Revision as of 00:46, 26 November 2024 editMarchjuly (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users111,643 edits →File:A defence of the constitutions of gov of the USA Book Cover.jpg: Ce← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 07:49, 28 December 2024 edit undoMarchjuly (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users111,643 edits →File:Bokontayev.jpg: new sectionTag: New topic | ||
(140 intermediate revisions by 49 users not shown) | |||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
|archiveheader = {{talk archive navigation}} | |archiveheader = {{talk archive navigation}} | ||
|maxarchivesize = 100K | |maxarchivesize = 100K | ||
|counter = |
|counter = 55 | ||
|minthreadsleft = 0 | |minthreadsleft = 0 | ||
|minthreadstoarchive = 5 | |minthreadstoarchive = 5 | ||
Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
|} | |} | ||
== Quick note regarding AN discussion on AfD closures that you may be interested in == | |||
==Deleted articles== | |||
Can I please see the deleted article ]. ] (]) 00:00, 15 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
:{{Reply to|Davidgoodheart}} . ]] 02:34, 15 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
::Can I please see the deleted ]. ] (]) 21:42, 17 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
:::{{Reply to|Davidgoodheart}} . ]] 06:37, 18 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
::::Please let me see the deleted ]. ] (]) 05:14, 19 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
:::::{{Reply to|Davidgoodheart}} . ]] 05:20, 19 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
::::::Can I please see the deleted ] article. ] (]) 05:41, 22 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
:::::::{{Reply to|Davidgoodheart}} . ]] 05:45, 22 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
::::::::Can I please see the deleted article ]. Davidgoodheart (talk) 17:20, 22 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
:::::::::{{Reply to|Davidgoodheart}} . It is a promotional mess, but perhaps the sources may be of value. ]] 13:00, 24 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
] There is currently a discussion at ] regarding the timing of AfD closures. The thread is ]. Thank you.<!--Template:Discussion notice--> — ] <sub>]</sub> 01:14, 20 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
== ] == | |||
== Deletion of "Unlock It" artwork == | |||
Please, the above category ain't empty, containing ] as of 02:02, 16 November 2024 (UTC). It isn't the most populous of categories, but should be left to stay and not deleted, in the light that future people from or associated with ] in ], ] might have their articles published on Misplaced Pages. <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 02:02, 16 November 2024 (UTC)</small> | |||
:{{Reply to|Elías Fortaleza de la Fuerza Sánchez}} It was empty when I tagged it. The deletion tag can be removed once it is populated. ]] 02:04, 16 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
Hi, I've seen that you decided to delete the "]" artwork yesterday. I wasn't present in the discussion since I was on vacations and didn't look at my talk page frequently. I saw that a sockpuppet answered with reasons I share about why the file should've been kept. However, I don't know the user and I think its unfair that because of them, my upload had to be deleted. I understand that the user has done things not permitted here but I should've been taken into account also since I'm the one that uploaded the artwork. I've already began a discussion with @] but nobody else participated. Now that the issue was taken to Files for discussion, I could've been tagged to share my input (I would've look at the alert and share my opinion too). I have nothing against none of you (I understand you're doing your work) but I disagree with the abrupt ending of the discussion and prefer to start the discussion again. I'm new with these type of discussions so if you can give me some guidance about what I can do now, I would gladly accept it. ] (]) 04:42, 20 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
== Article for review == | |||
:{{Reply to|GiankM. M}} Hi, this file was actually deleted by {{U|Pppery}}. Perhaps he is willing to reconsider his closure given this comment. ]] 11:16, 20 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
::I don't believe that to be the song's official cover art (it was using the Pop 2 cover almost immediately after). Nor the one at ] actually. See the Unlock It file's talk page.--<span style="background:#FF0;font-family:Rockwell Extra Bold">]]]</span> 13:44, 20 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
::Oh, ok. Thank you for clarifying it. ] (]) 14:12, 20 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
::: I deleted that because (ignoring a comment by a sock) the nomination argument was uncontested for a month. Deletion discussions have no minimum participation. If you still want the discussion reopened and relisted I would be willing to oblige, but it looks like that is no longer needed. ] ] 16:33, 20 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
::::@] Oh, I got it. Thank you for explaining. But can I upload the file again or we need to do the discussion first? ] (]) 01:40, 21 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
::::: I have undeleted the file and reopened the discussion. ] ] 02:33, 21 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
::::::Thank you so much! ] (]) 04:51, 21 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
== Help me, please == | |||
Please, as an administrator, I'd like you to check this article ] and review it. It doubt it has been reviewed. Thanks! ] •  (] ]) 02:16, 16 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
* Hello, dear Explicit! Please, tell me how You can create Your own draft in the Enwiki (''for writing future articles'')?.. Otherwise, I must admit, here I am, for now, a complete loser... Thanks. ] (]) 12:54, 20 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
** Oh, that's it, hang up! It seems that it has already happened... 🤗🙄🙌 ] (]) 13:14, 20 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
== |
== Season's Greetings == | ||
<div style="border-style:solid; border-color:blue; background-color:AliceBlue; border-width:1px; text-align:left; padding:8px;" class="plainlinks">] ] | |||
<div style="font-size: larger; text-align: center">Hello there! <span class="nowrap"><span style="font-family:Comic Sans MS;color:#50B849;">'''''Vestrian24Bio'''''</span> (<small>]</small>)</span> wishes you & yours ]!<br /><br />Whether you celebrate ], ], ], ],<br />] (for the rest of us!) or even the ],<br />here's hoping your holiday time is wonderful and<br />- '''especially''' -<br /> | |||
Regarding the just-deleted ], I don't need it refunded but could you tell me whether it is about VS the sportsman or VS the photographer? Thanks, ] (]) 21:32, 16 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
that the New Year will be an improvement on the old.<br />CHEERS!<br /> | |||
:{{Reply to|Ingratis}} The draft is about the artistic gymnast. ]] 00:32, 17 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
::Thanks! ] (]) 06:42, 17 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
12:46, 22 December 2024 (UTC)<br /></div> | |||
== Categories of the ] == | |||
{{clear}}</div> <span class="nowrap"><span style="font-family:Comic Sans MS;color:#50B849;">'''''Vestrian24Bio'''''</span> (<small>]</small>)</span> 12:46, 22 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
:Also, I wanted to know how to add an edit notice like you have... <span class="nowrap"><span style="font-family:Comic Sans MS;color:#50B849;">'''''Vestrian24Bio'''''</span> (<small>]</small>)</span> 12:58, 22 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
Hello! Please explain to me why categories: ], ], ], ] (etc.) are allowed, but category ], ] is not allowed? ] (]) 15:06, 18 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
:{{Reply to| |
::{{Reply to|Vestrian24Bio}} You can create your edit notice at ]. ]] 14:47, 22 December 2024 (UTC) | ||
:::Is there a way to create a group edit notice to appear in all my userspace pages... <span class="nowrap"><span style="font-family:Comic Sans MS;color:#50B849;">'''''Vestrian24Bio'''''</span> (<small>]</small>)</span> 07:54, 25 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
::::{{Reply to|Vestrian24Bio}} This can be done on at ]. Additional information can be found at the ]. ]] 11:34, 25 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
:::::Thanks. <span class="nowrap"><span style="font-family:Comic Sans MS;color:#50B849;">'''''Vestrian24Bio'''''</span> (<small>]</small>)</span> 12:26, 25 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
== Bhutabali deletion == | |||
== ] == | |||
While the delete vote looks unanimous, reading the actual arguments instead of the bolded votes shows a clearer consensus for redirection from multiple participants. Could you redirect it instead? Thanks. ] (]) 13:27, 22 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
:{{Reply to| |
:{{Reply to|PARAKANYAA}} {{Done}}, closure adjusted. ]] 14:47, 22 December 2024 (UTC) | ||
== |
== Seasonal greetings:) == | ||
{| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 4px solid #FFD700;" | |||
Hello, I noticed that a page about Bobo Ajudua was deleted by you. I was unaware of the deletion, so I went ahead and created a new page about him and his controversial issue with Afrobeats singer Davido. ] (]) 21:19, 18 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 2px;" | ] | |||
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 2px 2px 0 2px; height: 1.5em;" | '''Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2025!''' | |||
|- | |||
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | | |||
---- | |||
'''Hello Explicit, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this ]. Spread the ] by wishing another user a ] and a ], whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2025. <br />Happy editing,'''<br /> | |||
— Benison <small>(] · ])</small> 18:12, 22 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
''{{resize|96%|Spread the love by adding {{tls|Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.}}'' | |||
== User:Doomguy427 == | |||
|}<span id="Benison:1734891120337:User_talkFTTCLNExplicit" class="FTTCmt">— Benison <small>(] · ])</small> 18:12, 22 December 2024 (UTC)</span> | |||
== Appeal of deletion of "List of controversial elections" == | |||
Hi Explicit. {{no ping|Doomguy427}} is a relatively new account that looks to be editing in good-faith; the problem is that they keep uploading images without any source information or any license. They haven't responded to any of the notifications about this on their user talk page and they don't seem to be slowing down. They're almost certainly getting the files from somewhere online and ] was cleaned up by another user. Any suggestions on how to proceed here? Would you mind posting something about this on their user talk? -- ] (]) 21:38, 18 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
:{{Reply to|Marchjuly}} Hi, I have left the user a warning. ]] 00:25, 19 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
::Thank you for taking a look. -- ] (]) 00:32, 19 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
I would like to appeal the decision to delete the article ], because the article has been on WP for 12 years, with dozens of editors contributing to it, yet it was removed in the midst of a controversial election in the US with only one week of discussion. Also, no opportunity was given to allow content from the article to be moved to other articles prior to deletion. <b>] (]•])</b> 19:08, 22 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
== ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message == | |||
:{{Reply to|Sparkie82}} There was resounding consensus to delete the article. ] is not a valid argument to keep it. A week of discussion is the standard and is only extended if consensus is unclear, which was not the case here. There was no support to move the content anywhere else. ]] 03:52, 23 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
::I was questioning the timing of the discussion, opening an AFD in the midst of a highly contentious election which could taint any consensus and suggested that the discussion/decision occur some time after the election. In any case, how can I access the information in the article which I need for my own purposes? <b>] (]•])</b> 22:46, 23 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
== ] == | |||
<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #a2a9b1; background-color: #fdf2d5; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; "> | |||
<div class="ivmbox-image noresize" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">]</div> | |||
<div class="ivmbox-text"> | |||
Hello! Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2024|end}}-1 day}}. All ''']''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. | |||
Hey, might need a quick page protection here! ]<sup>(])</sup> 03:40, 23 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. | |||
:Already done! No need to worry yourself here. ]<sup>(])</sup> 03:48, 23 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>] (]) 00:15, 19 November 2024 (UTC)</small> | |||
::{{ec}} {{Reply to|YesI'mOnFire}} I blocked four accounts as obvious sockpuppets of each other. I didn't see the need to protect it after that, but oh well. ]] 03:52, 23 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
:::Seeing that he tried using multiple account, I doubt he was going to stop anytime soon. So imo a page protection was necessary. Anyway thanks. ]<sup>(])</sup> 03:54, 23 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
== Template-deletion == | |||
Regarding ], I don't doubt the nomination and lack of use at that time, but the {{tl|Chembox DrugClass}} template is in support of a feature that was (and still is) implemented and documented. The {{tl|Chembox}} suite is possibly some of the spaghettiest spaghetti we have:( So since then, at least one article invoked {{tl|chembox}} in a way that triggered that template and therefore gave broken output. Is this sufficient basis to un-delete it? ] (]) 13:09, 23 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
:{{Reply to|DMacks}} Yes, the template can be undeleted if it is put to use. The nominator does a lot of cleanup with unused templates and nominates them for that reason, as to not keep hundreds of templates laying around for no one to maintain them. ]] 13:15, 23 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
::] uses it. I definitely have no objection to that sort of cleanup. In this particular case, it would have been easily noticed by the chemistry folks if a note had been posted to the template talkpage. It's a redirect, where the target has decent visibility but the template itself is not, so I'm not surprised nobody noticed that the template itself was tagged. ] (]) 13:23, 23 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
:::{{Reply to|DMacks}} I've restored the template, so everything is sorted now. ]] 13:30, 23 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
::::Thanks! ] (]) 13:35, 23 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
== Happy Holidays == | |||
<div style="border-style:solid; border-color:#FF4646; background-color:#F6F0F7; border-width:2px; text-align:left; padding:7px; border-radius:1em; box-shadow: 0.1em 0.1em 0.5em rgba(0,0,0,0.75);;" class="plainlinks">]]]{{Center|]}} | |||
'''Hello Explicit:''' Enjoy the ''']''' and ''']''' if it's occurring in your area of the world, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Misplaced Pages. Cheers, ] (]) 15:09, 24 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
]{{paragraph break}} | |||
</div> | </div> | ||
<div style="padding-left: 2em; margin-top: 1em; font-size: 88%; font-style: italic">Spread the WikiLove; use {{tls|Season's Greetings}} to send this message</div>{{-}} ] (]) 15:09, 24 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
</div> | |||
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2024/Coordination/MM/02&oldid=1258243447 --> | |||
== Please undelete Draft:Santikaro == | |||
Hi Xplicit and happy holidays to you and all your loved ones! | |||
I've left a message on my talk page and on the deletion page to ask for please reinstating / undeleting my draft | |||
https://en.wikipedia.org/Draft:Santikaro | |||
The only reason I did not get to edit it for six months is that I started teaching and it took all my time. I have been intending to make a minor edit before the deadline but forgot by mistake to set the calendar reminder. | |||
I believe this article can be easily accepted - a number of people on here have given me useful advice on what needs to be done for the article to be easily accepted. | |||
I would greatly appreciate undeleting it, please. | |||
Happy holidays and happy new year, may you be well, happy and safe, | |||
-Peaceful-D ] (]) 15:27, 24 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
== Pictures Deleted? == | |||
I recently uploaded 2 pictures that you then moved to the delete log, and I’m not sure why. Both of the are from a public website of a public university, UL. Wouldn’t that make them free content? What is needed to allow these to be published? Thanks. ] (]) 15:54, 24 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
:{{Reply to|Frank042316}} I guess you're referring to ] and ]. At the upload form, you must have indicated a licensing restriction, like noncommercial use or no derivatives, as these were automatically tagged for speedy deletion in accordance with ]. What are the source links for these images? ]] 00:56, 25 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
::they are from the universities web page, and were used to nnou de the purchase of the 2 pieces of property, so very much in the public domain. Thanks <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 10:02, 25 December 2024 (UTC)</small> | |||
:::{{Reply to|Frank042316}} Being available on the university's webpage does not mean the files are in the public domain, unless it explicitly states so. Can you provide links to determine the copyright status of these two files? ]] 11:34, 25 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
::::Sure: | |||
::::https://louisiana.edu/news/ul-lafayette-our-lady-lourdes-finalize-property-acquisition | |||
::::https://louisiana.edu/news/ul-lafayette-our-lady-lourdes-finalize-property-acquisition | |||
::::Thanks again. ] (]) 11:41, 25 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
:::::{{Reply to|Frank042316}} There is nothing on the website which indicates these image are freely licensed. The only copyright notice reads, "© 2024 University of Louisiana at Lafayette. All rights reserved." These images can not be used on Misplaced Pages. ]] 06:17, 27 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
== Template:Blockquote protection == | |||
== Old AFD question == | |||
No rush, but I think {{tl|Blockquote}} was at template editor protection, not full protection, before the most recent merge/delete/undelete fun adventure that you appear to have had. It has been useful for me to be able to edit it over the past few years as people change their minds about tiny parts of MOS. – ] (]) 16:43, 24 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
Hello, you closed this AFD, ], as a delete in 2022 and deleted the article ] as a part of that. I have found the duplicate article ] still exists, as near as I can tell because ] was moved there in 2009 but then someone turned that redirect back into an article. I was wondering if you wanted to delete ] as a duplicate whose deletion was called for by the AFD, or if I should nominated it for a new AFD now. Obviously this was some time ago so I understand if you have no idea at this point. ] (]) 02:48, 19 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
:{{Reply to| |
:{{Reply to|Jonesey95}} Ah, I see it now. The protection log of {{tl|Blockquote}} shows full protection from 2011, but over at its previous title {{tl|Quote}}, it was reduced to template editors three years later. I've adjusted it accordingly. ]] 00:56, 25 December 2024 (UTC) | ||
::Thanks for |
::Tricky. Thanks for investigating. I think with under 200K transclusions, we'll be OK with template editor protection. – ] (]) 00:58, 25 December 2024 (UTC) | ||
== F7 deletions == | |||
== File:Greenwich SM City Masinag (2024-11-16).jpg == | |||
Hi, please restore the following images so I can fix them. | |||
Hi Explicit. Could you take a look at ]? It seems to have multiple problems, ], ] and maybe even ] or ]. I'm not sure what tag to place on it. There could also be problems per ]. -- ] (]) 05:36, 19 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
] (]) 06:52, 25 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
:{{Reply to|1989}} {{Done}}, files restored. ]] 11:34, 25 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
::So because both the taken photograph and the box set are non-free, it can’t be hosted here? I would need to find a free image of the non-free box set covers then use it as fair use? Both of the images were taken by Viz Media, who also owns the box art. Given that, there shouldn’t be a layered copyright issue since there is no two separate owners. Correct me if I’m wrong. ] (]) 14:17, 25 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
== Deletion:Akidearest == | |||
== File:Starship Moments After Liftoff.jpeg == | |||
Hi there! | |||
Hi Explicit. Would you mind taking a look at ]? All of this user's uploads so far have been screenshots from YouTube videos released under YT's standard licensing; so, I've tagged them for speedy deletion per F9. This particular file is also a screenshot but it's via {{url|https://spacenews.com/spacex-launches-sixth-starship-but-aborts-booster-landing/|this website}}, and unlike the others i'm wondering whether it might be possible to convert to a non-free license given the way it's being used in ]. I'm a bit hesitant though because ] seems to indicate that a free image of these SpaceX launches might be possible. SpaceX, itself, could even provide some acceptably licensed images if it wants. Is it then in your opinion even worth converting this to non-free per ]? -- ] (]) 06:22, 20 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
I wanted to reach out about the recent deletion of the article on YouTuber Akidearest. I understand the sources in the old article weren't sufficient or notable enough, so I would like to fully revise the article and put it up again for review. The original author's account is gone, so I don't know how to access the old article. I would like to reference it, if possible! ] (]) 13:32, 25 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
:{{Reply to|Marchjuly}} Hi, I've deleted all the video screenshots as copyright violations. Aside from the most recent flight test, ] is the only other in the series that does not contain freely licensed media. It's unlikely that an image for either article would qualify by Misplaced Pages's fair use standards, unless a particular image ''itself'' (and not the flight test in general) is subject to sourced critical commentary in accordance with ] or considered significant enough for {{tl|Non-free historic image}}. As flight test 6 is incredibly fresh, free media may became available in the coming days or weeks. ]] 06:51, 20 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
::Thanks for checking on these. Do you suggest tagging the remaining file for speedy deletion per F9 or just letting it be deleted for not having a copyright license per F4? -- ] (]) 07:15, 20 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
:::{{Reply to|Marchjuly}} My rule of thumb is to just let these types of files meet their fate. Regardless of the process, the end result is usually the same. ]] 13:03, 21 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
::::Yes, that's probably the best thing to do in this case. Thanks again. -- ] (]) 21:38, 21 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
== ] == | |||
== Why was this deleted? == | |||
'''Freestyle''', or '''Latin freestyle''' (initially called '''Latin hip hop''') is a form of electronic dance music that emerged in the New York metropolitan area, Boston, Philadelphia, and Miami, primarily among Hispanic Americans, Irish Americans and Italian Americans in the 1980s. It experienced its greatest popularity from the late 1980s until the early 1990s. A common theme of freestyle lyricism originated as heartbreak in an urban environment typified by New York City. ] (]) 03:32, 26 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
== A misplaced file (commons/enwiki) == | |||
:{{tpw}} ]. ] (]) 08:35, 21 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
A confused new user has recently uploaded obviously non-free logo to Commons. They clearly meant to upload it to enwiki, as an updated version of file that you have recently correctly deleted as unused. Since you, the deleting admin, are conveniently an admin both here ''and'' on Commons, would you mind fixing this little mess? It seems to be as simple as deleting from Commons, restoring , and then updating that outdated local version with that's on Commons right now. Thanks. ] (]) 03:50, 26 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
::<!-- Begin Template:UND -->] '''Done''' – as a contested ], the article has been restored upon request.<!-- End Template:UND - soft --> ]] 13:03, 21 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
:Thanks for bringing this to my attention. I have deleted the Commons file and restored the local file with the recent logo. ]] 06:17, 27 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
== Deletion review for ] == | |||
== You've got mail == | |||
An editor has asked for ] of ]. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review.<!-- Template:DRV notice --> ] (]) 10:10, 26 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
== File:Ramesh Panigrahi.jpg == | |||
{{You've got mail|dashlesssig=<span style="background-color: RoyalBlue; border-radius: 1em; padding: 3px 3px 3px 3px;">''']''' <small>]</small></span> 09:58, 21 November 2024 (UTC)}} | |||
Hi Explicit. Could you take a look at ]? I can't tell whether it's a reupload of the same file you deleted the other day per F4 or whether it's a different image with the same file name. The uploader is the same person so I'm thinking the image also has F4 and F11 issues even if it's a new image. -- ] (]) 22:57, 26 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
:@] I emailed you hours ago explaining the situation, and have just had to go to Oversight ''again'' to request suppression of the ANI thread where you and @] disclosed the supressed username. Utterly stupid behaviour. <span style="background-color: RoyalBlue; border-radius: 1em; padding: 3px 3px 3px 3px;">''']''' <small>]</small></span> 13:18, 21 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
:{{Reply to|Marchjuly}} Hi, it's a different picture from the deleted version. A bot has already tagged it for lacking a source. ]] 06:17, 27 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
::Thank you for checking on this. -- ] (]) 07:23, 27 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
:::You mentioned the username in your ''first'' ANI post. <span style="background-color: RoyalBlue; border-radius: 1em; padding: 3px 3px 3px 3px;">''']''' <small>]</small></span> 13:46, 21 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
::::{{Reply to|Qcne}} ...Yes, that's why I just said. "I couldn't do much about the initial mention" because your email came afterwards. Like I stated at ANI, I was not aware of the distinction between account suppression and username suppression, given the original case I linked. ]] 13:58, 21 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
:::::I just would have thought you'd have immediately requested oversight once my email had gone through, instead of waiting hours and continuing the ANI thread. <span style="background-color: RoyalBlue; border-radius: 1em; padding: 3px 3px 3px 3px;">''']''' <small>]</small></span> 14:01, 21 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
::{{tq|1=Utterly stupid behaviour}}<br>That's a nasty way to talk to somebody. Please be kinder! <span style="position: relative; top: -0.5em;">꧁</span>]<span style="position: relative; top: -0.5em;">꧂</span> 06:12, 22 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
== Deletion Review for ] == | |||
== You may want to go for ARB == | |||
You have deleted ] without any discussion having taken place. I have posted a delete review request. Please restore this image until an actual discussion & review have occurred. ] (]) 15:08, 27 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
Hi, another way for solve this, if needed, is trying for an Arbcom case instead of being so angered on AN/I. Please calm down or just take a break for a few hours, which might be better. ] 13:21, 21 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
:{{Reply to|Lemonaka}} {{ec}} I honestly can not be bothered to tread through the politics of Misplaced Pages. I have enough work to do around here and mountains of page creations to do on Commons. I'd rather spend my time doing those things. ]] 13:37, 21 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
Since the thread has now been suppressed, just to let you know (if you didn't see it) that I removed your two personal attacks on Liz (the second one was so egregious, especially to a female editor, that I seriously considered blocking you). Please don't do that again. ] 13:23, 21 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
:{{Reply to|Black Kite}} Noted. For the record, I didn't consider the second one being taken that way. It's a heteronormative train of thought, and hetero is something I am not. Viewing the world with a different lens and all, but thanks for the context reminder. ]] 13:37, 21 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
::Allow me to introduce you to the phrase, "get off my back." It means the same thing except no one has to think about your dick. Wins all around. ] (]) 16:16, 21 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
::I don't understand how "get off my dick" means something different in a non-hetronormative context and indeed when I looked into this phrase I found examples of it being used against gay men by straight men. I do understand how you wouldn't get the disgust lots of us have felt seeing it used against Liz. I seriously considered pressing the block button myself. I didn't become an admin to block people and since I respect Black Kite's assessmment that he would have done the same for any user with your editing/block history I didn't take him up on his permission for someone else to do it. But for what it's worth I actually think there is a ''better'' case to block an admin for it since there is a higher expectation in these regards. ] (]) 17:05, 21 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
:::{{tq|I do understand how you wouldn't get the disgust lots of us have felt seeing it used against Liz.}} Why though? It's pretty obviously offensive and incredibly disrespectful. ] (]) 18:41, 21 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
::::As I said I felt disgust upon seeing it and I left my message because I find {{tqq|I didn't consider the second one being taken that way. It's a heteronormative train of thought, and hetero is something I am not}} in adequate. However, when looking into it there do seem to be certain communities (at least online ones) which use it rather than far more reasonable and acceptable "get off my back" and it appears explicit is a part of them. ] (]) 19:20, 21 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
:::::Not just online communities. It's a common phrase men say to each other, at least in the US (or at least in the parts where I've been), stemming from "stepping on my dick" being a more emphatic version of "stepping on my toes", and thus "get off my dick" being a more emphatic version of "stop stepping on my toes" or "get off my back" or "get off my ass". But a man should ''never'' say "get off my dick" to a woman, because it obviously has a very different connotation in that context. Even where the phrase is common, a man saying it to a woman would be a major faux pas. It was a dumb and offensive thing for Explicit to say to Liz. ] (]) 19:31, 21 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
::::::I concur. Saying something like "hop off " is something commonly used as slang in the US to mean like "stop annoying me", but I will admit that there's times it shouldn't be used, especially in this context. Usually it's just a more innapropriate way of saying "leave me alone", but I can't speak on behalf of everyone. ]<sub>]</sub><sup>]</sup> 23:41, 21 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
:::::{{replyto|Barkeep49}} Fair enough. Not being heterosexual myself I found the "heteronormative train of thought" excuse pretty poor. ] (]) 19:50, 21 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
::::::It unfortunately shows the (general, I have no personal issue with Barkeep49) pisspoor way editors who identify as female are treated here. The insult, the report, and the timing from Explicit are an extremely poor showing from a long term admin. (And to head off any questions, no it's not recall worthy and I don't believe in forced apologies) ] ] 23:32, 21 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
:::::::lol at much of this discussion. Several different universes here, but Explicit lived up to their name and should have thought a smidge more, especially during the next several minutes, and edited and spellchecked the thing. If I were an admin I'd give Explicit a justified 4 hours in the penalty box, although assume good faith seems to enter into all viewpoints of this. ] (]) 02:55, 22 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
Explicit, you're lucky other people got there first. If I had gotten there first, I can tell you with certainty that I would not have exhibited the hesitation that {{u|Black Kite}} and {{u|Barkeep49}} showed with the block button. ] ] 15:25, 22 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
:Explicit, I agree with Roy Smith. I was asleep when this was reported. Had I been awake and watching ANI, you would be blocked and it would not have been for four hours. Keep your sexualized insults to yourself. ] (]) 18:43, 22 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
== File:The Computer Book (BBC 1982).jpg == | |||
== Tzamplakon family == | |||
Hi, | |||
Hi User:Explicit, I think the article ] was deleted once, but is now renewed. May you explain this case to me. Thanks. ] (]) ] (]) 12:48, 24 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
:{{Reply to|Jingiby}} Hi, the article was draftified in early October and the resulting redirect was deleted in accordance with the speedy deletion criterion regarding ]. The draft was submitted by the author and accepted by a reviewer a little over two weeks later, so it was moved back into mainspace. ]] 13:00, 24 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
I only got back to editing Misplaced Pages today, and read the file talk page a little earlier. It was only later in the day that I have time to do some editing and was planning to convert the deletion request to an FFD as the uploader (]) was quite passionate in his defence of the image. Would you be willing to restore so I can take it to FFD? -- ] (]) 00:43, 28 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
==AlgoSec== | |||
:{{Reply to|Whpq}} Very well, I have restored the file. ]] 00:45, 28 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
Can I please see the deleted article ]. This is a notable cybersecurity firm, with hundreds of global customers https://www.algosec.com/our-customers and should not be deleted. You can see some of the news coverage they have received https://www.algosec.com/news ] <!--Template:Undated--><small class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added 20:33, 25 November 2024 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
::Thanks -- ] (]) 00:48, 28 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
:{{Reply to|Amechad}} Are you affiliated with the company? Would you like to disclose any ]? ]] 23:52, 25 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
== File:Bokontayev.jpg == | |||
== ] == | |||
Hi Explicit. Can you take a look at ]? This is another file that you've previously deleted twice before (once per F4 and once per F11) that could be a reupload or a new file with the same name. -- ] (]) 07:49, 28 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
I bookmarked this a while ago with a note to myself (possibly PD). It's since been deleted, but could you take a look? I remember nothing of the file beyond the note I left to myself. <span style="color: #1a237e; background-color: #fff176; font-weight: bold;">]</span> <span style="color: #fff176; background-color: #1a237e; font-weight: bold;">]</span> 22:47, 25 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
:{{Reply to|JayCubby}} The cover in question can be found . ] currently uses a different image. ]] 23:52, 25 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
::Thanks! The portrait is PD and the cover text is by no means a literary work, so couldn't this be below TOO? <span style="color: #1a237e; background-color: #fff176; font-weight: bold;">]</span> <span style="color: #fff176; background-color: #1a237e; font-weight: bold;">]</span> 23:57, 25 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
:::{{Reply to|JayCubby}} The textured background is pretty complex, so I suspect that would push this cover above the threshold of originality. ]] 00:07, 26 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
::::@] Good point! <span style="color: #1a237e; background-color: #fff176; font-weight: bold;">]</span> <span style="color: #fff176; background-color: #1a237e; font-weight: bold;">]</span> 00:12, 26 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
:::::{{ec}} {{tpw}} Hi {{u|JayCubby}}. You might be able to argue as much, but it probably would be better to ask about this at ] because that's really where this file should be if the cover art is truly PD. It seems to me that there wouldn't be much point in restoring the file here on Misplaced Pages if it's ultimately only going to end up at Commons anyway, and there's no point in getting it restored locally if Commons can't host the file. Finally, although being PD means the file doesn't need to be treated as non-free and thus isn't subject to deletion per ], there could still be encyclopedic or contextual reasons unrelated to copyright as to why the image currently being used in the main infobox of the article might still be considered by others as preferable to this particular one. That's something that you probably would need to resolve through article talk page discussion. One thing you might want to ask about here on Misplaced Pages at either ] or ] is whether ] needs to be treated as non-free since it seems to be a pretty clear case of ] given that the file comes from ] (page 7). -- ] (]) 00:20, 26 November 2024 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 07:49, 28 December 2024
Archives |
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 |
This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
|
Quick note regarding AN discussion on AfD closures that you may be interested in
There is currently a discussion at WP:AN regarding the timing of AfD closures. The thread is "Early" closes at AfD. Thank you. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 01:14, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
Deletion of "Unlock It" artwork
Hi, I've seen that you decided to delete the "Unlock It" artwork yesterday. I wasn't present in the discussion since I was on vacations and didn't look at my talk page frequently. I saw that a sockpuppet answered with reasons I share about why the file should've been kept. However, I don't know the user and I think its unfair that because of them, my upload had to be deleted. I understand that the user has done things not permitted here but I should've been taken into account also since I'm the one that uploaded the artwork. I've already began a discussion with @Launchballer but nobody else participated. Now that the issue was taken to Files for discussion, I could've been tagged to share my input (I would've look at the alert and share my opinion too). I have nothing against none of you (I understand you're doing your work) but I disagree with the abrupt ending of the discussion and prefer to start the discussion again. I'm new with these type of discussions so if you can give me some guidance about what I can do now, I would gladly accept it. GiankM. M (talk) 04:42, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
- @GiankM. M: Hi, this file was actually deleted by Pppery. Perhaps he is willing to reconsider his closure given this comment. ✗plicit 11:16, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
- I don't believe that to be the song's official cover art (it was using the Pop 2 cover almost immediately after). Nor the one at Out of My Head (Charli XCX song) actually. See the Unlock It file's talk page.--Launchballer 13:44, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
- Oh, ok. Thank you for clarifying it. GiankM. M (talk) 14:12, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
- I deleted that because (ignoring a comment by a sock) the nomination argument was uncontested for a month. Deletion discussions have no minimum participation. If you still want the discussion reopened and relisted I would be willing to oblige, but it looks like that is no longer needed. * Pppery * it has begun... 16:33, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
- @Pppery Oh, I got it. Thank you for explaining. But can I upload the file again or we need to do the discussion first? GiankM. M (talk) 01:40, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
- I have undeleted the file and reopened the discussion. * Pppery * it has begun... 02:33, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you so much! GiankM. M (talk) 04:51, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
- I have undeleted the file and reopened the discussion. * Pppery * it has begun... 02:33, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
- @Pppery Oh, I got it. Thank you for explaining. But can I upload the file again or we need to do the discussion first? GiankM. M (talk) 01:40, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
- I deleted that because (ignoring a comment by a sock) the nomination argument was uncontested for a month. Deletion discussions have no minimum participation. If you still want the discussion reopened and relisted I would be willing to oblige, but it looks like that is no longer needed. * Pppery * it has begun... 16:33, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
Help me, please
- Hello, dear Explicit! Please, tell me how You can create Your own draft in the Enwiki (for writing future articles)?.. Otherwise, I must admit, here I am, for now, a complete loser... Thanks. Артурчик. (talk) 12:54, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
- Oh, that's it, hang up! It seems that it has already happened... 🤗🙄🙌 Артурчик. (talk) 13:14, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
Season's Greetings
Hello there! Vestrian24Bio (TALK) wishes you & yours the very best of the season!Whether you celebrate Christmas, Diwali, Hanukkah, Kwanzaa,
Festivus (for the rest of us!) or even the Saturnalia,
here's hoping your holiday time is wonderful and
- especially -
that the New Year will be an improvement on the old.
CHEERS!
Vestrian24Bio (TALK) 12:46, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- Also, I wanted to know how to add an edit notice like you have... Vestrian24Bio (TALK) 12:58, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- @Vestrian24Bio: You can create your edit notice at User talk:Vestrian24Bio/Editnotice. ✗plicit 14:47, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- Is there a way to create a group edit notice to appear in all my userspace pages... Vestrian24Bio (TALK) 07:54, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
- @Vestrian24Bio: This can be done on at Template:Editnotices/Group/User talk:Vestrian24Bio. Additional information can be found at the editnotice how-to guide. ✗plicit 11:34, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks. Vestrian24Bio (TALK) 12:26, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
- @Vestrian24Bio: This can be done on at Template:Editnotices/Group/User talk:Vestrian24Bio. Additional information can be found at the editnotice how-to guide. ✗plicit 11:34, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
- Is there a way to create a group edit notice to appear in all my userspace pages... Vestrian24Bio (TALK) 07:54, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
- @Vestrian24Bio: You can create your edit notice at User talk:Vestrian24Bio/Editnotice. ✗plicit 14:47, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
Bhutabali deletion
While the delete vote looks unanimous, reading the actual arguments instead of the bolded votes shows a clearer consensus for redirection from multiple participants. Could you redirect it instead? Thanks. PARAKANYAA (talk) 13:27, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- @PARAKANYAA: Done, closure adjusted. ✗plicit 14:47, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
Seasonal greetings:)
Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2025! | |
Hello Explicit, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2025. Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages. |
— Benison (Beni · talk) 18:12, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
Appeal of deletion of "List of controversial elections"
I would like to appeal the decision to delete the article List of controversial elections, because the article has been on WP for 12 years, with dozens of editors contributing to it, yet it was removed in the midst of a controversial election in the US with only one week of discussion. Also, no opportunity was given to allow content from the article to be moved to other articles prior to deletion. Sparkie82 (t•c) 19:08, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- @Sparkie82: There was resounding consensus to delete the article. An article's age is not a valid argument to keep it. A week of discussion is the standard and is only extended if consensus is unclear, which was not the case here. There was no support to move the content anywhere else. ✗plicit 03:52, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- I was questioning the timing of the discussion, opening an AFD in the midst of a highly contentious election which could taint any consensus and suggested that the discussion/decision occur some time after the election. In any case, how can I access the information in the article which I need for my own purposes? Sparkie82 (t•c) 22:46, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
Thomas Fellows (activist)
Hey, might need a quick page protection here! 🔥YesI'mOnFire🔥 03:40, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- Already done! No need to worry yourself here. 🔥YesI'mOnFire🔥 03:48, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- (edit conflict) @YesI'mOnFire: I blocked four accounts as obvious sockpuppets of each other. I didn't see the need to protect it after that, but oh well. ✗plicit 03:52, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- Seeing that he tried using multiple account, I doubt he was going to stop anytime soon. So imo a page protection was necessary. Anyway thanks. 🔥YesI'mOnFire🔥 03:54, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- (edit conflict) @YesI'mOnFire: I blocked four accounts as obvious sockpuppets of each other. I didn't see the need to protect it after that, but oh well. ✗plicit 03:52, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
Template-deletion
Regarding Misplaced Pages:Templates for discussion/Log/2023 July 25#Template:Chembox DrugClass, I don't doubt the nomination and lack of use at that time, but the {{Chembox DrugClass}} template is in support of a feature that was (and still is) implemented and documented. The {{Chembox}} suite is possibly some of the spaghettiest spaghetti we have:( So since then, at least one article invoked {{chembox}} in a way that triggered that template and therefore gave broken output. Is this sufficient basis to un-delete it? DMacks (talk) 13:09, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- @DMacks: Yes, the template can be undeleted if it is put to use. The nominator does a lot of cleanup with unused templates and nominates them for that reason, as to not keep hundreds of templates laying around for no one to maintain them. ✗plicit 13:15, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- Tryptamine uses it. I definitely have no objection to that sort of cleanup. In this particular case, it would have been easily noticed by the chemistry folks if a note had been posted to the template talkpage. It's a redirect, where the target has decent visibility but the template itself is not, so I'm not surprised nobody noticed that the template itself was tagged. DMacks (talk) 13:23, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- @DMacks: I've restored the template, so everything is sorted now. ✗plicit 13:30, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks! DMacks (talk) 13:35, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- @DMacks: I've restored the template, so everything is sorted now. ✗plicit 13:30, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- Tryptamine uses it. I definitely have no objection to that sort of cleanup. In this particular case, it would have been easily noticed by the chemistry folks if a note had been posted to the template talkpage. It's a redirect, where the target has decent visibility but the template itself is not, so I'm not surprised nobody noticed that the template itself was tagged. DMacks (talk) 13:23, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
Happy Holidays
Hello Explicit: Enjoy the holiday season and winter solstice if it's occurring in your area of the world, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Misplaced Pages. Cheers, Abishe (talk) 15:09, 24 December 2024 (UTC)
Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Season's Greetings}} to send this messageAbishe (talk) 15:09, 24 December 2024 (UTC)
Please undelete Draft:Santikaro
Hi Xplicit and happy holidays to you and all your loved ones!
I've left a message on my talk page and on the deletion page to ask for please reinstating / undeleting my draft https://en.wikipedia.org/Draft:Santikaro
The only reason I did not get to edit it for six months is that I started teaching and it took all my time. I have been intending to make a minor edit before the deadline but forgot by mistake to set the calendar reminder.
I believe this article can be easily accepted - a number of people on here have given me useful advice on what needs to be done for the article to be easily accepted.
I would greatly appreciate undeleting it, please.
Happy holidays and happy new year, may you be well, happy and safe, -Peaceful-D Peaceful-D (talk) 15:27, 24 December 2024 (UTC)
Pictures Deleted?
I recently uploaded 2 pictures that you then moved to the delete log, and I’m not sure why. Both of the are from a public website of a public university, UL. Wouldn’t that make them free content? What is needed to allow these to be published? Thanks. Frank042316 (talk) 15:54, 24 December 2024 (UTC)
- @Frank042316: I guess you're referring to File:DOL Property.png and File:OLOL Acregae.png. At the upload form, you must have indicated a licensing restriction, like noncommercial use or no derivatives, as these were automatically tagged for speedy deletion in accordance with WP:CSD#F3. What are the source links for these images? ✗plicit 00:56, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
- they are from the universities web page, and were used to nnou de the purchase of the 2 pieces of property, so very much in the public domain. Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Frank042316 (talk • contribs) 10:02, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
- @Frank042316: Being available on the university's webpage does not mean the files are in the public domain, unless it explicitly states so. Can you provide links to determine the copyright status of these two files? ✗plicit 11:34, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
- Sure:
- https://louisiana.edu/news/ul-lafayette-our-lady-lourdes-finalize-property-acquisition
- https://louisiana.edu/news/ul-lafayette-our-lady-lourdes-finalize-property-acquisition
- Thanks again. Frank042316 (talk) 11:41, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
- @Frank042316: There is nothing on the website which indicates these image are freely licensed. The only copyright notice reads, "© 2024 University of Louisiana at Lafayette. All rights reserved." These images can not be used on Misplaced Pages. ✗plicit 06:17, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
- @Frank042316: Being available on the university's webpage does not mean the files are in the public domain, unless it explicitly states so. Can you provide links to determine the copyright status of these two files? ✗plicit 11:34, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
- they are from the universities web page, and were used to nnou de the purchase of the 2 pieces of property, so very much in the public domain. Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Frank042316 (talk • contribs) 10:02, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
Template:Blockquote protection
No rush, but I think {{Blockquote}} was at template editor protection, not full protection, before the most recent merge/delete/undelete fun adventure that you appear to have had. It has been useful for me to be able to edit it over the past few years as people change their minds about tiny parts of MOS. – Jonesey95 (talk) 16:43, 24 December 2024 (UTC)
- @Jonesey95: Ah, I see it now. The protection log of {{Blockquote}} shows full protection from 2011, but over at its previous title {{Quote}}, it was reduced to template editors three years later. I've adjusted it accordingly. ✗plicit 00:56, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
- Tricky. Thanks for investigating. I think with under 200K transclusions, we'll be OK with template editor protection. – Jonesey95 (talk) 00:58, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
F7 deletions
Hi, please restore the following images so I can fix them.
1989 (talk) 06:52, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
- @1989: Done, files restored. ✗plicit 11:34, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
- So because both the taken photograph and the box set are non-free, it can’t be hosted here? I would need to find a free image of the non-free box set covers then use it as fair use? Both of the images were taken by Viz Media, who also owns the box art. Given that, there shouldn’t be a layered copyright issue since there is no two separate owners. Correct me if I’m wrong. 1989 (talk) 14:17, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
Deletion:Akidearest
Hi there! I wanted to reach out about the recent deletion of the article on YouTuber Akidearest. I understand the sources in the old article weren't sufficient or notable enough, so I would like to fully revise the article and put it up again for review. The original author's account is gone, so I don't know how to access the old article. I would like to reference it, if possible! Maehii (talk) 13:32, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
Freestyle music
Freestyle, or Latin freestyle (initially called Latin hip hop) is a form of electronic dance music that emerged in the New York metropolitan area, Boston, Philadelphia, and Miami, primarily among Hispanic Americans, Irish Americans and Italian Americans in the 1980s. It experienced its greatest popularity from the late 1980s until the early 1990s. A common theme of freestyle lyricism originated as heartbreak in an urban environment typified by New York City. 50.29.112.115 (talk) 03:32, 26 December 2024 (UTC)
A misplaced file (commons/enwiki)
A confused new user has recently uploaded this obviously non-free logo to Commons. They clearly meant to upload it to enwiki, as an updated version of this file that you have recently correctly deleted as unused. Since you, the deleting admin, are conveniently an admin both here and on Commons, would you mind fixing this little mess? It seems to be as simple as deleting the non-free file from Commons, restoring our outdated local version, and then updating that outdated local version with the file that's on Commons right now. Thanks. 78.28.44.127 (talk) 03:50, 26 December 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for bringing this to my attention. I have deleted the Commons file and restored the local file with the recent logo. ✗plicit 06:17, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
Deletion review for Alisha Parveen
An editor has asked for a deletion review of Alisha Parveen. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Amafanficwriter (talk) 10:10, 26 December 2024 (UTC)
File:Ramesh Panigrahi.jpg
Hi Explicit. Could you take a look at File:Ramesh Panigrahi.jpg? I can't tell whether it's a reupload of the same file you deleted the other day per F4 or whether it's a different image with the same file name. The uploader is the same person so I'm thinking the image also has F4 and F11 issues even if it's a new image. -- Marchjuly (talk) 22:57, 26 December 2024 (UTC)
- @Marchjuly: Hi, it's a different picture from the deleted version. A bot has already tagged it for lacking a source. ✗plicit 06:17, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for checking on this. -- Marchjuly (talk) 07:23, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
Deletion Review for File:BigMacButton1975.png
You have deleted File:BigMacButton1975.png without any discussion having taken place. I have posted a delete review request. Please restore this image until an actual discussion & review have occurred. Christopher Rath (talk) 15:08, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
File:The Computer Book (BBC 1982).jpg
Hi,
I only got back to editing Misplaced Pages today, and read the file talk page a little earlier. It was only later in the day that I have time to do some editing and was planning to convert the deletion request to an FFD as the uploader (User:Jheald) was quite passionate in his defence of the image. Would you be willing to restore so I can take it to FFD? -- Whpq (talk) 00:43, 28 December 2024 (UTC)
- @Whpq: Very well, I have restored the file. ✗plicit 00:45, 28 December 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks -- Whpq (talk) 00:48, 28 December 2024 (UTC)
File:Bokontayev.jpg
Hi Explicit. Can you take a look at File:Bokontayev.jpg? This is another file that you've previously deleted twice before (once per F4 and once per F11) that could be a reupload or a new file with the same name. -- Marchjuly (talk) 07:49, 28 December 2024 (UTC)