Misplaced Pages

History of Iran: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 03:38, 5 December 2015 editCemsentin1 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users1,785 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit Latest revision as of 12:15, 31 December 2024 edit undoMascarbone (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users4,162 editsm Masoud Pezeshkian (2024–present) 
(998 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Short description|None}}
{{History of Iran}} {{History of Iran}}
{{Use dmy dates|date=December 2021}}
The '''history of ]''', commonly also known as ] in the ], is intertwined with the history of a larger region, also to an extent known as ], comprising the area from ], the ], and ] in the west to the borders of ] and ] in the east, and from the ] and the ] in the north to the ] and the ] in the south.
{{Use Oxford spelling|date=January 2024}}


The '''history of Iran''' (or ], as it was known in the Western world) is intertwined with ], a sociocultural region spanning from ] to the ] and from the ] to the ]. Central to this area is modern-day ], which covers the bulk of the ].
Iran is home to one of the world's oldest continuous major civilizations, with historical and urban settlements dating back to 4000 BC.<ref name="xinhuaciv">, retrieved 1 October 2007</ref> The southwestern and western part of the ] participated in the traditional ] with ], from the ], and later with various other peoples, such as the ], ], and ]. ] names the Persians as the ''first Historical People''.<ref name="IRHEGEL">{{cite encyclopedia |last=Azadpour |first=M | title= HEGEL, GEORG WILHELM FRIEDRICH | encyclopedia=Encyclopædia Iranica | accessdate=2015-04-11|url=http://www.iranicaonline.org/articles/hegel-georg-wilhelm-friedrich}}</ref> The ] unified Iran as a nation and empire in 625 BC.<ref name="Encyclopædia Britannica Concise Encyclopedia Article: Media">http://www.britannica.com/ebc/article-9371723 Encyclopædia Britannica Concise Encyclopedia Article: Media</ref> The ] (550–330 BC), founded by ], was the first of the ] empires to rule from the ] to ] and also ], spanning three continents, from their seat of power in ] (]). It was the largest empire yet seen and the first world empire.<ref name=book>{{cite book| author = David Sacks, Oswyn Murray, Lisa R. Brody|author2=Oswyn Murray |author3=Lisa R. Brody | title = Encyclopedia of the ancient Greek world| url = https://books.google.com/?id=gsGmuQAACAAJ| year = 2005| publisher = Infobase Publishing| ISBN = 978-0-8160-5722-1| pages = 256 (at the right portion of the page) }}</ref> They were succeeded by the ], the ] and the ] who governed Iran for almost 1,000 years, and would put Iran once again as the leading powers in the world, only this time amongst their arch rival, the ] and the successive ].


Iran is home to one of the world's oldest continuous major civilizations, with historical and urban settlements dating back to 4000 BC.<ref name="People.cn"> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210224223600/http://en.people.cn/90001/90782/90874/6236885.html |date=24 February 2021 }}, retrieved 1 October 2007</ref> The western part of the Iranian plateau participated in the traditional ] with ] (in ] and ]), ] (in ]), ] (in ]) and later with other peoples such as the ] (in ] and ]) in the southwest of ]<ref>{{cite web | url=https://scholar.harvard.edu/pizzorno/presentations/dinkha-tepe-revisited | title=Dinkha Tepe Revisited }}</ref><ref>{{cite web | url=https://iranicaonline.org/articles/denka-dinkha-tepe | title=Welcome to Encyclopaedia Iranica }}</ref><ref>{{cite web | url=https://en.mehrnews.com/news/12769/Capital-of-Musasir-government-in-northwest-Iran-experts-believe | title=Capital of Musasir government in northwest Iran, experts believe | date=4 September 2005 }}</ref><ref>{{cite web | url=https://www.tehrantimes.com/news/130071/Search-for-Musasir-capital-resumes-at-Rabat-Tepe-next-week | title=Search for Musasir capital resumes at Rabat Tepe next week | date=21 October 2006 }}</ref> and ] (in ], ] and ]) in the ] area.<ref>{{cite web | url=https://iranicaonline.org/articles/ziwiye | title=Welcome to Encyclopaedia Iranica }}</ref><ref>{{cite web | url=https://www.tehrantimes.com/news/500219/Qalaichi-s-ancient-necropolis-excavated-for-the-first-time | title=Qalaichi's ancient necropolis excavated for the first time | date=23 June 2024 }}</ref><ref>{{cite web | url=https://www.ucl.ac.uk/sargon/essentials/countries/mannea/ | title=Mannea, a forgotten kingdom of Iran }}</ref><ref>{{cite web | url=https://www.worldhistory.org/elam/ | title=Elam }}</ref><ref>{{cite web | url=https://www.tehrantimes.com/news/489442/Amazing-archaeological-finds-dating-back-to-Elamite-era-unearthed | title=Amazing archaeological finds dating back to Elamite era unearthed in western Iran | date=26 September 2023 }}</ref><ref>{{cite journal | url=https://typeset.io/papers/a-new-decorated-bronze-belt-from-orumiyeh-region-north-2x453z5m | doi=10.1080/05786967.2022.2082314 | title=A New Decorated Bronze Belt from Orumiyeh Region, North-Western Iran | date=2022 | last1=Khanmohammadi | first1=Behrouz | last2=Bonfanti | first2=Annarita Stefania | last3=Dan | first3=Roberto | journal=Iran | pages=1–11 }}</ref><ref>{{cite journal | url=https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/05786967.2018.1505441 | doi=10.1080/05786967.2018.1505441 | title=A Decorated Bronze Belt from Gargul, Iran | date=2019 | last1=Cifarelli | first1=Megan | last2=Mollazadeh | first2=Kazem | last3=Binandeh | first3=Ali | journal=Iran | volume=57 | issue=2 | pages=175–184 }}</ref><ref>{{cite journal | url=https://archaeopresspublishing.com/ojs/index.php/aramazd/article/view/1304 | doi=10.32028/ajnes.v15i1-2.1304 | title=A metal belt in the Orumiyeh museum, Iran | date=2022 | last1=Khanmohammadi | first1=Behrouz | last2=Bonfanti | first2=Annarita S. | last3=Abbaszadeh | first3=Maryam | last4=Dan | first4=Roberto | journal=Aramazd: Armenian Journal of Near Eastern Studies | volume=15 | issue=1–2 | pages=163–170 }}</ref><ref>{{cite web | url=https://www.culturalsurvival.org/publications/cultural-survival-quarterly/lurs-iran | title=The Lurs of Iran &#124; Cultural Survival | date=17 February 2010 }}</ref> ] called the Persians the "first Historical People".<ref name="IRHEGEL">{{cite encyclopedia |last=Azadpour |first=M |title=HEGEL, GEORG WILHELM FRIEDRICH |encyclopedia=Encyclopædia Iranica |access-date=2015-04-11 |url=http://www.iranicaonline.org/articles/hegel-georg-wilhelm-friedrich |archive-date=2015-04-11 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150411142730/http://www.iranicaonline.org/articles/hegel-georg-wilhelm-friedrich |url-status=live }}</ref> The Iranian empire began in the ] with the rise of the ], who unified Iran as a nation and empire in 625 BC.<ref name="Encyclopædia Britannica Concise Encyclopedia Article: Media">https://www.britannica.com/ebc/article-9371723 {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080429175334/https://www.britannica.com/ebc/article-9371723 |date=2008-04-29 }} Encyclopædia Britannica Concise Encyclopedia Article: Media</ref> The ] (550–330 BC), founded by ], was the largest empire the world had seen, spanning from the ] to ] and ]. They were succeeded by the ], ], and ] empires, who governed Iran for almost 1,000 years, making Iran a leading power once again. Persia's arch-rival during this time was the ] and its successor, the ].
The ] proper begins in the Iron Age, following the influx of ]. Iranian people gave rise to the ], the ], the ], and the ] during the ].


Iran endured invasions by the ], ], ], and ]. Despite these invasions, Iran continually reasserted its ] and developed as a distinct political and cultural entity. The ] (632–654) ended the Sasanian Empire and marked a turning point in Iranian history, leading to the ] from the eighth to tenth centuries and the decline of ]. However, the achievements of prior Persian civilizations were absorbed into the new ] polity. Iran suffered invasions by nomadic tribes during the ] and ], negatively impacting the region.<ref>{{cite book|last=Baten |first=Jörg |title=A History of the Global Economy. From 1500 to the Present.|date=2016|publisher=Cambridge University Press|page=214|isbn=978-1-107-50718-0}}</ref> Iran was reunified as an independent state in 1501 by the ], which established ] as the empire's official religion,<ref name="savoryeiref">R. M. Savory, "Safavids", '']'', 2nd edition</ref> marking a significant turning point in the ].<ref name="islamic1600">, Applied History Research Group, University of Calgary, 1998 {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080612134542/http://www.ucalgary.ca/applied_history/tutor/islam/empires/safavid/abbas.html |date=2008-06-12 }}, retrieved 1 October 2007</ref> Iran functioned again as a leading world power, especially in rivalry with the ]. In the 19th century, Iran lost significant territories in the ] to the ] following the ].<ref name="books.google.nl1">{{Cite book|last=Dowling|first=Timothy C.|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=KTq2BQAAQBAJ&pg=PA728|title=Russia at War: From the Mongol Conquest to Afghanistan, Chechnya, and Beyond |year=2014|pages = 728–729
Once a major empire of ] proportions,<ref name="autogenerated1">http://anthropology.net/user/kambiz_kamrani/blog/2006/12/05/engineering_an_empire_the_persians</ref><ref></ref> having conquered far and wide, Iran has endured invasions too, by the ], ], ], and the ]. Iran has continually reasserted its ] throughout the centuries and has developed as a distinct political and cultural entity.
| series= 2 volumes|publisher=ABC-CLIO|isbn=978-1-59884-948-6|language=en}}</ref>


Iran remained a monarchy until the 1979 ], when it officially became an ] on 1 April 1979.<ref>, {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060316040030/https://www.britannica.com/ebi/article-202892 |date=2006-03-16 }}, ''Encyclopædia Britannica'', retrieved 23 January 2008</ref><ref name="Britannica"> 23 January 2008 {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20071215140348/https://www.britannica.com/eb/article-32981 |date=15 December 2007 }}</ref> Since then, Iran has experienced significant political, social, and economic changes. The establishment of the ''Islamic Republic of Iran'' led to the restructuring of its political system, with ] as the Supreme Leader. Iran's foreign relations have been shaped by the ] (1980–1988), ongoing tensions with the United States, and its nuclear program, which has been a point of contention in international diplomacy. Despite economic sanctions and internal challenges, Iran remains a key player in Middle Eastern and global geopolitics.
The ] (633–656) ended the ] and was a turning point in Iranian history. ] took place during 8th to 10th century and led to the eventual decline of the ] religion in ], as well as many of its dependancies. However, the achievements of the previous Persian civilizations were not lost, but were to a great extent absorbed by the new ]ic polity and civilization.

Iran was once again reunified as an independent state in 1501 by the ] which ] ]<ref name="savoryeiref">R.M. Savory, ''Safavids'', ], 2nd edition</ref> as the official ] of their empire, marking one of the most important turning points in the ].<ref name="islamic1600">, retrieved 1 October 2007</ref> Functioning again as a leading power, this time amongst their neighboring ] arch rival ], Iran had been a monarchy ruled by a shah, or emperor, almost without interruption from 1501 until the 1979 ], when Iran officially became an ] on 1 April 1979.<ref>, Encyclopædia Britannica retrieved 23 January 2008</ref><ref name = "Britannica"> 23 January 2008</ref>

In the course of the first half of the 19th century, Iran irrevocably lost many of its territories in the ] which it had been ruling intermittently encompassed for millennia, as well as being part of the very concept of Iran for centuries,{{sfn|Fisher|Avery|Hambly|Melville|1991|pp=329-330}} comprising modern day ], ], ], and ] following the ] and ] to its rapidly expanding and emerged neighboring rival, the ].<ref name="books.google.nl">Timothy C. Dowling pp 729 ABC-CLIO, 2 dec. 2014 ISBN 1598849484</ref>


==Prehistory== ==Prehistory==
{{Further|List of archaeological sites in Iran|Prehistory of Iran}}
], dating from the first half of 1st millennium BC.]]
{{Further|Tepe Sialk|Jiroft culture|Shahr-e Sukhteh}}
] Before the 2003 earthquake.]]
] is one of the few extant ]s outside of Mesopotamia and is considered to be the best preserved example in the world.]]
{{Further|Archaeological sites in Iran|Prehistory of Iran}}
{{Further|Tappeh Sialk|Jiroft culture|Shahr-i Sokhta}}


===Paleolithic=== ===Paleolithic===
The earliest archaeological artifacts in Iran were found in the ] and ] sites that are thought to date back to 100,000 years ago in the Middle Paleolithic.<ref>Ancient Iran, Encyclopedia Britannica, www.britannica.com</ref> ] Stone tools made by ] man have also been found.<ref name=Museum>http://www.pbase.com/k_amj/tehran_museum retrieved 27 March 2008</ref> There are more cultural remains of ] man dating back to the ] period, which mainly have been found in the Zagros region and fewer in central Iran at sites such as Kobeh, Kunji, ], Tamtama, ], and ] Cave.<ref>J.D. Vigne, J. Peters and D. Helmer, ''First Steps of Animal Domestication'', Proceedings of the 9th Conference of the International Council of Archaeozoology, Durham, August 2002, ISBN 1-84217-121-6</ref> In 1949 a Neanderthal ] was discovered by CS Coon in ].<ref>{{cite web|last1=TRINKAUS|first1=E.|last2=BIGLARI|first2=F.|title=M IDDLE P ALEOLITHIC H UMAN R EMAINS FROM B ISITUN C AVE , I RAN|website=http://www.academia.edu|accessdate=1 March 2015}}</ref> Evidence for ] and ] periods are known mainly from the ] region in the caves of ] and ] and a few number of sites in the Alborz range and Central Iran. The earliest archaeological artifacts in Iran were found in the ] and ] sites that are thought to date back to 10,000 years ago in the Middle Paleolithic.<ref>Ancient Iran, ''Encyclopædia Britannica'', www.britannica.com</ref> ] stone tools made by ]s have also been found.<ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Biglari|first1=Fereidoun|last2=Shidrang|first2=Sonia|date=2019|title=Rescuing the Paleolithic Heritage of Hawraman, Kurdistan, Iranian Zagros|url=https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/10.1086/706536|journal=Near Eastern Archaeology|volume=82|issue=4|pages=226–235|doi=10.1086/706536|s2cid=212851965 |issn=1094-2076}}</ref> There are more cultural remains of Neanderthals dating back to the ] period, which mainly have been found in the Zagros region and fewer in central Iran at sites such as Kobeh, Kunji, ], Tamtama, ], and ] Cave.<ref>J.D. Vigne, J. Peters and D. Helmer, ''First Steps of Animal Domestication'', Proceedings of the 9th Conference of the International Council of Archaeozoology, Durham, August 2002, {{ISBN|1-84217-121-6}}</ref> In 1949, a Neanderthal ] was discovered by ] in Bisitun Cave.<ref>{{cite web|last1=TRINKAUS|first1=E.|last2=BIGLARI|first2=F.|title=Middle Paleolithic Human Remains from Bisitun Cave, Iran|url=http://www.academia.edu|access-date=2021-11-06|archive-date=2016-07-27|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160727234409/http://kau.academia.edu/DaniyalAlGhazzawi|url-status=live}}</ref> Evidence for ] and ] periods are known mainly from the ] in the caves of ] and ] and a few number of sites in ], ] and ]. During this time, people began creating ].<ref>{{cite web | url=https://www.tehrantimes.com/news/503588/UNESCO-assessor-visits-prehistoric-caves-in-Khorramabad-s-valley | title=UNESCO assessor visits prehistoric caves in Khorramabad's valley | date=13 September 2024 }}</ref><ref>{{cite web | url=https://newspaper.irandaily.ir/7490/3/7192 | title=Khorramabad Valley: A potential UNESCO World Heritage Site }}</ref>


===Neolithic to Chalcolithic=== ===Neolithic to Chalcolithic===
There are also 10,000-year-old human and animal figurines from Teppe Sarab in Kermanshah Province among the many other ancient artifacts.<ref name=Museum/> Early agricultural communities such as ] in 10,000 BC<ref>"Early humans in Iran were growing wheat 12,000 years ago", http://www.nbcnews.com/science/science-news/early-humans-iran-were-growing-wheat-12-000-years-ago-f6C10536898, First published July 5th 2013</ref><ref>{{cite web|last1=Riehl|first1=Simone|title=Emergence of Agriculture in the Foothills of the Zagros Mountains of Iran (Supplement)|url=http://www.researchgate.net/publication/259041065_Emergence_of_Agriculture_in_the_Foothills_of_the_Zagros_Mountains_of_Iran_%28Supplement%29|website=www.researchgate.net|accessdate=1 March 2015}}</ref> along with settlements such as ] (the earliest village in ]) in 8000 BC,<ref>{{cite web|url=http://oi.uchicago.edu/research/pubs/nn/spr97_alizadeh.html |title=Excavations at Chogha Bonut: The earliest village in Susiana |publisher=Oi.uchicago.edu |accessdate=21 June 2013}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|last =Hole|first =Frank|title =NEOLITHIC AGE IN IRAN|work =Encyclopedia Iranica|publisher =Encyclopaedia Iranica Foundation|date = 20 July 2004|url =http://www.iranicaonline.org/articles/neolithic-age-in-iran|accessdate =9 August 2012}}</ref> began to flourish in and around the ] region in western Iran.<ref name=MMA>{{cite web |url=http://www.metmuseum.org/toah/ht/02/wai/ht02wai.htm |title=Iran, 8000–2000 BC |accessdate=2008-08-09 |work=The Timeline of Art History |publisher=The Metropolitan Museum of Art |date=October 2000}}</ref> Around about the same time the earliest known clay vessels and modeled human and animal terracotta figurines were produced at Ganj Dareh, also in western Iran.<ref name=MMA/> Early agricultural communities such as ] in 10,000 BC<ref>{{cite web|title=Early humans in Iran were growing wheat 12,000 years ago|url=http://www.nbcnews.com/science/science-news/early-humans-iran-were-growing-wheat-12-000-years-ago-f6C10536898|date=5 July 2013|work=NBC.news|access-date=10 September 2014|archive-date=2 November 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201102183951/https://www.nbcnews.com/science/science-news/early-humans-iran-were-growing-wheat-12-000-years-ago-f6C10536898|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|last1=Riehl|first1=Simone|title=Emergence of Agriculture in the Foothills of the Zagros Mountains of Iran (Supplement)|url=https://www.researchgate.net/publication/259041065|website=www.researchgate.net|access-date=1 March 2015|archive-date=3 May 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190503134900/https://www.researchgate.net/publication/259041065_Emergence_of_Agriculture_in_the_Foothills_of_the_Zagros_Mountains_of_Iran_Supplement|url-status=live}}</ref> along with settlements such as ] (the earliest village in Elam) in 8000 BC,<ref>{{cite web |url=http://oi.uchicago.edu/research/pubs/nn/spr97_alizadeh.html |title=Excavations at Chogha Bonut: The earliest village in Susiana |publisher=University of Chicago
|access-date=21 June 2013 |archive-date=25 July 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130725195537/http://oi.uchicago.edu/research/pubs/nn/spr97_alizadeh.html |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite encyclopedia|last =Hole|first =Frank|title =Neolithic Age in Iran|encyclopedia =Encyclopedia Iranica|publisher =Encyclopaedia Iranica Foundation|date =20 July 2004|url =http://www.iranicaonline.org/articles/neolithic-age-in-iran|access-date =9 August 2012|archive-date =23 October 2012|archive-url =https://web.archive.org/web/20121023055952/http://www.iranicaonline.org/articles/neolithic-age-in-iran|url-status =live}}</ref> began to flourish in and around the Zagros Mountains region in western Iran.<ref name=MMA>{{cite web |url=http://www.metmuseum.org/toah/ht/02/wai/ht02wai.htm |title=Iran, 8000–2000 BC |access-date=2008-08-09 |work=The Timeline of Art History |publisher=The Metropolitan Museum of Art |date=October 2000 |archive-date=2001-03-05 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20010305194154/http://www.metmuseum.org/toah/ht/02/wai/ht02wai.htm |url-status=live }}</ref> Around about the same time, the earliest-known clay vessels and modelled human and animal terracotta figurines were produced at Ganj Dareh, also in western Iran.<ref name=MMA/> There are also 10,000-year-old human and animal figurines from Tepe Sarab in Kermanshah Province among many other ancient artefacts.<ref>{{cite web
| url=http://www.pbase.com/k_amj/tehran_museum |url-status= live
| archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130726032154/http://www.pbase.com/k_amj/tehran_museum |archive-date=2013-07-26
|others= Ali Majdfar, photography
| access-date= 27 March 2008
| title= Ancient Iran Museum
}}</ref>


The south-western part of Iran was part of the ] where most of humanity's first major crops were grown, in villages such as ] (where a settlement was first founded possibly as early as 4395 cal BC)<ref>The Archaeology of Elam: Formation and Transformation of an Ancient Iranian State - by D. T. Potts, Cambridge University Press, 29/07/1999 - page 46-47 - ISBN 0521563585 hardback</ref> and settlements such as ], dating back to 6800 BC;<ref name="xinhuaciv"/><ref>''Chogha Mish (Iran)'', By K. Kris Hirst – http://archaeology.about.com/od/cterms/g/choghamish.htm</ref> there are 7,000-year-old ]s of ] ] in the ]<ref></ref> (now on display at the ]) and ruins of 7,000-year-old settlements such as ] are further testament to that. The two main Neolithic Iranian settlements were the ] and ]. The south-western part of Iran was part of the ] where most of humanity's first major crops were grown, in villages such as ] (where a settlement was first founded possibly as early as 4395 cal BC)<ref name="Elam">{{cite book
|title=The Archaeology of Elam: Formation and Transformation of an Ancient Iranian State
|first= D. T. | last=Potts
| publisher=Cambridge University Press
| year= 1999
| isbn =0-521-56358-5}}</ref>{{rp|46–47}} and settlements such as ], dating back to 6800 BC;<ref name="xinhuaciv"> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161123142419/http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/2007-08/10/content_6508609.htm |date=23 November 2016 }}, retrieved 1 October 2007</ref><ref>{{cite web|title=Chogha Mish (Iran)|author=K. Kris Hirst|url=http://archaeology.about.com/od/cterms/g/choghamish.htm|access-date=2010-06-11|archive-date=2013-11-06|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131106002737/http://archaeology.about.com/od/cterms/g/choghamish.htm|url-status=live}}</ref> there are 7,000-year-old jars of wine ] in the Zagros Mountains<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.museum.upenn.edu/new/research/Exp_Rese_Disc/NearEast/wine.shtml |title=Penn Museum – University of Pennsylvania Museum of Archaeology and Anthropology |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20081216011240/http://www.museum.upenn.edu/new/research/Exp_Rese_Disc/NearEast/wine.shtml |archive-date=2008-12-16 }}</ref> (now on display at the ]) and ruins of 7000-year-old settlements such as ] are further testament to that. The two main Neolithic Iranian settlements were ] and the hypothetical ].<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Smith |first=Philip E. L. |date=1990 |title=Architectural Innovation and Experimentation at Ganj Dareh, Iran |journal=World Archaeology |volume=21 |issue=3 |pages=323–335 |doi=10.1080/00438243.1990.9980111 |jstor=124833 |issn=0043-8243}}</ref>


===Bronze Age=== ===Bronze Age===
{{further|Tappeh Sialk|Jiroft civilization|Elam|Kura-Araxes culture|Akkadian Empire|Kassites|Mannaeans}} {{further|Tepe Sialk|Jiroft culture|Elam|Kura–Araxes culture|Akkadian Empire|Kassites|Mannaea}}
], Iran]]
Parts of what is modern-day northwestern Iran was part of the ] (circa 3,400 B.C. — circa 2,000 B.C.), that stretched up into the neighboring regions of the ] and ].<ref name="books.google.nl">K. Kh. Kushnareva.
] is one of the few extant ]s outside of ] and is considered to be the best preserved example in the world.]]
UPenn Museum of Archaeology, 1 jan. 1997. ISBN 0924171502 p 44</ref><ref name="Ancient Turkey">Antonio Sagona,Paul Zimansky. Routledge 2015. ISBN 1134440278 p 163</ref>
Parts of what is modern-day northwestern Iran was part of the ] (circa 3400 BC—ca. 2000 BC), that stretched up into the neighbouring regions of the ] and ].<ref name="books.google.nl2">{{cite book|last=Kushnareva|first=K. Kh.|title=The Southern Caucasus in Prehistory: Stages of Cultural and Socioeconomic Development from the Eighth to the Second Millennium B.C.|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=e1PNO7urjHQC&pg=PA44|year=1997|publisher=UPenn Museum of Archaeology|isbn=978-0-924171-50-5|access-date=2016-05-08|archive-date=2020-09-13|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200913110041/https://books.google.com/books?id=e1PNO7urjHQC&pg=PA44|url-status=live}}, page 44</ref><ref name="Ancient Turkey">{{cite book|last1=Sagona|first1=Antonio|last2=Zimansky|first2=Paul|title=Ancient Turkey|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=SsLKBgAAQBAJ&pg=PA163|date=24 February 2015|publisher=Routledge|isbn=978-1-134-44027-6|access-date=8 May 2016|archive-date=6 September 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200906034914/https://books.google.com/books?id=SsLKBgAAQBAJ&pg=PA163|url-status=live}}, page 163</ref>


Susa is one of the oldest-known settlements of Iran and the world. Based on C14 dating, the time of foundation of the city is as early as 4395 BC,<ref name="Elam pp. 45-46">The Archaeology of Elam: Formation and Transformation of an Ancient Iranian State - by D. T. Potts, Cambridge University Press, 29/07/1999 - pp. 45-46 - ISBN 0521563585 hardback</ref> a time that goes beyond the age of civilization in Mesopotamia. The general perception among archeologists is that Susa was an extension of the Sumerian city state of Uruk.<ref>Algaze, Guillermo. 2005. The Uruk World System: The Dynamics of Expansion of Early Mesopotamian Civilization</ref><ref>http://oi.uchicago.edu/pdf/saoc63.pdf</ref> In its later history, Susa became the capital of ], which emerged as a state found 4000 BC.<ref name="Elam pp. 45-46"/> There are also dozens of ] sites across the Iranian plateau pointing to the existence of ancient cultures and urban settlements in the 4th millennium BC,<ref name="xinhuaciv" /> One of the earliest civilizations in Iranian plateau was the ] in southeastern Iran, in the province of ]. ] is one of the oldest-known settlements of Iran and the world. Based on C14 dating, the time of the foundation of the city is as early as 4395 BC,<ref name="Elam" />{{rp|45–46}} a time right after the establishment of the ancient Sumerian city of Uruk in 4500 BC. The general perception among archaeologists is that Susa was an extension of the ]ian city-state of ], hence incorporating many aspects of Mesopotamian culture.<ref>Algaze, Guillermo. 2005. The Uruk World System: The Dynamics of Expansion of Early Mesopotamian Civilization</ref><ref>{{Cite book
| title= Beyond the Ubaid: transformation and integration in the late prehistoric societies of the Middle East
| editor1 = Robert A. Carter
| editor2 = Graham Philip
| series= Studies in Ancient Oriental Civilization
| volume= 63
| orig-date= 2006
| year=2010
| isbn = 978-1-885923-66-0
| place = Ann Arbor
| publisher= University of Chicago Press
|url=http://oi.uchicago.edu/pdf/saoc63.pdf |archive-date=2014-03-21 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140321143949/http://oi.uchicago.edu/pdf/saoc63.pdf |url-status=live
}}</ref> In its later history, Susa became the capital of Elam, which emerged as a state founded 4000 BC.<ref name="Elam" />{{rp|45–46}} There are also dozens of ] sites across the Iranian plateau pointing to the existence of ancient cultures and urban settlements in the fourth millennium BC.<ref name="xinhuaciv" /> One of the earliest civilizations on the Iranian plateau was the ] in southeastern Iran in the province of ].


It is one of the most artifact-rich archaeological sites in the Middle East. Archaeological excavations in Jiroft led to the discovery of several objects belonging to the 4th millennium BC.<ref></ref> There is a large quantity of objects decorated with highly distinctive engravings of animals, mythological figures, and architectural motifs. The objects and their iconography are unlike anything ever seen before by archeologists. Many are made from ], a gray-green soft stone; others are in ], ], ], and even ]. Recent excavations at the sites have produced the world's earliest inscription which pre-dates Mesopotamian inscriptions.<ref> retrieved 27 March 2008</ref><ref name="IRANIAN HISTORY">{{cite encyclopedia |last=Yarshater |first=Yarshater | title = Iranian history | encyclopedia = Encyclopædia Iranica | accessdate = 2008-06-23|url=http://www.iranicaonline.org/articles/iran-ii1-pre-islamic-times}}</ref> It is one of the most artefact-rich archaeological sites in the Middle East. Archaeological excavations in Jiroft led to the discovery of several objects belonging to the 4th millennium BC.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.chnpress.com/news/?section=2&id=6864 |title=5000-Y-Old Inscribed Tablets Discovered in Jiroft |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110511111851/http://www.chnpress.com/news/?section=2&id=6864 |archive-date=2011-05-11 }}</ref> There is a large quantity of objects decorated with highly distinctive engravings of animals, mythological figures, and architectural motifs. The objects and their iconography are considered unique. Many are made from ], a grey-green soft stone; others are in ], ], ], and even ]. Recent excavations at the sites have produced the world's earliest inscription which pre-dates Mesopotamian inscriptions.<ref>{{Cite news|title=New Discoveries in Jiroft May Change History of Civilization
| publisher= Cultural Heritage News Agency
| archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20080411035252/http://www.chnpress.com/news/?section=2&id=6126
| date = 26 January 2006
| archive-date= 11 April 2008
|url=https://www.chnpress.com/news|access-date=2023-03-16}}</ref><ref name="IRANIAN HISTORY">{{cite encyclopedia |last=Yarshater |first=Yarshater |title=Iranian history |encyclopedia=Encyclopædia Iranica |access-date=2008-06-23 |url=http://www.iranicaonline.org/articles/iran-ii1-pre-islamic-times |archive-date=2021-02-03 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210203041803/https://iranicaonline.org/articles/iran-ii1-pre-islamic-times |url-status=live }}</ref>


There are records of numerous other ancient civilizations on the ] before the emergence of ] tribes during the ]. The ] saw the rise of urbanization into organized city states and the invention of writing (the ]) in the Near East. While Bronze Age ] made use of writing from an early time, the ] remains undeciphered, and records from ] pertaining to Elam are scarce. There are records of numerous other ancient civilizations on the ] before the emergence of ] during the ]. The ] saw the rise of urbanization into organized city-states and the invention of writing (the ]) in the Near East. While Bronze Age ] made use of writing from an early time, the ] remains undeciphered, and records from ] pertaining to Elam are scarce.


Russian historian ] determines the present day Iranian population of Iranian plateau as descendants of mainly non-Persian groups: "It is the autochthones of the Iranian plateau, and not the Proto-Indo-European tribes of Europe, which are, in the main, the ancestors, in the physical sense of the word, of the present-day Iranians."<ref>Diakonoff, I., M., “Media”, Cambridge History of Iran, II, Cambridge, 1985, p.43 . </ref> Russian historian ] stated that the modern inhabitants of Iran are descendants of mainly non-Indo-European groups, more specifically of pre-Iranic inhabitants of the Iranian Plateau: "It is the autochthones of the Iranian plateau, and not the Proto-Indo-European tribes of Europe, which are, in the main, the ancestors, in the physical sense of the word, of the present-day Iranians."<ref>Diakonoff, I., M., "Media", Cambridge History of Iran, II, Cambridge, 1985, p.43 . </ref>


===Early Iron Age=== ===Early Iron Age===
{{see also|Neo-Assyrian Empire|Urartu}} {{see also|Neo-Assyrian Empire|Urartu}}
] in the shape of a ram's head, gold – ] - ] - western Iran <ref>{{cite web | url=https://iranicaonline.org/articles/ziwiye | title=Welcome to Encyclopaedia Iranica }}</ref> –, late 7th–early 6th century BCE]]
], from the first half of the 1st millennium BC]]
Records become more tangible with the rise of the ] and its records of incursions from the Iranian plateau. Records become more tangible with the rise of the ] and its records of incursions from the Iranian plateau.
As early as the 20th century BC, tribes came to the Iranian Plateau from the ]. The arrival of Iranians on the Iranian plateau forced the Elamites to relinquish one area of their empire after another and to take refuge in ], ] and nearby area, which only then became coterminous with Elam.<ref name="Elam">{{cite encyclopedia |last=Lackenbacher |first=Sylvie | encyclopedia = Encyclopædia Iranica|title=Elam|accessdate=2008-06-23|url=http://www.iranicaonline.org/articles/elam-vii}}</ref> Bahman Firuzmandi say that the southern Iranians might be intermixed with the Elamite peoples living in the plateau.<ref>^ Bahman Firuzmandi "Mad, Hakhamanishi, Ashkani, Sasani" pp. 20</ref> As early as the 20th century BC, tribes came to the Iranian plateau from the ]. The arrival of Iranians on the Iranian plateau forced the ]ites to relinquish one area of their empire after another and to take refuge in Elam, ] and the nearby area, which only then became coterminous with Elam.<ref name="EI-Elam">{{cite encyclopedia|last=Lackenbacher|first=Sylvie|encyclopedia=Encyclopædia Iranica|title=Elam|access-date=2008-06-23|url=http://www.iranicaonline.org/articles/elam-vii|archive-date=2020-11-18|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201118145532/https://iranicaonline.org/articles/elam-vii|url-status=live}}</ref> Bahman Firuzmandi say that the southern Iranians might be intermixed with the Elamite peoples living in the plateau.<ref>^ Bahman Firuzmandi "Mad, Hakhamanishi, Ashkani, Sasani" pp. 20</ref>
By the mid-1st millennium BC, Medes, ]s, and ] populated the Iranian plateau. Until the rise of the Medes, they all remained under ]n domination, like the rest of the ]. In the first half of the 1st millennium BC, parts of northwestern Iran were incorporated into ]. By the mid-first millennium BC, ], ], and ]ns populated the Iranian plateau. Until the rise of the Medes, they all remained under ]n domination, like the rest of the ]. In the first half of the first millennium BC, parts of what is now ] were incorporated into ].

==Classical Antiquity==


==Classical antiquity==
===Median and Achaemenid Empire (650 BC&ndash;330 BC)===
{{Main|Median Empire|Achaemenid Empire}} ===Median and Achaemenid Empire (678–330 BC)===
{{Main|Medes|Achaemenid Empire}}
{{see also|Greco-Persian Wars}} {{see also|Greco-Persian Wars}}
<gallery mode=packed> <gallery mode="packed">
Map of the Achaemenid Empire.jpg|A map of the ] Pasargad Tomb Cyrus3.jpg|The tomb of ]
Gate of All Nations, Persepolis.jpg|Ruins of the ], Persepolis
Map achaemenid empire en.png|The Achaemenid Empire at its greatest extent
Persepolis001.jpg|Ruins of the ], Persepolis
Cyrus tomb.jpg|The monument generally assumed to be the tomb of ]
Medes and Persians at eastern stairs of the Apadana, Persepolis.JPG|Depiction of united ] and ] at the ], Persepolis
Persepolis T Chipiez.jpg|Representation of the palace of Darius I at ] (T.Chipiez)
Persepolis - Tachara 01.jpg|Ruins of the ], Persepolis
</gallery> </gallery>


In 646 BC, The ] king ] sacked Susa, which ended Elamite supremacy in the region.<ref name=MMA3>{{cite web |url=http://www.metmuseum.org/toah/ht/04/wai/ht04wai.htm |title=Iran, 1000 BC–1 AD|accessdate=2008-08-09 |work=The Timeline of Art History |publisher=The Metropolitan Museum of Art |date=October 2000}}</ref> For over 150 years Assyrian kings of nearby Northern ] were seeking to conquer ] of Western Iran.<ref name=bnet>{{cite news |url=http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0SBL/is_16/ai_n13810181 |title=The rise and fall of Media |accessdate=2008-08-10 |work=International Journal of Kurdish Studies |publisher=BNET |date=January 2002 | first=I.N. | last=Medvedskaya}}</ref> Under pressure from the ], the small kingdoms of the western Iranian plateau coalesced into increasingly larger and more centralized states.<ref name=MMA3/> In 646 BC, ]n king ] sacked ], which ended Elamite supremacy in the region.<ref name=MMA3>{{cite web |url=http://www.metmuseum.org/toah/ht/04/wai/ht04wai.htm |title=Iran, 1000 BC–1 AD |access-date=2008-08-09 |work=The Timeline of Art History |publisher=The Metropolitan Museum of Art |date=October 2000 |archive-date=2021-01-25 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210125012421/http://www.metmuseum.org/toah/ht/04/wai/ht04wai.htm |url-status=live }}</ref> For over 150 years Assyrian kings of nearby Northern ] had been wanting to conquer ] of Western Iran.<ref name=bnet>{{cite news|url=http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0SBL/is_16/ai_n13810181 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080328003303/http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0SBL/is_16/ai_n13810181 |archive-date=2008-03-28 |title=The Rise and Fall of Media |access-date=2008-08-10 |work=International Journal of Kurdish Studies |publisher=BNET |date=January 2002 |first=I.N. |last=Medvedskaya }}</ref> Under pressure from Assyria, the small kingdoms of the western Iranian plateau coalesced into increasingly larger and more centralized states.<ref name=MMA3/>
]
In the second half of the seventh century BC, the Medes gained their independence and were united by ]. In 612 BC, ], ]' grandson, and the ]ian king ] invaded Assyria and laid siege to and eventually destroyed ], the Assyrian capital, which led to the fall of the ].<ref name=Nineveh>{{cite book |title=The pre-Islamic Middle East |last=Sicker |first=Martin |year=2000 |publisher=Greenwood Publishing Group |isbn=978-0-275-96890-8 |pages=68/69 }}</ref> ] was later on conquered and dissolved as well by the Medes.<ref> {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150702205257/http://www.starspring.com/ascender/urartu/urartu.html |date=2015-07-02 }}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.allaboutturkey.com/urartu.htm|title=Urartu Civilization – All About Turkey|access-date=2015-06-18|archive-date=2015-07-01|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150701005402/http://www.allaboutturkey.com/urartu.htm|url-status=live}}</ref> The Medes are credited with founding Iran as a nation and empire, and established the first Iranian empire, the largest of its day until ] established a unified empire of the Medes and Persians, leading to the ] (c.550–330 BC).


]
In the second half of the 7th century BC, the ] tribes gained their independence and were united by ]. In 612 BC ], ]' grandson, and the Babylonian king ] invaded Assyria and laid siege to and eventually destroyed ], the Assyrian capital, which led to the fall of the ].<ref name=Nineveh>{{cite book |title=The pre-Islamic Middle East |last=Sicker |first=Martin |year=2000 |publisher=Greenwood Publishing Group |isbn=978-0-275-96890-8 |pages=68/69 |url= }}</ref> Urartu was later on conquered and dissolved as well by the Medes.<ref></ref><ref></ref> The Medes are credited with the foundation of Iran as a nation and empire, and established the first Iranian empire, the largest of its day until ] established a unified empire of the Medes and ] leading to the ] (c.550–330 BC).


] overthrew, in turn, ], ], and ], creating an empire far larger than ]. He was better able, through more benign policies, to reconcile his subjects to Persian rule; and the longevity of his empire was one result. The ], like the ]n, was also "]", xšāyaθiya xšāyaθiyānām (shāhanshāh in modern Persian) – "great king," ], as known by the ]. ] overthrew, in turn, the ], ]n, and ] empires, creating an empire far larger than Assyria. He was better able, through more benign policies, to reconcile his subjects to Persian rule; the longevity of his empire was one result. The Persian king, like the ]n, was also "]", ''xšāyaθiya xšāyaθiyānām'' (''shāhanshāh'' in modern Persian) – "great king", ], as known by the ].


Cyrus's son, ], conquered the last major power of the region, ], causing the collapse of the ]. Since he became ill and died before, or while, leaving ], stories developed, as related by ], that he was struck down for impiety against the ]. Be that as it may, it led to a succession crisis. The winner, ], based his claim on membership in a collateral line of the ]. Cyrus's son, ], conquered the last major power of the region, ], causing the collapse of the ]. Since he became ill and died before, or while, leaving ], stories developed, as related by ], that he was struck down for impiety against the ]. After the death of Cambyses II, Darius ascended the throne by overthrowing the legitimate Achaemenid monarch ], and then quelling rebellions throughout his kingdom. As the winner, ], based his claim on membership in a collateral line of the Achaemenid Empire.


Darius' first capital was at Susa, and he started the building programme at ]. He rebuilt a canal between the ] and the ], a forerunner of the modern ]. He improved the extensive road system, and it is during his reign that mention is first made of the ] (shown on map), a great highway stretching all the way from Susa to ] with posting stations at regular intervals. Major reforms took place under Darius. ]age, in the form of the ''daric'' (gold coin) and the ''shekel'' (silver coin) was standardized (coinage had already been invented over a century before in Lydia c. 660 BC but not standardized),<ref></ref> and administrative efficiency was increased. Darius' first capital was at Susa, and he started the building program at ]. He rebuilt a canal between the ] and the ], a forerunner of the modern ]. He improved the extensive road system, and it is during his reign that mentions are first made of the ] (shown on map), a great highway stretching all the way from Susa to ] with posting stations at regular intervals. Major reforms took place under Darius. ]age, in the form of the ''daric'' (gold coin) and the ] (silver coin) was standardized (coinage had already been invented over a century before in Lydia c. 660 BC but not standardized),<ref>{{Cite web
| url = http://www.thebritishmuseum.ac.uk/forgottenempire/persia/darius.html
| title= Forgotten Empire— the world of Ancient Persia
| publisher= The British Museum
| year = 2005
|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070423012310/http://www.thebritishmuseum.ac.uk/forgottenempire/persia/darius.html |archive-date=2007-04-23
|access-date=2023-03-16}}</ref> and administrative efficiency increased.


The ] language appears in royal inscriptions, written in a specially adapted version of ]. Under Cyrus the Great and ], the Persian Empire eventually became the largest empire in human history up until that point, ruling and administrating over most of the then known world,<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.wsu.edu/~dee/MESO/PERSIANS.HTM |title=The Persians |year=1996 |first=Richard |last=Hooker |accessdate=2006-08-20}}</ref> as well as spanning three continents, namely ], Asia, and Africa. Their greatest achievement was the empire itself. The Persian Empire represented the world's first superpower<ref name="autogenerated1">http://anthropology.net/user/kambiz_kamrani/blog/2006/12/05/engineering_an_empire_the_persians</ref><ref></ref> that was based on a model of tolerance and respect for other cultures and religions.<ref></ref> The ] language appears in royal inscriptions, written in a specially adapted version of the ]. Under Cyrus the Great and ], the Persian Empire eventually became the largest empire in human history up until that point, ruling and administrating over most of the then known world,<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.wsu.edu/~dee/MESO/PERSIANS.HTM |title=The Persians |year=1996 |first=Richard |last=Hooker |access-date=2006-08-20 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060829110727/http://www.wsu.edu/~dee/MESO/PERSIANS.HTM |archive-date=2006-08-29 }}</ref> as well as spanning the continents of ], Asia, and Africa. The greatest achievement was the empire itself. The Persian Empire represented the world's first ]<ref name="autogenerated1">{{cite web|url=http://anthropology.net/user/kambiz_kamrani/blog/2006/12/05/engineering_an_empire_the_persians |title=Engineering an Empire: The Persians &#124; Anthropology.net |access-date=2007-03-13 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070110020201/http://anthropology.net/user/kambiz_kamrani/blog/2006/12/05/engineering_an_empire_the_persians |archive-date=2007-01-10 }}</ref><ref name="encyclopedia.com">{{cite web|url=http://www.encyclopedia.com/doc/1G1-155920057.html|title=Greek-Persian Wars (490 bce–479 bce) - Gale Encyclopedia of World History: War - Encyclopedia.com|access-date=2007-03-13|archive-date=2009-09-04|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090904162341/http://www.encyclopedia.com/doc/1G1-155920057.html|url-status=live}}</ref> that was based on a model of tolerance and respect for other cultures and religions.<ref> {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20050907204041/http://web.utk.edu/~persian/benevolent.htm |date=2005-09-07 }}</ref>


] ]
In the late 6th century BC, Darius launched his European campaign, in which he defeated the ], conquered ], and subdued all coastal Greek cities, as well as defeating the European ] around the ] river.<ref name="A companion to Ancient Macedonia">Joseph Roisman,Ian Worthington. John Wiley & Sons, 2011. ISBN 144435163X pp 135-138, pp 343-345</ref> In 513/512, ] became a ] kingdom of Persia.<ref name="A companion to Ancient Macedonia"/> In the late sixth century BC, Darius launched his European campaign, in which he defeated the ], conquered ], and subdued all coastal Greek cities, ] the European ] around the ] river.{{sfn|Roisman|Worthington|2011|p=345}} In 512/511 BC, ] became a ] kingdom of Persia.{{sfn|Roisman|Worthington|2011|p=345}}


In 499 BC, ] lent support to a revolt in ] which resulted in the sacking of ]. This led to an Achaemenid campaign against mainland Greece known as the ] which lasted the first half of the 5th century BC, and is known as one of the most important wars in ]. In the ], the Persian general ] re-subjugated Thrace and made Macedon a full part of Persia.<ref name="A companion to Ancient Macedonia"/> The war eventually turned out in defeat however. Darius' successor ] launched the ]. At a crucial moment in the war, almost all of mainland Greece was overran by the Persians, including all territories to the north of the Isthmus of ],<ref>Brian Todd Carey, Joshua Allfree, John Cairns. Pen and Sword, 19 jan. 2006 ISBN 1848846304</ref> however, this was also turned out in a Greek victory, following the battles of ] and ], by which Persia lost its footholds in Europe, and eventually withdrew from it.{{sfn|Roisman|Worthington|2011|pp=135-138, 342-345}} During the Greco-Persian wars Persia made some major territorial advantages and razed and captured ] in 480 BC, but after a string of Greek victories the Persians were forced to withdraw while losing control of ], ] and ]. Fighting continued for several decades after the successful Greek repelling of the Second Invasion with numerous Greek city states under the latters' newly formed ], which eventually ended with the peace of Callias in 449 BC, ending the Greco-Persian Wars. In 404 BC following the death of ] Egypt rebelled under ]. Later Egyptian ] successfully resisted Persian attempts to reconquer ] until 343 BC when Egypt was reconquered by ]. In 499 BC, ] lent support to a revolt in ], which resulted in the sacking of ]. This led to an Achaemenid campaign against mainland Greece known as the ], which lasted the first half of the 5th century BC, and is known as one of the most important wars in ]. In the ], the Persian general ] re-subjugated Thrace and made Macedon a full part of Persia.{{sfn|Roisman|Worthington|2011|p=345}} The war eventually turned out in defeat, however. Darius' successor ] launched the ]. At a crucial moment in the war, about half of mainland Greece was overrun by the Persians, including all territories to the north of the Isthmus of ],<ref>{{Cite book|last1=Carey|first1=Brian Todd|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=3OSfBwAAQBAJ&pg=PT32|title=Warfare in the Ancient World|last2=Allfree|first2=Joshua B.|last3=Cairns|first3=John|date=2006-01-19|publisher=Pen and Sword|isbn=978-1-84884-630-2|language=en}}</ref><ref name="Aeschylus, Burian2009">{{cite book|author1=Aeschylus|author2=Peter Burian|author3=Alan Shapiro|title=The Complete Aeschylus: Volume II: Persians and Other Plays|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=0kTiBwAAQBAJ&pg=PT18|date=17 February 2009|publisher=Oxford University Press|isbn=978-0-19-045183-7|page=18|access-date=12 September 2016|archive-date=23 September 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200923003450/https://books.google.com/books?id=0kTiBwAAQBAJ&pg=PT18|url-status=live}}</ref> however, this was also turned out in a Greek victory, following the battles of ] and ], by which Persia lost its footholds in Europe, and eventually withdrew from it.{{sfn|Roisman|Worthington|2011|pp=135–138, 342–345}} During the Greco-Persian wars, the Persians gained major territorial advantages. They ], once in 480 BC and again in 479 BC. However, after a string of Greek victories the Persians were forced to withdraw, thus losing control of ], ] and ]. Fighting continued for several decades after the successful Greek repelling of the Second Invasion with numerous Greek city-states under the Athens' newly formed ], which eventually ended with the peace of Callias in 449 BC, ending the Greco-Persian Wars. In 404 BC, following the death of ], Egypt rebelled under ]. Later ]s successfully resisted Persian attempts to reconquer Egypt until 343 BC, when Egypt was reconquered by ].
].]]


]}}]]
===Hellenic conquest and Seleucid Empire (312 BC – 248 BC)===

]
===Greek conquest and Seleucid Empire (312 BC–248 BC)===
{{Main|Seleucid Empire}} {{Main|Seleucid Empire}}
] in 200 BC, before Antiochus was defeated by the Romans]]
In 334 BC-331 BC ], also known in the ] ] as "the accursed Alexander", defeated ] in the battles of ], ] and ], swiftly conquering the Persian Empire by 331 BC. Alexander's empire broke up shortly after his death, and Alexander's general, ], tried to take control of ], ], and later Syria and ].


From 334 BC to 331 BC, ] defeated ] in the battles of ], ] and ], swiftly conquering the Persian Empire by 331 BC. Alexander's empire broke up shortly after his death, and Alexander's general, ], tried to take control of Iran, ], and later ] and ]. His empire was the ]. He was killed in 281 BC by ].
His ruling family is known as the ]. He was killed in 281 BC by ]. Greek language, philosophy, and art came with the colonists. During the ] throughout Alexander's former empire, Greek became the common tongue of diplomacy and literature.
], first native Persian ruler after Greek rule.]]


===Parthian Empire (248 BC – 224 AD)=== ===Parthian Empire (248 BC–224 AD)===
] prince, ].]]
{{Main|Parthian Empire}} {{Main|Parthian Empire}}
{{See also|Roman-Parthian Wars}} {{See also|Roman–Parthian Wars}}
], first native Persian ruler after Greek rule]]
The ] was the realm of the ] (اشکانیان), who reunited and governed the Iranian plateau after ] and defeating the ] ] (سلوکیان) in the later 3rd century BC, and intermittently controlled ] between ca 150 BC and 224 AD. The Parthian Empire quickly included ].


The ]{{Emdash}}ruled by the Parthians, a group of northwestern Iranian people{{Emdash}}was the realm of the Arsacid dynasty. This latter reunited and governed the Iranian plateau after the ] and defeating the Seleucid Empire in the late third century BC. It intermittently controlled Mesopotamia between {{Circa|150 BC and 224 AD}} and absorbed ].
Parthia was the Eastern arch-enemy of the ]; and it limited Rome's expansion beyond ] (central ]). The ] armies included two types of ]: the heavily armed and armoured ]s and lightly armed but highly mobile ].


Parthia was the eastern arch-enemy of the ] and it limited Rome's expansion beyond ] (central Anatolia). The Parthian armies included two types of ]: the heavily armed and armored ]s and the lightly armed but highly-mobile ].
For the Romans, who relied on heavy ], the Parthians were too hard to defeat, as both types of cavalry were much faster and more mobile than foot soldiers. The ] used by the Parthian cavalry was most notably feared by the Roman soldiers, which proved pivotal in the crushing Roman defeat at the ]. On the other hand, the Parthians found it difficult to occupy conquered areas as they were unskilled in ]. Because of these weaknesses, neither the Romans nor the Parthians were able completely to ] each other's territory.


For the Romans, who relied on heavy ], the Parthians were too hard to defeat, as both types of cavalry were much faster and more mobile than foot soldiers. The ] used by the Parthian cavalry was most notably feared by the Roman soldiers, which proved pivotal in the crushing Roman defeat at the ]. On the other hand, the Parthians found it difficult to occupy conquered areas as they were unskilled in ] warfare. Because of these weaknesses, neither the Romans nor the Parthians were able completely to ] each other's territory.
The Parthian empire subsisted for five centuries, longer than most Eastern Empires. The end of this empire came at last in 224 CE, when the empire's organization had loosened and the last king was defeated by one of the empire's vassal peoples, the Persians under the ] dynasty. However, the Arsacid dynasty continued to exist for centuries onwards under the ], the ], and the ], which were all eponymous branches of the Arsacid dynasty of Parthia.


The Parthian empire subsisted for five centuries, longer than most Eastern Empires. The end of this empire came at last in 224 AD, when the empire's organization had loosened and the last king was defeated by one of the empire's vassal peoples, the Persians under the Sasanians. However, the Arsacid dynasty continued to exist for centuries onwards in ], the ], and the ], which were all eponymous branches of the dynasty.
===Sasanian Empire (224 – 651 AD)===
{{see also|Roman-Persian relations|Byzantine-Sassanid Wars|Byzantine–Sasanian War of 602–628}}
] of Iranian emperor ] (on horseback) capturing ] emperor ] (kneeing) and ] (standing).]]
{{Main|Sasanian Empire}}
The first shah of the Sasanian Empire, ], started reforming the country both economically and militarily. For a period of more than 400 years, Iran was once again one of the leading powers in the world, alongside its neighboring rival, the ]-].<ref>Norman A. Stillman ''The Jews of Arab Lands'' pp 22 Jewish Publication Society, 1979 ISBN 0827611552</ref><ref>International Congress of Byzantine Studies ''Proceedings of the 21st International Congress of Byzantine Studies, London, 21–26 August 2006, Volumes 1-3'' pp 29. Ashgate Pub Co, 30 sep. 2006 ISBN 075465740X</ref> The empire's territory, at its height, encompassed all of today's ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], parts of ], ], ], parts of ], ], ], and parts of ].


===Sasanian Empire (224–651 AD)===
Most of the Sassanian empire's lifespan it was overshadowed by the frequent ], a continuation of the ] and the all-comprising ], the latter otherwise known as the longest lasting conflict in human history. Started in the 1st century BC by their predecessors the Parthians and Romans, the last Roman-Persian War would only be fought in the 7th century. The Persians defeated the Romans in the ] in 260 and took the Roman emperor, ], prisoner for the remainder of his life.
{{Main|Sasanian Empire}}

{{see also|Roman–Iranian relations|Byzantine–Sasanian wars|Byzantine–Sasanian War of 602–628}}
] was conquered early on. During ]'s rule in 590–628, ], ], ] and ] were also annexed to the Empire. The Sassanians called their empire ''Erânshahr'' (or ''Iranshahr'', "Dominion of the Aryans", i.e. of ]).<ref>Garthwaite, Gene R., ''The Persians'', p. 2</ref>
] of Iranian emperor ] (on horseback) capturing Roman emperor ] (kneeing) and ] (standing).]]
] bowl showing king ].]]
The first shah of the Sasanian Empire, ], started reforming the country economically and militarily. For a period of more than 400 years, Iran was once again one of the leading powers in the world, alongside its neighbouring rival, the ] and then ]s.<ref>Norman A. Stillman ''The Jews of Arab Lands'' pp 22 Jewish Publication Society, 1979 {{ISBN|0827611552}}</ref><ref>International Congress of Byzantine Studies ''Proceedings of the 21st International Congress of Byzantine Studies, London, 21–26 August 2006, Volumes 1–3'' pp 29. Ashgate Pub Co, 30 September 2006 {{ISBN|075465740X}}</ref> The empire's territory, at its height, encompassed all of today's Iran, ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], parts of ], ], ], parts of ], ], ], and parts of ].


Most of the Sasanian Empire's lifespan was overshadowed by the frequent ], a continuation of the ] and the all-comprising ]; the last was the longest-lasting conflict in human history. Started in the first century BC by their predecessors, the Parthians, and Romans, the last Roman–Persian War was fought in the seventh century. The Persians defeated the Romans at the ] in 260 and took emperor ] prisoner for the remainder of his life.
]' army and Persians under ]. Fresco by ], c. 1452.]]
A chapter of Iran's history followed after roughly six hundred years of conflict with the Roman Empire. During this time, the Sassanian and Romano-Byzantine armies clashed for influence in ], the western ] (mainly ] and ]; modern-day ] and ]), ], Armenia and the Levant. Under Justinian I, the war came to an uneasy peace with payment of tribute to the Sassanians.


Eastern Arabia was conquered early on. During ]'s rule in 590–628, ], ], ] and ] were also annexed to the Empire. The Sassanians called their empire ''Erânshahr'' ("Dominion of the Aryans", i.e., of ]).<ref>Garthwaite, Gene R., ''The Persians'', p. 2</ref>
However the Sasanians used the deposition of the Byzantine ] as a ''casus belli'' to attack the Empire. After many gains, the Sassanians were defeated at Issus, Constantinople and finally Nineveh, resulting in peace. With the conclusion of the over 700 years lasting ] through the climactic ] which included the very ], the war-exhausted Persians lost the ] (632) in ], (present day ]) to the invading forces of Islam.


A chapter of Iran's history followed after roughly six hundred years of conflict with the Roman Empire. During this time, the Sassanian and Romano-Byzantine armies clashed for influence in Anatolia, the western Caucasus (mainly ] and the ]; modern-day ] and ]), ], Armenia and the Levant. Under Justinian I, the war came to an uneasy peace with payment of tribute to the Sassanians.
The Sassanian era, encompassing the length of the ] period, is considered to be one of the most important and influential historical periods in Iran, and had a major impact on the world. In many ways the Sassanian period witnessed the highest achievement of ], and constitutes the last great Iranian Empire before the adoption of Islam. Persia influenced Roman civilization considerably during Sassanian times,<ref>J. B. Bury, p.109.</ref> their cultural influence extending far beyond the empire's territorial borders, reaching as far as Western Europe,<ref name="autogenerated2">Durant.</ref> Africa,<ref></ref> China and India<ref>Sarfaraz, pp. 329–330.</ref> and also playing a prominent role in the formation of both European and Asiatic medieval art.<ref></ref>


However, the Sasanians used the deposition of the Byzantine emperor ] as a ''casus belli'' to attack the Empire. After many gains, the Sassanians were defeated at Issus, Constantinople, and finally Nineveh, resulting in peace. With the conclusion of the over 700 years lasting Roman–Persian Wars through the climactic ], which included the very ], the war-exhausted Persians lost the ] (632) in ] (present-day ]) to the invading Muslim forces.
This influence carried forward to the ]. The dynasty's unique and aristocratic culture transformed the Islamic conquest and destruction of Iran into a Persian Renaissance.<ref name="autogenerated2" /> Much of what later became known as Islamic culture, architecture, writing and other contributions to civilization, were taken from the Sassanian Persians into the broader Muslim world.<ref>Zarinkoob, p.305.</ref>


The Sasanian era, encompassing the length of ], is considered to be one of the most important and influential historical periods in Iran, and had a major impact on the world. In many ways, the Sassanian period witnessed the highest achievement of Persian civilization and constitutes the last great Iranian Empire before the adoption of Islam. Persia influenced Roman civilization considerably during Sassanian times,<ref>J. B. Bury, p.109.</ref> their cultural influence extending far beyond the empire's territorial borders, reaching as far as Western Europe,<ref name="autogenerated2">Durant.</ref> Africa,<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.transoxiana.com.ar/0104/sasanians.html|title=Compareti – Sasanians in Africa – Transoxiana 4|access-date=2007-03-05|archive-date=2008-05-28|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080528203821/http://www.transoxiana.com.ar/0104/sasanians.html|url-status=live}}</ref> China and India<ref>Sarfaraz, pp. 329–330.</ref> and also playing a prominent role in the formation of both European and Asiatic medieval art.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.artarena.force9.co.uk/sass2.htm|title=Iransaga – Persian Art, The Sassanians|access-date=2007-03-05|archive-date=2019-11-23|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191123010249/http://www.artarena.force9.co.uk/sass2.htm|url-status=live}}</ref>
==Medieval Iran==


This influence carried forward to the ]. The dynasty's unique and aristocratic culture transformed the Islamic conquest and destruction of Iran into a Persian Renaissance.<ref name="autogenerated2" /> Much of what later became known as Islamic culture, architecture, writing, and other contributions to civilization, were taken from the Sassanian Persians into the broader Muslim world.<ref>Zarinkoob, p.305.</ref>
===Caliphate and Sultanate era===
]' army and Persians under ]. Fresco by ], c. 1452.}}]]


==Medieval period==
===Early Islamic period===
====Islamic conquest of Persia (633–651)==== ====Islamic conquest of Persia (633–651)====
{{Main|Muslim conquest of Persia}} {{Main|Muslim conquest of Persia}}
] ]
In 633, when the Sasanian king ] was ruling over Iran, the Muslims under ] invaded the country right after it had been in a bloody civil war. Several Iranian nobles and families such as king Dinar of the ], and later ]iyans of ], mutinied against their Sasanian overlords. Although the ] had claimed the Sasanian throne under the two prominent generals ] and ], it remained royal to the Sasanians during their struggle against the Arabs, but the Mihrans were eventually betrayed and defeated by their own kinsmen, the ], under their leader ], who had mutinied against Yazdegerd III.


In 633, when the Sasanian king ] was ruling over Iran, the Muslims under ] invaded the country right after it had been in a bloody civil war. Several Iranian nobles and families such as king Dinar of the ], and later ]iyans of ], mutinied against their Sasanian overlords. Although the ] had claimed the Sasanian throne under the two prominent generals ] and ], it remained loyal to the Sasanians during their struggle against the Arabs, but the Mihrans were eventually betrayed and defeated by their own kinsmen, the ], under their leader ], who had mutinied against Yazdegerd III.
Yazdegerd III, fled from one district to another until a local miller killed him for his purse at ] in 651.<ref>{{cite web | url=http://p2.www.britannica.com/oscar/print?articleId=106324&fullArticle=true&tocId=9106324 | title=Iran | publisher=]}}</ref> By 674, Muslims had conquered ] (which included modern Iranian Khorasan province and modern Afghanistan and parts of ]).


Yazdegerd III fled from one district to another until a local miller killed him for his purse at ] in 651.<ref>{{cite encyclopedia | url=http://p2.www.britannica.com/oscar/print?articleId=106324&fullArticle=true&tocId=9106324 | title=Iran | encyclopedia=] | access-date=2007-06-21 | archive-date=2013-08-13 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130813184232/http://p2.www.britannica.com/oscar/print?articleId=106324&fullArticle=true&tocId=9106324 | url-status=live }}</ref> By 674, Muslims had conquered ] (which included modern Iranian Khorasan province and modern Afghanistan and parts of ]).
The ] ended the Sasanian Empire and led to the eventual decline of the ] religion in Persia. Over time, the majority of Iranians converted to Islam. Most of the aspects of the previous Persian civilizations were not discarded, but were absorbed by the new ]ic polity.


The ] ended the Sasanian Empire and led to the eventual decline of the ] religion in Persia. Over time, the majority of Iranians converted to Islam. Most of the aspects of the previous Persian civilizations were not discarded but were absorbed by the new ]ic polity. As ] has commented:
As ] has commented:<ref name="lewis">{{cite web | url=http://www.tau.ac.il/dayancenter/mel/lewis.html | title=Iran in history | first=Bernard | last=Lewis | publisher=] | accessdate=2007-04-03}}</ref>
<blockquote>"These events have been variously seen in Iran: by some as a blessing, the advent of the true faith, the end of the age of ignorance and heathenism; by others as a humiliating national defeat, the conquest and subjugation of the country by foreign invaders. Both perceptions are of course valid, depending on one's angle of vision."</blockquote> {{blockquote|"These events have been variously seen in Iran: by some as a blessing, the advent of the true faith, the end of the age of ignorance and heathenism; by others as a humiliating national defeat, the conquest and subjugation of the country by foreign invaders. Both perceptions are of course valid, depending on one's angle of vision."<ref name="lewis">{{cite web|url=http://www.tau.ac.il/dayancenter/mel/lewis.html |title=Iran in history |first=Bernard |last=Lewis |publisher=] |access-date=2007-04-03 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070429144545/http://www.tau.ac.il/dayancenter/mel/lewis.html |archive-date=2007-04-29 }}</ref>}}


====The Umayyad Caliphate and its incursions into the Caspian coast==== ====Umayyad era and Muslim incursions into the Caspian coast====
{{Main|Umayyad Caliphate}} {{Main|Umayyad Caliphate}}
After the fall of ] in 651, the ] Arabs adopted many Persian customs especially the administrative and the court mannerisms. Arab provincial governors were undoubtedly either Persianized ] or ethnic Persians; certainly Persian remained the language of official business of the caliphate until the adoption of Arabic toward the end of the 7th century,<ref>Hawting G., ''The First Dynasty of Islam. The Umayyad Caliphate AD 661–750'', (London) 1986, pp. 63–64</ref> when in 692 minting began at the caliphal capital, ]. The new Islamic coins evolved from imitations of Sassanian coins (as well as ]), and the ] script on the coinage was replaced with ]. After the fall of the Sasanian Empire in 651, the ] of the ] adopted many Persian customs, especially the administrative and the court mannerisms. Arab provincial governors were undoubtedly either Persianized ] or ethnic Persians; certainly Persian remained the language of official business of the caliphate until the adoption of Arabic toward the end of the seventh century,<ref>Hawting G., ''The First Dynasty of Islam. The Umayyad Caliphate AD 661–750'', (London) 1986, pp. 63–64</ref> when in 692 minting began at the capital, ]. The new Islamic coins evolved from imitations of Sasanian coins (as well as ]), and the ] on the coinage was replaced with ].


During the reign of the ] dynasty, the Arab conquerors imposed ] as the primary language of the subject peoples throughout their empire. ], who was not happy with the prevalence of the ] in the ], ordered the official language of the conquered lands to be replaced by Arabic, sometimes by force.<ref>'']'', by ], ], et al. Section on The Arab Conquest of Iran and . Vol 4, 1975. London. p.46</ref> In ]'s ''From The Remaining Signs of Past Centuries'' for example it is written: During the Umayyad Caliphate, the Arab conquerors imposed ] as the primary language of the subject peoples throughout their empire. ], who was not happy with the prevalence of the Persian language in the ], ordered the official language of the conquered lands to be replaced by Arabic, sometimes by force.<ref>'']'', by ], ], et al. Section on The Arab Conquest of Iran and. Vol 4, 1975. London. p.46</ref> In ]'s ''From The Remaining Signs of Past Centuries'' for example it is written:
{{blockquote|"When ] under the command of Al-Hajjaj bin Yousef was sent to ] with a military expedition and conquered it for the second time, he swiftly killed whoever wrote the Khwarazmian native language that knew of the Khwarazmian heritage, history, and culture. He then killed all their Zoroastrian priests and burned and wasted their books, until gradually the illiterate only remained, who knew nothing of writing, and hence their history was mostly forgotten."<ref>]. الآثار الباقية عن القرون الخالية, p.35,36,48 وقتی قتبیه بن مسلم سردار حجاج، بار دوم بخوارزم رفت و آن را باز گشود هرکس را که خط خوارزمی می نوشت و از تاریخ و علوم و اخبار گذشته آگاهی داشت از دم تیغ بی دریغ درگذاشت و موبدان و هیربدان قوم را یکسر هلاک نمود و کتابهاشان همه بسوزانید و تباه کرد تا آنکه رفته رفته مردم امی ماندند و از خط و کتابت بی بهره گشتند و اخبار آنها اکثر فراموش شد و از میان رفت</ref>}}


There are a number of historians who see the rule of the Umayyads as setting up the "dhimmah" to increase taxes from the '']s'' to benefit the Muslim Arab community financially and by discouraging conversion.<ref name="Astren">Fred Astren pg.33–35</ref> Governors lodged complaints with the caliph when he enacted laws that made conversion easier, depriving the provinces of revenues.
<blockquote>"When ] under the command of ] was sent to ] with a military expedition and conquered it for the second time, he swiftly killed whomever wrote the Khwarazmian native language that knew of the Khwarazmian heritage, history, and culture. He then killed all their ] priests and burned and wasted their books, until gradually the illiterate only remained, who knew nothing of writing, and hence their history was mostly forgotten."<ref>]. الآثار الباقية عن القرون الخالية, p.35,36,48 وقتی قتبیه بن مسلم سردار حجاج، بار دوم بخوارزم رفت و آن را باز گشود هرکس را که خط خوارزمی می نوشت و از تاریخ و علوم و اخبار گذشته آگاهی داشت از دم تیغ بی دریغ درگذاشت و موبدان و هیربدان قوم را یکسر هلاک نمود و کتابهاشان همه بسوزانید و تباه کرد تا آنکه رفته رفته مردم امی ماندند و از خط و کتابت بی بهره گشتند و اخبار آنها اکثر فراموش شد و از میان رفت</ref>
</blockquote>


In the 7th century, when many non-Arabs such as ] entered Islam, they were recognized as ] ("clients") and treated as second-class citizens by the ruling Arab elite until the end of the Umayyad Caliphate. During this era, Islam was initially associated with the ethnic identity of the Arab and required formal association with an ] and the adoption of the client status of ''mawali''.<ref name="Astren"/> The half-hearted policies of the late Umayyads to tolerate non-Arab Muslims and Shias had failed to quell unrest among these minorities.
There are a number of historians who see the rule of the Umayyads as setting up the "]" to increase taxes from the '']s'' to benefit the Arab Muslim community financially and by discouraging conversion.<ref name="Astren">Fred Astren pg.33–35</ref> Governors lodged complaints with the caliph when he enacted laws that made conversion easier, depriving the provinces of revenues.
] and its neighbouring territories]]
In the 7th century, when many non-Arabs such as ] entered Islam, they were recognized as ] and treated as second class citizens by the ruling Arab elite until the end of the Umayyad dynasty. During this era, Islam was initially associated with the ethnic identity of the Arab and required formal association with an Arab tribe and the adoption of the client status of ''mawali''.<ref name="Astren"/> The half-hearted policies of the late Umayyads to tolerate non-Arab Muslims and ]s had failed to quell unrest among these minorities.


However, all of Iran was still not under Arab control, and the region of ] was under ] control, while ] was under ] and ] control, and the ] under ] control. The Arabs had invaded these regions several times, but achieved no decisive result because of the inaccessible terrain of the regions. The most prominent ruler of the Dabuyids, known as ] (r. 712-728), managed to hold his domains during his long struggle against the Arab general ], who was defeated by a combined Dailamite-Dabuyid army, and was forced to retreat from Tabaristan.<ref>Pourshariati (2008), pp. 312-313</ref> However, all of Iran was still not under Arab control, and the region of ] was under the control of the ], while ] was under ] and ] control, and the ] region under ]. The Arabs had invaded these regions several times but achieved no decisive result because of the inaccessible terrain of the regions. The most prominent ruler of the Dabuyids, known as ] (r. 712–728), managed to hold his domains during his long struggle against the Arab general ], who was defeated by a combined Dailamite-Dabuyid army, and was forced to retreat from Tabaristan.<ref>Pourshariati (2008), pp. 312–313</ref>


With the death of the Umayyad ] ] in 743, the Islamic world was launched into civil war. ] was sent to Khorasan by the Abbasids initially as a propagandist and then to revolt on their behalf. He took ] defeating the Umayyad governor there ]. He became the ] Abbasid governor of Khurasan. During the same period, the Dabuyid ruler ] declared independence from the Umayyads, but was shortly forced to recognize Abbasid authority. In 750, Abu Muslim became leader of the Abbasid army and defeated the Umayyads at the ]. Abu Muslim stormed ], the capital of the Umayyad caliphate, later that year. With the death of the Umayyad Caliph ] in 743, the Islamic world was launched into civil war. ] was sent to Khorasan by the ] initially as a propagandist and then to revolt on their behalf. He took ] defeating the Umayyad governor there ]. He became the ] Abbasid governor of Khurasan. During the same period, the Dabuyid ruler ] declared independence from the Umayyads but was shortly forced to recognize Abbasid authority. In 750, Abu Muslim became the leader of the Abbasid army and defeated the Umayyads at the ]. Abu Muslim stormed ], the capital of the Umayyad caliphate, later that year.


====The Abbasid Caliphate and Iranian semi-independent governments==== ==== Abbasid period and autonomous Iranian dynasties ====
{{Main|Abbasid Caliphate||Iranian Intermezzo|Tahirid dynasty|Saffarid dynasty|Ziyarid dynasty|Samanids|Sajid dynasty|Sallarid dynasty|Ilyasids|Buyid dynasty|Kakuyids}}
] in 900.]]
] ] in 900 AD.]]
]
{{Main|Abbasid Caliphate|Tahirid dynasty|Saffarid dynasty|Ziyarid dynasty|Samanids|Sajid dynasty|Sallarid dynasty|Ilyasids|Buyid dynasty|Kakuyids}}
The Abbasid army consisted primarily of Khorasanians and was led by an Iranian general, ]. It contained both Iranian and Arab elements, and the Abbasids enjoyed both Iranian and Arab support. The Abbasids overthrew the Umayyads in 750.<ref name="Islamic Conquest"></ref> According to Amir Arjomand, the ] essentially marked the end of the Arab empire and the beginning of a more inclusive, multiethnic state in the Middle East.<ref name=said>], . ], vol. 27, #1-4. ]: ], 1994.</ref>


The Abbasid army consisted primarily of Khorasanians and was led by an Iranian general, ]. It contained both Iranian and Arab elements, and the Abbasids enjoyed both Iranian and Arab support. The Abbasids overthrew the Umayyads in 750.<ref name="Islamic Conquest">{{cite web|url=http://www.iranchamber.com/history/islamic_conquest/islamic_conquest.php|title=History of Iran: Islamic Conquest|access-date=2007-06-21|archive-date=2019-10-05|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191005023220/http://www.iranchamber.com/history/islamic_conquest/islamic_conquest.php|url-status=live}}</ref> According to Amir Arjomand, the ] essentially marked the end of the Arab empire and the beginning of a more inclusive, multi-ethnic state in the Middle East.<ref name=said>], Abd Allah Ibn al-Muqaffa and the Abbasid Revolution. ], vol. 27, #1–4. ]: ], 1994. {{JSTOR|i401381}}</ref>
One of the first changes the Abbasids made after taking power from the Umayyads was to move the empire's capital from ], in the ], to ]. The latter region was influenced by Persian history and culture, and moving the capital was part of the Persian mawali demand for Arab influence in the empire. The city of ] was constructed on the ], in 762, to serve as the new Abbasid capital.<ref name="AHGC">{{cite web|work=Applied History Research Group, University of Calagary|url=http://www.ucalgary.ca/applied_history/tutor/islam/fractured/|title=The Islamic World to 1600|accessdate=August 26, 2006}}</ref>


One of the first changes the Abbasids made after taking power from the Umayyads was to move the empire's capital from ], in the ], to ]. The latter region was influenced by Persian history and culture, and moving the capital was part of the Persian mawali demand for Arab influence in the empire. The city of ] was constructed on the ], in 762, to serve as the new Abbasid capital.<ref name="AHGC">{{cite web|work=Applied History Research Group, University of Calgary |url=https://www.ucalgary.ca/applied_history/tutor/islam/fractured/ |title=The Islamic World to 1600 |access-date=26 August 2006 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20081005003551/http://www.ucalgary.ca/applied_history/tutor/islam/fractured/ |archive-date=5 October 2008 }}</ref>
The Abbasids established the position of ] like ] in their administration, which was the equivalent of a "vice-caliph", or second-in-command. Eventually, this change meant that many caliphs under the Abbasids ended up in a much more ceremonial role than ever before, with the vizier in real power. A new Persian bureaucracy began to replace the old Arab aristocracy, and the entire administration reflected these changes, demonstrating that the new dynasty was different in many ways to the Umayyads.<ref name="AHGC"/>


The Abbasids established the position of ] like ] in their administration, which was the equivalent of a "vice-caliph", or second-in-command. Eventually, this change meant that many caliphs under the Abbasids ended up in a much more ceremonial role than ever before, with the vizier in real power. A new Persian bureaucracy began to replace the old Arab aristocracy, and the entire administration reflected these changes, demonstrating that the new dynasty was different in many ways from the Umayyads.<ref name="AHGC"/>
By the 9th century, Abbasid control began to wane as regional leaders sprang up in the far corners of the empire to challenge the central authority of the Abbasid caliphate.<ref name="AHGC"/> The Abbasid caliphs began enlisting ''mamluks'', Turkic-speaking warriors, who had been moving out of Central Asia into ] as slave warriors as early as the 9th century. Shortly thereafter the real power of the Abbasid caliphs began to wane; eventually they became religious figureheads while the warrior slaves ruled.<ref name="Islamic Conquest"/>

By the 9th century, Abbasid control began to wane as regional leaders sprang up in the far corners of the empire to challenge the central authority of the Abbasid caliphate.<ref name="AHGC"/> The Abbasid caliphs began enlisting ''mamluks'', Turkic-speaking warriors, who had been moving out of Central Asia into ] as slave warriors as early as the 9th century. Shortly thereafter the real power of the Abbasid caliphs began to wane; eventually, they became religious figureheads while the warrior slaves ruled.<ref name="Islamic Conquest"/>

] was the leader of '']''. A devout ], he led the Persian freedom movement against oppressive Arab rule.|alt=]]
The 9th century also saw the revolt by native Zoroastrians, known as the ], against oppressive Arab rule. The movement was led by a Persian freedom fighter ]. Babak's Iranianizing<ref>Bernard Lewis (1991), "The Political Language of Islam", University of Chicago Press, pp 482: "Babak's Iranianizing rebellion in Azerbaijan gave occasion for sentiments at the capital to harden against men who were sympathetic to the more explicitly Iranian tradition"</ref> rebellion, from its base in ] in ],<ref>F. Daftary (1999) Sectarian and National Movements in Iran, Khurasan and Transoxania During Umayyad and Early 'Abbasid Times In History of Civilizations of Central Asia, vol. IV, part One, ed. M. S. Asimov, and C. E. Bosworth. Paris: UNESCO Publishing, pp. 41–60. excerpt from pg 50: "The activities of the Khurammiya reached their peak in the movement of Babak al-Khurrami, whose protracted rebellion based in north-western Iran seriously threatened the stability of the Abbassid caliphate... This revolt lasting for more than twenty years soon spread from Azerbaijan (North/West Iran) to western and central parts of Iran."</ref> called for a return of the political glories of the ]<ref>], "Mystics, monarchs, and messiahs", Harvard CMES, 2002. pg 138: "Babak revolted in Azerbaijan (816–838), evoking Abu Muslim as a heroic symbol..and called for a return to the Iranian past"</ref> past. The Khorramdin rebellion of Babak spread to the Western and Central parts of Iran and lasted more than twenty years before it was defeated when Babak was betrayed by ], a senior general of the Abbasid Caliphate.


As the power of the Abbasid caliphs diminished, a series of dynasties rose in various parts of Iran, some with considerable influence and power. Among the most important of these overlapping dynasties were the ] in ] (821–873); the ] in ] (861–1003, their rule lasted as maliks of Sistan until 1537); and the ] (819–1005), originally at ]. The Samanids eventually ruled an area from central Iran to Pakistan.<ref name="Islamic Conquest"/> As the power of the Abbasid caliphs diminished, a series of dynasties rose in various parts of Iran, some with considerable influence and power. Among the most important of these overlapping dynasties were the ] in ] (821–873); the ] in ] (861–1003, their rule lasted as maliks of Sistan until 1537); and the ] (819–1005), originally at ]. The Samanids eventually ruled an area from central Iran to Pakistan.<ref name="Islamic Conquest"/>


By the early 10th century, the Abbasids almost lost control to the growing Persian faction known as the ] (934–1062). Since much of the Abbasid administration had been Persian anyway, the Buyids were quietly able to assume real power in Baghdad. The Buyids were defeated in the mid-11th century by the ] Turks, who continued to exert influence over the Abbasids, while publicly pledging allegiance to them. The balance of power in Baghdad remained as such – with the Abbasids in power in name only – until the Mongol invasion of 1258 sacked the city and definitively ended the Abbasid dynasty.<ref name="AHGC"/> By the early 10th century, the Abbasids almost lost control to the growing Persian faction known as the ] (934–1062). Since much of the Abbasid administration had been Persian anyway, the Buyids were quietly able to assume real power in Baghdad. The Buyids were defeated in the mid-11th century by the ] ], who continued to exert influence over the Abbasids, while publicly pledging allegiance to them. The balance of power in Baghdad remained as such – with the Abbasids in power in name only – until the Mongol invasion of 1258 sacked the city and definitively ended the Abbasid dynasty.<ref name="AHGC"/>


During the ] period an enfranchisement was experienced by the ''mawali'' and a shift was made in political conception from that of a primarily Arab empire to one of a Muslim empire<ref name="Tobin">Tobin 113–115</ref> and c. 930 a requirement was enacted that required all bureaucrats of the empire be Muslim.<ref name="Astren" />{{clear}} During the ] period an enfranchisement was experienced by the ''mawali'' and a shift was made in political conception from that of a primarily Arab empire to one of a Muslim empire<ref name="Tobin">Tobin 113–115</ref> and c. 930 a requirement was enacted that required all bureaucrats of the empire be Muslim.<ref name="Astren" />


====Islamic golden age, Shu'ubiyya movement and Persianization process==== ====Islamic golden age, Shu'ubiyya movement and Persianization process====
{{See also|Islamization of Iran|Islamic Golden Age|Shu'ubiyya}} {{See also|Islamization of Iran|Islamic Golden Age|Shu'ubiyya}}
] (1236–1311), a Persian astronomer, depicting an epicyclic planetary model|alt=]]


] was a long process by which ] was gradually adopted by the majority population of Iran. ]'s "conversion curve" indicates that only about 10% of Iran converted to Islam during the relatively Arab-centric ] period. Beginning in the ] period, with its mix of Persian as well as Arab rulers, the Muslim percentage of the population rose. As Persian Muslims consolidated their rule of the country, the Muslim population rose from approximately 40% in the mid-9th century to close to 90% by the end of the 11th century.<ref name="Tobin"/> ] suggests that the rapid increase in conversion was aided by the Persian nationality of the rulers.<ref>Nasr, Hoseyn; Islam and the pliqht of modern man</ref>
] to the Persian court.]]
] was a long process by which ] was gradually adopted by the majority population of Iran. ]'s "conversion curve" indicates that only about 10% of Iran converted to Islam during the relatively Arab-centric ] period. Beginning in the ] period, with its mix of Persian as well as Arab rulers, the Muslim percentage of the population rose. As Persian Muslims consolidated their rule of the country, the Muslim population rose from approximately 40% in the mid-9th century to close to 100% by the end of the 11th century.<ref name="Tobin"/> ] suggests that the rapid increase in conversion was aided by the Persian nationality of the rulers.<ref>Nasr, Hoseyn; Islam and the pliqht of modern man</ref>


Although Persians adopted the religion of their conquerors, over the centuries they worked to protect and revive their distinctive language and culture, a process known as ]. Arabs and Turks participated in this attempt.<ref name="britannica">Encyclopædia Britannica, ''"Seljuq"'', Online Edition, ()</ref><ref>Richard Frye, The Heritage of Persia, p. 243.</ref><ref>Rayhanat al- adab, (3rd ed.), vol. 1, p. 181.</ref> Although Persians adopted the religion of their conquerors, over the centuries they worked to protect and revive their distinctive language and culture, a process known as ]. Arabs and Turks participated in this attempt.<ref name="britannica2">''Encyclopædia Britannica'', "Seljuq", Online Edition, ( {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20071219231803/https://www.britannica.com/eb/article-9066688 |date=2007-12-19 }})</ref><ref>Richard Frye, The Heritage of Persia, p. 243.</ref><ref>Rayhanat al- adab, (3rd ed.), vol. 1, p. 181.</ref>


In the 9th and 10th centuries, non-Arab subjects of the ] created a movement called ] in response to the privileged status of Arabs. Most of those behind the movement were Persian, but references to ], ] and ] are attested.<ref>Enderwitz, S. "Shu'ubiyya". ''Encyclopedia of Islam''. Vol. IX (1997), pp. 513–14.</ref> Citing as its basis Islamic notions of equality of races and nations, the movement was primarily concerned with preserving ]n culture and protecting Persian identity, though within a Muslim context. The most notable effect of the movement was the survival of the ] to the present day. In the 9th and 10th centuries, non-Arab subjects of the ] created a movement called ] in response to the privileged status of Arabs. Most of those behind the movement were Persian, but references to ], ] and ] are attested.<ref>Enderwitz, S. "Shu'ubiyya". ''Encyclopedia of Islam''. Vol. IX (1997), pp. 513–14.</ref> Citing as its basis Islamic notions of equality of races and nations, the movement was primarily concerned with preserving Persian culture and protecting Persian identity, though within a Muslim context.


The ] led the revival of Persian culture and the first important Persian poet after the arrival of Islam, ], was born during this era and was praised by Samanid kings. The Samanids also revived many ancient Persian festivals. Their successor, the ], who were of non-Iranian Turkic origin, also became instrumental in the revival of Persian.<ref></ref> The ] led the revival of Persian culture and the first important Persian poet after the arrival of Islam, ], was born during this era and was praised by Samanid kings. The Samanids also revived many ancient Persian festivals. Their successor, the ], who were of non-Iranian Turkic origin, also became instrumental in the revival of Persian culture.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.iranchamber.com/history/samanids/samanids.php|title=History of Iran: Samanid Dynasty|access-date=2007-06-21|archive-date=2019-04-01|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190401010449/http://www.iranchamber.com/history/samanids/samanids.php|url-status=live}}</ref>


] King ] of ], brought ] to the Persian court of ].<ref name="ME">{{cite book |last1=Eder |first1=Manfred A. J. |title=South Asian Archaeology 2007 Proceedings of the 19th Meeting of the European Association of South Asian Archaeology in Ravenna, Italy, July 2007, Volume II |date=2010 |publisher=Archaeopress Archaeology |isbn=978-1-4073-0674-2 |page=69 |url=http://history.chess.free.fr/papers/Eder%202007-2.pdf}}</ref><ref>{{cite book |last1=Bakker |first1=Hans T. |author-link=Hans T. Bakker|title=The Huns in Central and South Asia. How Two Centuries of War against Nomadic Invaders from the Steps are Concluded by a Game of Chess between the Kings of India and Iran |date=2017 |url=https://www.academia.edu/34156496}}</ref>]]
The culmination of the ] movement was the '']'', the national epic of Iran, written almost entirely in Persian. This voluminous work, reflects Iran's ancient history, its unique cultural values, its pre-Islamic ] religion, and its sense of nationhood.


The culmination of the ] movement was the '']'', the national epic of Iran, written almost entirely in Persian. This voluminous work, reflects Iran's ancient history, its unique cultural values, its pre-Islamic ] religion, and its sense of nationhood. According to ]:<ref name="lewis"/>
] (1236–1311), a Persian Astronomer. The image depicts an epicyclic planetary model.]]


<blockquote>"Iran was indeed Islamized, but it was not Arabized. Persians remained Persians. And after an interval of silence, Iran re-emerged as a separate, different and distinctive element within Islam, eventually adding a new element even to Islam itself. Culturally, politically, and most remarkable of all even religiously, the Iranian contribution to this new Islamic civilization is of immense importance. The work of Iranians can be seen in every field of cultural endeavour, including Arabic poetry, to which poets of Iranian origin composing their poems in Arabic made a very significant contribution. In a sense, Iranian Islam is a second advent of Islam itself, a new Islam sometimes referred to as Islam-i Ajam. It was this Persian Islam, rather than the original Arab Islam, that was brought to new areas and new peoples: to the Turks, first in Central Asia and then in the Middle East in the country which came to be called Turkey, and of course to India. The Ottoman Turks brought a form of Iranian civilization to the walls of Vienna..."</blockquote>
According to ]:<ref name="lewis"/>
<blockquote>"Iran was indeed Islamized, but it was not Arabized. Persians remained Persians. And after an interval of silence, Iran reemerged as a separate, different and distinctive element within Islam, eventually adding a new element even to Islam itself. Culturally, politically, and most remarkable of all even religiously, the Iranian contribution to this new Islamic civilization is of immense importance. The work of Iranians can be seen in every field of cultural endeavor, including Arabic poetry, to which poets of Iranian origin composing their poems in Arabic made a very significant contribution. In a sense, Iranian Islam is a second advent of Islam itself, a new Islam sometimes referred to as Islam-i Ajam. It was this Persian Islam, rather than the original Arab Islam, that was brought to new areas and new peoples: to the Turks, first in Central Asia and then in the Middle East in the country which came to be called Turkey, and of course to India. The Ottoman Turks brought a form of Iranian civilization to the walls of Vienna..."</blockquote>


The ] was to yield deep transformations within the cultural, scientific, and political structure of Iran's society: The blossoming of ], ], ] and ] became major elements of the newly forming Muslim civilization. Inheriting a heritage of thousands of years of civilization, and being at the "crossroads of the major cultural highways",<ref>Caheb C., Cambridge History of Iran, ''Tribes, Cities and Social Organization'', vol. 4, p305–328</ref> contributed to Persia emerging as what culminated into the "]". During this period, ] vastly contributed to technology, science and medicine, later influencing the rise of European science during ].<ref>Kühnel E., in ''Zeitschrift der deutschen morgenländischen Gesell'', Vol. CVI (1956)</ref> The ] was to yield deep transformations within the cultural, scientific, and political structure of Iran's society: The blossoming of ], ], ] and ] became major elements of the newly forming Muslim civilization. Inheriting a heritage of thousands of years of civilization, and being at the "crossroads of the major cultural highways",<ref>Caheb C., Cambridge History of Iran, ''Tribes, Cities and Social Organization'', vol. 4, p305–328</ref> contributed to Persia emerging as what culminated into the "]". During this period, ] vastly contributed to technology, science and medicine, later influencing the rise of European science during ].<ref>Kühnel E., in ''Zeitschrift der deutschen morgenländischen Gesell'', Vol. CVI (1956)</ref>


The most important scholars of almost all of the Islamic sects and schools of thought were Persian or lived in Iran, including the most notable and reliable ] collectors of ] and ] like ], ], ], ] and Imam Bukhari, the greatest ] of Shia and Sunni like ], ], ] and ], the greatest ], ], ], ], ], ] and ] like ], and ], the greatest ] like ], ]. The most important scholars of almost all of the Islamic sects and schools of thought were Persian or lived in Iran, including the most notable and reliable ] collectors of ] and ] like ], ], ], ] and Imam Bukhari, the greatest ] of Shia and Sunni like ], ], ] and ], the greatest ], ], ], ], ], ] and ] like ] and ], and the greatest ] like ] and ].


===={{anchor|Persianate states and dynasties (977-1219)}}Persianate states and dynasties (977–1219)==== ===={{anchor|Persianate states and dynasties (977-1219)}}Persianate states and dynasties (977–1219)====
{{Main|Persianate|Ghaznavids|Great Seljuq|Khwarazmian dynasty}}
], built in 1067, Persia, contain tombs of Seljuq princes.]]
], built in 1067, Persia, contain tombs of Seljuq princes.]]
{{Main|Persianate|Ghaznavids|Great Seljuq|Khwarezmid Dynasty}}

In 977 a Turkic governor of the Samanids, ], conquered ] (in present-day Afghanistan) and established a dynasty, the ], that lasted to 1186.<ref name="Islamic Conquest"/> The Ghaznavid empire grew by taking all of the Samanid territories south of the ] in the last decade of the 10th century, and eventually occupied parts of Eastern Iran, Afghanistan, Pakistan and northwest India.<ref name="AHGC"/>
In 977, a Turkic governor of the Samanids, ], conquered ] (in present-day Afghanistan) and established a dynasty, the ], that lasted to 1186.<ref name="Islamic Conquest"/> The Ghaznavid empire grew by taking all of the Samanid territories south of the ] in the last decade of the 10th century, and eventually occupied parts of Eastern Iran, Afghanistan, Pakistan and north-west India.<ref name="AHGC"/>


The Ghaznavids are generally credited with launching Islam into a mainly ] India. The invasion of India was undertaken in 1000 by the Ghaznavid ruler, ], and continued for several years. They were unable to hold power for long, however, particularly after the death of Mahmud in 1030. By 1040 the Seljuqs had taken over the Ghaznavid lands in Iran.<ref name="AHGC"/> The Ghaznavids are generally credited with launching Islam into a mainly ] India. The invasion of India was undertaken in 1000 by the Ghaznavid ruler, ], and continued for several years. They were unable to hold power for long, however, particularly after the death of Mahmud in 1030. By 1040 the Seljuqs had taken over the Ghaznavid lands in Iran.<ref name="AHGC"/>


The ], who like the Ghaznavids were Persianate in nature and of Turkic origin, slowly conquered Iran over the course of the 11th century.<ref name="Islamic Conquest"/> The dynasty had its origins in the ] tribal confederations of Central Asia and marked the beginning of ] power in the Middle East. They established a ] ] rule over parts of ] and the Middle East from the 11th to 14th centuries. They set up an empire known as Great Seljuq Empire that stretched from ] in the west to western Afghanistan in the east and the western borders of (modern-day) ] in the northeast; and was the target of the ]. Today they are regarded as the cultural ancestors of the Western ], the present-day inhabitants of ], ], and ], and they are remembered as great patrons of ], ], ], and ].<ref name="britannica">], ''"Seljuq"'', Online Edition, (): ''"... Because the Turkish Seljuqs had no Islamic tradition or strong literary heritage of their own, they adopted the cultural language of their Persian instructors in Islam. Literary Persian thus spread to the whole of Iran, and the Arabic language disappeared in that country except in works of religious scholarship ..."''</ref><ref name="iranica">O.Özgündenli, ''"Persian Manuscripts in Ottoman and Modern Turkish Libraries"'', ], Online Edition, ()</ref><ref name="Ravandi">M. Ravandi, ''"The Seljuq court at Konya and the Persianisation of Anatolian Cities"'', in Mesogeios (Mediterranean Studies), vol. 25–6 (2005), pp. 157–69</ref> The ], who like the Ghaznavids were Persianate in nature and of Turkic origin, slowly conquered Iran over the course of the 11th century.<ref name="Islamic Conquest"/> The dynasty had its origins in the ] tribal confederations of Central Asia and marked the beginning of ] power in the Middle East. They established a ] rule over parts of ] and the Middle East from the 11th to 14th centuries. They set up an empire known as Great Seljuq Empire that stretched from Anatolia in the west to western Afghanistan in the east and the western borders of (modern-day) ] in the north-east; and was the target of the ]. Today they are regarded as the cultural ancestors of the Western ], the present-day inhabitants of ], ] and ], and they are remembered as great patrons of ], ], ], and ].<ref name="britannica3">'']'', "Seljuq", Online Edition, ( {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20071219231803/https://www.britannica.com/eb/article-9066688 |date=2007-12-19 }}): ''"... Because the Turkish Seljuqs had no Islamic tradition or strong literary heritage of their own, they adopted the cultural language of their Persian instructors in Islam. Literary Persian thus spread to the whole of Iran, and the Arabic language disappeared in that country except in works of religious scholarship ..."''</ref><ref name="iranica">{{citation
|first= Osman G. | last =Özgüdenli
| date = 20 July 2005
| url = https://iranicaonline.org/articles/persian-manuscripts-1-ottoman
| title= Persian Manuscripts I. in Ottoman and modern Turkish libraries
| encyclopedia = Encyclopædia Iranica
| archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20201205211832/http://www.iranicaonline.org/articles/persian-manuscripts-1-ottoman
| url-status=live
| archive-date= 5 December 2020
}}</ref><ref name="Ravandi">{{ cite journal
| year=2005
| title= Ravandi, the Seljuq court at Konya and the Persianisation of Anatolian Cities
| journal= Mesogeios (Mediterranean Studies)
| publisher= Editions Herodotos
| volume= 25/26 | pages= 157–169
| last = Hillenbrand | first = Carole
}}</ref>


]
The dynastic founder, ], turned his army against the Ghaznavids in Khorasan. He moved south and then west, conquering but not wasting the cities in his path. In 1055 the caliph in Baghdad gave Tughril Beg robes, gifts, and the title King of the East. Under Tughril Beg's successor, ] (1072&ndash;1092), Iran enjoyed a cultural and scientific renaissance, largely attributed to his brilliant Iranian vizier, ]. These leaders established the observatory where ] did much of his experimentation for a new calendar, and they built ] in all the major towns. They brought ], one of the greatest Islamic theologians, and other eminent scholars to the Seljuq capital at Baghdad and encouraged and supported their work.<ref name="Islamic Conquest"/>


The founder of the dynasty, ], turned his army against the Ghaznavids in Khorasan. He moved south and then west, conquering but not wasting the cities in his path. In 1055 the caliph in Baghdad gave Tughril Beg robes, gifts, and the title King of the East. Under Tughril Beg's successor, ] (1072–1092), Iran enjoyed a cultural and scientific renaissance, largely attributed to his brilliant Iranian vizier, ]. These leaders established the observatory where ] did much of his experimentation for a new calendar, and they built ] in all the major towns. They brought ], one of the greatest Islamic theologians, and other eminent scholars to the Seljuq capital at Baghdad and encouraged and supported their work.<ref name="Islamic Conquest"/>
]
When Malik Shah I died in 1092, the empire split as his brother and four sons quarrelled over the apportioning of the empire among themselves. In Anatolia, Malik Shah I was succeeded by ] who founded the ] and in ] by his brother ]. In ] he was succeeded by his son ] whose reign was contested by his other three brothers ] in ], ] in ] and ] in ]. As Seljuq power in Iran weakened, other dynasties began to step up in its place, including a resurgent Abbasid caliphate and the ]. The Khwarezmid Empire was a Sunni Muslim Persianate dynasty, of East Turkic origin, that ruled in Central Asia. Originally vassals of the Seljuqs, they took advantage of the decline of the Seljuqs to expand into Iran.<ref></ref> In 1194 the Khwarezmshah ] defeated the Seljuq sultan ] in battle and the Seljuq empire in Iran collapsed. Of the former Seljuq Empire, only the ] in ] remained.


When Malik Shah I died in 1092, the empire split as his brother and four sons quarreled over the apportioning of the empire among themselves. In Anatolia, Malik Shah I was succeeded by ] who founded the ] and in Syria by his brother ]. In Persia he was succeeded by his son ] whose reign was contested by his other three brothers ] in ], ] in ] and ] in ]. As Seljuq power in Iran weakened, other dynasties began to step up in its place, including a resurgent Abbasid caliphate and the ]. The Khwarezmid Empire was a Sunni Muslim Persianate dynasty, of East Turkic origin, that ruled in Central Asia. Originally vassals of the Seljuqs, they took advantage of the decline of the Seljuqs to expand into Iran.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://search.eb.com/eb/article-9045365|title=Academic Home|access-date=2007-06-23|archive-date=2021-03-04|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210304083325/http://academic.eb.com/|url-status=live}}</ref> In 1194 the Khwarezmshah ] defeated the Seljuq sultan ] in battle and the Seljuq empire in Iran collapsed. Of the former Seljuq Empire, only the ] in Anatolia remained.
A serious internal threat to the Seljuqs during their reign came from the ], a secret sect with headquarters at ] between ] and ]. They controlled the immediate area for more than 150 years and sporadically sent out adherents to strengthen their rule by murdering important officials. Several of the various theories on the etymology of the word '']'' derive from these killers.<ref name="Islamic Conquest"/>{{clear}}

A serious internal threat to the Seljuqs during their reign came from the ], a secret sect with headquarters at ] between ] and ]. They controlled the immediate area for more than 150 years and sporadically sent out adherents to strengthen their rule by murdering important officials. Several of the various theories on the etymology of the word '']'' derive from these killers.<ref name="Islamic Conquest"/>{{clear}}


Parts of northwestern Iran were conquered in the early 13th century AD by the ], led by ].<ref name="Lordkipanidze-154">Lordkipanidze, Mariam (1987), ''Georgia in the XI-XII Centuries''. Tbilisi: Ganatleba, p. 154.</ref> Parts of northwestern Iran were conquered in the early 13th century AD by the ], led by ].<ref name="Lordkipanidze-154">Lordkipanidze, Mariam (1987), ''Georgia in the XI-XII Centuries''. Tbilisi: Ganatleba, p. 154.</ref>


=== {{anchor|Mongol invasion (1219-1221)}}Mongol invasion (1219–1221)=== ===Mongol conquest and rule (1219–1358)===
===={{anchor|Mongol invasion (1219-1221)}}Mongol invasion (1219–1221)====
{{Main|Mongol invasion of Central Asia|Mongol invasion of Persia|Mongol Empire}}
] on the eve of the Mongol invasions, ''c.'' 1200.]]
{{Main|Mongol invasion of Central Asia|Mongol invasion of Khwarezmia and Eastern Iran|Mongol Empire}}
The ] only lasted for a few decades, until the arrival of the ]. ] had unified the Mongols, and under him the ] quickly expanded in several directions, until by 1218 it bordered Khwarezm. At that time, the Khwarezmid Empire was ruled by ] (1200–1220). Muhammad, like Genghis, was intent on expanding his lands and had gained the submission of most of Iran. He declared himself shah and demanded formal recognition from the Abbasid caliph ]. When the caliph rejected his claim, Ala ad-Din Muhammad proclaimed one of his nobles caliph and unsuccessfully tried to depose an-Nasir.


] on the eve of the Mongol invasions, ''c.'' 1200]]
The ] began in 1219, after two diplomatic missions to Khwarezm sent by Genghis Khan had been massacred. During 1220–21 ], ], ], ] and ] were razed, and the whole populations were slaughtered. The Khwarezm-Shah fled, to die on an island off the Caspian coast.<ref></ref>
During the invasion of ] in 1219, along with the main Mongol force, Genghis Khan used a Chinese specialist catapult unit in battle, they were used again in 1220 in Transoxania. The Chinese may have used the catapults to hurl gunpowder bombs, since they already had them by this time.<ref>{{cite book |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=esnWJkYRCJ4C&pg=PA58&dq=transoxania+chinese+gunpowder+catapult&hl=en&ei=pvLTTs3XH8Ho0QH866g4&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=1&ved=0CC8Q6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=transoxania%20chinese%20gunpowder%20catapult&f=false |title=Firearms: a global history to 1700 |author=Kenneth Warren Chase|accessdate=2011-11-28 |edition=illustrated |series= |volume= |date= |year=2003 |month= |publisher=Cambridge University Press |location= |language= |isbn=0-521-82274-2 |page=58 |pages= |quote=Chinggis Khan organized a unit of Chinese catapult specialists in 1214, and these men formed part of the first Mongol army to invade Transoxania in 1219. This was not too early for true firearms, and it was nearly two centuries after catapult-thrown gunpowder bombs had been added to the Chinese arsenal. Chinese siege equipment saw action in Transoxania in 1220 and in the north Caucasus in 1239–40.}}</ref>


]
While Genghis Khan was conquering Transoxania and Persia, several Chinese who were familiar with gunpowder were serving in Genghis's army.<ref>{{cite book |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=OgQXAQAAIAAJ&q=Though+he+was+himself+a+Chinese,+he+learned+his+trade+from+his+father,+who+had+accompanied+Genghis+Khan+on+his+invasion+of+Muslim+Transoxania+and+Iran.+Perhaps+the+use+of+gunpowder+as+a+propellant,+in+other+words+the+invention+of+true&dq=Though+he+was+himself+a+Chinese,+he+learned+his+trade+from+his+father,+who+had+accompanied+Genghis+Khan+on+his+invasion+of+Muslim+Transoxania+and+Iran.+Perhaps+the+use+of+gunpowder+as+a+propellant,+in+other+words+the+invention+of+true&hl=en&ei=TgfUTtqlEZLD0AHC95QD&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=1&ved=0CDAQ6AEwAA|title=The Mongol Warlords: Genghis Khan, Kublai Khan, Hulegu, Tamerlane |authors=David Nicolle, Richard Hook|accessdate=2011-11-28 |edition=illustrated |series= |volume= |date= |year=1998 |month= |publisher=Brockhampton Press |location= |language= |isbn=1-86019-407-9 |page=86 |pages= |quote=Though he was himself a Chinese, he learned his trade from his father, who had accompanied Genghis Khan on his invasion of Muslim Transoxania and Iran. Perhaps the use of gunpowder as a propellant, in other words the invention of true guns, appeared first in the Muslim Middle East, whereas the invention of gunpowder itself was a Chinese achievement }}</ref> "Whole regiments" entirely made out of Chinese were used by the Mongols to command bomb hurling trebuchets during the invasion of Iran.<ref>{{cite book |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=X7e8rHL1lf4C&pg=PA46&dq=Chinese+engineers+operating+trebuchets+(catapults)+throwing+gunpowder+bombs.+Their+progress+was+rapid+and+devastating+until,+after+the+sack+of+Baghdad+in+1258,+they+entered+Syria.+There+they+met+an+Islamic+army+similarly+equipped+and&hl=en&ei=zLPVTvKoJ-rt0gGusumeAg&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=1&ved=0CC8Q6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=Chinese%20engineers%20operating%20trebuchets%20(catapults)%20throwing%20gunpowder%20bombs.%20Their%20progress%20was%20rapid%20and%20devastating%20until%2C%20after%20the%20sack%20of%20Baghdad%20in%201258%2C%20they%20entered%20Syria.%20There%20they%20met%20an%20Islamic%20army%20similarly%20equipped%20and&f=false|title=Technology in world civilization: a thousand-year history |author=Arnold Pacey|accessdate=2011-11-28 |edition=reprint, illustrated |series= |volume= |date= |year=1991 |month= |publisher=MIT Press |location= |language= |isbn=0-262-66072-5 |page=46 |pages= |quote=During the 1250s, the Mongols invaded Iran with 'whole regiments' of Chinese engineers operating trebuchets (catapults) throwing gunpowder bombs. Their progress was rapid and devastating until, after the sack of Baghdad in 1258, they entered Syria. There they met an Islamic army similarly equipped and experienced their first defeat. In 1291, the same sort of weapon was used during the siege of Acre, when the European Crusaders were expelled form Palestine.}}</ref> Historians have suggested that the Mongol invasion had brought Chinese gunpowder weapons to Central Asia. One of these was the ], a Chinese mortar.<ref>{{cite book |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=AzG5llo3YCMC&pg=PA474&dq=Indeed,+it+is+possible+that+gunpowder+devices,+including+Chinese+mortar+(+huochong),+had+reached+Central+Asia+through+the+Mongols+as+early+as+the+thirteenth+century.71+Yet+the+potential+remained+unexploited;&hl=en&ei=gQrUToDEO4Hz0gHfi-SyBQ&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=1&ved=0CC8Q6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=Indeed%2C%20it%20is%20possible%20that%20gunpowder%20devices%2C%20including%20Chinese%20mortar%20(%20huochong)%2C%20had%20reached%20Central%20Asia%20through%20the%20Mongols%20as%20early%20as%20the%20thirteenth%20century.71%20Yet%20the%20potential%20remained%20unexploited%3B&f=false|title=History of Civilizations of Central Asia: Development in contrast : from the sixteenth to the mid-nineteenth century |authors=Chahryar Adle, Irfan Habib|editor=Ahmad Hasan Dani, Chahryar Adle, Irfan Habib|accessdate=2011-11-28 |edition=illustrated |series= |volume=Volume 5 of History of Civilizations of Central Asia |date= |year=2003 |month= |publisher=UNESCO |location= |language= |isbn=92-3-103876-1 |page=474 |pages= |quote=Indeed, it is possible that gunpowder devices, including Chinese mortar (huochong), had reached Central Asia through the Mongols as early as the thirteenth century.71 Yet the potential remained unexploited; even Sultan Husayn's use of cannon may have had Ottoman inspiration. }}</ref> Books written around the area afterward depicted gunpowder weapons which resembled those of China.<ref>{{cite book |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=X7e8rHL1lf4C&pg=PA46&dq=The+presence+of+these+individuals+in+China+in+the+1270s,+and+the+deployment+of+Chinese+engineers+in+Iran,+mean+that+there+were+several+routes+by+which+information+about+gunpowder+weapons+could+pass+from+the+Islamic+world+to+China,+or+vice+versa.+Thus+when+two+authors+from+the+eastern+Mediterranean+region+wrote+books+about+gunpowder+weapons+around+the+year+1280,+it+is+not+suprising+that+they+described+bombs,+rockets+and+fire-lances+very+similar+to+some+types+of+Chinese+weaponry.&hl=en&ei=93fmTojAO4Hy0gGX2uDqBQ&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=1&ved=0CDEQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=The%20presence%20of%20these%20individuals%20in%20China%20in%20the%201270s%2C%20and%20the%20deployment%20of%20Chinese%20engineers%20in%20Iran%2C%20mean%20that%20there%20were%20several%20routes%20by%20which%20information%20about%20gunpowder%20weapons%20could%20pass%20from%20the%20Islamic%20world%20to%20China%2C%20or%20vice%20versa.%20Thus%20when%20two%20authors%20from%20the%20eastern%20Mediterranean%20region%20wrote%20books%20about%20gunpowder%20weapons%20around%20the%20year%201280%2C%20it%20is%20not%20suprising%20that%20they%20described%20bombs%2C%20rockets%20and%20fire-lances%20very%20similar%20to%20some%20types%20of%20Chinese%20weaponry.&f=false|title=Technology in world civilization: a thousand-year history |author=Arnold Pacey|accessdate=2011-11-28 |edition=reprint, illustrated |series= |volume= |date= |year=1991 |month= |publisher=MIT Press |location= |language= |isbn=0-262-66072-5 |page=46 |pages= |quote=The presence of these individuals in China in the 1270s, and the deployment of Chinese engineers in Iran, mean that there were several routes by which information about gunpowder weapons could pass from the Islamic world to China, or vice versa. Thus when two authors from the eastern Mediterranean region wrote books about gunpowder weapons around the year 1280, it is not surprising that they described bombs, rockets and fire-lances very similar to some types of Chinese weaponry. }}</ref>

The ] only lasted for a few decades, until the arrival of the ]. ] had unified the Mongols, and under him the ] quickly expanded in several directions. In 1218, it bordered Khwarezm. At that time, the Khwarazmian Empire was ruled by ] (1200–1220). Muhammad, like Genghis, was intent on expanding his lands and had gained the submission of most of Iran. He declared himself shah and demanded formal recognition from the Abbasid caliph ]. When the caliph rejected his claim, Ala ad-Din Muhammad proclaimed one of his nobles caliph and unsuccessfully tried to depose an-Nasir.

The ] began in 1219, after two diplomatic missions to Khwarezm sent by Genghis Khan had been massacred. During 1220–21 ], ], ], ] and ] were razed, and the whole populations were slaughtered. The Khwarezm-Shah fled, to die on an island off the Caspian coast.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.britannica.com/eb/article-32173/Iran|title=Iran – history – geography|access-date=2007-06-25|archive-date=2008-06-25|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080625022733/https://www.britannica.com/eb/article-32173/Iran|url-status=live}}</ref>
During the invasion of ] in 1219, along with the main Mongol force, Genghis Khan used a Chinese specialist catapult unit in battle, they were used again in 1220 in Transoxania. The Chinese may have used the catapults to hurl gunpowder bombs, since they already had them by this time.<ref>{{cite book |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=esnWJkYRCJ4C&q=transoxania+chinese+gunpowder+catapult&pg=PA58 |title=Firearms: a global history to 1700 |author=Kenneth Warren Chase |access-date=2011-11-28 |edition=illustrated |year=2003 |publisher=Cambridge University Press |isbn=0-521-82274-2 |page=58 |quote=Chinggis Khan organized a unit of Chinese catapult specialists in 1214, and these men formed part of the first Mongol army to invade Transoxania in 1219. This was not too early for true firearms, and it was nearly two centuries after catapult-thrown gunpowder bombs had been added to the Chinese arsenal. Chinese siege equipment saw action in Transoxania in 1220 and in the north Caucasus in 1239–40. |archive-date=2021-01-04 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210104153953/https://books.google.com/books?id=esnWJkYRCJ4C&q=transoxania+chinese+gunpowder+catapult&pg=PA58 |url-status=live }}</ref>

While Genghis Khan was conquering Transoxania and Persia, several Chinese who were familiar with gunpowder were serving in Genghis's army.<ref>{{cite book |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=OgQXAQAAIAAJ&q=Though+he+was+himself+a+Chinese,+he+learned+his+trade+from+his+father,+who+had+accompanied+Genghis+Khan+on+his+invasion+of+Muslim+Transoxania+and+Iran.+Perhaps+the+use+of+gunpowder+as+a+propellant,+in+other+words+the+invention+of+true |title=The Mongol Warlords: Genghis Khan, Kublai Khan, Hulegu, Tamerlane |author=David Nicolle |author2=Richard Hook |access-date=2011-11-28 |edition=illustrated |year=1998 |publisher=Brockhampton Press |isbn=1-86019-407-9 |page=86 |quote=Though he was himself a Chinese, he learned his trade from his father, who had accompanied Genghis Khan on his invasion of Muslim Transoxania and Iran. Perhaps the use of gunpowder as a propellant, in other words the invention of true guns, appeared first in the Muslim Middle East, whereas the invention of gunpowder itself was a Chinese achievement |archive-date=2016-04-12 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160412094659/https://books.google.com/books?id=OgQXAQAAIAAJ |url-status=live }}</ref> "Whole regiments" entirely made out of Chinese were used by the Mongols to command bomb hurling trebuchets during the invasion of Iran.<ref>{{cite book |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=X7e8rHL1lf4C&q=Chinese+engineers+operating+trebuchets+%28catapults%29+throwing+gunpowder+bombs.+Their+progress+was+rapid+and+devastating+until%2C+after+the+sack+of+Baghdad+in+1258%2C+they+entered+Syria.+There+they+met+an+Islamic+army+similarly+equipped+and&pg=PA46 |title=Technology in world civilization: a thousand-year history |author=Arnold Pacey |access-date=2011-11-28 |edition=reprint, illustrated |year=1991 |publisher=MIT Press |isbn=0-262-66072-5 |page=46 |quote=During the 1250s, the Mongols invaded Iran with 'whole regiments' of Chinese engineers operating trebuchets (catapults) throwing gunpowder bombs. Their progress was rapid and devastating until, after the sack of Baghdad in 1258, they entered Syria. There they met an Islamic army similarly equipped and experienced their first defeat. In 1291, the same sort of weapon was used during the siege of Acre, when the European Crusaders were expelled form Palestine. |archive-date=2020-08-20 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200820015938/https://books.google.com/books?id=X7e8rHL1lf4C |url-status=live }}</ref> Historians have suggested that the Mongol invasion had brought Chinese gunpowder weapons to Central Asia. One of these was the ], a Chinese mortar.<ref>{{cite book |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=AzG5llo3YCMC&q=Indeed%2C+it+is+possible+that+gunpowder+devices%2C+including+Chinese+mortar+%28+huochong%29%2C+had+reached+Central+Asia+through+the+Mongols+as+early+as+the+thirteenth+century.71+Yet+the+potential+remained+unexploited%3B&pg=PA474 |title=History of Civilizations of Central Asia: Development in contrast: from the sixteenth to the mid-nineteenth century |author=Chahryar Adle |author2=Irfan Habib |editor1=Ahmad Hasan Dani |editor2=Chahryar Adle |editor3=Irfan Habib |access-date=2011-11-28 |edition=illustrated |volume=5 of History of Civilizations of Central Asia |year=2003 |publisher=UNESCO |isbn=92-3-103876-1 |page=474 |quote=Indeed, it is possible that gunpowder devices, including Chinese mortar (huochong), had reached Central Asia through the Mongols as early as the thirteenth century.71 Yet the potential remained unexploited; even Sultan Husayn's use of cannon may have had Ottoman inspiration. |archive-date=2020-07-23 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200723141803/https://books.google.com/books?id=AzG5llo3YCMC |url-status=live }}</ref> Books written around the area afterward depicted gunpowder weapons which resembled those of China.<ref>{{cite book |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=X7e8rHL1lf4C&q=The+presence+of+these+individuals+in+China+in+the+1270s%2C+and+the+deployment+of+Chinese+engineers+in+Iran%2C+mean+that+there+were+several+routes+by+which+information+about+gunpowder+weapons+could+pass+from+the+Islamic+world+to+China%2C+or+vice+versa.+Thus+when+two+authors+from+the+eastern+Mediterranean+region+wrote+books+about+gunpowder+weapons+around+the+year+1280%2C+it+is+not+suprising+that+they+described+bombs%2C+rockets+and+fire-lances+very+similar+to+some+types+of+Chinese+weaponry.&pg=PA46 |title=Technology in world civilization: a thousand-year history |author=Arnold Pacey |access-date=2011-11-28 |edition=reprint, illustrated |year=1991 |publisher=MIT Press |isbn=0-262-66072-5 |page=46 |quote=The presence of these individuals in China in the 1270s, and the deployment of Chinese engineers in Iran, mean that there were several routes by which information about gunpowder weapons could pass from the Islamic world to China, or vice versa. Thus when two authors from the eastern Mediterranean region wrote books about gunpowder weapons around the year 1280, it is not surprising that they described bombs, rockets and fire-lances very similar to some types of Chinese weaponry. |archive-date=2021-01-04 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210104155102/https://books.google.com/books?id=X7e8rHL1lf4C&q=The+presence+of+these+individuals+in+China+in+the+1270s,+and+the+deployment+of+Chinese+engineers+in+Iran,+mean+that+there+were+several+routes+by+which+information+about+gunpowder+weapons+could+pass+from+the+Islamic+world+to+China,+or+vice+versa.+Thus+when+two+authors+from+the+eastern+Mediterranean+region+wrote+books+about+gunpowder+weapons+around+the+year+1280,+it+is+not+suprising+that+they+described+bombs,+rockets+and+fire-lances+very+similar+to+some+types+of+Chinese+weaponry.&pg=PA46 |url-status=live }}</ref>


==== Destruction under the Mongols ==== ==== Destruction under the Mongols ====
Before his death in 1227, Genghis had reached western ], pillaging and burning cities along the way. Before his death in 1227, Genghis had reached western Azerbaijan, pillaging and burning many cities along the way after entering into Iran from its north east.


The Mongol invasion was disastrous to the Iranians. Although the Mongol invaders were eventually converted to Islam and accepted the culture of Iran, the Mongol destruction of the Islamic heartland marked a major change of direction for the region. Much of the six centuries of Islamic scholarship, culture, and infrastructure was destroyed as the invaders burned libraries, and replaced mosques with Buddhist temples.<ref></ref> The Mongol invasion was by and large disastrous to the Iranians. Although the Mongol invaders eventually converted to Islam and accepted the culture of Iran, the Mongol destruction in Iran and other regions of the Islamic heartland (particularly the historical Khorasan region, mainly in Central Asia) marked a major change of direction for the region. Much of the six centuries of Islamic scholarship, culture, and infrastructure was destroyed as the invaders leveled cities, burned libraries, and in some cases replaced mosques with ]s.{{sfn|May|2012|p=185}}<ref> {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070610151205/http://www.ucalgary.ca/applied_history/tutor/islam/mongols/ |date=2007-06-10 }}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |url=https://iranicaonline.org/articles/iran-ii2-islamic-period-page-3 |title=IRAN ii. IRANIAN HISTORY (2) Islamic period p – Encyclopaedia Iranica<!-- Bot generated title --> |access-date=2021-10-27 |archive-date=2021-10-27 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211027011625/https://iranicaonline.org/articles/iran-ii2-islamic-period-page-3 |url-status=live }}</ref>


The Mongols killed many Iranian civilians. Destruction of ] irrigation systems in the north east of Iran destroyed the pattern of relatively continuous settlements, producing many abandoned towns which were relatively quite good with irrigation and agriculture.<ref>{{Cite journal|url=https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-the-royal-asiatic-society/article/abs/cambridge-history-of-iran-vol-v-the-saljuq-and-mongol-periods-edited-by-j-a-boyle-pp-xiii-762-16-pl-cambridge-university-press-1968-375/500FB3BC61352E3DF36AE63FD5D4CA16|title=The Cambridge History of Iran|journal=Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society|volume=V: The Saljuq and Mongol periods|editor=J. A. Boyle|pages=Xiii, 762, 16|publisher=Cambridge University Press|date=1968|issue=1|doi=10.1017/S0035869X0012965X|s2cid=161828080|access-date=27 October 2021|archive-date=27 October 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211027155602/https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-the-royal-asiatic-society/article/abs/cambridge-history-of-iran-vol-v-the-saljuq-and-mongol-periods-edited-by-j-a-boyle-pp-xiii-762-16-pl-cambridge-university-press-1968-375/500FB3BC61352E3DF36AE63FD5D4CA16|url-status=bot: unknown | issn = 0035-869X}}</ref>
The Mongols killed many civilians. Destruction of ] irrigation systems destroyed the pattern of relatively continuous settlement, producing numerous isolated oasis cities in a land where they had previously been rare.<ref>Water, ch. 3</ref> A large number of people, particularly males, were killed; between 1220 and 1258, the total population of Iran may have dropped from 2,500,000 to 250,000 as a result of mass ] and ].<ref></ref>


==== Ilkhanate (1256–1335)==== ==== Ilkhanate (1256–1335)====
]s]]
{{Main|Ilkhanate}} {{Main|Ilkhanate}}

After Genghis's death, Iran was ruled by several Mongol commanders. Genghis' grandson, ], was tasked with the westward expansion of Mongol dominion. However, by time he ascended to power, the Mongol Empire had already dissolved, dividing into different factions. Arriving with an army, he established himself in the region and founded the ], a breakaway state of the Mongol Empire, which would rule Iran for the next eighty years and become Persianate in the process.
]

After Genghis's death, Iran was ruled by several Mongol commanders. Genghis' grandson, ], was tasked with the westward expansion of Mongol dominion. However, by the time he ascended to power, the Mongol Empire had already dissolved, dividing into different factions. Arriving with an army, he established himself in the region and founded the ], a breakaway state of the Mongol Empire, which would rule Iran for the next eighty years and become Persian in the process.


Hulagu Khan seized Baghdad in 1258 and put the last Abbasid caliph to death. The westward advance of his forces was stopped by the ], however, at the ] in ] in 1260. Hulagu's campaigns against the Muslims also enraged ], khan of the ] and a convert to Islam. Hulagu and Berke fought against each other, demonstrating the weakening unity of the Mongol empire. Hulagu Khan seized Baghdad in 1258 and put the last Abbasid caliph to death. The westward advance of his forces was stopped by the ], however, at the ] in ] in 1260. Hulagu's campaigns against the Muslims also enraged ], khan of the ] and a convert to Islam. Hulagu and Berke fought against each other, demonstrating the weakening unity of the Mongol empire.


The rule of Hulagu's great-grandson, ] (1295–1304) saw the establishment of Islam as the state religion of the Ilkhanate. Ghazan and his famous Iranian vizier, ], brought Iran a partial and brief economic revival. The Mongols lowered taxes for artisans, encouraged agriculture, rebuilt and extended irrigation works, and improved the safety of the trade routes. As a result, commerce increased dramatically. The rule of Hulagu's great-grandson, ] (1295–1304) saw the establishment of Islam as the state religion of the Ilkhanate. Ghazan and his famous Iranian vizier, ], brought Iran a partial and brief economic revival. The Mongols lowered taxes for artisans, encouraged agriculture, rebuilt and extended irrigation works, and improved the safety of the trade routes. As a result, commerce increased dramatically.


Items from India, China, and Iran passed easily across the Asian steppes, and these contacts culturally enriched Iran. For example, Iranians developed a new style of painting based on a unique fusion of solid, two-dimensional Mesopotamian painting with the feathery, light brush strokes and other motifs characteristic of China. After Ghazan's nephew ] died in 1335, however, the Ilkhanate lapsed into civil war and was divided between several petty dynasties – most prominently the ], ], ] and ]. Items from India, China, and Iran passed easily across the Asian steppes, and these contacts culturally enriched Iran. For example, Iranians developed a new style of painting based on a unique fusion of solid, two-dimensional Mesopotamian painting with the feathery, light brush strokes and other motifs characteristic of China. After Ghazan's nephew ] died in 1335, however, the Ilkhanate lapsed into civil war and was divided between several petty dynasties – most prominently the ], ], ] and ].


The mid-14th-century ] killed about 30% of the country's population.<ref>.</ref> The mid-14th-century ] killed about 30% of the country's population.<ref> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090109165503/http://www.nationalreview.com/interrogatory/kelly200509140843.asp |date=2009-01-09 }}.</ref>


==== Sunnism and Shiism in pre-Safavid Iran ==== ==== Sunnism and Shiism in pre-Safavid Iran ====
], the greatest religious site in Iran, which was built in the 9th century and the pilgrimage site for all Muslims since then.]]
{{Main|Islam in Iran}} {{Main|Islam in Iran}}
], the tomb of the eighth Imam of the twelver Shiites]]
Prior to the rise of the Safavid Empire, Sunni Islam was the dominant religion, accounting for around 90% of the population at the time. According to ] the majority of Iranian scholars and masses remained Sunni until the time of the Safavids.<ref name="Motahhari"></ref> The domination of Sunnis did not mean Shia were rootless in Iran. The writers of ] of Shia were Iranian, as well as many other great Shia scholars.
Prior to the rise of the Safavid Empire, Sunni Islam was the dominant religion, accounting for around 90% of the population at the time. According to ] the majority of Iranian scholars and masses remained Sunni until the time of the Safavids.<ref name="Motahhari">{{cite web|url=http://www.al-islam.org/al-tawhid/iran/mutual.htm|title=Islam and Iran: A Historical Study of Mutual Services|work=Al islam|date=2013-03-13|access-date=2007-07-09|archive-date=2013-07-30|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130730231845/http://www.al-islam.org/al-tawhid/iran/mutual.htm|url-status=live}}</ref> The domination of Sunnis did not mean Shia were rootless in Iran. The writers of ] of Shia were Iranian, as well as many other great Shia scholars.


The domination of the Sunni creed during the first nine Islamic centuries characterized the religious history of Iran during this period. There were however some exceptions to this general domination which emerged in the form of the ] of ], the ], the ], the rule of ] (r. Shawwal 703-Shawwal 716/1304-1316) and the ].<ref name="al-islam.org"></ref> The domination of the Sunni creed during the first nine Islamic centuries characterized the religious history of Iran during this period. There were however some exceptions to this general domination which emerged in the form of the ] of ] (see ]), the ], the ], the rule of ] (r. Shawwal 703-Shawwal 716/1304–1316) and the ].<ref name="al-islam.org">{{cite web|url=http://www.al-islam.org/mot/iraqishiism/|title=Four Centuries of Influence of Iraqi Shiism on Pre-Safavid Iran|work=Al islam|date=2013-02-27|access-date=2007-07-09|archive-date=2013-09-04|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130904232915/http://www.al-islam.org/mot/iraqishiism/|url-status=live}}</ref>


Apart from this domination there existed, firstly, throughout these nine centuries, Shia inclinations among many Sunnis of this land and, secondly, original ] as well as ] had prevalence in some parts of Iran. During this period, Shia in Iran were nourished from ]h, ] and later from ] and ].<ref name="al-islam.org"/> Shiism was the dominant sect in ], ], ], ] and ]. In many other areas merged population of Shia and Sunni lived together. Apart from this domination there existed, firstly, throughout these nine centuries, Shia inclinations among many Sunnis of this land and, secondly, original ] as well as ] had prevalence in some parts of Iran. During this period, Shia in Iran were nourished from ]h, ] and later from ] and ].<ref name="al-islam.org"/> Shiism was the dominant sect in ], ], ], ] and ]. In many other areas merged population of Shia and Sunni lived together.{{citation needed|date=April 2023}}


During the 10th and 11th centuries, ] sent ] ] to Iran as well as other Muslim lands. When Ismailis divided into two sects, ]s established their base in Iran. ] conquered fortresses and captured ] in 1090 AD. Nizaris used this fortress until a Mongol raid in 1256. During the 10th and 11th centuries, ] sent ] ] to Iran as well as other Muslim lands. When Ismailis divided into two sects, ]s established their base in Iran. ] conquered fortresses and captured ] in 1090 AD. Nizaris used this fortress until a Mongol raid in 1256.{{citation needed|date=April 2023}}


After the Mongol raid and fall of the Abbasids, Sunni hierarchies faltered. Not only did they lose the caliphate but also the status of official ]. Their loss was the gain of Shia, whose center wasn't in Iran at that time. Several local Shia dynasties like ] were established during this time. After the Mongol raid and fall of the Abbasids, Sunni hierarchies faltered. Not only did they lose the caliphate but also the status of official ]. Their loss was the gain of Shia, whose centre wasn't in Iran at that time. Several local Shia dynasties like ] were established during this time.{{citation needed|date=April 2023}}


The main change occurred in the beginning of the 16th century, when ] founded the ] and initiated a religious policy to ] of the ], and the fact that modern Iran remains an officially Shi'ite state is a direct result of Ismail's actions. The main change occurred in the beginning of the 16th century, when ] founded the ] and initiated a religious policy to ] of the ], and the fact that modern Iran remains an officially Shi'ite state is a direct result of Ismail's actions.{{citation needed|date=April 2023}}


== Timurid Empire (1370–1507) == === Timurid Empire (1370–1507) ===
].]]
{{Main|Timurid Empire}} {{Main|Timurid Empire}}
]s and sphere of influence in ]-] (1402–1403)]]
Iran remained divided until the arrival of ], who is variously described as of Mongol or Turkic origin<ref>Peter B. Golden ''Central Asia in World History (New Oxford World History)'' (Oxford University Press, 2011), page 94: "He was born some 100 km (62 miles) south of Samarkand into a clan of the Barlas, a Turkicized tribe of Mongol descent."</ref> belonging to the ]. Like its predecessors, the ] was also part of the Persianate world. After establishing a power base in Transoxiana, Timur invaded Iran in 1381 and eventually conquered most of it. Timur's campaigns were known for their brutality; many people were slaughtered and several cities were destroyed.<ref name="lcweb2.loc.gov">This section incorporates test from the public domain ] </ref>
] conqueror ] from skull, performed by the ] ] and ] ] (1941)]]


Iran remained divided until the arrival of ], a ]<ref>Peter B. Golden ''Central Asia in World History (New Oxford World History)'' (Oxford University Press, 2011), page 94: "He was born some 100 km (62 miles) south of Samarkand into a clan of the Barlas, a Turkicized tribe of Mongol descent."</ref> belonging to the ]. Like its predecessors, the ] was also part of the Persianate world. After establishing a power base in Transoxiana, Timur invaded Iran in 1381 and eventually conquered most of it. Timur's campaigns were known for their brutality; many people were slaughtered and several cities were destroyed.<ref name="lcweb2.loc.gov">This section incorporates text from the public domain ].<br />{{Citation
His regime was characterized by its inclusion of Iranians in administrative roles and its promotion of architecture and poetry. His successors, the Timurids, maintained a hold on most of Iran until 1452, when they lost the bulk of it to ]. The Black Sheep Turkmen were conquered by the ] under ] in 1468; Uzun Hasan and his successors were the masters of Iran until the rise of the Safavids.<ref name="lcweb2.loc.gov"/>
| archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20080917085548/http://lcweb2.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/r?frd/cstdy:@field(DOCID+ir0018)
| title= Iran: a country study
| chapter =Invasions of the Mongols and Tamerlane
| series= Library of Congress Country Studies
|archive-date=17 September 2008
| year = 1989
| first = Helen | last = Chapin Metz
| url = https://tile.loc.gov/storage-services/master/frd/frdcstdy/ir/irancountrystudy00curt_0/irancountrystudy00curt_0_djvu.txt
| url-status= unfit
}}</ref>


His regime was characterized by tyranny and bloodshed, but also by its inclusion of Iranians in administrative roles and its promotion of architecture and poetry. His successors, the Timurids, maintained a hold on most of Iran until 1452, when they lost the bulk of it to ]. The Black Sheep Turkmen were conquered by the ] under ] in 1468; Uzun Hasan and his successors were the masters of Iran until the rise of the Safavids.<ref name="lcweb2.loc.gov"/>
== Ak Koyunlu ==
{{Main|Ak Koyunlu}}


] poet ]'s popularity became firmly established in the Timurid era that saw the compilation and widespread copying of his '']''. Sufis were often persecuted by orthodox Muslims who considered their teachings ]. Sufism developed a symbolic language rich with metaphors to obscure poetic references to provocative philosophical teachings. Hafez concealed his own Sufi faith, even as he employed the secret language of Sufism (developed over hundreds of years) in his own work, and he is sometimes credited with having "brought it to perfection".<ref>{{cite book |last1=Ladinsky |first1=Daniel James |title=The Gift: Poems by the Great Sufi Master |year=1999 |publisher=Arkana |isbn=978-0-14-019581-1 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=_cdWZkYE_ZQC&dq=women+executed+in+medieval+persia&pg=PA18 |access-date=11 August 2020 |archive-date=4 March 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210304144255/https://www.google.com/books/edition/The_Gift/_cdWZkYE_ZQC?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=women+executed+in+medieval+persia&pg=PA18&printsec=frontcover |url-status=live }}</ref> His work was imitated by ], whose own popularity grew to spread across the full breadth of the Persianate world.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Brookshaw |first1=Dominic Parviz |title=Hafiz and His Contemporaries:Poetry, Performance and Patronage in Fourteenth Century Iran |date=28 February 2019 |publisher=Bloomsbury Publishing |isbn=978-1-78672-588-2 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=v7qKDwAAQBAJ |access-date=11 August 2020 |archive-date=4 March 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210304144130/https://www.google.com/books/edition/Hafiz_and_His_Contemporaries/v7qKDwAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1 |url-status=live }}</ref>
==Kara Koyunlu==

===Kara Koyunlu===
{{Main|Kara Koyunlu}} {{Main|Kara Koyunlu}}
The Kara Koyunlu were a ]<ref>{{citation
| author1= W. B. Fisher | author2= C. E. Bosworth
| year = 2011 | orig-date=1986
| url = https://iranicaonline.org/articles/araxes-river#pt2
| title= Araxes River
| encyclopedia = Encyclopædia Iranica
| archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20210104154026/https://iranicaonline.org/articles/araxes-river#pt2
| url-status=live
| archive-date= 4 January 2021
}}<br />"Subsequently, it came under the control of Turkmen dynasties like the Āq Qoyunlū and Qara Qoyunlū and then of local khanates like those of Qara Bāḡ and Naḵǰavān which formed a buffer region between the Ottomans and Safavids."{{pb}}{{cite book |last1=Philippe |first1=Beaujard |title=The Worlds of the Indian Ocean |date=2019 |publisher=Cambridge University Press |chapter=Western Asia: Revival of the Persian Gulf |isbn=978-1-108-34121-9 |pages=515–521}}<br />"In a state of demographic stagnation or downturn, the region was an easy prey for nomadic Turkmen. The Turkmen, however, never managed to build strong states, owing to a lack of sedentary populations (Martinez-Gros 2009: 643). When Tamerlane died in 1405, the Jalāyerid sultan Ahmad, who had fled Iraq, came back to Baghdad. Five years later, he died in Tabriz (1410) in a battle led against the Turkmen Kara Koyunlu (" Black Sheep"), who took Baghdad in 1412."{{pb}}{{cite web |title=Kara Koyunlu |url=https://www.britannica.com/topic/Kara-Koyunlu |website=Encyclopædia Britannica |access-date=2020-07-16 |archive-date=2019-03-22 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190322033432/https://www.britannica.com/topic/Kara-Koyunlu |url-status=live }}<br />"Kara Koyunlu, also spelled Qara Qoyunlu, Turkish Karakoyunlular, English Black Sheep, Turkmen tribal federation that ruled Azerbaijan, Armenia, and Iraq from about 1375 to 1468."{{pb}}{{cite book |title=The Book of Dede Korkut |url=https://archive.org/details/bookofdedekorkut0000unse |url-access=registration |date=1972 |publisher=University of Texas Press |isbn=0-292-70787-8 |at=Introduction |edition=F.Sumer, A.Uysal, W.Walker}}</ref> tribal federation that ruled over northwestern Iran and surrounding areas from 1374 to 1468 CE. The Kara Koyunlu expanded their conquest to Baghdad, however, internal fighting, defeats by the ], rebellions by the ] in response to their persecution,<ref>Kouymjian. "Armenia", pp. 6–7.</ref> and failed struggles with the ] led to their eventual demise.<ref>{{cite book |title=The Encyclopedia of World History|url=https://archive.org/details/encyclopediaworl00stea|url-access=limited|last=Stearns|first=Peter N.|author2=Leonard, William|year=2001|publisher=Houghton Muffin Books|isbn=0-395-65237-5|page=}}</ref>

=== Ak Koyunlu ===
{{Main|Ak Koyunlu}}
] confederation at its greatest extent.]]
Aq Qoyunlu were Turkmen<ref>{{cite web |title=Ak Koyunlu |url=https://www.britannica.com/topic/Ak-Koyunlu |website=Encyclopaedia Britannica |access-date=2020-07-16 |archive-date=2020-04-26 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200426102626/https://www.britannica.com/topic/Ak-Koyunlu |url-status=live }} "AK Koyunlu, also spelled Aq Qoyunlu ("White Sheep"), '''Turkmen''' tribal federation that ruled northern Iraq, Azerbaijan, and eastern Anatolia from 1378 to 1508..."</ref><ref>{{cite book |title=Türkmen Ak koyunlu İmparatorluğu: Türkmen Ak koyunlu İmparatorluğu makaleler antolojisi (in Turkish) |date=2003 |publisher=Grafiker |isbn=975-92721-7-2 |page=418}}</ref> under the leadership of the ] tribe,<ref>C.E.Bosworth and R.Bulliet, ''The New Islamic Dynasties: A Chronological and Genealogical Manual '', Columbia University Press, 1996, {{ISBN|0-231-10714-5}}, p. 275.</ref> tribal federation of Sunni Muslims who ruled over most of Iran and large parts of surrounding areas from 1378 to 1501 CE. Aq Qoyunlu emerged when ] granted them all of ] in present-day Turkey. Afterward, they struggled with their rival Oghuz Turks, the ]. While the Aq Qoyunlu were successful in defeating Kara Koyunlu, their struggle with the emerging ] led to their downfall.<ref>Woods, John E. (1998) ''The Ak kuyunlu: Clan, Confederation, Empire,'' University of Utah Press, Salt Lake City, p. 128, {{ISBN|0-87480-565-1}}</ref>


=={{anchor|Early modern era (1502-1925)}}Early modern era (1502–1925)== =={{anchor|Early modern era (1502-1925)}}Early modern period==
Persia underwent a revival under the ] (1502–1736), the most prominent figure of which was ]. Some historians credit the Safavid dynasty for founding the modern nation-state of Iran. Iran's contemporary Shia character, and significant segments of Iran's current borders take their origin from this era (''e.g. ]''). Persia underwent a revival under the ] (1502–1736), the most prominent figure of which was ]. Some historians credit the Safavid dynasty for founding the modern nation-state of Iran. Iran's contemporary Shia character, and significant segments of Iran's current borders take their origin from this era (''e.g. ]'').


===Safavid Empire (1501–1736)=== ===Safavid Empire (1501–1736)===
] at its greatest extent.]]
]
{{Main|Safavid Empire}} {{Main|Safavid Empire}}
{{See also|Ottoman-Persian Wars|Safavid conversion of Iran to Shia Islam}} {{See also|Ottoman–Persian wars|Safavid conversion of Iran to Shia Islam}}
] (1501–1736) at its greatest extent]]


The Safavid dynasty was one of the most significant ruling dynasties of Iran, and "is often considered the beginning of modern Persian history".<ref>{{cite encyclopedia | first = Rudi
The '''Safavid dynasty''' was one of the most significant ruling dynasties of ] (modern Iran), and "is often considered the beginning of modern Persian history".<ref>{{cite encyclopedia |last= |first= | title= SAFAVID DYNASTY | encyclopedia=Encyclopædia Iranica |url=http://www.iranicaonline.org/articles/safavids}}</ref> They ruled one of the greatest Persian empires after the ]<ref>Helen Chapin Metz. ''Iran, a Country study''. 1989. University of Michigan, p. 313.</ref><ref>Emory C. Bogle. ''Islam: Origin and Belief''. University of Texas Press. 1989, p. 145.</ref><ref>Stanford Jay Shaw. History of the Ottoman Empire. Cambridge University Press. 1977, p. 77.</ref><ref>Andrew J. Newman, Safavid Iran: ''Rebirth of a Persian Empire'', IB Tauris (March 30, 2006).</ref> and established the ] school of ]<ref name="savoryeiref">RM Savory, ''Safavids'', '']'', 2nd ed.</ref> as the official ] of their empire, marking one of the most important turning points in ]. The Safavids ruled from 1501 to 1722 (experiencing a brief restoration from 1729 to 1736) and at their height, they controlled all of modern ], ] and ], most of ], the ], ], ] and ], as well as parts of ], ], ], ] and ]. Safavid Iran was one of the Islamic "]", along with its neighbours, its arch rival the ], and the ].
| last= Mathee
| year = 2008
| title= Safavid Dynasty
| encyclopedia= Encyclopædia Iranica | url= http://www.iranicaonline.org/articles/safavids | access-date= 2014-06-02 | archive-date= 2019-05-24 | archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20190524085947/http://www.iranicaonline.org/articles/safavids | url-status= live }}</ref> They ruled one of the greatest Persian empires after the ]<ref>{{ cite book
| editor-link= Helen Chapin Metz
|editor-last= Chapin Metz| editor-first = Helen
| title=Iran, a Country study | year=1989
| publisher= University of Michigan | page = 313}}{{pb}}{{ cite book
| first = Emory C. | last =Bogle
| title=Islam: Origin and Belief
| publisher=University of Texas Press
| year=1989 | page =145}}{{pb}}{{cite book
| first = Stanford Jay | last=Shaw
| title=History of the Ottoman Empire
| publisher=Cambridge University Press
| year=1977 | page= 77}}{{pb}}Andrew J. Newman, Safavid Iran: ''Rebirth of a Persian Empire'', I.B. Tauris (30 March 2006).</ref> and established the ] school of ]<ref name="savoryeiref"/> as the ] of their empire, marking one of the most important turning points in ]. The Safavids ruled from 1501 to 1722 (experiencing a brief restoration from 1729 to 1736) and at their height, they controlled all of modern Iran, ] and ], most of ], the ], ], ] and ], as well as parts of ], ], ], ] and ]. Safavid Iran was one of the Islamic "]", along with its neighbours, its archrival and principal enemy the ], as well as the ].


The Safavid ruling dynasty was founded by Ismāil, who styled himself ].<ref name="ismailsafaviiranica">
The Safavid ruling dynasty was founded by Ismāil, who styled himself ]<ref name="ismailsafaviiranica"> ''Encyclopedia Iranica''.</ref> Practically worshipped by his ] followers, Ismāil invaded ] to avenge the death of his father, ], who had been killed during his siege of ], in ]. Afterwards he went on a campaign of conquest, and following the capture of ] in July 1501, he enthroned himself as the Shāh of Azerbaijan,<ref>Richard Tapper. "Shahsevan in Safavid Persia", ''Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies'', University of London, Vol. 37, No. 3, 1974, p. 324</ref><ref>Lawrence Davidson, Arthur Goldschmid, "A Concise History of the Middle East", Westview Press, 2006, p. 153</ref><ref>, Britannica Concise. Online Edition 2007</ref> minted coins in this name, and proclaimed Shi'ism the official religion of his domain.<ref name="savoryeiref" />
{{citation
| first1= Roger M. | last1=Savory
| first2= Ahmet T. | last2=Karamustafa
| year = 2012 | orig-date=1998
| url = http://www.iranicaonline.org/articles/esmail-i-safawi
| title= Esmāʿīl I Ṣafawī
| encyclopedia = Encyclopædia Iranica
| archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20190725111610/http://www.iranicaonline.org/articles/esmail-i-safawi
| url-status=live
| archive-date= 25 July 2019
| volume=VIII/6
| pages = 628–636
}}


</ref> Practically worshipped by his ] followers, Ismāil invaded ] to avenge the death of his father, ], who had been killed during his siege of ], in Dagestan. Afterwards he went on a campaign of conquest, and following the capture of ] in July 1501, he enthroned himself as the Shāh of Iran,<ref>{{ cite journal
Although initially the masters of Azerbaijan and southern ] only, the Safavids had, in fact, won the struggle for power in Persia which had been going on for nearly a century between various dynasties and political forces following the fragmentation of the ] and the ]. A year after his victory in Tabriz, Ismāil proclaimed most of Persia as his domain, and <ref name="savoryeiref" /> quickly conquered and unified Iran under his rule. Soon afterwards, the new Safavid Empire rapidly conquered regions, nations, and peoples in all directions, including ], ], parts of ], ] (Iraq), ], ], ], large parts of what is now ], parts of ], and large chunks of ], laying the foundation of its multi-ethnic character which would heavily influence the empire itself (most notably the ] and its ]). However, territories in ], ], ] and present Western Iran lost to Ottoman Empire and ] region to Uzbek khanates of Bukhara and Khiva after ] in 1514 till ] in 1590.
| first = Richard | last = Tapper
| title= Shāhsevan in Ṣafavid Persia
| journal=Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London
| volume=37 | number=3 | year =1974
| jstor= 612582
| publisher =Cambridge University Press
| pages = 321–354
| doi = 10.1017/S0041977X00136286
| s2cid = 177504456
}}</ref>{{rp|324}}<ref>Lawrence Davidson, Arthur Goldschmid, ''A Concise History of the Middle East'', Westview Press, 2006, p. 153</ref><ref> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080120194533/http://concise.britannica.com/ebc/article-9377424/Safavid-dynasty |date=2008-01-20 }}, Britannica Concise. Online Edition 2007</ref> minted coins in this name, and proclaimed Shi'ism the official religion of his domain.<ref name="savoryeiref" />


Although initially the masters of Azerbaijan and southern Dagestan only, the Safavids had, in fact, won the struggle for power in Persia which had been going on for nearly a century between various dynasties and political forces following the fragmentation of the ] and the ]. A year after his victory in Tabriz, Ismāil proclaimed most of Persia as his domain, and<ref name="savoryeiref" /> quickly conquered and unified Iran under his rule. Soon afterwards, the new Safavid Empire rapidly conquered regions, nations, and peoples in all directions, including Armenia, Azerbaijan, parts of Georgia, ] (Iraq), Kuwait, Syria, ], large parts of what is now Afghanistan, parts of Turkmenistan, and large chunks of Anatolia, laying the foundation of its multi-ethnic character which would heavily influence the empire itself (most notably the Caucasus and ]).
During Tahmasp' reign, he carried out multiple invasions in the ] which had been incorporated in the ] empire since Shah Ismail I and for many centuries afterwards, and started with the trend of deporting and moving hundreds of thousands of ], ], and ] to Iran's heartlands. Initially only solely put in the royal harems, royal guards, and minor other sections of the Empire, Tahmasp believed he could eventually reduce the power of the Qizilbash, by creating and fully integrating a new layer in Iranian society. As '']'' states, for Tahmãsp, the problem circled around the military tribal elite of the empire, the Qezelbāš, who believed that physical proximity to and control of a member of the immediate Safavid family guaranteed spiritual advantages, political fortune, and material advancement.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.iranicaonline.org/articles/tahmasp-i|title=ṬAHMĀSP I|accessdate=12 May 2015}}</ref> With this new Caucasian layer in Iranian society, the indisputed might of the Qizilbash (who functioned much like the '']'' of the neighboring ]) would be questioned and fully diminished as society would become fully ].


]
Shah ] and his successors would significantly expand this policy and plan initiated by Tahmasp, deporting during his reign alone around some 200,000 ], 300,000 ] and 100,000-150,000 ] to Iran, completing the foundation of a new layer in Iranian society. With this, and the complete systematic disorganisation of the Qizilbash by his personal orders, he eventually fully succeeded in replacing the power of the Qizilbash, with that of the ] ghulams. These new Caucasian elements (the so-called '']'' / غِلْمَان / ''"servants"''), almost always after conversion to ] depending on given function would be, were unlike the Qizilbash, fully loyal only to the Shah. The other masses of Caucasians were deployed in all other possible functions and positions available in the empire, as well as in the ], regular ], craftsmen, farmers, etc. This system of mass usage of Caucasian subjects remained to exist until the fall of the ].


], the son and successor of ], carried out multiple invasions in the Caucasus which had been incorporated in the ] since Shah Ismail I and for many centuries afterwards, and started with the trend of deporting and moving hundreds of thousands of ], ], and ] to Iran's heartlands. Initially only solely put in the royal harems, royal guards, and minor other sections of the Empire, Tahmasp believed he could eventually reduce the power of the ], by creating and fully integrating a new layer in Iranian society. As '']'' states, for Tahmasp, the problem circled around the military tribal elite of the empire, the Qizilbash, who believed that physical proximity to and control of a member of the immediate Safavid family guaranteed spiritual advantages, political fortune, and material advancement.<ref>{{citation
] (also known as ''Rustam Khan''), viceroy of ], eastern ], from 1633-1658.]]
| last = Mitchell| first=Colin P.
The greatest of the Safavid monarchs, ] (1587&ndash;1629) came to power in 1587 aged 16. Abbas I first fought the Uzbeks, recapturing ] and Mashhad in 1598, which had been lost by his predecessor ] by the ]. Then he turned against the Ottomans, the Safavids their arch rivals, recapturing Baghdad, eastern Iraq and the ] provinces and beyond ]. Between 1616-1618, following the disobedience of his most loyal ] subjects ] and ], Abbas carried out a punitive campaign in his territories of Georgia, devastating ] and ] and carrying away 130,000<ref>Eskandar Beg, pp. 900-901, tr. Savory, II, p. 1116</ref> - 200,000<ref>Malekšāh Ḥosayn, p. 509</ref> Georgian captives towards mainland Iran. His new army, which had dramatically been improved with the advent of ] and his brothers following the ], pitted the first crushing victory over the Safavids' arch rivals, the Ottomans in the abovementioned 1603-1618 war and would surpass the Ottomans in military strength. He also used his new force to dislodge the Portuguese from ] (1602) and ] (1622) with aid of the English navy, in the Persian Gulf.
| year = 2009
| encyclopedia = Encyclopædia Iranica
|url=http://www.iranicaonline.org/articles/tahmasp-i|title=Ṭahmāsp I
|access-date=12 May 2015|archive-date=17 May 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150517061306/http://www.iranicaonline.org/articles/tahmasp-i|url-status=live}}</ref> With this new Caucasian layer in Iranian society, the undisputed might of the Qizilbash (who functioned much like the '']'' of the neighbouring ]) would be questioned and fully diminished as society would become fully ].


Shah ] and his successors would significantly expand this policy and plan initiated by Tahmasp, deporting during his reign alone around some 200,000 ], 300,000 ] and 100,000–150,000 ] to Iran, completing the foundation of a new layer in Iranian society. With this, and the complete systematic disorganisation of the Qizilbash by his personal orders, he eventually fully succeeded in replacing the power of the Qizilbash, with that of the ] ghulams. These new Caucasian elements (the so-called '']'' / غِلْمَان / ''"servants"''), almost always after conversion to ] depending on given function would be, unlike the Qizilbash, fully loyal only to the Shah. The other masses of Caucasians were deployed in all other possible functions and positions available in the empire, as well as in the ], regular military, craftsmen, farmers, etc. This system of mass usage of Caucasian subjects remained to exist until the fall of the ].
He expanded commercial links with the ] and established firm links with the European royal houses, which had been initiated by Ismail I earlier on by the ]. Thus Abbas I was able to break the dependence on the Qizilbash for military might and therefore was able to centralize control.
The Safavid dynasty had already established itself during Shah Ismail I, but under Abbas I it really became a major power in the world along its arch rival the Ottoman Empire, against whom it became able to compete with on equal foot. It also started the promotion of tourism in Iran. Under their rule Persian Architecture flowered again and saw many new monuments in various Iranian cities, of which ] is the most notable example.


] (also known as ''Rustam Khan''), viceroy of ], eastern Georgia, from 1633 to 1658|alt=]]
Except for Shah ], ], ], and ], many of the Safavid rulers were ineffectual, often being more interested in their women, alcohol and other leisure activities. The end of Abbas II' reign in 1666, marked the beginning of the end of the Safavid dynasty. Despite falling revenues and military threats, many of the later shahs had lavish lifestyles. Shah Soltan Hosain (1694–1722) in particular was known for his love of wine and disinterest in governance.<ref>Mottahedeh, Roy, ''The Mantle of the Prophet : Religion and Politics in Iran'', One World, Oxford, 1985, 2000, p.204</ref>


The greatest of the Safavid monarchs, ] (1587–1629) came to power in 1587 aged 16. Abbas I first fought the Uzbeks, recapturing ] and Mashhad in 1598, which had been lost by his predecessor ] by the ]. Then he turned against the Ottomans, the archrivals of the Safavids, recapturing Baghdad, eastern Iraq, the Caucasian provinces, and beyond ]. Between 1616 and 1618, following the disobedience of his most loyal Georgian subjects ] and ], Abbas carried out a punitive campaign in his territories of Georgia, devastating ] and ] and carrying away 130,000<ref>Eskandar Beg, pp. 900–901, tr. Savory, II, p. 1116</ref> – 200,000{{sfn|Mikaberidze|2015|pages=291, 536}}<ref>{{citation
The declining country was repeatedly raided on its frontiers. Finally, ] ] chieftain named ] began a rebellion in ] and defeated the Safavid army under the Iranian Georgian governor over the region, ]. In 1722, ] of neighbouring ] launched the ], capturing many of Iran's Caucasian territories, including ], ], ], but also ], ] and ]. At the mids of all chaos, in the same year 1722 an Afghan army led by Mir Wais' son ] marched across eastern Iran, ]. Mahmud proclaimed himself 'Shah' of Persia. Meanwhile, Persia's imperial rivals, the Ottomans and the Russians, took advantage of the chaos in the country to seize more territory for themselves.<ref>], biography of Nader, The Sword of Persia (I.B. Tauris, 2006) pp. 17–56</ref> By these events, the Safavid dynasty had effectively ended. In 1724, conform the ], the Ottomans and the Russians agreed to divide the newly conquered territories of Iran amongst themselves.<ref>]. ]"] ABC-CLIO 2011. p 726</ref>
|last1=Matthee |first1=Rudi |title=GEORGIA vii. Georgians in the Safavid Administration |url=https://iranicaonline.org/articles/georgia-vii-
| encyclopedia = Encyclopædia Iranica
| volume=X/5 | pages= 493–496
|orig-date= 2001 |year =2012 |archive-date=19 May 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210519082609/https://iranicaonline.org/articles/georgia-vii- |url-status=live }}</ref> Georgian captives towards mainland Iran. His new army, which had dramatically been improved with the advent of ] and his brothers following the ], pitted the first crushing victory over the Safavids' archrivals, the Ottomans in the above-mentioned 1603–1618 war and would surpass the Ottomans in military strength. He also used his new force to dislodge the Portuguese from ] (1602) and ] (1622) with aid of the English navy, in the Persian Gulf.

He expanded commercial links with the ] and established firm links with the European royal houses, which had been initiated by Ismail I earlier on by the ]. Thus Abbas I was able to break the dependence on the Qizilbash for military might and therefore was able to centralize control.
The Safavid dynasty had already established itself during Shah Ismail I, but under Abbas I it really became a major power in the world along with its archrival the Ottoman Empire, against whom it became able to compete with on equal foot. It also started the promotion of tourism in Iran. Under their rule Persian Architecture flourished again and saw many new monuments in various Iranian cities, of which ] is the most notable example.

Except for Shah ], Shah ], Shah ], and Shah ], many of the Safavid rulers were ineffectual, often being more interested in their women, alcohol and other leisure activities. The end of Abbas II's reign in 1666, marked the beginning of the end of the Safavid dynasty. Despite falling revenues and military threats, many of the later shahs had lavish lifestyles. Shah Soltan Hosain (1694–1722) in particular was known for his love of wine and disinterest in governance.<ref>Mottahedeh, Roy, ''The Mantle of the Prophet : Religion and Politics in Iran'', One World, Oxford, 1985, 2000, p.204</ref>

The declining country was repeatedly raided on its frontiers. Finally, ] ] chieftain named ] began a rebellion in ] and defeated the Safavid army under the Iranian Georgian governor over the region, ]. In 1722, ] of neighbouring ] launched the ], capturing many of Iran's Caucasian territories, including ], ], ], but also ], ] and ]. In the midst of chaos, in the same year of 1722, an Afghan army led by Mir Wais' son ] marched across eastern Iran, ]. Mahmud proclaimed himself 'Shah' of Persia. Meanwhile, Persia's imperial rivals, the Ottomans and the Russians, took advantage of the chaos in the country to seize more territory for themselves.<ref>], biography of Nader, ''The Sword of Persia'' (I.B. Tauris, 2006) pp. 17–56</ref> By these events, the Safavid dynasty had effectively ended. In 1724, conform the ], the Ottomans and the Russians agreed to divide the newly conquered territories of Iran amongst themselves.{{sfn|Mikaberidze|2011|p=1024}}


===Nader Shah and his successors=== ===Nader Shah and his successors===
]]]
{{Main|Afsharid dynasty|Zand dynasty}} {{Main|Afsharid dynasty|Zand dynasty}}
]]]
<!-- Deleted image removed: ] at its greatest extent under ]]] -->
]]]
Iran's territorial integrity was restored by a native Iranian ] ] warlord from Khorasan, ]. He defeated and banished the Afghans, ], ], and negotiated Russian withdrawal from Irans Caucasian territories, by the ] and ]. By 1736, Nader had become so powerful he was able to depose the Safavids and have himself crowned shah. Nader was one of the last great conquerors of Asia and briefly possessed over what was probably the most powerful empire in the world. To financially aid his wars against Persia's arch rival, the ], he fixated his mind on the weak but rich ] to the east. In 1739, accompanied by his loyal Caucasian vassals including ],<ref>David Marshall Lang. Columbia University Press, 1957 (digitalised March 2009, originally from the ]) p 142</ref> he ], defeated a numerically superior Mughal army in ], and ], bringing back immense wealth to Persia. On his way back, he also conquered all Uzbek khanates - except ] - and made the Uzbeks his vassals. He also firmly reestablished Persian rule over the entire ], Bahrain, as well as large parts of ] and Mesopotamia temporarily. Undefeated for years, his defeat in ], following guerrilla rebellions by the ] and the assassination attempt on him near ] is often marked as the turning point in Naders impressive career. Frustratingly for him, the Dagestanis resorted to guerrilla warfare and Nader with his standard army could make little headway against them.<ref>Spencer C. Tucker. p 739</ref> At the ] and the ], Nader's army was crushingly defeated and he lost half of his entire force, as well forcing him to flee for the mountains.<ref>Ramazan Gadzhimuradovich Abdulatipov. Edwin Mellen Press, 2000. p 15</ref> Though Nader managed to take most of ] during his campaign, the effective guerrilla warfare as deployed by the Lezgins, but also the ] and ] made the Iranian re-conquest of the particular ] region this time a short lived one; several years later, Nader ]. Around the same time, the assassination attempt was made on him near Mazandaran which accelerated the course of history; he slowly grew ill and megalomaniac, blinding his sons whom he suspected of the assassination attempts, and increasing cruelty against his subjects and officers. In his later years this eventually provoked multiple revolts and, ultimately, Nader's assassination in 1747.<ref>Axworthy ''Iran: Empire of the Mind'' (Penguin, 2008) pp. 152–167</ref>
Iran's territorial integrity was restored by a native Iranian ] ] warlord from Khorasan, ]. He defeated and banished the Afghans, ], ], and negotiated Russian withdrawal from Iran's Caucasian territories, with the ] and ]. By 1736, Nader had become so powerful he was able to depose the Safavids and have himself crowned shah. To financially support his wars against Persia's arch-rival, the ], he fixed his sights on the weak but rich ] to the east. In 1739, accompanied by his loyal Caucasian subjects including ],<ref>{{Cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=ITnRAAAAMAAJ|title=The Last Years of the Georgian Monarchy, 1658–1832
| page=142
|isbn=978-0-231-93710-8 |last1=Lang |first1=David Marshall |year=1957 |publisher=Columbia University Press
}}</ref><ref name="The Making of the Georgian Nation">{{Cite book|last=Suny|first=Ronald Grigor|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=riW0kKzat2sC&dq=erekle+appointed+king+of+kakheti+by+nader+shah&pg=PA55|title=The Making of the Georgian Nation, Second Edition|date=1994-10-22|publisher=Indiana University Press|isbn=978-0-253-20915-3|language=en}}</ref>{{rp|55}} he ], defeated a numerically superior Mughal army in ], and ], bringing back immense wealth to Persia. On his way back, he also conquered all the Uzbek khanates – except for ] – and made the Uzbeks his vassals. He also firmly re-established Persian rule over the entire Caucasus, Bahrain, as well as large parts of Anatolia and Mesopotamia. Undefeated for years, his defeat in ], following guerrilla rebellions by the ] and the assassination attempt on him near ] is often considered the turning point in Nader's impressive career. To his frustration, the Dagestanis resorted to guerrilla warfare, and Nader with his conventional army could make little headway against them.<ref>{{Cite book|last=Tucker|first=Spencer C.|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=h5_tSnygvbIC&pg=PA739|title=A Global Chronology of Conflict: From the Ancient World to the Modern Middle East
| page=739
| series= 6 volumes |date=2009|publisher=ABC-CLIO|isbn=978-1-85109-672-5|language=en}}</ref> At the ] and the Battle of Avaria, Nader's army was crushingly defeated and he lost half of his entire force, as well forcing him to flee for the mountains.<ref>{{Cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=cAYhAQAAMAAJ
|year=2000 |isbn=978-0-7734-3194-2
| first = Ramazan Gadzhimuradovich | last= Abdulatipov
| title = Russia and the Caucasus: On the Arduous Path to Unity
| publisher= Edwin Mellen Press
| page=15
}}</ref>{{better source needed|date=May 2023|reason=self-published source}} Though Nader managed to take most of ] during his campaign, the effective guerrilla warfare as deployed by the Lezgins, but also the ] and ] made the Iranian re-conquest of the particular ] region this time a short lived one; several years later, Nader ]. Around the same time, the assassination attempt was made on him near Mazandaran which accelerated the course of history; he slowly grew ill and megalomaniac, blinding his sons whom he suspected of the assassination attempts, and showing increasing cruelty against his subjects and officers. In his later years this eventually provoked multiple revolts and, ultimately, Nader's assassination in 1747.<ref>Axworthy ''Iran: Empire of the Mind'' (Penguin, 2008) pp. 152–167</ref>


Nader's death was followed by a period of anarchy in Iran as rival army commanders fought for power. Nader's own family, the Afsharids, were soon reduced to holding on to a small domain in Khorasan. Many of the ] territories broke away in various ]. Ottomans regained lost territories in Anatolia and Mesopotamia. ] and the Uzbek khanates of ] and ] regained independence. ], one of Nader's officers, founded an independent state which eventually became modern Afghanistan. ], who had been appointed king of ] by Nader himself in 1744,<ref>Ronald Grigor Suny. ], 1994. p 55</ref> had declared de facto independence, and took over the neighbouring ] as well. He would reunite both later through the ], and become the new Georgian king of a politically united ] for the first time in three centuries.<ref>]. Routledge & Kegan Paul (original from the ]) p 541</ref> From his capital ], ] of the ] ruled "an island of relative calm and peace in an otherwise bloody and destructive period,"<ref>Axworthy p.168</ref> however the extent of Zand power was confined to contemporary Iran and parts of the Caucasus. Between 1747 and 1795, through the Zand period, Erekle was therefore by the turn of events in Iran able to maintain Georgia's autonomy.{{sfn|Fisher|Avery|Hambly|Melville|1991|p=328}} Karim Khan's death in 1779 led to yet another civil war in which the ] eventually triumphed and became kings of Iran. During the civil war, Iran lost permanently Basra, captured by Persians during ], to Ottomans in 1779 and ] to ] after ] in 1783. Nader's death was followed by a ]. Nader's own family, the Afsharids, were soon reduced to holding on to a small domain in Khorasan. Many of the Caucasian territories broke away in various ]. Ottomans regained lost territories in Anatolia and Mesopotamia. ] and the Uzbek khanates of ] and ] regained independence. ], one of Nader's officers, founded an independent state which eventually became modern Afghanistan. ] and ], who, in 1744, had been made the kings of ] and ] respectively by Nader himself for their loyal service,<ref name="The Making of the Georgian Nation" />{{rp|55}} capitalized on the eruption of instability, and declared ''de facto'' independence. Erekle II assumed control over Kartli after Teimuraz II's death, thus unifying the two as the ], becoming the first Georgian ruler in three centuries to preside over a politically unified eastern Georgia,<ref>{{citation
| first = Keith | last = Hitchins
| year = 2012 | orig-date=1998
| url = http://www.iranicaonline.org/articles/erekle-ii
| title= Erekle II
| encyclopedia = Encyclopædia Iranica
| volume=VIII/5
| pages = 541–542
| editor-last= Yarshater | editor-first= Ehsan
|isbn=978-0-7100-9090-4
}}</ref> and due to the frantic turn of events in mainland Iran he would be able to remain ''de facto'' autonomous through the ] period.{{sfn|Fisher|Avery|Hambly|Melville|1991|p=328}} From his capital ], ] of the ] ruled "an island of relative calm and peace in an otherwise bloody and destructive period,"<ref>Axworthy p.168</ref> however the extent of Zand power was confined to contemporary Iran and parts of the Caucasus. Karim Khan's death in 1779 led to yet another civil war in which the ] eventually triumphed and became kings of Iran. During the civil war, Iran permanently lost ] in 1779 to the Ottomans, which had been captured during the ],<ref>{{cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=lMkUAAAAIAAJ|title=British Interests in the Persian Gulf|first=ʻAbd al-Amīr Muḥammad|last=Amīn|date=1 January 1967|publisher=Brill Archive|access-date=10 August 2016|archive-date=19 December 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191219023233/https://books.google.com/books?id=lMkUAAAAIAAJ|url-status=live}}</ref> and ] to ] after ] in 1783.{{citation needed|date=July 2016}}


==Late modern period==
===Qajar dynasty (1794–1925)===

{{Main|Qajar dynasty|Russo-Persian War (1804-1813)|Russo-Persian War (1826-1828)}}
===Qajar dynasty (1796–1925)===
{{Main|Qajar dynasty|Russo-Persian War (1804–1813)|Russo-Persian War (1826–1828)}}
{{See also|Battle of Krtsanisi|Treaty of Gulistan|Treaty of Turkmenchay|Iranian Constitutional Revolution}} {{See also|Battle of Krtsanisi|Treaty of Gulistan|Treaty of Turkmenchay|Iranian Constitutional Revolution}}
<gallery mode="packed" heights="180px">
] (Iranian, active ca. 1800-1830). Portrait of ]. ].]]
File:Mihr 'Ali (Iranian, active ca. 1800-1830). Portrait of Fath 'Ali Shah Qajar, 1815.jpg|] (Iranian, active ca. 1800–1830). Portrait of ]. ].
].]]
File:Yek toman qajar.jpg|Qajar era currency bill with depiction of ].
]
File:Map Iran 1900-en.png|A map of Iran under the ] in the 19th century.
], ], ], and ], before being forced to cede the territories to ] per the ]]]
File:Gulistan-Treaty.jpg|A map showing the 19th-century northwestern borders of Iran, comprising modern-day eastern ], ], ], and the ], before being ceded to the neighboring ] by the ].
] emerged victorious out of the civil war that commenced with the death of the last Zand king. His reign is noted for the reemergence of a centrally led and united Iran. After the death of Nader Shah and the last of the Zands, most of Iran's integral ] territories had broken away into various ]. Agha Mohammad Khan, like the Safavid kings and Nader Shah before him, viewed the region as no different than the territories in mainland Iran. Therefore, his first objective after having secured mainland Iran, was to reincorpate the Caucasus region into Iran.{{sfn|Mikaberidze|2011|p=409}} ] was seen as one of the most integral territories.{{sfn|Fisher|Avery|Hambly|Melville|1991|p=328}} For Agha Mohammad Khan, the resubjugation and reintegration of Georgia into the Iranian Empire was part of the same process that had brought ], ], and ] under his rule.{{sfn|Fisher|Avery|Hambly|Melville|1991|p=328}} As the '']'' states, its permanent secession was inconceivable and had to be resisted in the same way as one would resist an attempt at the separation of ] or ].{{sfn|Fisher|Avery|Hambly|Melville|1991|p=328}} It was therefore natural for Agha Mohammad Khan to perform whatever necessary means in the Caucasus in order to subdue and reincorporate the recently lost regions following Nader Shah's death and the demise of the Zands, including putting down what in Iranian eyes was seen as treason on the part of the '']'' of Georgia, namely the Georgian king ] (Heraclius II) who was appointed ''viceroy'' (]) of Georgia by Nader Shah himself.{{sfn|Fisher|Avery|Hambly|Melville|1991|p=328}}
</gallery>
] emerged victorious out of the civil war that commenced with the death of the last Zand king. His reign is noted for the reemergence of a centrally led and united Iran. After the death of Nader Shah and the last of the Zands, most of Iran's Caucasian territories had broken away into various ]. Agha Mohammad Khan, like the Safavid kings and Nader Shah before him, viewed the region as no different from the territories in mainland Iran. Therefore, his first objective after having secured mainland Iran, was to reincorpate the Caucasus region into Iran.{{sfn|Mikaberidze|2011|p=409}} Georgia was seen as one of the most integral territories.{{sfn|Fisher|Avery|Hambly|Melville|1991|p=328}} For Agha Mohammad Khan, the resubjugation and reintegration of Georgia into the Iranian Empire was part of the same process that had brought ], ], and ] under his rule.{{sfn|Fisher|Avery|Hambly|Melville|1991|p=328}} As the '']'' states, its permanent secession was inconceivable and had to be resisted in the same way as one would resist an attempt at the separation of ] or ].{{sfn|Fisher|Avery|Hambly|Melville|1991|p=328}} It was therefore natural for Agha Mohammad Khan to perform whatever necessary means in the Caucasus in order to subdue and reincorporate the recently lost regions following Nader Shah's death and the demise of the Zands, including putting down what in Iranian eyes was seen as treason on the part of the '']'' (viceroy) of Georgia, namely the Georgian king ] (Heraclius II) who was appointed viceroy of Georgia by Nader Shah himself.{{sfn|Fisher|Avery|Hambly|Melville|1991|p=328}}


Agha Mohammad Khan subsequently demanded that Heraclius II renounce ], and to submit again to Persian suzerainty,{{sfn|Mikaberidze|2011|p=409}} in return for peace and the security of his kingdom. The Ottomans, Iran's neighboring rival, recognized the latter's rights over ] and ] for the first time in four centuries.<ref name="Donald Rayfield p 255">{{Cite book|last=Rayfield|first=Donald|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=PxQpmg_JIpwC&pg=PA255|title=Edge of Empires: A History of Georgia|date=2013
Agha Mohammad Khan subsequently demanded Heraclius II to renounce ] of several years earlier, that formally denounced any dependence on Persia and for full Russian protection and assistance in its affairs, and to reaccept Persian suzerainty,{{sfn|Mikaberidze|2011|p=409}} in return for peace and the security of his kingdom. The Ottomans, Iran's neighboring rival, recognized the latters rights over ] and ] for the first time in four centuries.<ref name="Donald Rayfield p 255">Donald Rayfield. Reaktion Books, 15 feb. 2013 ISBN 1780230702 p 255</ref> Heraclius appealed then to his theoretical protector, Empress ], pledging for at least 3,000 Russian troops,<ref name="Donald Rayfield p 255"/> but he was ignored, leaving Georgia to fend off the Persian threat alone.<ref name="Lang">] (1962), ''A Modern History of Georgia'', p. 38. ]: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.</ref> Nevertheless, Heraclius II still rejected the Khan’s ].<ref name="Suny">] (1994), ''The Making of the Georgian Nation'', p. 59. ], ISBN 0-253-20915-3</ref> As a response, Agha Mohammad Khan invaded the Caucasus region after crossing the ], and, while on his way to Georgia, he re-subjugated Iran's territories of the ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], which comprise modern-day ], ], ], and ]. Having reached Georgia with his large army, it culminated in the ], which resulted in the capture, and sack of ], as well as the effective resubjugation of Georgia into Iran.<ref name="books.google.nl">Michael Axworthy. Penguin UK, 6 nov. 2008 ISBN 0141903414</ref><ref>{{cite book |quote="Agha Muhammad Khan remained nine days in the vicinity of Tiflis. His victory proclaimed the restoration of Iranian military power in the region formerly under Safavid domination."|title=The Cambridge History of Iran |first=William Bayne |last=Fisher |publisher=Cambridge University Press |volume=7 |year=1991 |pages=128–129 }}</ref> Upon his return from his successful campaign in Tbilisi and in effective control over Georgia, together with some 15,000 ] captives that were moved back to mainland Iran,<ref name="Lang"/> Agha Mohammad was formally crowned ] in 1796 in the ], just like his predecessor Nader Shah was about sixty years earlier.
|page=255|publisher=Reaktion Books|isbn=978-1-78023-070-2|language=en}}</ref> Heraclius appealed then to his theoretical protector, Empress ], pleading for at least 3,000 Russian troops,<ref name="Donald Rayfield p 255"/> but he was ignored, leaving Georgia to fend off the Persian threat alone.<ref name="Lang">{{ cite book
| author-link=David Marshall Lang
| last= Lang | first=David Marshall
| year=1962
| title=A Modern History of Georgia
| page = 38
| place=London
| publisher= Weidenfeld and Nicolson}}
<!-- every 1962 edition of this book I've found on gbooks is published by Grove Press, and entitled "A Modern History of Soviet Georgia". The edition with the title present in the citation is a 2001 edition published by Curzon. I'm sure we can source this claim elsewhere if nobody has a copy of this book with a page 38 and frontispiece -->
</ref> Nevertheless, Heraclius II still rejected the Khan's ].<ref name="Suny">] (1994), ''The Making of the Georgian Nation'', p. 59. ], {{ISBN|0-253-20915-3}}</ref> As a response, Agha Mohammad Khan invaded the Caucasus region after crossing the ], and, while on his way to Georgia, he re-subjugated Iran's territories of the ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], which comprise modern-day ], ], ], and ]. Having reached Georgia with his large army, he prevailed in the ], which resulted in the capture and sack of ], as well as the effective resubjugation of Georgia.<ref name="books.google.nl3">{{Cite book|last=Axworthy|first=Michael|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=k9HyyYrPIGgC&pg=PT192|title=Iran: Empire of the Mind: A History from Zoroaster to the Present Day|date=2008-11-06|publisher=Penguin UK|isbn=978-0-14-190341-5|language=en}}{{page needed|date=May 2023}}</ref><ref>{{cite book |quote=Agha Muhammad Khan remained nine days in the vicinity of Tiflis. His victory proclaimed the restoration of Iranian military power in the region formerly under Safavid domination.|title=The Cambridge History of Iran |first=William Bayne |last=Fisher |publisher=Cambridge University Press |volume=7 |year=1991 |pages=128–129 }}</ref> Upon his return from his successful campaign in Tbilisi and in effective control over Georgia, together with some 15,000 Georgian captives that were moved back to mainland Iran,<ref name="Lang"/> Agha Mohammad was formally crowned ] in 1796 in the ], just as his predecessor Nader Shah was about sixty years earlier.


Agha Mohammad Shah was later assassinated while preparing a second expedition against Georgia in 1797 in ]{{sfn|Fisher|Avery|Hambly|Melville|1991|p=329}} (now part of the ]) and the seasoned king Heraclius died early in 1798. The reassertion of Iranian hegemony over Georgia did not last long; in 1799 the Russians marched into Tbilisi.<ref>{{Cite book|last1=Miller|first1=Aleksei
Agha Mohammad Shah was later assassinated while preparing a second expedition against Georgia in 1797 in ]{{sfn|Fisher|Avery|Hambly|Melville|1991|p=329}} (nowadays part of the ]) and the seasoned king Heraclius died early in 1798. Reassessment of Iranian hegemony over Georgia did not last long; in 1799 the Russians marched into Tbilisi.<ref>Alekseĭ I. Miller. Central European University Press, 2004 ISBN 9639241989 p 204</ref> The Russians were already actively occupied with an expansionistic policy towards its neighboring empires to its south, namely the Ottoman Empire and the successive Iranian kingdoms since the late 17th/early 18th century. The next two years following Russia's entrance into Tbilisi were a time of muddle and confusion, and the weakened and devastated Georgian kingdom, with its capital half in ruins, was easily ] in 1801.<ref name="Lang"/><ref name="Suny"/> As Iran could not permit or allow the cession of ] and ], which had formed part of the very concept of Iran for centuries,{{sfn|Fisher|Avery|Hambly|Melville|1991|pp=329-330}} it would also become the direct uplead to the wars of several years later, namely the ] and ], which would eventually prove for the irrevocable forced cession and loss of what is nowadays ], ], ], and ] to Imperial Russia per the ] and ] of 1813 and 1828 respectively, as the ancient ties could be severed by a superior force from outside.{{sfn|Fisher|Avery|Hambly|Melville|1991|p=329}}<ref name="books.google.nl"/> By this, millennia old close ties between the region and Iran would be, thus, eventually severed in the course of the 19th century by which Iran losts swaths of its integral territories.
| url=https://books.google.com/books?id=_8niIYSTqToC&pg=PA204|title=Imperial Rule|last2=Rieber|first2=Alfred J.|date=2004-01-01|publisher=Central European University Press
| page = 204 n. 48
| series = Pasts Incorporated. CEU Studies in the Humanities
| volume= 1
|isbn=978-963-9241-98-5|language=en}}</ref> The Russians were already actively occupied with an expansionist policy towards its neighboring empires to its south, namely the Ottoman Empire and the successive Iranian kingdoms since the late 17th/early 18th century. The next two years following Russia's entrance into Tbilisi were a time of confusion, and the weakened and devastated Georgian kingdom, with its capital half in ruins, was easily ] in 1801.<ref name="Lang"/><ref name="Suny"/> As Iran could not permit or allow the cession of ] and Dagestan, which had been an integral part of Iran for centuries,{{sfn|Fisher|Avery|Hambly|Melville|1991|pp=329–330}} this would lead directly to the wars of several years later, namely the ] of ] and ]. The outcome of these two wars (in the ] and the ], respectively) proved for the irrevocable forced cession and loss of what is now eastern ], ], ], and ] to Imperial Russia.{{sfn|Fisher|Avery|Hambly|Melville|1991|p=329-330}}<ref name="books.google.nl3"/>


The area to the north of the river ], among which the territory of the contemporary republic of Azerbaijan, eastern Georgia, Dagestan, and Armenia were Iranian territory until they were occupied by Russia in the course of the 19th century.<ref name="Swietochowski Borderland">{{cite book|last=Swietochowski|first=Tadeusz|author-link=Tadeusz Swietochowski|year=1995|title=Russia and Azerbaijan: A Borderland in Transition|pages=69, 133|publisher=]|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=FfRYRwAACAAJ
The area to the North of the river ], among which the territory of the contemporary republic of Azerbaijan, eastern Georgia, Dagestan, and Armenia were Iranian territory until they were occupied by Russia in the course of the 19th century.<ref name="Swietochowski Borderland">{{cite book |last=Swietochowski|first=Tadeusz |authorlink= Tadeusz Swietochowski |year=1995|title=Russia and Azerbaijan: A Borderland in Transition|pages= 69, 133 |edition= |publisher=] |url= https://books.google.com/books?id=FfRYRwAACAAJ&dq=Russia+and+Iran+in+the+great+game:+travelogues+and+orientalism|isbn=978-0-231-07068-3}}</ref><ref>{{cite book |last=L. Batalden|first=Sandra |year=1997|title=The newly independent states of Eurasia: handbook of former Soviet republics|page= 98|edition= |publisher=Greenwood Publishing Group |url= https://books.google.com/books?id=WFjPAxhBEaEC&dq=The+newly+independent+states+of+Eurasia:+handbook+of+former+Soviet+republics|isbn=978-0-89774-940-4}}</ref><ref>Timothy C. Dowling pp 728-729 ABC-CLIO, 2 dec. 2014 ISBN 1598849484</ref><ref>{{cite book |last=E. Ebel, Robert|first=Menon, Rajan |year=2000|title=Energy and conflict in Central Asia and the Caucasus|page= 181 |edition= |publisher=Rowman & Littlefield |url= https://books.google.com/books?id=-sCpf26vBZ0C&dq=Energy+and+conflict+in+Central+Asia+and+the+Caucasus|isbn=978-0-7425-0063-1}}</ref><ref>{{cite book |last=Andreeva|first=Elena |year=2010|title=Russia and Iran in the great game: travelogues and orientalism|page= 6 |edition= reprint |publisher=Taylor & Francis | url= https://books.google.com/books?id=FfRYRwAACAAJ&dq=%3DRussia+and+Iran+in+the+great+game:+travelogues+and+orientalism|isbn=978-0-415-78153-4}}</ref><ref>{{cite book |last=Çiçek, Kemal|first=Kuran, Ercüment |year=2000|title=The Great Ottoman-Turkish Civilisation|edition= |publisher=University of Michigan |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=c5VpAAAAMAAJ&q=The+Great+Ottoman-Turkish+Civilisation&dq=The+Great+Ottoman-Turkish+Civilisation|isbn=978-975-6782-18-7}}</ref><ref>{{cite book |last=Ernest Meyer, Karl |first=Blair Brysac, Shareen |year=2006|title=Tournament of Shadows: The Great Game and the Race for Empire in Central Asia|page= 66 |edition= |publisher=Basic Books |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=Ssv-GONnxTsC&dq=Tournament+of+Shadows:+The+Great+Game+and+the+Race+for+Empire+in+Central+Asia|isbn=978-0-465-04576-1}}</ref>
|isbn=978-0-231-07068-3|access-date=2020-10-17|archive-date=2015-07-13|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150713174716/https://books.google.com/books?id=FfRYRwAACAAJ
|url-status=live}}{{pb}}{{cite book|last=L. Batalden|first=Sandra|year=1997|title=The newly independent states of Eurasia: handbook of former Soviet republics|page=98|publisher=Greenwood Publishing Group|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=WFjPAxhBEaEC
|isbn=978-0-89774-940-4|access-date=2020-10-17|archive-date=2015-07-13|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150713174717/https://books.google.com/books?id=WFjPAxhBEaEC
|url-status=live}}{{pb}}{{Cite book|last=Dowling|first=Timothy C.|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=KTq2BQAAQBAJ&pg=PA728|title=Russia at War: From the Mongol Conquest to Afghanistan, Chechnya, and Beyond | series =2 volumes|date=2014-12-02|publisher=ABC-CLIO|isbn=978-1-59884-948-6|language=en
|pages = 728–729}}{{pb}}{{cite book|last=E. Ebel, Robert|first=Menon, Rajan|year=2000|title=Energy and conflict in Central Asia and the Caucasus|page=181|publisher=Rowman & Littlefield|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=-sCpf26vBZ0C
|isbn=978-0-7425-0063-1|access-date=2020-10-17|archive-date=2015-07-13|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150713174720/https://books.google.com/books?id=-sCpf26vBZ0C
|url-status=live}}{{pb}}{{cite book|last=Andreeva|first=Elena|year=2010|title=Russia and Iran in the great game: travelogues and orientalism|page=6|edition=reprint|publisher=Taylor & Francis|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=FfRYRwAACAAJ
|isbn=978-0-415-78153-4|access-date=2020-10-17|archive-date=2015-07-13|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150713174721/https://books.google.com/books?id=FfRYRwAACAAJ
|url-status=live}}{{pb}}{{cite book|last=Çiçek, Kemal|first=Kuran, Ercüment|year=2000|title=The Great Ottoman-Turkish Civilisation|publisher=University of Michigan|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=c5VpAAAAMAAJ
|isbn=978-975-6782-18-7|access-date=2015-06-20|archive-date=2015-07-13|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150713174723/https://books.google.com/books?id=c5VpAAAAMAAJ
|url-status=live}}{{pb}}{{cite book|last=Ernest Meyer, Karl|first=Blair Brysac, Shareen|year=2006|title=Tournament of Shadows: The Great Game and the Race for Empire in Central Asia|page=66|publisher=Basic Books|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=Ssv-GONnxTsC
|isbn=978-0-465-04576-1|access-date=2020-10-17|archive-date=2015-07-13|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150713174725/https://books.google.com/books?id=Ssv-GONnxTsC
|url-status=live}}</ref>


<gallery mode=packed heights=130px> <gallery mode="packed" heights="130px">
File:Battle Between Persians and Russians - State Hermitage Museum.jpg|Painting showing the ], 13 February 1812. ]. File:Battle Between Persians and Russians - State Hermitage Museum.jpg|Painting showing the ], 13 February 1812. ].
File:Russian troops storming Lankaran fortress, January 13th, 1813..jpg|], 1812. Painted by ]. File:Russian troops storming Lankaran fortress, January 13th, 1813..jpg|], 1812. Painted by ].
Line 327: Line 519:
===Migration of Caucasian Muslims=== ===Migration of Caucasian Muslims===
{{See also|Ayrums|Qarapapaqs|Ethnic Cleansing of Circassians}} {{See also|Ayrums|Qarapapaqs|Ethnic Cleansing of Circassians}}
] in 1909]] ] in 1909]]
Following the official losing of the aforementioned vast territories in the Caucasus, major demographic shifts were bound to take place. Solidly Persian-speaking territories of Iran were lost, with all its inhabitants in it. Following the 1804-1814 War, but also per the 1826-1828 war which ceded the last territories, large migrations, so called ], set off to migrate to mainland Iran. Some of these groups included the ], ], ], Shia ], and other ] Muslims.<ref name="Caucasus Survey">{{cite web|url=http://www.caucasus-survey.org/vol1-no2/yemelianova-islam-nationalism-state-muslim-caucasus.php|title=Caucasus Survey|accessdate=23 April 2015}}</ref> Following the official loss of vast territories in the Caucasus, major demographic shifts were bound to take place. Following the 1804–1814 war, but also per the 1826–1828 war which ceded the last territories, large migrations, so-called ], set off to migrate to mainland Iran. Some of these groups included the ], ], ], Shia ], and other ] Muslims.<ref name="Caucasus Survey">{{cite web|url=http://www.caucasus-survey.org/vol1-no2/yemelianova-islam-nationalism-state-muslim-caucasus.php|title=Caucasus Survey|access-date=23 April 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150415070826/http://www.caucasus-survey.org/vol1-no2/yemelianova-islam-nationalism-state-muslim-caucasus.php|archive-date=15 April 2015}}</ref>


Through the ] during the ], many thousands of Ayrums and Qarapapaqs were settled in Tabriz. During the remaining part of the 1804-1813 war, as well as through the ], the absolute bulk of the Ayrums and Qarapapaqs that were still remaining in newly conquered Russian territories were settled in and migrated to ] (in modern-day Iran's ]).<ref name="Mansoori">{{cite book|last=Mansoori|first=Firooz|title=Studies in History,Language and Culture of Azerbaijan|year=2008|publisher=Hazar-e Kerman|location=Tehran|isbn=978-600-90271-1-8|accessdate=2 April 2012|page=245|chapter=17|language=fa}}</ref> After the ] during the ], many thousands of Ayrums and Qarapapaqs were settled in Tabriz. During the remaining part of the 1804–1813 war, as well as through the ], a large number of the Ayrums and Qarapapaqs that were still remaining in newly conquered Russian territories were settled in and migrated to ] (in modern-day Iran's ]).<ref name="Mansoori">{{cite book|last=Mansoori|first=Firooz|title=Studies in History, Language and Culture of Azerbaijan|year=2008|publisher=Hazar-e Kerman|location=Tehran|isbn=978-600-90271-1-8|page=245|chapter=17|language=fa}}</ref> As the '']'' states; "The steady encroachment of Russian troops along the frontier in the Caucasus, General ]'s brutal punitive expeditions and misgovernment, drove large numbers of Muslims, and even some Georgian Christians, into exile in Iran."{{sfn|Fisher|Avery|Hambly|Melville|1991|p=336}}


In 1864 until the early 20th century, ] of Caucasian Muslims as a result of the Russian victory in the ]. Others simply voluntarily refused to live under ] Russian rule, and thus disembarked for Turkey or Iran. These migrations once again, towards Iran, included masses of Caucasian ], other Transcaucasian Muslims, as well as many North Caucasian Muslims, such as Circassians, Shia Lezgins and ].<ref name="Caucasus Survey"/><ref>А. Г. Булатова. Лакцы (XIX — нач. XX вв.). Историко-этнографические очерки. — Махачкала, 2000.</ref> From 1864 until the early 20th century, ] of Caucasian Muslims as a result of the Russian victory in the ]. Others simply voluntarily refused to live under Christian Russian rule, and thus departed for Turkey or Iran. These migrations once again, towards Iran, included masses of Caucasian ], other Transcaucasian Muslims, as well as many North Caucasian Muslims, such as Circassians, Shia Lezgins and ].<ref name="Caucasus Survey"/><ref>A. G. Bulаtovа. Lаktsy (XIX — nаch. XX vv.). Istoriko-etnogrаficheskie ocherki. — Mаkhаchkаlа, 2000.</ref>
Many of these migrants would prove to play a pivotal role in further Iranian history, as they formed most of the ranks of the ], which was also to be established in the late 19th century.<ref name="mepc.org">{{cite web|url=http://mepc.org/journal/middle-east-policy-archives/iranian-armed-forces-politics-revolution-and-war-part-one?print|title=The Iranian Armed Forces in Politics, Revolution and War: Part One|accessdate=23 May 2014}}</ref> The initial ranks of the brigade would be entirely composed of ] and other Caucasian Muhajirs.<ref name="mepc.org"/> This brigade would prove decisive in the following decades to come in Qajar history. Many of these migrants would prove to play a pivotal role in further Iranian history, as they formed most of the ranks of the ], which was established in the late 19th century.<ref name="mepc.org">{{cite web|url=http://mepc.org/journal/middle-east-policy-archives/iranian-armed-forces-politics-revolution-and-war-part-one?print|title=The Iranian Armed Forces in Politics, Revolution and War: Part One|date=22 May 2012 |access-date=23 May 2014|archive-date=3 March 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160303165712/http://mepc.org/journal/middle-east-policy-archives/iranian-armed-forces-politics-revolution-and-war-part-one?print|url-status=live}}</ref> The initial ranks of the brigade would be entirely composed of ] and other Caucasian Muhajirs.<ref name="mepc.org"/> This brigade would prove decisive in the following decades in Qajar history.


Furthermore, the 1828 ] included the official rights for the Russian Empire to encourage settling of ] from Iran in the newly conquered Russian territories.<ref>"Griboedov not only extended protection to those Caucasian captives who sought to go home but actively promoted the return of even those who did not volunteer. Large numbers of Georgian and Armenian captives had lived in Iran since 1804 or as far back as 1795." Furthermore, the 1828 ] included the official rights for the Russian Empire to encourage settling of ] from Iran in the newly conquered Russian territories.<ref>"Griboedov not only extended protection to those Caucasian captives who sought to go home but actively promoted the return of even those who did not volunteer. Large numbers of Georgian and Armenian captives had lived in Iran since 1804 or as far back as 1795."
Fisher, William Bayne;Avery, Peter; Gershevitch, Ilya; Hambly, Gavin; Melville, Charles. ''The Cambridge History of Iran'' Cambridge University Press, 1991. p. 339.</ref><ref>{{ru icon}} , Фундаментальная Электронная Библиотека</ref> This also helped in changing the demographics of the regions considerably.<ref>Bournoutian. ''Armenian People'', p. 105</ref> The ], concluded with Turkey in 1829 granted for more mass settling of Armenians in the newly incorporated territories. Slowly but surely, the number of Christians, that formerly made out since the 17th century a relatively small minority in the region (except for Georgia), were starting to compose an ever growing number of the total population, especially in the former Iranian-ruled Armenian and Georgian territories. Fisher, William Bayne;Avery, Peter; Gershevitch, Ilya; Hambly, Gavin; Melville, Charles. ''The Cambridge History of Iran'' Cambridge University Press, 1991. p. 339.</ref><ref>{{in lang|ru}} {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160113142046/http://feb-web.ru/feb/griboed/texts/piks3/3_4_v3.htm |date=13 January 2016 }}, Fundаmentаl'nаya Elektronnаya Bibliotekа</ref> Until the mid-fourteenth century, Armenians had constituted a majority in ].{{sfn|Bournoutian|1980|pages=11, 13–14}}
At the close of the fourteenth century, after ]'s campaigns, the ] flourished, and Islam had become the dominant faith, and Armenians became a minority in Eastern Armenia. {{sfn|Bournoutian|1980|pages=11, 13–14}} After centuries of constant warfare on the ], many Armenians chose to emigrate and settle elsewhere. Following ]'s massive relocation of Armenians and Muslims in 1604–05,<ref>]. ''The Books of Histories''; chapter 4. Quote: " deep inside understood that he would be unable to resist Sinan Pasha, i.e. the Sardar of Jalaloghlu, in a battle. Therefore he ordered to relocate the whole population of Armenia - Christians, Jews and Muslims alike, to Persia, so that the Ottomans find the country depopulated."</ref> their numbers dwindled even further.


At the time of the Russian invasion of Iran, some 80% of the population of ] were Muslims (], ], and ]) whereas Christian ] constituted a minority of about 20%.{{sfn|Bournoutian|1980|pages=12–13}} As a result of the ] (1813) and the Treaty of Turkmenchay (1828), Iran was forced to cede Iranian Armenia (which also constituted the present-day ]), to the Russians.{{sfn|Bournoutian|1980|pages=1–2}}{{sfn|Mikaberidze|2015|page=141}} After the Russian administration took hold of Iranian Armenia, the ethnic make-up shifted, and thus for the first time in more than four centuries, ethnic Armenians started to form a majority once again in one part of historic Armenia.{{sfn|Bournoutian|1980|page=14}} The new Russian administration encouraged the settling of ethnic Armenians from Iran proper and ]. As a result, by 1832, the number of ethnic Armenians had matched that of the Muslims.{{sfn|Bournoutian|1980|pages=12–13}} It would be only after the ] and the ], which brought another influx of Turkish Armenians, that ethnic Armenians once again established a solid majority in ].{{sfn|Bournoutian|1980|page=13}} Nevertheless, the city of Erivan retained a Muslim majority up to the twentieth century.{{sfn|Bournoutian|1980|page=13}} According to the traveller ], the city of Erivan was about 50% Armenian and 50% Muslim (Tatars{{efn|The term "Tatars", employed by the Russians, referred to ] Muslims (Shia and ]) of ].<ref name="BournoutianTatarMuslim">{{cite book |last1=Bournoutian |first1=George |author1-link=George Bournoutian |title=Armenia and Imperial Decline: The Yerevan Province, 1900-1914 |date=2018 |publisher=Routledge |page=35 (note 25)}}</ref> Unlike Armenians and ], the Tatars did not have their own alphabet and used the ].<ref name="BournoutianTatarMuslim"/> After 1918 with the establishment of the ], and "especially during the ] era", the Tatar group identified itself as "]".<ref name="BournoutianTatarMuslim"/> Prior to 1918 the word "]" exclusively referred to the ].<ref>{{cite book |last1=Bournoutian |first1=George |author1-link=George Bournoutian |title=Armenia and Imperial Decline: The Yerevan Province, 1900-1914 |date=2018 |publisher=Routledge |page=xiv}}</ref>}} i.e. Azeris and Persians) in the early 1890s.{{sfn|Kettenhofen|Bournoutian|Hewsen|1998|pages=542–551}}
Following the resettlement of Persian Armenians in the newly conquered Russian territories after 1828, thus significant demographic shifts were bound to take place. The Armenian-American historian ] gives a summary of the ethnic makeup prior to the events of 1828 just for the territory of the ] as an example:<ref>{{cite book |title=Eastern Armenia in the Last Decades of Persian Rule, 1807 - 1828 |last=Bournoutian |first=George A. |authorlink= |coauthors= |year=1982 |publisher=Undena Publications |location=Malibu |isbn= |page= |pages=xxii + 165 |url= |accessdate=}}</ref>
{{cquote|In the first quarter of the 19th century the Khanate of Erevan included most of Eastern Armenia and covered an area of approximately 7,000 square miles. The land was mountainous and dry, the population of about 100,000 was roughly 80 percent ] (Persian, Azeri, Kurdish) and 20 percent Christian (Armenian).}}
After the incorporation of the ] into the ], Muslim majority of the area gradually changed, at first the Armenians who were left captive were accouraged to return.<ref name="William Bayne Fisher p. 339">The Cambridge History of Iran by William Bayne Fisher, Peter Avery, Ilya Gershevitch, Gavin Hambly, Charles Melville, Cambridge University Press, 1991 p. 339</ref> As a result of which an estimated 57,000 Armenian refugees from Persia returned to the territory of the ] khanates after 1828, while about 35,000 Muslims (Persians, Turkic groups, Kurds, Lezgis, etc.) out total population of over 100,000 left the region.<ref name="potier">{{cite book |title=Conflict in Nagorno-Karabakh, Abkhazia and South Ossetia: A Legal Appraisal |last=Potier |first=Tim |authorlink= |coauthors= |year=2001 |publisher=Martinus Nijhoff Publishers |location= |isbn=90-411-1477-7 |page=2 |pages= |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=JL9N4F1SgyYC&pg=PA2 |accessdate=}}</ref>


Fath Ali Shah's reign saw increased diplomatic contacts with the West and the beginning of intense European diplomatic rivalries over Iran. His grandson ], who fell under the Russian influence and made two unsuccessful attempts to capture ], succeeded him in 1834. When Mohammad Shah died in 1848 the succession passed to his son Nasser-e-Din, who proved to be the ablest and most successful of the Qajar sovereigns.{{citation needed|date=May 2015}} Fath Ali Shah's reign saw increased diplomatic contacts with the West and the beginning of intense European diplomatic rivalries over Iran. His grandson ], who succeeded him in 1834, fell under the Russian influence and made two unsuccessful attempts to capture ]. When Mohammad Shah died in 1848 the succession passed to his son ], who proved to be the ablest and most successful of the Qajar sovereigns. He founded the first modern hospital in Iran.<ref>Azizi, Mohammad-Hossein. "The historical backgrounds of the Ministry of Health foundation in Iran." Arch Iran Med 10.1 (2007): 119-23.</ref>


===Constitutional Revolution and deposement=== ===Constitutional Revolution and deposition===
{{main|1921 Persian coup d'état}}
The Great Persian Famine of 1870–1871 is believed to have caused the death of 2 million persons.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0041-977X%281986%2949%3A1%3C183%3ATGPFO1%3E2.0.CO%3B2-Q&size=LARGE&origin=JSTOR-enlargePage |title=The Great Persian Famine of 1870–1871 |publisher=Links.jstor.org |date= |accessdate=2010-08-25}}</ref>


The ] is believed to have caused the death of two million people.<ref>{{cite journal|jstor=617680|title=The Great Persian Famine of 1870–71|first=Shoko|last=Okazaki|date=1 January 1986|journal=Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London|volume=49|issue=1|pages=183–192|doi=10.1017/s0041977x00042609|s2cid=155516933 }}</ref>
A new era in the History of Persia dawned with the ] against the Shah in the late 19th and early 20th centuries. The Shah managed to remain in power, granting a limited constitution in 1906 (making the country a ]). The first Majlis (parliament) was convened on October 7, 1906.


A new era in the history of Persia dawned with the ] against the Shah in the late 19th and early 20th centuries. The Shah managed to remain in power, granting a limited constitution in 1906 (making the country a ]). The first ] (parliament) was convened on 7 October 1906.
The discovery of ] in 1908 by the British in ] spawned intense renewed interest in Persia by the ] (''see ] and ], now ]''). Control of Persia remained contested between the United Kingdom and Russia, in what became known as ], and codified in the ], which divided Persia into spheres of influence, regardless of her national sovereignty.


The discovery of ] in 1908 by the British in ] spawned intense renewed interest in Persia by the ] (see ] and ], now ]). Control of Persia remained contested between the United Kingdom and Russia, in what became known as ], and codified in the ], which divided Persia into spheres of influence, regardless of her national sovereignty.
During World War I, the country was occupied by British, Ottoman and Russian forces but was essentially neutral (see ]). In 1919, after the Russian revolution and their withdrawal, Britain attempted to establish a ] in Iran, which was unsuccessful.


During World War I, the country was occupied by British, Ottoman and Russian forces but was essentially neutral (see ]). In 1919, after the ] and their withdrawal, Britain attempted to establish a ] in Persia, which was unsuccessful.
Finally, the ] and the central power vacuum caused by the instability of the ] government resulted in the rise of ] and the establishment of the ] in 1925.


In 1921, a military ] established ], an officer of the ], as the dominant figure for the next 20 years. ] was also a leader and important figure in the perpetration of the ]. The ] was not actually directed at the Qajar monarchy; according to ], it was targeted at officials who were in power and actually had a role in controlling the government; the cabinet and others who had a role in governing Persia.<ref>. ].</ref> In 1925, after being prime minister for a couple of years, Reza Shah became the king of Iran and established the Pahlavi dynasty.{{clear}} Finally, the ] and the central power vacuum caused by the instability of the Qajar government resulted in the rise of Reza Khan, who was later to become ], and the subsequent establishment of the ] in 1925. In 1921, a military ] established Reza Khan, an officer of the ], as the dominant figure for the next 20 years. ] was also a leader and important figure in the perpetration of the coup. The coup was not actually directed at the Qajar monarchy; according to '']'', it was targeted at officials who were in power and actually had a role in controlling the government the cabinet and others who had a role in governing Persia.<ref>
{{cite encyclopedia
| first = Niloofar | last = Shambayati
| volume=VI/4 | pages = 351–354
| year = 2015 | orig-date= 1993
| title= Coup D'Etat of 1299/1921
| encyclopedia= Encyclopædia Iranica | url= https://iranicaonline.org/articles/coup-detat-of-1299-1921 }}</ref> In 1925, after being prime minister for two years, Reza Khan became the first shah of the Pahlavi dynasty.


==Pahlavi era (1925–1979)== ===Pahlavi era (1925–1979)===
{{Main|Pahlavi dynasty}} {{Main|Pahlavi Iran}}


=== {{anchor|Reza Shah (1925-1941)}}Reza Shah (1925–1941) === ==== {{anchor|Reza Shah (1925-1941)}}Reza Shah (1925–1941) ====
{{main|Persian Cossack Brigade}}
]]]
] ruled for almost 16 years until 16 September 1941, when he was forced to ] by the ]. He established an ] that valued ], ], ] and ] combined with strict ] and ].<ref>Michael P. Zirinsky; "Imperial Power and Dictatorship: Britain and the Rise of Reza Shah, 1921–1926", International Journal of Middle East Studies 24 (1992), 639–663, Cambridge University Press</ref> Reza Shah introduced many socio-economic reforms, reorganizing the army, government administration, and finances.<ref name="Columbia_Encyclopedia">{{cite encyclopedia
{{main|Persian Cossack Brigade|1921 Persian coup d'état}}
| archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20090201151652/http://www.bartleby.com/65/re/RezaShah.html
] ruled for almost 16 years until September 16, 1941, when he was forced to ] by the ]. He established an ] that valued ], ], ] and ] combined with strict ] and ].<ref>Michael P. Zirinsky; "Imperial Power and Dictatorship: Britain and the Rise of Reza Shah, 1921–1926", International Journal of Middle East Studies 24 (1992), 639–663, Cambridge University Press</ref> Reza Shah introduced many socio-economic reforms, reorganizing the army, government administration, and finances.<ref name="Columbia_Encyclopedia">The Columbia Encyclopedia, Sixth Edition: </ref>
| url = http://www.bartleby.com/65/re/RezaShah.html
| url-status= usurped
| archive-date= 1 February 2009
| encyclopedia= The Columbia Encyclopedia
| edition= Sixth
| orig-date= 2001 | year = 2007
| title= Reza Shah Pahlevi
}}</ref>


To his supporters his reign brought "law and order, discipline, central authority, and modern amenities – schools, trains, buses, radios, cinemas, and telephones".<ref name="Ervand, 2008 p.91">Ervand, ''History of Modern Iran'', (2008), p.91</ref> However, his attempts of modernisation have been criticised for being "too fast"<ref>The Origins of the Iranian Revolution by Roger Homan. International Affairs (Royal Institute of International Affairs 1944–), Vol. 56, No. 4 (Autumn, 1980), pp. 673–677 </ref> and "superficial",<ref>Richard W. Cottam, Nationalism in Iran, University of Pittsburgh Press, ISBN o-8229-3396-7</ref> To his supporters, his reign brought "law and order, discipline, central authority, and modern amenities – schools, trains, buses, radios, cinemas, and telephones".<ref name="Ervand, 2008 p.91">Ervand, ''History of Modern Iran'', (2008), p.91</ref> However, his attempts of modernisation have been criticised for being "too fast"<ref>The Origins of the Iranian Revolution by Roger Homan. International Affairs, Vol. 56, No. 4 (Autumn, 1980), pp. 673–677.{{JSTOR|2618173}}</ref> and "superficial",<ref>Richard W. Cottam, Nationalism in Iran, University of Pittsburgh Press, ISBN o-8229-3396-7</ref> and his reign a time of "oppression, corruption, taxation, lack of authenticity" with "security typical of ]s."<ref name="Ervand, 2008 p.91"/>
and his reign a time of "oppression, corruption, taxation, lack of authenticity" with "security typical of ]s."<ref name="Ervand, 2008 p.91"/>


Many of the new laws and regulations created resentment among devout Muslims and the clergy. For example, mosques were required to use chairs; most men were required to wear western clothing, including a hat with a brim; women were encouraged to discard the ]; men and women were allowed to freely congregate, violating Islamic ]. Tensions boiled over in 1935, when bazaaris and villagers rose up in ] at the ] in ], chanting slogans such as 'The Shah is a new ].' Dozens were killed and hundreds were injured when troops finally quelled the unrest.<ref>Bakhash, Shaul, ''Reign of the Ayatollahs : Iran and the Islamic Revolution'' by Shaul, Bakhash, Basic Books, c1984, p.22</ref> Many of the new laws and regulations created resentment among devout Muslims and the clergy. For example, mosques were required to use chairs; most men were required to wear western clothing, including a hat with a brim; women were encouraged to discard the ]—hijab was eventually ]; men and women were allowed to congregate freely, violating Islamic ]. Tensions boiled over in 1935, when bazaaris and villagers rose up ] at the ] in ] to protest against plans for the hijab ban, chanting slogans such as 'The Shah is a new ].' Dozens were killed and hundreds were injured when troops finally quelled the unrest.<ref>Bakhash, Shaul, ''Reign of the Ayatollahs : Iran and the Islamic Revolution'' by Shaul, Bakhash, Basic Books, c1984, p.22</ref>


===World War II=== ====World War II====
{{See also|Anglo-Soviet Invasion of Iran|Polish civilian camps in World War II|Persian Corridor}} {{See also|Anglo-Soviet invasion of Iran|Polish civilian camps in World War II|Persian Corridor}}
{{multiple image
] with FDR at the ], 1943]]
| align = right
]
| image1 = Shah with FDR.jpeg
In August 1941, ] was invaded by ], British and other ] armed forces. The invasion lasted from 25 August to 17 September 1941, and was codenamed '']''. The purpose was to secure Iranian ]s and ensure Allied ]s (see '']'') for the Soviets fighting against Axis forces on the ]. Though Iran was officially neutral, according to the Allies its monarch ] was friendly toward the ] and was deposed during the subsequent occupation and replaced with his young son ], who ruled until 1979.
| width1 = 200
| alt1 =
| caption1 = ] with FDR at the ], 1943.
| image2 = Teheran, Iran. Polish refugee colony operated by the Red Cross has a colorful setting in the outskirts of the city.jpeg
| width2 = 220
| alt2 =
| caption2 = ], c. 1943.
| footer =
}}
While ] against the ], the Iranian government expected Germany to win the war and establish a powerful force on its borders. It rejected British and Soviet demands to expel German residents from Iran. In response, the two ] ] and easily overwhelmed the weak Iranian army in '']''. Iran became the major conduit of Allied ] aid to the Soviet Union. The purpose was to secure Iranian ]s and ensure Allied ]s (see '']''). Iran remained officially neutral. Its monarch ] was deposed during the subsequent occupation and replaced with his young son ].<ref>Richard Stewart, ''Sunrise at Abadan: the British and Soviet invasion of Iran, 1941'' (1988).</ref>


At the ], the ] guaranteed the post-war independence and boundaries of Iran. However, when the war actually ended, Soviet troops stationed in northwestern Iran not only refused to withdraw but backed revolts that established short-lived, pro-Soviet separatist national states in the northern regions of Azerbaijan and ], the ] and the ] respectively, in late 1945. Soviet troops did not withdraw from Iran proper until May 1946 after receiving a promise of oil concessions. The Soviet republics in the north were soon ] and the oil concessions were revoked. At the ], the Allies issued the ] which guaranteed the post-war independence and boundaries of Iran. However, when the war actually ended, Soviet troops stationed in northwestern Iran not only refused to withdraw but backed revolts that established short-lived, pro-Soviet separatist national states in the northern regions of Azerbaijan and ], the ] and the ] respectively, in late 1945. Soviet troops did not withdraw from Iran proper until May 1946 after receiving a promise of oil concessions. The Soviet republics in the north were soon ] and the oil concessions were revoked.<ref>Louise Fawcett, "Revisiting the Iranian Crisis of 1946: How Much More Do We Know?." ''Iranian Studies'' 47#3 (2014): 379–399.</ref><ref>{{Cite journal|title=The Iranian Crisis of 1945–46 and the Cold War |last=Hess |first=Gary R. |journal=Political Science Quarterly |volume=89 |number=1 |date=March 1974 |pages=117–145|doi=10.2307/2148118 |jstor=2148118 |url=http://azargoshnasp.com/recent_history/atoor/theiraniancriris194546.pdf|access-date=2023-03-16|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160215211023/http://azargoshnasp.com/recent_history/atoor/theiraniancriris194546.pdf |archive-date=15 February 2016 }}</ref>


==={{anchor|Mohammad-Reza Shah (1941-1979)}}Mohammad-Reza Shah (1941–1979)=== ===={{anchor|Mohammad-Reza Shah (1941-1979)}}Mohammad-Reza Shah (1941–1979)====
]]] ]]]
].]]

Initially there were hopes that post-occupation Iran could become a ]. The new, young Shah ] initially took a very hands-off role in government, and allowed ] to hold a lot of power. Some elections were held in the first shaky years, although they remained mired in corruption. Parliament became chronically unstable, and from the 1947 to 1951 period Iran saw the rise and fall of six different prime ministers. Pahlavi increased his political power by convening the ], which finally formed the ]—a legislative ] allowed for in the 1906 constitution but never brought into being. The new senators were largely supportive of Pahlavi, as he had intended. Initially there were hopes that post-occupation Iran could become a ]. The new, young Shah ] initially took a very hands-off role in government, and allowed ] to hold a lot of power. Some elections were held in the first shaky years, although they remained mired in corruption. Parliament became chronically unstable, and from the 1947 to 1951 period Iran saw the rise and fall of six different prime ministers. Pahlavi increased his political power by convening the ], which finally formed the ]—a legislative ] allowed for in the 1906 constitution but never brought into being. The new senators were largely supportive of Pahlavi, as he had intended.


In 1951 Prime Minister ] received the vote required from the parliament to ] the British-owned oil industry, in a situation known as the ]. Despite British pressure, including an economic blockade, the nationalization continued. Mosaddeq was briefly removed from power in 1952 but was quickly re-appointed by the shah, due to a popular uprising in support of the premier and he, in turn, forced the Shah into a brief exile in August 1953 after a failed military coup by Imperial Guard Colonel Nematollah Nassiri. In 1951 Prime Minister ] received the vote required from the parliament to ] the British-owned oil industry, in a situation known as the ]. Despite British pressure, including an economic blockade, the nationalization continued. Mosaddeq was briefly removed from power in 1952 but was quickly re-appointed by the Shah, due to a popular uprising in support of the premier, and he, in turn, forced the Shah into a brief exile in August 1953 after a failed military coup by ] Colonel ].


====1953: U.S. organized coup removes Mosaddeq==== =====1953: U.S. aided coup removes Mosaddeq=====
{{main|1953 Iranian coup d'état}} {{main|1953 Iranian coup d'état}}
Shortly thereafter on August 19 a successful coup was headed by retired army general ], organized by the United States (CIA)<ref name=BBC>{{cite web|title=CIA documents acknowledge its role in Iran's 1953 coup|url=http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-23762970|publisher=BBC News|accessdate=20 August 2013}}</ref> with the active support of the British (MI6) (known as ] and Operation Boot to the respective agencies).<ref>{{cite book|last=Kinzer|first=Stephen|title=The Brothers: John Foster Dulles, Allen Dulles, and Their Secret World War|publisher=Times Books|location=New York|year=2013}}</ref> The coup—with a ] campaign designed to turn the population against Mosaddeq—forced Mosaddeq from office. Mosaddeq was arrested and tried for treason. Found guilty, his sentence reduced to house arrest on his family estate while his foreign minister, ], was executed. ] succeeded him as prime minister, and suppressed opposition to the Shah, specifically the ] and Communist ]. Shortly thereafter on 19 August a successful ] was headed by retired army general ], aided by the United States (])<ref name=BBC>{{cite news|title=CIA documents acknowledge its role in Iran's 1953 coup|url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-23762970|work=BBC News|access-date=20 August 2013|archive-date=9 March 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210309131918/https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-23762970|url-status=live}}</ref> with the active support of the British (]) (known as ] to the respective agencies).<ref>{{cite book|last=Kinzer|first=Stephen|title=The Brothers: John Foster Dulles, Allen Dulles, and Their Secret World War|publisher=Times Books|location=New York|year=2013}}</ref> The coup—with a ] campaign designed to turn the population against Mosaddeq <ref>{{Cite journal|last=Gölz|first=Olmo|date=2019-01-01|title=Gölz "The Dangerous Classes and the 1953 Coup in Iran: On the Decline of 'lutigari' Masculinities." In Crime, Poverty and Survival in the Middle East and North Africa: The 'Dangerous Classes' since 1800. Edited by Stephanie Cronin, 177–90. London: I.B. Tauris, 2019.|url=https://www.academia.edu/40997855|journal=Crime, Poverty and Survival in the Middle East and North Africa}}</ref> — forced Mosaddeq from office. Mosaddeq was arrested and tried for treason. Found guilty, his sentence was reduced to house arrest on his family estate while his foreign minister, ], was executed. ] succeeded him as prime minister, and suppressed opposition to the Shah, specifically the ] and Communist ].


] ]
Iran was ruled as an autocracy under the shah with American support from that time until the revolution. The Iranian government entered into agreement with an international consortium of foreign companies which ran the Iranian oil facilities for the next 25 years splitting profits fifty-fifty with Iran but not allowing Iran to audit their accounts or have members on their board of directors. In 1957 martial law was ended after 16 years and Iran became closer to the West, joining the ] and receiving military and economic aid from the US. In 1961, Iran initiated a series of economic, social, agrarian and administrative reforms to modernize the country that became known as the Shah's White Revolution. Iran was ruled as an autocracy under the Shah with American support from that time until the revolution. The Iranian government entered into agreement with an international consortium of foreign companies which ran the Iranian oil facilities for the next 25 years, splitting profits fifty-fifty with Iran but not allowing Iran to audit their accounts or have members on their board of directors. In 1957 martial law was ended after 16 years and Iran became closer to the West, joining the ] and receiving military and economic aid from the US. In 1961, Iran initiated a series of economic, social, agrarian and administrative reforms to modernize the country that became known as the Shah's ].


The core of this program was land reform. Modernization and economic growth proceeded at an unprecedented rate, fueled by Iran's vast petroleum reserves, the third-largest in the world. However the reforms, including the ], did not greatly improve economic conditions and the liberal pro-Western policies alienated certain ]ic religious and political groups. In early June 1963 ] occurred in support of ] ] following the cleric's arrest for a speech attacking the shah. The core of this program was land reform. Modernization and economic growth proceeded at an unprecedented rate, fueled by Iran's vast petroleum reserves, the third-largest in the world. However, the reforms, including the White Revolution, did not greatly improve economic conditions and the liberal pro-Western policies alienated certain ]ic religious and political groups. In early June 1963 ] occurred in support of ] ] following the cleric's arrest for a speech attacking the Shah.


Two years later, premier ] was assassinated and the internal security service, ], became more violently active. In the 1970s leftist ] such as ] (MEK), emerged and attacked regime and foreign targets. Two years later, premier ] was assassinated and the internal security service, ], became more violently active. In the 1970s, leftist ] such as ] (MEK), emerged and contributed to overthrowing the Shah during the 1979 Iranian Revolution.


Nearly a hundred Iran political prisoners were killed by the SAVAK during the decade before the revolution and many more were arrested and tortured.<ref>Abrahamian, ''Tortured Confessions'' (1999), pp. 135–6, 167, 169</ref> The Islamic clergy, headed by the Ayatollah ] (who had been exiled in 1964), were becoming increasingly vociferous. Nearly a hundred Iran political prisoners were killed by the SAVAK during the decade before the revolution and many more were arrested and tortured.<ref>Abrahamian, ''Tortured Confessions'' (1999), pp. 135–6, 167, 169</ref> The Islamic clergy, headed by the Ayatollah ] (who had been exiled in 1964), were becoming increasingly vociferous.


Iran greatly increased its defense budget and by the early 1970s was the region's strongest military power. Bilateral relations with its neighbor ] were not good, mainly due to a dispute over the ] waterway. In November 1971, Iranian forces seized control of three islands at the mouth of the Persian Gulf; in response, Iraq expelled thousands of Iranian nationals. Following a number of clashes in April 1969, Iran abrogated the 1937 accord and demanded a renegotiation. Iran greatly increased its defense budget and by the early 1970s was the region's strongest military power. Bilateral relations with Iraq were not good, mainly due to a dispute over the ] waterway. In November 1971, Iranian forces seized control of three islands at the mouth of the Persian Gulf; in response, Iraq expelled thousands of Iranian nationals. Following a number of clashes in April 1969, Iran abrogated the 1937 accord and demanded a renegotiation.


In mid-1973, the Shah returned the oil industry to national control. Following the ], Iran did not join the Arab oil embargo against the West and ]. Instead, it used the situation to raise oil prices, using the money gained for modernization and to increase defense spending. In mid-1973, the Shah returned the oil industry to national control. Following the ], Iran did not join the Arab oil embargo against the West and ]. Instead, it used the situation to raise oil prices, using the money gained for modernization and to increase defense spending.


A border dispute between Iraq and Iran was resolved with the signing of the ] on March 6, 1975. A border dispute between Iraq and Iran was resolved with the signing of the ] on 6 March 1975.


== Contemporary period ==
==Iranian Revolution and the Islamic Republic (1979)==
=== Revolution and the Islamic Republic (1979 to present) ===
] returns to Iran after 14 years exile in France on 1 February 1979.]]
{{Main|Iranian Revolution|History of the Islamic Republic of Iran}} {{Main|Iranian Revolution|History of the Islamic Republic of Iran}}
] returns to Iran after 14 years exile in France on 1 February 1979.]]
The '''Iranian Revolution''', also known as the '''Islamic Revolution''',<ref name = "Chamber">, Iran Chamber.</ref> was the ] that transformed Iran from an absolute ] under ] ], to an ] under Ayatollah ], one of the leaders of the revolution and founder of the Islamic Republic.<ref name = "Britannica">.</ref> Its time span can be said to have begun in January 1978 with the first major demonstrations,<ref>.</ref> and concluded with the approval of the new ] Constitution—whereby Ayatollah Khomeini became ] of the country—in December 1979.<ref name = "Britannica Khomeini">, Encyclopædia Britannica.</ref>


The Iranian Revolution, also known as the Islamic Revolution,<ref name = "Chamber">{{Cite web|title=History of Iran: Islamic Revolution of 1979|url=https://www.iranchamber.com/history/islamic_revolution/islamic_revolution.php|access-date=2023-03-16|website=www.iranchamber.com}}</ref> was the ] that transformed Iran from an absolute ] under ] ] to an ] under ] ], one of the leaders of the revolution and founder of the Islamic Republic.<ref name = "Britannica"/> Its time span can be said to have begun in January 1978 with the first major demonstrations,<ref>{{Cite web
In between, ] left the country for exile in January 1979 after strikes and demonstrations paralyzed the country, and on February 1, 1979 Ayatollah Khomeini returned to Tehran to a greeting of several million Iranians.<ref name = "Britannica Khomeini">, Encyclopædia Britannica.</ref> The final collapse of the Pahlavi dynasty occurred shortly after on February 11 when Iran's military declared itself "neutral" after guerrillas and rebel troops overwhelmed troops loyal to the Shah in armed street fighting. Iran officially became an Islamic Republic on April 1, 1979, when Iranians overwhelmingly approved a national referendum to make it so.<ref>, Encyclopædia Britannica.</ref>
|year=2018|orig-date=1998|title=The Iranian Revolution|url=http://www.fsmitha.com/h2/ch29ir.html|access-date=2023-03-16|last = Smitha | first = Frank E.
|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161010233759/http://www.fsmitha.com/h2/ch29ir.html |archive-date=2016-10-10
}}</ref> and concluded with the approval of the new ] Constitution—whereby Ayatollah Khomeini became ] of the country—in December 1979.<ref name="Britannica Khomeini">{{Cite encyclopaedia
| url = https://www.britannica.com/biography/Ruhollah-Khomeini
| title= Ruhollah Khomeini
| encyclopedia= Britannica
| last = Afari | first = Janet
| date= 19 May 2023
| access-date= 2023-05-21
}}</ref>


In between, ] left the country for exile in January 1979 after strikes and demonstrations paralyzed the country, and on 1 February 1979, Ayatollah Khomeini returned to Tehran.<ref name="Britannica Khomeini"/> The final collapse of the Pahlavi dynasty occurred shortly after on 11 February when Iran's military declared itself "neutral" after guerrillas and rebel troops overwhelmed troops loyal to the Shah in armed street fighting. Iran officially became an Islamic Republic on 1 April 1979, after Iranians overwhelmingly approved a ] to make it so a day before.<ref> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060316040030/https://www.britannica.com/ebi/article-202892 |date=2006-03-16 }}, Encyclopædia Britannica.</ref>
=== Ideology of the 1979 Iranian Revolution ===


{{Further|Ideology of the 1979 Iranian Revolution}} ==== Ideology of the 1979 Iranian Revolution ====
{{Further|Ideology of the Iranian Revolution}}


The ideology of revolutionary government was populist, nationalist and most of all ]. Its unique constitution is based on the concept of '']'' the idea advanced by Khomeini that Muslims – in fact everyone – requires "guardianship", in the form of rule or supervision by the leading ] or jurists.<ref>Dabashi, ''Theology of Discontent'' (1993), p.419, 443</ref> Khomeini served as this ruling jurist, or ], until his death in 1989. The ideology of the revolutionary government was populist, nationalist and most of all ]. Its unique constitution is based on the concept of '']'' the idea advanced by Khomeini that Muslims – in fact everyone – requires "guardianship", in the form of rule or supervision by the leading ] or jurists.<ref>Dabashi, ''Theology of Discontent'' (1993), p.419, 443</ref> Khomeini served as this ruling jurist, or ], until his death in 1989.


Iran's rapidly modernising, capitalist economy was replaced by populist and Islamic economic and cultural policies. Much industry was ], laws and schools Islamicized, and Western influences banned. Iran's rapidly modernising, capitalist economy was replaced by populist and Islamic economic and cultural policies. Much industry was ], laws and schools Islamicized, and Western influences banned.


The Islamic revolution also created great impact around the world. In the non-Muslim world it has changed the image of Islam, generating much interest in the politics and spirituality of Islam,<ref>Shawcross, William, ''The Shah's Last Ride'' (1988), p. 110.</ref> along with "fear and distrust towards Islam" and particularly the Islamic Republic and its founder.<ref name=nasr>Nasr, Vali, ''The Shia Revival'', Norton, (2006), p.138</ref> The Islamic revolution also created great impact around the world. In the non-Muslim world it has changed the image of Islam, generating much interest in the politics and spirituality of Islam,<ref>Shawcross, William, ''The Shah's Last Ride'' (1988), p. 110.</ref> along with "fear and distrust towards Islam" and particularly the Islamic Republic and its founder.<ref name=nasr>{{cite book
| last = Nasr
| first = Vali
| title=The Shia Revival
| publisher= W.W. Norton | year=2007
| isbn = 978-0-393-06640-1
| page =138}}</ref>


==={{anchor|Khomeini (1979-1989)}}Khomeini Takes Power (1979–1989)=== === {{anchor|Khomeini (1979-1989)}}Khomeini (1979–1989) ===
Khomeini served as leader of the revolution or as ] from 1979 to his death on June 3, 1989. This era was dominated by the consolidation of the revolution into a ] republic under Khomeini, and by the costly and bloody ]. Khomeini served as leader of the revolution or as ] from 1979 to his death on 3 June 1989. This era was dominated by the consolidation of the revolution into a ] republic under Khomeini, and by the costly and bloody ].


The consolidation lasted until 1982–3,<ref>''Encyclopedia of Islam and Muslim World'', Thomson Gale, 2004, p.357 (article by Stockdale, Nancy, L.)</ref><ref>Keddie, ''Modern Iran'', (2006), p.241</ref> as Iran coped with the damage to its economy, military, and apparatus of government, and protests and uprisings by secularists, leftists, and more traditional Muslims—formerly ally revolutionaries but now rivals—were effectively suppressed. Many political opponents were executed by the new regimes. Following the events of the revolution, Marxist guerrillas and federalist parties revolted in some regions comprising ], ] and ], which resulted in severe fighting between rebels and revolutionary forces. These revolts began in April 1979 and lasted between several months to over a year, depending on the region. The ], led by the KDPI, was the most violent, lasting until 1983 and resulting in 10,000 casualties. The consolidation lasted until 1982–3,<ref>''Encyclopedia of Islam and Muslim World'', Thomson Gale, 2004, p.357 (article by Stockdale, Nancy, L.)</ref><ref>Keddie, ''Modern Iran'', (2006), p.241</ref> as Iran coped with the damage to its economy, military, and apparatus of government, and protests and uprisings by secularists, leftists, and more traditional Muslims—formerly ally revolutionaries but now rivals—were effectively suppressed. Many political opponents were executed by the new regimes. Following the events of the revolution, Marxist guerrillas and federalist parties revolted in regions comprising ], ] and ], resulting in severe fighting between rebels and revolutionary forces. These revolts began in April 1979 and lasted between several months to over a year, depending on the region. The ], led by the KDPI, was the most violent, lasting until 1983 and resulting in 10,000 casualties.


In the summer of 1979 a new constitution giving Khomeini a powerful post as guardian jurist ]<ref></ref> and a clerical ] power over legislation and elections, was drawn up by an ]. The new constitution was approved by referendum in December 1979. In the summer of 1979 a new constitution giving Khomeini a powerful post as guardian jurist Supreme Leader<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.iranonline.com/iran/iran-info/Government/constitution-8.html |title=Iranian Government Constitution, English Text |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20101123063337/http://www.iranonline.com/iran/iran-info/Government/constitution-8.html |archive-date=2010-11-23 }}</ref> and a clerical ] power over legislation and elections, was drawn up by an ]. The new constitution was approved by referendum in December 1979.


==== {{anchor|Iran hostage crisis (1979-1981)}}Iran hostage crisis (1979–1981)==== ==== {{anchor|Iran hostage crisis (1979-1981)}}Iran hostage crisis (1979–1981) ====
{{Main|Iran hostage crisis}} {{Main|Iran hostage crisis}}
An early event in the history of the Islamic republic that had a long-term impact was the ]. Following the admitting of the former Shah of Iran into the United States for cancer treatment, on November 4, 1979, Iranian students ], labeling the embassy a "den of spies."<ref name="carterpbs">, retrieved 1 October 2007</ref> Fifty-two hostages were held for 444 days until January 1981.<ref>Guests of the Ayatollah: The Iran Hostage Crisis: The First Battle in America's War with Militant Islam, Mark Bowden, p. 127, 200</ref> An American ] failed.<ref name="Atlantic"></ref> An early event in the history of the Islamic republic that had a long-term impact was the ]. Following the admitting of the former Shah of Iran into the United States for cancer treatment, on 4 November 1979, Iranian students ], labeling the embassy a "den of spies."<ref name="carterpbs"> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110119224031/https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/amex/carter/sfeature/sf_hostage.html |date=2011-01-19 }}, retrieved 1 October 2007</ref> Fifty-two hostages were held for 444 days until January 1981.<ref>Guests of the Ayatollah: The Iran Hostage Crisis: The First Battle in America's War with Militant Islam, Mark Bowden, p. 127, 200</ref> An American ] failed.<ref name="Atlantic">{{cite web|url=https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2006/05/the-desert-one-debacle/4803/2/|title=The Desert One Debacle|first=Mark|last=Bowden|website=]|date=May 2006|access-date=2017-03-07|archive-date=2012-07-30|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120730081638/http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2006/05/the-desert-one-debacle/4803/2|url-status=live}}</ref>


The takeover was enormously popular in Iran, where thousands gathered in support of the hostage takers, and it is thought to have strengthened the prestige of the ] and consolidated the hold of anti-Americanism. It was at this time that Khomeini began referring to America as the "]." In America, where it was considered a violation of the long-standing principle of international law that ] may be expelled but not held captive, it created a powerful anti-Iranian backlash. Relations between the two countries have remained deeply antagonistic and American ] have hurt Iran's economy.<ref>, ''Middle East Economic Survey'', 26 August 2002</ref> The takeover was enormously popular in Iran, where thousands gathered in support of the hostage takers, and it is thought to have strengthened the prestige of the ] and consolidated the hold of anti-Americanism. It was at this time that Khomeini began referring to America as the "]." In America, where it was considered a violation of the long-standing principle of international law that ] may be expelled but not held captive, it created a powerful anti-Iranian backlash. Relations between the two countries have remained deeply antagonistic and American ] have hurt Iran's economy.<ref>{{Cite journal
|title=A Review Of US Unilateral Sanctions Against Iran|url=http://www.mafhoum.com/press3/108E16.htm|access-date=2023-03-16
| journal= Middle East Economic Survey
| year = 2002
|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171010024317/http://www.mafhoum.com/press3/108E16.htm |archive-date=2017-10-10
| volume= 45 | number= 34
| first1 = Herman | last1=Franssen
| first2= Elaine | last2=Morton
}}</ref>


==== Iran–Iraq War (1980–1988) ==== ==== Iran–Iraq War (1980–1988) ====
{{Main|Iran–Iraq War}} {{Main|Iran–Iraq War}}
] ]
During this political and social crisis, ]i leader ] attempted to take advantage of the disorder of the Revolution, the weakness of the Iranian military and the revolution's antagonism with Western governments. The once-strong Iranian military had been disbanded during the revolution, and with the Shah ousted, Hussein had ambitions to position himself as the new strong man of the Middle East, and sought to expand Iraq's access to the Persian Gulf by acquiring territories that Iraq had claimed earlier from Iran during the Shah's rule.


During this political and social crisis, Iraqi leader ] attempted to take advantage of the disorder of the Revolution, the weakness of the Iranian military and the revolution's antagonism with Western governments. The once-strong Iranian military had been disbanded during the revolution, and with the Shah ousted, Hussein had ambitions to position himself as the new strong man of the Middle East. He sought to expand Iraq's access to the Persian Gulf by acquiring territories that Iraq had claimed earlier from Iran during the Shah's rule.
Of chief importance to Iraq was ] which not only boasted a substantial Arab population, but rich oil fields as well. On the unilateral behalf of the ], the islands of ] and the ] became objectives as well. With these ambitions in mind, Hussein planned a full-scale assault on Iran, boasting that his forces could reach the capital within three days. On September 22, 1980, the Iraqi army invaded Iran at Khuzestan, precipitating the ]. The attack took revolutionary Iran completely by surprise.

Of chief importance to Iraq was ] which not only boasted a substantial Arab population, but rich oil fields as well. On the unilateral behalf of the ], the islands of ] and the ] became objectives as well. With these ambitions in mind, Hussein planned a full-scale assault on Iran, boasting that his forces could reach the capital within three days. On 22 September 1980, the Iraqi army invaded Iran at Khuzestan, precipitating the ]. The attack took revolutionary Iran completely by surprise.


Although Saddam Hussein's forces made several early advances, Iranian forces had pushed the Iraqi army back into Iraq by 1982. Khomeini sought to ] westward into Iraq, especially on the majority Shi'a Arabs living in the country. The war then continued for six more years until 1988, when Khomeini, in his words, "drank the cup of poison" and accepted a truce mediated by the United Nations. Although Saddam Hussein's forces made several early advances, Iranian forces had pushed the Iraqi army back into Iraq by 1982. Khomeini sought to ] westward into Iraq, especially on the majority Shi'a Arabs living in the country. The war then continued for six more years until 1988, when Khomeini, in his words, "drank the cup of poison" and accepted a truce mediated by the United Nations.


Tens of thousands of Iranian ] and ] personnel were killed when Iraq used ] in its warfare. ] by ], the Arab countries of the ], the Soviet Union and the ] states, the United States (beginning in 1983), France, the United Kingdom, Germany, ], and the ] (which also sold weapons to Iran). Tens of thousands of Iranian civilians and military personnel were killed when Iraq used ] in its warfare. ] by ], the Arab countries of the ], the Soviet Union and the ] states, the United States (beginning in 1983), France, the United Kingdom, Germany, ], and the ] (which also sold weapons to Iran).


There were more than 100,000 Iranian victims<ref name="r1">Centre for Documents of The Imposed War, Tehran. (مرکز مطالعات و تحقیقات جنگ)</ref> of Iraq's chemical weapons during the eight-year war. The total Iranian casualties of the war were estimated to be between 500,000 and 1,000,000. Almost all relevant international agencies have confirmed that Saddam engaged in chemical warfare to blunt Iranian ]s; these agencies unanimously confirmed that Iran never used chemical weapons during the war.<ref></ref><!-- There were more than 182,000 Kurdish victims<ref name="r1">Centre for Documents of The Imposed War, Tehran. (مرکز مطالعات و تحقیقات جنگ)</ref> of Iraq's chemical weapons during the eight-year war. The total Iranian casualties of the war were estimated to be between 500,000 and 1,000,000. Almost all relevant international agencies have confirmed that Saddam engaged in chemical warfare to blunt Iranian ]s; these agencies unanimously confirmed that Iran never used chemical weapons during the war.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://fas.org/news/iran/1997/970205-480132.htm|title=Iran, 'Public Enemy Number One'|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150620160352/https://fas.org/news/iran/1997/970205-480132.htm|archive-date=2015-06-20}}</ref><!--
--><ref></ref><!-- --><ref>{{cite web|url=https://fas.org/cw/intro.htm|title=Chemical Weapons Information – Federation of American Scientists|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150620160905/https://fas.org/cw/intro.htm|archive-date=2015-06-20}}</ref><!--
--><ref></ref><!-- --><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.antiwar.com/glantz/?articleid=2804|title=Winter Soldier: Domingo Rosas Antiwar.com Original|date=8 November 2008|access-date=29 October 2007|archive-date=6 June 2011|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110606082652/http://www.antiwar.com/glantz/?articleid=2804|url-status=live}}</ref><!--
--><ref></ref> --><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.nti.org/e_research/profiles/Iran/Chemical/2340_2965.html|title=Iran Countries NTI|access-date=2007-10-29|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100408212924/http://www.nti.org/e_research/profiles/Iran/Chemical/2340_2965.html|archive-date=2010-04-08}}</ref>


Starting on 19 July 1988 and lasting about five months the ] systematically executed thousands of political prisoners across Iran. This is commonly referred to as the ] or the 1988 Iranian Massacre. The main target was the membership of the ] (PMOI), although a lesser number of political prisoners from other leftist groups were also included such as the ] (Communist Party).<ref></ref><ref>Abrahamian, Ervand, ''Tortured Confessions'', University of California Press, 1999, 209–228</ref> Estimates of the number executed vary from 1,400<ref></ref> to 30,000.<ref></ref><ref></ref> Starting on 19 July 1988 and lasting for about five months the ] systematically executed thousands of political prisoners across Iran. This is commonly referred to as the ] or the 1988 Iranian Massacre. The main target was the membership of the ] (PMOI), although a lesser number of political prisoners from other leftist groups were also included such as the ] (Communist Party).<ref> {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20050924060950/http://www.pww.org/article/view/5754/1/231/ |date=2005-09-24 }}</ref><ref>Abrahamian, Ervand, ''Tortured Confessions'', University of California Press, 1999, 209–228</ref> Estimates of the number executed vary from 1,400<ref>{{Cite web |url=http://www.holycrime.com/Images/Listof1367Massacre.pdf |title=Massacre 1988 (Pdf) |access-date=2008-07-30 |archive-date=2021-02-25 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210225140452/http://www.holycrime.com/Images/Listof1367Massacre.pdf |url-status=live }}</ref> to 30,000.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.iranfocus.com/modules/news/article.php?storyid=160|title=Iran Focus|date=5 September 2004 |access-date=2008-07-30|archive-date=2008-02-20|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080220155725/http://www.iranfocus.com/modules/news/article.php?storyid=160|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2001/02/04/wiran04.xml|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060210125211/http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=%2Fnews%2F2001%2F02%2F04%2Fwiran04.xml|archive-date=2006-02-10|title=News|newspaper=The Telegraph|date=2016-03-15|access-date=2021-08-04}}</ref>


===Rule Under Khamenei (1989–present)=== === Khamenei (1989–present) ===
On his deathbed in 1989, ] appointed a 25-man Constitutional Reform Council which named then president ] as the next Supreme Leader, and made a number of changes to Iran's constitution.<ref>Abrahamian, ''History of Modern Iran'', (2008), p.182</ref> A smooth transition followed Khomeini's death on 3 June 1989. While Khamenei lacked Khomeini's "charisma and clerical standing", he developed a network of supporters within Iran's armed forces and its economically powerful ].<ref name="ReferenceA">"Who's in Charge?" by Ervand Abrahamian ''London Review of Books'', 6 November 2008</ref> Under his reign Iran's regime is said – by at least one observer – to resemble more "a clerical oligarchy ... than an autocracy."<ref name="ReferenceA"/>


====The First Eight Years (1989-1997) ==== ==== Rafsanjani: pragmatic conservativism (1989–1997) ====
Ali-] succeeded Khamenei as president on 3 August 1989, as a pragmatic conservative who served two four-year terms and focused his efforts on rebuilding the country's economy and infrastructure damaged by war, though hampered by low oil prices. Rafsanjani sought to restore confidence in the government among the general population by privatizing the companies that had been nationalized in the first few years of the Islamic Republic, as well as by bringing in qualified technocrats to manage the economy. The state of their economy also influenced the government to move towards ending their diplomatic isolation. This was achieved through the reestablishment of normalized relations with neighbors such as ] and an attempt to improve its reputation in the region with assertions that its revolution was not exportable to other states.<ref>''Treacherous Alliance : the secret dealings of Israel, Iran and the United States'' by Trita Pasri, Yale University Press, 2007, p.145</ref> During the ] in 1991 the country remained ], restricting its action to the condemnation of the U.S. and allowing fleeing Iraqi aircraft and refugees into the country.{{fact|date=September 2024}}
On his deathbed in 1989, ] appointed a 25-man Constitutional Reform Council which named then president ] as the next Supreme Leader, and made a number of changes to Iran's constitution.<ref>Abrahamian, ''History of Modern Iran'', (2008), p.182</ref> A smooth transition followed Khomeini's death on June 3, 1989. While Khamenei lacked Khomeini's "charisma and clerical standing", he developed a network of supporters within Iran's armed forces and its economically powerful ].<ref name="ReferenceA">"Who's in Charge?" by Ervand Abrahamian ''London Review of Books'', 6 November 2008</ref> Under his reign Iran's regime is said – by at least one observer – to resemble more "a clerical oligarchy ... than an autocracy."<ref name="ReferenceA"/>


Iran in the 1990s had a greater secular behavior and admiration for Western popular culture than in the previous decades. This admiration had become a way in which the urban population expressed their resentment at the invasive Islamic policies of the government.<ref name="Westview Press">{{cite book|last1=Cleveland|first1=William L.|title=A History of the Modern Middle East|date=2016|publisher=Westview Press|location=Boulder, CO|isbn=978-0-8133-4980-0}}</ref> The pressures from the population placed on the new Supreme Leader Ayatollah ] led to an uneasy alliance between him and President ]. Through this alliance they attempted to hinder the ]'s ability to gain further control of the state. In 1989, they created a sequence of constitutional amendments that removed the office of prime minister and increased the scope of presidential power. However, these new amendments did not curtail the powers of the ] in any way; this position still contained the ultimate authority over the armed forces, the making of war and peace, the final say in foreign policy, and the right to intervene in the legislative process whenever he deemed it necessary.<ref name="Westview Press"/>
Succeeding Khamenei as president was pragmatic conservative Ali-], who served two four-year terms and focused his efforts on rebuilding Iran's economy and war-damaged infrastructure though low oil prices hampered this endeavour. His regime also successfully promoted birth control, cut military spending and normalized relations with neighbors such as Saudi Arabia.<ref>''Treacherous Alliance : the secret dealings of Israel, Iran and the United States'' by Trita Pasri, Yale University Press, 2007, p.145</ref> During the ] in 1991 the country remained ], restricting its action to the condemnation of the U.S. and allowing fleeing Iraqi aircraft and refugees into the country.


====Reforms and Consequences (1997-2005)==== ==== Khatami: reformers and conservatives struggle (1997–2005) ====
], ] President of Iran from 1997 to 2005]]


President Rafsanjani's economic policies led to stronger relations with the outside world. But his government's relaxation of the enforcement of certain regulations on social behavior were met with some responses of widespread disenchantment among the general population with the ulama as rulers of the country.<ref name="Westview Press"/> This led to the defeat of the government's candidate for president in 1997, who had the backing of the supreme Islamic jurist. He was beaten by an independent candidate from the ], ]. He received 69% of the vote and enjoyed particular support from two groups of the population that had felt ostracized by the practices of the state: women and youth. The younger generations in the country had been too young to experience the shah's regime or the revolution that ended it, and now they resented the restrictions placed on their daily lives under the Islamic Republic. Mohammad Khatami's presidency was soon marked by tensions between the ] and an increasingly conservative and vocal clergy. This rift reached a climax in July 1999 when massive anti-government protests erupted in the streets of ]. The disturbances lasted over a week before police and pro-government vigilantes dispersed the crowds.
], ] President of Iran from 1997 to 2005.]]
Rafsanjani was succeeded in 1997 by the ] ]. His presidency was soon marked by tensions between the ] and an increasingly conservative and vocal clergy. This rift reached a climax in July 1999 when massive anti-government protests erupted in the streets of ]. The disturbances lasted over a week before police and pro-government vigilantes dispersed the crowds.


Khatami was re-elected in June 2001 but his efforts were repeatedly blocked by the conservatives in the parliament. Conservative elements within Iran's government moved to undermine the reformist movement, banning liberal newspapers and disqualifying candidates for parliamentary elections. This clampdown on dissent, combined with the failure of Khatami to reform the government, led to growing political apathy among Iran's youth. Khatami was re-elected in June 2001 but his efforts were repeatedly blocked by the conservatives in the parliament. Conservative elements within Iran's government moved to undermine the reformist movement, banning liberal newspapers and disqualifying candidates for parliamentary elections. This clampdown on dissent, combined with the failure of Khatami to reform the government, led to growing political apathy among Iran's youth.


In June 2003, anti-government protests by several thousand students took place in Tehran.<ref></ref><ref></ref> Several ]s protests also occurred in 2006. In June 2003, anti-government protests by several thousand students took place in Tehran.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/2980102.stm|title=Iranians protest against clerics|date=11 June 2003|via=bbc.co.uk|access-date=17 April 2006|archive-date=13 February 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210213220325/http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/2980102.stm|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|title=Uprising in Iran
|url=https://iranvajahan.net/|access-date=2023-03-16
| archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20060503222730/http://iranvajahan.net/german/uprising.html
| date = 1 July 2007
| url-status =usurped
|archive-date= 3 May 2006}}</ref> Several ]s protests also occurred in 2006.


==== Ahmadinejad: hardline conservatism (2005–2013) ====
==== 2005 Presidential Election and Consequences (2005-2009) ====
] 6th President of Iran from 2005 to 2013]]

In ], ], mayor of Tehran, became the sixth president of Iran, after winning 62 percent of the vote in the ], against former president Ali-].<ref> In the ], ], mayor of Tehran, became the sixth president of Iran, after winning 62 percent of the vote in the ], against former president Ali-].<ref>{{cite news
{{cite news
| url = http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/4740441.stm | url = http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/4740441.stm
| title = Iran hardliner becomes president | title = Iran hardliner becomes president
| accessdate = 2006-12-06 | access-date = 2006-12-06
| date = August 3, 2005 | date = 3 August 2005
| publisher = ] | publisher = ]
| archive-date = 2019-05-14
}}
| archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20190514040842/http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/4740441.stm
</ref> During the authorization ceremony he kissed Khamenei's hand in demonstration of his loyalty to him.<ref>
| url-status = live
}}</ref> During the authorization ceremony he kissed Khamenei's hand in demonstration of his loyalty to him.<ref>
{{cite web {{cite web
| url = http://www.iranvajahan.net/cgi-bin/news.pl?l=en&y=2006&m=09&d=09&a=1 |url=http://www.iranvajahan.net/cgi-bin/news.pl?l=en&y=2006&m=09&d=09&a=1
| title = Behind Ahmadinejad, a Powerful Cleric |title=Behind Ahmadinejad, a Powerful Cleric
| accessdate = 2006-12-06 |access-date=2006-12-06
| date = September 9, 2006 |date=9 September 2006
| publisher = ] |work=]
|url-status=usurped
|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20061102205142/http://www.iranvajahan.net/cgi-bin/news.pl?l=en&y=2006&m=09&d=09&a=1
|archive-date=2 November 2006
}} }}
</ref><ref>http://tofoiran.packdeal.com/clips/DrIman/20060906-DrIman-CNN-225.asx</ref> </ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://tofoiran.packdeal.com/clips/DrIman/20060906-DrIman-CNN-225.asx |title=Archived copy |access-date=2011-06-18 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110715032350/http://tofoiran.packdeal.com/clips/DrIman/20060906-DrIman-CNN-225.asx |archive-date=2011-07-15 }}</ref>


During this time, the American invasion of ], overthrow of ]'s regime and empowerment of its ] majority, all strengthened Iran's position in the region particularly in the mainly Shia south of Iraq, where a top Shia leader in the week of September 3, 2006 renewed demands for an autonomous Shia region.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://english.aljazeera.net/NR/exeres/D890900D-A483-4C19-86C8-41F35135090D.htm|title=Iraq prime minister to visit Iran|publisher=]|date=September 9, 2006}}</ref> At least one commentator (Former U.S. Defense Secretary ]) has stated that as of 2009 Iran's growing power has eclipsed ] as the major foreign policy issue in the ].<ref></ref> During this time, the American invasion of Iraq, the overthrow of ]'s regime and empowerment of its ] majority, all strengthened Iran's position in the region particularly in the mainly Shi'a south of Iraq, where a top Shia leader in the week of 3 September 2006 renewed demands for an autonomous Shi'a region.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://english.aljazeera.net/NR/exeres/D890900D-A483-4C19-86C8-41F35135090D.htm |archive-url=http://wayback.vefsafn.is/wayback/20100418234826/http://english.aljazeera.net/NR/exeres/D890900D-A483-4C19-86C8-41F35135090D.htm |archive-date=18 April 2010 |title=Iraq prime minister to visit Iran |work=] |date=9 September 2006 }}</ref> At least one commentator (former U.S. Defense Secretary ]) has stated that as of 2009 Iran's growing power has eclipsed ] as the major foreign policy issue in the Middle East.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2009/jul/29/cohen-says-fear-of-iran-now-tops-wrath-against-isr/|title=Cohen: Middle East fearful of Iran|work=The Washington Times|access-date=2009-07-30|archive-date=2021-01-25|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210125213616/https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2009/jul/29/cohen-says-fear-of-iran-now-tops-wrath-against-isr/|url-status=live}}</ref>


During 2005 and 2006, there were claims that ] and ] were planning to attack Iran, with the most cited reason being ] which the United States and some other states fear could lead to ]. During 2005 and 2006, there were claims that ] and ] were planning to attack Iran, with the most cited reason being ] which the United States and some other states fear could lead to ]. China and Russia opposed military action of any sort and opposed ]. Khamenei issued a ] forbidding the production, stockpiling and use of ]s. The fatwa was cited in an official statement by the Iranian government at an August 2005 meeting of the ] (IAEA) in ].<ref>{{cite web|url=https://countervortex.org/blog/iran-issues-anti-nuke-fatwa/|title=Iran issues anti-nuke fatwa|date=12 August 2005|last=Weinberg|first=Bill|publisher=Counter Vortex|access-date=30 September 2020|archive-date=26 January 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210126045509/https://countervortex.org/blog/iran-issues-anti-nuke-fatwa/|url-status=live}}</ref><ref> {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130810154009/http://www.mathaba.net/news/?x=302258 |date=2013-08-10 }}</ref>
] and Russia oppose military action of any sort and oppose ]. Ayatollah ] issued a ] forbidding the production, stockpiling and use of ]. The fatwa was cited in an official statement by the Iranian government at an August 2005 meeting of the ] (IAEA) in ].<ref></ref><ref></ref>


In 2009 ] was hotly disputed and marred by large ] that formed the "greatest domestic challenge" to the leadership of the Islamic Republic "in 30 years".<ref name="mostaghim"></ref> Reformist opponent ] and his supporters alleged voting irregularities and by 1 July 2009, 1000 people had been arrested and 20 killed in street demonstrations.<ref></ref> Supreme Leader ] and other Islamic officials blamed foreign powers for fomenting the protest.<ref></ref> In 2009, ] was hotly disputed and marred by large ] that formed the "greatest domestic challenge" to the leadership of the Islamic Republic "in 30 years". The resulting social unrest is widely known as the ].<ref name="mostaghim">{{cite web|url=http://www.latimes.com/?view=page8&feed:a=latimes_1min&feed:c=topstories&feed:i=47678542|title=California, national and world news|work=Los Angeles Times|access-date=2016-08-10|archive-date=2019-05-02|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190502000537/https://www.latimes.com/?view=page8&feed:a=latimes_1min&feed:c=topstories&feed:i=47678542|url-status=live}}</ref> Reformist opponent ] and his supporters alleged voting irregularities and by 1 July 2009, 1000 people had been arrested and 20 killed in street demonstrations.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.theguardian.com/world/2009/jul/01/mousavi-iran-government-declared-illegitimate|title=Mousavi says new Ahmadinejad government 'illegitimate'|first=Ian |last=Black |date=1 July 2009|work=The Guardian|access-date=17 December 2016|archive-date=3 February 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210203110725/https://www.theguardian.com/world/2009/jul/01/mousavi-iran-government-declared-illegitimate|url-status=live}}</ref> Supreme Leader ] and other Islamic officials blamed foreign powers for fomenting the protest.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.cnn.com/2009/WORLD/meast/06/16/iran.elections.timeline/|title=Timeline: 2009 Iran presidential elections - CNN.com|website=]|access-date=2009-07-25|archive-date=2016-04-28|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160428202952/http://www.cnn.com/2009/WORLD/meast/06/16/iran.elections.timeline/|url-status=live}}</ref>


==== Rouhani: pragmatism (2013–2021) ====
{{History Timeline of Iran}}
]
]


On 15 June 2013, ] won the presidential election in Iran, with a total number of 36,704,156 ballots cast; Rouhani won 18,613,329 votes. In his press conference one day after election day, Rouhani reiterated his promise to recalibrate Iran's relations with the world.<ref>{{cite news |title=Rouhani wins big |url=https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2013/6/15/rouhani-wins-irans-presidential-election-2 |work=Al Jazeera |language=en}}</ref>
==== 2013 Presidential Election and Improving US Iran Relations (2013-present) ====


On 2 April 2015, following eight days of tortuous discussions in Switzerland, which lasted through the night, Iran and six world powers (United States, United Kingdom, France, China and Russia plus Germany) on the outlines of an understanding to limit Iran's nuclear programs, negotiators indicated, as both sides prepared for announcements. Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammad ] tweeted: "Found solutions. Ready to start drafting immediately." European Union foreign policy chief ] tweeted that she would meet the press with Zarif after a final meeting of the seven nations in the nuclear talks. She wrote: "Good news."
On 15 June 2013, ] won the presidential election in Iran, with a total number of 36,704,156 ballots cast; Rouhani won 18,613,329 votes. In his press conference one day after election day, Rouhani reiterated his promise to recalibrate Iran’s relations with the world.


Reading out a joint statement, European Union foreign policy chief Federica Mogherini hailed what she called a "decisive step" after more than a decade of work. Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif followed with the same statement in ]. ] and the top diplomats of Britain, France and Germany also briefly took the stage behind them. The deal is intended to be a provisional framework for a comprehensive agreement and was signed in 2015, and marked a significant breakthrough in the 12-year history of negotiations with Iran over its nuclear programme.<ref>{{cite news |title=What is the Iran nuclear deal? |url=https://www.nbcnews.com/storyline/smart-facts/what-iran-nuclear-deal-n868346 |work=NBC News |date=10 May 2018 |language=en}}</ref>
On April 2, 2015, following eight days of tortuous discussions in Switzerland, which lasted through the night to Thursday, Iran and six world powers on the outlines of an understanding to limit Iran's nuclear programs, negotiators indicated, as both sides prepared for announcements. Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammad ] tweeted: "Found solutions. Ready to start drafting immediately." European Union foreign policy chief ] tweeted that she would meet the press with Zarif after a final meeting of the seven nations in the nuclear talks. She wrote: "Good news."


When ] was campaigning to become ], he repeatedly said he would abandon the ]. After he was elected president, the USA announced its withdrawal from the agreement on 8 May 2018.<ref>{{cite news |title=Trump declares US withdrawal from Iran nuclear deal |url=https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2018/5/8/donald-trump-declares-us-withdrawal-from-iran-nuclear-deal |work=Al Jazeera |language=en}}</ref>
Reading out a joint statement, European Union foreign policy chief Federica Mogherini hailed what she called a "decisive step" after more than a decade of work. Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif followed with the same statement in Farsi. ] and the top diplomats of Britain, France and Germany also briefly took the stage behind them. The deal is intended to be a provisional framework for a comprehensive agreement that is not due to be signed until the end of June, but if it includes concrete facts and figures, it will mark a significant breakthrough in the 12-year history of negotiations with Iran over its nuclear programme.


The Iranian-backed group known as Kataib Hezbollah attacked the United States embassy in Baghdad on 31 December 2019.<ref>{{cite news |title=Protesters storm US embassy compound in Baghdad |url=https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2019/12/31/protesters-storm-us-embassy-compound-in-baghdad |work=Al Jazeera |language=en}}</ref>
==See also==


On 3 January 2020, the United States military executed a drone strike at ], killing ], the leader of the ], an elite branch of the ].<ref>{{cite news |title=Iran vows 'harsh' response after US kills commander |url=https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2020/1/3/iran-condemns-us-killing-of-quds-force-head-qassem-soleimani |work=Al Jazeera |language=en}}</ref>
* ]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]


On 3 August 2021 ] was elected 8th President of Iran.<ref>{{cite news |last1=Motamedi |first1=Maziar |title=At inauguration, Raisi promises Iran's 'engagement with world' |url=https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2021/8/5/irans-raisi-sends-message-of-strength-in-inauguration |work=Al Jazeera |language=en}}</ref>
;General

*]
==== Ebrahim Raisi (2021–2024) ====

Beginning on 16 September 2022 ] started against the ] following the death of ].<ref>{{Cite news |work=Reuters |date=20 September 2022 |title=Protests flare across Iran in violent unrest over woman's death |language=en |url=https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/tehran-governor-accuses-protesters-attacks-least-22-arrested-2022-09-20/ |access-date=23 September 2022 |archive-date=27 September 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220927195508/https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/tehran-governor-accuses-protesters-attacks-least-22-arrested-2022-09-20/ |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite news |last1=Strzyżyńska |first1=Weronika |title=Iranian woman dies 'after being beaten by morality police' over hijab law |url=https://www.theguardian.com/global-development/2022/sep/16/iranian-woman-dies-after-being-beaten-by-morality-police-over-hijab-law |access-date=22 September 2022 |work=The Guardian |date=16 September 2022 |language=en |archive-date=20 September 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220920020636/https://www.theguardian.com/global-development/2022/sep/16/iranian-woman-dies-after-being-beaten-by-morality-police-over-hijab-law |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite web |last1=Leonhardt |first1=David |title=Iran's Ferocious Dissent |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2022/09/26/briefing/iran-protests-mahsa-amini.html |website=The New York Times |access-date=27 September 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220927061245/https://www.nytimes.com/2022/09/26/briefing/iran-protests-mahsa-amini.html |archive-date=27 September 2022 |date=26 September 2022 |url-status=live}}</ref>

On 1 April 2024, Israel's air ] on an Iranian consulate building in the Syrian capital Damascus killed an important senior commander of the ] (IRGC), Brig Gen ].<ref>{{cite news |title=Several killed in Israeli strike on Iranian consulate in Damascus |url=https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2024/4/1/several-killed-in-israeli-strike-on-iranian-consulate-in-damascus-reports |work=Al Jazeera |language=en}}</ref> In retaliation for the Israeli strike, Iran ] Israel with over 300 drones and missiles on 13 April. However, the Iranian attack was mainly intercepted either outside Israeli airspace or over the country itself. It was the biggest missile attack in Iranian history, and its first ever direct attack on Israel.<ref>{{cite news |title=Why have Israel and Iran attacked each other? |url=https://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-68811276 |date=14 April 2024}}</ref> It was followed by a retaliatory ] by Israel on Isfahan, Iran on 19 April.<ref>{{cite news |title=Israel Iran attack: Damage seen at air base in Isfahan |url=https://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-68866548 |date=21 April 2024}}</ref>

On 19 May 2024, Ebrahim Raisi died in a ] in the country’s East Azerbaijan province.<ref>{{cite web |title=Ebrahim Raisi, Iran's president, dies in helicopter crash aged 63 |url=https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2024/5/20/ebrahim-raisi-irans-president-dies-in-helicopter-crash-aged-63 |website=Al Jazeera |language=en}}</ref> First Vice President ] was appointed acting president after the death of President Raisi.<ref>{{cite news |title=Iran's new acting president Mohammad Mokhber, a veteran of the regime |url=https://www.france24.com/en/asia-pacific/20240520-iran-s-new-acting-president-mohammad-mokhber-a-veteran-of-the-regime |work=France 24 |date=20 May 2024 |language=en}}</ref>

==== Masoud Pezeshkian (2024–present) ====

On 28 July 2024, ] was formally endorsed as Iran's new president by Iran's supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. Pezeshkian, a reformist, won in a ] runoff on 5 July.<ref>{{cite news |title=Iran's supreme leader endorses reformist Pezeshkian as new president. He takes oath Tuesday |url=https://apnews.com/article/iran-supreme-leader-endorsement-new-president-khamenei-pezeshkian-a9ecb0eb8e20ed8b92602e5d507fe616 |work=AP News |date=28 July 2024 |language=en}}</ref>

On 31 July 2024, ], political chief of Palestinian political and military organisation ], was ] in Iran’s capital, Tehran, where he was to attend the inauguration ceremony of Iran’s President Masoud Pezeshkian.<ref>{{cite news |title=Hamas political chief Ismail Haniyeh assassinated in Iran |url=https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2024/7/31/hamass-political-chief-ismail-haniyeh-assassinated-in-iran-state-media |work=Al Jazeera |language=en}}</ref>

On 1 October 2024, Iran launched about 180 ballistic missiles at Israel in retaliation for assassinations of Haniyeh, ] and ]. On 27 October, Israel responded to that attack by strikes on a missile defence system in the Iranian region of Isfahan.<ref>{{cite news |title=What we know about Israel’s attack on Iran |url=https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cgr0yvrx4qpo |work=www.bbc.com}}</ref>

==See also==
{{portal|Iran}}
*] *]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]

==Notes==
{{notelist}}


==References== ==References==
Line 524: Line 798:


==Sources== ==Sources==
* {{cite conference |last1=Bournoutian|first1=George A.|author-link=George Bournoutian|title=The Population of Persian Armenia Prior to and Immediately Following its Annexation to the Russian Empire: 1826–1832|date=1980|publisher=The Wilson Center, Kennan Institute for Advanced Russian Studies |series=Kennan Institute Occasional Paper Series |article-number=91 |url=https://www.wilsoncenter.org/publication/the-population-persian-armenia-prior-to-and-immediately-following-its-annexation-to-the |conference=Nationalism and social change in Transcaucasia }}
* {{cite book | last1 = Fisher | first1 = William Bayne | last2 = Avery | first2= P. | last3 = Hambly | first3 = G. R. G | last4 = Melville | first4 = C. | title = The Cambridge History of Iran | volume = 7 | url = https://books.google.nl/books?id=H20Xt157iYUC&dq=agha+muhammad+khan+invade+georgia&hl=nl&source=gbs_navlinks_s | publisher = ] | location = Cambridge | year = 1991 | isbn = 0521200954 | ref = harv}}
* {{cite book|last1=Bournoutian|first1=George A.|title=A Concise History of the Armenian People: (from Ancient Times to the Present)|date=2002|publisher=Mazda Publishers|isbn=978-1-56859-141-4|edition=2|url-access=registration|url=https://archive.org/details/concisehistoryof00geor}}
* {{cite book | last = Mikaberidze | first = Alexander | title = Conflict and Conquest in the Islamic World: A Historical Encyclopedia | volume = 1 | publisher = ABC-CLIO | year = 2011 | isbn = 1598843362 | ref = harv}}
* {{cite book | last1 = Fisher | first1 = William Bayne | last2 = Avery | first2= P. | last3 = Hambly | first3 = G. R. G | last4 = Melville | first4 = C. | title = The Cambridge History of Iran | volume = 7 | url = https://books.google.com/books?id=H20Xt157iYUC&q=agha+muhammad+khan+invade+georgia | publisher = ] | location = Cambridge | year = 1991 | isbn = 0-521-20095-4 }}
*{{cite book|last1=Roisman|first1=Joseph|last2=Worthington|first2=Ian|title=A Companion to Ancient Macedonia|publisher=John Wiley and Sons|year=2011|isbn=978-1-44-435163-7|url=https://books.google.nl/books?id=QsJ183uUDkMC&pg=PA345&lpg=PA345&dq=Achaemenid+Persians+ruled+balkans&source=bl&ots=K7qasgPG1K&sig=lkiajbVuNcHEbI5Lz3MnvIUBG1U&hl=nl&sa=X&ei=sb6RVP2qHoPUaqeGgZgE&ved=0CEkQ6AEwBQ#v=onepage&q=Achaemenid%20Persians%20ruled%20balkans&f=false|ref=harv}}
* {{cite encyclopedia | article = EREVAN | last1 = Kettenhofen | first1 = Erich | last2 = Bournoutian | first2 = George A. | last3 = Hewsen | first3 = Robert H. | author-link3 = Robert H. Hewsen | encyclopedia = Encyclopaedia Iranica, Vol. VIII, Fasc. 5 | pages = 542–551 | year = 1998 }}
* {{cite book |title=The Mongol Conquests in World History |first=Timothy |last=May |publisher=Reaktion Books |year=2012 }}
* {{cite book | last = Mikaberidze | first = Alexander | title = Conflict and Conquest in the Islamic World: A Historical Encyclopedia | volume = 1 | publisher = ABC-CLIO | year = 2011 | isbn = 978-1-59884-336-1 }}
* {{cite book|last1=Mikaberidze|first1=Alexander|author-link1=Alexander Mikaberidze|title=Historical Dictionary of Georgia|date=2015|publisher=Rowman & Littlefield|isbn=978-1-4422-4146-6|edition=2|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=JNNQCgAAQBAJ&q=sakhltukhutsesi}}
*{{cite book|last1=Roisman|first1=Joseph|last2=Worthington|first2=Ian|title=A Companion to Ancient Macedonia|publisher=John Wiley and Sons|year=2011|isbn=978-1-44-435163-7|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=QsJ183uUDkMC&pg=PA345}}


==Further reading== ==Further reading==
*{{cite book |last=Abrahamian |first=Ervand |title=A History of Modern Iran |authorlink=Ervand Abrahamian |coauthors= |year=2008 |publisher=Cambridge University Press |location= |isbn=0-521-82139-8 |pages= }} *{{cite book |last=Abrahamian |first=Ervand |title=A History of Modern Iran |author-link=Ervand Abrahamian |year=2008 |publisher=Cambridge University Press |isbn=978-0-521-82139-1 }}
* Brew, Gregory. ''Petroleum and Progress in Iran: Oil, Development, and the Cold War'' (Cambridge University Press, 2022)
*{{cite book |last=Cambridge University Press |first= |title=Cambridge History of Iran |authorlink= |coauthors= |year=1968–1991 |publisher=Cambridge University Press |location=Cambridge |isbn=0-521-45148-5 |pages= |series=(8 vols.)}}
*{{cite book |last=Daniel |first=Elton L. |title=The History of Iran |authorlink=Elton L. Daniel |coauthors= |year=2000 |publisher=Greenwood |location=Westport, Connecticut |isbn=0-313-36100-2 |pages= }} *{{cite book |last=Cambridge University Press |title=Cambridge History of Iran |year=1968–1991 |publisher=Cambridge University Press |location=Cambridge |isbn=0-521-45148-5 |series=(8 vols.)}}
*{{cite book |last=Daniel |first=Elton L. |title=The History of Iran |author-link=Elton L. Daniel |year=2000 |publisher=Greenwood |location=Westport, Connecticut |isbn=0-313-36100-2 |url-access=registration |url=https://archive.org/details/historyofiran0000dani }}
*{{cite book |first=Richard |last=Foltz |authorlink=Richard Foltz |title=Iran in World History |publisher=Oxford University Press |location=New York |year=2015 |isbn=9780199335497}}
*{{cite book |first=Richard |last=Foltz |author-link=Richard Foltz |title=Iran in World History |publisher=Oxford University Press |location=New York |year=2015 |isbn=978-0-19-933549-7}}
*Rudi Matthee, Willem Floor. I.B.Tauris, 25 apr. 2013
*Rudi Matthee, Willem Floor. I.B.Tauris, 25 April 2013
*{{cite journal |last=Del Guidice |first=Marguerite |title=Persia – Ancient soul of Iran *{{cite journal |last=Del Guidice |first=Marguerite |title=Persia – Ancient soul of Iran
|date= August 2008| journal = ] |date= August 2008| journal= ]
}} }}
*Joseph Roisman, Ian Worthington. pp 342–346, pp 135–138. (] rule in the ] and Eastern Europe). John Wiley & Sons, 7 jul. 2011. ISBN 144435163X. *Joseph Roisman, Ian Worthington. pp 342–346, pp 135–138. (] rule in the ] and Eastern Europe). John Wiley & Sons, 7 July 2011. {{ISBN|144435163X}}.
*{{cite book |last=Olmstead |first=Albert T. E. |title=The History of the Persian Empire: Achaemenid Period |authorlink= |coauthors= |year=1948 |publisher=University of Chicago Press |location=Chicago |isbn= |pages= }} *{{cite book |last=Olmstead |first=Albert T. E. |title=The History of the Persian Empire: Achaemenid Period |url=https://archive.org/details/in.ernet.dli.2015.532747 |year=1948 |publisher=University of Chicago Press |location=Chicago }}
*Van Gorde, A. Christian. ''Christianity in Persia and the Status of Non-Muslims in Iran'' (Lexington Books; 2010) 329 pages. Traces the role of Persians in Persia and later Iran since ancient times, with additional discussion of other non-Muslim groups. *Van Gorde, A. Christian. ''Christianity in Persia and the Status of Non-Muslims in Iran'' (Lexington Books; 2010) 329 pages. Traces the role of Persians in Persia and later Iran since ancient times, with additional discussion of other non-Muslim groups.
*Sabri Ateş. "Ottoman-Iranian Borderlands: Making a Boundary, 1843–1914" Cambridge University Press, 21 okt. 2013. ISBN 1107245087. *Sabri Ateş. "Ottoman-Iranian Borderlands: Making a Boundary, 1843–1914" Cambridge University Press, 21 okt. 2013. {{ISBN|1107245087}}.
*Askolʹd Igorevich Ivanchik, Vaxtang Ličʻeli. "Achaemenid Culture and Local Traditions in Anatolia, Southern Caucasus and Iran". BRILL, 2007. *], Vaxtang Ličʻeli. "Achaemenid Culture and Local Traditions in Anatolia, Southern Caucasus and Iran". BRILL, 2007.
*], ''Persian Pageant: A Cultural History of Iran,'' Arya Press, Calcutta, 1950. *], ''Persian Pageant: A Cultural History of Iran,'' Arya Press, Calcutta, 1950.
* {{cite book | last=Nasr | first=Hossein | title=Sufi Essays | publisher=Suny press | year=1972 | isbn=978-0-87395-389-4}} * {{cite book | last=Nasr | first=Hossein | title=Sufi Essays | publisher=Suny press | year=1972 | isbn=978-0-87395-389-4}}
* Rezvani, Babak., "Ethno-territorial conflict and coexistence in the Caucasus, Central Asia and Fereydan" Amsterdam University Press, 15 mrt. 2014. * Rezvani, Babak., "Ethno-territorial conflict and coexistence in the Caucasus, Central Asia and Fereydan" Amsterdam University Press, 15 mrt. 2014.
* Stephanie Cronin., "Iranian-Russian Encounters: Empires and Revolutions Since 1800" Routledge, 2013. ISBN 0415624339. * Stephanie Cronin., "Iranian-Russian Encounters: Empires and Revolutions Since 1800" Routledge, 2013. {{ISBN|0415624339}}.
* Chopra, R.M., article on "A Brief Review of Pre-Islamic Splendour of Iran", INDO-IRANICA, Vol.56 (1-4), 2003. * Chopra, R.M., article on "A Brief Review of Pre-Islamic Splendour of Iran", INDO-IRANICA, Vol.56 (1–4), 2003.
* ]. "The Turks, Iran and the Caucasus in the Middle Ages" Variorum Reprints, 1978. * ]. "The Turks, Iran and the Caucasus in the Middle Ages" Variorum Reprints, 1978.


==External links== ==External links==
{{wikibooks|Iranian History}}
* Persian History * Persian History
* an article by ] * an article by '']''
* an article by Encyclopædia Britannica online by Janet Afary * {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130813184232/http://p2.www.britannica.com/oscar/print?articleId=106324&fullArticle=true&tocId=9106324 |date=13 August 2013 }} an article by ''Encyclopædia Britannica'' online by Janet Afary
* an article by Encyclopædia Britannica online by Adrian David Hugh Bivar and Mark J. Dresden * an article by Encyclopædia Britannica online by Adrian David Hugh Bivar and Mark J. Dresden
* *
* * {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20061110131804/http://www.iranchamber.com/history/historic_periods.php |date=10 November 2006 }}
* *
* from 1715 * from 1715
Line 566: Line 845:
{{DEFAULTSORT:History Of Iran}} {{DEFAULTSORT:History Of Iran}}
] ]
] ]
] ]

Latest revision as of 12:15, 31 December 2024

Part of a series on the
History of Iran

The Gate of All Nations in Fars
Prehistoric periodBCE / BC
Baradostian culture c. 36,000–18,000
Zarzian culture c. 20,000–10,000
Shulaveri–Shomu culture c. 6000–5000
Zayandeh River Culture c. 6th millennium
Dalma culture c. 5th millennium
Ancient period
Kura–Araxes culture 3400–2000
Helmand culture/Jiroft culture c. 3300–2200
Proto-Elamite 3200–2700
Lullubi Kingdom/Zamua c. 3100-675
Elam 2700–539
Marhaši c. 2550-2020
Oxus Civilization c. 2400–1700
Akkadian Empire 2400–2150
Kassites c. 1500–1155
Avestan period c. 1500–500
Neo-Assyrian Empire 911–609
Urartu 860–590
Mannaea 850–616
Zikirti 750-521
Saparda 720-670
Imperial period
Median Empire 678–550 BC
Scythian Kingdom 652–625 BC
Anshanite Kingdom 635 BC–550 BC
Neo-Babylonian Empire 626 BC–539 BC
Sogdia c. 6th century BC–11th century AD
Achaemenid Empire 550 BC–330 BC
Kingdom of Armenia 331 BC–428 AD
Atropatene c. 323 BC–226 AD
Kingdom of Cappadocia 320s BC–17 AD
Seleucid Empire 312 BC–63 BC
Kingdom of Pontus 281 BC–62 BC
Fratarakas 3rd-century BC–132 BC
Parthian Empire 247 BC–224 AD
Elymais 147 BC–224 AD
Characene 141 BC–222 AD
Kings of Persis 132 BC–224 AD
Indo-Parthian Kingdom 19 AD–224/5
Paratarajas 125–300
Sasanian Empire 224–651
Zarmihrids 6th century–785
Qarinvandids 550s–11th century
Medieval periodCE / AD
Rashidun Caliphate 632-661
Umayyad Caliphate 661–750
Abbasid Caliphate 750–1258
Dabuyids 642–760
Bavandids 651–1349
Masmughans of Damavand 651–760
Baduspanids 665–1598
Justanids 791 – 11th century
Alid dynasties 864 – 14th century
Tahirid dynasty 821–873
Samanid Empire 819–999
Saffarid dynasty 861–1003
Ghurid dynasty pre-879 – 1215
Sajid dynasty 889–929
Sallarid dynasty 919–1062
Ziyarid dynasty 930–1090
Ilyasids 932–968
Buyid dynasty 934–1062
Rawadid dynasty 955–1070
Hasanwayhids 959–1095
Ghaznavid dynasty 977–1186
Annazids 990/1–1117
Kakuyids 1008–1141
Nasrid dynasty 1029–1236
Shabankara 1030–1355
Seljuk Empire 1037–1194
Khwarazmian dynasty 1077–1231
Eldiguzids 1135–1225
Atabegs of Yazd 1141–1319
Salghurids 1148–1282
Hazaraspids 1155–1424
Pishkinid dynasty 1155–1231
Khorshidi dynasty 1184-1597
Qutlugh-Khanids 1223-1306
Mihrabanids 1236–1537
Kurt dynasty 1244–1396
Ilkhanate Empire 1256–1335
Chobanid dynasty 1335–1357
Muzaffarid dynasty 1335–1393
Jalayirid Sultanate 1337–1376
Sarbadars 1337–1376
Injuids 1335–1357
Afrasiyab dynasty 1349–1504
Mar'ashis 1359–1596
Timurid Empire 1370–1507
Kar-Kiya dynasty 1370s–1592
Qara Qoyunlu 1406–1468
Aq Qoyunlu 1468–1508
Early modern period
Safavid Iran 1501–1736
(Hotak dynasty) 1722–1729
Afsharid Iran 1736–1796
Zand dynasty 1751–1794
Modern period
Qajar Iran 1789–1925
Pahlavi Iran 1925–1979
Contemporary period
Iranian Revolution 1979
Interim Government 1979
Islamic Republic 1979–present
Related articles
Timeline
flag Iran portal

The history of Iran (or Persia, as it was known in the Western world) is intertwined with Greater Iran, a sociocultural region spanning from Anatolia to the Indus River and from the Caucasus to the Persian Gulf. Central to this area is modern-day Iran, which covers the bulk of the Iranian plateau.

Iran is home to one of the world's oldest continuous major civilizations, with historical and urban settlements dating back to 4000 BC. The western part of the Iranian plateau participated in the traditional ancient Near East with Elam (in Ilam and Khuzestan), Kassites (in Kuhdesht), Gutians (in Luristan) and later with other peoples such as the Urartians (in Oshnavieh and Sardasht) in the southwest of Lake Urmia and Mannaeans (in Piranshahr, Saqqez and Bukan) in the Kurdish area. Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel called the Persians the "first Historical People". The Iranian empire began in the Iron Age with the rise of the Medes, who unified Iran as a nation and empire in 625 BC. The Achaemenid Empire (550–330 BC), founded by Cyrus the Great, was the largest empire the world had seen, spanning from the Balkans to North Africa and Central Asia. They were succeeded by the Seleucid, Parthian, and Sasanian empires, who governed Iran for almost 1,000 years, making Iran a leading power once again. Persia's arch-rival during this time was the Roman Empire and its successor, the Byzantine Empire.

Iran endured invasions by the Macedonians, Arabs, Turks, and Mongols. Despite these invasions, Iran continually reasserted its national identity and developed as a distinct political and cultural entity. The Muslim conquest of Persia (632–654) ended the Sasanian Empire and marked a turning point in Iranian history, leading to the Islamization of Iran from the eighth to tenth centuries and the decline of Zoroastrianism. However, the achievements of prior Persian civilizations were absorbed into the new Islamic polity. Iran suffered invasions by nomadic tribes during the Late Middle Ages and early modern period, negatively impacting the region. Iran was reunified as an independent state in 1501 by the Safavid dynasty, which established Shia Islam as the empire's official religion, marking a significant turning point in the history of Islam. Iran functioned again as a leading world power, especially in rivalry with the Ottoman Empire. In the 19th century, Iran lost significant territories in the Caucasus to the Russian Empire following the Russo-Persian Wars.

Iran remained a monarchy until the 1979 Iranian Revolution, when it officially became an Islamic republic on 1 April 1979. Since then, Iran has experienced significant political, social, and economic changes. The establishment of the Islamic Republic of Iran led to the restructuring of its political system, with Ayatollah Khomeini as the Supreme Leader. Iran's foreign relations have been shaped by the Iran-Iraq War (1980–1988), ongoing tensions with the United States, and its nuclear program, which has been a point of contention in international diplomacy. Despite economic sanctions and internal challenges, Iran remains a key player in Middle Eastern and global geopolitics.

Prehistory

Further information: List of archaeological sites in Iran and Prehistory of Iran Further information: Tepe Sialk, Jiroft culture, and Shahr-e Sukhteh

Paleolithic

The earliest archaeological artifacts in Iran were found in the Kashafrud and Ganj Par sites that are thought to date back to 10,000 years ago in the Middle Paleolithic. Mousterian stone tools made by Neanderthals have also been found. There are more cultural remains of Neanderthals dating back to the Middle Paleolithic period, which mainly have been found in the Zagros region and fewer in central Iran at sites such as Kobeh, Kunji, Bisitun Cave, Tamtama, Warwasi, and Yafteh Cave. In 1949, a Neanderthal radius was discovered by Carleton S. Coon in Bisitun Cave. Evidence for Upper Paleolithic and Epipaleolithic periods are known mainly from the Zagros Mountains in the caves of Kermanshah and Khorramabad and a few number of sites in Piranshahr, Alborz and Central Iran. During this time, people began creating rock art.

Neolithic to Chalcolithic

Early agricultural communities such as Chogha Golan in 10,000 BC along with settlements such as Chogha Bonut (the earliest village in Elam) in 8000 BC, began to flourish in and around the Zagros Mountains region in western Iran. Around about the same time, the earliest-known clay vessels and modelled human and animal terracotta figurines were produced at Ganj Dareh, also in western Iran. There are also 10,000-year-old human and animal figurines from Tepe Sarab in Kermanshah Province among many other ancient artefacts.

The south-western part of Iran was part of the Fertile Crescent where most of humanity's first major crops were grown, in villages such as Susa (where a settlement was first founded possibly as early as 4395 cal BC) and settlements such as Chogha Mish, dating back to 6800 BC; there are 7,000-year-old jars of wine excavated in the Zagros Mountains (now on display at the University of Pennsylvania) and ruins of 7000-year-old settlements such as Tepe Sialk are further testament to that. The two main Neolithic Iranian settlements were Ganj Dareh and the hypothetical Zayandeh River Culture.

Bronze Age

Further information: Tepe Sialk, Jiroft culture, Elam, Kura–Araxes culture, Akkadian Empire, Kassites, and Mannaea
Cylinder with a ritual scene, early 2nd millennium BC, Geoy Tepe, Iran
Chogha Zanbil is one of the few extant ziggurats outside of Mesopotamia and is considered to be the best preserved example in the world.

Parts of what is modern-day northwestern Iran was part of the Kura–Araxes culture (circa 3400 BC—ca. 2000 BC), that stretched up into the neighbouring regions of the Caucasus and Anatolia.

Susa is one of the oldest-known settlements of Iran and the world. Based on C14 dating, the time of the foundation of the city is as early as 4395 BC, a time right after the establishment of the ancient Sumerian city of Uruk in 4500 BC. The general perception among archaeologists is that Susa was an extension of the Sumerian city-state of Uruk, hence incorporating many aspects of Mesopotamian culture. In its later history, Susa became the capital of Elam, which emerged as a state founded 4000 BC. There are also dozens of prehistoric sites across the Iranian plateau pointing to the existence of ancient cultures and urban settlements in the fourth millennium BC. One of the earliest civilizations on the Iranian plateau was the Jiroft culture in southeastern Iran in the province of Kerman.

It is one of the most artefact-rich archaeological sites in the Middle East. Archaeological excavations in Jiroft led to the discovery of several objects belonging to the 4th millennium BC. There is a large quantity of objects decorated with highly distinctive engravings of animals, mythological figures, and architectural motifs. The objects and their iconography are considered unique. Many are made from chlorite, a grey-green soft stone; others are in copper, bronze, terracotta, and even lapis lazuli. Recent excavations at the sites have produced the world's earliest inscription which pre-dates Mesopotamian inscriptions.

There are records of numerous other ancient civilizations on the Iranian plateau before the emergence of Iranian peoples during the Early Iron Age. The Early Bronze Age saw the rise of urbanization into organized city-states and the invention of writing (the Uruk period) in the Near East. While Bronze Age Elam made use of writing from an early time, the Proto-Elamite script remains undeciphered, and records from Sumer pertaining to Elam are scarce.

Russian historian Igor M. Diakonoff stated that the modern inhabitants of Iran are descendants of mainly non-Indo-European groups, more specifically of pre-Iranic inhabitants of the Iranian Plateau: "It is the autochthones of the Iranian plateau, and not the Proto-Indo-European tribes of Europe, which are, in the main, the ancestors, in the physical sense of the word, of the present-day Iranians."

Early Iron Age

See also: Neo-Assyrian Empire and Urartu
Rhyton in the shape of a ram's head, gold – Saqqez - Kurdistan - western Iran –, late 7th–early 6th century BCE
A gold cup at the National Museum of Iran, from the first half of the 1st millennium BC

Records become more tangible with the rise of the Neo-Assyrian Empire and its records of incursions from the Iranian plateau. As early as the 20th century BC, tribes came to the Iranian plateau from the Pontic–Caspian steppe. The arrival of Iranians on the Iranian plateau forced the Elamites to relinquish one area of their empire after another and to take refuge in Elam, Khuzestan and the nearby area, which only then became coterminous with Elam. Bahman Firuzmandi say that the southern Iranians might be intermixed with the Elamite peoples living in the plateau. By the mid-first millennium BC, Medes, Persians, and Parthians populated the Iranian plateau. Until the rise of the Medes, they all remained under Assyrian domination, like the rest of the Near East. In the first half of the first millennium BC, parts of what is now Iranian Azerbaijan were incorporated into Urartu.

Classical antiquity

Median and Achaemenid Empire (678–330 BC)

Main articles: Medes and Achaemenid Empire See also: Greco-Persian Wars

In 646 BC, Assyrian king Ashurbanipal sacked Susa, which ended Elamite supremacy in the region. For over 150 years Assyrian kings of nearby Northern Mesopotamia had been wanting to conquer Median tribes of Western Iran. Under pressure from Assyria, the small kingdoms of the western Iranian plateau coalesced into increasingly larger and more centralized states.

The Medes at the time of their maximum expansion

In the second half of the seventh century BC, the Medes gained their independence and were united by Deioces. In 612 BC, Cyaxares, Deioces' grandson, and the Babylonian king Nabopolassar invaded Assyria and laid siege to and eventually destroyed Nineveh, the Assyrian capital, which led to the fall of the Neo-Assyrian Empire. Urartu was later on conquered and dissolved as well by the Medes. The Medes are credited with founding Iran as a nation and empire, and established the first Iranian empire, the largest of its day until Cyrus the Great established a unified empire of the Medes and Persians, leading to the Achaemenid Empire (c.550–330 BC).

The Achaemenid Empire at its greatest extent

Cyrus the Great overthrew, in turn, the Median, Lydian, and Neo-Babylonian empires, creating an empire far larger than Assyria. He was better able, through more benign policies, to reconcile his subjects to Persian rule; the longevity of his empire was one result. The Persian king, like the Assyrian, was also "King of Kings", xšāyaθiya xšāyaθiyānām (shāhanshāh in modern Persian) – "great king", Megas Basileus, as known by the Greeks.

Cyrus's son, Cambyses II, conquered the last major power of the region, ancient Egypt, causing the collapse of the Twenty-sixth Dynasty of Egypt. Since he became ill and died before, or while, leaving Egypt, stories developed, as related by Herodotus, that he was struck down for impiety against the ancient Egyptian deities. After the death of Cambyses II, Darius ascended the throne by overthrowing the legitimate Achaemenid monarch Bardiya, and then quelling rebellions throughout his kingdom. As the winner, Darius I, based his claim on membership in a collateral line of the Achaemenid Empire.

Darius' first capital was at Susa, and he started the building program at Persepolis. He rebuilt a canal between the Nile and the Red Sea, a forerunner of the modern Suez Canal. He improved the extensive road system, and it is during his reign that mentions are first made of the Royal Road (shown on map), a great highway stretching all the way from Susa to Sardis with posting stations at regular intervals. Major reforms took place under Darius. Coinage, in the form of the daric (gold coin) and the shekel (silver coin) was standardized (coinage had already been invented over a century before in Lydia c. 660 BC but not standardized), and administrative efficiency increased.

The Old Persian language appears in royal inscriptions, written in a specially adapted version of the cuneiform script. Under Cyrus the Great and Darius I, the Persian Empire eventually became the largest empire in human history up until that point, ruling and administrating over most of the then known world, as well as spanning the continents of Europe, Asia, and Africa. The greatest achievement was the empire itself. The Persian Empire represented the world's first superpower that was based on a model of tolerance and respect for other cultures and religions.

Map showing key sites during the Persian invasions of Greece.

In the late sixth century BC, Darius launched his European campaign, in which he defeated the Paeonians, conquered Thrace, and subdued all coastal Greek cities, as well as defeating the European Scythians around the Danube river. In 512/511 BC, Macedon became a vassal kingdom of Persia.

In 499 BC, Athens lent support to a revolt in Miletus, which resulted in the sacking of Sardis. This led to an Achaemenid campaign against mainland Greece known as the Greco-Persian Wars, which lasted the first half of the 5th century BC, and is known as one of the most important wars in European history. In the First Persian invasion of Greece, the Persian general Mardonius re-subjugated Thrace and made Macedon a full part of Persia. The war eventually turned out in defeat, however. Darius' successor Xerxes I launched the Second Persian invasion of Greece. At a crucial moment in the war, about half of mainland Greece was overrun by the Persians, including all territories to the north of the Isthmus of Corinth, however, this was also turned out in a Greek victory, following the battles of Plataea and Salamis, by which Persia lost its footholds in Europe, and eventually withdrew from it. During the Greco-Persian wars, the Persians gained major territorial advantages. They captured and razed Athens twice, once in 480 BC and again in 479 BC. However, after a string of Greek victories the Persians were forced to withdraw, thus losing control of Macedonia, Thrace and Ionia. Fighting continued for several decades after the successful Greek repelling of the Second Invasion with numerous Greek city-states under the Athens' newly formed Delian League, which eventually ended with the peace of Callias in 449 BC, ending the Greco-Persian Wars. In 404 BC, following the death of Darius II, Egypt rebelled under Amyrtaeus. Later pharaohs successfully resisted Persian attempts to reconquer Egypt until 343 BC, when Egypt was reconquered by Artaxerxes III.

A panoramic view of Persepolis

Greek conquest and Seleucid Empire (312 BC–248 BC)

Main article: Seleucid Empire
The Seleucid Empire in 200 BC, before Antiochus was defeated by the Romans

From 334 BC to 331 BC, Alexander the Great defeated Darius III in the battles of Granicus, Issus and Gaugamela, swiftly conquering the Persian Empire by 331 BC. Alexander's empire broke up shortly after his death, and Alexander's general, Seleucus I Nicator, tried to take control of Iran, Mesopotamia, and later Syria and Anatolia. His empire was the Seleucid Empire. He was killed in 281 BC by Ptolemy Keraunos.

Parthian Empire (248 BC–224 AD)

Main article: Parthian Empire See also: Roman–Parthian Wars
Bagadates I, first native Persian ruler after Greek rule

The Parthian Empire—ruled by the Parthians, a group of northwestern Iranian people—was the realm of the Arsacid dynasty. This latter reunited and governed the Iranian plateau after the Parni conquest of Parthia and defeating the Seleucid Empire in the late third century BC. It intermittently controlled Mesopotamia between c. 150 BC and 224 AD and absorbed Eastern Arabia.

Parthia was the eastern arch-enemy of the Roman Empire and it limited Rome's expansion beyond Cappadocia (central Anatolia). The Parthian armies included two types of cavalry: the heavily armed and armored cataphracts and the lightly armed but highly-mobile mounted archers.

For the Romans, who relied on heavy infantry, the Parthians were too hard to defeat, as both types of cavalry were much faster and more mobile than foot soldiers. The Parthian shot used by the Parthian cavalry was most notably feared by the Roman soldiers, which proved pivotal in the crushing Roman defeat at the Battle of Carrhae. On the other hand, the Parthians found it difficult to occupy conquered areas as they were unskilled in siege warfare. Because of these weaknesses, neither the Romans nor the Parthians were able completely to annex each other's territory.

The Parthian empire subsisted for five centuries, longer than most Eastern Empires. The end of this empire came at last in 224 AD, when the empire's organization had loosened and the last king was defeated by one of the empire's vassal peoples, the Persians under the Sasanians. However, the Arsacid dynasty continued to exist for centuries onwards in Armenia, the Iberia, and the Caucasian Albania, which were all eponymous branches of the dynasty.

Sasanian Empire (224–651 AD)

Main article: Sasanian Empire See also: Roman–Iranian relations, Byzantine–Sasanian wars, and Byzantine–Sasanian War of 602–628
Rock-face relief at Naqsh-e Rustam of Iranian emperor Shapur I (on horseback) capturing Roman emperor Valerian (kneeing) and Philip the Arab (standing).
Hunting scene on a gilded silver bowl showing king Khosrau I.

The first shah of the Sasanian Empire, Ardashir I, started reforming the country economically and militarily. For a period of more than 400 years, Iran was once again one of the leading powers in the world, alongside its neighbouring rival, the Roman and then Byzantine Empires. The empire's territory, at its height, encompassed all of today's Iran, Iraq, Azerbaijan, Armenia, Georgia, Abkhazia, Dagestan, Lebanon, Jordan, Palestine, Israel, parts of Afghanistan, Turkey, Syria, parts of Pakistan, Central Asia, Eastern Arabia, and parts of Egypt.

Most of the Sasanian Empire's lifespan was overshadowed by the frequent Byzantine–Sasanian wars, a continuation of the Roman–Parthian Wars and the all-comprising Roman–Persian Wars; the last was the longest-lasting conflict in human history. Started in the first century BC by their predecessors, the Parthians, and Romans, the last Roman–Persian War was fought in the seventh century. The Persians defeated the Romans at the Battle of Edessa in 260 and took emperor Valerian prisoner for the remainder of his life.

Eastern Arabia was conquered early on. During Khosrow II's rule in 590–628, Egypt, Jordan, Palestine and Lebanon were also annexed to the Empire. The Sassanians called their empire Erânshahr ("Dominion of the Aryans", i.e., of Iranians).

A chapter of Iran's history followed after roughly six hundred years of conflict with the Roman Empire. During this time, the Sassanian and Romano-Byzantine armies clashed for influence in Anatolia, the western Caucasus (mainly Lazica and the Kingdom of Iberia; modern-day Georgia and Abkhazia), Mesopotamia, Armenia and the Levant. Under Justinian I, the war came to an uneasy peace with payment of tribute to the Sassanians.

However, the Sasanians used the deposition of the Byzantine emperor Maurice as a casus belli to attack the Empire. After many gains, the Sassanians were defeated at Issus, Constantinople, and finally Nineveh, resulting in peace. With the conclusion of the over 700 years lasting Roman–Persian Wars through the climactic Byzantine–Sasanian War of 602–628, which included the very siege of the Byzantine capital of Constantinople, the war-exhausted Persians lost the Battle of al-Qādisiyyah (632) in Hilla (present-day Iraq) to the invading Muslim forces.

The Sasanian era, encompassing the length of Late Antiquity, is considered to be one of the most important and influential historical periods in Iran, and had a major impact on the world. In many ways, the Sassanian period witnessed the highest achievement of Persian civilization and constitutes the last great Iranian Empire before the adoption of Islam. Persia influenced Roman civilization considerably during Sassanian times, their cultural influence extending far beyond the empire's territorial borders, reaching as far as Western Europe, Africa, China and India and also playing a prominent role in the formation of both European and Asiatic medieval art.

This influence carried forward to the Muslim world. The dynasty's unique and aristocratic culture transformed the Islamic conquest and destruction of Iran into a Persian Renaissance. Much of what later became known as Islamic culture, architecture, writing, and other contributions to civilization, were taken from the Sassanian Persians into the broader Muslim world.

Battle between Heraclius' army and Persians under Khosrow II. Fresco by Piero della Francesca, c. 1452.

Medieval period

Early Islamic period

Islamic conquest of Persia (633–651)

Main article: Muslim conquest of Persia
Phases of the Islamic conquest   Expansion under Muhammad, 622–632   Expansion during the Rashidun Caliphate, 632–661   Expansion during the Umayyad Caliphate, 661–750

In 633, when the Sasanian king Yazdegerd III was ruling over Iran, the Muslims under Umar invaded the country right after it had been in a bloody civil war. Several Iranian nobles and families such as king Dinar of the House of Karen, and later Kanarangiyans of Khorasan, mutinied against their Sasanian overlords. Although the House of Mihran had claimed the Sasanian throne under the two prominent generals Bahrām Chōbin and Shahrbaraz, it remained loyal to the Sasanians during their struggle against the Arabs, but the Mihrans were eventually betrayed and defeated by their own kinsmen, the House of Ispahbudhan, under their leader Farrukhzad, who had mutinied against Yazdegerd III.

Yazdegerd III fled from one district to another until a local miller killed him for his purse at Merv in 651. By 674, Muslims had conquered Greater Khorasan (which included modern Iranian Khorasan province and modern Afghanistan and parts of Transoxiana).

The Muslim conquest of Persia ended the Sasanian Empire and led to the eventual decline of the Zoroastrian religion in Persia. Over time, the majority of Iranians converted to Islam. Most of the aspects of the previous Persian civilizations were not discarded but were absorbed by the new Islamic polity. As Bernard Lewis has commented:

"These events have been variously seen in Iran: by some as a blessing, the advent of the true faith, the end of the age of ignorance and heathenism; by others as a humiliating national defeat, the conquest and subjugation of the country by foreign invaders. Both perceptions are of course valid, depending on one's angle of vision."

Umayyad era and Muslim incursions into the Caspian coast

Main article: Umayyad Caliphate

After the fall of the Sasanian Empire in 651, the Arabs of the Umayyad Caliphate adopted many Persian customs, especially the administrative and the court mannerisms. Arab provincial governors were undoubtedly either Persianized Arameans or ethnic Persians; certainly Persian remained the language of official business of the caliphate until the adoption of Arabic toward the end of the seventh century, when in 692 minting began at the capital, Damascus. The new Islamic coins evolved from imitations of Sasanian coins (as well as Byzantine), and the Pahlavi script on the coinage was replaced with Arabic alphabet.

During the Umayyad Caliphate, the Arab conquerors imposed Arabic as the primary language of the subject peoples throughout their empire. Al-Hajjaj ibn Yusuf, who was not happy with the prevalence of the Persian language in the divan, ordered the official language of the conquered lands to be replaced by Arabic, sometimes by force. In al-Biruni's From The Remaining Signs of Past Centuries for example it is written:

"When Qutaibah bin Muslim under the command of Al-Hajjaj bin Yousef was sent to Khwarazmia with a military expedition and conquered it for the second time, he swiftly killed whoever wrote the Khwarazmian native language that knew of the Khwarazmian heritage, history, and culture. He then killed all their Zoroastrian priests and burned and wasted their books, until gradually the illiterate only remained, who knew nothing of writing, and hence their history was mostly forgotten."

There are a number of historians who see the rule of the Umayyads as setting up the "dhimmah" to increase taxes from the dhimmis to benefit the Muslim Arab community financially and by discouraging conversion. Governors lodged complaints with the caliph when he enacted laws that made conversion easier, depriving the provinces of revenues.

In the 7th century, when many non-Arabs such as Persians entered Islam, they were recognized as mawali ("clients") and treated as second-class citizens by the ruling Arab elite until the end of the Umayyad Caliphate. During this era, Islam was initially associated with the ethnic identity of the Arab and required formal association with an Arab tribe and the adoption of the client status of mawali. The half-hearted policies of the late Umayyads to tolerate non-Arab Muslims and Shias had failed to quell unrest among these minorities.

However, all of Iran was still not under Arab control, and the region of Daylam was under the control of the Daylamites, while Tabaristan was under Dabuyid and Paduspanid control, and the Mount Damavand region under Masmughans of Damavand. The Arabs had invaded these regions several times but achieved no decisive result because of the inaccessible terrain of the regions. The most prominent ruler of the Dabuyids, known as Farrukhan the Great (r. 712–728), managed to hold his domains during his long struggle against the Arab general Yazid ibn al-Muhallab, who was defeated by a combined Dailamite-Dabuyid army, and was forced to retreat from Tabaristan.

With the death of the Umayyad Caliph Hisham ibn Abd al-Malik in 743, the Islamic world was launched into civil war. Abu Muslim was sent to Khorasan by the Abbasid Caliphate initially as a propagandist and then to revolt on their behalf. He took Merv defeating the Umayyad governor there Nasr ibn Sayyar. He became the de facto Abbasid governor of Khurasan. During the same period, the Dabuyid ruler Khurshid declared independence from the Umayyads but was shortly forced to recognize Abbasid authority. In 750, Abu Muslim became the leader of the Abbasid army and defeated the Umayyads at the Battle of the Zab. Abu Muslim stormed Damascus, the capital of the Umayyad caliphate, later that year.

Abbasid period and autonomous Iranian dynasties

Main articles: Abbasid Caliphate, Iranian Intermezzo, Tahirid dynasty, Saffarid dynasty, Ziyarid dynasty, Samanids, Sajid dynasty, Sallarid dynasty, Ilyasids, Buyid dynasty, and Kakuyids
The Saffarid dynasty in 900 AD.
Map of the Iranian dynasties in the mid 10th-century.

The Abbasid army consisted primarily of Khorasanians and was led by an Iranian general, Abu Muslim Khorasani. It contained both Iranian and Arab elements, and the Abbasids enjoyed both Iranian and Arab support. The Abbasids overthrew the Umayyads in 750. According to Amir Arjomand, the Abbasid Revolution essentially marked the end of the Arab empire and the beginning of a more inclusive, multi-ethnic state in the Middle East.

One of the first changes the Abbasids made after taking power from the Umayyads was to move the empire's capital from Damascus, in the Levant, to Iraq. The latter region was influenced by Persian history and culture, and moving the capital was part of the Persian mawali demand for Arab influence in the empire. The city of Baghdad was constructed on the Tigris River, in 762, to serve as the new Abbasid capital.

The Abbasids established the position of vizier like Barmakids in their administration, which was the equivalent of a "vice-caliph", or second-in-command. Eventually, this change meant that many caliphs under the Abbasids ended up in a much more ceremonial role than ever before, with the vizier in real power. A new Persian bureaucracy began to replace the old Arab aristocracy, and the entire administration reflected these changes, demonstrating that the new dynasty was different in many ways from the Umayyads.

By the 9th century, Abbasid control began to wane as regional leaders sprang up in the far corners of the empire to challenge the central authority of the Abbasid caliphate. The Abbasid caliphs began enlisting mamluks, Turkic-speaking warriors, who had been moving out of Central Asia into Transoxiana as slave warriors as early as the 9th century. Shortly thereafter the real power of the Abbasid caliphs began to wane; eventually, they became religious figureheads while the warrior slaves ruled.

Babak Khorramdin was the leader of the Khurramīyah movement. A devout Zoroastrian, he led the Persian freedom movement against oppressive Arab rule.

The 9th century also saw the revolt by native Zoroastrians, known as the Khurramites, against oppressive Arab rule. The movement was led by a Persian freedom fighter Babak Khorramdin. Babak's Iranianizing rebellion, from its base in Azerbaijan in northwestern Iran, called for a return of the political glories of the Iranian past. The Khorramdin rebellion of Babak spread to the Western and Central parts of Iran and lasted more than twenty years before it was defeated when Babak was betrayed by Afshin, a senior general of the Abbasid Caliphate.

As the power of the Abbasid caliphs diminished, a series of dynasties rose in various parts of Iran, some with considerable influence and power. Among the most important of these overlapping dynasties were the Tahirids in Khorasan (821–873); the Saffarids in Sistan (861–1003, their rule lasted as maliks of Sistan until 1537); and the Samanids (819–1005), originally at Bukhara. The Samanids eventually ruled an area from central Iran to Pakistan.

By the early 10th century, the Abbasids almost lost control to the growing Persian faction known as the Buyid dynasty (934–1062). Since much of the Abbasid administration had been Persian anyway, the Buyids were quietly able to assume real power in Baghdad. The Buyids were defeated in the mid-11th century by the Seljuq Turks, who continued to exert influence over the Abbasids, while publicly pledging allegiance to them. The balance of power in Baghdad remained as such – with the Abbasids in power in name only – until the Mongol invasion of 1258 sacked the city and definitively ended the Abbasid dynasty.

During the Abbasid period an enfranchisement was experienced by the mawali and a shift was made in political conception from that of a primarily Arab empire to one of a Muslim empire and c. 930 a requirement was enacted that required all bureaucrats of the empire be Muslim.

Islamic golden age, Shu'ubiyya movement and Persianization process

See also: Islamization of Iran, Islamic Golden Age, and Shu'ubiyya
Extract from a medieval manuscript by Qotbeddin Shirazi (1236–1311), a Persian astronomer, depicting an epicyclic planetary model

Islamization was a long process by which Islam was gradually adopted by the majority population of Iran. Richard Bulliet's "conversion curve" indicates that only about 10% of Iran converted to Islam during the relatively Arab-centric Umayyad period. Beginning in the Abbasid period, with its mix of Persian as well as Arab rulers, the Muslim percentage of the population rose. As Persian Muslims consolidated their rule of the country, the Muslim population rose from approximately 40% in the mid-9th century to close to 90% by the end of the 11th century. Seyyed Hossein Nasr suggests that the rapid increase in conversion was aided by the Persian nationality of the rulers.

Although Persians adopted the religion of their conquerors, over the centuries they worked to protect and revive their distinctive language and culture, a process known as Persianization. Arabs and Turks participated in this attempt.

In the 9th and 10th centuries, non-Arab subjects of the Ummah created a movement called Shu'ubiyyah in response to the privileged status of Arabs. Most of those behind the movement were Persian, but references to Egyptians, Berbers and Aramaeans are attested. Citing as its basis Islamic notions of equality of races and nations, the movement was primarily concerned with preserving Persian culture and protecting Persian identity, though within a Muslim context.

The Samanid dynasty led the revival of Persian culture and the first important Persian poet after the arrival of Islam, Rudaki, was born during this era and was praised by Samanid kings. The Samanids also revived many ancient Persian festivals. Their successor, the Ghaznawids, who were of non-Iranian Turkic origin, also became instrumental in the revival of Persian culture.

Persian manuscript describing how an ambassador from India, probably sent by the Maukhari King Śarvavarman of Kannauj, brought chess to the Persian court of Khosrow I.

The culmination of the Persianization movement was the Shahnameh, the national epic of Iran, written almost entirely in Persian. This voluminous work, reflects Iran's ancient history, its unique cultural values, its pre-Islamic Zoroastrian religion, and its sense of nationhood. According to Bernard Lewis:

"Iran was indeed Islamized, but it was not Arabized. Persians remained Persians. And after an interval of silence, Iran re-emerged as a separate, different and distinctive element within Islam, eventually adding a new element even to Islam itself. Culturally, politically, and most remarkable of all even religiously, the Iranian contribution to this new Islamic civilization is of immense importance. The work of Iranians can be seen in every field of cultural endeavour, including Arabic poetry, to which poets of Iranian origin composing their poems in Arabic made a very significant contribution. In a sense, Iranian Islam is a second advent of Islam itself, a new Islam sometimes referred to as Islam-i Ajam. It was this Persian Islam, rather than the original Arab Islam, that was brought to new areas and new peoples: to the Turks, first in Central Asia and then in the Middle East in the country which came to be called Turkey, and of course to India. The Ottoman Turks brought a form of Iranian civilization to the walls of Vienna..."

The Islamization of Iran was to yield deep transformations within the cultural, scientific, and political structure of Iran's society: The blossoming of Persian literature, philosophy, medicine and art became major elements of the newly forming Muslim civilization. Inheriting a heritage of thousands of years of civilization, and being at the "crossroads of the major cultural highways", contributed to Persia emerging as what culminated into the "Islamic Golden Age". During this period, hundreds of scholars and scientists vastly contributed to technology, science and medicine, later influencing the rise of European science during the Renaissance.

The most important scholars of almost all of the Islamic sects and schools of thought were Persian or lived in Iran, including the most notable and reliable Hadith collectors of Shia and Sunni like Shaikh Saduq, Shaikh Kulainy, Hakim al-Nishaburi, Imam Muslim and Imam Bukhari, the greatest theologians of Shia and Sunni like Shaykh Tusi, Imam Ghazali, Imam Fakhr al-Razi and Al-Zamakhshari, the greatest physicians, astronomers, logicians, mathematicians, metaphysicians, philosophers and scientists like Avicenna and Nasīr al-Dīn al-Tūsī, and the greatest shaykhs of Sufism like Rumi and Abdul-Qadir Gilani.

Persianate states and dynasties (977–1219)

Main articles: Persianate, Ghaznavids, Great Seljuq, and Khwarazmian dynasty
The Kharaghan twin towers, built in 1067, Persia, contain tombs of Seljuq princes.

In 977, a Turkic governor of the Samanids, Sabuktigin, conquered Ghazna (in present-day Afghanistan) and established a dynasty, the Ghaznavids, that lasted to 1186. The Ghaznavid empire grew by taking all of the Samanid territories south of the Amu Darya in the last decade of the 10th century, and eventually occupied parts of Eastern Iran, Afghanistan, Pakistan and north-west India.

The Ghaznavids are generally credited with launching Islam into a mainly Hindu India. The invasion of India was undertaken in 1000 by the Ghaznavid ruler, Mahmud, and continued for several years. They were unable to hold power for long, however, particularly after the death of Mahmud in 1030. By 1040 the Seljuqs had taken over the Ghaznavid lands in Iran.

The Seljuqs, who like the Ghaznavids were Persianate in nature and of Turkic origin, slowly conquered Iran over the course of the 11th century. The dynasty had its origins in the Turcoman tribal confederations of Central Asia and marked the beginning of Turkic power in the Middle East. They established a Sunni Muslim rule over parts of Central Asia and the Middle East from the 11th to 14th centuries. They set up an empire known as Great Seljuq Empire that stretched from Anatolia in the west to western Afghanistan in the east and the western borders of (modern-day) China in the north-east; and was the target of the First Crusade. Today they are regarded as the cultural ancestors of the Western Turks, the present-day inhabitants of Turkey, Azerbaijan and Turkmenistan, and they are remembered as great patrons of Persian culture, art, literature, and language.

Seljuq empire at the time of its greatest extent, at the death of Malik Shah I

The founder of the dynasty, Tughril Beg, turned his army against the Ghaznavids in Khorasan. He moved south and then west, conquering but not wasting the cities in his path. In 1055 the caliph in Baghdad gave Tughril Beg robes, gifts, and the title King of the East. Under Tughril Beg's successor, Malik Shah (1072–1092), Iran enjoyed a cultural and scientific renaissance, largely attributed to his brilliant Iranian vizier, Nizam al Mulk. These leaders established the observatory where Omar Khayyám did much of his experimentation for a new calendar, and they built religious schools in all the major towns. They brought Abu Hamid Ghazali, one of the greatest Islamic theologians, and other eminent scholars to the Seljuq capital at Baghdad and encouraged and supported their work.

When Malik Shah I died in 1092, the empire split as his brother and four sons quarreled over the apportioning of the empire among themselves. In Anatolia, Malik Shah I was succeeded by Kilij Arslan I who founded the Sultanate of Rûm and in Syria by his brother Tutush I. In Persia he was succeeded by his son Mahmud I whose reign was contested by his other three brothers Barkiyaruq in Iraq, Muhammad I in Baghdad and Ahmad Sanjar in Khorasan. As Seljuq power in Iran weakened, other dynasties began to step up in its place, including a resurgent Abbasid caliphate and the Khwarezmshahs. The Khwarezmid Empire was a Sunni Muslim Persianate dynasty, of East Turkic origin, that ruled in Central Asia. Originally vassals of the Seljuqs, they took advantage of the decline of the Seljuqs to expand into Iran. In 1194 the Khwarezmshah Ala ad-Din Tekish defeated the Seljuq sultan Toghrul III in battle and the Seljuq empire in Iran collapsed. Of the former Seljuq Empire, only the Sultanate of Rum in Anatolia remained.

A serious internal threat to the Seljuqs during their reign came from the Nizari Ismailis, a secret sect with headquarters at Alamut Castle between Rasht and Tehran. They controlled the immediate area for more than 150 years and sporadically sent out adherents to strengthen their rule by murdering important officials. Several of the various theories on the etymology of the word assassin derive from these killers.

Parts of northwestern Iran were conquered in the early 13th century AD by the Kingdom of Georgia, led by Tamar the Great.

Mongol conquest and rule (1219–1358)

Mongol invasion (1219–1221)

Main articles: Mongol invasion of Central Asia, Mongol invasion of Persia, and Mongol Empire
Eurasia on the eve of the Mongol invasions, c. 1200
The Mongol Empire's expansion

The Khwarazmian dynasty only lasted for a few decades, until the arrival of the Mongols. Genghis Khan had unified the Mongols, and under him the Mongol Empire quickly expanded in several directions. In 1218, it bordered Khwarezm. At that time, the Khwarazmian Empire was ruled by Ala ad-Din Muhammad (1200–1220). Muhammad, like Genghis, was intent on expanding his lands and had gained the submission of most of Iran. He declared himself shah and demanded formal recognition from the Abbasid caliph Al-Nasir. When the caliph rejected his claim, Ala ad-Din Muhammad proclaimed one of his nobles caliph and unsuccessfully tried to depose an-Nasir.

The Mongol invasion of Iran began in 1219, after two diplomatic missions to Khwarezm sent by Genghis Khan had been massacred. During 1220–21 Bukhara, Samarkand, Herat, Tus and Nishapur were razed, and the whole populations were slaughtered. The Khwarezm-Shah fled, to die on an island off the Caspian coast. During the invasion of Transoxiana in 1219, along with the main Mongol force, Genghis Khan used a Chinese specialist catapult unit in battle, they were used again in 1220 in Transoxania. The Chinese may have used the catapults to hurl gunpowder bombs, since they already had them by this time.

While Genghis Khan was conquering Transoxania and Persia, several Chinese who were familiar with gunpowder were serving in Genghis's army. "Whole regiments" entirely made out of Chinese were used by the Mongols to command bomb hurling trebuchets during the invasion of Iran. Historians have suggested that the Mongol invasion had brought Chinese gunpowder weapons to Central Asia. One of these was the huochong, a Chinese mortar. Books written around the area afterward depicted gunpowder weapons which resembled those of China.

Destruction under the Mongols

Before his death in 1227, Genghis had reached western Azerbaijan, pillaging and burning many cities along the way after entering into Iran from its north east.

The Mongol invasion was by and large disastrous to the Iranians. Although the Mongol invaders eventually converted to Islam and accepted the culture of Iran, the Mongol destruction in Iran and other regions of the Islamic heartland (particularly the historical Khorasan region, mainly in Central Asia) marked a major change of direction for the region. Much of the six centuries of Islamic scholarship, culture, and infrastructure was destroyed as the invaders leveled cities, burned libraries, and in some cases replaced mosques with Buddhist temples.

The Mongols killed many Iranian civilians. Destruction of qanat irrigation systems in the north east of Iran destroyed the pattern of relatively continuous settlements, producing many abandoned towns which were relatively quite good with irrigation and agriculture.

Ilkhanate (1256–1335)

Main article: Ilkhanate
Mongol successor khanates

After Genghis's death, Iran was ruled by several Mongol commanders. Genghis' grandson, Hulagu Khan, was tasked with the westward expansion of Mongol dominion. However, by the time he ascended to power, the Mongol Empire had already dissolved, dividing into different factions. Arriving with an army, he established himself in the region and founded the Ilkhanate, a breakaway state of the Mongol Empire, which would rule Iran for the next eighty years and become Persian in the process.

Hulagu Khan seized Baghdad in 1258 and put the last Abbasid caliph to death. The westward advance of his forces was stopped by the Mamelukes, however, at the Battle of Ain Jalut in Palestine in 1260. Hulagu's campaigns against the Muslims also enraged Berke, khan of the Golden Horde and a convert to Islam. Hulagu and Berke fought against each other, demonstrating the weakening unity of the Mongol empire.

The rule of Hulagu's great-grandson, Ghazan (1295–1304) saw the establishment of Islam as the state religion of the Ilkhanate. Ghazan and his famous Iranian vizier, Rashid al-Din, brought Iran a partial and brief economic revival. The Mongols lowered taxes for artisans, encouraged agriculture, rebuilt and extended irrigation works, and improved the safety of the trade routes. As a result, commerce increased dramatically.

Items from India, China, and Iran passed easily across the Asian steppes, and these contacts culturally enriched Iran. For example, Iranians developed a new style of painting based on a unique fusion of solid, two-dimensional Mesopotamian painting with the feathery, light brush strokes and other motifs characteristic of China. After Ghazan's nephew Abu Said died in 1335, however, the Ilkhanate lapsed into civil war and was divided between several petty dynasties – most prominently the Jalayirids, Muzaffarids, Sarbadars and Kartids.

The mid-14th-century Black Death killed about 30% of the country's population.

Sunnism and Shiism in pre-Safavid Iran

Main article: Islam in Iran
Imam Reza shrine, the tomb of the eighth Imam of the twelver Shiites

Prior to the rise of the Safavid Empire, Sunni Islam was the dominant religion, accounting for around 90% of the population at the time. According to Mortaza Motahhari the majority of Iranian scholars and masses remained Sunni until the time of the Safavids. The domination of Sunnis did not mean Shia were rootless in Iran. The writers of The Four Books of Shia were Iranian, as well as many other great Shia scholars.

The domination of the Sunni creed during the first nine Islamic centuries characterized the religious history of Iran during this period. There were however some exceptions to this general domination which emerged in the form of the Zaydīs of Tabaristan (see Alid dynasties of northern Iran), the Buyids, the Kakuyids, the rule of Sultan Muhammad Khudabandah (r. Shawwal 703-Shawwal 716/1304–1316) and the Sarbedaran.

Apart from this domination there existed, firstly, throughout these nine centuries, Shia inclinations among many Sunnis of this land and, secondly, original Imami Shiism as well as Zaydī Shiism had prevalence in some parts of Iran. During this period, Shia in Iran were nourished from Kufah, Baghdad and later from Najaf and Hillah. Shiism was the dominant sect in Tabaristan, Qom, Kashan, Avaj and Sabzevar. In many other areas merged population of Shia and Sunni lived together.

During the 10th and 11th centuries, Fatimids sent Ismailis Da'i (missioners) to Iran as well as other Muslim lands. When Ismailis divided into two sects, Nizaris established their base in Iran. Hassan-i Sabbah conquered fortresses and captured Alamut in 1090 AD. Nizaris used this fortress until a Mongol raid in 1256.

After the Mongol raid and fall of the Abbasids, Sunni hierarchies faltered. Not only did they lose the caliphate but also the status of official madhhab. Their loss was the gain of Shia, whose centre wasn't in Iran at that time. Several local Shia dynasties like Sarbadars were established during this time.

The main change occurred in the beginning of the 16th century, when Ismail I founded the Safavid dynasty and initiated a religious policy to recognize Shi'a Islam as the official religion of the Safavid Empire, and the fact that modern Iran remains an officially Shi'ite state is a direct result of Ismail's actions.

Timurid Empire (1370–1507)

Main article: Timurid Empire
Detailed map of the Timurid Empire with its tributary states and sphere of influence in Western-Central Asia (1402–1403)
Forensic facial reconstruction of Turco-Mongol conqueror Timur from skull, performed by the Soviet archaeologist and anthropologist Mikhail Mikhaylovich Gerasimov (1941)

Iran remained divided until the arrival of Timur, a Turco-Mongol belonging to the Timurid dynasty. Like its predecessors, the Timurid Empire was also part of the Persianate world. After establishing a power base in Transoxiana, Timur invaded Iran in 1381 and eventually conquered most of it. Timur's campaigns were known for their brutality; many people were slaughtered and several cities were destroyed.

His regime was characterized by tyranny and bloodshed, but also by its inclusion of Iranians in administrative roles and its promotion of architecture and poetry. His successors, the Timurids, maintained a hold on most of Iran until 1452, when they lost the bulk of it to Black Sheep Turkmen. The Black Sheep Turkmen were conquered by the White Sheep Turkmen under Uzun Hasan in 1468; Uzun Hasan and his successors were the masters of Iran until the rise of the Safavids.

Sufi poet Hafez's popularity became firmly established in the Timurid era that saw the compilation and widespread copying of his divan. Sufis were often persecuted by orthodox Muslims who considered their teachings blasphemous. Sufism developed a symbolic language rich with metaphors to obscure poetic references to provocative philosophical teachings. Hafez concealed his own Sufi faith, even as he employed the secret language of Sufism (developed over hundreds of years) in his own work, and he is sometimes credited with having "brought it to perfection". His work was imitated by Jami, whose own popularity grew to spread across the full breadth of the Persianate world.

Kara Koyunlu

Main article: Kara Koyunlu

The Kara Koyunlu were a Turkmen tribal federation that ruled over northwestern Iran and surrounding areas from 1374 to 1468 CE. The Kara Koyunlu expanded their conquest to Baghdad, however, internal fighting, defeats by the Timurids, rebellions by the Armenians in response to their persecution, and failed struggles with the Ag Qoyunlu led to their eventual demise.

Ak Koyunlu

Main article: Ak Koyunlu
The Aq Qoyunlu confederation at its greatest extent.

Aq Qoyunlu were Turkmen under the leadership of the Bayandur tribe, tribal federation of Sunni Muslims who ruled over most of Iran and large parts of surrounding areas from 1378 to 1501 CE. Aq Qoyunlu emerged when Timur granted them all of Diyar Bakr in present-day Turkey. Afterward, they struggled with their rival Oghuz Turks, the Qara Qoyunlu. While the Aq Qoyunlu were successful in defeating Kara Koyunlu, their struggle with the emerging Safavid dynasty led to their downfall.

Early modern period

Persia underwent a revival under the Safavid dynasty (1502–1736), the most prominent figure of which was Shah Abbas I. Some historians credit the Safavid dynasty for founding the modern nation-state of Iran. Iran's contemporary Shia character, and significant segments of Iran's current borders take their origin from this era (e.g. Treaty of Zuhab).

Safavid Empire (1501–1736)

Main article: Safavid Empire See also: Ottoman–Persian wars and Safavid conversion of Iran to Shia Islam
The Safavid Empire (1501–1736) at its greatest extent

The Safavid dynasty was one of the most significant ruling dynasties of Iran, and "is often considered the beginning of modern Persian history". They ruled one of the greatest Persian empires after the Muslim conquest of Persia and established the Twelver school of Shi'a Islam as the official religion of their empire, marking one of the most important turning points in Muslim history. The Safavids ruled from 1501 to 1722 (experiencing a brief restoration from 1729 to 1736) and at their height, they controlled all of modern Iran, Azerbaijan and Armenia, most of Georgia, the North Caucasus, Iraq, Kuwait and Afghanistan, as well as parts of Turkey, Syria, Pakistan, Turkmenistan and Uzbekistan. Safavid Iran was one of the Islamic "gunpowder empires", along with its neighbours, its archrival and principal enemy the Ottoman Empire, as well as the Mughal Empire.

The Safavid ruling dynasty was founded by Ismāil, who styled himself Shāh Ismāil I. Practically worshipped by his Qizilbāsh followers, Ismāil invaded Shirvan to avenge the death of his father, Shaykh Haydar, who had been killed during his siege of Derbent, in Dagestan. Afterwards he went on a campaign of conquest, and following the capture of Tabriz in July 1501, he enthroned himself as the Shāh of Iran, minted coins in this name, and proclaimed Shi'ism the official religion of his domain.

Although initially the masters of Azerbaijan and southern Dagestan only, the Safavids had, in fact, won the struggle for power in Persia which had been going on for nearly a century between various dynasties and political forces following the fragmentation of the Kara Koyunlu and the Aq Qoyunlu. A year after his victory in Tabriz, Ismāil proclaimed most of Persia as his domain, and quickly conquered and unified Iran under his rule. Soon afterwards, the new Safavid Empire rapidly conquered regions, nations, and peoples in all directions, including Armenia, Azerbaijan, parts of Georgia, Mesopotamia (Iraq), Kuwait, Syria, Dagestan, large parts of what is now Afghanistan, parts of Turkmenistan, and large chunks of Anatolia, laying the foundation of its multi-ethnic character which would heavily influence the empire itself (most notably the Caucasus and its peoples).

Portrait of Shah Abbas I

Tahmasp I, the son and successor of Ismail I, carried out multiple invasions in the Caucasus which had been incorporated in the Safavid empire since Shah Ismail I and for many centuries afterwards, and started with the trend of deporting and moving hundreds of thousands of Circassians, Georgians, and Armenians to Iran's heartlands. Initially only solely put in the royal harems, royal guards, and minor other sections of the Empire, Tahmasp believed he could eventually reduce the power of the Qizilbash, by creating and fully integrating a new layer in Iranian society. As Encyclopædia Iranica states, for Tahmasp, the problem circled around the military tribal elite of the empire, the Qizilbash, who believed that physical proximity to and control of a member of the immediate Safavid family guaranteed spiritual advantages, political fortune, and material advancement. With this new Caucasian layer in Iranian society, the undisputed might of the Qizilbash (who functioned much like the ghazis of the neighbouring Ottoman Empire) would be questioned and fully diminished as society would become fully meritocratic.

Shah Abbas I and his successors would significantly expand this policy and plan initiated by Tahmasp, deporting during his reign alone around some 200,000 Georgians, 300,000 Armenians and 100,000–150,000 Circassians to Iran, completing the foundation of a new layer in Iranian society. With this, and the complete systematic disorganisation of the Qizilbash by his personal orders, he eventually fully succeeded in replacing the power of the Qizilbash, with that of the Caucasian ghulams. These new Caucasian elements (the so-called ghilman / غِلْمَان / "servants"), almost always after conversion to Shi'ism depending on given function would be, unlike the Qizilbash, fully loyal only to the Shah. The other masses of Caucasians were deployed in all other possible functions and positions available in the empire, as well as in the harem, regular military, craftsmen, farmers, etc. This system of mass usage of Caucasian subjects remained to exist until the fall of the Qajar dynasty.

Rostom (also known as Rustam Khan), viceroy of Kartli, eastern Georgia, from 1633 to 1658

The greatest of the Safavid monarchs, Shah Abbas I the Great (1587–1629) came to power in 1587 aged 16. Abbas I first fought the Uzbeks, recapturing Herat and Mashhad in 1598, which had been lost by his predecessor Mohammad Khodabanda by the Ottoman–Safavid War (1578–1590). Then he turned against the Ottomans, the archrivals of the Safavids, recapturing Baghdad, eastern Iraq, the Caucasian provinces, and beyond by 1618. Between 1616 and 1618, following the disobedience of his most loyal Georgian subjects Teimuraz I and Luarsab II, Abbas carried out a punitive campaign in his territories of Georgia, devastating Kakheti and Tbilisi and carrying away 130,000 – 200,000 Georgian captives towards mainland Iran. His new army, which had dramatically been improved with the advent of Robert Shirley and his brothers following the first diplomatic mission to Europe, pitted the first crushing victory over the Safavids' archrivals, the Ottomans in the above-mentioned 1603–1618 war and would surpass the Ottomans in military strength. He also used his new force to dislodge the Portuguese from Bahrain (1602) and Hormuz (1622) with aid of the English navy, in the Persian Gulf.

He expanded commercial links with the Dutch East India Company and established firm links with the European royal houses, which had been initiated by Ismail I earlier on by the Habsburg–Persian alliance. Thus Abbas I was able to break the dependence on the Qizilbash for military might and therefore was able to centralize control. The Safavid dynasty had already established itself during Shah Ismail I, but under Abbas I it really became a major power in the world along with its archrival the Ottoman Empire, against whom it became able to compete with on equal foot. It also started the promotion of tourism in Iran. Under their rule Persian Architecture flourished again and saw many new monuments in various Iranian cities, of which Isfahan is the most notable example.

Except for Shah Abbas the Great, Shah Ismail I, Shah Tahmasp I, and Shah Abbas II, many of the Safavid rulers were ineffectual, often being more interested in their women, alcohol and other leisure activities. The end of Abbas II's reign in 1666, marked the beginning of the end of the Safavid dynasty. Despite falling revenues and military threats, many of the later shahs had lavish lifestyles. Shah Soltan Hosain (1694–1722) in particular was known for his love of wine and disinterest in governance.

The declining country was repeatedly raided on its frontiers. Finally, Ghilzai Pashtun chieftain named Mir Wais Khan began a rebellion in Kandahar and defeated the Safavid army under the Iranian Georgian governor over the region, Gurgin Khan. In 1722, Peter the Great of neighbouring Imperial Russia launched the Russo-Persian War (1722–1723), capturing many of Iran's Caucasian territories, including Derbent, Shaki, Baku, but also Gilan, Mazandaran and Astrabad. In the midst of chaos, in the same year of 1722, an Afghan army led by Mir Wais' son Mahmud marched across eastern Iran, besieged and took Isfahan. Mahmud proclaimed himself 'Shah' of Persia. Meanwhile, Persia's imperial rivals, the Ottomans and the Russians, took advantage of the chaos in the country to seize more territory for themselves. By these events, the Safavid dynasty had effectively ended. In 1724, conform the Treaty of Constantinople, the Ottomans and the Russians agreed to divide the newly conquered territories of Iran amongst themselves.

Nader Shah and his successors

Main articles: Afsharid dynasty and Zand dynasty
Nader Shah
The Afsharid Empire at its greatest extent in 1741–1745 under Nader Shah

Iran's territorial integrity was restored by a native Iranian Turkic Afshar warlord from Khorasan, Nader Shah. He defeated and banished the Afghans, defeated the Ottomans, reinstalled the Safavids on the throne, and negotiated Russian withdrawal from Iran's Caucasian territories, with the Treaty of Resht and Treaty of Ganja. By 1736, Nader had become so powerful he was able to depose the Safavids and have himself crowned shah. To financially support his wars against Persia's arch-rival, the Ottoman Empire, he fixed his sights on the weak but rich Mughal Empire to the east. In 1739, accompanied by his loyal Caucasian subjects including Erekle II, he invaded Mughal India, defeated a numerically superior Mughal army in less than three hours, and completely sacked and looted Delhi, bringing back immense wealth to Persia. On his way back, he also conquered all the Uzbek khanates – except for Kokand – and made the Uzbeks his vassals. He also firmly re-established Persian rule over the entire Caucasus, Bahrain, as well as large parts of Anatolia and Mesopotamia. Undefeated for years, his defeat in Dagestan, following guerrilla rebellions by the Lezgins and the assassination attempt on him near Mazandaran is often considered the turning point in Nader's impressive career. To his frustration, the Dagestanis resorted to guerrilla warfare, and Nader with his conventional army could make little headway against them. At the Battle of Andalal and the Battle of Avaria, Nader's army was crushingly defeated and he lost half of his entire force, as well forcing him to flee for the mountains. Though Nader managed to take most of Dagestan during his campaign, the effective guerrilla warfare as deployed by the Lezgins, but also the Avars and Laks made the Iranian re-conquest of the particular North Caucasian region this time a short lived one; several years later, Nader was forced to withdraw. Around the same time, the assassination attempt was made on him near Mazandaran which accelerated the course of history; he slowly grew ill and megalomaniac, blinding his sons whom he suspected of the assassination attempts, and showing increasing cruelty against his subjects and officers. In his later years this eventually provoked multiple revolts and, ultimately, Nader's assassination in 1747.

Nader's death was followed by a period of anarchy in Iran as rival army commanders fought for power. Nader's own family, the Afsharids, were soon reduced to holding on to a small domain in Khorasan. Many of the Caucasian territories broke away in various Caucasian khanates. Ottomans regained lost territories in Anatolia and Mesopotamia. Oman and the Uzbek khanates of Bukhara and Khiva regained independence. Ahmad Shah Durrani, one of Nader's officers, founded an independent state which eventually became modern Afghanistan. Erekle II and Teimuraz II, who, in 1744, had been made the kings of Kakheti and Kartli respectively by Nader himself for their loyal service, capitalized on the eruption of instability, and declared de facto independence. Erekle II assumed control over Kartli after Teimuraz II's death, thus unifying the two as the Kingdom of Kartli-Kakheti, becoming the first Georgian ruler in three centuries to preside over a politically unified eastern Georgia, and due to the frantic turn of events in mainland Iran he would be able to remain de facto autonomous through the Zand period. From his capital Shiraz, Karim Khan of the Zand dynasty ruled "an island of relative calm and peace in an otherwise bloody and destructive period," however the extent of Zand power was confined to contemporary Iran and parts of the Caucasus. Karim Khan's death in 1779 led to yet another civil war in which the Qajar dynasty eventually triumphed and became kings of Iran. During the civil war, Iran permanently lost Basra in 1779 to the Ottomans, which had been captured during the Ottoman–Persian War (1775–76), and Bahrain to Al Khalifa family after Bani Utbah invasion in 1783.

Late modern period

Qajar dynasty (1796–1925)

Main articles: Qajar dynasty, Russo-Persian War (1804–1813), and Russo-Persian War (1826–1828) See also: Battle of Krtsanisi, Treaty of Gulistan, Treaty of Turkmenchay, and Iranian Constitutional Revolution

Agha Mohammad Khan emerged victorious out of the civil war that commenced with the death of the last Zand king. His reign is noted for the reemergence of a centrally led and united Iran. After the death of Nader Shah and the last of the Zands, most of Iran's Caucasian territories had broken away into various Caucasian khanates. Agha Mohammad Khan, like the Safavid kings and Nader Shah before him, viewed the region as no different from the territories in mainland Iran. Therefore, his first objective after having secured mainland Iran, was to reincorpate the Caucasus region into Iran. Georgia was seen as one of the most integral territories. For Agha Mohammad Khan, the resubjugation and reintegration of Georgia into the Iranian Empire was part of the same process that had brought Shiraz, Isfahan, and Tabriz under his rule. As the Cambridge History of Iran states, its permanent secession was inconceivable and had to be resisted in the same way as one would resist an attempt at the separation of Fars or Gilan. It was therefore natural for Agha Mohammad Khan to perform whatever necessary means in the Caucasus in order to subdue and reincorporate the recently lost regions following Nader Shah's death and the demise of the Zands, including putting down what in Iranian eyes was seen as treason on the part of the wali (viceroy) of Georgia, namely the Georgian king Erekle II (Heraclius II) who was appointed viceroy of Georgia by Nader Shah himself.

Agha Mohammad Khan subsequently demanded that Heraclius II renounce its 1783 treaty with Russia, and to submit again to Persian suzerainty, in return for peace and the security of his kingdom. The Ottomans, Iran's neighboring rival, recognized the latter's rights over Kartli and Kakheti for the first time in four centuries. Heraclius appealed then to his theoretical protector, Empress Catherine II of Russia, pleading for at least 3,000 Russian troops, but he was ignored, leaving Georgia to fend off the Persian threat alone. Nevertheless, Heraclius II still rejected the Khan's ultimatum. As a response, Agha Mohammad Khan invaded the Caucasus region after crossing the Aras river, and, while on his way to Georgia, he re-subjugated Iran's territories of the Erivan Khanate, Shirvan, Nakhchivan Khanate, Ganja khanate, Derbent Khanate, Baku khanate, Talysh Khanate, Shaki Khanate, Karabakh Khanate, which comprise modern-day Armenia, Azerbaijan, Dagestan, and Igdir. Having reached Georgia with his large army, he prevailed in the Battle of Krtsanisi, which resulted in the capture and sack of Tbilisi, as well as the effective resubjugation of Georgia. Upon his return from his successful campaign in Tbilisi and in effective control over Georgia, together with some 15,000 Georgian captives that were moved back to mainland Iran, Agha Mohammad was formally crowned Shah in 1796 in the Mughan plain, just as his predecessor Nader Shah was about sixty years earlier.

Agha Mohammad Shah was later assassinated while preparing a second expedition against Georgia in 1797 in Shusha (now part of the Republic of Azerbaijan) and the seasoned king Heraclius died early in 1798. The reassertion of Iranian hegemony over Georgia did not last long; in 1799 the Russians marched into Tbilisi. The Russians were already actively occupied with an expansionist policy towards its neighboring empires to its south, namely the Ottoman Empire and the successive Iranian kingdoms since the late 17th/early 18th century. The next two years following Russia's entrance into Tbilisi were a time of confusion, and the weakened and devastated Georgian kingdom, with its capital half in ruins, was easily absorbed by Russia in 1801. As Iran could not permit or allow the cession of Transcaucasia and Dagestan, which had been an integral part of Iran for centuries, this would lead directly to the wars of several years later, namely the Russo-Persian Wars of 1804-1813 and 1826–1828. The outcome of these two wars (in the Treaty of Gulistan and the Treaty of Turkmenchay, respectively) proved for the irrevocable forced cession and loss of what is now eastern Georgia, Dagestan, Armenia, and Azerbaijan to Imperial Russia.

The area to the north of the river Aras, among which the territory of the contemporary republic of Azerbaijan, eastern Georgia, Dagestan, and Armenia were Iranian territory until they were occupied by Russia in the course of the 19th century.

Migration of Caucasian Muslims

See also: Ayrums, Qarapapaqs, and Ethnic Cleansing of Circassians
Persian Cossack Brigade in Tabriz in 1909

Following the official loss of vast territories in the Caucasus, major demographic shifts were bound to take place. Following the 1804–1814 war, but also per the 1826–1828 war which ceded the last territories, large migrations, so-called Caucasian Muhajirs, set off to migrate to mainland Iran. Some of these groups included the Ayrums, Qarapapaqs, Circassians, Shia Lezgins, and other Transcaucasian Muslims.

After the Battle of Ganja of 1804 during the Russo-Persian War (1804–1813), many thousands of Ayrums and Qarapapaqs were settled in Tabriz. During the remaining part of the 1804–1813 war, as well as through the 1826–1828 war, a large number of the Ayrums and Qarapapaqs that were still remaining in newly conquered Russian territories were settled in and migrated to Solduz (in modern-day Iran's West Azerbaijan province). As the Cambridge History of Iran states; "The steady encroachment of Russian troops along the frontier in the Caucasus, General Yermolov's brutal punitive expeditions and misgovernment, drove large numbers of Muslims, and even some Georgian Christians, into exile in Iran."

From 1864 until the early 20th century, another mass expulsion took place of Caucasian Muslims as a result of the Russian victory in the Caucasian War. Others simply voluntarily refused to live under Christian Russian rule, and thus departed for Turkey or Iran. These migrations once again, towards Iran, included masses of Caucasian Azerbaijanis, other Transcaucasian Muslims, as well as many North Caucasian Muslims, such as Circassians, Shia Lezgins and Laks. Many of these migrants would prove to play a pivotal role in further Iranian history, as they formed most of the ranks of the Persian Cossack Brigade, which was established in the late 19th century. The initial ranks of the brigade would be entirely composed of Circassians and other Caucasian Muhajirs. This brigade would prove decisive in the following decades in Qajar history.

Furthermore, the 1828 Treaty of Turkmenchay included the official rights for the Russian Empire to encourage settling of Armenians from Iran in the newly conquered Russian territories. Until the mid-fourteenth century, Armenians had constituted a majority in Eastern Armenia. At the close of the fourteenth century, after Timur's campaigns, the Timurid Renaissance flourished, and Islam had become the dominant faith, and Armenians became a minority in Eastern Armenia. After centuries of constant warfare on the Armenian plateau, many Armenians chose to emigrate and settle elsewhere. Following Shah Abbas I's massive relocation of Armenians and Muslims in 1604–05, their numbers dwindled even further.

At the time of the Russian invasion of Iran, some 80% of the population of Iranian Armenia were Muslims (Persians, Turkics, and Kurds) whereas Christian Armenians constituted a minority of about 20%. As a result of the Treaty of Gulistan (1813) and the Treaty of Turkmenchay (1828), Iran was forced to cede Iranian Armenia (which also constituted the present-day Armenia), to the Russians. After the Russian administration took hold of Iranian Armenia, the ethnic make-up shifted, and thus for the first time in more than four centuries, ethnic Armenians started to form a majority once again in one part of historic Armenia. The new Russian administration encouraged the settling of ethnic Armenians from Iran proper and Ottoman Turkey. As a result, by 1832, the number of ethnic Armenians had matched that of the Muslims. It would be only after the Crimean War and the Russo-Turkish War of 1877–1878, which brought another influx of Turkish Armenians, that ethnic Armenians once again established a solid majority in Eastern Armenia. Nevertheless, the city of Erivan retained a Muslim majority up to the twentieth century. According to the traveller H. F. B. Lynch, the city of Erivan was about 50% Armenian and 50% Muslim (Tatars i.e. Azeris and Persians) in the early 1890s.

Fath Ali Shah's reign saw increased diplomatic contacts with the West and the beginning of intense European diplomatic rivalries over Iran. His grandson Mohammad Shah, who succeeded him in 1834, fell under the Russian influence and made two unsuccessful attempts to capture Herat. When Mohammad Shah died in 1848 the succession passed to his son Naser al-Din Shah Qajar, who proved to be the ablest and most successful of the Qajar sovereigns. He founded the first modern hospital in Iran.

Constitutional Revolution and deposition

Main article: 1921 Persian coup d'état

The Great Persian Famine of 1870–1871 is believed to have caused the death of two million people.

A new era in the history of Persia dawned with the Persian Constitutional Revolution against the Shah in the late 19th and early 20th centuries. The Shah managed to remain in power, granting a limited constitution in 1906 (making the country a constitutional monarchy). The first Majlis (parliament) was convened on 7 October 1906.

The discovery of petroleum in 1908 by the British in Khuzestan spawned intense renewed interest in Persia by the British Empire (see William Knox D'Arcy and Anglo-Iranian Oil Company, now BP). Control of Persia remained contested between the United Kingdom and Russia, in what became known as The Great Game, and codified in the Anglo-Russian Convention of 1907, which divided Persia into spheres of influence, regardless of her national sovereignty.

During World War I, the country was occupied by British, Ottoman and Russian forces but was essentially neutral (see Persian Campaign). In 1919, after the Russian Revolution and their withdrawal, Britain attempted to establish a protectorate in Persia, which was unsuccessful.

Finally, the Constitutionalist movement of Gilan and the central power vacuum caused by the instability of the Qajar government resulted in the rise of Reza Khan, who was later to become Reza Shah Pahlavi, and the subsequent establishment of the Pahlavi dynasty in 1925. In 1921, a military coup established Reza Khan, an officer of the Persian Cossack Brigade, as the dominant figure for the next 20 years. Seyyed Zia'eddin Tabatabai was also a leader and important figure in the perpetration of the coup. The coup was not actually directed at the Qajar monarchy; according to Encyclopædia Iranica, it was targeted at officials who were in power and actually had a role in controlling the government — the cabinet and others who had a role in governing Persia. In 1925, after being prime minister for two years, Reza Khan became the first shah of the Pahlavi dynasty.

Pahlavi era (1925–1979)

Main article: Pahlavi Iran

Reza Shah (1925–1941)

Main article: Persian Cossack Brigade

Reza Shah ruled for almost 16 years until 16 September 1941, when he was forced to abdicate by the Anglo-Soviet invasion of Iran. He established an authoritarian government that valued nationalism, militarism, secularism and anti-communism combined with strict censorship and state propaganda. Reza Shah introduced many socio-economic reforms, reorganizing the army, government administration, and finances.

To his supporters, his reign brought "law and order, discipline, central authority, and modern amenities – schools, trains, buses, radios, cinemas, and telephones". However, his attempts of modernisation have been criticised for being "too fast" and "superficial", and his reign a time of "oppression, corruption, taxation, lack of authenticity" with "security typical of police states."

Many of the new laws and regulations created resentment among devout Muslims and the clergy. For example, mosques were required to use chairs; most men were required to wear western clothing, including a hat with a brim; women were encouraged to discard the hijab—hijab was eventually banned in 1936; men and women were allowed to congregate freely, violating Islamic mixing of the sexes. Tensions boiled over in 1935, when bazaaris and villagers rose up in rebellion at the Imam Reza shrine in Mashhad to protest against plans for the hijab ban, chanting slogans such as 'The Shah is a new Yezid.' Dozens were killed and hundreds were injured when troops finally quelled the unrest.

World War II

See also: Anglo-Soviet invasion of Iran, Polish civilian camps in World War II, and Persian Corridor Mohammad Reza Pahlavi with FDR at the Tehran Conference, 1943.Polish refugee camp on the outskirts of Tehran, c. 1943.

While German armies were highly successful against the Soviet Union, the Iranian government expected Germany to win the war and establish a powerful force on its borders. It rejected British and Soviet demands to expel German residents from Iran. In response, the two Allies invaded in August 1941 and easily overwhelmed the weak Iranian army in Operation Countenance. Iran became the major conduit of Allied Lend-Lease aid to the Soviet Union. The purpose was to secure Iranian oil fields and ensure Allied supply lines (see Persian Corridor). Iran remained officially neutral. Its monarch Rezā Shāh was deposed during the subsequent occupation and replaced with his young son Mohammad Reza Pahlavi.

At the Tehran Conference of 1943, the Allies issued the Tehran Declaration which guaranteed the post-war independence and boundaries of Iran. However, when the war actually ended, Soviet troops stationed in northwestern Iran not only refused to withdraw but backed revolts that established short-lived, pro-Soviet separatist national states in the northern regions of Azerbaijan and Iranian Kurdistan, the Azerbaijan People's Government and the Republic of Kurdistan respectively, in late 1945. Soviet troops did not withdraw from Iran proper until May 1946 after receiving a promise of oil concessions. The Soviet republics in the north were soon overthrown and the oil concessions were revoked.

Mohammad-Reza Shah (1941–1979)

Tehran men celebrating the 1953 Iranian coup d'état

Initially there were hopes that post-occupation Iran could become a constitutional monarchy. The new, young Shah Mohammad Reza Shah Pahlavi initially took a very hands-off role in government, and allowed parliament to hold a lot of power. Some elections were held in the first shaky years, although they remained mired in corruption. Parliament became chronically unstable, and from the 1947 to 1951 period Iran saw the rise and fall of six different prime ministers. Pahlavi increased his political power by convening the Iran Constituent Assembly, 1949, which finally formed the Senate of Iran—a legislative upper house allowed for in the 1906 constitution but never brought into being. The new senators were largely supportive of Pahlavi, as he had intended.

In 1951 Prime Minister Mohammed Mosaddeq received the vote required from the parliament to nationalize the British-owned oil industry, in a situation known as the Abadan Crisis. Despite British pressure, including an economic blockade, the nationalization continued. Mosaddeq was briefly removed from power in 1952 but was quickly re-appointed by the Shah, due to a popular uprising in support of the premier, and he, in turn, forced the Shah into a brief exile in August 1953 after a failed military coup by Imperial Guard Colonel Nematollah Nassiri.

1953: U.S. aided coup removes Mosaddeq
Main article: 1953 Iranian coup d'état

Shortly thereafter on 19 August a successful coup was headed by retired army general Fazlollah Zahedi, aided by the United States (CIA) with the active support of the British (MI6) (known as Operation Ajax and Operation Boot to the respective agencies). The coup—with a black propaganda campaign designed to turn the population against Mosaddeq — forced Mosaddeq from office. Mosaddeq was arrested and tried for treason. Found guilty, his sentence was reduced to house arrest on his family estate while his foreign minister, Hossein Fatemi, was executed. Zahedi succeeded him as prime minister, and suppressed opposition to the Shah, specifically the National Front and Communist Tudeh Party.

1971 film about Iran under the Shah

Iran was ruled as an autocracy under the Shah with American support from that time until the revolution. The Iranian government entered into agreement with an international consortium of foreign companies which ran the Iranian oil facilities for the next 25 years, splitting profits fifty-fifty with Iran but not allowing Iran to audit their accounts or have members on their board of directors. In 1957 martial law was ended after 16 years and Iran became closer to the West, joining the Baghdad Pact and receiving military and economic aid from the US. In 1961, Iran initiated a series of economic, social, agrarian and administrative reforms to modernize the country that became known as the Shah's White Revolution.

The core of this program was land reform. Modernization and economic growth proceeded at an unprecedented rate, fueled by Iran's vast petroleum reserves, the third-largest in the world. However, the reforms, including the White Revolution, did not greatly improve economic conditions and the liberal pro-Western policies alienated certain Islamic religious and political groups. In early June 1963 several days of massive rioting occurred in support of Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini following the cleric's arrest for a speech attacking the Shah.

Two years later, premier Hassan Ali Mansur was assassinated and the internal security service, SAVAK, became more violently active. In the 1970s, leftist guerilla groups such as Mujaheddin-e-Khalq (MEK), emerged and contributed to overthrowing the Shah during the 1979 Iranian Revolution.

Nearly a hundred Iran political prisoners were killed by the SAVAK during the decade before the revolution and many more were arrested and tortured. The Islamic clergy, headed by the Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini (who had been exiled in 1964), were becoming increasingly vociferous.

Iran greatly increased its defense budget and by the early 1970s was the region's strongest military power. Bilateral relations with Iraq were not good, mainly due to a dispute over the Shatt al-Arab waterway. In November 1971, Iranian forces seized control of three islands at the mouth of the Persian Gulf; in response, Iraq expelled thousands of Iranian nationals. Following a number of clashes in April 1969, Iran abrogated the 1937 accord and demanded a renegotiation.

In mid-1973, the Shah returned the oil industry to national control. Following the Arab-Israeli War of October 1973, Iran did not join the Arab oil embargo against the West and Israel. Instead, it used the situation to raise oil prices, using the money gained for modernization and to increase defense spending.

A border dispute between Iraq and Iran was resolved with the signing of the Algiers Accord on 6 March 1975.

Contemporary period

Revolution and the Islamic Republic (1979 to present)

Main articles: Iranian Revolution and History of the Islamic Republic of Iran
Ayatollah Khomeini returns to Iran after 14 years exile in France on 1 February 1979.

The Iranian Revolution, also known as the Islamic Revolution, was the revolution that transformed Iran from an absolute monarchy under Shah Mohammad Reza Pahlavi to an Islamic republic under Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, one of the leaders of the revolution and founder of the Islamic Republic. Its time span can be said to have begun in January 1978 with the first major demonstrations, and concluded with the approval of the new theocratic Constitution—whereby Ayatollah Khomeini became Supreme Leader of the country—in December 1979.

In between, Mohammad Reza Pahlavi left the country for exile in January 1979 after strikes and demonstrations paralyzed the country, and on 1 February 1979, Ayatollah Khomeini returned to Tehran. The final collapse of the Pahlavi dynasty occurred shortly after on 11 February when Iran's military declared itself "neutral" after guerrillas and rebel troops overwhelmed troops loyal to the Shah in armed street fighting. Iran officially became an Islamic Republic on 1 April 1979, after Iranians overwhelmingly approved a national referendum to make it so a day before.

Ideology of the 1979 Iranian Revolution

Further information: Ideology of the Iranian Revolution

The ideology of the revolutionary government was populist, nationalist and most of all Shi'a Islamic. Its unique constitution is based on the concept of velayat-e faqih the idea advanced by Khomeini that Muslims – in fact everyone – requires "guardianship", in the form of rule or supervision by the leading Islamic jurist or jurists. Khomeini served as this ruling jurist, or supreme leader, until his death in 1989.

Iran's rapidly modernising, capitalist economy was replaced by populist and Islamic economic and cultural policies. Much industry was nationalized, laws and schools Islamicized, and Western influences banned.

The Islamic revolution also created great impact around the world. In the non-Muslim world it has changed the image of Islam, generating much interest in the politics and spirituality of Islam, along with "fear and distrust towards Islam" and particularly the Islamic Republic and its founder.

Khomeini (1979–1989)

Khomeini served as leader of the revolution or as Supreme Leader of Iran from 1979 to his death on 3 June 1989. This era was dominated by the consolidation of the revolution into a theocratic republic under Khomeini, and by the costly and bloody war with Iraq.

The consolidation lasted until 1982–3, as Iran coped with the damage to its economy, military, and apparatus of government, and protests and uprisings by secularists, leftists, and more traditional Muslims—formerly ally revolutionaries but now rivals—were effectively suppressed. Many political opponents were executed by the new regimes. Following the events of the revolution, Marxist guerrillas and federalist parties revolted in regions comprising Khuzistan, Kurdistan and Gonbad-e Qabus, resulting in severe fighting between rebels and revolutionary forces. These revolts began in April 1979 and lasted between several months to over a year, depending on the region. The Kurdish uprising, led by the KDPI, was the most violent, lasting until 1983 and resulting in 10,000 casualties.

In the summer of 1979 a new constitution giving Khomeini a powerful post as guardian jurist Supreme Leader and a clerical Council of Guardians power over legislation and elections, was drawn up by an Assembly of Experts for Constitution. The new constitution was approved by referendum in December 1979.

Iran hostage crisis (1979–1981)

Main article: Iran hostage crisis

An early event in the history of the Islamic republic that had a long-term impact was the Iran hostage crisis. Following the admitting of the former Shah of Iran into the United States for cancer treatment, on 4 November 1979, Iranian students seized US embassy personnel, labeling the embassy a "den of spies." Fifty-two hostages were held for 444 days until January 1981. An American military attempt to rescue the hostages failed.

The takeover was enormously popular in Iran, where thousands gathered in support of the hostage takers, and it is thought to have strengthened the prestige of the Ayatollah Khomeini and consolidated the hold of anti-Americanism. It was at this time that Khomeini began referring to America as the "Great Satan." In America, where it was considered a violation of the long-standing principle of international law that diplomats may be expelled but not held captive, it created a powerful anti-Iranian backlash. Relations between the two countries have remained deeply antagonistic and American international sanctions have hurt Iran's economy.

Iran–Iraq War (1980–1988)

Main article: Iran–Iraq War
An Iranian soldier with gas mask during the Iran–Iraq War

During this political and social crisis, Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein attempted to take advantage of the disorder of the Revolution, the weakness of the Iranian military and the revolution's antagonism with Western governments. The once-strong Iranian military had been disbanded during the revolution, and with the Shah ousted, Hussein had ambitions to position himself as the new strong man of the Middle East. He sought to expand Iraq's access to the Persian Gulf by acquiring territories that Iraq had claimed earlier from Iran during the Shah's rule.

Of chief importance to Iraq was Khuzestan which not only boasted a substantial Arab population, but rich oil fields as well. On the unilateral behalf of the United Arab Emirates, the islands of Abu Musa and the Greater and Lesser Tunbs became objectives as well. With these ambitions in mind, Hussein planned a full-scale assault on Iran, boasting that his forces could reach the capital within three days. On 22 September 1980, the Iraqi army invaded Iran at Khuzestan, precipitating the Iran–Iraq War. The attack took revolutionary Iran completely by surprise.

Although Saddam Hussein's forces made several early advances, Iranian forces had pushed the Iraqi army back into Iraq by 1982. Khomeini sought to export his Islamic revolution westward into Iraq, especially on the majority Shi'a Arabs living in the country. The war then continued for six more years until 1988, when Khomeini, in his words, "drank the cup of poison" and accepted a truce mediated by the United Nations.

Tens of thousands of Iranian civilians and military personnel were killed when Iraq used chemical weapons in its warfare. Iraq was financially backed by Egypt, the Arab countries of the Persian Gulf, the Soviet Union and the Warsaw Pact states, the United States (beginning in 1983), France, the United Kingdom, Germany, Brazil, and the People's Republic of China (which also sold weapons to Iran).

There were more than 182,000 Kurdish victims of Iraq's chemical weapons during the eight-year war. The total Iranian casualties of the war were estimated to be between 500,000 and 1,000,000. Almost all relevant international agencies have confirmed that Saddam engaged in chemical warfare to blunt Iranian human wave attacks; these agencies unanimously confirmed that Iran never used chemical weapons during the war.

Starting on 19 July 1988 and lasting for about five months the government systematically executed thousands of political prisoners across Iran. This is commonly referred to as the 1988 executions of Iranian political prisoners or the 1988 Iranian Massacre. The main target was the membership of the People's Mojahedin Organization of Iran (PMOI), although a lesser number of political prisoners from other leftist groups were also included such as the Tudeh Party of Iran (Communist Party). Estimates of the number executed vary from 1,400 to 30,000.

Khamenei (1989–present)

On his deathbed in 1989, Khomeini appointed a 25-man Constitutional Reform Council which named then president Ali Khamenei as the next Supreme Leader, and made a number of changes to Iran's constitution. A smooth transition followed Khomeini's death on 3 June 1989. While Khamenei lacked Khomeini's "charisma and clerical standing", he developed a network of supporters within Iran's armed forces and its economically powerful religious foundations. Under his reign Iran's regime is said – by at least one observer – to resemble more "a clerical oligarchy ... than an autocracy."

Rafsanjani: pragmatic conservativism (1989–1997)

Ali-Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani succeeded Khamenei as president on 3 August 1989, as a pragmatic conservative who served two four-year terms and focused his efforts on rebuilding the country's economy and infrastructure damaged by war, though hampered by low oil prices. Rafsanjani sought to restore confidence in the government among the general population by privatizing the companies that had been nationalized in the first few years of the Islamic Republic, as well as by bringing in qualified technocrats to manage the economy. The state of their economy also influenced the government to move towards ending their diplomatic isolation. This was achieved through the reestablishment of normalized relations with neighbors such as Saudi Arabia and an attempt to improve its reputation in the region with assertions that its revolution was not exportable to other states. During the Persian Gulf War in 1991 the country remained neutral, restricting its action to the condemnation of the U.S. and allowing fleeing Iraqi aircraft and refugees into the country.

Iran in the 1990s had a greater secular behavior and admiration for Western popular culture than in the previous decades. This admiration had become a way in which the urban population expressed their resentment at the invasive Islamic policies of the government. The pressures from the population placed on the new Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei led to an uneasy alliance between him and President Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani. Through this alliance they attempted to hinder the ulama's ability to gain further control of the state. In 1989, they created a sequence of constitutional amendments that removed the office of prime minister and increased the scope of presidential power. However, these new amendments did not curtail the powers of the Supreme Leader of Iran in any way; this position still contained the ultimate authority over the armed forces, the making of war and peace, the final say in foreign policy, and the right to intervene in the legislative process whenever he deemed it necessary.

Khatami: reformers and conservatives struggle (1997–2005)

Mohammad Khatami, reformist President of Iran from 1997 to 2005

President Rafsanjani's economic policies led to stronger relations with the outside world. But his government's relaxation of the enforcement of certain regulations on social behavior were met with some responses of widespread disenchantment among the general population with the ulama as rulers of the country. This led to the defeat of the government's candidate for president in 1997, who had the backing of the supreme Islamic jurist. He was beaten by an independent candidate from the Reformists, Mohammad Khatami. He received 69% of the vote and enjoyed particular support from two groups of the population that had felt ostracized by the practices of the state: women and youth. The younger generations in the country had been too young to experience the shah's regime or the revolution that ended it, and now they resented the restrictions placed on their daily lives under the Islamic Republic. Mohammad Khatami's presidency was soon marked by tensions between the reform-minded government and an increasingly conservative and vocal clergy. This rift reached a climax in July 1999 when massive anti-government protests erupted in the streets of Tehran. The disturbances lasted over a week before police and pro-government vigilantes dispersed the crowds.

Khatami was re-elected in June 2001 but his efforts were repeatedly blocked by the conservatives in the parliament. Conservative elements within Iran's government moved to undermine the reformist movement, banning liberal newspapers and disqualifying candidates for parliamentary elections. This clampdown on dissent, combined with the failure of Khatami to reform the government, led to growing political apathy among Iran's youth.

In June 2003, anti-government protests by several thousand students took place in Tehran. Several human rights protests also occurred in 2006.

Ahmadinejad: hardline conservatism (2005–2013)

Mahmoud Ahmadinejad 6th President of Iran from 2005 to 2013

In the 2005 Iranian presidential election, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, mayor of Tehran, became the sixth president of Iran, after winning 62 percent of the vote in the run-off poll, against former president Ali-Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani. During the authorization ceremony he kissed Khamenei's hand in demonstration of his loyalty to him.

During this time, the American invasion of Iraq, the overthrow of Saddam Hussein's regime and empowerment of its Shi'a majority, all strengthened Iran's position in the region particularly in the mainly Shi'a south of Iraq, where a top Shia leader in the week of 3 September 2006 renewed demands for an autonomous Shi'a region. At least one commentator (former U.S. Defense Secretary William S. Cohen) has stated that as of 2009 Iran's growing power has eclipsed anti-Zionism as the major foreign policy issue in the Middle East.

During 2005 and 2006, there were claims that the United States and Israel were planning to attack Iran, with the most cited reason being Iran's civilian nuclear energy program which the United States and some other states fear could lead to a nuclear weapons program. China and Russia opposed military action of any sort and opposed economic sanctions. Khamenei issued a fatwa forbidding the production, stockpiling and use of nuclear weapons. The fatwa was cited in an official statement by the Iranian government at an August 2005 meeting of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) in Vienna.

In 2009, Ahmadinejad's reelection was hotly disputed and marred by large protests that formed the "greatest domestic challenge" to the leadership of the Islamic Republic "in 30 years". The resulting social unrest is widely known as the Iranian Green Movement. Reformist opponent Mir-Hossein Mousavi and his supporters alleged voting irregularities and by 1 July 2009, 1000 people had been arrested and 20 killed in street demonstrations. Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei and other Islamic officials blamed foreign powers for fomenting the protest.

Rouhani: pragmatism (2013–2021)

Hassan Rouhani 2017
Ebrahim Raisi in 2021

On 15 June 2013, Hassan Rouhani won the presidential election in Iran, with a total number of 36,704,156 ballots cast; Rouhani won 18,613,329 votes. In his press conference one day after election day, Rouhani reiterated his promise to recalibrate Iran's relations with the world.

On 2 April 2015, following eight days of tortuous discussions in Switzerland, which lasted through the night, Iran and six world powers (United States, United Kingdom, France, China and Russia plus Germany) agreed on the outlines of an understanding to limit Iran's nuclear programs, negotiators indicated, as both sides prepared for announcements. Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif tweeted: "Found solutions. Ready to start drafting immediately." European Union foreign policy chief Federica Mogherini tweeted that she would meet the press with Zarif after a final meeting of the seven nations in the nuclear talks. She wrote: "Good news."

Reading out a joint statement, European Union foreign policy chief Federica Mogherini hailed what she called a "decisive step" after more than a decade of work. Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif followed with the same statement in Persian. U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry and the top diplomats of Britain, France and Germany also briefly took the stage behind them. The deal is intended to be a provisional framework for a comprehensive agreement and was signed in 2015, and marked a significant breakthrough in the 12-year history of negotiations with Iran over its nuclear programme.

When Donald Trump was campaigning to become President of the US, he repeatedly said he would abandon the Iran nuclear deal. After he was elected president, the USA announced its withdrawal from the agreement on 8 May 2018.

The Iranian-backed group known as Kataib Hezbollah attacked the United States embassy in Baghdad on 31 December 2019.

On 3 January 2020, the United States military executed a drone strike at Baghdad Airport, killing Qasem Soleimani, the leader of the Quds Force, an elite branch of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps.

On 3 August 2021 Ebrahim Raisi was elected 8th President of Iran.

Ebrahim Raisi (2021–2024)

Beginning on 16 September 2022 protests started against the government of Iran following the death of Mahsa Amini.

On 1 April 2024, Israel's air strike on an Iranian consulate building in the Syrian capital Damascus killed an important senior commander of the Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps (IRGC), Brig Gen Mohammad Reza Zahedi. In retaliation for the Israeli strike, Iran attacked Israel with over 300 drones and missiles on 13 April. However, the Iranian attack was mainly intercepted either outside Israeli airspace or over the country itself. It was the biggest missile attack in Iranian history, and its first ever direct attack on Israel. It was followed by a retaliatory missile strike by Israel on Isfahan, Iran on 19 April.

On 19 May 2024, Ebrahim Raisi died in a helicopter crash in the country’s East Azerbaijan province. First Vice President Mohammad Mokhber was appointed acting president after the death of President Raisi.

Masoud Pezeshkian (2024–present)

On 28 July 2024, Masoud Pezeshkian was formally endorsed as Iran's new president by Iran's supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. Pezeshkian, a reformist, won in a presidential election runoff on 5 July.

On 31 July 2024, Ismail Haniyeh, political chief of Palestinian political and military organisation Hamas, was assassinated in Iran’s capital, Tehran, where he was to attend the inauguration ceremony of Iran’s President Masoud Pezeshkian.

On 1 October 2024, Iran launched about 180 ballistic missiles at Israel in retaliation for assassinations of Haniyeh, Hassan Nasrallah and Abbas Nilforoushan. On 27 October, Israel responded to that attack by strikes on a missile defence system in the Iranian region of Isfahan.

See also

Notes

  1. The term "Tatars", employed by the Russians, referred to Turkish-speaking Muslims (Shia and Sunni) of Transcaucasia. Unlike Armenians and Georgians, the Tatars did not have their own alphabet and used the Perso-Arabic script. After 1918 with the establishment of the Azerbaijan Democratic Republic, and "especially during the Soviet era", the Tatar group identified itself as "Azerbaijani". Prior to 1918 the word "Azerbaijan" exclusively referred to the Iranian province of Azarbayjan.

References

  1. People, "New evidence: modern civilization began in Iran", 10 Aug 2007 Archived 24 February 2021 at the Wayback Machine, retrieved 1 October 2007
  2. "Dinkha Tepe Revisited".
  3. "Welcome to Encyclopaedia Iranica".
  4. "Capital of Musasir government in northwest Iran, experts believe". 4 September 2005.
  5. "Search for Musasir capital resumes at Rabat Tepe next week". 21 October 2006.
  6. "Welcome to Encyclopaedia Iranica".
  7. "Qalaichi's ancient necropolis excavated for the first time". 23 June 2024.
  8. "Mannea, a forgotten kingdom of Iran".
  9. "Elam".
  10. "Amazing archaeological finds dating back to Elamite era unearthed in western Iran". 26 September 2023.
  11. Khanmohammadi, Behrouz; Bonfanti, Annarita Stefania; Dan, Roberto (2022). "A New Decorated Bronze Belt from Orumiyeh Region, North-Western Iran". Iran: 1–11. doi:10.1080/05786967.2022.2082314.
  12. Cifarelli, Megan; Mollazadeh, Kazem; Binandeh, Ali (2019). "A Decorated Bronze Belt from Gargul, Iran". Iran. 57 (2): 175–184. doi:10.1080/05786967.2018.1505441.
  13. Khanmohammadi, Behrouz; Bonfanti, Annarita S.; Abbaszadeh, Maryam; Dan, Roberto (2022). "A metal belt in the Orumiyeh museum, Iran". Aramazd: Armenian Journal of Near Eastern Studies. 15 (1–2): 163–170. doi:10.32028/ajnes.v15i1-2.1304.
  14. "The Lurs of Iran | Cultural Survival". 17 February 2010.
  15. Azadpour, M. "HEGEL, GEORG WILHELM FRIEDRICH". Encyclopædia Iranica. Archived from the original on 11 April 2015. Retrieved 11 April 2015.
  16. https://www.britannica.com/ebc/article-9371723 Archived 2008-04-29 at the Wayback Machine Encyclopædia Britannica Concise Encyclopedia Article: Media
  17. Baten, Jörg (2016). A History of the Global Economy. From 1500 to the Present. Cambridge University Press. p. 214. ISBN 978-1-107-50718-0.
  18. ^ R. M. Savory, "Safavids", Encyclopedia of Islam, 2nd edition
  19. "The Islamic World to 1600", Applied History Research Group, University of Calgary, 1998 Archived 2008-06-12 at the Wayback Machine, retrieved 1 October 2007
  20. Dowling, Timothy C. (2014). Russia at War: From the Mongol Conquest to Afghanistan, Chechnya, and Beyond. 2 volumes. ABC-CLIO. pp. 728–729. ISBN 978-1-59884-948-6.
  21. "Iran Islamic Republic", Archived 2006-03-16 at the Wayback Machine, Encyclopædia Britannica, retrieved 23 January 2008
  22. ^ Encyclopædia Britannica 23 January 2008 Archived 15 December 2007 at the Wayback Machine
  23. Ancient Iran, Encyclopædia Britannica, www.britannica.com
  24. Biglari, Fereidoun; Shidrang, Sonia (2019). "Rescuing the Paleolithic Heritage of Hawraman, Kurdistan, Iranian Zagros". Near Eastern Archaeology. 82 (4): 226–235. doi:10.1086/706536. ISSN 1094-2076. S2CID 212851965.
  25. J.D. Vigne, J. Peters and D. Helmer, First Steps of Animal Domestication, Proceedings of the 9th Conference of the International Council of Archaeozoology, Durham, August 2002, ISBN 1-84217-121-6
  26. TRINKAUS, E.; BIGLARI, F. "Middle Paleolithic Human Remains from Bisitun Cave, Iran". Archived from the original on 27 July 2016. Retrieved 6 November 2021.
  27. "UNESCO assessor visits prehistoric caves in Khorramabad's valley". 13 September 2024.
  28. "Khorramabad Valley: A potential UNESCO World Heritage Site".
  29. "Early humans in Iran were growing wheat 12,000 years ago". NBC.news. 5 July 2013. Archived from the original on 2 November 2020. Retrieved 10 September 2014.
  30. Riehl, Simone. "Emergence of Agriculture in the Foothills of the Zagros Mountains of Iran (Supplement)". www.researchgate.net. Archived from the original on 3 May 2019. Retrieved 1 March 2015.
  31. "Excavations at Chogha Bonut: The earliest village in Susiana". University of Chicago. Archived from the original on 25 July 2013. Retrieved 21 June 2013.
  32. Hole, Frank (20 July 2004). "Neolithic Age in Iran". Encyclopedia Iranica. Encyclopaedia Iranica Foundation. Archived from the original on 23 October 2012. Retrieved 9 August 2012.
  33. ^ "Iran, 8000–2000 BC". The Timeline of Art History. The Metropolitan Museum of Art. October 2000. Archived from the original on 5 March 2001. Retrieved 9 August 2008.
  34. "Ancient Iran Museum". Ali Majdfar, photography. Archived from the original on 26 July 2013. Retrieved 27 March 2008.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: others (link)
  35. ^ Potts, D. T. (1999). The Archaeology of Elam: Formation and Transformation of an Ancient Iranian State. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0-521-56358-5.
  36. ^ Xinhua, "New evidence: modern civilization began in Iran", 10 Aug 2007 Archived 23 November 2016 at the Wayback Machine, retrieved 1 October 2007
  37. K. Kris Hirst. "Chogha Mish (Iran)". Archived from the original on 6 November 2013. Retrieved 11 June 2010.
  38. "Penn Museum – University of Pennsylvania Museum of Archaeology and Anthropology". Archived from the original on 16 December 2008.
  39. Smith, Philip E. L. (1990). "Architectural Innovation and Experimentation at Ganj Dareh, Iran". World Archaeology. 21 (3): 323–335. doi:10.1080/00438243.1990.9980111. ISSN 0043-8243. JSTOR 124833.
  40. Kushnareva, K. Kh. (1997). The Southern Caucasus in Prehistory: Stages of Cultural and Socioeconomic Development from the Eighth to the Second Millennium B.C. UPenn Museum of Archaeology. ISBN 978-0-924171-50-5. Archived from the original on 13 September 2020. Retrieved 8 May 2016., page 44
  41. Sagona, Antonio; Zimansky, Paul (24 February 2015). Ancient Turkey. Routledge. ISBN 978-1-134-44027-6. Archived from the original on 6 September 2020. Retrieved 8 May 2016., page 163
  42. Algaze, Guillermo. 2005. The Uruk World System: The Dynamics of Expansion of Early Mesopotamian Civilization
  43. Robert A. Carter; Graham Philip, eds. (2010) . Beyond the Ubaid: transformation and integration in the late prehistoric societies of the Middle East (PDF). Studies in Ancient Oriental Civilization. Vol. 63. Ann Arbor: University of Chicago Press. ISBN 978-1-885923-66-0. Archived (PDF) from the original on 21 March 2014.
  44. "5000-Y-Old Inscribed Tablets Discovered in Jiroft". Archived from the original on 11 May 2011.
  45. "New Discoveries in Jiroft May Change History of Civilization". Cultural Heritage News Agency. 26 January 2006. Archived from the original on 11 April 2008. Retrieved 16 March 2023.
  46. Yarshater, Yarshater. "Iranian history". Encyclopædia Iranica. Archived from the original on 3 February 2021. Retrieved 23 June 2008.
  47. Diakonoff, I., M., "Media", Cambridge History of Iran, II, Cambridge, 1985, p.43 . This paper is cited in the Journal of Eurasian Studies on page 51.
  48. "Welcome to Encyclopaedia Iranica".
  49. Lackenbacher, Sylvie. "Elam". Encyclopædia Iranica. Archived from the original on 18 November 2020. Retrieved 23 June 2008.
  50. ^ Bahman Firuzmandi "Mad, Hakhamanishi, Ashkani, Sasani" pp. 20
  51. ^ "Iran, 1000 BC–1 AD". The Timeline of Art History. The Metropolitan Museum of Art. October 2000. Archived from the original on 25 January 2021. Retrieved 9 August 2008.
  52. Medvedskaya, I.N. (January 2002). "The Rise and Fall of Media". International Journal of Kurdish Studies. BNET. Archived from the original on 28 March 2008. Retrieved 10 August 2008.
  53. Sicker, Martin (2000). The pre-Islamic Middle East. Greenwood Publishing Group. pp. 68/69. ISBN 978-0-275-96890-8.
  54. Urartu – Lost Kingdom of Van Archived 2015-07-02 at the Wayback Machine
  55. "Urartu Civilization – All About Turkey". Archived from the original on 1 July 2015. Retrieved 18 June 2015.
  56. "Forgotten Empire— the world of Ancient Persia". The British Museum. 2005. Archived from the original on 23 April 2007. Retrieved 16 March 2023.
  57. Hooker, Richard (1996). "The Persians". Archived from the original on 29 August 2006. Retrieved 20 August 2006.
  58. "Engineering an Empire: The Persians | Anthropology.net". Archived from the original on 10 January 2007. Retrieved 13 March 2007.
  59. "Greek-Persian Wars (490 bce–479 bce) - Gale Encyclopedia of World History: War - Encyclopedia.com". Archived from the original on 4 September 2009. Retrieved 13 March 2007.
  60. Benevolent Persian Empire Archived 2005-09-07 at the Wayback Machine
  61. ^ Roisman & Worthington 2011, p. 345.
  62. Carey, Brian Todd; Allfree, Joshua B.; Cairns, John (19 January 2006). Warfare in the Ancient World. Pen and Sword. ISBN 978-1-84884-630-2.
  63. Aeschylus; Peter Burian; Alan Shapiro (17 February 2009). The Complete Aeschylus: Volume II: Persians and Other Plays. Oxford University Press. p. 18. ISBN 978-0-19-045183-7. Archived from the original on 23 September 2020. Retrieved 12 September 2016.
  64. Roisman & Worthington 2011, pp. 135–138, 342–345.
  65. Norman A. Stillman The Jews of Arab Lands pp 22 Jewish Publication Society, 1979 ISBN 0827611552
  66. International Congress of Byzantine Studies Proceedings of the 21st International Congress of Byzantine Studies, London, 21–26 August 2006, Volumes 1–3 pp 29. Ashgate Pub Co, 30 September 2006 ISBN 075465740X
  67. Garthwaite, Gene R., The Persians, p. 2
  68. J. B. Bury, p.109.
  69. ^ Durant.
  70. "Compareti – Sasanians in Africa – Transoxiana 4". Archived from the original on 28 May 2008. Retrieved 5 March 2007.
  71. Sarfaraz, pp. 329–330.
  72. "Iransaga – Persian Art, The Sassanians". Archived from the original on 23 November 2019. Retrieved 5 March 2007.
  73. Zarinkoob, p.305.
  74. "Iran". Encyclopædia Britannica. Archived from the original on 13 August 2013. Retrieved 21 June 2007.
  75. ^ Lewis, Bernard. "Iran in history". Tel Aviv University. Archived from the original on 29 April 2007. Retrieved 3 April 2007.
  76. Hawting G., The First Dynasty of Islam. The Umayyad Caliphate AD 661–750, (London) 1986, pp. 63–64
  77. Cambridge History of Iran, by Richard Nelson Frye, Abdolhosein Zarrinkoub, et al. Section on The Arab Conquest of Iran and. Vol 4, 1975. London. p.46
  78. Al-Biruni. الآثار الباقية عن القرون الخالية, p.35,36,48 وقتی قتبیه بن مسلم سردار حجاج، بار دوم بخوارزم رفت و آن را باز گشود هرکس را که خط خوارزمی می نوشت و از تاریخ و علوم و اخبار گذشته آگاهی داشت از دم تیغ بی دریغ درگذاشت و موبدان و هیربدان قوم را یکسر هلاک نمود و کتابهاشان همه بسوزانید و تباه کرد تا آنکه رفته رفته مردم امی ماندند و از خط و کتابت بی بهره گشتند و اخبار آنها اکثر فراموش شد و از میان رفت
  79. ^ Fred Astren pg.33–35
  80. Pourshariati (2008), pp. 312–313
  81. ^ "History of Iran: Islamic Conquest". Archived from the original on 5 October 2019. Retrieved 21 June 2007.
  82. Saïd Amir Arjomand, Abd Allah Ibn al-Muqaffa and the Abbasid Revolution. Iranian Studies, vol. 27, #1–4. London: Routledge, 1994. JSTOR i401381
  83. ^ "The Islamic World to 1600". Applied History Research Group, University of Calgary. Archived from the original on 5 October 2008. Retrieved 26 August 2006.
  84. Bernard Lewis (1991), "The Political Language of Islam", University of Chicago Press, pp 482: "Babak's Iranianizing rebellion in Azerbaijan gave occasion for sentiments at the capital to harden against men who were sympathetic to the more explicitly Iranian tradition"
  85. F. Daftary (1999) Sectarian and National Movements in Iran, Khurasan and Transoxania During Umayyad and Early 'Abbasid Times In History of Civilizations of Central Asia, vol. IV, part One, ed. M. S. Asimov, and C. E. Bosworth. Paris: UNESCO Publishing, pp. 41–60. excerpt from pg 50: "The activities of the Khurammiya reached their peak in the movement of Babak al-Khurrami, whose protracted rebellion based in north-western Iran seriously threatened the stability of the Abbassid caliphate... This revolt lasting for more than twenty years soon spread from Azerbaijan (North/West Iran) to western and central parts of Iran."
  86. Kathryn Babayan, "Mystics, monarchs, and messiahs", Harvard CMES, 2002. pg 138: "Babak revolted in Azerbaijan (816–838), evoking Abu Muslim as a heroic symbol..and called for a return to the Iranian past"
  87. ^ Tobin 113–115
  88. Nasr, Hoseyn; Islam and the pliqht of modern man
  89. Encyclopædia Britannica, "Seljuq", Online Edition, (LINK Archived 2007-12-19 at the Wayback Machine)
  90. Richard Frye, The Heritage of Persia, p. 243.
  91. Rayhanat al- adab, (3rd ed.), vol. 1, p. 181.
  92. Enderwitz, S. "Shu'ubiyya". Encyclopedia of Islam. Vol. IX (1997), pp. 513–14.
  93. "History of Iran: Samanid Dynasty". Archived from the original on 1 April 2019. Retrieved 21 June 2007.
  94. Eder, Manfred A. J. (2010). South Asian Archaeology 2007 Proceedings of the 19th Meeting of the European Association of South Asian Archaeology in Ravenna, Italy, July 2007, Volume II (PDF). Archaeopress Archaeology. p. 69. ISBN 978-1-4073-0674-2.
  95. Bakker, Hans T. (2017). The Huns in Central and South Asia. How Two Centuries of War against Nomadic Invaders from the Steps are Concluded by a Game of Chess between the Kings of India and Iran.
  96. Caheb C., Cambridge History of Iran, Tribes, Cities and Social Organization, vol. 4, p305–328
  97. Kühnel E., in Zeitschrift der deutschen morgenländischen Gesell, Vol. CVI (1956)
  98. Encyclopædia Britannica, "Seljuq", Online Edition, (LINK Archived 2007-12-19 at the Wayback Machine): "... Because the Turkish Seljuqs had no Islamic tradition or strong literary heritage of their own, they adopted the cultural language of their Persian instructors in Islam. Literary Persian thus spread to the whole of Iran, and the Arabic language disappeared in that country except in works of religious scholarship ..."
  99. Özgüdenli, Osman G. (20 July 2005), "Persian Manuscripts I. in Ottoman and modern Turkish libraries", Encyclopædia Iranica, archived from the original on 5 December 2020
  100. Hillenbrand, Carole (2005). "Ravandi, the Seljuq court at Konya and the Persianisation of Anatolian Cities". Mesogeios (Mediterranean Studies). 25/26. Editions Herodotos: 157–169.
  101. "Academic Home". Archived from the original on 4 March 2021. Retrieved 23 June 2007.
  102. Lordkipanidze, Mariam (1987), Georgia in the XI-XII Centuries. Tbilisi: Ganatleba, p. 154.
  103. "Iran – history – geography". Archived from the original on 25 June 2008. Retrieved 25 June 2007.
  104. Kenneth Warren Chase (2003). Firearms: a global history to 1700 (illustrated ed.). Cambridge University Press. p. 58. ISBN 0-521-82274-2. Archived from the original on 4 January 2021. Retrieved 28 November 2011. Chinggis Khan organized a unit of Chinese catapult specialists in 1214, and these men formed part of the first Mongol army to invade Transoxania in 1219. This was not too early for true firearms, and it was nearly two centuries after catapult-thrown gunpowder bombs had been added to the Chinese arsenal. Chinese siege equipment saw action in Transoxania in 1220 and in the north Caucasus in 1239–40.
  105. David Nicolle; Richard Hook (1998). The Mongol Warlords: Genghis Khan, Kublai Khan, Hulegu, Tamerlane (illustrated ed.). Brockhampton Press. p. 86. ISBN 1-86019-407-9. Archived from the original on 12 April 2016. Retrieved 28 November 2011. Though he was himself a Chinese, he learned his trade from his father, who had accompanied Genghis Khan on his invasion of Muslim Transoxania and Iran. Perhaps the use of gunpowder as a propellant, in other words the invention of true guns, appeared first in the Muslim Middle East, whereas the invention of gunpowder itself was a Chinese achievement
  106. Arnold Pacey (1991). Technology in world civilization: a thousand-year history (reprint, illustrated ed.). MIT Press. p. 46. ISBN 0-262-66072-5. Archived from the original on 20 August 2020. Retrieved 28 November 2011. During the 1250s, the Mongols invaded Iran with 'whole regiments' of Chinese engineers operating trebuchets (catapults) throwing gunpowder bombs. Their progress was rapid and devastating until, after the sack of Baghdad in 1258, they entered Syria. There they met an Islamic army similarly equipped and experienced their first defeat. In 1291, the same sort of weapon was used during the siege of Acre, when the European Crusaders were expelled form Palestine.
  107. Chahryar Adle; Irfan Habib (2003). Ahmad Hasan Dani; Chahryar Adle; Irfan Habib (eds.). History of Civilizations of Central Asia: Development in contrast: from the sixteenth to the mid-nineteenth century. Vol. 5 of History of Civilizations of Central Asia (illustrated ed.). UNESCO. p. 474. ISBN 92-3-103876-1. Archived from the original on 23 July 2020. Retrieved 28 November 2011. Indeed, it is possible that gunpowder devices, including Chinese mortar (huochong), had reached Central Asia through the Mongols as early as the thirteenth century.71 Yet the potential remained unexploited; even Sultan Husayn's use of cannon may have had Ottoman inspiration.
  108. Arnold Pacey (1991). Technology in world civilization: a thousand-year history (reprint, illustrated ed.). MIT Press. p. 46. ISBN 0-262-66072-5. Archived from the original on 4 January 2021. Retrieved 28 November 2011. The presence of these individuals in China in the 1270s, and the deployment of Chinese engineers in Iran, mean that there were several routes by which information about gunpowder weapons could pass from the Islamic world to China, or vice versa. Thus when two authors from the eastern Mediterranean region wrote books about gunpowder weapons around the year 1280, it is not surprising that they described bombs, rockets and fire-lances very similar to some types of Chinese weaponry.
  109. May 2012, p. 185.
  110. The Il-khanate Archived 2007-06-10 at the Wayback Machine
  111. "IRAN ii. IRANIAN HISTORY (2) Islamic period p – Encyclopaedia Iranica". Archived from the original on 27 October 2021. Retrieved 27 October 2021.
  112. J. A. Boyle, ed. (1968). "The Cambridge History of Iran". Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society. V: The Saljuq and Mongol periods (1). Cambridge University Press: Xiii, 762, 16. doi:10.1017/S0035869X0012965X. ISSN 0035-869X. S2CID 161828080. Archived from the original on 27 October 2021. Retrieved 27 October 2021.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: bot: original URL status unknown (link)
  113. Q&A with John Kelly on The Great Mortality on National Review Online Archived 2009-01-09 at the Wayback Machine.
  114. "Islam and Iran: A Historical Study of Mutual Services". Al islam. 13 March 2013. Archived from the original on 30 July 2013. Retrieved 9 July 2007.
  115. ^ "Four Centuries of Influence of Iraqi Shiism on Pre-Safavid Iran". Al islam. 27 February 2013. Archived from the original on 4 September 2013. Retrieved 9 July 2007.
  116. Peter B. Golden Central Asia in World History (New Oxford World History) (Oxford University Press, 2011), page 94: "He was born some 100 km (62 miles) south of Samarkand into a clan of the Barlas, a Turkicized tribe of Mongol descent."
  117. ^ This section incorporates text from the public domain Library of Congress Country Studies.
    Chapin Metz, Helen (1989), "Invasions of the Mongols and Tamerlane", Iran: a country study, Library of Congress Country Studies, archived from the original on 17 September 2008
  118. Ladinsky, Daniel James (1999). The Gift: Poems by the Great Sufi Master. Arkana. ISBN 978-0-14-019581-1. Archived from the original on 4 March 2021. Retrieved 11 August 2020.
  119. Brookshaw, Dominic Parviz (28 February 2019). Hafiz and His Contemporaries:Poetry, Performance and Patronage in Fourteenth Century Iran. Bloomsbury Publishing. ISBN 978-1-78672-588-2. Archived from the original on 4 March 2021. Retrieved 11 August 2020.
  120. W. B. Fisher; C. E. Bosworth (2011) , "Araxes River", Encyclopædia Iranica, archived from the original on 4 January 2021
    "Subsequently, it came under the control of Turkmen dynasties like the Āq Qoyunlū and Qara Qoyunlū and then of local khanates like those of Qara Bāḡ and Naḵǰavān which formed a buffer region between the Ottomans and Safavids."Philippe, Beaujard (2019). "Western Asia: Revival of the Persian Gulf". The Worlds of the Indian Ocean. Cambridge University Press. pp. 515–521. ISBN 978-1-108-34121-9.
    "In a state of demographic stagnation or downturn, the region was an easy prey for nomadic Turkmen. The Turkmen, however, never managed to build strong states, owing to a lack of sedentary populations (Martinez-Gros 2009: 643). When Tamerlane died in 1405, the Jalāyerid sultan Ahmad, who had fled Iraq, came back to Baghdad. Five years later, he died in Tabriz (1410) in a battle led against the Turkmen Kara Koyunlu (" Black Sheep"), who took Baghdad in 1412.""Kara Koyunlu". Encyclopædia Britannica. Archived from the original on 22 March 2019. Retrieved 16 July 2020.
    "Kara Koyunlu, also spelled Qara Qoyunlu, Turkish Karakoyunlular, English Black Sheep, Turkmen tribal federation that ruled Azerbaijan, Armenia, and Iraq from about 1375 to 1468."The Book of Dede Korkut (F.Sumer, A.Uysal, W.Walker ed.). University of Texas Press. 1972. Introduction. ISBN 0-292-70787-8.
  121. Kouymjian. "Armenia", pp. 6–7.
  122. Stearns, Peter N.; Leonard, William (2001). The Encyclopedia of World History. Houghton Muffin Books. p. 122. ISBN 0-395-65237-5.
  123. "Ak Koyunlu". Encyclopaedia Britannica. Archived from the original on 26 April 2020. Retrieved 16 July 2020. "AK Koyunlu, also spelled Aq Qoyunlu ("White Sheep"), Turkmen tribal federation that ruled northern Iraq, Azerbaijan, and eastern Anatolia from 1378 to 1508..."
  124. Türkmen Ak koyunlu İmparatorluğu: Türkmen Ak koyunlu İmparatorluğu makaleler antolojisi (in Turkish). Grafiker. 2003. p. 418. ISBN 975-92721-7-2.
  125. C.E.Bosworth and R.Bulliet, The New Islamic Dynasties: A Chronological and Genealogical Manual , Columbia University Press, 1996, ISBN 0-231-10714-5, p. 275.
  126. Woods, John E. (1998) The Ak kuyunlu: Clan, Confederation, Empire, University of Utah Press, Salt Lake City, p. 128, ISBN 0-87480-565-1
  127. Mathee, Rudi (2008). "Safavid Dynasty". Encyclopædia Iranica. Archived from the original on 24 May 2019. Retrieved 2 June 2014.
  128. Chapin Metz, Helen, ed. (1989). Iran, a Country study. University of Michigan. p. 313.Bogle, Emory C. (1989). Islam: Origin and Belief. University of Texas Press. p. 145.Shaw, Stanford Jay (1977). History of the Ottoman Empire. Cambridge University Press. p. 77.Andrew J. Newman, Safavid Iran: Rebirth of a Persian Empire, I.B. Tauris (30 March 2006).
  129. Savory, Roger M.; Karamustafa, Ahmet T. (2012) , "Esmāʿīl I Ṣafawī", Encyclopædia Iranica, vol. VIII/6, pp. 628–636, archived from the original on 25 July 2019
  130. Tapper, Richard (1974). "Shāhsevan in Ṣafavid Persia". Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London. 37 (3). Cambridge University Press: 321–354. doi:10.1017/S0041977X00136286. JSTOR 612582. S2CID 177504456.
  131. Lawrence Davidson, Arthur Goldschmid, A Concise History of the Middle East, Westview Press, 2006, p. 153
  132. "Safavid dynasty" Archived 2008-01-20 at the Wayback Machine, Britannica Concise. Online Edition 2007
  133. Mitchell, Colin P. (2009), "Ṭahmāsp I", Encyclopædia Iranica, archived from the original on 17 May 2015, retrieved 12 May 2015
  134. Eskandar Beg, pp. 900–901, tr. Savory, II, p. 1116
  135. Mikaberidze 2015, pp. 291, 536.
  136. Matthee, Rudi (2012) , "GEORGIA vii. Georgians in the Safavid Administration", Encyclopædia Iranica, vol. X/5, pp. 493–496, archived from the original on 19 May 2021
  137. Mottahedeh, Roy, The Mantle of the Prophet : Religion and Politics in Iran, One World, Oxford, 1985, 2000, p.204
  138. Michael Axworthy, biography of Nader, The Sword of Persia (I.B. Tauris, 2006) pp. 17–56
  139. Mikaberidze 2011, p. 1024.
  140. Lang, David Marshall (1957). The Last Years of the Georgian Monarchy, 1658–1832. Columbia University Press. p. 142. ISBN 978-0-231-93710-8.
  141. ^ Suny, Ronald Grigor (22 October 1994). The Making of the Georgian Nation, Second Edition. Indiana University Press. ISBN 978-0-253-20915-3.
  142. Tucker, Spencer C. (2009). A Global Chronology of Conflict: From the Ancient World to the Modern Middle East. 6 volumes. ABC-CLIO. p. 739. ISBN 978-1-85109-672-5.
  143. Abdulatipov, Ramazan Gadzhimuradovich (2000). Russia and the Caucasus: On the Arduous Path to Unity. Edwin Mellen Press. p. 15. ISBN 978-0-7734-3194-2.
  144. Axworthy Iran: Empire of the Mind (Penguin, 2008) pp. 152–167
  145. Hitchins, Keith (2012) , "Erekle II", in Yarshater, Ehsan (ed.), Encyclopædia Iranica, vol. VIII/5, pp. 541–542, ISBN 978-0-7100-9090-4
  146. ^ Fisher et al. 1991, p. 328.
  147. Axworthy p.168
  148. Amīn, ʻAbd al-Amīr Muḥammad (1 January 1967). British Interests in the Persian Gulf. Brill Archive. Archived from the original on 19 December 2019. Retrieved 10 August 2016.
  149. ^ Mikaberidze 2011, p. 409.
  150. ^ Rayfield, Donald (2013). Edge of Empires: A History of Georgia. Reaktion Books. p. 255. ISBN 978-1-78023-070-2.
  151. ^ Lang, David Marshall (1962). A Modern History of Georgia. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson. p. 38.
  152. ^ Suny, Ronald Grigor (1994), The Making of the Georgian Nation, p. 59. Indiana University Press, ISBN 0-253-20915-3
  153. ^ Axworthy, Michael (6 November 2008). Iran: Empire of the Mind: A History from Zoroaster to the Present Day. Penguin UK. ISBN 978-0-14-190341-5.
  154. Fisher, William Bayne (1991). The Cambridge History of Iran. Vol. 7. Cambridge University Press. pp. 128–129. Agha Muhammad Khan remained nine days in the vicinity of Tiflis. His victory proclaimed the restoration of Iranian military power in the region formerly under Safavid domination.
  155. Fisher et al. 1991, p. 329.
  156. Miller, Aleksei; Rieber, Alfred J. (1 January 2004). Imperial Rule. Pasts Incorporated. CEU Studies in the Humanities. Vol. 1. Central European University Press. p. 204 n. 48. ISBN 978-963-9241-98-5.
  157. Fisher et al. 1991, pp. 329–330.
  158. Fisher et al. 1991, p. 329-330.
  159. Swietochowski, Tadeusz (1995). Russia and Azerbaijan: A Borderland in Transition. Columbia University Press. pp. 69, 133. ISBN 978-0-231-07068-3. Archived from the original on 13 July 2015. Retrieved 17 October 2020.L. Batalden, Sandra (1997). The newly independent states of Eurasia: handbook of former Soviet republics. Greenwood Publishing Group. p. 98. ISBN 978-0-89774-940-4. Archived from the original on 13 July 2015. Retrieved 17 October 2020.Dowling, Timothy C. (2 December 2014). Russia at War: From the Mongol Conquest to Afghanistan, Chechnya, and Beyond. 2 volumes. ABC-CLIO. pp. 728–729. ISBN 978-1-59884-948-6.E. Ebel, Robert, Menon, Rajan (2000). Energy and conflict in Central Asia and the Caucasus. Rowman & Littlefield. p. 181. ISBN 978-0-7425-0063-1. Archived from the original on 13 July 2015. Retrieved 17 October 2020.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)Andreeva, Elena (2010). Russia and Iran in the great game: travelogues and orientalism (reprint ed.). Taylor & Francis. p. 6. ISBN 978-0-415-78153-4. Archived from the original on 13 July 2015. Retrieved 17 October 2020.Çiçek, Kemal, Kuran, Ercüment (2000). The Great Ottoman-Turkish Civilisation. University of Michigan. ISBN 978-975-6782-18-7. Archived from the original on 13 July 2015. Retrieved 20 June 2015.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)Ernest Meyer, Karl, Blair Brysac, Shareen (2006). Tournament of Shadows: The Great Game and the Race for Empire in Central Asia. Basic Books. p. 66. ISBN 978-0-465-04576-1. Archived from the original on 13 July 2015. Retrieved 17 October 2020.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  160. ^ "Caucasus Survey". Archived from the original on 15 April 2015. Retrieved 23 April 2015.
  161. Mansoori, Firooz (2008). "17". Studies in History, Language and Culture of Azerbaijan (in Persian). Tehran: Hazar-e Kerman. p. 245. ISBN 978-600-90271-1-8.
  162. Fisher et al. 1991, p. 336.
  163. A. G. Bulаtovа. Lаktsy (XIX — nаch. XX vv.). Istoriko-etnogrаficheskie ocherki. — Mаkhаchkаlа, 2000.
  164. ^ "The Iranian Armed Forces in Politics, Revolution and War: Part One". 22 May 2012. Archived from the original on 3 March 2016. Retrieved 23 May 2014.
  165. "Griboedov not only extended protection to those Caucasian captives who sought to go home but actively promoted the return of even those who did not volunteer. Large numbers of Georgian and Armenian captives had lived in Iran since 1804 or as far back as 1795." Fisher, William Bayne;Avery, Peter; Gershevitch, Ilya; Hambly, Gavin; Melville, Charles. The Cambridge History of Iran Cambridge University Press, 1991. p. 339.
  166. (in Russian) A. S. Griboyedov. "Zаpiskа o pereselenii аrmyan" iz" Persii v" nаshi oblаsti" Archived 13 January 2016 at the Wayback Machine, Fundаmentаl'nаya Elektronnаya Bibliotekа
  167. ^ Bournoutian 1980, pp. 11, 13–14.
  168. Arakel of Tabriz. The Books of Histories; chapter 4. Quote: " deep inside understood that he would be unable to resist Sinan Pasha, i.e. the Sardar of Jalaloghlu, in a battle. Therefore he ordered to relocate the whole population of Armenia - Christians, Jews and Muslims alike, to Persia, so that the Ottomans find the country depopulated."
  169. ^ Bournoutian 1980, pp. 12–13.
  170. Bournoutian 1980, pp. 1–2.
  171. Mikaberidze 2015, p. 141.
  172. Bournoutian 1980, p. 14.
  173. ^ Bournoutian 1980, p. 13.
  174. ^ Bournoutian, George (2018). Armenia and Imperial Decline: The Yerevan Province, 1900-1914. Routledge. p. 35 (note 25).
  175. Bournoutian, George (2018). Armenia and Imperial Decline: The Yerevan Province, 1900-1914. Routledge. p. xiv.
  176. Kettenhofen, Bournoutian & Hewsen 1998, pp. 542–551.
  177. Azizi, Mohammad-Hossein. "The historical backgrounds of the Ministry of Health foundation in Iran." Arch Iran Med 10.1 (2007): 119-23.
  178. Okazaki, Shoko (1 January 1986). "The Great Persian Famine of 1870–71". Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London. 49 (1): 183–192. doi:10.1017/s0041977x00042609. JSTOR 617680. S2CID 155516933.
  179. Shambayati, Niloofar (2015) . "Coup D'Etat of 1299/1921". Encyclopædia Iranica. Vol. VI/4. pp. 351–354.
  180. Michael P. Zirinsky; "Imperial Power and Dictatorship: Britain and the Rise of Reza Shah, 1921–1926", International Journal of Middle East Studies 24 (1992), 639–663, Cambridge University Press
  181. "Reza Shah Pahlevi". The Columbia Encyclopedia (Sixth ed.). 2007 . Archived from the original on 1 February 2009.
  182. ^ Ervand, History of Modern Iran, (2008), p.91
  183. The Origins of the Iranian Revolution by Roger Homan. International Affairs, Vol. 56, No. 4 (Autumn, 1980), pp. 673–677.JSTOR 2618173
  184. Richard W. Cottam, Nationalism in Iran, University of Pittsburgh Press, ISBN o-8229-3396-7
  185. Bakhash, Shaul, Reign of the Ayatollahs : Iran and the Islamic Revolution by Shaul, Bakhash, Basic Books, c1984, p.22
  186. Richard Stewart, Sunrise at Abadan: the British and Soviet invasion of Iran, 1941 (1988).
  187. Louise Fawcett, "Revisiting the Iranian Crisis of 1946: How Much More Do We Know?." Iranian Studies 47#3 (2014): 379–399.
  188. Hess, Gary R. (March 1974). "The Iranian Crisis of 1945–46 and the Cold War" (PDF). Political Science Quarterly. 89 (1): 117–145. doi:10.2307/2148118. JSTOR 2148118. Archived from the original (PDF) on 15 February 2016. Retrieved 16 March 2023.
  189. "CIA documents acknowledge its role in Iran's 1953 coup". BBC News. Archived from the original on 9 March 2021. Retrieved 20 August 2013.
  190. Kinzer, Stephen (2013). The Brothers: John Foster Dulles, Allen Dulles, and Their Secret World War. New York: Times Books.
  191. Gölz, Olmo (1 January 2019). "Gölz "The Dangerous Classes and the 1953 Coup in Iran: On the Decline of 'lutigari' Masculinities." In Crime, Poverty and Survival in the Middle East and North Africa: The 'Dangerous Classes' since 1800. Edited by Stephanie Cronin, 177–90. London: I.B. Tauris, 2019". Crime, Poverty and Survival in the Middle East and North Africa.
  192. Abrahamian, Tortured Confessions (1999), pp. 135–6, 167, 169
  193. "History of Iran: Islamic Revolution of 1979". www.iranchamber.com. Retrieved 16 March 2023.
  194. Smitha, Frank E. (2018) . "The Iranian Revolution". Archived from the original on 10 October 2016. Retrieved 16 March 2023.
  195. ^ Afari, Janet (19 May 2023). "Ruhollah Khomeini". Britannica. Retrieved 21 May 2023.
  196. Iran Islamic Republic Archived 2006-03-16 at the Wayback Machine, Encyclopædia Britannica.
  197. Dabashi, Theology of Discontent (1993), p.419, 443
  198. Shawcross, William, The Shah's Last Ride (1988), p. 110.
  199. Nasr, Vali (2007). The Shia Revival. W.W. Norton. p. 138. ISBN 978-0-393-06640-1.
  200. Encyclopedia of Islam and Muslim World, Thomson Gale, 2004, p.357 (article by Stockdale, Nancy, L.)
  201. Keddie, Modern Iran, (2006), p.241
  202. "Iranian Government Constitution, English Text". Archived from the original on 23 November 2010.
  203. PBS, American Experience, Jimmy Carter, "444 Days: America Reacts" Archived 2011-01-19 at the Wayback Machine, retrieved 1 October 2007
  204. Guests of the Ayatollah: The Iran Hostage Crisis: The First Battle in America's War with Militant Islam, Mark Bowden, p. 127, 200
  205. Bowden, Mark (May 2006). "The Desert One Debacle". The Atlantic. Archived from the original on 30 July 2012. Retrieved 7 March 2017.
  206. Franssen, Herman; Morton, Elaine (2002). "A Review Of US Unilateral Sanctions Against Iran". Middle East Economic Survey. 45 (34). Archived from the original on 10 October 2017. Retrieved 16 March 2023.
  207. Centre for Documents of The Imposed War, Tehran. (مرکز مطالعات و تحقیقات جنگ)
  208. "Iran, 'Public Enemy Number One'". Archived from the original on 20 June 2015.
  209. "Chemical Weapons Information – Federation of American Scientists". Archived from the original on 20 June 2015.
  210. "Winter Soldier: Domingo Rosas – Antiwar.com Original". 8 November 2008. Archived from the original on 6 June 2011. Retrieved 29 October 2007.
  211. "Iran – Countries – NTI". Archived from the original on 8 April 2010. Retrieved 29 October 2007.
  212. Iranian party demands end to repression Archived 2005-09-24 at the Wayback Machine
  213. Abrahamian, Ervand, Tortured Confessions, University of California Press, 1999, 209–228
  214. "Massacre 1988 (Pdf)" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on 25 February 2021. Retrieved 30 July 2008.
  215. "Iran Focus". 5 September 2004. Archived from the original on 20 February 2008. Retrieved 30 July 2008.
  216. "News". The Telegraph. 15 March 2016. Archived from the original on 10 February 2006. Retrieved 4 August 2021.
  217. Abrahamian, History of Modern Iran, (2008), p.182
  218. ^ "Who's in Charge?" by Ervand Abrahamian London Review of Books, 6 November 2008
  219. Treacherous Alliance : the secret dealings of Israel, Iran and the United States by Trita Pasri, Yale University Press, 2007, p.145
  220. ^ Cleveland, William L. (2016). A History of the Modern Middle East. Boulder, CO: Westview Press. ISBN 978-0-8133-4980-0.
  221. "Iranians protest against clerics". 11 June 2003. Archived from the original on 13 February 2021. Retrieved 17 April 2006 – via bbc.co.uk.
  222. "Uprising in Iran". 1 July 2007. Archived from the original on 3 May 2006. Retrieved 16 March 2023.
  223. "Iran hardliner becomes president". BBC. 3 August 2005. Archived from the original on 14 May 2019. Retrieved 6 December 2006.
  224. "Behind Ahmadinejad, a Powerful Cleric". The New York Times. 9 September 2006. Archived from the original on 2 November 2006. Retrieved 6 December 2006.
  225. "Archived copy". Archived from the original on 15 July 2011. Retrieved 18 June 2011.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
  226. "Iraq prime minister to visit Iran". Al Jazeera. 9 September 2006. Archived from the original on 18 April 2010.
  227. "Cohen: Middle East fearful of Iran". The Washington Times. Archived from the original on 25 January 2021. Retrieved 30 July 2009.
  228. Weinberg, Bill (12 August 2005). "Iran issues anti-nuke fatwa". Counter Vortex. Archived from the original on 26 January 2021. Retrieved 30 September 2020.
  229. Iran, holder of peaceful nuclear fuel cycle technology Archived 2013-08-10 at the Wayback Machine
  230. "California, national and world news". Los Angeles Times. Archived from the original on 2 May 2019. Retrieved 10 August 2016.
  231. Black, Ian (1 July 2009). "Mousavi says new Ahmadinejad government 'illegitimate'". The Guardian. Archived from the original on 3 February 2021. Retrieved 17 December 2016.
  232. "Timeline: 2009 Iran presidential elections - CNN.com". CNN. Archived from the original on 28 April 2016. Retrieved 25 July 2009.
  233. "Rouhani wins big". Al Jazeera.
  234. "What is the Iran nuclear deal?". NBC News. 10 May 2018.
  235. "Trump declares US withdrawal from Iran nuclear deal". Al Jazeera.
  236. "Protesters storm US embassy compound in Baghdad". Al Jazeera.
  237. "Iran vows 'harsh' response after US kills commander". Al Jazeera.
  238. Motamedi, Maziar. "At inauguration, Raisi promises Iran's 'engagement with world'". Al Jazeera.
  239. "Protests flare across Iran in violent unrest over woman's death". Reuters. 20 September 2022. Archived from the original on 27 September 2022. Retrieved 23 September 2022.
  240. Strzyżyńska, Weronika (16 September 2022). "Iranian woman dies 'after being beaten by morality police' over hijab law". The Guardian. Archived from the original on 20 September 2022. Retrieved 22 September 2022.
  241. Leonhardt, David (26 September 2022). "Iran's Ferocious Dissent". The New York Times. Archived from the original on 27 September 2022. Retrieved 27 September 2022.
  242. "Several killed in Israeli strike on Iranian consulate in Damascus". Al Jazeera.
  243. "Why have Israel and Iran attacked each other?". 14 April 2024.
  244. "Israel Iran attack: Damage seen at air base in Isfahan". 21 April 2024.
  245. "Ebrahim Raisi, Iran's president, dies in helicopter crash aged 63". Al Jazeera.
  246. "Iran's new acting president Mohammad Mokhber, a veteran of the regime". France 24. 20 May 2024.
  247. "Iran's supreme leader endorses reformist Pezeshkian as new president. He takes oath Tuesday". AP News. 28 July 2024.
  248. "Hamas political chief Ismail Haniyeh assassinated in Iran". Al Jazeera.
  249. "What we know about Israel's attack on Iran". www.bbc.com.

Sources

Further reading

External links

History of Asia
Sovereign states
States with
limited recognition
Dependencies and
other territories
Iran topics
History
Prehistory
Ancient
3400–539 BC
550 BC–AD 224
AD 224–651
Medieval and
early modern
632–1090
977–1432
1370–1925
Modern
1925–1979
Islamic Republic
1979–present
See also
Geography
Politics
General
Councils
Officials
Economy
General
Sectors
State-owned
companies
Places
Society
Demographics
Languages
Peoples
Religion
Other
Culture
Music
Other topics
Categories: