| Revision as of 17:38, 23 January 2012 view source168.137.100.23 (talk)No edit summary← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 19:16, 27 December 2024 view source Lowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,294,330 editsm Archiving 1 discussion(s) to User talk:Fæ/2024) (bot | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{User:MiszaBot/config | {{User:MiszaBot/config | ||
| |archiveheader = {{aan}} | |archiveheader = {{aan}} | ||
| |minthreadsleft = |
|minthreadsleft = 2 | ||
| |minthreadstoarchive = 1 | |minthreadstoarchive = 1 | ||
| |algo = old(7d) | |algo = old(7d) | ||
| |archive = User talk:Fæ/%(year)d | |archive = User talk:Fæ/%(year)d | ||
| }}{{bots|deny=DPL bot}}{{archivebox|{{center|]<br>]<br>]<br>]<br>]<br>]<br>]}}|search=no|bot=}} | |||
| }}{{bots|deny=DPL bot}}{{/head}} | |||
| {{notice|image=Faebot logo.png|When I do reply it may be from a mobile phone or by email. {{=)}} Due to routinely using public wifi, my edits will normally be via ToR to avoid browser hijacking.}} | |||
| {{archives|{{center|]<br/>]<br/>]}}|search=yes|bot=MiszaBot}} | |||
| {{Off and On WikiBreak}} | |||
| {{User:Fæ/WMUK disclaimer}} | |||
| __TOC__ | |||
| == Nomination of ] for deletion == | |||
| == ] == | |||
| <div class="afd-notice"> | |||
| <div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0;">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ] is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ]. | |||
| The article will be discussed at ''']''' until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. | |||
| Hi Fæ, I'm still hoping to get your feedback on the ] (TREC) article -- see question in talk page. If you agree that the citations have been improved, we'd like to remove the notability flag that you attached. Perhaps of interest to you and other Wikipedians is the ] (]) <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding ] comment added 04:08, 17 January 2012 (UTC).</span><!--Template:Undated--> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
| :Sorry I was so late in returning to this. I have removed the tag based on your improvements. I remain a bit unconvinced about conferences but this is probably an issue for the lack of good guidelines in this area. The article is obviously created in good faith and I hope you continue to work on it to make long term impact on the historic record as obvious as possible. Cheers --] (]) 21:37, 19 January 2012 (UTC) | |||
| Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.<!-- Template:Afd notice --></div> ] (]) 16:17, 12 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == You've got mail! == | |||
| == Good article reassessment for ] == | |||
| {{you've got mail}} ] (]) 21:28, 19 January 2012 (UTC) | |||
| ] has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the ]. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ] (]) 22:45, 26 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ==Disambiguation link notification== | |||
| Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to ]. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the ]{{*}} Join us at the ].</small> | |||
| :] (] | ]) | |||
| ::added links pointing to ] and ] | |||
| :] (] | ]) | |||
| ::added a link pointing to ] | |||
| :] (] | ]) | |||
| ::added a link pointing to ] | |||
| It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 11:14, 22 January 2012 (UTC) | |||
| :What an unnecessary notice, the designer never thought of ]. It is rather annoying as in these cases I converted inter-wiki links to local links and did not actually add the link itself to the article. Guess I am forced to add the surplus code {{((}}bots|deny=DPL bot}} to my page header. --] (]) 12:06, 22 January 2012 (UTC) | |||
| Hi Fæ, I'm hoping to discuss the flag you attached about the changes to the H&R Block page. I made edits today to update a sorely outdated page. | |||
| I moved the 2 former business units, Financial Advisors and RSM McGladrey, from the Business section to the history section. That content doesn't appear to be promotional in nature. | |||
| Also the products section only listed one product, so I added from the current annual report the other products. When the flag was added, I deleted the descriptions in case they seemed promotional in nature. | |||
| Can you provide any background on what you think still needs to be improved? Or if you agree the product section was the issue and now has been improved, we'd like to ask to remove the flag that you attached. Thanks | |||
Latest revision as of 19:16, 27 December 2024
 Archives |
|
/2014 /2015 /2016 /2017 /2018 /2019 /2020 |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 2 sections are present. |
 | When I do reply it may be from a mobile phone or by email.  Due to routinely using public wifi, my edits will normally be via ToR to avoid browser hijacking. |
 | Fæ is busy and is going to be on Misplaced Pages in off-and-on doses, and may not respond swiftly to queries. |
Nomination of Clare Dimyon for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Clare Dimyon is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Clare Dimyon until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Ynsfial (talk) 16:17, 12 October 2024 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for British Library
British Library has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 22:45, 26 December 2024 (UTC)