| Revision as of 15:30, 27 December 2024 edit79.200.21.192 (talk) →December 2024: ReplyTag: Reply← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 15:31, 27 December 2024 edit undoScottishFinnishRadish (talk | contribs)Checkusers, Oversighters, Administrators60,813 edits →December 2024: ReplyTag: Reply | ||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
| :Please take part in the discussion on the article talk page or you will likely be blocked from editing the article. ] (]) 14:32, 27 December 2024 (UTC) | :Please take part in the discussion on the article talk page or you will likely be blocked from editing the article. ] (]) 14:32, 27 December 2024 (UTC) | ||
| ::The disputed entry impacts on an active libel and defamation case. It seems to me this entry has been deliberately edited to suppress public knowledge of the recent libel action. The amendment from 'abuse allegation' to 'abuse allegations' clearly implies more than one public accuser, a further distortion of the truth that seems highly prejudicial to Mr Stanley (a living person) and directly impacts upon his livelihood. The source cited for these amendments, screenanarchy.com, is a blog entry and, in my opinion, not a valid primary source. I believe these amendments have been made by Finland based journalists promoting a tabloid 'documentary' 'SHADOWLAND', that seeks to exploit this unfortunate case for financial gain. ] (]) 15:30, 27 December 2024 (UTC) | ::The disputed entry impacts on an active libel and defamation case. It seems to me this entry has been deliberately edited to suppress public knowledge of the recent libel action. The amendment from 'abuse allegation' to 'abuse allegations' clearly implies more than one public accuser, a further distortion of the truth that seems highly prejudicial to Mr Stanley (a living person) and directly impacts upon his livelihood. The source cited for these amendments, screenanarchy.com, is a blog entry and, in my opinion, not a valid primary source. I believe these amendments have been made by Finland based journalists promoting a tabloid 'documentary' 'SHADOWLAND', that seeks to exploit this unfortunate case for financial gain. ] (]) 15:30, 27 December 2024 (UTC) | ||
| :::Those are arguments that should be made on the talk page ]. ] (]) 15:31, 27 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| {{Block indent|''If this is a ], and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider ] for yourself or ] so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.''}}<!-- Template:Shared IP advice --> | {{Block indent|''If this is a ], and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider ] for yourself or ] so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.''}}<!-- Template:Shared IP advice --> | ||
Latest revision as of 15:31, 27 December 2024
December 2024
Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Misplaced Pages about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Richard Stanley (director). Thank you. GiantSnowman 13:56, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Misplaced Pages, as you did at Richard Stanley (director). GiantSnowman 14:20, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
Hi 79.200.21.192! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of Richard Stanley (director) several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.
All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree at Talk:Richard Stanley (director), please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 14:31, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
- Please take part in the discussion on the article talk page or you will likely be blocked from editing the article. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 14:32, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
- The disputed entry impacts on an active libel and defamation case. It seems to me this entry has been deliberately edited to suppress public knowledge of the recent libel action. The amendment from 'abuse allegation' to 'abuse allegations' clearly implies more than one public accuser, a further distortion of the truth that seems highly prejudicial to Mr Stanley (a living person) and directly impacts upon his livelihood. The source cited for these amendments, screenanarchy.com, is a blog entry and, in my opinion, not a valid primary source. I believe these amendments have been made by Finland based journalists promoting a tabloid 'documentary' 'SHADOWLAND', that seeks to exploit this unfortunate case for financial gain. 79.200.21.192 (talk) 15:30, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
- Those are arguments that should be made on the talk page here. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 15:31, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
- The disputed entry impacts on an active libel and defamation case. It seems to me this entry has been deliberately edited to suppress public knowledge of the recent libel action. The amendment from 'abuse allegation' to 'abuse allegations' clearly implies more than one public accuser, a further distortion of the truth that seems highly prejudicial to Mr Stanley (a living person) and directly impacts upon his livelihood. The source cited for these amendments, screenanarchy.com, is a blog entry and, in my opinion, not a valid primary source. I believe these amendments have been made by Finland based journalists promoting a tabloid 'documentary' 'SHADOWLAND', that seeks to exploit this unfortunate case for financial gain. 79.200.21.192 (talk) 15:30, 27 December 2024 (UTC)