Revision as of 02:35, 14 January 2012 view sourceFæ (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers83,148 edits ce | Latest revision as of 19:16, 27 December 2024 view source Lowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,294,330 editsm Archiving 1 discussion(s) to User talk:Fæ/2024) (bot | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{User:MiszaBot/config | {{User:MiszaBot/config | ||
|archiveheader = {{aan}} | |archiveheader = {{aan}} | ||
|minthreadsleft = |
|minthreadsleft = 2 | ||
|minthreadstoarchive = 1 | |minthreadstoarchive = 1 | ||
|algo = old(7d) | |algo = old(7d) | ||
|archive = User talk:Fæ/%(year)d | |archive = User talk:Fæ/%(year)d | ||
}}{{bots|deny=DPL bot}}{{archivebox|{{center|]<br>]<br>]<br>]<br>]<br>]<br>]}}|search=no|bot=}} | |||
}}{{/head}} | |||
{{notice|image=Faebot logo.png|When I do reply it may be from a mobile phone or by email. {{=)}} Due to routinely using public wifi, my edits will normally be via ToR to avoid browser hijacking.}} | |||
{{archives|{{center|]<br/>]<br/>]}}|search=yes|bot=MiszaBot}} | |||
{{Off and On WikiBreak}} | |||
{{User:Fæ/WMUK disclaimer}} | |||
__TOC__ | |||
== Nomination of ] for deletion == | |||
== ] == | |||
<div class="afd-notice"> | |||
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0;">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ] is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ]. | |||
The article will be discussed at ''']''' until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. | |||
An article you made serious cuts to some time ago has been restored to its unsourced/non-neutral version. I was going to clean it up to remove some of the non-neutrality and lack of sourcing, but I thought you might wish to intervene first. Your edits are <span class="plainlinks"></span>, and the restoration of the old content is <span class="plainlinks"></span>. —] <small><sup>]</sup></small>/<small>]</small> 20:56, 12 January 2012 (UTC) | |||
:I thought about rolling back, but I'm not sure it's that simple. The article has a real problem being single-sourced, however, I think this can be resolved by improvement rather than just cutting it back to a stub as I suspect reasonable mention in sources (esp. non-English) can be uncovered. I agree that the non-neutral text needs to be trimmed. Bit busy, so I'll probably not get around to looking further. Cheers --] (]) 06:52, 13 January 2012 (UTC) | |||
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.<!-- Template:Afd notice --></div> ] (]) 16:17, 12 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
== Good article reassessment for ] == | |||
] has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the ]. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ] (]) 22:45, 26 December 2024 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 19:16, 27 December 2024
Archives |
/2014 /2015 /2016 /2017 /2018 /2019 /2020 |
This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 2 sections are present. |
When I do reply it may be from a mobile phone or by email. Due to routinely using public wifi, my edits will normally be via ToR to avoid browser hijacking. |
Fæ is busy and is going to be on Misplaced Pages in off-and-on doses, and may not respond swiftly to queries. |
Nomination of Clare Dimyon for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Clare Dimyon is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Clare Dimyon until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Ynsfial (talk) 16:17, 12 October 2024 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for British Library
British Library has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 22:45, 26 December 2024 (UTC)