Revision as of 06:17, 11 March 2022 edit117.228.216.57 (talk) Undid revision 1076331849 by Shankargb (talk)Tags: Undo Reverted← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 08:23, 27 December 2024 edit undoMaxeto0910 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users93,201 edits removed completely unsourced entries; see talk page for other reasonTags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit | ||
(413 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Short description|Entity speculated to be or become a superpower}} | |||
{{Multiple issues| | |||
{{ |
{{Use Oxford spelling|date=May 2020}} | ||
[[File:Superpower.svg|thumb|300px| | |||
{{undue|date=April 2021}} | |||
{{more citations needed|date=April 2021}} | |||
{{outdated|date=April 2021}} | |||
}} | |||
{{short description|Entity speculated to become a superpower}} | |||
{{Use British English Oxford spelling|date=May 2020}} | |||
[[File:Superpower.png|thumb|300px| | |||
'''Extant superpower''' | '''Extant superpower''' | ||
{{legend|#ffff00|]}} | {{legend|#ffff00|]}} | ||
Line 15: | Line 8: | ||
{{legend|#000080|]}} | {{legend|#000080|]}} | ||
{{legend|#00ff00|]}} | {{legend|#00ff00|]}} | ||
{{legend|#ff6600|]}}]] | {{legend|#ff6600|]}} | ||
]] | |||
A '''potential superpower''' is a ] or other ] that is speculated to be or have the potential to become a ]; a sovereign state or ] that holds a dominant position characterized by the ability to ] and ] on a global scale through economic, military, technological, political, and/or cultural means.<ref name="Munro1">{{cite web |last1=Munro |first1=André |title=superpower |url=https://www.britannica.com/topic/superpower |access-date=2 May 2023 |website=Encyclopedia Britannica}}</ref><ref name="Mark1">{{cite news |last=Leonard |first=Mark |date=18 February 2005 |title=Europe: the new superpower |work=] |url=http://www.cer.org.uk/articles/leonard_irish_times_18feb05.html |access-date=31 May 2015 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090327034443/http://www.cer.org.uk/articles/leonard_irish_times_18feb05.html |archive-date=27 March 2009}}</ref><ref>{{cite book |last=McCormick |first=John |title=The European Superpower |date=2007 |publisher=] |author-link=John McCormick (political scientist)}}</ref> | |||
A '''potential superpower''' is a ] or a political and economic entity that is speculated to be—or to have the potential to soon become—a ]. | |||
After the ], which, following the ], is currently considered to be the world's ]<ref>{{Cite web |last=Lee |first=Yen Nee |date=2020-09-17 |title=The U.S. is still a dominant power — but it's not clear if it remains the global leader |url=https://www.cnbc.com/2020/09/17/us-is-still-a-dominant-power-but-it-may-not-be-the-global-leader.html |access-date=2024-07-15 |website=CNBC |language=en}}</ref> and sole widely undisputed<ref>{{Cite web |last=Mathew Burrows |first=Robert A. Manning |date=2020-08-17 |title=What Happens When America Is No Longer the Undisputed Super Power? |url=https://nationalinterest.org/feature/what-happens-when-america-no-longer-undisputed-super-power-166828 |access-date=2024-07-15 |website=The National Interest |language=en}}</ref>—and by some accounts only<ref>{{Cite magazine |last=Bremmer |first=Ian |date=2015-05-28 |title=5 Reasons Why the US Remains the World's Only Superpower |url=https://time.com/3899972/us-superpower-status-military/ |access-date=2024-07-15 |magazine=TIME |language=en}}</ref><ref>{{Cite book |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=nTKBdY5HBeUC&q=Canada%2520Among%2520Nations%252C%25202004%253A%2520Setting%2520Priorities+Straight |title=Canada Among Nations, 2004: Setting Priorities Straight |date=17 January 2005 |publisher=McGill-Queen's Press – MQUP |isbn=978-0-7735-2836-9 |page=85 |quote=The United States is the sole world's superpower. |access-date=15 July 2024 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230116145100/https://books.google.com/books?id=nTKBdY5HBeUC&q=Canada%2520Among%2520Nations%252C%25202004%253A%2520Setting%2520Priorities+Straight |archive-date=16 January 2023 |url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |last=Dannatt |first=Richard |date=2024-04-14 |title=America has just reminded us there is only one world superpower |url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2024/04/14/america-has-just-reminded-us-who-is-the-worlds-superpower/ |access-date=2024-07-15 |work=The Telegraph |language=en-GB |issn=0307-1235}}</ref>—superpower, only ], the ], ], and ] have consistently been academically discussed as potential superpowers of the 21st century, with ] having been a former candidate in the 1980s. | |||
Currently, only the ] fulfills the criteria to be considered a superpower.<ref>{{cite book|title=From Colony to Superpower: U.S. Foreign Relations since 1776|url=https://archive.org/details/fromcolonytosupe1776herr|url-access=limited|first=George|last=C. Herring|publisher=Oxford University Press|page=|year=2008|isbn=978-0-19-507822-0}}</ref> However, the United States is no longer the only uncontested ] superpower and the world's sole ] to dominate in every domain (i.e. military, culture, economy, technology, diplomatic).<ref>{{Cite web|last=Allison|first=Graham|date=2020-10-15|title=China Is Now the World's Largest Economy. We Shouldn't Be Shocked.|url=https://nationalinterest.org/feature/china-now-world%E2%80%99s-largest-economy-we-shouldn%E2%80%99t-be-shocked-170719|access-date=2020-10-23|website=The National Interest|language=en}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|title=Asia Power Index {{!}} US|url=https://power.lowyinstitute.org/countries/united-states/|access-date=2020-10-20|website=power.lowyinstitute.org|language=en|quote="The United States remains the most powerful country in the region but registered the largest fall in relative power of any Indo–Pacific country in 2020. A ten-point overall lead over China two years ago has been narrowed by half in 2020."}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|date=2011-09-07|title=From Hyperpower to Declining Power|url=https://www.pewresearch.org/global/2011/09/07/from-hyperpower-to-declining-power/|access-date=2020-10-22|website=Pew Research Center's Global Attitudes Project|language=en-US}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|last=Walt|first=Stephen M.|title=How to Ruin a Superpower|url=https://foreignpolicy.com/2020/07/23/how-to-ruin-a-superpower/|access-date=2020-10-22|website=Foreign Policy|language=en-US}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|title=America's innovation edge now in peril, says Baker Institute, American Academy of Arts and Sciences report|url=https://news.rice.edu/2020/09/30/americas-innovation-edge-now-in-peril-says-baker-institute-american-academy-of-arts-and-sciences-report/|access-date=2020-10-23|website=news.rice.edu}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|date=2019-10-22|title=China will overtake US in tech race|url=https://www.omfif.org/2019/10/china-will-overtake-us-in-tech-race/|access-date=2020-10-23|website=OMFIF|language=en-GB}}</ref><ref name=":2">{{Cite news|date=2019-11-27|title=China now has more diplomatic posts than any other country|language=en-GB|work=BBC News|url=https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-china-50569237|access-date=2020-10-21}}</ref> China on the other hand, has been referred to as an emerging superpower, given that Beijing's power is now beyond the classification of a Great Power.<ref>{{cite news|author=Dan De Luce|url=https://news.yahoo.com/9-11-china-grew-superpower-100340852.html|location=London|title=This is the relationship that will define global politics|date=17 October 2021}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|author=Michael Schuman|url=https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-10-27/china-rise-to-global-superpower-is-a-restoration-not-an-ascent|location=Bloomberg|title=China's inexorable rise to Superpower is history repeating itself|date=27 October 2020}}</ref> | |||
Since the 1990s, ],<ref>{{cite news|author=Jacques Martin|url=https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2006/jun/15/comment.china|work=The Guardian|location=London|title=This is the relationship that will define global politics|date=15 June 2006|access-date=22 May 2010}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal|author=Emmanuel Solomon John|url=https://www.researchgate.net/publication/333759875|title=China: Emerging superpower|date=June 2019}}</ref><ref>{{cite report|author=Anthony H. Cordesman|url=https://csis-prod.s3.amazonaws.com/s3fs-public/publication/190912_China_Grand_Strategy_Full-Report.pdf|work=]|title=China and the U.S.: Cooperation, Competition and/or Conflict|date=12 September 2019}}</ref> ],<ref name="elephantdragon">{{cite book|author=Robyn Meredith|title=The Elephant and the Dragon: The Rise of India and China and What it Means for All of Us|publisher=W.W Norton and Company|year=2007|isbn=978-0-393-33193 6|url=https://archive.org/details/elephantdragonri00mere}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=http://realtruth.org/articles/434-iasitm.html|title=India – A Superpower in the Making?}}</ref> the ]<ref name="rjguttman">{{cite book|last=Guttman|first=R.J.|date=2001|url=https://archive.org/details/europeinnewcentu00robe|url-access=registration|title=Europe in the New Century|publisher=]|isbn=9781555878528}}</ref> and ]<ref name="Russia in the 21st Century">{{cite book|author=Steven Rosefielde|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=eC6HdSYZhRgC|title=Russia in the 21st Century: The Prodigal Superpower|publisher=Cambridge University Press|year=2005|isbn=978-0-521-83678-4|author-link=Steven Rosefielde|access-date=13 September 2015}}</ref> have been commonly described as potential superpowers. ] was formerly considered a potential superpower due to its ].<ref name="Zakaria, F 2008">{{cite book|last=Zakaria|first=Fareed|url=https://archive.org/details/postamericanworl00zaka_199|title=The Post-American World|date=2008|publisher=W. W. Norton and Company|isbn=978-0-393-06235-9|page=|author-link=Fareed Zakaria|url-access=limited}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news|date=November 12, 2009|title=Land of the setting sun|url=https://www.economist.com/business/2009/11/12/land-of-the-setting-sun|newspaper=The Economist}}</ref><ref>{{cite magazine|date=July 4, 1988|title=Japan From Superrich To Superpower|url=http://content.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,967823,00.html|magazine=]}}</ref> However, its status as a potential superpower has eroded since the 1990s due to an ] and ].<ref name="Leika Kihara">{{cite news|title=Japan eyes end to decades long deflation|url=https://www.reuters.com/article/japan-economy-estimate-idUSL4E8JH1TC20120817#ySOkSfW3bZs8lVWK.97|author=Leika Kihara|work=Reuters|date=17 August 2012|access-date=7 September 2012}}</ref> | |||
Collectively these potential superpowers, and the United States, comprise ], ], more than ], and ].<ref>{{cite web|url = http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/weo/2015/01/weodata/weorept.aspx?pr.x=23&pr.y=9&sy=2014&ey=2014&scsm=1&ssd=1&sort=country&ds=.&br=1&c=512%2C668%2C914%2C672%2C612%2C946%2C614%2C137%2C311%2C962%2C213%2C674%2C911%2C676%2C193%2C548%2C122%2C556%2C912%2C678%2C313%2C181%2C419%2C867%2C513%2C682%2C316%2C684%2C913%2C273%2C124%2C868%2C339%2C921%2C638%2C948%2C514%2C943%2C218%2C686%2C963%2C688%2C616%2C518%2C223%2C728%2C516%2C558%2C918%2C138%2C748%2C196%2C618%2C278%2C624%2C692%2C522%2C694%2C622%2C142%2C156%2C449%2C626%2C564%2C628%2C565%2C228%2C283%2C924%2C853%2C233%2C288%2C632%2C293%2C636%2C566%2C634%2C964%2C238%2C182%2C662%2C453%2C960%2C968%2C423%2C922%2C935%2C714%2C128%2C862%2C611%2C135%2C321%2C716%2C243%2C456%2C248%2C722%2C469%2C942%2C253%2C718%2C642%2C724%2C643%2C576%2C939%2C936%2C644%2C961%2C819%2C813%2C172%2C199%2C132%2C733%2C646%2C184%2C648%2C524%2C915%2C361%2C134%2C362%2C652%2C364%2C174%2C732%2C328%2C366%2C258%2C734%2C656%2C144%2C654%2C146%2C336%2C453%2C263%2C528%2C268%2C923%2C532%2C738%2C944%2C578%2C176%2C537%2C534%2C742%2C536%2C866%2C429%2C369%2C433%2C744%2C178%2C186%2C436%2C925%2C136%2C869%2C343%2C746%2C158%2C926%2C439%2C466%2C916%2C112%2C664%2C111%2C826%2C298%2C542%2C927%2C967%2C846%2C443%2C299%2C917%2C582%2C544%2C474%2C941%2C754%2C446%2C698%2C666&s=NGDPD&grp=0&a=|title=World Economic Outlook Database, April 2015|access-date=10 June 2015}}</ref><ref name="IMF Groups">{{cite web|url=http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/weo/2015/01/weodata/weorept.aspx?pr.x=58&pr.y=19&sy=2014&ey=2014&scsm=1&ssd=1&sort=country&ds=.&br=1&c=001%2C998&s=NGDPD&grp=1&a=1|title=Report for Selected Country Groups and Subjects|publisher=]|work=]|date=April 2015|access-date=15 April 2015}}</ref><ref name=imf>{{cite web|url=https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/SPROLLs/world-economic-outlook-databases#sort=%40imfdate%20descending|title=Report for Selected Country Groups and Subjects (PPP valuation of country GDP)|publisher=IMF|access-date=April 8, 2015}}</ref> | |||
== China == | == China == | ||
{{ |
{{Further|Chinese Century|China's peaceful rise|}} | ||
The ] has arguably received the most consistent coverage in the popular press of its potential superpower status,<ref>{{cite web |url = http://edition.cnn.com/SPECIALS/1999/china.50/asian.superpower/ |title = Visions of China – Asian Superpower |website = CNN |year = 1999 |access-date=19 July 2014 }}</ref><ref name=":1">{{cite web |url = https://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/jan/01/china-military-presence-superpower-collision-japan |title = China's military presence is growing. Does a superpower collision loom? |website = The Guardian |date=1 January 2014 |access-date=19 July 2014 }}</ref><ref>{{cite journal|author=Cordesman, Anthony|date=1 October 2019|title=China and the United States: Cooperation, Competition, and/or Conflict|url=https://www.csis.org/analysis/china-and-united-states-cooperation-competition-andor-conflict|access-date=22 March 2021|journal=Center for Strategic and International Studies|quote=Seen from this perspective, such trends clearly that show that China already is a true economic superpower with growing resources and a steadily improving technology base. Its military structure is evolving to the point where China can compare or compete with the U.S. — at least in Asia.}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|author1=Silver, Laura|author2=Devlin, Kat|author3=Huang, Christine|date=5 December 2019|title=China's Economic Growth Mostly Welcomed in Emerging Markets, but Neighbors Wary of Its Influence|url=https://www.pewresearch.org/global/2019/12/05/chinas-economic-growth-mostly-welcomed-in-emerging-markets-but-neighbors-wary-of-its-influence/|access-date=22 March 2021|work=Pew Research Center|quote=China has emerged as a global economic superpower in recent decades. It is not only the world’s second largest economy and the largest exporter by value, but it has also been investing in overseas infrastructure and development at a rapid clip}}</ref><ref name="CNN_naval">{{cite news|author=Lendon, Brad|date=5 March 2021|title=China has built the world's largest navy. Now what's Beijing going to do with it?|publisher=CNN|url=https://www.cnn.com/2021/03/05/china/china-world-biggest-navy-intl-hnk-ml-dst/index.html|access-date=22 March 2021|quote=In 2018, China held 40% of the world's shipbuilding market by gross tons, according to United Nations figures cited by the China Power Project at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, well ahead of second place South Korea at 25%. Put in a historical perspective, China's shipbuilding numbers are staggering – dwarfing even the U.S. efforts of World War II. China built more ships in one year of peace time (2019) than the U.S. did in four of war (1941–1945).}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|author=Lemahieu, Herve|date=29 May 2019|title=Five big takeaways from the 2019 Asia Power Index|url=https://www.lowyinstitute.org/the-interpreter/power-shifts-fevered-times-2019-asia-power-index|access-date=22 March 2021|publisher=Lowy Institute|quote=China, the emerging superpower, netted the highest gains in overall power in 2019, ranking first in half of the eight Index measures. For the first time, China narrowly edged out the United States in the Index’s assessment of economic resources. In absolute terms China’s economy grew by more than the total size of Australia’s economy in 2018. The world’s largest trading nation has also paradoxically seen its GDP become less dependent on exports. This makes China less vulnerable to an escalating trade war than most other Asian economies.}}</ref> and has been identified as a rising or emerging economic and military superpower by academics and other experts.<ref>{{cite web |first = Chito | last=Romana |url = https://abcnews.go.com/International/china-replace-us-top-superpower/story?id=9986355 |title = Does China Want to Be Top Superpower? |website = Abcnews.go.com |date = 2 March 2010 |access-date = 10 February 2012}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url = http://carnegieendowment.org/2006/02/09/from-rural-transformation-to-global-integration-environmental-and-social-impacts-of-china-s-rise-to-superpower/dfi |title = From Rural Transformation to Global Integration: The Environmental and Social Impacts of China's Rise to Superpower – Carnegie Endowment for International Peace |date=9 February 2006 |access-date = 10 February 2012 }}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url = http://www.getabstract.com/en/summary/global-business/china-the-balance-sheet/6584/?isbn= |title = China: The Balance Sheet Summary |website = getabstract.com |year = 2006 |access-date = 19 July 2014 }}</ref><ref>{{cite web |first = Merri B. |last = Uckert |url = http://www.au.af.mil/au/awc/awcgate/awc/uckertmb.pdf |title = China As An Economic and Military Superpower: A Dangerous Combination? |date = April 1995 |access-date = 10 February 2012 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20130115145821/http://www.au.af.mil/au/awc/awcgate/awc/uckertmb.pdf |archive-date = 15 January 2013 |url-status = dead }}</ref> One source argued that "China certainly presents the most promising all-round profile" of a potential superpower, having high economic growth and a large population.<ref name="The United States and the Great Powers">{{cite book |last=Buzan |first=Barry |title=The United States and the Great Powers |publisher=Polity Press |year=2004 |isbn=0-7456-3375-7 |location=Cambridge, United Kingdom |page=70}}</ref> According to ], ], China represents the "biggest geopolitical test of the 21st century" to the United States, as it is "the only country with enough ] to ] the current ]".<ref>{{Cite web |date=2021-03-03 |title=China poses "biggest geopolitical test" for the U.S., Blinken says |url=https://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/china-poses-biggest-geopolitical-test-u-s-says-secretary-state-n1259489 |access-date=2024-07-09 |website=NBC News |language=en}}</ref> | |||
{| style="width:auto; toc:25em; font-size:85%; text-align:left;" class="infobox" | |||
|- | |||
!colspan="4" style="text-align:center; background:#ccf;"|] | |||
|- | |||
|colspan="4" style="text-align:center;"|] | |||
|- | |||
|colspan="4" style="text-align:center;"|] | |||
|} | |||
Great focus has been placed on China's growing economic activity on the global stage, in particular where it has been in competition with the United States. Examples of this have included the establishing and large-scale expansion in countries joining the ] in contrast to traditional western institutions, along with the ] and China's role in the ].<ref name="Foreign Policy-April-1-2015">{{cite magazine|author=Allen-Ebrahimian, Bethany |title=Obama Is Sitting Alone at a Bar Drinking a Consolation Beer|url=https://foreignpolicy.com/2015/04/01/obama-china-bank-aiib-policy/|magazine=]|date=April 1, 2015}}</ref><ref name="Boeing’s Crisis Strengthens Beijing’s Hand-March-20-2019">{{cite magazine|author=Aboulafia, Richard |title=Boeing's Crisis Strengthens Beijing's Hand|url=https://foreignpolicy.com/2019/03/20/boeings-crisis-strengthens-beijings-hand-737max-faa-caac-aviation-regulators-trade-war-china-xi-trump/|magazine=]|date=March 20, 2019}}</ref> It has also been argued that the future is likely to be of growing competition between two highly dominant countries in the form of the United States and China while others begin to lag behind economically.<ref name="Columbia University Press-February-2018">{{Cite book|author=Tunsjø, Øystein |title=The Return of Bipolarity in World Politics: China, the United States, and Geostructural Realism|url=https://cup.columbia.edu/book/the-return-of-bipolarity-in-world-politics/9780231176545|publisher=]|date=February 27, 2018|isbn=9780231546904}}</ref> Predictions have also been made of it overtaking the United States as the world's largest economy in the 2020s.<ref>{{cite web|author=Thair Shaikh |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120311061413/http://articles.cnn.com/2011-06-10/world/china.military.superpower_1_superpower-military-spending-military-dominance/2?_s=PM%3AWORLD |url=http://articles.cnn.com/2011-06-10/world/china.military.superpower_1_superpower-military-spending-military-dominance/2?_s=PM:WORLD |title=When Will China Become a Global Superpower? |publisher=CNN |date=10 June 2011 |archive-date=11 March 2012 |access-date=28 June 2014 |url-status=dead }}</ref> Due to ], China has also been referred to as an "]".<ref>{{Cite book |last=Lee |first=Kai-Fu |title=] |publisher=] |date=September 25, 2018 |language=English}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last=Westerheide |first=Fabian |title=China – The First Artificial Intelligence Superpower |url=https://www.forbes.com/sites/cognitiveworld/2020/01/14/china-artificial-intelligence-superpower/ |access-date=2024-07-19 |website=Forbes |language=en}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |last1=Milmo |first1=Dan |last2=editor |first2=Dan Milmo Global technology |date=2021-12-08 |title=TechScape: how China became an AI superpower ready to take on the United States |url=https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2021/dec/08/techscape-china-ai-united-states |access-date=2024-07-19 |work=The Guardian |language=en-GB |issn=0261-3077}}</ref> | |||
The ] receives continual coverage in the popular press of its emerging superpower status,<ref>{{cite web |url = http://edition.cnn.com/SPECIALS/1999/china.50/asian.superpower/ |title = Visions of China - Asian Superpower |website = CNN |year = 1999 |access-date=19 July 2014 }}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url = https://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/jan/01/china-military-presence-superpower-collision-japan |title = China's military presence is growing. Does a superpower collision loom? |website = The Guardian |date=1 January 2014 |access-date=19 July 2014 }}</ref><ref>{{cite web|author=Cordesman, Anthony|date=1 October 2019|title=China and the United States: Cooperation, Competition, and/or Conflict|url=https://www.csis.org/analysis/china-and-united-states-cooperation-competition-andor-conflict|access-date=22 March 2021|work=Center for Strategic and International Studies|quote=Seen from this perspective, such trends clearly that show that China already is a true economic superpower with growing resources and a steadily improving technology base. Its military structure is evolving to the point where China can compare or compete with the U.S. — at least in Asia.}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|author1=Silver, Laura|author2=Devlin, Kat|author3=Huang, Christine|date=5 December 2019|title=China's Economic Growth Mostly Welcomed in Emerging Markets, but Neighbors Wary of Its Influence|url=https://www.pewresearch.org/global/2019/12/05/chinas-economic-growth-mostly-welcomed-in-emerging-markets-but-neighbors-wary-of-its-influence/|access-date=22 March 2021|work=Pew Research Center|quote=China has emerged as a global economic superpower in recent decades. It is not only the world’s second largest economy and the largest exporter by value, but it has also been investing in overseas infrastructure and development at a rapid clip}}</ref><ref name="CNN_naval">{{cite news|author=Lendon, Brad|date=5 March 2021|title=China has built the world's largest navy. Now what's Beijing going to do with it?|publisher=CNN|url=https://www.cnn.com/2021/03/05/china/china-world-biggest-navy-intl-hnk-ml-dst/index.html|access-date=22 March 2021|quote=In 2018, China held 40% of the world's shipbuilding market by gross tons, according to United Nations figures cited by the China Power Project at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, well ahead of second place South Korea at 25%. Put in a historical perspective, China's shipbuilding numbers are staggering -- dwarfing even the U.S. efforts of World War II. China built more ships in one year of peace time (2019) than the U.S. did in four of war (1941-1945).}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|author=Lemahieu, Herve|date=29 May 2019|title=Five big takeaways from the 2019 Asia Power Index|url=https://www.lowyinstitute.org/the-interpreter/power-shifts-fevered-times-2019-asia-power-index|access-date=22 March 2021|publisher=Lowy Institute|quote=China, the emerging superpower, netted the highest gains in overall power in 2019, ranking first in half of the eight Index measures. For the first time, China narrowly edged out the United States in the Index’s assessment of economic resources. In absolute terms China’s economy grew by more than the total size of Australia’s economy in 2018. The world’s largest trading nation has also paradoxically seen its GDP become less dependent on exports. This makes China less vulnerable to an escalating trade war than most other Asian economies.}}</ref> and has been identified as a rising or emerging economic growth and military superpower by academics and other experts. In fact, the "rise of China" has been named the top news story of the 21st century by the ], as measured by number of appearances in the global print and electronic media, on the Internet and blogosphere, and in social media.<ref>{{cite web |url = http://www.ycwb.com/ePaper/xkb/html/2011-05/07/content_1105830.htm |script-title = zh:21世纪新闻排行中国崛起居首位 |trans-title = The rise of China ranked first place in 21st century news |language = zh-Hans-CN |website = Ycwb.com |date = 7 May 2011 |access-date = 10 February 2012 |url-status=dead |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20110927095901/http://www.ycwb.com/ePaper/xkb/html/2011-05/07/content_1105830.htm |archive-date = 27 September 2011 }}</ref><ref>{{cite web |first = Chito | last=Romana |url = https://abcnews.go.com/International/china-replace-us-top-superpower/story?id=9986355 |title = Does China Want to Be Top Superpower? |website = Abcnews.go.com |date = 2 March 2010 |access-date = 10 February 2012}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url = http://carnegieendowment.org/2006/02/09/from-rural-transformation-to-global-integration-environmental-and-social-impacts-of-china-s-rise-to-superpower/dfi |title = From Rural Transformation to Global Integration: The Environmental and Social Impacts of China's Rise to Superpower - Carnegie Endowment for International Peace |date=9 February 2006 |access-date = 10 February 2012 }}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url = http://www.getabstract.com/en/summary/global-business/china-the-balance-sheet/6584/?isbn= |title = China: The Balance Sheet Summary |website = getabstract.com |year = 2006 |access-date = 19 July 2014 }}</ref><ref>{{cite web |first = Merri B. |last = Uckert |url = http://www.au.af.mil/au/awc/awcgate/awc/uckertmb.pdf |title = China As An Economic and Military Superpower: A Dangerous Combination? |date = April 1995 |access-date = 10 February 2012 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20130115145821/http://www.au.af.mil/au/awc/awcgate/awc/uckertmb.pdf |archive-date = 15 January 2013 |url-status = dead }}</ref> The term "]" has been applied by scholars to the possibility that the People's Republic of China could ] with ] and influence on par with the United States.<ref>{{cite book |title=History of International Broadcasting |first=James|last=Wood |page=155 |publisher=IET |year=2000 }}</ref> The potential for the two countries to form stronger relations to address global issues is sometimes referred to as the ]. | |||
In contrast to this however there have been some who question how long this pace of economic growth could continue, with emphasis placed on China's very large but ] of over 1.4 billion, and long-term effects of pollution within the country that have accumulated during its fast pace of industrialisation, and also that while it continues to grow it has yet to prove attractive to skilled immigration from outside the country in the same way other countries like the United States have.<ref name="articles.economictimes.indiatimes.com">{{cite news |last=Beardson |first=Timothy |date=June 28, 2013 |title=I don't see China becoming a superpower in this century|work=The Times Of India |url=http://articles.economictimes.indiatimes.com/2013-06-28/news/40234296_1_challenges-facing-china-foreign-companies-china-20-years |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160305034514/http://articles.economictimes.indiatimes.com/2013-06-28/news/40234296_1_challenges-facing-china-foreign-companies-china-20-years |archive-date=March 5, 2016}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|author=Timothy Beardson|url=https://www.huffingtonpost.com/timothy-beardson/china-pollution_b_3331929.html|title=Action Needed on the Environment|work=Huffington Post|date=24 May 2013|access-date=26 July 2014 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210226075322/https://www.huffpost.com/entry/china-pollution_b_3331929 |archive-date=February 26, 2021}}</ref><ref>{{cite book|author=Susan Shirk|date=2008|title=China: Fragile Superpower|url=https://archive.org/details/chinafragilesupe00shir|url-access=registration|publisher=Oxford University Press|isbn=978-0-19-537319-6}}</ref><ref name="Chua, A 2007">{{cite book|author=Amy Chua|year=2007|title=Day of Empire: How Hyperpowers Rise to Global Dominance – and Why They Fall|publisher=Random House|isbn=978-0-385-51284-8|url=https://archive.org/details/dayofempirehowhy00chua_0}}</ref> A supposed lack of ] is another aspect of contention to China's status as a potential superpower.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Swain |first=Ashok |date=2021-01-21 |title=China's economy and military can overtake US, but it still won't become global superpower |url=https://theprint.in/opinion/chinas-can-overtake-us-but-it-still-wont-become-global-superpower/588718/ |access-date=2024-07-12 |website=ThePrint |language=en-US}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |title=Today's China will never be a superpower |url=https://www.ft.com/content/233b101e-7d51-11e9-81d2-f785092ab560 |access-date=2024-07-12 |website=www.ft.com}}</ref> | |||
] asserted in 2004 that "China certainly presents the most promising all-round profile" of a potential superpower.<ref name="The United States and the Great Powers">{{cite book|last=Buzan|first=Barry|title=The United States and the Great Powers|publisher=Polity Press|year=2004|location=Cambridge, United Kingdom|page=70|isbn=0-7456-3375-7}}</ref> Buzan claimed that "China is currently the most fashionable potential superpower and the one whose degree of alienation from the dominant international society makes it the most obvious political challenger." However, he noted this challenge is constrained by the major challenges of development and by the fact that its rise could trigger a counter coalition of states in ].{{citation needed|date=June 2015}} | |||
There has been significant discussion around the ability for China to project power militarily. There has been argument that its ties with Russia and Central Asia could see the ] become the "] of the East".<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/27/magazine/27world-t.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0|newspaper=]|last=Khanna|first=Parag|title=Waving Goodbye to Hegemony|access-date=July 19, 2014}}</ref> It has also been argued that American absence from the Indo-Pacific region during the ] has allowed Chinese to actively challenge the United States as the pre-eminent power in the region.<ref>{{cite report|author=Ashley Townshend, Brendan Thomas-Noone, Matilda Steward|url=https://www.ussc.edu.au/analysis/averting-crisis-american-strategy-military-spending-and-collective-defence-in-the-indo-pacific|work=]|title=Averting Crisis: American strategy, military spending and collective defence in the Indo-Pacific|date= 19 August 2019}}</ref> Others have argued however that China still remains surrounded by potentially hostile nations and still lacks few friends or allies necessary for it to truly compete with the United States.<ref>{{cite magazine|author=Minxin Pei|url=https://foreignpolicy.com/2012/03/20/the-loneliest-superpower/|title=The Loneliest Superpower|magazine=Foreign Policy|date=20 March 2012|access-date=28 June 2014 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210505071234/https://foreignpolicy.com/2012/03/20/the-loneliest-superpower/ |archive-date=May 5, 2021}}</ref> | |||
] stated in 2008 that by making massive trade and investment deals with Latin America and Africa, China had established its presence as a superpower along with the ] and the ]. China's rise is demonstrated by its ballooning share of trade in its ]. He believed that China's "consultative style" had allowed it to develop political and economic ties with many countries including those viewed as ]s by the United States. He stated that the ] founded with Russia and the Central Asian countries may eventually be the "] of the East".<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/27/magazine/27world-t.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0|newspaper=]|last=Khanna|first=Parag|title=Waving Goodbye to Hegemony|access-date=July 19, 2014}}</ref> | |||
Economist and author of ''Eclipse: Living in the Shadow of China's Economic Dominance'' ] argued in 2012 that China will direct the world's financial system by 2020{{update inline|date=April 2021}} and that the Chinese ] will replace the ] as the world's ] in 10 to 15 years. The United States' ] will remain longer. He stated that "China was a top dog economically for thousands of years prior to the ]. In some ways, the past few hundred years have been an aberration."<ref>{{cite magazine|author=Ted Greenwald |url=https://www.wired.com/2012/02/st_subramanianqa/ |title=Taming the Dragon: One Scholar's Plan to Soften Chinese Dominance |magazine=WIRED |date=February 28, 2012|volume=20 |issue=3 |access-date=June 28, 2014}}</ref> | |||
Lawrence Saez at the ], London, argued in 2011 that the United States will be surpassed by China as military superpower within twenty years. Regarding economic power, the Director of the China Center for Economic Reform at ] Yao Yang stated that "Assuming that the Chinese and U.S. economies grow, respectively, by 8% and 3% in real terms, that China's inflation rate is 3.6% and America's is 2% (the averages of the last decade), and that the renminbi appreciates against the dollar by 3% per year (the average of the last six years), China will become the world's largest economy by 2021. By that time, both countries' GDP will be about $24 trillion."<ref>{{cite web|author=Thair Shaikh |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120311061413/http://articles.cnn.com/2011-06-10/world/china.military.superpower_1_superpower-military-spending-military-dominance/2?_s=PM%3AWORLD |url=http://articles.cnn.com/2011-06-10/world/china.military.superpower_1_superpower-military-spending-military-dominance/2?_s=PM:WORLD |title=When Will China Become a Global Superpower? |publisher=CNN |date=10 June 2011 |archive-date=11 March 2012 |access-date=28 June 2014 |url-status=dead }}</ref> | |||
Historian ] argued in 2011, pointing to factors such as the ] predicting that China's GDP (] adjusted) will overtake that of the United States in 2016,{{update needed|date=April 2021}} that a power shift to a world with several superpowers was happening "Now". However, China was still lacking in soft power and power projection abilities and had a low ]. The article also stated that the ] in a 2009 survey found that people in 15 out of 22 countries believed that China had or would overtake the US as the world's leading superpower.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://english.caixin.com/2012-02-27/100360946.html|publisher=]|title=Oxford Prof on China and the New World OrderPart 1|date=27 February 2012|access-date=19 July 2014}}</ref> | |||
In an interview given in 2011, Singapore's first premier, ], stated that while China supplanting the United States is not a foregone conclusion, Chinese leaders are nonetheless serious about displacing the United States as the most powerful country in Asia. "They have transformed a poor society by an economic miracle to become now the second-largest economy in the world. How could they not aspire to be number 1 in Asia, and in time the world?"<ref name="LeeAllison2013">{{cite book|author1=Kuan Yew Lee|author2=Graham Allison|author3=Robert D. Blackwill|author4=Ali Wyne|title=Lee Kuan Yew: The Grand Master's Insights on China, the United States, and the World|chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=geiCymK1IWIC&pg=PA2|access-date=11 December 2015|date=1 February 2013|publisher=MIT Press|isbn=978-0-262-01912-5|page=2|chapter=Future of China}}</ref> The Chinese strategy, Lee maintains, will revolve around their "huge and increasingly highly skilled and educated workers to out-sell and out-build all others."<ref name="Allison 2012 4">{{cite book| last=Allison| first=Graham and Robert D. Blackwill, with Ali Wyne| title=Lee Kuan Yew: The Grand Master's Insights on China, the United States, and the World| year=2012| publisher=The MIT Press| location=Cambridge Massachusetts| isbn=978-0-262-01912-5| page=4| url=https://books.google.com/books?id=geiCymK1IWIC}}</ref> Nevertheless, relations with the United States, at least in the medium term, will not take a turn for the worse because China will "avoid any action that will sour up relations with the U.S. To challenge a stronger and technologically superior power like the U.S. will abort their 'peaceful rise.'"<ref name="Allison 2012 4"/> Though Lee believes China is genuinely interested in growing within the global framework the United States has created, it is biding its time until it becomes strong enough to successfully redefine the prevailing political and economic order.<ref>{{cite book|last=Allison|first=Graham and Robert D. Blackwill, with Ali Wyne|title=Lee Kuan Yew: The Grand Master's Insights on China, the United States, and the World|year=2012|publisher=The MIT Press|location=Cambridge Massachusetts|isbn=978-0-262-01912-5|page=12|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=geiCymK1IWIC}}</ref> | |||
Chinese foreign policy adviser ] in 2012 stated that many Chinese officials see China as a first-class power which should be treated as such. China is argued to soon become the world's largest economy and to be making rapid progress in many areas. The United States is seen as a declining superpower as indicated by factors such as poor economic recovery, financial disorder, high deficits gaining close to GDP levels and unemployment, increasing political polarization, and overregulation forcing jobs overseas in China.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.epi.org/publication/counting_the_jobs_lost_to_china/|title=Counting the jobs lost to China|work=Economic Policy Institute|date=31 March 2010|access-date=8 July 2014}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|author1=Kenneth Lieberthal|author2=Wang Jisi|url=http://www.voanews.com/content/us-china-experts-warn-of-growing-bilateral-distrust-145900615/179594.html|publisher=]|title=US, China Experts Warn of Growing Bilateral Distrust|date=2 April 2012|access-date=19 July 2014}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.brookings.edu/~/media/research/files/papers/2012/3/30-us-china-lieberthal/0330_china_lieberthal.pdf|publisher=China Center at Brookings|title=Addressing U.S.-China Strategic Distrust|date=March 2012|access-date=19 July 2014}}</ref>{{needs update|date=June 2021}} | |||
Some consensus has concluded that China has reached the qualifications of superpower status, citing China's growing political clout and leadership in the economic sectors has given the country renewed standings in the International Community. Although China's military projection is still premature and untested, the perceived humiliation of US leadership in failing to prevent its closest allies in joining the ],<ref name="Foreign Policy-April-1-2015">{{cite magazine|author=Allen-Ebrahimian, Bethany |title=Obama Is Sitting Alone at a Bar Drinking a Consolation Beer|url=https://foreignpolicy.com/2015/04/01/obama-china-bank-aiib-policy/|magazine=]|date=April 1, 2015}}</ref> along with the ] and China's role in the ],<ref name="Boeing’s Crisis Strengthens Beijing’s Hand-March-20-2019">{{cite magazine|author=Aboulafia, Richard |title=Boeing's Crisis Strengthens Beijing's Hand|url=https://foreignpolicy.com/2019/03/20/boeings-crisis-strengthens-beijings-hand-737max-faa-caac-aviation-regulators-trade-war-china-xi-trump/|magazine=]|date=March 20, 2019}}</ref> was seen as a ] or an ] to the ] that dominated post-Cold War international relations. University Professor Øystein Tunsjø argues that competition between China and the USA will increase, leading to the gap between them decreasing, while the gap between the two countries and the rest of the top ten largest economies will widen.<ref name="Columbia University Press-February-2018">{{Cite book|author=Tunsjø, Øystein |title=The Return of Bipolarity in World Politics: China, the United States, and Geostructural Realism|url=https://cup.columbia.edu/book/the-return-of-bipolarity-in-world-politics/9780231176545|publisher=]|date=February 27, 2018|isbn=9780231546904}}</ref> Additionally, economics correspondent, ] and Beijing Bureau Chief of China, ] further stated that China is using a combination of its economic might and growing military advancements to pressure, coerce and change the current world order to accommodate China's interests at the expense of the United States and its allies.<ref name="The New York Times-November-25-2018">{{cite news|author1=Goodman, Peter |author2=Perlez, Jane |title=Beijing is leveraging its commercial and military might to redraw the terms of trade, diplomacy and security, challenging the liberal democratic order.|url=https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2018/11/25/world/asia/china-world-power.html?mtrref=www.google.com&gwh=9DD0254E4F46A3D7C0FD201DDFA1E152&gwt=pay|newspaper=]|date=November 25, 2018}}</ref> | |||
The 2019 Chinese Defense White Paper highlights growing strategic competition between China and the United States although it stops short of the military and ideological confrontation that was shown during the ]. Rather, according to ], although the paper flags both China and the US as competing superpowers, it was far more moderate in its treatment of the US in contrast to the United States view on Chinese military developments. Cordesman states that the paper in the end, was a warning that will shape Sino-American relations as China becomes stronger than Russia in virtually every respect other than its nuclear arsenal.<ref name="China’s New 2019 Defense White Paper: An Open Strategic Challenge to the United States, But One Which Does Not Have to Lead to Conflict-July-24-2019">{{cite journal|author=Cordesman, Anthony H. |title=China's New 2019 Defense White Paper: An Open Strategic Challenge to the United States, But One Which Does Not Have to Lead to Conflict|url=https://www.csis.org/analysis/chinas-new-2019-defense-white-paper-open-strategic-challenge-united-states-one-which-does|journal=]|date=July 24, 2019}}</ref> | |||
On August 19, 2019, the ] handed out a report, suggesting that Washington no longer enjoys primacy in the Indo-Pacific. It stresses that the ] has greatly distracted US response to China's role in the Pacific; that US military force in the region has greatly atrophied whereas Beijing only grew stronger and more capable since ], to the point that China could now actively challenge the United States over the Indo-Pacific.<ref>{{cite report|author=Ashley Townshend, Brendan Thomas-Noone, Matilda Steward|url=https://www.ussc.edu.au/analysis/averting-crisis-american-strategy-military-spending-and-collective-defence-in-the-indo-pacific|work=]|title=Averting Crisis: American strategy, military spending and collective defence in the Indo-Pacific|date= 19 August 2019}}</ref> According to the 2021 Asia Power Index, within Asia, the United States still takes the lead on military capacity, cultural influence, resilience, future resources, diplomatic influence, and defense networks, but falls behind China in two parameters: economic capability and economic relationships.<ref name=":8">{{Cite web|title=China - Lowy Institute Asia Power Index|url=https://power.lowyinstitute.org/|access-date=2021-12-05|website=Lowy Institute Asia Power Index 2021|language=en}}</ref> | |||
China's challenging the United States for global predominance constitutes the core issue in the debate over the ].<ref name="Ali">{{cite news|last1=Wyne|first1=Ali|date=21 June 2018|title=Is America Choosing Decline?|magazine=The New Republic|url=https://newrepublic.com/article/149008/america-choosing-decline|access-date=28 March 2019}}</ref><ref>{{cite book|last1=Brown|first1=Stuart S.|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=RgVBK3B1oOQC&q=US+cultural+decline|title=The Future of US Global Power: Delusions of Decline|date=2013|publisher=Palgrave Macmillan|isbn=9781137023155|language=en|access-date=24 March 2019}}</ref><ref name="Cn-domin">{{cite web|last1=Rapoza|first1=Kenneth|title=The Future: China's Rise, America's Decline|url=https://www.forbes.com/sites/kenrapoza/2017/03/26/the-future-chinas-rise-americas-decline/#43133b093b2f|access-date=28 March 2019|website=Forbes|language=en}}</ref> | |||
=== Contrary views === | |||
Timothy Beardson, founder of Crosby International Holdings, stated in 2013 that he does not see "China becoming a superpower". He pointed out that China has continually polluted its environment during its 30 years of economic growth and will have to grapple with an ageing and shrinking workforce in the future.<ref name="articles.economictimes.indiatimes.com">{{cite news |last=Beardson |first=Timothy |date=June 28, 2013 |title=I don't see China becoming a superpower in this century|work=The Times Of India |url=http://articles.economictimes.indiatimes.com/2013-06-28/news/40234296_1_challenges-facing-china-foreign-companies-china-20-years |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160305034514/http://articles.economictimes.indiatimes.com/2013-06-28/news/40234296_1_challenges-facing-china-foreign-companies-china-20-years |archive-date=March 5, 2016}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|author=Timothy Beardson|url=https://www.huffingtonpost.com/timothy-beardson/china-pollution_b_3331929.html|title=Action Needed on the Environment|work=Huffington Post|date=24 May 2013|access-date=26 July 2014 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210226075322/https://www.huffpost.com/entry/china-pollution_b_3331929 |archive-date=February 26, 2021}}</ref> | |||
Geoffrey Murray's ''China: The Next Superpower'' (1998) argued that while the potential for China is high, this is fairly perceived only by looking at the risks and obstacles China faces in managing its population and resources. The political situation in China may become too fragile to survive into superpower status, according to ] in ''China: Fragile Superpower'' (2008). Other factors that could constrain China's ability to become a superpower in the future include limited supplies of energy and raw materials, questions over its innovation capability, inequality and corruption, and risks to social stability and the environment.<ref>{{cite book|author=Susan Shirk|date=2008|title=China: Fragile Superpower|url=https://archive.org/details/chinafragilesupe00shir|url-access=registration|publisher=Oxford University Press|isbn=978-0-19-537319-6}}</ref> | |||
] stated in 2007 that whether a country is attractive to immigrants is an important quality for a superpower. She also wrote that China lacks the pull to bring scientists, thinkers, and innovators from other countries as immigrants.<ref name="Chua, A 2007">{{cite book|author=Amy Chua|year=2007|title=Day of Empire: How Hyperpowers Rise to Global Dominance – and Why They Fall|publisher=Random House|isbn=978-0-385-51284-8|url=https://archive.org/details/dayofempirehowhy00chua_0}}</ref> | |||
] argued in 2010 that China is not a superpower and it will not be one anytime soon and argued that China faces daunting political and economic challenges.<ref>{{cite magazine|author=Minxin Pei|url=http://apac2020.thediplomat.com/feature/china%E2%80%99s-not-a-superpower/|title=China's Not a Superpower|magazine=The Diplomat|date=20 January 2010|access-date=10 February 2012 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170426042015/http://apac2020.thediplomat.com/feature/china%E2%80%99s-not-a-superpower/ |archive-date=April 26, 2007}}</ref> In 2012 he argued that China, despite using its economic power to influence some nations, has few real friends or allies and is surrounded by potentially hostile nations. This situation could improve if regional territorial disputes were resolved and China participated in an effective regional defence system that would reduce the fears of its neighbours. Alternatively, a democratization of China could improve foreign relations with many nations.<ref>{{cite magazine|author=Minxin Pei|url=https://foreignpolicy.com/2012/03/20/the-loneliest-superpower/|title=The Loneliest Superpower|magazine=Foreign Policy|date=20 March 2012|access-date=28 June 2014 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210505071234/https://foreignpolicy.com/2012/03/20/the-loneliest-superpower/ |archive-date=May 25, 2021}}</ref> | |||
== European Union == | == European Union == | ||
{{See also|Eurosphere|Paneuropean Union}} | |||
{{main|European Union as an emerging superpower}} | |||
{{see also|Eurosphere}} | |||
{|style="width:auto; toc:25em; font-size:85%; text-align:left;" class="infobox" | |||
|- | |||
!colspan="4" style="text-align:center; background:#ccf;"|] | |||
|- | |||
|colspan="4" style="text-align:center;"|] | |||
|- | |||
|colspan="4" style="text-align:center;"|] | |||
|} | |||
The ] (EU) has been called an emerging superpower by academics.<ref name="rjguttman"/><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.wilsoncenter.org/index.cfm?event_id=113994&fuseaction=events.event_summary|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060808165746/http://www.wilsoncenter.org/index.cfm?fuseaction=events.event_summary&event_id=113994|archive-date=8 August 2006|publisher=Wilson Center|title=The EU Future: Global Power or European Governance|access-date=28 July 2014}}</ref> Many scholars and academics like T. R. Reid,<ref>Reid, T. R. (2004) The United States of Europe 305p, ''Penguin Books'' {{ISBN|1-59420-033-5}}</ref> Andrew Reding,<ref name="A. R.">{{cite news|author=Andrew Reding|url=http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2002-01-06/news/0201060227_1_european-union-bering-sea-common-currency|title=EU in position to be world's next superpower|newspaper=Chicago Tribune|date=January 6, 2002|access-date=7 July 2014}}</ref> ],<ref>{{cite web|author=Andrew Moravcsik|title=The Quiet Superpower|url=http://www.princeton.edu/~amoravcs/library/quiet.pdf|publisher=Princeton University Press|date=17 June 2002|access-date=26 July 2014}}</ref> ],<ref>{{cite book|author=Mark Leonard|title=Why Europe Will Run the 21st Century|date=8 August 2006|publisher=Perseus Books Group|isbn=1-58648-424-9}}</ref> ],<ref>{{cite book|author=Jeremy Rifkin|year=2004|title=The European Dream|url=https://archive.org/details/europeandream00jere|url-access=registration|isbn=1-58542-345-9}}</ref> ],<ref>{{cite news|author=Richard A. Clarke|title=The European Superpower|date=2006|publisher=Palgrave Macmillan}}</ref> and some politicians like ]<ref>{{cite magazine|author=Jonathan Rauch|url=https://www.theatlantic.com/doc/200502u/nj_rauch_2005-02-01|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080828194231/http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/200502u/nj_rauch_2005-02-01|archive-date=28 August 2008|title=Europe Is the Next Rival Superpower. But Then, So Was Japan.|magazine=The Atlantic|date=1 February 2005|access-date=26 July 2014}}</ref> and ],<ref>{{cite news|author=Benedict Brogan|url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/poland/1369282/Blair-wants-EU-to-become-superpower.html |archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/archive/20220112/https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/poland/1369282/Blair-wants-EU-to-become-superpower.html |archive-date=2022-01-12 |url-access=subscription |url-status=live|title=Blair wants EU to become superpower|date=7 October 2000|access-date=27 March 2014|location=London|work=The Daily Telegraph}}{{cbignore}}</ref> believed that the EU either is, or will become, a superpower in the 21st century. These prognoses, however, all predate the ] and ]. See; ]. | |||
Mark Leonard cites several factors: the EU's large population, large economy, low inflation rates, the unpopularity and perceived failure of US foreign policy in recent years,{{when|date=January 2019}} and certain EU member states' high quality of life (especially when measured in terms such as hours worked per week, health care, social services).<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.cer.org.uk/in-the-press/europe-new-superpower|title=Europe: the new superpower|publisher=CER|date=18 February 2005|access-date=28 May 2014}}</ref> | |||
] believes that the EU has already achieved superpower status, based on the size and global reach of its economy and on its global political influence. He argues that the nature of power has changed since the ]-driven definition of superpower was developed, and that military power is no longer essential to great power; he argues that control of the means of production is more important than control of the means of destruction, and contrasts the threatening ] of the United States with the opportunities offered by the ] wielded by the European Union.<ref name="The European Superpower">{{cite book|author=John McCormick|title=The European Superpower|isbn=978-1-4039-9846-0|date=14 November 2006}}</ref> | |||
] believes that "Europe is overtaking its rivals to become the world's most successful empire."<ref name="empirestrikesback">{{cite web|author=Parag Khanna|url=http://paragkhanna.com/the-empire-strikes-back/|title=The Empire Strikes Back|publisher=ParagKhanna.com|date=18 February 2008|access-date=14 March 2014}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|author=Parag Khanna|url=https://www.theguardian.com/world/2008/feb/02/eu.politics|title=US scholar Parag Khanna on the rise of the new Rome – Europe|newspaper=The Guardian|date=2 February 2008|access-date=14 March 2014}}</ref> Khanna writes that ], ], and other regions prefer to emulate "]" rather than the ].<ref name="empirestrikesback" /> This could possibly be seen in the ] and ]. Notably, the EU as a whole has some of the world's largest and most influential languages being official within its borders.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.nocturne.ca/nn-worldlanguages.htm|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100302063751/http://www.nocturne.ca/nn-worldlanguages.htm|archive-date=2 March 2010|title=Languages of the world|work=Nocturne|access-date=26 July 2014}}</ref> | |||
Andrew Reding also takes the ] into account. An eventual future accession of the rest of ], the whole of ], and ], would not only boost ], but it would also increase the EU's population to about 800 million, which he considers almost equal to that of ] or ]. The EU is qualitatively different from India and China since it is enormously more prosperous and technologically advanced.<ref name="A. R." /> Turkish PM ] said in 2005: "In 10 or 15 years, the EU will be a place where civilizations meet. It will be a superpower with the inclusion of Turkey."<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.turkishweekly.net/2005/06/04/news/-eu-will-be-super-power-with-turkey/|publisher=Turkish Weekly|title=EU will be Super Power with Turkey|date=4 June 2005|access-date=10 February 2012}}</ref> | |||
Robert J. Guttman wrote in 2001 that the very definition of the term superpower has changed, and in the 21st century it does not only refer to states with military power, but also to groups such as the European Union, with strong market economics, young, highly educated workers savvy in high technology, and a global vision.<ref>{{cite book|url=https://archive.org/details/europeinnewcentu00robe|url-access=registration|quote=Europe emerging superpower.|title=Europe in the New Century: Visions of an Emerging Superpower|publisher=]|year=2001|isbn=9781555878528|access-date=10 February 2012}}</ref> Friis Arne Petersen, the ] ambassador to the US, has expressed similar views but has conceded that the EU is a "special kind of superpower", one that has yet to establish a unified military force that exerts itself even close to the same level as many of its individual members.<ref>{{cite web|author=Trevor Williams|url=http://www.globalatlanta.com/danish-envoy-economic-strength-makes-eu-a-rising-superpower/|title=Danish Envoy: Economic Strength Makes EU a 'Rising Superpower'|work=Globalatlanta|date=29 October 2008|access-date=19 July 2014}}</ref> | |||
Additionally, it is argued by commentators that full political integration is not required for the European Union to wield international influence: that its apparent weaknesses constitute its real strengths (as of its low-profile diplomacy and the emphasis on the rule of law)<ref name="The European Superpower"/> and that the EU represents a new and potentially more successful type of international actor than traditional ones;<ref>{{cite web|author=Adrian Hyde-Price|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090326212441/http://www.arena.uio.no/cidel/WorkshopOsloSecurity/Hyde-Price.pdf|archive-date=26 March 2009|date=23 October 2004|url=http://www.arena.uio.no/cidel/WorkshopOsloSecurity/Hyde-Price.pdf|title=The EU, Power and Coercion: From 'Civilian' to 'Civilising' Power|publisher=ARENA Centre for European Studies}}</ref> however, it is uncertain if the effectiveness of such an influence would be equal to that of a more politically integrated union of states such as the United States.<ref>{{cite magazine|url=http://www.nybooks.com/articles/2005/02/10/europe-vs-america/|title=Europe vs. America by Tony Judt|magazine=The New York Review of Books|date=10 February 2005|access-date=10 February 2012}}</ref> | |||
Barry Buzan notes that the EU's potential superpower status depends on its "stateness". It is unclear though how much state-like quality is needed for the EU to be described as a superpower. Buzan states that the EU is unlikely to remain a potential superpower for a long time because although it has material wealth, its "political weakness and its erratic and difficult course of internal political development, particularly as regards a common foreign and defence policy" constrains it from being a superpower.<ref name="The United States and the Great Powers" /> | |||
], former ], has said that he thinks the EU is both a superpower and not a superpower. While the EU is a superpower in the sense that it is the largest ], ] and aid donor in the world, it is not a superpower in the defence or foreign policy spheres. Like Barry Buzan, Alexander Stubb thinks that the major factor constraining the EU's rise to superpower status is its lack of statehood in the international system; other factors are its lack of internal drive to project power worldwide, and continued preference for the sovereign nation-state among some Europeans. To counterbalance these, he urged the EU leaders to approve and ratify the ] (which they did in 2009), create an EU foreign ministry (], established in 2010), develop a ], hold one collective seat at the ] and ], and address what he described as the "sour mood" toward the EU prevalent in some European countries today.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://carnegieendowment.org/files/0717carnegie-stubb.pdf|publisher=Carnegie Endowment|title=Will the EU Ever Become a Superpower?|date=17 July 2008|access-date=10 February 2012}}</ref> | |||
=== Contrary views === | |||
{{Globalize section|Great Britain|date=March 2021}} | |||
Some commentators do not believe that the EU will achieve superpower status. "The EU is not and never will be a superpower", according to the former UK ] ].<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.gees.org/documentos/Documen-02639.pdf|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110726024647/http://www.gees.org/documentos/Documen-02639.pdf|archive-date=2011-07-26|title=(FCO) Europe 2030: Model power not Superpower – Bruges Speech by the Rt Hon David Miliband MP Foreign Secretary|date=15 November 2007|access-date=10 February 2012}}</ref> Lacking a unified foreign policy and with an inability to project military power worldwide, the EU lacks "the substance of superpowers", who by definition have "first of all military reach possess the capacity to arrive quickly anywhere with troops that can impose their government's will."<ref>{{cite news|author=Amotz Asa-El|author-link=Amotz Asa-El|url=http://fr.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?pagename=JPost/JPArticle/ShowFull&cid=1226404727902|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20081117034827/http://fr.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1226404727902&pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull|archive-date=17 November 2008|title=Middle Israel: Barack Obama and the decline of America|newspaper=Jerusalem Post|date=13 November 2008|access-date=10 February 2012}}</ref> EU parliamentarian Ilka Schroeder argues that the high degree of involvement in conflicts such as the ] is used by the EU largely to compensate for European inability to project military power internationally, particularly in contrast to the US.<ref>{{cite web|author=Julie Stahl|url=http://www.crosswalk.com/1238927/|title=Europe Wants to Rival US as Military Superpower, Says EU Parliamentarian|publisher=Crosswalk.com|date=2 January 2004|access-date=10 February 2012|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120315215942/http://www.crosswalk.com/1238927/|archive-date=15 March 2012|url-status=dead}}</ref> | |||
'']'''s ] notes that the lack of a strong European military only exacerbates the lack of unified EU foreign policy and discounts any EU arguments towards superpower status, noting especially that the EU's creation of a global response force rivalling the superpower's (United States) is "unthinkable".<ref>{{cite web|author=Robert Lane Greene|url=https://www.globalpolicy.org/component/content/article/173-sovereign/30500.html|title=EU Constitution: A 'Superpower Europe' It Won't Be|publisher=Globalpolicy.org|date=18 July 2003|access-date=10 February 2012}}</ref> Similarly, ] finds that “EU-Europe remains a political pygmy and all but military zero in any collective sense.”<ref>Colin S. Gray, "Document No. 1: The Quadrennial Defense Review (QDR), 2006, and the Perils of the Twenty-First Century," ''Comparative Strategy'', 25/2, (2006): p 143.</ref> | |||
Britain's ] has warned against the "worry" that many Europeans are pushing for greater EU integration to counterbalance the United States,<ref>{{cite news|url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/politics/4020973.stm|work=BBC News|title=Howard warning on EU 'superpower'|date=17 November 2004|access-date=22 May 2010}}</ref> while Europe's total reliance on soft (non-military) power is in part because of its lack of a "shared identity."<ref>{{cite web|author=Iskra Kirova|url=http://uscpublicdiplomacy.org/pdin_monitor_article/the_european_union_a_quiet_superpower_or_a_relic_of_the_past|title=The European Union, a "Quiet Superpower" or a Relic of the Past|publisher=USC Center on Public Diplomacy|date=25 March 2007|access-date=28 May 2014}}</ref> While to some the European Union should be a "model power" unafraid of using military force and backing free trade, its military shortcomings argue against superpower status.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/politics/7097162.stm|title=Miliband EU speech in full|work=BBC News|date=15 November 2007|access-date=28 June 2014}}</ref> | |||
According to ], the European Union did not produce a real "union" but a "misnomer." It failed to use the years of “Europe whole and free” to make Europe truly whole and its freedom firmly secure. The notion of Europe as “a political and military heavyweight" became "increasingly illusory.” Europe, once the centre of the West, became an extension of a West whose defining player is America.<ref>Zbigniew Brzezinski, ''Strategic Vision: America and the Crisis of Global Power'', (New York: Basic Books, 2012), p 22, 126.</ref> | |||
], former British ], has also pointed out the economic crisis of the European Union. Osborne said, "The biggest economic risk facing Europe doesn't come from those who want reform and re-negotiation. It comes from a failure to reform and renegotiate. It is the status quo which condemns the people of Europe to an ongoing economic crisis and continuing decline." Osborne also said that the EU is facing growing competition with global economic powers like China, India and the US, and the European Union should "reform or decline."<ref>{{cite news|author=James Kirkup|url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/eu/10572725/George-Osborne-lectures-the-EU-on-reform.html |archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/archive/20220112/https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/eu/10572725/George-Osborne-lectures-the-EU-on-reform.html |archive-date=2022-01-12 |url-access=subscription |url-status=live|title=George Osborne lectures the EU on reform|newspaper=Telegraph|date=14 Jan 2014|access-date=17 March 2014|location=London}}{{cbignore}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|url=http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/business/international-business/EU-falling-behind-India-China-British-finance-minister/articleshow/28839348.cms|title=EU falling behind India, China: British finance minister|newspaper=]|date=15 January 2014|access-date=17 March 2014}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|author=Andrew Osborn|url=https://www.reuters.com/article/us-britain-eu-osborne-idUSBREA0F05020140116#lYdgZKhqtUbbQehB.97|title=Reform or lose us as member, Britain's finance minister tells EU|work=Reuters|date=15 January 2014|access-date=17 March 2014}}</ref> | |||
On 31st January 2020, the United Kingdom, the EU's fourth largest financial contributor after Germany, France and Italy,<ref>{{Cite web|title=EU budget|url=https://ec.europa.eu/info/strategy/eu-budget_en|access-date=2021-07-27|website=European Commission - European Commission|language=en}}</ref> left the European Union. This represented the first time a member state left the organization and its antecedent institutions since the ] was ]. ] could thwart the EU's goal of becoming a global superpower.<ref>{{cite news |title=Brexit Britain has ensured EU is even 'further away' from EVER becoming global superpower |url=https://www.express.co.uk/news/politics/1399552/Brexit-Britain-news-latest-EU-update-global-superpower-latest-update-vn |work=Express.co.uk |date=18 February 2021 |language=en}}</ref> | |||
== India == | |||
{{main|India as a potential superpower}} | |||
{{see also|Indian Century}} | |||
{|style="width:auto; toc:25em; font-size:85%; text-align:left;" class="infobox" | |||
|- | |||
!colspan="4" style="text-align:center; background:#ccf;"|] | |||
|- | |||
|colspan="4" style="text-align:center;"|] | |||
|- | |||
|colspan="4" style="text-align:center;"|] | |||
|} | |||
The ] has seen considerable coverage of its potential of becoming a superpower, both in the media and among academics.<ref name="rising"/><ref>{{cite web| title=India welcomed as new sort of superpower| publisher=Highbeam| url=https://www.highbeam.com/doc/1P1-111273946.html| archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140629120629/http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1P1-111273946.html| url-status=dead| archive-date=June 29, 2014| date=July 21, 2005| last=Giridharadas| first=Anand| access-date=August 2, 2014}}</ref> In 2006, '']'' and the '']'' joined several academics in discussing India's potential of becoming a superpower.<ref name="rising">{{cite magazine| url=http://www.newsweek.com/india-rising-106259| title=India Rising| magazine=Newsweek| date=March 5, 2006| last=Zakaria| first=Fareed| access-date=August 2, 2014}}</ref><ref name="IndiaSuperpower">{{cite web|url=http://realtruth.org/articles/434-iasitm.html| title=India: A Superpower in the Making?| last=Ambrose| first=Jeffrey R.| publisher=RealTruth.org| access-date=August 2, 2014}}</ref> | |||
] is almost certain that India will become a superpower in the 21st century. As an example, he predicts that due to India's functional institutions of democracy, it will emerge as a desirable, entrepreneurial and resource and energy-efficient superpower in the near future. He had predicted that by 2015 India would overtake China to be the fastest growing economy in the world and predicts an emergence as a full-fledged economic superpower by 2025. In addition to that, he states, India has the potential to serve as a leading example of how to combine rapid economic growth with fairness towards and inclusion of those at the bottom rungs of the ladder and of efficient resource utilization, especially in energy.<ref>{{cite news|date=2011-01-09|title=India 2025: What kind of superpower?|publisher=Economictimes.indiatimes.com|url=https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/opinion/et-commentary/india-2025-what-kind-of-superpower/articleshow/7238752.cms|access-date=2012-02-10}}</ref> India briefly became the world's fastest growing economy in 2015 but growth declined below China's since 2018.<ref>{{cite news|title=India to beat China again as fastest-growing economy in 2016: IMF|url=http://articles.economictimes.indiatimes.com/2015-07-09/news/64243978_1_growth-projection-world-economic-outlook-update-fastest-growing-economy|access-date=20 November 2015|date=9 July 2015}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news|date=2019-05-31|title=India loses place as world's fastest-growing economy|language=en-GB|work=BBC News|url=https://www.bbc.com/news/business-48478028|access-date=2020-10-18}}</ref> | |||
Economists and researchers at ] have projected India's 7% projected annual growth rate through 2024 would continue to put it ahead of China, making India the fastest growing economy in the world.<ref>{{cite news|title=New Growth Projections Predict the Rise of India, East Africa and Fall of Oil Economies|url=http://www.hks.harvard.edu/news-events/news/articles/new-growth-projections|access-date=12 April 2016|date=7 May 2015}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|title=India Will Be Fastest-Growing Economy for Coming Decade, Harvard Researchers Predict|url=https://blogs.wsj.com/indiarealtime/2016/01/01/india-will-be-fastest-growing-economy-for-coming-decade-harvard-researchers-predict/|access-date=12 April 2016|date=1 January 2016}}</ref> In 2017, Center for International Development at Harvard University, published a research study,<ref name="2025 Projections Harvard"/> projecting that India has emerged<ref name="2025 Projections Harvard"/> as the economic pole of global growth by surpassing China and is expected to maintain its lead over the 2020s.<ref name="2025 Projections Harvard">{{cite web|title=New 2025 Global Growth Projections Predict China's Further Slowdown and the Continued Rise of India|url=http://atlas.cid.harvard.edu/rankings/growth-predictions/|work=]|access-date=10 July 2017}}</ref> | |||
The ] (EU) has been called an emerging superpower or having already achieved that status, primarily to do with its economic power and political influence on the world stage. Factors highlighted have included its large population, the size and global reach of its combined economy, and the comparative unpopularity of US foreign policy.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.cer.org.uk/in-the-press/europe-new-superpower|title=Europe: the new superpower|publisher=CER|date=18 February 2005|access-date=28 May 2014}}</ref><ref name="The European Superpower">{{cite book|author=John McCormick|title=The European Superpower|isbn=978-1-4039-9846-0|date=14 November 2006|publisher=Macmillan Education UK }}</ref> | |||
Robyn Meredith pointed out in 2007 that the average incomes of European and Americans are higher than Chinese and Indians, and hundreds of millions of Chinese as well as Indians live in poverty, she also suggested that economic growth of these nations has been the most important factor in reducing global poverty of the last two decades, as per the World Bank report.<ref name="elephantdragon" /> ] adds to this, that India still faces many problems such as "pervasive rural poverty, entrenched ], and high ] just to name a few". However, she notes that India has made tremendous strides to fix this, stating that some of India's achievements, such as working to dismantle the centuries-old ] and maintaining the world's largest diverse democracy, are historically unprecedented.<ref name="Chua, A 2007"/> | |||
Despite lacking a cohesive military of its own, with military capabilities still the matter of individual member states, it has been argued that this is irrelevant in the 21st century and accordingly so when considering the status of the EU as a potential superpower.<ref>{{cite book|url=https://archive.org/details/europeinnewcentu00robe|url-access=registration|quote=Europe emerging superpower.|title=Europe in the New Century: Visions of an Emerging Superpower|publisher=]|year=2001|isbn=9781555878528|access-date=10 February 2012}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|author=Trevor Williams|url=http://www.globalatlanta.com/danish-envoy-economic-strength-makes-eu-a-rising-superpower/|title=Danish Envoy: Economic Strength Makes EU a 'Rising Superpower'|work=Globalatlanta|date=29 October 2008|access-date=19 July 2014}}</ref> Others however have questioned this interpretation, instead arguing that its lack of a unified military structure compared to the United States undermines the case that the EU is a potential superpower.<ref>{{cite web|author=Robert Lane Greene|url=https://www.globalpolicy.org/component/content/article/173-sovereign/30500.html|title=EU Constitution: A 'Superpower Europe' It Won't Be|publisher=Globalpolicy.org|date=18 July 2003|access-date=10 February 2012}}</ref><ref>Colin S. Gray, "Document No. 1: The Quadrennial Defense Review (QDR), 2006, and the Perils of the Twenty-First Century," ''Comparative Strategy'', 25/2, (2006): p 143.</ref> | |||
] pointing out that India's young population coupled with the ] ]-speaking population in the world could give India an advantage over China. He also believes that while other industrial countries will face a youth gap, India will have many young people, or in other words, workers, and by 2050, its per capita income will rise by twenty times its current level. According to Zakaria, another strength that India has is that its democratic government has lasted for 60 years, stating that a democracy can provide for long-term stability, which has given India a name.<ref>Zakaria, F. (2008) ''The Post-American World''. W. W. Norton and Company, {{ISBN|978-0-393-06235-9}}</ref> | |||
The EU's lack of political integration has also come under conflicting views regarding its effect on superpower status. Some have argued that its more "low profile" diplomacy and emphasis on the rule of law represent a new kind of geopolitical influence that fulfills the political requirements for consideration of being a superpower rather than simply failing to meet them.<ref name="The European Superpower" /><ref>{{cite web|author=Adrian Hyde-Price|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090326212441/http://www.arena.uio.no/cidel/WorkshopOsloSecurity/Hyde-Price.pdf|archive-date=26 March 2009|date=23 October 2004|url=http://www.arena.uio.no/cidel/WorkshopOsloSecurity/Hyde-Price.pdf|title=The EU, Power and Coercion: From 'Civilian' to 'Civilising' Power|publisher=ARENA Centre for European Studies}}</ref> Others however argue that its lack of a centralised foreign or defence policy leaves its effectiveness uncertain when compared to that of a more politically integrated union of states such as the United States,<ref>{{cite magazine|url=http://www.nybooks.com/articles/2005/02/10/europe-vs-america/|title=Europe vs. America by Tony Judt|magazine=The New York Review of Books|date=10 February 2005|access-date=10 February 2012}}</ref><ref name="The United States and the Great Powers" /> and it has even been argued that the EU remains as little more than an extension of a Europe reliant or dominated by the United States.<ref>Zbigniew Brzezinski, ''Strategic Vision: America and the Crisis of Global Power'', (New York: Basic Books, 2012), p 22, 126.</ref> | |||
], founder and president of the Economic Strategy Institute and former counselor to the Secretary of Commerce in the ], has predicted that "It is going to be India's century. India is going to be the biggest economy in the world. It is going to be the biggest superpower of the 21st century."<ref>{{cite web |url= http://www.rediff.com/money/2006/mar/29minter.htm |title=India will be the biggest superpower|work=Rediff |year=2006 |access-date=19 July 2014}}</ref> | |||
The European Union has been called a "regulatory superpower" due to the ], which suggests that ] and ] will also be adopted by numerous countries outside the EU over time.<ref>{{Cite web |last=dmalloy |date=2023-06-15 |title=The world's regulatory superpower is taking on a regulatory nightmare: artificial intelligence |url=https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/blogs/new-atlanticist/the-worlds-regulatory-superpower-is-taking-on-a-regulatory-nightmare-artificial-intelligence/ |access-date=2023-09-15 |website=Atlantic Council |language=en-US}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last=kdaponte |date=2023-05-24 |title=Meta fine shows EU is 'regulatory superpower,' Northeastern expert says |url=https://cssh.northeastern.edu/meta-fine-shows-eu-is-regulatory-superpower-northeastern-expert-says/ |access-date=2023-09-15 |website=College of Social Sciences and Humanities |language=en-us}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal |last=Bradford |first=Anu |date=2020-03-01 |title=The Brussels Effect: How the European Union Rules the World |url=https://scholarship.law.columbia.edu/books/232 |journal=Faculty Books|doi=10.1093/oso/9780190088583.001.0001 |isbn=978-0-19-008858-3 }}</ref> | |||
According to the report named "Indian Century: Defining India's Place in a Rapidly Changing Global Economy" by ] Institute for Business Value, India is predicted to be among the world's highest-growth nations over the coming years.<ref name="IBM India Century">{{cite journal|last=Subramanian|first=Samanth|title=The Outlier:The inscrutable politics of Subramanian Swamy|url=http://www.caravanmagazine.in/reportage/outlier|journal=The Caravan: A Journal of Politics & Culture|date=1 May 2012|access-date=29 March 2018}}</ref><ref name="IBM 21">{{cite news|title=India to be world's highest growth nation in 21st century: IBM study|url=http://www.business-standard.com/article/economy-policy/india-to-be-world-s-highest-growth-nation-in-21st-century-ibm-study-115121000918_1.html|work=]|date=10 December 2015|access-date=11 February 2016|last1=Team|first1=BS Web}}</ref><ref name="IBM">{{cite web|title=21st century is India's century: IBM chief Virginia Rometty|url=http://www.moneycontrol.com/news/economy/21st-century-is-indias-century-ibm-chief-virginia-rometty_1963021.html|work=]|access-date=11 February 2016}}</ref> | |||
== India == | |||
{{Further|Indian Century}} | |||
] wrote in 2008 that he believes that India is not, nor will it become a superpower for the foreseeable future, lagging decades behind China in both development and strategic appetite.<ref>{{cite news| last=Khanna |first=Parag |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/27/magazine/27world-t.html |title=Waving Goodbye to Hegemony |newspaper=]|date=2008-01-27 |access-date=2012-02-10}}</ref> He says that India is "big but not important", has a highly successful professional class, while millions of its citizens still live in ]. He also writes that it matters that China borders a dozen more countries than India and is not hemmed in by a vast ocean and the world's tallest mountains.<ref>{{cite web| last=Khanna |first=Parag |url=http://www.newamerica.net/node/8987 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110629133515/http://www.newamerica.net/node/8987 |archive-date=2011-06-29 |title=The Rise of Non-Americanism |publisher=Newamerica.net |date=2008-05-18 |access-date=2012-02-10}}</ref> However, in a recent article written by Khanna, he says that India, along with China, will grow ever stronger, while other powers, like Europe, muddle along.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://paragkhanna.com/future-shock-welcome-to-the-new-middle-ages/ |title=Parag Khanna |publisher=Parag Khanna |date=2010-12-28 |access-date=2012-02-10}}</ref> | |||
The ] has seen considerable coverage of its potential of becoming a superpower economically. Multiple opinions have pointed towards India's rapid economic development as a reason for it to be considered a potential superpower, in particular during the 2010s when it was predicted to outpace China's growth into the future.<ref>{{cite news |date=2011-01-09|title=India 2025: What kind of superpower? |first=Michael |last=Dingman |work=] |publisher=Bennett, Coleman & Co. Ltd. |url=https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/opinion/et-commentary/india-2025-what-kind-of-superpower/articleshow/7238752.cms|access-date=2012-02-10}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.rediff.com/money/2006/mar/29minter.htm |title=India will be the biggest superpower |work=Rediff |year=2006 |access-date=19 July 2014}}</ref><ref name="IBM India Century">{{cite journal |last=Subramanian |first=Samanth |title=The Outlier:The inscrutable politics of Subramanian Swamy |url=http://www.caravanmagazine.in/reportage/outlier |journal=The Caravan: A Journal of Politics & Culture |date=1 May 2012 |access-date=29 March 2018}}</ref><ref name="rising">{{cite magazine |last=Zakaria |first=Fareed |date=March 5, 2006 |title=India Rising |url=http://www.newsweek.com/india-rising-106259 |magazine=Newsweek |access-date=August 2, 2014}}</ref> Economists and researchers at ] have projected India's 7% projected annual growth rate through 2024 would continue to put it ahead of China, making India the fastest growing economy in the world.<ref>{{cite news |title=New Growth Projections Predict the Rise of India, East Africa and Fall of Oil Economies |url=http://www.hks.harvard.edu/news-events/news/articles/new-growth-projections |website=Harvard Kennedy School |access-date=12 April 2016 |date=7 May 2015 |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20160508145617/https://www.hks.harvard.edu/news-events/news/articles/new-growth-projections |archivedate=2016-05-08}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |title=India Will Be Fastest-Growing Economy for Coming Decade, Harvard Researchers Predict |work=The Wall Street Journal |first=Raymond |last=Zhong |url=https://blogs.wsj.com/indiarealtime/2016/01/01/india-will-be-fastest-growing-economy-for-coming-decade-harvard-researchers-predict/ |access-date=12 April 2016 |date=1 January 2016}}</ref> Over and above, India also has the advantage of having a very large and growing young population with a median age of 28, compared to China's median age of 39.<ref>{{Cite web |last1=Silver |first1=Laura |last2=Huang |first2=Christine |last3=Clancy |first3=Laura |title=Key facts as India surpasses China as the world's most populous country |url=https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2023/02/09/key-facts-as-india-surpasses-china-as-the-worlds-most-populous-country/ |access-date=2024-02-23 |website=Pew Research Center |date=9 February 2023 |language=en-US}}</ref> | |||
], reviewing the book ''In Spite of the Gods: The Strange Rise of Modern India'', writes that, while India has had impressive growth and has some world-class institutions, several other indicators are puzzlingly poor. The ] and the coverage of ] programs are at levels similar or worse than in many sub-Saharan African nations. In the ], India's child malnutrition was the worst of the 42 nations with comparable and recent data.<ref name="doi10.1257/jel.47.3.771">{{Cite journal | last1 = Pritchett | first1 = L. | title = A Review of Edward Luce'sIn Spite of the Gods: The Strange Rise of Modern India | doi = 10.1257/jel.47.3.771 | journal = Journal of Economic Literature | volume = 47 | issue = 3 | pages = 771–081 | year = 2009 }}</ref> In the recent findings in the 2020 ], India ranks 94th out of the 107 countries with 14% of the total population in severe hunger, compared to its peers (Brazil, China and Russia) ranked between 1-18th.<ref>{{Cite web|title=2020 Global Hunger Index Results - Global, Regional, and National Trends|url=https://www.globalhungerindex.org/results.html|access-date=2020-11-03|website=Global Hunger Index (GHI) - peer-reviewed annual publication designed to comprehensively measure and track hunger at the global, regional, and country levels|language=en}}</ref> | |||
While India's economic growth has continued, others have noted that inequality remains high in the country and that its potential for trading appears more limited compared to regional rivals such as China, and that despite India briefly becoming the world's fastest-growing economy in 2015 its growth declined below China's since 2018.<ref>{{cite news |last=Khanna |first=Parag |authorlink=Parag Khanna |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/27/magazine/27world-t.html |title=Waving Goodbye to Hegemony |newspaper=] |date=2008-01-27 |access-date=2012-02-10}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |last=Khanna |first=Parag |authorlink=Parag Khanna |url=http://www.newamerica.net/node/8987 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110629133515/http://www.newamerica.net/node/8987 |archive-date=2011-06-29 |title=The Rise of Non-Americanism |publisher=New America Foundation |date=2008-05-18 |access-date=2012-02-10}}</ref><ref name="doi10.1257/jel.47.3.771">{{Cite journal |last=Pritchett |first=Lant |authorlink=Lant Pritchett |title=A Review of Edward Luce's 'In Spite of the Gods: The Strange Rise of Modern India' |doi=10.1257/jel.47.3.771 |journal=Journal of Economic Literature |volume=47 |issue=3 |pages=771–081 |year=2009}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|title=India to beat China again as fastest-growing economy in 2016: IMF |work=] |publisher=Bennett, Coleman & Co. Ltd. |url=http://articles.economictimes.indiatimes.com/2015-07-09/news/64243978_1_growth-projection-world-economic-outlook-update-fastest-growing-economy |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150717151633/http://articles.economictimes.indiatimes.com/2015-07-09/news/64243978_1_growth-projection-world-economic-outlook-update-fastest-growing-economy |url-status=dead |archive-date=July 17, 2015 |access-date=20 November 2015 |date=9 July 2015}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news|date=2019-05-31|title=India loses place as world's fastest-growing economy |language=en-GB |work=BBC News |url=https://www.bbc.com/news/business-48478028 |access-date=2020-10-18}}</ref> | |||
Adult ] is 61%. In one study, 26% of teachers were absent from work and 1/3 of those showing up did not teach. 40% of health care workers were absent from work. ] remains an important force. Pritchett argues that a very large population, a very long statistical "tail" of high quality students, and some very good higher education institutions gives a misleading impression of Indian education. Indian students placed forty-first and thirty-seventh in a study comparing students in the two Indian states ] and ] to the forty-six nations in the 2003 ].<ref name="doi10.1257/jel.47.3.771" /> In the ] 2009, the two Indian states ranked 72nd and 73rd out of 74 countries in both reading and mathematics, and 73rd and 74th in science.<ref name="autogenerated1">{{cite web|title=Database – PISA 2009|url=http://pisa2009.acer.edu.au/interactive_results.php|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160322032020/http://pisa2009.acer.edu.au/interactive_results.php|archive-date=2016-03-22|access-date=2016-04-15|publisher=Pisa2009.acer.edu.au}}</ref> | |||
It has also been argued that India's government and bureaucracy is also geared against emerging as a superpower, with it being argued that it "does very little collective thinking about its long-term foreign policy goals, since most of the strategic planning that takes place within the government happens on an individual level".<ref name="FA Miller 14">{{cite journal |last=Miller |first=Manjari Chatterjee |date=May–June 2013 |title=India's Feeble Foreign Policy |url=https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/india/2013-04-03/indias-feeble-foreign-policy |journal=Foreign Affairs |volume=92 |issue=3 |pages=14–18 |access-date=27 June 2013 |authorlink=Manjari Miller}}</ref> | |||
], assistant professor of international relations at ], argues that India is a "would-be" great power but "resists its own rise".<ref name="FA Miller 14">{{cite journal|last=Miller|first=Manjari Chatterjee|title=India's Feeble Foreign Policy|journal=Foreign Affairs|date=May–June 2013|volume= 92|issue= 3|page=14|url=https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/india/2013-04-03/indias-feeble-foreign-policy|access-date=27 June 2013}}</ref> Three factors contribute to this stagnation, she argues. First, ]'s foreign policy decisions are highly individualistic.<ref name="FA Miller 14"/> "This autonomy, in turn, means that New Delhi does very little collective thinking about its long-term foreign policy goals, since most of the strategic planning that takes place within the government happens on an individual level."<ref>{{cite journal|last=Miller|first=Manjari Chatterjee|title=India's Feeble Foreign Policy|journal=Foreign Affairs|date=May–June 2013|volume= 92|issue= 3|page=15|url=https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/india/2013-04-03/indias-feeble-foreign-policy|access-date=27 June 2013}}</ref> Second, a dearth of ]s helps insulate Indian foreign policymakers from outside influences.<ref name="FA Miller 14"/> "U.S. foreign policymakers, by contrast, can expect strategic guidance from a broad spectrum of organizations that supplement the long-term planning that happens within the government itself."<ref>{{cite journal| last=Miller| first=Manjari Chatterjee| title=India's Feeble Foreign Policy| journal=Foreign Affairs| date=May–June 2013| volume= 92| issue= 3| page=17| url=https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/india/2013-04-03/indias-feeble-foreign-policy| access-date=27 June 2013}}</ref> Third, many of India's political elites believe that the country's inevitable rise is a ] construct that has placed unrealistic expectations on India's economic growth forecasts and its international commitments.<ref name="FA Miller 14"/> By contrast, Miller notes that Chinese political leaders pay very close attention to the international hype surrounding their country's growing stature.<ref name="FA Miller 14"/> Miller concludes that "India's inability to develop top-down, long-term strategies means that it cannot systematically consider the implications of its growing power. So long as this remains the case, the country will not play the role in global affairs that many expect."<ref>{{cite journal| last=Miller| first=Manjari Chatterjee| title=India's Feeble Foreign Policy| journal=Foreign Affairs| date=May–June 2013| volume= 92| issue= 3| page=18| url=https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/india/2013-04-03/indias-feeble-foreign-policy| access-date=27 June 2013}}</ref> | |||
== Russia == | == Russia == | ||
{{Further|Russia as an energy superpower|History of the Russian Federation}} | |||
{{further|Post-Soviet Russia}} | |||
{|style="width:auto; toc:25em; font-size:85%; text-align:left;" class="infobox" | |||
|- | |||
!colspan="4" style="text-align:center; background:#ccf;"|] | |||
|- | |||
|colspan="4" style="text-align:center;"|] | |||
|- | |||
|colspan="4" style="text-align:center;"|] | |||
|} | |||
], the world's largest nation, is home to over 30% of the world's ] according to some sources.<ref name="ems.psu.edu">Kevin M. Korabik, {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190720062114/https://www.ems.psu.edu/~williams/russia.htm |date=20 July 2019 }}, '']'', 1 December 1997</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.eepcindia.com/download/Circular-160411115935.pdf |title=India Partner Country at INNOPROM-2016 Show: Russia: (11-14 July 2016, Yekaterinburg, Russia) |publisher=] |date=July 2016 |access-date=4 January 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160611000234/http://www.eepcindia.com/download/Circular-160411115935.pdf |archive-date=11 June 2016 |url-status=dead }}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.oceanunite.org/round-up/pre-empting-russias-year-ecology/|title=Pre-empting Russia's Year of Ecology|work=Ocean Unite|date=February 2016}}</ref> Since its ], it has been both a ] and a ]. Throughout most of the ]-era, Russia was one of the world's two ]s. However, after the ], it lost its superpower status, and recently has been suggested as a potential candidate for resuming superpower status in the 21st century.<ref name="Russia in the 21st Century"/><ref name="georgiandaily.com">New York Times by Ronald Steel professor of international relations August 24, 2008 (Superpower Reborn)</ref><ref>{{cite web|author=Farooque Chowdhury|url=http://www.countercurrents.org/chowdhury221213.htm|title=A Militarily Resurging Russia|publisher=Counter Currents|date=22 December 2013|access-date=13 September 2015}}</ref> While others have made the assertion that it is already a superpower.<ref>{{cite news|title=A Superpower Is Reborn|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2008/08/24/opinion/24steel.html?_r=0|newspaper=The New York Times|access-date=19 November 2015}}</ref> In 2009, ], late President of ] whose government was noted to have enjoyed warm relations with the ], stated that "Russia is a superpower", citing waning American influence in global affairs, and suggested the ] be elevated to a global currency.<ref>{{cite news|author=Megan K. Stack|url=https://articles.latimes.com/2009/sep/11/world/fg-russia-chavez11|title=Venezuela's Hugo Chavez recognizes independence of breakaway Georgia republics|newspaper=]|date=11 September 2009|access-date=7 July 2014}}</ref> ]i Prime Minister ] called Russia an important superpower, praising its effectiveness as an ally of Israel.<ref>{{cite web|author=Robert Berger|url=http://www.voanews.com/content/netanyahu-heads-to-russia-with-call-for-crippling-sanctions-on-iran-84341537/112463.html|title=Netanyahu Heads to Russia with Call for 'Crippling Sanctions' on Iran|publisher=]|date=13 February 2010|access-date=7 July 2014}}</ref> In his 2005 publication entitled ''Russia in the 21st Century: The Prodigal Superpower'', ], a professor of economics at ], predicted that Russia would emerge as a superpower before 2010 and augur another arms race. However, Rosefielde noted that such an end would come with tremendous sacrifice to global security and the Russian people's freedom.<ref>{{cite book|author=Steven Rosefielde|author-link=Steven Rosefielde|url=http://www.cambridge.org/gb/academic/subjects/economics/international-economics/russia-21st-century-prodigal-superpower|title=Russia in the 21st Century|publisher=] Press|date=February 2005|isbn=978-0-521-54529-7}}</ref> | |||
], since ], has been considered both a ] and a ]. Throughout most of the ]-era, the Soviet Union was one of the world's two ]s. However, after the ], the Russian Federation as its successor state lost its superpower status. In the early 21st century, Russia has been suggested as a potential candidate for resuming superpower status,<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Minkina |first=Mirosław |date=2019-09-30 |title=Russia's return to the superpower status |url=https://securityanddefence.pl/Russia-s-return-to-the-superpower-status,110335,0,2.html |journal=Security and Defence Quarterly |volume=26 |issue=4 |pages=34–50 |doi=10.35467/sdq/110335 |issn=2300-8741|hdl=11331/2402 |hdl-access=free }}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |last1=Graham-Harrison |first1=Emma |last2=Luhn |first2=Alec |last3=Walker |first3=Shaun |last4=Rice-Oxley |first4=Mark |last5=Sedghi |first5=Amy |date=2015-07-07 |title=China and Russia: the world's new superpower axis? |url=https://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/jul/07/china-russia-superpower-axis |access-date=2024-07-12 |work=The Guardian |language=en-GB |issn=0261-3077}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |title=Q&A: The return of the Russian superpower? |url=https://edition.cnn.com/2009/WORLD/europe/05/07/russia.analysis.chance/index.html |access-date=2024-07-12 |website=edition.cnn.com}}</ref> while others have made the assertion that it is already a superpower.<ref>{{cite news|title=A Superpower Is Reborn|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2008/08/24/opinion/24steel.html?_r=0|newspaper=The New York Times|access-date=19 November 2015}}</ref> In his 2005 publication entitled ''Russia in the 21st Century: The Prodigal Superpower'', ], a professor of economics at ], predicted that Russia would emerge as a superpower before 2010 and augur another arms race. However, Rosefielde noted that such an end would come with tremendous sacrifice to global security and the Russian people's freedom.<ref>{{cite book|author=Steven Rosefielde|author-link=Steven Rosefielde|url=http://www.cambridge.org/gb/academic/subjects/economics/international-economics/russia-21st-century-prodigal-superpower|title=Russia in the 21st Century|publisher=] Press|date=February 2005|isbn=978-0-521-54529-7}}</ref>{{Page needed|date=December 2023}} ] of '']'' compared Russia's actions with its own neighbouring territories, to those of "any other superpower", taking ] and ] as examples.<ref>{{cite news|author=Stephen Kinzer|url=https://www.bostonglobe.com/opinion/2014/05/11/russia-acts-like-any-other-superpower/AJRSNiIUYQPAHRlLXcfIlJ/story.html|title=Russia acts like any other superpower|newspaper=Boston Globe|date=11 May 2014|access-date=7 July 2014}}</ref> | |||
In 2014, ] of '']'' compared Russia's actions with its own neighbouring territories, to those of "any other superpower", taking ] and ] as examples.<ref>{{cite news|author=Stephen Kinzer|url=https://www.bostonglobe.com/opinion/2014/05/11/russia-acts-like-any-other-superpower/AJRSNiIUYQPAHRlLXcfIlJ/story.html|title=Russia acts like any other superpower|newspaper=Boston Globe|date=11 May 2014|access-date=7 July 2014}}</ref> A mixed opinion has been offered by Matthew Fleischer of the '']'': he contends that Russia will not become a superpower unless ] eats away at the ] that covers, as of March 2014, two-thirds of the country's landmass. The absence of this permafrost would reveal immense stores of oil, natural gas, and precious minerals, as well as potential farmland, which would allow Russia to "become the world's bread basket—and control the planet's food supply."<ref>{{cite news|author=Matthew Fleischer|url=https://www.latimes.com/opinion/opinion-la/la-ol-climate-change-russia-super-power-20140311-story.html|title=How curbing climate change can prevent Russia from becoming a superpower|newspaper=Los Angeles Times|date=12 March 2014|access-date=7 July 2014}}</ref> | |||
Russian news agency ] called Russia a "superpower" ].<ref>{{cite news|title=Россия – военная сверхдержава, и США должны с этим считаться|url=http://ria.ru/world/20151104/1313528799.html|access-date=8 November 2015|publisher=РИА Новости|language=ru}}</ref> | |||
=== Contrary views === | |||
During the annual ] address at the ] in December 2013, Russian president ] denied any Russian aspiration to be a superpower. He was quoted saying: "We do not aspire to be called some kind of superpower, understanding that as a claim to world or regional hegemony. We do not infringe on anyone's interests, we do not force our patronage on anyone, or try to teach anyone how to live."<ref>{{cite news|work=Reuters|url=https://www.reuters.com/article/us-russia-putin-usa-idUSBRE9BB09M20131212#JyFg7fEQaBur6ogM.97|title=Russia is a force for moral good but no superpower|date=12 December 2013|access-date=2 August 2014}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.vedomosti.ru/politics/articles/2013/12/12/putin-rossiya-ne-pretenduet-na-status-sverhderzhavy|script-title=ru:Путин: Россия не претендует на статус сверхдержавы|trans-title=Putin: Russia does not make claims to superpower status|language=ru|publisher=]|website=vedomosti.ru|date=12 December 2013|access-date=8 July 2014}}</ref> | |||
Several analysts commented on the fact that Russia showed signs of an aging and shrinking population. ] said that this severely constricts and limits Russia's potential to re-emerge as a central world power.<ref>{{cite news|author=Fred Weir|url=http://www.globalpost.com/dispatch/news/regions/europe/russia/111102/russia-population-superpower-health-soviet-union|title=Despite huge cash bonuses to mothers, Russia's population is shrinking|work=GlobalPost|date=3 November 2011|access-date=8 July 2014}}</ref> In 2011, British historian and professor ] also highlighted the negative effects of Russia's declining population, and suggested that Russia is on its way to "global irrelevance".<ref>{{cite magazine|author=Niall Ferguson|url=http://www.newsweek.com/decline-putins-russia-its-way-global-irrelevance-65847|title=In Decline, Putin's Russia Is On Its Way to Global Irrelevance|magazine=]|date=12 December 2011|access-date=2 August 2014}}</ref> Russia has, however, shown a slight population growth since the late 2000s, partly due to immigration and slowly rising birth rates.<ref>{{cite magazine|author=Mark Adomanis|url=https://www.forbes.com/sites/markadomanis/2013/05/11/russias-population-isnt-shrinking-its-growing-very-very-slowly/|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130609004205/http://www.forbes.com/sites/markadomanis/2013/05/11/russias-population-isnt-shrinking-its-growing-very-very-slowly/|url-status=dead|archive-date=June 9, 2013|title=Russia's Population Isn't Shrinking (It's Growing Very, Very Slowly)|magazine=Forbes|date=11 May 2013|access-date=8 July 2014}}</ref> | |||
Nathan Smith of the '']'' has said that despite Russia having potential, it did not win the new "Cold War" in the 1980s, and thus makes superpower status inaccurate.<ref>{{cite news|author=Nathan Smith|url=http://www.nbr.co.nz/article/do-not-treat-russia-superpower-it-isnt-ns-152930|title=Do not treat Russia like a superpower, it isn't|newspaper=]|date=8 March 2014|access-date=7 July 2014}}</ref> ] predicted that if the Russian elite is not consolidated, Russia will disappear as a single state.<ref name="shevchenko">{{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160920214334/http://www.phisci.ru/files/issues/2015/02/RJPS_2015-02_Shevchenko.pdf |date=2016-09-20 }}</ref> ] said the moment the ] leaves Russia, other territorial regions would follow.<ref>{{Cite news|date=2011-12-20|title=Владимир Путин: Отделение Кавказа от России приведет к развалу страны|language=ru|trans-title=Vladimir Putin: Separation of the Caucasus from Russia will lead to the collapse of the country|work=Российская газета|url=https://rg.ru/2011/12/20/reg-skfo/gudermes-anons.html|access-date=2018-05-06 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210729223249/https://rg.ru/2011/12/20/reg-skfo/gudermes-anons.html |archive-date=July 29, 2021}}</ref> | |||
] of the ] has described Russia as a "] Superpower" amid the ]. He stated that "Russia is even weaker than most people, myself included, seem to have realized." He highlighted that the military performance of Russia "has been less effective than advertised." The Russian army is in a stalemate during the war in Ukraine, especially at the beginning of the invasion, it encountered serious logistical problems, especially the fuel supply situation. Also the country's ] is only a bit more than half as large as western countries such as Britain and France. Due to the ], it has become even weaker economically than it did before it went to war. Its standard of living is sustained by large imports of manufactured goods, mostly paid for via exports of oil and natural gas. This leaves Russia’s economy highly vulnerable to sanctions that might disrupt this trade. He concluded "Russia now stands revealed as a Potemkin superpower, with far less real strength than meets the eye."<ref>{{cite journal|author=]|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2022/02/28/opinion/putin-military-sanctions-weakness.html|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220301041314/https://www.nytimes.com/2022/02/28/opinion/putin-military-sanctions-weakness.html|url-status=live|archive-date=1 March 2022|title=Russia Is a Potemkin Superpower|publisher=]|date=28 February 2022|access-date=1 March 2022}}</ref> | |||
== Former prediction for Japan's potential superpower status == | |||
{{further|Japanese popular culture|Lost Decades|l2=Lost Decade}} | |||
{|style="width:auto; toc:25em; font-size:85%; text-align:left;" class="infobox" | |||
|- | |||
!colspan="4" style="text-align:center; background:#ccf;"|] | |||
|- | |||
|colspan="4" style="text-align:center;"|] | |||
|- | |||
|colspan="4" style="text-align:center;"|] | |||
|} | |||
Others however have put forward more pessimistic views towards Russia's ability to regain its superpower status. A mixed opinion has been offered by Matthew Fleischer of the ''],'' contending that severe climate change would be necessary for much of Russia's inherent natural resources to become viable.<ref>{{cite news|author=Matthew Fleischer|url=https://www.latimes.com/opinion/opinion-la/la-ol-climate-change-russia-super-power-20140311-story.html|title=How curbing climate change can prevent Russia from becoming a superpower|newspaper=Los Angeles Times|date=12 March 2014|access-date=7 July 2014}}</ref> | |||
In the 1980s, many political and ] predicted that ] would eventually accede to superpower status, due to its large population, huge ] and high ] at that time. Japan was expected to eventually surpass the economy of the United States, which never happened.<ref name="Zakaria, F 2008">{{cite book|last=Zakaria|first=Fareed|url=https://archive.org/details/postamericanworl00zaka_199|title=The Post-American World|date=2008|publisher=W. W. Norton and Company|isbn=978-0-393-06235-9|page=|author-link=Fareed Zakaria|url-access=limited}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news|date=November 12, 2009|title=Land of the setting sun|url=https://www.economist.com/business/2009/11/12/land-of-the-setting-sun|newspaper=The Economist}}</ref><ref>{{cite magazine|date=July 4, 1988|title=Japan From Superrich To Superpower|url=http://content.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,967823,00.html|magazine=]}}</ref> However, Japan is considered a cultural superpower in terms of the large-scale influence Japanese ], electronics, automobiles, music, ], and ] have on the world.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.spectator.co.uk/2015/01/how-japan-became-a-pop-culture-superpower/|title=How Japan became a pop culture superpower|date=January 31, 2015|website=The Spectator}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2010/09/07/reference/anime-makes-japan-superpower/|title='Anime' makes Japan superpower|first=Kazuaki|last=Nagata|date=September 7, 2010|via=Japan Times Online}}</ref> | |||
Several analysts commented on the fact that Russia showed signs of an aging and shrinking population. ] said that this severely constricts and limits Russia's potential to re-emerge as a central world power.<ref>{{cite news|author=Fred Weir|url=http://www.globalpost.com/dispatch/news/regions/europe/russia/111102/russia-population-superpower-health-soviet-union|title=Despite huge cash bonuses to mothers, Russia's population is shrinking|work=GlobalPost|date=3 November 2011|access-date=8 July 2014}}</ref> In 2011, British historian and professor ] also highlighted the negative effects of Russia's declining population, and suggested that Russia is on its way to "global irrelevance".<ref>{{cite magazine|author=Niall Ferguson|url=http://www.newsweek.com/decline-putins-russia-its-way-global-irrelevance-65847|title=In Decline, Putin's Russia Is On Its Way to Global Irrelevance|magazine=]|date=12 December 2011|access-date=2 August 2014}}</ref> Russia has, however, shown a slight population growth since the late 2000s, partly due to immigration, quickly rising birth rates, slowly declining death rates.<ref>{{cite magazine|author=Mark Adomanis|url=https://www.forbes.com/sites/markadomanis/2013/05/11/russias-population-isnt-shrinking-its-growing-very-very-slowly/|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130609004205/http://www.forbes.com/sites/markadomanis/2013/05/11/russias-population-isnt-shrinking-its-growing-very-very-slowly/|url-status=dead|archive-date=June 9, 2013|title=Russia's Population Isn't Shrinking (It's Growing Very, Very Slowly)|magazine=Forbes|date=11 May 2013|access-date=8 July 2014}}</ref> | |||
Japan was ranked as the world's ] in 2015.<ref name="CreditSuisse2015">{{cite report|url=http://publications.credit-suisse.com/tasks/render/file/index.cfm?fileid=EE7A6A5D-D9D5-6204-E9E6BB426B47D054|title=The End of Globalization or a more Multipolar World?|publisher=] AG|first1=Michael|last1=O’Sullivan|first2=Krithika|last2=Subramanian|date=2015-10-17|access-date=2017-07-14|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180215235711/http://publications.credit-suisse.com/tasks/render/file/index.cfm?fileid=EE7A6A5D-D9D5-6204-E9E6BB426B47D054|archive-date=2018-02-15|url-status=dead}}</ref> The military capabilities of the ] are held back by the pacifist ]. However, there is a gradual push for a ]. On 18 September 2015, the National Diet enacted the ], a series of laws that allow Japan's Self-Defense Forces to ] of allies in combat for the first time under its constitution.<ref>{{cite news|title=Japan enacts major changes to its self-defense laws |last=Slavin |first=Erik |location=Tokyo |date=18 September 2015 |newspaper=] |url=http://www.stripes.com/news/pacific/japan-enacts-major-changes-to-its-self-defense-laws-1.368783|url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180619063041/https://www.stripes.com/news/pacific/japan-enacts-major-changes-to-its-self-defense-laws-1.368783 |archive-date=June 19, 2018 }}</ref> In May 2017, former Japanese Prime Minister ] set a 2020 deadline for revising Article 9, which would legitimize the JSDF in the Constitution,<ref>{{cite web|url=http://thediplomat.com/2017/05/abes-new-vision-for-japans-constitution/|title=Abe's New Vision for Japan's Constitution|first=Yuki Tatsumi, The|last=Diplomat|website=thediplomat.com|access-date=18 May 2017}}</ref>but the constitutional revision was never implemented before Abe's resignation as prime minister in 2020 due to health problems. | |||
Russia's ability to project hard power was also questioned following the ] in 2022, with the Russian military's poor performance prompting economist ] to suggest Russia was little more than a "] Superpower".<ref>{{cite journal|author=]|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2022/02/28/opinion/putin-military-sanctions-weakness.html|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220301041314/https://www.nytimes.com/2022/02/28/opinion/putin-military-sanctions-weakness.html|url-status=live|archive-date=1 March 2022|title=Russia Is a Potemkin Superpower|journal=]|date=28 February 2022|access-date=1 March 2022}}</ref> | |||
=== Contrary views === | |||
Though still the world's tenth-largest population and third-largest economy as of 2016 in terms of nominal GDP, Japan has faced an ongoing period of stagnation during the ] since the 1990s. Japan has been suffering from an ] since the early 2000s with real decline in total population starting in 2011,<ref>{{Cite web|last=Armstrong|first=Shiro|date=2016-05-16|title=Japan's Greatest Challenge (And It's Not China): Massive Population Decline|url=https://nationalinterest.org/blog/the-buzz/japans-greatest-challenge-its-not-china-massive-population-16212|access-date=2020-10-18|website=The National Interest|language=en}}</ref> eroding its potential as a superpower.<ref name="Leika Kihara">{{cite news|title=Japan eyes end to decades long deflation|url=https://www.reuters.com/article/japan-economy-estimate-idUSL4E8JH1TC20120817#ySOkSfW3bZs8lVWK.97|author=Leika Kihara|work=Reuters|date=17 August 2012|access-date=7 September 2012}}</ref> | |||
{{clear}} | |||
== Comparative statistics == | == Comparative statistics of current candidates == | ||
<div style="overflow:auto"> | <div style="overflow:auto"> | ||
{| class="wikitable sortable" style="text-align: center" | {| class="wikitable sortable" style="text-align: center" | ||
!rowspan=2|Country/Union | !rowspan=2|Country/Union | ||
!rowspan=2|Population<ref> ''] — ]'', Retrieved 10 May 2018</ref><ref> '']''</ref> | !rowspan=2|Population<ref> ''] — ]'', Retrieved 10 May 2018</ref><ref> '']''</ref> | ||
!rowspan=2|Area<br />(km<sup>2</sup>) | !rowspan=2|Area<br />(km<sup>2</sup>) | ||
!colspan=2|]<ref name=":0">{{Cite web|title=World Economic Outlook Database, April 2021|url=https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/WEO/weo-database/2021/April/weo-report?a=1&c=998,&s=NGDPD,PPPGDP,PPPPC,&sy=2019&ey=2026&ssm=0&scsm=1&scc=0&ssd=1&ssc=0&sic=0&sort=country&ds=.&br=1|access-date=23 July 2021|website=IMF|language=en}}</ref> | !colspan=2|]<ref name=":0">{{Cite web|title=World Economic Outlook Database, April 2021|url=https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/WEO/weo-database/2021/April/weo-report?a=1&c=998,&s=NGDPD,PPPGDP,PPPPC,&sy=2019&ey=2026&ssm=0&scsm=1&scc=0&ssd=1&ssc=0&sic=0&sort=country&ds=.&br=1|access-date=23 July 2021|website=IMF|language=en}}</ref> | ||
!colspan=2|]<ref name=":0"/> | !colspan=2|]<ref name=":0"/> | ||
!rowspan=2|Military<br> |
!rowspan=2|Military<br>expenditures<br/>(Int$ billion)<ref>{{Cite web|date=April 2023|title=Trends in world military expenditure-2022|url=https://www.sipri.org/sites/default/files/2023-04/2304_fs_milex_2022.pdf|website=SIPRI}}</ref> | ||
!rowspan=2|Military<br>expenditures<br/>(Int$ billion)<ref>{{Cite web|date=April 2021|title=Trends in world military expenditure-2020|url=https://www.sipri.org/sites/default/files/2021-04/fs_2104_milex_0.pdf|website=SIPRI}}</ref> | |||
!rowspan=2|]<ref name="Technical notes 2020">{{cite web|title=Human Development Report 2019 – Technical notes|url=http://hdr.undp.org/sites/default/files/hdr2020_technical_notes.pdf|website=hdr.undp.org|publisher=United Nations Development Programme|access-date=15 December 2020|pages=2–4}}</ref> | !rowspan=2|]<ref name="Technical notes 2020">{{cite web|title=Human Development Report 2019 – Technical notes|url=http://hdr.undp.org/sites/default/files/hdr2020_technical_notes.pdf|website=hdr.undp.org|publisher=United Nations Development Programme|access-date=15 December 2020|pages=2–4}}</ref> | ||
!rowspan=2|] | |||
!rowspan=2|UN Veto Power | |||
|- | |- | ||
!( |
!(USD million) | ||
!] ($) | !] ($) | ||
!(Int$ million) | !(Int$ million) | ||
!] (Int$) |
!] (Int$) | ||
|- | |- | ||
| style="text-align: left" | {{flag|United States}} | | style="text-align: left" | {{flag|United States}} | ||
| |
| 346,238,081 | ||
| 9,525,067 | | 9,525,067 | ||
| |
| 25,035,164 | ||
| 68,309 | | 68,309 | ||
| 22,675,271 | | 22,675,271 | ||
| |
| 75,180 | ||
| |
| 877 | ||
| 0.926 (very high) | |||
| 778.0 | |||
| Yes | |||
| 0.926 (<span style="color:#006000;">very high</span>) | |||
| yes | |||
|---- | |---- | ||
| style="text-align: left" | {{flag|China}} | | style="text-align: left" | {{flag|China}} | ||
| 1,411,778,724 | | 1,411,778,724 | ||
| 9,596,961 | | 9,596,961 | ||
| |
| 18,321,197 | ||
| 11,819 | | 11,819 | ||
| 26,656,766 | | 26,656,766 | ||
| |
| 21,291 | ||
| |
| 292 | ||
| 0.761 (high) | |||
| 252 | |||
| Yes | |||
| 0.761 (<span style="color:#0c0;">high</span>) | |||
| yes | |||
|---- | |---- | ||
| style="text-align: left" | {{nowrap|{{flag|European Union}}}} | | style="text-align: left" | {{nowrap|{{flag|European Union}}}} | ||
| |
| 449,206,209 | ||
| 4,233,262 | | 4,233,262 | ||
| 17,127,535 | | 17,127,535 | ||
| 38,256 | | 38,256 | ||
| 20,918,062 | | 20,918,062 | ||
| |
| 53,960 | ||
| – | |||
| 186<ref>{{Cite web|title=European defence spending hit new high in 2019|url=https://eda.europa.eu/news-and-events/news/2021/01/28/european-defence-spending-hit-new-high-in-2019|access-date=2021-05-16|website=eda.europa.eu|language=en}}</ref> | | 186<ref>{{Cite web|title=European defence spending hit new high in 2019|url=https://eda.europa.eu/news-and-events/news/2021/01/28/european-defence-spending-hit-new-high-in-2019|access-date=2021-05-16|website=eda.europa.eu|language=en}}</ref> | ||
| 0.911 ( |
| 0.911 (very high) | ||
| (France) | | (]) | ||
|---- | |---- | ||
| style="text-align: left" | {{ |
| style="text-align: left" | {{flag|India}} | ||
| 1, |
| 1,456,604,163 | ||
| 3,287,263 | | 3,287,263 | ||
| 3, |
| 3,468,566 | ||
| |
| 3,057 | ||
| 10,207,290 | | 10,207,290 | ||
| |
| 10,475 | ||
| |
| 81.4 | ||
| 0.645 (medium) | |||
| 72.9 | |||
| No | |||
| 0.645 (<span style="color:#fc0;">medium</span>) | |||
| no | |||
|---- | |---- | ||
| style="text-align: left" | {{ |
| style="text-align: left" | {{flag|Russia}} | ||
| |
| 144,458,123 | ||
| 17,125,191 | | 17,125,191 | ||
| |
| 2,133,092 | ||
| 11,654 | | 11,654 | ||
| 4,328,122 | | 4,328,122 | ||
| |
| 31,967 | ||
| |
| 86.4 | ||
| 0.824 (very high) | |||
| 61.7 | |||
| Yes | |||
| 0.824 (<span style="color:#006000;">very high</span>) | |||
| yes | |||
|}</div> | |}</div> | ||
{{NoteFoot}} | |||
== Former candidates == | |||
=== Japan === | |||
In the 1980s, some political and economic analysts predicted that ] would eventually accede to superpower status, due to its large population, growing ], ], ], ] and ] influence, large ], and ].<ref>{{Citation |last=Smith |first=Dennis B. |title=The Emergence of the Economic Superpower: 1980 to the Present |date=1995 |work=Japan since 1945: The Rise of an Economic Superpower |pages=138–169 |editor-last=Smith |editor-first=Dennis B. |url=https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-24126-2_6 |access-date=2024-07-10 |place=London |publisher=Macmillan Education UK |language=en |doi=10.1007/978-1-349-24126-2_6 |isbn=978-1-349-24126-2}}</ref><ref name="Japan From Superrich To Superpower" /><ref>{{Cite web |last=Kreisberg |first=Paul |date=1988-12-11 |title=Japan: A Superpower Minus Military Power |url=https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1988-12-11-op-67-story.html |access-date=2024-07-10 |website=Los Angeles Times |language=en-US}}</ref> Japan's economy was expected to eventually surpass ].<ref name="Zakaria, F 2008">{{cite book |last=Zakaria |first=Fareed |author-link=Fareed Zakaria |url=https://archive.org/details/postamericanworl00zaka_199 |title=The Post-American World |date=2008 |publisher=W. W. Norton and Company |isbn=978-0-393-06235-9 |page= |url-access=limited}}</ref><ref name="Land of the setting sun">{{Cite news |date=November 12, 2009 |title=Land of the setting sun |url=https://www.economist.com/business/2009/11/12/land-of-the-setting-sun |newspaper=The Economist}}</ref><ref name="Japan From Superrich To Superpower">{{cite magazine |date=July 4, 1988 |title=Japan From Superrich To Superpower |url=http://content.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,967823,00.html |magazine=]}}</ref> However, this prediction failed to materialise following ] and the resulting "]", where Japan has suffered a flat to negative economic outlook,<ref name="Leika Kihara">{{cite news |author=Leika Kihara |date=17 August 2012 |title=Japan eyes end to decades long deflation |url=https://www.reuters.com/article/japan-economy-estimate-idUSL4E8JH1TC20120817#ySOkSfW3bZs8lVWK.97 |access-date=7 September 2012 |work=Reuters}}</ref> while ] before suffering real decline in total population starting in 2011.<ref name=":1" /><ref>{{Cite news |date=2023-01-20 |title=Japan was the future but it's stuck in the past |url=https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-63830490 |access-date=2024-07-10 |language=en-GB}}</ref> | |||
== See also == | == See also == | ||
{{colbegin}} | {{colbegin}} | ||
* ] | * ] | ||
* ] | |||
* ] | * ] | ||
* ] | * ] | ||
* ] | |||
* ] | * ] | ||
* ] | * ] | ||
* ] | * ] | ||
* ] | * ] | ||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | * ] | ||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | * ] | ||
* ] | * ] | ||
* ] | * ] | ||
* ] | |||
* ] | * ] | ||
* ] | |||
{{colend}} | {{colend}} | ||
== References == | == References == | ||
{{reflist|30em}} | {{reflist|30em}} | ||
{{clear}} | |||
== External links == | == External links == | ||
Line 306: | Line 169: | ||
{{DEFAULTSORT:Potential Superpowers}} | {{DEFAULTSORT:Potential Superpowers}} | ||
] | ] | ||
] | ] |
Latest revision as of 08:23, 27 December 2024
Entity speculated to be or become a superpower
A potential superpower is a sovereign state or other polity that is speculated to be or have the potential to become a superpower; a sovereign state or supranational union that holds a dominant position characterized by the ability to exert influence and project power on a global scale through economic, military, technological, political, and/or cultural means.
After the United States, which, following the collapse of the Soviet Union, is currently considered to be the world's foremost and sole widely undisputed—and by some accounts only—superpower, only China, the European Union, India, and Russia have consistently been academically discussed as potential superpowers of the 21st century, with Japan having been a former candidate in the 1980s.
China
Further information: Chinese Century and China's peaceful riseThe People's Republic of China has arguably received the most consistent coverage in the popular press of its potential superpower status, and has been identified as a rising or emerging economic and military superpower by academics and other experts. One source argued that "China certainly presents the most promising all-round profile" of a potential superpower, having high economic growth and a large population. According to U.S. Secretary of State, Antony Blinken, China represents the "biggest geopolitical test of the 21st century" to the United States, as it is "the only country with enough power to jeopardize the current global order".
Great focus has been placed on China's growing economic activity on the global stage, in particular where it has been in competition with the United States. Examples of this have included the establishing and large-scale expansion in countries joining the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank in contrast to traditional western institutions, along with the Belt and Road Initiative and China's role in the worldwide groundings of the Boeing 737 MAX. It has also been argued that the future is likely to be of growing competition between two highly dominant countries in the form of the United States and China while others begin to lag behind economically. Predictions have also been made of it overtaking the United States as the world's largest economy in the 2020s. Due to the country's rapidly developing AI industry, China has also been referred to as an "AI superpower".
In contrast to this however there have been some who question how long this pace of economic growth could continue, with emphasis placed on China's very large but ageing and shrinking population of over 1.4 billion, and long-term effects of pollution within the country that have accumulated during its fast pace of industrialisation, and also that while it continues to grow it has yet to prove attractive to skilled immigration from outside the country in the same way other countries like the United States have. A supposed lack of soft power is another aspect of contention to China's status as a potential superpower.
There has been significant discussion around the ability for China to project power militarily. There has been argument that its ties with Russia and Central Asia could see the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation become the "NATO of the East". It has also been argued that American absence from the Indo-Pacific region during the war on terror has allowed Chinese to actively challenge the United States as the pre-eminent power in the region. Others have argued however that China still remains surrounded by potentially hostile nations and still lacks few friends or allies necessary for it to truly compete with the United States.
European Union
See also: Eurosphere and Paneuropean UnionThe European Union (EU) has been called an emerging superpower or having already achieved that status, primarily to do with its economic power and political influence on the world stage. Factors highlighted have included its large population, the size and global reach of its combined economy, and the comparative unpopularity of US foreign policy.
Despite lacking a cohesive military of its own, with military capabilities still the matter of individual member states, it has been argued that this is irrelevant in the 21st century and accordingly so when considering the status of the EU as a potential superpower. Others however have questioned this interpretation, instead arguing that its lack of a unified military structure compared to the United States undermines the case that the EU is a potential superpower.
The EU's lack of political integration has also come under conflicting views regarding its effect on superpower status. Some have argued that its more "low profile" diplomacy and emphasis on the rule of law represent a new kind of geopolitical influence that fulfills the political requirements for consideration of being a superpower rather than simply failing to meet them. Others however argue that its lack of a centralised foreign or defence policy leaves its effectiveness uncertain when compared to that of a more politically integrated union of states such as the United States, and it has even been argued that the EU remains as little more than an extension of a Europe reliant or dominated by the United States.
The European Union has been called a "regulatory superpower" due to the Brussels effect, which suggests that regulations and standards applicable in the EU will also be adopted by numerous countries outside the EU over time.
India
Further information: Indian CenturyThe Republic of India has seen considerable coverage of its potential of becoming a superpower economically. Multiple opinions have pointed towards India's rapid economic development as a reason for it to be considered a potential superpower, in particular during the 2010s when it was predicted to outpace China's growth into the future. Economists and researchers at Harvard University have projected India's 7% projected annual growth rate through 2024 would continue to put it ahead of China, making India the fastest growing economy in the world. Over and above, India also has the advantage of having a very large and growing young population with a median age of 28, compared to China's median age of 39.
While India's economic growth has continued, others have noted that inequality remains high in the country and that its potential for trading appears more limited compared to regional rivals such as China, and that despite India briefly becoming the world's fastest-growing economy in 2015 its growth declined below China's since 2018.
It has also been argued that India's government and bureaucracy is also geared against emerging as a superpower, with it being argued that it "does very little collective thinking about its long-term foreign policy goals, since most of the strategic planning that takes place within the government happens on an individual level".
Russia
Further information: Russia as an energy superpower and History of the Russian FederationRussia, since its imperial times, has been considered both a great power and a regional power. Throughout most of the Soviet-era, the Soviet Union was one of the world's two superpowers. However, after the dissolution of the Soviet Union, the Russian Federation as its successor state lost its superpower status. In the early 21st century, Russia has been suggested as a potential candidate for resuming superpower status, while others have made the assertion that it is already a superpower. In his 2005 publication entitled Russia in the 21st Century: The Prodigal Superpower, Steven Rosefielde, a professor of economics at University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, predicted that Russia would emerge as a superpower before 2010 and augur another arms race. However, Rosefielde noted that such an end would come with tremendous sacrifice to global security and the Russian people's freedom. Stephen Kinzer of The Boston Globe compared Russia's actions with its own neighbouring territories, to those of "any other superpower", taking Ukraine and Crimea as examples.
Others however have put forward more pessimistic views towards Russia's ability to regain its superpower status. A mixed opinion has been offered by Matthew Fleischer of the Los Angeles Times, contending that severe climate change would be necessary for much of Russia's inherent natural resources to become viable.
Several analysts commented on the fact that Russia showed signs of an aging and shrinking population. Fred Weir said that this severely constricts and limits Russia's potential to re-emerge as a central world power. In 2011, British historian and professor Niall Ferguson also highlighted the negative effects of Russia's declining population, and suggested that Russia is on its way to "global irrelevance". Russia has, however, shown a slight population growth since the late 2000s, partly due to immigration, quickly rising birth rates, slowly declining death rates.
Russia's ability to project hard power was also questioned following the Russian invasion of Ukraine in 2022, with the Russian military's poor performance prompting economist Paul Krugman to suggest Russia was little more than a "Potemkin Superpower".
Comparative statistics of current candidates
Country/Union | Population | Area (km) |
GDP (nominal) | GDP (PPP) | Military expenditures (Int$ billion) |
HDI | UN Security Council veto power | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(USD million) | Per capita ($) | (Int$ million) | Per capita (Int$) | ||||||
United States | 346,238,081 | 9,525,067 | 25,035,164 | 68,309 | 22,675,271 | 75,180 | 877 | 0.926 (very high) | Yes |
China | 1,411,778,724 | 9,596,961 | 18,321,197 | 11,819 | 26,656,766 | 21,291 | 292 | 0.761 (high) | Yes |
European Union | 449,206,209 | 4,233,262 | 17,127,535 | 38,256 | 20,918,062 | 53,960 | 186 | 0.911 (very high) | (France) |
India | 1,456,604,163 | 3,287,263 | 3,468,566 | 3,057 | 10,207,290 | 10,475 | 81.4 | 0.645 (medium) | No |
Russia | 144,458,123 | 17,125,191 | 2,133,092 | 11,654 | 4,328,122 | 31,967 | 86.4 | 0.824 (very high) | Yes |
Former candidates
Japan
In the 1980s, some political and economic analysts predicted that Japan would eventually accede to superpower status, due to its large population, growing economic, military, industrial, technological and cultural influence, large gross domestic product, and high economic growth at that time. Japan's economy was expected to eventually surpass that of the United States. However, this prediction failed to materialise following a stock market crash and the resulting "Lost Decades", where Japan has suffered a flat to negative economic outlook, while its population has been aging since the late 1980s before suffering real decline in total population starting in 2011.
See also
- American Century
- ASEAN
- Asian Century
- BRIC
- BRICS
- Emerging power
- Energy superpower
- Eurasian Economic Union
- Great power
- List of countries in Europe by military expenditures
- Mercosur
- Post–Cold War era
- Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership
- Second Cold War
- South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation
- Superpower collapse
References
- Munro, André. "superpower". Encyclopedia Britannica. Retrieved 2 May 2023.
- Leonard, Mark (18 February 2005). "Europe: the new superpower". Irish Times. Archived from the original on 27 March 2009. Retrieved 31 May 2015.
- McCormick, John (2007). The European Superpower. Palgrave Macmillan.
- Lee, Yen Nee (2020-09-17). "The U.S. is still a dominant power — but it's not clear if it remains the global leader". CNBC. Retrieved 2024-07-15.
- Mathew Burrows, Robert A. Manning (2020-08-17). "What Happens When America Is No Longer the Undisputed Super Power?". The National Interest. Retrieved 2024-07-15.
- Bremmer, Ian (2015-05-28). "5 Reasons Why the US Remains the World's Only Superpower". TIME. Retrieved 2024-07-15.
- Canada Among Nations, 2004: Setting Priorities Straight. McGill-Queen's Press – MQUP. 17 January 2005. p. 85. ISBN 978-0-7735-2836-9. Archived from the original on 16 January 2023. Retrieved 15 July 2024.
The United States is the sole world's superpower.
- Dannatt, Richard (2024-04-14). "America has just reminded us there is only one world superpower". The Telegraph. ISSN 0307-1235. Retrieved 2024-07-15.
- "Visions of China – Asian Superpower". CNN. 1999. Retrieved 19 July 2014.
- ^ "China's military presence is growing. Does a superpower collision loom?". The Guardian. 1 January 2014. Retrieved 19 July 2014.
- Cordesman, Anthony (1 October 2019). "China and the United States: Cooperation, Competition, and/or Conflict". Center for Strategic and International Studies. Retrieved 22 March 2021.
Seen from this perspective, such trends clearly that show that China already is a true economic superpower with growing resources and a steadily improving technology base. Its military structure is evolving to the point where China can compare or compete with the U.S. — at least in Asia.
- Silver, Laura; Devlin, Kat; Huang, Christine (5 December 2019). "China's Economic Growth Mostly Welcomed in Emerging Markets, but Neighbors Wary of Its Influence". Pew Research Center. Retrieved 22 March 2021.
China has emerged as a global economic superpower in recent decades. It is not only the world's second largest economy and the largest exporter by value, but it has also been investing in overseas infrastructure and development at a rapid clip
- Lendon, Brad (5 March 2021). "China has built the world's largest navy. Now what's Beijing going to do with it?". CNN. Retrieved 22 March 2021.
In 2018, China held 40% of the world's shipbuilding market by gross tons, according to United Nations figures cited by the China Power Project at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, well ahead of second place South Korea at 25%. Put in a historical perspective, China's shipbuilding numbers are staggering – dwarfing even the U.S. efforts of World War II. China built more ships in one year of peace time (2019) than the U.S. did in four of war (1941–1945).
- Lemahieu, Herve (29 May 2019). "Five big takeaways from the 2019 Asia Power Index". Lowy Institute. Retrieved 22 March 2021.
China, the emerging superpower, netted the highest gains in overall power in 2019, ranking first in half of the eight Index measures. For the first time, China narrowly edged out the United States in the Index's assessment of economic resources. In absolute terms China's economy grew by more than the total size of Australia's economy in 2018. The world's largest trading nation has also paradoxically seen its GDP become less dependent on exports. This makes China less vulnerable to an escalating trade war than most other Asian economies.
- Romana, Chito (2 March 2010). "Does China Want to Be Top Superpower?". Abcnews.go.com. Retrieved 10 February 2012.
- "From Rural Transformation to Global Integration: The Environmental and Social Impacts of China's Rise to Superpower – Carnegie Endowment for International Peace". 9 February 2006. Retrieved 10 February 2012.
- "China: The Balance Sheet Summary". getabstract.com. 2006. Retrieved 19 July 2014.
- Uckert, Merri B. (April 1995). "China As An Economic and Military Superpower: A Dangerous Combination?" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 15 January 2013. Retrieved 10 February 2012.
- ^ Buzan, Barry (2004). The United States and the Great Powers. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Polity Press. p. 70. ISBN 0-7456-3375-7.
- "China poses "biggest geopolitical test" for the U.S., Blinken says". NBC News. 2021-03-03. Retrieved 2024-07-09.
- Allen-Ebrahimian, Bethany (April 1, 2015). "Obama Is Sitting Alone at a Bar Drinking a Consolation Beer". Foreign Policy.
- Aboulafia, Richard (March 20, 2019). "Boeing's Crisis Strengthens Beijing's Hand". Foreign Policy.
- Tunsjø, Øystein (February 27, 2018). The Return of Bipolarity in World Politics: China, the United States, and Geostructural Realism. Columbia University Press. ISBN 9780231546904.
- Thair Shaikh (10 June 2011). "When Will China Become a Global Superpower?". CNN. Archived from the original on 11 March 2012. Retrieved 28 June 2014.
- Lee, Kai-Fu (September 25, 2018). AI Superpowers: China, Silicon Valley, and the New World Order. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
- Westerheide, Fabian. "China – The First Artificial Intelligence Superpower". Forbes. Retrieved 2024-07-19.
- Milmo, Dan; editor, Dan Milmo Global technology (2021-12-08). "TechScape: how China became an AI superpower ready to take on the United States". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 2024-07-19.
{{cite news}}
:|last2=
has generic name (help) - Beardson, Timothy (June 28, 2013). "I don't see China becoming a superpower in this century". The Times Of India. Archived from the original on March 5, 2016.
- Timothy Beardson (24 May 2013). "Action Needed on the Environment". Huffington Post. Archived from the original on February 26, 2021. Retrieved 26 July 2014.
- Susan Shirk (2008). China: Fragile Superpower. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-537319-6.
- Amy Chua (2007). Day of Empire: How Hyperpowers Rise to Global Dominance – and Why They Fall. Random House. ISBN 978-0-385-51284-8.
- Swain, Ashok (2021-01-21). "China's economy and military can overtake US, but it still won't become global superpower". ThePrint. Retrieved 2024-07-12.
- "Today's China will never be a superpower". www.ft.com. Retrieved 2024-07-12.
- Khanna, Parag. "Waving Goodbye to Hegemony". The New York Times. Retrieved July 19, 2014.
- Ashley Townshend, Brendan Thomas-Noone, Matilda Steward (19 August 2019). Averting Crisis: American strategy, military spending and collective defence in the Indo-Pacific. United States Studies Centre (Report).
{{cite report}}
: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) - Minxin Pei (20 March 2012). "The Loneliest Superpower". Foreign Policy. Archived from the original on May 5, 2021. Retrieved 28 June 2014.
- "Europe: the new superpower". CER. 18 February 2005. Retrieved 28 May 2014.
- ^ John McCormick (14 November 2006). The European Superpower. Macmillan Education UK. ISBN 978-1-4039-9846-0.
- Europe in the New Century: Visions of an Emerging Superpower. Lynne Rienner Publishers. 2001. ISBN 9781555878528. Retrieved 10 February 2012.
Europe emerging superpower.
- Trevor Williams (29 October 2008). "Danish Envoy: Economic Strength Makes EU a 'Rising Superpower'". Globalatlanta. Retrieved 19 July 2014.
- Robert Lane Greene (18 July 2003). "EU Constitution: A 'Superpower Europe' It Won't Be". Globalpolicy.org. Retrieved 10 February 2012.
- Colin S. Gray, "Document No. 1: The Quadrennial Defense Review (QDR), 2006, and the Perils of the Twenty-First Century," Comparative Strategy, 25/2, (2006): p 143.
- Adrian Hyde-Price (23 October 2004). "The EU, Power and Coercion: From 'Civilian' to 'Civilising' Power" (PDF). ARENA Centre for European Studies. Archived from the original (PDF) on 26 March 2009.
- "Europe vs. America by Tony Judt". The New York Review of Books. 10 February 2005. Retrieved 10 February 2012.
- Zbigniew Brzezinski, Strategic Vision: America and the Crisis of Global Power, (New York: Basic Books, 2012), p 22, 126.
- dmalloy (2023-06-15). "The world's regulatory superpower is taking on a regulatory nightmare: artificial intelligence". Atlantic Council. Retrieved 2023-09-15.
- kdaponte (2023-05-24). "Meta fine shows EU is 'regulatory superpower,' Northeastern expert says". College of Social Sciences and Humanities. Retrieved 2023-09-15.
- Bradford, Anu (2020-03-01). "The Brussels Effect: How the European Union Rules the World". Faculty Books. doi:10.1093/oso/9780190088583.001.0001. ISBN 978-0-19-008858-3.
- Dingman, Michael (2011-01-09). "India 2025: What kind of superpower?". The Economic Times. Bennett, Coleman & Co. Ltd. Retrieved 2012-02-10.
- "India will be the biggest superpower". Rediff. 2006. Retrieved 19 July 2014.
- Subramanian, Samanth (1 May 2012). "The Outlier:The inscrutable politics of Subramanian Swamy". The Caravan: A Journal of Politics & Culture. Retrieved 29 March 2018.
- Zakaria, Fareed (March 5, 2006). "India Rising". Newsweek. Retrieved August 2, 2014.
- "New Growth Projections Predict the Rise of India, East Africa and Fall of Oil Economies". Harvard Kennedy School. 7 May 2015. Archived from the original on 2016-05-08. Retrieved 12 April 2016.
- Zhong, Raymond (1 January 2016). "India Will Be Fastest-Growing Economy for Coming Decade, Harvard Researchers Predict". The Wall Street Journal. Retrieved 12 April 2016.
- Silver, Laura; Huang, Christine; Clancy, Laura (9 February 2023). "Key facts as India surpasses China as the world's most populous country". Pew Research Center. Retrieved 2024-02-23.
- Khanna, Parag (2008-01-27). "Waving Goodbye to Hegemony". The New York Times. Retrieved 2012-02-10.
- Khanna, Parag (2008-05-18). "The Rise of Non-Americanism". New America Foundation. Archived from the original on 2011-06-29. Retrieved 2012-02-10.
- Pritchett, Lant (2009). "A Review of Edward Luce's 'In Spite of the Gods: The Strange Rise of Modern India'". Journal of Economic Literature. 47 (3): 771–081. doi:10.1257/jel.47.3.771.
- "India to beat China again as fastest-growing economy in 2016: IMF". The Economic Times. Bennett, Coleman & Co. Ltd. 9 July 2015. Archived from the original on July 17, 2015. Retrieved 20 November 2015.
- "India loses place as world's fastest-growing economy". BBC News. 2019-05-31. Retrieved 2020-10-18.
- Miller, Manjari Chatterjee (May–June 2013). "India's Feeble Foreign Policy". Foreign Affairs. 92 (3): 14–18. Retrieved 27 June 2013.
- Minkina, Mirosław (2019-09-30). "Russia's return to the superpower status". Security and Defence Quarterly. 26 (4): 34–50. doi:10.35467/sdq/110335. hdl:11331/2402. ISSN 2300-8741.
- Graham-Harrison, Emma; Luhn, Alec; Walker, Shaun; Rice-Oxley, Mark; Sedghi, Amy (2015-07-07). "China and Russia: the world's new superpower axis?". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 2024-07-12.
- "Q&A: The return of the Russian superpower?". edition.cnn.com. Retrieved 2024-07-12.
- "A Superpower Is Reborn". The New York Times. Retrieved 19 November 2015.
- Steven Rosefielde (February 2005). Russia in the 21st Century. UNC Press. ISBN 978-0-521-54529-7.
- Stephen Kinzer (11 May 2014). "Russia acts like any other superpower". Boston Globe. Retrieved 7 July 2014.
- Matthew Fleischer (12 March 2014). "How curbing climate change can prevent Russia from becoming a superpower". Los Angeles Times. Retrieved 7 July 2014.
- Fred Weir (3 November 2011). "Despite huge cash bonuses to mothers, Russia's population is shrinking". GlobalPost. Retrieved 8 July 2014.
- Niall Ferguson (12 December 2011). "In Decline, Putin's Russia Is On Its Way to Global Irrelevance". Newsweek. Retrieved 2 August 2014.
- Mark Adomanis (11 May 2013). "Russia's Population Isn't Shrinking (It's Growing Very, Very Slowly)". Forbes. Archived from the original on June 9, 2013. Retrieved 8 July 2014.
- Paul Krugman (28 February 2022). "Russia Is a Potemkin Superpower". New York Times. Archived from the original on 1 March 2022. Retrieved 1 March 2022.
- Population by country on July 2017 Est. The World Factbook — Central Intelligence Agency, Retrieved 10 May 2018
- Population in EU (28) on 1 January 2017 Eurostat
- ^ "World Economic Outlook Database, April 2021". IMF. Retrieved 23 July 2021.
- "Trends in world military expenditure-2022" (PDF). SIPRI. April 2023.
- "Human Development Report 2019 – Technical notes" (PDF). hdr.undp.org. United Nations Development Programme. pp. 2–4. Retrieved 15 December 2020.
- "European defence spending hit new high in 2019". eda.europa.eu. Retrieved 2021-05-16.
- Smith, Dennis B. (1995), Smith, Dennis B. (ed.), "The Emergence of the Economic Superpower: 1980 to the Present", Japan since 1945: The Rise of an Economic Superpower, London: Macmillan Education UK, pp. 138–169, doi:10.1007/978-1-349-24126-2_6, ISBN 978-1-349-24126-2, retrieved 2024-07-10
- ^ "Japan From Superrich To Superpower". Time. July 4, 1988.
- Kreisberg, Paul (1988-12-11). "Japan: A Superpower Minus Military Power". Los Angeles Times. Retrieved 2024-07-10.
- Zakaria, Fareed (2008). The Post-American World. W. W. Norton and Company. p. 210. ISBN 978-0-393-06235-9.
- "Land of the setting sun". The Economist. November 12, 2009.
- Leika Kihara (17 August 2012). "Japan eyes end to decades long deflation". Reuters. Retrieved 7 September 2012.
- "Japan was the future but it's stuck in the past". 2023-01-20. Retrieved 2024-07-10.
External links
- Centre for Rising Powers, University of Cambridge
- China on the World Stage from the Dean Peter Krogh Foreign Affairs Digital Archives
- Blast off: India hopes Mars rocket will enhance its superpower status by The Times
- China and India: The Power of Two by Harvard Business Review
- The End of Pax Americana: How Western Decline Became Inevitable by The Atlantic
- Why The U.S. Remains The World's Unchallenged Superpower