Revision as of 13:11, 10 April 2022 view sourcePiotrus (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Event coordinators, Extended confirmed users, File movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers285,860 edits Notification: listing of Piccadilly Circus in popular culture at WP:Articles for deletion.Tag: Twinkle← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 19:16, 27 December 2024 view source Lowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,293,752 editsm Archiving 1 discussion(s) to User talk:Fæ/2024) (bot | ||
(10 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown) | |||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
{{Off and On WikiBreak}} | {{Off and On WikiBreak}} | ||
== |
== Nomination of ] for deletion == | ||
⚫ | <div class="afd-notice"> | ||
⚫ | <div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0;">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ] is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ]. | ||
⚫ | The article will be discussed at ''']''' until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. | ||
] | |||
Read an old 2019 BLP thread on terfs and wp:label, and you made a very nice and appreciated point about not discouraging trans editors from participating in trans topics. Have a cat! | |||
<span style="background-color:#20B2AA;padding: 2px 3px 1px 3px">] <span style="color:#fff">⁂</span> ]</span> 20:19, 27 November 2021 (UTC) | |||
<br style="clear: both;"/> | |||
== Guy Macon's voluntary iban removed == | |||
Hi. Just letting you know that {{u|Guy Macon}}'s voluntary interaction ban with you has been lifted, per a clear consensus at ]. The full discussion is . Happy to discuss further if required. -- ] (]) 10:12, 5 January 2022 (UTC) | |||
== Nomination of ] for deletion == | |||
⚫ | <div class="afd-notice"> | ||
⚫ | <div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article |
||
⚫ | Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.<!-- Template:Afd notice --></div> ] (]) 16:17, 12 October 2024 (UTC) | ||
⚫ | The article will be discussed at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. | ||
== Good article reassessment for ] == | |||
⚫ | Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. | ||
] has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the ]. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ] (]) 22:45, 26 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
<!-- Template:Afd notice --></div> <sub style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">]|]</sub> 13:11, 10 April 2022 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 19:16, 27 December 2024
Archives |
/2014 /2015 /2016 /2017 /2018 /2019 /2020 |
This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 2 sections are present. |
When I do reply it may be from a mobile phone or by email. Due to routinely using public wifi, my edits will normally be via ToR to avoid browser hijacking. |
Fæ is busy and is going to be on Misplaced Pages in off-and-on doses, and may not respond swiftly to queries. |
Nomination of Clare Dimyon for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Clare Dimyon is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Clare Dimyon until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Ynsfial (talk) 16:17, 12 October 2024 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for British Library
British Library has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 22:45, 26 December 2024 (UTC)