| Revision as of 08:23, 27 January 2012 view sourceFæ (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers83,148 edits Note about harassment← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 19:16, 27 December 2024 view source Lowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,294,330 editsm Archiving 1 discussion(s) to User talk:Fæ/2024) (bot | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{User:MiszaBot/config | {{User:MiszaBot/config | ||
| |archiveheader = {{aan}} | |archiveheader = {{aan}} | ||
| |minthreadsleft = |
|minthreadsleft = 2 | ||
| |minthreadstoarchive = 1 | |minthreadstoarchive = 1 | ||
| |algo = old(7d) | |algo = old(7d) | ||
| |archive = User talk:Fæ/%(year)d | |archive = User talk:Fæ/%(year)d | ||
| }}{{bots|deny=DPL bot}}{{archivebox|{{center|]<br>]<br>]<br>]<br>]<br>]<br>]}}|search=no|bot=}} | |||
| }}{{bots|deny=DPL bot}}{{/head}} | |||
| {{notice|image=Faebot logo.png|When I do reply it may be from a mobile phone or by email. {{=)}} Due to routinely using public wifi, my edits will normally be via ToR to avoid browser hijacking.}} | |||
| {{archives|{{center|]<br/>]<br/>]}}|search=yes|bot=MiszaBot}} | |||
| {{Off and On WikiBreak}} | |||
| {{User:Fæ/WMUK disclaimer}} | |||
| __TOC__ | |||
| == Nomination of ] for deletion == | |||
| == ] == | |||
| <div class="afd-notice"> | |||
| <div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0;">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ] is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ]. | |||
| The article will be discussed at ''']''' until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. | |||
| Hi Fæ, I'm still hoping to get your feedback on the ] (TREC) article -- see question in talk page. If you agree that the citations have been improved, we'd like to remove the notability flag that you attached. Perhaps of interest to you and other Wikipedians is the ] (]) <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding ] comment added 04:08, 17 January 2012 (UTC).</span><!--Template:Undated--> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
| :Sorry I was so late in returning to this. I have removed the tag based on your improvements. I remain a bit unconvinced about conferences but this is probably an issue for the lack of good guidelines in this area. The article is obviously created in good faith and I hope you continue to work on it to make long term impact on the historic record as obvious as possible. Cheers --] (]) 21:37, 19 January 2012 (UTC) | |||
| Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.<!-- Template:Afd notice --></div> ] (]) 16:17, 12 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == You've got mail! == | |||
| == Good article reassessment for ] == | |||
| {{you've got mail}} ] (]) 21:28, 19 January 2012 (UTC) | |||
| ] has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the ]. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ] (]) 22:45, 26 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ==Disambiguation link notification== | |||
| Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to ]. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the ]{{*}} Join us at the ].</small> | |||
| :] (] | ]) | |||
| ::added links pointing to ] and ] | |||
| :] (] | ]) | |||
| ::added a link pointing to ] | |||
| :] (] | ]) | |||
| ::added a link pointing to ] | |||
| It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 11:14, 22 January 2012 (UTC) | |||
| :What an unnecessary notice, the designer never thought of ]. It is rather annoying as in these cases I converted inter-wiki links to local links and did not actually add the link itself to the article. Guess I am forced to add the surplus code {{((}}bots|deny=DPL bot}} to my page header. --] (]) 12:06, 22 January 2012 (UTC) | |||
| ==H&R Block== | |||
| Hi Fæ, I'm hoping to discuss the flag you attached about the changes to the H&R Block page. I made edits today to update a sorely outdated page. | |||
| I moved the 2 former business units, Financial Advisors and RSM McGladrey, from the Business section to the history section. That content doesn't appear to be promotional in nature. | |||
| Also the products section only listed one product, so I added from the current annual report the other products. When the flag was added, I deleted the descriptions in case they seemed promotional in nature. | |||
| Can you provide any background on what you think still needs to be improved? Or if you agree the product section was the issue and now has been improved, we'd like to ask to remove the flag that you attached. Thanks <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 17:38, 23 January 2012 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
| *{{la|H&R Block}} | |||
| :I can see you already removed the advert notice. It is not unusual to wait for more than 3 hours for a reply, other contributors are not necessarily available for 24 hours a day. I may return for a more detailed look, but I am glad to see the spammish detail that you previously pasted on the product range has been trimmed down to a simple list. However, you may want to seek advice at ] as you appear to be directly involved with the organization the article is about. Thanks --] (]) 21:07, 23 January 2012 (UTC) | |||
| Thanks for the response. I did wait several hours but understand that you're not sitting at your computer 24/7. I only made the edit to remove the notice because I made the change in response and reached out in good faith to open the discussion to make the improvements. The content wasn't intended to be "spammish," but meant to describe the product/service as the name likely won't stand alone. I did make an extra effort to review and follow the Misplaced Pages guidelines, that any edits were to update outdated information only and seemingly non-controversial edits. I saw on WP:COIN that the "conflict of interest guideline does not absolutely prohibit subject-matter experts or other people with a connection to a subject from editing articles on that subject." Thanks for the reply, and I'll watch for any additional feedback. There is still some outdated information but I'll wait to confirm the information from today is considered in good standing. Thanks for the guidance. <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 22:02, 23 January 2012 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
| ==Misplaced Pages:Peer review for ]== | |||
| Hi Fæ, I was wondering whether you'd be interested in ]? | |||
| Kind Regards -- ]<small>.</small>]] 20:44, 23 January 2012 (UTC) | |||
| :That is a huge scary topic. I'm afraid that religious articles tend to cause a lot of heat and this particular Pope is recent enough for that to still be a worry for me. Thanks for asking though and good luck with getting the review banked. {{=)|9}} --] (]) 00:30, 24 January 2012 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| I have raised the question of banning Kuiper for outing, if your allegations are true, at both here and Commons. Please comment at ] here, and also at Commons if you want to. ←] <sup>'']''</sup> ]→ 17:07, 25 January 2012 (UTC) | |||
| :I'll email you a link to the relevant material. --] (]) 17:09, 25 January 2012 (UTC) | |||
| ::Oops, you don't have email enabled. Please email me if you want a link. Thanks --] (]) 17:10, 25 January 2012 (UTC) | |||
| :::I don't even want to know who he tried to out. I would prefer that you go to the ANI page here (and on Commons also, if you want) and solicit the help of another admin. I am not an admin. ←] <sup>'']''</sup> ]→ 17:11, 25 January 2012 (UTC) | |||
| ::::Thanks, personally I try and steer clear of ANI. I'll pass the information to another person to take a view on. Thanks --] (]) 17:14, 25 January 2012 (UTC) | |||
| == Just quit already == | |||
| You're gonna burn in this world and the next! Best admin evar ! ] (]) 04:43, 27 January 2012 (UTC) | |||
| :This comment fits a coordinated pattern I have seen of personal homophobic harassment directed against me over the last month on Twitter, Misplaced Pages Review, email, Wikimedia Commons and Misplaced Pages. I would like those that keep an eye on my user page to take note and reflect on whether the harassment policies we have for the Wikimedia projects are able to act effectively or efficiently when anonymous accounts are repeatedly used to attack members of our community. Not all such attacks are as obvious as this one. Thanks ] (]) 08:23, 27 January 2012 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 19:16, 27 December 2024
 Archives |
|
/2014 /2015 /2016 /2017 /2018 /2019 /2020 |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 2 sections are present. |
 | When I do reply it may be from a mobile phone or by email.  Due to routinely using public wifi, my edits will normally be via ToR to avoid browser hijacking. |
 | Fæ is busy and is going to be on Misplaced Pages in off-and-on doses, and may not respond swiftly to queries. |
Nomination of Clare Dimyon for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Clare Dimyon is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Clare Dimyon until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Ynsfial (talk) 16:17, 12 October 2024 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for British Library
British Library has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 22:45, 26 December 2024 (UTC)