : proceedings of the conference held at the Manchester Museum, University of Manchester, 2–4 October 2009. Oxford: Archaeopress. 2011. pp. 7–9. ISBN 978-1407307602.
  63. ^ Lovett, Miranda (21 July 2020). "Reflecting on the Rise of the Hoteps". Sapiens. Retrieved 7 July 2021.
  64. Young, Damon (5 March 2016). "Hotep, Explained". The Root. Retrieved 7 July 2021.
  65. Sheffield, Matthew (23 April 2018). "Laura Ingraham meets the Afrocentric "alt-right" — and it's every bit as weird as it sounds". Salon. Retrieved 7 July 2021.
  66. Bastién, Angelica Jade (17 October 2016). "'Insecure' Season 1, Episode 2: Failure to Change". The New York Times. Retrieved 7 July 2021.
  67. Bowen, Sesali (8 May 2018). "What Dear White People Got Right About Hoteps". refinery29. Retrieved 7 July 2021.
  68. Maku, Bright (6 February 2023). "Alkebulan: Understanding the origins behind Africa's original name". Skabash!. Retrieved 10 May 2024.
  69. "The Ancient Name for Africa was "Alkebulan" meaning "Mother of Mankind"". The African History. 3 July 2020. Retrieved 10 May 2024.
  70. "Alkebulan: The Original Name Of Africa And How To Pronounce It". Africa Global Radio. 15 March 2022. Retrieved 10 May 2024.
  71. Jacobs, Frank (11 November 2014). "Africa, uncolonized: a detailed look at an alternate continent". Big Think. Retrieved 10 May 2024.
  72. Early, Gerald (17 May 2002). "Afrocentrism". Encyclopedia Britannica. Retrieved 2 August 2022.
  73. Yaacov Shavit, History in Black: African-Americans in Search of an Ancient Past, Frank Cass Publishers, 2001, pp. vii.
  74. ^ Stearns, Peter N. (2008). The Oxford Encyclopedia of the Modern World: 1750 to the Present. Oxford University Press. p. 59. ISBN 978-0-19-517632-2. Opponents of Afrocentrism claim that this approach is entrenched in myth and fantasy. Mary Lefkowitz, in Not Out of Africa, argues that Afrocentrism is grounded in identity politics and not in sound scholarship.
  75. ^ *Afrocentrism by Robert Todd Carroll, Skeptic's Dictionary.
  76. Robert Todd Carroll (2003), The Skeptic's Dictionary: A Collection of Strange Beliefs, Amusing Deceptions, and Dangerous Delusions, New York: John Wiley & Sons, ISBN 0-471-27242-6 (paperback). p. 148
  77. Lefkowitz 1996, pp. 125–126, 137–141
  78. Lefkowitz, Mary R. (1996). Not out of Africa : how Afrocentrism became an excuse to teach myth as history. New York. p. 242. ISBN 046509838X.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)
  79. Ibrahim Sundiata, "The Argument We Are Really Having", American Historical Review, (1996).
  80. ^ Hope Felder, Cain (1994). "Afrocentrism, the Bible, and the Politics of Difference". The Princeton Seminary Bulletin. XV (2).
  81. ^ Nathan Glazer, We Are All Multiculturalists Now, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1997 ISBN 0-674-94836-X.
  82. Adisa A. Alkebulan, "Defending the Paradigm", Journal of Black Studies, Vol. 37, No. 3, pp. 410–427 (2007).
  83. Meier, August, "Review: Mary Lefkowitz, Not out of Africa: How Afrocentrism became an Excuse to Teach Myth as History", Journal of American History, December 1996.
  84. Maghan Keita, Race and the Writing of History: Riddling the Sphinx, p. 7.
  85. Africawithin.com.
  86. Clarke, John Henrik. "Cheikh Anta Diop and the New Light on African History". nbufront.org. National Black United Front. Archived from the original on 19 February 2009. Retrieved 15 October 2015.
  87. "Cheikh Anta Diop, The Pharoah [sic] of Knowledge". Archived from the original on 13 June 2007. Retrieved 15 October 2015.
  88. Rashidi, Runoko. "The Global African Presence". cwo.com. Archived from the original on 14 January 2012. Retrieved 15 October 2015.
  89. Sertima, Ivan Van. "Journal of African Civilizations". cwo.com. Archived from the original on 26 April 2006. Retrieved 15 October 2015.

Literature

Primary

Secondary

External links

Pan-Africanism
Ideology
Variants
Concepts
Proponents
Politicians
Others
Organizations
Educational
Political
Symbols
Dynamics
Related
Ethnocentrism
Regional variants
Related phenomena
Categories: