Revision as of 00:49, 31 December 2024 editThe Bushranger (talk | contribs)Administrators157,264 edits →Photo?: comment← Previous edit |
Latest revision as of 00:49, 31 December 2024 edit undoThe Bushranger (talk | contribs)Administrators157,264 edits →Photo?: typo |
Line 14: |
Line 14: |
|
Are any photos/screenshots from the recent alleged public appearance of the J-36 compatible with Misplaced Pages licensing? ] (]) 00:34, 31 December 2024 (UTC) |
|
Are any photos/screenshots from the recent alleged public appearance of the J-36 compatible with Misplaced Pages licensing? ] (]) 00:34, 31 December 2024 (UTC) |
|
:Not that I'm aware of. Someone did upload a still from the widely-circulated video early on, but it was deleted for ]. - ] <sub>]</sub><span style="color:#6B8E23">\</span><sup>]</sup> 00:43, 31 December 2024 (UTC) |
|
:Not that I'm aware of. Someone did upload a still from the widely-circulated video early on, but it was deleted for ]. - ] <sub>]</sub><span style="color:#6B8E23">\</span><sup>]</sup> 00:43, 31 December 2024 (UTC) |
|
::Ordinarly I'd argue that a ]-compliant image would be appropriate given the difficulty of getting a free image for likely quite some time, but I remember the massive debate over that when the ] was new and it was serioously proposed that a Wikipedian's hand-drawn sketch be used in the article(!). So best to wait, I think. - ] <sub>]</sub> 00:49, 31 December 2024 (UTC) |
|
::Ordinarly I'd argue that a ]-compliant image would be appropriate given the difficulty of getting a free image for likely quite some time, but I remember the massive debate over that when the ] was new and it was seriously proposed that a Wikipedian's hand-drawn sketch be used in the article(!). So best to wait, I think. - ] <sub>]</sub> 00:49, 31 December 2024 (UTC) |